Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Nunamiut (talk | contribs)
1,307 edits
→Sean Gervasi: new section
Nunamiut (talk | contribs)
1,307 edits
Line 506: Line 506:
== Sean Gervasi ==
== Sean Gervasi ==


*{{revisions|pageName}}
*{{revisions|Sean_Gervasi}}
reasoning
⚫
reasoning -[[User:Nunamiut|Nunamiut]] ([[User talk:Nunamiut|talk]]) 03:01, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
The article is on a person who was a very important figure on the left and had extensive knowledge and published books on the break up of the USSR and Yugoslavia. The article only needs a little cleanup on the references and there are more than enough JSTOR references and other reliable references to be filled in so the three or more already there should not be a problem to be added to. Thank you. Sincerely.
⚫
-[[User:Nunamiut|Nunamiut]] ([[User talk:Nunamiut|talk]]) 03:01, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:06, 17 January 2014


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

File:Tnaturningpoint2005.jpg

It was removed from TNA Turning Point and deleted as maintenance. I have expanded the article it belongs in at User:Wrestlinglover/Turning Point (2005) and with lucky I will be finished today. I previously had a filed reinstated for the same reasons with Genesis (2005). -WillC 22:32, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Wrestlinglover: Fair use images cannot be used outside the mainspace and you have the image markup in the draft. Once in the mainspace there should be no problem with undeletion of the file, but do that first please. Just drop a note here that you've done it and I or anyone else can take care of it then (you can prefix your post with a ping template to draw my attention here more quickly, just as I did for you in this response). Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm gonna place it in Turning Point (2005 wrestling) when I have expanded. It is just gonna sit outside of any article until I'm finished. I'll have a week before it is deleted again. I understand the rules. I just wanted to get ahead of it and not have to wait. Last time I asked for an undeletion it took a day or so.--WillC 23:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As a fair use image it really shouldn't sit orphaned either. We treat that as a necessary evil and wait when it was in use to see whether it will become un-orphaned but with a deleted file, it really should be ready to go when undeleted. It's not likely to take a day and even if it does, that won't hurt the article.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:44, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Fuhghettaboutit: Alright, I have created the article and nominated it for GA. Now the image can be undeleted and I'll place it in the article.--WillC 16:25, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Wrestlinglover: Undeleted! Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done For the bot —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:18, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Andrej Prskalo

The player was played in full-pro league. -Jolicnikola (talk) 01:31, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Please update the article and add a reliable source to show that he meets WP:NFOOTY, or it may be deleted again. JohnCD (talk) 11:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Carabello

reasoning -Mkwhi2 (talk) 01:57, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I added a sentence or two to this article and found it to be accurate. I do think that the name should be Michael Carabello, however, not Mike. He goes by Mike to friends, but his stage name is Michael.

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. I have moved it to Michael Carabello and also reverted to the last good version before it was re-written as a PR puff piece which, as the PROD nomination said, "reads like a summary page from a press kit used to promote artists/musicians". Even then, part of it was unsourced gossip, which I have removed. I have added refs, but it could do with expansion. JohnCD (talk) 10:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

scientific analysis instruments

I wish to have this article undeleted for either one of two reasons. Firstly, I do not believe it qualifies for deletion under "A7: Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". I feel that the presence of the article on the company its self adds to the completeness of Wikipedia as it contains articles detailing other companies that manufacture mass spectrometers and that when looking into mass spectrometry, it is helpful to link to pages about companies activly involved in the research and development of mass spectrometry. The fact that the company in question manufactures and develops mass spectrometers is justification enough to the scientific community to warrent its inclusion. Secondly, if the article still warrents deletion as it is not properly referenced or still does not indicate its relevence, I would request that the script is sent to me by email or sent to my sandbox so I can improve the quality of the content -DrMNairn (talk) 09:44, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:DrMNairn/Scientific Analysis Instruments. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact RHaworth (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. Notability in Wikipedia's sense is not a matter of saying so, but has tom be demonstrated by references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 11:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Udita Tyagi

to get the backup -Munishwar Gulati 09:53, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Quillan Roberts

Quillan Roberts has been backup keeper for Toronto FC for 2 years, and although hasn't played a regular season match, has been on the bench for many, has received media coverage, and even played in the 2012 match against Liverpool. There's no way that this long-standing article should have been prodded - should at least have gone to AFD for discussion Nfitz (talk) 13:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC) -Nfitz (talk) 13:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Manjunath Aradhya

There is a need for that person to be known to many people in this world.Many of his students search about him to know what he is doing right now. SO i think it is important that the page is undeleted -PoorneshYalamuri (talk) 14:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Ohnoitsjamie (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:18, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sean Burch

I, 70.208.165.109, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 70.208.165.109 (talk) 14:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Data as code

The related concept code as data is sound and refers to several techniques found in computing. I want to review the text to see if a broad concept article can be created covering both terms, please userfy or move to Draft. -Diego (talk) 15:01, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. This was a PROD deletion so could have been restored directly, but it is so extremely thin that I have put it in Draft:Data as code as you suggested. If you decide not to use it, let me know and I will re-inter it. JohnCD (talk) 16:12, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:MD Sonic the Hedgehog.png

While this may seem paradoxical, I am requesting undeletion for a previous version of this picture because the new version is higher quality. The picture was originally kept at a lower resolution on purpose in order to properly represent the fact that this is a Sega Genesis game, where visible pixels would be a given. However, User:HappyLogolover2011 appears to have used an emulator and/or a photo editor to provide a picture that smooths out the graphics which, while it does techincally make a "better quality" picture, misrepresents the game. It was originally deleted after HappyLogo put up a "Orphaned non-free revision" tag after uploading his new version, resulting in an admin promptly deleting it. -TheStickMan[✆Talk] 17:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was meant to smooth out because we need better results. Also, it was upscaled using the xBRz alithogram to present a smooth picture used from an emulator with their graphic settings.--HappyLogolover2011 (talk) 18:10, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As I (and others) have already said, the point of these pictures is to accurately represent the game. The attempts to improve their quality are appreciated but not needed at all. TheStickMan[✆Talk] 19:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Surrender The Fall

I, Anne Delong, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. I found quite a few 2013 reviews for this band, but while I was looking the submission was deleted. —Anne Delong (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mahmoud Elshal

I, Tahroy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Tahroy (talk) 22:10, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:54, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Boxing Hall of Fame Las Vegas

I, Boxinghalloffame, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Boxinghalloffame (talk) 22:35, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. The article needs references that show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:09, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ruturaj Prajapati (Member)

reasoning -Ruturaj Prajapati (Member) (talk) 10:23, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - user blocked as block-evading sock, here only for self-promotion. JohnCD (talk) 10:37, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Child Rights Information Network

is a well-known and notable organisation in children's rights, cited by the UN and others. I looked for Google Books citations, and stopped at 20. -Rbreen (talk) 11:48, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Boleyn (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Please add references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 21:33, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marie Okada

Marie Megumi Okada is a television announcer from Wakayama,Japan.She is represented by the Okayama Broadcasting/OHK. She Started her career after she earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Tourism at Wakayama University.Aside from being an anoouncer,She is also a MC and a broadcaster.Okada is a half-Japanese and half-Filipino. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chantaru (talk • contribs) 12:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 09:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slimeballs1.jpg

Deleting admin now inactive. Want to add image to Slimeballs ---evrik (talk) 13:19, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dorce Sardoc

I, Cimok78, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. FlavioB 13:58, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:15, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/C.L.G. An Tearmainn

I, CLGAnTearmainn, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. CLGAnTearmainn (talk) 20:11, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add this page to Wikipedia. I'm not sure how to link to other pages but there are pages about other Donegal GAA teams so I would like to add Termon to this list. Serches for "Ardara GAA", "Glenswilly GAA" and Donegal GAA in general will show this.

Thanking you in advance for your help, Connell McGrenra CLG An Tearmainn

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You can probably get help and advice at Wikipedia:WikiProject Gaelic games - leave a message on their talk page. JohnCD (talk) 21:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The_Rapsody_Overture

article was relevant and referenced by several other pages -Tdejong67 (talk) 00:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Boleyn (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Please add references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 12:00, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Erick Kaffka

Administrator failed to research credits given through SAG-AFTRA, Erick Kaffka has 6 acting credits given by the productions in addition to a starring role on an entire season of Welcome to Paradox, and starring roles on 2 episodes of Untold Stories of the ER. His charity work and advocacy with the disabled through show business is highly notable. He is also the only double AK amputee actor in North America. The administrator stated in his reasons for deletion that the "actor known to date exclusively for extra or stunt double roles" is potentially damaging to this person's career as this is not a researched fact. See IMDB and notice the CREDITED roles. Erick Kaffka has not done background work since 1999. For future reference, a Stunt Double is a recognized credit by the The Academy of Motion Pictures & Sciences, and The Academy of Television Arts & Sciences and is not an unimportant job. Also I am not his agent, his original bio was taken from my fundraiser website that he was the keynote speaker for by someone unknown to me and placed on IMDB. Your administrators need to do more research on subjects (especially pertaining to people). All you have to do is google this person to see all of the articles written about him across the globe. Perhaps you should allow more time for other contributors to add. If you are going to leave it deleted, then please remove the part about him not only doing "extra or stunt double roles" This is clearly not the case.-Paraisoevents (talk) 04:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 Please note that Wikipedia has a very specific definition of notability - only subjects that multiple third-party reliable sources with no connection to the subject have written about are notable by Wikipedia's standards. See also our username policy, because irrespective of whether or not you are his agent, your username gives the impression that you are editing on behalf of a company. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 09:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/PASACAT

I, Datamonger, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Datamonger (talk) 05:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Remember that Wikipedia is not a place for organizations to tell the world about themselves: for advice, read WP:Your first article and User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard. JohnCD (talk) 21:49, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ZenDay

I was not familiar with the PROD process and did not remove the PROD notice to avoid deletion. However we did add missing information, including external links to third-party discussions that prove notability. Thanks! -Richardfr74 (talk) 09:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user NatGertler (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 11:53, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Eisen

I, Marki10024, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Marki10024 (talk) 15:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Crown Inn Coalway

It was not made clear why the page was deleted. It was a factual page regarding the last of its kind in a village. -Wassj93 (talk) 16:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC) How would I get a copy of the page that was put up. The page was set to 'speedy delete' before the page was complete. therefore the finished page should not have violated these items. Wassj93 (talk) 11:16, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at user:Wassj93/Crown. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Peridon (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. Peridon (talk) 22:00, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Machel Waikenda

Hello everyone. The article was deleted under G5 because the article was created by an user who's account got blocked later because of Sock Puppetry. But I think the article had the notability to be enlisted on Wikipedia. So, is there any way to restore this article? I can fix it if it has some neutrality issues. -Sourov0000 (talk) 20:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A G5 can be restored provided that you are willing to accept responsibility for the banned user's edits. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if accepting the responsibility is allowed according to the rules of Wikipedia yet. If it doesn't violate any rules, then it can be taken. As the user was banned, he certainly made many Vandalism edits in Wikipedia. If fixing the article to meet Wikipedia's Guideline is the thing, then I will be able to do it. Sourov0000 (talk) 03:46, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Accepting the responsibility for a banned user's constructive edits has always been allowed, and edits have been reinstated under that basis before. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:12, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I will take the responsibility of the constructive edits of the banned user. Thank you. Sourov0000 (talk) 13:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/M.Shiva Shankar ( Kannada Playback Singer )

I, Sampath.ramkumar, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Sampath.ramkumar (talk) 22:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:55, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jesús Omar Rivera

RESOLVED
Undeleted through WP:DRV. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 02:45, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy deleted under A7 (no indication of importance) but the subject is quite notable per WP:BASIC and the following reliable sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Subject has appeared in WKAQ-TV, WAPA-TV, WLII-TV, and WIPR-TV. He also appears every week as a guest on WPRM-FM. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 02:14, 13 January 2014 (UTC) -—Ahnoneemoos (talk) 02:14, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Solar Cargo

reasoning -Msloewengart (talk) 02:49, 13 January 2014 (UTC) |1= Solar Cargo |2= This page I believe should not have been deleted. This is a new page, and just needed some work. I saw nothing innapropriate about it. This is why I respectfully request for you to undo the deletion of this page. Thank you.[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Bbb23 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 08:28, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Statement of Principles and Strategies

I, 207.38.238.140, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 207.38.238.140 (talk) 04:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 08:47, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Statement of Principles and Strategies

This article was removed because it had not been approved for posting and my co-authors and I had not yet had time to improve the article in order to meet Wikipedia standards. We would like it to be re-posted so that we can improve it and resubmit it for evaluation -207.38.238.140 (talk) 04:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Nothing to do. Perhaps the request above this one is what you meant. No article by that exact title has ever existed in main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 08:25, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WiseMapping

This article was removed because ("No third party sources, no evidence of notability."). I would like to complete the article completing with relevant thrdidparty links. Could you please revert the deletion ? Regards Paulo Veiga — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pveiga (talk • contribs) 04:28, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user MrOllie (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Read WP:Your first article for advice; what is needed to establish WP:Notability in Wikipedia's sense is references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 08:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fujiwara no Michimasa

I, Miyabeajisai, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Miyabeajisai (talk) 09:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - I have accepted the article and added it to the main encyclopedia at Fujiwara no Michimasa. Thank you for your contribution! JohnCD (talk) 22:08, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Knowledge Economy Forum

I, 194.78.218.206, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 194.78.218.206 (talk) 09:10, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:14, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ComputerTel Ltd.

I, 217.41.40.75, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 217.41.40.75 (talk) 09:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please edit it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice. JohnCD (talk) 17:24, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Constance Wagner

I, Morgan Le Fay, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Morgan Le Fay (talk) 16:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:15, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Martin Brady

88.81.147.84 (talk) 17:09, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:53, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kamlashanker Vishvakarma

Dear concern my reason not to delete this page are as follows : 1. This page is not about my self or my page. this is about someone i know. 2. this is not promotional because on this page there is just general information about that person. 3. I need this article to tag this person in National Rural Health Mission article because he has lot of inputs in govt of india, ministry of health. 4. So this article has meet the crietria for inclution at Wikipedia. -Yashisharma007 (talk) 17:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. There is no indication that this person is notable enough to have an encyclopedia article. Please read WP:Notability (people) for an indication of the sort of level of achievement required, also WP:UPANDCOMING. JohnCD (talk) 20:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feathercoin

archiving -WSF (talk) 17:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC) - As the article has been deleted again, please move it to my user space at Feathercoin.[reply]

 Not done. After an AfD your first call should normally be to the closing administrator, in this case user Sandstein (talk), and having read their closing decision, I would rather leave this decision to them. JohnCD (talk) 20:21, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Haneef Shareef

Haneef Shareef is a film maker i know you dont believe me,but hundred percent he is Balochi Film film maker and i am submiting his article to promote our films and director,if you delete my article the how will support me,,plz dont delete it plz i will be thank ful of you,plz restore it and give me permission to edit it,and keep it in wikipedia -Balochi tamur (talk) 19:17, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi please donot delete my page please restore it ,i am working and i will work for betterment,please do not delete it,advance thanks. -Balochi tamur (talk) 19:33, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please revert the deletion? i will make it better and i will provide it references pls restore it..thanks -Balochi tamur (talk) 19:38, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. You wrote "'i am submiting his article to promote our films and director", but Wikipedia is not for promotion of any kind. Wikipedia is selective about subjects for articles: just to be a film director is not enough. Please read WP:FILMMAKER for the relevant notability standard. If, but only if, you believe that you can find significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to show how he meets that standard, then go to Wikipedia:Articles for creation and make a draft article there for someone else to review. JohnCD (talk) 20:44, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/All Our Kin

I, Rachelbwilf, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Rachelbwilf (talk) 20:32, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - this submission was deleted as a copyright violation from the organization's website, and also as promotional - very obviously the organization using Wikipedia to tell the world about itself, which is not what an encyclopedia article should be. You are welcome to make a new submission. For advice, read:
Do not copy from the organization's own material (which is anyway likely to have an unsuitably promotional tone), and note particularly the need for references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 22:46, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Erra_(band)

I believe that this was in error, as I cannot see why this article does not have importance or significance. Band articles a very good place for users like myself to get information on the group, and this was how I noticed that Erra's had been deleted. I would like to understand the reasoning as to why the article was deleted, and see if it is possible to have it reinstated. Thanks for an help!

On 26 November, 2011 user Phantomsteve deleted the article: "18:02, 26 November 2011 Phantomsteve (talk -DougeryThuggery (talk) 21:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Wikipedia is quite selective about subjects for articles, and does not expect to have articles about every band. The WP:Notability standard for bands is explained at WP:BAND. This article, when deleted in 2011, gave no indication that Erra qualified - they had not yet released an album. That was two years ago: if you think they now qualify, reply below here and I will "userfy" the article for you - move it into your user space where you can work on it. JohnCD (talk) 10:11, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stavros Damianides

reasoning -Ephestion (talk) 23:09, 13 January 2014 (UTC) The article had two pages with slightly different spelling Stavros Damianidis and Stavros Damianides.[reply]

The one with the surname spelt with "idis" on the end was to catch searches with alternative spelling of the main article found at Stavros Damianides.

When removing the page with the spelling "idis" someone also deleted Stavros Damianides. The latter has been ratified by the Walk About Magazine, Western Austrlian Neswpaper, some other paper clips, also video footage of him playing on the Chanel 9 TV station stage was available. I believe it was an accidental deletion and should be returned. I am not the creator or maintainer of the article.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SQRA

I, 110.142.45.106, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 110.142.45.106 (talk) 02:13, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zeecrowd

The page was flagged for deletion because I seems I had not provided the right sotfware category for Zeecrowd -JabberBee (talk) 10:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. No, it was deleted because it gave no indication that the product is important or significant enough to have an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not a product listing directory. The inclusion criterion is called WP:Notability and requires references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. From your username, it seems that in relation to this product you have a conflict of interest and should also read the WP:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 10:22, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

sina gharib

IT SHOULD NOT BE DELETED AS SINA GHARIB IS A LIGITMATE PUBLIC FIGURE, PLEASE SEE THE REFRENCES ON THE PAGE AND THE FILMS HE HAS BEEN IN, HIS TWITTER PAGE ALSO @SINAGHARIB... THANKS ALAN. (SINA GHARIBS MANAGER) -Alansmith111 (talk) 13:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user JohnCD (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
Also you should really read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, because you clearly have one. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:18, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Haene

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Sandro.friedrich (talk) 17:36, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You will ahve to add independent reliable references, not just IMDB and their own web site. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:11, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Karen L. Page

I, 23.242.28.82, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 23.242.28.82 (talk) 19:04, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I was not knowledgable enough on programming to make this page work, but if you reinstate it I will have someone with programming skills review it to see if we can fix it and make it passable by your standards.

Thank you.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/K. Anis Ahmed

I, Evelyn727, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Evelyn727 (talk) 19:16, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tom, Dick & Harry Creative Co.

Dbrashears (talk) 22:09, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/4K Stogram

I, Alex miller 034, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Alex miller 034 (talk) 08:36, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Saltire Housing Design Awards

wish to retrieve the material so I can make the alterations to allow it to be published -Aly.saltiresociety (talk) 09:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page is a copyright violation of http://www.saltiresociety.org.uk/awards/architecture/‎. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Teardrop turn

I, Karl Andrews, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Karl Andrews (talk) 15:42, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:27, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thrahimam

The Album Thrahimam consists of 7 songs from Andhra Keerthanalu (Andhra Christian Hymnal) which are regularly sung in all Churches of Andhra Pradesh. All songs are historic and have great meaning. Please do not delete this page. - Hiramrajkamal (talk) 17:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - I have moved the page into your "user space" at User:Hiramrajkamal/Thrahimam where you can work on it. If it is to be kept, it needs references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish WP:Notability, see also WP:NALBUMS. JohnCD (talk) 18:21, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Farah

I, Electoralreform, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Electoralreform (talk) 21:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:43, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The CMO Survey

I, 24.88.255.253, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 24.88.255.253 (talk) 04:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. In order to establish WP:Notability, you need references that show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 22:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Toptalent.in

reasoning -Silus151 (talk) 05:47, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about websites. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 22:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yadavan Chandran

I, 121.246.80.28, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 121.246.80.28 (talk) 08:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:54, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tubal Rabbi Cain

Tubal Rabbi Cain is a Nigerian Writer. According to the Publication titled The Damascus Document by globally acclaimed Precious Styles Publishers Limited, He was born at Etinan within the South Eastern Coastal Areas of Nigeria on the 29th of September, 1964. Tubal Rabbi Cain is a member of the Inner Circle of Poets, the Association of Nigerian Authors and the Underground Poets Society. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.190.4.30 (talk) 12:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tubal Rabbi Cain, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Addshore (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 15:16, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nawab Faizunnessa Govt. Girls' High School

I found this page on NPP, and it's a notable school but was a poor article. I put in the time and effort to add references and format correctly, but the originator came back and reverted my edits repeatedly, and then an Admin CSD'ed the page for advertising but went on a wikibreak right after so I can't get them personally to undelete. The originator then returned and re-created the page as Nawab Faizunnesa Govt. Girls’ High School, but with the same promotional tone and lack of proper sourcing. Can someone please undelete the version I actually brought up to snuff, and then we can get rid of the competing POV fork? MatthewVanitas (talk) 12:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC) -MatthewVanitas (talk) 12:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I have left Jimfbleak a note, since he is evidently still around - he just deleted the new fork. I will explain to the originator that re-spamming it will just get it deleted again. JohnCD (talk)

Full Cycle Recordings

Disagree that it is not a notable record label. Home of Roni Size, Krust, Die et al who were fundamental in the increase in popularity of Drum and Bass music in late 1990's and early 2000's. It is in the opinion of "explicit" that it is not a notable record label, and as such should not have been removed. No more than I could remove the label of an artist I deemed to be lacking of note!! -2.218.16.159 (talk) 14:05, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The article may yet be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. What it needs is references: Wikipedia:Notability is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 15:05, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Terry Wollman

I, Anne Delong, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. The article was deleted while I was in the process of finding sources. —Anne Delong (talk) 14:43, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Anne Delong:  Done. JohnCD (talk) 14:57, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Projection_Art

I, 96.33.16.7, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 96.33.16.7 (talk) 16:05, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review; please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. There does not appear to be any actual content yet, only headings, links and "See also". Read WP:Your first article and WP:Writing better articles for guidance on what an encyclopedia article should look like. JohnCD (talk) 22:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dolma Lhakang

I wish to improve the article so that it is of greater value, and no longer fails on the stated deletion criteria. -Glenn Oliver (talk) 16:25, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Glenn Oliver/Dolma Lhakang. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Toddst1 (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. JohnCD (talk) 22:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Boxing Hall of Fame Las Vegas, again

I, Boxinghalloffame, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Boxinghalloffame (talk) 19:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already  Done, five days ago, in response to your first request. @Boxinghalloffame: see message on your talk page. Also, please read the message below that which says you need to request a change of username.
Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. The article needs references that show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 20:09, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Manosphere

31.33.46.55 (talk) 20:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation/Gedamu Woldegiorgis (Aboy Gedamu)

I, Ynegede, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. The information presented on this page is relevant to a subculture of people living in diaspora who seek to better understand their history. -Ynegede (talk) 20:49, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. As discussed in the comments, the important issue is references. I appreciate that that is a problem in this field, but the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy is non-negotiable. References need not be on-line or in English, but they must have been published so that, in principle, an enquirer could check them. For that reason, oral tradition or private papers are not acceptable. JohnCD (talk) 22:22, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Charles P. O'Brien

I am back to try editing this article to address the problems identified by the editor. Please undelete it. Alternatively, if I should resubmit from scratch, i can do that, but I was hoping to re-read the editor's critique, to ensure that I respond to them. Thanks. -TMASI999 (talk) 20:52, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:25, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Gervasi

reasoning The article is on a person who was a very important figure on the left and had extensive knowledge and published books on the break up of the USSR and Yugoslavia. The article only needs a little cleanup on the references and there are more than enough JSTOR references and other reliable references to be filled in so the three or more already there should not be a problem to be added to. Thank you. Sincerely. -Nunamiut (talk) 03:01, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=591072059"