Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 494: Line 494:
*{{revisions|Draft:Purshottamdas Thakurdas}}
*{{revisions|Draft:Purshottamdas Thakurdas}}
''I, 86.69.180.157, request the undeletion of this [[WP:Drafts|draft]] or [[WP:AFC|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]]. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' [[Special:Contributions/86.69.180.157|86.69.180.157]] ([[User talk:86.69.180.157|talk]]) 11:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
''I, 86.69.180.157, request the undeletion of this [[WP:Drafts|draft]] or [[WP:AFC|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]]. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' [[Special:Contributions/86.69.180.157|86.69.180.157]] ([[User talk:86.69.180.157|talk]]) 11:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)


==Purshottamdas Thakurdas==

*{{revisions|Purshottamdas Thakurdas}}
''I, 86.69.180.157, request the undeletion of this [[WP:Drafts|draft]] or [[WP:AFC|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]]. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' [[Special:Contributions/86.69.180.157|86.69.180.157]] ([[User talk:86.69.180.157|talk]]) 11:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:12, 30 January 2020

    Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or rejected Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

    This page is only for requesting undeletion of pages and files which have already been deleted. If the page you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that pages deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G4, G5, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

    Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

    Instructions for special cases


    Holy Name of Jesus Church (Schenectady, New York)

    to correct any copyright issues —Deaconjimpncc (talk) 05:44, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Espresso Addict: - Is this draft refundable as a G13, or did you intend to delete it as a non-refundable copyvio? --kingboyk (talk) 15:55, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The declining review by Otr500 stated "There is almost a 50% chance that material has copyright violations. This could possibly be from from at least one source or close paraphrasing which is unacceptable. Notability is an issue when there are primary sources only." No specific source was mentioned and the reviewer did not ask for deletion on copyright grounds. As it was G13-able I'm afraid I did not investigate further. On a quick look now, without the benefit of the copyright-detecting tools, there's a couple of fragments copied from [1] but nothing that would lead to deletion. Perhaps Otr500 could comment? Espresso Addict (talk) 21:02, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I am sorry but I would have to refresh my thinking. A high probability of copyvio, even too close paraphrasing, along with only primary sources is a very good indication of a problem article. If I did not seek deletion it was probably because of more than one reason. I likely had trouble locating reliable independent sources, needed to satisfy the use of primary only, but that would be something presumably solved by the author or other interested party -- or not. I do not recall the copyvio issue or source but that figure (50% chance) would have come by running a scan as I would not presume to try to guess something like that. However, if I didn't seek deletion or report a clear violation, the decision to delete would be on the person that did so. Notability, however, would be an issue that could "lead to deletion". Otr500 (talk) 05:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Otr500: I wonder if the relatively high %age came from the list of pastors, which would not be a copyright problem? Espresso Addict (talk) 06:35, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I have no idea why I didn't list the link that showed the percentage?? I assumed (apparently wrongly) that the author would know. Aside from that issue have you found some secondary reliable and independent sources? Otr500 (talk) 06:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:History and Origin Of Sarrara Abbasi

    Need to redo work on it following the wikipedia guidelines —Ahsanwqr (talk) 12:04, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Wikipedia does not accept articles which consist of original research, or which lack any reliable sources of information.
    Appears to be original research. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History and Origin Of Sarrara Abbasi. Please provide a list of reliable sources you will use in the article if you still wish to have the draft undeleted. kingboyk (talk) 16:07, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ahsanwqr: I don't know if this is the same tribe or not, but some of the same people and place names are mentioned: Dhund (tribe). --kingboyk (talk) 16:18, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Rudolf Trenkel.jpg

    File was deleted as F5 "Unused non-free media file" when article Rudolf Trenkel was redirected, now restored and expanded so would be good to get image restored as well. Cheers —MisterBee1966 (talk) 12:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Uri Refaeli

    I, Nsctrl, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nsctrl (talk) 12:54, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. kingboyk (talk) 15:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:National Parker

    I, Vistadan, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vistadan 15:09, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. kingboyk (talk) 15:43, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Pramod Ratan Patil

    Undeletion was requested by QuiteUnusual on my talk page. --kingboyk (talk) 15:33, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. kingboyk (talk) 15:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Keven Stirdivant

    I, 172.116.152.49, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 172.116.152.49 (talk) 18:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Josephine Davison

    Meets WP:NACTOR for roles in Power Rangers SPD, Shortland Street, and Outrageous Fortune. [2] [3] [4]ミラP 19:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:31, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:DavidKorn.SpecialProjects/sandbox

    This was an article that was being worked on and would have been resubmitted in due course. However, due to health reasons there was a hiatus on working on the article in my Sandbox. I would like it restored so that I can continue to work on it. —DavidKorn.SpecialProjects (talk) 19:46, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:30, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    trammelled

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —2601:648:8202:96B0:0:0:0:4FFF (talk) 20:22, 23 January 2020 (UTC) I'm interested in viewing the contents of this apparent junk page, to see if it had any useful content beyond the wiktionary entry. If someone could temporarily undelete or userfy it for me, I'd appreciate it. It's ok to re-delete it a few hours later, or I can db-user it. Thanks. 2601:648:8202:96B0:0:0:0:4FFF (talk) 20:22, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done The entirety of the deleted page was a redirect to Fishing net#Trammel. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:29, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Matty_Horsman

    I, Belleleapt, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Belleleapt (talk) 01:32, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. kingboyk (talk) 02:45, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:BREAUX Capital

    Article is to be edited in effort to illustrate and clearly verify the standard of notability on the topic discussed —Sociologee (talk) 06:52, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    مستخدم:أبو السعد 22

    I want to move page into User:أبو السعد 22أبو السعد 22 (talk) 07:21, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ric Edelman (playwright)

    I, LJEditor, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. LJEditor (talk) 08:52, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. kingboyk (talk) 15:36, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Nigel Hughes

    I, LJEditor, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. LJEditor (talk) 08:53, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel Hughes, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. kingboyk (talk) 15:38, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:WHISHWORKS

    The page in question is not advertising any products, similar to other Wikipedia pages about businesses it aims only to show what the history of the company to date. I feel this deletion was unreasonable and request it be restored. Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —AshOwens19961 (talk) 09:21, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. kingboyk (talk) 15:44, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Ted Riederer

    I, Felttipmarker, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Felttipmarker (talk) 22:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Slap of Tunis

    I, JerrySa1, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jerry (talk) 23:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done©Geni (talk) 23:55, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    List_of_Games_with_Gold_games

    List of games with gold. It helps to show which games I have that are gold and which are not also its good to see future games aswell — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.176.15.193 (talk) 02:05, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Games with Gold games (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Yunshui (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. kingboyk (talk) 02:23, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Donald "C-Note" Hooker

    I, Selena Ebony, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Selena Ebony (talk) 03:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC) Selena Ebony (talk)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. kingboyk (talk) 03:52, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Lumentum

    I, UnitedStatesian, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:05, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. kingboyk (talk) 05:41, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    World Student Union

    I, Ashishkumar9919, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ashishkumar9919 (talk) 09:11, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:42, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:President_T

    I, Madbrad200, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Madbrad200 (talk) 12:21, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Notable British musicianMadbrad200 (talk) 12:21, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:16, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Abdullahi Sadiq

    This article was deleted under a ban policy after I was blocked for socking but I'm not a banned user, can it be restored? —Magherbin (talk) 12:54, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Magherbin, the article cannot be undeleted here as it was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#G5. The user who created the page remains blocked. I'm not familiar with this situation, but I see that there are a number of admins you've communicated with in recent days. I suggest you ask one of them, starting with the page's deleting admin, to restore it. Or, you could go to WP:DELREV. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:28, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Block structure

    There appears to have been a disambiguation page in the history under this recently created redirect. – Uanfala (talk) 15:38, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks, that's a good move. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 19:55, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:WaitWhat, Inc

    I, Podcast Lover, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Podcast Lover (talk) 21:25, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. kingboyk (talk) 22:11, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I began working on this page last year, but found myself too busy with work to complete it. I've come back around to my wikipedia work and want to complete work on this page so I can submit it. It will be easier to start from the draft than to start from scratch —Podcast Lover (talk) 21:28, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Deron Triff

    I, Podcast Lover, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Podcast Lover (talk) 21:29, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:13, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I first submitted this page last year. It didn't get approved -- for reasons I think I can address (and which will help me with the additional pages I'd like to add, with podcast companies and creators who are not yet represented in wikipedia. I got busy at work in the Fall, and am picking up my wikipedia work now. It will be faster for me to start with the draft page than to completely start over. Thank you! —Podcast Lover (talk) 21:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:History of PATH

    I suppose to finish this article which is part of my goal. — Happypillsjr 21:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The Mandela Effect (movie)

    I will fix it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dshibshm (talkcontribs) 22:14, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. —C.Fred (talk) 22:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I will make it correctly! I used other similar movie Wikipedia sites as guides. Please restore my draft.-DANO- (talk) 03:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Joseph Cohen (entrepreneur)

    I, Pigsonthewing, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:34, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prins Lawrence (talkcontribs) 23:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Arun_Kumar_Mishra

    I, Sagar1108, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sagar1108 (talk) 05:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Sublime Text

    article is not valid for deletion by a7 ruling, as it is about a price of software. —Mralext20 (talk) 05:58, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    77.70.96.51 request

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —77.70.96.51 (talk) 10:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Please repair your request – we cannot process malformed requests. Please use the code {{subst:refund|pageName|reasoning}} (replacing pagename with the name of the page you wish to have restored and reasoning with the reason for your request). kingboyk (talk) 20:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Mini-tiller

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —SEJustice (talk) 15:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC) There has been very limited or no publications to back up up mini-tiller until recently. I would like to use at least two publications and on eup coming publication in peer review journals.[reply]

    • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:43, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Betty Heldreich Windstedt

    I, BettySurfs, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BettySurfs (talk) 22:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:20, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:The Mandela Effect (film)

    Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:03, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    DNCC Ward No 25

    DNCC ward No -25 it is turth & Valuable information —mahbub 05:15, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Zero Waste Week

    I, HouseofStrauss, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HouseofStrauss (talk) 13:15, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:04, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I wish to edit this page to be in alignment with your criteria then resubmit. You did not authorise it because I left it more than six months. —HouseofStrauss (talk) 13:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Mark Lilley (songwriter)

    I, Paul9571, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Paul9571 (talk) 14:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:04, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Hastings Funds Management

    I, 46.252.74.36, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 46.252.74.36 (talk) 14:42, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:05, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Benjamin Sum

    I'm nominator of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Sum. At the time, he was competing in the top 5 of Myanmar Idol Season 4. So seems like WP:TOOSOON. End of the final competition, he became the Runner Up of the Season 4. Now he meets WP:MUSICBIO #9, So please kindly restore the article if you agree and I'll expand on article. I don't want to create new because I want to show respect for the original creator Qt0411JL, see he said on my talk page. Thanks Idolmm (talk) 17:26, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Sum, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Tone (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. kingboyk (talk) 23:55, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Bubbies_Fine_Foods

    I, VivaLaPandaz, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VivaLaPandaz (talk) 17:28, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. kingboyk (talk) 20:13, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Chemical bonding of water

    I moved a page over this redirect, and I'd like the redirect's history merged with Chemical bonding of H2O. —InvalidOS (talk) 18:21, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – Muboshgu (talk) 21:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Mid-South Industries

    I, UnitedStatesian, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:35, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. kingboyk (talk) 20:14, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Shout Out UK

    I am looking for the version that was deleted 00:39, 27 March 2015. If someone could post it to my user space, I will U1 it after reviewing. I would like to compare the version that was deleted at AfD to the newly created version since it has been 5 years. Thanks! —VQuakr (talk) 04:41, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    There were three sentences in that last version which was much smaller. Two that were not a copyright violation: "Shout Out UK was started as a British student newspaper by Matteo Bergamini in July 2012 with the goals of providing independent news and engaging young people in politics and journalism. Shout Out UK has been an advocate for citizen journalism and has provided opportunities for young people to publish and to be trained in journalism." - credit to Jytdog I suspect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Kannan Raajamanickam

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Hema0206 (talk) 09:14, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Kingboyk (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Onward to 2020 09:41, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:FL - Fish And Wildlife Commission.jpg

    The file is the patch for Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, as a work of government of Florida (and not those agencies allowed to claim copyright) the file is actually in Florida public domain. It is therefore requested to undelete the largest version of the file, in order to assist moving to Commons. —廣九直通車 (talk) 11:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Global Passport with Christina Cindrich

    I, AdamDeanHall, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AdamDeanHall (talk) 13:06, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:53, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:List of Tell 'Em Steve-Dave! Podcast Guests

    I, RackSystem, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. RackSystem (talk) 14:08, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Theory Wellness

    I, Cglife.bmarcus, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cglife.bmarcus (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:53, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Eajat

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —2405:205:B08F:E164:7E93:4919:5670:80D5 (talk) 20:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? I can't look in userspace because, you being an IP user, I haven't the faintest idea in whose userspace to look first. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Onward to 2020 21:12, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Closest I can find is EADAT. You'll have to be more specific. Hut 8.5 21:47, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Mark Yale Harris

    I, Sampf, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sampf (talk) 20:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Panoply (data warehouse)

    Request the page be restored as I intend to work on it more. Thank you! (talk) 20:55, 28 January 2020 (UTC) Draft:Panoply (data warehouse)[reply]

    Draft:Ronald Goldstock

    I, Emilydr00, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Emilydr00 (talk) 01:06, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Ronald Goldstock would like a wikipedia page, and has the merits to have one, I am just trying to create that page —Emilydr00 (talk) 01:07, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:19, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Disappearance of Ilene Misheloff

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jewelsmc (talk) 01:12, 29 January 2020 (UTC) Disappearance of Ilene Misheloff[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:20, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Agnel Roman

    this article is deleted with improper reason. it has notablity —Annki777 (talk) 10:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnel Roman, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Ritchie333 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:57, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Muboshgu: Just for the record, 78.26 (talk · contribs) closed the AfD discussion, I just deleted the article per WP:G4 twice and salted it after it was repeatedly recreated in the same state. Also paging Huon who filed the AfD. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:00, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Ritchie333, I see. The script isn't always accurate in preloading the empty fields. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:02, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    A claim could be made that the article was in a substantially different condition than when it was deleted, with the Times of India and the Bombay Times used as references. I took a glance at it, and decided not to remove the speedy tag because these sources were exactly the same verbatim, and appeared to be based on a press release. I figured another admin who came to the same conclusion I did would delete it. Anyway, I'd be willing to restore this to the Draft area, on strict condition that it go through the complete WP:AFC review process. @Annki777:, you've created more than 60 articles, yet only 22 of them have not been deleted. I'm not sure your grasp of our Notability guidelines indicate your should have extended confirmed status as it stands. I know it's badly backlogged, but I think using that process, instead of directly creating articles, would help you in the long run. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:07, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Punjab Lalit Kala Akademi

    I, Dharampal Singh, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dharampal Singh (talk) 13:21, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:58, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Century Association

    I, Ɱ, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ɱ (talk) 15:40, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Note that I actually will this time, been forgetting to address this one. ɱ (talk) 15:41, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:01, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:The_Spot_Barber_Shop

    I would like to work on this page and add national coverage Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Smwomble (talk) 16:42, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:01, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Desmond Cole

    There have been considerable developments in Cole's career, since the original article was deleted. Another contributor has drafted what may be a new version. I request the revision history of the earlier version be grafted to the current version. Talk page too please. Geo Swan (talk) 22:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC) —Geo Swan (talk) 22:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:World Tour (Saint Pepsi album)

    I, Hailmenoffordhamhail, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hailmenoffordhamhail (talk) 00:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:56, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:NEO.LIFE

    I, SeagullScreams, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SeagullScreams (talk) 01:00, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Stanley F. Johnson

    I, Taysheamo, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Taysheamo (talk) 01:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 02:39, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    DLsite

    I, 203.114.37.14, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 203.114.37.14 (talk) 02:20, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I do not see a deleted page at that title or at Draft:DLsite. —C.Fred (talk) 02:38, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:The Switch (1993 film)

    I, 73.180.52.240, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 73.180.52.240 (talk) 06:14, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Jan "Jannis" Kristoffersen

    I, 89.8.13.145, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 89.8.13.145 (talk) 08:50, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Draft:Purshottamdas Thakurdas

    I, 86.69.180.157, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.69.180.157 (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]