Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 250: Line 250:


'''Temporary extended confirmed protection:''' Persistent [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]] and [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]] between editors at cross-odds in an [[2020 Tigray conflict|active violent conflict]]. This conflict has seen [https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/17/ethiopias-cracking-down-tigray-activists-are-spreading-news/ a surge of new accounts created on social media] to litigate disputes virtually, and Wikipedia is no different, as evinced by editing patterns. --[[User:Varavour|Varavour]] ([[User talk:Varavour|talk]]) 00:34, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
'''Temporary extended confirmed protection:''' Persistent [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]] and [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]] between editors at cross-odds in an [[2020 Tigray conflict|active violent conflict]]. This conflict has seen [https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/17/ethiopias-cracking-down-tigray-activists-are-spreading-news/ a surge of new accounts created on social media] to litigate disputes virtually, and Wikipedia is no different, as evinced by editing patterns. --[[User:Varavour|Varavour]] ([[User talk:Varavour|talk]]) 00:34, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

=== [[List of dramatic television series with LGBT characters: 1970s–2000s]] ===
* {{pagelinks|1=List of dramatic television series with LGBT characters: 1970s–2000s}}
'''Full protection:''' Persistent IP and sock account vandalism listing characters without proper citation. [[User:Hellboy42|Hellboy42]] ([[User talk:Hellboy42|talk]]) 01:08, 26 November 2020 (UTC)



== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==
== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==

Revision as of 01:08, 26 November 2020

    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Israel relationship with other countries

    Indefinite Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 36.68.185.109 (talk) 23:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Non-admin comment: Anything even remotely related can get dragged into this. Look at the edit history of Ptitim, for one. - Sumanuil (talk) 01:05, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • While there is disruption (which, I might add, isn't heavy for any of those article to begin with), it does almost exclusively come from IPs or new accounts. So, if we would protect at all, pending-changes or semi-protection should be enough. I don't see a need for even that atm, though. No need to use a hammer where other venues are still open. Lectonar (talk) 10:10, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection - Persistent vandalism/edit-warring by IP editors who are either using non-neutral language in the controversy section or are deleting it seemingly for political purposes.Waqeem (talk) 23:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection - short term. Someone using an IP and two user accounts (one of them blocked) made several strange vandalism edits to the article in the last 12 hours. --mfb (talk) 00:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by a hurted and defeated Canadian. Flix11 (talk) 02:05, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. a gd fan (talk) 03:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered user keep vandalising the article, if there's any admin around please help to ban this user Ano666nymous. Even after told off by LizardJr8 in the user talk page, Ano666nymous continue to disobey and continue to vandalism the page. Paper9oll | Talk:(Paper9oll) 04:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Protection: A bunch of IP addresses repeatedly wrote vague (or deceptive) edit summaries for their edits that weren't constructive in the first place. Furthermore, almost no one noticed that one of IP editors deliberately removed hatnotes one month ago. I recently reinserted it. Well, the last IP edit was early this month last week, but frequent reverts concern me. George Ho (talk) 04:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC); standing corrected, 04:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Folks - IPs are consistently reverting the date of birth without sourcing the same. I am not able to protect anymore since I have to go to sleep shortly. Please provide temporary protection.

    The current date of birth is from this location: Assam Assembly. Ktin (talk) 04:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Folks, I just woke up and see that the vandals have been at it again! What would it take to provide some form of temporary protection? I am unable to continuously monitor this page. Ktin (talk) 18:40, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 05:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended-confirmed protection Repeated additions of copyvio by multiple users. PohranicniStraze (talk) 05:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Non-admin comment Adding or deleting a copyvio by multiple users is actually a content dispute. So it needs to undergo dispute resolution on talk page. 110.137.165.46 (talk) 05:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring. Ahmetlii (talk) 05:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NASCARfan0548  06:14, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection or pending changes: Article just came off semi-protection today, and the same pattern of vandalism that got the article semi-protected twice before immediately started up again. This article is going to need some kind of longer-term protection, because the vandal(s) hitting this article don't look to be going away. --IJBall (contribstalk) 06:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Ahmetlii (talk) 06:50, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    List of Malankara Metropolitans (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Eldhose Talk 07:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism/edit warring. AussieWikiDan (talk) 07:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism/edit warring. Eldhose Talk 07:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. One editor with a variety of similar IPs, one IP blocked yesterday but just carrying on with more IPs. FDW777 (talk) 07:56, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 11:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content and disruptive editing mostly by IPs and new accounts. Started as soon as the previous one expired, asking for an indef since this is not going to go away anytime soon. Gotitbro (talk) 12:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive and unsourced changes by some IP hopper. Wario-Man (talk) 12:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent adding of election results when they have not been called and vandalism by IP editors. Sdrqaz (talk) 13:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Paul Vaurie (talk) 15:01, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive additions/poor source understanding by IPs and new accounts. Likely to continue as seen by the article's history, article is covered by WP:ARBIPA sanctions, asking for a mid-term semi here. Gotitbro (talk) 15:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive political editing by rotating northern Taiwan-based IPs: 1 (they were blocked); 2 and 3 are merely block evasion

    Similar episode occurred last time page was protected. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 15:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism which involves dozens of grammar and style errors. BattleshipMan (talk) 16:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 17:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Most recent edits have been by IP editors adding false information or vandalism. –WPA (talk) 18:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection - Persistent vandalism by User:ImTheIP, using non-neutral language. Just discovered today (11.25.20) although vandalism occurred since September 2020. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Worlduse (talkcontribs) 19:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism to a BLP from four IPs in the last week. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 19:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite pending changes: Long term persistent addition of WP:PROMO/non-notable sites. While we are generally doing a good job of catching it, thinking Pending Changes may be helpful. S0091 (talk) 20:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Best regards, 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 21:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – On-going edit war. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – edit war over Mötley Crüe's music genre. MetalDiablo666 (talk) 22:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: This article has been victim to sockpuppetry and IP vandalism for years. Everytime it gets protected, the IPs return to just vandalise it again, typically by adding in false information to the programming list. It appears to me that the only option is an indefinite protection. If not, at least six months. Foxnpichu (talk) 22:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of poorly sourced information. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 23:01, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously protected, it is being hit by an IP-hopping vandal today. Ifnord (talk) 23:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent POVPUSH by IPs, has been going on continuously since the last year. A mid-term semi is needed. Gotitbro (talk) 23:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully once the initial attention around the death of the Diego Maradona has ceased the vandalism / disruptive editing will cease. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 00:10, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism about the stadium name. Paul Vaurie (talk) 00:00, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. S0091 (talk) 00:11, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing and edit warring between editors at cross-odds in an active violent conflict. This conflict has seen a surge of new accounts created on social media to litigate disputes virtually, and Wikipedia is no different, as evinced by editing patterns. --Varavour (talk) 00:34, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Full protection: Persistent IP and sock account vandalism listing characters without proper citation. Hellboy42 (talk) 01:08, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Unprotection: No reason to keep this page move-protected. It was apparently originally protected because Willy on Wheels hit it twice (and Grawp once). O.N.R. (talk) 17:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    I want to add a little information inside the template since houthi is already added on the Belligerents side i think we should add the casualties of the yemani also in the template same as egyptians or syrians especially those who died as resulted from isreali airstrike and according to those articles 20 July 2024 Israeli attack on Yemen and 29 September 2024 Israeli attacks on Yemen, the yemani casualties are 20 killed, and +147 injured 70.26.36.11 (talk) 03:48, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    In the second paragraph it states that "The desire to prevent the collapse of the Palestinians and to avoid more refugees were some of the reasons for the entry of the Arab League into the country, which began the 1948 Arab–Israeli War." It is absurd to characterize the invasion by the Arab league into Israel, which triggered the War of Independence as an "entry". The words "entry of" should be changed to "invasion by" which is supported by the source text and just about every other paper on the Israeli War of Independance. Apndrew (talk) 01:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    My suggestion is to leave out the following 2 sentences in the "German complicity" paragraph as they seem to be based on misunderstandings:

    "She also highlighted police suppression of pro-Palestine protests throughout Germany[509] as evidence of state complicity.[508] Karen Wells et al. highlight how Germany has entrenched its complicity in Israel's actions by banning use of the word "genocide" in reference to Israel.[471][better source needed]"

    1. In general violent protests are not allowed in Germany. As some of the first pro-Palestine protests were violent, they were sometimes forbidden by courts, if they were expected to turn violent. But that is common policy in Gemany with all subjects and not special for pro-Palestine protests.

    Meanwhile, there even is a calendar concerning pro-Palestinian protests[1] with daily up to 20 protests all over Germany. Thus, there is no general police suppression of pro-Palestine protests as is suggested by the current wording.

    2. The word “genocide” is not banned in reference to Israel in Germany - maybe that was a misunderstanding: What is not allowed in Germany is to call for genocide against Jews. The slogan “From the river to the sea” is seen as such call and banned. Gilbert04 (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC) Create a level 3 header with a link to the article in question, then a {{pagelinks}} template and then the reason.[reply]

    Semi-protection: High level of vandalism - addition of nonsense material 130.216.44.234 (talk) 23:12, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at Wikipedia: Requests for page protection/Rolling archive.