User talk:NorthernThunder

This user may have left Wikipedia. NorthernThunder has not edited Wikipedia since July 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

I often blank this page. You can assume I've read any messages left here. I may or may not reply on your talk page, or on the relevant article talk page, as the situation warrants.

/Archive 1

/Archive 2

Proposed deletion of Gilbert Rozon

The article Gilbert Rozon has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 12:50, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"USA-centric" tag on town meeting page

I removed the "needs global perspective" tag from the Town meeting page, since the article says the term is used primarily in the United States. If that's not the case, the article should say where else it's used; otherwise, the tag seemed to me like having a "needs global perspective" tag on an article about American football. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 18:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware that American football is played in other countries? NorthernThunder (talk) 18:22, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Colorization

Colorization is a noun, colorize is a verb (http://slovnik.seznam.cz/en-cz/word/?q=colorization&id=pyEGGYK5pd4) Uzerakount (talk) 07:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arthur-Lucien Beaubien.jpg needs authorship information.

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Arthur-Lucien Beaubien.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided),authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which:{{subst:usernameexpand|NorthernThunder}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:06, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello NorthernThunder! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

November 2011

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give National Press Building a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Mikaey, Devil's advocate 07:18, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Fishka Rais

Hello, NorthernThunder, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fishka Rais whether the article Fishka Rais should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Fishka Rais, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Clarityfiend (talk) 22:51, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In VE9EC, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page La Presse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:48, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Mike Milbury, you recently added links to the disambiguation pages Brookline and Assault and battery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mart McChesney

The article Mart McChesney has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An actor who's only verifiable roles are two episodes of Star Trek and a minor movie from 1984. Does not meet WP:ACTOR or WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 17:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AfD and PROD notifications

Hi NorthernThunder,

Back in November, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchukwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:51, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TheGuard.JPG

This image has two issues: no rationale and concerns of fair use as a gallery. Unless both issues are resolved, this image has seven days until deletion. --George Ho (talk) 22:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ken Scott (screenwriter)

The article Ken Scott (screenwriter) has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe decker ^{talk to me} 03:08, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Serena Sande

The article Serena Sande has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of meeting WP:BIO, couldn't find anything that indicates she WP:GNG in an HighBeam, ProQuest or Google News Archives other than playing a couple of minor theater roles passing mentions in the local newspaper, roles like "nurse" or "doctor" doesn't indicate notability neither

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret ^account 22:47, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karen Russell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Russell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Russell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:13, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maxime Rémillard

The article Maxime Rémillard has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 08:59, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have since supplied a reference, but PLEASE STOP CREATING UNREFERENCED BIOGRAPHIES OF LIVING PEOPLE!! I found your article due to a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people and I'm amazed that as you approach 1400 articles created you don't understand that we simply don't accept that any BLP should be unreferenced anymore. I've looked at some of your recent articles and most have references, but please ensure that ALL of them are referenced. Thanks, The-Pope (talk) 09:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your condescending attitude is even less helpful. NorthernThunder (talk) 10:55, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

reverting red links

Hello, NorthernThunder. You have new messages at Labattblueboy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Snyder

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michael Snyder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Robofish (talk) 22:59, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The request for speedy deletion has been turned down, so I've turned it into a WP:PROD. See the article for details. Robofish (talk) 10:48, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DuncanOrestesAlguire.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:DuncanOrestesAlguire.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|NorthernThunder}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:42, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GeorgeHaroldBaker.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:GeorgeHaroldBaker.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|NorthernThunder}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:47, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:LoranEllisBaker.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:LoranEllisBaker.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|NorthernThunder}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:02, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of recurring Star Trek: Deep Space Nine characters. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 12:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Maurice Breton.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Maurice Breton.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. YUL89YYZ (talk) 17:05, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hi NorthernThunder, you have new messages. I apologize for the mishap :( benzband (talk) 17:20, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph Harris Harper

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joseph Harris Harper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:39, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bits and Bytes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bits and Bytes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Richard BB 12:49, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Link rot

Hi NorthernThunder. I saw your edit to Laureen Harper, so just wanted to make sure you are aware of the guidance at Wikipedia:Link rot. Thanks, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gitane De Silva

The article Gitane De Silva has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PK T(alk) 20:41, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Family members of Prime Ministers

I've just recently noticed that you spent some time last fall trying to expand Wikipedia's coverage of Stephen Harper's family, so I wanted to ask that you take some time to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's principle that notability is not inherited.

Specifically, a father, mother, sibling or child of a Prime Minister of Canada is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article if the only claim of notability you can make is the family relationship to a Prime Minister. Because being the spouse of the Prime Minister is a notable public role in its own right, the wives are different — but in general, any other family member of a PM is allowed to have an article only if they've established their own notability independently of the family relationship alone. (Ben Mulroney and Catherine Clark and Justin Trudeau and Alexandre Trudeau and Geoffrey Pearson, for example, have all done things that would have gotten them in here regardless of who their fathers were; Ben's and Geoffrey's other siblings, conversely, have not.) And, in turn, a person's name is not added to {{Stephen Harper}} unless they actually have a separate article, which actually makes a valid and properly sourced claim of genuine notability, to link to.

Admittedly, on the surface it might look to you like there's a double standard for Canada vis-à-vis the United States — you do seem inordinately fond of making that claim whether there's an actual basis for it or not — but there really isn't, because a family member of a US president still has to meet a notability guideline in their own right. The United States has a much more invasive media culture that actively digs into these people in greater depth and intrusiveness than is true almost anywhere else in the world, so it ends up being a little bit easier than usual for those family members to actually garner enough media coverage to get past a notability guideline, but they still have to to get past a notability guideline on their own and still do not automatically get their own article just because they exist.

The test you need to apply is whether the person you want to write about has garnered a reasonable volume of media coverage that is specifically about them, which demonstrates their own independent notability. In other words, if there are media sources out there in which Joseph or Margaret or Rachel Harper is the primary subject, then they might potentially qualify for their own articles — but if their names merely get mentioned in media sources whose primary subject is Stephen, then their names may be mentioned in Stephen's article but they do not qualify for their own. Bearcat (talk) 18:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why we should let the media decide the notability of a person but if that's Wikipedia policy then I will follow it otherwise we aer just allowing Wikipedia to become even more American-biased. NorthernThunder (talk) 14:25, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Um, because the existence of media coverage is the definition of what notability is? Bearcat (talk) 23:15, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Edward Ritchie Bellemare

The article Edward Ritchie Bellemare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eric John Bergbusch

The article Eric John Bergbusch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Norman Frederick Henderson Berlis

The article Norman Frederick Henderson Berlis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:34, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marie Bernard-Meunier

The article Marie Bernard-Meunier has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:34, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leonard Michael Berry

The article Leonard Michael Berry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:34, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jacques Bilodeau

The article Jacques Bilodeau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charles Blair Birkett

The article Charles Blair Birkett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alfred Pike Bissonnet

The article Alfred Pike Bissonnet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pierre-André Bissonnette

The article Pierre-André Bissonnette has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable diplomat stub article. For the relevant notability policy, please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Diplomats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RileyBot (talk) 22:46, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clegg Hoyt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clegg Hoyt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clegg Hoyt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:27, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roy William Blake

The article Roy William Blake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable mid-level unelected official, per WP:DIPLOMAT. Recently added references do not conclusively indicate otherwise.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Klein zach 05:12, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roy William Blake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roy William Blake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy William Blake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Proposed deletion of Barbara Richardson (diplomat)

The article Barbara Richardson (diplomat) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable per WP:DIPLOMAT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Klein zach 23:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I got it. Diplomats are not notable. NorthernThunder (talk) 16:56, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Diplomats are not automatically notable just for being diplomats — they are notable if reliable sources can be added to provide depth and context about their diplomatic careers, and are not notable if all you can add is a stub that just says "Barbara Richardson is a diplomat" and doesn't cite any sources to verify the fact or demonstrate why anyone should care.

Her role is significant enough that reliable sources probably can be added to make her notability more apparent — but notability is a question of the sourcing that can or cannot be provided about the person, and not something that all diplomats automatically get just for being diplomats. Is there a reason you seem to so persistently have trouble understanding the distinction between those two things? Bearcat (talk) 23:42, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Barbara Richardson (diplomat) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbara Richardson (diplomat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Richardson (diplomat) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hi NorthernThunder , looking at the period of time tht the Barbara Richardson (diplomat) page has been around and the amount of edits seemigly back and forth, I'd say that the article needs a bit more work. I've voted to keep for now as I believe it has merit and she is notable. Itime is the essence I dar say (Solution55 (talk) 08:52, 2 May 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Problem with loading main page

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

The main page loads with the links to the different language portals all appearing at the left margin. NorthernThunder (talk) 22:01, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I misunderstand you, but that sounds like the way it's supposed to be. Why is that a problem? Huon (talk) 22:14, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming you did understand me, aesthetically, it just looks wrong because it leaves a big white space in the middle. NorthernThunder (talk) 22:54, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To me the main page looks roughly like this: File:Wikipedia Main Page.png. The interwiki links to versions in other languages are at the left. I don't see any white space in the middle. Huon (talk) 23:26, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to upload a screenshot of my desktop so I'll try to explain it again. The page at http://www.wikipedia.org/ has links to the different languages of Wikipedia. They are supposed to surround a Wikiglobe but they do not here. The Wikiglobe is at the top left and each language wiki hypertext link is directly below them in descending order. To the right is the rest of the page which is blank. NorthernThunder (talk) 23:41, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry, that was indeed a misunderstanding; we were talking about differeng "main pages". There was indeed a problem with the page you pointed to, but it seems to be resolved now. No idea what the problem was, and it would probably something outside the control of the English Wikipedia - nothing editors here could have helped with. Huon (talk) 00:46, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Philip Francis Brady, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Philip Francis Brady" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 16:36, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Truong Hoa Binh

The article Truong Hoa Binh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Tassedethe (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adam Blackwell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Blackwell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Blackwell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toddst1 (talk) 16:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Calgary City Council may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{legislature

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Collab on Article:Privacy Act (1983)

Hi NorthernThunder, you are the creator of the Privacy Act, 1983 page from September 10, 2012. I'm hoping to clean up some of the Canada Privacy related topics, but I am quite a new editor and a little weary to Be bold on such an important Act. I was hoping that we could collaborate to make a couple of these pages better. I'll be in Talk! -Cheers RhodesArk (talk) 20:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

117Avenue

Removing a red link defeats the very nature of Wikipedia. If you see a red link, be bold and create an article for it. NorthernThunder (talk) 06:11, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vinny Argiro

The article Vinny Argiro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable actor

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk) 02:06, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Royal Canadian Mounted Police may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Men in politics

Category:Men in politics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 15:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion explanation

Barack Obama is burdened with way too many categories already, and regular editors routinely try to trim the categories to only those that are absolutely essential. A "men in politics" category is not only inessential, but I would argue it is largely redundant. -- Scjessey (talk) 16:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK NorthernThunder (talk) 16:50, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marivel Taruc for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marivel Taruc is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marivel Taruc until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:44, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Renan

The article David Renan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.67.230.140.124 (talk) 14:29, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michel Auger (politician)

The article Michel Auger (politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only one reference; subject may not meet WP:N or WP:BIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Parson's Cat (talk) 17:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NorthernThunder. You have new messages at Parsonscat's talk page.
Message added 18:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

File source problem with File:HarryGrenfellArchibald.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:HarryGrenfellArchibald.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:AlexanderMacGillivrayYoung.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:AlexanderMacGillivrayYoung.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jay_Switzer

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Jay_Switzer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Nomination of Denelle Balfour for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Denelle Balfour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denelle Balfour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 22:08, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Skill testing question may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

obstacle to claiming a prize. The questions are also becoming easier.]</ref> For contests held in other countries but open to Canadians, a STQ must be asked of any

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:02, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image uploads

Hi,

I've been adding {{information}} to a lot of uploads recently and was wondering if you would consider reviewing your uploads (mostly Canadian biographicla images), so that the {{information}} is brought to an enhanced standard as well as merely useful one :)

Thanks in advance. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:01, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK Will do when I have time. NorthernThunder (talk) 16:50, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rhonda Aldrich

The article Rhonda Aldrich has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to met WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:22, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Women writers Invitation

Hello NorthernThunder! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women writers. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women writers, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women writers on Wikipedia.

If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women writers page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement!

Proposed deletion of Susan Hay

The article Susan Hay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not asserted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:11, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mayor

Just a reminder that the person who wins a mayoral election does not instantly become the incumbent mayor of a town or city the moment they've been declared the winner on election night — there's a transition period first, during which the outgoing mayor is still the incumbent, and the incoming one is only a mayor-elect. Ontario's new mayors are not actually taking office until December 1 — so Tony Antoniazzi can be added to the infobox in a supplementary field as mayor-elect, but for the duration of October and November Bill Enouy is still the actual mayor and cannot be removed from the infobox yet. Bearcat (talk) 19:56, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. NorthernThunder (talk) 20:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Privacy Act

FYI Talk:Privacy Act, 1983#Title. Mathew5000 (talk) 11:30, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Al Dubois

The article Al Dubois has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Longtime unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 19:33, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anne Marie La Traverse

The article Anne Marie La Traverse has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Hello NorthernThunder, and thanks for your contributions on Canadian topics! It's important not to leave these biographies of living people unsourced indefinitely, as they can be subject to vandalism. You need another reliable source, in addition to the links to IMDB, for a biography of a living person. See WP:USERGENERATED for an explanation. I didn't spot anything quickly about her other than the name of her employer, so I'm proposing the article for deletion. --Djembayz (talk) 21:21, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Overs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Overs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Overs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Esquivalience ^t 05:07, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vasiliki Maliaros for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vasiliki Maliaros is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasiliki Maliaros until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 07:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Canadian Independent Telephone Association

The article Canadian Independent Telephone Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has been marked with tags for almost three years, showing no sources. May not meet WP:ORG and clearly nobody is keen to build or maintain the page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Air ♠ Combat _What's^{up, dog?} 14:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jody Vance for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jody Vance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jody Vance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of CTV Movie

The article CTV Movie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable Canadian television show tagged since August 2008.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:49, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Technical Knockout (TV series)

The article Technical Knockout (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Entirely unsourced article about a television series, for which improved referencing cannot be located on either Google or ProQuest. A television series does not get an automatic WP:NMEDIA pass just because it exists; it must be reliably sourceable, but this isn't.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearcat (talk) 22:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, NorthernThunder. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Environics Analytics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Environics Analytics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Environics Analytics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Basil Monster 17:43, 29 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basil Monster (talk • contribs)

Category:Industry Canada has been nominated for discussion

Category:Industry Canada, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 06:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:GeorgeHaroldBaker.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:GeorgeHaroldBaker.jpg appears to be missing information as to one (or more) of the following :

The author or creators of the work, (including information as to the author's lifespan).
Where and how this particular version was obtained.
When the work was created,

If you did provide such information, it is currently confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|NorthernThunder}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

Please also add authorship and sourcing to other files you created or uplopaded. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ellen David for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ellen David is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellen David until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:37, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bilawal House I

The article Bilawal House I has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

the article is unfeferenced and the topic is non notable, maybe contain lots of wrong information also it have been written in very poor style

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ominictionary (talk) 16:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pam Pietroforte

The article Pam Pietroforte has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Television show writer of questionable notability-only wrote 2 episodes of a TV show.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 02:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Todd (1803–1873) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Todd (1803–1873) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Todd (1803–1873) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 14:49, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RueMorgue 62.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RueMorgue 62.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, NorthernThunder. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elizabeth Yake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elizabeth Yake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Yake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 12:15, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of True West Films for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article True West Films is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True West Films until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 12:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Holly Horton

The article Holly Horton has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Toddst1 (talk) 07:08, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Van Epperson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Van Epperson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Van Epperson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louis Adolphe Billy.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Louis Adolphe Billy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Alexis Jazz (talk) 07:21, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mr. Dramatic

The article Mr. Dramatic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Short films are generally non-notable and do no meet WP:NFP. Article currently contains no sourcing to demonstrating meeting notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:01, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Holly Horton

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Holly Horton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Toddst1 (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Willcock

The article James Willcock has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. » Shadowowl | talk 19:37, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Willcock

The article James Willcock has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. » Shadowowl | talk 10:21, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of James Willcock

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on James Willcock requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. » Shadowowl | talk 14:51, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Willcock

The article James Willcock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sourced only to IMDb.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adam9007 (talk) 14:52, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Merrill Edwin Barrington.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Merrill Edwin Barrington.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:39, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcel Bourbonnais.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Marcel Bourbonnais.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:46, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, NorthernThunder. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scott Laurie

The article Scott Laurie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP with no sources available that would support WP:N notability. Various searches show no suitable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:26, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marc Grégoire

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marc Grégoire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Madg2011 (talk) 16:17, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marc Grégoire

The article Marc Grégoire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Speedy deletion declined. Article is about a former head of the Canadian Coast Guard with no assertion of notability. No other Commissioners have articles. Both sources are routine biographies.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Madg2011 (talk) 18:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marc Grégoire for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marc Grégoire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Grégoire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Madg2011 (talk) 19:00, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aaron Saltzman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Saltzman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Saltzman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 20:48, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Teresa Kruze

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Teresa Kruze requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Madg2011 (talk) 23:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Teresa Kruze for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teresa Kruze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teresa Kruze until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Madg2011 (talk) 23:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeffrey Nicholas Brown for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeffrey Nicholas Brown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Nicholas Brown until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:52, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Gillies (musician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Gillies (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Gillies (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 12:33, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spawnsoundtrackcover.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Spawnsoundtrackcover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:34, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Haley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Haley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Haley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 16:10, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harry Forestell

The article Harry Forestell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP since 2015. If you remove hits from CBC, his employer, there are zero sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mark Bunting

The article Mark Bunting has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Doug Mehus T·C 02:56, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Curtis Brown for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Curtis Brown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Curtis Brown until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 10:12, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Erick Weiss for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erick Weiss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erick Weiss until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 10:41, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Danitza Kingsley

The article Danitza Kingsley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor, no sources available other than IMDb

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John P. Connolly (actor)

The article John P. Connolly (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor, only link is IMDb

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Heather Lauren Olson

The article Heather Lauren Olson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor, WP:BEFORE shows no substantial secondary sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:40, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Bridle

Hi NT! I believe you initiated the WP article on Paul Bridle, and entered the predecessor/successor tables, which I have found most useful! What is your source for this? The one quibble I have is the predecessor of the second ICSC/ICC for Laos tour. You have William GM Olivier, but Global Affairs has him as 1957-58, ie. following Peter GR Campbell, on the first tour table. From 1958-1961 I believe the Laos ICSC was adjourned. When it was revived in 1961, I believe Maynard was brought back, for a second tour. This means Bridle followed him twice! However, there is a gap in Maynard's entry on Global Affairs so i cannot confirm that definitively. However, photos and mentions suggest Maynard was back in 1961. How would you respond to that, NT? Regards, Protozoon (talk) 02:06, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mick Gould

The article Mick Gould has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nicholas Shaffer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicholas Shaffer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Shaffer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 23:22, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephen Davies (actor)

The article Stephen Davies (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:08, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Canada

The article Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Canada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This short article is actually a content fork. the same information is contained, with greater detail, in the article: Legislative Assembly of the Province of Canada. Since the information is already in that article, there is no need for this article as a stand-alone article. Nor should there be a merge, since the information is already in the article on the Legislative Assembly.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 01:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peter Loubardias for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Loubardias is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Loubardias until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 16:41, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Caroline Junko King for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caroline Junko King is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Junko King until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:50, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Twelveinchesofsnow.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Twelveinchesofsnow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Crest of the Vice Chief of the Defence Staff of Canada.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crest of the Vice Chief of the Defence Staff of Canada.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Natasha Ramsahai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natasha Ramsahai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Ramsahai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Magnolia677 (talk) 16:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark Heyck for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Heyck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Heyck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bearcat (talk) 05:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Members of the House of Commons of Canada with military service has been nominated for renaming

Category:Members of the House of Commons of Canada with military service has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Bennett Government" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bennett Government. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 3#Bennett Government until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 06:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ravi Baichwal

The article Ravi Baichwal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NJOURN. Lacks notability and sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 02:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tom Kennedy (journalist)

The article Tom Kennedy (journalist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NJOURN. Lacks notability and sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 02:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kate Wheeler

The article Kate Wheeler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NJOURN. Lacks notability and sources. Can't find anything on google for her.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 08:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Guillermo Rishchynski

The article Guillermo Rishchynski has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thepharoah17 (talk) 10:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deirdre Lenihan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deirdre Lenihan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deirdre Lenihan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Clarityfiend (talk) 08:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Curtis Brown for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Curtis Brown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Curtis Brown (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Film Creator (talk) 09:45, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Albury, Ontario" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Albury, Ontario and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 26#Albury, Ontario until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 05:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heroes s01 e08.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heroes s01 e08.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jacques Bilodeau for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacques Bilodeau, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacques Bilodeau until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charles Philip Bassett

The article Charles Philip Bassett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:BEFORE returns nothing, except a few odd book results that are have nothing to do with the subject (very unlikely to create WP:SIGCOV)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 22:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ryerson University faculty

A tag has been placed on Category:Ryerson University faculty indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:07, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:CanadaConsulChicago.png

The file File:CanadaConsulChicago.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:CanadaConsulChicago.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:22, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jeannie Lee

The article Jeannie Lee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:21, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steve Chao for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Chao is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Chao until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Health and Community Services St. John's Region for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Health and Community Services St. John's Region is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Health and Community Services St. John's Region until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--IMR2000 (talk) 20:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Grenfell Regional Health Services Board for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grenfell Regional Health Services Board is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grenfell Regional Health Services Board until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--IMR2000 (talk) 03:14, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Health Labrador Corporation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Health Labrador Corporation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Health Labrador Corporation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--IMR2000 (talk) 03:37, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BenjaminGraydonAllmark.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BenjaminGraydonAllmark.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leonard Michael Berry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leonard Michael Berry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonard Michael Berry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tails Wx 22:35, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of J. Denis Bélisle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J. Denis Bélisle, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Denis Bélisle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jacques J.A. Asselin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacques J.A. Asselin, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacques J.A. Asselin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eric John Bergbusch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eric John Bergbusch, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric John Bergbusch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marc Brault for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marc Brault, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Brault until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Terence Charles Bacon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Terence Charles Bacon, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terence Charles Bacon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clayton George Bullis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clayton George Bullis, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clayton George Bullis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bertram Charles Butler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bertram Charles Butler, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bertram Charles Butler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Clemence Gordon Brown for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Clemence Gordon Brown, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Clemence Gordon Brown until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Top 10 (Canadian TV program)

The article Top 10 (Canadian TV program) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear notable, nothing was found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2018

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul André Beaulieu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul André Beaulieu, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul André Beaulieu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Norell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Norell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Norell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daniel Georges Marc Baudouin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Georges Marc Baudouin, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Georges Marc Baudouin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Rollins Barker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Rollins Barker, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Rollins Barker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Théodore Jean Arcand for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Théodore Jean Arcand, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Théodore Jean Arcand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Atlantic Pilotage Authority for deletion

The Atlantic Pilotage Authority page has been relatively dead and I don't think meets notability guidelines, regrettably. Started a discussion here: Kwkintegrator (talk) 00:58, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joyce Schure

The article Joyce Schure has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mucube (talk • contribs) 02:40, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Atlantic Pilotage Authority for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atlantic Pilotage Authority, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlantic Pilotage Authority until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sara Hradecky for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sara Hradecky, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Hradecky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anna Biolik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anna Biolik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Biolik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LibStar (talk) 22:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Slashing (ice hockey) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Slashing (ice hockey) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slashing (ice hockey) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Maccore Henni user talk Respond using tb, please. 22:25, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karen Hill (television writer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Hill (television writer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Hill (television writer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Orest Sushko

The article Orest Sushko has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Melcous (talk) 10:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Guillermo Rishchynski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guillermo Rishchynski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guillermo Rishchynski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LibStar (talk) 23:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michel Verrault

The article Michel Verrault has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Variety Tonight for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Variety Tonight is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Variety Tonight until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]