User talk:Sotakeit
Please leave a . |
Welcome!
Hello, Sotakeit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! D. J. Bracey (talk) 19:24, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
Hello
Just saw your page. Don't worry, I started out as a dabbler, and now I am extremely addicted to Wiki, so much so it has become my husband's favorite joke. If something comes up that we don't know the answer to, he just reminds me that since I am ALWAYS on Wiki, I can find the answer. Glad to have you here. Prsgoddess187 23:59, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks :) Sotakeit 14:28, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
Esperanza elections
You've received this spam because you signed up for it here. To stop the spam, pop over and remove yourself and you'll never hear from Esperanza again!
News from Esperanza
Hello, fellow Esperanzians! This is just a friendly reminder that elections for Administrator General and two advisory council positions have just begun. Voting will last until Friday, December 30, so make sure you exercise your right to vote! Also, I'm pleased to announce the creation of the Esperanza mailing list. I urge all members to join; see Wikipedia:Esperanza/Contact for more information. All you need to do is email me and I will activate your account. This will be a great way to relax, stay in touch, and hear important announcements. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?)
This message was delivered to all Esperanza members by our acting messenger, Redvers. If you do not wish to receive further messages, please list yourself at WP:ESP/S. Thanks.
An Esperanzial note
As I remember, the last spam that was handed out was on the 20th of December last year, so I think it's time for another update. First and foremost, the new Advisory Council and Administrator General have been elected. They consist of myself as Admin General and FireFox, Titoxd, Flcelloguy and Karmafist as the Advisory Council. We as a group met formally for the first time on the 31st of Decembe. The minutes of this meeting can be found at WP:ESP/ACM. The next one is planned for tonight (Sunday 29 January) at 20:30 UTC and the agenda can be found at WP:ESP/ACM2.
In other news, Karmafist has set up a discussion about a new personal attack policy, which it can be found here. Other new pages include an introductory page on what to do when you sign up, So you've joined Esperanza... and a welcome template: {{EA-welcome}} (courtesy of Bratsche). Some of our old hands may like to make sure they do everything on the list as well ;) Additionally, the userpage award program proposal has become official is operational: see Wikipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award to nominate a userpage or volunteer as a judge. Also see the proposed programs page for many new proposals and old ones that need more discussion ;)
Other than that, I hope you all had a lovely Christmas and wish you an Esperanzially good new WikiYear :D Thank you! --Celestianpower háblame 16:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Message delivered by Rune.welsh using AWB. If you wish to recieve no further messages of this ilk, please sign your name here.
Another Esperanzial note...
Hi again Esperanzians! Well, since our last frolic in the realms of news, the Advisory Council has met twice more (see WP:ESP/ACM2 and WP:ESP/ACM3). As a result, the charter has been ammended twice (see here for details) and all of the shortcuts have been standardised (see the summary for more details). Also of note is the Valentines ball that will take place in the Esperanza IRC channel on the 14th of February (tomorrow). It will start at 6pm UTC and go on until everyone's had enough! I hope to see you all there! Also, the spamlist has been dissolved - all Esperanzians will now recieve this update "newsletter".
The other major notice I need to tell you about is the upcoming Esperanza Advisory Council Elections. These will take place from 12:00 UTC on February 20th to 11:59 UTC on February 27th. The official handing-over will take place the following day. Candidates are able to volunteer any time before the 20th, so long as they are already listed on the members list. Anyone currently listed on the memberlist can vote. In a change since last time, if you have already been a member of the leadership, you may run again. Due to the neutrality precident, I will not vote for anyone.
Yours, as ever, Esperanzially,
--Celestianpower háblame 09:00, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
(message delivered by FireFox using AWB on Celestianpower's behalf)
TfD nomination of Template:Headgear
Template:Headgear has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Headgear. Thank you. Jon513 17:11, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Table width
Hi, I have fixed the table width. You just need to insert width=XX% or width=YYpx in the right place. See table help. Anyways, you still need to provide references and find some solution for image copyrights for your list to be perfect :) Renata 01:20, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Well, fair use is generally allowed on WP, you just have to comply with very strict rules. And one of these rules are that you cannot use images claimed under fair use for decorations, i.e. where those images are not neccessary or where they provide little info. Like in this list - the images are here so that the list looks nice, all the important info is in the table. All other licenses (public domain, GFDL, etc.) are ok and you can use those images in whatever way you want. So in short, if you want to keep the images, you need to find "free" (i.e. that are in public domain, under GFDL, or CC licenses) alternatives. Hope this explains. Feel free to ask any questions. Renata 00:48, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- You cannot use WP as reference. You need some outside works (websites, books, articles, tv shows, etc etc) that agree with your facts you presented in the list. See WP:CITE. Also, the first two images are not ok since there is no explanation as to why they are in public domain. The user as well might have lied. It's quite tough to make a list/article featured, but don't give up! :) Renata 18:25, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Consort-less rulers
I left a question at Talk:Royal Consorts of the United Kingdom, Great Britain and England. Rmhermen 21:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
medieval women
Hi! Thanks for joining my wee project. I'm a little new to the "project" thing, and confess to having more of an idea that it should be done than a concrete sense of how it should be done. But that won't stop us! No sir. I think good progress has been made with getting articles added to the med. women category, so now we can move on to going through them and seeing which ones can be most easily and profitably improved. If you have a copy of the Encyclopedia of Medieval History (I do!), that, or a similar reference tome, might be a good place to start. You say you're into royalty, so maybe you could spruce up the ones about queens and consorts. I'd also like to make some kind of portal or other schematic browsing device, but I'm not sure exactly what it should look like...maybe we should check out the Medieval Warfare project folks and see if they have any advice for us! Anyway, I hope that gives you some idea of a starting point. We can figure it out as we go along... Oh! and look for recruits! Yeah! Welcome aboard! Cantara 20:19, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
I'll help copyedit your list as soon as you add a few more citations to the introduction. In the meantime, would you do me the favor of a critique on my nomination Cultural depictions of Joan of Arc? Best wishes, Durova 16:55, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- We still need page references for the introduction. If you'll just write them out on my talk page and quote the line where they go, I'll put them in. Best wishes, Durova 22:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Esperanza Newsletter, Issue #1
|
|
FLC
Please do not blank nominations like this one even if they are not appropriate. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 13:18, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Esperanza Newsletter, Issue #2
|
|
Latin America won!
Joyous | Talk 19:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
A welcome from WikiProject Middle-earth!
Hello, Sotakeit!
Thank you for joining WikiProject Middle-earth and contributing to improve Tolkien-related articles. We are glad to have you join in the effort!
Here're some good links and subpages related to our WikiProject.
- Middle-earth WikiProject discussion
- Middle-earth WikiProject things to do - A compilation of all the tasks that are needed to do
- Middle-earth Standards (talk)
- Middle-earth WikiProject Portal
If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to ask on our talk page.
Thank you for your contributions and have fun editing!
NOTE: There is a poll/proposal concerning the renaming of our WikiProject. Please vote here to share your opinion! —Mirlen 15:54, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
The Lord of the Rings Peer Review
I have make extensive changes to our Lord of the Rings article in an attempt to work it up to Featured Article status. In order to find more suggestions I have listed it under Wikipedia:Peer Review. Under the guidelines to nominations I am required to notify others of knowledge in the area to review it. I have decided that the best group for this would be our WikiProject. So I ask you all to look at the article and make any suggestions you can. Hopefully we will be voting this FA soon enough. SorryGuy 00:57, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Old Skool Esperanzial note
Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Celestianpower háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:HHMagME.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:HHMagME.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Esperanza Newsletter, Issue #3
|
|
Image marked for deletion
Image:Arch_lit.jpg listed for deletion
Updated image in SVG format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Arch_lit.svg MeekMark 01:50, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Image:Sectional.JPG listed for deletion
Updated image in SVG format: Image:Section_sign.svg MeekMark 16:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Violin image
Hi; I thought you might be interested to know that the base image you used for Violinconstruction.JPG was my wife's teaching fiddle for the past three or four years. Just recently she upgraded, and that one has been placed with one of her students, where we think it will have a good home. I've left some thoughts on the image's talk page; do with them what you will, as this fascinating world continues on its merry way. Cheers (is the Queen's English for teşekkur ederim,) __ Just plain Bill 14:20, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Fantastic job, and quickly done; brilliant! The nut is the little block of ebony that the strings ride over, coming out of the pegbox. The fingerboard doesn't go all the way to the bridge; the end of the board can be seen in the neighbourhood of the upper corners. For simplicity's sake, you might consider calling out the neck and fingerboard without the parentheses after. This image probably also deserves a place in Violin construction and mechanics. What you've done adds a lot; cheers! __ Just plain Bill 13:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- On reflection, the "(chin to root)" parenthesis adds a bit. Keep it, or not? I don't know. :-) _ Just plain Bill
- Further reflection: you may want to give the pegbox a span-bracket thingy... OK, I'll give it a rest now, before it gets too fussed-over. _ JpB
- Looks good to me. One minor nit: there's only one nut. Might want to just say "Fingerboard" there, since it doesn't reach to the bridge. ciao, __ Just plain Bill 03:32, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Fair Use Images
Hello, Sotakeit. Sorry, there are meant to be NO Fair Use images in user pages (I know, it sucks). Even the images you created/uploaded yourself need to be removed. Read WP:FU. I will let you remove it yourself, but if you don't be aware someone who is less courteous will. Weirdy 09:54, 19 June 2006 (UTC) Hello! Bye!
- Thanks for the thanks. And, in case you were wondering, the image on my User Page is not a fair use image, just to let you know. Weirdy 06:37, 20 June 2006 (UTC).
A short Esperanzial update
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.
As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.
Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, —Celestianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for moving the content to its own article, and for working at wikifying it.
One small thing I disagree with: I don't think nobility should link to Dutch nobility. The Dutch language is spoken in at least three different countries, two of which have their own nobility. The limited link is especially unfortunate since the example I gave was of a member of Belgian nobility.--82.92.181.129 11:43, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
August Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
September Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
November Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
WikiProject Harry Potter
Hello, Sotakeit. Over at WikiProject Harry Potter we're trying to compile a list of active participants. Your name, along with all other project participants, has been placed on the inactive list. If you'd like to get involved again, please place your name back on the active list, and take a look at the project talk page for the latest happenings. |
RHB(AWB) 23:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC), on behalf of WPHarry Potter
Your edit to French language
Why did you delete the map? Joeldl 16:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Time for resolution
Hiya. For several months now, the article naming for 18th Century British royals has been ever-which-where — all over the shop. In an attempt to solve this, I have prepared a page for discussion: here. Please, please, please come and discuss, even contribute to the Poll. Cheers! DBD 15:36, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Imperial Crypt Vaults graphic.
Great graphic! There are a few corrections needed, though:
- The B for the children's columbarium should be moved all the way to the right-hand wall. The kids' coffins are in flat-bottomed tubes cut into the thickness of the outside wall.
- Where you presently have the B should be another letter, representing Leopold's Vault.
- In Ferdinand's Vault, you do have two of the corner piers (that contain a lot of coffins) shown, but the other two corners should also show such piers too.
Thanks for adding this graphic... it does improve the article.
--StanZegel (talk) 04:16, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Violin and cello question
Hey there. I LOVE the violin construction image you used. Do you know if there is a cello equivalent?? Coal town guy (talk) 20:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Managed this from the German JPEG hope everyone likes itCoal town guy (talk) 14:41, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Sotakeit -- I added a couple of paragraphs on Byzantine examples, with cites. It probably could stand some polishing -- & some more links -- but it gives an idea of what's there. -- llywrch (talk) 06:55, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Redirect
Per Wikipedia:Redirect#Do not "fix" links to redirects that are not broken and Wikipedia:Piped link#When not to use, it is generally not advised to pipe a link just to avoid a redirect. DrKiernan (talk) 15:53, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- Ah! Thanks, DrKiernan, wasn't aware of this. Sotakeit (talk) 15:55, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Review of Peribsen
hi. Thank you so much for reviewing! Just one lil' thing: the Seth animal is no "chimera", it is simply unknown, which animal it once was... No Egyptologist uses the term "chimera", they always write "Seth animal". Regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 11:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, @Nephiliskos, I don't follow? Which point does this relate to? Very interesting article, however. I enjoyed reading it. In regards to content, and if the few niggles I had are fixed, I would definitely support. Sotakeit (talk) 11:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hi there. I have read your comments and I already started to re-write the article entrance. For the other points I will ask some portal members for help. I would leave you a note when done. Regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 15:36, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm done so far. Please check again. Regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 15:42, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nephiliskos, I think the lead is looking much better. I've edited a few words and phrases to fix grammar issues and make it a little more idiomatic. Well referenced too. Happy give it my support. Sotakeit (talk) 07:43, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Russian saints
Thank you again for your comments. Do you think the prose in the tables is understandable and grammatically correct? Or does it need some copyediting? Regards. --Tomcat (7) 11:43, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, Tomcat7 I've gone through and correct any grammar/language issues I can see - tried not to change any of the content especially. What do you think?
- I was unsure about what you meant by 'living behind the River Danube', 'grabbed himself shoulder-long' or ' after heavy head wound' ? None seem to make sense in English.
- 1) I removed that phrase as I am not able to describe it in English. In Russian there exist such wordings as "behind" and "ahead" a river. I think English speakers would use cardinal directions. 2) it means that he grabbed himself until his shoulders 3) changed to injury
- Nor do I know what 'drinking bout' refers to?
- it means addiction of drinking something
- Finally, when you use the phrase "known to the world" (as in Ephraim, known to the world Eustathius), do you mean "better known as"? If so, then I would have changed this. Sotakeit (talk) 12:26, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- After tonsure, the person receives a new name. So this wording describes someone's worldly, secular name.--Tomcat (7) 13:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Royal intermarriage
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Royal intermarriage you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 09:40, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- I have put the review on hold for a week: the references need some work to get them up to GA standard. Other (minor) comments are on the GAN review page. Tim riley talk 09:39, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Royal intermarriage
The article Royal intermarriage you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Royal intermarriage for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 09:40, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Ha ha! I've beaten the blasted bot to your page. This is a real person (i.e. me) congratulating you on the well-deserved promotion of the article to GA. I wish to say how much I enjoyed it: another feather in Wikipedia's cap. Tim riley talk 20:40, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Royal intermarriage
The article Royal intermarriage you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Royal intermarriage for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 20:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- I just got in before that blasted bot, but it means well and correctly reflects my congratulations. Tim riley talk 20:45, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:15, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Royal intermarriage
On 22 July 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Royal intermarriage, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Habsburgs' frequent practice of royal intermarriage led to severe inbreeding? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Royal intermarriage. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:42, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Princess Caroline Matilda of Great Britain, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Caroline Matilda of Great Britain. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:04, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:46, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
IPA at Guangxi
I removed your addition of IPA to this article. Guangxi isn't an English word, so doesn't really have an English pronunciation. Whenever I hear it it's said essentially in Chinese, but there's no need for Chinese IPA as pinyin serves the same purpose, precisely giving the pronunciation (with tones which English IPA doesn't have) and being much more widely understood. IPA is hardly ever used for Chinese in articles for this reason. It's not needed except in articles like pinyin.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 13:48, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 11 March
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Garter Principal King of Arms page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Princess Alice of the United Kingdom
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Princess Alice of the United Kingdom you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 15:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Princess Alice of the United Kingdom
The article Princess Alice of the United Kingdom you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Princess Alice of the United Kingdom for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 15:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Barnstar for You!
The Good Article Barnstar | ||
For your contributions to bring Princess Alice of the United Kingdom to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! — ₳aron 09:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Princess Alice of the United Kingdom
The article Princess Alice of the United Kingdom you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Princess Alice of the United Kingdom for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 09:21, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sotakeit. Any idea why there is no indication of its location on the map? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, Martinevans123! I'd missed a pesky "-" from the longitude. All fixed now. How's that? Sotakeit (talk) 10:34, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- That's much better, thanks! Although I sometimes wonder about the utility of these standard maps without any place names - is one meant to navigate by means of the shape of the county boundary? Useful in preparing for the University Challenge picture round, I guess! Martinevans123 (talk) 10:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- You've a point there, Martinevans123. I suppose if you don't already have some sort of familiarity with the region, they're not much help at all. What brought you to the article, if you don't mind me asking? I've had a go at expanding it from 'stub status' and listed it for peer review, however if you have the time and inclination, it would be great if you could give it a quick critique? Sotakeit (talk) 11:43, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- I generally arrive at articles at random, but I see that in this case it was CPRE. I can see you've dome a lot of good work there. I'll try and have a look. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- You've a point there, Martinevans123. I suppose if you don't already have some sort of familiarity with the region, they're not much help at all. What brought you to the article, if you don't mind me asking? I've had a go at expanding it from 'stub status' and listed it for peer review, however if you have the time and inclination, it would be great if you could give it a quick critique? Sotakeit (talk) 11:43, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- That's much better, thanks! Although I sometimes wonder about the utility of these standard maps without any place names - is one meant to navigate by means of the shape of the county boundary? Useful in preparing for the University Challenge picture round, I guess! Martinevans123 (talk) 10:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sotakeit. Thanks for reviewing the Manor House, Sleaford article I nominated, and for the barnster - it's nice to have one's work appreciated occasionally. As for Rode Hall, I don't mind taking a look over the next few days and making suggestions on the talk page. Although I would obviously be objective, I am not sure how I feel about reviewing it, as I worry that it might be seen as QPQ... Thank you very much for your review and kind words; happy editing, —Noswall59 (talk) 15:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC).
Bethesda Methodist Chapel, Stoke-on-Trent
This user helped promote Bethesda Methodist Chapel, Stoke-on-Trent to good article status. |
Good work. SilkTork ✔Tea time 17:01, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Congratulations on bringing this article up to GA level. Although I started it, I do know from my own experience how much harder it is to develop an article into a condition that satisfies a reviewer.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rode Hall you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Edwininlondon -- Edwininlondon (talk) 12:40, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Sotakeit, I have finished my review. I'm happy to help out a bit to get it to GA. Edwininlondon (talk) 17:29, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Edwininlondon. Sorry for the lack off response. I've been having some Wikipedia downtime. I'll have a look at your review tonight and try and get as much of your suggestions actioned as possible. Thanks! Sotakeit (talk) 18:07, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Sotakeit. I reckon you still have no time to act. What would you like me to do? I could make as many changes as possible myself. Although I don't know if that is going outside the realm of what a reviewer should do. Edwininlondon (talk) 11:37, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Edwininlondon, I came here after seeing that there had been no edits to the article by Sotakeit and no response there to your review after over a month. You've already made a number of edits to the article; unless you plan to do all the edits needed to address the many issues you raised in the review, it's probably time to close the nomination as unsuccessful, since it can't be listed without correcting each and every problem noted. Once Sotakeit has returned to active editing and has updated the article to fix the issues you noted, he can renominate it; you can always offer to review that nomination as well, if you wish, though it's certainly not a requirement for you to do so. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:33, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset, I will see how far I get with making the edits myself. I might learn a thing or two. Thanks for your guidance. Edwininlondon (talk) 19:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Edwininlondon, I came here after seeing that there had been no edits to the article by Sotakeit and no response there to your review after over a month. You've already made a number of edits to the article; unless you plan to do all the edits needed to address the many issues you raised in the review, it's probably time to close the nomination as unsuccessful, since it can't be listed without correcting each and every problem noted. Once Sotakeit has returned to active editing and has updated the article to fix the issues you noted, he can renominate it; you can always offer to review that nomination as well, if you wish, though it's certainly not a requirement for you to do so. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:33, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Sotakeit. I reckon you still have no time to act. What would you like me to do? I could make as many changes as possible myself. Although I don't know if that is going outside the realm of what a reviewer should do. Edwininlondon (talk) 11:37, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Edwininlondon. Sorry for the lack off response. I've been having some Wikipedia downtime. I'll have a look at your review tonight and try and get as much of your suggestions actioned as possible. Thanks! Sotakeit (talk) 18:07, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Rode Hall you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rode Hall for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Edwininlondon -- Edwininlondon (talk) 22:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi! You recently placed your GA review of my article Princess Charlotte of Prussia on hold. I thought I'd place a note here to let you know I resolved your concerns from the review. Was there anything else you think needs improvement, or is the article now passed? Please post on the review page. Thanks! Ruby 2010/2013 17:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Hi Sotakeit; hope you are well. It is understandable when RL takes over Wikipedia, and if that has happened; you have my understanding. However, if you have a moment, please pass this GA review if you believe the article now meets the criteria. All the best, Prhartcom (talk) 20:40, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
How is/was Odilo of Cluny outdated?
How is this outdated? tahc chat 16:32, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Contests
User:Dr. Blofeld has created Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Sotakeit. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:The Royal Collection Department
Template:The Royal Collection Department has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 12:17, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Sotakeit. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Cbox.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Cbox.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Dbmusic.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:55, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
File:Cleffs O.JPG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cleffs O.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:12, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!
Greetings!
You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.
This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.
Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!
If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:
- Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
- Country Winners
- Diversity winner
- High quality contributors
- Gender-gap fillers
- Page improvers
- Wikidata Translators
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)
The file File:JohnIVPortedit.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
The file File:AnneAusEdit.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
The file File:MariaSpainEdit.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!
Greetings!
After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:
- Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
- Diversity winner
- Gender-gap fillers
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)