User talk:Shudde/Archive 4

Re: Ray Gravell edit

I just wanted to thank you for adding a third point of view on the interview with Grav - I felt that the reversions made were a little abrupt, as all I was trying to do was make more information available to editors of the article, to cite as they see fit, although in light of the comments made I should point out that as you noted, it's not a Youtube ripoff - however, I am working on the behalf of the charity that owns that material. It is in the Deed of Trust of that charity to make the videos available to all interested parties, and I thought that Grav's Wikipedia page would be the perfect place to share it with pre-qualified interested parties who have already donated their time to accumulating and sharing information. However, I'm not familiar with Wikipedia's policies or procedures so I'd appreciate some clarification from an experienced editor as to whether I've made some sort of error by doing so in that manner.

Redshoesproductions (talk) 14:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review feedback

Hi, I noticed you have a request in at peer review which has not yet received any response besides the semi-automated script. Have you tried requesting a peer review from the volunteers list? Another idea is to review someone else's request (particularly one from the list of requests without responses), then ask that they look at your request. Hope these are helpful suggestions and help to get some feedback for your request soon, APR _t 20:54, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review idea

Hi, I have made a proposal that no peer review request be archived without some response. To aid in this, there is a new list of PR requests at least one week old that have had no repsonses beyond a semi-automated peer review. This list is at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog.

There are just over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, so I figure if each of these volunteers reviewed just one or two PR requests without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog (as there have been 2 or 3 such unanswered requests a day on average).

If you would be able to help out with a review or two a month from the "no responses" backlog list that would be great (and much appreciated). Please discuss questions, comments, or ideas at the PR talk page and thanks in advance for your help, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 00:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thanks

		Thanks for the support
		Thanks for your support on my request for adminship. It passed 92/2/2, and I hope to live up to the community's expectations. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:11, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RL & RU combo infox

Back in January you helped me by adding a Title change qualifier to the State Rep section of the Rugby League part of the combined RL/RU infobox. The solution you may recall was if I notate "yes" in the line "sooteam pre-1980=yes" then the title for that section would say "State Rep" and if I notate "no" , then title will be "State of Origin". This qualifier now seems to no longer be effective. See Kevin Ryan or Ken Kearney. Could you have a look ? Much obliged -Sticks66 13:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Shaw (Australia)

Hi. Please will you review this article - I considered the claim of having played for Victoria sufficient to turn down a speedy, but as it's unreferenced, I've no idea if it's a hoax or he played for the second XV or something. The Rugby Union WikiProject seems pretty moribund judging by their talk page, so I approached you directly. Also, you might be interested in my recent post at WP:Village Pump (technical) re Barnstars, as you seem to be suffering too. --Dweller (talk) 12:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC) Bold text[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Six Nations

Thanks for that. We also have a new box Template:Six nations new, which was made by User:Gareth_E_Kegg, so the old ones could probably be deleted now. I recently found that thw WRU have a really good archive on their site, with venues for all Welsh matches right back to 1883, so in time I am going to go back through and add all those too. Just need to find another union with good archives! I also need to add a summary line along the lines of X won the championship, with a grand slam or similar. I just hope the French wiki pages are correct, as I just took the scores etc from there! Nouse4aname (talk) 10:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April GA Newsletter

The April issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is now available. Dr. Cash (talk) 04:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sino-NZ relations

This is a serious question, are you blind!!! there was a notice on my user page that this article was under counstruction with explicit instructions not to be touched, so what gives you the right to come in and post it with out my consent?? This article was nowhere near ready and i am, well frankly, pissed off that you did this, and unless you can give me a good explaination of your actions i will be reporting this as vandalism. Taifar ious1 07:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, since you moved my WIP page to the mainspace I lost the entire page that the article was in so I was wondering if you could possible get it back to the way it was before you moved the article please? thanks, Taifar ious1 00:41, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 20 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Farah Palmer, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--DaughterofSun (talk) 04:36, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1995 Japanese Grand Prix

Hi Shudde. I notice you are down as a peer review volunteer under the everydaylife section, covering sports. I was wondering whether you could possibly peer review the 1995 Japanese Grand Prix article for me. The peer review is located here. Regards, D.M.N. (talk) 09:22, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nazionale di rugby XV della Nuova Zelanda

Hi. I think that All Blacks' page will go in "Vetrina", but now it.wiki section on rugby union is quite busy because there are two other voices (england and wales rugby union team) that are undergoing to "vaglio". Probably in few weeks also New Zealand team will be under "vaglio". Thank you for your message, bye --Tia solzago (talk) 16:01, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank spam

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 194 supporting, 9 opposing, and 4 neutral.

Your kindness and constructive criticism is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers, Anthony and Acalamari for their nominations.

Thank you again, VanTucky

Peer review request

Hello. I noticed that you have listed yourself as a peer review volunteer in the area of sports. I would like comments on an article I have recently put up for review, SummerSlam (1988). Any help is appreciated, so if you have some time, I'd appreciate your comments here. Thanks so much! If you are not interested in reviewing the article, please ignore this message. Nikki311 22:16, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All Blacks -v- France

Despite the looong wait (for which I apologise) this is pretty much done, I think. Perhaps you could give it a quick read through for accuracy and I'll give it another read for style. 11:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the thanks. I'm sorry, once again, it took so long. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 12:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I really wasn't expecting that :) --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 10:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles May Newsletter

The May Newsletter for WikiProject Good Articles has now been published. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:15, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Wellington Phoenix FC results

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Wellington Phoenix FC results, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Wellington Phoenix FC results. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? – Pee Jay 09:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Something for you (first half)

		The Running Man Barnstar
		For your massive and devoted contribution to the improvement of Wikipedia's coverage of rugby union football, please accept this Running Man Barnstar. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 08:04, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Something for you (second half)

		The Featured Article Medal
		For your fine achievement in bringing six articles – All Blacks, Crusaders, Waisale Serevi, France national rugby union team, England national rugby union team and Wales national rugby union team – to featured article status, I award you the Featured Article Medal, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 08:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Hi Shudde, I wanted to say thank you for supporting my request for adminship, which passed with 100 supports, 0 opposes and 1 neutral. I wanted to get round everybody individually, even though it's considered by some to be spam (which... I suppose it is! but anyway. :)). It means a lot to me that the community has placed its trust in my ability to use the extra buttons, and I only hope I can live up to its expectations. If you need anything, or notice something that bothers you, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks again, PeterSymonds | talk 23:01, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks Shudde

I just wanted to say "thank you" for the kind message you left me on my Talk Page.

It was interesting to see the old YouTube clip of the Barbarians Vs All Blacks game. I remember seeing that game live on TV at the time. It was that game that first got me interested in rugby. It was a great game at the time, how rugby has changed in the last 25 years...for the better, I think. I have to say that the haka in that match must have been the worst one I have ever seen...that wouldn't scare a flee!

Anyway, thanks again. I am very impressed by your list of Featured Articles.

Seth Whales (talk) 15:58, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Military history of New Zealand during World War II

yes, why? Taifar ious1 10:06, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re AB's

I detailed that it was a training squad, a much more accurate squad than the WC squad from 2007. I noted that the Crusaders players were left in, you are more than welcome to remove them and put a note in stating that they are not included at this moment in time.Londo 06 12:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose that region/province issue would see me wanting all the players with their franchises and you with all their local clubs. I can totally understand the call. It looks like the page has been updated since your message anyway.Londo 06 19:52, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Peer Review help

Thank you for you work as a peer review volunteer. Since March, there has been a concerted effort to make sure all peer review requests get some response. Requests that have gone three days or longer without a substantial response are listed at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog. I have three requests to help this continue.

1) If you are asked to do a peer review, please ask the person who made the request to also do a review, preferably of a request that has not yet had feedback. This is fairly simple, but helps. For example when I review requests on the backlog list, I close with Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, ...

2) While there are several people who help with the backlog, lately I have been doing up to 3 or 4 peer reviews a day and can not keep this up much longer. We need help. Since there are now well over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, if each volunteer reviewed just one PR request without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog. To help spread out the load, I suggest those willing pick a day of the month and do a review that day (for example, my first edit was on the 8th, so I could pick the 8th). Please pick a peer review request with no responses yet, if possible off the backlog list. If you want, leave a note on my talk page as to which day you picked and I will remind you each month.

3) I have made some proposals to add some limits to peer review requests at Wikipedia_talk:Peer_review#Proposed_limits. The idea is to prevent any one user from overly burdening the process. These seem fairly reasonable (one PR request per editor per day, only four total PR requests per editor at a time, PR requests with cleanup banners can be delisted (like GAN quick fail), and wait two weeks to relist a PR request after it is archived), but have gotten no feedback in one week. If you have any thoughts on these, please weigh in.

Thanks again for your help and in advance for any assistance with the backlog. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 21:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:OtagoHighlandersLogo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:OtagoHighlandersLogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:03, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Review

Hi, I have been working on an article titled Iowa High School Athletic Association. If you can find the time, would you please give it a look over?Bradenkeith (talk) 19:18, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good articles newsletter

Delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 02:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Coffee

Yup -- that's my photo. -Quasipalm (talk) 13:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About a template that I created

Hello, i created {{Argentina's IRB world ranking}}(and in Spanish Wikipedia). I do not know if is well, if so I would like to do with the other teams, that you think? Shooke (talk) 00:31, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks, in a few days I will start doing others starting from the first in the ranking, greetings Shooke (talk) 03:03, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

My RfA

I hope the other kids at school play with me...

Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which closed successfully. I felt the process was a thorough review of my contributions and my demeanor, and I was very gratified to see how many editors took the time to really see what I'm about and how I can be of help to the project. As a result, some editors changed their views during the discussion, and most expressed specific, detailed points to indicate their opinion (whether it was , , or ).

A number of editors were concerned about my level of experience. I was purposeful in not waiting until a particular benchmark occurred before requesting adminship, because I feel - as many do - that adminship is not a reward and that each case is individual. It is true that I am not the most experienced editor around here, but I appreciate that people dug into my contributions enough to reach the conclusion that I seem to have a clue. Also, the best thing about this particular concern is that experience is something an editor - or administrator - can always get more of, and I'll continue doing that, just as I've been doing. (If I seem a little slow at it, feel free to slap me.)

I am a strong believer in the concept that this project is all about the content, and I'm looking forward to contributing wherever I can. Please let me know if I can be of any help. In the meantime, I'm off to school...

Thanks again!

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The traditional rfa thank you message

		Thank you for the support!
		Shudde, it is my honor to report that thanks in part to your support my third request for adminship passed (80/18/2). I appreciate the trust you and the WP community have in me, and I will endeovour to put my newly acquired mop and bucket to work for the community as a whole. Yours sincerly and respectfuly, TomStar81 (Talk) 03:10, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy Morgan

Thanks for your words of support Shudde. Sometimes it's hard to know if anyone is reading or even thinks pages are worthy, so it's great to get a thumbs up. I'm presently building pages for all 15 Welsh players who faced the original All Blacks and I'm suprised at all their back stories. I've seen a template for a full rugby squad team with positions and was thinking of using it somehow once I've completed the squad. Any views? CheersFruitMonkey (talk) 05:59, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Teddy Morgan

On 12 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Teddy Morgan, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 22:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How cool is it when this happens!! I like you Shudde, you rock (in a post-ironic way rather than a 90s AOR way). FruitMonkey (talk) 22:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

England Tours

Don't you want the England Tours of '06, '07 and '08 to be like the others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.76.33.246 (talk) 13:04, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of All Black Tests at Carisbrook DYK

On 23 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of All Black Tests at Carisbrook, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 15:13, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for standard infobox for History of [country] templates

Hi there! You're a member of WikiProject History, so I'm just informing you about a proposal I've made about standardizing History of [country] templates (like Template:History of France). The discussion is located at the talk page for WikiProject History—your comments and criticism are welcome. Thank you. Mr. Absurd (talk) 05:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a million.

Thanks Shudde, it's great to be appreciated. Hope you noticed I finally nailed all 15 of the Welsh XV against The Original All Blacks, and got another one of them on DYK.FruitMonkey (talk) 13:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NZ Dual-code internationals

Hey Shudde, my bag you may recall, is dual-code rugby internationals. Having started articles on all Australians in the category I'm now moving onto an article on the topic itself (see sandbox, if you care). Two questions for you 1) Do you know of any online lists of all the Kiwi/All Black DCIs and 2) Presumably all or most of the original "All Golds" had been All Blacks, do you know if that's true and can you point me somewhere ? -Sticks66 14:18, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA, wich was successful with 73 support, 6 oppose, and 5 neutral.

I'll try to be as clear as I can in my communication and to clear some of the admin backlog on images.

If there is anything I can help you with, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page!

Cheers, --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 15:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:53, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page move advice needed.

A put together a page called 1906 South Africa rugby union tour and it's been moved to page 1906 South Africa Grand Slam tour. Now I have no problem with the page being moved (apart for the fact that the person didn't clean up the links too) as there is no real correct name for the tour, but I just feel the new name seems pretty inaccessable, as I've never heard tours being called that before and that wouldn't be my first port of call if I was looking for the page. Do you agree with the new naming convention, as there was no discussion before the move? Thanks, FruitMonkey (talk) 14:26, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've noted this on your talk page too FruitMonkey - I think the name is wrong and should be changed back to what it was. I have also put my thoughts on the article's talk page. We ought to have a consistent style which really ought to include "rugby union tour" in the title (and fair enough I haven't used that on any British Lions tour I have started!), but not Grand Slam tour.--Bcp67 (talk) 15:53, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CHICAGO

According to my records, you have nominated at least one article (Dwayne Wade) that includes a category at WP:CHIBOTCATS and that has been promoted to WP:FA, WP:FL or WP:GA. You are not signed up as an active member of WP:CHICAGO. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as such at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. Also, if you are a member, be aware of Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3 and be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of All Black Tests at Carisbrook

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of All Black Tests at Carisbrook, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Paulbrock (talk) 09:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter

Sorry about the delay. AWB has been having a few issues lately. Here is the august issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 20:50, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion on RU infobox.

As a member of the Rugby league infobox, we have modified our infobox {{Infobox rugby league biography}} dramatically and now takes the form (such as Brett Kimmorley).

However, I have also created a dual code infobox on my sandbox. With an example being Wendell Sailor and Sonny Bill Williams.

It dosen't really concern me what you believe is the better infobox. But for the sake of my infobox, and my lack of real understanding for rugby union, I ask for help in the rugby union section of the infobox.

I only have two headers (Club and Representative) for RU. But it was brought to my attention that there may be differing from Rugby league (which for notability in the infobox is just Club and Reps.) and RU, that it may not have the same levels.

But your infobox suggests "Super Rugby", "Provincial/State sides", "National", "National 7s" and "Clubs". Now, the policy of the new infobox was that youth clubs would be removed, so I'm not worried about ametuer clubs".

Would you please recconmend any suggestions for the RU section of the sandbox infobox. Perhaps distinguishing between the various levels and which could possibly be merged (for instance on your Rugby infobox, "State of Origin" and "National teams" are simply merged into "Representative" on the R infobox.)

Your help would be greatly appreciated, and I will watch this page, so you can reply here. Thankyou. The Windler talk 13:36, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:WaisaleSerevi.jpg

Image:WaisaleSerevi.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Waisale Serevi.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Waisale Serevi.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 11:25, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:22, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rudolf Wanderone peer review

A second peer review has been opened on Rudolf Wanderone; I hoped you might like to have a look at it, as one of the "daily life" peer reviewers. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 23:39, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Hello, I am wondering if you could peer reviewed the following sport article Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy at Wikipedia:Peer review/Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy/archive1. Thanks—Chris! _ct 20:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:59, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Any help would be appreciated here. Libro0 (talk) 20:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:55, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfC news

Dear AfC participant,

Msgj and Tnxman307 are organising the AfC challenge! It's a little competition to help improve some of the articles created through AfC and we are hoping that everyone will get involved. For level 1, you just need to bring a stub up to Start-class. Level 2 is improving a Start-class article to C-class. And so on. To get involved or for more information please see the competition page.
Those of you who haven't reviewed an article recently might not have noticed the new process that was implemented this year. Reviewing articles is now more enjoyable than ever :) You might like to give it a try. All articles waiting for review are in Category:Pending Afc requests. (Please read the updated instructions.)
Please consider adding {{AFC status}} to your userpage to keep track of the number of articles waiting for review. At the time of writing we are officially backlogged, so help is needed!
There is currently a proposal to bring the Images for upload process under the umbrella of WikiProject Articles for creation. The rationale is that both processes are designed to allow unregistered users to take part more fully in Wikipedia, and partipants in each process can probably help each other.

If you no longer wish to receive messages from WikiProject Articles for creation, please remove your name from this list. Thank you.

Image copyright problem with File:AB196TestProgramme.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AB196TestProgramme.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Ofw.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Ofw.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 03:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:48, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal from PR Volunteer List

Due to inactivity in the project within the last six months, you have been removed from the list of available editors at Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers. If you decide to return to editing Wikipedia, feel free to readd your name to this list. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:37, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clapham Rovers F.C. and Rugby

Hello, having added some information on Clapham Rovers F.C. and their rugby heritage I noticed your comment from May last year and thought I would let you know that I think I have addressed your concerns should you wish to peruse the article.Kwib (talk) 11:14, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:14, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps invitation

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:43, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:56, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2006 England rugby union tour of Australia

Shudde, I noticed (after I had made my edit) when other members tried to compile a report of this tour you reverted back to the redirect (about a year ago)

Do you not feel this tour is worthy of its own page? I note previous England tours (up till 2004) have their own reports, as does the 2006 tour of New Zealand and Australia by Ireland.

Slater582 (talk) 22:16, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Hi I'm relatively new as an editor here, but contributed somewhat to the 2009 British and Irish Lions tour to South Africa page. It would be great if you could have a look and make some suggestions?

Hope you find the time.

Thanks

Sahmejil (talk) 09:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Castillo (baseball) reassessment

I have put this through the WP:GAR process, sorry. If you want to comment please do so here. Spiderone (talk) 16:39, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:03, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of 1888–1889 New Zealand Native football team matches

I have nominated List of 1888–1889 New Zealand Native football team matches for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:09, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Smit record at captain

Could you help me with this article please. Mr Hall of England (talk) 14:01, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hammett03Final.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hammett03Final.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. 67.85.125.17 (talk) 01:29, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:81TourProtester.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:81TourProtester.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 19:16, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:47, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:21, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:31, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April.

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:14, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:55, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010)

Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial

Project news

Catch up with our project's activities over the last month, including the new Recruitment working group and Strategy think tank

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members

Editorial

LeonidasSpartan shares his thoughts on how, as individual editors, we can deal with frustration and disappointment in our group endeavour

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010)

Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial

Project news

New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced;
Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy

Editorial

Opportunities for new military history articles

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:58, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010)

Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial

Project news

The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants

Editorial

In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations

To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:47, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

super rugby

Hello, i would like to inform of a discussion on in the WikiProject Rugby Union discussion page about the format to be used through the season articles of the super 12, super 14 and super rugby seasons. Please click the link below and have your opinion, thank you. JaFa 01 (talk) 05:27, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Link: Discussion

Nomination of Adam Thompson for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Adam Thompson, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Thompson until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --W F C-- 16:50, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adam Thompson for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Adam Thompson, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Thompson until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —W F C— 06:30, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010)

Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial

Project news

The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)

Editorial

In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 20:29, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Main page apperance

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on November 26, 2010. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 26, 2010. If you think that it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director, Raul654 (talk · contribs). If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 07:13, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Waisale Serevi (born 1968) is a Fijian rugby union footballer. Although he has played fifteen-a-side rugby all his career, Serevi is most notable for his rugby sevens achievements. He is widely considered the greatest rugby sevens player of all time. In the 15-man game, he played for Fiji 39 times between 1989 and 2003, and scored 376 points. This included representing Fiji in the 1991, 1999, and 2003 Rugby World Cups. He also played professionally for Mitsubishi, Leicester, Stade Montois, Stade Bordelais and Staines. His representative sevens career started in 1989 when he played for Fiji at the Hong Kong tournament. With the exception of 2001, 2003 and 2004 he has played at Hong Kong every year since. Serevi has also played in the 1993, 1997, 2001, and 2005 Rugby World Cup Sevens, winning the World Cup with Fiji in 1997 and 2005. He won silver at the Commonwealth Games in 1998 and 2002, and captured bronze in 2006. Serevi has played in the International Rugby Board Sevens Series since its creation in 1999. In 2005 after winning the 2005 Rugby World Cup Sevens Serevi was appointed the Fiji Sevens team's coach. He coached Fiji to the 2005/2006 IRB Sevens Series victory — the first time the series was not won by New Zealand. (more...)

The mainpage date was postponed, if it is re-scheduled again, I'll notifie you. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 07:41, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

Your Military history Newsletter

Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:58, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Richie McCaw

I see you haven't been active for a while, but thought I would take a chance you check in occasionally. I have been developing the Richie McCaw article and I think it is a FA possibility. I have at least two more sections to write (personal life) and (reputation? - I haven't thought of a good heading yet, but it will be about his playing style, ability, targeting by opposition, cheating accusations etc). I will put a notice on WP:NZ and WP:RU when they are done seeking further help, but seeing your good work on All Blacks, Crusaders (rugby) and other rugby articles I wanted to give you an early look. Cheers AIRcorn (talk) 02:31, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms"
To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

Your Military history Newsletter

Project News: From the editors
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:43, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good article review help: Netball in the Cook Islands

Hi. I nominated Netball in the Cook Islands for a good article. As you're part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Polynesia, I was wondering if you could help review the article. If not, could you do the assessment for article as part of the project, level of importance and if it is at least worth a B? Thanks! --LauraHale (talk) 08:54, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]