Jump to content

Origin of SARS-CoV-2: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
U.S. government investigations: this is called an improvement, not the removal of the entire sentence
U.S. government investigations: this is called an improvement, not the removal of the entire sentence
Line 31: Line 31:
On 6 February 2020, the director of the White House's [[Office of Science and Technology Policy]] requested the [[National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine]] to convene a meeting of "experts, world class geneticists, coronavirus experts, and evolutionary biologists", to "assess what data, information and samples are needed to address the unknowns, in order to understand the evolutionary origins of COVID-19 and more effectively respond to both the outbreak and any resulting information".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nationalacademies.org/documents/link/LD006CF17B5004C7B41F63CD7E0A0F4EDF738C451F32/fileview/D20D1390AB906330493E8A40B27E965A6761F4117EA2/OSTP+Coronavirus+Request+to+NASEM_02.06.2020.pdf|title=OSTP Coronavirus Request to NASEM|website=www.nationalacademies.org|access-date=2021-01-15|archive-date=2021-01-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210121090506/https://www.nationalacademies.org/documents/link/LD006CF17B5004C7B41F63CD7E0A0F4EDF738C451F32/fileview/D20D1390AB906330493E8A40B27E965A6761F4117EA2/OSTP+Coronavirus+Request+to+NASEM_02.06.2020.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>
On 6 February 2020, the director of the White House's [[Office of Science and Technology Policy]] requested the [[National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine]] to convene a meeting of "experts, world class geneticists, coronavirus experts, and evolutionary biologists", to "assess what data, information and samples are needed to address the unknowns, in order to understand the evolutionary origins of COVID-19 and more effectively respond to both the outbreak and any resulting information".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nationalacademies.org/documents/link/LD006CF17B5004C7B41F63CD7E0A0F4EDF738C451F32/fileview/D20D1390AB906330493E8A40B27E965A6761F4117EA2/OSTP+Coronavirus+Request+to+NASEM_02.06.2020.pdf|title=OSTP Coronavirus Request to NASEM|website=www.nationalacademies.org|access-date=2021-01-15|archive-date=2021-01-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210121090506/https://www.nationalacademies.org/documents/link/LD006CF17B5004C7B41F63CD7E0A0F4EDF738C451F32/fileview/D20D1390AB906330493E8A40B27E965A6761F4117EA2/OSTP+Coronavirus+Request+to+NASEM_02.06.2020.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>


In April 2020, it was reported that the [[United States Intelligence Community|U.S. intelligence community]] was investigating whether the virus came from an accidental leak from a Chinese lab. The hypothesis was one of several possibilities being pursued by the investigators. A U.S. official said while it is a known fact that scientists at a lab in Wuhan have conducted ongoing research on coronaviruses, the results of the investigation were "inconclusive".<ref name="cnn._US_explores">{{Cite web |title=US explores possibility that coronavirus spread started in Chinese lab, not a market |last1=Campbell |first1=Josh |last2=Atwood |first2=Kylie |last3=Perez |first3=Evan |publisher=[[CNN]] |date=16 April 2020 |access-date=18 January 2021 |url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/15/politics/us-intelligence-virus-started-chinese-lab/index.html |archive-date=16 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210116103307/https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/15/politics/us-intelligence-virus-started-chinese-lab/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="nbcn_U.S._spies">{{Cite web |title=U.S. intel community examining whether coronavirus emerged accidentally from a Chinese lab |last1=Dilanian |first1=Ken |last2=Kube |first2=Courtney |publisher=[[NBC News]] |date=16 April 2020 |access-date=18 January 2021 |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/china/u-s-intel-community-examining-whether-coronavirus-emerged-accidentally-chinese-n1185371 |archive-date=16 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200416173210/https://www.nbcnews.com/news/china/u-s-intel-community-examining-whether-coronavirus-emerged-accidentally-chinese-n1185371 |url-status=live }}</ref> By the end of April 2020, the [[Director of National Intelligence#Office of the Director of National Intelligence|Office of the Director of National Intelligence]] said the U.S. intelligence community believed the coronavirus was not man-made or genetically modified, adding "The intelligence community will continue to rigorously examine emerging information and intelligence to determine whether the outbreak began through contact with infected animals or if it was the result of an accident at a laboratory in Wuhan."<ref name="reut_Coronavirus_was">{{Cite web |title=Coronavirus was 'not manmade or genetically modified': U.S. spy agency |last=Hosenball |first=Mark |work=[[Reuters]] |date=April 30, 2020 |access-date=January 20, 2021 |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-intelligence-idUSKBN22C2PN |archive-date=January 5, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210105005015/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-intelligence-idUSKBN22C2PN |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="theg_Trump_claims">{{Cite web |title=Trump claims to have evidence coronavirus started in Chinese lab but offers no details |last1=Singh |first1=Maanvi |last2=Davidson |first2=Helen |last3=Borger |first3=Julian |newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |date=April 30, 2020 |access-date=January 20, 2021 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/30/donald-trump-coronavirus-chinese-lab-claim |archive-date=May 7, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200507045320/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/30/donald-trump-coronavirus-chinese-lab-claim |url-status=live }}</ref> According to a foreign official in regular contact with the Trump administration, the intelligence shared by the U.S. with the [[Five Eyes]] did not rule one hypothesis in or out. The official highlighted the lack of an independent team inside China.<ref name="edit_Trum">{{Cite web |title=Trump contradicts US intel community by claiming he's seen evidence coronavirus originated in Chinese lab |last1=Cohen |first1=Zachary |last2=Marquardt |first2=Alex |last3=Atwood |first3=Kylie |last4=Acosta |first4=Jim |publisher=[[CNN]] |date=April 30, 2020 |access-date=January 20, 2021 |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/30/politics/trump-intelligence-community-china-coronavirus-origins/index.html |archive-date=May 7, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200507155040/https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/30/politics/trump-intelligence-community-china-coronavirus-origins/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="bbc._Coronavirus_Is">{{Cite web |title=Coronavirus: Is there any evidence for lab release theory? |last=Rincon |first=Paul |publisher=[[BBC News]] |date=1 May 2020 |access-date=20 January 2021 |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-52318539 |archive-date=16 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200416234322/https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-52318539 |url-status=live }}</ref>
In April 2020, it was reported that the [[United States Intelligence Community|U.S. intelligence community]] was investigating whether the virus came from an accidental leak from a Chinese lab. The hypothesis was one of several possibilities being pursued by the investigators. While U.S. officials said it is a known fact that scientists at a lab in Wuhan have conducted ongoing research on coronaviruses, then U.S. secretary of defense [[Mark Esper]] said the results of the investigation were "inconclusive".<ref name="cnn._US_explores">{{Cite web |title=US explores possibility that coronavirus spread started in Chinese lab, not a market |last1=Campbell |first1=Josh |last2=Atwood |first2=Kylie |last3=Perez |first3=Evan |publisher=[[CNN]] |date=16 April 2020 |access-date=18 January 2021 |url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/15/politics/us-intelligence-virus-started-chinese-lab/index.html |archive-date=16 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210116103307/https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/15/politics/us-intelligence-virus-started-chinese-lab/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="nbcn_U.S._spies">{{Cite web |title=U.S. intel community examining whether coronavirus emerged accidentally from a Chinese lab |last1=Dilanian |first1=Ken |last2=Kube |first2=Courtney |publisher=[[NBC News]] |date=16 April 2020 |access-date=18 January 2021 |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/china/u-s-intel-community-examining-whether-coronavirus-emerged-accidentally-chinese-n1185371 |archive-date=16 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200416173210/https://www.nbcnews.com/news/china/u-s-intel-community-examining-whether-coronavirus-emerged-accidentally-chinese-n1185371 |url-status=live }}</ref> By the end of April 2020, the [[Director of National Intelligence#Office of the Director of National Intelligence|Office of the Director of National Intelligence]] said the U.S. intelligence community believed the coronavirus was not man-made or genetically modified, adding "The intelligence community will continue to rigorously examine emerging information and intelligence to determine whether the outbreak began through contact with infected animals or if it was the result of an accident at a laboratory in Wuhan."<ref name="reut_Coronavirus_was">{{Cite web |title=Coronavirus was 'not manmade or genetically modified': U.S. spy agency |last=Hosenball |first=Mark |work=[[Reuters]] |date=April 30, 2020 |access-date=January 20, 2021 |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-intelligence-idUSKBN22C2PN |archive-date=January 5, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210105005015/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-intelligence-idUSKBN22C2PN |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="theg_Trump_claims">{{Cite web |title=Trump claims to have evidence coronavirus started in Chinese lab but offers no details |last1=Singh |first1=Maanvi |last2=Davidson |first2=Helen |last3=Borger |first3=Julian |newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |date=April 30, 2020 |access-date=January 20, 2021 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/30/donald-trump-coronavirus-chinese-lab-claim |archive-date=May 7, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200507045320/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/30/donald-trump-coronavirus-chinese-lab-claim |url-status=live }}</ref> According to a foreign official in regular contact with the Trump administration, the intelligence shared by the U.S. with the [[Five Eyes]] did not rule one hypothesis in or out. The official highlighted the lack of an independent team inside China.<ref name="edit_Trum">{{Cite web |title=Trump contradicts US intel community by claiming he's seen evidence coronavirus originated in Chinese lab |last1=Cohen |first1=Zachary |last2=Marquardt |first2=Alex |last3=Atwood |first3=Kylie |last4=Acosta |first4=Jim |publisher=[[CNN]] |date=April 30, 2020 |access-date=January 20, 2021 |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/30/politics/trump-intelligence-community-china-coronavirus-origins/index.html |archive-date=May 7, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200507155040/https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/30/politics/trump-intelligence-community-china-coronavirus-origins/index.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="bbc._Coronavirus_Is">{{Cite web |title=Coronavirus: Is there any evidence for lab release theory? |last=Rincon |first=Paul |publisher=[[BBC News]] |date=1 May 2020 |access-date=20 January 2021 |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-52318539 |archive-date=16 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200416234322/https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-52318539 |url-status=live }}</ref>


On 3 May 2020, US secretary of state, Mike Pompeo said in a TV interview that there is "enormous evidence" the coronavirus originated in a lab in Wuhan without providing any of the alleged evidence. However, on the same day, Pompeo told a radio interviewer, "We don't know if it came from the [[Wuhan Institute of Virology]]. We don't know if it emanated from the wet market or yet some other place. We don't know those answers."<ref name="theg_Mike_Pompeo">{{Cite web |title=Mike Pompeo: 'enormous evidence' coronavirus came from Chinese lab |last=Borger |first=Julian |newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |date=May 3, 2020 |access-date=January 21, 2021 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/03/mike-pompeo-donald-trump-coronavirus-chinese-laboratory |archive-date=May 4, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200504220049/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/03/mike-pompeo-donald-trump-coronavirus-chinese-laboratory |url-status=live }}</ref> On 5 May 2020, [[chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff|Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman]] [[Mark Milley]] said the [[weight of evidence]] at the time suggested that the coronavirus was neither man-made nor released from a lab, although "nothing's conclusive".<ref name="theh_Joint_Chiefs">{{Cite web |title=Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman says evidence suggests coronavirus was not man-made or released from lab |last=MITCHELL |first=ELLEN |publisher=The Hill |date=May 5, 2020 |access-date=January 19, 2021 |url=https://thehill.com/policy/defense/496241-joint-chiefs-of-staff-chairman-says-evidence-suggests-coronavirus-was-not |archive-date=December 12, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201212200112/https://thehill.com/policy/defense/496241-joint-chiefs-of-staff-chairman-says-evidence-suggests-coronavirus-was-not |url-status=live }}</ref> The same month, [[Bundesnachrichtendienst|German foreign intelligence]] briefed the German government that the Trump administration's claims about a lab leak were possibly deliberate misinformation, and were meant to distract from the administration's handling of the pandemic in the U.S.<ref name="CNBC-German-report">{{cite news |publisher=CNBC |title=German spy agency doubts US 'China lab' coronavirus accusations, report says |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/08/german-spy-agency-doubts-us-china-lab-coronavirus-accusations-report-says.html |access-date=20 January 2020 |date=8 May 2020}}</ref> German intelligence found that none of the [[Five Eyes]] intelligence agencies were willing to support Pompeo's claims of a lab leak.<ref name="CNBC-German-report"/>
On 3 May 2020, US secretary of state, Mike Pompeo said in a TV interview that there is "enormous evidence" the coronavirus originated in a lab in Wuhan without providing any of the alleged evidence. However, on the same day, Pompeo told a radio interviewer, "We don't know if it came from the [[Wuhan Institute of Virology]]. We don't know if it emanated from the wet market or yet some other place. We don't know those answers."<ref name="theg_Mike_Pompeo">{{Cite web |title=Mike Pompeo: 'enormous evidence' coronavirus came from Chinese lab |last=Borger |first=Julian |newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |date=May 3, 2020 |access-date=January 21, 2021 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/03/mike-pompeo-donald-trump-coronavirus-chinese-laboratory |archive-date=May 4, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200504220049/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/03/mike-pompeo-donald-trump-coronavirus-chinese-laboratory |url-status=live }}</ref> On 5 May 2020, [[chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff|Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman]] [[Mark Milley]] said the [[weight of evidence]] at the time suggested that the coronavirus was neither man-made nor released from a lab, although "nothing's conclusive".<ref name="theh_Joint_Chiefs">{{Cite web |title=Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman says evidence suggests coronavirus was not man-made or released from lab |last=MITCHELL |first=ELLEN |publisher=The Hill |date=May 5, 2020 |access-date=January 19, 2021 |url=https://thehill.com/policy/defense/496241-joint-chiefs-of-staff-chairman-says-evidence-suggests-coronavirus-was-not |archive-date=December 12, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201212200112/https://thehill.com/policy/defense/496241-joint-chiefs-of-staff-chairman-says-evidence-suggests-coronavirus-was-not |url-status=live }}</ref> The same month, [[Bundesnachrichtendienst|German foreign intelligence]] briefed the German government that the Trump administration's claims about a lab leak were possibly deliberate misinformation, and were meant to distract from the administration's handling of the pandemic in the U.S.<ref name="CNBC-German-report">{{cite news |publisher=CNBC |title=German spy agency doubts US 'China lab' coronavirus accusations, report says |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/08/german-spy-agency-doubts-us-china-lab-coronavirus-accusations-report-says.html |access-date=20 January 2020 |date=8 May 2020}}</ref> German intelligence found that none of the [[Five Eyes]] intelligence agencies were willing to support Pompeo's claims of a lab leak.<ref name="CNBC-German-report"/>

Revision as of 15:30, 22 January 2021

Investigations into the origin of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include several ongoing missions and efforts by governments, international organisations, and others.

Origins

COVID-19 is caused by infection with a virus called severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). SARS-CoV-2 appears to have originated in bats or pangolins and was spread to humans by zoonotic transfer,[1] although the likelihood that pangolins facilitated viral adaptation to human is low.[2] Its exact evolutionary history, the identity and provenance of its most recent ancestors, and the place, time, and mechanism of transmission of the first human infection, remain unknown.[3][4]

Health authorities in China and abroad have cautioned that origin tracing efforts could take years and the results could be inconclusive.[5]

International calls for investigations

In April 2020, Australian foreign minister Marise Payne called for an independent international inquiry into the origins of the coronavirus pandemic.[6] A few days later, Australian prime minister Scott Morrison insisted that Australia should remain committed to an independent investigation into the origin of COVID-19 in spite of China's dismissal of the prospect.[7] German chancellor Angela Merkel also pressed China for transparency about the origin of the coronavirus, following similar concerns raised by the French president Emmanuel Macron.[8] Britain also expressed support for an investigation, although both France and Britain said the priority at the time was to first fight the virus.[9][10]

In May 2020, the World Health Assembly, which governs the World Health Organization (WHO), passed a motion calling for a "comprehensive, independent and impartial" investigation into the COVID-19 pandemic. A record 137 countries, including Australia and China, co-sponsored the motion, giving overwhelming international endorsement to the investigation.[11]

In November 2020, WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said "We need to know the origin of this virus because it can help us to prevent future outbreaks," adding, "There is nothing to hide. We want to know the origin, and that's it." He also urged countries not to politicize the origin tracing process, saying that would only create barriers to learning the truth.[12]

Chinese government investigations

The first investigation conducted in China was by the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission, responding to hospitals reporting cases of pneumonia of unknown etiology, resulting in the closure of the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market on 1 January 2020 for environmental sanitation and disinfection. Chinese national authorities informed the WHO China Country Office of these cases on 31 December 2019.[13]

In April 2020, China imposed restrictions on publishing academic research on the novel coronavirus. Investigations into the origin of the virus would receive extra scrutiny and must be approved by Central Government officials.[14][15] Despite the restrictions, Ian Lipkin, a U.S. scientist, said that he was working with a team of Chinese researchers under the auspices of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, a Chinese government agency, to investigate the origin of the virus. Lipkin has developed long-standing relationships with Chinese officials, including premier Li Keqiang, because of his contributions to rapid testing for SARS in 2003.[16]

In December 2020, it was reported that the Chinese Communist Party's flagship newspaper featured a study by scientists associated with the state-backed Chinese Academy of Sciences positing that the earliest human-to-human transmission occurred on the Indian subcontinent three to four months before the Wuhan outbreak. The study, which was not peer-reviewed, was posted on the preprint platform SSRN. It was later withdrawn from the platform at the authors' request.[17]

U.S. government investigations

According to The New York Times, in mid-January 2020, U.S. intelligence agencies had not detected any alarm within the Chinese government that analysts presumed would be associated with an accidental virus leak from a government lab.[18] The New York Times later reported that in January, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) could not support any hypothesis of the outbreak's origin, with CIA analysts saying there was no evidence at the time to get behind any with high confidence.[19] In April 2020, the New York Times reported that senior officials in the Trump administration were pressuring intelligence agencies to find evidence for the unsubstantiated theory that the virus leaked from the laboratory, leading to concern among some intelligence analysts that intelligence assessments would be distorted to serve a political campaign to lay blame on China for the outbreak.[20]

On 6 February 2020, the director of the White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy requested the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to convene a meeting of "experts, world class geneticists, coronavirus experts, and evolutionary biologists", to "assess what data, information and samples are needed to address the unknowns, in order to understand the evolutionary origins of COVID-19 and more effectively respond to both the outbreak and any resulting information".[21]

In April 2020, it was reported that the U.S. intelligence community was investigating whether the virus came from an accidental leak from a Chinese lab. The hypothesis was one of several possibilities being pursued by the investigators. While U.S. officials said it is a known fact that scientists at a lab in Wuhan have conducted ongoing research on coronaviruses, then U.S. secretary of defense Mark Esper said the results of the investigation were "inconclusive".[22][23] By the end of April 2020, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence said the U.S. intelligence community believed the coronavirus was not man-made or genetically modified, adding "The intelligence community will continue to rigorously examine emerging information and intelligence to determine whether the outbreak began through contact with infected animals or if it was the result of an accident at a laboratory in Wuhan."[24][25] According to a foreign official in regular contact with the Trump administration, the intelligence shared by the U.S. with the Five Eyes did not rule one hypothesis in or out. The official highlighted the lack of an independent team inside China.[26][27]

On 3 May 2020, US secretary of state, Mike Pompeo said in a TV interview that there is "enormous evidence" the coronavirus originated in a lab in Wuhan without providing any of the alleged evidence. However, on the same day, Pompeo told a radio interviewer, "We don't know if it came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. We don't know if it emanated from the wet market or yet some other place. We don't know those answers."[28] On 5 May 2020, Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Mark Milley said the weight of evidence at the time suggested that the coronavirus was neither man-made nor released from a lab, although "nothing's conclusive".[29] The same month, German foreign intelligence briefed the German government that the Trump administration's claims about a lab leak were possibly deliberate misinformation, and were meant to distract from the administration's handling of the pandemic in the U.S.[30] German intelligence found that none of the Five Eyes intelligence agencies were willing to support Pompeo's claims of a lab leak.[30]

On 4 January 2021, The Times reported that Matthew Pottinger, then Deputy National Security Advisor, said that a whistleblower former scientist from the Wuhan Institute of Virology has been working with U.S. intelligence services, revealing that the laboratory was linked to the Chinese military, which may have been using its research for dual use.[31] Since the beginning of the pandemic, Pottinger had believed that Chinese leaders were engaging in a massive coverup and "psychological warfare" to obscure the origin of the virus and deflect blame. He pushed intelligence agencies to explore the hypothesis that the virus was accidentally leaked from a virology lab in Wuhan.[32][18]

On 15 January 2021, the U.S. State Department published a "fact sheet", stating that the U.S. government was not sure if the outbreak of the virus began "through contact with infected animals", or as a result of "an accident at a laboratory" in Wuhan. The document stated "The U.S. government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses." It further stated that the institute has "engaged in classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017".[33][34] Chinese government spokesperson Hua Chunying countered the claims.[35]

World Health Organization investigations

In mid 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) began negotiations with the government of China on conducting an investigation into the origins of COVID-19. On 5 November 2020, the WHO published a "terms of reference" document for a "WHO-convened Global Study of the Origins of SARS-CoV-2" based on terms agreed in their negotiations with the government of China. The terms of reference outline a first phase of study to better understand how the virus "might have started circulating in Wuhan", and a second phase of longer-term studies based on its findings. [36]

The WHO formed a team of ten researchers with expertise in virology, public health and animals to conduct investigations.[37] The mission was expected to travel to China in the first week of January 2021 to investigate the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.[38] However, the Chinese government blocked the entry of the WHO team after their visas were not approved, despite the fact that China had previously agreed to allow the team's entry.[39][40][41][42] A few days later, permission was granted for the team to arrive.[43][44][45] On 14 January 2021, the WHO's investigation team arrived in Wuhan, China.[46]

Members of the investigative team include Thea Fisher, John Watson, Marion Koopmans, Dominic Dwyer, Vladimir Dedkov, Hung Nguyen-Viet, Fabian Leendertz, Peter Daszak, Farag El Moubasher, and Ken Maeda. The team also includes five WHO experts led by Peter Ben Embarek, two Food and Agriculture Organization representatives, and two representatives from the World Organisation for Animal Health.[47] The inclusion of Peter Daszak in the team has stirred controversy. Daszak is the head of EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit that studies spillover events, and has been a longtime collaborator of over 15 years with the Wuhan Institute of Virology's Shi Zhengli.[48][49] While Daszak is highly knowledgeable about Chinese laboratories and the emergence of diseases in the area, his close connection with the WIV is seen as a conflict of interest in the WHO's investigation. When a BBC News journalist asked about his relationship with the WIV, Daszak said, "We file our papers, it's all there for everyone to see."[48][50]

U.S. officials previously denounced the investigation as a "Potemkin exercise" and criticised the "terms of reference" allowing Chinese scientists to do the first phase of preliminary research.[31][51] On 15 January, U.S. secretary of state Mike Pompeo said that to assist the WHO investigative team's work and ensure a transparent, thorough investigation of COVID-19's origin, the U.S. was sharing new information and urging the WHO to press the Chinese government to address three specific issues, including the illnesses of several researchers inside the WIV in autumn 2019, the WIV's research on "RaTG13" and "gain of function", and the WIV's links to the Chinese military.[52] On 18 January, the U.S. called on China to allow the WHO's expert team to interview "care givers, former patients and lab workers" in the city of Wuhan, drawing a rebuke from the Chinese government. Australia also called for the WHO team to have access to "relevant data, information and key locations".[46]

The Lancet COVID-19 Commission task force

On November 23, 2020, an international task force led by Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, was formed as part of The Lancet COVID-19 Commission, chaired by Dr. Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University. Daszak stated that the task force was formed to "conduct a thorough and rigorous investigation into the origins and early spread of SARS-CoV-2". The task force has 12 members with backgrounds in One Health, outbreak investigation, virology, lab biosecurity and disease ecology. [53]

See also

References

  1. ^ Barh, Debmalya; Silva Andrade, Bruno; Tiwari, Sandeep; Giovanetti, Marta; Góes-Neto, Aristóteles; Alcantara, Luiz Carlos Junior; Azevedo, Vasco; Ghosh, Preetam (2020-09-01). "Natural selection versus creation: a review on the origin of SARS-COV-2". Le Infezioni in Medicina. 28 (3): 302–311. ISSN 1124-9390. PMID 32920565. Archived from the original on 2020-11-02. Retrieved 2021-01-22.
  2. ^ Boni MF, Lemey P, Jiang X, Lam TT, Perry BW, Castoe TA; et al. (2020). "Evolutionary origins of the SARS-CoV-2 sarbecovirus lineage responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic". Nat Microbiol. 5 (11): 1408–1417. doi:10.1038/s41564-020-0771-4. PMID 32724171.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ "WHO-convened Global Study of the Origins of SARS-CoV-2". WHO. Archived from the original on January 14, 2021. Retrieved January 19, 2021.
  4. ^ Relman, David A. (November 24, 2020). "Opinion: To stop the next pandemic, we need to unravel the origins of COVID-19". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117 (47): 29246–29248. doi:10.1073/pnas.2021133117. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 33144498. Archived from the original on January 17, 2021. Retrieved January 19, 2021.
  5. ^ Cadell, Cate (December 11, 2020). "One year on, Wuhan market at epicentre of virus outbreak remains barricaded and empty". Reuters. Retrieved January 19, 2021.
  6. ^ Worthington, Brett (April 19, 2020). "Payne wants transparent probe into coronavirus origins independent of WHO". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Archived from the original on April 19, 2020. Retrieved January 19, 2021.
  7. ^ STAYNER, TOM (21 April 2020). "Australia and China clash over independent inquiry into coronavirus pandemic". SBS News. Archived from the original on 5 January 2021. Retrieved 18 January 2021.
  8. ^ Lau, Stuart; Wong, Catherine (April 21, 2020). "Germany adds to growing pressure on China over coronavirus origin". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on January 4, 2021. Retrieved January 18, 2021.
  9. ^ "UK envoy in Washington backs probe into origins of pandemic, WHO reforms". Reuters. April 29, 2020. Archived from the original on December 13, 2020. Retrieved January 19, 2021.
  10. ^ Needham, Kirsty; Nebehay, Stephanie (April 21, 2020). "Australia seeks probe into coronavirus spread, France and UK say now not the time". Reuters. Archived from the original on May 27, 2020. Retrieved January 18, 2021.
  11. ^ Dziedzic, Stephen (May 20, 2020). "Australia started a fight with China by pushing for a COVID-19 inquiry — was it necessary?". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Archived from the original on May 21, 2020. Retrieved January 19, 2021.
  12. ^ "WHO's Tedros says 'Let's not politicize probe of virus origins'". Reuters. November 30, 2020. Archived from the original on January 22, 2021. Retrieved January 22, 2021.
  13. ^ "WHO | Pneumonia of unknown cause – China". WHO. Archived from the original on 2020-04-18. Retrieved 2021-01-15.
  14. ^ Gan, Nectar; Hu, Caitlin; Watson, Ivan (12 April 2020). "China imposes restrictions on research into origins of coronavirus". CNN. Archived from the original on 17 January 2021. Retrieved 18 January 2021.
  15. ^ Kang, Dake; Cheng, Maria; Mcneil, Sam (December 30, 2020). "China clamps down in hidden hunt for coronavirus origins". Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 20, 2021. Retrieved January 22, 2021.
  16. ^ Manson, Katrina; Yu, Sun (April 26, 2020). "US and Chinese researchers team up for hunt into Covid origins". Financial Times. Archived from the original on November 14, 2020. Retrieved January 19, 2021.
  17. ^ Hua, Sha (8 December 2020). "China Floats Covid-19 Theories That Point to Foreign Origins, Frozen Food". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 19 January 2021. Retrieved 19 January 2021.
  18. ^ a b Lipton, Eric; Sanger, David E.; Haberman, Maggie; Shear, Michael D.; Mazzetti, Mark; Barnes, Julian E. (11 April 2020). "He Could Have Seen What Was Coming: Behind Trump's Failure on the Virus". New York Times. Archived from the original on 15 April 2020. Retrieved 16 April 2020.
  19. ^ Mazzetti, Mark; Barnes, Julian E.; Wong, Edward; Goldman, Adam (April 30, 2020). "Trump Officials Are Said to Press Spies to Link Virus and Wuhan Labs". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 7, 2020. Retrieved January 20, 2021.
  20. ^ Mazzetti, Mark; Barnes, Julian E.; Wong, Edward; Goldman, Adam (30 April 2020). "Trump Officials Are Said to Press Spies to Link Virus and Wuhan Labs". New York Times. Retrieved 27 May 2020.
  21. ^ "OSTP Coronavirus Request to NASEM" (PDF). www.nationalacademies.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-01-21. Retrieved 2021-01-15.
  22. ^ Campbell, Josh; Atwood, Kylie; Perez, Evan (16 April 2020). "US explores possibility that coronavirus spread started in Chinese lab, not a market". CNN. Archived from the original on 16 January 2021. Retrieved 18 January 2021.
  23. ^ Dilanian, Ken; Kube, Courtney (16 April 2020). "U.S. intel community examining whether coronavirus emerged accidentally from a Chinese lab". NBC News. Archived from the original on 16 April 2020. Retrieved 18 January 2021.
  24. ^ Hosenball, Mark (April 30, 2020). "Coronavirus was 'not manmade or genetically modified': U.S. spy agency". Reuters. Archived from the original on January 5, 2021. Retrieved January 20, 2021.
  25. ^ Singh, Maanvi; Davidson, Helen; Borger, Julian (April 30, 2020). "Trump claims to have evidence coronavirus started in Chinese lab but offers no details". The Guardian. Archived from the original on May 7, 2020. Retrieved January 20, 2021.
  26. ^ Cohen, Zachary; Marquardt, Alex; Atwood, Kylie; Acosta, Jim (April 30, 2020). "Trump contradicts US intel community by claiming he's seen evidence coronavirus originated in Chinese lab". CNN. Archived from the original on May 7, 2020. Retrieved January 20, 2021.
  27. ^ Rincon, Paul (1 May 2020). "Coronavirus: Is there any evidence for lab release theory?". BBC News. Archived from the original on 16 April 2020. Retrieved 20 January 2021.
  28. ^ Borger, Julian (May 3, 2020). "Mike Pompeo: 'enormous evidence' coronavirus came from Chinese lab". The Guardian. Archived from the original on May 4, 2020. Retrieved January 21, 2021.
  29. ^ MITCHELL, ELLEN (May 5, 2020). "Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman says evidence suggests coronavirus was not man-made or released from lab". The Hill. Archived from the original on December 12, 2020. Retrieved January 19, 2021.
  30. ^ a b "German spy agency doubts US 'China lab' coronavirus accusations, report says". CNBC. 8 May 2020. Retrieved 20 January 2020.
  31. ^ a b Tang, Didi (January 4, 2021). "Biological weapons lab leaked coronavirus, claims US official". The Times. Archived from the original on January 10, 2021. Retrieved January 18, 2021.
  32. ^ Nakamura, David; Leonnig, Carol D.; Nakashima, Ellen (April 29, 2020). "Matthew Pottinger faced Communist China's intimidation as a reporter. He's now at the White House shaping Trump's hard line policy toward Beijing". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on May 18, 2020. Retrieved January 19, 2021.
  33. ^ "Fact Sheet: Activity at the Wuhan Institute of Virology". United States Department of State. 15 January 2021. Archived from the original on 17 January 2021. Retrieved 18 January 2021.
  34. ^ MacDiarmid, Campbell (January 16, 2021). "Wuhan lab staff were first victims of coronavirus, says US". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 16, 2021. Retrieved January 18, 2021.
  35. ^ "Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying's Regular Press Conference on January 20, 2021". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China. January 20, 2021. Archived from the original on January 20, 2021. Retrieved January 22, 2021.
  36. ^ "WHO-convened Global Study of the Origins of SARS-CoV-2". www.who.int. Archived from the original on 2021-01-14. Retrieved 2021-01-15.
  37. ^ Mallapaty, Smriti (December 2, 2020). "Meet the scientists investigating the origins of the COVID pandemic". Nature. 588 (7837): 208–208. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-03402-1. Archived from the original on January 14, 2021. Retrieved January 15, 2021 – via www.nature.com.
  38. ^ Nebehay, Stephanie; Skydsgaard, Nikolaj (December 16, 2020). "Exclusive: WHO-led team expected in China in January to probe COVID-19 origins - experts". Reuters. Archived from the original on December 16, 2020. Retrieved December 17, 2020.
  39. ^ Hinshaw, Drew (6 January 2021). "WHO Criticizes China for Stymying Investigation Into Covid-19 Origins". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 10 January 2021. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  40. ^ Regan, Helen; Sidhu, Sandi (6 January 2021). "WHO team blocked from entering China to study origins of coronavirus". CNN. Archived from the original on 8 January 2021. Retrieved 9 January 2021.
  41. ^ Shepherd, Christian (6 January 2021). "China blocks WHO team sent to probe Covid's origins". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 6 January 2021. Retrieved 6 January 2021.
  42. ^ "China blocks entry to WHO team studying Covid's origins". the Guardian. 5 January 2021. Archived from the original on 6 January 2021. Retrieved 6 January 2021.
  43. ^ "WHO coronavirus investigation team to arrive in China on Thursday". South China Morning Post. 11 January 2021. Archived from the original on 11 January 2021. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  44. ^ "China: WHO experts arriving Thursday for virus origins probe". ABC News. Archived from the original on 11 January 2021. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  45. ^ "China reports biggest daily COVID-19 case jump in over 5 months". Reuters. 11 January 2021. Archived from the original on 11 January 2021. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  46. ^ a b Nebehay, Stephanie (January 18, 2021). "U.S. and China clash at WHO over scientific mission in Wuhan". Reuters. Archived from the original on January 18, 2021. Retrieved January 18, 2021.
  47. ^ "Virus origin / Origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus". World Health Organization. January 18, 2021. Retrieved January 21, 2021.
  48. ^ a b Ryan, Jackson (January 19, 2021). "How the hunt for COVID-19's origin became a twisted, confusing mess". CNET. Archived from the original on January 22, 2021. Retrieved January 19, 2021.
  49. ^ Chan, Alina; Ridley, Matt (15 January 2021). "The World Needs a Real Investigation Into the Origins of Covid-19". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 16 January 2021. Retrieved 20 January 2021.
  50. ^ Sudworth, John (December 21, 2020). "Covid: Wuhan scientist would 'welcome' visit probing lab leak theory". BBC News. Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved January 20, 2021.
  51. ^ Nebehay, Stephanie (November 10, 2020). "U.S. denounces terms for WHO-led inquiry into COVID origins". Reuters. Archived from the original on December 25, 2020. Retrieved December 17, 2020.
  52. ^ Pompeo, Michael R. (15 Jan 2021). "Ensuring a Transparent, Thorough Investigation of COVID-19's Origin - United States Department of State". United States Department of State. Archived from the original on 19 January 2021. Retrieved 19 January 2021.
  53. ^ Sachs, Jeffrey D.; Karim, Salim Abdool; Aknin, Lara; Allen, Joseph; Brosbøl, Kirsten; Barron, Gabriela Cuevas; Daszak, Peter; Espinosa, María Fernanda; Gaspar, Vitor; Gaviria, Alejandro; Haines, Andy; Hotez, Peter; Koundouri, Phoebe; Bascuñán, Felipe Larraín; Lee, Jong-Koo; Pate, Muhammad; Polman, Paul; Reddy, Srinath; Serageldin, Ismail; Shah, Raj; Thwaites, John; Vike-Freiberga, Vaira; Wang, Chen; Were, Miriam Khamadi; Xue, Lan; Zhu, Min; Bahadur, Chandrika; Bottazzi, Maria Elena; Amor, Yanis Ben; Barredo, Lauren; Caman, Ozge Karadag; Lafortune, Guillaume; Torres, Emma; Ethridge, Ismini; Bartels, Juliana G. E. (October 10, 2020). "Lancet COVID-19 Commission Statement on the occasion of the 75th session of the UN General Assembly". The Lancet. 396 (10257): 1102–1124. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31927-9. PMID 32941825 – via www.thelancet.com.