Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 116: Line 116:
===Articles created/expanded on January 4===
===Articles created/expanded on January 4===


====[[Crucibulum]]====
{{DYKsuggestion<!--Please do not copy this code directly for nominating. Instead, use {{subst:DYKsug}} as described in the header.-->
| hook = ... that [[bird's nest fungi]] from the genus '''''[[Crucibulum]]''''' (''[[Crucibulum laeve]]'', pictured) rely on falling rain to help disperse their spores?
| creator = sasata
| creator2 =
| creator3 =
| creator4 =
| expander =
| expander2 =
| expander3 =
| nominator =
| comment =
| image = Crucibulum laeve.jpg
| credits =
*{{DYKmake|Crucibulum|sasata}}
}} at 09:57, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
:*
{{-}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line.-->
====[[Bridge scour]]====
====[[Bridge scour]]====
{{DYKsuggestion<!--Please do not copy this code directly for nominating. Instead, use {{subst:DYKsug}} as described in the header.-->
{{DYKsuggestion<!--Please do not copy this code directly for nominating. Instead, use {{subst:DYKsug}} as described in the header.-->

Revision as of 09:57, 4 January 2009

Template:Active editnotice

Asik-Asik Falls
Asik-Asik Falls

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page.

Instructions

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Using a DYK suggestion string (see below examples), list new suggestions in the candidate entries section below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged. Thanks for participating and please remember to check back for comments on your nomination.

DYK criteria

Official criteria: DYK rules
Unofficial criteria: LaPella's unwritten rules
  • DYK evaluation includes:
  • Length - The Article should contain at least 1,500 characters in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles having more than 1,500 characters of prose still may be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
  • Verification - The DYK hook fact in the article needs an inline cite at the end of the sentence and the article in general should use inline, cited sources.
  • Date - The new article should be no more than five days old and the expanded article should be expanded at least fivefold with new text within the last five days.
  • Length
  • DYK qualifying characters: To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a JavaScript extension like User:Dr pda/prosesize.js (instructions on the talk page), a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. For Mac users, Apple has a Word counter widget available for Mac OS X 10.4 or later. Note: The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.
  • Lists: Proposed lists need 1,500+ characters of prose text. The listed items themselves are not counted as part the the 1,500 DYK qualifying characters
  • Verification
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    1. interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    2. short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    3. neutral,
    4. definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    5. always cited in the article with an inline citation.
  • Please note that hooks are subject without notice to copyediting as they move to the main page. The nature of the DYK process makes it impractical to consult users over every such edit. In particular, hooks will be shortened if they are deemed too long: the 200-character limit is an outside limit, not a recommended length. Also, watch the suggestions page to ensure that no issues have been raised about your hook, because if you do not respond to issues raised your hook may not be featured at all.
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus unduly on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Other issues
  • Pictures: Pictures accompanying the DYK hook should be:
    1. freely licensed suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely licensed pictures;
    2. suitable, attractive, and interesting at a 100x100px-wide resolution;
    3. already in the article; and
    4. relevant to the article.
  • Sounds: Sounds accompanying the DYK hook should have similar qualities to pictures, and should be formatted using {{DYK Listen|filename.ogg|Brief description}}

Sample DYK suggestion strings

Please use one of the strings below to post your DYK nomination, using the "author" and "nominator" fields to identify the users who should receive credit for their contributions if the hook is featured on the main page.

  1. Nom without image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= }}
  2. Nom with image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= | image= | caption= }}
    To include more than one new or expanded article in a single hook: |article2= |article3= |article4= | (etc)
    To include more than one author: |author2= |author3= | (etc)
    To include alternate hooks: |ALT1= |ALT2= | (etc)
    To add a comment: |comment=
    To add the article you reviewed: |reviewed=

Do not wikilink the article title, or the author username field; the template will wikilink them automatically. Do wikilink the article title in the hook field, however.
Do not add a section heading if you are using the template; the template will add one for you.
Do not include a signature (~~~~) after the template.
Do not use non-free images in your hook suggestion.

An example of how to use the template is given below:

{{subst:DYKsug
 | article   = Example
 | hook      = ... that this [[article]] is an '''[[example]]''' ''(pictured)''?
 | creator   = Jimbo Wales
 | expander  = 
 | nominator =
 | image     = Example.png
 | comment   =
}}
  • Note that you should only use one of the above templates for the original hook. If you want to suggest a second, alternative hook for the same article submission, just type it in manually. The above templates output useful code for each submission and if you employ them for alternative hooks, you will mess up the page formatting.
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|October 7}} Thanks, ~~~~

Symbols

If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:

Symbol Code DYK Ready? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe DYK eligibility requires some additional work. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Please consider using {{subst:DYKproblem}} on the user's talk page, in case they do not notice if there is an issue.

Current status

The next update will be produced from queue 3.

There are five queues;

Count of DYK Hooks
Section # of Hooks # Verified
August 7 1
August 8 1
August 11 1
August 14 1
August 20 1
August 23 1
August 24 2 2
August 25 5 4
August 26 3 1
August 27 3 2
August 28 4 2
August 29 4 2
August 30 10 3
August 31 3 1
September 1 3 3
September 2 5 2
September 3 4 3
September 4 2 1
September 5 2
September 6 4 1
September 7 7 2
September 8 3
September 9 6 2
September 10 6 5
September 11 4 2
September 12 6 1
September 13 3 1
September 14 3 3
September 15 9 4
September 16 7 2
September 17 3 2
September 18 10 8
September 19 7 3
September 20 9 1
September 21 4 1
September 22 6 2
September 23 7
September 24 6 2
September 25 6 3
September 26 6 2
September 27 9 3
September 28 8 5
September 29 7 5
September 30 6 6
October 1 5 5
October 2 2 1
October 3 10 3
October 4 8 4
October 5 7 2
October 6 1
October 7 1
Total 242 107
Last updated 03:27, 7 October 2024 UTC
Current time is 04:22, 7 October 2024 UTC [refresh]

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Where is my hook?

If you can't find the hook you submitted to this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is in the queue for display on the main page. You can check whether your hook has been moved to the queue by reviewing the queue listings at the bottom of this page.

If your hook is not in the queue or already on the main page, it has probably been deleted. Deletion occurs if the hook is more than about eight days old and has unresolved issues for which any discussion has gone stale. If you think your hook has been unfairly deleted, you can query its deletion on the discussion page, but as a general rule deleted hooks will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on January 4

Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:57, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:16, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:12, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:44, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:38, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:59, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestionRyanCross (talk) 01:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:47, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on January 3

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:45, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:48, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:16, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 17:26, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:01, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:55, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

  • length OK however none of the refs actually use the phrase "political correctness gone mad" although they come close e.g. "there is this whole political correctness agenda" in the Daily Mail article (you can always trust the Mail to come up with that sort of comment) Nancy talk 16:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just wondering - if the point is that the school has changed its name should that not be reflected in the title of the article? Nancy talk 16:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:52, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 10:36, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 10:26, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:55, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:17, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:28, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC) ALT1 ... that a bounty jumper, Adam Worth (pictured), became the inspiration for Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Moriarty?

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:36, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:08, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

... that African American civil rights activist Mel Boozer was the first openly gay person nominated for the office of Vice President of the United States? - new article, self nom. Otto4711 (talk) 02:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:37, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


Articles created/expanded on January 2

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:51, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:32, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:34, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:45, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:58, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:07, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


File:Appatro.jpg

Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 15:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:11, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 10:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

NB. John Barnard Byles was created by me on January 3rd. Malick78 (talk) 16:08, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 10:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

The first hook didn't work out, as the reference doesn't back up the claim 'nationalist' explicitly. proposal for a new hook: "that the Iraqi Democratic July 14 Movement tried to rally opponents of Saddam Hussein's Baathist government, recalling the legacy of the July 14 revolution of 1958?" --Soman (talk) 19:32, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:34, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Verified, offline hook reference accepted in good faith. AdjustShift (talk) 13:58, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Offline hook reference has also been verified. AdjustShift (talk) 14:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. --74.13.125.109 (talk) 07:34, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on January 1

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:01, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion Cbl62 (talk) 05:38, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:29, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 17:35, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:21, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 12:37, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:29, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:16, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion.

Verified. Either hook works. Ecoleetage (talk) 22:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

This took place on January 7, 1861, so January 7 would make the best date for this to be featured.--Gen. Bedford his Forest 03:53, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Need "American Civil War" in the hook. --74.13.125.109 (talk) 07:31, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not really; the war wouldn't start for three months yet.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 07:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion. — RyanCross (talk) 02:54, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Verified. Feel free to insert "baseball" where you sit fit. Ecoleetage (talk) 22:33, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Added "Major League Baseball player" instead. — RyanCross (talk) 01:59, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There are better hooks available, if a bit of research is done to add a few sentences and references to this article. For example, general manager Bob Gainey fired himself as head coach in 1996. See here and here and here and here and here. - Dravecky (talk) 13:05, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I will certainly add that into the article. I will make the alternate hook that I think you suggested after I finish adding the Bob Gainey firing himself sentence. Thanks and happy new year. -- signed by SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24 (spell my name backwards) at 01:51, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done adding it to the article. Below is the alternate hook. -- signed by SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24 (spell my name backwards) at 02:06, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1 ... that in the middle of the 1995–96 National Hockey League season, Bob Gainey, who was the general manager and the head coach of the Dallas Stars, an American professional ice hockey team based in Dallas, Texas, fired himself as the head coach and replaced himself with Ken Hitchcock, who won the Stanley Cup with the Stars in the 1998–99 National Hockey League season? Kind of long, but can be shortened. -- signed by SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24 (spell my name backwards) at 02:06, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, wrote the wrong season. -- signed by SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24 (spell my name backwards) at 09:57, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ALT2: ... that Bob Gainey fired himself as head coach of the Dallas Stars in the middle of the 1995–96 National Hockey League season? - (the article explains he was also the team's general manager, the tiny bit of mystery in the hook will get more people to read this article) Dravecky (talk) 10:45, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Might as well mention that he was the only one not leave with a winning record. --74.13.125.109 (talk) 07:27, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think the hook looks better like this. -- signed by SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24 (spell my name backwards) at 07:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion. First nomination of the year for DYK! :-) — RyanCross (talk) 00:50, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Verified. Welcome to 2009 in DYK-land, Ryan! Ecoleetage (talk) 22:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for verifying, Ecoleetage. 97198, I've added a link. — RyanCross (talk) 02:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:32, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

AGF verified for Norwegian source. Ecoleetage (talk) 22:34, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on December 31

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:33, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion Cbl62 (talk) 21:37, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

* Oppose. The article is currently being addressed at AfD. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 18:45, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:13, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:14, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:29, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:46, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:18, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Length, date (December 31), and hook (online ref) all verified. --IvoShandor (talk) 00:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The ALT is fine with me. VX!~~~ 03:20, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:43, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Sure it is, ref 12. I've added another too. Maury Markowitz (talk) 17:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Great article but I'm still not finding a specific sentence with a citation that says what the hook says. The sentence cited by ref 12 appears only tangentially related. - Dravecky (talk) 10:10, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All of the statements in the hook are directly and specifically cited in a reference in the article. In the particular case under discussion, the Globe and Mail, in reference 13, specifically states that the election was called as a direct result of the "in-and-out" scheme. Click here and see the second and third paragraphs. Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:14, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:03, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:20, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Shouldn't this be 1963 Dahomey coup d'état instead? There was no country called "Benin" till 1975. --74.13.129.148 (talk) 14:08, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:30, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion Cbl62 (talk) 07:49, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 30

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Source is fine. Quote checks out. It is using only one source, which should be changed to ensure that there is more diversity, however, right now there is not a problem because the source relies on a wide range of points of views and source material that are quoted through the single source. Perhaps some of the sources could be quoted directly (such as Houston Telegraph and Texas Register), but as of now there should not be a problem. Ottava Rima (talk) 21:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:14, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Sources seem to check out. Page is a little skimpy, but no problem. Barely meets the 1,500 character count, but still meets it. I would recommend a possible double nom with Henry V the Fat if someone can come up with one. Ottava Rima (talk) 21:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

  • For sure, but it's about the most interesting thing that can be cited to the NDB (it's not that boring either, as fostering shows that his family had entered an intimate relationship with the Bohemian monarchs, which in turn sheds light on lots of the politics of the era). The rest is a translation of pl. wiki. If you could find a citation to a cooler fact, that'd be great! Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 14:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

  • See User talk:Ottava Rima#Odes for the mathematics behind the expansion. These numbers do not include any indented or blocked in numbers, so there should be no controversy. Any questions or concerns, please contact me or Mrathel directly. We are constantly expanding and working on the pages, so things may change. Ottava Rima (talk) 19:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:16, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:40, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:14, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:06, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:06, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

  • An interesting article, but unfortunately completely ineligible for DYK. This is not a new article; in fact, the initial version of the article is dated February 2008. On Dec 31, 2008 the article had a slight extension, but it was far less than a fivefold expansion (not even two-fold) compared with its previous version, dated Dec 13, 2008. Sorry, but completely ineligible for DYK according to WP:DYK#DYK rules. Nsk92 (talk) 04:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please look at the full history log of the article. The article was initially created in mainspace on February 27, 2008[1] and was gradually expanded in mainspace over the next 9 months. Here is the diff[2] comparing the current version with the version of December 13, 2008. The fact that the revision provided in your diff was prepared in user space does not make this a new article (because a previous version of the article already existed in mainspace), nor does it make it a 5x+ expansion compared with the previous operative version of December 13, 2008. Nsk92 (talk) 05:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oops, I take it back. I see that the article was moved from userspace into mainspace using an actual pagemove rather than traditional paste-in, so the history log portion I was looking at actually referred to the time when it was still a user subpage. So it does qualify as a new article. Nsk92 (talk) 05:43, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hmmm, now I am really confused. I don't see anything relevant in the move log but I do see a creation of a brand new manual redirect from a user subpage to the mainspace article on Dec 31[3]. Could someone else please take a look at this and try to figure out what exactly is going on? Nsk92 (talk) 05:57, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I thought this is the move log, which shows a move, and therefore I thought the article's previous version couldn't have existed in main space or it would have prevented the move. A move automatically creates a redirect from the "from" page to the "to" page. But others are certainly welcome to look. Art LaPella (talk) 06:05, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I think you are right. I was looking for the record of this move by clicking on "View logs for this page" in the history page of the article itself, but for some reason the move does not show up there[4]. However, it does show in the log section for the Sandbox page, as you pointed out. So it seems that everything is Ok with the date of the article after all and that it was created in mainspace on Dec 31, 2008 and so the article is DYK eligible as a new article. Nsk92 (talk) 06:21, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:33, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKalt

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:33, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

I like it! Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:31, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:53, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Fixed! Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:31, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:20, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Looks good. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • WTH is the "Breen office"? Do we have a relevant link; otherwise it should be explained? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnbod (talkcontribs) 15:12, 1 January 2009 UTC (UTC)

Ready to go. MovieMadness (talk) 17:41, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:* Unfortunately, all of the articles are older than 5 days, and none have been expanded 5x in the last 5 days. Unless 5x expansion occurs, none of the articles can pass. Terrakyte (talk) 16:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:57, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:22, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 10:19, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:42, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


"Canadian territories"? That's Canada! --74.13.125.109 (talk) 07:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Umm...yes, it is. -- signed by SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24 (spell my name backwards) at 07:33, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Expiring noms

Articles created/expanded on December 29

Template:DYKsuggestion at 10:52, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:23, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:05, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm planning to but it will have to wait a week or two the least, sadly, no time right now. The hook could be used then if not good enough now. EA210269 (talk) 12:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Or ALT2 ... that Hal Fryar received a number of complaints from English teachers because he appeared in a movie with the grammatically incorrect title The Outlaws Is Coming? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 09:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:38, 30 December 2008 (UTC)



Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:29, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

ALT 1... that the Thimpu principles were put forward by Sri Lankan Tamil delegates at Thimpu, Bhutan? Taprobanus (talk) 04:32, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:14, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:29, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

  • That image is weird, surely there is a better one somewhere, I will keep my eyes open for one. An alt follows.
  • ALT1: ... that although the U.S. MC-1 chemical bomb was designed to fit the F-4 Phantom II, it could not fit that plane's successor, the F-16?

Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:19, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:23, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 28

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:34, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

  • On a closer look, there is no source to say that it is a form of pousse-cafe either. There are no references except for the ingredients, so the page might not actually make it through a deletion nomination in its current state. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:16, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ref's fixed. Also, pousse-cafe is a form of drink where the ingredients are layered. Do we need a reference to source that steel is a form of metal? pousse cafe is simply the technical classification of a layered drink. Also, weasel words removed. Cabe6403 (TalkSign!) 21:34, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 10:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Before Colonel Warden started his expansion of the article on December 30, the article contained 546 characters of prose. Atm, it contains 2132, which is not a 5x expansion. The article needs to get to 2730 characters, at least, before this DYK nom can pass. Terrakyte (talk) 03:18, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:45, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:22, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:59, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:50, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

  • This alternate hook depends upon which hook is used for another of my suggestions below, the E14 munition. If the alternate about that munition being made of cardboard is used, then this one, obviously, should not be used, so make sure you check the archives before using this one. --IvoShandor (talk) 21:52, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

  • I've moved the reference two sentences down. Is that what was wanted? Regarding references at the end of each paragraph, I am following WP:SCG which states that references are not required for material that can be considered to be "common knowledge". The unreferenced parts of this article are covered in detail in the general references 2 and 3 and can also be found in many chemistry text-books at first-year University level. Petergans (talk) 11:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:29, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Done! Mjroots (talk) 18:41, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:57, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Dates and length checkout good but the cited sentence mentions the mountains and the stained glass but not the birdsong. There is an uncited sentence later in the article that mentions birdsong but it is neither connected to the hook sentence nor referenced in any way. - Dravecky (talk) 09:26, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

This alternate hook could go two ways, it could be a double hook, but you'd probably have to let E86 cluster bomb slide, because by my count its only about 1,480 characters, and I really don't think I can get any more out of it without being wordy and ridiculous. Unless someone else has another source, of course. Alternatively, this hook could be used without E86 cluster bomb bolded as one of the hook articles like so:
--IvoShandor (talk) 13:15, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 10:25, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:09, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Might as well mention that none of them has a winning record. BTW, the first three were actually managers for the Tampa Bay Devil Rays. --74.13.128.83 (talk) 14:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How about this. Your suggestion is at the bottom. -- signed by SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24 spell my name backwards at 16:31, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1 ... that all four of the managers for the Tampa Bay (Devil) Rays, a Major League Baseball franchise based in St. Petersburg, Florida, have never had a winning percentage with the (Devil) Rays? -- signed by SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24 spell my name backwards at 16:31, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ALT2 ... that none of the managers of the Tampa Bay (Devil) Rays, a Major League Baseball team based in St. Petersburg, Florida, has ever had a winning record with the team? - (still not quite perfect, but I think this is closer) Dravecky (talk) 21:48, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
'ALT3 ... that the Tampa Bay (Devil) Rays, a Major League Baseball team located in St. Petersburg, Florida, has had a losing record under each of its four managers?--Wehwalt (talk) 02:01, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:54, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

ALT1 ... that Captain Aristide Protet was shot with a poisoned arrow on the island of Carabane, where he was subsequently buried standing up? (grave pictured)



Perhaps this would be better as a double nomination:

ALT2 ... that the Jola, the majority ethnic group in Carabane (scenery pictured), are very distinct from other major ethnic groups in Senegal by their language, egalitarian society, freedom from political hierarchy, and lack of slavery? Neelix (talk) 19:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:58, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

This article currently isn't long enough for Did You Know. Please see #Instructions for details. Art LaPella (talk) 21:50, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Lengthened. Art LaPella (talk) 04:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

This article currently isn't long enough for Did You Know. Please see #Instructions for details. Art LaPella (talk) 21:50, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Lengthened. Art LaPella (talk) 04:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Art, I've found more material for the article and it's now over 2500 characters.--Parkwells (talk) 02:41, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on December 27

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:28, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

No problem; I have added a citation of book by same author I quoted from the forum. You now have a source that fulfills your reliability requirement.

FYI, http:www.theaerodrome.com's forum contains informative dialogue by the authors of the Osprey series of books about World War I aviation, as well as other experts on the subject. So long as I consider the individual, I can find reliable info in these forums, as well as leads to books. Admittedly, I also find much to question or ignore.

Georgejdorner (talk) 08:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Offline ref now present.  Sandstein  10:01, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've done a bit of cleanup but this article still has lots of bare url references which must be cleaned up before this can pass to the front page. - Dravecky (talk) 04:06, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:27, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

  • I think it's interesting that he lived in exile (from the nationalists) and fought in the Spanish Civil War. I would go with: " that East German communist Paul Verner (pictured) spent years in exile and fought as a volunteer in the International Brigades during the Spanish Civil War?" I might even leave out the International Brigades. I don't think most people know what that is. You could even say he fled the nationalists in Germany and fought against Franco's nationalist forces in Spain. Interesting article. A lot of interesting history in there. The intro needs to be expanded to summarize the rest of the article.ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My worry is that saying East German is strange since we're talking about what is now Germany and what was Germany when he was fighting for Spain. Eastern Germany was inbetween. Can't they read the article to find out that he was an East German politician? I'm okay with adding he's a socialist too, although the "International" birgades is a bit of a tip off. Plus I like people going to the article to learn more. What do you think? Am I over complicating matters? My hook would need to be wikified properly. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:16, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]



Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

I like the hook. Short and catchy. I also think it's notable that all six emperor names end in zong. What are the odds on that? :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:34, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

-zong is commonly used in the Temple name of Chinese emperors. May I suggest not showing the word "Emperor" six times? --74.13.128.83 (talk) 14:31, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]



Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:27, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


Articles created/expanded on December 26

Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

  • The fight over the woman was what sparked (caused) the massacre a few months later. The first sentence of the "Massacre" section of the article states that 30 aborigines were killed, and this is backed up by reference 7. --Bruce1eetalk 08:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am the writer of the article. Bruce Lee is correct. The fight over use/abuse of aboriginal women is what caused an escalation of violence leading to a massacre of 30 aborigines. The generally accepted view of most historians familiar with this incident (see Historical skepticism section) is that George Augustus Robinson's account that 30 people were killed in the massacre is accurate, this being an estimate based upon his investigation. One controversial historian disputes Robinson's account and estimate of number killed. I have detailed this in the Historical skepticism section to ensue the article has a neutral POV.--Takver (talk) 09:49, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have clarified the first paragraph in the article to state over 30 aborigines attacked, 30 killed, an unknown number escaping.--Takver (talk) 10:17, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, but my question about the timeline and the direct connection of the "fight over women" still stands. The article says the incident with the women took place in December 1827 and one aborigine was shot dead. Then at some point later, the tribe drove a flock of sheep over a cliff. Then in February, a "punitive expedition killed twelve Aborigines in response." Only after that do we get to the massacre but the detail emphasized is how the bodies were thrown over the same cliff the sheep had been driven over—making it seem far more about the sheep than the aboriginal women. I don't doubt that these events took place as described it's just that the article doesn't clearly and directly connect the original fight over the women to the massacre, rather it makes the massacre seem a bloody escalation in an terrible, ongoing genocide. - Dravecky (talk) 18:07, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But the events are connected. Reference 7, under the heading "Cape Grim Massacre", describes the sequence of events, beginning with the molestation of the aboriginal women and ending with the massacre of the 30 aborigines. --Bruce1eetalk 07:25, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:54, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

  • I was trying to emphasize that he had a very substantial number of stolen bases in the minors, but never really made it as a major leaguer. The "but only" was intended in comparison to the number stolen in the minors not to minimize stealing 4 bases in 18 major league games, which would be about 35 in a full 162-game season. I wonder if "and" instead of "but only" loses that hookiness? Alansohn (talk) 21:58, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree that switching them around makes it read better. I do have a minor quibble, though; the word "but" still makes it read as though we're passing some sort of judgment on his accomplishments, IMHO. To me it reads like, "...Snead wasn't very good in the majors, but he did really well in the minors!" I think using "compared to" takes our opinion out of it entirely and lets the reader make up their own mind (lets them make the comparison for themselves, if you will). So my suggestion would be (ALT 4) ... that baseball player Esix Snead had four stolen bases in two brief appearances in the major leagues with the New York Mets compared to 507 in nine minor-league seasons? faithless (speak) 19:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

<outdent> I'm a little confused. The original hook says 4 stolen bases in 2 brief appearances. Then there is mention of 18 games? How many games did he play in? If he stole 4 bases in 2 appearances I don't see a quibble, I think we just go with the original hook and replace the word "but" with the word "and". It's clear he didn't make it in the majors if he's only had 2 appearances. Isn't the whole point that he's notable for a zillion minor league and a few in the major league, why are we but-butting? I would also take out the word brief. Why were his appearances brief? The original hook is fine assuming he had 2 appearances, we just replace but with and. We don't have to explain why his career in the majors was short. People can read the article.ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:28, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess the question is what is meant by "appearances". Snead was called up to the majors twice, getting into 17 games the first time and one the 2nd. Appearances here doesn't (or shouldn't, anyway) mean games played. But I am not sure that the number of call ups to the majors he had is really relevant to the hook. So it seems to me that the following would appropriately contrast his major and minor league stolen base record without introducing confusion as to what is meant by "appearances", because 4 stolen bases in 2 games would be a lot: (ALT 5)... that baseball player Esix Snead stole 507 bases in the minor-leagues but had just four stolen bases in the major leagues? Or else maybe something like: (ALT 6)... that baseball player Esix Snead had four stolen bases in 18 major league games, but stole 507 bases in nine minor-league seasons? Rlendog (talk) 06:27, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:09, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Article length, date, and hooks' length check out, but what make either of the two sources used reliable? In addition, the sources should have last access dates and publishers in their citations. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Length, reference and history verified. Daniel Case (talk) 05:33, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the hook is not properly cited per DYK standards. - Dravecky (talk) 08:57, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:12, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Checks out OK, but the fact is this hook is a bit ad-ish. Could we just focus on it being a test-prep game? Is this unusual enough? Daniel Case (talk) 05:30, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:16, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

So that's how the comma got there? I removed it because I thought it was a typo that I had made. Well, if that's the accepted pattern, no complaints; I've restored it. Thanks for explaining. Nyttend (talk) 21:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That comma looks ridiculous. Can we immediately reach consensus that random commas that serve no purpose aren't a good idea and revise the guideline? ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:42, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would love it if we can reach a consensus, any consensus, at WP:COMMA or Talk:Comma, or even that this particular sentence is an exception. Just tell me what the rule is, so I can apply it. At the moment, the best indication of a consensus is that WP:COMMA is in the Manual of Style. [5] may also be helpful. Art LaPella (talk) 06:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't like the comma either. I prefer the alternate hook to get rid of the comma :-) Nyttend (talk) 15:13, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:15, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

ALT: ... that some members of the fungal family Orbiliaceae can lasso nematodes using outgrowths of their hyphae? Sasata (talk) 16:08, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The ALT is great. I don't even think lasso needs to be in quotes. Isn't that exactly what lasso means? I have to go read the article to find out more... good job! ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:55, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Upon inspection I notice the lasso claim is uncited and seems a bit of a stretch (it's perhaps not exactly a lasso action). I think a cited bit supporting a carniverous fungi DYK hook would be just fine. ChildofMidnight (talk) 09:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've added another (online) citation (+ link to PDF of article) for the lasso action, and removed quotes from hook. Sasata (talk) 17:45, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The citation does use the word lasso to describe the ring swelling action that traps prey (one of five methods) these nifty fungi use. It doesn't meet my definition of a lasso action (where's the throw?) but if you don't think carniverous fungi is exciting enough, I can live with it. :) Also, the introduction should be expanded to reflect teh article contents. It's kind of short.ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've added another sentence so the lead section should be proportional to the length of the article. BTW, I did think the original hook was exciting enough, I added the ALT to satisfy another DYK editor who didn't think it was :) Cheers Sasata (talk) 17:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]



Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:54, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:59, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

  • The source doesn't make it quite clear to me that Jefferson was responsible. It says McMahon was entrusted with the seeds, and then "Jefferson insisted that these new discoveries were the property of the expedition and of the federal government, so McMahon was forced, perhaps rightfully so, to grow these novelties under restriction in a quarantine-like situation." But this seems compatible with the reading that once he'd been given the seeds, Jefferson set the quarantine requirement on him. It's possible I've missed something from another part of the source, though. Olaf Davis | Talk 09:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I had thought "Beginning in 1806 McMahon was trusted with seeds and plants collected from the Lewis and Clark expedition" would be direct enough: I've added a second Monticello reference that also contains the statement. If the source didn't quite make it clear, perhaps the link wasn't clicked on; footnote text highlighted in purple can be clicked on to read on-line text, which is an intrinsic part of the footnote. --Wetman (talk) 14:37, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I did go to the link and the sentence you quote is clear - the only problem is the latter doesn't mention Jefferson. Could you point out where it says that it was Jefferson who was responsible for assigning McMahon the duty, please? (It's possible I'm missing it because I'm tired - I will go to sleep soon and come back to this next year!) Olaf Davis (talk) 23:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:01, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Suggest adding ", as it proved, " before premature.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:41, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on December 25

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:31, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Length, date, and verification a-ok. However, I don't feel the hook would be interesting to many people who don't know how much of an accomplishment 38 doctoral dissertations is. How about:
ALT1: ... that classical scholar Hendrik Wagenvoort directed 38 doctoral dissertations during his career, an unusually high number in the field of classical studies? Terrakyte (talk) 04:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm concerned not only that this is a single-sourced article but that it appears from the reference to have been written by the subject. - Dravecky (talk) 08:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on December 24

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:26, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

If this is unusual (and it might arguably be), we need to find a way to explain why. Daniel Case (talk) 21:39, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Reworded.Mitch32(Go Syracuse) 22:06, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]




Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:24, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Length and date are OK, and the article is interesting, but I strongly recommend writing another hook. The current hook is incomprehensible (and hence uninteresting) to me as a layperson because I don't know what the Darjah Utama Temasek and the Sijil Kemuliaan are, or what an "achievement" of a coat of arms is (presumably heraldic jargon?). Also, the verb "uses" is in the singular despite having two subjects; it should be in the plural ("use"). Maybe the following would work?
"... that the Singapore coat of arms is reproduced in full on two national awards, the Darjah Utama Temasek and Sijil Kemuliaan?"
But that doesn't sound like a very interesting fact, either. (And the article would have to be adopted accordingly.)  Sandstein  20:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What would you suggest? What stands out in your mind? User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 21:39, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe: "... that only the government of Singapore is allowed to use the coat of arms of Singapore (pictured)?" That would need an inline citation in the article.  Sandstein  17:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT: ... that the tiger in the Coat of arms of Singapore (pictured) represents Malaysia? [No inline citations yet, but this should be easily fixed.] --74.13.125.109 (talk) 07:18, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:46, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Sounds a bit like an ad to me, and I can't seem to find where this statement is explictly made and cited in the article. Daniel Case (talk) 04:58, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1: ... that the ball in the video game I Love Katamari can be rolled by tilting the iPhone/iPod Touch in the direction the player wants the ball to go? MuZemike (talk) 00:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Based on Apple's advertising, that's how practically all of the games on these models are controlled. It's about as remarkable as "this Atari 2600 game uses a joystick controller" and as much as I'd like to promote this it needs a better hook. - Dravecky (talk) 18:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Queues

Queue 1


Farnese Artemis in the National Archaeological Museum, Naples
Farnese Artemis in the National Archaeological Museum, Naples


Queue 2


Downtown Serekunda
Downtown Serekunda


Queue 3


Maximiliano Hernández Martínez
Maximiliano Hernández Martínez


Queue 4


Queue 5


7

1914 Memento Dollar
1914 Memento Dollar


See also

zh:Wikipedia:新條目推薦/候選