Jump to content

User talk:Heroeswithmetaphors: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Veena Malik
Line 41: Line 41:


[[User:Heroeswithmetaphors/Go|{{pi}}]]
[[User:Heroeswithmetaphors/Go|{{pi}}]]

==Veena Malik ==
If you think the information is worth including at all, start a discussion and consider why it belongs at all given [[WP:GOSSIP]], [[WP:BLP]], and [[WP:RECENTISM]]; as well as how it should be presented in a neutral manner given the sources.

To me, it looks like a publicity stunt - maybe on FHM's part, maybe on Malik's, maybe both. Nothing worth mention in an encyclopedia article. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 17:40, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:40, 2 December 2011

  • “There are two types of people: those who try to win and those who try to win arguments.” -- flâneur Nassim Nicholas Taleb
  • "Nothing is harder to put up with than the annoyance of good example." -- Mark Twain


{{like|username=Heroeswithmetaphors}} produces:

👍 Heroeswithmetaphors likes this.



<ref name=""> {{cite web
| url=  
| title=  
| last=  
| first=  
| publisher=  
| date=  
| accessdate =
}} </ref>

<ref name=""> {{cite news  
| last=  
| first=  
| url=  
| title=  
| publisher=  
| date=  
| accessdate= }} </ref>


π

Veena Malik

If you think the information is worth including at all, start a discussion and consider why it belongs at all given WP:GOSSIP, WP:BLP, and WP:RECENTISM; as well as how it should be presented in a neutral manner given the sources.

To me, it looks like a publicity stunt - maybe on FHM's part, maybe on Malik's, maybe both. Nothing worth mention in an encyclopedia article. --Ronz (talk) 17:40, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]