Aurangzeb: Difference between revisions
Undid revision 710166155 by 27.97.232.42 (talk) no reference provided |
Towns Hill (talk | contribs) →Establishment of Islamic law: Catherine B Asher's statement added. |
||
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
As emperor, Aurangzeb banned alcoholism, gambling,<ref>https://books.google.ca/books?id=2OJtAAAAMAAJ&dq=aurangzeb+banned+eunuch+gambling&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=He+curbed+evil+practices+of+gambling%2C+drinking+and+prostitution</ref> castration, servitude, [[eunuch]]s, music, [[nautch]] and [[narcotic]]s in the Mughal Empire. He learnt that at [[Sindh]], [[Multan]], [[Thatta]] and particularly at [[Varanasi]], the Hindu [[Brahmins]] attracted large numbers of indigenous local Muslims to their discourses. He ordered the Subahdars of these provinces to demolish the schools and the temples of non-Muslims.<ref name="Mukhiapp25-26" /> Aurangzeb also ordered Subahdars to punish Muslims who dressed like non-Muslims. The executions of the [[antinomian]] Sufi mystic [[Sarmad Kashani]] and the ninth Sikh Guru [[Tegh Bahadur]] bear testimony to Aurangzeb's religious intolerance; the former was beheaded on multiple accounts of heresy,{{efn| It has however been argued that the Mughal emperor had political motives for this particular execution. See the article on [[Sarmad Kashani]] for references.}} the latter, according to Sikhs, because he objected to Aurangzeb's [[forced conversion]]s.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.com/religion/religions/sikhism/people/teghbahadur.shtml |title=Religions – Sikhism: Guru Tegh Bahadur |publisher=BBC |date=1 October 2009 |accessdate=29 April 2012}}</ref> According to other sources, there is no official account that Aurangzeb forcefully converted people.<ref name="conversion">{{citation|url=https://books.google.ca/books?id=7xEdAAAAMAAJ&|title=A Vindication of Aurangzeb: In Two Parts|author=Sadiq Ali|year=1918|page=141}}</ref><ref name="conversion2">{{citation|url=https://books.google.ca/books?id=wsiXwh_tIGkC&pg=RA1-PA152&|title=The Pearson Indian History Manual for the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination|page=152|author=Vipul Singh}}</ref><ref name="conversion3">{{citation|url=https://books.google.ca/books?id=f9D4Ob1YcJgC&pg=PA73&|title=South Asia: An Environmental History|author=Christopher V. Hill|page=73|others=quote: "He did not, however, introduce forced conversion..."}}</ref><ref name="conversion4">{{citation|url=https://books.google.ca/books?id=5ZRIAQAAIAAJ&|others=quote: "''It should be noted that the only authority for these forced conversions is family or local tradition, and no mention of such (as far as I have been able to discover) is made in the historical accounts of Aurangzeb's reign.''"|title=The Preaching of Islam: A History of the Propagation of the Muslim Faith|author=Thomas Walker Arnold|year=1935|page=261}}</ref> He imposed [[Jizya]] on non-Muslims. Further, Aurangzeb levied discriminatory taxes on Hindu merchants at the rate of 5% as against 2.5% on Muslim merchants. He ordered to dismiss all Hindu ''quanungos'' and ''patwaris'' from revenue administration.<ref name="google1">[https://books.google.co.in/books?id=FduG_t2sxwMC&pg=PA190&lpg=PA190&dq=Aurangzeb+levied+taxes+on+Hindu+merchants&source=bl&ots=oB7CXi8_jU&sig=0j_ngj7f-EG9pS7wRGcTcC5kCOw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CE4Q6AEwCWoVChMIp8vfk-nLyAIVC3KOCh2JHQYM#v=onepage&q=Aurangzeb%20levied%20taxes%20on%20Hindu%20merchants&f=false Islam in South Asia: A Short History By Jamal Malik]</ref><ref>[https://books.google.co.in/books?id=LXkGCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA462&lpg=PA462&dq=aurangzeb+on+taxing+hindu+merchants&source=bl&ots=IFubGUGbKA&sig=vEMFDfbdHy0-Ncrc3Zh-ugSGobM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAmoVChMIgJC4_efLyAIVzxuOCh2p-wyF#v=onepage&q=aurangzeb%20on%20taxing%20hindu%20merchants&f=false Encyclopedia of World Trade: From Ancient Times to the Present]</ref><ref>[https://books.google.co.in/books?id=sxhAtCflwOMC&pg=PA260&lpg=PA260&dq=aurangzeb+on+dismissing+hindu+officials&source=bl&ots=UILXXYHenD&sig=P0p47pC-lRLhfsXl94jWP0oplSM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CBsQ6AEwADgKahUKEwjHhcyT6cvIAhWKGY4KHWOjAss#v=onepage&q=aurangzeb%20on%20dismissing%20hindu%20officials&f=false A Comprehensive History of Medieval India: Twelfth to the Mid-Eighteenth Century By Farooqui Salma Ahmed]</ref><ref>[https://books.google.co.in/books?id=8wC52sA8CtwC&pg=PA225&lpg=PA225&dq=aurangzeb+on+dismissing+hindu+officials&source=bl&ots=GO1zXnDCuB&sig=NJiu3GqiNiUxSDoON8LR43UQLow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CEsQ6AEwCTgKahUKEwjHhcyT6cvIAhWKGY4KHWOjAss#v=onepage&q=aurangzeb%20on%20dismissing%20hindu%20officials&f=false The Human Journey: A Concise Introduction to World History By Kevin Reilly]</ref> |
As emperor, Aurangzeb banned alcoholism, gambling,<ref>https://books.google.ca/books?id=2OJtAAAAMAAJ&dq=aurangzeb+banned+eunuch+gambling&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=He+curbed+evil+practices+of+gambling%2C+drinking+and+prostitution</ref> castration, servitude, [[eunuch]]s, music, [[nautch]] and [[narcotic]]s in the Mughal Empire. He learnt that at [[Sindh]], [[Multan]], [[Thatta]] and particularly at [[Varanasi]], the Hindu [[Brahmins]] attracted large numbers of indigenous local Muslims to their discourses. He ordered the Subahdars of these provinces to demolish the schools and the temples of non-Muslims.<ref name="Mukhiapp25-26" /> Aurangzeb also ordered Subahdars to punish Muslims who dressed like non-Muslims. The executions of the [[antinomian]] Sufi mystic [[Sarmad Kashani]] and the ninth Sikh Guru [[Tegh Bahadur]] bear testimony to Aurangzeb's religious intolerance; the former was beheaded on multiple accounts of heresy,{{efn| It has however been argued that the Mughal emperor had political motives for this particular execution. See the article on [[Sarmad Kashani]] for references.}} the latter, according to Sikhs, because he objected to Aurangzeb's [[forced conversion]]s.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.com/religion/religions/sikhism/people/teghbahadur.shtml |title=Religions – Sikhism: Guru Tegh Bahadur |publisher=BBC |date=1 October 2009 |accessdate=29 April 2012}}</ref> According to other sources, there is no official account that Aurangzeb forcefully converted people.<ref name="conversion">{{citation|url=https://books.google.ca/books?id=7xEdAAAAMAAJ&|title=A Vindication of Aurangzeb: In Two Parts|author=Sadiq Ali|year=1918|page=141}}</ref><ref name="conversion2">{{citation|url=https://books.google.ca/books?id=wsiXwh_tIGkC&pg=RA1-PA152&|title=The Pearson Indian History Manual for the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination|page=152|author=Vipul Singh}}</ref><ref name="conversion3">{{citation|url=https://books.google.ca/books?id=f9D4Ob1YcJgC&pg=PA73&|title=South Asia: An Environmental History|author=Christopher V. Hill|page=73|others=quote: "He did not, however, introduce forced conversion..."}}</ref><ref name="conversion4">{{citation|url=https://books.google.ca/books?id=5ZRIAQAAIAAJ&|others=quote: "''It should be noted that the only authority for these forced conversions is family or local tradition, and no mention of such (as far as I have been able to discover) is made in the historical accounts of Aurangzeb's reign.''"|title=The Preaching of Islam: A History of the Propagation of the Muslim Faith|author=Thomas Walker Arnold|year=1935|page=261}}</ref> He imposed [[Jizya]] on non-Muslims. Further, Aurangzeb levied discriminatory taxes on Hindu merchants at the rate of 5% as against 2.5% on Muslim merchants. He ordered to dismiss all Hindu ''quanungos'' and ''patwaris'' from revenue administration.<ref name="google1">[https://books.google.co.in/books?id=FduG_t2sxwMC&pg=PA190&lpg=PA190&dq=Aurangzeb+levied+taxes+on+Hindu+merchants&source=bl&ots=oB7CXi8_jU&sig=0j_ngj7f-EG9pS7wRGcTcC5kCOw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CE4Q6AEwCWoVChMIp8vfk-nLyAIVC3KOCh2JHQYM#v=onepage&q=Aurangzeb%20levied%20taxes%20on%20Hindu%20merchants&f=false Islam in South Asia: A Short History By Jamal Malik]</ref><ref>[https://books.google.co.in/books?id=LXkGCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA462&lpg=PA462&dq=aurangzeb+on+taxing+hindu+merchants&source=bl&ots=IFubGUGbKA&sig=vEMFDfbdHy0-Ncrc3Zh-ugSGobM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAmoVChMIgJC4_efLyAIVzxuOCh2p-wyF#v=onepage&q=aurangzeb%20on%20taxing%20hindu%20merchants&f=false Encyclopedia of World Trade: From Ancient Times to the Present]</ref><ref>[https://books.google.co.in/books?id=sxhAtCflwOMC&pg=PA260&lpg=PA260&dq=aurangzeb+on+dismissing+hindu+officials&source=bl&ots=UILXXYHenD&sig=P0p47pC-lRLhfsXl94jWP0oplSM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CBsQ6AEwADgKahUKEwjHhcyT6cvIAhWKGY4KHWOjAss#v=onepage&q=aurangzeb%20on%20dismissing%20hindu%20officials&f=false A Comprehensive History of Medieval India: Twelfth to the Mid-Eighteenth Century By Farooqui Salma Ahmed]</ref><ref>[https://books.google.co.in/books?id=8wC52sA8CtwC&pg=PA225&lpg=PA225&dq=aurangzeb+on+dismissing+hindu+officials&source=bl&ots=GO1zXnDCuB&sig=NJiu3GqiNiUxSDoON8LR43UQLow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CEsQ6AEwCTgKahUKEwjHhcyT6cvIAhWKGY4KHWOjAss#v=onepage&q=aurangzeb%20on%20dismissing%20hindu%20officials&f=false The Human Journey: A Concise Introduction to World History By Kevin Reilly]</ref> |
||
Another instance of Aurangzeb's notoriety was his policy of temple destruction, for which figures vary wildly from 80 to 60,000.<ref>{{Cite news|first=Richard M. |last=Eaton |url=http://www.hindu.com/fline/fl1726/17260700.pdf |title=Temple Desecration and Indo-Muslim States |year=2000 |page=297 |location=Chennai, India |work=The Hindu}}</ref> Indian historian [[Harbans Mukhia]] wrote that "In the end, as recently recorded in Richard Eaton's careful tabulation, some 80 temples were demolished between 1192 and 1760 (15 in Aurangzeb's reign) and he compares this figure with the claim of 60,000 demolitions, advanced rather nonchalantly by 'Hindu nationalist' propagandists,' although even in that camp professional historians are slightly more moderate."<ref name="Mukhiapp25-26">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dFDV5IJSbWEC |title=The Mughals of India |first=Harbans |last=Mukhia |pages=25–26}}</ref> Among the Hindu temples he demolished were the three most sacred: the [[Kashi Vishwanath temple]], [[Kesava Deo temple]] and [[Somnath temple]]. He built large mosques in their place.<ref name="Mukhiapp25-26"/> In 1679, he ordered destruction of several prominent temples that had become associated with his enemies: these included the temples of Khandela, Udaipur, Chittor and Jodhpur.<ref name="Temple2000p295">{{Cite news|first=Richard M. |last=Eaton |url=http://www.hindu.com/fline/fl1726/17260700.pdf |title=Temple Desecration and Indo-Muslim States |year=2000 |page=295 |location=Chennai, India |work=The Hindu}}</ref> Historian Richard Eaton believes the overall understanding of temples to be flawed. As early as the sixth century, temples became vital political landmarks as well as religious ones. He writes that not only was temple desecration widely practised and accepted, it was a necessary part of political struggle.<ref name="Temple2000p295"/> |
Another instance of Aurangzeb's notoriety was his policy of temple destruction, for which figures vary wildly from 80 to 60,000.<ref>{{Cite news|first=Richard M. |last=Eaton |url=http://www.hindu.com/fline/fl1726/17260700.pdf |title=Temple Desecration and Indo-Muslim States |year=2000 |page=297 |location=Chennai, India |work=The Hindu}}</ref> Indian historian [[Harbans Mukhia]] wrote that "In the end, as recently recorded in Richard Eaton's careful tabulation, some 80 temples were demolished between 1192 and 1760 (15 in Aurangzeb's reign) and he compares this figure with the claim of 60,000 demolitions, advanced rather nonchalantly by 'Hindu nationalist' propagandists,' although even in that camp professional historians are slightly more moderate."<ref name="Mukhiapp25-26">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dFDV5IJSbWEC |title=The Mughals of India |first=Harbans |last=Mukhia |pages=25–26}}</ref> Among the Hindu temples he demolished were the three most sacred: the [[Kashi Vishwanath temple]], [[Kesava Deo temple]] and [[Somnath temple]]. He built large mosques in their place.<ref name="Mukhiapp25-26"/> In 1679, he ordered destruction of several prominent temples that had become associated with his enemies: these included the temples of Khandela, Udaipur, Chittor and Jodhpur.<ref name="Temple2000p295">{{Cite news|first=Richard M. |last=Eaton |url=http://www.hindu.com/fline/fl1726/17260700.pdf |title=Temple Desecration and Indo-Muslim States |year=2000 |page=295 |location=Chennai, India |work=The Hindu}}</ref> Historian Richard Eaton believes the overall understanding of temples to be flawed. As early as the sixth century, temples became vital political landmarks as well as religious ones. He writes that not only was temple desecration widely practised and accepted, it was a necessary part of political struggle.<ref name="Temple2000p295"/> Catherine B. Asher, in ‘Architecture of Mughal India’, says:<blockquote>But when Aurangzeb did destroy temples, he did so not out of bigotry, but as a political response when his authority was challenged.</blockquote>[[Francois Bernier]], who traveled and chronicled Mughal India during the War of Succession, notes the distaste of both Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb for Christians. This led to the demolition of Christian settlements near the European factories and enslavement of Christian converts by Shah Jahan. Furthermore, Aurangzeb stopped all the aid to Christian missionaries (Frankish Padres) that had been initiated by Akbar and Jahangir.<ref>{{cite book |first=Francois |last=Bernier |authorlink=Francois Bernier |title=Travels Through the Mogul Empire |isbn=978-1-931641-22-7}}</ref>{{Page needed|date=September 2012}} |
||
[[Francois Bernier]], who traveled and chronicled Mughal India during the War of Succession, notes the distaste of both Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb for Christians. This led to the demolition of Christian settlements near the European factories and enslavement of Christian converts by Shah Jahan. Furthermore, Aurangzeb stopped all the aid to Christian missionaries (Frankish Padres) that had been initiated by Akbar and Jahangir.<ref>{{cite book |first=Francois |last=Bernier |authorlink=Francois Bernier |title=Travels Through the Mogul Empire |isbn=978-1-931641-22-7}}</ref>{{Page needed|date=September 2012}} |
|||
[[Ram Puniyani]] states that Aurangzeb was not always fanatically anti-Hindu, and kept changing his policies depending on the needs of the situation. He banned the construction of new temples, but permitted the repair and maintenance of existing temples. He also made generous donations of ''[[jagir]]''s to several temples to win the sympathies of his Hindu subjects. There are several ''firman''s (orders) in his name, supporting temples and [[gurudwara]]s, including [[Mahakaleshwar Jyotirlinga|Mahakaleshwar temple]] of [[Ujjain]], Balaji temple of [[Chitrakoot district|Chitrakoot]], [[Umananda Temple]] of [[Guwahati]] and the [[Shatrunjaya]] Jain temples.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=Fn7GhTpJ4esC&lpg=PA60&ots=n_1c4gWmr8&dq=Balaji%20temple%20aurangzeb&pg=PA60#v=onepage&q=firmans&f=false Communal politics: facts versus myths] by Ram Puniyani, Page 60</ref> During his time, the number of Hindu Mansabdars increased from 22% to 31% in the Mughal administration as he needed them to continue his fight in the Deccan.<ref name="google1"/> |
[[Ram Puniyani]] states that Aurangzeb was not always fanatically anti-Hindu, and kept changing his policies depending on the needs of the situation. He banned the construction of new temples, but permitted the repair and maintenance of existing temples. He also made generous donations of ''[[jagir]]''s to several temples to win the sympathies of his Hindu subjects. There are several ''firman''s (orders) in his name, supporting temples and [[gurudwara]]s, including [[Mahakaleshwar Jyotirlinga|Mahakaleshwar temple]] of [[Ujjain]], Balaji temple of [[Chitrakoot district|Chitrakoot]], [[Umananda Temple]] of [[Guwahati]] and the [[Shatrunjaya]] Jain temples.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=Fn7GhTpJ4esC&lpg=PA60&ots=n_1c4gWmr8&dq=Balaji%20temple%20aurangzeb&pg=PA60#v=onepage&q=firmans&f=false Communal politics: facts versus myths] by Ram Puniyani, Page 60</ref> During his time, the number of Hindu Mansabdars increased from 22% to 31% in the Mughal administration as he needed them to continue his fight in the Deccan.<ref name="google1"/> |
Revision as of 00:14, 16 March 2016
Aurangzeb | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6th Mughal emperor | |||||
Reign | 31 July 1658 – 3 March 1707 | ||||
Coronation | 13 June 1659 at Red Fort, Delhi | ||||
Predecessor | Shah Jahan | ||||
Successor | Muhammad Azam Shah (titular) Bahadur Shah I | ||||
Born | (N.S.) Dahod, Mughal Empire | 4 November 1618 ||||
Died | 20 February 1707 Ahmednagar, Mughal Empire | (aged 88)||||
Burial | |||||
Consort | Dilras Banu Begum | ||||
Wives | Nawab Bai Aurangabadi Mahal | ||||
Issue | Zeb-un-Nissa Muhammad Sultan Zinat-un-Nissa Muhammad Azam Shah Mehr-un-Nissa Sultan Muhammad Akbar Bahadur Shah I Badr-un-Nissa Zubdat-un-Nissa Muhammad Kam Bakhsh | ||||
| |||||
House | Timurid | ||||
Dynasty | Mughal Empire | ||||
Father | Shah Jahan | ||||
Mother | Mumtaz Mahal | ||||
Religion | Islam |
Mughal emperors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abul Muzaffar Muhi-ud-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb (14 October 1618 – 20 February 1707), commonly known as Aurangzeb Alamgir and by his imperial title Alamgir ("world conqueror" or "universe conqueror") and simply referred to as Aurangzeb was the sixth Mughal Emperor and ruled over most of the Indian subcontinent during some parts of his reign. His reign lasted for 49 years from 1658 until his death in 1707.
Aurangzeb was a notable expansionist and during his reign, the Mughal Empire temporarily reached its greatest extent. During his lifetime, victories in the south expanded the Mughal Empire to more than 3.2 million square kilometres and he ruled over a population estimated as being in the range of 100–150 million subjects, with an annual yearly tribute of £38,624,680 (2,87,94,69,894 rupees) in 1690 (the highest in the world at that time).
Aurangzeb's policies partly abandoned the legacy of pluralism, which remains a very controversial aspect of his reign and led to the downfall of the Mughal Empire. Rebellions and wars led to the exhaustion of the imperial Mughal treasury and army. He was a strong-handed authoritarian ruler, and following his death the expansionary period of the Mughal Empire came to an end, and centralized control of the empire declined rapidly.
Early life
Aurangzeb was born on 4 November 1618, in Dahod, Gujarat. He was the third son and sixth child of Shah Jahan and Mumtaz Mahal. His father was a governor of Gujarat at that time. In June 1626, after an unsuccessful rebellion by his father, Aurangzeb and his brother Dara Shikoh were kept as hostages under their grandparents' (Nur Jahan and Jahangir) Lahore court. On 26 February 1628, Shah Jahan was officially declared the Mughal Emperor, and Aurangzeb returned to live with his parents at Agra Fort, where Aurangzeb received his formal education in Arabic and Persian. His daily allowance was fixed at Rs. 500 which he spent on religious education and the study of history. He also accused his brothers of alcoholism and womanising.[citation needed]
On 28 May 1633 Aurangzeb escaped death when a powerful war elephant stampeded through the Mughal Imperial encampment. He rode against the elephant and struck its trunk with a lance,[1] and successfully defended himself from being crushed. Aurangzeb's valour was appreciated by his father who conferred him the title of Bahadur (Brave) and had him weighed in gold and presented gifts worth Rs. 200,000. This event was celebrated in Persian and Urdu verses and Aurangzeb said:[2]
If the (elephant) fight had ended fatally for me, it would not have been a matter of shame. Death drops the curtain even on Emperors; it is no dishonor. The shame lay in what my brothers did!
Early military campaigns and administration
Bundela War
On 15 December 1634, Aurangzeb was given his first command, comprising 10,000 horse and 4000 troopers. He was allowed to use the red tent, which was an imperial prerogative.[citation needed]
Subsequently, Aurangzeb was nominally in charge of the force sent to Bundelkhand with the intent of subduing the rebellious ruler of Orchha, Jhujhar Singh, who had attacked another territory in defiance of Shah Jahan's policy and was refusing to atone for his actions.[3] By arrangement, Aurangzeb stayed in the rear, away from the fighting, and took the advice of his generals as the Mughal Army gathered and commenced the Siege of Orchha in 1635.[citation needed] The campaign was successful and Singh was removed from power.[3]
Viceroy of the Deccan
Aurangzeb was appointed Viceroy of the Deccan in 1636.[5] After Shah Jahan's vassals had been devastated by the alarming expansion of Ahmednagar during the reign of the Nizam Shahi boy-prince Murtaza Shah III, the emperor dispatched Aurangzeb, who in 1636 brought the Nizam Shahi dynasty to an end.[6] In 1637, Aurangzeb married the Safavid princess, Dilras Banu Begum, also known as Rabia-ud-Daurani. She was his first wife and chief consort.[7][8] He also had an infatuation with a slave girl, Hira Bai, whose death at a young age greatly affected him. In his old age, he was under the charms of his concubine, Udaipuri Bai. The latter had formerly been a companion to Dara Shikoh.[9] In the same year, 1637, Aurangzeb was placed in charge of annexing the small Rajput kingdom of Baglana, which he did with ease.[10]
In 1644, Aurangzeb's sister, Jahanara, was burned when the chemicals in her perfume were ignited by a nearby lamp while in Agra. This event precipitated a family crisis with political consequences. Aurangzeb suffered his father's displeasure by not returning to Agra immediately but rather three weeks later. Shah Jahan had been nursing Jahanara back to health in that time and thousands of vassals had arrived in Agra to pay their respects.[citation needed] Shah Jahan was outraged to see Aurangzeb enter the interior palace compound in military attire and immediately dismissed him from his position of Viceroy of the Deccan; Aurangzeb was also no longer allowed to use red tents or to associate himself with the official military standard of the Mughal emperor.[citation needed]
In 1645, he was barred from the court for seven months and mentioned his grief to fellow Mughal commanders. Thereafter, Shah Jahan appointed him governor of Gujarat where he served well and was rewarded for bringing stability.[citation needed]
In 1647, Shah Jahan moved Aurangzeb from Gujarat to be governor of Balkh, replacing a younger son, Murad Baksh, who had proved ineffective there. The area was under attack from Uzbek and Turkoman tribes. Whilst the Mughal artillery and muskets were a formidable force, so too were the skirmishing skills of their opponents. The two sides were in stalemate and Aurangzeb discovered that his army could not live off the land, which was devastated by war. With the onset of winter, he and his father had to make a largely unsatisfactory deal with the Uzbeks, giving away territory in exchange for nominal recognition of Mughal sovereignty. The Mughal force suffered still further with attacks by Uzbeks and other tribesmen as it retreated through snow to Kabul. By the end of this two-year campaign, into which Aurangzeb had been plunged at a late stage, a vast sum of money had been expended for little gain.[11]
Further inauspicious military involvements followed, as Aurangzeb was appointed governor of Multan and Sindh. His efforts in 1649 and 1652 to dislodge the Safavids at Kandahar, which they had recently retaken after a decade of Mughal control, both ended in failure as winter approached. The logistical problems of supplying an army at the extremity of the empire, combined with the poor quality of armaments and the intransigence of the opposition have been cited by John Richards as the reasons for failure, and a third attempt in 1653, led by Dara Shikoh, met with the same outcome.[12]
Dara Shikoh's appointment followed the removal of Aurangzeb, who once again became Viceroy in the Deccan. He regretted this and harboured feelings that Shikoh had manipulated the situation to serve his own ends. Aurangbad's two jagirs (land grants) were moved there as a consequence of his return and, because the Deccan was a relatively impoverished area, this caused him to lose out financially. So poor was the area that grants were required from Malwa and Gujarat in order to maintain the administration and the situation caused ill-feeling between father and son. Shah Jahan insisted that things could be improved if Aurangzeb made efforts to develop cultivation, but the efforts that were made proved too slow in producing results to satisfy the emperor.[13]
Aurangzeb proposed to resolve the situation by attacking the dynastic occupants of Golconda (the Qutb Shahis) and Bijapur (the Adil Shahis). As an adjunct to resolving the financial difficulties, the proposal would also extend Mughal influence by accruing more lands. Again, he was to feel that Dara had exerted influence on his father: believing that he was on the verge of victory in both instances, Aurangzeb was frustrated that Shah Jahan chose then to settle for negotiations with the opposing forces rather than pushing for complete victory.[13]
War of Succession
The four sons of Shah Jahan all held posts as governors during their father's reign. The emperor favoured the eldest, Dara Shikoh, and this had caused resentment among the younger three, who sought at various times to strengthen alliances between themselves and against Dara. There was no Muslim tradition of primogeniture and historian Satish Chandra says that "In the ultimate resort, connections among the powerful military leaders, and military strength and capacity [were] the real arbiters."[13] Jacques Weber, emeritus professor of modern history at the University of Nantes,[14] explains that "... the loyalties of these officials seem to have been motivated more by their own interests, the closeness of the family relation and above all the charisma of the pretenders than by ideological divides."[15] The contest for power was primarily between Dara Shikoh and Aurangzeb because, although all four sons had demonstrated competence in their official roles, it was around these two that the supporting cast of officials and other influential people mostly circulated.[16] There were ideological differences — Dara was an intellectual and a religious liberal in the mould of Akbar, while Aurangzeb was much more conservative — but, as historians Barbara D. Metcalf and Thomas R. Metcalf say, "To focus on divergent philosophies neglects the fact that Dara was a poor general and leader. It also ignores the fact that factional lines in the succession dispute were not, by and large, shaped by ideology ..."[17] Muslims and Hindus did not divide along religious lines in their support for one pretender or the other nor, according to Chandra, is there much evidence to support the belief that Jahanara and other members of the royal family were split in their support. Jahanara, certainly, interceded at various times on behalf of all of the princes and was well-regarded by Aurangzeb even though she shared the religious outlook of Dara.[18]
In 1656, a general under Qutb Shahi dynasty named Musa Khan lead an army of 12,000 Musketeers to attack Aurangzeb, and later on the same campaign Aurangzeb in turn rode against an army consisting 8,000 horsemen and 20,000 Karnataka Musketeers[19]
Having made clear that he wanted Dara to succeed him, Shah Jahan became ill with stranguary in 1657 and was closeted under the care of his favourite son in the newly built city of Shahjahanabad (Old Delhi). Rumours of the death of Shah Jahan abounded and the younger sons were concerned that Dara might be hiding it for Machiavellian reasons. Thus, they took action: Shah Shuja prepared to contest the throne from Bengal, where he had been governor since 1637, while Murad did the same in his governorship of Gujarat and Aurangzeb did so in the Deccan. It is not known whether these preparations were made in the mistaken belief that the rumours of death were true or whether the challengers were just taking advantage of the situation.[13]
After regaining some of his health, Shah Jahan moved to Agra and Dara urged him to send forces to challenge Shah Shuja and Murad, who had declared themselves rulers in their respective territories. While Shah Shuja was defeated at Banares in February 1658, the army sent to deal with Murad discovered to their surprise that he and Aurangzeb had combined their forces,[18] the two brothers having agreed to partition the empire once they had gained control of it.[20] The two armies clashed at Dharmat in April 1658, with Aurangzeb being the victor. Shuja was being chased through Bihar and the victory of Aurangzeb proved this to be a poor decision by Dara Shikoh, who now had a defeated force on one front and a successful force unnecessarily pre-occupied on another. Realising that his recalled Bihar forces would not arrive at Agra in time to resist the emboldened Aurangzeb's advance, Dara scrambled to form alliances in order but found that Aurangzeb had already courted key potential candidates. When Dara's disparate, hastily concocted army clashed with Aurangzeb's well-disciplined, battle-hardened force at the Battle of Samugarh in late May, neither Dara's men nor his generalship were any match for Aurangzeb. Dara had also become over-confident in his own abilities and, by ignoring advice not to lead in battle while his father was alive, he cemented the idea that he had usurped the throne.[18] "After the defeat of Dara, Shah Jahan was imprisoned in the fort of Agra where he spent eight long years under the care of his favourite daughter Jahanara."[21]
Aurangzeb then broke his arrangement with Murad Baksh, which probably had been his intention all along.[20] Instead of looking to partition the empire between himself and Murad, he had his brother arrested and imprisoned at Gwalior Fort. Murad was executed on 4 December 1661, ostensibly for the murder of the diwan of Gujarat some time earlier. The allegation was encouraged by Aurangzeb, who caused the diwan's son to seek retribution for the death under the principles of Sharia law.[22] Meanwhile, Dara gathered his forces, and moved to the Punjab. The army sent against Shuja was trapped in the east, its generals Jai Singh and Dilir Khan submitted to Aurangzeb, but Dara's son, Suleiman Shikoh, escaped. Aurangzeb offered Shah Shuja the governorship of Bengal. This move had the effect of isolating Dara Shikoh and causing more troops to defect to Aurangzeb. Shah Shuja, who had declared himself emperor in Bengal began to annex more territory and this prompted Aurangzeb to march from Punjab with a new and large army that fought during the Battle of Khajwa, where Shah Shuja and his chain-mail armored war elephants were routed by the forces loyal to Aurangzeb. Shah Shuja then fled to Arakan (in present-day Burma), where he was executed by the local rulers.[23]
With Shuja and Murad disposed of, and with his father immured in Agra, Aurangzeb pursued Dara Shikoh, chasing him across the north-western bounds of the empire. Aurangzeb claimed that Dara was no longer a Muslim and accused him of poisoning the Mughal Grand Vizier Saadullah Khan. Both of these statements however lacked any evidence.[citation needed] After a series of battles, defeats and retreats, Dara was betrayed by one of his generals, who arrested and bound him. In 1658, Aurangzeb arranged his formal coronation in Delhi.
"On 10 August 1659, Dara was executed on grounds of apostasy."[21] Having secured his position, Aurangzeb confined his frail father at the Agra Fort but did not mistreat him. Shah Jahan was cared for by Jahanara and died in 1666.[20]
Reign
Establishment of Islamic law
Historian Katherine Brown has noted that "The very name of Aurangzeb seems to act in the popular imagination as a signifier of politico-religious bigotry and repression, regardless of historical accuracy." The subject is controversial and, despite no proof, has resonated in modern times with popularly accepted claims that he intended to destroy the Bamiyan Buddhas.[24] As a political and religious conservative, Aurangzeb chose not to follow the liberal religious viewpoints of his predecessors after his ascension. Shah Jahan had already moved away from the liberalism of Akbar, although in a token manner rather than with the intent of suppressing Hinduism,[25][a] and Aurangzeb took the change still further.[26] Though the approach to faith of Akbar, Jahangir and Shah Jahan was more syncretic than Babur, the founder of the empire, Aurangzeb's position is not so obvious. His emphasis on sharia competed, or was directly in conflict, with his insistence that zawabit or secular decrees could supersede sharia.[27] Despite claims of sweeping edicts and policies, contradictory accounts exist.[28] He sought to codify Hanafi law by the work of several hundred jurists, called Fatawa-e-Alamgiri.[28] It is possible the War of Succession and continued incursions combined with Shah Jahan's spending made cultural expenditure impossible.[29]
As emperor, Aurangzeb banned alcoholism, gambling,[30] castration, servitude, eunuchs, music, nautch and narcotics in the Mughal Empire. He learnt that at Sindh, Multan, Thatta and particularly at Varanasi, the Hindu Brahmins attracted large numbers of indigenous local Muslims to their discourses. He ordered the Subahdars of these provinces to demolish the schools and the temples of non-Muslims.[31] Aurangzeb also ordered Subahdars to punish Muslims who dressed like non-Muslims. The executions of the antinomian Sufi mystic Sarmad Kashani and the ninth Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur bear testimony to Aurangzeb's religious intolerance; the former was beheaded on multiple accounts of heresy,[b] the latter, according to Sikhs, because he objected to Aurangzeb's forced conversions.[32] According to other sources, there is no official account that Aurangzeb forcefully converted people.[33][34][35][36] He imposed Jizya on non-Muslims. Further, Aurangzeb levied discriminatory taxes on Hindu merchants at the rate of 5% as against 2.5% on Muslim merchants. He ordered to dismiss all Hindu quanungos and patwaris from revenue administration.[37][38][39][40]
Another instance of Aurangzeb's notoriety was his policy of temple destruction, for which figures vary wildly from 80 to 60,000.[41] Indian historian Harbans Mukhia wrote that "In the end, as recently recorded in Richard Eaton's careful tabulation, some 80 temples were demolished between 1192 and 1760 (15 in Aurangzeb's reign) and he compares this figure with the claim of 60,000 demolitions, advanced rather nonchalantly by 'Hindu nationalist' propagandists,' although even in that camp professional historians are slightly more moderate."[31] Among the Hindu temples he demolished were the three most sacred: the Kashi Vishwanath temple, Kesava Deo temple and Somnath temple. He built large mosques in their place.[31] In 1679, he ordered destruction of several prominent temples that had become associated with his enemies: these included the temples of Khandela, Udaipur, Chittor and Jodhpur.[42] Historian Richard Eaton believes the overall understanding of temples to be flawed. As early as the sixth century, temples became vital political landmarks as well as religious ones. He writes that not only was temple desecration widely practised and accepted, it was a necessary part of political struggle.[42] Catherine B. Asher, in ‘Architecture of Mughal India’, says:
But when Aurangzeb did destroy temples, he did so not out of bigotry, but as a political response when his authority was challenged.
Francois Bernier, who traveled and chronicled Mughal India during the War of Succession, notes the distaste of both Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb for Christians. This led to the demolition of Christian settlements near the European factories and enslavement of Christian converts by Shah Jahan. Furthermore, Aurangzeb stopped all the aid to Christian missionaries (Frankish Padres) that had been initiated by Akbar and Jahangir.[43][page needed]
Ram Puniyani states that Aurangzeb was not always fanatically anti-Hindu, and kept changing his policies depending on the needs of the situation. He banned the construction of new temples, but permitted the repair and maintenance of existing temples. He also made generous donations of jagirs to several temples to win the sympathies of his Hindu subjects. There are several firmans (orders) in his name, supporting temples and gurudwaras, including Mahakaleshwar temple of Ujjain, Balaji temple of Chitrakoot, Umananda Temple of Guwahati and the Shatrunjaya Jain temples.[44] During his time, the number of Hindu Mansabdars increased from 22% to 31% in the Mughal administration as he needed them to continue his fight in the Deccan.[37]
Execution of opponents
The first prominent execution during the long reign of Aurangzeb started with that of his brother Prince Dara Shikoh, who was accused of being influenced by Hinduism although some sources argue it was done for political reasons.[45][45] Aurangzeb had his allied brother Prince Murad Baksh held for murder, judged and then executed.[46] Aurangzeb is accused of poisoning his imprisoned nephew Sulaiman Shikoh.[47]
Aurangzeb then executed Sarmad Kashani a controversial Sufi mystic of Jewish origins.[48]
Later Aurangzeb executed Sambhaji the leader of the Maratha Confederacy. During his trial he was found guilty of murder and violence, atrocities[49] against the Muslims of Burhanpur and Bahadurpur in Berar by Marathas under his command.[50]
The Sikh leader Guru Tegh Bahadur was arrested on orders by Aurangzeb, found guilty of blasphemy by a Qadi's court and executed.[51]
Expansion of the Mughal Empire
Throughout his reign, Aurangzeb engaged in almost constant warfare. He built up a massive army and began a program of military expansion along all the boundaries of his empire. He pushed north-west into the Punjab and also drove south, conquering two further Muslim kingdoms[citation needed] - the Adil Shahis of Bijapur and Qutbshahis of Golconda — to add to the defeat of the Ahmednagar Sultanate that had been accomplished in 1636 while he had been viceroy of the Deccan. These new territories were administered by the Mughal Nawabs loyal to Aurangzeb.[citation needed]
Soon after seizing the throne, Aurangzeb began advancements against the unruly Sultan of Bijapur and during 1657, the Mughals are known to have utilized rockets during the Siege of Bidar, against Sidi Marjan.[56][page needed] Aurangzeb's forces discharged rockets and grenades while scaling the walls, and Sidi Marjan himself was mortally wounded after a rocket struck his large gunpowder depot. After twenty-seven days of hard fighting, Bidar was captured by the Mughals.[56]
In 1663, during his visit to Ladakh, Aurangzeb established direct control over that part of the empire and loyal subjects such as Deldan Namgyal agreed to pledge tribute and loyalty. Deldan Namgyal is also known to have constructed a Grand Mosque in Leh, which he dedicated to Mughal rule.[57]
In 1664, Shaista Khan (the son of Asaf Khan IV), was appointed the Subedar of Bengal. He immediately eliminated Portuguese and Arakanese pirates from the region, and in 1666 led an army of 70,000 men to recapture the port of Chittagong from the Arakanese king Sanda Thudhamma. Chittagong remained a key port throughout Mughal rule.[58][page needed]
In 1685, Aurangzeb dispatched his son, Muhammad Azam Shah, with a force of nearly 50,000 men to capture Bijapur Fort and defeat Sikandar Adil Shah (the ruler of Bijapur) who refused to be a vassal. The Mughals could not make any advancements upon Bijapur Fort mainly because of the superior usage of cannon batteries on both sides. Outraged by the stalemate Aurangzeb himself arrived on 4 September 1686 and commanded the Siege of Bijapur; after eight days of fighting, the Mughals were victorious.[citation needed]
Only one remaining ruler, Abul Hasan Qutb Shah (the Qutbshahi ruler of Golconda), refused to surrender. He and his servicemen fortified themselves at Golconda and fiercely protected the Kollur Mine, which was then probably the world's most productive diamond mine, and an important economic asset. In 1687, Aurangzeb led his grand Mughal army against the Deccan Qutbshahi fortress during the Siege of Golconda. The Qutbshahis had constructed massive fortifications throughout successive generations on a granite hill over 400 ft high with an enormous eight-mile long wall enclosing the city. The main gates of Golconda had the ability to repulse any war elephant attack. Although the Qutbshahis maintained the impregnability of their walls, at night Aurangzeb and his infantry erected complex scaffolding that allowed them to scale the high walls. During the eight-month siege the Mughals faced many hardships including the death of their experienced commander Kilich Khan Bahadur. Eventually, Aurangzeb and his forces managed to penetrate the walls by capturing a gate, and their entry into the fort led Abul Hasan Qutb Shah to surrender peacefully.
Military equipment
Mughal cannon making skills advanced during the 17th century.[59] One of the most impressive Mughal cannons is known as the Zafarbaksh, which is a very rare composite cannon, that required skills in both wrought-iron forge welding and bronze-casting technologies and the in-depth knowledge of the qualities of both metals.[60]
Aurangzeb military entourage consisted of 16 cannons including the Azdaha Paikar (which, was capable of firing a 33.5 kg ordnance)[61] and Fateh Rahber (20 feet long with Persian and Arabic inscriptions).
The Ibrahim Rauza was also a famed cannon, which was well known for its multi-barrels.[62] François Bernier, the personal physician to Aurangzeb, observed versatile Mughal gun-carriages each drawn by two horses.[63]
Despite these innovations, most soldiers used bows and arrows, the quality of sword manufacture was so poor that they preferred to use ones imported from England, and the operation of the cannons was entrusted not to Mughals but to European gunners. Other weapons used during the period included rockets, cauldrons of boiling oil, muskets and manjaniqs (stone-throwing catapults).[64]
Infantry who were later called Sepoy and who specialized in siege and artillery emerged during the reign of Aurangzeb[65]
-
Daulatabad cannon
-
Kalak Bangadi cannon.
-
one of the Daulatabad cannons
-
Kilkila cannon
-
Aurangabad cannon
War elephants
In the year 1703, the Mughal commander at Coromandel, Daud Khan Panni spent 10,500 coins to purchase 30 to 50 war elephants from Ceylon.[66]
Art and Culture
Aurangzeb was known to be of a more austere nature than his predecessors. Being religious he encouraged Islamic calligraphy. His reign also saw the building of the Lahore badshahi Mosque, and Bibi ka Maqbara in Aurangabad for his wife Rabia-ud-Daurani.
Calligraphy
The Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb is known to have patronized works of Islamic Calligraphy during his reign particularly Syed Ali Tabrizi.[68]
-
Quatrain on the Virtue of Patience by Muhammad Muhsin Lahuri.
-
Spousal Advice, by Abdallah Lahuri.
-
Works of Hafez, by Abdallah Lahuri.
-
Works of Hafez, by Muhammad Tahir Lahuri.
Architecture
Unlike his father, Aurangzeb was not much interested in architecture. The structure of Bibi Ka Maqbara in Aurangabad,which now is a historical monument was constructed by the sons of Aurangzeb in remembrance of their mother. The inspiration came from Taj mahal as is quite visible from its architecture. Aurangzeb ordered the construction of the Badshahi Mosque in Lahore. Aurangzeb constructed a small marble mosque known as the Moti Masjid (Pearl Mosque) in the Red Fort complex in Delhi. He also constructed a mosque on Benares. The mosque he constructed in Srinagar is still the largest in Kashmir.
-
17th century Badshahi Masjid built by Aurangzeb in Lahore.
-
Great Mosque of Aurungzeb and the adjoining Ghats.
-
Imperial Delhi's Golden Mosque.
-
Tomb of Sufi saint, Syed Abdul Rahim Shah Bukhari constructed by Aurangzeb.
-
Lalbagh Fort, in modern Bangladesh.
Textile
The Textile industry in the Mughal Empire emerged very firmly during the reign of the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb and was particularly well noted by Francois Bernier, a French physician of the Mughal Emperor. Francois Bernier writes how Karkanahs, or workshops for the artisans, particularly in textiles flourished by "employing hundreds of embroiderers, who were superintended by a master". He further writes how "Artisans manufacture of silk, fine brocade, and other fine muslins, of which are made turbans, robes of gold flowers, and tunics worn by females, so delicately fine as to wear out in one night, and cost even more if they were well embroidered with fine needlework".[69]
He also explains the different techniques employed to produce such complicated textiles such as Himru (whose name is Persian for "brocade"), Paithani (whose pattern is identical on both sides), Mushru (satin weave) and how Kalamkari, in which fabrics are painted or block-printed, was a technique that originally came from Persia. Francois Bernier provided some of the first, impressive descriptions of the designs and the soft, delicate texture of Pashmina Shawls also known as Kani, which were very valued for their warmth and comfort among the Mughals, and how these textiles and shawls eventually began to find their way to France and England.[70]
-
Shawls manufactured in the Mughal Empire had highly influenced other cultures around the world.
-
Shawl makers in the Mughal Empire.
-
Mughal imperial carpet
Foreign relations
As soon as he became emperor, Aurangzeb sent some of the finest ornate gifts such as carpets, lamps, tiles and others to the Islamic shrines at Mecca and Medina. He also ordered the construction of very large ships in Surat that would transport these gifts and even pilgrims to the Hijaz. These annual expeditions organized by Aurangzeb were led by Mir Aziz Badakhshi who died in Mecca of natural causes but managed to deliver more than 45,000 silver coins and several thousand Kaftans of honor.[72][page needed]
Relations with the Uzbek
Subhan Quli, Balkh's Uzbek ruler was the first to recognize him in 1658 and requested for a general alliance, he worked alongside the new Mughal Emperor since 1647 when Aurangzeb was the Subedar of Balkh.
Relations with the Safavid dynasty
Aurangzeb received the embassy of Abbas II of Persia in 1660 and returned them with gifts. However relations between the Mughal Empire and the Safavid dynasty were tense because the Persians attacked the Mughal army positioned near Kandahar. Aurangzeb prepared his armies in the Indus River Basin for a counteroffensive, but Abbas II's death in 1666 caused Aurangzeb to end all hostilities. Aurangzeb's rebellious son, Sultan Muhammad Akbar, sought refuge with Suleiman I of Persia, who had rescued him from the Imam of Musqat and later refused to assist him in any military adventures against Aurangzeb.[73]
Relations with the French
In the year 1667 the French East India Company ambassadors Le Gouz and Bebert presented Louis XIV of France's letter which urged the protection of French merchants from various rebels in the Deccan. In response to the letter Aurangzeb issued a Firman allowing the French to open a factory in Surat.
-
March of the Great Mogol (Aurangzeb)
-
François Bernier, was a French physician and traveler, who for 12 years was the personal physician of Aurangzeb. He described his experiences in Travels in the Mughal Empire.
-
Map of the Mughal Empire by Vincenzo Coronelli (1650–1718) of Venice, who served as Royal Geographer to Louis XIV of France.
-
French map of the Deccan.
Relations with the Sultanate of Maldives
In the 1660s, the Sultan of the Maldives, Ibrahim Iskandar I, requested help from Aurangzeb's representative, the Faujdar of Balasore. The sultan was concerned about the impact of Dutch and English trading ships but the powers of Aurangzeb did not extend to the seas, the Maldives were not under his governance and nothing came of the request.[74]
Relations with the Ottoman Empire
In 1688 the desperate Ottoman Sultan Suleiman II urgently requested for assistance against the rapidly advancing Austrians, during the Ottoman–Habsburg War. However, Aurangzeb and his forces were heavily engaged in the Deccan Wars against the Marathas to commit any formal assistance to their Ottoman allies.[75]
Relations with the English
In 1686, the English East India Company, which had unsuccessfully tried to obtain a firman, an imperial directive that would grant England regular trading privileges throughout the Mughal empire, initiated the so-called Child's War. This hostility against the empire ended in disaster for the English, particularly when Aurangzeb dispatched a strong fleet from Janjira commanded by the Sidi Yaqub and manned by Mappila loyal to Ali Raja Ali II and Abyssinian sailors firmly blockaded Bombay in 1689.[76][page needed] In 1690 the company sent envoys to Aurangzeb's camp to plead for a pardon. The company's envoys had to prostrate themselves before the emperor, pay a large indemnity, and promise better behavior in the future.
In September 1695, English pirate Henry Every perpetrated one of the most profitable pirate raids in history with his capture of a Grand Mughal convoy near Surat. The Indian ships had been returning home from their annual pilgrimage to Mecca when the pirates struck, capturing the Ganj-i-Sawai, reportedly the greatest ship in the Muslim fleet, and its escorts in the process. When news of the piracy reached the mainland, a livid Aurangzeb nearly ordered an armed attack against the English-governed city of Bombay, though he finally agreed to compromise after the East India Company promised to pay financial reparations, estimated at £600,000 by the Mughal authorities.[77] Meanwhile, Aurangzeb shut down four of the East India Company's factories, imprisoned the workers and captains (who were nearly lynched by a rioting mob), and threatened to put an end to all English trading in India until Every was captured.[77] The Privy Council and East India Company offered a massive bounty for Every's apprehension, leading to the first worldwide manhunt in recorded history.[78] However, Every successfully eluded capture.[citation needed]
In 1702, Aurangzeb sent Daud Khan Panni, the Mughal Empire's Subhedar of the Carnatic region, to besiege and blockade Fort St. George for more than three months.[79] The governor of the fort Thomas Pitt was instructed by the English East India Company to sue for peace.
-
British pirates engaging the Mughal Emperor's Ship Ganj-i-Sawai.
-
Letter from Aurangzeb to Sir William Norris, 1st Baronet.
-
A depiction of Every, with the Fancy engaging the Mughal Emperor's Ship Ganj-i-Sawai in the background.
Administrative reforms
Revenue
Aurangzeb's exchequer raised a record[citation needed] £100 million in annual revenue through various sources like taxes, customs and land revenue, et al. from 24 provinces.[81]
Coins
-
Half rupee
-
Rupee coin showing full name
-
Rupee with square area
-
A copper dam of Aurangzeb
Aurangzeb felt that verses from the Quran should not be stamped on coins, as done in former times, because they were constantly touched by the hands and feet of people. His coins had the name of the mint city and the year of issue on one face, and, the following couplet on other:[82]
King Aurangzeb Alamgir
Stamped coins, in the world, like the bright full moon.[82]
Rebellions
By 1700, the Marathas attacked the Mughal provinces from the Deccan and secessionist agendas from the Rajputs, Hindu Jats and Sikhs rebelled against the Mughal Empire's administrative and economic systems.[83][page needed]
- In 1669, the Hindu Jat peasants of Bharatpur around Mathura rebelled and created Bharatpur state but were defeated.
- In 1659, Shivaji, launched a surprise attack on the Mughal Viceroy Shaista Khan and, while waging war against Aurangzeb. Shivaji and his forces attacked the Deccan, Janjira and Surat and tried to gain control of vast territories. In 1689 Aurangzeb's armies captured Shivaji's son Sambhaji and executed him after he had sacked Burhanpur. But, the Marathas continued the fight and it actually started the terminal decline of his empire.[84]
- In 1679, the Rathore clan under the command of Durgadas Rathore rebelled when Aurangzeb didn't give permission to make the young Rathore prince the king and took direct command of Jodhpur. This incident caused great unrest among the Hindu Rajput rulers under Aurangzeb and led to many rebellions in Rajputana.
- In 1672, the Satnami, a sect concentrated in an area near Delhi, under the leadership of Bhirbhan, took over the administration of Narnaul, but they were eventually crushed upon Aurangzeb's personal intervention with very few escaping alive.[85]
- In 1671, the Battle of Saraighat was fought in the easternmost regions of the Mughal Empire against the Ahom Kingdom. The Mughals led by Mir Jumla II and Shaista Khan attacked and were defeated by the Ahoms.
- Maharaja Chhatrasal was a medieval Indian warrior from Bundela Rajput clan, who fought against the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb, and established his own kingdom in Bundelkhand, becoming a Maharaja of Panna.[86]
Jat rebellion
In 1669, Hindu Jats began to organize a rebellion that is believed to have been caused by Aurangzeb's imposition of Jizya (a form of organized religious taxation).[87] The Jats were led by Gokula, a rebel landholder from Tilpat. By the year 1670 20,000 Jat rebels were quelled and the Mughal Army took control of Tilpat, Gokula's personal fortune amounted to 93,000 gold coins and hundreds of thousands of silver coins.[88]
Gokula was caught and executed. But the Jats continued to terrorize the Mughals and attacked Akbar's mausoleum the gold, silver and fine carpets within the tomb .[89] There are claims that Jats caused two large silver doors at the entrance of the Taj Mahal to be stolen and melted down.[90] However, Jats later established their independent state of Bharatpur.
Mughal–Maratha Wars
In 1657, while Aurangzeb attacked Golconda and Bijapur in the Deccan, the Hindu Maratha warrior aristocrat, Shivaji, used guerrilla tactics to take control of three Adil Shahi forts formerly under his father's command. With these victories, Shivaji assumed de facto leadership of many independent Maratha clans. The Marathas harried the flanks of the warring Adil Shahis and Mughals, gaining weapons, forts, and territory.[91] Shivaji's small and ill-equipped army survived an all out Adil Shahi attack, and Shivaji personally killed the Adil Shahi general, Afzal Khan.[92] With this event, the Marathas transformed into a powerful military force, capturing more and more Adil Shahi and Mughal territories.[93] Shivaji went on to neutralise Mughal power in the region.[94]
In 1659, Aurangzeb sent his trusted general and maternal uncle Shaista Khan, the Wali in Golconda to recover forts lost to the Maratha rebels. Shaista Khan drove into Maratha territory and took up residence in Pune. But in a daring raid on the governor's palace in Pune during a midnight wedding celebration, the Marathas killed Shaista Khan's son and maimed Shaista Khan by cutting off the fingers of his hand. Shaista Khan, however, survived and was re-appointed the administrator of Bengal going on to become a key commander in the war against the Ahoms.
Shivaji captured forts belonging to both Mughals and Bijapur. At last Aurangzeb ordered the armament of the Daulatabad Fort with two bombards (the Daulatabad Fort was later utilized as a Mughal bastion during the Deccan Wars). Aurangzeb also sent his general Raja Jai Singh of Amber, a Hindu Rajput, to attack the Marathas. Jai Singh won the fort of Purandar after fierce battle in which the Maratha commander Murarbaji fell. Foreseeing defeat, Shivaji agreed for a truce and a meeting with Aurangjeb at Delhi. Jai Singh also promised Shivaji his safety, placing him under the care of his own son, the future Raja Ram Singh I. However, circumstances at the Mughal court were beyond the control of the Raja, and when Shivaji and his son Sambhaji went to Agra to meet Aurangzeb, they were placed under house arrest, from which they managed to effect a daring escape.[95]
Shivaji returned to the Deccan, and crowned himself Chhatrapati or the ruler of the Maratha Confederacy in 1674.[96] While Aurangzeb continued to send troops against him, Shivaji expanded Maratha control throughout the Deccan until his death in 1680. Shivaji was succeeded by his son, Sambhaji. Militarily and politically, Mughal efforts to control the Deccan continued to fail.[citation needed]
Aurangzeb's reign over the empire reached its climax the emperor, he no longer honored the rights of Christians, Jews, Muslims, Dadupanthis, Stargazers, Malakis, Atheists, Brahmins, Jains, in fact all the communities of the Empire. His imposition of Jizya upon communities that were not adherents of Islam, led to the rise of the opportunistic Shivaji and his Maratha Confederacy, whose leadership clearly indicated to Aurangzeb in a letter "Protesting against Imposition of Jaziya (2nd April 1679)".[97]
On the other hand, Aurangzeb's third son Akbar left the Mughal court along with a few Muslim Mansabdar supporters and joined Muslim rebels in the Deccan. Aurangzeb in response moved his court to Aurangabad and took over command of the Deccan campaign. The rebels were defeated and Akbar fled south to the shelter of Sambhaji, Shivaji's successor. More battles ensued, and Akbar fled to Persia and never returned.[98]
In 1689, Aurangzeb's forces captured Sambhaji. His successor Rajaram and his Maratha forces fought individual battles against the forces of the Mughal Empire, and territory changed hands repeatedly during years of interminable warfare. As there was no central authority among the Marathas, Aurangzeb was forced to contest every inch of territory, at great cost in lives and money. Even as Aurangzeb drove west, deep into Maratha territory – notably conquering Satara — the Marathas expanded their attacks further into Mughal lands – Malwa, Hyderabad and Jinji in Tamil Nadu. Aurangzeb waged continuous war in the Deccan for more than two decades with no resolution.[99] He thus lost about a fifth of his army fighting rebellions led by the Marathas in Deccan India. He traveled a long distance to the Deccan to conquer the Marathas and eventually died at the age of 90, still fighting the Marathas.[citation needed]
Aurangzeb's shift from conventional warfare to anti-insurgency in the Deccan region shifted the paradigm of Mughal military thought. There were conflicts between Marathas and Mughals in Pune, Jinji, Malwa and Vadodara. The Mughal Empire's port city of Surat was sacked twice by the Marathas during the reign of Aurangzeb and the valuable port was in ruins.[100]
"So every plan and project that Aurangzeb formed came to little good; and every enterprise which he undertook was long in execution and failed in its objective."
Khafi Khan, Muntakhabu-l Lubab (1874)
-
A Mughal trooper in the Deccan.
-
Aurangzeb leads his final expedition (1705), leading an army of 500,000 troops.
-
Mughal-era aristocrat armed with a matchlock musket.
Ahom campaign
While Aurangzeb and his brother Shah Shuja had been fighting against each other, the Hindu rulers of Kuch Behar and Assam took advantage of the disturbed conditions in the Mughal Empire, had invaded imperial dominions. For three years they were not attacked, but in 1660 Mir Jumla II, the viceroy of Bengal, was ordered to recover the lost territories.[101]
The Mughals set out in November 1661, and within weeks occupied the capital of Kuch Behar after a few fierce skirmishes. The Kuch Behar was annexed, and the Mughal Army reorganized and began to retake their territories in Assam. Mir Jumla II's forces captured Pandu, Guwahati, and Kajali practically unopposed. In February 1662, Mir Jumla II initiated the Siege of Simalugarh and after the Mughal cannon breached the fortifications, the Ahoms abandoned the fort and escaped. Mir Jumla II then proceeded towards Garhgaon the capital of the Ahom kingdom, which was reached on 17 March 1662, although the ruler Raja Sutamla fled and the victorious Mughals captured 100 elephants, about 300,000 coins of silver, 8000 shields, 1000 ships, and 173 massive stores of rice.[101]
Later that year in December 1663, the aged Mir Jumla II died on his way back to Dacca of natural causes, but skirmishes continued between the Mughals and Ahoms after the rise of Chakradhwaj Singha, who refused to pay further indemnity to the Mughals and during the wars that continued the Mughals suffered great hardships. Munnawar Khan emerged as a leading figure and is known to have supplied food to vulnerable Mughal forces in the region near Mathurapur. Although the Mughals under the command of Syed Firoz Khan the Faujdar at Guwahati were overrun by two Ahom armies in the year 1667, but they continued to hold and maintain presence along their the eastern territories even after the Battle of Saraighat in the year 1671.[102]
The Battle of Saraighat was fought in 1671 between the Mughal empire (led by the Kachwaha king, Raja Ramsingh I), and the Ahom Kingdom (led by Lachit Borphukan) on the Brahmaputra river at Saraighat, now in Guwahati. Although much weaker, the Ahom Army defeated the Mughal Army by brilliant uses of the terrain, clever diplomatic negotiations to buy time, guerrilla tactics, psychological warfare, military intelligence and by exploiting the sole weakness of the Mughal forces—its navy.
The Battle of Saraighat was the last battle in the last major attempt by the Mughals to extend their empire into Assam. Though the Mughals managed to regain Guwahati briefly after a later Borphukan deserted it, the Ahoms wrested control in the Battle of Itakhuli in 1682 and maintained it till the end of their rule.[103]
Satnami rebellion
In May 1672, the Satnami sect obeying the commandments of an "old toothless woman" (according to Mughal accounts) organized a massive[clarification needed] revolt in the agricultural heartlands of the Mughal Empire. The Satnamis were known to have shaved off their heads and even eyebrows and had temples in many regions of Northern India. They began a large-scale rebellion 75 miles southwest of Delhi.[104]
The Satnamis believed they were invulnerable to Mughal bullets and believed they could multiply in any region they entered. The Satnamis initiated their march upon Delhi and overran small-scale Mughal infantry units.[105]
Aurangzeb responded by organizing a Mughal army of 10,000 troops and artillery, and dispatched detachments of his own personal Mughal imperial guards to carry out several tasks. In order to boost Mughal morale, Aurangzeb wrote Islamic prayers, made amulets, and drew designs that would become emblems in the Mughal Army. This rebellion would have a serious aftermath effect on the Punjab.[104]
Sikh Rebels
Early in Aurangzeb's reign, various insurgent groups of Sikhs engaged Mughal troops in increasingly bloody battles. The ninth Sikh Guru, Guru Tegh Bahadur, like his predecessors was opposed to conversion of the local population as he considered it wrong. According to Sikh sources, approached by Kashmiri Pandits to help them retain their faith and avoid forced religious conversions, Guru Tegh Bahadur took on Aurangzeb. Other sources however state that Aurangzeb did not forcefully convert people.[33][34][35][36] The emperor perceived the rising popularity of the Guru as a threat to his sovereignty and in 1670 had him executed,[106][page needed] which infuriated the Sikhs. In response, Guru Tegh Bahadur's son and successor, Guru Gobind Singh, further militarized his followers, starting with the establishment of Khalsa in 1699, eight years before Aurangzeb's death.[citation needed] In 1705, Guru Gobind Singh sent a letter entitled Zafarnamah to Aurangzeb. This drew attention to Auranzeb's cruelty and how he had betrayed Islam.[107][108] The letter caused him much distress and remorse.[109] Guru Gobind Singh's formation of Khalsa in 1699 led to the establishment of the Sikh Confederacy and later Sikh Empire.
Pashtun rebellion
The Pashtun revolt in 1672 under the leadership of the warrior poet Khushal Khan Khattak of Kabul, was triggered when soldiers under the orders of the Mughal Governor Amir Khan allegedly molested women of the Pashtun tribes in modern-day Kunar Province of Afghanistan. The Safi tribes retaliated against the soldiers. This attack provoked a reprisal, which triggered a general revolt of most of tribes. Attempting to reassert his authority, Amir Khan led a large Mughal Army to the Khyber Pass, where the army was surrounded by tribesmen and routed, with only four men, including the Governor, managing to escape.[citation needed]
After that the revolt spread, with the Mughals suffering a near total collapse of their authority in the Pashtun belt. The closure of the important Attock-Kabul trade route along the Grand Trunk road was particularly disastrous. By 1674, the situation had deteriorated to a point where Aurangzeb camped at Attock to personally take charge. Switching to diplomacy and bribery along with force of arms, the Mughals eventually split the rebels and partially suppressed the revolt, although they never managed to wield effective authority outside the main trade route.
Death and legacy
By 1689, almost all of Southern India was a part of the Mughal Empire and after the conquest of Golconda, Aurangzeb may have been the richest and most powerful man alive.[citation needed] Mughal victories in the south expanded the Mughal Empire to 3.2 million square kilometres, with a population estimated as being between 100 million and 150 million. But this supremacy was short-lived.[110] Jos Gommans, Professor of Colonial and Global History at the University of Leiden,[111] says that "... the highpoint of imperial centralisation under emperor Aurangzeb coincided with the start of the imperial downfall."[112]
Aurangzeb's vast imperial campaigns against rebellion-affected areas of the Mughal Empire caused his opponents to exaggerate the "importance" of their rebellions. The results of his campaigns were made worse by the incompetence of his regional Nawabs.[citation needed]
Muslim views regarding Aurangzeb vary. Most Muslim historians believe that Aurangzeb was the last powerful ruler of an empire inevitably on the verge of decline. The major rebellions organized by the Sikhs and the Marathas had deep roots in the remote regions of the Mughal Empire.[citation needed]
Unlike his predecessors, Aurangzeb considered the royal treasury to be held in trust for the citizens of his empire. He made caps and copied the Quran to earn money for his use. Aurangzeb constructed a small marble mosque known as the Moti Masjid (Pearl Mosque) in the Red Fort complex in Delhi. However, his constant warfare, especially with the Marathas, drove his empire to the brink of bankruptcy just as much as the wasteful personal spending and opulence of his predecessors.[citation needed] Aurangzeb knew he would not return to the throne after his final campaign against the Marathas in 1706, in which he was joined by newly emerging commanders in the Mughal army such as Syed Hassan Ali Khan Barha, Saadat Ali Khan and Asaf Jah I, and Daud Khan.[citation needed]
The Indologist Stanley Wolpert, emeritus professor at UCLA,[113] says that:
the conquest of the Deccan, to which Aurangzeb devoted the last 26 years of his life, was in many ways a Pyrrhic victory, costing an estimated hundred thousand lives a year during its last decade of futile chess game warfare. The expense in gold and rupees can hardly be accurately estimated. Aurangzeb's encampment was like a moving capital – a city of tents 30 miles in circumference, with some 250 bazaars, with a 1⁄2 million camp followers, 50,000 camels and 30,000 elephants, all of whom had to be fed, stripped the Deccan of any and all of its surplus grain and wealth ... Not only famine but bubonic plague arose ... Even Aurangzeb, had ceased to understand the purpose of it all by the time he was nearing 90 ... "I came alone and I go as a stranger. I do not know who I am, nor what I have been doing," the dying old man confessed to his son, Azam, in February 1707.[114]
Even when ill and dying, Aurangzeb made sure that the populace knew he was still alive, for if they had thought otherwise then the turmoil of another war of succession was likely.[115] He died in Ahmednagar on 20 February 1707 at the age of 88, having outlived many of his children. His modest open-air grave in Khuldabad expresses his deep devotion to his Islamic beliefs. It is sited in the courtyard of the shrine of the Sufi saint Shaikh Burhan-u'd-din Gharib, who was a disciple of Nizamuddin Auliya of Delhi.
Brown writes that after his death, "a string of weak emperors, wars of succession, and coups by noblemen heralded the irrevocable weakening of Mughal power". She notes that the populist but "fairly old-fashioned" explanation for the decline is that there was a reaction to Aurangzeb's oppression.[116] Aurangzeb's son, Bahadur Shah I, succeeded him and the empire, both because of Aurangzeb's over-extension and because of Bahadur Shah's weak military and leadership qualities, entered a period of terminal decline. Immediately after Bahadur Shah occupied the throne, the Maratha Empire – which Aurangzeb had held at bay, inflicting high human and monetary costs even on his own empire – consolidated and launched effective invasions of Mughal territory, seizing power from the weak emperor. Within decades of Aurangzeb's death, the Mughal Emperor had little power beyond the walls of Delhi.[117]
Full title
His full imperial title was: Al-Sultan al-Azam wal Khaqan al-Mukarram Hazrat Abul Muzaffar Muhy-ud-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb Bahadur Alamgir I, Badshah Ghazi, Shahanshah-e-Sultanat-ul-Hindiya Wal Mughaliya.[118]
See also
References
Notes
- ^ Regarding the tokenistic aspect of Shah Jahan's actions to strengthen Islam in his empire, Satish Chandra says, "We may conclude that Shah Jahan tried to effect a compromise. While formally declaring the state to be an Islamic one, showing respect to the sharia, and observing its injunctions in his personal life, he did not reject any of the liberal measures of Akbar. ... Shah Jahan's compromise was based not on principle but on expediency."[25]
- ^ It has however been argued that the Mughal emperor had political motives for this particular execution. See the article on Sarmad Kashani for references.
Citations
- ^ Schimmel, Annemarie (2004). The empire of the great Mughals. London: Reaktion Books. p. 54. ISBN 1-86189-185-7.
- ^ Waldemar Hansen (1 January 1986). The Peacock Throne: The Drama of Mogul India. Motilal Banarsidass Publ. pp. 122–124. ISBN 978-81-208-0225-4. Retrieved 23 November 2012.
- ^ a b Richards, John F. (1996). The Mughal Empire. The New Cambridge History of India. Vol. 5 (Reprinted ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 130. ISBN 9780521566032. Retrieved 28 September 2012.
- ^ Abdul Hamid Lahori (1636). "Prince Awrangzeb (Aurangzeb) facing a maddened elephant named Sudhakar". Padshahnama.
- ^ Weber, Jacques (2004) [1994 (Librarie Arthême Fayard, as L'Histoire de L'Inde Modern)]. "Mogul Splendour: The successors of Akbar (1605–1707)". In Markovits, Claude (ed.). A History of Modern India, 1480–1950. London: Anthem Press. p. 103. ISBN 9781843310044. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ George Michell and Mark Zebrowski, Architecture and Art of the Deccan Sultanates, (Cambridge University Press, 1999), 12.
- ^ Eraly, Abraham (2007). The Mughal World: Life in India's Last Golden Age. Penguin Books India. p. 147.
- ^ Chandra, Satish (2002). Parties and politics at the Mughal Court, 1707–1740. Oxford University Press. p. 50.
- ^ Brown, Katherine Butler (January 2007). "Did Aurangzeb Ban Music? Questions for the Historiography of his Reign". Modern Asian Studies. 41 (1): 82–84. doi:10.1017/S0026749X05002313.
- ^ Richards, John F. (1996). The Mughal Empire. The New Cambridge History of India. Vol. 5 (Reprinted ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 128. ISBN 9780521566032. Retrieved 29 September 2012.
- ^ Richards, John F. (1996). The Mughal Empire. The New Cambridge History of India. Vol. 5 (Reprinted ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 132–133. ISBN 9780521566032. Retrieved 29 September 2012.
- ^ Richards, John F. (1996). The Mughal Empire. The New Cambridge History of India. Vol. 5 (Reprinted ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 134–135. ISBN 9780521566032. Retrieved 29 September 2012.
- ^ a b c d Chandra, Satish (2005). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals. Vol. 2. Har-Anand Publications. pp. 267–269. ISBN 9788124110669. Retrieved 29 September 2012.
- ^ "Jacques Weber" (in French). Université de Nantes. 19 November 2009. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ Weber, Jacques (2004) [1994 (Librarie Arthême Fayard, as L'Histoire de L'Inde Modern)]. "Mogul Splendour: The successors of Akbar (1605–1707)". In Markovits, Claude (ed.). A History of Modern India, 1480–1950. London: Anthem Press. p. 96. ISBN 9781843310044. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ Richards, John F. (1996). The Mughal Empire. The New Cambridge History of India. Vol. 5 (Reprinted ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 151–152. ISBN 9780521566032. Retrieved 1 October 2012.
- ^ Metcalf, Barbara D.; Metcalf, Thomas R. (2006). A Concise History of Modern India (Second ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 20–21. ISBN 978-0-521-86362-9.
- ^ a b c Chandra, Satish (2005). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals. Vol. 2. Har-Anand Publications. pp. 270–271. ISBN 9788124110669. Retrieved 29 September 2012.
- ^ Kolff, Dirk H. A. (8 August 2002). Naukar, Rajput, and Sepoy: The Ethnohistory of the Military Labour Market of Hindustan, 1450-1850 quoting Syed Aurangzeb, p. 64-65 (illustrated, revised ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 22. ISBN 0521523052.
- ^ a b c Chandra, Satish (2005). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals. Vol. 2. Har-Anand Publications. p. 272. ISBN 9788124110669. Retrieved 29 September 2012.
- ^ a b Sen, Sailendra (2013). A Textbook of Medieval Indian History. Primus Books. p. 183. ISBN 978-9-38060-734-4.
- ^ Richards, John F. (1996). The Mughal Empire. The New Cambridge History of India. Vol. 5 (Reprinted ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 162. ISBN 9780521566032. Retrieved 1 October 2012.
- ^ The Cambridge History of India (1922), vol. IV, p. 481.
- ^ Brown, Katherine Butler (January 2007). "Did Aurangzeb Ban Music? Questions for the Historiography of his Reign". Modern Asian Studies. 41 (1): 78. doi:10.1017/S0026749X05002313.
- ^ a b Chandra, Satish (2005). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals. Vol. 2. Har-Anand Publications. pp. 255–256. ISBN 9788124110669. Retrieved 29 September 2012.
- ^ Richards, John F. (1996). The Mughal Empire. The New Cambridge History of India. Vol. 5 (Reprinted ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 171. ISBN 9780521566032. Retrieved 28 September 2012.
- ^ Chandra, Satish (2006) [1999]. Medieval India: From Sultanate To The Mughals: Mughal Empire (1526-1748) (Second Reprint ed.). Har-Anand Publications PVT LTD. p. 350. ISBN 8124110662. Retrieved 24 October 2014.
- ^ a b Brown, Katherine Butler (January 2007). "Did Aurangzeb Ban Music? Questions for the Historiography of his Reign". Modern Asian Studies. 41 (1): 77. doi:10.1017/S0026749X05002313.
- ^ Zaman, Taymiya R. (2007). Inscribing Empire: Sovereignty and Subjectivity in Mughal Memoirs. University of Michigan. p. 153. ISBN 9780549181170.
- ^ https://books.google.ca/books?id=2OJtAAAAMAAJ&dq=aurangzeb+banned+eunuch+gambling&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=He+curbed+evil+practices+of+gambling%2C+drinking+and+prostitution
- ^ a b c Mukhia, Harbans. The Mughals of India. pp. 25–26.
- ^ "Religions – Sikhism: Guru Tegh Bahadur". BBC. 1 October 2009. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
- ^ a b Sadiq Ali (1918), A Vindication of Aurangzeb: In Two Parts, p. 141
- ^ a b Vipul Singh, The Pearson Indian History Manual for the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination, p. 152
- ^ a b Christopher V. Hill, South Asia: An Environmental History, quote: "He did not, however, introduce forced conversion...", p. 73
- ^ a b Thomas Walker Arnold (1935), The Preaching of Islam: A History of the Propagation of the Muslim Faith, quote: "It should be noted that the only authority for these forced conversions is family or local tradition, and no mention of such (as far as I have been able to discover) is made in the historical accounts of Aurangzeb's reign.", p. 261
- ^ a b Islam in South Asia: A Short History By Jamal Malik
- ^ Encyclopedia of World Trade: From Ancient Times to the Present
- ^ A Comprehensive History of Medieval India: Twelfth to the Mid-Eighteenth Century By Farooqui Salma Ahmed
- ^ The Human Journey: A Concise Introduction to World History By Kevin Reilly
- ^ Eaton, Richard M. (2000). "Temple Desecration and Indo-Muslim States" (PDF). The Hindu. Chennai, India. p. 297.
- ^ a b Eaton, Richard M. (2000). "Temple Desecration and Indo-Muslim States" (PDF). The Hindu. Chennai, India. p. 295.
- ^ Bernier, Francois. Travels Through the Mogul Empire. ISBN 978-1-931641-22-7.
- ^ Communal politics: facts versus myths by Ram Puniyani, Page 60
- ^ a b Gerald James Larson, India's Agony Over Religion, (State University of New York Press, 1995), 111.
- ^ The Cambridge Shorter History of India, Vol. II, ed. H.H. Dodwell, (Cambridge University Press, 1934), 416.
- ^ Vincent Arthur Smith, The Oxford History of India: From the Earliest Times to the End of 1911, (Clarendon Press, 1920), 412.
- ^ a b David Cook, Martyrdom in Islam, (Cambridge University Press, 2007), 80.
- ^ Burton Stein, A History of India, ed. David Arnold, (Blackwell Publishers, 1998), 179.[1]
- ^ John F. Richards, The Mughal Empire, (Cambridge University Press, 1995), 223.
- ^ Hardip Singh Syan, Sikh Militancy in the Seventeenth Century: Religious Violence in Mughal and Early Modern India, (I.B. Tauris, 2012), 130-131.
- ^ Burton Stein, A History of India, ed. David Arnold, (Blackwell Publishers, 1998), 179.[2]
- ^ J. L. Mehta (1 January 2005). Advanced Study in the History of Modern India: Volume One: 1707 - 1813. Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd. pp. 50–. ISBN 978-1-932705-54-6. Retrieved 29 September 2012.
- ^ Stein, B.; Arnold, D. (2010). A History of India. Wiley. p. 180. ISBN 9781444323511. Retrieved 3 October 2014.
- ^ A Gateway to Sikhism | Sri Guru Tegh Bhadur Sahib - A Gateway to Sikhism
- ^ a b Prasad, Ishwari (1974). The Mughal Empire. Chugh Publications. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
- ^ Kaul, H. N. (1998). Rediscovery of Ladakh. Indus Publishing. p. 63. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
- ^ Weber, Jacques (2004) [1994 (Librarie Arthême Fayard, as L'Histoire de L'Inde Modern)]. "Mogul Splendour: The successors of Akbar (1605–1707)". In Markovits, Claude (ed.). A History of Modern India, 1480-1950. London: Anthem Press. ISBN 9781843310044. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ Singh, Abhay Kumar (2006). Modern World System and Indian Proto-industrialization: Bengal 1650-1800. Vol. 1. New Delhi: Northern Book Centre. pp. 351–352. ISBN 9788172112011. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ Balasubramaniam, R.; Chattopadhyay, Pranab K. (2007). "Zafarbaksh - The Composite Mughal Cannon of Aurangzeb at Fort William in Kolkata" (PDF). Indian Journal of History of Science. 42. National Institute of Sciences of India. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
- ^ Roy, K.; Roy, L.D.H.K. (2011). War, Culture and Society in Early Modern South Asia, 1740-1849. Taylor & Francis. p. 30. ISBN 9781136790874. Retrieved 3 October 2014.
- ^ Douglas, James (1893). Bombay and western India: a series of stray papers. Vol. 2. Sampson Low, Marston & Company.
- ^ Buchanan, Brenda J. (2006). Gunpowder, Explosives And the State: A Technological History. Ashgate Publishing. p. 59. ISBN 9780754652595.
- ^ Partington, James Riddick (1998) [1960 (Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons)]. A History of Greek Fire and Gunpowder. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 221. ISBN 9780801859540. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ Naukar, Rajput, and Sepoy: The Ethnohistory of the Military Labour Market of Hindustan; Dirk H. A. Kolff; Cambridge University Press, 2002; ISBN=0521523052, 9780521523059
- ^ Mughal Warfare: Indian Frontiers and Highroads to Empire, 1500–1700, p. 122, at Google Books
- ^ "Emirates owner to sell Quran inscribed by Aurangzeb".
- ^ Taher, M. (1994). Librarianship and Library Science in India: An Outline of Historical Perspectives. Concept Publishing Company. p. 54. ISBN 9788170225249. Retrieved 3 October 2014.
- ^ "Saudi Aramco World : Mughal Maal". saudiaramcoworld.com. Retrieved 3 October 2014.
- ^ "Saudi Aramco World : Pashmina: Kashmir's Best Cashmere". saudiaramcoworld.com. Retrieved 3 October 2014.
- ^ Schimmel, A.; Waghmar, B.K. (2004). The Empire of the Great Mughals: History, Art and Culture. Reaktion Books. p. 17. ISBN 9781861891853. Retrieved 3 October 2014.
- ^ Farooqi, Naimur Rahman (1989). Mughal-Ottoman relations: a study of political & diplomatic relations. Idarah-i Adabiyat-i Delli. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
- ^ Matthee, Rudi (15 December 2011). Persia in Crisis: Safavid Decline and the Fall of Isfahan. pp. 126, 136. ISBN 9781845117450.
- ^ Tripathy, Rasananda (1986). Crafts and Commerce in Orissa. Delhi: Mittal Publications. p. 91. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
- ^ Farooqi, Naimur Rahman (1989). Mughal-Ottoman relations: a study of political & diplomatic relations. Idarah-i Adabiyat-i Delli. pp. 152–154. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
- ^ Faruki, Zahiruddin (1935). Aurangzeb and His times (Reprinted ed.). Bombay: Idarah-i Adabiyāt-i Delli. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
- ^ a b Burgess, Douglas R. (2009). "Piracy in the Public Sphere: The Henry Every Trials and the Battle for Meaning in Seventeenth‐Century Print Culture". Journal of British Studies. 48 (4). The University of Chicago Press: 887–913. doi:10.1086/603599.
- ^ Burgess, Douglas R. (2009). The Pirates' Pact: The Secret Alliances Between History's Most Notorious Buccaneers and Colonial America. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. p. 144. ISBN 978-0-07-147476-4.
- ^ Blackburn, Terence R. (2007). A Miscellany Of Mutinies And Massacres In India. APH Publishing. p. 11. ISBN 9788131301692. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
- ^ Wilbur, Marguerite Eyer (1951). The East India Company and the British Empire in the Far East. Stanford: Stanford University Press. p. 178. ISBN 9780804728645. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
- ^ Hunter, Sir William Wilson (2005) [1886 (London:)]. The Indian Empire: Its People, History, and Products (Reprinted ed.). New Delhi: Asian Educational Services. p. 311. ISBN 9788120615816. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
- ^ a b Sarkar, Sir Jadunath (1947). Maasir-i-Alamgiri A history of Emperor Aurangzeb Alamgir. Calcutta: Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal. p. 13.
- ^ Metcalf, Barbara D.; Metcalf, Thomas R. (2006). A Concise History of Modern India (Second ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-86362-9.
- ^ Schmidt, Karl J. (1995). An Atlas and Survey of South Asian History. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe. p. 54. ISBN 9781563243349. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
- ^ Edwardes, Stephen Meredyth; Garrett, Herbert Leonard Offley (1930). Mughal rule in India. p. 119. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
- ^ Bhagavānadāsa Gupta, Contemporary Sources of the Mediaeval and Modern History of Bundelkhand (1531-1857), vol. 1 (1999). ISBN 81-85396-23-X.
- ^ Burjor Avari. Islamic Civilization in South Asia: A History of Muslim Power and Presence in the Indian Subcontinent. Routledge. pp. 131–. ISBN 9780415580618. Retrieved 8 December 2014.
- ^ Chandra, S. (2005). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals Part - II. Har-Anand Publications. p. 290. ISBN 9788124110669. Retrieved 3 October 2014.
- ^ Asher, Catherine B (24 September 1992). "Architecture of Mughal India". ISBN 9780521267281.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help); Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - ^ http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/southasia/Culture/Archit/TajM.html
- ^ Kincaid, Dennis (1937). The Grand Rebel: An Impression of Shivaji, Founder of the Maratha Empire. London: Collins. pp. 72–78.
- ^ Kincaid, Dennis (1937). The Grand Rebel: An Impression of Shivaji Maharaj, Founder of the Maratha Empire. London: Collins. pp. 121–125.
- ^ Kincaid, Dennis (1937). The Grand Rebel: An Impression of Shivaji, Founder of the Maratha Empire. London: Collins. pp. 130–138.
- ^ Weber, Jacques (2004) [1994 (Librarie Arthême Fayard, as L'Histoire de L'Inde Modern)]. "Mogul Splendour: The successors of Akbar (1605–1707)". In Markovits, Claude (ed.). A History of Modern India, 1480-1950. London: Anthem Press. p. 102. ISBN 9781843310044. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ Kincaid, Dennis (1937). The Grand Rebel: An Impression of Shivaji, Founder of the Maratha Empire. London: Collins. p. 197.
- ^ Kincaid, Dennis (1937). The Grand Rebel: An Impression of Shivaji, Founder of the Maratha Empire. London: Collins. p. 283.
- ^ http://pakteahouse.net/2012/04/26/shivajis-letter-to-aurangzeb/
- ^ Gascoigne, Bamber; Gascoigne, Christina (1971). The Great Moghuls. Cape. pp. 228–229.
- ^ Gascoigne, Bamber; Gascoigne, Christina (1971). The Great Moghuls. Cape. pp. 239–246.
- ^ Stein, B.; Arnold, D. (2010). A History of India. Wiley. p. 181. ISBN 9781444323511. Retrieved 3 October 2014.
- ^ a b Majumdar, R. C.; Sarkar, Jadunath (1943–1948). History of Bengal. Vol. II. Dacca. p. 364.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Majumdar, R. C.; Sarkar, Jadunath (1943–1948). History of Bengal. Vol. II. Dacca. p. 378.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Sarkar, J. N. (1992), "Chapter VIII Assam-Mughal Relations", in Barpujari, H. K., The Comprehensive History of Assam 2, Guwahati: Assam Publication Board, pp. 148–256
- ^ a b Hansen, W. (1986). The Peacock Throne: The Drama of Mogul India. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 454. ISBN 9788120802254. Retrieved 3 October 2014.
- ^ Edwardes, S.M.; Garrett, H.L.O. (1930). Mughal Rule in India. Atlantic Publishers and Distributors. p. 119. ISBN 9788171565511. Retrieved 3 October 2014.
- ^ Sehgal, Narender (1994). Converted Kashmir: Memorial of Mistakes. Delhi: Utpal Publications. pp. 152–153. ISBN 978-8185217062. Archived from the original on 18 April 2014.
- ^ Chaitanya, Krishna (1976). A History of Indian Painting: The modern period. p. 3. ISBN 9788170173106.
- ^ Randhawa, Karenjot (2012). Civil Society in Malerkotla, Punjab: Fostering Resilience Through Religion. Lexington Books. p. 61. ISBN 9780739167373.
- ^ Renard, John (2012). Fighting Words: Religion, Violence, and the Interpretation of Sacred Texts. University of California Press. p. 215. ISBN 9780520274198.
- ^ Richards, John F. (1996). The Mughal Empire. The New Cambridge History of India. Vol. 5 (Reprinted ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 1. ISBN 9780521566032. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ "Prof.dr. J.J.L. (Jos) Gommans". Universiteit Leiden. 14 August 2012. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ Gommans, Jos J. L. (2002). Mughal Warfare: Indian Frontiers and Highroads to Empire 1500-1700. London: Routledge. p. 16. ISBN 9780415239899. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ "Stanley A. Wolpert". UCLA. Retrieved 1 October 2012.
- ^ Wolpert, Stanley A. (2004) [1977]. New History of India (7th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195166774.
- ^ Braudel, Fernand (1992) [1979 (Paris: Librairie Armand Colin: Le Temps du Monde)]. Civilization and Capitalism: 15th-18th Century: The Perspective of the World. Vol. III. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press. p. 514. ISBN 9780520081161. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ Brown, Katherine Butler (January 2007). "Did Aurangzeb Ban Music? Questions for the Historiography of his Reign". Modern Asian Studies. 41 (1): 79. doi:10.1017/S0026749X05002313.
- ^ Mehta, Jaswant (2005). Advanced Study in the History of Modern India 1707-1813. Elgin Ill, USA: New Dawn Press. p. 141. ISBN 1-932705-54-6.
- ^ "Tomb of Aurangzeb" (PDF). ASI Aurangabad. Retrieved 21 March 2015.
Further reading
- Hansen, Waldemar (1986) [1972 (Holt, Rinehart, Winston)]. The Peacock Throne: The Drama of Mogul India (Second ed.). Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 9788120802254.
- Eraly, Abraham (2007). The Mughal world. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 9780297852094.
- A Short History of Pakistan, Dr. Ishtiaque Hussain Qureshi, University of Karachi Press.
- Delhi, Khushwant Singh, Penguin USA, Open Market Ed edition, 5 February 2000. (ISBN 0-14-012619-8)
- Muḥammad Bakhtāvar Khān. Mir'at al-'Alam: History of Emperor Awangzeb Alamgir. Trans. Sajida Alvi. Lahore: Idārah-ʾi Taḥqīqāt-i Pākistan, 1979.
- Khan, Khafi (2006) [1718]. Hashim, Muhammad (ed.). Muntakhab-ul Lubab. Pakistan: Sang-e-Meel Publications.
- Kruijtzer, Gijs (2009). Xenophobia in Seventeenth-century India (PDF). Leiden University Press. ISBN 9789087280680.
External links
- Aurangzeb, as he was according to Mughal Records
- Article on Aurganzeb from MANAS group page, UCLA
- The Tragedy of Aureng-zebe Text of John Dryden's drama, based loosely on Aurangzeb and the Mughal court, 1675
- Coins of Aurangzeb