Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Official Lists (talk | contribs) at 17:34, 4 April 2013 (→Lawrence Frankopan: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions nor to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

List of K.O.3an Guo characters

When the article got deleted, it was stated in the reasons as 'Entirely in-universe, no secondary sources.' The thing is, this article, it is just an extended article for the drama K.O.3an Guo, where more information about the characters can be found, of course there will not have any secondary sources for it. Most/majority of the information are fictitious, it's not even real at all. Please restore this page back, it's kind of hard to understand what the drama is talking about/know more about the characters by just watching the show. -Virgo8994 (talk) 10:36, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Although this was an expired PROD, it was deleted well over a year ago, the arguments by the nominator still hold true. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done The merits don't matter as long as the article does not fall under CSD and does not have BLP issues. PROD was created for a very specific purpose, and it would be a slippery slope to start denying requests like this. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:54, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sean O'Reilly (politician)

Clearly meets WP:POLITICIAN and received significant press coverage. The page was speedily deleted without WP:AFD -Voidz (talk) 02:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. The references are (a) two local newspaper accounts with one-line quotes from him on the need for a playground fence and a primary school, (b) four which show his name in lists of councillors, (c) his own LinkedIn page. That is nothing like enough to show notability. The note to WP:POLITICIAN #2 says "A politician who has received "significant press coverage" has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple news feature articles, by journalists." The WP:GNG says: ""Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail... Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention" See also WP:42 for what is required. JohnCD (talk) 14:25, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There are many news coverages like this[1]. I don't understand ...has been written about, in depth,... because if already written about then why people would need to search in Wikipedia? - Voidz (t·c) 17:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's not indepth, and the content must be 90% O'Reilly's own words so its a primary not a secodary source. Spartaz Humbug! 17:34, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please paste the article source to my sandbox so i can further improve it before re-publishing? - Voidz (t·c) 09:52, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Voidz/Sean O'Reilly (politician). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:58, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! =) - Voidz (t·c) 18:34, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Go! Band

reasoning -72.49.88.100 (talk) 21:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Lionelt (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. The article needs references to show how it meets the notability standard of WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk) 11:09, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aashiqui.in

this Hindi Film's page was deleted by some ignorant person who has no knowledge of hindi films. Please restore this page. -122.169.34.237 (talk) 09:38, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Odie5533 (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. If you do, please read WP:CIVIL first. If the article is to be kept, it needs references to show how it meets the notability standard of WP:Notability (films): all there is now is one (bad) review plus a Times of India article where its only mention is an entry in a list of 53 films. JohnCD (talk) 10:58, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gibraltar Open

This page was for a Darts tournament and was being updated with each years' winners. I have no idea of the reasons for its deletion, or who deleted it, nor are the procedures clear as to what to do about it. For anyone other than a wiki expert the procedures are gobbledygook and unintelligable. I would like this page to be restored as I can see no reason for its deletion and it provided useful information to darts players. -178.208.196.229 (talk) 15:15, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This was one of a number of similar articles deleted after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colorado Open (darts). The reason was lack of notability. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is selective about subjects for articles: the test used is called Wikipedia:Notability and is not a matter of saying so but of references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources.
Since the article was deleted after a deletion discussion, it will not be restored here: if you think the discussion was wrongly decided, or you have new information, you should approach user J04n (talk), the administrator who closed it; then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can go to WP:Deletion review.
Alternatively, you could set up your own wiki on Wikia, perhaps in conjunction with some of the other darts tournaments whose pages were deleted at the same AfD, to record each year's winners. JohnCD (talk) 18:06, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bohlin Cywinski Jackson

Page originally deleted because nominator was the only one commenting -no conversation with page editor/user who made most recent changes. Admin notes that the changes made by the user in question were recent and not substantial, and they not introduce the problems stated in complaint. I was referred to the page by a professor of an architecture class as a good source of the company's history and work and would like to have the page undeleted for reference and updates on the firm. Raindelay95 (talk) 23:44, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested "soft delete", the article has been restored on request. JohnCD (talk) 10:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
JohnCD - thanks so much for your help. I'm glad to see the page is back up! Raindelay95 (talk) 23:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Drupion

reasoning -Yngens (talk) 23:49, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Am not very much experienced in doing things in Wikipedia. I am a customer of Drupion and not finding information about them decided to create a page for this company. The page was not much different from lot's of other company pages like, for example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acquia and frankly saying I don't understand why http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drupion got deleted. Please give me the opportunity to copy my text at least. But I would appreciate if anyone could explain why it was removed in the first place and give me some cluse how it can be reinstated. I've already read the guidelines and requirements and don't see anything in my post for Drupion, that would not comply with them.

  •  Not done the article was deleted because it read like an advertisement for the company. That makes sense since you copied the text of http://drupion.com/about to create the article. For you to create an article that would survive you would need to find sources that discuss the company. These sources would have to be independent of the company. You can use the company web site for basic information, but you have to include sources from others. If you want the text you started with go to http://drupion.com/about GB fan 00:01, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1953 Fitzgerald Report

Benjamin Fitzgerald, who is the author of the report is still alive and he can add commentary regarding its veracity.It must be undeleted for him to do so. -24.61.42.186 (talk) 02:31, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1953 Fitzgerald Report, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Michig (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 09:56, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jip Deng

Jip Deng is a kind of cultural symbol. It symbolizes Hong Kong cultures. -Siulingng6 (talk) 07:47, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Please see WP:PROD for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion. JohnCD (talk) 09:58, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:PeaceMagazine(1991).jpg

This file has been published under CC BY-ND 3.0 license as stated by the publisher here [2] -- Voidz (t·c) 18:32, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - CC-BY-ND's "No derivatives" is too restrictive for Wikipedia's CC-BY-SA. JohnCD (talk) 18:44, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Couryers Band

reasoning -Shopgrl20 (talk) 01:16, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1=The Couryers Band 2=The Couryers Band was named as one of the top two garage bands of the 1960s era in Michigan. http://www.michiganrockandrolllegends.com/dr-js-blog/158-michigan-garage-band-compilations

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:9oaLEbNQrx4J:www.michiganrockandrolllegends.com/dr-js-blog/158-michigan-garage-band-compilations+the+couriers+garage+band+michigan&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=safari

http://www.amazon.com/Michigan-Garage-Bands-Various-Artists/dp/B00000096O http://www.last.fm/music/The+Couriers/_/I+Couldn't+Care+Less http://www.cicadelic.com/segmentsa.htm

http://www.60sgaragebands.com/couryers.html Tom Valente Recalls The Couryers (copied text removed}

 Not done. This looks like a valid deletion and the sources you have offered are not reliable. Please see our inclusion standard and band inclusion standard. For this to have any chance on wikipedia you need to show that this article meets one or the other of these, Spartaz Humbug! 07:36, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Free University of NYC

I created a new page for The Free University of NYC, as it was on the same page as Free University of New York and was incorrectly labeled as the same organization. Free University of New York and The Free University of NYC are two completely separate things. One was a front for the Maoist PLP Party in the last 1960's. The other was a one day even that was party of the Occupy movement. Their names are close, but they are not the same thing at all. I went back and did the proper WP:SPLIT process. It was flagged for speedy delete, and despite my explanation on the talk page through the speedy delete process, it was deleted anyway. Presently, The Free University of NYC redirects to Free University of New York. When I pointed this out to the editor who speedy deleted it, he agreed, and send me here to get it restored. That conversation is on the talk page here: User_talk:Smileguy91#Speedy_Deletion_of_The_Free_University_of_NYC -Theredproject (talk) 03:00, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spartaz, two questions: 1. As per Bold Revert Discuss, after I engage a conversation on the talk page, where do I go to ask for the Redirection to be removed (if that is the consensus.) The original speedy deleter actually didn't know where the right place was, as he sent me to the WP:ADMINNOTICEBOARD. 2. What is the issue re notability? Is it a question of not having enough sources, period? Is it a question of not having sources that explicitly state "The Free University of NYC has nothing to do with the Free University of New York?" The organizers of the 2012 project never mention FUNY in their materials, is that enough? Thanks.--Theredproject (talk) 15:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Spartaz and Redproject, I was the user who marked the article for speedy deletion. I deleted the page originally because I believed that the Free University of New York and the Free University of NYC were the same thing, which apparently is false, because I did not view the sources before CSD-tagging it with Twinkle. As for your comments, Redproject, notability does not increase or decrease with number of citations used. The reason for WP:GNG undeletion denial was because, at the time of deletion, the article did not explicitly say why the article's subject was notable; thus does not fit Wikipedia notability standards. Articles that do not explain why the article's subject is notable are promptly tagged for deletion by recent changes patrollers. Regards, smileguy91talk 17:45, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pete Cummins

Artist may be notable, was PROD deletion. If you don't want to undelete, please provide a userfied version for me. Per disqus thread at Boing Boing. Thanks.Smallman12q (talk) 13:44, 30 March 2013 (UTC) -Smallman12q (talk) 13:44, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

big al mack

reasoning -ZeBaconator (talk) 17:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek: The Next Generation Interactive Technical Manual

This was a PROD deleteion where the deletor stated, "This article is about a subject which MAY NOT (empahsis added) be notable enough to be included on Wikipedia". However, the title is notable, for example, this title was the first Apple Quicktime VR product -168.233.254.6 (talk) 19:39, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user MER-C (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. Notability is not a matter of saying so but of providing references that show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 23:46, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Improper Burial

The band had a respectable page(not some 2-second stub) and is popular among it's scene and deserves album pages to support and aid in the presentation of their career. -TheDethklokGuy (talk) 01:45, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: - article has not been deleted, but see WP:NALBUMS. JohnCD (talk) 13:51, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons Bleedings

It's a notable album, by a notable band that deserves to be on Wikipedia. It does exist and is well known in the metal community. -TheDethklokGuy (talk) 01:49, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Article has not been deleted, but see WP:NALBUMS; also note that the first reference, metalunderground.com, gets blocked by Firefox as an attack page, see this report. JohnCD (talk) 13:56, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contact (word game)

I believe that sources could be found for this article but may not have been due to the fact that the article covers a more obscure subject. Reson Given for Deletion was: "Expired PROD, concern was: unsourced; only sources presented so far are copyrighted". -Eatmark (talk) 06:22, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Jeff G. (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. If it is to be kept, you will need to find sources that show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 13:43, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Sigma Rho

The wikipedia page was accurate and was deleted for weak reasons. Although a small organization, Alpha Sigma Rho Sorority, Inc. had a wikipedia article that was informative with up to date details. There are plenty of online articles, pictures, official FaceBook pages, websites and other sources that can be used to validate the information on the wikipedia article and add to the content to strengthen the article that was written about the Alpha Sigma Rho Sorority, Inc. -155.247.166.29 (talk) 22:06, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Sigma Rho, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Postdlf (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 13:35, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Potty Training: learning with the animals

I created the stub and within few minutes it was nominated for CSD#A7. Then i dropped it and requested the nominator to try AfD so i can keep adding sources. But before i undo the tag, it was deleted. Kindly help. Many thanks, -†@πωεεṝ ♥@me 22:44, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Tanweer Khan /Potty Training: learning with the animals. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact NawlinWiki (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. I'll contact NawlinWiki (talk · contribs) for sure before publishing it or will opt for AfC. †@πωεεṝ ♥@me 13:59, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fled The Southwest

The article I created was about a band that I am currently in, and did not contain any insignificant or false information, all of which can be proven with evidence of the band's existence. The page was deleted because of "failure to provide reason for the significance of the article." The significance of an article is opinionated which leads me to feel that it is unfair for my article to be deleted for this reason, please consider restoring the page. Sincerely, Alec Morrow, Lead Guitarist in Fled The Southwest -209.33.35.4 (talk) 00:05, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Wikipedia is not a place for people to write about themselves or their own bands. See WP:BAND for what a band needs to have achieved before having an article, and Wikipedia is not about YOU for the reasons why, even then, you should leave it to someone uninvolved to write it. JohnCD (talk) 13:32, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ameer Idreis

it is about an author whom is becoming more known, also there are other authors who have wikipedia pages just like his, it contains valide information leading to three personal sites and some others. -Ewaldlover223 (talk) 14:22, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done See WP:UPANDCOMING. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:54, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ewald series

The wikipedia page was accurate and was deleted for terrible reasons. Although it is a not so well known book series, The Ewald Series, had a wikipedia article that was informative with up to date details. There are plenty of online websites, pictures, official FaceBook pages, and other sources that can be used to validate the information on the wikipedia article and add to the content to strengthen the article that was written about the Ewald Series--Ewaldlover223 (talk) 14:26, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:: this article has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ewald series, and that is where you should comment, but read Wikipedia:Notability (books) first. JohnCD (talk) 14:38, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deep Thrusts

No info about the video in the article Enumclaw horse sex case article -Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 18:15, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The video fails GNG. Whether or not the article needs the video ref is a different story.  little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer  20:17, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the GNG and still can't figure out why you deleted it. Anyway I could create a new article of Deep Thrusts and edit it to meet GNG rules?Female bodybuilder enthusiast (talk) 01:41, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Make a draft in your user space (click on Help:Userspace draft to start), then check with the deleting admin, The Anome (talk). If The Anome is not convinced, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 08:45, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mishapocalypse

It is an event that has occurred and effected more than 13 million people. While the original article might not have had sufficient data, there is more information on the subject now. It is an important event that people would most likely want to inform themselves on. Please undelete the Mishapocalypse page. People need to know. -Discodaleks (talk) 19:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done Non-notable children's game being played on Tumblr to publicize an obscure performer. Sockpuppets have been blocked.--Orange Mike | Talk 21:57, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mettler Toledo

Content was informative, not promotional -208.85.168.103 (talk) 19:47, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page is a copyright violation. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Old Red Cracker

reasoning - Old Red Cracker (ORC+) was a significant character of the underground reverse engineering movement in 1990s. He was and will be a prominent historical philosophical leader in the history of computing. The page was the only thing in Wikipedia about him and should be restored. 164.111.99.105 (talk) 20:17, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. However, please add sources in support of its notability, or it may be deleted at WP:AFD. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:04, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mishapocalypse

reasoning -99.155.183.37 (talk) 22:28, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. See response three above this. Please stop wasting our time - further requests will be treated as trolling and removed. JohnCD (talk) 22:37, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lhermite's Models

reasoning -L2j2 (talk) 22:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:: this article has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lhermite's models, and that is where you should comment. To understand the concerns expressed there, read Wikipedia:No original research, which includes: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery." JohnCD (talk) 23:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not done It has now been deleted as a result of that discussion. As such, the correct venue to dispute the deletion is Deletion review, not this page. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:38, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RecycleBot

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because the recyclebot was not advertising -- as an open source project there is no "product" and although I believe there are some companies planning commercial versions there is nothing for sale now to the best of my knowledge. I tried to cut out all the non-wikipedia sounding information from the sources - please reinstate the page and mark what was promotional -- I did try to cite a source for any claim.

On the G12 front all the text I lifted was from either the appropedia page on the topic which is cc-by-sa or the reprapwiki which is all gnufdl 1.2 - both of which I thought were consistent with wikipedia. Please reinstate - I think it is a great idea which has a ton of promise - and the initial list of media sources I used from appropedia make it clear it is noteworthy. (I also paired down that list of the references as a lot were repeats). Please let me know what else needs to be done to fix the article to reinstate it. -Recyclebotboy (talk) 00:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done I'm not seeing any clear instance of copyright violation (much of it's copied from a couple of free-licence sources, but they are credited appropriately), and this isn't so promotional as to qualify for G11 - the article has been restored, please work to improve it at your leisure. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:47, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Global Telecom & Technology

nLayer purchase in May 2012 makes it notable company now -60.241.90.39 (talk) 07:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Mean as custard (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. If the article is to be kept, it needs to show references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish notability, and to be written less like an advertisement. JohnCD (talk) 21:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jip Deng

reasoning -Siulingng6 (talk) 12:05, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jip Deng is a phrase we speak in Cantonese like Dai Pai Dong. Jip Deng implicitly symbolizes low-income family in Hong Kong as it is one of the affordable furniture for them. Also, it was a common used prop in previous Hong Kong movies. Therefore, it represents Hong Kong's collective memories and cultures and it is extraordinary important to record it.

 Not done Hi Siulingng6. This page is for undeletion of articles that were deleted in an uncontroversial manner. This means two things: 1) The page has to have been deleted in order for this page to have any applicability; and 2) the page has to have been deleted by a process that was not on the merits, such as after an articles for deletion discussion. Here, you asked for undeletion when the page was marked under prod but not yet deleted and now ask again when the page is still not deleted, but under discussion at articles for deletion. So there's nothing to undelete since it still exists, and if it is deleted at the current discussion, then this page will still not be the correct place to get any action because it does not apply to pages deleted on the merits.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Everlast Polymeric Cladding

There is no promotional or unambiguous language suggesting a further action to be made by the reader, it is solely an informational article that does not slander any other product. The article simply states some product detail that the average homeowner would not understand because of its complexities and frankly because they do not care know. The information is strictly unbiased and simply states facts. I am more than willing to revise the article in places where it should need editing. -Unitedhomeexperts (talk) 16:54, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unitedhomeexperts (talk) 16:54, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Wikipedia does not accept articles which consist of original research, or which lack any reliable sources of information. Marketing junk like "All colors feature ColorHold® capping resins, a UV- Stable acrylic polymer for exceptional color retention" has no place in an encyclopedia. Please also see WP:COI and WP:NOTCATALOG. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Renaud Laplanche

reasoning -64.183.42.39 (talk) 22:51, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After I edited the Renaud Laplanche article by adding references to support the notability of the subject, the article was deleted by User: Nick-D who claimed that the article is spam and "references do not establish notability - are all about the person's company with only passing coverage of him" . I would like to contest the deletion for the following reasons.

Renaud Laplanche, the subject of the article, is notable on the basis of Wikipedia notability criteria for people (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BIO):

  1. he has been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject -- many, though not all, of the existing secondary sources were cited in the article
  2. he has received well-known and significant awards or honor -- the awards were mentioned in the article; in addition, his company has under his leadership been recognized by awards not mentioned in this article but mentioned in the article about the company (Lending Club)
  3. he has made widely recognized contributions that are part of the enduring historical record in his specific field -- he is the leader of the largest company of the kind in the world and created new but already established alternatives to traditional institutions

I disagree with the reason that the deleting administator gave for deletion because people in leadership positions like Renaud Laplanche are not notable independently of their professional achievements. The facts about the company that he is the CEO of were not meant as promotions of the company but to highlight his significance and the achievements made under his leadership. This is similar to achievements of a coach of a sports team -- a coach is notable to the extent that the teams that he is coaching are notable.

I also argue that the deleting administrator did not pursue altenatives to the deletion and used his power of censorship unneccessarily: if the edits I made were indeed so detrimental to the quality of the article that the article needed to be deleted immediately, which I objected to above, it would have sufficed revert my edits or delete some sentences about the company rather than delete the whole article because the person is still notable (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Alternatives_to_deletion).

Done User:Orangemike has already restored this page. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Andres (Dre) Hidalgo

G12 speedy. ticket:2013040410000068 indicates that the subject has given permission to the original article's creator to reuse his website's content, but I'd like to assess notability before restoring to article space. Please userify to my account (maybe at User:FreeRangeFrog/Andres (Dre) Hidalgo) so I can take a look and get back to him. Thanks! -§FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:17, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DSM Training

Want to re-write the article so that it doesnt get deleted -Leonfifield1 (talk) 17:23, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence Frankopan

reasoning -Official Lists (talk) 17:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC) The person in this entry is the brother-in-law of a member of the Royal Family. His sister is married to the Queen's cousin, Lord Nicholas Windsor. So it is remarkable someone managed to delete this. The entry about a successful young businessman, with ample citations and documentary evidence, was deleted without any discussion. No one had noticed the entry was gone and there was, at no time, any possibility to contest the deletion. None of the criteria for deletion was fulfilled and the entry seemed to have been done as a personal attack on the relevant person. Please re-instate this entry. {subst:refund|1= pageName Lawrence FrankopanThe template {{Wikify}} has been deprecated since 25 August 2012, and is retained only for old revisions. If this page is a current revision, please remove the template.[reply]

Lawrence Frankopan
BornError: Need valid birth date: year, month, day
London, England
Other namesLawrence (or Laurent, Lorenzo, Lovro) Doimi de Lupis Frankopan
Parent(s)Prince Louis Frankopan, Count Doimi de Lupis
Ingrid Detter de Frankopan

Lawrence Frankopan, born 29 December 1977 , is a sports agent and businessman in London. He worked for many years at IMG and managed several world famous sportsmen. He is now Head of Lagardère Unlimited (UK).[6] In 2011 Lawrence Frankopan founded his own sports agency, StarWingSports Ltd., managing major tennis stars like Stan Wawrinka [7], Donna Vekić [8], Borna Corić, [9] and Chris Evert [10].

Early life=

Lawrence Doimi de Lupis Frankopan was born in London in 1977. His father is Prince Louis de Frankopan, Count Doimi de Lupis, born in Split in 1939, a member of the Croatian and the Italian nobility.[11] Lawrence's father came to England from Croatia after the Second World War to attend a boarding school and then go to Oxford University. His father is a Barrister, and a member of Middle Temple and a businessman. Her mother, Ingrid Detter de Frankopan, is a distinguished Professor Emeritus at Stockholm University, sometime Fellow of LMH and of St. Antony's College, Oxford and sometime Adviser on International Law to H.H. John Paul II, professor of international law, double doctor, D.Phil. (Oxon), Jur.Dr.(Stockholm), Lic. en droit (Paris) and Dipl. Diritto Europo (Turin), Barrister at Lincoln's Inn.[12][13]

He has two sisters, Paola and Christina, and two brothers; Peter and Nicholas, Princes Frankopan, Counts Doimi de Lupis.

Lawrence’s eldest sister, Paola, is married to Lord Nicholas Windsor, son of H.R.H. the Duke and Duchess of Kent. .[14][15][16][17][18]

Lawrence's sister Christina is an investment banker,[19] who is married to Patrick Nicholson, Head of Communications for Caritas Internationalis in the Vatican.[20]

Lawrence's eldest brother Peter, D.Phil. (Oxon); M.Phil. (Oxon); M.A. (Cantab), is a historian and author of 'The First Crusade'.[21] He is Director of Oxford University's Centre for Byzantine Research. He is a University Lecturer at the Faculty of Modern Languages and Fellow of Worcester College, Oxford University.[22] He is a Governor of Wellington College [23] and trustee of the World Monuments Fund.[24] Together with his wife, Jessica Sainsbury, M.A. (Cantab), he founded Cambridge University's Frankopan Directorship for Gender Studies.[25]

Lawrence’s other brother, Nicholas, M.A. (Oxon); M.Phil. (Cantab); MBA (Columbia), is an investment banker in London.

On 12 October 2012, Lawrence Frankopan was Best Man at the wedding of HRH Crown Prince Prince Guillaume, Hereditary Grand Duke of Luxembourg, and Countess Stéphanie de Lannoy[26]

Education and Career

Lawrence speaks several languages fluently, and was educated at Ampleforth and at Universidad Complutense de Madrid, where he studied Spanish and at King’s College, London, where he read philosophy and was awarded a B.A. before being invited to be Visiting Scholar in History at New College, Oxford.

References

  1. ^ "Lagardère - Press releases". Lagardere.com. 2010-02-03. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  2. ^ www.stanwawrinka.com
  3. ^ www.donnavekic.com
  4. ^ www.bornacoric.com
  5. ^ chrisevert.org
  6. ^ "Lagardère - Press releases". Lagardere.com. 2010-02-03. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  7. ^ www.stanwawrinka.com
  8. ^ www.donnavekic.com
  9. ^ www.bornacoric.com
  10. ^ chrisevert.org
  11. ^ The de Lupis family Italian site
  12. ^ "Biography of Ingrid Detter de Frankopan « RJ GAUDET & ASSOCIATES L.L.C". Rjgaudet.com. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  13. ^ "Ingrid Detter de Frankopan - United Kingdom | LinkedIn". Uk.linkedin.com. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  14. ^ "Royal.gov.uk". Royal Website. 26 September 2006.
  15. ^ "Independent Catholic News". Independent Catholic News. 31 October 2006.
  16. ^ "Royal News". Paul Theroff. 28 October 2006.
  17. ^ "Homerenaissancefoundation". Homerenaissancefoundation. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  18. ^ http://www.vogue.com/vogue-daily/article/my-royal-wedding-paola-de-frankopan-remembers-her-own-marriage-into-the-british-royal-family/
  19. ^ "Christina Frankopan - United Kingdom | LinkedIn". Uk.linkedin.com. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  20. ^ "Media Centre - Caritas Internationalis". Caritas.org. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  21. ^ Mantel, Hilary (2009-09-09). "The First Crusade: The Call from the East: Amazon.co.uk: Peter Frankopan: Books". Amazon.co.uk. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  22. ^ "Peter Frankopan". History.ox.ac.uk. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  23. ^ "Governors - Wellington College Website". Wellingtoncollege.org.uk. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  24. ^ "Staff and Trustees | About | WMF Britain". Wmf.org.uk. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  25. ^ "University of Cambridge Centre for Gender Studies » Frankopan Donation". Gender.cam.ac.uk. 2009-05-11. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  26. ^ Information Sheet for the Nuptial Mass of HRH Grand Duke of Luxemburg
  • The family site La Casata dei Lupi, (Italian language), contains photos of Lord and Lady Nicholas, their first son Albert, and members of the Frankopan de Lupis family. Retrieved 26 September 2009. As of 26 September 2009, this was the only source online that had the name of the second son as Leopold Ernest Augustus Guelph Windsor. This name has been confirmed in the 1st November by an official announcement sent to family members: "PAOLA AND NICHOLAS ANNOUNCE WITH JOY THE BIRTH OF THEIR SECOND SON LEOPOLD A BROTHER TO ALBERT BORN ON THE 8th OF SEPTEMBER 2009 8lb 2oz".
  • Doimi de Lupis genealogy (Italian language) hosted by Società Genealogica Italiana - SGI. Retrieved 26 September 2009. The page calls Lady Nicholas Windsor "S.A.R. Lady Paola Luisa Marica Doimi de Lupis de Frankopan Subich", and her sons "S.A.R. Lord Albert (Bertie) Louis Philip Edward Windsor" and "S.A.R. Lord Leopold Ernest Augustus Guelph Windsor". Her husband's great-grandfather George V of the United Kingdom and his sons abandoned the use of all German titles, including the titles of Duke/ Duchess of Saxony in 1917. Her husband and her sons are direct descendants of the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family and the Kings of England). The site reflects the Italian protocol and customs, according to the "Cerimoniale della Presidenza della Repubblica Italiana", stating that all the members of a sovereign and reigning families that come to visit Italy, are addressed as "Le Loro Altezze Reali", (LLAARR) (English TRH) or "Sua Altezza Reale" "SAR" (en.: HRH) etc. (check the official site of "Ministero degli affari Esteri - Cerimoniale diplomatico).

Template:Persondata


|2=reasoning }}The person in this entry is the brother-in-law of a member of the Royal Family. His sister is married to the Queen's cousin, Lord Nicholas Windsor. So it is remarkable someone managed to delete this. The entry about a successful young businessman, with ample citations and documentary evidence, was deleted without any discussion. No one had noticed the entry was gone and there was, at no time, any possibility to contest the deletion. None of the criteria for deletion was fulfilled and the entry seemed to have been done as a personal attack on the relevant person. Please re-instate this entry. {subst:refund|1= pageName Lawrence FrankopanThe template {{Wikify}} has been deprecated since 25 August 2012, and is retained only for old revisions. If this page is a current revision, please remove the template.

Lawrence Frankopan
BornError: Need valid birth date: year, month, day
London, England
Other namesLawrence (or Laurent, Lorenzo, Lovro) Doimi de Lupis Frankopan
Parent(s)Prince Louis Frankopan, Count Doimi de Lupis
Ingrid Detter de Frankopan

Lawrence Frankopan, born 29 December 1977 , is a sports agent and businessman in London. He worked for many years at IMG and managed several world famous sportsmen. He is now Head of Lagardère Unlimited (UK).[1] In 2011 Lawrence Frankopan founded his own sports agency, StarWingSports Ltd., managing major tennis stars like Stan Wawrinka [2], Donna Vekić [3], Borna Corić, [4] and Chris Evert [5].

Early life=

Lawrence Doimi de Lupis Frankopan was born in London in 1977. His father is Prince Louis de Frankopan, Count Doimi de Lupis, born in Split in 1939, a member of the Croatian and the Italian nobility.[6] Lawrence's father came to England from Croatia after the Second World War to attend a boarding school and then go to Oxford University. His father is a Barrister, and a member of Middle Temple and a businessman. Her mother, Ingrid Detter de Frankopan, is a distinguished Professor Emeritus at Stockholm University, sometime Fellow of LMH and of St. Antony's College, Oxford and sometime Adviser on International Law to H.H. John Paul II, professor of international law, double doctor, D.Phil. (Oxon), Jur.Dr.(Stockholm), Lic. en droit (Paris) and Dipl. Diritto Europo (Turin), Barrister at Lincoln's Inn.[7][8]

He has two sisters, Paola and Christina, and two brothers; Peter and Nicholas, Princes Frankopan, Counts Doimi de Lupis.

Lawrence’s eldest sister, Paola, is married to Lord Nicholas Windsor, son of H.R.H. the Duke and Duchess of Kent. .[9][10][11][12][13]

Lawrence's sister Christina is an investment banker,[14] who is married to Patrick Nicholson, Head of Communications for Caritas Internationalis in the Vatican.[15]

Lawrence's eldest brother Peter, D.Phil. (Oxon); M.Phil. (Oxon); M.A. (Cantab), is a historian and author of 'The First Crusade'.[16] He is Director of Oxford University's Centre for Byzantine Research. He is a University Lecturer at the Faculty of Modern Languages and Fellow of Worcester College, Oxford University.[17] He is a Governor of Wellington College [18] and trustee of the World Monuments Fund.[19] Together with his wife, Jessica Sainsbury, M.A. (Cantab), he founded Cambridge University's Frankopan Directorship for Gender Studies.[20]

Lawrence’s other brother, Nicholas, M.A. (Oxon); M.Phil. (Cantab); MBA (Columbia), is an investment banker in London.

On 12 October 2012, Lawrence Frankopan was Best Man at the wedding of HRH Crown Prince Prince Guillaume, Hereditary Grand Duke of Luxembourg, and Countess Stéphanie de Lannoy[21]

Education and Career

Lawrence speaks several languages fluently, and was educated at Ampleforth and at Universidad Complutense de Madrid, where he studied Spanish and at King’s College, London, where he read philosophy and was awarded a B.A. before being invited to be Visiting Scholar in History at New College, Oxford.

References

  1. ^ "Lagardère - Press releases". Lagardere.com. 2010-02-03. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  2. ^ www.stanwawrinka.com
  3. ^ www.donnavekic.com
  4. ^ www.bornacoric.com
  5. ^ chrisevert.org
  6. ^ The de Lupis family Italian site
  7. ^ "Biography of Ingrid Detter de Frankopan « RJ GAUDET & ASSOCIATES L.L.C". Rjgaudet.com. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  8. ^ "Ingrid Detter de Frankopan - United Kingdom | LinkedIn". Uk.linkedin.com. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  9. ^ "Royal.gov.uk". Royal Website. 26 September 2006.
  10. ^ "Independent Catholic News". Independent Catholic News. 31 October 2006.
  11. ^ "Royal News". Paul Theroff. 28 October 2006.
  12. ^ "Homerenaissancefoundation". Homerenaissancefoundation. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  13. ^ http://www.vogue.com/vogue-daily/article/my-royal-wedding-paola-de-frankopan-remembers-her-own-marriage-into-the-british-royal-family/
  14. ^ "Christina Frankopan - United Kingdom | LinkedIn". Uk.linkedin.com. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  15. ^ "Media Centre - Caritas Internationalis". Caritas.org. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  16. ^ Mantel, Hilary (2009-09-09). "The First Crusade: The Call from the East: Amazon.co.uk: Peter Frankopan: Books". Amazon.co.uk. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  17. ^ "Peter Frankopan". History.ox.ac.uk. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  18. ^ "Governors - Wellington College Website". Wellingtoncollege.org.uk. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  19. ^ "Staff and Trustees | About | WMF Britain". Wmf.org.uk. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  20. ^ "University of Cambridge Centre for Gender Studies » Frankopan Donation". Gender.cam.ac.uk. 2009-05-11. Retrieved 2011-10-24.
  21. ^ Information Sheet for the Nuptial Mass of HRH Grand Duke of Luxemburg
  • The family site La Casata dei Lupi, (Italian language), contains photos of Lord and Lady Nicholas, their first son Albert, and members of the Frankopan de Lupis family. Retrieved 26 September 2009. As of 26 September 2009, this was the only source online that had the name of the second son as Leopold Ernest Augustus Guelph Windsor. This name has been confirmed in the 1st November by an official announcement sent to family members: "PAOLA AND NICHOLAS ANNOUNCE WITH JOY THE BIRTH OF THEIR SECOND SON LEOPOLD A BROTHER TO ALBERT BORN ON THE 8th OF SEPTEMBER 2009 8lb 2oz".
  • Doimi de Lupis genealogy (Italian language) hosted by Società Genealogica Italiana - SGI. Retrieved 26 September 2009. The page calls Lady Nicholas Windsor "S.A.R. Lady Paola Luisa Marica Doimi de Lupis de Frankopan Subich", and her sons "S.A.R. Lord Albert (Bertie) Louis Philip Edward Windsor" and "S.A.R. Lord Leopold Ernest Augustus Guelph Windsor". Her husband's great-grandfather George V of the United Kingdom and his sons abandoned the use of all German titles, including the titles of Duke/ Duchess of Saxony in 1917. Her husband and her sons are direct descendants of the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family and the Kings of England). The site reflects the Italian protocol and customs, according to the "Cerimoniale della Presidenza della Repubblica Italiana", stating that all the members of a sovereign and reigning families that come to visit Italy, are addressed as "Le Loro Altezze Reali", (LLAARR) (English TRH) or "Sua Altezza Reale" "SAR" (en.: HRH) etc. (check the official site of "Ministero degli affari Esteri - Cerimoniale diplomatico).

Template:Persondata


|2=reasoning }}The person in this entry is the brother-in-law of a member of the Royal Family. His sister is married to the Queen's cousin, Lord Nicholas Windsor. So it is remarkable someone managed to delete this. The entry about a successful young businessman, with ample citations and documentary evidence, was deleted without any discussion. No one had noticed the entry was gone and there was, at no time, any possibility to contest the deletion. None of the criteria for deletion was fulfilled and the entry seemed to have been done as a personal attack on the relevant person. Please re-instate thie entry. Official Lists (talk) 17:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=548697894"