Jump to content

User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User:GlassCobra

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nikto (talk | contribs) at 05:37, 6 July 2016 (→Nikto). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Note! This page contains material which is kept because the contents are considered humorous. They are not intended, nor should they be used, for any research or serious use.
Shortcut
Deletion debates
Deletion today

Editors

Articles (by category)

Templates

Images & media

Categories (active)

User categories

Stub types

Redirects

Miscellany

Deletion review

Deletion policy
Process - log - tools

Guide - Admin guide

Editors for deletion (EfD), originally created by R then recreated by LaraLove Jennavecia Indubitably and then given to GlassCobra, is where Wikipedians discuss whether an editor should be deleted. Editors listed here are debated for up to ∞, after which the deletion process proceeds based on Wikipedia community consensus. The editor is then either kept, merged and/or redirected, transwikied, renamed/moved to another username, or deleted, deleted and salted, or deleted, salted and peppered (with a side of onion rings) per the deletion policy.[Verify]

This page explains what you should consider before nominating, the steps for nominating single or multiple editors, and how to discuss an EfD. It also lists the editors currently under consideration and includes a 'hall of notoriety'.

Instruction creep

  • You must not be listed here.
  • The editor must not be listed here.
  • The editor must be established and active, as new users may not understand the seriousness of this process.
  • You may not list more than one editor per week.

If you want to participate in this page, the following must be met:

  • You must not be listed here.
  • You must understand WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, and WP:DRRC, acknowledge that those policies apply here, as everywhere else on Wikipedia, and that any violations could result in a block. Be funny, not a dick.
  • Your participation here can not exceed 1% of your regular daily edits.[Who?]
  • You must agree to never revert to re-add any comment that has been removed by any administrator (or the nominated user) for any reason.


Criteria for editor deletion

If you get past the instruction creep and understand the deletion process, consult the Criteria for editor deletion and the instructions below on how to list editors for deletion. Any debates which violate the above will be removed. Do not nominate anyone unless you are reasonably sure they will accept the nomination. If you are nominating someone you do not know well, please avoid embarrassing yourself and ask them if they will accept the nomination before nominating them. Further, no editor may be nominated more than once.

Instructions

To list a candidate, put his or her name in a level three category below, and leave {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/Talk Notice}} on the editor's talk page. When ever you feel like it, close the debate placing {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/top}} at the top and {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/bottom}} at the bottom.

Nominees

Any editor nominated who finds it amusing and wishes to participate may add {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/Nom}} to their userpage. Do not place this template on the userpage of another editor, even if you nominated them — they can do it themselves, if they so desire. Any editor who does not wish to participate may remove their nomination from this page at any time and list themselves on the opt out list.

Old discussions

Hall of Notoriety
Previous Discussions

Current discussions

Nikto

Self nomination. Notorious, infamous, and garbled; alleged irrational wielder of the musical ban hammer (not the dude in Mahavishnu Orchestra, though as a tabled suggestion they may need salt too). Stared at Hoot Owl sideways, made it somewhere on the Gravina Island Bridge, and sat next to WP:Randy at All Boise HS. Google search takes you deep into the Black Hat. Has voted in multiple States for various reasons. HEPL. Nikto wha? 05:22, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Alpha Quadrant

Self nomination. Often confused with the Alpha Quadrant. Editor should be deleted immediately to avoid future confusion. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 03:24, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.


The result was per SwisterTwister. JORGENEV 10:09, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Crazymonkey1123

Self nom. I am that #1 most hated Wikipedian and completely fail WP:GNG because I only turn up 1,400 results on Google when I searched Crazymonkey1123. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T or M/Sign mine 04:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC) P.S. There are users named Crazymonkey1123 on other websites. I am in no way affiliated with them at all.

  • Delete for the userpage design alone, which really hurts my browser. The prescient link for subsequent trouting at the top is appreciated though. Hekerui (talk) 08:29, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete - be forced to watch a rotating wheel for eternity. Mwahahahahaha. SwisterTwister (talk) 07:19, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep: How could I possibly vote to delete a fellow WikiWolfcub! Pesky (talk …stalk!) 05:11, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Fling poo then Sweeten and hand out at Easter per WP:BEANS. Wabbott9 Tell me about it.... 04:26, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Entry closed - The editor has retired. SwisterTwister talk 20:34, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

SwisterTwister

Self-nom because I've admitted to breathing in the U.S.A. even though I can't help it. It's one of my guilty pleasures! That oh so yummy feeling when you breath in and out. It's the sweet temptations! *stares at breath warming the windows* Please sign the petition allowing SwisterTwister take those scrumptious deep breaths again! If President Barack Obama signed it, you can too! (Perhaps by signing, SwisterTwister will be able to breathe better again)SwisterTwister (talk) 06:22, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

President Barack Obama signing the Let SwisterTwister breath as freely as he wants Act
  • Delete – everything's bigger in Texas. 08:29, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Torture with a hot iron that has electricity running through it then set you on fire because you want to delete me :( Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T or M/Sign mine 05:52, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete because Swister is a Democrat and I'm a Republican. :D Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:12, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Force to listen to Tom Lehrer's song "pollution" to ruin that guilty pleasure for life! Pesky (talk …stalk!) 15:12, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Convert, I thought he was a sister. Ariconte (talk) 07:19, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Return for further processing, specifically to determine whether the person at any point declared herself to be a non-breather. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:42, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Courcelles

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present to you Courcelles. In the few months he has been an admin he has recorded 60k admin actions and is threatening to kill the servers if this continues. THINK OF THE SERVER KITTIES!!! Recently he was entrusted with the CU and OS flags and these give him even more opportunity to damage the wiki. Look at the content he's deleted and the editors he's blocked and with his recent endowment, these actions are not visible! :O We cannot let this continue! He is the admin version of Willy on Wheels. I move, for his own and the encyclopedia's good, that he be deleted so he can finally retire to the warm embrace of his bed which he has gone many cycles without. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 6:34pm • 08:34, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks goes to Sonia who helped write the first draft of this deletion.

  • Speedy Keep: He's in the Cabal© with me. Oh, and Oversight the nomination so we don't look bad. Muahahaha and stuff like that. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 15:51, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
  • HUH!? There's a cabal!? O.o We've been had! —James (Talk • Contribs) • 5:14pm • 07:14, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Never!! He shall be chained to the wiki and forced to labour day and night while the rest of us sit back in our lawn chairs and drink pina coladas. -- œ™ 13:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep! There must be some way of hardwiring that brain directly into the servers ... think of the improvements in server capacity and speed which could be achieved ... no need for sleep or play ... I'm sure I have just the screwdriver for the job somewhere here ..... :o) Pesky (talk) 07:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete if the alternative is to become a Cyberman! Courcelles 00:31, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep although I was blocked by him, Courcelles does a very fine job here, and is well respected. Intoronto1125TalkContributions 23:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep he's proper.Rhonda (talk)
  • hospitalize- he wants to delete himself, that's a sure sign something's wrong... sonia♫ 03:54, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
    • Yes, a good hit on the head with a spanner will go a long way ;) —James (Talk • Contribs) • 9:34pm • 11:34, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete and Oversight so that he can have his way. demize (t · c) 19:36, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete because he's a Wikipedia user, because everybody knows Wikipedia users are dangerous! *gasp* SwisterTwister (talk) 05:55, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep I've had a lot of problems with Administrators who abuse their authority. With my lengthy $h*t list to refer back to, and our cross watching of numerous articles, I think this is one of the good ones to keep around and overwork. Trackinfo (talk) 02:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Of Cource we should delete him! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure I like that being such an easy choice :P Courcelles 23:53, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep He/she has been very helpful around wikipedia so i vote keep. Elektrik Band 21:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete? I don't have a lot of experience with wikipedia but he deleted a page I started Ballast (band) without informing me after the page had been vandalized by someone else. I think it would have been more productive to revert the page back to it's original information. I'm willing to change my vote if someone can explain why this deletion and how it was done were appropriate and how I can properly put the page back up. noodle 23:37, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
    • The deleting admin in a PROD isn't supposed to notify the author- the person who places the tag should have done this, and per [{WP:PROD]], if no one, including the author, removes the tag in seven days, the page is deleted. It cna later be undeleted on request. While this isn't the orthodox venue for contesting PROD's, it'll do, and restored as a contested PROD. Courcelles 05:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep per oe and User:Shirik/Forced_adminship --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 05:23, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep keep keep! Definitely! This admin is always willing to help others and is very helpful with BLP vandalism--5 albert square (talk) 22:27, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete due to Mutant growth hormone the fictional element, this admin deletes a page without an explanation that reflects the discussion. The problem was not anymore the notability and a move then a merge to keep the information was explained. Mutant growth hormone now redirect to growth hormone but there is nothing to tell. Who wants redirections such as mutant human to human or mutant frog to frog ? Comic books have a fictional element called Mutant Growth Hormone. Real life put mutant as an adjective in front of different real names. Should we create redirections with mutant name ? 130.120.37.11 (talk) 15:41, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Redirect to WP:SERVERKITTIES to make up for the damage. Wabbott9 Tell me about it.... 04:30, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Courcellify. Eternally. jorgenev 03:43, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete: Every admin action kills a kitty. Joe Chill (talk) 02:41, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete..Obviously a shill for the Coors Brewing Company! Every time he signs, the subliminal message is "Coors sells". I used to stalk his userpage but found myself downing two six-packs a night. His deletion will decrease the amount of drunken editors by 37.5 percent. ```Buster Seven Talk 05:18, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

That Pesky Commoner!

Friendly Wolfie!

Self-nom (though I'd get it in here before anyone else did, lol!) For unacceptable levels of neck-sticking-out with side issues of invitations for trampling. And being pesky. Pesky (talk) 14:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

When I was brought up, and flint-knapping was the trade to be in, they were called cubs! (I like The Jungle Book :o) Pesky (talk) 12:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
  • C:>Format C: /X -- Kim van der Linde at venus 21:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
  • lick to death to give her a taste of her own medicine ;) sonia♫ 00:58, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Drowning in ice cream --43?9enter ☭msg☭contribs 07:10, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Mmmm... ice cream... —James (Talk • Contribs) • 11:24pm • 13:24, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
    You forgot to add <DROOL> to that. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 15:07, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
    D'oh! :) —James (Talk • Contribs) • 3:43pm • 05:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Merge with Jacob Black so they can run freely with wolves in the wild. SwisterTwister (talk) 07:19, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Elevate to the peerage We need more pesky nobles around here. Wabbott9 Tell me about it.... 04:32, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
  • KEEP!!!!! Why would I want a WikiWolfcub to die!?!?! Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T or M/Sign mine 05:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Knight him at Buckingham Palace with a touching ceremony with Wolf Blitzer doing the dubs.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:01, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Mixed feelings. On the one hand, identified possible improvement to Meermin, on the other hand, did not take the trouble to realize that it would be very difficult to implement those improvements, so the choice is pretty much between no article at all and what is there now. Simlarly, made a nice addition on my talk page regarding how to write articles, but did not take the trouble to realize that in fact I do know how to write articles, even if I don't always take the time and trouble for all the niceties.--Gautier lebon (talk) 09:47, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
I reverse my comment above. I made some comments regarding Pesky's comments, so he proceeded to find additional sources, including pictures, and rewrote the article, making it much better. This is outstanding editorial work, so I vote enthusiastically to keep Pesky as an editor.--Gautier lebon (talk) 08:12, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Aww! I should have seen this earlier - thank you! (Pesky's a she, by the way - but no offence taken!) And the Meermin grew in an alternative direction, too! Pesky (talk …stalk!) 18:03, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete. Presents too great a danger to kittens. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:44, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Drown by numbers. Wikipedia is no place to have a sense of humour.TheLongTone (talk) 09:53, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete Has actually been seen going in the house without scraping her Wellingtons. YUK! ```Buster Seven Talk 19:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

WereSpielChequers

zOMG the one with 85,000 edits forgets to sign her posts! [1]! --Perseus8235 16:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

  • Oversight all user edits immediately and subsequently have everyone watch this to remove this offense from our collective memory. Hekerui (talk) 22:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promote to Founder - then she won't have to bother signing any more; others will do it for her.  Chzz  ►  13:46, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Can't do it I'm sure (98% reliability) that this is a spoof on Wikipedian seriousness but even in jest I can't vote to delete the kind editor who welcomed me to Wikipedia. Nope, ain't gonna do it. Alice (talk) 22:48, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Move to Chess If you keep spilling the checkers, move to a different game. What? That's how I read your name, "We Spill Checkers"... Sven Manguard Wha? 15:43, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep not enough of us females around anyway :o) Pesky (talk) 12:26, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
    • I could have sworn WSC was a bloke. He bought me a pint at a meetup a while back. The wonders of modern technology! ;) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:23, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
      • Heh. I assumed he was a guy but this thread managed to thoroughly confuse me :P sonia♫ 00:58, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete sexually ambiguous ;) —James (Talk • Contribs) • 11:24pm • 13:24, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
  1. Obvious delete for having the gual to delete me.---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 00:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Wait, WSC is a girl??? WTF! Does that mean I have to start being nice to her?---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 19:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Brave the poppable one is to ask that second question of a potential hatpin wielder. ϢereSpielChequers 13:42, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
  1. Delete 1) Works too hard, 2) Raises the Standard of behavior much too high, 3) Non-combative to a fault, 4) Clear thoughts and explanations, 5) Is most likely pretty. ```Buster Seven Talk 19:33, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Chzz

Sausages. Silly.

Self-nom. I'm such a silly sausage, I just made a page entitled User talk:12:24, 27 January 2011 when trying to reply to an IP.

"Dear Mr. 27th January..."

Clearly, I'm an incompetent buffoon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by  Chzz  ►  12:36, 27 January 2011

I second this proposal. :P The Helpful One 14:06, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Deletion isn't appropriate when we can improve an editor! More sausages, and some time in the asylum. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 16:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  • chain to the Help Desk. sonia♫ 22:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete - user forgot to sign, clearly disruptive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by [CharlieEchoTango] 18:13, 27 January 2011
  • Have Chzz, now can haz burger? ϢereSpielChequers 00:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)     (Oh, the irony) — Preceding unsigned comment added by  Chzz  ►  12:36, 27 January 2011
  • Ultra-strength socky support - user just made "Greekdelta" and then had to add, {{db|I am an idiot. Also, G6. Meant to make template page. PEBCAK}}.  Chzz  ►  00:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep with extreme prejudice . A possibly worse fate? Pesky (talk) 15:01, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Make Vegetarian - There, no more sausage issues. It'll also do wonders for your figure, much less painful than that corset you were going to try out. Sven Manguard Wha? 15:40, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete the extra exercise would do him good. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 11:10pm • 13:10, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete for being an alien and exceeding the normal Wikipedian age of 99 years old! *wink* SwisterTwister (talk) 05:55, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Move to either Cheese or Mouse. Mwahahaha, Chzz will be eaten and experience a painful bite. *record scratches* Oh...I didn't realise my username was going to show on this thing. *hides under bed* SwisterTwister talk 07:20, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete Self identifies as "an incompetent buffoon". Obviously only half right! ```Buster Seven Talk 19:38, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

HJ Mitchell

Twelve pints/whiskies? He is clearly drunk; just like how drunk driving can harm yourself, others, and the odd street sign, editing under the influence can cause serious damage to Wikipedia. Delete before complaints of "zOMG ADMIN ABUSE" come flooding in. --Dylan620 (t • c • r) 02:29, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Eh? I'm not dronk... *falls off stall*, I'm perfectly so..., so..., sobe... whatever that word is! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:42, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Fixed: I swear to drunk I`m not god! --Addihockey10 e-mail 02:46, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Maybe it wis all those wiskees I given you then, sory ser i only had just 17 Tofutwitch11 (TALK) 02:51, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Field Sobriety Test, employ with TSA That'll learn you. l'aquatique[talk] 20:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete!! He keeps taking all the requests at WP:RFPERM before I even get a chance to do any! Quit hogging the fun stuff!! ;P -- œ™ 21:54, 24 January 2011 (UTC) ps. I'm only kidding... don't you dare stop the awesome work you're doing at RFPERM!
  • Free beer for all Then film the resulting escapades and put them on Youtube. sonia♫ 22:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  • ⁰I° ˚loveº y⁰ou˚...∘Iº lo˚ve youº al˚l∘ °hic°, ºle⁰ave˚ HMJºitchell∘ ˚alo⁰ne, ⁰he's ºmy ∘beshtistº mate° ...♬ thersh anold still♫ by the ♪meme, ♬Nelliiiiiie Dean♫... Chzz  ◀  0:35 (BAC) 11 Pints 2011
  • Splash with water How about something nice and low proof instead of whatever you're drinking now. Sven Manguard Wha? 15:36, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep on condition that the alcohol is shared. Pesky (talk) 12:27, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
  •  Awesome! I've always wanted to add that. --43?9enter ☭msg☭contribs 06:17, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep We need the typos! :) Dwon wiht porper seplling, amissiliate nwo nad eb sapred!!1!!! —James (Talk • Contribs) • 10:56pm • 12:56, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Change to User:Wikipedia Main Page or have him wander the Amazon forest for the long lost temple of Wikipedius Templus Holius of Jimmius Walius SwisterTwister (talk) 05:55, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Sonia

This person isn't all that notable. I mean a quick Google search returns 44,100,000 hits, well below my threshold of fifty million hits. This should have been done a long time ago but frequent intimidation by the person via late night phone calls have prevented me from doing so. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:18, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

  • /me huggles Sonia Keep her trapped in the IRC, where people can make lewd jokes and play out overused and long dead memes on her, on account of her being one of only two females in the entire IRC. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:42, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
    "Only two"? You sure 'bout dat? Crawling out o'the woodwork everywhere, we are :p Pesky (talk …stalk!) 05:30, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep because someone has to keep Kevin in check. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 06:00, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete : Completely useless editor who never does anything right. [CharlieEchoTango] 06:05, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep as the other one of the "two females in the entire IRC." Also, ten bucks that jokes about boobs will follow this !vote. —La Pianista ♫ ♪ 06:21, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
    • lolboobs. Who's paying you?sonia♫ 08:52, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
      • Your mother. I was supposed to pay her last night, but apparently it was the best bleepitybloopblop in her life, so I'm getting the money. —La Pianista ♫ ♪ 21:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep as notable poet and one of the people who have the rare gift of making IRC (including even quiet little Simple's channel), er... come alive. ;) Clementina talk 07:23, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
On second thought, we need her here with the urgency of a thousand thirsty sailors in the ocean, so speedy delete. Now. Clementina talk 07:41, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep! Shame on you Clementina! Besides, en:WP saw her first! - 220.101 talk\Contribs 08:06, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Deleep (Keelete). I'm still on the fence with this one... -- œ™ 11:26, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

    (ʇszu) | | 0S ʎɹɐnɹqǝℲ | | 61:91  ◄  zzɥɔ  sǝıuoןoɔ ǝɥʇ oʇ ʇɹodǝp ■

  • Weak keep - causes RfA problems ;) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:44, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Definitely keep good for moral support and huggies in IRC Pesky (talk) 11:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete The hugs... they're... infectious :O Chzz, how dare you :P Australia's not a dump >:S (brownie points if you see the irony in that). —James (Talk • Contribs) • 10:51pm • 12:51, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete from Wikipedia but Keep in my thoughts :-P Dcoetzee 06:05, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

AN/I

Move to User talk:Jimbo Wales. Access Denied [FATAL ERROR] 14:10, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

  • Comment: This is the wrong venue. To nominate a page in the Wikipedia namespace for deletion, see WP:MFD. ~NerdyScienceDude 22:40, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
  • WRONG VENUE - off with his head. Killiondude (talk) 06:20, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
  • FAIL. User:ANI was deleted two years ago. This discussion is flogging the dead horse. --Dylan620 (t • c • r) 02:29, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Move to Main Page --Σ ☭★ 07:05, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Move to an even better place....Talk:Main Page. *wink* SwisterTwister (talk) 06:23, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Nominate for Adminship User is the most productive and least disruptive editor I've met. Wabbott9 Tell me about it.... 04:35, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep to further irritate the deleted user that nominated it. Then re-nominate by a non-deleted user and delete that nominator too so that the page is still kept. Repeat process until the lack of users has caused ANI to be the only functioning page on the Wikipedia namespace, so it must then be moved into the user namespace. Then, actually nominate it for EfD. RedSoxFan2434 (talk) 17:24, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

TTTSNB has retired. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 16:41, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

The Thing That Should Not Be

An unauthorized bot; also has no life because of addiction to a newly discovered highly addictive drug called huggle. Access Denied [FATAL ERROR] 02:44, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete and low level format (just in case) - only valid treatment for an unauthorized bot. Besides, the bot chose a username indicative of the fact that it should not be, further supporting this sanction. ROBERTMFROMLI TALK/CNTRB 02:48, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close because of icons are shiny. Access Denied [FATAL ERROR] 02:50, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Comment "Newly discovred"? Ok then, if you consider 2 years "Newly discovered". :P The Thing // Talk // Contribs

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was {{{1}}} close User deleted. 20:26, March 25, 2011 Geni (talk | contribs) deleted "User:Mono" Alpha Quadrant talk 21:06, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Comment This makes the above block of small text a block of little circles... --Σ ☭★ 07:04, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Mono

No indication of importance/significance. This is distinct from questions of notability, verifiability and reliability of sources. THENEWMONO 01:58, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete, block, and oversight as a sockpuppet of Jimbo Wales (talk · contribs). ~NerdyScienceDude 02:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Very strongly neutral Is TheNewMono like the New Coca Cola? I guess since I dont drink soda, it doesnt matter to me either way. ROBERTMFROMLI TALK/CNTRB 03:45, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Delete Merge Userfy Neutral BJAODN Oppose Support Redirect List Comment. If you have the vote symblos script installed, please eat all the icons you see on the left. Access Denied [FATAL ERROR] 03:47, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Scrap Whilst Mono once served us with distinction and helped revolutionise our popular culture, it has long been superseded and now is totally obsolete ϢereSpielChequers 07:49, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Convert to User:Stereo. Hekerui (talk) 07:51, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete under criterion A7, unless indication of importance/significance is added, in which case speedy delete under non-criterion NC6. Reach Out to the Truth 03:28, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Trout this user is obsessed with their userpage! —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 10:18am • 23:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was close. Subject has been banned (deleted?) by the community. Dylan620 (t • c) 22:54, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Access Denied

Non-notable editor; only 11.5 million Google hits. I also am losing my mi-BUNNY!!!!!!!!!!&Ybdfb6ar359j43hj5wre5wh345jhw4wse4r Access Denied talk contribs editor review 05:25, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A9. Blatantly made attacks on other editors' choice of footwear here, here and here. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Eat with giant brick. Access Denied [FATAL ERROR] 10:20, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Grant Access. Doing so will remove this user and open his porn collection for me the greater good :-D Regards SoWhy 10:33, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep – 4 million hits on Google! As far as I know, access has already been granted... HeyMid (contributions) 19:22, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Swallow with giant ice cube - wipe that smile off your face. THENEWMONO 01:55, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
  • GARY COLEMAN per WP:FUCK. Dappl (talk) 06:34, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Deletion Denied per ghits. ϢereSpielChequers 07:56, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete User's userpage is a waste of valuable Wikipedia memory. Delete this editor!!! --Addihockey10 17:11, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Scramble password and disable email to ensure that access is denied. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
  •  Done Access for this editor is now Denied. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
    Because they are blocked. →♠Gƒoley↔Four♣← 05:43, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

Kayau

Non-notable user. Self-nom. Suggest WP:CSD. Kayau Voting IS evil 02:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

A long block.
  • Keep. 52,000 Google hits prove notability without a shadow of doubt, and show that the nominator is on a deletionist crusade against themself. Also, the nomination statement is an egregious self attack worthy of a long block (pictured). Jafeluv (talk) 21:38, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Lego with a long block. Or maybe one of the thin bits that always get stuck on the other ones... GlassCobra 15:28, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Move to Encyclopedia Dramatica. Access Denied [FATAL ERROR] 03:48, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Abstain as voting is Evil. But then supply a pointy deletion rationale in the neutral column but because both sides read the neutrals, so excessive vowels, K? ϢereSpielChequers 21:37, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was 0_o --Dylan620 (t • c • r) 03:17, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Protactinium-231 (now known as 4)

Self nom. A non-notable radioisotope of an obscure element on the periodic table that doesn't have it's own article on Wikipedia and only has 13,600 Google hits anyway. Delete. 23191Pa (chat me!) 08:32, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Supah delete! Nobody cares about science. — The Earwig @ 16:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
  • According to a well known encyclopaedia "Due to its scarcity, high radioactivity, and high toxicity, there are currently no uses for protactinium outside of scientific research." So I'm not sure whether to conserve this editor due to scarcity or delete due to toxicity. However it is superconductive below 1.4k - so I suggest freeze in liquid Helium and use to make servers based on superconductor technology. ϢereSpielChequers 20:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Will die in about 32760 years anyway, so kill him earlier and it won't make any difference. 23191Pa (chat me!) 08:32, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Not fair. I only have a few hours to live. 23491Pa (chat me!) 08:32, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Rename to Unobtanium then declare a lost cause. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 14:55, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Rename to macguffinite; using "unobtanium" on the big screen is just bad. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 15:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was force Jimbo to wear a bikini. --Dylan620 (t • c • r) 02:29, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Ched Davis

Admin has come to my user page and :O OMG stolen mah commas[2], forcing me to protect them[3]. This is unacceptable behavior, and shows that he is probably a sock of Jimbo Wales. Therefore he must be deleted at once! --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 02:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

  • Strong Remove from Jimbo's Underpants as nom --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 02:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Uber strong keep - If he's deleted I'll have to edit Bill Buchanan all by mahself ^_^ Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 02:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Punish Steal his commas for punishment.--Giants27(c|s) 02:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Get the fuck out of my underpants - Oh shit I've been found out... *runs*... --Jimbo Wales // get in my pants // adopt a wale // 02:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete from Jimbo's underpants? - this could go in so many dark directions. Somebody save me! ... mah "boys" need room to breathe! — Ched :  ?  03:01, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
    You pervert! you have "boys" in Jimbo's Underpants????? Speedy Delete Ched Davis!!!! </witch hunt> --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 03:10, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete for keeping young boys prisoner in Jimbo's underpants. That's just sick man. — Huntster (t @ c) 09:00, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
  • NOOO .. not "boys" as in "young men" ... muh nads, stones, nuts, twins, as in brass balls. .. sigh .. I have gots to start choosing my words better. Oh forget it, I'm sunk - Coffee - I'll get you for this!  ;~| — Ched :  ?  22:12, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Reluctant delete per sock User has by and large been a useful and thoughtful editor, so this particular sockpuppetry allegation is a bit of a surprise. But we can't have one person with two accounts having admin status, so plz chz wch act gets to keep the bit. ϢereSpielChequers 09:13, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
  • there must be an error ... good socks don't make mistakes. — Jimbo :  ?  — Ched :  ?  22:16, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was :

Floquenbeam

Recently passed in hell and with a remarkably calm approach. Refuses to reveal true identity, and thus I suspect this editor is actually a rogue adminbot. Suggest deletion and oversight of existence. Regards, --—Cyclonenim | Chat  17:47, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm all about transparency, so oppose oversight. Not sure how I feel yet about deletion, will consider carefully. On a procedural note, shouldn't you have at least waited until I placed myself in Category:Wikipedia administrators open to deletion? --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:05, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Nope, you don't need either to be an admin or open to recall to be listed here. ϢereSpielChequers 22:46, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Overthrow. As a completely uninvolved observer, I have determined that there is indeed Wikipedia-wide consensus to rise up against the robot dictatorship and make Jafeluv the new Emperor and God-King. — Cafeluv // have a cup // 12:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

harej

Nominator's rationale: Destroy. This user and his robot army already control everything at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, Wikipedia:Requested moves, Wikipedia:Proposed mergers and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion, with the stated intent to achieve more Lebensraum at the peaceful realm of category renames. Clearly this user is after total and utter dominance and Jimboship, and should be stopped at whatever cost. Upon deletion, I will assume control of the robot army as your new benevolent dictator. Jafeluv (talk) 11:15, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

  • Clearly you haven't heard of my plans to conquer France! I propose we suppress Jafeluv as a political dissident conspiring against the glorious reich. @harej 15:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete but after doing so, give the robot army to SoWhy. I have heard great things about that guy and I am sure he would do much more good with it. ClearlyNotSoWhy 16:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
    • This guy seems legit. (I had concerns that this was a plot by SoWhy, but then I noticed the username which clearly states that this is an unrelated editor.) I will consider appointing SoWhy to the position of cleaning my boots once I become Emperor. Jafeluv (talk) 09:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong neutral. I can't be bothered to make up my mind.. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 12:55, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
    • Even Stronger Neutral Because I can. ϢereSpielChequers 09:05, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
HLEP HERLP is this ok place to be asking question here? MY HOVERCRAFT IS FULL OF EELS helepe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chzz (talk • contribs) — Chzz (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was No Dramaz. GlassCobra 15:26, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Huntster

As nom I bring this before the community. User:Huntster has shown a blatant disregard for drama, has continually attempted to improve the wiki, has often been kind and welcoming to new users, and has consistently attempted to disrupt daily procedures by actually resolving problems. This type of behavior simply can not be permitted! I propose that this user be deleted post haste. — Ched :  ?  05:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete we have no use for quality people here. — Ched :  ?  05:22, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete as serving no real purpose. Clearly a sock of some better editor. — Huntster (t @ c) 09:10, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
  • I thought that Dumpster and Hamster were both useful articles in their own right. Would it be possible to de-merge them? ϢereSpielChequers 13:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep and expand. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:27, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete as every claim is unverifiable. Unless sources can be provided no point in keeping.--Giants27 (c|s) 17:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Draw and quarter, productive admins must be treated appropriately. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Subst and Delete - So we can use him on Trout, Boat, and Goldfish. Rowdy the Ant talk to Rowdy 22:45, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NETPOSITIVE. User seems to think that we're here to write an encyclopedia. Jafeluv (talk) 08:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
  • De-1337, fails WP:NORULES  Chzz  ►  09:18, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Death by horrendous singing, looking particularly at GlassCobra and TPH (my singing, of course, is absolutely excellent [citation needed], but it's canceled out). —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 02:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

King of Hearts

I was going to speedy delete it under G7, but since other users have made highly constructive, substantial edits, I am bringing it here for discussion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

Jimbo Wales

He no longer needs to be part of Wikipedia when all the other admins and users do what Wales does! --UpEpSilon (talk) 00:13, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

  • Obvious delete, no brainier, he is useless, annoying, doesn't respond to everyone, has too many talk page stalkers, is already loaded with cash, etc. MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 05:20, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Nashmim2000

Change the name ShowSports Page To OSN Sports

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:GlassCobra/Editor_for_deletion&oldid=728568207"