Criticism of the Catholic Church

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Epiphyllumlover (talk | contribs) at 18:48, 12 April 2019 (→‎Associated psychology: thumb|A [[Discipline (instrument of penance)|discipline with seven cords lying on top of the ''Raccolta'', a text that contains several acts of reparation and other devotions.]]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Criticism of the Catholic Church includes observations and examinations of the current or historic Catholic Church. Hostility towards Catholics or political opposition to the Catholic Church is outside the scope of this article and is instead covered in the "Anti-Catholicism" article.

Since the Catholic Church is the largest Christian church representing over half of all Christians[1] and one sixth of the world's population,[2] there is some degree of variation between Catholics simply due to wide ethnic and socioeconomic differences. Compounding this are historical periods of forced conversions and subsequent persistence of "cypto-" forms of illegal belief from people passing for Catholic, but still exerting some of their influence over the generations. As a result of the variation within the Catholic Church, certain criticisms may not apply to the entire Catholic Church. For example, traditionalist Catholics do not criticize the whole Catholic Church for being crypto-Protestant, but only certain elements such as Charismatic Catholics.

Criticisms from the Catholic church may come from people who self-identify as Catholics, from non-Catholics who distinguish their Christian faith from Catholicism, and from non-Christians who also criticize Christianity as a whole along with the Catholic Church.

Some criticisms originate from self-identified Catholics who would like to influence the future direction of Catholicism. For example, several popes criticized the Catholic Church for granting too many annulments, while some clergy in Europe and North America have been vocal about the need to ordain women. Likewise, commentary about worship practices mostly comes from people who self-identify as Catholic and thus have a vested interest in the impact of liturgical and architectural decisions.

Criticisms of corruption may be similar in character no matter whether the source of the criticism self-identifies as Catholic or not, while criticism of beliefs are most likely to originate from members of other Christian churches. When members of Eastern Orthodoxy and Protestant Churches make criticism of Catholicism, they are not merely picking apart another belief system, but instead are rebutting specific Catholic criticisms of their own churches. In turn all sides contribute to the larger theological and ecclesiological discussion.

Historical related criticisms often come from members of parties who identify with the wronged party in history. For example, criticisms involving the Crusades or the Ustaše are likely to be highlighted by from Eastern Orthodox Christians, while Protestants are more likely to cite the Wars of the Counter Reformation. Some historical actions are today criticized by Catholic leaders, not only in general sentiment, but also during the specific apologies directed towards the previously persecuted party. These historical criticisms are not necessarily strictly historical in character, as the area of conflict may still exist today. Although the Protestant Reformation in 16th-century Europe came about due to corruptions and abuses of church practices by clergy in addition to theological disputes,[3] Protestants in the 21st century may continue to hold similar criticisms.

Lifestyle related criticisms are often part of a larger culture war, and as a result criticisms which appear to be directed against the Catholic Church may actually be an example of scapegoating. For example, critics of Catholicism on procreation related questions may single out Catholicism for criticism, but also have similar, unstated views against other parties with similar practices.

Criticism of corruption

Sexual abuse

Sexual abuse has existed in the Catholic Church since at least as far back as the 11th century, when Peter Damian wrote a scathing treatise, Liber Gomorrhianus, against such abuses and others. In the late 15th century, Katharina von Zimmern and her sister were removed from their abbey to live in their family's house for a while partly because the young girls were molested by priests.[4] In 1531, Martin Luther claimed that Pope Leo X had vetoed a measure that cardinals should restrict the number of boys they kept for their pleasure, "otherwise it would have been spread throughout the world how openly and shamelessly the pope and the cardinals in Rome practice sodomy."[5]

The Papal states were the last European nation to prohibit the castration of boys for the purpose of producing castrato singers. It was not outlawed until 1870.

2011 graffiti in Portugal depicting a priest chasing two children.

The accusations began to receive isolated, sporadic publicity from the late 1980s.[6][7] By the 1990s, the cases began to receive significant media and public attention in some countries, especially in Canada, the United States, Australia and, through a series of television documentaries.[8] In January 2002, allegations of priests sexually abusing children were widely reported in the news media. It became clear that the officials of various Catholic dioceses were aware of some of the abusive priests, and shuffled them from parish to parish (sometimes after psychotherapy), in some cases without removing them from contact with children. A survey of the 10 largest U.S. dioceses found 234 priests from a total 25,616 in those dioceses, have had allegations of sexual abuse made against them in the last 50 years. The report does not state how many of these have been proven in court.[9]

Some of these reassignments were egregious, the worst leading to the resignation of Cardinal Bernard Law from the Boston archdiocese. Victims of such abuse filed lawsuits against a number of dioceses, resulting in multi-million dollar settlements in some cases. Similar allegations of abuse in Ireland led to the publication of the Ferns report in 2005, which stated that appropriate action was not taken in response to the allegations.[citation needed]

In response, in June 2002, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops initiated strict new guidelines ("zero tolerance") for the protection of children and youth in Catholic institutions across the country. The Vatican revisited what it regarded as the issue of homosexuality and a gay subculture within the clergy, because the vast majority of the cases consisted of males preying on male adolescents (over 90% of the sexual abuse victims were teenage boys rather than girls or prepubescents).[10]

In 2014, the United Nations focused some attention on this topic. The Permanent Representative of the Holy See to the UN, Silvano Maria Tomasi, appeared before the Committee against Torture and reported that during the previous ten years, 3420 cases of abuse against minors had been investigated and 884 priests had been removed from their positions and reduced to lay status.[11]

Financial corruption

Abbot practising simony (France, 12th century). Instances of simony have been documented going back to the 9th century.

In the 14th century, Dante Alighieri depicted the punishment of many "clergymen, and popes and cardinals" in hell for being avaricious or miserly.[12]

He also criticised certain popes and other simoniacs:[13]

"Rapacious ones, who take the things of God, / that ought to be the brides of Righteousness, / and make them fornicate for gold and silver! / The time has come to let the trumpet sound / for you; ...".

In the 18th century, Niccolò Coscia ruined the papal treasury through financial misconduct.[14]

In 1969, Dorothy Day wrote, "Fortunately, the Papal States were wrested from the Church in the last century, but there is still the problem of investment of papal funds. It is always a cheering thought to me that if we have good will and are still unable to find remedies for the economic abuses of our time, in our family, our parish, and the mighty church as a whole, God will take matters in hand and do the job for us."[15]

The Legion of Christ's multi-million dollar offshore holdings were revealed in the so-called Paradise Papers leak in November 2017.[16] The 2012 Vatican leaks scandal described alleged bribes paid to secure an audience with the pope.

In the 1980s there was a major scandal involving money laundering for the mafia and other financial controversies going back to the 1960s.[17]

Rent-seeking behaviour and politics

For several historical forms of political corruption in the Catholic Church, see Benefice § Pluralism and Cardinal-nephew
For bribery influencing the selection of popes, see Papal selection before 1059 § Ostrogothic rule (493–537)
For the ongoing issue over members of the hierarchy thought by some to live too extravagantly, see Prelate § Controversies involving prelatures

The Vatican City became a financial powerhouse following the 1929 Lateran Treaty.

In 1962, a letter writing campaign attempted to prevent the construction of the Watergate complex on the grounds that zoning waivers would not have been given had the Vatican not been a major investor.

When Ronald Reagan attempted to tax fraternal insurance companies such as the Knights of Columbus, then–Supreme Knight Virgil Dechant used White House connections to scuttle the effort. In addition, local Knights of Columbus councils set up phone banks and letter writing campaigns to oppose the measure.[18]

In 2003, John L. Allen Jr. placed the annual operating budget of the Vatican at about $260 million,[19] with the Patrimony of the Apostolic See holding an endowment of about $770 million.[20]

In May 2013, Chicago alderman Patrick J. O'Connor argued that the Catholic Church and other religious institutions and not for profit organizations should pay property taxes and be billed for water, and criticized them for objecting.[21]

In 2015, the Bishop of Oslo was charged with fraud for inflating membership rolls for the Catholic Church in Norway and the diocese had to repay some of its subsidy.[22]

Usury

Earlier concerns include 19th century Rothschild loans to the Holy See and 16th century concerns over abuse of the zinskauf clause.[23] This was particularly problematic because the charging of interest (all interest, not just excessive interest) was a violation of doctrine at the time, such as that reflected in the 1745 encyclical Vix pervenit. As a result, work-arounds were employed. For example, in the 15th century, the Medici Bank lent money to the Vatican, which was lax about repayment. Rather than charging interest, "the Medici overcharged the pope on the silks and brocades, the jewels and other commodities they supplied."[24] However, the 1917 Code of Canon Law switched position and allowed church monies to be used to accrue interest.[25]

Fees for spiritual things

In his 1520 To the Christian Nobility of the German Nation, Martin Luther wrote:[26]

Every prince, nobleman and city should boldly forbid their subjects to pay the annates to Rome and should abolish them entirely; for the pope has broken the compact, and made the annates a robbery, to the injury and shame of the whole German nation. He gives them to his friends, sells them for large amounts of money, and uses them to endow offices. He has thus lost his right to them, and deserves punishment.

In his 1537 Smalcald Articles, Martin Luther noted that "innumerable and unspeakable abuses have arisen in the whole world from the buying and selling of masses," [27] and was recorded as once saying, "The mass has devoured infinite sums of money."[28]

Italian priest Pino Puglisi refused money from Mafia members when offered it for the traditional feast day celebrations,[29] and also resisted the Mafia in other ways, for which he was martyred in 1993.

In 2014, Pope Francis criticized the practice of charging altarage fees or honorariums for things like baptisms, blessings, and Mass intentions (such as Masses for the dead).[30]

In 2018, Pope Francis criticized the selling of masses for the dead, stating, "the Mass is not paid for, redemption is free, if I want to make an offering, well and good, but Mass is free."[31] In response, Archbishop Julian Leow Beng Kim and two bishops put out a press release reminding Catholics that according to canon law, "any priest celebrating or concelebrating is permitted to receive an offering to apply the Mass for a specific intention."[32]

In 2019 a parish in the Philippines withdrew a planned fee hike for weddings after an outbreak of outrage on social media. The fee had been about $6,000 per wedding, but they were going to raise it to $9,800.[33]

Although the granting of indulgences for money went back to the 6th century, in 1567 Pope Pius V banned the sale of indulgences for money.[34]

Episcopal vs. congregational ownership of parish facilities

In the U.S beginning in approximately 1780 there was a struggle between lay trustees and bishops over the ownership of church property, with the trustees losing control following the 1852 Plenary Councils of Baltimore.[35]

In 2005, an interdict was issued to board members of St. Stanislaus Kostka Church (St. Louis, Missouri) in an attempt to get them to turn over the church property to the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis.

In 2006, a priest was accused of stealing $1.4 million from his parish, prompting a debate over Connecticut Raised Bill 1098 as a means of forcing the Catholic church to manage money differently.

In some cases, parishes have been liquidated and the assets taken by the diocese instead of being distributed to nearby parishes, which in violation of church financial rules.

Allegedly egotistical art patronage

Annulments

Popes Benedict XVI and John Paul II criticized the Catholic Church on the issue of the overuse of annulments to marriage,[36] [37] but Francis made changes to canon law to make it easier to get annulments.[38] He also asked dioceses to charge no fees for annulments "insofar as possible."[39]

Historically, Catholic leaders have opposed the legalization of divorce.

Clericalism

In his 1520 Treatise on the New Testament, Martin Luther argued that clericalism was a result of canon law:[40]

Yea, the priests and the monks are deadly enemies, wrangling about their self-conceived ways and methods like fools and madmen, not only to the hindrance, but to the very destruction of Christian love and unity. Each one clings to his sect and despises the others; and they regard the lay-men as though they were no Christians. This lamentable condition is only a result of the laws.

Demoniac clergy

For criticism that some Catholic clergy are demonically possessed, see Emmanuel Milingo § Criticism of the church
For criticism that specific Catholic priests made pacts with the devil, see Aix-en-Provence possessions and Loudun possessions
For criticism that Pope Sylvester II made a pact with a feminine demon, see Deal with the Devil § Alleged diabolical pacts in history

Clerical narcissism

A Catholic deacon[41] and a scholar at a Catholic university[42] have criticized the Catholic priesthood for having some narcissistic priests. In 2007, Mary Gail Frawley-O'Dea wrote,[43]

For the priest who is vulnerable to clericalist narcissism, and to the bishop embedded in it, the interpretation of ontological change that posits an actual merger with the being of Jesus Christ at the moment of ordination can support a belief that clergy are called by God to be inherently superior to other human beings.

Detraction

Some have thought Catholics need to guard better against the sin of detraction[44] than they are currently. In 2011, Seán Patrick O'Malley was accused of risking possible detraction when he published a list of names of accused abusers among the clergy before their canonical cases were completed.[45] Pope Francis accused other Catholics of detraction when they criticized his appointment of Juan Barros Madrid.[46]

On the other side of this issue, the counting of detraction as a sin has been criticized as "a kind of spiritual blackmail"[47] when used to silence victims of abuse. The Roman Catholic Diocese of Lincoln specifically cited detraction among other reasons why it would not participate in the study leading to the John Jay Report.[48] Concern about the sin of detraction was singled out as a contributing problem in the Murphy Report, which concluded:[49]

Many oaths, such as those in the US military, state the oathmaker swears "without mental reservation."

Many of the failures to report appalling behaviour by clergy may well be attributable to a wish to avoid committing the sin of detraction.

Deception

Moral laxity

When Pelagius moved to Rome around 380, he became concerned about the moral laxity of society. He blamed this laxity on the theology of divine grace preached by Augustine, among others.[50]

In his 1537 Apology of the Augsburg Confession, Philipp Melanchthon argued against the concept of imperfect contrition on the basis that it leaves the penitent person uncertain:[51]

When, however, will a terrified conscience, especially in those serious, true, and great terrors which are described in the psalms and the prophets, and which those certainly taste who are truly converted, be able to decide whether it fears God for His own sake, or is fleeing from eternal punishments?

In his 1537 Smalcald Articles, Martin Luther attacked the Catholic doctrine of imperfect contrition, arguing that "such contrition was certainly mere hypocrisy, and did not mortify the lust for sins; for they had to grieve, while they would rather have continued to sin, if it had been free to them." Instead he argued that "repentance is not piecemeal," and "In like manner confession, too, cannot be false, uncertain, or piecemeal."[52]

In 2010, Craig Monson wrote Nuns Behaving Badly, which dealt with the social and sexual lives of religious women in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Italy.[53]

In in his 2016 Amoris laetitia, Pope Francis stated, "Because of forms of conditioning and mitigating factors, it is possible that in an objective situation of sin – which may not be subjectively culpable, or fully such – a person can be living in God’s grace, can love and can also grow in the life of grace and charity, while receiving the Church’s help to this end."[54] He was criticized for this and other statements by Catholic scholars in the 2017 petition Correctio filialis de haeresibus propagatis.

Atheism

The novelist Miguel de Unamuno depicted an atheist priest who did not believe but was only trying to offer the opiate of the masses. However, a 2010 study failed to locate any atheist Catholic priests.[55]

Paganized Christianity

Gregory XIII's medal celebrating the 1572 St. Bartholomew's Day massacre. The use of holy medals and scapulars by Catholics today are examples of the use of amulets, which were also used in the pre-Christian era and are still used today as a pagan religious practice. Of course, amulets such as cross necklaces are also used by some non-Catholics.

As one example, some Protestants criticize the Catholic Church because they believe that the latter allowed Roman traditions to be brought back into the church.[56][57] They have stated that to conciliate the Pagans to nominal Christianity, the Catholic Church took measures to combine the Christian and Pagan festivals [58] so pagans would join the church; for example, Easter (a celebration of the Germanic goddess Ēostre) as a 'substitute' for Passover, though no record of Christian celebrations have been found which indicates that the celebration of Easter was observed with much importance before the second century.[56][57][59][60]

In general Catholics have approved of incorporating elements from Neoplatonism and other Hellenistic philosophy into Christianity, despite their pagan roots. Pope Benedict XVI argued that the Protestant Reformation served to de-Hellenize Christianity.[61] Nonetheless another element from paganism, Pandeism, plays a role in Catholic theology today, although its legitimacy is controversial, as reflected in the 2011 controversy between the theologian Elizabeth Johnson and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.

Although there are some New Age Catholics,[62] the New Age movement was officially rejected in the 2003 book A Christian Reflection on the New Age. Following his excommunication and reduction to lay status, Tomislav Vlašić founded Central Nucleus, a New Age movement that combines private revelation and Catholic theology with pseudoscience and astrology.[63] This one example of how some[a] prefer a greater role for paganism while accepting some Catholic influences in a syncretistic manner. As such, some people may self-identify as Catholic while not belonging to the Roman Catholic Church.

Criticism of beliefs

Concupiscence

Criticism of soteriology

Tetzel's money chest[b] Luther referred to this chest in thesis 27 of his Ninety-five theses: "They preach only human doctrines who say that as soon as the money clinks into the money chest, the soul flies out of purgatory."

On the basis of sola fide (faith alone) justification Protestants have questioned and criticized the Catholic Church's teaching regarding salvation through faith and good works. There has been disagreement between Catholics and Lutherans on these two matters. The Catholic Church teaches that it is the grace of God, "the free and undeserved help that God gives us to respond to his call", that justifies a person,[64] a grace that is a prerequisite for a free response of "collaboration in justification through faith, and in sanctification through charity",[65] "With regard to God, there is no strict right to any merit on the part of man",[66] so that "we can have merit in God's sight only because of God's free plan to associate man with the work of his grace. Merit is to be ascribed in the first place to the grace of God, and secondly to man's collaboration. Man's merit is due to God."[67] Catholic writers have cited against the Lutheran teaching the Epistle of James 2:24–26, the only passage of the Bible that speaks of "faith only", and other scriptural references.[68][69]

Confessional Lutheran apologists reject this interpretation of James on faith-works relations, teaching that the whole context of the Epistle and the Bible rather show that good works are a result of justification, not a cause:[70]

[We] strongly teaches good works, but not as a cause of our forgiveness. We do works not to be forgiven, but because we have been forgiven. St. Paul strongly teaches the importance of good works, but he also clearly says that salvation is by faith, not by works. The Catholic church elaborates on this and teaches that salvation is by faith alone, which is strengthened by works .[71]

Lutherans interpret the verses in the Epistle of James: "we are justified/declared righteous by people when they see the good works we do as a result of our faith and they conclude that our faith is sincere."[72] They conclude:

Paul is writing to people who said that faith in Jesus alone does not save a person, but one has to also obey God's law in order to be justified (Gal 3:3, 5:4). To counter the false idea that what we do in keeping the law must be added to faith in what Christ did for us. Paul often emphasizes in his letters (esp. Galatians, Romans, Colossians) that we are saved by grace through faith alone. James is writing to people who felt that believing in Jesus saved a person, but that having faith did not mean that a person necessarily would keep God's commandments out of love for God (James 2:14, 17). To show that faith is not really faith unless it leads a person to thank God for salvation in a life of glad and willing obedience to God's holy will. James emphasized that a faith which did not show that it was living faith was really not faith at all.[73]

A Lutheran exegesis further points out that James is simply reaffirming what Jesus teaches in Matthew 7:1–29 regarding works as a fruit of salvation, instead of a cause,[74] and that James 2:10 too denies works as a means to obtain forgiveness:

James here (verse 10) also shoots down the false doctrine of work-righteousness. The only way to be free of sin is to keep the law perfectly and in its entirety. If we offend it in the slightest, tiniest little way, we are guilty of all. Thank God that He sent Jesus to fulfill the Law in its entirety for us[75]

Criticism of Catholic synergism as semipelagian
Criticism of dual-covenant theology
Criticism of purgatory

Martin Luther was once recorded as saying:[76]

As for purgatory, no place in Scripture makes mention thereof, neither must we any way allow it; for it darkens and undervalues the grace, benefits, and merits of our blessed, sweet Saviour Christ Jesus. The bounds of purgatory extend not beyond this world; for here in this life the upright, good, and godly Christians are well and soundly scoured and purged.

In his 1537 Smalcald Articles, Luther stated:[77]

Therefore purgatory, and every solemnity, rite, and commerce connected with it, is to be regarded as nothing but a specter of the devil. For it conflicts with the chief article [which teaches] that only Christ, and not the works of men, are to help [set free] souls. Not to mention the fact that nothing has been [divinely] commanded or enjoined upon us concerning the dead.

Criticism of condign merit

In his 1532 Commentary on the Sermon of the Mount, Martin Luther criticized Catholic doctrine concerning condign merit. He noted that while the reward one gains from condign merit is much greater than that of congruent merit, the sort of good works said to attain each type of merit is similar. Luther thought it did not make sense that the two types of merit could be gained by similar actions when the benefit of condign merit is so much greater than the benefit of congruent merit.[78]

Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification

The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification signed by the Lutheran World Federation (LWF) and the Catholic Church on 31 October 1999 (and later by World Methodist Council meeting in Seoul, South Korea, on 18 July 2006) [79][80] stated that "a consensus in basic truths of the doctrine of justification exists between Lutherans and Catholics", making acceptable "differences of language, theological elaboration, and emphasis in the understanding of justification".[81] It was agreed that, "when Catholics affirm the 'meritorious' character of good works, they wish to say that, according to the biblical witness, a reward in heaven is promised to these works. Their intention is to emphasize the responsibility of persons for their actions, not to contest the character of those works as gifts, or far less to deny that justification always remains the unmerited gift of grace."[82] Regarding the belief of Lutherans, it was agreed that, "when they view the good works of Christians as the fruits and signs of justification and not as one's own 'merits', they nevertheless also understand eternal life in accord with the New Testament as unmerited 'reward' in the sense of the fulfillment of God's promise to the believer."[83]

Some Lutherans,[84] namely the second and the third largest Lutheran church bodies, namely International Lutheran Council (ILC) and the Confessional Evangelical Lutheran Conference (CELC), reject and criticize the Catholic-LWF joint declaration [85] stating that the document is not a real agreement and "should be repudiated by all Lutherans":

To put it mildly, confusion and not clarity reigns. The biblical Lutheran teaching of "forensic" justification maintains that the only effective cause of our forgiveness is a verdict of God that takes place outside of ourselves. We are declared "not guilty" entirely on the basis of what Christ has done for us. Catholic teaching on justification makes a change within man part of the cause of our forgiveness. The Joint Declaration does not represent a change in the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church. It does nothing to repudiate Rome's historic position on the doctrine. The Joint Declaration is nothing more than an ambiguous statement, carefully worded to make it possible for the Pope's representatives to sign it without changing, retracting, or correcting anything that has been taught by the Roman Catholic Church since the time of the Council of Trent in the sixteenth century.[86]

These particular Lutheran theologians comment that the Joint Declaration does nothing but simply "link" the Lutheran teaching of "Being declared righteous by God" with the Catholic teaching of "Becoming righteous by living a sanctified life", and is therefore not a real agreement but only "an agreement to disagree" on the teaching by which, as Lutheran reformers said, "the church stands or falls":[87]

The Joint Declaration is a compromise. It masquerades as a significant change which brings Roman Catholicism in line with confessional Lutheranism on the teaching of justification. In fact, it is a deception that presents the appearance of agreement without any real substance that would make agreement possible. It is a thinly veiled attempt on the part of ecumenicism to embrace Catholicism. In the final analysis it appears that Rome has moved closer to reattaching what was lost in the sixteenth century without any substantive change in its doctrinal position.[86]

Criticism of Tradition as authority

Protestants have questioned the Catholic Church's reliance on what it calls "Sacred Tradition", handed down from the apostles, whether orally or in writing (cf. 2 Thessalonians 2:15 – "Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught by us, whether by word, or our epistle"), and which the Church distinguishes from human traditions or customs,[88] and sees not as a distinct revelation parallel to Sacred Scripture but rather as the context within which Sacred Scripture is understood.[89]

Therefore, it holds that Sacred Scripture must be read and interpreted in accordance with the Spirit who inspired it, in a manner "especially attentive to the content and unity of the whole Scripture", "within the living Tradition of the whole Church", and "attentive to the analogy of faith".[90] The Catholic Church distinguishes Sacred Tradition from traditions, including theological ones, that the Church can retain, modify or even abandon.[91] Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition (not these changeable traditions) must be accepted and honoured with equal devotion and reverence, since they are both modes of transmission of the revelation that comes from a single divine source[92] and make up "a single sacred deposit of the Word of God".[93]

Regarding 2 Thessalonians 2:15 and the term "tradition", Evangelical Lutherans interpret the verse as Paul strengthening the Thessalonians by encouraging them to hold on tight to the gospel that he "had once handed down by preaching and teaching". The Lutheran apologists conclude that within the context "tradition" was referred to the divine gospel handed down (v. 14), not human traditions.[94] Lutherans believe that ordaining others to teach does not mean giving them the right to claim inspiration from the Holy Spirit which Jesus said he would give to his chosen apostles, all church leaders since the apostles are bound to Scripture like Timothy and Titus were, and that the canon was not established by church councils but by the apostles whom Jesus chose. Lutheran churches teach that 2 Peter 3:2 limits the Word of God to that which comes from the Old Testament prophets and New Testament apostles chosen by Christ. Moreoever, in their teachings in Revelation 2:2 John, the last of the apostles, commends the Christian church for rejecting anything that did not come from the Apostles of Jesus Christ. Lutherans believe that these passages show that the apostles established the canon before God took them to heaven and that not everything Roman Catholicism teaches agrees with the Scripture. They conclude that the Roman Catholic teachings show that the so-called oral traditions do not come from God who inspired the Scripture.[95]

Papal supremacy and infallibility

The supremacy of the Pope, the usage of the term 'Holy Father' to refer to the Pope, and belief that he can make infallible pronouncements have been subject to criticism by other Christian denominations. For example, in his 1537 Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope, Philipp Melanchthon criticized the claim of the 1302 papal bull Unam sanctam that obedience to the Pope is necessary for salvation. He rejected that claim because it contradicted the doctrine of justification by faith.[96]

In 1997, Benedict XVI (prior to his papacy) was asked on Bavarian television whether the Holy Spirit selects people to fill the office of pope. He responded, "There are too many contrary instances of popes the Holy Spirit obviously would not have picked."[97]

In Catholic theology, papal infallibility is the dogma that the Pope is preserved from error when he solemnly promulgated, or declared, to the Church solely on faith or morals. This doctrine has a long history,[citation needed] but was not defined dogmatically until the First Vatican Council of 1870. In Catholic theology, papal infallibility is one of the channels of the Infallibility of the Church.

Adherents of the Church believe that only the Church can interpret the scriptures in the Bible; the pope may be the final arbiter if there are differences. But according to the church's interpretation of 2 Peter,[98] anyone can interpret the word of God (by His guidance).

The Old Catholic Churches, organized in the Union of Ultrajectine Independent Catholic Churches, resisted Papal infallibility along with the First Vatican Council's dogma of Papal primacy of universal jurisdiction.[citation needed]

Decline of the papacy

Related to criticism about papal infallibility are criticisms about an alleged decline in papal power, as this is thought to be inconsistent with the promise that the gates of hell will not prevail against the church, and as such Catholic claims about this passage as referring only to their Church are argued to be incorrect. Martin Luther wrote in his 1535–1545 Commentary on Genesis:[99]

So was the Roman empire destroyed after all the other world-powers perished; but God's Word and Church remain forever. Likewise, Christ weakens the Pope's power, little by little;

In 1995, the Catholic feminist writer Margaret Hebblethwaite remarked:[100]

If in 1995 no one pays much attention when Rome bangs its fist and says "This is infallible", then what can we conclude? We can conclude that we are witnessing what may be the biggest decline of papal authority in real terms ever seen in history.

Ecclesiology

For criticism of Catholic ecclesiology in Eastern Orthodox theology, see East–West Schism § Ecclesiological disputes
For criticism of Catholic ecclesiology in Anglican theology, see Branch theory
For criticism of Catholic ecclesiology in Protestant theology, see Protestant ecclesiology, Sacerdotalism § Protestant belief, and Universal priesthood
For historical criticism of Catholic ecclesiology by Protestants, see the Augsburg Confession, Article XXVIII: Of Ecclesiastical Power, the 1689 Baptist Confession of Faith, Chapter 26: Of the Church, and Theology of John Calvin § Ecclesiology and sacraments

Section 8 of the Second Vatican Council's Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, Lumen gentium stated that "the one Church of Christ which in the Nicene Creed is professed as one, holy, catholic and apostolic ... subsists in the Catholic Church, which is governed by the sole successors of Peter the Apostle and by the Bishops in communion with him".[101] This phrase has been criticised by some traditionalists. The Catholic Church also teaches that the "true Church of Jesus Christ ... is the One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic and Roman Church",[102] and that "the Mystical Body of Christ and the Roman Catholic Church are one and the same thing".[103]

Stained glass window in a Catholic church depicting St. Peter's Basilica in Rome sitting "Upon this rock," a reference to Matthew 16:18. Most present-day Catholics interpret Jesus as saying he was building his church on the rock of the Apostle Peter and the succession of popes which claim Apostolic succession from him.
A 17th century illustration of Article VII: Of the Church from the Augsburg Confession, which states "...one holy Church is to continue forever. The Church is the congregation of saints, in which the Gospel is rightly taught and the Sacraments are rightly administered." Here the rock from Matthew 16:18 refers to the preaching and ministry of Jesus as the Christ, a view discussed at length in the 1537 Treatise.[104]

It is also Catholic teaching that the one Church of Christ is present and operative also in those Churches that are not in full communion with the Catholic Church but that have preserved apostolic succession and a valid Eucharist and are therefore true particular Churches; and that the members of the ecclesial communities that in the opinion of Rome lack apostolic succession also lack a valid Eucharist and are thus not Churches in the proper sense, although they "are in a certain communion, albeit imperfect, with the Church".[105][106]

Other Christian denominations, notably Protestant ones, who hold rather that the Church of Christ is the universal gathering of all believers,[107] disagree with these teachings. Protestants said they were saddened by the reiteration in 2007[106] of the teaching that, for lack of an apostolic succession recognized by Rome, the Christian communities born out of the 16th-century Protestant Reformation cannot be called churches.[108] Pope Benedict XVI issued the papal document Dominus Iesus which stated that Protestant denominations are not churches "in the proper sense."[109]

It is the Catholic Church's belief that it will last until the end of time and is indestructible, because Christ promised that the gates of hell will not prevail against it (Matthew 16:18) and that he would be with it always (Matthew 28:20).[110] This is criticized by Lutheran churches because the verses are ambiguous at best and say nothing of the traditions of the papacy.[111]

In 2010, Tony Flannery wrote:[112]

It is more likely that some time after Jesus, a select and privileged group within the community who had abrogated power and authority to themselves, interpreted the occasion of the Last Supper in a manner that suited their own agenda.[112]

In response to this and other statements, Flannery was suspended from the priesthood.[112]

Protestant apologists comment:

It is not correct to say that the Roman Catholic church was the original Christian church. The apostles came to Rome rather late in the NT. There was a genuine congregation in Rome, served by Paul and maybe by Peter, but the Roman Catholic church is an aberration from the apostolic church. The chief errors of the Catholic church were already there during the apostolic era in the opponents of the apostles, for example, in the Judaizers who opposed Paul in regard to the doctrine of justification by faith alone and in Diotrophes who opposed the apostle John by setting himself up as a little pope. Both of these trends are well established by the second century...We can say that the bishop of Rome was trying to be a pope by the second century and was well established as pope by the 5th and 7th centuries. Errors continued to be more brazenly promoted with the passage of time, but they were almost all there in seed from the earliest centuries. The Catholic church is not in succession from the apostles but from the Judaizing party in the Christian church which opposed the apostles. Its' doctrine of salvation is the doctrine of the Judaizers, not the doctrine of Paul or Peter.[72]

[dead link][dubious ]

Use of labels

There are long standing controversies over whether Protestant religious denominations should be called "Church" or not and whether the Roman Catholic Church's sense of the word "Catholic" is the only correct one. Catholic epistemology has been criticized by Eastern Orthodox Christians and Protestants. For example, in 2001, several leaders from the Church of Denmark released a public statement, saying in part,[113]

However, it has a destructive effect on ecumenical relations if one church deprives another church of the right to be called a church. It is just as destructive as if one Christian denies another Christian the right to be called a Christian.

Historically, Catholics would label members of certain Christian churches (also certain non-Christian religions) by the names of their founders, either actual or purported. Such supposed founders were referred to as heresiarchs. This was done even when the party thus labeled viewed itself as belonging to the one true church. This allowed the Catholic party to claim that the other church was founded by the founder, while the Catholic church was founded by Christ. This was done intentionally in order to "produce the appearance of the fragmentation within Christianity"[114]–a problem which the Catholic side would then attempt to remedy on its own terms.

Although Catholics reject Branch theory, Pope Benedict XVI and Pope John Paul II used the "two lungs" concept to relate Catholicism with Eastern Orthodoxy.[115]

Another semantic issue is when Catholics refer to people who do not identify with their birth sex or gender using pronouns not consistent with their current self-identity. The ability of Catholics to do this is also criticized.[116]

Anonymous Christian concept

Filioque

Canon

Nature of theology

Faith and reason

For criticism relating to the relationship between faith and reason, compare Faith and rationality § Views of the Roman Catholic Church to the Protestant views below in the article
Luther's Theology of the Cross was a critique of the use of reason in theology as used by the Catholic Church

Thomism

In 1914, Pius X cautioned that Catholic doctrine cannot be understood without the basic philosophical underpinnings of Thomas Aquinas' major theses.[117] In 1967, Thomism was criticized by Bertrand Russell. Besides this, neo-scholasticism in general, including Thomism, is criticized by some Catholics.

In his Against Henry, King of the English, Luther criticized the use of the proof by assertion and a reliance on style over substance in the Thomist form of disputation, which he alleged as being, "It seems so to me. I think so. I believe so." Luther also argued that the Thomist method led to shallow among theological debates in England at the time.[118]

Modern concerns

In 2009, Cardinal Anthony Olubunmi Okogie remarked, "those people there, in the US, they don’t value anything any more. And how do you want priests to come from a place like that?"[119]

Separation of church and state

Throughout much of the history of Western Civilization, the Catholic Church has exercised many functions in Catholic countries that are more usually associated with government today. Many functions like education, healthcare, and a judicial system covering religious and some social areas were begun and undertaken by the Church. Certain bishops acted as secular rulers in small states in Italy and the Holy Roman Empire, notably the Papal States, although these were always unusual. The full separation of church and state in Catholic Europe and Latin America was a gradual process that took place over time. The church openly opposed the abuses of Spanish and Portuguese authorities over their colonies during the Age of Reason and took steps to operate outside of these authorities in spite of protests from the various monarchs.[120]

The Catholic Church has tried to influence governments to preserve Sunday as a day of worship, to restrict or, as in Ireland, Italy, the Philippines, and Latin America, forbid divorce, abortion and euthanasia. It has also pressured governments to restrict or not to promote the use of contraceptives.[citation needed]

Catholic Social Teaching advocates a living wage, proper work hours and fair treatment of workers.[121] Freedom to practice one's religion is one of the basic human rights the Church has been noted in defending especially in Communist countries around the world.[122]

In 2018, the Catholic Bishops' Conference of Japan criticized the government of Japan for not separating church and state in the past, and urged them to do better.[123]

Liberation theology

Prior to his papacy, Joseph Ratzinger criticized some bishops for holding to liberation theology.[124][125][126]

The priest Camilo Torres (a leader of the Colombian guerrilla group ELN)[127][128][129] celebrated the Eucharist only among those engaged in armed struggle against the army of the Colombian state. He also fought for the ELN.[130]

Partial commitment

In general, see Lapsed Catholic
With respect to economic issues and social justice, see Mater si, magistra no
With respect to Catholics who dissent partway in preference of more liberal beliefs, see Cafeteria Catholicism § Surveys on dissenting Catholic laity
With respect to Catholics who dissent partway in preference of more conservative beliefs, see Sedeprivationism

Historically, charges of lukewarmness were directed towards Catholics who were converted by force, such as on the Iberian peninsula. For example, in response to recent Spanish military action, Martin Luther commented, "most of the Spaniards are half Moors, half Jews, fellows who believe nothing at all."[131]

Today this criticism is especially intended to undercut the legitimacy of Catholic leaders to speak for what Catholics want in the public sphere. For example, if a Catholic archbishop speaks in favor of legislation or a particular court decision, critics may point out survey results of self-identified Catholics which appear to contradict them.

Another modern aspect relating to this is the general finding that mixed marriages tend to result in families having a lower level of both religious observance and next-generation Catholicism.[132]

Marriage, abstinence, and procreation

Priest reading the blessing at a Catholic wedding, 2018

The Church teaches the practice of chastity. It interprets this to mean that believers should eschew fornication,[133] and that no persons inside or outside of marriage may practice masturbation, sodomy and homosexual practices (The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches "They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided" and that "Homosexual persons are called to chastity"),[134] artificial contraception,[135] coitus interruptus,[136][137] sterilization, and the procurement of or assisting in an abortion.[138]

The official Catholic teaching regards sexuality as "naturally ordered to the good of spouses" as well as the generation of children.[139]

The Church teaches fidelity, sexual abstinence and opposes the use of condoms, seeing them as counterproductive [140] The Catholic Church has been criticized for its pro-life efforts in all phases of society. The Church's denial of the use of condoms has provoked criticism especially in countries where AIDS and HIV infections are at epidemic proportions. The Church maintains that countries like Kenya where behavioral changes like abstinence are endorsed instead of condom use, are experiencing greater progress towards controlling the disease than those countries just promoting condoms.[141]

In 2013 Pope Francis criticized the Vatican for having a "gay lobby" in remarks during a meeting held in private with some of the Catholic religious from Latin America, and he was said to have promised to see what could be done to address the issue.[142] In July 2013, he responded directly to journalists' questions. He notably drew a distinction between the problem of lobbying and the sexual orientation of people: "If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge?" "The problem", he said, "is not having this orientation. We must be brothers. The problem is lobbying by this orientation, or lobbies of greedy people, political lobbies, Masonic lobbies, so many lobbies. This is the worse problem."[143][144]

In 2019, two cardinals, Walter Brandmüller and Raymond Leo Burke, stated:[145]

The plague of the homosexual agenda has been spread within the Church, promoted by organized networks and protected by a climate of complicity and a conspiracy of silence. The roots of this phenomenon are clearly found in that atmosphere of materialism, of relativism and of hedonism, in which the existence of an absolute moral law, that is without exceptions, is openly called into question.

Opposition to contraception
A Catholic family from Virginia, 1959

The Catholic Church maintains its opposition towards artificial means of birth control.[146][147] Some Catholic Church members and non-members criticize this belief as contributing to overpopulation and poverty.[148]

Pope Paul VI reaffirmed the Church's position in his 1968 encyclical Humanae vitae (Human Life). In this encyclical, the Pope acknowledges the realities of modern life as well as the questions and challenges these raise.[146] Furthermore, he explains that the purpose of intercourse is both "unitive and procreative", that is to say it strengthens the relationship of the husband and wife as well as offering the chance of creating new life. As such, it is a natural and full expression of our humanity. He writes that contraception "contradicts the will of the Author of life [God]. Hence to use this divine gift [sexual intercourse] while depriving it, even if only partially, of its meaning and purpose, is equally repugnant to the nature of man and of woman, and is consequently in opposition to the plan of God and His holy will."[146]

Supporters of birth control argue that economic growth which allows for a high population density without poverty is a direct function of the availability of birth control, as it leads to smaller families (as is the case in all nations which allow birth control), which in turn have more purchasing power to support themselves and provide their children with education, which is universally recognized as necessary for sustainable growth.[citation needed]

The Church counters this argument with its claim that "Though it is true that sometimes it is lawful to tolerate a lesser moral evil in order to avoid a greater evil or in order to promote a greater good, it is never lawful, even for the gravest reasons, to do evil that good may come of it —in other words, to intend directly something which of its very nature contradicts the moral order, and which must therefore be judged unworthy of man, even though the intention is to protect or promote the welfare of an individual, of a family or of society in general. Consequently, it is a serious error to think that a whole married life of otherwise normal relations can justify sexual intercourse which is deliberately contraceptive and so intrinsically wrong."[146]

The Church stands by its doctrines on sexual intercourse as defined by the Natural law: intercourse must at once be both the renewal of the consummation of marriage and open to procreation. If each of these postulates are not met, the act of intercourse is, according to Natural Law, an objective mortal sin. Therefore, since artificial contraception expressly prevents the creation of a new life (and, the Church would argue, removes the sovereignty of God over all of Creation), contraception is unacceptable. The Church sees abstinence as the only objective moral strategy for preventing the transmission of HIV.[149][150]

Cardinal Javier Lozano Barragán, President of the Pontifical Council for the Pastoral Care of Health Care Workers, has stated that Pope Benedict XVI asked his department to study the question of condom use as part of a broad look at several questions of bioethics.[151] However, the president of the Pontifical Council for the Family, Cardinal Alfonso López Trujillo, in an interview reported by the Catholic News Agency on May 4, 2006, said that the Church "maintains unmodified the teaching on condoms", and added that the Pope had "not ordered any studies about modifying the prohibition on condom use."[152]

The Church has been criticized for its opposition to promoting the use of condoms as a strategy to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS, teen pregnancy, and STDs. Church officials deny that their teaching against condom use is followed by those same people who flout Church teaching on illicit sexual activity, such as its absolute condemnation of anal intercourse between men.[citation needed]

The Catholic Church emphasizes "education towards sexual responsibility", focusing on partner fidelity rather than the use of condoms as the primary means of preventing the transmission of AIDS.[153] This stance has been criticized as unrealistic, ineffective, irresponsible and immoral by some public health officials and AIDS activists.[153] Some evidence suggests that abstinence-only sex education does not work, and comprehensive sex education should be used instead.[154][155][156]

Ordination of women

The Catholic Church has always ordained men in the clergy. Most scholars today believe the Medieval accounts regarding Pope Joan to be fictional,[157][158][159] and Episcopa Theodora could have received her title by being the wife or mother of a bishop,[160] although some allege that she was in fact a bishop. Internal dissenters and dissidents, such as Call to Disobedience, have criticised the church's opposition to female ordination.[161] The Church teaches that it does not have the authority to ordain 'woman priests'.[162]

As a result of feminism and other social and political movements that have removed barriers to the entry of women into professions that were traditionally male strongholds, since the fourth quarter of the 20th century, some women in a handful of countries have sought ordination into the Catholic priesthood: There is at least one organization that calls itself "Roman Catholic" that ordains women at the present time, Roman Catholic Womenpriests.[163] The Catholic hierarchy considers those groups to be excommunicated, a status that the groups in question reject.[163]

Official Catholic theology refers to the gender of Jesus as a reason for the purported discrimination against women. According to Roman Catholic thinking, the Priest is acting 'in persona Christi' (that is, in the Person of Christ), and Christ took the body of a man, and therefore the priest must be a man: "Only a baptized man (vir) validly receives sacred ordination." Paragraph 1577 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church states:

The Lord Jesus chose men (viri) to form the college of the twelve apostles, and the apostles did the same when they chose collaborators to succeed them in their ministry. The college of bishops, with whom the priests are united in the priesthood, makes the college of the twelve an ever-present and ever-active reality until Christ's return. The Church recognises herself to be bound by this choice made by the Lord himself. For this reason the ordination of women is not possible[164]

Roman Catholic Womenpriests criticises the Church's teaching that women, by virtue of their sex, cannot image Christ, saying:

...it is the call of every female and male Christian to image Christ; and it is the call of every female and male Christian to see Christ in every person.[citation needed]

In February 2011, 143 German-speaking academic theologians submitted a document styled as Church 2011 calling for, among a long list of actions, "women in (the) ordained ministry".[165]

Women's rights

Climate change

In July 2015, Cardinal George Pell criticised Pope Francis's encyclical Laudato si' for associating the church with the need to address climate, stating:[166]

It’s got many, many interesting elements. There are parts of it which are beautiful. But the church has no particular expertise in science ... the church has got no mandate from the Lord to pronounce on scientific matters. We believe in the autonomy of science.

The aim of Laudato si' was opposed by Vatican conservatives, Catholic conservatives, and some US evangelicals.[167]

Cannabis

Dan Linn, executive director of the Illinois chapter of the pro-cannabis group NORML criticized the Catholic church for taking an anti-cannabis stance:[168]

God put it on this planet for a reason. I don’t know why the bishops are concerned about undermining God’s credibility.

Khat

After a priest in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Embu took a stand in 2016 against the growing and consumption of khat, he was criticized by a nearby African Independent Pentecostal pastor who said other churches allow their members to chew it during worship. A nearby khat farmer claimed the priest was misdirected, as khat held ceremonial importance during bride price arrangements for the Meru people.[169]

Although the priest also repeated the claim[170] that Khat chewing causes impotence, this sort of claim was disputed by a local politician from the Roman Catholic Diocese of Meru, which although it home to an anti-khat program run by Caritas Internationalis,[171] still experiences khat use. The politician remarked:[172]

Had the scientists been present at the Mutuate Catholic Church during a service graced by Deputy President William Ruto, they would have appreciated the big number of children who overwhelmed adults, proving the virility of our men.

In 2012 in the United Kingdom, a priest commented in The Catholic Herald:[173]

Is it wrong to take khat? Yes it is. It can hardly be squared with the virtue of prudence, as taking any mood altering substance might well damage your health and make you temporarily less responsible. I would not take khat, except possibly just once to gauge its effects. But the real question is this – given that khat (or cocaine, or heroin) is bad for you, is the resolution not to take it better made at a personal level, or should it be made at the level of government?

Traditionalist Catholics

For traditionalist criticism of Vatican II, see Second Vatican Council § Objections to the council
For traditionalist criticism of ecumenism, see Unitatis redintegratio § Criticism
For traditionalist criticism of doctrine related to interfaith relations, see Nostra aetate § Contradiction with previous Church documents
For another major concern traditionalists have, see Modernism in the Catholic Church
For criticism over lending vestments, see Met Gala § Controversy
Cardinal Donald Wuerl welcoming the 14th Dalai Lama. The symbolic meaning behind pleasantries at inter-religious events are a common target for criticism among traditionalist Catholics, including some who have been banned from speaking engagements or are currently excommunicated.

Traditionalist Catholics see the Church's recent efforts at reformed teaching and (liturgical) practice (known as "aggiornamento"), in particular the Second Vatican Council, as not benefitting the advancement of the Church. Some groups, such as the Society of St. Pius X, saying the Church has betrayed the core values of Catholicism, have rejected some of the decisions of the Holy See that they see harmful to the faith. They have in common the firm adherence to the Tridentine Latin Mass that was used, with some changes, for 400 years prior to 1970.[citation needed]

Traditionalists also criticize charismatic Catholics as being crypto-Protestant.[174] This movement is inter-denominational and includes those belonging to Catholic Charismatic Renewal and members of the Chemin Neuf and Emmanuel communities.

The World Day of Prayer for Peace,[175] with a meeting in Assisi, Italy, in 1986, in which Pope John Paul II prayed only with the Christians,[176] was heavily criticised as giving the impression that syncretism and indifferentism were openly embraced by the Papal Magisterium. When a second ‘Day of Prayer for Peace in the World’[177] was held, in 2002, it was condemned as confusing the laity and compromising to "false religions". Likewise criticised was Pope John Paul II's kissing[178] of the Qur'an in Damascus, Syria, on one of his travels on 6 May 2001.

In 2017, the Holy See released a postage stamp honoring Martin Luther and Philipp Melanchthon to commemorate the 500th anniversary of the Reformation.[179] This was criticized by some traditionalist Catholics on the grounds that the two reformers should be regarded as enemies.[180]

Sedevacantists

For criticism of the current papacy by sedevacantists, see Sedevacantism § Counter-arguments
For the sedevacantist criticism of the Catholic Church's current position on the topic of cremation, see Cremation in the Christian World § The Roman Catholic Church

A numerically minor group, the sedevacantists, have characterized the current Pontiffs of the Catholic Church as heretics. This group says that the current Pope (as well, perhaps, as some of his immediate predecessors) were not legitimate. Sedeprivationists say that the post-conciliar Popes were or are defective Popes in that, due to their supposed espousal of the "modernist heresy", their consent to become Pope was faulty or defective, so that they became potentially Pope, but did not attain to the papacy.[citation needed]

A smaller group of Vatican II opponents, known as conclavists, have appointed papal replacements: see list of conclavist antipopes. These groups were estimated to comprise not more than a few hundred followers worldwide.[citation needed]

Associated psychology

A discipline with seven cords lying on top of the Raccolta, a text that contains several acts of reparation and other devotions.
For criticism of the psychological health of nuns, see Louviers possessions § Modern viewpoints

One study concluded that priests "tend to be more perfectionistic, worrisome, introversive, socially inept and in more extreme cases, perhaps more isolated and withdrawn."[181]

Describing Catholic guilt and scrupulosity as a possible outcome of Catholic belief and practice, Martin Luther stated:[182]

Many good-hearted people have hitherto experienced this under the Papacy, who earnestly strove to become pious, did everything as they were directed and taught, and yet gained from it only terrified and timid consciences, and on account of the fear and horror of death and of the judgment day, would gladly have ended their lives.

Psychology of saints

Saint and feast day hagiography

Criticism of practices

Sacrifice of the Mass

In articles 8 and 24 of the Apology of the Augsburg Confession, Philipp Melanchthon criticizes the ex opere operato mechanism of how sacraments work as being mechanicalistic and deriving from pagan determinism. Instead, he argues that sacraments are sacrifices pleasing to God through faith.[183]

The German Reformer Martin Luther also criticized what was to become the official Catholic position during the Council of Trent as follows: "They [Catholics] made the sacrament which they should accept from God, namely, the body and blood of Christ, into a sacrifice and have offered it to the selfsame God...Furthermore, they do not regard Christ's body and blood as a sacrifice of thanksgiving, but as a sacrifice of works...This is the true and chief abomination and the basis of all blasphemy in the papacy."[184] The Church of England, in the Book of Common Prayer, Article of Religion #31, uses similarly strong language: "Wherefore the sacrifice of Masses, in the which it was commonly said, that the Priest did offer Christ for the quick and the dead, to have remission of pain and guilt, were blasphemous fables, and dangerous deceits."[185][c]

Post-Trent, official Catholic doctrine on the Mass is as follows: "The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass," also called the Eucharist and the greatest of the seven sacraments of the Church. It is "a sacrifice," because it "re-presents" (makes present) the sacrifice of the cross, because it is its "memorial" and because it "applies its fruit," and "the sacrifice of Christ and the sacrifice of the Eucharist are "one single sacrifice: 'The victim is one and the same: the same now offers through the ministry of priests, who then offered himself on the cross; only the manner of offering is different;'" "when the Church celebrates the Eucharist, she commemorates Christ's Passover, and it is made present; the sacrifice Christ offered once for all on the cross remains ever present;"[186]

In 2007, Evangelical theologian Mark Noll reflected on Ecclesia de Eucharistia and concluded that "It is obvious that John Paul II teaches a Eucharist doctrine closer to what the Protestant reformers [Luther, Melancthon] themselves advocated than to what they condemned in the sixteenth century," including even his discussion of transubstantiation.[187]

Nathan Söderblom is ordained as archbishop of the Church of Sweden, 1914. Although the Swedish Lutherans can boast of an unbroken line of episcopal ordinations going back prior to the Reformation, today Rome does not recognize such ordinations as a valid due to the fact they occurred without authorization from the Roman See. The entire Porvoo Communion can trace its succession through the Swedish lineage.

Criticism for claiming that Protestant sacraments are invalid

Eastern Orthodox non-recognition of Catholic sacraments

Earlier disputes on this topic

The following parties have in the past claimed that Catholic sacraments are invalid in cases of clerical immorality:

Novatians

Donatists

Mariavites

Baptism

For the criticism which is based on the belief that people should be baptized when they are adults rather than when they are infants, see Believer's baptism § Arguments for credobaptism
For the criticism which is based on the belief that the Catholic doctrine of baptism fails to recognize the fact that baptism continues to forgive sins and work faith throughout a Christian's life (rather than just at the time when one is baptized), see Baptismal regeneration § Lutheranism, Baptism in Luther's Small Catechism, and Baptismal regeneration § Reformed tradition
For the opposite criticism which is based on the belief that the Catholic doctrine of baptism fails to recognize the fact that baptism cannot forgive sins at all, see Theology of Huldrych Zwingli § Baptism

Monastic vows

For Protestant criticism of monastic vows as practiced in the Catholic Church, see Augsburg Confession § Article XXVII: Of Monastic Vows and Letter to Several Nuns
For historical criticism of members of religious orders who did not take vows, see Beguines and Beghards § Criticism

In particular, the vow of stability has been criticized by some activists for enhancing the interpersonal power of the individual running a particular monastery and for being too restrictive to personal freedom.[188]

Excommunication, the interdict, and other penalties

Criticism for co-mingling secular and civil penalties

In his 1537 Smalcald Articles, Martin Luther wrote:[189]

The greater excommunication, as the Pope calls it, we regard only as a civil penalty, and it does not concern us ministers of the Church. But the lesser, that is, the true Christian excommunication, consists in this, that manifest and obstinate sinners are not admitted to the Sacrament and other communion of the Church until they amend their lives and avoid sin. And ministers ought not to mingle secular punishments with this ecclesiastical punishment, or excommunication.

Luther was critical because he thought the existing practice commingled secular and ecclesiastical punishments. To Luther, civil penalties were outside the domain of the church and were instead the responsibility of civil authorities. The practice of issuing out interdicts (a form of greater excommunication in the terminology of Luther's day) against entire locations was abolished in the 1983 Code of Canon Law due to "concern that penalties not be imposed indiscriminately on the guilty and innocent alike."[190] However, personal interdicts may still be given out, even in matters of money and politics, such as with St. Stanislaus Kostka Church (St. Louis, Missouri) in 2005. Non-spiritual expiatory penalties may be applied in some other cases, especially for clergy. These have been criticized for being overly punitive and inadequately pastoral.[191] For example, a member of the clergy might be ordered to live in a particular monastery for a period of time, or even the rest of his life, a punishment comparable to house arrest.[192] Access to electronic devices may also be restricted for persons sentenced to a life of prayer and penance.[193]

In some cases, excommunication would be announced with a ceremony involving a bell, book, and candle.
The Excommunication of Robert the Pious (1875) by Jean-Paul Laurens. Note the extinguished candle and candlestick holder. Robert was able to get his excommunication reversed following the election of the next pope.

Criticism for automatic excommunications

In canon law for Eastern Catholic Churches, there are no automatic excommunications, but there are still automatic excommunications for the Latin Church (sometimes termed Roman Catholics). Automatic, or latae sententiae excommunications have been criticized for lacking due process and conflating judicial and spiritual processes.[d] They have also been blamed for disturbing the consciences of Catholics (see scrupulosity) who wonder whether if they might somehow be excommunicated and not know it.

In the case of canon 915, the automatic nature of the excommunication enables church authorities to avoid conflict that could increase clarity[194] and release tension should offenders be confronted for their sins. Clerical inaction against pro-choice politicians has been a source of controversy,[195] as some think canon law mandates the excommunication of Catholic politicians who support abortion. For clarification, in Catholicism excommunication does not make a person non-Catholic, such as with some other denominations or religions. Only apostasy would make a baptized Catholic a non-Catholic.[196]

In in his 2016 Amoris laetitia, Pope Francis criticized the practice of suspending communion to some people who have incurred automatic excommunication due to divorce and remarriage.

Reforms in 1983

One reform in the 1983 code was that non-Catholic Christians are not assumed to be culpable for not being Roman Catholic, and are not discussed or treated as excommunicated Catholics guilty of heresy or schism.[197] Another reform in 1983 was a list of extenuating circumstances in Canon 1324 which could prevent excommunication or lessen other punishments.

Other criticisms of excommunication and other penalties

Historically, the excommunication of actors by the Catholic Church was a subject of criticism, as was the excessive number of excommunications and the posthumous excommunication exacted by the Cadaver Synod.

The sadistic attitude that delights in the damnation of others was satirized by 19th century poet Robert Browning in his Soliloquy in a Spanish Cloister.[198]

Against post-Vatican II worship architecture

Against liturgy changes

For the opposing view that liturgical changes have not gone far enough yet, see Rembert Weakland § Liturgical agenda

The use of the hymn Amazing Grace in Catholic worship has been criticized due to the use of the term "wretch."[199]

History of Latin vs. vernacular worship

Before the reforms from Vatican II in the late 1960s the Catholic Church was best-known outside the church for the Tridentine Mass, said mostly in ecclesiastical Latin with a few sentences in Ancient Greek and Hebrew.[200]

Since 1970, the Mass has been celebrated in the local language of where it is celebrated and the Mass in Latin has largely fallen into disuse. The vernacular Mass is also known as the Mass of Pope Paul VI, as he was the Pope who promulgated the vernacular missal. A minority of Roman Catholics however prefer the Mass to be celebrated in Latin, generally arguing that the Latin text is more authentic as regards, and truer to scripture and doctrine than the so-called "New Order" Mass.[201] It should be noted that since 1970 the use of the Latin Mass has been severely restricted, and even declared illegal in some dioceses. However, in 2007, Pope Benedict XVI loosened some restrictions on its use with the aim of healing the rift that had come about between advocates of the New Order Mass and those of the Tridentine Mass.[202]

However, during the time of the Reformation, some Protestants almost totally rejected the use of Latin as "hocus pocus", although some Lutherans continued worshipping in Latin with the frequency of Latin worship gradually tapering off over the next three hundred years until the period of Rationalism. The 1662 edition of the Church of England's Book of Common Prayer has a specific article (no. 24 of the Articles of Religion) devoted to the topic. It reads concisely and directly, "It is a thing repugnant to the Word of God, and the custom of the Primitive Church, to have publick [sic] Prayer in the Church, or to minister the Sacraments in a tongue not understanded [sic] of the people." This is backed by a statement in the section Concerning the Service of the Church which states: "Whereas Saint Paul would have such language spoken to people in the Church, as they might understand, and have profit by hearing the same; the service in this Church of England these many years hath [sic] been read in Latin to the people, which they understand not; so that they have heard with their ears only, and their heart, spirit, and mind, have not been edified thereby."[203]

The French Catholic Church in the 18th century adapted vernacular missals in some dioceses. In 1794 the Synod of Pistoia, firmly influenced by Jansenism, rejected the use of Latin and demanded the use of the vernacular. In the 19th century the "Old Catholic" anti-primacy movements adopted the vernacular liturgy along with other reforms. In 1962 the encyclical Veterum sapientia of Pope John XXIII instructed priests and seminaries to hold to the all-Latin Mass[citation needed] and to promote studying the Latin language. While the Second Vatican Council allowed the use of the vernacular in the liturgy of the Mass, it also demanded conservation of the use of Latin and stimulated Latin Gregorian chant. Even before promulgation of 1970 edition of the Roman Missal, use of the vernacular in the Eucharist was authorized on a worldwide scale and no longer in a few areas such as Dalmatia.[citation needed]

Criticism of the beatification of Pope John Paul II

Prayers and veneration to saints

Catholics have venerated Mary and other saints for supplication, or requested help of some sort. Prayers to the saints have their origin in the earliest centuries of the Catholic Church. Some Protestant Christians argued that, in order for Mary and the saints to actually hear all the prayers directed to them, they would by necessity be required to possess the attributes of omniscience and omnipresence, thus allowing them to know all the requests made by either ultimate knowledge or by actually being present with each supplicant simultaneously. Many Protestant churches have not traditionally called on the saints or apostles as intermediaries as do Catholics, citing 1 Tim. 2:5[204] to support this view.[citation needed]

Catholics answer that when they have prayed to a saint they have asked the saint to pray to God for them, not to have the saint do something for them personally. For Catholics, belief in the "Communion of Saints" means that death does not separate believers and requesting prayers of a saint is the same as asking any friend. They also say that Christians have historically believed that only material beings occupy time and space. Spirits, saints and angels do not occupy space nor are they subject to linear time.[205] This, they argue, would suggest that angels and saints do not need to be omnipresent or omnipotent to answer prayers. Apart from all time and space, they participate in the life of God in Heaven, through Theosis.[citation needed]

The intercession of saints was criticized in the Augsburg Confession, Article XXI: Of the Worship of the Saints. This criticism was refuted by the Catholic side in the Confutation,[206] which in turn was refuted by the Lutheran side in the Apology to the Augsburg Confession.[207]

Mariology

R. Albert Mohler Jr., president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, asserted "The issue of Mary remains one of the hottest debates on the Protestant/Catholic divide, and new proposals for Marian doctrines are likely to ignite a theological conflagration. It has been suggested by some Protestant writers that the Catholics worship Mary as a goddess."[208][209] These suggestions continue to be made in recent times.[citation needed]

However, the Catholic Church teaches that Mary is a created being, not a goddess, and has always taught that adoration (latria) is due to God alone and not to any created being. Whereas only God is entitled to receive latria, the saints are offered veneration (dulia), and Mary is offered a special veneration, hyperdulia - the highest possible veneration short of worship. Mary is also honoured, as she is the Mother of God— not in the sense that she is the mother of pre-existent Divine Nature, but in the sense that she gave birth to Christ, who is God.[citation needed]

Lutherans respond that what the Catechism of the Catholic Church says of Mary amounts to worship:

The Catechism of the Catholic Church is precisely what we are rejecting...Calling something by a different name does not change its nature. What is observed in the cult of Mary is worship...It is precisely the specious distinction between latreia, adoration, worship and hyperdulia, dulia, and veneration which we reject. The Catechism of the Catholic Church says Mary joined herself with Christ's sacrifice (964),[210] that Mary was free from original sin (966),[211] she was taken bodily to heaven (966),[212] that she has a saving office (969).[213] The church's devotion to Mary is intrinsic to the church's worship (970). The teaching that Mary collaborated with the work of her Son has no basis in Scripture. What is observed in the prayers to Mary and the Marian festivals is worship by whatever name the church chooses to call it. It is this practice that we reject. Mary cannot be treated as a co-mediatrix and co-redemptrix. Simply associating Mary's saving work with the saving work of her Son does not justify the false role Rome gives her. [214]

A Lutheran scholar has quoted paragraph 494 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church as, in his view, diminishing the glory of Christ by attributing a share in the work of salvation to Mary:

At the announcement that she would give birth to "the Son of the Most High" without knowing man, by the power of the Holy Spirit, Mary responded with the obedience of faith, certain that "with God nothing will be impossible": "Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord; let it be [done] to me according to your word."139 Thus, giving her consent to God's word, Mary becomes the mother of Jesus. Espousing the divine will for salvation wholeheartedly, without a single sin to restrain her, she gave herself entirely to the person and work of her Son; she did so in order to serve the mystery of redemption with him and dependent on him, by God's grace. As St. Irenaeus says, "Being obedient she became the cause of salvation for herself and the whole human race." Hence not a few of the early Fathers gladly assert. . .: "The knot of Eve's disobedience was untied by Mary's obedience: what the virgin Eve bound through her disbelief, Mary loosened by her faith." Comparing her with Eve, they call Mary "the Mother of the living" and frequently claim: "Death through Eve, life through Mary." [215]

Requiring children to be raised as Catholics

Longstanding requirements that both the Catholic and non-Catholic spouse must pledge to raise their children as Catholics during the wedding have been criticized as "legislating for Protestants."[216] In 1932, the consequences of failing to uphold this pledge could include the annulment of the marriage.[217] In 1970, this requirement was sort of relaxed[218] by only requiring the Catholic spouse to take a pledge. As a result the current prerequisite for granting permission to marry a non-Catholic is that the Catholic party pledges to undertake to remove dangers of defecting from the faith and to do all in his or her power so that all the children are baptized and brought up in the Catholic Church; the other party is to be made aware of this undertaking and obligation of the Catholic party.[219][220] If the prospective bride and groom attempt to circumvent this by having a civil ceremony instead or a religious wedding according to the non-Catholic spouse's faith, the new marriage is automatically considered an invalid mixed marriage by the Catholic church because it lacks a dispensation from the bishop to remedy the disparity of cult. Dispensations permitting a mixed marriage are only granted if the Catholic spouse pledges to raise their children Catholic.

Clerical celibacy requirements

For a comparison with the practice of married priests in Eastern Orthodoxy, see Ecclesiastical differences between the Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church § Celibacy of the priestly order
For the article about children of priests, see Children of the Ordained
For the article about priests with same-sex attractions, see Homosexual clergy in the Catholic Church
For criticism of mandatory clerical celibacy from 16th century Lutherans, see the Augsburg Confession, Article XXIII: Of the Marriage of Priests
For criticism of mandatory clerical celibacy as a cause of a shortage of priests, see Priest shortage in the Catholic Church
For the ongoing discussion on clerical marriage in the Amazon, see Synod of Bishops for the Pan-Amazon region
This statue from Konstanz, Germany shows a fictionalized version of the courtesan Imperia Cognati holding a naked Pope Martin V and Emperor Sigismund. The statue is ahistorical, not only because Martin V is not known to be one of the sexually active popes, but also because the historical Imperia did not have any popes among her known lovers. The statue is based on the short story, La Belle Impéria.

Mandatory priestly celibacy first appeared for the Spanish clergy at the Synod of Elvira in 306-306. This was reinforced by the pope in the Directa Decretal in 385, which stated that it was derived from the Apostles. Mandatory celibacy was written into law for the entire clergy as a result of the Second Lateran Council in 1139.[221][222] The Catholic Church's requirement of a vow of celibacy from Latin Church priests (while allowing very limited individual exceptions) is criticized for differing from Protestant changes issuing from the Protestant Reformation, which apply no limitations, and even from the practice of the ancient Eastern Orthodox Church and Eastern Catholic Churches. While requiring celibacy for bishops and priestmonks and excluding marriage by priests after ordination, the latter churches allow married men to be ordained to the priesthood and diaconate. The Latin Church also permits married men to be ordained as deacons. The Latin Church has also been accepting married priests from specific religions into the priesthood in the 20th and 21st centuries.[citation needed]

In July 2006, Bishop Emmanuel Milingo created the organization Married Priests Now!.[223] Responding to Milingo's November 2006 consecration of bishops, the Vatican stated "The value of the choice of priestly celibacy... has been reaffirmed."[224]

In the wake of the clergy sexual abuse scandals, some critics have charged that priestly celibacy was a contributing factor.[225][226][227] (see above)

In 1990, Richard Sipe explained the results of his 25 year study that was limited in its accuracy by the fact it was non-randomized. Sipe found that although only 2 percent of priests have fully achieved celibacy, 6 to 8 percent currently adhere to celibacy despite past reversals. About 40 percent of priests engage in some non-celibate exploration, but have the possibility to become fully celibate. At any given time, 20 percent of priests are involved in a heterosexual experiment with non-celibacy and 6 percent are involved sexually with minors.[228]

Protestant apologists further argue that clerical celibacy violates the Biblical teaching in the First Epistle to Timothy:[229]

"The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons. Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron. They forbid people to marry and order them to abstain from certain foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and who know the truth. For everything God created is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving."[230]

A married former Anglican priest is being re-ordained as a Catholic priest. The Holy See has at times granted dispensations from the celibacy requirement for former Anglican priests and former Lutheran ministers.[231]

However, the Church's tradition of celibacy traces its beginnings to both Jesus, who encouraged his apostles to be celibate if they were able to do so,[citation needed] and to St. Paul, who wrote of the advantages celibacy allowed a man in serving the Lord.[232] Thus, from the Church's beginnings, clerical celibacy was "held in high esteem" and is considered a kind of spiritual marriage with Christ, a concept further popularized by the early Christian theologian Origen.[233] About 300, the Synod of Elvira called for clerical celibacy . Clerical celibacy began to be enforced in papal decretals beginning with Pope Siricius (d. 399).[233] In 1074, mandatory celibacy of the clergy became canon law as part of Pope Gregory VII's effort to eliminate several forms of medieval church corruption.[234]

Martin Luther responded in his works "On Monastic Vows":

"If you obey the gospel, you ought to regard celibacy as a matter of free choice...They [Jesus and Paul] glory in faith alone. They praise celibacy not because the chaste are more perfect than others because they are chaste, and not because they do not lust contrary to the command, but because they are free from the cares and tribulation of the flesh which Paul attributes to marriage [1 Corinthians 7:32], and may freely and without hindrance dedicate themselves day and night to the word and faith."[235]

Confessional Lutherans, claiming the Bible as the only norming norm in all matters of Christian doctrine,[236][237][238][239][240] criticize the tradition of forced celibacy:

"In 1 Corinthians 7 the apostle Paul discusses the matter of the celibate life versus marriage. 'Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am. But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion' (verses 8-9)...The Bible says forbidding marriage and commanding people to abstain from certain foods are doctrines of demons (1 Timothy 4:1-4)."[229][241]

Generally, Protestantism holds that celibacy is not a scriptural requirement for the ministry.[242]

Exorcism

Private Revelation

The Catholic Church does not demand belief in any private revelation,[243] but does teach that its bishops have the right and duty to study them in order "to preserve the integrity of the truths of faith and morals."[244]

Civil disobedience

Gambling

Catholic foster and adoption agencies

Catholic foster adoption agencies have been criticized for not placing children with adults perceived to be living an immoral lifestyle in Catholic theology.[245]

Catholic orphanages

Catholic schools

In 2019, a Catholic school in Kansas City, Kansas was criticised for deciding not to enroll a child of a homosexual couple on the grounds of "helping our students understand the meaning and purpose of their sexuality."[246]

In 2017, a Catholic school in San Anselmo, California was criticized for removing or relocating most of its Catholic statues and artwork in an attempt to better accommodate non-Catholic students.[247]

Catholic hospitals

In 2019, a Catholic hospital in Eureka, California was criticized for not performing a hysterectomy as part of a sex-change operation.[248]

Gregorian calendar

Criticisms pertaining to specific churches, religions, or organizations

Recent criticisms by other religions or churches

Anglicans: criticism over the personal ordinariate

Eastern Orthodoxy: criticism over breaking "no proselytization" commitment

After the end of communism in Russia, both the Russian Orthodox Church and Catholics in Russia experienced a resurgence. An agreement in 1993 stated that Catholics would not proselytize Eastern Orthodox believers. In 2007 then Orthodox Patriarch Alexei II of Moscow demanded that the Vatican curb proselytism by Catholic clerics in Russia and eastern Europe.[249][250] Catholic officials have replied that their efforts in Russia were not aimed at Orthodox believers, but were reaching out to the vast majority of Russians who are not churchgoers.[249] The Church maintains that it "has a duty to evangelize; it is also its inalienable right".[251]

The Catholic Church holds that, "if a non-Catholic Christian, for reasons of conscience and having been convinced of Catholic truth, asks to enter into the full communion of the Catholic Church, this is to be respected as the work of the Holy Spirit and as an expression of freedom of conscience and of religion. In such a case, it would not be a question of proselytism in the negative sense that has been attributed to this term. ... This perspective naturally requires the avoidance of any undue pressure: 'in spreading religious faith and introducing religious practices, everyone should refrain at all times from any kind of action which might seem to suggest coercion or dishonest or improper persuasion, especially when dealing with poor or uneducated people'."[252] The Church does not see that as proselytism but rather as evangelism.[253][need quotation to verify]

Judaism: use of Tridentine liturgy

"Oremus et pro perfidis Judæis..." in Nouveau Paroissien Romain, 1924. Although the Latin word "perfidis" is a cognate of the English "perfidious" it does not mean the same thing. "Perfidis" means faithless or unbelieving, while "perfidious" means treacherous.

There was also controversy over Pope Benedict allowing a wider use of the Tridentine Mass in the 2007 motu proprio Summorum Pontificum. Concern was focused on the Good Friday liturgy in the Tridentine missal, which contained a prayer "For the conversion of the Jews" referring to Jewish "blindness" and prays for them to be "delivered from their darkness."[254] The American Jewish Committee (AJC) stated in a press release:

We acknowledge that the Church's liturgy is an internal Catholic matter and this motu proprio from Pope Benedict XVI is based on the permission given by John Paul II in 1988 and thus, on principle, is nothing new. However we are naturally concerned about how wider use of this Tridentine liturgy may impact upon how Jews are perceived and treated. We appreciate that the motu proprio actually limits the use of the Latin Mass in the days prior to Easter, which addresses the reference in the Good Friday liturgy concerning the Jews," Rosen added. "However, it is still not clear that this qualification applies to all situations and we have called on the Vatican to contradict the negative implications that some in the Jewish community and beyond have drawn concerning the motu proprio."[255]

In response to such complaints, Pope Benedict XVI in 2008 replaced the prayer in the 1962 Missal with a newly composed prayer that makes no mention of blindness or darkness. However, Jewish leaders were still disappointed by the revision.[256]

Islam: various controversies

For the controversy surrounding Muslim prayer in Spain, see Muslim campaign at Córdoba Cathedral
For criticism of interfaith dialogue with Muslims, see Pierre Claverie § Episcopate and ecumenism
For the controversy over whether Islam is a religion or a political system, see Raymond Leo Burke § Islam and immigration
For the controversy over advice not to marry a Muslim and move to an Islamic country, see José Policarpo § Marriages with Muslim men
For the controversy over whether Catholics may call God "Allah" if they want to, see Titular Roman Catholic Archbishop of Kuala Lumpur v Menteri Dalam Negeri
For more information on the following sub-section, see Regensburg lecture and Pope Benedict XVI and Islam

In 2006 Muslims objected to Pope Benedict XVI quoting the 14th-century Byzantine Christian Emperor Manuel Paleologos II who wrote "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."[257]

Although in his speech the Pope seemed to distantiate himself from the quote, which he said was made "with a startling brusqueness" by the emperor, its inclusion provoked a considerable response.[258] Islamic political and religious leaders expressed their concerns[259], and there were protests in much of the Islamic world, including Turkey, the West Bank of the Jordan,[260] Indonesia, and Iran.[261] Turkey's ruling party AKP likened the pope to Hitler and Mussolini and accused him of reviving the mentality of the Crusades, while Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said that "The Pope must not take lightly the spread of outrage that has been created".[262]

The Pope subsequently responded to those criticisms by stating that the quotation did not express his personal position, and that the indignation in the Muslim world was understandable. He explained the use of the quote by stating : "In quoting the text of the Emperor Manuel II, I intended solely to draw out the essential relationship between faith and reason. On this point I am in agreement with Manuel II, but without endorsing his polemic."[263] His response was included by the Vatican as a footnote in the text. In addition, the English translation of the speech (made in German) was amended to make the Pope's distanciation from the quote clearer to English speakers. Thus, in the amended English text the quote is characterized as having been made by the emperor with "a brusqueness that we find unacceptable" instead of "with a startling brusqueness" (translated from "in erstaunlich schroffer, uns überraschend schroffer Form ganz einfach").[264]

Buddhism: reactions to Pope John Paul II's statements on Buddhism

Crossing the Threshold of Hope by John Paul II, 1994

In 1994, Pope John Paul II wrote Crossing the Threshold of Hope, in which he discussed various non-Christian religions, including Buddhism. The book prompted widespread criticism from the Buddhist community, and the pope's statements were characterized as misunderstanding and offending Buddhism. Thinley Norbu Rinpoche, a Tibetan Buddhist lama, wrote a book to address the "serious, gratuitous misrepresentations of Buddhist doctrine which seemed to be based on misunderstandings" contained within Crossing the Threshold of Hope.[265][266] Ven. Bhikkhu Bodhi, a Theravada Buddhism scholar, published an essay "intended as a short corrective to the Pope's demeaning characterization of Buddhism" entitled Toward a Threshold of Understanding.[267] Sri Lanka Buddhists were cited by the New York Times as calling the pope's language offensive, notably its reference to nirvana as a state of "indifference with regard to the world" and its assertion that the Buddhist doctrine of salvation through nirvana is "almost exclusively negative."[268]

Criticisms by or of Catholic operations, organizations, or communities

Catholic League

In 1997, David Carlin of Commonweal criticized Bill Donohue and the Catholic League for being overly sensitive in the identification of anti-Catholicism.[269] In 1999, Jesuit priest James Martin, the associate editor of the Catholic magazine America wrote "Often their criticism is right on target, but frequently they speak without seeing or experiencing what they are critiquing, and that undercuts their credibility. Unfortunately, that type of response gives people the idea that the Catholic Church is unreflective."[270]

Opus Dei

Catholic Relief Services

Catholic Relief Services has been criticized for both actions and official positions pertaining to contraception at odds with traditional Catholic moral theology.

Jesuits

There has existed a sometimes tense relationship between Jesuits and the Holy See due to questioning of official church teaching and papal directives, such as those on abortion,[271][272] birth control,[273][274][275][276] women deacons,[277] homosexuality, and liberation theology.[278][279] Usually, this theological free thinking is academically oriented, being prevalent at the university level. From this standpoint, the function of this debate is less to challenge the magisterium than to publicize the results of historical research or to illustrate the church's ability to compromise in a pluralist society based on shared values that do not always align with religious teachings.[280] This has not prevented Popes from appointing Jesuits to powerful positions in the church. John Paul II and Benedict XVI together appointed ten Jesuit cardinals to notable jobs. Under Benedict, Archbishop Luis Ladaria Ferrer was Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Federico Lombardi was Vatican Press Secretary.[281] The current Pope, Francis, is himself a Jesuit.

Adorers of the Blood of Christ

The Adorers of the Blood of Christ have been criticized for opposing a natural gas pipeline from being built under their property. A Williams Companies spokesman stated:[282]

Like millions of homes and business across the U.S., the nuns’ retirement community enjoys the benefits of affordable, reliable natural gas service. Therefore, we find it ironic that the Adorers would challenge the value of natural gas infrastructure in the lawsuit, while at the same time promoting the availability and use of natural gas at their St. Anne’s Retirement Community.

Paulists

The founder of the Paulist Fathers, Isaac Hecker, was accused by the French cleric Charles Maignen (article in French) of subjectivism and crypto-Protestantism.[283] Additionally some who sympathized with Hecker were accused of Americanism.

Catholic Secular Forum

A Catholic Scouts of Europe participant receiving the Sacrament of Penance.

Catholic Scouts of Europe

Criticism of Catholic Scouts has concerned the proselytization of youth.

Cardinal Newman Society

Vatican Radio

The Vatican Radio lawsuit was concerned with radiation and public health in Rome.

Leadership Conference of Women Religious

The Council of Major Superiors of Women Religious was founded as a conservative opposition group of nuns to the more liberal Leadership Conference of Women Religious.

Communion and Liberation

Opus Sanctorum Angelorum

Neocatechumenal Way

Sodalitium Christianae Vitae

Catholic Answers

Bridgettines

Premonstratensians

Missionaries of Charity

Miles Jesu

Camillians

De La Salle Brothers

Oblates of St. Francis de Sales

Pallottines

Nuns on the Bus

Carmelites

Historically, the Carmelites were criticized for holding to and teaching about the Sabbatine Privilege.

Cistercians

Historically, the Cistercians were criticized for worldliness.

Capuchins

Historically, the Capuchins were under suspicion of being heretical (Protestant).

Dominicans

Although some early Domicans became inquisitors, there is no evidence that St. Dominic was one, despite a famous painting showing him as an inquisitor and later Protestant allegations that he was.

Franciscans

In 1322, Pope John XXII declared it was ridiculous to pretend that every scrap of food given to the friars and eaten by them belonged to the pope.[284]

Society of the Priests of Saint Sulpice

Not currently recognized as Roman Catholic

Society of Saint Pius X

Community of the Lady of All Nations

A spokesman for the Army of Mary called the 2007 excommunication of the nuns and the other members of the sect an injustice. Father Eric Roy, superior general of the Sons of Mary, an affiliate of the "Army of Mary", said that Marie-Paule Giguère has not claimed to be the reincarnation of the Virgin Mary, and that the 102-year-old Quebec woman "receives graces" from the Virgin Mary and God. "The Virgin Mary took possession of her soul. I would rather say it that way," said Roy.[285]

House of Prayer

In 1993, House of Prayer was founded in Ireland and then spread to the United States. In October 2014, a former member, Mick Power, asked publicly for the excommunication of Christina Gallagher, the founder of the House of Prayer movement. He accused Gallagher of scaremongering, simony, and heresy after she and Father Gerard McGinnity claimed that the state of Texas would be destroyed when the pilgrims did not fund a new House of Prayer there. In the event Texas was destroyed, people could be saved at the great chastisement by buying a € 250 picture.[286]

Intercessors of the Lamb

Criticism of Catholic actions in history

Writings criticizing the Catholic Church

Blanket apology

In May 1995, Pope John Paul II apologised for whatever offences had been committed by members of the Catholic Church. Again, as part of the Church's desire for reconciliation at the turn of the millennium, in 2000 he asked publicly for pardon "for the sins of Catholics throughout the ages".[287][288]

Persecution of heretics

This 1711 illustration for the Index Librorum Prohibitorum depicts the Holy Ghost supplying the book burning fire.

Before the 12th century, the Great Church[289] gradually suppressed what it saw as heresy usually through a system of ecclesiastical proscription, excommunication, anathema, and imprisonment. During this time in history, an accusation of heresy could be construed as treason against lawful civil rule, and therefore punishable by death, though this penalty was not frequently imposed, as this form of punishment had many ecclesiastical opponents.[290][291] Later those convicted of heresy were often handed to the state for execution under state laws.[citation needed]

Crusades

The Crusades were a series of military conflicts of a religious character waged by much of Christian Europe against external and internal threats. Crusades were fought against Muslims, pagan Slavs, Orthodox Christians, Mongols, Cathars, Hussites and political enemies of the popes.[292] Crusaders took vows and were granted an indulgence.[292]

Elements of the Crusades were criticized by some from the time of their inception in 1095. For example, Roger Bacon felt the Crusades were not effective because, "those who survive, together with their children, are more and more embittered against the Christian faith."[293] In spite of some criticism, the movement was still widely supported in Europe long after the fall of Acre in 1291. From that time forward, the Crusades to recover Jerusalem and the Christian East were largely lost. Later, 18th century rationalists judged the Crusaders harshly. As recently as the 1950s, Sir Steven Runciman published a highly critical account of the Crusades which referred to Holy War as "a sin against the Holy Ghost".[293]

During the Fourth Crusade Latin Crusaders murdered, raped and destroyed churches, and innocent Byzantine citizens. Medieval Europe consisted of hundreds of small states and principalities. Simultaneously, Europe faced encroachment of Muslim military forces from both the East via the Balkans and the West via Spain and North Africa. The Catholic Church, representing all of Western Christendom, encouraged crusades against Islamic controlled territories in Europe and in the Holy Land from 1095 through 1272 after Islam had conquered most of the Byzantine empire, including the Holy Land.[citation needed]

Subjugation of Ireland

Anti-semitism in medieval Europe

In the Middle Ages, religion played a major role in driving antisemitism. John Chrysostom published material that attacked Jewish Christians for participating in their old faith's rituals and traditions. Frequent uses of hyperbole and other rhetorical devices painted a harsh and negative picture of the Jews. This was largely ignored until the Jewish anti-Christian teachings began to surface in Muslim Andalusia in the 11th and 12th centuries.[294]

The Church responded by reviving, among others, "Adversus Judaeos"—Against the Jewish People, ultimately justifying their ejection from conquered Spanish lands. Anthony Julius quotes the phrase, "Rejecter of Christ, their land has rejected them. Their dispersion is proof of their wickedness." [295] Historically, Christians, including members of the clergy, have held the Jewish people collectively responsible for killing Jesus.[citation needed]

As stated in the Boston College Guide to Passion Plays, "Over the course of time, Christians began to accept... that the Jewish people as a whole were responsible for killing Jesus. According to this interpretation, both the Jews present at Jesus’ death and the Jewish people collectively and for all time, have committed the sin of deicide, or God-killing. For 1900 years of Christian-Jewish history, the charge of deicide has led to hatred, violence against and murder of Jews in Europe and America."[296]

The Fourth Council of the Lateran, summoned by Pope Innocent III with his papal bull of 19 April 1213, approved ‘Canon 68’. It required Jews and Muslims to wear special dress or badges to enable them to be distinguished from Christians. They were also forbidden to hold any public offices.[citation needed]

Counter-Reformation

A 19th-century depiction of Galileo Galilei before the Holy Office, by Joseph-Nicolas Robert-Fleury
Arguably the most famous case tried by the Roman Inquisition involved Galileo in 1633.

The Protestant Reformation (16th century in Europe) came about in no small part due to abuses of church practices by corrupt clergy in addition to these same theological disputes.[3] Before the Reformation, the Catholic Church had a uniquely powerful position in the political order of medieval western Europe; its clergymen occupied a privileged location in the social class structure; and theologically, it identified itself as the only legitimate Christian Church. Because Protestantism emerged from within the Catholic Church, and began as a protest against Catholic worldly practice and religious doctrine, the Papacy and Catholic rulers felt compelled to deal with Protestantism as a dangerous, destabilising influence in politics and society, as well as characterising Protestants as heretical and schismatic.[citation needed]

Within a few decades after the Reformation, governments in most of Europe sought to impose a particular religion, whether Catholicism or a variety of Protestantism, on all the population they ruled. Apart from outright war, members of the "wrong" church were often persecuted or driven into exile. In Catholic countries, the Spanish Inquisition and the Council of Troubles in the Habsburg Netherlands were among the bodies pursuing persecution by judicial means. In France, the French Wars of Religion included numerous massacres, most notoriously the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre of 1572. After a long peace following the Edict of Nantes in 1598, Louis XIV reopened the issue in the late 17th century, and the persecution known as the Dragonnades was followed in 1685 by the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes and the expulsion of all French Protestants. Religious refugees from both sides were common in many parts of Europe. The Vatican long remained opposed to the limited religious toleration that gradually became accepted in many parts of Europe.[citation needed] With the consolidation of Protestantism, the extirpation of 'heretics' became a much broader and more complex enterprise, complicated by the politics of territorial Protestant powers, especially in northern Europe. Persecution of Protestant groups ended only as Europe's rulers tired of fighting each other, despite the objections of the Pope, especially at the end of the Thirty Years' War.[citation needed]

During the Inquisition, the governments of Spain (and Italy, and sometimes France) prosecuted Protestant Christians in an attempt to stop the spread of the Reformation. Although the Church originally condoned these proceedings, they were difficult to regulate, and abuses eventually caused the Pope to call for an end to them. The last execution for heresy was of Cayetano Ripoll by the Spanish Inquisition in 1826.[citation needed]

When John Paul II visited Prague in 1990s, he apologized for Hus's execution and requested experts in this matter "to define with greater clarity the position held by Jan Hus among the Church's reformers, and acknowledged that "independently of the theological convictions he defended, Hus cannot be denied integrity in his personal life and commitment to the nation's moral education."[297][298][299][300]

In 2015, after visiting a Waldensian Temple in Turin, Pope Francis, in the name of the Catholic Church, asked Waldensian Christians for forgiveness for their persecution. The Pope apologized for the Church's "un-Christian and even inhumane positions and actions".[301]

Violating the rights of ethnic peoples

For the opposite criticism that the Catholic Church did not eliminate something harmful from an ethnic culture, see Caste system among Indian Christians § Caste discrimination among Christians

Slavery in Latin America

18th century China

Nationalist and "sovereignty" critique

Pope Celestine III crowning Henry VI, Holy Roman Emperor with his feet. He was only crowned after promising to cede Tusculum.

According to the nationalist critique, Catholicism poses a threat to sovereignty by virtue of its internationalist structure, headquartered in Rome.[citation needed]

In the history of the Catholic Church in England and Wales, when King Henry VIII established the Church of England, he chiefly objected to having to appeal to a foreign entity (the papacy) in order to annul his marriage, and thus sought to unite the secular and religious sources of authority within a single sovereign power (while not initially make substantial changes in doctrine).[302] In the History of the Catholic Church in Japan, when Christian missionaries arrived in Japan in the 1540s they initially flourished, however, Emperor Ogimachi issued edicts to ban Catholicism in 1565 and 1568. In 1587, the imperial regent Toyotomi Hideyoshi's banned Jesuit missionaries, and Christianity was repressed as a threat to national unity.[303] After the Tokugawa shogunate banned Christianity in 1620 it ceased to exist publicly. Only after the Meiji Restoration was Christianity re-established in Japan.[304]

Women's asylums

Removal of children from their parents

Canadian Indian residential school system

Spanish Civil War

Relationship with Mussolini

Relationship with Nazi Germany

German Catholics met the Nazi takeover with apprehension, as leading clergymen had been warning against Nazism for years.[305] A threatening, though initially mainly sporadic persecution of the Catholic Church in Germany commenced.[306] After initially making an effort to negotiate a modus vivendi with Nazi Germany, the church found such accommodation increasingly difficult in the face of ever more aggressive challenges by Nazi Germany.[citation needed]

Adolf Hitler became chancellor on January 30, 1933. On March 23, his government was given legislative powers through the Enabling Act of 1933, which was passed by all Reichstag except the Social Democrats and Communists (the latter had already been banned). These included the Centre Party, led by Father Ludwig Kaas. Before the Enabling Act was voted on, Hitler addressed the Reichstag, promising the Weimar Parliament that he would not interfere with the rights of the churches and stating that he attached the highest importance to cultivating and maintaining the friendliest relations with the Holy See. With power secured in Germany, Hitler quickly broke this promise.[307][308]

The signing of the Reichskonkordat on July 20, 1933 in Rome.

Cardinal Bertram, on March 28, announced that the bishops had dropped their prohibitions against Nazi membership. The bishops' decision opened the way for a concordat between the Holy See and the nominally functioning Weimar Republic.[309] Kershaw wrote that the Vatican was anxious to reach agreement with the new government, despite "continuing molestation of Catholic clergy, and other outrages committed by Nazi radicals against the Church and its organisations".[310] In April, the non-Nazi Vice Chancellor, Franz von Papen, was chosen by the new government to begin negotiations with the Vatican for a concordat.[311] On behalf of Cardinal Pacelli, Ludwig Kaas, the out-going chairman of the Centre Party, negotiated the draft of the terms with Papen. The concordat was finally signed, by Pacelli for the Vatican and von Papen for Germany, on July 20 and ratified on September 10. The Centre Party had been dissolved on July 6. The concordat gave the Catholic Church what it wanted in order to preserve the autonomy of ecclesiastical institutions and their religious activities, with full freedom of communication with Catholics in Germany for the Holy See and the bishops in all matters of their pastoral office (article 4), guarantees for the right to pastoral care in hospitals, prisons and similar institutions (article 20), and for the Catholic educational system (articles 19-25); it assured Hitler that the Church would end so-called political Catholicism. It required newly appointed bishops to take an oath of loyalty to the German Reich and to the Land (article 16), excluded clergy and religious from membership of political parties (article 32), and required priests and religious superiors whose headquarters were within Germany to be German citizens (articles 14-15). Article 31 acknowledged the Church would not support political causes. Nevertheless, Hitler routinely disregarded the concordat and permitted a persecution of the Catholic Church in Germany.[312] Shortly before the July 20 signing of the Reichskonkordat, Germany signed similar agreements with the state Protestant churches in Germany, although the Confessing Church opposed the regime.[313]

The German bishops issued a collective pastoral on 19 August 1936 to endorse Hitler's support for Franco.[314] The Vatican felt it necessary to issue two encyclicals opposing the policies of Mussolini and Hitler: Non abbiamo bisogno in 1931 and Mit brennender Sorge in 1937, respectively. Mit brennender Sorge included criticisms of Nazism and racism.[citation needed]

Joachim Fest, a biographer of Adolf Hitler, wrote that; "At first the Church was quite hostile and its bishops energetically denounced the "false doctrines" of the Nazis. Its opposition weakened considerably in the following years [after the Concordat] [-] Cardinal Bertram developed an ineffectual protest system [-] Resistance..remained largely a matter of individual conscience. In general they [both churches] attempted merely to assert their own rights and only rarely issued pastoral letters or declarations indicating any fundamental objection to Nazi ideology."[315]

The relationship between Pope Pius XII and the Holocaust has long been disputed[e], with some scholars arguing that he kept silent during the Holocaust, while others have argued that he saved thousands if not tens or hundreds of thousands of Jews.[citation needed]

In 1998, Pope John Paul II apologized for the failure of Catholics to help Jews during the Holocaust and acknowledged that Christian anti-semitism might have made Nazi persecution of the Jews easier, calling them "our elder brothers" in the faith.[317]

Critics reply that Pope Benedict XVI was a member of Hitler Youth, a paramilitary organization of the German Nazi Party, although membership was required by law for all 14-year-old German boys after December 1939.[318]

Nazi critique of Catholicism

The Nazi propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels wrote that there was "an insoluble opposition between the Christian and a heroic-German world view".[319]

During the Nazi era in Germany, the Catholic Church faced persecution. The Nazi leadership disapproved of Catholicism. Nazi ideology could not accept an autonomous establishment, whose legitimacy did not spring from the government. It desired the subordination of the church to the state.[320] The Nazis claimed jurisdiction over all collective and social activity, interfering with Catholic schooling, youth groups, workers' clubs and cultural societies.[321] To many Nazis, Catholics were suspected of insufficient patriotism, or even of disloyalty to the Fatherland, and of serving the interests of "sinister alien forces".[322] Nazi radicals also disdained the Semitic origins of Jesus Christ and the Christian religion.[319]

Though the broader membership of the Nazi Party after 1933 came to include many Catholics, aggressive anti-Church radicals like Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels and Hitler's chosen "deputy" Martin Bormann saw the campaign against the Churches as a priority concern, and anti-church and anticlerical sentiments were strong among grassroots party activists.[319] While the Nazi Führer Adolf Hitler's public relationship to religion in Nazi Germany may be defined as one of opportunism, his personal position on Catholicism and Christianity was one of hostility. Bormann recorded in Hitler's Table Talk that Nazism was secular, scientific and anti-religious in outlook.[323]

The 1920 Nazi Party Platform had promised to support freedom of religions with the caveat: "insofar as they do not jeopardize the state's existence or conflict with the moral sentiments of the Germanic race", and expressed support for so-called "Positive Christianity", a movement which sought to detach Christianity from its Jewish roots, and key doctrines like the Apostle's Creed. William Shirer wrote that under the leadership of Rosenberg, Bormann and Himmler—backed by Hitler—the Nazi regime intended to destroy Christianity in Germany, if it could.[324]

According to biographer Alan Bullock, Hitler, though raised a Catholic, retained some regard for the organisational power of Catholicism, but had utter contempt for its central teachings, which he said, if taken to their conclusion, "would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure".:[325]

In Hitler's eyes, Christianity was a religion fit only for slaves; he detested its ethics in particular. Its teaching, he declared, was a rebellion against the natural law of selection by struggle and the survival of the fittest.

Though he was willing at times to restrain his anticlericalism out of political considerations, and approved the Reich concordat signed between Germany and the Holy See, Hitler's long term hope was for a de-Christianised Germany.[326] In Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives, Bullock added that, though Hitler, like Napoleon before him, frequently employed the language of "divine providence" in defence of his own myth, he ultimately shared with the Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin, "the same materialist outlook, based on the nineteenth century rationalists' certainty that the progress of science would destroy all myths and had already proved Christian doctrine to be an absurdity".[327] Hitler possessed radical instincts in relation to the conflict with the churches, and though he occasionally spoke of wanting to delay the Church struggle.[328] Hitler's impatience with the churches, wrote Kershaw, "prompted frequent outbursts of hostility. In early 1937 he was declaring that 'Christianity was ripe for destruction', and that the Churches must yield to the "primacy of the state".[329] According to the Goebbels Diaries, Hitler hated Christianity. In an 8 April 1941 entry, Goebbels wrote "He hates Christianity, because it has crippled all that is noble in humanity."[330] In another entry, Goebbels wrote that Hitler was "deeply religious but entirely anti-Christian."[331][332] Goebbels wrote on 29 December 1939:[333]

The Führer... views Christianity as a symptom of decay. Rightly so. It is a branch of the Jewish race. This can be seen in the similarity of their religious rites. Both (Judaism and Christianity) have no point of contact to the animal element, and thus, in the end they will be destroyed.

— Goebbels Diaries, 29 December 1939

Goebbels was among the most aggressive anti-Church Nazi radicals. In 1928, soon after his election to the Reichstag, Goebbels wrote in his diary that National Socialism was a "religion" that needed a genius to uproot "outmoded religious practices" and put new ones in their place: "One day soon National Socialism will be the religion of all Germans."[334] Goebbels led the Nazi persecution of the German Catholic clergy and, as the war progressed, on the "Church Question", he wrote "after the war it has to be generally solved... There is, namely, an insoluble opposition between the Christian and a heroic-German world view".[319]

Hitler's chosen deputy and private secretary, Martin Bormann, was a rigid guardian of National Socialist orthodoxy and saw Christianity and Nazism as "incompatible" (mainly because of its Jewish origins),[335][336] as did the official Nazi philosopher, Alfred Rosenberg. In his "Myth of the Twentieth Century" (1930), Rosenberg wrote that the main enemies of the Germans were the "Russian Tartars" and "Semites" - with "Semites" including Christians, especially the Catholic Church.[337] In 1934, Hitler appointed Rosenberg as the cultural and educational leader of the Reich. Rosenberg was a neo-pagan and notoriously anti-Catholic.[324][338] In 1934, the Sanctum Officium in Rome recommended that Rosenberg's book be put on the Index Librorum Prohibitorum (forbidden books list) for scorning and rejecting "all dogmas of the Catholic Church, indeed the very fundamentals of the Christian religion".[339]

Relationship with the Ustaše

File:Prisilno pokrštavanje Srba u Slavoniji.jpg
Serb civilians forced to convert to Catholicism in Mikleuš.

Ante Pavelić, the leader of the Ustaše in Croatia during World War II, was granted a "devotional" audience with Pius XII in Rome.[340] Author John Cornwell views this act as "de facto recognition by the Holy See" of the Independent State of Croatia, which committed genocide against its Serb, Jewish and Roma citizens.[340] Soon afterwards, Abbot Ramiro Marcone was appointed apostolic legate to Zagreb.[340] Cornwell is unsure whether the Vatican was aware of the exact atrocities committed by the Ustaše by this point, but he noted "it was known from the very beginning that Pavelic was a totalitarian dictator, a puppet of Hitler and Mussolini, that he had passed a series of viciously racist and anti-Semitic laws, and that he was bent on enforced conversions from Orthodox to Catholic Christianity".[340]

Corrado Zoli and Evelyn Waugh have argued that many Catholic clergy members participated directly or indirectly in Ustaša campaigns of violence.[341] The most notorious example is that of expelled Franciscan Miroslav Filipović, known as "the devil of Jasenovac" for running the Jasenovac concentration camp, where estimates of the number killed range between 49,600 and 600,000.[342][343][344] Ivan Šarić is believed to have been the "worst" of the Catholic bishops who supported the Ustaša; his diocesan newspaper wrote: "there is no limit to love. The movement of liberation of the world from the Jews is a movement for the renewal of human dignity. Omniscient and omnipotent God stands behind this movement".[345] Bishop Šarić also appropriated Jewish property for his own use.[346]

According to Michael Phayer, Pope Pius XII protected Ante Pavelić after World War II, gave him "refuge in the Vatican properties in Rome", and assisted in his flight to South America; Pavelić and Pius XII shared the goal of a Catholic state in the Balkans and were unified in their opposition to the rising Communist state under Tito.[347] Pius XII also believed that Pavelić and other war criminals could not get a fair trial in Yugoslavia.[348] After arriving in Rome in 1946, Pavelić used the Vatican "ratline" to reach Argentina in 1948, along with other Ustaša,[349] Russian, Yugoslav, Italian, and American spies and agents all tried to apprehend Pavelić in Rome but the Vatican refused all cooperation and vigorously defended its extraterritorial status.[350] Pavelić was never captured or tried for his crimes.[351]

According to Michael Phayer, "the Vatican's motivation for harboring Pavelić grew in lockstep with its apprehension about Tito's treatment of the church".[352] [353]

Slovakia (1939–1945)

On 14 March 1939, Slovakia seceded from Czechoslovakia and allied itself, as demanded by Germany, with Hitler's coalition.[354] Four months later, the Slovak state was recognized by the Vatican,[355] "which had little alternative but to recognise Father Tiso's avowedly Catholic regime, despite reservations about his political involvement", and thus gave recognition later than Poland and Hungary and sooner than Switzerland, Sweden and the Soviet Union.[356][357]

On 1 October 1939, the priest Jozef Tiso, leader of the Slovak People's Party and until then prime minister of the new state, became its president. Tiso assumed the office in defiance of the Pope, and the Holy See immediately published a statement speaking of its grave misgivings.[358][359]

On 7 November 1940, the Church newspaper Katolícke Noviny declared that the Slovak Catholic clergy had long supported the HSLS (Hlinka's Slovak People's Party), warmly welcomed the foundation of a separate Slovak state, and supported the HSLS government.[360]

On 12 April 1942, the Slovak bishops had a pastoral letter read in all churches, protesting against the HSLS government's deportation of Jewish fellow-citizens to German-controlled Poland.[361]

Children's asylums

Ayacucho region of Peru (1980–2000)

See also

Template:Wikipedia books

Notes

  1. ^ Also see Hanare Kirishitan, Traditionalist Mexican-American Catholic Church, Independent sacramental movement, West African Vodun § Theology and practice, and Santería
  2. ^ on display at the Lutheran St. Nicholaus church in Jüterbog (article in German).
  3. ^ In the Epistle to the Hebrews, it reads: "He has no need, as did the high priests, to offer sacrifice day after day, first for his own sins and then for those of the people; he did that once for all when he offered himself. For the law appoints men subject to weakness to be high priests, but the word of the oath, which was taken after the law, appoints a son, who has been made perfect forever." (Hebrews 7:27,28 NABRE) Protestants interpret this as implying that 1) human priests offering sacrifice are redundant as Christ is the eternal and perfect High Priest, 2) the sacrifice of the Mass is redundant as Christ does not need to offer sacrifices day after day as practised in Catholicism and 3) Christ sacrificed Himself once and for all and then ascended into Heaven where he sits bodily at the right hand of the Father.[citation needed]
  4. ^ This is somewhat mitigated by Canon 1357, although it only grants a one month grace period
  5. ^ Michael Phayer wrote that "the historical debate about Pope Pius and the Holocaust is nearly as long-standing as Holocaust study itself".[316]

Sources

  • Rivelli, Marco Aurelio (1998). Le génocide occulté: État Indépendant de Croatie 1941–1945 [Hidden Genocide: The Independent State of Croatia 1941–1945] (in French). Lausanne: L'age d'Homme. ISBN 9782825111529. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Rivelli, Marco Aurelio (1999). L'arcivescovo del genocidio: Monsignor Stepinac, il Vaticano e la dittatura ustascia in Croazia, 1941-1945 [The Archbishop of Genocide: Monsignor Stepinac, the Vatican and the Ustaše dictatorship in Croatia, 1941-1945] (in Italian). Milano: Kaos. ISBN 9788879530798. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Rivelli, Marco Aurelio (2002). "Dio è con noi!": La Chiesa di Pio XII complice del nazifascismo ["God is with us!": The Church of Pius XII accomplice to Nazi Fascism] (in Italian). Milano: Kaos. ISBN 9788879531047. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Phayer, Michael (2000). The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930–1965. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0253214713. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Phayer, Michael (2008). Pius XII, the Holocaust, and the Cold War. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. ISBN 9780253349309. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Derek Wilson (2007). Out of the Storm: The Life and Legacy of Martin Luther. London: Hutchinson. ISBN 978-0-09-180001-7.

References

  1. ^ Marty, Martin E.; Chadwick, Henry; Pelikan, Jaroslav Jan (2000). "Christianity" in the Encyclopædia Britannica Millennium Edition. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc. The Roman Catholics in the world outnumber all other Christians combined.
  2. ^ "Number of Catholics and Priests Rises". Zenit News Agency. 2007-02-12. Archived from the original on 2008-02-25. Retrieved 2008-02-21. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  3. ^ a b Multiple Authors (2003) [2003]. "One". Medieval Times to Today. Pearson Prentice Hall. pp. 11, 93, 106, 112, 174, 140, 141. ISBN 978-0-13-062995-1.
  4. ^ "Katharina von Zimmern" (in German). frauen-und-reformation.de. Retrieved 2014-10-25.
  5. ^ Derek Wilson (2007). Out of the Storm: The Life and Legacy of Martin Luther. London: Hutchinson. ISBN 978-0-09-180001-7.; This allegation was made in the pamphlet Warnunge D. Martini Luther/ An seine lieben Deudschen, Wittenberg, 1531.
  6. ^ Bruni, Frank (2002). A Gospel of Shame: Children, Sexual Abuse, and the Catholic Church. HarperCollins. ISBN 0060522321.
  7. ^ "Sex abuse victim accuses Catholic church of fraud". USA Today. 29 June 2010. Retrieved 24 June 2012.
  8. ^ MOORE, Chris, "Betrayal of Trust: The Father Brendan Smyth Affair and the Catholic Church"; Marino 1995, ISBN 1-86023-027-X; the producer's book about the programme's content
  9. ^ Grossman, Cathy Lynn. "Survey: More clergy abuse cases than previously thought." USA Today (February 10, 2004). Retrieved July 21, 2007.
  10. ^ "Richard P. Fitzgibbons, M.D. - A Letter to the Catholic Bishops". Orthodoxytoday.org. Retrieved 2013-02-11.
  11. ^ El Vaticano destituyó a 884 sacerdotes por abusos a menores en última década (in Spanish)
  12. ^ Inferno, Canto VII, line 47, Mandelbaum translation.
  13. ^ Inferno, Canto XIX, lines 2–6, Mandelbaum translation
  14. ^ Rendina, Claudio (1993). I papi. Storia e segreti. Rome: Newton Compton. p. 592
  15. ^ "Hutterite Communities," Catholic Worker (July–August 1969)
  16. ^ "Legion of Christ Acknowledges Financial Abuse". CruxNow. Retrieved 2017-11-16.
  17. ^ Roe, Alex (Feb 21, 2012). "Why Nothing's Changed Since The Huge Corruption Scandal That Hit Italy 20 Years Ago". Business Insider.
  18. ^ Franklin, James L.; Vaillancourt, Meg; Wen, Patricia (3 April 1995). "Fraternal Group Uses Clout to Safeguard Its Interests". The Boston Globe.
  19. ^ All the Pope's Men: The Inside Story of How the Vatican Really Thinks, p. 79 by John L. Allen, Jr.
  20. ^ All the Pope's Men: The Inside Story of How the Vatican Really Thinks, p. 80
  21. ^ http://www.wlsam.com/common/page.php?feed=11&section_id=11&pt=Ald.+Pat+O'Connor%3A+Cardinal+George+should+focus+on+church+problems%2C+not+city+water&id. {{cite news}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)[dead link]
  22. ^ Gaffey, Conor (2 July 2015). "Catholic Church accused of defrauding Norway of €5.7m". Newsweek. Retrieved 4 July 2015.
  23. ^ See Martin Luther's Sermon on Trading and Usury
  24. ^ "The presence among the assets of silver plate for an amount of more than 4,000 florins reveals at any rate that the Rome branch dealt more or less extensively in this product for which there was a demand among the high churchmen of the Curia who did a great deal of entertaining and liked to display their magnificence." p. 205, also see p. 199, de Roover, Raymond Adrien (1948), The Medici Bank: its organization, management, and decline, New York; London: New York University Press; Oxford University Press (respectively)
  25. ^ T.L. Bouscaren and A.C. Ellis. 1957. Canon Law: A Text and Commentary. p. 825.
  26. ^ Open Letter to The Christian Nobility] by Martin Luther (1483-1546), iclnet.org
  27. ^ Smalcald Articles, Part II, Article II: Of the Mass.
  28. ^ The Table Talk of Martin Luther, Alexander Chalmers
  29. ^ Murder in Palermo: who killed Father Puglisi?, Commonweal, 11 October 2002
  30. ^ Pope Francis: Turning churches into 'businesses' is a scandal by Elise Harris Vatican City, Nov 21, 2014 / 10:33 am
  31. ^ Pope: 'You don’t pay for Mass, 'Christ's redemption is free' Asia News 03/07/2018, 13.03 Vatican
  32. ^ Clarification of Mass Offerings Apr 15, 2018
  33. ^ Makati parish in hot water for high wedding rates Sunday Examiner, Hong Kong, Saturday, 23 March 2019
  34. ^ "CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Indulgences". www.newadvent.org.
  35. ^ Howard C. Kee et al., Christianity: A Social and Cultural History (2nd Edition), 2 ed. (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997), 456.
  36. ^ "To Prelate Auditors, Officials and Advocates of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota (January 29, 2009) - BENEDICT XVI". Vatican.va. Retrieved 8 July 2018.
  37. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2012-07-17. Retrieved 2012-04-21. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  38. ^ Pope Francis Reforms Annulment Process: 9 things to know and share, Catholic Answers, accessed 8 September 2015
  39. ^ Annulment reform seems to cultivate change of culture Jun 5, 2017 by Dan Morris-Young
  40. ^ Works of Martin Luther: With Introductions and Notes, Volume 1, p. 295, 19115 Holman edition
  41. ^ A Few Thoughts on Narcissism in the Priesthood by Doug McManaman
  42. ^ Messing with the Mass: The problem of priestly narcissism today by Paul C. Vitz
  43. ^ Perversion of Power: Sexual Abuse in the Catholic Church by Mary Gail Frawley-O'Dea, 2007
  44. ^ [file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/2343-3223-1-SM.pdf Detraction in public life]
  45. ^ Misjudgment in Boston by Thomas G. Guarino 9/20/2011
  46. ^ McCarrick, the bishops, and unanswered questions by J.D. Flynn, Washington D.C., Jul 23, 2018 / 05:10 pm. Catholic News Agency
  47. ^ Priest: Here’s Why Bishops Cover Up Abuse By Rod Dreher, February 4, 2013, 11:52 AM
  48. ^ In Catholic Circles: An International News Roundup Spring 2004. Catholics for Choice is a dissident advocacy group.
  49. ^ Murphy Report, page 371
  50. ^ Filippo, Stephen N. "St. Augustine and Pelagianism". Ignatius Insight
  51. ^ Apology of the Augsburg Confession, Article XII (V): Of Repentance.
  52. ^ Smalcald Articles, Part III, Article III. Of Repentance,
  53. ^ Craig Monson: Nuns Behaving Badly: Tales of Music, Magic, Art and Arson in the Convents of Italy: University of Chicago Press: 2010.
  54. ^ Paragraph 303 of Amoris laetitia
  55. ^ Dennett, Daniel; LaScola, Linda (2010). "Preachers Who Are Not Believers" (PDF). Evolutionary Psychology. 1 (8): 122–150. Retrieved 14 February 2015.
  56. ^ a b Newcomb, Harvey (2003). Great Apostasy: Being an Account of the Origin, Rise and Progress of Corruption and Tryanny in the Church of Rome. Kessinger Publishing. pp. ix. ISBN 9780766178847.
  57. ^ a b Talmage, James E. (1973). Jesus the Christ (40th ed.). LDS Church. pp. 745–757. OCLC 2012826.
  58. ^ Will Durant in The Story of Civilization, Volume 3, "Caesar and Christ":
  59. ^ Socrates, Church History, 5.22, in Schaff, Philip (July 13, 2005). "The Author's Views respecting the Celebration of Easter, Baptism, Fasting, Marriage, the Eucharist, and Other Ecclesiastical Rites". Socrates and Sozomenus Ecclesiastical Histories. Calvin College Christian Classics Ethereal Library. Retrieved March 28, 2007.
  60. ^ The Two Babylons, p.104-105.
  61. ^ Pope Benedict XVI. "Faith, Reason, and the University: Memories and Reflections," Lecture of the Holy Fatehr at Aula Magna of the University of Regensburg, September 2006, para. 10
  62. ^ Catholic Christian Spirituality for New Age Dummies By Fr. Benjamin A. Vima
  63. ^ "Towards the New Creation". Luci dell'Esodo.
  64. ^ "Catechism of the Catholic Church - Grace and justification".
  65. ^ CCC, §§2001–2002
  66. ^ CCC, §2007
  67. ^ CCC, §2025
  68. ^ "Faith and Works". Catholicapologetics.org. 1997-01-03. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  69. ^ Dave Armstrong, A Biblical Defense of Catholicism
  70. ^ WELS Topical Q&A: Roman Catholic Faith and Works, saying: "It would also be correct to say that Catholics teach salvation by works since in Galatians Paul makes it clear that salvation by faith and works is really a form of salvation by works since salvation does not happen without the works...No Protestants that I am aware of say works don't matter. They do say that works do not have a role in obtaining forgiveness."
  71. ^ "Responses to previous questions... - Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS)". Archived from the original on 2009-09-27. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  72. ^ a b "Errors of Catholicism - Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS)". Archived from the original on 2009-09-27. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  73. ^ "Doctrine - Law/Gospel (06) - Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS)". Archived from the original on 2009-09-27. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  74. ^ Meier, Edward P. (1978), The Nature of True Faith: An Exegesis of James 2 Archived 2015-02-14 at the Wayback Machine, p8, Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary, saying: "James talks as if he were from Missouri, "Show me!" He says to the objector, "I can show you faith by my works." His works proved that his faith was active. But can the objector show faith without works? James knew what Matthew had said in the seventh chapter, "Ye shall know them by their fruits.""
  75. ^ Meier, Edward P. (1978), The Nature of True Faith: An Exegesis of James 2 Archived 2015-02-14 at the Wayback Machine, p5, Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary
  76. ^ The Table Talk Or Familiar Discourse of Martin Luther, 1848, page 226
  77. ^ Smalcald Articles, Part II, Article II: Of the Mass.
  78. ^ Commentary on the Sermon on the Mount translated by Charles A. Hay, 1892, page 97
  79. ^ LaBarr, Joan G. (20 July 2006). "World Methodists approve further ecumenical dialogue". United Methodist Church. Retrieved 2014-01-17.
  80. ^ Wooden, Cindy (24 July 2006). "Methodists adopt Catholic-Lutheran declaration on justification". Catholic News Service. Archived from the original on 25 July 2006. Retrieved 2014-01-17. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  81. ^ "Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification".
  82. ^ Joint Declaration, 38
  83. ^ Joint Declaration, 39
  84. ^ "The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification in Confessional Lutheran Perspective".
  85. ^ McCain, Rev. Paul T. (12 March 2010). "A Betrayal of the Gospel: The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification". First Things. ISSN 1047-5141. Retrieved 2014-01-17.
  86. ^ a b "WELS Topical Q&A - Justification". Archived from the original on 2009-09-27. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  87. ^ Gerlach, Joel, A Question of Indulgences - Again, Forward in Christ, October 1999, conclude: "In truth, we are still back to where we started on Oct. 31, 1517. The Pope has made it clear. It's a question of indulgences--again."
  88. ^ "Catholic Tradition: Life in the Spirit". beginningcatholic.com. Retrieved December 28, 2011.
  89. ^ "What Is Sacred Tradition?". Mark-Shea.com. Retrieved 7 July 2014.
  90. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church, Chap.2, Art.3: Sacred Scripture, §§111–114, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, accessed 11 July 2014 Archived August 16, 2014, at the Wayback Machine
  91. ^ CCC, §83, accessed 11 July 2014 Archived June 29, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  92. ^ "Catechism of the Catholic Church - IntraText".
  93. ^ CCC, §97 Archived October 27, 2014, at the Wayback Machine
  94. ^ Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod Topical Q&A: 2 Thessalonians 2:15 - Tradition, stating: Let's review the immediate context of this verse. Paul had just reminded the Thessalonian Christians that God had called them to faith "through our gospel" (v. 14). This was the gospel message Paul had preached to them. But now Paul was absent from these beloved brothers and sisters in Christ. So he encouraged them to stand firm against every attack on their faith and to hold on tightly to the gospel that Paul had once "handed down" to them by his preaching and teaching. It most definitely was not human tradition that Paul was encouraging the Thessalonians to hold on to. It was the divine gospel, the gospel by which God made them believers, the gospel Paul had the privilege of passing down to them.
  95. ^ WELS Topical Q&A: Response to Apostolic Tradition
  96. ^ "Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope - Book of Concord". bookofconcord.org.
  97. ^ For the question and a longer quote of the answer, see Conclave: The Politics, Personalities, and Process of the Next Papal Election by John Allen
  98. ^ 2 Peter 1–21
  99. ^ Commentary on Genesis, page 460
  100. ^ An historic decline in papal authority, Saturday 25 November 1995 01:02, The Independent, Margaret Hebblethwaite
  101. ^ Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 8 Archived September 6, 2014, at the Wayback Machine (The term "successor of Peter" is here used of the Bishop of Rome, the Pope; see Petrine theory.).
  102. ^ Pope Pius XII, Encyclical Mystici Corporis, 13 Archived March 17, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
  103. ^ Pope Pius XII, Encyclical Humani generis, 27 Archived April 19, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
  104. ^ Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope, paragraph 22 and following
  105. ^ Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Declaration Dominus Iesus on the unicity and salvific universality of Jesus Christ and the Church" (6 August 2000), 17 Archived April 11, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
  106. ^ a b Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Responses to some questions regarding certain aspects of the doctrine on the Church" (29 June 2007) Archived August 13, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
  107. ^ This We Believe, VII. Church and Ministry, Par 1 & 2, Wisconsin Lutheran Evangelical Synod
  108. ^ John Darling. "Strong reactions emerge to Pope's exclusivity assertion". MailTribune.com. Archived from the original on 2011-06-07. Retrieved 2010-06-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  109. ^ "Pope says Protestants not churches 'in the proper sense'". Religion News Service. July 11, 2007. Archived from the original on October 16, 2008. Retrieved December 28, 2011. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  110. ^ Brighenti, Kenneth; Trigilio, John (2007). The Catholicism Answer Book. Sourcebooks. p. 313. ISBN 978-1-40223229-9.
  111. ^ Eckert, Harold H., The Specific Functions of the Church in the World, Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary
  112. ^ a b c Douglas Dalby (19 January 2013). "Priest Is Planning to Defy the Vatican's Orders to Stay Quiet". The New York Times. Retrieved 21 January 2013.
  113. ^ Evangelical Lutheran Church in Denmark's reply to the Catholic Church
  114. ^ [Making Christians: Clement of Alexandria and the Rhetoric of Legitimacy by Denise Kimber Buell, 1999
  115. ^ Modern culture runs risk of amnesia, from a speech given May 20th, 2010
  116. ^ Police to question Catholic mum-of-five Caroline Farrow for 'using wrong pronoun to describe transgender girl' by Katy Clifton, Wednesday 20 March 2019 09:45
  117. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 31 August 2009. Retrieved 4 November 2009. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) Accessed 25 October 2012
  118. ^ Martin Luther against Henry King of England translated by the Rev. E. S. Buchanan, M.A., B.Sc. New York: Charles A. Swift, 1928
  119. ^ Chioma Gabriel, Sam Eyoboka (24 July 2009). "I had three girlfriends, I still have sexual urge". Vanguard. Retrieved 22 February 2013.
  120. ^ Duffy, Eamon (1997). Saints and Sinners, a History of the Popes. Yale University Press in association with S4C. Library of Congress Catalog card number 97-60897.
  121. ^ Leo Xiii. "Rerum Novarum". Vatican.va. Archived from the original on July 20, 2009. Retrieved 2012-07-23. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  122. ^ "Communist Persecution Against Catholic Church". Econc10.bu.edu. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  123. ^ Japanese bishops make stand on imperial ceremonies, ucanews.com, Tokyo, Japan March 2, 2018
  124. ^ Curti, Elena (May 8, 2010). "Study in Scarlet". The Tablet. p. 4. ISSN 0039-8837. (Available upon request)
  125. ^ Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, (September 13, 1984). "Instruction on certain aspects of the 'Theology of Liberation,'" Origins 14/13. Online version.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)Online version
  126. ^ Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, . (April 17, 1986). "Instruction on Christian Freedom and Liberation," Origins 15/44.
  127. ^ "Bienvenido/a a nuestra página Web – Ejército de Liberación Nacional". Eln-voces.com. 26 May 2008. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
  128. ^ "Colombia rebel groups Farc and ELN agree 'to unite'". BBC News. 17 December 2009. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
  129. ^ McDermott, Jeremy (5 November 2009). "Colombia's ELN rebels show new vigour". BBC News. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
  130. ^ "Camilo Torres Restrepo 1929–1966". Filosofia.org. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
  131. ^ The Table Talk of Martin Luther, p. 360, Alexander Chalmers translation, 1902
  132. ^ Mixed marriages lead to fewer Catholic children Oct. 26, 2016 by Thomas Reese
  133. ^ "1 Corinthians 7:2 - NRS - But because of cases of sexual immorality, each..."
  134. ^ "CCC 2357". Usccb.org. 1951-10-29. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  135. ^ "CCC 2370". Usccb.org. 1951-10-29. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  136. ^ Casti connubii
  137. ^ Casti connubii #53-56
  138. ^ "CCC 2272". Usccb.org. 1941-06-01. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  139. ^ "CCC 2353". Usccb.org. 1951-10-29. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  140. ^ Squires, Nick (2009-03-17). "Pope Benedict XVI: condoms make Aids crisis worse". London: Telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  141. ^ Dugger, Carol (2006-05-18). "Why is Kenya's AIDS rate plummeting?". International Herald Tribune. Archived from the original on 2013-04-26. Retrieved 2008-02-21. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  142. ^ "Pope Francis 'confirms Vatican gay lobby and corruption'". BBC News. 12 June 2013. Retrieved 27 August 2013.
  143. ^ Lizzie Davis (29 July 2013). "Pope Francis signals openness towards gay priests". The Guardian.
  144. ^ "Pope Francis: Who am I to judge gay people?". BBC News. 29 July 2013. Retrieved 27 August 2013.
  145. ^ An open letter from two cardinals, February 20, 2019, published in The Catholic Thing
  146. ^ a b c d Paul VI. "Humanae vitae - Encyclical Letter of His Holiness Paul VI on the regulation of birth, 25 July 1968". Vatican.va. Archived from the original on March 19, 2011. Retrieved 2010-06-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  147. ^ 1930 Papal Encyclical by Pope Pius XI Casti connubii
  148. ^ "Is the Vatican wrong on population control?". BBC News. 1999-07-09. Retrieved 2010-04-30.
  149. ^ "Contraception and Sterilization". Catholic.com. 2004-08-10. Archived from the original on December 11, 2009. Retrieved 2010-06-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  150. ^ "Birth Control". Catholic.com. 2004-08-10. Archived from the original on 2009-12-13. Retrieved 2010-06-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  151. ^ Dickey, Christopher (May 2006). "Catholics and Condoms". Newsweek. MSNBC. Archived from the original on 2006-07-06. Retrieved 2006-09-16.
  152. ^ "Church 'will not budge one inch' on issue of condom use, says Cardinal Lopez Trujillo". Catholic News Agency. May 2006. Retrieved 2006-09-16.
  153. ^ a b Thavis, John (18 March 2009). "Pope's condom comments latest chapter in sensitive church discussion". Archived from the original on 14 April 2009. Retrieved 24 August 2013. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  154. ^ Ott, MA; Santelli, JS (October 2007). "Abstinence and abstinence-only education". Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 19 (5): 446–52. doi:10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282efdc0b. PMC 5913747. PMID 17885460.
  155. ^ Fact Sheet[permanent dead link] (includes research citations).
  156. ^ Kirby, D. (2007). "Emerging Answers 2007: Research Findings on Programs to Reduce Teen Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Diseases". National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. Archived from the original on 2012-02-15. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  157. ^ Boureau, Alain (2001). The Myth of Pope Joan. Translated by Lydia G. Cochrane. University of Chicago Press. p. 8. ISBN 0-226-06745-9.
  158. ^ Rustici, Craig M. (2006). The Afterlife of Pope Joan: Deploying the Popess Legend in Early Modern England. University of Michigan Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-472-11544-0.
  159. ^ Noble, Thomas F. X. (April 2013). "Why Pope Joan?". Catholic Historical Review. 99 (2): 219–220.
  160. ^ [http://www.ewtn.com/vexperts/showmessage.asp?number=450315&Pg=Forum25& Episcopa Theodora Question from Diane Sulpizio on 10/7/2005]
  161. ^ Service, Religion News (3 July 2013). "Association of U.S. Catholic Priests (AUSCP) Reform Group Charts Pragmatic Path" – via Huff Post.
  162. ^ John Paul II in Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, c.f. Apostolic Exhortation Christifideles Laici (30 December 1988), 31
  163. ^ a b "True and False About Women's Ordinations". RCWP FAQs. Roman Catholic womenpriests. Retrieved 24 August 2013.
  164. ^ "CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1577". Scborromeo.org. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  165. ^ Memorandum:Church 2011 Archived November 24, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  166. ^ Scammell, Rosie (17 July 2015). "Cardinal Pell on environmental encyclical: Church has 'no particular expertise in science.'". America. Religion News Service. Retrieved 27 February 2019.
  167. ^ Vidal, John (27 December 2014). "Pope Francis's edict on climate change will anger deniers and US churches". The Guardian. Retrieved 11 February 2015.
  168. ^ Illinois Catholic bishops oppose marijuana legalization, but proponent says God put pot 'on this planet for a reason', Robert McCoppin, Chicago Tribune, Feb. 4th, 2019
  169. ^ Don't give miraa or its proceeds to church, priest tells Catholics Joseph Muchiri And Wainaina Ndung'u 28th Mar. 2016, Standard Digital
  170. ^ This review does not list impotance directly as a result of khat use, only infertility: Effects of khat (Catha edulis) consumption on reproductive functions: a review., East Afr Med J. 2003 Jun;80(6):318-23. Impotance and khat was studied in Erectile Dysfunction among Yemenis: Does Chewing Khat Play a Role?, which concluded that further research should be done.
  171. ^ Khat makes middlemen rich in Kenya, 2011-02-07 09:55, News24.com, IAB South Africa
  172. ^ We chew miraa, but we are still very ‘fertile’ — Meru leaders, The Nairobian, Phares Mutembei, 2016
  173. ^ Taking drugs should be legal but discouraged in the same way as smoking, Fr Alexander Lucie-Smith 23 January, 2012
  174. ^ Christian Millenarianism: From the Early Church to Waco By Stephen Hunt, page 164
  175. ^ "Address to the representatives of the Christian Churches and ecclesial communities and of the world religions". Vatican archives. © 1986,2009 Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 27 October 1986. Archived from the original on 27 December 2008. Retrieved 12 January 2009. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  176. ^ "Address to the representatives of the other Christian Churches and ecclesial communities". © 1986,2009 Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 27 October 1986. Archived from the original on 17 April 2009. Retrieved 12 January 2009. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  177. ^ "Day of Prayer for Peace in the World". Vatican archives. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 24 January 2002. Archived from the original on 15 May 2009. Retrieved 12 January 2009. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  178. ^ "John Paul II kisses the Koran (Qu'ran) at the Vatican". FIDES News Service. Tradition in Action, In]. 14 May 1999. Retrieved 12 January 2009.
  179. ^ Two New Vatican Postage Stamps, Celebrate St Francis de Sales, Mark 500th Anniversary Reformation
  180. ^ The Pope’s Achievement, Return to Fatima website
  181. ^ Dunn, P.J. (1990). Priesthood: A re-examination of the Roman Catholic theology of the presbyterate. New York, NY: Alba House, cited and quoted in Personality expectations and perceptions of Roman Catholic clergy member
  182. ^ Luther's Church postils, Twenty-Fourth Sunday After Trinity, published in The Precious and Sacred Writings of Martin Luther, Volume 14, edited by John Nicholas Lenker, 1905
  183. ^ From the Article VIII of the Apology of the Augsburg Confession: "It is still more needful to understand how the Sacraments are to be used. Here we condemn the whole crowd of scholastic doctors, who teach that the Sacraments confer grace ex opere operato, without a good disposition on the part of the one using them, provided he do not place a hindrance in the way. This is absolutely a Jewish opinion, to hold that we are justified by a ceremony, without a good disposition of the heart, i.e., without faith. And yet this impious and pernicious opinion is taught with great authority throughout the entire realm of the Pope." and also see Article XXIV of the Apology of the Augsburg Confession for the link to Baalitic worship, that is, pagan determinism.
  184. ^ "Luther and the Mass - Justification and the Joint Declaration - by Daniel Preus". Mtio.com. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  185. ^ Book Of Common Prayer, WM Collins Sons & Co., 1662/1968
  186. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1364–1367 – emphases are in the original Archived January 1, 2015, at the Wayback Machine
  187. ^ Noll, Mark A. (2007). "Ecclesia de Eucharistia: Locus of Doctrine, Way of Life". In Perry, Tim (ed.). The Legacy of John Paul II: An Evangelical Assessment. Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVaristy Press. pp. 118ff., esp. 118-9, 136–7. Retrieved 11 May 2018.
  188. ^ Vow of stability, concordatwatch.eu website
  189. ^ The Smalcald Articles Part III, Article IX. Of Excommunication
  190. ^ New Commentary on the Code of Canon Law By John P. Beal.
  191. ^ New Commentary on the Code of Canon Law by John P. Beal, p. 1553
  192. ^ [https://www.dioslc.org/documents/diocesan-tribunal/articles-1/275-usccb-canon-law-seminar-2010-beal/file Crime and punishment in the catholic church: An overview of possibilities and problems], USCCB Canon Law Seminar, 2010
  193. ^ What does it actually mean for a priest to be ‘laicized’? (Catholic News Agency)
  194. ^ Canon Law: A Comparative Study with Anglo-American Legal Theory by John J. Coughlin, p. 156
  195. ^ Bishops Wring Their Hands at the Whirlwind of Hell by Monica Migliorino Miller, January 29, 2019, Crisis Magazine
  196. ^ Humanities › Religion & Spirituality Excommunication in the Catholic Church
  197. ^ The Revised Code of Canon Law: Some Theological Issues in Theological Studies 47, 4, Dec 01, 1986, Thomas J. Green, p. 644
  198. ^ Soliloquy in a Spanish Cloister, full text on Google Books
  199. ^ Orthodoxy, Even in Our Music by Ralph A. Keifer, p. 17, Pastoral Music, April-May 1981
  200. ^ "Ordinary of the Tridentine Mass, 1962 Edition". Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  201. ^ "Why the Traditional Latin Mass? - The Evils of the New Liturgy". Olrl.org. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  202. ^ Israely, Jeff (2007-07-07). "Why the Pope is Boosting Latin Mass". Time. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  203. ^ [Book Of Common Prayer, 1662/1968, WM. Collins & Sons, Glasgow]
  204. ^ "...one mediator between God and man..." Bible.cc. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  205. ^ Morris, Joan Pahl (2003). What Catholics Believe. ISBN 9781585952632. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  206. ^ "1530 Roman Confutation". bookofconcord.org.
  207. ^ Apology to the Augsburg Confession, Article XXI : Of the Invocation of Saints
  208. ^ "Blessed Art Thou Among Women: The New Debate Over Mary". albertmohler.com. Retrieved 2018-04-27.
  209. ^ Tyler, James Endell (1851). The worship of the Blessed Virgin Mary in the church of Rome. This worship of the Virgin Mary in the Church of Rome may be conveniently examined under the following heads:— First, prayers offered to the Almighty in her name, for her merits, through her mediation, advocacy, and intercession. Secondly, prayers to herself, beseeching her to employ her good offices of intercession with the Eternal Father, and with her Son, in behalf of her petitioners. Thirdly, prayers to her directly for her protection from all evils, spiritual and bodily; for her guidance and aid, and for the influences of her grace. Fourthly, must be added the ascription of divine praises to her, in acknowledgment of her attributes and acts of power, wisdom, goodness, and mercy, and of her exalted state above all the spirits of life and glory in heaven; and for her share in the redemption of the world, and the benefits conferred by her on the individual worshiper.
  210. ^ The Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1370 Archived January 1, 2015, at the Wayback Machine says: "To the offering of Christ are united not only the members still here on earth, but also those already in the glory of heaven. In communion with and commemorating the Blessed Virgin Mary and all the saints, the Church offers the Eucharistic sacrifice. In the Eucharist the Church is as it were at the foot of the cross with Mary, united with the offering and intercession of Christ."
  211. ^ Although the Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1263 Archived June 9, 2011, at the Wayback Machine says that, for everyone, "by Baptism all sins are forgiven, original sin and all personal sins". Catholic doctrine also teaches Mary was preserved free from sins by the privilege granted by God instead: "the most Blessed Virgin Mary, in the first instance of her conception, by a singular grace and privilege granted by Almighty God, in view of the merits of Jesus Christ, the Saviour of the human race, was preserved free from all stain of original sin. (Encyclical Ineffabilis Deus of Pope Pius IX)
  212. ^ The Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1042 says that "after the universal judgment, the righteous will reign for ever with Christ, glorified in body and soul" while Catechism of the Catholic Church, 966 Archived December 14, 2014, at the Wayback Machine says that in the case of Mary she has been beforehand and directly "taken up body and soul into the glory of heaven...anticipating the resurrection" of all other Christians.
  213. ^ The passage explains that she "did not lay aside this saving office but by her manifold intercession continues to bring us the gifts of eternal salvation"
  214. ^ WELS Topical Q&A - Mother of Jesus | Why do you say that Catholics worship Mary?
  215. ^ Paragraph 494, the Catechism of the Catholic Church Archived March 3, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, part of which was quoted by Brug, John Catholicism Today, Forward in Christ, November 1997
  216. ^ Mixed marriages and ‘ne temere’, letter to the Irish Times, Dec 19, 2013
  217. ^ Strange Gods: A Secular History of Conversion by Susan Jacoby
  218. ^ "Vatican Asks Talks on Mixed Marriage". New York Times. 1 May 1970. Retrieved 27 April 2018. The new rules eliminate the requirement that the non-Catholic partner promise to raise the children in the Catholic faith. Instead, they require only that the non-Catholic be informed of his spouse's commitment to bring up the children as Catholics.
  219. ^ "Code of Canon Law – IntraText". Retrieved 7 November 2016.
  220. ^ "CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Mixed Marriage". www.newadvent.org. Retrieved 2018-08-18.
  221. ^ "Second Lateran Council". The Catholic Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2011-11-13.
  222. ^ Rev. Thomas Doyle. "A Very Short History of Clergy Sexual Abuse in the Catholic Church". Retrieved 2011-11-13.
  223. ^ "Archbishop launches married priests movement". World Peace Herald. 2006-07-14. Archived from the original on December 22, 2007. Retrieved 2006-11-16. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  224. ^ "Vatican stands by celibacy ruling". BBC News. 2006-11-16. Retrieved 2006-11-16.
  225. ^ "Australia's Royal Commission into child abuse attacks priestly celibacy". Catholic Herald. 15 December 2017.
  226. ^ "Western People - 2005/11/02: A 'clerical hell' is unveiled in Tuam". web.archive.org. 9 February 2009.
  227. ^ Scheper-Hughes, Nancy; Devine, John (2003). "Priestly Celibacy and Child Sexual Abuse". Sexualities. 6: 15–40. doi:10.1177/1363460703006001003.
  228. ^ Study says almost 50 percent of priests break celibacy vows, Victoria Advocate, 1990
  229. ^ a b "Lent - Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS)". Archived from the original on 2008-01-02. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  230. ^ 1 Timothy 4:1–4
  231. ^ Father William P. Saunders, Straight Answers.
  232. ^ Bainton, Horizon History of Christianity (1964), p. 64
  233. ^ a b Bokenkotter, A Concise History of the Catholic Church Doubleday (2004), p. 54, ISBN 0-385-50584-1
  234. ^ Bainton, Horizon History of Christianity (1964), p. 172
  235. ^ Luther's Works, American Edition, Volume 44, pp.262-264
  236. ^ Statement on Scripture Archived 2010-06-12 at the Wayback Machine by Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod, stating: "We believe and teach that God has given us His Holy Scripture to make us wise unto salvation through faith in Christ Jesus (2 Ti 3:13-17). We therefore confess Scripture to be the only, but all-sufficient foundation of our faith, the source of all our teachings, the norm of our conduct in life, and the infallible authority in all matters with which it deals. Lk 16:29-31; Dt 4:2; 13:1-5; Isa 8:20; Ac 26:22; Jn 10:35."
  237. ^ International Lutheran Federation formed, by Forward in Christ, stating their acceptance of "the Bible as the verbally inspired word of God and submit to it as the only authority in all matters of doctrine, faith, and life"
  238. ^ WELS Topical Q&A: Roman Catholic, stating "Lutherans say the only authority in the church is the Word of God as we have it in the Holy Scriptures. Catholicism says the tradition of the church and the decrees of the pope also are binding authorities in the church."
  239. ^ WELS Topical Q&A: Roman Catholic, stating: "We urge people to set the teachings of the Roman Church side by side with Scripture and to decide for themselves. God's Word is clear. It is the only authority."
  240. ^ What the Bible and Lutherans teach: The Bible, by Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod, stating: "As a result every statement in the Bible is the truth. One part of the Bible explains another part. It is the only guideline for the faith and life of Christians."
  241. ^ "Relationships - Marriage (09) - Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS)". Archived from the original on 2008-01-02. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  242. ^ "Pastor vs. Priest and Celibacy - Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS)". Archived from the original on 2008-01-02. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  243. ^ Benedict XVI, Verbum Domini, 14
  244. ^ Code of Canon Law, can. 823
  245. ^ ACLU and Michigan AG combine forces to tell Catholic adoption agency 'You can't do that' by Nicole Russell, March 26, 2019 04:47 PM
  246. ^ Kansas archbishop responds to criticism over school not enrolling child Mar 19, 2019 by Catholic News Service
  247. ^ Removing Catholic school’s statues may be necessary September 06, 2017, by Dr. Dan Guernsey
  248. ^ Catholic hospital lawsuit Kristine Solomon, Yahoo Lifestyle, March 26, 2019
  249. ^ a b "End Catholic "proselytism," Russian Patriarch demands". Cwnews.com. 2007-08-08. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  250. ^ "CWNews". CWNews. 2001-09-28. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  251. ^ "Asia News". Archived from the original on 2007-12-15. Retrieved 2007-12-17. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  252. ^ Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Doctrinal Note on Some Aspects of Evangelization
  253. ^ "Roman Catholic-Eastern Orthodox Dialogue". Public Broadcasting Service. 2000-07-14. Retrieved 2008-02-16.
  254. ^ Westcott, Kathryn (2007-04-27). "Concerns over Pope's Latin Mass move BBC World". BBC News. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  255. ^ "AJC Seeks Clarification on Latin Mass - AJC: Global Jewish Advocacy Legacy Site". Archived from the original on 2007-08-07. Retrieved 2007-08-07. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  256. ^ "US Jewish leaders call reintroduction of Latin prayer 'retrogression'". Eni.ch. 2008-02-15. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  257. ^ "Complete transcript of Benedict XVI's speech accessed January 7, 2008". London: Guardian. 2006-09-15. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  258. ^ "BBC News". BBC News. 2006-09-14. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  259. ^ "BBC News". BBC News. 2006-09-16. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  260. ^ "News". MSNBC. 2006-09-16. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  261. ^ CNN News Archived October 5, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
  262. ^ "USA Today". USA Today. 2006-09-16. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  263. ^ Benedict XVI, Faith, Reason and the University Memories and Reflections. 12 September 2006 (retrieved 9 February 2019). Regensburg Lecture, Footnote 3.
  264. ^ Noah, Timothy (2006-09-18). "What the Pope Said". Slate Magazine. Retrieved 2019-02-09. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  265. ^ Thinley Norbu. Welcoming Flowers From Across the Cleansed Threshold of Hope: An Answer to the Pope's Criticism of Buddhism (Kindle Locations 34-35). Jewel Pub House.
  266. ^ "Welcoming Flowers from across the Cleansed Threshold of Hope". Shambhala.com. Retrieved 20 January 2018.
  267. ^ "Toward a Threshold of Understanding". Accesstoinsight.org. Retrieved 20 January 2018.
  268. ^ Cowell, Alan (20 January 1995). "Pope, in Sri Lanka, Seeks To Soothe Buddhist Critics". Nytimes.com. Retrieved 20 January 2018.
  269. ^ "Donohue's crusade: tilting at the wrong windmill - Catholic League for Religious and Civil Liberties head William A. Donohue" column by David R. Carlin, Jr., Commonweal, May 23, 1997
  270. ^ Hu, Winnie (1999-11-02). "An Outspoken Church Defender". The New York Times. Retrieved 2011-07-14. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  271. ^ Kavanaugh, John F. (15 December 2008). "Abortion Absolutists". America. Retrieved 2 August 2011.
  272. ^ O'Brien, Dennis (30 May 2005). "No to Abortion: Posture, Not Policy". America. Retrieved 2 August 2011.
  273. ^ Rigali, Norbert J. (23 September 2000). "Words and Contraception". America. Retrieved 2 August 2011.
  274. ^ McCormick, Richard A. (17 July 1993). "'Humanae Vitae' 25 Years Later". America. Retrieved 2 August 2011.
  275. ^ Dulles, Avery (28 September 1968). "Karl Rahner on 'Humanae Vitae'". America. Archived from the original on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 2 August 2011.
  276. ^ Reese, Thomas J. (31 March 2009). "Pope, Condoms and AIDS". On Faith. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 3 April 2009. Retrieved 2 August 2011.
  277. ^ Zagano, Phyllis (17 February 2003). "Catholic Women Deacons". America. Retrieved 2 August 2011.
  278. ^ Martin, James (21 November 2008). "Jesuit General: Liberation Theology "Courageous"". America. Retrieved 2 August 2011.
  279. ^ Martin, James (29 August 2010). "Glenn Beck and Liberation Theology". America. Retrieved 2 August 2011.
  280. ^ Worthen, Molly (15 September 2012). "The Power of Political Communion". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 September 2012.
  281. ^ Thavis, John (8 September 2006). "'Sala Stampa' style change: From toreador to low-key mathematician". Catholic News Service. Archived from the original on 5 October 2009. Retrieved 12 June 2009. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  282. ^ Pennsylvania nuns sue federal agency over natural gas pipeline by Marie Cusick August 3, 2017
  283. ^ Hecker Studies: Essays on the Thought of Isaac Hecker edited by John Farina, 1983, published by The Missionary Society of St. Paul
  284. ^ pp. 100-101 in Rosalind B. Brooke, The Image of St Francis (Cambridge University Press, 2006 ISBN 978-0-521-78291-3)
  285. ^ "6 Catholic Nuns Excommunicated For Heresy", CBS News/AP, 27 September 2007
  286. ^ Mac Donald, Sarah (27 October 2014). "Church 'must tackle House of Prayer'". Irish Independent. Retrieved 27 October 2014.
  287. ^ "Pope Asks Forgiveness for Sins By Catholics Through the Ages". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2007-08-13. Retrieved 2008-01-08. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  288. ^ Beliefnet report on apology. Retrieved March 26, 2008.
  289. ^ The Great Church are those Christians and their leaders that endorsed Chalcedon, (or before Chalcedon, those standing with the great majority in earlier councils). They later divided into the Eastern Orthodox Church and Western Catholic Church.
  290. ^ "Catholic Encyclopedia: Inquisition". Newadvent.org. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  291. ^ "A History of the Inquisition In The Middle Ages. By Henry Charles Lea. Volume 1". Bulfinch.englishatheist.org. Retrieved 2012-07-23.
  292. ^ a b Riley-Smith, Jonathan. The Oxford History of the Crusades New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. ISBN 0-19-285364-3.
  293. ^ a b Riley-Smith, Jonathan. The Atlas of the Crusades New York: Facts on File, 1990. ISBN 0-8160-2186-4.
  294. ^ [ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/scjr/article/download/1800/1688]
  295. ^ Julius, Anthony, Trials of the Diaspora: A History of Anti-Semitism in England Oxford University Press, 2010, p. 564
  296. ^ Paley, Susan and Koesters, Adrian Gibbons, eds. "A Viewer's Guide to Contemporary Passion Plays". Retrieved March 12, 2006. Archived December 1, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
  297. ^ Caroll, Rory (2000-03-13). "Pope says sorry for sins of church". The Guardian. The Guardian. Retrieved January 14, 2013.
  298. ^ BBC News. "Pope issues apology". BBC. Retrieved January 14, 2013.
  299. ^ BBC News. "Pope apologises for Church sins". BBC News. Retrieved January 14, 2013.
  300. ^ Robinson, B A (2000-03-07). "Apologies by Pope John Paul II". Ontario Consultants. Retrieved January 14, 2013.
  301. ^ "Pope Francis asks Waldensian Christians to forgive the Church". Catholic Herald. 22 June 2015. Retrieved 22 June 2015.
  302. ^ Roger Scruton, A Dictionary of Political Thought (Macmillan, 1996), p. 470.
  303. ^ Jansen, p. 67
  304. ^ Jansen, Marius (2000). The Making of Modern Japan. Harvard University Press.
  305. ^ Ian Kershaw; Hitler a Biography; 2008 Edn; W.W. Norton & Company; London; p.261
  306. ^ Ian Kershaw; Hitler a Biography; 2008 Edn; W.W. Norton & Company; London; p.332
  307. ^ Ian Kershaw; Hitler a Biography; 2008 Edn; WW Norton & Company; London; p.281-283
  308. ^ Alan Bullock; Hitler: A Study in Tyranny; HarperPerennial Edition 1991; p146-149
  309. ^ Robert A. Krieg, Catholic Theologians in Nazi Germany, p.6, Continuum, 2004 ISBN 0-8264-1576-8
  310. ^ Ian Kershaw; Hitler a Biography; 2008 Edn; WW Norton & Company; London; p.295
  311. ^ Ian Kershaw; Hitler a Biography; 2008 Edn; W.W. Norton & Company; London; p.290
  312. ^ Ian Kershaw; Hitler a Biography; 2008 Edn; WW Norton & Company; London p.295
  313. ^ "Concordat Watch - Germany".
  314. ^ Paul Preston, The Spanish Civil War, p.222, Harper Perennial, 2006
  315. ^ Plotting Hitlers death:The German Resistance to Hitler 1933-45, Joachim Fest, Phoenix edn. 1997 p.32
  316. ^ Phayer, 2008, p. 42.
  317. ^ "A Pope for the World". BBC. 2005.
  318. ^ Evans, Richard J. (2005). The Third Reich in Power. Penguin Books. p. 272. ISBN 978-1-59420-074-8.
  319. ^ a b c d Ian Kershaw; Hitler a Biography; 2008 Edn; W.W. Norton & Co; London; pp. 381–82
  320. ^ Theodore S. Hamerow; On the Road to the Wolf's Lair - German Resistance to Hitler; Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1997; ISBN 0-674-63680-5; p. 196
  321. ^ Theodore S. Hamerow; On the Road to the Wolf's Lair - German Resistance to Hitler; Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1997; ISBN 0-674-63680-5; p. 136
  322. ^ Theodore S. Hamerow; On the Road to the Wolf's Lair - German Resistance to Hitler; Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1997; ISBN 0-674-63680-5; p. 74
  323. ^ Evans, Richard J. (2008). The Third Reich at War: How the Nazis led Germany from conquest to disaster. London: Penguin. pp. 547–8. ISBN 978-0-14-101548-4.
  324. ^ a b William L. Shirer; The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich; Secker & Warburg; London; 1960; p. 240
  325. ^ Alan Bullock; Hitler: A Study in Tyranny; HarperPerennial Edition 1991; p219
  326. ^
  327. ^ Alan Bullock; Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives; Fontana Press; 1993; pp.412
  328. ^ Ian Kershaw; Hitler a Biography; 2008 Edn; WW Norton & Company; London; p.381-382
  329. ^ Ian Kershaw; Hitler a Biography; W. W. Notron & Co; 2008 Edn; pp.295-297
  330. ^ Fred Taylor Translation pp.304-305
  331. ^ Bonney, Richard (2009). Confronting the Nazi war on Christianity: the Kulturkampf newsletters, 1936-1939 Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang Pub., p. 20.
  332. ^ Lang, Peter (2009). Adolf Hitler: The Definitive Biography. New York: Anchor Books, p. 703.
  333. ^ Fred Taylor Translation; The Goebbels Diaries 1939-41; Hamish Hamilton Ltd; London; 1982; ISBN 0-241-10893-4; p.77
  334. ^ "American Experience . The Man Behind Hitler . Transcript - PBS".
  335. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica Online: Fascism - Identification with Christianity; 2013. Web. 14 Apr. 2013
  336. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica Online - Martin Bormann; web 25 April 2013
  337. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica Online - Alfred Rosenberg; web 25 April 2013.
  338. ^ The Nazi War Against the Catholic Church; National Catholic Welfare Conference; Washington D.C.; 1942
  339. ^ Richard Bonney; Confronting the Nazi War on Christianity: the Kulturkampf Newsletters, 1936–1939; International Academic Publishers; Bern; 2009 ISBN 978-3-03911-904-2; pp. 122
  340. ^ a b c d Cornwell, 1999, p. 252.
  341. ^ Phayer, Michael. 2000. The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930–1965. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. pgs. 34-5
  342. ^ Phayer, Michael. 2000. The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930–1965. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pg. 34-35
  343. ^ Phayer, Michael. 2000. The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930–1965. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pg.38
  344. ^ "Yad Vashem - Request Rejected".
  345. ^ Phayer, Michael. 2000. The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930–1965. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pg. 35
  346. ^ Phayer, Michael. 2000. The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930–1965. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pg.30
  347. ^ Phayer, Michael. 2000. The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930–1965. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pg. 220
  348. ^ Phayer, Michael. 2000. The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930–1965. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press., pg. 226
  349. ^ Phayer, Michael. 2000. The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930–1965. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press., pg. 220
  350. ^ Phayer, Michael. 2000. The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930–1965. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pg. 221
  351. ^ Phayer, Michael. 2000. The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930–1965. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pg.220
  352. ^ Phayer, Michael. 2000. The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930–1965. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pg. 222
  353. ^ "Concordat Watch - Croatia".
  354. ^ Gerhard L. Weinberg, The Foreign Policy of Hitler's Germany: Starting World War II, 1937–1939 (Chicago, 1980), pp. 470–481.
  355. ^ "Notanant on Notanant: - Login page".
  356. ^ Axworthy, Mark (2002). Axis Slovakia. Axis Europa Books. p. 44. ISBN 978-1-89122741-7.
  357. ^ New York Times and Montreal Gazette of 27 October 1939: "Vatican Frowns on Tiso Election As President of the Slovak Republic"
  358. ^ Ward, James Mace (2013). Priest, Politician, Collaborator. Cornell University Press. p. 194. ISBN 978-0-80146812-4.
  359. ^ Joseph Bottum & David G. Dalin, The Pius War, (Lexington Books 2004 ISBN 978-0-73910906-9), p. 271
  360. ^ "Concordat Watch - Slovakia - Texts of Slovak concordats and other Church-state documents".
  361. ^ Mahoney, William M. (2011). The History of the Czech Republic and Slovakia. ABC-CLIO. p. 184. ISBN 978-0-31336305-4.

External links

Skeptical
Apologetic