User:Ras Benjih

Projects  Training Teahouse  Organiza  WP:Football  File:Ras Benjih.jpeg Wiki Only The Best Is Good Enough User Projects Media Links My Help LET THE GOOD TIME JUMP OR LET THE GOOD TIME ROLL Rick Riordan Task Force Alerts Announcements: Current Focus: Got an idea for the project? Edit this template to send out a new announcement! Recent publications: TBA See RickRiordan.com for information on upcoming (currently non-notable) books. Want to help out? Patrol this watchlist for vandalism and potential new members! Add this template to your userpage and receive updates! Just add {{Wikipedia:RRTF/Update}}. ↑ My Info ↓ ♂This contributor to Wikipedia is male. This user is married. This user has a common-law spouse. Fantastic Brain This user can't stop thinking. This user used to be a vegetarian. _ ↑ On Projects ↓ This user is a member of the Women's Football / Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO). This user proudly participates in WikiProject South Africa. This user is a participant in WikiProject Music. This user participates in WikiProject Biography. This user is a participant in WikiProject Video games. This user is a participant in WikiProject Football. This user is a participant in WikiProject Novels. ↑ Userboxes ↓ This user has used the Userbox Maker. This user is a UserBox Factory. ↑ On Sports ↓ This user is a fan of the football club The Brazilians. This user likes the FIFA World Cup CFCThis user is a supporter of CHELSEA ↑ Interests/Likes ↓ This user really enjoys dark and stormy nights. This user is a WWE fan. This userbox can be used to express a preference for various letters of the English alphabet. See the template for more details. This user's favourite animal is the Leopard. ↑ Languages ↓ Babel user information af-1 Hierdie gebruiker het basiese kennis van Afrikaans. xh-1 This user has basic knowledge of isiXhosa. en-2 This user has intermediate knowledge of English. zu-2 Lomsebenzisi unolwazi olungengakanani lwesiZulu. tn-N This user has a native understanding of Setswana. st-N This user has a native understanding of Sesotho. Users by language ↑ About Biographies ↓ Unsourced biographies of living people (BLPs) created after March 18, 2010, can be proposed for deletion using a special proposed deletion process. To place a BLPPROD tag, the process requires that the article contain no sources in any form (as references, external links, etc.), which support any statements made about the person in the biography. Unlike standard proposed deletion, the BLP deletion template may be removed only after the biography contains a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article. If the biography remains unsourced after seven days, the biography may be deleted. The editor who applies the deletion tag to a biography should notify the biography's creator or main contributor. This proposed deletion mechanism is intended to augment, not supersede, other Wikipedia deletion processes or content policies. A common source of confusion in application is the different treatment of presence of sources for placement of the tag, versus removal of the tag. The requirements can be summed up as: Only add a BLPPROD if there are no sources in any form that name the subject, but once (properly) placed, it can only be removed if a reliable source is added. This compromise avoids the need for judgement calls about reliability of sources for placement, and limits that issue to the far fewer instances, at the other end, where a source is actually added during the seven-day period. Scope Although our policy on biographies of living persons covers all types of biographical material, the use of this deletion procedure is intended to apply only to actual biographies of living people. This deletion procedure does not apply to such things as lists of people or biographical information contained in other articles. If there is any doubt to the applicability of this procedure, then it is preferable to use another deletion process. Background Per Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people, all articles are required to include reliable sources for any material about a living person that is contentious. In addition, all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged need a reliable source per our verifiability policy. The more contentious the material, the higher quality the source must be. All improperly sourced articles about living people may be subject to deletion per the standard deletion processes, but in addition, biographies created after March 18, 2010, that do not contain at least one source directly supporting the material may also be proposed for deletion under this new process. Nominating To place a BLPPROD tag, the process requires that the article contain no sources in any form (as references, external links, etc.), which support any statements made about the person in the biography. Please note that this is a different criterion than is used for sources added after the placement of the tag. If you see a biography about a living person without references, you are strongly encouraged to either source or remove any contentious material and look for reliable sources that support the remainder of the biography's content. Nevertheless, a nomination may also be used to involve the article creator or to ensure that a problematic entry is being attended to more swiftly than by tagging it with {{BLP unsourced}}. If, considering all this, you want to use this deletion process, you should: Before nomination: Make sure the article contains no sources in any form, which support any statements made about the person. Consider finding reliable sources yourself (See also WP:BEFORE). Consider using another deletion process if you do not believe the article meets notability guidelines, or What Wikipedia is Not. Also, check to see whether the article meets one of the criteria for speedy deletion, if so, use that instead. Check the biography's history to be sure that it was created after March 18, 2010. Review the biography's history to confirm that it has not been vandalized especially if sources have been removed, and there is no more suitable referenced version to revert to. If the unsourced BLP is wholly negative in tone, do not use this process. Add {{db-g10}} instead to nominate for speedy deletion. If there are any unsourced negative or contentious statements, remove them. Nomination: Add {{subst:prod blp}} to the top of the biography to nominate it. Provide an edit summary that clearly indicates the biography has been proposed for deletion. Do not mark the edit as minor. Consider adding the biography to your watchlist. Consider notifying the biography's creator or other significant contributors by leaving a message at their talk page(s) informing them of the proposed deletion. This can be done by adding the {{subst:PRODwarningBLP|Name of biography}} tag, or other appropriate text. Using Twinkle to tag the article will automatically inform the biography's creator. If there is any doubt to the applicability of this procedure to the article, then it is preferable to use another deletion process. Objecting To be canceled, this process requires the presence of at least one reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the biography. Do not remove the {{prod blp}} until the biography has at least one such source. If a {{prod blp}} has been removed then: if no such source has been provided, the tag may be re-added. When practical, revert to the original expiration date; however, in borderline cases, such as where a source of questionable reliability (rather than an obvious unreliable source) has been added, the biography should be listed instead at Articles for Deletion. if a relevant and reliable source has been provided but you still believe the biography should be deleted, use one of the regular deletion processes. In all cases, consider taking the time to highlight and discuss sourcing policy with interested editors as appropriate. Hybrid articles Sometimes redirects and other articles created before March 18, 2010 will be edited to change their subject to a BLP of a different person. Such articles can be split as follows and the expanded articles may then be subject to this deletion process if their first edit was after March 18, 2010. delete example per {{G6}} restore the newer edits about the new subject and move it to Example (occupation) without creating a redirect restore example as it was before it was altered if Example (occupation) is a new unsourced BLP then either source or tag it with {{blpprod}} explain to the author of the new version what has happened and where their article is now. Deleting and undeleting Before deletion based on this process, administrators should check the biography and its history to confirm that: the {{prod blp}} tag has been in place for at least seven days; no valid sources have been included in the biography or provided on the talk page; there is no suitable previous version to revert to; the biography was created after March 18, 2010. If you decide to delete the biography, provide an informative deletion reason, such as the standard one provided by the software: 'Expired BLPPROD, concern was: Unsourced BLP'. If you are using an automated script, make sure it leaves an adequate log summary. You may also choose to move the biography to the draft space instead, if appropriate. To ensure independent judgment, a biography should not be deleted by the same person who added the {{prod blp}} tag. The biography may be undeleted when an editor is prepared to add a reliable source. The undeletion can be requested through an administrator or at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Upon restoration, the {{prod blp}} template should not be removed, but needs to be replaced or resubstituted to reset the expiration date. Where the request has not gone through requests for undeletion, the admin carrying out the undeletion is expected to check that a reliable source has been added. If you decide not to delete the biography because {{prod blp}} is no longer applicable—that is, a valid source has been provided, or you add one—then you need only remove the {{prod blp}}. If the biography has a source, but is still partially unsourced, consider tagging the biography with {{BLP sources}}. Relationship with other policies and processes Further information: Wikipedia:BLP § Summary deletion, creation prevention, and courtesy blanking This method of proposed deletion is an additional tool to be used in the interests of increasing the quality of BLP sourcing on Wikipedia. Nothing in this policy should be understood to affect the core content policies or existing deletion processes. Whether the BLP is subject to deletion or not, contentious material which is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed from the biography immediately and without prior discussion, in accordance with the BLP policy. {{prod blp}} tagged biographies remain eligible for speedy deletion nomination in the usual way. When tagging a proposed deletion candidate for speedy deletion, the proposed deletion tag should be left in place in case the speedy deletion is rejected. A rejected speedy candidate is still eligible for proposed deletion. The {{prod blp}} tag may be restored if replaced with a speedy deletion tag. Per this section of the BLP policy, badly written BLPs should be stubbified or deleted. Administrators may have to delete pages if the page's primary content is unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material; there is no obvious way to fix it; and there is no previous version of the page that is policy compliant. WikiProject Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons welcomes editors who might help address the backlog of unsourced BLP articles! See also Category:BLP articles proposed for deletion Wikipedia:Database reports/Recently created unreferenced biographies of living people a computer generated list of likely unreferenced BLPs. Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people in which consensus was found for such a process Did you know? ... that in 2023, footballer Funso Ojo was named as Port Vale's PFA community player of the year for his efforts at becoming more environmentally friendly? (14 September 2023) ... that according to sportswriter Jon Henderson, the 1943 Football League War Cup final was "widely regarded as the greatest club football match of the war"? (16 September 2023) ... that Dear England tells the story of how manager Gareth Southgate helped change notions of masculinity for the men's national football team? (17 September 2023) ... that Seattle Sounders FC players held their practices over Zoom during part of their 2020 season? (26 September 2023) ... that tickets on secondary markets for the 2023 Leagues Cup final ranged from $484 to $12,000 within a day of release? (28 September 2023) These extracts from newly created football articles appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page on the date shown. A full archive of all football related entries is maintained on Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Did you know. Goals Write articles: on an overview of football in every country. on women's national teams in every country. on all notable football clubs in every country. on all notable football players in every country. on all notable football stadiums in every country. on all notable football competitions in every country. Improve articles: to make them comply with standards set up here. to make them featured articles eventually. Categorize articles: to make it easy to find what you want to find. Members You can find a list of all Members here. Joining WikiProject Football is easy – just add your username to the bottom of the list. When joining the project, you should watch this page. This allows you to keep up-to-date with discussions about the project on the talk page. Manual of style Guidelines and help pages for writing articles and other contributions. Articles Manual of style for a few common types of article: Club manual of style National team manual of style National association manual of style Competition manual of style League season manual of style Club season manual of style Country season manual of style Match manual of style Player manual of style Stadium manual of style Categories Info on in what category articles should be placed: Category structure Templates Numerous templates exist, how to find them and how to use them: Template list Notability How to know if an article should be on Wikipedia or not: Notability guideline for players (official Wikipedia guideline) Leagues that are fully professional to confer player notability Notability guidelines for clubs (WikiProject guideline) Notability guidelines for leagues (WikiProject guideline) Sources Members of the project have collected a list of sources and links that could be of help to editors wishing to expand articles. The links collection lists all the websites of governing bodies such as FIFA and UEFA. It also contains player databases for all levels of competition, from National level to club level. The booklist lists some of the books that project members own. These members can be contacted for help in sourcing if information from these books is needed. Link collection Booklist Assessment department The assessment department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Association football related articles. The proportion of all articles with an assessed project banner is: 99% assessed (estimate: some more article talk pages may still need a banner)     The proportion of all articles with known importance is: 94.7% known importance (estimate: some more articles may still need a banner)     FIFA national football teams coloured by article class. (13 December 2014) FIFA national women's football teams coloured by class. (25 July 2012) Article statistics Football articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 1 22 52 112 187 FL 4 24 255 283 GA 58 301 585 944 B 17 226 617 738 1,598 C 18 285 2,827 6,081 9,211 Start 5 363 13,885 69,841 2,630 86,724 Stub 31 33,369 157,898 16,882 208,180 List 3 17 288 8,108 93 8,509 Category 85,143 85,143 Disambig 160 160 File 16,747 16,747 Portal 458 458 Project 283 283 Redirect 2 1,967 4,819 6,788 Template 23,473 23,473 Other 17 486 503 Assessed 44 1,006 51,365 245,602 131,569 19,605 449,191 Unassessed 9 4,569 4,578 Total 44 1,006 51,365 245,611 131,569 24,174 453,769 See also: Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Football articles by quality log Open tasks New articles For a list of recently created football articles, see: New articles Requested articles Follow this link to go to the specific section of Wikipedia:Requested articles that lists the requested articles for football. Articles currently under a review This section lists those articles that are currently undergoing Peer review or are currently featured content candidates. Current good article candidates can be found on the good article candidates page under the Sports subheading. Current featured content candidates Article Status Peer Review FAC/FLC Bootham Crescent Current FAC FAC List of Central Coast Mariners FC players Current FLC FLC Scotland national football team 1920–39 results Current FLC FLC List of international goals scored by Bobby Charlton Current FLC FLC List of international goals scored by Miroslav Klose Current FLC FLC List of international goals scored by Thierry Henry Current FLC FLC Current good article candidates Article Status Peer Review GAN Broadhurst Park Current GAN GAN Zesh Rehman Current GAN GAN Nea Salamis Famagusta Current GAN GAN 1984 European Super Cup Current GAN GAN Nikola Žigić Current GAN GAN 1979 FA Charity Shield Current GAN GAN RB Leipzig Current GAN GAN 2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season Current GAN GAN Michael Chopra Current GAN GAN Darren O'Dea Current GAN GAN Jesé Current GAN GAN Pittsburgh Riverhounds Current GAN GAN Bicycle kick Current GAN GAN Serdar Tasci Current GAN GAN 2015 FA Community Shield Current GAN GAN 1995 Football League Cup Final Current GAN GAN Bosnia and Herzegovina national football team Current GAN GAN Ajax 5–1 Liverpool (1966) Current GAN GAN Battle of the Buffet Current GAN GAN Articles currently undergoing peer review Article Status Peer Review FAC/FLC S.L. Benfica in European football Current PR PR Harry Kane Current PR PR

Dual Licenser Copyright Work Copyrighted work by Emol4Life Designs Copyright Registration Registration date: September 06, 2015 - 01:44 PM Copyright number: TOZW-ZW7R-PSJV-DUNV Fingerprint: 6092a8cfff726c5ee4b3188e2d74925 0c923a033bee324c84bb67e88d17f1ae6 Title: Ras Benjih Description: Ras Benjih at home Category: Photograph Copyright seal <a target="_blank" href="http://www.copyrighted.com/copyrights/view/tozw-zw7r-psjv-dunv"><img border="0" alt="Copyrighted.com Registered & Protected TOZW-ZW7R-PSJV-DUNV" title="Copyrighted.com Registered & Protected TOZW-ZW7R-PSJV-DUNV" width="150" height="40" src="http://static.copyrighted.com/images/seal.gif" /></a> Images from Lakes Gallery 12 Hury Reservoir Blackton Reservoir Rabbit Lake Ashford Reservoir Reggae Legends Joseph Hill in 2000) Joseph Hill, Jamaican Festival Wikipedia:Userboxes/New Userboxes Wiki Links Licencing The Wikipedia Adventure An interactive online tutorial/game to make an editor's first 100 edits a positive experience. The Wikipedia Adventure Badges

External Links

http://myaccount.google.com http://www.copyrighted.com/copyrights/view/tozw-zw7r-psjv-dunvtozw-zw7r-psjv-dunv

http://static.copyrighted.com/images/seal.gif

Training for Students complete!

Training for Students complete!