Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Salvaged request
→‎Oxford Media and Business School: Done: AfC submission deleted under CSD G13. Please remember to submit the draft for review. (using responseHelper)
Line 561: Line 561:
*{{revisions|Draft:Oxford Media and Business School}}
*{{revisions|Draft:Oxford Media and Business School}}
[[User:Everythingyouknow|Everythingyouknow]] ([[User talk:Everythingyouknow|talk]]) 09:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
[[User:Everythingyouknow|Everythingyouknow]] ([[User talk:Everythingyouknow|talk]]) 09:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
*<!-- Begin Template:UND -->[[File:Yes check.svg|18px]] '''Done''' – as an [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]] (AfC) submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]], the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says {{button|Submit your draft for review!}}.<!-- End Template:UND - afc-ns --> [[User:kingboyk|kingboyk]] ([[User talk:Kingboyk|talk]]) 11:34, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:34, 27 August 2019

"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.
    Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
    Shortcuts

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

    This page is only for requesting undeletion of pages and files which have already been deleted. If the page you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that pages deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G4, G5, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

    Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

    Instructions for special cases
    float
    float
    float
    float
    Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

    Deletion discussions
    Articles
    Templates and modules
    Files
    Categories
    Redirects
    Miscellany
    Speedy deletion
    Proposed deletion


    Draft:Acellus Academy

    I, Tigereye7, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tigereye7 (talk) 21:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    I think this would have qualified for speedy deletion as blatant advertising in addition to G13, but I don't object if someone else wants to restore it. Hut 8.5 15:11, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree that the page needs a lot of work regarding the tone and references but based on available references its accreditation, I think it is significant. Please move it back to draft so it can be worked on and, if appropriate, resubmitted for review. Thank you. --Tigereye7 (talk) 16:24, 19 August 2019 (UTC)  [reply]
    Hmm. User:Tigereye7, this article was tagged for G11 deletion (courtesy ping to User:DGG), but the deleting admin User:RHaworth deleted it as G13 which is refundable (although I note that the draft had not been abandoned for 6 months).
    I think that, given your belief that the institution is notable and your assurances that you will work on it, the right thing to do in this venue is to restore the draft. This decision explicitly does not preclude another user (including DGG) from re-tagging it for speedy deletion. If that happens, and an admin chooses to delete it under a non-refundable criterion, the issue will have to be raised at WP:DRV instead. --kingboyk (talk) 17:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --kingboyk (talk) 17:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Jeans Explosion

    Image has been published on Flikr under a share-alike 2.0 license. See https://www.flickr.com/photos/34161233@N03/25002440847/ —Blue windy muso (talk) 15:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Blue windy muso: according to your link the image dates from 1970. Unless the person who uploaded it to Flikr is the original copyright holder (from 1970) then the fact somebody uploaded a photo of it to Flikr in 2011 and tagged it with a free licence means nothing, because the copyright will still be with the person who created the work originally. Which means we can't use it here. Hut 8.5 21:09, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done --kingboyk (talk) 17:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Cannabis Now

    I, Hathj, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hathj (talk) 22:14, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Sogan Kokou

    I, Das osmnezz, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Das osmnezz (talk) 04:00, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Eric Solis

    I have reviewed the claim made that this page violates G11 which notes that "If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced with text written from a neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion."

    I do not believe the page uses promotional language. If this is the case, I would like to see an example of this language and would be happy to revise. Also, the page primarily uses citations from recognized media sources.

    Additionally, the subject is notable, with multiple patents and industry recognition. The administrator who conducted the deletion seems to have a proclivity for Speedy Deletion, which is very troubling. If we want to have a discussion about improving this page, I believe that would be a more appropriate route rather than speedy deletion. —GhostDust (talk) 06:19, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:25, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Now done – restored to draft: Eric Solis. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:36, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Vincent_J.Derudder

    I, Fecif official, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fecif official (talk) 07:54, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:StudioRed

    I, Christianbourgeois, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Christianbourgeois (talk) 15:46, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Pimpflurry

    Pearllycan Lindokuhle Shiba (born September 10, 1995),[2] better known as Pimpflurry , is a South African Rapper, singer, songwriter, and record producer. Based in Mpumalanga, South Africa. He is independent, He release music under his own record label " black panther supreme records" which falls under Pimpflurry (Pty ) Ltd, subsequently releasing a series of singles, including " Watch Me ", "why you on your feelings ", " Life Problems & " Going Gold ". He recently shared a stage alongside with Seawater aLasea who is based in manzini, Swaziland. This pair shared a stage on " Epic Gig episode II eSwatini " with Buffalo Souljah, kwesta, mlindo the vocalist and many more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LindokuhleShiba (talk • contribs) 15:48, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    im his publisher and we are closely related. He is a legitimate musician. I have all his information from biography,press kit, company registration and all and then click the "Publish changes" button below —LindokuhleShiba (talk) 15:52, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    @LindokuhleShiba: First off, you are obligated to disclose this relationship formally. Second, we can't cite anything from his press kit, a biography written at his direction, or government documents (such as business registrars). Third, every claim made about a living person MUST be backed up by a strong third-party source or else it must be deleted. Fourth, the existing draft is borderline promotional. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 21:32, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @LindokuhleShiba: there is literally no content in the deleted version of the draft, just the notice marking it as a draft, so there is nothing to restore. Given what you said above I strongly recommend you read WP:COI before making any further edits on this topic. Hut 8.5 21:30, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done and recreation deleted under criterion WP:CSD#G11. --kingboyk (talk) 17:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Günther Scheel.jpg

    File was deleted as F5 "Unused non-free media file" when article Günther Scheel was redirected, now restored and expanded so would be good to get image restored as well. Cheers —MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:24, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Jay Schneiderman

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —65.51.179.193 (talk) 20:08, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    This page deletion was recent and discovered when an attempt was made to update the article content with recent material of regional significance, as well as the addition of a significant number of reliable, independent, and secondary sources. This would include the replacement for the primary source hyperlink that has since be deactivated and cited as evidence for the proposed deletion.

    More specifically, material will be submitted that will easily demonstrate that the article subject is a "major local political figure who has received significant press coverage" and who "meets the general notability guideline" of Wikipedia.

    Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 21:33, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Schneiderman, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, RL0919 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --kingboyk (talk) 18:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Rick Zbur

    I intend to work on the page. —Sgarrettpate (talk) 21:25, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Formal criteria for adjoint functors

    G13; it’s a notable topic that I understand is not covered in main space. —Taku (talk) 22:54, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    This would be the third time it'll have been restored as a G13. The last two restorations resulted in deletion 6 months later. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 22:59, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:SaberZ

    I, Joseefitness, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Joseefitness (talk) 01:57, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    March 2019 Seattle Shooting Spree

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Cbsallaccess (talk) 02:47, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Karen Kornienko

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Dohiarmon (talk) 06:57, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Draft:Karen Kornienko[reply]

    Draft:Sad Songs & Waltzes

    I, Amucomm, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Amucomm (talk) 10:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Alba_Orbital

    This page should not have been deleted as there was no valid reason to delete. The company is still active and is growing significantly to become a major player in the global space industry —185.7.228.154 (talk) 12:15, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Finland–North Korea relations

    I, Finnusertop, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:28, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Tom_Walkinshaw_(entrepreneur)

    Person is notable so should not have been deleted. See recent articles in Scotsman newspaper https://www.scotsman.com/heritage/scottish-firm-s-little-known-role-in-helping-apollo-11-astronauts-find-a-new-frontier-1-4968315, The National Newspaper https://www.thenational.scot/news/17551624.scottish-satellite-firm-plans-second-pocketqube-launch-mission/, BBC https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-44194126, Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/callyrussell/2019/03/06/glasgow-from-ships-to-the-space-race/ —185.7.228.154 (talk) 14:12, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    In the case of your speedy deletion situation you should consult the deleter who is RHaworth, a person who is likely to respond. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:29, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. --kingboyk (talk) 16:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Analysys Mason

    I, ACMoerman, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ACMoerman (talk) 19:16, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Gubernatorial lines of succession in the United States

    I, Nevermore27, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nevermore27 (talk) 20:19, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Allen Forrest

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —TheRealAllenForrest (talk) 23:10, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    I’ve been featured in Billboard Magazine, Vogue, Yahoo.com, Tidal, Nationally on iHeart Radio, Millions of streams, regional hits.

    I can provide whatever information is needed.

    Not done. You failed to specify which article you wish to see restored. SoWhy 16:02, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Blocked (WP:NOTHERE). Evidently this relates to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Forrest (2nd nomination). Both the article and the AFD appear to have been frequented by sockpuppets, and User:TheRealAllenForrest's only contributions since 2015 have been advocating for retention of the article about him. I've also soft blocked the possibly related account User:ForrestGroup because of a username violation. --kingboyk (talk) 15:48, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Joseph Ngozi Nkoro

    to continue with editing and uploading of the profile —Capt Jack Sparrow (talk) 08:14, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. SoWhy 16:04, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Benizelos.jpg

    Originally tagged as fair use and then deleted, but in fact is PD: it was published in Halsey, Francis W. (ed.), Literary Digest History of the World War, Volume 1, 1919, p. 195, thus PD-US or PD-70 (soon PD-100). — geraki (talk) 08:20, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Done. @Geraki: Please add the necessary information to the image and consider transferring it to Wikimedia Commons. Regards SoWhy 16:06, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Zuurberg

    I, Muonmo, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Muonmo (talk) 08:39, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



    I do wish to work on a way to show that "it's independently notable", as suggested by StraussInTheHouse, but I need a bit more time for this please. —Muonmo (talk) 08:44, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. SoWhy 16:07, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Young Professionals Forum

    I, Saxfreak01, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Saxfreak01 (talk) 11:35, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. SoWhy 16:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Abdul Kadar Khatri

    The page Abdul Kadar Khatri should moved to the Draftspace because i am wanna going to work on it, and i have strong references of the article as it shows notability. —Hamidkhatri

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. SoWhy 16:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Walid Al-Kuwatli

    I, Writer9324, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Writer9324 (talk) 13:57, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. SoWhy 16:14, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


    Mark Poloncarz

    Article was deleted without any warning or consideration of the references provided. User (Bearcat) claims the article was completely unreferenced, which was not the case. At the very least, could you grant me access to the original article to ensure all references were properly in place? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davebojo8 (talk • contribs) 14:57, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Poloncarz, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, 78.26 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. SoWhy 16:10, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Cheadle_Hulme_Cricket_Club

    I, 23AlexR, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 23AlexR (talk) 15:12, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. SoWhy 16:13, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    ODers

    Article was deleted and should be recreated as it related to Roblox —64.222.180.90 (talk) 15:47, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. SoWhy 16:19, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    RiSE Festival

    I want to request to have this page undeleted because it was not advertising and written from an unbiased perspective. I made sure that I cited many things from accurate and reliable sources. My page was deleted under this heading: R2: Cross-namespace redirect. I'm not sure what that means because I'm fairly new to Wikipedia but if told, I'm sure I can fix it once the page is undeleted —Brookecyrobin (talk) 15:53, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. SoWhy 16:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Jamaica men's national ice hockey team

    I, AaronWikia, request the undeletion of this page as a redirect deleted under CSD G7. Please restore the redirect to Jamaica men's national junior ice hockey team as I intend to work on it. —AaronWikia (talk) 15:58, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Done. SoWhy 16:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    QTest

    may I have the previous deletion discussion please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shevonsilva (talk • contribs)

    Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QTest. Hut 8.5 20:29, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    File:University of Oxford.svg

    Deleted under F5 after an IP removed it, the disruptive edits were not properly reverted to restore the file —Aloneinthewild (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Schazjmd/Anne Emery (romance novelist)

    Author-requested deletion; I've found the additional resources that I need and would like to continue working on it. —Schazjmd (talk) 00:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleyaman

    The page meets the WP:MUSICBIO criteria, especially the 1st and 2nd points, also the 7th and 11th. Most reliable references were provided which were in French. —HovhannesKarapetyan (talk) 11:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Bori! 20:34, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G4. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:30, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Jessica Yaniv waxing case

    Good afternoon - I would like a copy of this deleted article in userspace or by email so that I can continue working on it. It was deleted at AfD and that deletion was endorsed at DRV, primarily based on WP:NOTNEWS. This is a court case that has been argued but a decision has not yet been handed down by the court. I would like to improve the article, integrate the court's decision (when released), and then attempt to restore as per WP:DELETE when the concerns expressed at AfD/DRV have been fully addressed. Please note that I am not requesting restoration of the page. Cosmic Sans (talk) 18:18, 23 August 2019 (UTC) —Cosmic Sans (talk) 18:18, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    @Graeme Bartlett: - Thank you for the help! I had an email on my account, but it was unverified. I just verified it, so everything should be in order. Thanks again! Cosmic Sans (talk) 12:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
     Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:33, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Portal:New York City/Wikiprojects

    Got carried away w/ subpage deletions. Need that. —Mark Schierbecker (talk) 19:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Portal:New York City/Other projects

    Got carried away w/ subpage deletions. Need that. —Mark Schierbecker (talk) 19:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Hyper Panda

    Restore previous revisions and redirect it to Panda Retail Company —37.124.60.52 (talk) 19:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    List of top 10 singles in 1984 (Australia)

    deleted by mistake —1997 mht (talk) 07:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Done --kingboyk (talk) 12:13, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Zhilik

    Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.This article was delated by mistake. —ZANITAAHMEDZHILIK (talk) 13:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial.
    User:ZANITAAHMEDZHILIK You were already informed that we wouldn't undelete on 3rd August. Please don't ask for a refund again or you will be blocked for disruption. You were given good advice on 3rd August - please follow it. --kingboyk (talk) 15:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:The Treble (band)

    I, Mbmusicfan, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mbmusicfan (talk) 13:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. --kingboyk (talk) 15:31, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:India_Islamic_Cultural_Centre

    I, Rashid Jorvee, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jorvee 14:54, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --kingboyk (talk) 15:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    File:1917.mp3

    Speech of Eleftherios Venizelos in 1917, it is PD-70. I cannot find the file in the deletion log (maybe it was deleted before mediawiki had a deletion log?) but I am sure about the filename as I had included it in this edit and it stayed there for more than two and half years (removed in this edit). — geraki (talk) 16:15, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Geraki: There's no actual deleted file at that title, only a description page which says "Eleftherios Venizelos speech to the Greek people in 1917." The present system of logging deletions (and I think deleted content) was only introduced in late 2004, which is why there's nothing in the deletion log and I think why there's no file there. Possibly someone at WP:VPT might have an idea of how to get it back. Hut 8.5 16:28, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not entirely sure, but my vague recollection is that at one point a deleted file was immediately deleted from the disk (files are stored directly on disk; their description pages are stored in the database just like any other wiki page). The release notes for Mediawiki 1.7.0 say "Deleted files can now be archived and undeleted, if you set up an appropriate non-web-accessible directory. Set $wgSaveDeletedFiles on and an appropriate directory path in $wgFileStore['deleted']['directory']". 1.7.0 was released in July 6, 2006. I second the suggestion of asking at WP:VPT but I suspect you might be out of luck - hopefully I'm wrong though. --kingboyk (talk) 16:41, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    @Hut 8.5 and Kingboyk:, if there is deleted description page when it was deleted? - geraki (talk) 16:48, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Good question! (because the answer is potentially quite revealing) -
    Deletion log: No matching items in log.
    Page history: 15:36, 30 September 2003 . . Geraki (talk | contribs | block) 57 bytes (Eleftherios Venizelos speech to the Greek people in 1917.)
    --kingboyk (talk) 16:58, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    (edit conflict)Don't know, the description page doesn't give any clue as to when it was deleted and there's nothing in the logs (it may well have been deleted before Mediawiki properly logged file deletions). There is only one deleted revision of the description page, by you on 30 September 2003. Hut 8.5 17:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Guanaco (talk · contribs) converted that file to Special:Undelete/File:1917.ogg, which was itself deleted, though this one left a recoverable file. Deleted at XfD this thing I had to turn into an external link because that subject line does not get along with wikilinks. Deleted as OR/AB, not sure what the AB means or how OR applies. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:24, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    I restored File:1917.ogg. I note that according to the Cornell copyright chart, assuming this was broadcast at the time it was made, and no special provisions apply, it becomes public domain in the United States on January 1, 2022, so please either provide a convincing argument it is actually PD, or make it comply with NFCC, or request it be deleted again. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:33, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Done. That was fun! --kingboyk (talk) 11:05, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    File:DLTSGDOM - George Michael - Elton John.jpg

    I re-categorized the file as free in the UK and the US, so previous revisions must be restored. I plan to transfer it to Commons soon. —George Ho (talk) 20:04, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

     Done — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Scarlet Aura

    I, DrTES, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DrTES 21:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

    I restored this for you earlier this year @DrTES:, what are you planning to do this time? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:15, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    @Graeme Bartlett: The band has gained much more visibility lately, they have features in printed magazines. I will work on finalizing the article about them

    list of people by countries visited

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Colinedwardrice (talk) 21:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC) This wiki page provided a placeholder for world travelers or budding world travelers to find links to inspirational stories and articles on the most traveled humans in history and to benchmark their own progress against famous people such as Hilary Clinton or the Queen of England. The only alternatives are clubs such as Traveler's Century Club which impose their own rule books to the detriment of debate and alternative benchmarks. Citing wikipage deletion based on a lack of a precise definition of travel criteria or a finite list of travelers is illogical- by that definition, Africa would be deleted in the 19th century because the interior had not been mapped or explored. Providing a focal point for travelers allowed the topic to be clarified and evolved by like-minded people.[reply]

    That isn't what Wikipedia is for. You're better off having this on a personal blog. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Fram was railroaded! 21:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    And while we're here, Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Fram was railroaded! 22:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people by number of countries visited, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, RL0919 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:09, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    David Berry (American musician)

    Saw a review for the guy in Prog Magazine and seems to have a following and a robust catalog of music. Not sure why still listed in index but no article? —71.99.131.3 (talk) 14:54, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    The article was nominated for deletion but the sole author requested speedy deletion before that process was complete. It is refundable, but it looks like it might need a bit of a work. Will you work on the article if it is undeleted? --kingboyk (talk) 17:46, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Degeneration (algebraic geometry)

    G13; an important topic not covered in mainspace —Taku (talk) 03:13, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Genus of a group

    G13; I don’t know if this is already covered or not but I and the other editors need to see the content to determine that —Taku (talk) 03:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Walks on ordinals

    G13; I don’t know if this draft is needed but the discussion is needed as opposed to the silent deletion —Taku (talk) 03:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:H-maxima transform

    G13; The discussion on whether this draft is needed is needed —Taku (talk) 03:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Writing, History, Art, and Music (WHAM)

    G13; not sure about the notability (so better to keep it for now) —Taku (talk) 03:27, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Clement Slue Tally

    I, Menyea, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Menyea (talk) 11:19, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. --kingboyk (talk) 14:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Intouch Solutions

    I, Jbrown3423, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jbrown3423 (talk) 11:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intouch Solutions, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Black Kite (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --kingboyk (talk) 14:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Karen people in the United States

    I, Inter&anthro, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Inter&anthro (talk) 15:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    • My apologies, I was planning to finish up working on the article and move it to the mainspace once the text was properly fleshed out, but I got side tracked with other things inside and outside of Wikipedia and left the draft on the back burner for too long. Inter&anthro (talk) 15:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    User:Inter&anthro No problem at all, these things happen - and it looks like the article will be worth waiting for!
    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. --kingboyk (talk) 15:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Angel Angelov (engineer)

    I, 160.36.191.9, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 160.36.191.9 (talk) 16:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --kingboyk (talk) 16:44, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Oliver Maloba

    Reference links added to the page —Tipkorir (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    This page has not yet been deleted. Please see WP:PROD for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 17:51, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Coming to America 2

    This was a redirect. Its former target page prior to its WP:G8 deletion, Coming 2 America, exists again. —Steel1943 (talk) 17:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Done~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 17:49, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Carolyn Lee Jones

    I, Rmhadsell, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rmhadsell (talk) 18:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --kingboyk (talk) 18:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Mekzholan/CometVisu

    I, Mekzholan, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mekzholan (talk) 20:17, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    My feedback to my prior request was not followed up as can be read at Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_342#User:Mekzholan/CometVisu

    Of course, any help to make it finally fit to move it to the main namespace would also be appreciated :) --Mekzholan (talk) 20:17, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Reply pending. --kingboyk (talk) 20:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Unless there are significantly better references available providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements I see no point in undeletion. DGG ( talk ) 20:55, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Right. My reply was going to be lengthy, hence the placeholder. I don't support undeletion either, unless I'm presented with some convincing new facts. --kingboyk (talk) 21:12, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done The draft (which I have moved back to Draft:CometVisu by the way) has been "in progress" since 2015, and has been declined 3 times and refunded twice. Furthermore, according to your user page you have a conflict of interest which you have apparently not declared to the AFC reviewers. Indeed, whilst I always try to assume good faith, I'd have to question whether you are here to build an encyclopedia at all if not for some minor edits in 2015.
    At Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_342#User:Mekzholan/CometVisu you wrote: "as I'm not a professional full time Wikipedia author I can only work on it from time to time".
    I'm sorry to have to point this out, but the fact that it is down to you to write about the software and that 4 years after starting the draft it has got nowhere, because nobody else without a conflict of interest has stepped up to write about it, ought to tell you something. I strongly suggest you let this go; if your software is notable then it will receive extensive coverage in reliable sources and other (not professional, not full time, but volunteer!) editors will at some point surely write about it. --kingboyk (talk) 21:12, 26 August 2019 (UTC) (e/c)[reply]

    Jaime Jara

    We never asked for the page to be reviewed or deleted, it was deleted without any notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.71.249.233 (talk) 21:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    (Non-administrator comment) Who is "we"? --Finngall talk 21:42, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    The logs show otherwise. It was nominated for deletion (i.e., somebody requested it to be deleted), and it was deleted at the conclusion of that discussion...in 2013.
    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaime Jara, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, The Bushranger (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.—C.Fred (talk) 21:49, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Faizullah_Arain

    Took a deep look before editing this article as he a notable celebrity, its not converting advertising, someone deleted this page for harming his reputation or mistakenly . Kindly take a look at this and restore it —Davidvoki (talk) 21:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    @Davidvoki: The most recent deletion of this page was at the author's request. That said, the most recent version of this page was moved to Draft:Faizullah Arain. Please work on it there and submit after it meets standards. —C.Fred (talk) 22:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Davidvoki - Are you a paid editor and/or do you have any conflict of interest to declare? --kingboyk (talk) 22:13, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Kingboyk: No I am not the paid editor, I am wikipedia contributor, Although I found this topic interesting and eligible so I wrote article about him, aswell I am the author of it and its ready for mainspace.
    OK, Davidvoki, thank you for the reply. As you should now be aware, the draft is at Draft:Faizullah Arain. I have submitted it for review, on your behalf. You will need to wait for a reviewer and this may take some weeks. That gives you plenty of time to finish off any loose ends! If you have any further questions, please ask at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk and not here, as here we only deal with deleted content. --kingboyk (talk) 01:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    @C.Fred: Author requested the deletion before under R2 long time ago and that issue was fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidvoki (talk • contribs) 00:03, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    @Davidvoki: Oh, yeah, I see where that was restored. At any rate, the article has been moved to draft space, and this is not the place to request review of an article for a move to mainspace. Please work on the draft and submit it when it's ready. —C.Fred (talk) 00:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Done Article is in draft space and awaits AfC review. --kingboyk (talk) 01:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Breaking Mysterious

    I just want to request WP:Userfication of this deleted article, so that I can have more time to establish notability. —Ghostofnemo (talk) 02:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Ghostofnemo/Breaking Mysterious. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Sandstein (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. --kingboyk (talk) 02:54, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Humaira Farin Khan

    Please restore this page as I intend to work on it. —ChotoBhai (talk) 06:32, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Oxford Media and Business School

    Everythingyouknow (talk) 09:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=912711402"