Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 1,270: Line 1,270:
:*[[Image:Symbol confirmed.svg|18px]] It is sourced to ''The Fighting Ships of the Rising Sun'' by Howarth. The word Kamikaze is sourced to the dictionary. Length is good. Time is good. <small style="background:#ccc;border:#000 1px solid;padding:0 3px 1px 4px;white-space:nowrap;">[[User:sp|<font color="#000">spryde</font>]] | [[User_talk:sp|<font color="#000">talk</font>]]</small> 00:06, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
:*[[Image:Symbol confirmed.svg|18px]] It is sourced to ''The Fighting Ships of the Rising Sun'' by Howarth. The word Kamikaze is sourced to the dictionary. Length is good. Time is good. <small style="background:#ccc;border:#000 1px solid;padding:0 3px 1px 4px;white-space:nowrap;">[[User:sp|<font color="#000">spryde</font>]] | [[User_talk:sp|<font color="#000">talk</font>]]</small> 00:06, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
::*I took the liberty of italicizing the ship name for you. [[User:Manxruler|Manxruler]] ([[User talk:Manxruler|talk]]) 01:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
::*I took the liberty of italicizing the ship name for you. [[User:Manxruler|Manxruler]] ([[User talk:Manxruler|talk]]) 01:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
: After more than 20 years, what do you expect? --[[Special:Contributions/74.14.21.155|74.14.21.155]] ([[User talk:74.14.21.155|talk]]) 20:34, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
{{-}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line.-->
{{-}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line.-->



Revision as of 20:34, 24 January 2009

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page.

Instructions

Using a DYK suggestion string (see below examples), list new suggestions in the candidate entries section below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged. Thanks for participating and please remember to check back for comments on your nomination.

DYK criteria

Official criteria: DYK rules and additional guidelines

Sample DYK suggestion strings

Please use one of the strings below to post your DYK nomination, using the "author" and "nominator" fields to identify the users who should receive credit for their contributions if the hook is featured on the main page.

  1. Nom without image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= }}
  2. Nom with image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= | image= | caption= }}
    To include more than one new or expanded article in a single hook: |article2= |article3= |article4= | (etc)
    To include more than one author: |author2= |author3= | (etc)
    To include alternate hooks: |ALT1= |ALT2= | (etc)
    To add a comment: |comment=
    To add the article you reviewed: |reviewed=

Do not wikilink the article title, or the author username field; the template will wikilink them automatically. Do wikilink the article title in the hook field, however.
Do not add a section heading if you are using the template; the template will add one for you.
Do not include a signature (~~~~) after the template.
Do not use non-free images in your hook suggestion.

An example of how to use the template is given below:

{{subst:DYKsug
 | article   = Example
 | hook      = ... that this [[article]] is an '''[[example]]''' ''(pictured)''?
 | creator   = Jimbo Wales
 | expander  = 
 | nominator =
 | image     = Example.png
 | comment   =
}}
  • Note that you should only use one of the above templates for the original hook. If you want to suggest a second, alternative hook for the same article submission, just type it in manually. The above templates output useful code for each submission and if you employ them for alternative hooks, you will mess up the page formatting.
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|November 18}} Thanks, ~~~~

Symbols

If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:

Symbol Code DYK Ready? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe DYK eligibility requires additional work. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Please consider using {{subst:DYKproblem}} on the user's talk page, in case they do not notice if there is an issue.

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Where is my hook?

If you can't find the hook you submitted to this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is in the queue for display on the main page. You can check whether your hook has been moved to the queue by reviewing the queue listings.

If your hook is not in the queue or already on the main page, it has probably been deleted. Deletion occurs if the hook is more than about eight days old and has unresolved issues for which any discussion has gone stale. If you think your hook has been unfairly deleted, you can query its deletion on the discussion page, but as a general rule deleted hooks will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on January 24

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:47, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:17, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:15, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:15, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:44, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:10, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:05, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on January 23

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:49, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:29, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 10:33, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:12, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:02, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:47, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:18, 24 January 2009 (UTC)



Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:37, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:47, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:27, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:56, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:55, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:23, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 19:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:38, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:27, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:10, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:36, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 12:11, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on January 22

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:06, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Though User:69.255.118.198's edits didn't vastly increase the page's size, s/he put in substantial copyediting and citation adding work to make this a decent article, and deserves recognition if the hook makes the main page. Hope I've credited appropriately in the template. Gonzonoir (talk) 22:30, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)



Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:53, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Before anyone complains about the "length delta", go back in the article history to the last major version - it consists entirely of text copy and pasted from another source. The current version is completely new, in spite of the original being created recently. Maury Markowitz (talk) 01:53, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The expansion is enough, but it isn't because "the last major version ... consists entirely of text copy and pasted from another source" (see Additional Rule A4). It's because that version consists mainly of a block quote, which isn't considered "prose" requiring expansion (Additional Rule A2), a list, and references, which also aren't "prose" (WP:DYK#Selection criteria 2.) Art LaPella (talk) 05:22, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, I didn't know about that particular rule. That's a garbage rule that should be thrown out. Tempshill (talk) 19:42, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia talk:Did you know is the place to debate the rules. Art LaPella (talk) 20:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:36, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:13, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Currently on the market? Fine for a new article: I agree that it's not so good for the Main Page.--Wetman (talk) 02:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But it still meets DYK requirement. Alientraveller (talk) 10:32, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What happened to the "No Ads" clause in the Unwritten Rules? --74.14.21.155 (talk) 20:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 12:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 10:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on January 21

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:48, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

After more than 20 years, what do you expect? --74.14.21.155 (talk) 20:34, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:23, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

I wish I could tell you, I can't find anything that says what her race was, but I can find numerous sources that say "of color." I found one picture that claims to be of her, if it is, then I would have to guess Native American or Hispanic, but the page the picture is on would not be considered to be reliable.---Balloonman PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 18:27, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1: ... that the 2005 World Series of Poker Ladies Champion was nominated for an Academy Award in 1994?---Balloonman PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 18:27, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Might as well link to Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress. Don't give it away with a link to the film, though. :) --74.14.17.102 (talk) 19:36, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, you could list the film... the person who won the Best Supporting Actress was in the same film ;0---Balloonman PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 19:52, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2: ... that a 1994 Academy Award nominee won the 2005 World Series of Poker Ladies Championship and is known to poker players as the Unibombshell?---Balloonman PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 18:27, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:38, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:28, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

  • This article is totally based on primary sources (information from the Port authorities in the Tokyo Government). Wikipedia is based on the principles of mostly using secondary sources removed from the subject (WP:V). This should be so especially for information that could be contested such as claims of being the first as per this case. A search on Google books, bring up independent sources such as these, that should be used to build the article (and source for the hook) instead. Jappalang (talk) 01:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

If you still think this hook is not perfect, can you suggest an alternative?—Chris! ct 21:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ALT 1: ... that Alexander Hamilton was the first Cabinet member to be born outside of the United States?—Chris! ct 21:06, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2: ... that former Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton was the first Cabinet member to be born outside of the territory that would become the United States? (too wordy but less confusing - none of Washington's cabinet was born in the United States, just places that would become a part of the United States) - Dravecky (talk) 07:19, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
We could avoid Hamilton entirely, and go with something like ALT 3:"... that President George W. Bush appointed three Cabinet members who had been born outside of the United States, the most of any president?" or ALT 4:"... that five past United States Treasury Secretaries were born outside of the United States?" Shimgray | talk | 19:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I like ALT 3.—Chris! ct 19:56, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Length and >1500 characters verified. Article is, however, created from a single source, a primary one at that, the Danish Royal House. A search on Google reveals quite a few publications (secondary sources) that can back up the hook and other data in the article.[1] Jappalang (talk) 07:15, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

... that the Appomattox Court House National Historical Park (pictured), an antebellum village containing the Old Appomattox Court House, McLean house, Clover Hill Tavern, New County Jail, Jones Law Office, Woodson Law Office, Plunkett-Meeks Store, Bocock-Isbell House, Peers House, Mariah Wright House, Charles Sweeney Cabin, Sweeney-Conner Cabin, Sweeney Prizery, various park ruins and park cemeteries, is where the American Civil War ended? 16 article hook, all new articles. self nom by --Doug Coldwell talk 13:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes! Alt: ... that the Appomattox Court House National Historical Park (pictured) is an antebellum village containing 13 historical buildings along with cemeteries and various ruins? Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose to the ALT because I would like to get all 16 articles in the same hook, a record DYK for the Wikipedia:Did you know/Hall of Fame. All 16 articles are new articles that qualify. --Doug Coldwell talk 16:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As I see it, the whole idea of DYK is to show new articles to readers. In this case a reader who is really interested in all 16 articles will find them all by reading the first. Even if that is not the purpose of DYK, I do know that the purpose of DYK does not include writing hooks in odd ways solely to get on a "hall of fame". Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Would all of them even withstand an AfD? Grsz11 17:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
IMO, this game of trying to cram the largest possible number of articles into a single hook is contrary to the purpose of DYK. The original hook proposed here is much too large to have any useful value in attracting attention to interesting new articles. If this is what Wikipedia:Did you know/Hall of Fame leads to, then perhaps the Hall of Fame should be abolished. --Orlady (talk) 18:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Second Orlady's comment. We have already been subject to some nasty criticism for perceived award-collecting behavior, and putting an overlinked mass on the Main Page just for one user's gratification would not be appropriate and would subject us to more unneeded wikidrama. (No intention there to offend you, Doug Coldwell—you've done impressive work here and, no matter what happens with this hook, we will still remember that you were able to write and nominate 16 articles at once—it's just that this kind of hook would not be beneficial for the DYK project or for readers.)
Besides, if you break this up into a couple hooks (assuming that a few of these article subjects are notable enough to be in a hook independent of Appomattox Court House National Historical Park), your articles would get more airtime and more attention.
Personally, I believe it would be better to merge all those sub-articles into Appomattox Court House National Historical Park (that might even make it a good candidate for FL or FA), but this is not the appropriate venue for that discussion; it might be worth discussing at that article's talk page, though. That kind of merge, though, would make the ALT hook fine. Politizer talk/contribs 18:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest the below alternate hook of 14 articles which I believe would receive much airtime for all the articles involved, especially if it were to be the first hook in the Queue with its pictute. It isn't anything different than what has already been done for the 8, 9, and 11 article DYKs in the Wikipedia:Did you know/Hall of Fame.
Alt 2 ... that the Appomattox Court House National Historical Park (pictured), where the American Civil War ended, contains period structures of the Old Appomattox Court House, McLean house, Clover Hill Tavern, New County Jail, Jones Law Office, Woodson Law Office, Plunkett-Meeks Store, Bocock-Isbell House, Peers House, Mariah Wright House, Charles Sweeney Cabin, Sweeney-Conner Cabin and the Sweeney Prizery? 14 new articles, self nom by --Doug Coldwell talk 09:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Doug, you need an interesting fact to make a good DYK hook. The end of the American Civil War has nothing to do with most of your hook! --74.14.22.20 (talk) 16:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Each of the period (Civil War) structures says in each article of that particular structure that the National Park Service says the structure is significant because it was in the Appomattox Court House National Historical Park (then the village of Appomattox Court House) at the time General Lee surrendered to General Grant. The end of the American Civil War has everything to do with each of these structures. The National Park Service has restored each of these structures because of this significance and they are all part of this history (the end of the American Civil War). Some have more important significance than others. For example: the McLean house is where Lee and Grant signed the surrender papers (picture of replica tables in the article). The Clover Hill Tavern is where the pardons (picture in the article of a typical parole) were printed for the Confederate soldiers, so they could return home with no hassle from others. --Doug Coldwell talk 19:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Then put these interesting things in the hook(s), Doug! Neither of your proposed hooks explain what each item has to do with the American Civil War! Let's forget about the record and opt for hook quality, okay? --74.13.126.178 (talk) 07:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The hook isn't thrilling, but it's far from the dullest ever. This is, after all, a mighty effort by Doug. Xn4 (talk) 08:46, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, ALT 3 looks excellent to me also. No, I do not believe each building is in the NRHP. --Doug Coldwell talk 16:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have found this NRHP for the Park. Could a better info box template be used for Appomattox Court House National Historical Park? --Doug Coldwell talk 17:03, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

This is taking longer than I expected. Schuym1 (talk) 01:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Additional Rule G1. Art LaPella (talk) 06:58, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on January 20

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:42, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

  • I love this hook but the source article seems dubious that any such law existed and the article describes two contradictory reasons for the two clocks. The hook needs rewording to make clear that this is "according to employees" or some other mild but acceptable weaseling. - Dravecky (talk) 08:56, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

  • All the citations are from one reference, a foreign-language book, unavailable online. I was wondering if the TT Class 8 was also mentioned in other sources, for example, the news? Rosiestep (talk) 20:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • While I totally agree with Punkmorten that the DYK no longer requires online sources, and that books are more reliable than newspaper articles, the newspaper Adresseavisen had an article on this in 2005. However, this has been removed from the online section, and is now only available through the paid service Atekst (that I, and perhaps also Punkmorten, have access to through our universities). The article was called "Trikken — elsket og hatet". So, with all due respect, the current DYK rules say that if all the other criteria are met, you have to except in good faith (unless you belive it to not be correct), especially from established authors. Arsenikk (talk) 18:44, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

ALT... that in 1962, because of differences in the demands for a separate nation called Dravida Nadu, India's Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam party split and a short-lived Tamil National Party was formed?
You are right. The original hook was indeed too vague. Does the alt look OK? Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 22:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:35, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

  • DYK Rules No. 3. "The hook fact must be cited in the article with an inline citation, ... The hook fact must have an inline citation right after it since the fact is an extraordinary claim, ..."; this is not done in this article for this hook. Jappalang (talk) 15:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • [[Image:Symbol confirmed.svg|18px]] Hook's length, article's >1500 characters, and sources (reliability and inline for hook) verified. Note that article is, however, tagged with multiple issues (lack of citations, need for copyediting, and peacock terms). Jappalang (talk) 08:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
DYK Rules No. 3 also says "The hook should include a definite fact that must be mentioned in the article." The hook can't say "may have". Something "may have" happened is not a definite fact. --74.14.22.20 (talk) 16:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In light of this, should this hook be a {{DYK?no}} or {{DYKno}}? Jappalang (talk) 05:19, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1: ... that noted Canadian bootlegger and businessman James Scott Cooper was reported by his wife to have drowned after going overboard on a transatlantic voyage in 1931, but no body was ever found? --Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Interesting. This might be banal but Anderson spelled "Doctor" in full, so since the quote uses the abbreviated form, did it come from The Gentleman's Magazine (which requires a volume number)? Jappalang (talk) 00:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Lengths are okay. But the main WP:V reference (for both articles) links to a pay-site. The other ref, mentioned at Breydon Viaduct (but not at Alexander Ross) does confirm his connection to the project by not his title. I'm AGF that the subscription site states it fully and correctly. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 05:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For anyone interested the list of staff on the viaduct from the subscription site reads: "Mr. Alexander Ross, M. Inst. C.E., as Engineer-in-Chief, and Mr. William Marriott, M. Inst. C.E., District Engineer and Locomotive Superintendent to the Midland and Great Northern Railways Joint Committee, as executive Engineer, to whom Mr. Graham Gribble M. Inst. C.E., acted as Chief Assistant, and Mr. A. E. Glennie as Resident Engineer...". The article was written by Marriott and Gribble so hopefully they could remember the roles OK! Many thanks - Dumelow (talk) 12:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:06, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Now fully referenced. - Mgm|(talk) 11:46, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
with thanks to User:MichaelQSchmidt. - Mgm|(talk) 09:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:05, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

  • This claims comes from sources associated with the company. Third party sources do not state is as fact, but merely attribute it to the company. Also, the claim is about the core ASIC, not the whole router. Xasodfuih (talk) 20:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1: ... that Juniper Networks' first product M40 router Internet Processor ASIC was capable of forwarding packets at 40 Mpps, a capacity more than 100 times faster than that of any other available router architectures at that time?
Added a more precise hook with added new references -- Tinu Cherian - 06:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That hooks seems over 200 chars. How about using fewer proprietary terms in it?
ALT2: ... that Juniper Networks' first product, the M40 router, had a forwarding plane ASIC designed for 40Mpps—a throughput 100 times faster than that of any core router available at that time?
Also, you haven't really improved the quality of the sources, just their quantity: more press releases, juniper web pages, CTO interviews, but not a single 3rd party hands-on assessment of the that statement. Some third party must have benchmarked the M40 in the past 10 years...
There seems to be some formatting error in the references of that section as well. Xasodfuih (talk) 00:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

It's an obit in a scientific journal, so it's probably OK. That said, it's actually got the date of his appointment as an MBE wrong, it was 1971, not 1972 - I've added the official record of the appointment as an additional reference, I've tweaked the hook slightly, the usual "standard" seems to be to link the full grade and name of the honour. David Underdown (talk) 10:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to those who have improved the article. Maias (talk) 22:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I dunno, but doesn't everyone know this already? How about SVG being "traded" to the Magic for draft picks? Or is it not in the article? That's a pretty unconventional way of obtaining draft picks. –Howard the Duck 03:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find a reference for that though. Here's an alternate hook...

ALT1 ... that Ron Rothstein was the first head coach of the Miami Heat, an American professional basketball team based in Miami, Florida? -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24 review me 06:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This one's more interesting that the original. –Howard the Duck 06:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:23, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 10:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on January 19

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Ok, not sure how to intrepret that. Is there a high water mark for each article and the 5X is of that? The text you provide the diff for had been reverted several times by admins and editors due to the involvement of sockpuppet Jvolkblum. After enough grumbling, I rewrote the article by going back to the sources and finding more to add. I'll defer to the groups wisdom as to whether I should withdraw the entry .... dm (talk) 07:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:51, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the green tick, Jappalang. Who was massacred? Some survivors of the shipwreck decided to kill other survivors.... Maybe it's too gruesome. (There was also raping, but...) Maybe massacre is not the right vocabulary. I've removed that word "massacre" from the hook to keep things simple. --PFHLai (talk) 23:32, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Comment/explanation. Added a bunch of references on the 14th and 15th but actual article text expansion was begun on the 19th. Hope that's ok. Shrumster (talk) 08:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's OK, because we don't include references when counting characters of prose. So the 9x expansion figure is about the same whether you calculate it from the 14th or the 19th. Art LaPella (talk) 18:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Shouldn't that be Soviet Bloc? - 17:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:02, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion

  • The article has not been expanded enough, so far it's been expanded 3.1x. Also, the hook is implied but not explicitly stated (the article does not explicitly say the park has no lions). Shubinator (talk) 00:25, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It (the hook) does now. (I hope) – Julia Rossi (talk) 07:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:54, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

That twenty could be 20. Julia Rossi (talk) 07:54, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, didn't realise about Congon: it was a different fact, though. Last night, I finally decided to devote a couple of free hours to it. The JPStalk to me 09:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Fixed typo (yeas->years) and suggest the(se) only two Jews... Julia Rossi (talk) 07:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion Lordoliver Lord R. Oliver I His Lordship's Court 21:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Article hasn't been expanded enough, only 3.5x now by my count. Unfortunately tables and lists don't count. Also, to me the hook was a bit confusing because I didn't know that the promotion refers to WWE. Rephrasing to due to his contract with WWE would help. Shubinator (talk) 00:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, I forgot to count. Your suggestion would work, but it makes no difference really since its not technically 5x.TRUCO 01:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There isn't really much more to add to the list in order to add 2,000 more characters of prose.--TRUCO 04:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 20:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:34, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

  • 249 character hook. Also, the hook is not explicitly stated in the article. The article has been expanded much more than 5x though. Also (this has nothing to do with DYK), I'd recommend moving the "See also" (now called "More info") before the References section per WP:ALSO. Shubinator (talk) 02:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh gosh... I knew it's a lot more than 5x, but once I got started I wanted it to be worthy of Wiki and just kept going. I have moved the "See also" per your good advice. As for the hook... I was worried about that. I liked it, but in complete agreement with you, here's a shorter and more precise alternate:
Shubinator (talk) 03:27, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Looking back over it, I don't like the repitition of "promised". If someone wants to reword it slightly when adding it to a queue, that's fine with me. Perhaps "guaranteed" to replace the first one, or "assured"/"told" for the second? GaryColemanFan (talk) 15:35, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


Expiring noms

Articles created/expanded on January 18

Template:DYKsuggestion at 10:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:05, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)



Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Length, history, reference good. But I would recommend rewording the hook; it's a bit confusing now and I had to read it twice. How about this:
ALT: ... that microbiologist Hans Knöll defended the historic center of Jena, which was threatened by the construction of the Jen-Tower (pictured)?
Also, there's a much better picture of the Jen-Tower at File:Intershop Hochhaus.jpg. Shubinator (talk) 18:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No objection to the rewording. I know there's a fancier pic of the tower, but you cannot see how close the collegium is in that pic. Surroundings are important in this case. Xasodfuih (talk) 18:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

The reference explicitly does not say that and uses "the world's least printed stamp" term. --Redtigerxyz Talk 12:57, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Gothic Revival should at least be the link, if not what the hook says. Johnbod (talk)
OK, done. But the point is it was not Tudor (revival). Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ALT hook: ... that the Cheshire landowner Rowland Egerton-Warburton wrote poetry and some of his rhymes are still present on signposts in his estate?

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:40, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:08, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

This is the only example I've ever heard of a fungus being used as fish bait, thought that might warrant a DYK. Are any of the following more interesting to you? Sasata (talk) 16:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1 ... that Cookeina is a genus of cup fungus found in the tropics and subtropics?
ALT2 ... that Cookeina globosa, member of the fungal genus Cookeina, is known only from the Mbalmayo rain forest reserve in southern Cameroon?
ALT3 ... that Cookeina, a genus of tropical and subtropical cup fungi, have asci which mature simultaneously rather than in series?
In the original hook, does the offline source really mean a Malaysian town called "Peninsular"? It probably means Peninsular Malaysia (no comma, one link; it was once known as Malaya). The Peninsular link is about Spain. Art LaPella (talk) 02:24, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch, I've fixed the hook above. Thanks - Sasata (talk) 04:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Both articles still need some cleanup before promotion. Strike article has repeated phrases ("Workers at the Daily News settled their issues, accepting raises of $8 per week in talks mediated by United States Secretary of Labor W. Willard Wirtz") and other grammar issues. - Dravecky (talk) 03:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for catching the near-duplicate sentences. I have reviewed both articles and I think all issues have been addressed. Please let me know if you have any other questions regarding either article. Alansohn (talk) 05:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:54, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Very open to alternate hook suggestions, and wondering how proper it is to use words like "upcoming" since the article involves a biannual event that will take place now on January 27 and 28, soon losing much of its "current events" appeal for a while. MURGH disc. 01:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

  • How about this:
"... that the Amagi class battlecruisers were to be canceled due to the Five-Power Treaty, but an exemption saved Akagi, which (after conversion to an aircraft carrier) took part in the attack on Pearl Harbor?"
Actually, see here for the most current version. Parsecboy (talk) 16:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alright; we expanded a second article. I know that this is long, but it is by far the best hook we could come up with:
... that the Error: {{sclass}} invalid format code: 6. Should be 0–5, or blank (help)s and Error: {{sclass}} invalid format code: 6. Should be 0–5, or blank (help)s were slated to be scrapped in accordance with the Washington Naval Treaty, but a special exception sought by the U.S. delegation saved both Kaga and Akagi, which (after conversions to aircraft carriers) later took part in the attack on Pearl Harbor?
Would "against the U.S." be needed at the end of the hook? —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 00:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
216 characters, but the Tosa mention is 21-characters, so it should be a reasonable exceeding of the 200-byte guideline... Jappalang (talk) 05:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Yep! Nice work, but there were some errors; I've corrected them. AdjustShift (talk) 15:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)



Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

ALT: ... that college football player Bob Ward is the only player to have been selected by the Associated Press as a first-team All-American in both an offensive and defensive position? Strikehold (talk) 16:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:47, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

In a statement like this, the date is always relevant.=--Wetman (talk)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Hmmm, this is tough. It's definitely a wiki; you can tell from the Recent changes page. It doesn't seem to be an open wiki though. In the About section it says "The project welcomes contributions from those interested in these subjects", but there isn't a link to create a new account. I'm not sure if it's enough of a closed wiki to be a WP:RS (open wikis are discouraged by WP:SPS). Can one of the other DYK editors look this over? Shubinator (talk) 07:03, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion Ironholds (talk) 02:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion Ironholds (talk) 01:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Multiple sourcing is good practice for any article - many of the ones you've submitted recently you could have quite easily verified details of their military service and/or honours using the London Gazette as I've since done for you. Obits have traditionally focussed on the good points of the deceased, so they may not present a fully-rounded picture - this is probably less true now than it has been in the past - and things like the ODNB do often use obits as sources, so this is not to say they shouldn't be sued, just try to find other sources too. David Underdown (talk) 12:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Duly noted. I wasn't aware I'd used the ODNB for anything recently (other than some additional verification of details for the Lord Denning article. I didn't use the Gazette because I wasn't aware statements of fact need to be verified by multiple sources; yes, the Gazette says he was promoted to rank X, but so does the newspaper obit. With these three articles I did try and look for additional sourcing but could not find anything with what was available to me (the military and the sciences are two areas I don't deal with on a daily basis, leaving well, google).Ironholds (talk) 12:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry, I wasn't sayign that you had used ODNB recently, just trying to make the point that since they use obits as sources then they must be considered as a valid source for us to - but bearing in mind the possible issues. Obviously the gaette is factual only, but it's also definitive, I've seen obits which have got the dates and so on wrong, if you take the dates from the Gazette you've got the official record - it's the best possible source for those sorts of things - and at least it demonstrates that you ahve looked for other sources. David Underdown (talk) 13:53, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion

  • Note: Would prefer using the first hook and not the ALTs as the first hook contains two pieces of information—March sentencing to prison and reality show. The ALTs only have information on the show, but I just added those hooks there incase. If for some reason the first hook has a problem that needs fixing, go with ALTs. — RyanCross (talk) 09:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on January 17

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:53, 20 January 2009 (UTC)



Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

  • I got the obviously wrong impression from this hook that Epik continued to write after being executed. Can the information in the hook be re-organized? Maybe some tweaking of the tenses would help, too. --PFHLai (talk) 16:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That sure would be a good hook if true :) I added the years now so maybe it's clearer? Närking (talk) 20:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's much better and clearer! Thanks! Närking (talk) 09:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:30, 18 January 2009 (UTC)



Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:08, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Indeed. But nothing wrong with being easily amused. Since you don't feel every article must be interesting to the masses, would you mind commenting on my nom, the one just below this? And again, it's comical from an insider's point of view: the inefficiencies of state and federal government is such that they can't get a list like this correct - tax $$ at work. (rolls eyes) ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 04:22, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is the first time I've been compelled to edit DYK, and I don't have the foggiest idea what this hook is trying to say. Moreover, I don't even see any point in the article about it being a former I-87 bridge. Is this entire hook about this fact: "instead of marking it as County Road 35, the USDOT marked it as Old State Road 35"? Aaronw (talk) 22:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Then what does this say - "The United States Department of Transportation, who maintains a "National Bridge Inventory" has a listing of County Route 35's former bridge over the Northway. However, instead of marking it as County Road 35, the USDOT marked it as Old State Road 35." - Mitch32(Go Syracuse) 01:03, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's pretty straight forward. You read the hook, you have questions, so you go to the article, which successfully answers your question. The difference is "County Route" versus "State Route" (old in this case). Subtle, but significant (to where your taxes go). ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 04:22, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Only significant if it made someone screw up and spend the wrong taxes, but the bridge is actually owned and maintained by the state (as it crosses over a state highway) and there's another field ("Maintenance Responsibility / Owner") in the NBI that correctly says so. (Aside: some New York State Routes are in fact county-maintained.) --NE2 04:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at Mr Tan (talk) 16:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No probs.Mr Tan (talk) 12:55, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on January 16

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:23, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Dates, length, and ref check out but sorting the "make" credits for this one will be a bit of a nightmare. Do we want to give this article a day or two to settle down before promoting it? Given the backlog, even it were promoted right now it wouldn't appear on the home page for about a day and a half. Perhaps by then the article will have been filled out and the editing will start to settle down. - Dravecky (talk) 13:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I think it is a really good hook. Unfortunately, the DYK criteria says "Articles that have appeared on the main page's In the News section are not eligible" to be a DYK nom. Flight 1549 is currently featured on the In The News section. Therefore, I don't think we can have the double hook offered by Matthewedwards. I suggest we remove the Flight 1549 as a DYK nom in the alternative hook, but keep the rest of the alternative hook the same.Terrakyte (talk) 11:04, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I would hold this hook for as long as possible. People who are in the news may have more that is yet to be revealled. He may have hidden notable saintly (or otherwise) qualities which have yet to surface. Victuallers (talk) 12:28, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ALT 3: ... that C.B. "Sully" Sullenberger, who successfully landed an Airbus A320 in the Hudson River in 2009, operates a safety consulting firm?

Note that there are perhaps hundreds of people who expanded the article. I will notify them for DYK credit if this passes. These people should get credit, not only Jrsamples.

Also, my suggested hook doesn't restate what everyone knows, i.e. that Sully landed the plane. It highlights that he has a safety consulting firm (so he might really be a safety expert who safely landed the plane in the water) Chergles (talk) 19:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree that more people beside myself, as nominator, and Jrsamples, should gain credit. I apologise that I did not add some more people as collaborators. I don't think everyone who edited the article should be given DYK credit, though. Please don't think that I'm being selfish, or ungratful, I just think that most editors did relatively very minor work, such as correcting grammar, and do not warrant DYK credit. Looking at the revision history of the article, I suggest User:ERcheck, User:Chergles, User talk:75.73.218.164, User:Geo Swan, User:Space cadet65, User:Terrakyte, as well as the creator User:Jrsamples, should receive DYK criteria. Having said that, my suggestions take into account only those who have made more than 5 non-minor edits to the article. One person could have made but one edit, but it was really consequential. I will look through the edit history to find more people who could deserve DYK criteria. I believe the hook offered by Chergles can be improved; I believe less people will recognize "C.B. "Sully" Sullenberger", than Chesley Sullenberger or Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger. I also think that when Mjroots said that US Airways Flight 1549 couldn't be "bolded" in the hook, I don't think that meant it couldn't be included in the overall hook, though I could be wrong. I think US Airways Flight 1549 should be stated, since I believe more people will recognize the flight if the hook says something like "Flight 1549 in the Hudson River", than "an Airbus A320 in the Hudson River". I also think the image at the top of this discussion should be included with this hook, since hooks with pics seem to generally attract more attention. I also think that a lot of people, as you said Chergles, know now that he landed the plane. I think though a lot of people already know that he owns a safety consulting firm, though, and I don't think a lot of people know that he had "had gained the IQ necessary to join Mensa International at the age of 12", and that he "was an accident investigator for the USAF and NTSB". Terrakyte (talk) 23:23, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think ALT 3 or the unnumbered alt 4 are the best hooks. Chergles (talk) 18:15, 24 January 2009 (UTC) I agree with Terraktye that few know he was an accident investigator. Perhaps a hook that he was a former aviation accident investigator and operated a safety consulting firm? Chergles (talk) 18:16, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Just to be clear, the prose expansion was well over the 5X req. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:13, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The prose expansion seems to have consisted of writing overly-long, stylistically inappropriate (television episodes should be summarized in the past tense, not the present) and rather review-like recounts of the episodes. So tagged. Daniel Case (talk) 16:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually all of the prose, not just the episode info, was added. The tense can easily be changed, but how else would you suggest summarizing a judged competition other than describing what happened and how the audience and judges reacted to the performances? --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:23, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

I've added sections; how much expansion do you think it would need to become usable? Gonzonoir (talk) 10:43, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just put in some more detail on his informant activities too. Gonzonoir (talk) 16:52, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


See also