Christian Science: Difference between revisions
Simplywater (talk | contribs) |
Simplywater (talk | contribs) clarifying |
||
Line 559: | Line 559: | ||
===Children's rights=== |
===Children's rights=== |
||
====Religious exemptions==== |
====Religious exemptions==== |
||
The main criticism Christian Science has faced is that adherents impose their ideas on their children, and by failing to provide access to medical care are denying them equal protection under the law.<ref>Peters 2007, p. 15; [http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1168&context=facpubs Dwyer 2000], p. 159.</ref> Children with disabilities and illnesses, or who are in pain, have been told there is nothing wrong with them apart from "incorrect" thinking. Fraser argues that this can undermine children's confidence in their own perceptions, and cause [[hypochondria]] by making them obsessed with their bodies in an effort to control their thoughts about them.<ref>Fraser 1999, pp. 323–325; [http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/unbound/flashbks/xsci/suffer.htm Fraser 1995]: "That infuriating, smug calm in the face of crisis is part of what makes Christian Science so dangerous."</ref> In the case of very young children, parents have been told by practitioners that the |
The main criticism Christian Science has faced is that adherents impose their ideas on their children, and by failing to provide access to medical care are denying them equal protection under the law.<ref>Peters 2007, p. 15; [http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1168&context=facpubs Dwyer 2000], p. 159.</ref> Children with disabilities and illnesses, or who are in pain, have been told there is nothing wrong with them apart from "incorrect" thinking. Fraser argues that this can undermine children's confidence in their own perceptions, and cause [[hypochondria]] by making them obsessed with their bodies in an effort to control their thoughts about them.<ref>Fraser 1999, pp. 323–325; [http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/unbound/flashbks/xsci/suffer.htm Fraser 1995]: "That infuriating, smug calm in the face of crisis is part of what makes Christian Science so dangerous."</ref> In the case of very young children, parents have been told by practitioners that the illness must mainly be addressed in the parents thought. The church maintains that members are free to choose medical care, but several have said they fear being ostracized if they do.<ref name=Vitellop1/> Nate Talbot, a past spokesperson for the Christian Science movement, objects to that view. "members of this denomination take community concerns about the well being of children with deep seriousness. They have a strong record of cooperation with public health officials over the years" <ref>Palmer, Luanne Linnard; When Parents Say 'No'; Religious and Cultural Influence on Pediatric Care; Sigma Theta Tau Press (pg 80)</ref><ref>Anders, Margaret; Transcultural Concepts in Nursing Care; Wolters Kluwer Health (p 382)</ref><ref>Losch, Richard; Many Faces of Faith; A Guide to World Religions (191)</ref> |
||
The Christian Science church in the United States has used the [[Free Exercise Clause]] of the [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]], which guarantees the [[Freedom of religion in the United States|protection of religious practice]], to persuade states to maintain religious-exemption statutes.<ref>[http://www.jstor.org/stable/4144687 Hughes 2004]; [http://www.jstor.org/stable/466070 Young 2001]; [http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/flashbks/xsci/suffer.htm Fraser 1995].</ref> After the conviction for manslaughter in 1967 of the Christian Scientist mother of five-year-old Lisa Sheridan, who died of pneumonia without medical care in Cape Code, Massachusetts,<ref>Peters 2007, [http://books.google.com/books?id=vDUElGmA3vkC&pg=PA113 pp. 113–114]; Fraser 2003, [http://books.google.com/books?id=9RYs-Z6AdpQC&pg=PA268 p. 268].</ref> the church successfully lobbied the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) to add the following, in 1974, to the [[Code of Federal Regulations]]: |
The Christian Science church in the United States has used the [[Free Exercise Clause]] of the [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]], which guarantees the [[Freedom of religion in the United States|protection of religious practice]], to persuade states to maintain religious-exemption statutes.<ref>[http://www.jstor.org/stable/4144687 Hughes 2004]; [http://www.jstor.org/stable/466070 Young 2001]; [http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/flashbks/xsci/suffer.htm Fraser 1995].</ref> After the conviction for manslaughter in 1967 of the Christian Scientist mother of five-year-old Lisa Sheridan, who died of pneumonia without medical care in Cape Code, Massachusetts,<ref>Peters 2007, [http://books.google.com/books?id=vDUElGmA3vkC&pg=PA113 pp. 113–114]; Fraser 2003, [http://books.google.com/books?id=9RYs-Z6AdpQC&pg=PA268 p. 268].</ref> the church successfully lobbied the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) to add the following, in 1974, to the [[Code of Federal Regulations]]: |
Revision as of 22:22, 26 March 2014
Christian Science | |
---|---|
Founder | Mary Baker Eddy (1821–1910) |
Mother Church | The First Church of Christ, Scientist, Back Bay, Boston |
Key texts | Mary Baker Eddy, Science and Health With Key to the Scriptures and Manual of the Mother Church |
Membership | 100,000–400,000 worldwide, as of 2008[1] |
Number of churches | 1,100 in the United States, 600 elsewhere, as of 2010[2] |
Key beliefs | Scientific statement of being;[3] "Basic teachings", Church of Christ, Scientist |
Website | |
christianscience.com |
Christian Science is a set of beliefs and practices belonging to the metaphysical family of new religious movements.[4] It was developed in the United States by Mary Baker Eddy (1821–1910) after she experienced what she said was a miraculous recovery from a fall. She subsequently wrote Science and Health (1875), which argued that sickness is an illusion that can be corrected by prayer alone. The book became Christian Science's central text along with the Bible; by 2001, according to the church, it had sold ten million copies in 16 languages.[5]
Eddy and around 25 followers were granted a charter in 1879 to found the Church of Christ (Scientist), and in 1894 the Mother Church, The First Church of Christ, Scientist, was built in Boston, Massachusetts.[6] Eddy's ideas proved popular: during the first decades of the 20th century Christian Science became the fastest growing American religion. A census in 1936 counted nearly 270,000 Scientists in the United States, a figure that had declined by the 1990s to just over 100,000; a church estimate in 2008 placed the global membership at 400,000.[7] The religion is known for the Christian Science Monitor, which won seven Pulitzer Prizes between 1950 and 2002, and for its Reading Rooms, which are open to the public in around 1,200 cities.[8]
Christian Scientists see their religion as consistent with Christian theology, despite key differences.[9] In particular they subscribe to a radical form of philosophical idealism, believing that reality is purely spiritual and the material world an illusion. This includes the view that disease is a spiritual rather than physical disorder, that there is no death, and that the sick should be treated, not by medicine, but by a form of prayer that seeks to correct the beliefs responsible for the illusion of ill health.[10]
The church does not require that Christian Scientists avoid all medicine – adherents use dentists, optometrists, obstetricians, physicians for broken bones, and vaccination when required by law – but maintains that Christian Science prayer is most effective when not combined with medical care.[11] Between the 1880s and 1990s the avoidance of medical treatment and vaccination led to the deaths of several adherents and their children; parents and others were prosecuted for manslaughter or neglect, and in a few cases convicted.[12]
Background and theology
Metaphysical–Christian Science–New Thought family
Part of a series of articles on |
Christian Science |
---|
Part of a series of articles on |
New Thought |
---|
Two periods of Protestant Christian revival known as the Second and Third Great Awakening (c. 1800–1830 and 1850–1900) nurtured a proliferation of religious movements in the United States, including Adventists, Jehovah's Witnesses, Latter Day Saints, Spiritualists, Swedenborgians, Theosophists, and the metaphysical family.[13]
The metaphysical family consists of several groups, including Christian Science, that were known as the mind-cure, mental-cure, or mental-healing movement, and from the mid-1890s as New Thought (though Christian Science distinguished itself from the latter). The movement emphasized the centrality of the mental world (what it called the "metaphysical"), rather than the material, and in particular saw the mind as the key to physical health.[4] Eddy several times referred to Christian Science as "Metaphysical Science" and "Metaphysical Healing."[14] There was keen interest in alternatives to medicine, such as homeopathy, hydropathy, mesmerism and the relationship between mind, body and diet, in large measure because medical practice was crude and frightening, but also in reaction to the idea that suffering was something to be endured as a test or punishment from God.[15]
The mind-cure movement traced its roots to the work of New England "mental healer" Phineas Parkhurst Quimby (1802–1866), whose motto was "the truth is the cure" (persuade the patient that she is not ill and she will recover); Eddy was a patient of Quimby's and was accused of having founded Christian Science on the basis of his unpublished manuscripts.[16] William James (1842–1910) saw in mind-cure traces of spiritism, Hinduism, the subjective idealism of George Berkeley (1685–1753) and the transcendentalism of Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882). The point above all was to maintain a cheerful attitude; James described the mind-cure literature as "moonstruck with optimism."[17]
New Thought and Christian Science adherents believed they were applying newly discovered spiritual laws scientifically; Philip Jenkins wrote that they saw themselves at the "apex of modern thinking."[18] They differed in that Eddy's philosophy was not dualist. She did not argue merely for the primacy of mind, but dismissed the material world entirely as an illusion; reality for Eddy was purely spiritual.[19] She taught that the mind (or what she called "mortal mind") cannot cure disease, because disease is the mind's mistake and mind cannot cure what it has caused. What heals, she argued, is "not one mind acting upon another mind ... not the transference of human images of thought to other minds," but Divine Mind.[20]
Christian Science theology
Eddy regarded Christian Science as a return to early Christianity and its "lost element of healing," and saw Science and Health as an inspired text and a kind of second coming.[21] At the core of her theology is the idea that God's creation is entirely good, that the material world, including evil, sickness and death, are illusions, and that humankind, as an idea of God or Mind, is perfect; the limitations and flaws of "mortal man" are simply humankind's mistaken view of itself.[22] Her radical idealism is summed up by her "scientific statement of being," which she called the "first plank in the platform of Christian Science": "There is no life, truth, intelligence, nor substance in matter. All is infinite Mind and its infinite manifestation."[3] For Christian Scientists, the spiritualization of thought that comes with the acceptance of this has the power to heal.[23]
"[T]here is no person to be healed, no material body, no patient, no matter, no illness, no one to heal, no substance, no person, no thing and no place that needs to be influenced. This is what the practitioner must first be clear about."
— Frank Prinz-Wondollek,
Christian Science practitioner, 2011[24]
Christian Science practitioners are Scientists who, for a fee, offer a special kind of prayer to address ill health or any other problem a patient might have. There is no appeal to a personal god; the process involves the practitioner engaging, alone (known as "absent treatment), in a silent rhetorical argument to reaffirm to herself the unreality of matter. She might also suggest that the patient read passages from Science and Health. In the view of Christian Science this process connects the patient, as a spiritual being, to Divine Mind; historian of religion Amanda Porterfield describes it in terms of an "invisible spiritual force that stimulates healing."[25]
Christian Science leaders see their religion as Christian and reject any identification with the New Thought movement; Eddy herself was strongly influenced by her Congregationalist upbringing.[26] There are nevertheless key differences between Christian Science theology and that of traditional Christianity. Eddy redefined the Christian vocabulary, leading to very different views of the Trinity, creation, divinity of Jesus, atonement, resurrection, heaven and hell.[9]
Eddy saw God not as a person, but as "incorporeal, divine, supreme, infinite Mind, Spirit, Soul, Principle, Life, Truth, Love."[27] (In referring to God as "All-in-all" she denied that she had embraced pantheism, but that was nevertheless how the clergy interpreted it.)[28] She distinguished, as Phineas Parkhurst Quimby had done, between Jesus the man and the concept of Christ; Christ was a quality rather than an identity, a synonym for Truth.[29] She regarded Jesus as the first person fully to manifest Divine Mind, a template for other human beings; Eddy called him a Christian Scientist and a "Way-shower" between humanity and God, and regarded his death as an illusion like any other.[30]
The Holy Ghost is "Divine Science" or Christian Science.[31] Heaven and hell are states of mind. There is no death; a person who seems to die simply adjusts to a level of consciousness inaccessible to the living.[32] Eddy also reinterpreted the Lord's Prayer: "Our Father–Mother God, all-harmonious."[33] In 1907 Mark Twain (1835–1910) described the appeal of the new religion to Eddy's followers:
She has delivered to them a religion which has revolutionized their lives, banished the glooms that shadowed them, and filled them and flooded them with sunshine and gladness and peace; a religion which has no hell; a religion whose heaven is not put off to another time, with a break and a gulf between, but begins here and now, and melts into eternity as fancies of the waking day melt into the dreams of sleep.
They believe it is a Christianity that is in the New Testament; that it has always been there, that in the drift of ages it was lost through disuse and neglect, and that this benefactor has found it and given it back to men, turning the night of life into day, its terrors into myths, its lamentations into songs of emancipation and rejoicing.[34]
Eddy's view of Science and Health as inspired by God represented a challenge to the Bible's authority, in the opinion of the more conservative of the Protestant clergy.[35] "Eddyism," as it was known, was regularly referred to as a cult; one of the first uses of the modern sense of the word cult was in Anti-Christian Cults (1898) by A. H. Barrington, a book about Spiritualism, Theosophy and Christian Science.[36] Some ministers interpreted Christian Science as gnosticism, the idea (regarded by Christians as heretical) that the material world is the result of a mistake on the part of a supreme being and the work of a demiurge.[37] Others defended the new religion's rejection of materialism. In a few cases Christian Scientists saw themselves expelled from Christian congregations, but for the most part ministers worried that their parishioners were crossing over. A correspondent in the London Times wrote in May 1885: "Scores of the most valued church members are joining the Christian Science branch of the metaphysical organization, and it has thus far been impossible to check the defection."[38]
History
Birth
Mary Baker Eddy
Christian Science | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Born | Mary Morse Baker July 16, 1821 | ||||||||||||
Died | December 3, 1910 | (aged 89)||||||||||||
|
Mary Baker Eddy was born Mary Morse Baker on a farm in Bow, New Hampshire, the youngest of six children. The family were Protestant Congregationalists; her father, Mark Baker, was a deeply religious man who would lead the family in lengthy prayer every morning and evening.[43] In common with most women at the time, she was given little formal education, but by some accounts she read widely at home.[44]
Eddy experienced protracted ill health from childhood, with conditions she described as chronic indigestion and spinal inflammation, and established a pattern of appearing to be seriously ill, even losing consciousness, then quickly recovering.[45] The literary critic Harold Bloom described her as "an extraordinary wreck, a monumental hysteric of classical dimensions, indeed a kind of anthology of nineteenth-century nervous ailments."[46] McClure's magazine wrote in 1907, in a series of highly critical articles: "Nothing had the power of exciting Mark Baker like one of Mary's 'fits,' as they were called. His neighbors ... remember him as he went to fetch Dr. Ladd, how he lashed his horses down the hill, standing upright in his wagon and shouting in his tremendous voice: 'Mary is dying!'"[47]
Christian Scientists regard this criticism as inaccurate and sexist, an attack (typical of that period) on the sanity of a woman who was challenging powerful male interests. Eddy was a target of this, they argue, because she stood against the hegemony of the clergy and medical establishment.[48]
Eddy's first husband died shortly before her 23rd birthday, six months after they married and three months before the birth of their son, leaving her penniless; as a result of her poor health she lost custody of the boy when he was four, although sources differ as to whether she could have prevented this.[49] Her second husband, who left her after 13 years of marriage, promised to become the child's legal guardian – per the legal doctrine of coverture, women at that time in the United States could not be their own children's guardians – but it is unclear whether he did, and Eddy lost contact with her son until he was in his thirties. Her third husband, Asa Gilbert Eddy, died five years after they married.[50]
She wore an imported black satin dress heavily beaded with tiny black jet beads, black satin slippers, beaded, and had on her rarely beautiful diamonds. ... She stood before us, seemingly slight, graceful of carriage, and exquisitely beautiful even to critical eyes. Then, still standing, she faced her class as one who knew herself to be a teacher by divine right.
– C. Lulu Blackman, 1885[51]
Gillian Gill, one of Eddy's biographers, wrote that Eddy was by all accounts charismatic – charming and flattering when she needed to be – and able to inspire great loyalty, although she could also be irrational, capricious and unkind.[52] It was in part because of her unusual personality that Christian Science flourished, despite the numerous legal and other disputes she initiated, including among her closest followers.[53]
"She was like a patch of colour in those gray communities," McClure's wrote, "She never laid aside her regal air; never entered a room or left it like other people. There was something about her that continually excited and stimulated, and she gave people the feeling that a great deal was happening."[54] Mark Twain, a prominent critic of hers, described her as "vain, untruthful [and] jealous," but "[i]n several ways ... the most interesting woman that ever lived, and the most extraordinary."[55]
Phineas Parkhurst Quimby
Eddy tried every remedy for her ailments, including homeopathy, mesmerism, hydropathy at the Vail's Hydropathic Institute in Hill, New Hampshire, and the vegetarian Graham diet of the Rev. Sylvester Graham (1794–1851), who took the view that "all medicine, as such, is itself an evil."[56] According to Ronald Numbers and Rennie Schoepflin, alternative practitioners were much sought after at a time when physicians, or allopaths as they were known, regularly "bled, puked and purged" their patients.[57]
In 1862 Eddy heard of "Quimbyism," a healing method developed by Phineas Parkhurst "Park" Quimby (1802–1866), a former clockmaker who worked in Portland, Maine. Styled Dr. P.P. Quimby, he called himself "a teacher of the science of health and happiness," and his philosophy was "the truth is the cure." This would sometimes consist of shouting at a patient who could not walk, "you can walk!"[58] McClure's wrote of Quimby that, although he had had only six weeks' schooling, he was regarded as a "mild-mannered New England Socrates" because of his refusal to accept anything on authority. So far as local legend was concerned, McClure's wrote, when Quimby got to work consumptives recovered and the blind saw.[59]
Treating people whether or not they could pay, Quimby started practicing after hearing a lecture by the French mesmerist Charles Poyen, who visited Maine in 1838. Mesmerism, also called animal magnetism, was named after Franz Mesmer (1734–1815), a German physician who argued that animals produced an invisible force or fluid that could be used to heal.[60] Quimby saw himself as a medium or clairvoyant who could feel and change this fluid, thereby correcting his patients' mistaken view that they were ill.[61] For years he and an assistant, Lucius Burkmar, traveled around New England giving demonstrations.[62]
Quimby argued that the real person – spiritual man or "scientific man" – is the perfect embodiment of Spirit, Wisdom, Principle, Truth, Mind, Science. Scientific man cannot be sick, but he is overwhelmed by the man of matter and false beliefs. (He drew a similar distinction between Jesus the man and the concept of Christ or Truth.)[63] "Man is made up of truth and belief," Quimby wrote, "and, if he is deceived into a belief that he has, or is liable to have, a disease, the belief is catching, and the effect follows it."[64] In the 1850s he began to write his ideas down; he was generous in allowing patients to copy these unpublished manuscripts, which became an issue when Eddy was accused, after his death, of having based her own writing on his.[65]
Eddy wrote to Quimby in August 1862, telling him she could barely sit up; she had to be carried up the stairs to his consulting rooms (she told the Boston Post in 1883 that, before she saw Quimby, she had been more or less confined to her bed or room for seven years).[66] She felt better immediately and returned to see him several times.[67]
The fall in Lynn
Eddy's father died in October 1865 when she was 44 years old, followed by the death of Quimby on January 16, 1866. Eddy wrote a poem on January 22, "Lines on the Death of Dr. P. P. Quimby, Who Healed with the Truth that Christ Taught, in Contradistinction to All Isms," which was published in a local newspaper.[68] Two weeks later, on February 1, Eddy slipped on some ice in Lynn, Massachusetts, injuring her head and neck. She recovered after a few days of bed rest. Years later, she wrote that, while in bed from the fall, she had read a Bible passage about one of Jesus's healings and that it was this reading, or an insight she experienced because of the reading (Eddy called it a revelation), that healed her. Christian Scientists call this the "fall in Lynn," and see it as the birth of their religion.[69] Eddy wrote to a prospective student in 1871:
Mrs. Mary Patterson of Swampscott fell upon the ice near the corner of Market and Oxford Streets on Thursday evening and was severely injured. She was taken up in an insensible condition and carried into the residence of S.M. Bubier, Esq., near by, where she was kindly cared for during the night. Doctor Cushing, who was called, found her injuries to be internal and of a serious nature, inducing spasms and internal suffering. She was removed to her home in Swampscott yesterday afternoon, though in a critical condition.
— Lynn Reporter, February 3, 1866[70]
Dr. Cushing of this city pronounced my injury incurable and that I could not survive three days because of it, when on the third day I rose from my bed and to the utter confusion of all I commenced my usual avocations and notwithstanding displacements, etc., I regained the natural position and functions of the body.[71]
The physician who treated her, Alvin M. Cushing, swore an affidavit for McClure's in 1907 in which he said the injury had not been a serious one, that he had not told Eddy otherwise, and that she had responded over the next few days to morphine and a homeopathic remedy (arnica); Eddy had not said anything to him about a miraculous healing.[72]
The degree to which she considered herself healed at the time is also disputed. Two weeks after the accident she wrote to Julius Dresser (1838–1893), who had been a patient and devotee of Quimby's and had become his office manager.[73] She enclosed the poem she had written for Quimby and asked Dresser to "step forward into the place [Quimby had] vacated." She told Dresser she had awoken after the fall to find herself "the helpless cripple I was before I saw Dr. Quimby," and asked if he would treat her.[74] Several months later she again suggested she had not recovered from the fall; in June 1866 the Mayor of Lynn told the city Eddy had sent them a letter "in which she states that owing to the unsafe condition of [the streets] ... she slipped and fell, causing serious personal injuries, from which she has little prospect of recovering, and asking for pecuniary recompense for the injuries received."[75]
In her autobiography, Retrospection and Introspection (1891), Eddy was clear about attributing the discovery of Christian Science prayer to the fall in Lynn.[76] But in the first edition of Science and Health (1875), she wrote that she had discovered it while struggling with indigestion as a child.[77] Eddy offered more than one version of this. In the first edition she wrote that she had spent years of her youth following a rigid version of the Graham diet: a once-a-day helping of vegetables, a slice of bread, and water. She continued: "After years of suffering ... our eyes were suddenly opened, and we learned suffering is self-imposed, a belief, and not truth." In later editions, when the fall in Lynn took precedence, Eddy attributed the indigestion to a woman she had known and offered its disappearance as the result of Christian Science prayer. In the final edition she wrote that it had happened to a man she had known.[78]
Writing and teaching
Richard Kennedy's practice
Eddy separated from her second husband, Daniel Patterson, in 1866 after 13 years of marriage. Left without a home, she moved between lodgings, either with friends or in boarding houses. Money was a constant source of worry. In June and July 1868 she advertised for students in a spiritualist magazine, the Banner of Light, promising a new healing method, a "principle of science" that would heal with "[n]o medicine, electricity, physiology or hygiene required for unparalleled success in the most difficult cases." The ad was signed Mary B. Glover, using her first husband's surname.[79]
She at first called her ideas Moral Science, and later Divine Science, Metaphysical Science, Metaphysical Healing, the Christ-cure and the Truth-cure. In the first edition of Science and Health in 1875 she called it Christian Science too, first using the lower-case science, but later in the same edition capitalizing it.[80] Quimby had referred to the "religion of Christ [being] shown in the progress of Christian science" in his essay "Aristocracy and Democracy."[81] She may also have found the term in Edmond de Pressensé's (1824–1891) The Early Years of Christianity (1870), a copy of which was in her library; she had underlined a passage that referred to primitive Christianity and Christian science.[82]
Eddy became close to a fellow lodger, Richard Kennedy, in one of the Spiritualist boarding houses she lived in (she would later accuse him of using mesmerism against her). When they met he was a teenager working in a box factory. She began to teach him Moral Science and in 1870 they decided to open a practice in Lynn; he would see patients and she would teach. Her business card read "Mrs. Mary M. Glover, Teacher of Moral Science." Kennedy agreed to pay her $1,000 for the previous two years' tuition in quarterly installments of $50.[83] He leased rooms in June that year on the second floor of Miss Susie Magoun's school on the corner of Shepard Street and South Common, and put a sign in the yard, "Dr. Kennedy"; he was 21 at this point and Eddy was in her fifties. The practice became popular; Cather and Milmine wrote that people would say: "Go to Dr. Kennedy. He can't hurt you, even if he doesn't help you."[84]
The Science of Man
Eddy placed an ad in the Lynn Semi-Weekly Reporter on August 13, 1870: "Mrs. Glover, the well-known Scientist, will receive applications for one week from ladies and gentlemen who wish to learn how to heal the sick without medicine, and with a success unequaled by any known method of the present day, at Dr. Kennedy's office, No. 71 South Common Street, Lynn, Mass."[85]
Many of the students were shoe workers; Lynn was a center of the shoe industry. When the classes began Eddy charged $100, raised a few weeks later to $300 (one third of a shoe worker's annual income), for a three-week, 12-lesson course. She based the lessons on an unpublished manuscript that she called The Science of Man or the principle which controls all phenomena, and later The Science of Man by which the Sick are healed, or Questions and Answers in Moral Science. McClure's and others charged that this manuscript was Quimby's.[86]
In these early years Eddy did acknowledge her debt to Quimby. When a prospective student asked in 1871 whether her methods had been advertised or practiced before, she replied: "Never advertised and practiced only by one individual who healed me, Dr. Quimby ... I discovered the art in a moment's time, and he acknowledged it to me; he died shortly after and since then, eight years, I have been founding and demonstrating the science."[87] Two books were published around that time, The Mental Cure (1871) and Mental Medicine (1872), by Warren F. Evans, a Swedenborgian minister who had been in touch with Quimby, and which elaborated on the same or a similar healing system.[88]
Eddy's classes consisted of lessons in metaphysics, in question-and-answer format, beginning with "What is God?" The answer was "Principle, wisdom, love, and truth," rather than the anthropomorphic vision the students were used to.[89] They were told to make a copy of the manuscript, but were forbidden, under a $3,000 bond, from showing it to anyone. They agreed to pay her 10 percent annually of any income they derived from her methods and $1,000 if they did not practice or teach it.[90] The manuscript advised students to rub their patients' heads, as Quimby had done, but when a student accused Eddy of practicing mesmerism and demanded a refund, she told her remaining students to ignore that part of the manuscript, and from that point on Christian Science healing did not involve touching patients.[91]
It was a running thread throughout Eddy's life that she fell out with those around her, and inevitably Kennedy was added to that list. He came to believe that Moral Science could achieve far less than Eddy promised, and although his practice and her classes were flourishing he urged her to be more circumspect, which angered her. In November 1871 she accused him in front of others of cheating at cards; it was one of many scenes she had caused between them and he walked out on her, ignoring one of her fainting spells.[92]
Mary B. Glover's Christian Scientists' Home
Once Kennedy and Eddy had settled their financial affairs in May 1872, she was left with $6,000. Peel writes that she had already started work on Science and Health, and at that point had completed 60 pages. She again moved between boarding houses and the homes of friends, and was renting rooms in Lynn at 9 Broad Street, when the house opposite came on the market. She purchased 8 Broad Street in March 1875 for $5,650, taking in tenants to pay the mortgage. It was in the attic room of this house that she completed the first edition of Science and Health.[92]
Shortly after moving in, Eddy became close to another student, Daniel Spofford. He was 33 years old and married when he joined her class (his wife had taken it years earlier); he ended up leaving his wife in the hope that he might marry Eddy, but his feelings were not reciprocated. Spofford and seven other students agreed to form an association that would pay Eddy a certain amount a week for one year if she would preach to them every Sunday. They called themselves the Christian Scientists Association.[93] Spofford would later find himself the object of Eddy's fury: expelled from the association, sued for engaging in mental malpractice, and allegedly targeted for murder by Eddy's third husband (a claim that remained unproven).[94]
Eddy placed a sign on 8 Broad Street, Mary B. Glover's Christian Scientists' Home.[95] According to Cather and Milmine, there was a regular turnover of tenants and domestic staff, whom Eddy accused of stealing from the house; she blamed Richard Kennedy for turning people against her using mental malpractice.[96] Peel writes that there was also local gossip about the attractive woman, the men who came and went, and whether she was engaged in witchcraft. She was hurt, but made light of it: "Of course I believe in free love; I love everyone."[97]
Science and Health
Eddy copyrighted her book, then called The Science of Life, in July 1874. Several publishers turned it down, but in September that year a printer agreed to handle it if Eddy would pay the costs.[98] Three of her students, George Barry, Elizabeth Newhall and Daniel Spofford, came up with the necessary $2,000, and after much proofreading and revision by Eddy, it was published by the Christian Science Publishing Company on October 30, 1875, as Science and Health, with eight chapters and 456 pages. (Barry ended up suing Eddy for, among other things, payment for his copying the manuscript in long hand for the printer.)[99]
Martin Gardner (1914–2010) called the book a "chaotic patchwork of repetitious, poorly paragraphed topics," full of spelling, punctuation and grammatical mistakes.[100] It was positively received by Amos Bronson Alcott (1799–1888), who wrote to Eddy in January 1876 that she had "reaffirm[ed] in modern phrase the Christian revelations," and that he was pleased to see it had been written by a woman.[101]
Eddy added Key to the Scriptures to the sixth edition in 1884, and for the 16th edition hired an editor, James Henry Wiggin (1836–1900), a Unitarian clergyman. Eddy's personal assistant, Calvin Frye (1845–1917), contacted Wiggin in August 1885 for help; Wiggin told his literary executor that he was surprised by the mistakes, contradictions and untidy structure, so he rewrote the book and added a new chapter, "Wayside Hints."[102]
People said that simply reading Science and Health had been enough to heal them; cures were claimed for everything from cancer to blindness. New York lawyer William Purrington argued in 1900 that the beneficiaries were "hysterical patients, the morbidly introspective, the worriers, the malades imaginaires, the victims of obscure nervous ailments."[103] Richard Cabot (1868–1939) of Harvard Medical School investigated the testimonies that appeared in the Christian Science Journal, which Eddy founded in 1883, for his senior thesis, The Medical Bearing of Mind-Care (1892).[104] He wrote in McClure's in 1908 that the claims were based on self-diagnosis or secondhand stories about what a doctor had supposedly said, and could be attributed to the placebo effect.[105]
Eddy continued to revise the book until her death in 1910, issuing 432 editions in all; the final edition ran to 18 chapters and 600 pages.[106] She encouraged members to buy a new copy whenever she published a major revision, which brought in significant earnings.[107] Other income derived from the sale of rings and brooches, pictures of Eddy, and in 1889 the Mary Baker Eddy souvenir spoon; Eddy asked every Christian Scientist to buy at least one, or a dozen if they could afford to.[108]
When the copyright on Science and Health expired in 1971, the church persuaded Congress to pass a law, overturned in 1987 as unconstitutional, extending it to the year 2046; the bill to extend the copyright was supported by two of President Nixon's aides, Christian Scientists H.R. Haldeman (1926–1993) and John Ehrlichman (1925–1999).[109] By April 2001, according to the church, the book had sold ten million copies and was available in 16 languages and English Braille.[5]
Eddy's view: sickness is belief
Science and Health expanded on the view that, as Quimby had argued, sickness was a belief. Eddy wrote in the first edition: "Physical effects proceed from mental causes; the belief we can move our hand moves it, and the belief we cannot do this renders it impossible during this state of mind. Palsy is a belief that attacks mind, and holds a limb inactive independent of the mind's consent, but the fact that a limb is moved only with mind proves the opposite, namely, that mind renders it also immovable."[110]
My experiments in homeopathy had made me sceptical as to material curative methods. ... [T]he drug is attenuated to such a degree that not a vestige of it remains; and from this I learn that it is not the drug that cures the disease or changes one of the symptoms ... The highest attenuation of homeopathy and the most potent steps out of matter into Mind; and thus it should be seen that Mind is the healer, or metaphysics, and that there is no efficacy in the drug.
– Mary Baker Eddy, 1889[111]
"Agree not with sickness," she wrote, "meet the physical condition with a mental protest, that destroys it as one property destroys another in chemistry."[112] She wrote years later that she had personally healed tuberculosis, diphtheria and cancer: "at one visit a cancer that had eaten the flesh of the neck and exposed the jugular vein so that it stood out like a cord. I have physically restored sight to the blind, hearing to the deaf, speech to the dumb, and have made the lame walk."[113]
Eddy's views derived in part from her skepticism about homeopathy, after she witnessed what was arguably the placebo effect in patients she said she had treated with homeopathic remedies; they seemed to recover despite being administered remedies so diluted they were drinking plain water. She concluded from this that Mind, or what she called "metaphysics," was the healer.[111]
In later editions of Science and Health she wrote that even naming and reading about disease was sufficient to externalize thoughts as physical symptoms.[114] She argued similarly against the recording of ages: "Timetables of birth and death are so many conspiracies against manhood and womanhood."[115] To counter the argument that people can be harmed by poison in the absence of any belief about it, she referred to the power of majority opinion.[116]
She allowed exceptions from Christian Science prayer for the dentist and basic surgical procedures, such as fixing broken limbs; she said that she had healed broken bones using "mental surgery," but that this skill would be the last to be learned.[117] She herself wore glasses, used morphine, had her third husband treated by a physician, and arranged for an autopsy when he died.[118] But for the most part (then and now), Christian Scientists believe that medicine and Christian Science prayer are incompatible, because they proceed from contradictory assumptions. Medicine asserts that something is physically broken and needs to be fixed, while Christian Science asserts that the spiritual reality is perfect and that any belief to the contrary needs to be corrected.[119]
Eddy's debt to Quimby
Gill wrote that the nature of Eddy's debt to Quimby became the single most controversial issue of her life.[120] In later editions of Science and Health Eddy drew a distinction between her methods and Quimby's, maintaining that the "theology of Christian Science is based on the action of the divine Mind over the human mind and body whereas, 'mind-cure' rests on the notion that the human mind can cure its own disease."[121]
It is apparent, then, that in Christian Science it is not one man's mind acting upon another man's mind that heals; that it is solely the Spirit of God that heals; that the healer's mind performs no office but to convey that force to the patient; that it is merely the wire which carries the electric fluid, so to speak, and delivers the message. Therefore, if these things be true, mental-healing and Science-healing are separate and distinct processes, and no kinship exists between them.
– Mark Twain, Christian Science (1907)[122]
Ernest Sutherland Bates (1879–1939) and John V. Dittemore, a former director of the Christian Science church, argued in their 1932 biography of Eddy that Science and Health is "practically all Quimby," except for the idea of malicious animal mesmerism.[123] In February 1883 one of Quimby's followers, Julius Dresser, accused Eddy in the Boston Post of having plagiarized Quimby's unpublished manuscript.[124]
Eddy denied the charge; on the contrary, she insisted, it was she who had influenced Quimby. The issue ended up in court in 1883 when Eddy filed a complaint about a publication of Edward J Arens, one of her students. He had published a pamphlet in June 1881, Theology, or the Understanding of God as Applied to Healing the Sick, that copied over 20 pages of Science and Health; he credited Quimby, Jesus, the Gottesfreunde, and "some thoughts contained in a work by Eddy."[125] Arens counter-claimed that Eddy had plagiarized it from Quimby in the first place. Quimby's family was unwilling to produce his manuscript for the lawsuit, and Eddy won the case.[126]
Eddy suggested that her own work was being confused for Quimby's; she had handed her manuscripts out to students, she said, and now "the evil-minded" were saying those texts did not originate with her.[127] She was accused again in July 1904 in the New York Times, which had obtained one of Quimby's unpublished manuscripts.[128] McClure's also obtained a Quimby manuscript and repeated the charge in 1907: "For 20 closely written pages, Quimby's manuscript, Questions and Answers, is word for word the same as Mrs. Glover's manuscript, The Science of Man."[129] The Quimby Manuscripts were eventually published in 1921 by Julius Dresser's son, Horatio Dresser (1866–1954). Sources differ as to whether the plagiarism charge stands. Martin Gardner maintained in 1993 that it did, while Caroline Fraser wrote that the plagiarism claims had been exaggerated, but that it was clear Quimby was Eddy's inspiration.[130]
Malicious animal magnetism
In January 1877 Eddy spurned an approach from Daniel Spofford, and to everyone's surprise married another of her students, Asa Gilbert Eddy (1826–1882).[131] Eddy already believed that her former student Richard Kennedy was plotting against her; weeks after the wedding Spofford was added to the list. She had hinted in October 1876 that he might be a successor; instead he found himself expelled from the Christian Scientists' Association in January 1878 for "immorality" after quarrelling with her over money. She also filed lawsuits against Spofford and several other students to recover royalties from their healing practices or unpaid tuition fees. Cather and Milmine wrote that Eddy "required of her students absolute and unquestioning conformity to her wishes; any other attitude of mind she regarded as dangerous."[132]
The conviction that she was at the center of plots and counter-plots became a feature of Eddy's life. This was expressed as a belief that the mind could act at a distance to cause harm or even death (or, at least, the illusion of harm or death), and that several of her students were using this power against her. She called it malicious animal magnetism (MAM), malicious mesmerism or mental malpractice.[133] Eddy wrote in earlier editions of Science and Health, for example in 1889, that MAM was "literally demonology" (a sentence missing from the final edition), and that it had gained strength from Christian Science "as if to forestall the power of good."[134] She spoke openly about it, including to the press, despite the ridicule it attracted.[135]
Everything that went wrong in her life from the late 1870s she blamed on MAM.[136] Cather and Milmine wrote: "Those of her students who believed in mesmerism were always on their guard with each other, filled with suspicion and distrust. Those who did not believe in it dared not admit their disbelief. If a member of that household denied the doctrine, or even showed a lack of interest in it, he was at once pronounced a mesmerist and requested to leave."[137]
Salem witchcraft trial, murder charge
In May 1878 Eddy brought a case against Spofford, in the name of a patient, Lucretia Brown, in Salem, Massachusetts, for practicing mesmerism; it came to be known as the second Salem witchcraft trial. For reasons that remain unclear, Brown believed that Spofford had bewitched her, causing her, according to Eddy, "severe spinal pains and neuralgia and a temporary suspension of mind."[138] Eddy held a power of attorney allowing her to appear in court on Brown's behalf, along with 20 of her supporters (a "cloud of witnesses," according to the Boston Globe), but Judge Horace Gray (1828–1902) declined to hear the case.[139] Amos Bronson Alcott accompanied Eddy to the hearing.[140]
In preparation for the hearing, Eddy organized a 24-hour "watch" at 8 Broad Street, during which she asked 12 of her students to use their minds for two hours each to think of Spofford and block the MAM.[141] She continued to organize these watches, or "private meetings," for the rest of her life; the students would be required to give "adverse treatment" to one of her enemies, often Richard Kennedy, calling him, for example, bilious, consumptive, or poisoned by arsenic.[142] At her Pleasant View home in Concord, New Hampshire, where she lived from 1889, she required the watchers to attend hour-long meetings at least twice a day to address manifestations of MAM.[143]
The attempt to have Spofford tried was not the end of the dispute. In October 1878 Eddy's husband and another of her students, Edward Arens (whom Eddy accused four years later of having killed her husband with MAM when he died of a heart condition), were charged with conspiring to murder Spofford. A barman said they had offered him $500 to carry out the killing; after a complex series of claims and counter-claims, the charges were dropped when a key witness retracted his statement.[144] Eddy attributed the allegations to a plot by former students to undermine sales of the second edition of Science and Health, just published.[145] Her lawyer ended up having to file for an attachment against her house to collect his fee.[146]
Growth
Establishing the church, move to Boston
On August 23, 1879, shortly after the conspiracy-to-murder allegation had receded, the Christian Scientists' Association was granted a charter to form the Church of Christ (Scientist).[147] With an initial congregation of 26 members, services were held in people's homes in Lynn and later in Hawthorne Hall, Boston.[148] On January 31, 1881, Eddy was granted a charter to form the Massachusetts Metaphysical College. The college lived wherever Eddy was teaching; a new sign appeared on 8 Broad Street. The college's stated purpose: "To teach pathology, ontology, therapeutics, moral science, metaphysics, and their application to the treatment of disease."[149]
In October 1881 there was a revolt. Eight of the church's most active members resigned from the church and the association after tiring of malicious mesmerism and the legal disputes. They signed a document complaining of Eddy's "frequent ebullitions of temper, love of money, and the appearance of hypocrisy." Only a few students remained, including Calvin Frye (1845–1917), who went on to become her most loyal personal assistant. Eddy rallied the remaining members, who appointed her pastor of the new church in November 1881. They drew up a resolution in February 1882 that she was "the chosen messenger of God to the nations," and "unless we hear Her voice we do not hear His voice."[150]
The resignations ended Eddy's time in Lynn. The church was struggling to survive and her reputation had been damaged by the internal dissent. By now 61 years old, she decided to move to Boston and in early 1882 rented a house at 569 Columbus Avenue, a silver plaque announcing the arrival of the Massachusetts Metaphysical College.[151] Between 1881 and 1889, when Eddy closed the college, 4,000 students took her 12-lesson course, at $300 a person, making her a rich woman.[152] Mark Twain wrote that she had turned a sawdust mine (possibly Quimby's) into a Klondike.[153]
Third husband's death, first journal, first church
Shortly after the move to Boston, Eddy's husband died of heart disease. On the day of his death, June 4, 1882, she asked the Boston Globe to send a reporter to her home. The newspaper said she appeared "much overcome" and "could scarcely control herself enough to make the following statement":
Her husband, she said, had died with every symptom of arsenical poisoning. Both he and she knew it to be the result of a malicious mesmeric influence exerted upon his mind by certain parties here in Boston, who had sworn to injure them. She had formerly had the same symptoms of arsenical poison herself, and it was some time before she discovered it to be the mesmeric work of an enemy. Soon after her marriage her husband began to manifest the same symptoms and had since shown them from time to time; but was, with her help, always able to overcome them. A few weeks ago she observed that he did not look well, and when questioned he said that he was unable to get the idea of this arsenical poison out of his mind. He had been steadily growing worse ever since, but still had hoped to overcome the trouble until the last. After the death the body had turned black.[154]
A doctor performed an autopsy, and showed Eddy her husband's diseased heart, but she responded with more interviews about the mesmerism claim.[155] Fraser wrote that the articles made Eddy a household name, a real-life version of the charismatic and beautiful Verena Tarrant in Henry James's The Bostonians (1885–1886), with her interest in spiritualism, women's rights and the mind cure.[156]
After her husband's death, Eddy move next door to 571 Columbus Avenue. Several students moved in with her; she held her lectures there and the students saw patients.[157] In 1883 she founded the Journal of Christian Science, later called the Christian Science Journal, which spread news of her ideas still further.[158] According to Cather and Milmine: "Copies found their way to remote villages in Missouri and Arkansas, to lonely places in Nebraska and Colorado, where people had much time for reflection, little excitement, and a great need to believe in miracles."[159]
The first Christian Science church was erected in 1886 in Oconto, Wisconsin, at a cost of $1,137.20, by several local women who believed they had been helped by Christian Science.[160] By 1890 the Church of Christ (Scientist) had 8,724 members in the United States, after starting out 11 years earlier with just 26.[161]
First prosecutions
From the 1880s several adults and children died after being offered Christian Science prayer instead of medical treatment, leading to around 50 prosecutions of parents and Christian Science practitioners between then and the 1990s.[2] The American Medical Association (AMA) declared war on Christian Scientists, calling them in 1895: "Molochs to infants, and pestilential perils to communities in spreading contagious diseases."[162]
Despite the opposition from physicians, prosecutors and prominent newspapers, juries were reluctant to convict where there was a sincere belief that the patient was being helped. There was also opposition to the AMA's effort to strengthen medical licencing laws to outlaw Christian Science treatment. Historian Shawn Francis Peters writes that other religions rallied to the Christian Scientists' defence against attempts to hand physicians a legal monopoly on healing. In the courts and in public debate, Christian Scientists and Jehovah's Witnesses linked their healing claims directly to early Christianity, a "rhetorically savvy move," according to Peters.[163]
The first prosecution was in March 1888 when Abby H. Corner, a practitioner in Medford, Massachusetts, was charged with manslaughter after attending to her own daughter during childbirth; the daughter bled to death and the baby did not survive. The defense argued that the bleeding might have been fatal even with medical attention, and Corner was acquitted.[164]
Eddy distanced herself from Corner, to the dismay of the Christian Scientists' Association. She told the Boston Globe that Corner had never entered the obstetrics class at the Massachusetts Metaphysical College, and had attended the college for one term only.[165] According to Cather and Milmine, the obstetrics course was a recent development; Eddy had for years allowed her students to attend women in childbirth and had even called herself "Professor of Obstetrics" in 1882. They wrote: "Hundreds of Mrs. Eddy's students were then practising who knew no more about obstetrics than the babes they helped into this world."[166]
In 1893 Ezra Buswell, a practitioner in Beatrice, Nebraska, was charged with practicing medicine without a licence after a child died of cholera under his care; a jury acquitted but he was convicted on appeal.[167] Practitioners in Ohio, Minnesota and Wisconsin were acquitted of the same offence in 1898, 1899 and 1900.[168] In 1898 novelist Harold Frederic, London correspondent for the New York Times, died in England of heart disease after being attended to by a practitioner, but charges of manslaughter against the practitioner and Frederic's mistress were dropped.[169] The following year seven-year-old Rolfe Saunders died of pneumonia without medical care at Fort Porter, near Buffalo, New York; a grand jury failed to return indictments against his Christian Scientist parents and two practitioners.[170]
Eddy issued instructions in 1902 that Christian Scientists would no longer treat infectious diseases and should report them as required by law, after the death that year of seven-year-old Esther Quimby of diphtheria in White Plains, New York.[171] In failing to have her quarantined, her parents had exposed others to the infection; the parents and the practitioner, John C. Lathrop, were charged with manslaughter, but the case was dismissed.[172] In England in 1913 Christian Scientist Benjamin Jewell was also acquitted of manslaughter after his seven-year-old daughter died of diphtheria; the judge ruled that, in having called for a practitioner rather than a doctor, the neglect was not clearly willful.[173]
Building the Mother Church, fastest growing religion
The cornerstone of the Mother Church, The First Church of Christ, Scientist, was laid in May 1894 in the Back Bay area of Boston. The stone was hollow and contained the Bible, Eddy's writings, and a list of directors and financial contributors.[174] Eddy had purchased the land and church members raised the funds for the construction; the building was finished in December 1894 at a cost of $250,000.[175]
The church contained a "Mother's Room" in the tower for Eddy's personal use. The archway at the entrance to the room was made of Italian marble, with the word Mother engraved on the floor. It was furnished with rare books, silks, tapestries, Persian rugs, a 200-year-old lamp, a fireplace rug made of 100 duck skins, and a dressing gown, slippers, handkerchiefs and a pin cushion.[176] Gill wrote that Eddy spent only one night there; it was eventually turned into a storage room.[177]
By April 1896 the Boston membership had exceeded the church's seating capacity, and plans began for an extension. By 1903 the whole block around the church had been purchased by Christian Scientists and the extension was completed in 1906;[178] it accommodated 5,000 people at a cost of $2 million.[179] This attracted the criticism that, while Christian Scientists were willing to spend money on a magnificent new church, they maintained no hospitals, orphanages or missions in the slums.[180]
Christian Science went on to become the fastest growing American religion in the first few decades of the 20th century.[181] The US federal religious census recorded 85,717 Christian Scientists in 1906; 30 years later it was 268,915.[182] There were just seven Christian Science churches in that country in 1890, a figure that by 1910 had risen to 1,077, and churches began to appear in other countries: 58 in England, 38 in Canada and 28 elsewhere by 1910.[183]
View of Mark Twain
Mark Twain was a contemporaneous critic of Eddy's. His first article about her was published in Cosmopolitan in October 1899.[184] Another three articles appeared between December 1902 and February 1903 in North American Review, then a book, Christian Science (1907).[185] He also wrote "The Secret History of Eddypus, the World Empire" (1901–1902), in which Christian Science replaces Christianity and Eddy becomes the Pope.[186]
Twain described Eddy as "[g]rasping, sordid, penurious, famishing for everything she sees – money, power, glory – vain, untruthful, jealous, despotic, arrogant, insolent, pitiless where thinkers and hypnotists are concerned, illiterate, shallow, incapable of reasoning outside of commercial lines, immeasurably selfish."[187] Incensed by the view that she was using Christian Science to accrue wealth, he wrote: "From end to end of the Christian Science literature not a single (material) thing in the world is conceded to be real, except the Dollar."[188]
Science and Health he called "strange and frantic and incomprehensible and uninterpretable" (though he also argued that Eddy had not written it herself):[189] "There is nothing in Christian Science that is not explicable; for God is one, Time is one, Individuality is one, and may be one of a series, one of many, as an individual man, individual horse; whereas God is one, not one of a series, but one alone and without an equal."[184] Eddy apart, Twain felt ambivalent toward mind-cure; he argued that "the thing back of it is wholly gracious and beautiful."[190] His daughter Clara (1874–1962) became a Christian Scientist and wrote a book about it, Awake to a Perfect Day (1956).[191]
McClure's articles
The first biography of Eddy, and the first history of Christian Science, appeared in McClure's magazine (1893–1929) in a devastating critique published in 14 installments between January 1907 and June 1908, preceded by an editorial in December 1906.[193] The essence of the articles is that Eddy was an uneducated, dishonest plagiarist whose chief concern was money. The material, which included court documents, news articles from the 1880s, and affidavits from people who knew Eddy, was published in book form in 1909 as The Life of Mary Baker G. Eddy and the History of Christian Science.[194] It became the key source for most subsequent non-church histories of the religion.[195]
The editor-in-chief S.S. McClure (1857–1949) assigned five writers to work on the series: Willa Cather (1873–1947), who was the principal author; Burton J. Hendrick (1870–1949); Will Irwin (1873–1948); political columnist Mark Sullivan (1874–1952); researcher Georgine Milmine (1874–1950); and briefly Ida Tarbell (1857–1944).[196] The book was kept out of print from early in its life by the Christian Science church, which bought the original manuscript.[197] It was republished in 1971 by Baker Book House when its copyright expired, and again in 1993 by the University of Nebraska Press.[196]
In his introduction to the 1993 edition, David Stouck wrote that Willa Cather's portrayal of Eddy contains "some of the finest portrait sketches and reflections on human nature" that she would ever write.[198] Gillian Gill took a different view of the material. She argued that a great deal of it was based on anonymous sources and was designed to damage Eddy during a lawsuit, the so-called "Next Friends" suit, in which her relatives sought to have her declared unable to manage her own affairs.[199]
Next Friends suit, Christian Science Monitor, Eddy's death
In March 1907 several of Eddy's relatives, including her son, George Glover, filed the "Next Friends suit" against members of Eddy's household staff. The suit alleged that the staff, including Eddy's personal assistant Calvin Frye (1845–1917), were misusing her property and that Eddy, by then 85 years old, was unable to conduct her own affairs.[200] One of the plaintiffs was Ebenezer Johnson Foster Eddy, a homeopath Eddy had legally adopted in November 1888 when she was 68 and he was 41; the idea behind the adoption, according to Cather and Milmine, was that Eddy would have someone who was unquestionably loyal to her.[201]
Gill wrote that the lawsuit originated with stories in the New York World (1860–1931), owned by Joseph Pulitzer (1847–1911), that Eddy was sick and dying; the newspaper apparently paid for some of the plaintiffs' legal expenses.[200] Four psychiatrists (then known as "alienists") were sent to Eddy's home to interview her as part of the proceedings. They concluded that she was mentally competent. One of them, Dr. Allan McLane Hamilton (1848–1919), told the New York Times that the attacks on Eddy were the result of "a spirit of religious persecution that has at last quite overreached itself."[202]
In response to the stories in the New York World and McClure's, Eddy asked the Christian Science Publishing Society on August 8, 1908, to found the Christian Science Monitor as a platform for responsible journalism.[203] It was published for the first time on November 25 that year,[204] and went on to win seven Pulitzer Prizes between 1950 and 2002.[205]
Eddy died two years later, on the evening of Saturday, December 3, 1910, aged 89. The first reader of the Mother Church in Boston announced the death at the end of the Sunday morning service, saying that Eddy had "passed from our sight." The church issued a statement reaffirming its belief that "the time will come when there will be no more death," but that Christian Scientists "do not look for [Mrs. Eddy's] return in this world."[206] The church placed an armed guard outside her tomb at Mount Auburn cemetery, which triggered complaints from Christian Scientists who believed she would be resurrected.[207] Her estate was valued at $1.5 million, most of which she left to the church.[208]
Decline and reasons for the rise
Christian Science practitioners (US) (Stark 1998)[209] |
Practitioners per million | |
---|---|---|
1883 | 14 | 0.3 |
1887 | 110 | 1.9 |
1895 | 553 | 7.9 |
1911 | 3,280 | 34.9 |
1919 | 6,111 | 58.5 |
1930 | 9,722 | 79.0 |
1941 | 11,200 | 84.0 |
1945 | 9,823 | 70.2 |
1953 | 8,225 | 51.7 |
1972 | 5,848 | 28.0 |
1981 | 3,403 | 15.1 |
1995 | 1,820 | 6.9 |
A census at the height of the religion's popularity in 1936 counted nearly 270,000 Christian Scientists in the United States. The movement has been in decline ever since; Rodney Stark estimated that there were 106,000 Scientists in that country in 1990.[210] He wrote in 1998 that it was uncertain whether Christian Science would survive another generation.[211]
There were 1,271 Christian Science practitioners worldwide in 2014, against 11,200 in the United States in 1941; according to Stark clusters of the practitioners listed in the Christian Science Journal in 1998 were living in the same retirement communities.[212] In 2009 the church announced that for the first time more new members had been admitted from Africa than from the United States.[213] The church has sold church buildings to free up funds for congregations that could otherwise not continue.[214]
Stark attributed the rise of the movement in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to several factors. It retained cultural continuity with Christianity, the native religion, by stressing that it was Christian and adopting its terms, despite the novel content Eddy introduced.[215] It was not puritanical; members were expected not to drink or smoke but could otherwise do as they pleased, and several exceptions to the avoidance of medicine were permitted.[216] It offered professional opportunities to women, as practitioners after just 12 lessons of study, who might otherwise have had none; 12 of the 14 practitioners listed in the first edition of Christian Science Journal were women.[217] In 1906 72 percent of Christian Scientists in the United States were female, against 49 percent of the population, and similar percentages held true for 1926 and 1936.[218]
The major factor in the rise of the movement was that medical practice was in its infancy; many physicians practiced little more than quackery and patients often fared better if left alone. Within that context Christian Science prayer compared favorably with medical care.[220] The increased efficacy of medicine around the period of World War II heralded the religion's decline because Christian Science prayer began to perform poorly by comparison. Stark charts the use of sulfonamide to kill bacteria, the availability of penicillin in the 1940s and breakthroughs in immunology.[221]
Other factors in the decline included increased opportunities for women to work outside the home,[222] and that much of the membership was elderly; in 1998 30 percent were over 65.[223] Eddy was over 60 herself by the time the movement became popular; Stark writes that the "characteristics of the earliest members of a movement will tend to be reproduced in subsequent converts."[224]
A significant percentage of Scientists remained single, or became Scientists in later life when their children were adults and therefore unlikely to be converted; Eddy herself placed little emphasis on marriage and family.[225] Christian Science did not have a missionary class that sought out new members, so it relied on internal growth, but the conversion rate within families was not high: in a study cited by Stark 26 of 80 people (33 percent) raised with Christian Science became Scientists themselves.[226]
Practices and governance
Christian Science prayer
Practitioners, nursing homes
Part of a series on |
Christianity |
---|
Christian Scientists certified by the church to charge for Christian Science prayer are called Christian Science practitioners. There were around 1,400 practitioners in the United States in 2010.[119] Their training is much the same as it was in Eddy's day, a two-week, 12-lesson course called primary-class instruction, based on the 24 questions and answers in the Recapitulation chapter of Science and Health. Upon completion they can apply to be listed as practitioners in the Christian Science Journal.[227]
Practitioners in the United States charge $25–$50 for a telephone or e-mail consultation, and more for house calls. Practitioners wanting to teach primary class themselves must take an additional six-day "normal class," which is held in Boston just once every three years.[228]
Christian Science nursing homes have been run independently of the church since 1993, accredited by the Commission for Accreditation of Christian Science Nursing Organizations/Facilities. The homes offer no medical services; several are Medicare or Medicaid providers. The nurses are Christian Scientists who have completed a course of religious study and training in basic skills, such as feeding and bathing, in a Christian Science training center; no medical or nursing qualifications are required.[229]
Prayers and testimonies
The aim of Christian Science prayer is to convince patients, or (from the perspective of Christian Science) help them understand, that they are not ill, and could not be ill, because there is no such thing as illness. They are, rather, the perfect ideas of Mind or God.[230] A practitioner told the New York Times in 2010 that a patient with a lump under his arm is displaying a "manifestation of fear, not a lump." There is no laying on of hands; practitioners need not even be near the patient, but can act by telephone or e-mail, which they call "absent treatment."[119] There are no set words or practices, and no appeal to God for help.[231]
According to Robert Clark of the church's Committee on Publication for Florida, Christian Science prayer consists of "replacing ... fear and doubt with certainty of the divine presence in one's life. ... The process is really one of forsaking matter, and matter-based thinking, for spirit and spiritually-based knowing."[23]
Fraser described Christian Science prayer as the practitioner silently arguing about the nature of reality. The practitioner might tell herself, "the allness of God using Eddy's seven synonyms – Life, Truth, Love, Spirit, Soul, Principle and Mind," then that "Spirit, Substance, is the only Mind, and man is its image and likeness; that Mind is intelligence; that Spirit is substance; that Love is wholeness; that Life, Truth, and Love are the only reality." She might continue by denying various ideas, including other religions, the existence of evil, mesmerism, astrology, numerology and the symptoms of whatever the illness is. She concludes, according to Fraser, by asserting that disease is a lie, that this is the word of God and that it has the power to heal.[232]
The Christian Science Journal and Christian Science Sentinel publish anecdotal testimonies from adherents who say they were healed in this way. Published testimonies must be accompanied by statements from three verifiers, who are "people who know [the testifier] well and have either witnessed the healing or can vouch for [the testifier's] integrity in sharing it"; these statements are similarly anecdotal.[233]
The church published 53,900 such testimonies between 1900 and April 1989, according to a church report, An Empirical Analysis of Medical Evidence in Christian Science Testimonies of Healing, 1969–1988.[234] The study examined 10,000 reported healings from 1969–1988, 2,337 of which the church said had been medically diagnosed, and 623 of which were "medically confirmed by follow-up examinations." The report offered no evidence of the confirmation.[235] The Massachusetts Committee for Children and Youth listed among the report's methodological flaws that it had failed to compare the rates of successful and unsuccessful Christian Science treatment.[236] Philosopher Margaret P. Battin wrote that the seriousness with which the testimonies are treated by Christian Scientists ignores factors such as false positives caused by spontaneous recovery and self-limiting conditions. Because no negative accounts are published, the material feeds into people's tendency to over-rely on anecdotes when making decisions.[237]
Children's rights
Religious exemptions
The main criticism Christian Science has faced is that adherents impose their ideas on their children, and by failing to provide access to medical care are denying them equal protection under the law.[238] Children with disabilities and illnesses, or who are in pain, have been told there is nothing wrong with them apart from "incorrect" thinking. Fraser argues that this can undermine children's confidence in their own perceptions, and cause hypochondria by making them obsessed with their bodies in an effort to control their thoughts about them.[239] In the case of very young children, parents have been told by practitioners that the illness must mainly be addressed in the parents thought. The church maintains that members are free to choose medical care, but several have said they fear being ostracized if they do.[2] Nate Talbot, a past spokesperson for the Christian Science movement, objects to that view. "members of this denomination take community concerns about the well being of children with deep seriousness. They have a strong record of cooperation with public health officials over the years" [240][241][242]
The Christian Science church in the United States has used the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, which guarantees the protection of religious practice, to persuade states to maintain religious-exemption statutes.[243] After the conviction for manslaughter in 1967 of the Christian Scientist mother of five-year-old Lisa Sheridan, who died of pneumonia without medical care in Cape Code, Massachusetts,[244] the church successfully lobbied the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) to add the following, in 1974, to the Code of Federal Regulations:
A parent or guardian legitimately practicing his religious beliefs who thereby does not provide specified medical treatment for a child, for that reason alone shall not be considered a negligent parent or guardian; however, such an exception shall not preclude a court from ordering that medical services be provided to the child, where his health requires it.[245]
Only a dozen states had religious exemptions before this, but afterwards states were obliged to include one in child-neglect legislation or lose funding. The Christian Science church was either mentioned in the statutes or the wording made clear that the exemption referred to Christian Science.[246] For example, the state of Washington religious exemption said as of March 2014: "It is the intent of the legislature that a person who, in good faith, is furnished Christian Science treatment by a duly accredited Christian Science practitioner in lieu of medical care is not considered deprived of medically necessary health care or abandoned."[247]
Largely as a result of lobbying by Children's Healthcare is a Legal Duty, the government eliminated the HEW regulation in 1983, but 37 states, Guam and the District of Columbia still had religious-exemption statutes as of March 2014.[248] Many of the exemptions say that in life-threatening situations children must be given access to medical care, but without early access to physicians the seriousness of an illness may not be recognized, in part because Christian Scientists are encouraged not to educate themselves about physical ailments.[249]
Child deaths, prosecutions
In over 50 cases, from the prosecution of Abby Corner in 1888 to the early 1990s, prosecutors charged Christian Scientists after adults and children died of treatable illnesses without medical care.[250] A study published in 1998 in Pediatrics examined 172 child deaths between 1975 and 1995 where parents had withheld medical care for religious reasons; 28 deaths involved Christian Science (this was the second highest number from a single group; the highest was the Faith Assembly with 64). Of the 172, all but three of the children would have benefited from medical care in the opinion of the authors, and 140 involved conditions where survival rates with medical treatment would have exceeded 90 percent.[251]
In 1937 10-year-old Audrey Kay Whitney, a diabetic, died after her father left her with a Christian Scientist aunt in Chicago, who withdrew her insulin and took her to a practitioner. An attempt to prosecute the practitioner for manslaughter failed. (In 1959 the father approached the practitioner in his office and shot him three times; he was acquitted of attempted murder.)[252] In 1955 seven-year-old David Cornelius also died after his insulin was withdrawn. His Christian Scientist parents were charged with manslaughter; the church hired a lawyer and the charges were dropped after the judge said the couple had held a "sincere belief in the inefficacy of medical treatment."[253]
In March 1967 five-year-old Lisa Sheridan died of pneumonia in Cape Code, Massachusetts, after contracting strep throat; according to pediatrician Paul Offit she was found at autopsy to have two pints of pus in her chest that could have been removed. Her mother was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to five years' probation.[254] In July 1977 16-month-old Matthew Swan died of bacterial meningitis in Detroit, Michigan, after his parents were persuaded by Christian Science practitioners not to take him to a physician; by the time they took him to hospital, the infection had caused irreversible brain damage. The parents, Douglas and Rita, responded by founding Children's Healthcare is a Legal Duty (CHILD).[255]
Between 1980 and 1990 another seven Christian Scientist parents were prosecuted after their children died without medical care, three in California; two cases were dismissed and four resulted in convictions, two of which were later overturned.[256] In June 1988 12-year-old Ashley King died in Phoenix, Arizona, after living for months with a tumor on her leg the size of a watermelon; her parents pleaded guilty to reckless endangerment.[257] A prominent case in Massachusetts was Commonwealth v. Twitchell, which saw David and Ginger Twitchell convicted in 1990 of involuntary manslaughter after their two-year-old son, Robyn, died of peritonitis caused by a bowel obstruction.[258] The conviction was overturned in 1993 when the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the couple had "reasonably believed," based on a church publication they had read, that they could rely on Christian Science prayer without being prosecuted.[259]
Lundman v. McKown
The first time the church was held liable in a wrongful death suit was in August 1993, when a Minnesota jury ordered it to pay damages to the father of 11-year-old Ian Lundman, who died in May 1989 as a consequence of undiagnosed diabetes.[260] Although the award against the church was overturned, the case is regarded as important because the judgments against a Christian Science practitioner and nurse were upheld.[261]
The boy had been ill for weeks, but when his condition worsened his mother sought help from a practitioner, a Christian Science nursing home and the church's Committee on Publication. The home sent a Christian Science nurse to sit with the boy, who was later deemed to have been in a diabetic coma; doctors testified that he could have been saved by an insulin injection up to two hours before his death. The nurse's notes were entered into evidence. The first entry noted that he was barely responsive; his breathing was labored and he was vomiting. She read hymns, rubbed his lips with Vaseline and tried to give him water. Over five hours later, 16 minutes before she wrote that he had stopped breathing, she wrote "passing possible."[262]
The mother and stepfather were charged with manslaughter, but the charges were dismissed.[262] The boy's father, Douglass Lundman, sued the mother, stepfather, practitioner, nurse, nursing home and the church. In August 1993 he was awarded $5.2 million compensatory damages divided between all the defendants, later reduced to $1.5 million, and $9 million in punitive damages against the church.[263] The Minnesota State Court of Appeals upheld the judgment against the individuals in 1995, but overturned the award against the church and nursing home, finding that a judgment that forced the church to "abandon teaching its central tenet" was unconstitutional, and that, while the individuals had a duty of care toward the boy, the church and nursing home did not.[264] Several of the parties appealed to the United States Supreme Court, but it declined to hear the case, and turned down an appeal by the father to reinstate the punitive damages against the church.[265]
Avoidance of vaccination
Massachusetts made vaccination against smallpox compulsory for schoolchildren in 1855, and other states soon followed.[266] Christian Scientists protested against the laws. A Christian Scientist in Wisconsin won a case in 1897 that allowed his unvaccinated son to attend public school, and several others were arrested in 1899 for avoiding vaccination during an epidemic in Georgia. In 1900 Eddy issued advice to adherents: "Rather than quarrel over vaccination I recommend that if the law demand an individual to submit to this process he obey the law and then appeal to the gospel to save him from any bad results." In 1902 she added that Christian Scientists should report contagious diseases to health boards when the law required it.[267] Forty-eight states allowed religious exemptions to compulsory vaccination as of 2013.[266]
There were at least four significant outbreaks of infectious diseases at Christian Science institutions between 1972 and 1994.[268] In 1972 128 students at a Christian Science school in Greenwich, Connecticut, contracted polio and four were left partially paralyzed. In 1982 a nine-year-old girl died of diphtheria after attending a Christian Science camp in Colorado.[269] In 1985 128 people were infected with measles, and three died, at Principia College, a Christian Science school in Elsah, Illinois.[270] In 1994 190 people in six states were infected with measles traced to a child from a Christian Science family in Elsah.[271]
Christian Science church
Governance, Manual of the Mother Church
The First Church of Christ, Scientist is headquartered in a 28-story building on its original site in Boston; the site covers 14 acres and includes a plaza with a 670-foot reflecting pool.[272] The church is led by a president and five-person Board of Directors, and by the Committee on Publication (with representatives around the world), an institution Eddy set up in 1898 to protect her own and the church's reputation.[273] The first church to be built in any city is named the First Church of Christ, Scientist; the next, the Second Church of Christ, Scientist, and so on (for example, the Third Church of Christ, Scientist, London). When a church closes the others are not renamed. Only the Mother Church in Boston uses the definite article in the title.[274]
Eddy's Manual of The Mother Church (1895) lists 83 requirements and prohibitions for members. Requirements include daily study of the Bible and Science and Health.[275] It also requires daily prayer; members are expected to say each day: "Thy kingdom come; let the reign of divine Truth, Life, and Love be established in me, and rule out of me all sin; and may Thy Word enrich the affections of all mankind, and govern them!"[276]
They must subscribe to church periodicals if they can afford to, and pay an annual tax to the church of not less than one dollar.[277] Prohibitions include joining other churches, publishing articles that are uncharitable toward religion, medicine, the law and courts, engaging in public debate or writing about Christian Science without board approval, engaging in mental malpractice, or visiting a book store that sells "obnoxious" books. It also includes "The Golden Rule": "A member of The Mother Church shall not haunt Mrs. Eddy’s drive when she goes out, continually stroll by her house, or make a summer resort near her for such a purpose."[275]
Christian Science churches have no clergy, sermons or rituals, and perform no baptisms, marriages or burials; Eddy forbade the development of a church heirarchy apart from the Board of Directors and Committees on Publication. Readers select hymns and read aloud from Science and Health and the Bible. There are Sunday morning and evening services, Sunday schools, and meetings on Wednesday afternoons or evenings during which members offer testimonies; Wednesday meetings and Sunday schools are also offered online.[278]
The church began an ecumenical dialogue in the 2000s with mainstream Christian churches with a view to fostering closer relationships. In 2008 Michael Kinnamon, then general secretary of the National Council of Churches (NCC), invited Christian Scientists to visit the NCC governing board and join NCC commissions. According to Shirley Paulson, the church's Head of Ecumenical Affairs as of 2014, the stumbling blocks for better relationships are the "surface similarities" between Christian Science and gnosticism, and the church's rejection of medical care.[279]
The organization has been accused at times of silencing internal criticism by firing staff, delisting practitioners and excommunicating members.[280] Stephen Gottschalk – author of The Emergence of Christian Science in American Religious Life (1973) and Rolling Away the Stone: Mary Baker Eddy's Challenge to Materialism (2005) – who worked for the church's Committee on Publication in Boston for 13 years, was forced out in 1990 after advising the board to be more accepting of internal criticism; by the end of the year, five of his associates had resigned or been fired, according to Caroline Fraser.[281]
Notable members
Christian Scientists have tended to be white and middle-class. Most have been women and, as of the 1990s, 42 percent had a college education. [282] Notable Scientists have included two former Directors of Central Intelligence, William H. Webster and Admiral Stansfield M. Turner, as well as Richard Nixon's chief of staff H. R. Haldeman and Nixon's White House Counsel John Ehrlichman.[283] Others include physicist Laurance Doyle and NASA astronaut Alan Shepard, Bill Bowerman, Co-founder of Nike, Henry Paulson, former Secretary of Treasury and in England the viscountess Nancy Astor and naval officer Charles Lightoller, the highest-ranking officer to survive the 1912 sinking of the Titanic.[284] [285] [286]
- Also see Charles Lightoller, "It is difficult to tell of the experience ...", Christian Science Journal, October 1912. There used to be a concentration of Scientists in the film industry (see above).[283]
Those raised within Christian Science include comedian Robin Williams, puppeteer Jim Henson, television host Ellen DeGeneres, musician James Hetfield, jurist Helmuth James Graf von Moltke, military analyst Daniel Ellsberg, who leaked the Pentagon Papers in 1971, and actors Elizabeth Taylor, Henry Fonda, Audrey Hepburn and Anne Archer. Archer left Christian Science when her son, Tommy Davis, was a child; both became prominent in the Church of Scientology.[287]
Publishing Society, The Destiny of The Mother Church
The Christian Science Publishing Society publishes several periodicals, including the Christian Science Monitor, a newspaper with a reputation for high-quality international news coverage.[288] The winner of seven Pulitzer Prizes between 1950 and 2002, and numerous other awards, the Monitor had a daily circulation in 1970 of 220,000, which by 2008 had contracted to 52,000. It moved in 2009 to a largely online presence with a weekly print run.[289] In the 1980s the church produced its own television programs, Christian Science Monitor Reports and World Monitor, and in 1991 founded the Monitor Channel, a 24-hour news channel, which closed with heavy losses after 13 months.[290]
The church also publishes the weekly Christian Science Sentinel, the monthly Christian Science Journal, and the Herald of Christian Science, a non-English publication. In April 2012 JSH-Online made all back issues of the Journal, Sentinel and Herald available online to subscribers.[291]
The church faced significant internal dissent in 1991 when the Publishing Society published The Destiny of The Mother Church, written decades earlier by Bliss Knapp (1877–1958), the son of two of Eddy's students. Knapp had been president of the Mother Church and a Christian Science practitioner.[249] The book suggested that the Old and New Testaments had predicted Eddy's coming and that she was the Woman of the Apocalypse in the latter.[292] Knapp had the book printed privately in 1947 but was anxious that it be church-authorized, so he and his family bequeathed $98-million to the church on condition that it publish the book by 1993; otherwise the money would go to Stanford University and the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.[293]
The church refused at least once after the bequest was set up, but agreed to publish the book in 1991, and made it available in Christian Science reading rooms; the other parties disputed that this constituted authorizing it and in the end the bequest was split three ways.[293] In the view of some church members, the book tainted the religion's status as Christian and lent support to the view of it as a cult.[249] A senior employee was fired for failing to support the church and 18 of the 21 editorial staff of the religious journals resigned.[293]
Works by Mary Baker Eddy
- Science and Health (1875)
- The Science of Man, By Which the Sick are Healed (1876)
- Christian Healing (1880)
- The People's God (1883)
- Historical Sketches of Metaphysical Healing (1885)
- Defence of Christian Science (1885)
- No and Yes (1887)
- Rudiments and Rules of Divine Science (1887)
- Unity of Good and Unreality of Evil (1888)
- Retrospection and Introspection (1891)
- Rudimental Divine Science (1894)
- Manual of the Mother Church (1895)
- Pulpit and Press (1895)
- Miscellaneous Writings, 1883–1896 (1897)
- Christ and Christmas (1897)
- Christian Science versus Pantheism (1898)
- The Christian Science Hymnal (1898)
- Christian Healing and the People's Idea of God (1908)
- Poems (1910)
- The First Church of Christ Scientist and Miscellany (1913)
- Prose Works (1925)
-
Second Church of Christ, Scientist, Los Angeles, CA
-
Third Church of Christ, Scientist, London
-
First Church of Christ, Scientist, Ottawa
-
Christian Science Reading Room, Boston, MA
-
Christian Science Reading Room, Reading, England
-
Christian Science Reading Room, Lexington, MA
-
Mary Baker Eddy Library, Boston, MA
-
Mary Baker Eddy's home, Swampscott, MA
-
Mary Baker Eddy's home, Newton, MA
-
Mary Baker Eddy memorial, Mount Auburn Cemetery, Watertown, MA
See also
Notes
- ^ Valente (PBS) 2008: "The church estimates it has about 400,000 members worldwide, but independent studies put membership at around 100,000."
- Also see Stark 1998, the most detailed study of membership.
- ^ a b c Paul Vitello, "Christian Science Church Seeks Truce With Modern Medicine", The New York Times, March 23, 2010, p. 1
- ^ a b Eddy, Science and Health, chapter XIV, Recapitulation, the "Scientific statement of being": "There is no life, truth, intelligence, nor substance in matter. All is infinite Mind and its infinite manifestation, for God is All-in-all. Spirit is immortal Truth; matter is mortal error. Spirit is the real and eternal; matter is the unreal and temporal. Spirit is God, and man is His image and likeness. Therefore man is not material; he is spiritual."
- For it being the "first plank in the platform of Christian Science," see Eddy, Miscellaneous Writings, Chapter II, One Cause and Effect; Gottschalk 1973, p. 58.
- Schoepflin 2001, p. 28: "Embracing a radical idealism, Eddy affirmed that there is no Life, Substance, or Intelligence in Matter. That all is mind and there is no matter."
- Cunningham 1967, p. 886: "Eddy compounded [Quimby's] system of mental therapeutics with an idealistic metaphysics and a pantheistic theology to create a distinctive creed, summarized in a brief doctrinal formula known as the 'Scientific statement of being.'"
- This is not the theoretical construct of idealist philosophy; during World War I, Bryan R. Wilson (1926–2004) wrote, Christian Scientists argued that no war was being fought and that no one was being killed (though Scientists did serve in both world wars). See Wilson 1961, pp. 154, 207, cited in Stark 1998, p. 196.
- ^ a b For Christian Science belonging to the metaphysical–New Thought family, see:
- Harley 2010, p. 671: "Christian Science is a metaphysical religion with a spiritual healing component ..."
- Mead, Hill and Atwood 2010 (13th edition), p. 354, categorizes Christian Science as one of the "Esoteric, Spiritualist and New Thought bodies."
- Melton 2009 (8th edition), p. 741, classifies Christian Science as part of the Christian Science–metaphysical group within the "Western Esotericism" family. For a summary, see here. For an older edition, see Melton 1996, chapter 16, "Christian Science-Metaphysical Family", p. 133ff.
- Saliba 2003, p. 26: "The Christian Science-Metaphysical Family. This family, known also as "New Thought" in academic literature, stresses the need to understand the functioning of the human mind in order to achieve the healing of all human ailments."
- Lewis 2003, p. 94: "Groups in the metaphysical (Christian Science–New Thought) tradition ... usually claim to have discovered spiritual laws which, if properly understood and applied, transform and improve the lives of ordinary individuals, much as technology has transformed society."
- Simmons 1995, p. 61: "[M]ost outside observers place Christian Science in the metaphysical family of religious organizations ... The broad descriptive term 'metaphysical' is not used in a manner common to the trained philosopher. Instead, it denotes the primacy of Mind as the controlling factor in human experience."
- For the metaphysical groups being referred to as the mind-cure, mental-cure and mental-healing movement, see Taves 1999, p. 312.
- For new religious movement, see, for example, Kaplan 2006, p. 89–90; Gallagher 2004, pp. 54–55 ("[Christian Science] is an example of a new religious movement in the United States that has survived the generation of its founder").
- ^ a b "The Christian Science Pastor: The Bible & Science And Health With Key To The Scriptures", christianscience.org.
- ^ For the charter in 1879 and the 26 charter members, see Cather and Milmine (McClure's), August 1907, p. 458.
- ^ Stark 1998 is the most detailed study of the rise and decline of Christian Science. See p. 190 for Christian Science being "the fastest growing American religious movement during the first few decades of the 20th century"; p. 191 for the 1936 census figure of 268,915, and for the estimate of 106,000 members in 1990.
- Also see Vitello (New York Times) 2010, p. 1: "Though officials do not provide membership statistics, scholars estimate that the church's numbers have dropped to under 100,000 from a peak of about twice that at the turn of the 20th century."
- Valente (PBS) 2008: "Membership in the church has steadily declined since the 1930s. Mrs. Eddy forbade her followers from keeping an official membership tally. The church estimates it has about 400,000 members worldwide, but independent studies put membership at around 100,000. In the US, the number of churches has dwindled from about 1,500 10 years ago to 1,100 today."
- Gallagher 2004, p. 54: "In contrast to other groups, like the Branch Davidians, the Church of Christ, Scientist nonetheless retained a substantial following of somewhere near 100,000 followers in 2003."
- Stein 2003, p. 99: "The Mother Church does not issue contemporary membership statistics for Christian Science. Therefore no precise numbers exist at the present. Most informed observers, however, believe that this is a movement in numerical decline."
- ^ Fuller 2011, p. 175; David Cook, "Monitor shifts from print to Web-based strategy", The Christian Science Monitor, October 29, 2008; "Reading rooms", Christian Science.
- ^ a b Melton 2005, p. 146: "Although Eddy's attempt to wed healing with Christianity had parallels in the healing experiences so central to Jesus' ministry, her teachings radically departed from Protestant tradition. God was seen as a Principle, not as a person, and that principle was described as Life, Truth, Love, Substance, and Intelligence. Eddy also advanced an allegorical interpretation of the Bible; the Key to the Scriptures she appended to Science and Health was a dictionary to assist in that interpretation."
- Stark and Bainbridge 1996, p. 106: "Mrs. Eddy's sharpest break with traditional Christian teaching was her denial of the reality of matter."
- Melton 1992, p. 36: "Almost as much as the medical controversy, charges of heresy from orthodox Christian churches have hounded the Church. Leaders of Christian Science insist that they are within the mainstream of Christian teachings, a concern which leads to their strong resentment of any identification with the New Thought movement, which they see as having drifted far from their central Christian affirmations. At the same time, strong differences with traditional Christian teachings concerning the Trinity, the unique divinity of Jesus Christ, atonement for sin, and the creation are undeniable. While using Christian language, Science and Health with Key to Scriptures and Eddy's other writings radically redefine basic theological terms, usually by the process commonly called allegorization. Such redefinitions are most clearly evident in the glossary to Science and Health (pages 579–599)."
- Christian Science: A Sourcebook of Contemporary Material, Christian Science Publishing Society, 1990, p. 17, cited in Poloma 1991, p. 338: [Christian Science]" does not even fit comfortably under the wide umbrella of Protestantism, for it conflicts with tenets held by most denominations."
- Bednarowski 1989, p. 28: " ... Christian Science is a system which radically reinterprets, but nonetheless retains, the language of traditional Christian theology."
- ^ Battin 1999, p. 11; Schoepflin 2002, p. 6.
- ^ "New York Times Response from the Christian Science Board of Directors", christianscience.com, 24 March 2010.
- Schoeplin 2001, pp. 192–193; Hughes 2004–2005, p. 248.
- ^ Fraser (Atlantic) 1995; Peters 2007, p. 13.
- "The Christian Scientist Not Indicted", The New York Times, June 10, 1888.
- David Margolick, "In Child Deaths, a Test for Christian Science", The New York Times, August 6, 1990.
- "Christian Scientists Found Liable in Death", The New York Times, August 19, 1993.
- ^ Melton 1991, p. 7; McLoughlin 1980, pp. 1, 16–17 (for the dates of the Second Great Awakening, p. 10); Pritchard 1976, p. 316ff, particularly 318ff.
- ^ Eddy, Science and Health, 1889, 40th edition, pp. 11, 13, 40, 103, 352, 415, 543.
- ^ Pritchard 1976, pp. 319–320; Simmons 1995, p. 63; Curtis 2007, pp. 57–58.
- ^ Taves 1999, p. 212: "The metaphysical movement that gave rise to Christian Science and, eventually, New Thought, had its origins in the thought and practice of Phineas P. Quimby and four of his students, Mary Baker Eddy, Annetta and Julius Dresser, and Warren Felt Evans."
- Cather and Milmine 1909, pp. 128–129; Bates and Dittmore 1932, p. 156; Schoepflin 2001, p. 119.
- ^ James 1902, pp. 75–76, 84: "Christian Science so-called, the sect of Mrs. Eddy, is the most radical branch of mind-cure in its dealings with evil."
- ^ Jenkins 2000, p. 60; Lewis 2003, pp. 18, 93–94, 105.
- ^ Prentiss 2001, p. 322.
- ^ Eddy, "Christian Science in Tremont Temple", Miscellaneous Writings 1883-1896, Chapter IV, Addresses: "It is not one mind acting upon another mind; it is not the transference of human images of thought to other minds; it is not supported by the evidence before the personal senses, — Science contradicts this evidence; it is not of the flesh, but of the Spirit. It is Christ come to destroy the power of the flesh; it is Truth over error ... It is not one mortal thought transmitted to another's thought from the human mind that holds within itself all evil."
- Also see Gottschalk 1973, p. 124.
- ^ For "lost element of healing," see Eddy, Historical Sketch.
- Eddy, Retrospection and Introspection, pp. 95–96: "The second appearing of Jesus is, unquestionably, the spiritual advent of the advancing idea of God, as in Christian Science."
- Weddle 1991, p. 281: "Eddy regarded her book, written as a magnificent obsession during nine years of difficult and nomadic existence (1866–75), as the dawning of the messianic age: the second advent of Jesus."
- Eddy, Miscellany, p. 115: "I should blush to write of Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures as I have, were it of human origin, and I, apart from God, its author; but as I was only a scribe echoing the harmonies of heaven in divine metaphysics, I cannot be super-modest in my estimate of the Christian Science textbook."
- ^ Wilson 1961, pp. 122–123.
- ^ a b "What is Christian Science treatment", Christian Science church, September 1, 2011.
- ^ Frank Prinz-Wondollek, "How does Christian Science heal?", Boston, Massachusetts, April 28, 2011.
- ^ Stark 1998, pp. 196–197; Fraser 1999, pp. 94–96; Porterfield 2005, pp. 178–180, for the quote, 180.
- Practitioners have been unwilling to perform their prayers in public or for journalists, so what transpires is unclear. See Vitello (New York Times) 2010, p. 2: "Church officials recently permitted two practitioners and two patients to talk about Christian Science treatments with a reporter from The New York Times ... They would not discuss the care of children or let a reporter witness a treatment session."
- ^ Melton 1992, p. 36: "Leaders of Christian Science insist that they are within the mainstream of Christian teachings, a concern which leads to their strong resentment of any identification with the New Thought movement ..."
- Daschke and Ashcraft 2005, p. 27: "The Christian aspect was, for Eddy, always important. She did not interpret her approach as being a departure from Christian theology, but as an elaboration on it that corrected previous errors."
- Albanese 2006, p. 284: "[Eddy] would continue to affirm her connection to this Congregational world, and, in fact, the language of sin was woven in and out of her writings throughout her life. Arguably she never gave up Calvinism when she embraced metaphysics."
- ^ Eddy, Science and Health, chapter XIV, Recapitulation.
- Melton 2005, p. 146.
- ^ Eddy, "Christian Science versus Pantheism", 1901, p. 4.
- Cunningham 1967, pp. 896–897: "Indeed, no criticism was more frequently voiced by clerical observers than this one [pantheism], for it was deemed the root error of her theology."
- ^ Wilson 1961, p. 121; Gottschalk 1973, p. 60; for "not an identity but a quality," see Stark 1998, p. 199; for Quimby, see Porterfield 2005, p. 179; Whorton 2004, p. 119.
- ^ Albanese 2012, p. 167; Simmons 1995, p. 62.
- Prentiss 2001, p. 322: "Jesus, whom Scientists take to be only human, demonstrated the illusory nature of matter and therefore the illusory nature of the death of the body, with his own crucifixion and apparent resurrection. Yet 'resurrection' was a misnomer from the Christian Science perspective, because he never suffered death. However, as mortals needed evidence to be convinced of the power that spirit and mind had over death, the demonstration of surviving crucifixion was necessary."
- Eddy, Science and Health, Chapter XVII, Glossary: Jesus as "the highest human corporeal concept of the divine idea."
- Eddy, "The Great Discovery", Retrospection and Introspection: Jesus as a "natural and divine Scientist ... a Christian Scientist," and "Way-shower."
- Eddy, Science and Health, Chapter II, Atonement and Eucharist: "The lonely precincts of the tomb gave Jesus a refuge from his foes, a place in which to solve the great problem of being. His three days’ work in the sepulchre set the seal of eternity on time. He proved Life to be deathless and Love to be the master of hate. He met and mastered on the basis of Christian Science, the power of Mind over matter, all the claims of medicine, surgery, and hygiene. ...
"His disciples believed Jesus to be dead while he was hidden in the sepulchre, whereas he was alive, demonstrating within the narrow tomb the power of Spirit to overrule mortal, material sense. ...
"They who earliest saw Jesus after the resurrection and beheld the final proof of all that he had taught, misconstrued that event. ... The reappearing of Jesus was not the return of a spirit. He presented the same body that he had before his crucifixion, and so glorified the supremacy of Mind over matter."
- ^ Melton 1992, p. 36; Wilson 1961, p. 121.
- ^ Daschke and Ashcraft 2005, p. 28.
- For her definition of hell, see Eddy, Science and Health, Chapter XVII, Glossary: "Mortal belief; error; lust; remorse; hatred; revenge; sin; sickness; death; suffering and self-destruction; self-imposed agony; effects of sin; that which 'worketh abomination or maketh a lie.'"
- ^ Jenkins 2000, p. 231.
- ^ Twain 1907, p. 180; also available here; see the same quote in "Mark Twain & Mary Baker Eddy a film by Val Kilmer", trailer, YouTube, from 04:30 mins, retrieved March 17, 2014.
- ^ Melton 1992, p. 36: "Almost as much as the medical controversy, charges of heresy from orthodox Christian churches have hounded the Church."
- Melton 2005, p. 146: "The very fact that Science and Health was a new revelation challenged the authority that Protestants ascribed to the Bible alone."
- ^ Melton 2003, p. 17: "The term 'cult' was originally applied to groups such as Christian Science and Spiritualism, which were viewed as deviations from orthodox Christianity." For examples, see The New York Times, November 4, 1906, and February 26, 1910. For A. H. Barrington, see Jenkins 2000, p. 49.
- Several scholars and other commentators, including conservative Christians, continue to view it as a cult because of the rejection of medicine and the degree to which it departs from traditional Christian doctrine:
- Melton 2003, p. 25: "At the same time, other groups have maintained their 'unacceptable' beliefs and practices and continue to be condemned as cults – Theosophy, Spiritualism, Christian Science, Jehovah's Witnesses, Nation of Islam (Farrakhan), etc." (For a discussion of the church–sect–cult divide, see pp. 19–21, and 21–33.)
- Stark and Bainbridge 1996, p. 106: "Christian Science is classified as a cult, not a sect, because of the amount of novel culture it added to traditional Christian doctrine."
- Simmons 1995, p. 66: "The eschewing of any type of medical help in the face of illness has tended to move Christian Science from denomination to sect or cult on the sociological continuum based on the oft-publicized deaths of children of Christian Science parents, especially when the illness was allegedly curable if medical help had been sought."
- Melton 1992. Christian Science is listed under Section II, "The Established Cults," pp. 29–37; see the chapter, "What is a cult?", p. 3ff.
- Christian Science remained listed in the 2003 edition of Walter Ralston Martin's (1928–1989) religious reference book, The Kingdom of the Cults. See Jenkins 2000, p. 59; Martin 2003, p. 149ff;
- ^ Cunningham 1967, p. 899; Gottschalk 1973, p. 91.
- For more about gnosticism, see Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, The Western Esoteric Traditions, Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 27ff.
- ^ Cunningham 1967, p. 892; The Times, May 26, 1885, cited in Gottschalk 1973, p. xvii.
- ^ Gottschalk 2006, p. 64.
- ^ Gill 1998, pp. 244, 288.
- ^ Gill 1998, p. xxix.
- ^ Gill 1998, pp. 84–85.
- ^ Gill 1998, pp. 3, 9.
- ^ Eddy, Retrospection and Introspection, p. 10: "My father was taught to believe that my brain was too large for my body and so kept me much out of school, but I gained book-knowledge with far less labor than is usually requisite. At ten years of age I was as familiar with Lindley Murray's Grammar as with the Westminster Catechism; and the latter I had to repeat every Sunday. My favorite studies were natural philosophy, logic, and moral science. From my brother Albert I received lessons in the ancient tongues, Hebrew, Greek, and Latin. My brother studied Hebrew during his college vacations. After my discovery of Christian Science, most of the knowledge I had gleaned from schoolbooks vanished like a dream."
- Gill 1998, p. 50: "In November 1842, at age twenty-one, she completed her formal schooling, having done three full semesters at the Sanbornton Academy under Dyer Sanborn."
- ^ Fraser 1999, pp. 34–35; Gottschalk 1973, p. 106.
- Peel 1966, p. 45: "She would end in a state of unconsciousness that would sometimes last for hours and send the family in a panic." (Robert Peel (1909–1992) was a Christian Scientist and sympathetic biographer of Eddy's. For further discussion, see Gill 1998, p. 39ff.)
- ^ Bloom 1992, p. 133.
- ^ Cather and Milmine 1909, p. 22; Fraser 1999, p. 34; Fraser (New York Times) 1999.
- Also see Cather and Milmine, January 1907, p. 236.
- ^ McDonald 1986, p. 97ff (that McDonald is a Christian Scientist, see Gill 1998, p. xviii); Gottschalk 2001, letter to the New York Review of Books.
- ^ Fraser 1999, pp. 36–37.
- ^ For Eddy's second marriage and the husband failing to adopt the boy, see Gill 1998, p. 102; for the second husband's adultery, see p. 170. But see Fraser 1999, p. 40, where Fraser indicates that Patterson did sign the guardianship papers.
- For Eddy's third husband's death, see Fraser 1999, p. 78.
- For women having no right of guardianship, see Westberg 1996.
- "Women and the Law", Women, Enterprise & Society, Harvard Business School, 2010: "A married woman or feme covert was a dependent, like an underage child or a slave, and could not own property in her own name or control her own earnings, except under very specific circumstances. When a husband died, his wife could not be the guardian to their under-age children."
- Eddy, "Marriage and Parentage," Retrospection and Introspection, p. 20: "After returning to the paternal roof I lost all my husband's property, except what money I had brought with me; and remained with my parents until after my mother's decease.
"A few months before my father's second marriage, to Mrs. Elizabeth Patterson Duncan, sister of Lieutenant-Governor George W. Patterson of New York, my little son, about four years of age, was sent away from me, and put under the care of our family nurse, who had married, and resided in the northern part of New Hampshire. I had no training for self-support, and my home I regarded as very precious. The night before my child was taken from me, I knelt by his side throughout the dark hours, hoping for a vision of relief from this trial. ...
"My second marriage was very unfortunate, and from it I was compelled to ask for a bill of divorce, which was granted me in the city of Salem, Massachusetts.
"My dominant thought in marrying again was to get back my child, but after our marriage his stepfather was not willing he should have a home with me. A plot was consummated for keeping us apart. The family to whose care he was committed very soon removed to what was then regarded as the Far West.
"After his removal a letter was read to my little son, informing him that his mother was dead and buried. Without my knowledge a guardian was appointed him, and I was then informed that my son was lost. Every means within my power was employed to find him, but without success. We never met again until he had reached the age of thirty-four, had a wife and two children, and by a strange providence had learned that his mother still lived, and came to see me in Massachusetts."
- ^ Powell 1930, pp. 148–149. Blackman continued: "She turned to the student at the end of the first row of seats and took direct mental cognizance of this one, plainly knocked at the door of this individual consciousness. It was as if a question had been asked and answered and a benediction given. Then her eyes rested on the next in order and the same recognition was made. This continued until each member of the class had received the same mental cognizance. No audible word voiced the purely mental contact."
- ^ Gill 1998, p. 172: "Any account of the rise of Christian Science falls short of the mark if it fails to see and acknowledge that Mary Baker Eddy had charisma."
- Gill 1998, p. 405: "She could be bad-tempered, irrational, capricious, inconsiderate, domineering, sanctimonious, unkind."
- ^ Cather and Milmine 1909, pp. 122–123.
- For the relevance of Eddy's personality, see for example Gill 1999, p. 172.
- ^ Cather and Milmine 1909, pp. 122–123.
- ^ Twain, Christian Science, chapters I and XV.
- Gardner 1993, p. 199, argued that Twain was being sarcastic in calling Eddy the most interesting woman that ever lived. Twain wrote (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3187/3187-h/3187-h.htm#link2HCH0001 chapter I]):
- "In several ways she is the most interesting woman that ever lived, and the most extraordinary. The same may be said of her career, and the same may be said of its chief result. She started from nothing. Her enemies charge that she surreptitiously took from Quimby a peculiar system of healing which was mind-cure with a Biblical basis. She and her friends deny that she took anything from him. This is a matter which we can discuss by-and-by. Whether she took it or invented it, it was—materially—a sawdust mine when she got it, and she has turned it into a Klondike; its spiritual dock had next to no custom, if any at all: from it she has launched a world-religion which has now six hundred and sixty-three churches, and she charters a new one every four days. When we do not know a person—and also when we do—we have to judge his size by the size and nature of his achievements, as compared with the achievements of others in his special line of business—there is no other way. Measured by this standard, it is thirteen hundred years since the world has produced any one who could reach up to Mrs. Eddy's waistbelt."
- ^ Schoepflin 2002, p. 22.
- For the quote from Graham, see Numbers and Schoepflin 1999, p. 580.
- ^ Numbers and Schoepflin 1999, p. 580.
- ^ For Poyen, see Taves 1999, pp. 161, 213.
- For "a teacher of the science of health and happiness, see Quimby 2009, pp. 81, 264, 286, 472. For "the truth is the cure," p. 507.
- For "you can walk!", see Gottschalk 1973, p. 105.
- In his essay "Aristocracy and Democracy," Quimby used the phrase "Christian Science," but not clearly of his own ideas; see Quimby 2009, p. 69.
- ^ Cather and Milmine, February 1907, pp. 340–341.
- ^ For background, see Gauld 1992; p. 192ff for Quimby.
- Also see Frank Pattie, Mesmer and Animal Magnetism, Edmonston Publishing, 1994.
- ^ Dresser (ed), p. 78; Taves 1999, pp. 213–214; Schoepflin 2001, p. 23.
- Quimby described his methods in a "circular to the sick": "Dr. P.P. Quimby ... simply sits down by his patients, tells them their feelings, etc., then his explanation is the cure; and if he succeeds in correcting their error, he changes the fluids of the system and establishes the truth or health." See Quimby 2009, p. 507.
- ^ Gauld 1992, p. 193.
- ^ Cather and Milmine, February 1907, pp. 345–346; Taves 1999 p. 214.
- ^ Dresser (ed), The Quimby Manuscripts, 1961, p. 35.
- ^ Cather and Milmine, February 1907, pp. 344–345; Gauld 1992, p. 194; Gill 1998, pp. 119, 314–316; Taves 1999, p. 213.
- ^ Cather and Milmine, February 1907, p. 347; Gill 1998, pp. 127–128; for the Boston Post, see Cather and Milmine, April 1907, p. 610.
- ^ Schoepflin 2002, p. 23.
- Eddy described Quimby's approach in the Portland Evening Courier on November 7, 1862: "But now I see, dimly at first, and only as trees walking, the great principle which underlies Dr. Quimby 's faith and works; and just in proportion to my right perception of truth, is my recovery. This truth which he opposes to the error of giving intelligence to matter, and placing pain where it never placed itself, if received understandingly changes the currents of the system to their normal action, and the mechanism of the body goes on undisturbed. ... The truth which he establishes in the patient cures him ... and the body, which is full of light, is no longer in disease." See Mary M. Patterson, "What I do not Know and what I do Know", Portland Evening Courier, 7 November 1862; Peabody 1904, p. 10; Cather and Milmine, February 1907; Bates and Dittemore 1932, p. 90.
- ^ Cather and Milmine 1909, p. 70.
- ^ Gottschalk 1973, p. 27; Weddle 1991, pp. 288–289; Gill 1998, pp. 161–168.
- ^ Gill 1998, p. 161.
- ^ Cather and Milmine 1909, p. 83; Gill 1998, p. 162.
- ^ Cather and Milmine 1909, pp. 84–86. Cushing said:
- "On February 1, 1866, I was called to the residence of Samuel M. Bubier, who was a shoe manufacturer and later was mayor of Lynn, to attend said Mrs. Patterson, who had fallen upon the icy sidewalk in front of Mr. Bubier's factory and had injured her head by the fall. I found her very nervous, partially unconscious, semi-hysterical, complaining by word and action of severe pain in the back of her head and neck. ...
"There was, to my knowledge, no other physician in attendance upon Mrs. Patterson during this illness from the day of the accident, February 1, 1866, to my final visit on February 13th, and when I left her on the 13th day of February, she seemed to have recovered from the disturbance caused by the accident and to be, practically, in her normal condition. I did not at any time declare, or believe, that there was no hope for Mrs. Patterson's recovery, or that she was in a critical condition, and did not at any time say, or believe, that she had but three or any other limited number of days to live. Mrs. Patterson did not suggest, or say, or pretend, or in any way whatever intimate, that on the third, or any other day, of her said illness, she had miraculously recovered or been healed, or that, discovering or perceiving the truth of the power employed by Christ to heal the sick, she had, by it, been restored to health. As I have stated, on the third and subsequent days of her said illness, resulting from her said fall on the ice, I attended Mrs. Patterson and gave her medicine ..."
- Also see Gill 1998, pp. 163–164.
- "On February 1, 1866, I was called to the residence of Samuel M. Bubier, who was a shoe manufacturer and later was mayor of Lynn, to attend said Mrs. Patterson, who had fallen upon the icy sidewalk in front of Mr. Bubier's factory and had injured her head by the fall. I found her very nervous, partially unconscious, semi-hysterical, complaining by word and action of severe pain in the back of her head and neck. ...
- ^ For Dresser, see Cather and Milmine, February 1907, p. 344.
- ^ Cather and Milmine, February 1908, p. 390; Gill 1998, p. 158.
- ^ Powell 1930, p. 116: "in which she states that owing to the unsafe condition of that portion of Market Street at the junction of Oxford Street, on the first day of February last she slipped and fell, causing serious personal injuries, from which she has little prospect of recovering, and asking for pecuniary recompense for the injuries received."
- Also see Gill 1998, p. 163.
- ^ Eddy, Retrospection and Introspection, p. 24: "It was in Massachusetts, in February, 1866, and after the death of the magnetic doctor, Mr. P.P. Quimby, whom spiritualists would associate therewith, but who was in no wise connected with this event, that I discovered the Science of divine metaphysical healing which I afterwards named Christian Science. The discovery came to pass in this way. During twenty years prior to my discovery I had been trying to trace all physical effects to a mental cause; and in the latter part of 1866 I gained the scientific certainty that all causation was Mind, and every effect a mental phenomenon.
"My immediate recovery from the effects of an injury caused by an accident, an injury that neither medicine nor surgery could reach, was the falling apple that led me to the discovery how to be well myself, and how to make others so."
- ^ Gill 1998, pp. 47–48.
- ^ Cather and Milmine 1909, p. 81.
- Eddy, Science and Health (1875), 1st edition, pp. 189–190: "When quite a child we adopted the Graham system for dyspepsia, ate only bread and vegetables, and drank water, following this diet for years; we became more dyspeptic, however, and, of course, thought we must diet more rigidly; so we partook of but one meal in twenty-four hours, and this consisted of a thin slice of bread, about three inches square, without water ..."
- Eddy, Science and Health (1889), 40th edition, pp. 96–98: "I knew a woman who, when quite a child, adopted the Graham diet to cure dyspepsia. She ate bread and vegetables only, and drank nothing but water for many years. Her dyspepsia increasing, she decided that her diet should be more rigid, and thereafter she partook of but one meal in twenty-four hours, this meal consisting of only a thin slice of bread without water. ..."
- Eddy, Science and Health (1910), Chapter VIII, Footsteps of Truth, p. 221: "I knew a person who when quite a child adopted the Graham system to cure dyspepsia. For many years, he ate only bread and vegetables, and drank nothing but water. His dyspepsia increasing, he decided that his diet should be more rigid, and thereafter he partook of but one meal in twenty-four hours, this meal consisting of only a thin slice of bread without water. ..."
- ^ Numbers and Schoepflin 1999, p. 583.
- ^ For metaphysical healing (later capitalized), see Eddy, Science and Health, 40th edition, 1889, p. 11, Metaphysical Science, p. 13, Divine Science, p. 22, Christ-cure, p. 117, Moral Science, p. 204; for Truth-cure, final edition, Chapter VIII, Footsteps of Truth, p. 237.
- For her use of Christian Science in the first edition, see Peel 1966, p. 283.
- Eddy, Science and Health, first edition, Mary Baker Eddy Science Institute.
- ^ Quimby 2009, p. 69.
- ^ Peel 1966, p. 243.
- ^ Cather and Milmine 1909, pp. 134, 139; Peel 1966, pp. 222, 239.
- ^ Cather and Milmine (McClure's), May 1907, pp. 97–98.
- ^ Peel 1966, p. 246.
- ^ Cather and Milmine (McClure's), May 1907 pp. 100–101, 104.
- For the titles of the Science and Man manuscript, see Peel 1966, pp. 232–233; for $300 being one third of a Lynn shoe-worker's annual income, p. 252.
- ^ Peel 1966, p. 259.
- ^ Peel 1966, pp. 268–269.
- ^ Peel 1966, p. 249.
- ^ Cather and Milmine (McClure's), May 1907, pp. 100–101, 104; for the $1,000, see Peel 1966, p. 247.
- ^ Peel 1966, p. 266.
- ^ a b Cather and Milmine (McClure's), May 1907, pp. 107–108.
- For her having written 60 pages of Science and Health by May 1872, see Peel 1966, p. 272; for 8 Broad Street, see p. 285.
- ^ Peel 1996, pp. 286–287.
- ^ Cather and Milmine (McClure's), August 1907, pp. 450ff, 455; Gill 1998, p. 257; Fraser 1999, p. 70.
- ^ Cather and Milmine (McClure's), July 1907, p. 333; Cather and Milmine 1909, p. 153; Peel 1966, p. 290.
- ^ Cather and Milmine 1909, p. 230.
- ^ Peel 1971, p. 14.
- ^ Peel 1996, p. 283.
- ^ Cather and Milmine (McClure's), June 1908, pp. 179–180, 186; for $2,000 and the names of the students, see Peel 1996, p. 358, footnote 108, and for Barry, pp. 22–23.
- ^ Gardner (Los Angeles Times) 1999: "Never proofed, this tome, originally 456 pages, swarmed with hundreds of typos, as well as a raft of spelling mistakes, bad punctuation and even worse grammar. The book was a chaotic patchwork of repetitious, poorly paragraphed topics, at times incoherent, that alter as abruptly as images in a dream."
- Eddy, Science and Health, first edition, Mary Baker Eddy Science Institute.
- ^ Peel 1966, p. 292.
- ^ For Eddy's addition of Key to the Scriptures in 1884, see Cather and Milmine 1909, p. 208. According to Schoepflin 2001, p. 119, it was added in 1883.
- For the rest, see "Mark Twain indorses exposure of Mrs. Eddy", The New York Times, November 5, 1906.
- Also see Gottschalk 1973, p. 42.
- ^ William Purrington, Christian Science, 1900, cited in Whorton 2004, p. 126.
- E. B. S., Jr., "Christian Science by William A. Purrington", The American Law Register (1898–1907), 48(6), June 1900, pp. 380–381.
- William Purrington, "Manslaughter, Christian Science and the Law," American Lawyer, 7, 1899, pp. 5–9.
- ^ Charles Stewart Roberts, "The Case of Richard Cabot", Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 22(3), July 2009, pp. 246–263.
- ^ Whorton 2004, pp. 124–125; Cabot (McClure's), August 1908.
- ^ Fraser 1999, p. 26; Weddle 1991, pp. 281, 288.
- ^ Gill 1998, pp. 330–331.
- ^ Fraser 1999, p. 112.
- ^ Gardner 1993, pp. 125–126; "Christian Science Text's Copyright Is Ruled Illegal by Appeals Court", The New York Times, September 23, 1987.
- ^ Eddy, "Healing the sick", chapter 8, Science and Health, first edition, p. 439.
- ^ a b Eddy, Science and Health, chapter I, Physiology, 40th edition, 1889, p. 47.
- Eddy, Science and Health, final edition, Chapter VI, Science, Theology, Medicine, pp. 152–153: "Her [the author's] experiments in homœopathy had made her skeptical as to material curative methods. Jahr, from Aconitum to Zincum oxydatum, enumerates the general symptoms, the characteristic signs, which demand different remedies; but the drug is frequently attenuated to such a degree that not a vestige of it remains. Thus we learn that it is not the drug which expels the disease or changes one of the symptoms of disease.
"The author has attenuated Natrum muriaticum (common table-salt) until there was not a single saline property left. The salt had 'lost his savour;' and yet, with one drop of that attenuation in a goblet of water, and a teaspoonful of the water administered at intervals of three hours, she has cured a patient sinking in the last stage of typhoid fever. The highest attenuation of homœopathy and the most potent rises above matter into mind. This discovery leads to more light. From it may be learned that either human faith or the divine Mind is the healer and that there is no efficacy in a drug."
- Schoepflin 2002, p. 113ff.
- For background on the placebo effect, see Anne Harrington, The Placebo Effect: An Interdisciplinary Exploration, Harvard University Press, 1999; and Walter A. Brown, The Placebo Effect in Clinical Practice, Oxford University Press, 2013.
- Eddy, Science and Health, final edition, Chapter VI, Science, Theology, Medicine, pp. 152–153: "Her [the author's] experiments in homœopathy had made her skeptical as to material curative methods. Jahr, from Aconitum to Zincum oxydatum, enumerates the general symptoms, the characteristic signs, which demand different remedies; but the drug is frequently attenuated to such a degree that not a vestige of it remains. Thus we learn that it is not the drug which expels the disease or changes one of the symptoms of disease.
- ^ Eddy, "Healing the sick", chapter 8, Science and Health, first edition, p. 454.
- ^ Eddy, First Church of Christ Scientist and Miscellany, Part 2 (Miscellany), Chapter I, To the Christian World.
- ^ Eddy, Science and Health, Chapter VII, Physiology, pp. 196–197.
- ^ Eddy, Science and Health, Chapter VIII, Footsteps of Truth, p. 246: "Except for the error of measuring and limiting all that is good and beautiful, man would enjoy more than threescore years and ten and still maintain his vigor, freshness, and promise."
- ^ Eddy, Science and Health, Chapter VII, Physiology, pp. 177–178; Gardner 1993, p. 64.
- ^ Eddy, Science and Health, Chapter XII, Christian Science Practice, pp. 401–402: "Until the advancing age admits the efficacy and supremacy of Mind, it is better for Christian Scientists to leave surgery and the adjustment of broken bones and dislocations to the fingers of a surgeon, while the mental healer confines himself chiefly to mental reconstruction and to the prevention of inflammation. Christian Science is always the most skilful surgeon, but surgery is the branch of its healing which will be last acknowledged. However, it is but just to say that the author has already in her possession well-authenticated records of the cure, by herself and her students through mental surgery alone, of broken bones, dislocated joints, and spinal vertebræ."
- ^ For the glasses, Cather and Milmine (McClure's), August 1907, p. 459].
- For the physician and autopsy, Cather and Milmine (McClure's), September 1907, p. 568]; for the morphine, Gill 1999, p. 546.
- ^ a b c Vitello (New York Times) 2010, p. 2.
- ^ Gill 1998, p. 119; also see pp. 314–316.
- ^ Eddy, Miscellaneous Writings, pp. 62–63.
- ^ Twain 1907, chapter X, p. 267.
- ^ Bates and Dittmore 1932, p. 156; Gill 1998, p. 230.
- ^ Schoepflin 2001, p. 119; Gill 1998, pp. 119–120, 314–316.
- "Congress library gets Eddy letters", The New York Times, April 6, 1930; Dresser 1887; Gottschalk 1973, pp. 107–108, 108.
- ^ Bates and Dittemore 1932, pp. 211–212.
- ^ Gill 1998, pp. 313–315.
- ^ Eddy wrote in 1891 of her pamphlet, The Science of Man (copyrighted in 1870): "In 1870 I copyrighted the first publication on spiritual, scientific Mind-healing, entitled The Science of Man. This little book is converted into the chapter on Recapitulation in Science and Health. It was so new – the basis it laid down for physical and moral health was so hopelessly original – that I did not venture upon its publication until later ... Five years after taking out my first copyright, I taught the Science of Mind-healing, alias Christian Science, by writing out my manuscripts for students and distributing them unsparingly. This will account for certain published and unpublished manuscripts extant, which the evil-minded would insinuate did not originate with me." See Eddy, Retrospection and Introspection, Works, pp. 240–241; for the same statement, see here.
- Eddy, Science and Health (1889), 40th edition, pp. 6–7. She wrote that Quimby had had in his possession some writings of hers, so that she was in effect being accused of having plagiarized herself: "Mr. Quimby's ... method of treating disease was obviously physical, rather than mental. ... I healed some of his patients, and also corrected some of the desultory paragraphs which he had committed to paper, besides leaving with him some of my own writings, which are now claimed as his.
"Mr. Quimby's son has stated ... that he has in his possession all his father's written utterances; and I have offered to pay for their publication, but he declines to publish them; for their publication would silence the insinuation that Mr. Quimby originated the system of healing which I claim to be mine."
- Eddy, Science and Health (1889), 40th edition, pp. 6–7. She wrote that Quimby had had in his possession some writings of hers, so that she was in effect being accused of having plagiarized herself: "Mr. Quimby's ... method of treating disease was obviously physical, rather than mental. ... I healed some of his patients, and also corrected some of the desultory paragraphs which he had committed to paper, besides leaving with him some of my own writings, which are now claimed as his.
- ^ "True Origin of Christian Science", The New York Times, July 10, 1904; Gill 1998, pp. xxxiii, 425–428. Gill believes the author of the article was Frederick Peabody, a lawyer who had been in dispute with Eddy.
- ^ Cather and Milmine 1909, pp. 128–129.
- The Science of Man became the Recapitulation chapter of Science and Health, chapter XII, p. 403ff.
- Quimby, "Questions and Answers," The Quimby Manuscripts, chapter 13, p. 165ff; complete manuscript and chapter 13, archive.org.
- Also see Cather and Milmine 1909, pp. 162–163: "We have seen that while she was in Stoughton, Mrs. Glover wrote a preface, signed "Mary M. Glover," to her copy of Quimby's manuscript, Questions and Answers, and that she made slight changes in, and additions to, the text. In examining the copies of this manuscript which were given out to her students in Lynn, 1870-1872, we find that this signed preface has been incorporated in the text, so that the manuscript reads like the composition of one person, and that instead of being issued with a title-page, reading Extracts from P. P. Quimby's Writings, as was the Stoughton manuscript, the copies given out in Lynn were unsigned. This manuscript Mrs. Glover called The Science of Man, or the Principle which Controls Matter." They concluded (p. 133): "Others of his pupils lost themselves in Quimby's philosophy, but Mrs. Glover lost Quimby in herself."
- ^ Gardner 1993, p. 47; Fraser 1999, p. 50.
- Eddy was also accused, by Walter M. Haushalter in his Mrs. Eddy Purloins from Hegel (1936), of having copied material from an essay by Francis Lieber (1798–1872); see Haushalter 2010 [1936], foreword and p. 33ff; Gardner 1993, pp. 145–154.
- The essay by Lieber was "The Metaphysical Religion of Hegel" (1866).
- Theologian Charles S. Braden accused her of having plagiarized an essay by Lindley Murray (1745–1826), and wrote that another essay, "Taking Offense," was printed as one of Eddy's when it had first been published anonymously by an obscure newspaper; see Braden 1967, p. 296.
- Gardner 1993, pp. 145–154, listed other writers whose words he said she had used without attribution, including John Ruskin (1819–1900), Thomas Carlyle (1795–1881), Charles Kingsley (1819–1875), Henri-Frédéric Amiel (1821–1881), and Hugh Blair (1718–1800).
- ^ Peel 1971, pp. 18–19.
- ^ Cather and Milmine (McClure's), July 1907, pp. 342–343.
- For Spofford being a possible successor, Cather and Milmine 1909, p. 247.
- ^ Stark 1998; Moore 1986, pp. 112–113.
- ^ Gottschalk 1973, p. 148; Moore 1986, pp. 112–113; Simmons 1995, p. 62.
- Eddy, Science and Health, 1889, 40th edition, p. 214: "The mild forms of animal magnetism are disappearing, and its aggressive features are coming to the front. The looms of crime, hidden in the dark recesses of mortal thought, are every hour weaving webs more complicated and subtile." The current (1910) edition has the same text, but subtile is spelled subtle.
- ^ Moore 1986, pp. 112–113.
- ^ Fraser 1999, p. 103; Gill 1998, pp. xvii, 397.
- For her belief that MAM would kill her, see Tucker 2004, p. 166.
- A Christian Scientist, Marion Stephens, killed herself in April 1910, apparently in fear of MAM; see Lay Eddyite Suicide to 'Death Thought', The New York Times, April 26, 1910.
- ^ Cather and Milmine 1909, p. 301.
- ^ Cather and Milmine (McClure's), July 1907, p. 344ff; for the complaint, p. 347; Peel 1971, pp. 40–45; Gill 1998, p. 253ff.
- ^ Cather and Milmine (McClure's), July 1907, pp. 347–348.
- ^ Peel 1971, p. 44.
- ^ Gill 1998, p. 397; Cather and Milmine (McClure's), July 1907, p. 346: "Mr Henry F. Dunnels of Ipswich was one of the chosen twelve. He says in his affidavit: 'When the Spofford lawsuit came along, she took twelve of us from the Association and made us take two hours apiece, one after the other. She made a statement that this man Spofford was adverse to her and that he used his mesmeric or hypnotic power over her students and her students' patients and hindered the students from performing healing on their patients, and we were held together to keep our minds over this Spofford to prevent him from exercising this mesmeric power over her students and patients. This twenty-four hours' work was done in her house.'"
- ^ Cather and Milmine 1909, p. 304.
- ^ Moore 1986, pp. 112–113; Gill 1998, p. 397.
- ^ Cather and Milmine (McClure's), August 1907, pp. 450ff, 455; Bates and Dittemore 1932, pp. 194–201; Peel 1971, pp. 50–58; Gill 1998, p. 257.
- ^ Cather and Milmine (McClure's), August 1907, p. 454.
- ^ Bates and Dittemore 1932, p. 201.
- ^ Cather and Milmine, August 1907, p. 458.
- ^ Stark 1998, p. 189.
- ^ Cather and Milmine, September 1907, p. 567; Bates and Dittemore 1932, p. 210.
- ^ Cather and Milmine, August 1907, pp. 460–461; Bates and Dittemore 1932, pp. 213–215; Stark 1998, p. 189.
- ^ Cather and Milmine, August 1907, p. 462; September 1907, p. 568.
- ^ Cather and Milmine, August 1907, p. 462; September 1907, p. 567; Stark 1998, p. 189.
- ^ Twain 1907, chapter one; Whorton 2004, p. 123.
- ^ "Mesmerism or Arsenic", Boston Daily Globe, June 4, 1882.
- Bates and Dittemore 1932, p. 219; Gill 1999, pp. 287–289.
- ^ Bates and Dittemore 1932, p. 220; Gill 1998, p. 289.
- ^ Fraser 1999, pp. 84–85; Peters 2007, p. 89.
- ^ Cather and Milmine, September 1907, pp. 567–568, 575.
- ^ "The Massachusetts Metaphysical College", Longyear Museum.
- ^ Cather and Milmine 1909, p. 313.
- ^ Ivey 1999, p. 31; "First Church of Christ, Scientist", Oconto County Historical Society.
- ^ Cunningham 1967, p. 890; for 26 members in 1879, see Cather and Milmine, August 1907, p. 458.
- ^ Cunningham 1967, p. 902; Peters 2007, p. 98.
- ^ Schoepflin 2003, p. 189; Peters 2007, pp. 100, 107.
- ^ Schoepflin 2002, pp. 82–85.
- Cather and Milmine 1909, pp. 354–355.
- "Christian Science Killed Her", The New York Times, May 18, 1888.
- "Mrs. Corner on Trial", The New York Times, May 22, 1888.
- "The Christian Scientist Held", The New York Times, May 26, 1888.
- "The Christian Scientist Not Indicted", The New York Times, June 10, 1888.
- ^ Cather and Milmine 1909, p. 356; the letter was dated April 29, 1888.
- ^ Cather and Milmine 1909, pp. 355–356, 359–360.
- For Eddy calling herself "Professor of Obstetrics," see Gill 1998, p. 347.
- ^ Peters 2007, pp. 103–104.
- ^ Peters 2007, pp. 104–106; Schoepflin 2003, p. 156.
- ^ "Harold Frederic Dead", The New York Times, October 20, 1898.
- "Verdict against the Scientists", The New York Times, November 9, 1898: the coroner said it was "difficult to realize in these enlightened days of the nineteenth century that sensible and intelligent people should lend themselves to such an absurd course of procedure."
- "Harold Frederic's Death: Miss Lyon and Miss Mills Arraigned on the Charge of Manslaughter", The New York Times, November 10, 1898.
- "Christian Scientists Free", The New York Times, December 6, 1898.
- ^ Peters 2007, p.
- "The Christian Science Case", The New York Times, May 27, 1899.
- ^ Peters 2007, pp. 94–96.
- ^ Peters 2007, pp. 94–96.
- ^ "Eddyite is Held for Child's Death; London Coroner's Jury Renders a Verdict of Manslaughter", The New York Times, August 20, 1913.
- "Christian Science Failed; English Father Appears in Court on a Manslaughter Charge", The New York Times, August 21, 1913.
- "X-Scientist Escapes; Englishman Whose Child Died While Undergoing Treatment Is Freed", The New York Times, September 9, 1913.
- ^ Gill 1998, p. 360.
- ^ Ivey 1999, pp. 50, 52.
- ^ Gill 1998, p. 363, citing Armstrong.
- ^ Gill 1998, p. xiv.
- ^ Ivey 1999, pp. 70–75.
- ^ Gill 1998, p. xii.
- ^ Cunningham 1967, pp. 901–902.
- ^ Stark 1998, p. 190.
- ^ Ahlstrom 2004, p. 1025; New York Times, November 4, 1906.
- ^ For seven church buildings in 1890, see Cunningham 1967, p. 890: he writes that there were 1,104 in 1910.
- For the other figures, see "Christian Science", Encyclopædia Britannica, 1922.
- ^ a b Twain, "Christian Science and the Book of Mrs. Eddy", Cosmopolitan, October 1899.
- ^ Camfield 2003, pp. 716, 717.
- Twain, "Christian Science", North American Review, December 1902.
- Twain, Christian Science, 1907.
- He had earlier written about mental healing in general in an article called "Mental Telepathy, Harper's, December 1891.
- ^ Twain, "The Secret History of Eddypus, the World Empire".
- ^ Twain 1907, chapter XV.
- ^ Stahl 2012, p. 202.
- For the quote from Twain, see Twain 1907, chapter 7.
- ^ Twain 1907, chapter III.
- ^ Schrager 1998.
- Twain 1907: "For the thing back of it is wholly gracious and beautiful: the power, through loving mercifulness and compassion, to heal fleshly ills and pains and grief—all—with a word, with a touch of the hand! This power was given by the Saviour to the Disciples, and to all the converted. All—every one. It was exercised for generations afterwards. Any Christian who was in earnest and not a make-believe, not a policy-Christian, not a Christian for revenue only, had that healing power, and could cure with it any disease or any hurt or damage possible to human flesh and bone. These things are true, or they are not. If they were true seventeen and eighteen and nineteen centuries ago it would be difficult to satisfactorily explain why or how or by what argument that power should be nonexistent in Christians now."
- ^ Kaplan 2005, pp. 538–539; Mizruchi 2005, pp. 528–529.
- ^ "Novel", Pulitzer Prizes.
- Stouck 1993, p. xvff, introduction to the University of Nebraska Press edition.
- ^ McClure's, December 1906; Cather and Milmine, January 1907 – June 1908, 14 articles.
- Eddy, "Reply to McClure's Magazine", Christian Science Endtime Center.
- ^ Cather and Milmine 1909.
- ^ Bercovitch 2005, p. 530ff; Fraser 1999, pp. 137–141; Gill 1998, p. 567; Gardner 1993, p. 41.
- ^ Fraser 1999, p. 139; Gardner 1993, p. 41.
- ^ McClure's, December 1906; Stouck 1993, p. xviii.
- ^ Gill 1998, pp. 37–39.
- ^ a b Gill 1998, pp. 471–472, 488.
- ^ Cather and Milmine, March 1908.
- ^ "Dr. Alan McLane Hamilton Tells About His Visit to Mrs. Eddy", The New York Times, August 25, 1907.
- ^ Gill 1998, p. 532; Gottschalk 2006, p. 40.
- ^ Gill 1998, p. xv.
- ^ Fuller 2011, p. 175; Cook (Christian Science Monitor) 2008.
- ^ Bates and Dittemore 1932, p. 451.
- Also see "New York Eddyites Take Death Calmly", The New York Times, December 5, 1910.
- "The Strange Life of Mary Baker Eddy", The New York Times, December 5, 1910.
- ^ "Look for Mrs. Eddy to rise from tomb", The New York Times, December 29, 1910.
- ^ "Church gets most of her estate", The New York Times, December 15, 1910.
- "Nothing left to relatives", The New York Times, December 8, 1910.
- ^ Stark 1998, p. 192, citing the Christian Science Journal.
- ^ Stark 1998, p. 191.
- ^ Stark 1998, p. 190.
- ^ Stark 1998, p. 192; [=practitioners_teachers&language=english&distance_select=any "Teachers and practitioners"], The Christian Science Journal Directory.
- ^ Bryant (Christian Science Monitor) 2009.
- ^ Stark 1998, p.194.
- ^ Stark 1998, p. 195.
- ^ Stark 1998, pp. 198–199.
- ^ Stark 1998, pp. 206, 212.
- ^ Stark 1998, pp. 203–204.
- ^ There was a fire in a side building there in 2013. See "Eight residents displaced by fire in SF's Richmond District", ABC7 News, November 6, 2013.
- ^ Stark 1998, pp. 197–198.
- ^ Stark 1998, pp. 211–212.
- ^ Stark 1998, p. 212.
- ^ Stark 1998, p. 203.
- ^ Stark 1998, p. 205.
- ^ Stark 1998, pp. 203–204.
- ^ Stark 1998, pp. 202, 204–205, 208.
- ^ Fraser 1999, pp. 91–93; Eddy, Chapter XIV, Recapitulation, Science and Health.
- ^ Fraser 1999, p. 91; Eddy, "Board of Education, ARTICLE XXIX, Applicants and Graduates", Manual of The Mother Church, 89th edition, 1895, pp. 88–90.
- ^ Fraser 1999, p. 329.
- "Christian Science nursing facilities", Commission for Accreditation of Christian Science Nursing Organizations/Facilities.
- "Christian Science Nursing is spiritually based healthcare", Commission for Accreditation of Christian Science Nursing Organizations/Facilities.
- ^ Stark 1998, p. 196.
- ^ Gottschalk 2006, p. 86.
- ^ Fraser 1999, pp. 94–96.
- ^ "Testimony Guidelines", JSH-Online, Christian Science church; for anecdotal, see Battin 1999, p. 15.
- ^ Battin 1999, p. 15; "An Empirical Analysis of Medical Evidence in Christian Science Testimonies of Healing, 1969–1988", Christian Science church, April 1989, p. 2, courtesy of the Johnson Fund.
- ^ "An Empirical Analysis," p. 7.
- ^ Peters 2007, p. 22; "An Analysis of a Christian Science Study of the Healings of 640 Childhood Illnesses", Death by Religious Exemption, Coalition to Repeal Exemptions to Child Abuse Laws, Massachusetts Committee for Children and Youth, January 1992, Section IX, p. 34.
- ^ Battin 1999, p. 15.
- ^ Peters 2007, p. 15; Dwyer 2000, p. 159.
- ^ Fraser 1999, pp. 323–325; Fraser 1995: "That infuriating, smug calm in the face of crisis is part of what makes Christian Science so dangerous."
- ^ Palmer, Luanne Linnard; When Parents Say 'No'; Religious and Cultural Influence on Pediatric Care; Sigma Theta Tau Press (pg 80)
- ^ Anders, Margaret; Transcultural Concepts in Nursing Care; Wolters Kluwer Health (p 382)
- ^ Losch, Richard; Many Faces of Faith; A Guide to World Religions (191)
- ^ Hughes 2004; Young 2001; Fraser 1995.
- ^ Peters 2007, pp. 113–114; Fraser 2003, p. 268.
- ^ Young 2001, p. 270; Peters 2007, p. 116.
- ^ Peters 2007, p. 116; Young 2001, p. 270.
- ^ "RCW 9A.42.005, Findings and intent — Christian Science treatment — Rules of evidence", Washington State legislature.
- West Virginia has a religious exemption that protects parents when their children die: "Child neglect resulting in death; criminal penalties. ... No child who in lieu of medical treatment was under treatment solely by spiritual means through prayer in accordance with a recognized method of religious healing with a reasonable proven record of success shall, for that reason alone, be considered to have been neglected within the provisions of this section." A "recognized method of healing" is defined as one where "fees and expenses incurred in connection with such treatment are permitted to be deducted from taxable income as 'medical expenses' ..." This definition applies to Christian Science prayer. See Swan 2013 (video lecture), from 11:20 mins.
- "West Virginia Code, §61-8D-4a. Child neglect resulting in death; criminal penalties", West Virginia Legislature.
- "Religious Exemptions to Child Neglect", National District Attorneys Association, June 2013.
- ^ Peters 2007, 116.
- "Exemptions from providing medical care for sick children", Children's Healthcare is a Legal Duty.
- For 37 states, Guam and the District of Columbia, see "Religious Exemptions to Child Neglect", National District Attorneys Association, June 2013.
- ^ a b c Fraser 1995.
- ^ Fraser 1999, p. 262; Vitello (New York Times) 2010, p. 2.
- ^ Asser and Swan 1998; Peters 2007, pp. 12, 14
- Seth Asser, the pediatrician who wrote the paper with Rita Swan (a former Christian Scientist whose own son died in similar circumstances), wrote that it was "Jonestown in slow motion." See David van Biema, "Faith Or Healing?", Time, 152(9), August 31, 1998, quoting Asser: "Kids die from accidental deployment of air bags, and you get hearings in Congress. But this goes on, and dozens die, and people think there's no problem because the deaths happen one at a time. Yet the kids who die suffer horribly. This is Jonestown in slow motion."
- ^ Peters 2007, pp. 109–110.
- "Church Trio Freed in Child's Death", United Press, March 4, 1938.
- "Shooting Climaxes Old Grudge", Associated Press, January 31, 1959.
- ^ Peters 2007, pp. 112–113.
- ^ Offit 2011, p. 194; Peters 2007, pp. 113–114.
- ^ Peters 2007, pp. 194–195; Fraser 1999, pp. 287–292, 295.
- Rita Swan, "When Faith Fails Children", The Humanist, November/December 2000.
- Rita Swan, "‘Matthew, you cannot be sick’", The Dublin Review, 2009–2010.
- ^ Peters 2007, pp. 118–121: Four-year-old Shauntay Walker, who was suffering from bacterial meningitis, died in Sacramento, California, in 1984; her mother pleaded guilty to manslaughter, and was fined and placed on probation. Seth Glazer and Natalie Middleton-Rippberger, also suffering from bacterial meningitis, died in Los Angeles after their parents withheld treatment; the Glazers were acquitted of all charges, while Natalie's parents were acquitted of manslaughter but convicted of neglect.
- "Christian Scientists Found Liable in Death", The New York Times, August 19, 1993.
- David Margolick, "In Child Deaths, a Test for Christian Science", The New York Times, August 6, 1990.
- ^ Peters 2007, p. 13; Fraser 1999, pp. 305–309; Fraser 1995.
- Tamara Jones, "Prayers, Parental Duty : Child Deaths Put Faith on Trial", Los Angeles Times, June 17, 1989.
- ^ Peters 2007, p. 122ff; Fraser 1999, pp. 303–305; Commonwealth vs. David R. Twitchell, 1993; Margolick (New York Times) 1990.
- Doris Sue Wong, "Neighbor calls Twitchell son's cries 'unbearable'", Boston Globe, May 24, 1990.
- ^ North East Rep Second Ser, August 11, 1993.
- "Court Overturns Conviction of Christian Science Couple", Associated Press, August 12, 1993.
- ^ Roberts (British Medical Journal) 1996.
- For the case, see State v. McKown, Court of Appeals of Minnesota, October 16, 1990; State v. McKown, Supreme Court of Minnesota, September 20, 1991; Lundman v. McKown, Court of Appeals of Minnesota, April 1995.
- ^ Fraser 1999, p. 313: "It would be the most far-reaching and ultimately damaging lawsuit ever filed against Christian Scientists and their church."
- Linda Greenhouse, "Supreme Court Roundup; Christian Scientists Rebuffed in Ruling By Supreme Court", The New York Times, January 23, 1996: "This case, involving a family from Independence, Minn., has been one of the most closely watched of these cases in its circuitous journey through the Minnesota courts since Ian Lundman's death in 1989."
- For the Supreme Court declining to hear the appeal, see Linda Greenhouse, "A Court's Loud Silence", The New York Times, January 28, 1996.
- "Christian Scientists Found Liable in Death", The New York Times, August 19, 1993.
- ^ a b Lundman v. McKown, Court of Appeals of Minnesota, April 1995, p. 3; Fraser 1999, pp. 310–313.
- ^ Fraser 1999, p. 314; Peters 2007, pp. 127–128.
- ^ Linda Greenhouse, "Supreme Court Roundup; Christian Scientists Rebuffed in Ruling By Supreme Court", The New York Times, January 23, 1996.
- Lundman v. McKown, Court of Appeals of Minnesota, April 1995, p. 31.
- ^ Linda Greenhouse, "Supreme Court Roundup; Christian Scientists Rebuffed in Ruling By Supreme Court", The New York Times, January 23, 1996; Fraser 1999, pp. 313–315; Peters 2007, p. 129.
- For the cases, see McKown v. Lundman, No. 95-355, and Lundman v. First Church of Christ, Scientist, No. 95-534.
- Also see Stephen L. Carter, "The Power of Prayer, Denied", The Christian Science Monitor, February 7, 1996.
- ^ a b "Vaccination Exemptions", The College of Physicians of Philadelphia, undated, accessed February 8, 2013.
- ^ Willrich 2011, pp. 260–261; Gill 1998, p. 684: When Eddy's son told her he had refused to have his own son vaccinated, she replied: 'But if it were my child I should let them vaccinate him and then with Christian Science I would prevent its harming the health of my child.'"
- ^ Novotny 1988; Fraser 2003, p. 268.
- ^ Fraser 1999, p. 303; Swan 1983.
- ^ "Epidemiologic Notes and Reports Multiple Measles Outbreaks on College Campuses – Ohio, Massachusetts, Illinois", Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, March 15, 1985.
- Fraser 1999, pp. 301–302; United Press International, March 13, 1985.
- ^ "Outbreak of Measles Among Christian Science Students – Missouri and Illinois, 1994", Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, July 1, 1994.
- Fraser 1999, p. 303; "Measles Outbreak Began at Ski Trip in Colorado", Associated Press, May 8, 1994.
- ^ Fraser 1995.
- ^ "List of Church Officers", Manual of the Mother Church; Gottschalk 1973, p. 190.
- ^ Stark 1998, p. 193, for the sequences.
- ^ a b Swanson 2001, p. 11; Manual of the Mother Church, discipline.
- ^ Manual of the Mother Church, Article VIII, Section 4.
- ^ Manual of the Mother Church, Article VIII Sections 13, 14.
- ^ "Sunday church services and Wednesday testimony meetings", Christian Science church.
- "Online Wednesday meetings", Christian Science church.
- Fraser 1999, pp. 17, 18.
- ^ Shirley Paulson, "Christian Science in Ecumenical Dialogue: Signs of change", paper presented at CESNUR 2013 conference, Falun, Sweden, 2013, pp. 6–8.
- Chet Manchester, "Christian churches – furthering the dialogue", Christian Science Journal, April 2012; Michael Kinnamon, "Ecumenical Christianity and its implications for Christian Science," Ecumenical Trends, 41(10), November 2012.
- ^ Stecklow (Philadelphia Inquirer) 1991.
- ^ Fraser 1999, p. 373–374.
- ^ Fraser 1999, p. 18.
- ^ a b Margolick (New York Times) 1990, p. 2: "William H. Webster, the Director of Central Intelligence, and Adm. Stansfield M. Turner, a former Director; Representative Christopher Shays, Republican of Connecticut; Judge Thomas P. Griesa of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; and Jean Stapleton and Carol Channing, the actresses."
- For H. R. Haldeman and John Ehrlichman, see Fraser (The Atlantic) 1995.
- Gardner (Los Angeles Times) 1999: "Believers included Cecil B. DeMille, Joan Crawford, Mary Pickford, Mickey Rooney, Ginger Rogers and, later on, Doris Day, Robert Duvall, George Hamilton and a raft of others."
- For Val Kilmer and Horton Foote, see Fraser 1999, p. 215.
- ^ For Alan Shepard, Fraser 1999, p. 239; for Nancy Astor, pp. 186–190; for Charles Lightoller, p. 427; for Laurance Doyle, "Dr. Laurance Doyle", Principia College.
- ^ For Bill Bowerman, Moore, Kenny, Bowerman and the men of Oregon, (p.35)
- ^ For Paulson, Paulson, Henry; On the Brink, http://books.google.com/books?id=OB5Ne0JlQWIC&printsec=frontcover&dq=paulson+christian+treasury&hl=en&sa=X&ei=HzUzU-PEL8jcoASJ3oLwBQ&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=christian%20science&f=false
- ^ For Robin Williams and Elizabeth Taylor, see Fraser 1999, p. 215; for Ellen DeGeneres, Henry Fonda and Audrey Hepburn, Fuller 2011, p. 48; for Helmuth von Moltke, Biesinger 2006, p. 576; for Anne Archer, Wright 2013, p. 335; for Ellsberg, Wells 2001, p. 49.
- ^ Stephanie Clifford, "Christian Science Paper to End Daily Print Edition", The New York Times, October 28, 2008.
- ^ Jon Fine, "The Christian Science Monitor to Become a Weekly", Business Week, October 28, 2008; David Cook, "Monitor shifts from print to Web-based strategy", The Christian Science Monitor, October 29, 2008.
- ^ Seth Faison, "The Media Business; New Deadline for Monitor Channel", The New York Times, April 6, 1992.
- ^ "Learn more about JSH-Online".
- ^ Gardner 1993, pp. 210–214; Fraser 1999, p. 369ff.
- ^ a b c Peter Steinfels, "Fiscal and Spiritual Rifts Shake Christian Scientists", The New York Times, February 29, 1992.
- John Marcus, "Christian Science Dissent Testing the Faith", Associated Press, May 15, 1992.
References
- News sources are listed only in the Notes section, unless used multiple times.
- Ahlstrom, Sydney. A Religious History of the American People, Yale University Press, 2004 (first published 1972).
- Albanese, Catherine. A Republic of Mind and Spirit: A Cultural History of American Metaphysical Religion, Yale University Press, 2006.
- Albanese, Catherine. America: Religions and Religion, Cengage Learning, 2012.
- Asser, Seth M. and Swan, Rita. "Child fatalities from religion-motivated medical neglect", Pediatrics, 101(4 Pt 1), April 1998, pp. 625–629.
- Bates, Ernest Sutherland and Dittemore, John V. Mary Baker Eddy: The Truth and the Tradition, A. A. Knopf, 1932.
- Battin, Margaret P. "High-Risk Religion: Christian Science and the Violation of Informed Consent," in Peggy DesAutels, Margaret P. Battin and Larry May (eds.), Praying for a Cure: When Medical and Religious Practices Conflict, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1999.
- Bercovitch, Sacvan. "Cosmopolitan variations," in Sacvan Bercovitch and Cyrus R. K. Patell (eds.), The Cambridge History of American Literature: Volume 3, Prose Writing, 1860-1920, University of Cambridge Press, 2005.
- Biesinger, Joseph A. Germany: A Reference Guide from the Renaissance to the Present, Infobase Publishing, 2006.
- Bloom, Harold. The American Religion, Simon & Schuster, 1992.
- Bohlke, L. Brent. "Willa Cather and The Life of Mary Baker G. Eddy", American Literature, 54(2), May 1982, pp. 288–294.
- Braden, Charles S. Review of Mary Baker Eddy, The Years of Discovery by Robert Peel, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 6(2), Autumn 1967.
- British Medical Journal. "The Bishop Of London On Christian Science", 2(2342), November 12, 1905.
- Bryant, Christa Case. "Africa contributes biggest share of new members to Christian Science church", Christian Science Monitor, June 9, 2009.
- Cabot, Richard. "One Hundred Christian Science Cures", McClure's, August 1908.
- Camfield, Gragg. The Oxford Companion to Mark Twain, Oxford University Press, 2003.
- Cather, Willa and Milmine, Georgine. "Mary Baker G. Eddy", McClure's magazine, January 1907 – June 1908, 14 articles.
- Cather, Willa and Milmine, Georgine. The Life of Mary Baker G. Eddy and the History of Christian Science, Doubleday 1909; latest edition University of Nebraska Press, 1993. Also see archive.org.
- Court of Appeals of Minnesota. "Lundman v. McKown", April 4, 1995.
- Cunningham, Raymond J. "The Impact of Christian Science on the American Churches, 1880–1910", The American Historical Review, 72(3), April 1967, pp. 885–905.
- Curtis, Heather D. Faith in the Great Physician: Suffering and Divine Healing in American Culture, 1860–1900, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.
- Daschke, Dereck and Ashcroft, Michael. New Religious Movements: A Documentary Reader, New York University Press, 2005.
- DeChant, Dell. "World Religions Made in the U.S.A.: Metaphysical Communities—Christian Science and Theosophy", in Jacob Neusner (ed.), World Religions in America, Westminster John Knox Press, 2003.
- Dresser, Julius. The True Story of Mental Science, Alfred Mudge & Son, 1887.
- Dwyer, James G. "Spiritual Treatment Exemptions to Child Medical Neglect Laws: What We Outsiders Should Think", College of William & Mary Law School, 2000.
- Eddy, Mary Baker. Science and Health, The Christian Science Board of Directors, first published 1875.
- Eddy, Mary Baker. Rudimental Divine Science, The Christian Science Board of Directors, first published 1883.
- Eddy, Mary Baker. Historical Sketch of Christian Science Mind-healing, 1888.
- Eddy, Mary Baker. Manual of the Mother Church, 89th edition, The Christian Science Board of Directors, first published 1895.
- Eddy, Mary Baker. "The People's Idea of God", delivered as a sermon, 1908.
- Eddy, Mary Baker. Miscellaneous Writings, 1897.
- Fraser, Caroline. "Suffering Children and the Christian Science Church", The Atlantic, April 1995.
- Fraser, Caroline. God's Perfect Child: Living and Dying in the Christian Science Church, Henry Holt and Company, 1999.
- Fraser, Caroline. "Christian Science", in Gary Laderman and Luis D. León (eds.), Religion and American Cultures: An Encyclopedia of Traditions, Diversity, and Popular Expressions, ABC-CLIO, 2003.
- Fuller, Linda K. The Christian Science Monitor: An Evolving Experiment in Journalism. ABC-CLIO, 2011.
- Gallagher, Eugene V. The New Religious Movements Experience In America. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2004.
- Gardner, Martin. The Healing Revelations of Mary Baker Eddy. Prometheus Books, 1993.
- Gardner, Martin. "Mind over Matter", Los Angeles Times, August 22, 1999.
- Gauld, Alan. A History of Hypnotism, University of Cambridge Press, 1992.
- Gill, Gillian. Mary Baker Eddy, Da Capo Press, 1998.
- Gottschalk, Stephen. The Emergence of Christian Science in American Religious Life, University of California Press, 1973.
- Gottschalk, Stephen. "The Real Mrs. Eddy", The New York Review of Books, January 11, 2001, letter to the editor.
- Gottschalk, Stephen. Rolling away the stone: Mary Baker Eddy's challenge to materialism, Indiana University Press, 2006.
- Harley, Gail M. "Church of Christ, Scientist," in J. Gordon Melton and Martin Baumann (eds.), Religions of the World, ABC-CLIO, 2010.
- Horn, Jason Gary. Mark Twain and William James: Crafting a Free Self, University of Missouri Press, 1996.
- Hughes, Richard A. "The Death of Children by Faith-Based Medical Neglect", Journal of Law and Religion, 20(1), 2004.
- Ivey, Paul Eli. Prayers in Stone: Christian Science Architecture in the United States, 1894–1930, University of Illinois Press, 1999.
- James, William. The Varieties of Religious Experience, 1902 (Gifford Lectures).
- Jenkins, Philip. Mystics and Messiahs: Cults and New Religions in American History, Oxford University Press, 2000.
- Jones, Gary. "The Real Mrs. Eddy", The New York Review of Books, January 11, 2001, letter to the editor.
- Kaplan, Fred. The Singular Mark Twain: A Biography, Anchor, 2005.
- Kaplan, Jeffrey. "New Religious Movements and Globalization," in Eugene Gallagher and Michael Ashcraft, Introduction to New and Alternative Religions in America, Greenwood Publishing Company, 2007.
- Klassen, Pamela. Spirits of Protestantism: Medicine, Healing, and Liberal Christianity, University of California Press, 2011.
- Lewis, James R. Legitimating New Religions. Rutgers University Press, 2003.
- Lundman case: State v. McKown, Court of Appeals of Minnesota, October 16, 1990; State v. McKown, Supreme Court of Minnesota, September 20, 1991; Lundman v. McKown, Court of Appeals of Minnesota, April 1995.
- Martin, Walter and Zacharias, Ravi. "Christian Science", The Kingdom of the Cults, 2003, first published 1965.
- McClure's magazine (see Cather and Milmine).
- McDonald, Jean A. "Mary Baker Eddy and the Nineteenth-Century 'Public' Woman: A Feminist Reappraisal", Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 2(1), 1986.
- McGuire, Meredith B. Ritual Healing in Suburban America, Rutgers University Press, 1988.
- McLoughlin, William G. Revivals, Awakenings, and Reform, University of Chicago Press, 1978.
- Mead, Frank Spencer; Hill, Samuel S.; and Atwood, Craig. Handbook of Denominations in the United States, Abingdon Press, 2010 (13th edition).
- Melton, J. Gordon. Introduction in Timothy Miller, When Prophets Die: The Postcharismatic Fate of New Religious Movements, SUNY Press, 1991.
- Melton, J. Gordon. "Church of Christ, Scientist (Christian Science)," Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America, Routledge, 1992, first published 1986.
- Melton, J. Gordon. "An Introduction to New Religions," in James R. Lewis (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of New Religious Movements, Oxford University Press, 2003.
- Melton, J. Gordon. "Christian Science," Encyclopedia of Protestantism, Infobase Publishing, 2005.
- Melton, J. Gordon. The Encyclopedia of American Religions, Gale Research International, 2009 (8th edition).
- Mizruchi, Susan L. "Becoming Multicultural: Culture, Economy, and the Novel: 1860–1920," in Sacvan Bercovitch and Cyrus R. K. Patell (eds.), The Cambridge History of American Literature: Volume Three, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
- Moore, R. Laurence. Religious Outsiders and the Making of Americans, Oxford University Press, 1986.
- National District Attorneys Association, "Religious Exemptions to Child Neglect", June 2013.
- North East Rep Second Ser. "Commonwealth v. Twitchell", 11(617), August 11, 1993, pp. 609–621.
- Novotny, T. et al.. "Measles outbreaks in religious groups exempt from immunization laws", Public Health Reports, 103(1), Jan–Feb 1988, pp. 49–54.
- Numbers, Ronnie L. and Schoepflin, Rennie B. "Ministries of Healing: Mary Baker Eddy, Ellen G. White and the Religion of Health", in Judith Walzer Leavitt (ed.). Women and Health in America. University of Wisconsin Press, 1999.
- Parker, Gail. "Mary Baker Eddy and Sentimental Womanhood", The New England Quarterly, 43(1), March 1970, pp. 3–18.
- Peel, Robert. Mary Baker Eddy: The Years of Discovery. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966, later published by the Christian Science Publishing Society.
- Peel, Robert. Mary Baker Eddy: The Years of Trial, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.
- Peters, Shawn Francis. When Prayer Fails: Faith Healing, Children, and the Law. Oxford University Press, 2007.
- Poloma, Margaret M. "A Comparison of Christian Science and Mainline Christian Healing Ideologies and Practices", Review of Religious Research, 32(4), June 1991, pp. 337–350.
- Porterfield, Amanda. Healing in the History of Christianity, Oxford University Press, 2005.
- Powell, Lyman P. Mary Baker Eddy: A Life Size Portrait. The Christian Science Publishing Society, 1930.
- Prentiss, Craig R. "Sickness, Death and Illusion in Christian Science", in Colleen McDannell (ed.). Religions of the United States in practice: Vol. 1. Princeton University Press, 2001.
- Pritchard, Linda K. "Religious Change in Nineteenth-Century America," in Charles Y. Glock and Robert Neelly Bellah (eds.), The New Religious Consciousness, University of California Press, 1976.
- Quimby, Phineas Parkhurst. The Complete Collected Works of Dr. Phineas Parkhurst Quimby, Seed of Life Publishing, 2009, first published 1921.
- Quimby, Phineas Parkhurst. The Quimby Manuscripts, Cosimo, 2008, first published 1921, edited by Horatio Dresser.
- Rescher, Nicholas. "Idealism", in Jaegwon Kim, Ernest Sosa, and Gary S. Rosenkrantz (eds.), A Companion to Metaphysics, 2nd edition, John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
- Roberts, John. "Religion should not put a child's health at risk", British Medical Journal, February 3, 1996.
- Saliba, John A. Understanding New Religious Movements, Rowman Altamira, 2003.
- Schoepflin, Rennie B. "Christian Science", in Paul S. Boyer (ed.), The Oxford Companion to United States History, Oxford University Press, 2001, p. 119ff.
- Schoepflin, Rennie B. Christian Science on Trial: Religious Healing in America, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.
- Schrager, Cynthia D. "Mark Twain and Mary Baker Eddy: Gendering the Transpersonal Subject", American Literature, 70(1), 1998.
- Simmons, John K. "Christian Science and American Culture", in Timothy Miller (ed.). America's Alternative Religions. SUNY Press, 1995.
- Sparkman, John. "JSH-Online Progress", The Christian Science Journal, February 2012.
- Stahl, J.D. Mark Twain, Culture and Gender: Envisioning America Through Europe, University of Georgia Press, 2012.
- Stark, Rodney. "The Rise and Fall of Christian Science", Journal of Contemporary Religion, 13(2), 1998, pp. 189–214.
- Stark, Rodney and Bainbridge, William Sims. Religion, Deviance, and Social Control, Routledge, 1996.
- Stecklow, Steve. "Church's Media Moves At Issue A Burgeoning Network Sparks Dissent", Philadelphia Inquirer, October 14, 1991.
- Stein, Stephen J. Communities of Dissent: A History of Alternative Religions in America, Oxford University Press, 2003.
- Sugerman, D. E. et al.. "Measles Outbreak in a Highly Vaccinated Population, San Diego, 2008: Role of the Intentionally Undervaccinated", Pediatrics, 125(4), April 1, 2010, pp. 747–755.
- Swan, Rita. "Faith healing, Christian Science, and the medical care of children",New England Journal of Medicine, 309(26), December 1983, pp. 1639–1641.
- Swan, Rita. "Religion, Culture and Criminal Law", Child-Friendly Faith Project Conference, November 8, 2013 (video; discusses Christian Science prayer and children from 11:20 mins).
- Swanson, Douglas J. "'Standing Porter at the Door of Thought': The Social Order of the Christian Science Church", paper presented to the Western Social Science Association annual conference, 2001.
- Taves, Ann. Fits, Trances, and Visions, Princeton University Press, 1999.
- Tucker, Ruth. Another Gospel: Cults, Alternative Religions, and the New Age Movement, Zondervan, 2004.
- Twain, Mark, "Christian Science and the Book of Mrs. Eddy", Cosmopolitan, October 1899.
- Twain, Mark. "Christian Science", North American Review, December 1902.
- Twain, Mark. Christian Science, 1907.
- Weddle, David L. "The Christian Science Textbook: An Analysis of the Religious Authority of Science and Health by Mary Baker Eddy", The Harvard Theological Review, 84(3), 1991.
- Wells, Tom. Wild Man: The Life and Times of Daniel Ellsberg, Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.
- Whorton, James C. Nature Cures: The History of Alternative Medicine in America, Oxford University Press, 2004.
- Willrich, Michael. Pox: An American History, Penguin Press, 2011.
- Wilson, Bryan R. Sects and Society: A Sociological Study of the Elim Tabernacle, Christian Science, and Christadelphians, University of California Press, 1961.
- Wright, Lawrence. Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood & the Prison of Belief. Knopf, 2013.
- Young, Beth Rapp. "Defending Child Medical Neglect: Christian Science Persuasive Rhetoric", Rhetoric Review, 20(3/4), 2001, pp. 268–292.
Further reading
- Christian Science resources
- Christian Science church
- Christian Science publications (Journal, Herald and Sentinel)
- Eddy, Mary Baker. Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures, final edition.
- __________. Science and Health (1875), 1st edition (also here).
- __________. Manual of the Mother Church, 89th edition.
- Mary Baker Eddy Library, Christian Science church.
- Christian Science lectures.
- Emergence International, LGBT advocacy within Christian Science.
- Longyear Museum, devoted to the life and work of Mary Baker Eddy.
- The Bookmark, independent source of literature on Christian Science.
- Doyle, Laurance. "Science & Spirit: Where Do They Meet?" (lecture on Christian Science), Stanford University, May 6, 2008.
- Articles, books
- Beasley, Norman. The Cross and the Crown, the History of Christian Science, Duell, Sloan and Pearce, 1952.
- Braden, Charles S. Spirits in Rebellion: The Rise and Development of New Thought, Southern Methodist University Press, 1963.
- New York Review of Books, reviews and replies about books by Caroline Fraser and Gillian Gill:
- Caroline Fraser, "Mrs. Eddy Builds Her Empire", July 11, 1996.
- M. Victor Westberg, reply by Caroline Fraser, "Christian Science: An Exchange", November 14, 1996.
- Caroline Fraser, "Overachiever" (review of Gillian Gill's Mary Baker Eddy), April 27, 2000.
- Gillian Gill, reply by Caroline Fraser, "Mrs. Eddy's Voices", June 29, 2000.
- Whitney Balliett, "Mad Genius" (review of Caroline Fraser's God's Perfect Child), September 21, 2000.
- Gary A. Jones and Stephen Gottschalk, reply by Whitney Balliett, "The Real Mrs. Eddy", January 11, 2001.
- Hoekema, Anthony A. The Four Major Cults: Christian Science, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormonism, Seventh-Day Adventism, Eerdmans, 1963.
- New York Times, The. "Mary Baker Eddy", archive of articles, 1899 to the present.
- May, Larry. "Challenging Medical Authority", in Peggy DesAutels, Margaret P. Battin, and Larry May (eds.), Praying for a Cure: When Medical and Religious Practices Conflict, Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.
- Merrick, J.C. "Christian Science healing of minor children", Issues Law Med, 10(3), Winter 1994, 321–342.
- Morris, Henry. "'Suggestion' in the treatment of disease", British Medical Journal, 1(2581), 1910 (discusses Christian Science, pp. 1462–1466).
- Ruetenik, Tadd. "The First Church of Christ, Pragmatist: Christian Science and Responsible Optimism", Journal of Religion and Health, 51(4), December 2012, pp. 1397–1405.
- Simpson, W. F. "Comparative Mortality of Two College Groups, 1945–1983", MMWR Weekly, 40(33), August 23, 1991, pp. 579–582.
- Swensen, Rolf. "A Metaphysical Rocket in Gotham: The Rise of Christian Science in New York City, 1885–1910", Journal of Religion and Society, 12, 2010.
- Books by former Christian Scientists (chronological)
- Simmons, Thomas. The Unseen Shore: Memories of a Christian Science Childhood, Beacon 1991.
- Wilson, Barbara. Blue Windows: A Christian Science Childhood, Picador 1997.
- Fraser, Caroline. God's Perfect Child: Living and Dying in the Christian Science Church, Metropolitan Books, 1999.
- Kramer, Linda S. The Religion That Kills: Christian Science: Abuse, Neglect, and Mind Control, Bookworld Services, 1999.
- Swan, Rita. The Last Strawberry, Hag's Head Press, 2009.
- Greenhouse, Lucy. fathermothergod: My Journey Out of Christian Science, Crown, 2011.
- Biographies of Mary Baker Eddy (chronological)
- Cather, Willa and Milmine, Georgine. "Mary Baker G. Eddy", McClure's magazine, December 1906 – June 1908.
- Wilbur, Sybil. The Life of Mary Baker Eddy, The Christian Science Publishing Society, 1907.
- Meehan, Michael. Mrs. Eddy and the Late Suit in Equity, Ulan Press 2012, first published 1908.
- Cather, Willa and Milmine, Georgine. The Life of Mary Baker G. Eddy and the History of Christian Science, Doubleday 1909 (unz.org and archive.org).
- Bancroft, Samuel P. Mrs. Eddy as I Knew Her in 1870, Geo H. Ellis Co, 1923.
- Dickey, Adam H. Memoirs of Mary Baker Eddy, Bookmark 2002, first published 1927.
- Dakin, Edwin Franden. Mrs. Eddy, the Biography of a Virginal Mind, C. Scribner's Sons, 1929.
- Powell, Lyman P. Mary Baker Eddy: A Life Size Portrait, The Christian Science Publishing Society, 1930.
- Springer, Fleta Campbell. According to the Flesh, Coward-McCann, 1930.
- Bates, Ernest Sutherland and Dittemore, John V. Mary Baker Eddy: The Truth and the Tradition, A. A. Knopf, 1932.
- Tomlinson, Irving C. Twelve Years with Mary Baker Eddy, Christian Science Publishing Society, 1945.
- Studdert Kennedy, Hugh A. Mrs. Eddy: Her Life, Her Work and Her Place in History, Farallon Press, 1947.
- Peel, Robert. Mary Baker Eddy: The Years of Discovery, The Christian Science Publishing Society, 1966.
- Peel, Robert. Mary Baker Eddy: The Years of Trial, The Christian Science Publishing Society, 1971.
- Peel, Robert. Mary Baker Eddy: The Years of Authority, The Christian Science Publishing Society, 1977.
- Gardner, Martin. The Healing Revelations of Mary Baker Eddy, Prometheus Books, 1993.
- Thomas, David. With Bleeding Footsteps: Mary Baker Eddy's Path to Religious Leadership, Knopf 1994.
- Nenneman, Richard A. Persistent Pilgrim: The Life of Mary Baker Eddy, Nebbadoon Press, 1997.
- Gill, Gillian. Mary Baker Eddy, Da Capo Press, 1998.
- Gottschalk, Stephen. Rolling Away the Stone: Mary Baker Eddy's Challenge to Materialism, Indiana University Press, 2006.