Jump to content

Ethics in religion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
HKongbott (talk | contribs)
Line 9: Line 9:


Most [[religion]]s have an [[ethics|ethical]] component, often derived from purported supernatural [[revelation]] or guidance. Some assert that religion is necessary to live ethically. [[Simon Blackburn]] states that there are those who "would say that we can only flourish under the umbrella of a strong social order, cemented by common adherence to a particular religious tradition".<ref>{{cite book |title= Ethics: A Very Short Introduction|last= Simon|first= Blackburn|year= 2001|publisher= Oxford University Press|location= Oxford|isbn= 978-0-19-280442-6|page= 90}}</ref>
Most [[religion]]s have an [[ethics|ethical]] component, often derived from purported supernatural [[revelation]] or guidance. Some assert that religion is necessary to live ethically. [[Simon Blackburn]] states that there are those who "would say that we can only flourish under the umbrella of a strong social order, cemented by common adherence to a particular religious tradition".<ref>{{cite book |title= Ethics: A Very Short Introduction|last= Simon|first= Blackburn|year= 2001|publisher= Oxford University Press|location= Oxford|isbn= 978-0-19-280442-6|page= 90}}</ref>

==Anitist ethics==
{{Main article|Babayland|Philippine mythology|Cultural achievements of pre-colonial Philippines]]
[[Philippine mythology|Anitism]] has a diverse array of societal ethics. Despite the age of Anitism, which has existed even before the arrival of colonizers in the 16th century, many of the ethical beliefs have been compared to modern progressive ethics by recent generations. The beliefs revere both [[women]] and [[Babaylan|feminized men]].<ref name="Kasaysayan 1998"/> Women and men enjoyed the same rights and privileges.<ref name="Kasaysayan 1998"/> Due to the equal treatment of women and men under the beliefs, any gender can ascend the headship of families, villages, and cities.<ref>The History of Filipino Women's Writings
by Riitta Vartti, An article from
Firefly - Filipino Short Stories, Helsinki 2001</ref> Women can also ascend the throne of a nation. In some cases, some queens have ascended as sole ruler, superior to her consort.<ref>Ibn Battuta, p. 888.</ref><ref name="filipiknow.net">{{Cite web|url=https://filipiknow.net/filipina-muslims-philippine-history/|title=8 Filipina Queens and Princesses Too Awesome for Disney Movies|date=February 26, 2019|website=FilipiKnow}}</ref><ref name="Odal2000">{{cite book|title=The River Dwellers|first=Grace|work=Pasig : The River of Life|publisher=Unilever Philippines|year=2000|isbn=|editor-last=Alejandro|editor-first=Reynaldo Gamboa|location=|pages=43–66|editor-last2=Yuson|editor-first2=Alfred A.|editor-link2=Alfred Yuson|author=Odal-Devora}}</ref>

[[Virginity]] is not an issue, and children and elders are given the same respect,<ref name="Kasaysayan 1998"/> as children are also noted as capable of things that an elder can do if given the proper training. Unwed mothers or fathers are not shamed,<ref name="Kasaysayan 1998"/> as many of the Anitist gods and goddesses are the same.<ref name="Kasaysayan 1998"/> [[Divorce]] is also practiced, and was highly accepted. Both women and men can initiate a divorce.<ref name=cnnphilippines>{{cite web|url=http://cnnphilippines.com/life/culture/2019/4/15/philippine-feminism.html|title=A beginner's guide to Philippine feminism|website=cnnphilippines}}</ref><ref name="Kasaysayan 1998"/><ref name="ReferenceA">"Philippine Gay Culture: Binabae to Bakla, Silahis to MSM (Queer Asia)", J. Neil Garcia, {{ISBN|978-9622099852}}</ref> The practice of [[abortion]] is widely accepted.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Henley |first1=David |last2=Nordholt |first2=Henk Schulte |title=Environment, Trade and Society in Southeast Asia: A Longue Durée Perspective |date=2015 |publisher=Brill |isbn=9789004288041 |page=85 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Bme8rQEACAAJ&d=&redir_esc=y |language=en |chapter=Chapter 6 - The Longue Durée in Filipino Demographic History The Role of Fertility Prior to 1800 (Linda Newson) |quote=Abortions were also common for unmarried women.}}</ref>

After marriage, women did not lose their name.<ref name="Kasaysayan 1998"/> In fact, if a woman was especially distinguished, either from her own merit or her family's merit, her husband usually took her name as she was seen as far [[superior (hierarchy)|superior]] to her husband.<ref name="Kasaysayan 1998"/> During this time, women and feminized men were also given high distinction as many of which took on the role of [[shaman]]s (such as [[babaylan]]s), who also took on the role as interim head<ref name="Kasaysayan 1998"/> of the domain every time a [[datu]], a male or female ruler,<ref>The History of Filipino Women's Writings
by Riitta Vartti, An article from
Firefly - Filipino Short Stories, Helsinki 2001</ref> is absent or goes into a journey.<ref name="Kasaysayan 1998"/> Furthermore, in some societies, biological sex did not always define a person's identity, as some of those who were born as a man were fully accepted by society as a woman (such as the mentefuwaleys), and vice versa,<ref>Wisdom from a Rainforest: The Spiritual Journey of an Anthropologist (1998), Stuart A. Schlegel, University of Georgia Press</ref><ref>https://www.manilatimes.net/2018/07/12/opinion/analysis/learning-from-the-teduray-transgender-women-are-real-women-2/418546/</ref> an early notion of [[transgender]] acceptance and inclusion in a religious society.<ref>https://outragemag.com/learning-from-the-teduray-people-valuing-self-determination/</ref>

The people can freely marry and have children,<ref name="liturgy">{{cite book|author=Agnes M. Brazal |editor =Jozef Lamberts|title =Liturgy and Inculturation: Introduction|chapter =Inculturation: An Interpretative Model|publisher =Peeters|series =Studies in Liturgy|volume=77|year =1996|isbn =9789068318371|chapter-url=https://books.google.com.ph/books?id=Chp1Jlqv1GQC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false}}</ref> including male ''asog'' who were recorded by early Spanish colonists as being married to other men, an early notion of religious [[same-sex marriage]], although the distinction between heterosexual and homosexual marriages was never given as both were viewed as equally the same thing.<ref name="garcia2008"/><ref name="kroeber"/><ref group="note" name="auto"/><ref name="brewer99"/>

When the Spaniards came and started colonizing the Philippine islands in 1521, the colonialists and friars were horrified<ref>The History of Filipino Women's Writings
by Riitta Vartti, An article from
Firefly - Filipino Short Stories, Helsinki 2001</ref> in the perspective of the natives towards [[women]], feminized men, [[marriage]], [[divorce]], and [[virginity]]. The Spaniards acknowledged the "superior quality of the indigenous"; however, they also sought out to remold many precolonial concepts of equality, which led to much colonially-imposed [[hate crime]]s<ref>"Further Validation of the Genderism and Transphobia Scale in the Philippines", Raymond Aquino Macapagal, University of the Philippines - Diliman, Philippine Journal of Psychology, 2013, 46(2), 49-59</ref><ref name="ReferenceA"/> [[discrimination]], and gender inequality in the Philippines,<ref name="Kasaysayan 1998"/><ref name="ReferenceA"/> which continue to linger within Philippine society in modern times.<ref>The use of quantile regressions in estimating gender wage differentials: a case study of the Philippines
C Sakellariou - Applied Economics, 2004</ref><ref>Gender differences in land inheritance, schooling and lifetime income: evidence from the rural Philippines
J Estudillo, A Quisumbing, K Otsuka, 2001</ref><ref>Homonegativity in southeast Asia: Attitudes toward lesbians and gay men in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam - Philippines section, EJ Manalastas, BA Torres, 2017</ref>


==Buddhist ethics==
==Buddhist ethics==

Revision as of 08:40, 16 February 2020

Ethics involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior.[1] A central aspect of ethics is "the good life", the life worth living or life that is simply satisfying, which is held by many philosophers to be more important than traditional moral conduct.[2]

Most religions have an ethical component, often derived from purported supernatural revelation or guidance. Some assert that religion is necessary to live ethically. Simon Blackburn states that there are those who "would say that we can only flourish under the umbrella of a strong social order, cemented by common adherence to a particular religious tradition".[3]

Anitist ethics

{{Main article|Babayland|Philippine mythology|Cultural achievements of pre-colonial Philippines]] Anitism has a diverse array of societal ethics. Despite the age of Anitism, which has existed even before the arrival of colonizers in the 16th century, many of the ethical beliefs have been compared to modern progressive ethics by recent generations. The beliefs revere both women and feminized men.[4] Women and men enjoyed the same rights and privileges.[4] Due to the equal treatment of women and men under the beliefs, any gender can ascend the headship of families, villages, and cities.[5] Women can also ascend the throne of a nation. In some cases, some queens have ascended as sole ruler, superior to her consort.[6][7][8]

Virginity is not an issue, and children and elders are given the same respect,[4] as children are also noted as capable of things that an elder can do if given the proper training. Unwed mothers or fathers are not shamed,[4] as many of the Anitist gods and goddesses are the same.[4] Divorce is also practiced, and was highly accepted. Both women and men can initiate a divorce.[9][4][10] The practice of abortion is widely accepted.[11]

After marriage, women did not lose their name.[4] In fact, if a woman was especially distinguished, either from her own merit or her family's merit, her husband usually took her name as she was seen as far superior to her husband.[4] During this time, women and feminized men were also given high distinction as many of which took on the role of shamans (such as babaylans), who also took on the role as interim head[4] of the domain every time a datu, a male or female ruler,[12] is absent or goes into a journey.[4] Furthermore, in some societies, biological sex did not always define a person's identity, as some of those who were born as a man were fully accepted by society as a woman (such as the mentefuwaleys), and vice versa,[13][14] an early notion of transgender acceptance and inclusion in a religious society.[15]

The people can freely marry and have children,[16] including male asog who were recorded by early Spanish colonists as being married to other men, an early notion of religious same-sex marriage, although the distinction between heterosexual and homosexual marriages was never given as both were viewed as equally the same thing.[17][18][note 1][19]

When the Spaniards came and started colonizing the Philippine islands in 1521, the colonialists and friars were horrified[20] in the perspective of the natives towards women, feminized men, marriage, divorce, and virginity. The Spaniards acknowledged the "superior quality of the indigenous"; however, they also sought out to remold many precolonial concepts of equality, which led to much colonially-imposed hate crimes[21][10] discrimination, and gender inequality in the Philippines,[4][10] which continue to linger within Philippine society in modern times.[22][23][24]

Buddhist ethics

Ethics in Buddhism are traditionally based on the enlightened perspective of the Buddha, or other enlightened beings who followed him. Moral instructions are included in Buddhist scriptures or handed down through tradition. Most scholars of Buddhist ethics thus rely on the examination of Buddhist scriptures, and the use of anthropological evidence from traditional Buddhist societies, to justify claims about the nature of Buddhist ethics.[25]

According to traditional Buddhism, the foundation of Buddhist ethics for laypeople is the Pancasila: no killing, stealing, lying, sexual misconduct, or intoxicants. In becoming a Buddhist, or affirming one's commitment to Buddhism, a layperson is encouraged to vow to abstain from these negative actions. Buddhist monks and nuns take hundreds more such vows (see vinaya).[citation needed]

The sole reliance on traditional formulae or practices, however, can be questioned by Western Buddhists whose main concern is the practical solution of complex moral problems in the modern world. To find a justifiable approach to such problems it may be necessary not just to appeal to the precepts or the vinaya, but to use more basic Buddhist teachings (such as the Middle Way) to aid interpretation of the precepts and find more basic justifications for their usefulness relevant to all human experience. This approach avoids basing Buddhist ethics solely on faith in the Buddha's enlightenment or Buddhist tradition, and may allow more universal non-Buddhist access to the insights offered by Buddhist ethics.[26]

The Buddha provided some basic guidelines for acceptable behavior that are part of the Noble Eightfold Path. The initial percept is non-injury or non-violence to all living creatures from the lowest insect to humans. This precept defines a non-violent attitude toward every living thing. The Buddhist practice of this does not extend to the extremes exhibited by Jainism, but from both the Buddhist and Jain perspectives, non-violence suggests an intimate involvement with, and relationship to, all living things.[27]

Theravada monk Bhikkhu Bodhi has observed:

"Buddhist ethics, as formulated in the five precepts, is sometimes charged with being entirely negative. ... [I]t has to be pointed out that the five precepts, or even the longer codes of precepts promulgated by the Buddha, do not exhaust the full range of Buddhist ethics. The precepts are only the most rudimentary code of moral training, but the Buddha also proposes other ethical codes inculcating definite positive virtues. The Mangala Sutta, for example, commends reverence, humility, contentment, gratitude, patience, generosity, etc. Other discourses prescribe numerous family, social, and political duties establishing the well being of society. And behind all these duties lie the four attitudes called the "immeasurables"—loving-kindness, compassion, sympathetic joy, and equanimity."[28]

Christian ethics

Christian ethics in general has tended to stress the need for love, grace, mercy, and forgiveness because of sin. With divine assistance, the Christian is called to become increasingly virtuous in both thought and deed, see also the Evangelical counsels. Conversely, the Christian is also called to abstain from vice.[citation needed]

Christian ethical principles are based on the teachings within the Bible. They begin with the notion of inherent sinfulness, which requires essential atonement. Sin is estrangement from God which is the result of not doing God's will. God's will can be summed up by the precept: "Love God with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength, and your neighbor as yourself", commonly called the Great Commandment. Christian ethics are founded upon the concept of grace which transforms a person's life and enable's one to choose and act righteously.[citation needed] As sin is both individual and social, so is grace applied to both the individual and society. Christian ethics has a teleological aspect—all ethical behavior is oriented towards a vision of the Kingdom of God—a righteous society where all live in peace and harmony with God and nature, as envisioned in the Book of Isaiah. Specific ethical behaviors originate in the Old Testament’s Ten Commandments, and are enriched by teachings in the Psalms and morals contained in historical accounts, see also Biblical law in Christianity.

Christian ethics is not substantially different from Jewish ethics, except in the exhortation to love one's enemy.[citation needed] Perhaps the greatest contribution of Christian ethics is this command to love one's enemies.[citation needed] It has been argued (see Ched Myers's Binding the Strong Man, and John Howard Yoder's The Politics of Jesus) that Jesus was waging a non-violent campaign against the Roman oppressors and many of his sayings relate to this campaign--turn the other cheek, go the second mile, etc. Understanding these commands as part of a larger campaign makes it impossible to interpret Christian ethics as an individual ethic.[citation needed] It is both an individual and a social ethic concerned with life here on earth.

Other tenets include maintaining personal integrity and the absence of hypocrisy, as well as honesty and loyalty, mercy and forgiveness, rejection of materialism and the desire for wealth and power, and teaching others in your life through personal joy, happiness and Godly devotion.[citation needed]

There are several different schema of vice and virtue. Aquinas adopted the four cardinal virtues of Aristotle (justice, courage, temperance and prudence), and added to them the Christian virtues of faith, hope and charity (from St.Paul, 1 Corinthians 13). Other schema include the Seven Deadly Sins and the Seven virtues. For more see Christian philosophy and Biblical law in Christianity.

Confucian ethics

Confucianism and Neo-Confucianism emphasize the maintenance and propriety of relationships as the most important consideration in ethics[29]. To be ethical is to do what one's relationships require. Notably, though, what you owe to another person is inversely proportional to their distance from you. In other words, you owe your parents everything, but you are not in any way obligated towards strangers. This can be seen as a recognition of the fact that it is impossible to love the entire world equally and simultaneously. This is called relational ethics, or situational ethics. The Confucian system differs very strongly from Kantian ethics in that there are rarely laws or principles which can be said to be true absolutely or universally.

This is not to say that there has never been any consideration given to universalist ethics. In fact, in Zhou Dynasty China, the Confucians' main opponents, the followers of Mozi argued for universal love (Chinese: 兼爱; pinyin: jiān ài). The Confucian view eventually held sway, however, and continues to dominate many aspects of Chinese thought. Many have argued, for example, that Mao Zedong was more Confucian than Communist. Confucianism, especially of the type argued for by Mencius (Chinese: 孟子; pinyin: mèng zĭ), argued that the ideal ruler is the one who (as Confucius put it) "acts like the North Star, staying in place while the other stars orbit around it". In other words, the ideal ruler does not go out and force the people to become good, but instead leads by example. The ideal ruler fosters harmony rather than laws.

Confucius stresses honesty above all. His concepts of (Chinese: ), (Chinese: ), and rén (Chinese: ) can be seen as deeper expressions of honesty (Chinese: ; pinyin: chéng; lit. 'sincerity') and fidelity (Chinese: ; pinyin: xiào) to the ones to whom one owes one's existence (parents) and survival (one's neighbours, colleagues, inferiors in rank). He codified traditional practice and actually changed the meaning of the prior concepts that those words had meant. His model of the Confucian family and Confucian ruler dominated Chinese life into the early 20th century. This had ossified by then into an Imperial hierarchy of rigid property rights, hard to distinguish from any other dictatorship. Traditional ethics had been perverted by legalism.

Buddhist influence

Buddhism, and specifically Mahayana Buddhism, brought a cohesive metaphysic to Chinese thought and a strong emphasis on universalism. Neo-Confucianism was largely a reaction to Buddhism's dominance in the Tang dynasty, and an attempt at developing a native Confucian metaphysical/analytical system.

Daoist ethics

Laozi (Lao Tzu) and other Taoist (Daoist) authors argued for an even greater passivity on the part of rulers than did the Confucians. For Laozi, (Lao Tzu) the ideal ruler is one who does virtually nothing that can be directly identified as ruling. Clearly, both Daoism and Confucianism presume that human nature is basically good. The main branch of Confucianism, however, argues that human nature must be nurtured through ritual (li 禮), culture (wen 文) and other things, while the Daoists (Taoists) argued that the trappings of society were to be gotten rid of.

Taoist ethics ask for a greater sense of being and less identification with the act of doing. Taoist passivity nurtures, cultivates and prepares an atmosphere that allows the majestic and the real to shine, which influences society for the better. - "If you want to awaken all of humanity, then awaken all of yourself; if you want to eliminate the suffering in the world, then eliminate all that is dark and negative in yourself. Truly, the greatest gift you have to give is that of your own self-transformation." - Lao Tzu

Hindu ethics

Ahimsa - non-violence in action, words and thoughts - is considered the highest ethical value and virtue in Hinduism.[30] Above: non-violence sculpture by Carl Fredrik Reutersward in Malmo, Sweden.

Ethics is called Nitisastra (Sanskrit: नीतिशास्त्र)[31] in ancient texts of Hinduism.[32] Ethics and virtue are a much debated[33] and an evolving concept in ancient scriptures of Hinduism.[34][35] Virtue, right conduct, ethics and morality are part of the complex concept Hindus call Dharma - everything that is essential for people, the world and nature to exist and prosper together, in harmony.[36] As P.V. Kane, the author of the History of Dharmasastra said, the term "Dharma" does not have a synonym in English language. While it is often interpreted as meaning "duty", it can mean justice, right, moral, good, and much more.[37]

Ethics are explained in Hindu philosophy as something that cannot be imposed, but something that is realized and voluntarily lived up to by each individual. For example, Apastamba explained it thus: "virtue and vice do not go about saying - here we are!; neither the Gods, Gandharvas, nor ancestors can convince us - this is right, this is wrong; virtue is an elusive concept, it demands careful and sustained reflection by every man and woman before it can become part of one's life.[38]

Ethics that constitute a dharmic life - that is a moral, ethical, virtuous life - evolve in vedas and upanishads. Ethical subjects and questions are debated by various schools of Hinduism, quite extensively, in numerous texts on what is right conduct, when, how and why.[32] Over time, new virtues were conceptualized and added by ancient Hindu scholars, some replaced, others merged. For example, Manusamhita initially listed ten virtues necessary for a human being to live a dharmic life: Dhriti (courage), Kshama (forgiveness), Dama (temperance), Asteya (Non-covetousness/Non-stealing), Saucha (inner purity), Indriyani-graha (control of senses), dhi (reflective prudence), vidya (wisdom), satyam (truthfulness), akrodha (freedom from anger).[39] In later verses, this list was reduced to five virtues by the same scholar, by merging and creating a more broader concept. The shorter list of virtues became: Ahimsa (Non-violence), Dama (self restraint), Asteya (Non-covetousness/Non-stealing), Saucha (inner purity), Satyam (truthfulness).[40][41]

The Persian historian Al Biruni who visited and lived in India for 16 years in the early 11th century, describes the concept of ethics and virtuous behavior among Hindus of his times. Of ethical mandates among Hindus, a literal translation of his Persian language manuscript includes (1) A man shall not kill; (2) nor lie; (3) nor steal; (4) nor whore; (5) nor hoard up treasures.[42] These correspond to five Yamas of ancient Hindu ethics: Ahimsa (non-violence), Satya (truth, non-falsehood), Asteya (non-stealing), Brahmacharya (celibacy if unmarried and non-cheating on one's partner if married), and Aparigraha (non-possessiveness).[43] In addition to these five negative things to abstain from, Hindu ethics also recommends five positive things to strive for as Niyamas: Śauca (purity in body, speech and mind), Santosha (contentment, acceptance of circumstances with optimism), Tapas (perseverance, meditation, austerity), Swadhyaya (lifelong learning) and Pranidhan (right attitude, contemplation).[43][44] An ethical life in Hinduism is essential for a liberated life, one without craving, one that is content, attained through knowledge and by abstaining from evil.[45]

Hindu literature variously discuss ethics as one or more of four topics: (1) Gunas that is inner tendencies of conduct found in every individual (in large measure, psychology); (2) Purushartha that is proper aims of life for every individual for self-development and happiness (dharma, artha, kama and moksha); (3) Ashramas that is ethics for an individual in different periods of one's lifetime (ethical expectations for a child are distinguished from those for adults, old age); and (4) Varnasramas that is ethics and conduct for every individual in relation to society.[32] Ancient literature at the foundation of various Hindu traditions primarily discuss the first three, while the last has attracted greater attention since the 18th century. Some early 20th century literature wondered if ethics was ever a serious topic of study in Hinduism.[46] Later studies have yielded the above four approaches to ethics in different schools of Hinduism, tied together with three common themes:[32][46][47] (1) ethics is an essential part of dharma concept,[48][49] (2) Ahimsa (non-violence) is the foundational premise without which - suggests Hinduism - ethics and any consistent ethical theory is impossible,[50][51] and (3) Ethics cannot always be dualistically or non-dualistically reduced from first principles, ethics is closely related to moksha (self realization and spiritual freedom) with Vivekacudamani stating, "individuals with self knowledge and spiritual freedom are inherently self examining and ethical" and "ethics, freedom and knowledge require each other".[48][52] In addition to the above four topics in Hindu ethics, scholars[53][54] state that the karma doctrine of Hinduism is part of its ethical theory compendium.

The Bhagavad Gita—considered one of the epitomes of historic Hindu discussion of virtues and an allegorical debate on what is right and what is wrong—argues some virtues are not necessarily always absolute, but sometimes relational; for example, it explains a virtue such as Ahimsa must be re-examined when one is faced with war or violence from the aggressiveness, immaturity or ignorance of others.[55][56][57]

Islamic ethics

The foundational source in the gradual codification of Islamic ethics was the Muslim understanding and interpretations of the mankind has been granted the faculty to discern God's will and to abide by it. This faculty most crucially involves reflecting over the meaning of existence, which, as John Kelsay in the Encyclopedia of Ethics phrases, "ultimately points to the reality of God." Therefore, regardless of their environment, humans are believed to have a moral responsibility to submit to God's will and to follow Islam (as demonstrated in the Qur'an and the Sunnah, or the sayings of Muhammad [Quran 7:172]).[58]

This natural inclination is, according to the Qur'an, subverted by mankind's focus on material success: such focus first presents itself as a need for basic survival or security, but then tends to manifest into a desire to become distinguished among one's peers. Ultimately, the focus on materialism, according to the Islamic texts, hampers with the innate reflection as described above, resulting in a state of jahiliyya or "ignorance."[58]

Muslims believe that Muhammad, like other prophets in Islam, was sent by God to remind human beings of their moral responsibility, and challenge those ideas in society which opposed submission to God. According to Kelsay, this challenge was directed against five main characteristics of pre-Islamic Arabia:[58]

  1. The division of Arabs into varying tribes (based upon blood and kinship). This categorization was confronted by the ideal of a unified community based upon Islamic piety, an "ummah;"
  2. The acceptance of the worship of a multitude of deities besides Allah - a view challenged by strict Islamic monotheism, which dictates that Allah has no partner in worship nor any equal;
  3. The trait of muruwwa (manliness), which Islam discouraged, instead emphasizing on the traits of humility and piety;
  4. The focus on achieving fame or establishing a legacy, which was replaced by the concept that mankind would be called to account before God on the day of resurrection;
  5. The reverence of and compliance with ancestral traditions, a practice challenged by Islam—which instead assigned primacy to submitting to God and following revelation.

These changes lay in the reorientation of society as regards to identity and life of the Muslim belief, world view, and the hierarchy of values. From the viewpoint of subsequent generations, this caused a great transformation in the society and moral order of life in the Arabian Peninsula. For Muhammad, although pre-Islamic Arabia exemplified "heedlessness," it was not entirely without merit. Muhammad approved and exhorted certain aspects of the Arab pre-Islamic tradition, such as the care for one's near kin, for widows, orphans, and others in need and for the establishment of justice. However, these values would be re-ordered in importance and placed in the context of strict monotheism.[58]

Furthermore, a Muslim should not only follow these five main characteristics, but also be more broad about his morals. Therefore, the more the Muslim is applying these rules, the better that person is morally. For example, Islamic ethics can be applied by important verses in the Quran . The most fundamental characteristics of a Muslim are piety and humility. A Muslim must be humble with God and with other people:

“And turn not your face away from people (with pride), nor walk in insolence through the earth. Verily, God likes not each arrogant boaster. And be moderate (or show no insolence) in your walking, and lower your voice. Verily, the harshest of all voices is the voice (braying) of the ass.” (Quran 31:18-19)

Muslims must be in control of their passions and desires.

A Muslim should not be vain or attached to the ephemeral pleasures of this world. While most people allow the material world to fill their hearts, Muslims should keep God in their hearts and the material world in their hand. Instead of being attached to the car and the job and the diploma and the bank account, all these things become tools to make us better people. Morality in Islam addresses every aspect of a Muslim's life, from greetings to international relations. It is universal in its scope and in its applicability. Morality reigns in selfish desires, vanity and bad habits. Muslims must not only be virtuous, but they must also enjoin virtue. They must not only refrain from evil and vice, but they must also forbid them. In other words, they must not only be morally healthy, but they must also contribute to the moral health of society as a whole.

“You are the best of the nations raised up for (the benefit of) men; you enjoin what is right and forbid the wrong and believe in God; and if the followers of the Book had believed it would have been better for them; of them (some) are believers and most of them are transgressors.” (Quran: 3:110)

Muhammad summarized the conduct of a Muslim when he said:

“My Sustainer has given me nine commands: to remain conscious of God, whether in private or in public; to speak justly, whether angry or pleased; to show moderation both when poor and when rich, to reunite friendship with those who have broken off with me; to give to him who refuses me; that my silence should be occupied with thought; that my looking should be an admonition; and that I should command what is right.”

Islam is a way of life and it does not work in isolation. In a business practice for example, the Muslims are call to adhere good business ethical values, does not cheat, and does not charge interests to the buyers. Research has also observed how Islamic religiosity influences work ethics[59] and business ethics.

Jewish ethics

Jewish ethics may be said to originate with the Hebrew Bible, its broad legal injunctions, wisdom narratives and prophetic teachings. Most subsequent Jewish ethical claims may be traced back to the texts, themes and teachings of the written Torah.

In early rabbinic Judaism, the Oral Torah both interprets the Hebrew Bible and delves afresh into many other ethical topics. The best known rabbinic text associated with ethics is the non-legal Mishnah tractate of Avot, popularly translated as Ethics of the Fathers. Generally, ethics is a key aspect of non-legal rabbinic literature, known as aggadah, and ethical teachings are found throughout the more legal (halakhic) portions of the Mishnah, Talmud and other rabbinic literature. This early Rabbinic ethics shows signs of cross-fertilization and polemical exchange with both the Greek (Western philosophical) ethical tradition and early Christian tradition.

In the medieval period, direct Jewish responses to Greek ethics may be seen in major rabbinic writings. Notably, Maimonides offers a Jewish interpretation of Aristotle (e.g., Nicomachean Ethics), who enters into Jewish discourse through Islamic writings. Maimonides, in turn, influences Thomas Aquinas, a dominant figure in Catholic ethics and the natural law tradition of moral theology. The relevance of natural law to medieval Jewish philosophy is a matter of dispute among scholars.

Hellenistic influence

Ethics in systematic form, and apart from religious belief, is as little found in apocryphal or Judæo-Hellenistic literature as in the Bible. However, Greek philosophy greatly influenced Alexandrian writers such as the authors of IV Maccabees, the Book of Wisdom, and Philo.

Much progress in theoretical ethics came as Jews came into closer contact with the Hellenic world. Before that period the Wisdom literature shows a tendency to dwell solely on the moral obligations and problems of life as appealing to man as an individual, leaving out of consideration the ceremonial and other laws which concern only the Jewish nation. From this point of view Ben Sira's collection of sayings and monitions was written, translated into Greek, and circulated as a practical guide. The book contains popular ethics in proverbial form as the result of everyday life experience, without higher philosophical or religious principles and ideals.

More developed ethical works emanated from Hasidean circles in the Maccabean time, such as are contained in Tobit, especially in Chapter IV. Here the first ethical will or testament is found, giving a summary of moral teachings, with the Golden Rule, "Do that to no man which thou hatest!" as the leading maxim. There are even more elaborate ethical teachings in the Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs, in which each of the twelve sons of Jacob, in his last words to his children and children's children, reviews his life and gives them moral lessons, either warning them against a certain vice he had been guilty of, so that they may avoid divine punishment, or recommending them to cultivate a certain virtue he had practised during life, so that they may win God's favor. The chief virtues recommended are love for one's fellow man, industry, especially in agricultural pursuits, simplicity, sobriety, benevolence toward the poor, compassion even for the brute and avoidance of all passion, pride, and hatred. Similar ethical farewell monitions are attributed to Enoch in the Ethiopic Enoch (xciv. et seq.) and the Slavonic Enoch (lviii. et seq.) and to the three patriarchs.

The Hellenistic Jewish propaganda literature made the propagation of Jewish ethics taken from the Bible its main object for the sake of winning the pagan world to pure monotheism. It was owing to this endeavor that certain ethical principles were laid down as guiding maxims for the Gentiles, first of all the three capital sins, idolatry, murder, and incest, were prohibited (see Sibyllines, iii. 38, 761; iv. 30 et seq.). In later Jewish rabbinic literature these Noachide Laws were gradually developed into six, seven, and ten, or thirty laws of ethics binding upon every human being.

Germanic Neopagan ethics

Germanic Neopagans, including followers of both Asatru and Theodism, try to emulate the ethical values of the ancient Germanic peoples (Norse or Anglo-Saxon) through the form of the Nine Noble Virtues.

Scientology ethics

Scientology ethics is based upon the concepts of good and evil. Ethics may be defined as the actions an individual takes on itself to ensure its continued survival across the dynamics.[60]

Secular ethics

Secular ethics is a moral philosophy in which ethics are based solely on human faculties such as scientific reason, sociobiological composition, or ethical intuition, and not derived from purported supernatural revelation or guidance. Secular ethics comprise a wide variety of moral and ethical systems including consequentialism, freethinking, humanism, secular humanism, and utilitarianism, among others.

The majority of secular moral concepts are based on the acceptance of natural rights and social contracts, and on a more individual scale of either some form of attribution of intrinsic value to things, Kantianesque ethical intuitionism or of a logical deduction that establishes a preference for one thing over another, as with Occam's razor.[citation needed] Approaches such as ethical egoism, moral relativism, moral skepticism, and moral nihilism are also considered.

Shinto ethics

Shinto beliefs start with an assumption of the inherent goodness of humans as descendants of the kami.[61] By the 6th century CE, Shinto had drawn from a Chinese idea that good people will adhere to societal norms, and emperors have a divine mandate to bring about the "desirable and required order".[61] Shinto adherents are to "realize and carry out the will of the kami and the ancestors in the family, the community, and the nation".[61]

Although State Shinto reinforced subordination to the emperor and the state, Shrine Shinto is a situation-based ethical system that emphasizes right actions toward others, versus adherence to a specific belief system.[62] Shrine Shinto also stresses gratefulness for "blessings of the kami", and maintaining harmony with the emperor and the world.[62]

Wiccan ethics

Wiccan morality is largely based on the Wiccan Rede: 'An' it harm none, do what ye will' -- old-fashioned language for 'as long as you aren't harming anyone, do as you wish'. While this could be interpreted to mean "do no harm at all", it is usually interpreted as a declaration of the freedom to act, along with the necessity of thinking through and taking responsibility for the consequences of one's actions.[63]

Another element of Wiccan Morality comes from the Law of Threefold Return, which is understood to mean that whatever one does to another person or thing (benevolent or otherwise) returns with triple force.[64]

Many Wiccans also seek to cultivate a set of eight virtues mentioned in Doreen Valiente's Charge of the Goddess,[65] these being mirth, reverence, honour, humility, strength, beauty, power and compassion. In Valiente's poem they are ordered in pairs of complementary opposites, reflecting a dualism that is common throughout Wiccan philosophy.[citation needed]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: "Ethics"
  2. ^ Singer, P. (1993) Practical Ethics, 2nd edition (p.10), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  3. ^ Simon, Blackburn (2001). Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 90. ISBN 978-0-19-280442-6.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Cite error: The named reference Kasaysayan 1998 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. ^ The History of Filipino Women's Writings by Riitta Vartti, An article from Firefly - Filipino Short Stories, Helsinki 2001
  6. ^ Ibn Battuta, p. 888.
  7. ^ "8 Filipina Queens and Princesses Too Awesome for Disney Movies". FilipiKnow. February 26, 2019.
  8. ^ Odal-Devora, Grace (2000). Alejandro, Reynaldo Gamboa; Yuson, Alfred A. (eds.). The River Dwellers. Unilever Philippines. pp. 43–66. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  9. ^ "A beginner's guide to Philippine feminism". cnnphilippines.
  10. ^ a b c "Philippine Gay Culture: Binabae to Bakla, Silahis to MSM (Queer Asia)", J. Neil Garcia, ISBN 978-9622099852
  11. ^ Henley, David; Nordholt, Henk Schulte (2015). "Chapter 6 - The Longue Durée in Filipino Demographic History The Role of Fertility Prior to 1800 (Linda Newson)". Environment, Trade and Society in Southeast Asia: A Longue Durée Perspective. Brill. p. 85. ISBN 9789004288041. Abortions were also common for unmarried women.
  12. ^ The History of Filipino Women's Writings by Riitta Vartti, An article from Firefly - Filipino Short Stories, Helsinki 2001
  13. ^ Wisdom from a Rainforest: The Spiritual Journey of an Anthropologist (1998), Stuart A. Schlegel, University of Georgia Press
  14. ^ https://www.manilatimes.net/2018/07/12/opinion/analysis/learning-from-the-teduray-transgender-women-are-real-women-2/418546/
  15. ^ https://outragemag.com/learning-from-the-teduray-people-valuing-self-determination/
  16. ^ Agnes M. Brazal (1996). "Inculturation: An Interpretative Model". In Jozef Lamberts (ed.). Liturgy and Inculturation: Introduction. Studies in Liturgy. Vol. 77. Peeters. ISBN 9789068318371.
  17. ^ Cite error: The named reference garcia2008 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  18. ^ Cite error: The named reference kroeber was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  19. ^ Cite error: The named reference brewer99 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  20. ^ The History of Filipino Women's Writings by Riitta Vartti, An article from Firefly - Filipino Short Stories, Helsinki 2001
  21. ^ "Further Validation of the Genderism and Transphobia Scale in the Philippines", Raymond Aquino Macapagal, University of the Philippines - Diliman, Philippine Journal of Psychology, 2013, 46(2), 49-59
  22. ^ The use of quantile regressions in estimating gender wage differentials: a case study of the Philippines C Sakellariou - Applied Economics, 2004
  23. ^ Gender differences in land inheritance, schooling and lifetime income: evidence from the rural Philippines J Estudillo, A Quisumbing, K Otsuka, 2001
  24. ^ Homonegativity in southeast Asia: Attitudes toward lesbians and gay men in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam - Philippines section, EJ Manalastas, BA Torres, 2017
  25. ^ Damien Keown The Nature of Buddhist Ethics Macmillan 1992; Peter Harvey An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics Cambridge University Press 2000
  26. ^ Robert Ellis A Buddhist theory of moral objectivity (Ph.D. thesis) Archived 2011-07-23 at the Wayback Machine
  27. ^ Carl Olson, The Different Paths of Buddhism p.73
  28. ^ Bodhi (1994). For other examples of Buddhist discourses that promote ethical behaviors among laity see, for instance, the Sigalovada Sutta (referred to as "the Vinaya of the householder" by Buddhaghosa) and the Dhammika Sutta.
  29. ^ Wong, David (2018), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), "Chinese Ethics", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2020-01-18
  30. ^ Stephen H. Phillips & other authors (2008), in Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace, & Conflict (Second Edition), ISBN 978-0123739858, Elsevier Science, Pages 1347–1356, 701-849, 1867
  31. ^ Ethics Sanskrit English Dictionary
  32. ^ a b c d Alban G. Widgery (1930), The Principles of Hindu Ethics, International Journal of Ethics, Vol. 40, No. 2 (Jan., 1930), pp. 232-245
  33. ^ Roderick Hindery (2004), Comparative Ethics in Hindu and Buddhist Traditions, ISBN 978-8120808669; pages 268-72;
    • Quote: "(In Hinduism), srutis did not pretend to deal with all situations or irregularities in the moral life, leaving these matters to human reasons (Mbh Xii.109); Accordingly, that again which is virtue may, according to time and place, be sin (...); Under certain conditions, acts that are apparently evil (such as violence) can be permitted if they produce consequences that are good (protection of children and women in self defense when the society is attacked in war)
    • Quote: "(The Hindu scripture) notes the interrelationship of several virtues, consequentially. Anger springs from covetousness; (the vice of) envy disappears in consequence of (the virtues) of compassion and knowledge of self (Mbh Xii.163);
  34. ^ Crawford, S. Cromwell (1982), The evolution of Hindu ethical ideals, Asian Studies Program, University of Hawaii Press
  35. ^ Becker and Becker (2001), Encyclopedia of Ethics, ISBN 978-0415936729, 2nd Edition, Routledge, pages 845-848
  36. ^ Steven Rosen (2006), Essential Hinduism, Praeger, ISBN 0-275-99006-0, page 31-45
  37. ^ Kane, P. V. (1962). Kane, P.V. (1962), History of Dharmasastra (Ancient and Medieval Religious and Civil Law in India),. Pune: Bhandarkar Press. pp. Volume 1, pp 2–10.
  38. ^ Phillip Wagoner, see Foreword, in Srinivasan, Dharma: Hindu Approach to a Purposeful Life, ISBN 978-1-62209-672-5;
    • Also see: Apastamba, Dharma Sutra, 1.20.6
  39. ^ Tiwari, K. N. (1998), Classical Indian Ethical Thought: A Philosophical Study of Hindu, Jaina, and Buddhist Morals, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, ISBN 978-81-208-1608-4, pp 52-55
  40. ^ Gupta, B. (2006). BHAGAVAD GĪTĀ AS DUTY AND VIRTUE ETHICS. Journal of Religious Ethics, 34(3), 373-395.
  41. ^ Mohapatra & Mohapatra, Hinduism: Analytical Study, ISBN 978-8170993889; see pages 37-40
  42. ^ Alberuni's India (v. 1), Chapter VII, Columbia University Libraries, London : Kegan Paul, Trübner & Co., (1910), page 73-75
  43. ^ a b Andrea Hornett (2012), Ancient Ethics and Contemporary Systems: The Yamas, the Niyamas and Forms of Organization, in Leadership through the Classics (Editor: Prastacos et al), Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-642-32445-1, Chapter 5, pages 63-78
  44. ^ B. Chandel (2014), The Immanent and the Transcendent in Indian Ethics, Ethics or Moral Philosophy, Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey, Volume 11, ISBN 978-94-007-6894-9, pp 35-37
  45. ^ Alberuni's India (v. 1), Chapter VII, Columbia University Libraries, London : Kegan Paul, Trübner & Co., (1910), page 72-73
  46. ^ a b William F. Goodwin, Ethics and Value in Indian Philosophy, Philosophy East and West, Vol. 4, No. 4 (Jan., 1955), pp. 321-344
  47. ^ Wilhelm Halbfass, Tradition and Reflection - Explorations in Indian Thought, State University of New York Press, ISBN 0-7914-0362-9
  48. ^ a b William F. Goodwin, Ethics and Value in Indian Philosophy, Philosophy East and West, Vol. 4, No. 4 (Jan., 1955), pages 328-329
  49. ^ Arti Dhand (2002), The Dharma of Ethics, the Ethics of Dharma: Quizzing the Ideals of Hinduism, The Journal of Religious Ethics, Vol. 30, No. 3 (Fall, 2002), pp. 347-372
  50. ^ Wilhelm Halbfass, Tradition and Reflection - Explorations in Indian Thought, State University of New York Press, ISBN 0-7914-0362-9, pages 87-96, 111-114, 131-257
  51. ^ B. Chandel (2014), The Immanent and the Transcendent in Indian Ethics, Ethics or Moral Philosophy, Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey, Volume 11, ISBN 978-94-007-6894-9, pp 35-46
  52. ^ Wilhelm Halbfass, Tradition and Reflection - Explorations in Indian Thought, State University of New York Press, ISBN 0-7914-0362-9, page 394, 353
  53. ^ Bruce R. Reichenbach (1988), The Law of Karma and the Principle of Causation, Philosophy East and West, Vol. 38, No. 4 (Oct., 1988), pp. 399-410
  54. ^ Roy W. Perrett (1998), Hindu Ethics: A Philosophical Study, University of Hawaii Press, ISBN 978-0824820855
  55. ^ Subedi, S. P. (2003). The Concept in Hinduism of ‘Just War’. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 8(2), pages 339-361
  56. ^ Klaus K. Klostermaier (1996), in Harvey Leonard Dyck and Peter Brock (Ed), The Pacifist Impulse in Historical Perspective, see Chapter on Himsa and Ahimsa Traditions in Hinduism, ISBN 978-0802007773, University of Toronto Press, pages 230-234
  57. ^ Bakker, F. L. (2013), Comparing the Golden Rule in Hindu and Christian Religious Texts. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses, 42(1), pages 38-58
  58. ^ a b c d Islamic ethics, Encyclopedia of Ethics
  59. ^ Wisker, Zazli Lily (2016). "The effect of religiosity and personality on work ethics: A case of Muslim managers". 2017 Science Journal Of Business And Management. 4: 1–9.
  60. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2006-06-17. Retrieved 2006-04-12.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  61. ^ a b c Bowker, John (1997). World Religions: The Great Faiths Explored & Explained. London: Dorling Kindersley Limited. p. 101. ISBN 0-7894-1439-2.
  62. ^ a b Bowker, John (1997). World Religions: The Great Faiths Explored & Explained. London: Dorling Kindersley Limited. p. 108. ISBN 0-7894-1439-2.
  63. ^ Harrow, Judy (1985) "Exegesis on the Rede" Archived 2007-10-06 at the Wayback Machine in Harvest vol. 5, Number 3 (Oimelc 1985). Retrieved 26 February 2007.
  64. ^ Gerald Gardner, High Magic's Aid, London: Michael Houghton, 1949, p.303
  65. ^ Farrar, Janet & Stewart, Eight Sabbats for Witches.

Bibliography

Going for Refuge & Taking the Precepts (The Wheel Publication No. 282/284). Kandy, Sri Lanka: Buddhist Publication Society. (Originally published 1981 and transcribed for Internet publication in 1994.) Retrieved 2007-11-12 from "Access to Insight" at http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/bodhi/wheel282.html.

Further reading

External links


Cite error: There are <ref group=note> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=note}} template (see the help page).