Religion in the Philippines

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Dominant religion in the Philippines, Christianity (purple) and Islam (green).

Religion in the Philippines is marked by a majority of people being adherents of the Christian faith.[1] At least 92% of the population is Christian; about 81% belong to the Roman Catholic Church while about 11% belong to Protestant Christian and independent Catholic denominations, such as Iglesia Filipina Independiente, Seventh-day Adventist Church, United Church of Christ in the Philippines and Evangelicals.[1] Officially, the Philippines is a secular nation, with the Constitution guaranteeing separation of church and state, and requiring the government to respect all religious beliefs equally.

According to national religious surveys, about 5.6% of the population of the Philippines is Muslim, making Islam the second largest religion in the country. However, A 2012 estimate by the National Commission on Muslim Filipinos (NCMF) stated that there were 10.7 million Muslims, or approximately 11 percent of the total population.[2] Most Muslims live in parts of Mindanao, Palawan, and the Sulu Archipelago – an area known as Bangsamoro or the Moro region.[3] Some have migrated into urban and rural areas in different parts of the country. Most Muslim Filipinos practice Sunni Islam according to the Shafi'i school.[4] There are some Ahmadiyya Muslims in the country.[5]

Philippine traditional religions are still practiced by an estimated 2% of the population,[6][7] made up of many aboriginal and tribal groups. These religions are often syncretized with Christianity and Islam. Animism, folk religion, and shamanism remain present as undercurrents of mainstream religion, through the albularyo, the babaylan, and the manghihilot. Buddhism is practiced by 2% of the populations by the Japanese people community, Japanese Filipino community,[8][6][7][9] and together with Taoism and Chinese folk religion is also dominant in Chinese communities. There are smaller number of followers of Hinduism,[6][7][9] and Judaism, and Baha'i.[10] More than 10% of the population is non-religious, with the percentage of non-religious people overlapping with various faiths, as the vast majority of the non-religious select a religion in the Census for nominal purposes.[6][7][11]

Demographics[edit]

The Philippine Statistics Authority in October 2015 reported that 80.58% of the total Filipino population were Roman Catholics, and 5.57% were Islamic.[12]

Population by religious affiliation (2010)
Affiliation Number
Roman Catholic, including Catholic Charismatic 80.58 80.58
 
74,211,896
Islam 5.57 5.57
 
5,127,084
Evangelicals (PCEC) 2.68 2.68
 
2,469,957
Iglesia Ni Cristo 2.45 2.45
 
2,251,941
Non-Roman Catholic and Protestant (NCCP) 1.16 1.16
 
1,071,686
Aglipayan 1.00 1
 
916,639
Seventh-day Adventist 0.74 0.74
 
681,216
Bible Baptist Church 0.52 0.52
 
480,409
United Church of Christ in the Philippines 0.49 0.49
 
449,028
Jehovah's Witnesses 0.45 0.45
 
410,957
Other Protestants 0.31 0.31
 
287,734
Church of Christ 0.28 0.28
 
258,176
Jesus is Lord Church 0.23 0.23
 
207,246
Tribal Religions 0.19 0.19
 
177,147
United Pentecostal Church (Philippines) Inc. 0.18 0.18
 
169,956
Other Baptists 0.17 0.17
 
154,686
Philippine Independent Catholic Church 0.15 0.15
 
138,364
Unión Espiritista Cristiana de Filipinas, Inc. 0.15 0.15
 
137,885
Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints 0.15 0.15
 
133,814
Association of Fundamental Baptist Churches in the Philippines 0.12 0.12
 
106,509
Evangelical Christian Outreach Foundation 0.10 0.1
 
96,102
None 0.08 0.08
 
73,248
Convention of the Philippine Baptist Church 0.07 0.07
 
65,008
Crusaders of the Divine Church of Christ Inc. 0.06 0.06
 
53,146
Buddhist 0.05 0.05
 
46,558
Lutheran Church of the Philippines 0.05 0.05
 
46,558
Iglesia sa Dios Espiritu Santo Inc. 0.05 0.05
 
45,000
Philippine Benevolent Missionaries Association 0.05 0.05
 
42,796
Faith Tabernacle Church (Living Rock Ministries) 0.04 0.04
 
36,230
Others 0.33 0.33
 
299,399
TOTAL 92,097,978
Source: Philippine Statistics Authority[12]

Ancient indigenous beliefs[edit]

During pre-colonial times, a form of animism was widely practiced in the Philippines. Today, the Philippines is mostly Catholic and other forms of Christianity, and only a handful of the indigenous tribes continue to practice the old traditions. These are a collection of beliefs and cultural mores anchored more or less in the idea that the world is inhabited by spirits and supernatural entities, both good and bad, and that respect be accorded to them through nature worship. These spirits all around nature are known as "diwatas", showing cultural relationship with Hinduism (Devatas).

Wooden images of ancestral spirits (anito) in a museum in Bontoc, Philippines

Some worship specific deities, such as the Tagalog supreme deity, Bathala, and his children Adlaw, Mayari, and Tala, or the Visayan deity Kan-Laon. Others practice Ancestor worship (anitos).[citation needed] Variations of animistic practices occur in different ethnic groups. Magic, chants and prayers are often key features. Its practitioners were highly respected (and some feared) in the community, as they were healers, midwives (hilot), shamans, witches and warlocks (mangkukulam), priests/priestesses (babaylan/katalonan), tribal historians and wizened elders that provided the spiritual and traditional life of the community. In the Visayan regions, shamanistic and animistic beliefs in witchcraft (barang) and mythical creatures like aswang (vampires), duwende (dwarves), and bakonawa (a gigantic sea serpent), may exist in some indigenous peoples alongside more mainstream Christian and Islamic faiths.

Spanish missionaries during the 16th century arrived in the Philippines noting about warrior priestesses leading tribal spiritual affairs. Many were condemned as pagan heretics. Although suppressed, these matriarchal tendencies run deep in Filipino society and can still be seen in the strong leadership roles modern Filipino women are assuming in business, politics, academia, the arts and in religious institutions.

Nominally animists constitute about one percent of the population.[citation needed] But animism's influence pervade daily life and practice of the colonial religions that took root in the Philippines. Elements of folk belief melded with Christian and Islamic practices to give a unique perspective on these religions.

Bahá'í Faith[edit]

The Bahá'í Faith in the Philippines started in 1921 with the first Bahá'í first visiting the Philippines that year,[13] and by 1944 a Bahá'í Local Spiritual Assembly was established.[14] In the early 1960s, during a period of accelerated growth, the community grew from 200 in 1960 to 1000 by 1962 and 2000 by 1963. In 1964 the National Spiritual Assembly of the Bahá'ís of the Philippines was elected and by 1980 there were 64,000 Bahá'ís and 45 local assemblies.[15] The Bahá'ís have been active in multi/inter-faith developments. The 2005 World Christian Encyclopedia estimates the Bahá'í population of the Philippines at about 247,500.[16]

Buddhism[edit]

No written record exists about the early Buddhism in the Philippines. The recent archaeological discoveries and the few scant references in the other nations's historical records can tell, however, about the existence of Buddhism from the 9th century onward in the islands. These records mention the independent states that comprise the Philippines and which show that they were not united as one country in the early days. Archaeological finds include Buddhist artifacts. The style are of Vajrayana influence.

The Philippines's early states must have become the tributary states of the powerful Buddhist Srivijaya empire that controlled the trade and its sea routes from the 6th century to the 13th century in Southeast Asia. The states’s trade contacts with the empire long before or in the 9th century must have served as the conduit for introducing Vajrayana Buddhism to the islands.

Both Srivijaya empire in Sumatra and Majapahit empire in Java were unknown in history until 1918 when the Ecole Francaise d'Extreme Orient's George Coedes postulated their existence because they had been mentioned in the records of the Chinese Tang and Sung imperial dynasties. Ji Ying, a Chinese monk and scholar, stayed in Sumatra from 687 to 689 on his way to India. He wrote on the Srivijaya's splendour, "Buddhism was flourishing throughout the islands of Southeast Asia. Many of the kings and the chieftains in the islands in the southern seas admire and believe in Buddhism, and their hearts are set on accumulating good action."

Both empires replaced their early Theravada Buddhist religion with Vajrayana Buddhism in the 7th century.[17]

Many Filipino customs have strong Buddhist influences. Estimates of the Buddhist population of the Philippines is around 2%.[18] Buddhism in the Philippines is growing fast, mainly because of increasing immigration to the country. Buddhism is largely confined to the Filipino Chinese, Chinese, Japanese, Thai, and Vietnamese communities though local adherents are on the rise.[citation needed] There are temples in Manila, Davao, and Cebu, and other places. Several schools of Buddhism are present in the Philippines – Mahayana, Vajrayana, Theravada, as well as groups such as Soka Gakkai International.[19]

Christianity[edit]

San Fernando Metropolitan Cathedral in Pampanga

Christianity arrived in the Philippines with the landing of Ferdinand Magellan in 1521. In the late 16th century, the archipelago was claimed for Spain and named it after its king. Missionary activity during the country's colonial rule by Spain and the United States led the transformation of the Philippines into the first and then, along with East Timor, one of two predominantly Catholic nations in East Asia, with approximately 92.5% of the population belonging to the Christian faith.[6][20]

Roman Catholicism[edit]

The Catholic Cebu Metropolitan Cathedral, built on the site of the Church of St. Vitales, the first church built in the Philippines

Roman Catholicism is the predominant religion and the largest Christian denomination, with estimates of approximately 87% of the population belonging to this faith in the Philippines.[6] The country has a significant Spanish Catholic tradition, and Spanish style Catholicism is embedded in the culture, which was acquired from priests or friars.

The Catholic Church has great influence on Philippine society and politics. One typical event is the role of the Catholic hierarchy during the bloodless People Power Revolution of 1986. Then-Archbishop of Manila and de facto Primate of the Philippines, Jaime Cardinal Sin appealed to the public via radio to congregate along Epifanio de los Santos Avenue in support of rebel forces. Some seven million people responded to the call between 22–25 February, and the non-violent protests successfully forced President Ferdinand E. Marcos out of power and into exile in Hawaii.

Several Catholic holidays are culturally important as family occasions, and are observed in the civil calendar. Chief among these are Christmas, which includes celebrations of the civil New Year, and the more solemn Holy Week, which may occur in March or April. Every November, Filipino families celebrate All Saints' Day and All Souls' Day as a single holiday in honour of the saints and the dead, visiting and cleaning ancestral graves, offering prayers, and feasting.

Papal visits[edit]

  • Pope Paul VI was the target of an assassination attempt at Manila International Airport in the Philippines in 1970. The assailant, a Bolivian Surrealist painter named Benjamín Mendoza y Amor Flores, lunged toward Pope Paul with a kris, but was subdued.
  • Pope John Paul II visited the country twice, 1981 and 1995. The final Mass of the event was recorded to have been attended by 4 million people, and was at the time the largest papal crowd in history.
  • Pope Benedict XVI declined the invitation of Cardinal Gaudencio Rosales and CBCP President Ángel Lagdameo to visit because of a hectic schedule.
  • Pope Francis visited the country in January 2015, and the concluding Mass at the Quirino Grandstand had almost 6 million attendees, breaking the record at Pope John Paul's Mass at the same site twenty years prior.

Iglesia ni Cristo[edit]

Main article: Iglesia ni Cristo

Iglesia ni Cristo (English: Church of Christ; Spanish: Iglesia de Cristo) is the largest entirely indigenous-initiated religious organisation in the Philippines comprising roughly 2% of religious affiliation in the Philippines.[21][22][23][24][25] Felix Y. Manalo officially registered the church with the Philippine Government on July 27, 1914[26] and because of this, most publications refer to him as the founder of the church. Felix Manalo claimed that he was restoring the church of Christ that was lost for 2,000 years. He died on April 12, 1963, aged 76.

The Philippine Arena was constructed by the Iglesia ni Cristo for its Centennial Anniversary and large gatherings.

The Iglesia ni Cristo is known for its large evangelical missions. The largest of which was the Grand Evangelical Mission (GEM) which also occurred simultaneously on 19 sites across the country. In Manila site alone, more than 600,000 people attended the event.[27] Other programs includes the Lingap sa Mamamayan (Aid to Humanity),[28] The Kabayan Ko Kapatid Ko (My Countrymen, My Brethren) and various resettlement projects for affected individuals.[29]

The primary purpose of the Church is to worship the almighty God based on his teachings as taught by Jesus Christ and as recorded in the bible. The church’s major activities include worship service, missionary works, edification. According to the March 2012 issue of PASUGO Magazine (p. 24), the Demographics of the Iglesia ni Cristo then was composed of 112 countries and 7 territories comprising 110 races.

Jesus Miracle Crusade International Ministry[edit]

Main article: Jesus Miracle Crusade

The Jesus Miracle Crusade International Ministry (JMCIM) is an apostolic Pentecostal religious group from the Philippines which believes particularly in the promotion of miracles and faith in God for healing. JMCIM was founded by evangelist Wilde E. Almeda on February 14, 1975.

Members Church of God International[edit]

Members Church of God International (Filipino: Mga Kasapi Iglesia ng Dios Internasyonal) is a religious organization popularly known through its television program, Ang Dating Daan (English for the "The Old Path").

The church is known for their "Bible Expositions", where guests and members are given a chance to ask any biblical question to the Overall Servant of the church, Eliseo Soriano directly from the Bible. He and his co-servants expose teachings of asked religions which are not biblical and expands more knowledge about some misunderstood verses by using old manuscripts and reliable bible translations. Since 2005, Soriano went outside the Philippines to host Bible Expositions around the world.[30]

Besides general preaching, they also established charity works. Among these humanitarian services are the charity homes for the senior citizens and orphaned children and teenagers; transient homes; medical missions; full college scholarship; start-up capital for livelihood projects; vocational trainings for the differently-abled; free legal assistance; free bus, jeepney, and train rides for commuters and senior citizens, and; free Bible for everyone. In its effort to save lives, MCGI is now one of the major blood donor in the Philippines, as acknowledged by the Philippine National Red Cross.[31]

Most Holy Church of God in Christ Jesus[edit]

The Most Holy Church of God in Christ Jesus (Filipino: Kabanalbanalang Iglesia ng Dios kay Kristo Hesus),[32][33] is an independent Christian denomination officially registered in the Philippines by Teofilo D. Ora in May 1922. The Church claims to restore the visible Church founded in Jerusalem by Christ Jesus. It has spread to areas including California, USA; Calgary, Canada, Dubai, UAE and other Asian countries. The Church will be celebrating its centennial anniversary in May 2022.

The church was founded by Bishop Teofilo D. Ora in 1922. He, along with Avelino Santiago and Nicolas Perez, split off from the Iglesia ni Cristo (Church of Christ) in 1922. They initially called their church Iglesia Verdadera de Cristo Hesus (True Church of Christ Jesus). However, following a religious doctrine controversy, Nicolas Perez split off from the group and registered an offshoot called Iglesia ng Dios kay Kristo Hesus, Haligi at Suhay ng Katotohanan (Church of God in Christ Jesus, the Pillar and Support of the Truth). Teofilo D. Ora was bishop until his death in 1969. He was officially succeeded by Bishop Salvador C. Payawal who led the church until 1989. Subsequent bishops were Bishop Gamaliel T. Payawal (1989 to 2003) and Bishop Isagani N. Capistrano (2003–present). It was during Gamaliel Payawal's tenure when the church was renamed as Most Holy Church of God in Christ Jesus.

Philippine Independent Church[edit]

Iglesia Filipina Independiente Parish of the Virgin of the Assumption in Maragondon, Cavite.

The Philippine Independent Church (officially Spanish: Iglesia Filipina Independiente, IFI; colloquially known as the Aglipayan Church) is an independent Christian denomination in the form of a national church in the Philippines. Its schism from the Catholic Church was proclaimed in 1902 by the members of the Unión Obrera Democrática Filipina due to the alleged mistreatment of Filipinos by Spanish priests and the execution of nationalist José Rizal under Spanish colonial rule.

Isabelo de los Reyes was one of the initiators of the separation, and suggested that former Catholic priest Gregorio Aglipay be the head of the church. It is also known as the Aglipayan Church after its first Obispo Maximo, Gregorio Aglipay.

(In June 12, the Philippines will commemorate the Independence Day from Spanish colonization proclaimed in Kawit, Cavite on June 12, 1898. The Aglpayan re-posts this IFI historical Sketch to encourage our members to reflect on the heritage of the IFI and how this heritage may help us understand our responses to the challenges and context of our ministry.) CENTENARY OF THE IGLESIA FILIPINA INDEPENDIENTE Celebrating the Heritage for National Freedom, Independence and Abundant Life A Historical Sketch Filipino Resistance Against American Colonization The First Philippine Republic, which was the rightful goal of the Revolution against Spain, was inaugurated in January 23, 1899. Less than two weeks later, the infant Republic became involved in the Filipino-American War. America, which came projecting itself as an ally was exposed in the Treaty of Paris for having entered into an agreement with Spain that nullified the gains of the Filipinos. This treaty became America’s legal claim for sovereignty in the islands. A longer and bloodier war ensued for more than three years. This is glaring evidence that the infant Republic enjoyed the full support of the populace. The invaders minimized this into a Philippine Insurrection against the United States. Part of the strategy to minimize Filipino resistance was the establishment of a civil government in the pacified areas. Positions in the provincial and municipal government lured many of the leaders to collaborate with the Americans. The Philippine Commission, established by the Americans as the civil counterpart of the invading military, legislated the Sedition Law in 1901. This prohibited the advocacy of independence in the occupied areas. Superior forces and discipline of the enemy led to the surrender of Aguinaldo two years later. Some Filipino generals continued the fight but by May of the next year, Miguel Malvar who was the last leader with official links to the Republic also surrendered. The end of the Filipino-American War as officially proclaimed by US President Theodore Roosevelt on July 4, 1902 did not mean the end of Filipino resistance or in a more positive manner, the Filipino desire for liberty. The laws passed by the Philippine Commission (which was the sole legislative body until the establishment of the Philippine Assembly in 1907) could be seen as evidence of continuing Filipino aspirations for liberty. Three of these would be the Sedition Law (1901) which forbade advocacy of independence even through peaceful means; Brigandage Act (1902) which classified all armed resistance as pure banditry; and the Reconcentration Act (1903) which gave legal justification for hamletting to deny the guerrilla’s support from the populace. A later one was the Flag Law (1907), which prohibited the display of the Flag (used in the Proclamation of Independence on June 12, 1898) and the playing of the Philippine National Anthem (Marcha Nacional at that time). The Filipinos’ expression of their desire for liberty was varied and these laws could be seen as curtailing such a struggle. Resistance in many forms characterized the first decade of the 20th century. In the urban centers most particularly in Manila and Cebu, journalists and writers like Aurelio Tolentino, Juan Matapang Cruz, Juan Abad, Vicente Sotto and others, continued to write in symbolism. Some of their writings were judged as seditious. Various groups continued the armed struggle. The Brigandage Act branded as bandits many of the revolutionaries who continued the struggle for liberty like Macario Sakay and the lieutenants of Vibora (the Viper who was Artemio Ricarte). Even millenarian movements joined the fray or even if they did not, they were suspected as such, and therefore suffered persecutions. In this period of continuing resistance when the institutional and missionary churches were cooperating (explicitly or otherwise) with the newly established American colonial government, the Iglesia Filipina Independiente was born and grew rapidly. The Founding of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente It was Sunday, August 3, 1902 when in a meeting of the General Council of the Union Obrera Democratica (UOD), its head, Isabelo de los Reyes, Sr., popularly known as Don Belong, proclaimed the establishment of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente. To give shape to this Church, he proposed the creation of two councils to operate in one equal level: the Executive to be composed of lay people and the Doctrinal to be composed by clergy who were nominated as bishops of the dioceses. Fr. Gregorio Aglipay was proposed as the head with the title of Obispo Maximo (Supreme Bishop). To give credence to this movement, prominent Filipinos were nominated and the civil governor, William Howard Taft, Emilio Aguinaldo and Pardo de Tavera were proposed as honorary presidents. In the following two weeks, many protested such move in the press. Except for Aguinaldo, all the lay people rejected their nominations and denied involvement. Fathers Manuel Roxas, Mariano Dakanay, Jorge Barlin, Adriano Garces, Praxedes Magalona, and several others privately requested Don Belong to exclude their names. The most telling blow came from Fr. Gregorio Aglipay whose circular to the Filipino clergy dated August 16 and was published on August 20 called for a meeting assuring them that “he had not approved the declaration of any schism before all means of reaching an understanding with Rome should be exhausted.” The Manila American published the following day a derisive article picturing the IFI as “the church that died before it was born.” Nevertheless, one year afterwards, the IFI can count, if not claim, one and a half million members roughly one fourth or 25% of the population. The start of the swelling membership can be gleaned from two articles in the first official organ of the church, the La Iglesia Filipina Independiente Revista Catolica (LIFIRC). The first article explains: Therefore, Isabelo de los Reyes, deeply offended by the rebuffs of his own friends formed an Executive Committee from the Staff of the Democratic Labor Union and began to print circulars and the first two Fundamental Epistles, which were later approved by the Supreme Council of Bishops. The people, on the other hand, aligned themselves behind Señor Reyes from the beginning, many popular organizations and Protestants joining the Filipino Church, as indicated by the testimonies which the press kept publishing which we will reproduce in the next number. The Ecclesiastical Governor of Ilocos Norte, the singularly praiseworthy Pedro Brillantes, today, the most notable Bishop of that diocese, as head of the Clergy, accepted and solemnly joined our Holy Church, and this gave great impetus to the religious movement. The second article listed the First Adherents of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente. First among the numerous groups were 63 residents of Navotas (first on the list was a woman’s name – Saturnina Bunda). Other groupings included priests, seminarians, faithful from several municipalities, guilds and other labor groups, local committees and even expatriates. On October 1, 1902, Pedro Brillantes took possession of his diocese and proclaimed Bacarra as his episcopal seat. In his Acta de Posesion, he made it clear that he had been “canonically chosen and elected Bishop according to the ancient usage of the Church” and that he was chosen by the “clergy and the laity belonging to various political parties in and Manila, ” and that this election was confirmed by the faithful of Ilocos Norte province. Priests consecrated him on October 20 in accordance with the First Epistle, which justified the consecration of bishops. Documents also show that on October 1, Bishop Gregorio Aglipay headed the signatories of the short-lived 1902 Constitution of the Philippine Independent Church. The titles attached to the other signatories also showed that they had accepted their nominations as bishops in the August 3 proclamation. The following day, the Second Fundamental Epistle was issued as a reply to Bishop Alcocer’s denunciation of the Church separation. The members were exhorted not to render evil for evil. More importantly, this epistle laid down the IFI’s belief that revolutions are in accordance with the will of God as its first paragraph says: Neither the leaf of a tree nor a single bird falls to the earth without the will of our Heavenly Father (Mt. 10:29). Revolutions, therefore, are perfectly providential, and despite their causing us momentary disasters, they ultimately bring us far-reaching redemption and result in benefits that will bless many generations to come. They are like typhoons which, in the twinkling of an eye, destroy and erase secular vices and abuses, and their social upheavals, moreover, have this time been used by Divine Providence to castigate the errors of an enthroned frailocracy, errors over which we now wish to draw the veil of merciful oblivion. The first that was formally signed by Bishop Aglipay was the Third Fundamental Epistle entitled Declaration of Principles which was issued on October 17. This was publicly read during the inauguration through a Solemn Pontifical Mass on October 26 officiated by Bishop Aglipay. It was held in an open field in the corner of Lemery and Azcarraga Streets before a congregation of several thousands. Three days later, the Fourth Fundamental Epistle that further laid down the organizational structure of the Church was issued. This epistle also prescribed the curriculum for theological education and some immediate steps to remedy the need for more priests. On November 2, in a public announcement, Bishop Aglipay set aside this date for a special commemorative service for the heroes of the Philippine Revolution – Rizal, Burgos, Gomez and Zamora, and other heroes and for all insurgents who died in the struggle for freedom. On that day an incident took place which led to the takeover of the church in Paco, Pandacan and Sampaloc Churches by the Aglipayans. On the ninth, the Municipal Council of Lagonoy with some of the prominent citizens passed a resolution that declared themselves and their parish priest as members of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente renouncing their allegiance to the Catholic Church of Rome. The following day, William Howard Taft, the Civil Governor of the Philippines submitted his official report concerning the situation of the country. Taft mentioned the Aglipayan movement could have “have an important bearing upon future conditions and which may perhaps add much to the labor of maintaining of peace and order in the archipelago” On the 16th, Bishop Aglipay issued a manifesto due to the rapid growth of the national Filipino Church and the necessity of an authoritative outline of the Church that all may know its object. The manifesto contained statements that expressed much of the rationale of the newly founded Church. At one point, for instance, it declared “The time has come for a Filipino National Church for the Filipino people, ministered by the Filipino clergy. Years of friar oppression made this imperative. The liberty of worship and conscience and the separation of Church and State could make it contemptible for us to give spiritual allegiance to the Italian in Rome claiming temporal power whose recognition from government by all means known to masters of deception.” On December 8, Epistle V was published in protest against the Quae Mari Sinico, the papal constitution giving the Holy See’s answer to the religious turmoil in the Islands. It became a rallying point for the IFI against the Holy See. Year 1903 – 1945 Struggle for National Freedom, Independence and Abundant Life The Iglesia Filipina Independiente was founded by the people of our country. This is the product of their desire for liberty, religiously, politically and socially. I was only one of the instruments of its expression. Gregorio L. Aglipay The new year was started by the concerned civil and religious authorities agreeing that the four religious orders should be withdrawn in two years and that only secular and non-Spanish members of the regulars should act as parish priests as part of the contract on the sale of friar lands. On the 18th of January, the Bishops of Isabela, Cagayan, Pangasinan, Abra, Nueva Ecija, Cavite and Manila consecrated Bishop Aglipay. A newspaper of the IFI, the La Verdad came out with its first issue on the 21st. In the month of February, Aurelio Tolentino delivered speeches before two IFI Congregations, Guagua and Mexico Pampanga. In his speeches can be found the first reference to the IFI as one, which rose from the ashes of the revolution. In May 14, Bishop Aglipay submitted to Taft’s office copies of the royal and papal decrees substantiating his claim to the Cathedral of Manila and all the properties stating that they belonged to the Spanish government and not to the Church, and that therefore the same should be the property of the insular government of the US. The Sixth and last Fundamental Epistle was issued on August 17. This Epistle is very explicit in dealing with liberty. Though it was intended as an exhortation for the Filipinos, its publication in the official organ of the church can be seen as scathing remarks for the Americans. More importantly, it laid down the principle that it is in accordance to the will of God and the nature of man that humankind enjoys liberty: Ah Liberty! Its worth is understood only when it is lost; it can only be loved in the ‘saddest darkness of prison cells.’ A free man is a complete man, dignified, honorable, of lofty sentiments, attended by all his rights and by his unavoidable duties as well; but a man who becomes a slave of his own free will is a man with a vile heart, a deceitful, abject psychopath – a person, in short, deserving of pity. We are born with the right to think freely and express our thoughts according to the light of reason which the Divinity has given us; we are born with the right to associate freely with those we choose for the purpose of our own perfection and needs; we are born with the right to govern our own persons, our families, home and birthplace; we are born in short, with the right to do freely whatever is our own pleasure so long as we do not violate the liberty and rights of others. On the 17th of September, The IFI formally canonized the four Filipino heroes, Rizal, Burgos, Gomez and Zamora. They were to be regarded as saints but not with idolatrous intent of rendering them with divine honors. No veneration would be accorded to them. Instead, emulation for their exemplary courage and heroism was encouraged. This expressed the nationalistic spirit of the new church. On October 11, Don Belong returned from Japan and began the Church publication La Iglesia Filipina Independiente Revista Catolica (LIFIRC). On October 28, the IFI adopted the Doctrina y Reglas Constitucionales (DRC) that replaced the Fundamental Epistles as the doctrinal foundation and governing rules of the Church until 1947 with only slight revisions in 1918 and 1940. On August 5, 1947, the IFI adopted a new Constitution and Canons as well as a Declaration of Faith and Articles of Religion. In its opening paragraph, the DRC declared: The object of the founding of the Philippine Independent Church is principally to respond to the imperative need to restore the worship of the one true God in all its splendor and the purity of his most holy Word which, under the reign of obscurantism, has been diluted and distorted in a most disheartening manner for any Christian of even moderate education. On December 1, Bishop Edward Herzog of the Swiss Independent Church of Berne, Switzerland wrote in recognition to the new Church that “we conserve the Catholic Faith, Catholic Sacraments, the Catholic Liturgy and the Catholic Constitution but added that they are independent of the Pope and especially denied the decree of the Vatican.” February 21, 1904 saw the start of the serialization of the Lecturas de Cuaresma in the La Iglesia Filipina Independiente: Revista Catolica. The last of the series was on May 1, 1904. The whole series was published in Barcelona in 1906. Achutegui and Bernad wrote that this book is one of those that stated that the IFI is the most rationalistic religion based on the Bible. On June 26, Bishop Aglipay accepted the invitation to attend the Provincial Synod of Manila convoked by the Apostolic Delegate, John Baptiste Guidi to be held in August 7, 1904. Bishop Aglipay’s letter also expressed gratitude to this conciliatory gesture especially since it did not contain the usual fulmination and menacing phrases. However, he wanted to know if the synod would be willing to discuss the motives, which had driven the Filipinos to that painful separation. On July 24, 1905, the Philippine Commission enacted a special law to decide the controversy between the Roman Catholic Church and the Philippine Independent Church. This was the Philippine Commission Act No. 1376 and entitled “An Act Providing for the Speedy Disposition as to the Right of Administration or Possession of the Churches, convents, cemeteries and other Church Properties and as to Ownership and Title Thereto by Vesting in the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands original jurisdiction to decide such controversies and for other purposes”. On November 30, 1906, the Supreme Court handed down a momentous decision that in effect ordered the IFI to return all properties it had seized and occupied from the Roman Catholic Church. The US Supreme Court upheld the decision in 1909. A more important event for this year was the publication in Barcelona of the Oficio Divino by Isabelo de los Reyes, Sr. This book was officially adopted on June 10, 1907 and thus became the official Prayer Book and Ritual for the IFI until 1947 when a new Declaration of Faith and Articles of Religion was adopted by the General Assembly. However, it was only in 1960 that it ceased usage with the adoption of the two official Liturgical Books, the Filipino Missal and the Filipino Ritual. Between 1924 and 1932, there were promulgations of Bishop Aglipay to amplify Unitarian reforms he wished to bring about in the IFI. The majority of the people especially the clergy however did not accept these promulgations. Translations into the different Filipino dialects ensued, some in parts, and some in whole. That this happened could be proven by the two letters of Don Belong from Barcelona published in El Renacimiento in the February and April issues of 1908. In the first, Don Belong was urging Bishop Aglipay and the IFI authorities to translate the Oficio Divino into the major Philippine languages. The second was an apology after knowing that Bishop Aglipay and the IFI authorities were doing their jobs seriously. Another evidence is the 1921 publication of Fr. Sabino Rigor’s compilation, Mga Panalanging Hinango sa Oficio Divino ng IFI, translated by Fr. Ceferino Ramirez. On May 21, 1909, the Philippine Assembly approved a resolution approving the constant desire of the Filipinos to attain independence. The IFI had this theme in its regular and special liturgical occasions. In 1910, the church started the yearly celebration of the Misang Parangal sa Mga Bayani ng Himagsikan. Its Preface soon became the oft-repeated Preface in the Sunday Eucharist and special celebrations in the IFI. Its most celebrated phrase that brought tears to many members of the congregation is the phrase that contains the explicit succor for national freedom, independence and abundant life (kalayaan, pagsasarili at kaginhawaan). These terms in the Prefacio are especially reminiscent of the words of the Kartilya ng Katipunan. On June 4, 1910 the first Celebration of the Feast Day of Maulawin took place in Sta. Cruz, Laguna. In 1911, there was the composition and speedy dissemination of the Hiligaynon hymn, Ambahanon sang Himaya (Song/Hymn of Adoration) composed by Fr. Jose Javellana an IFI priest in Antique. This hymn has a Tagalog version included as Hymn 89 in the Imnaryong Pilipino published by the Diocese of Cavite in 1990. On September 28, 1924, the Maria Clara Christ’s Church was inaugurated. The best-known religious statue is the Birhen ng Balintawak (Our Lady of Balintawak). There are actually two images in the statue: the Virgin, in a gown designed after the Philippine flag, symbolizing the mother country; and a young boy, garbed as a Katipunan guerrilla representing the struggle of the Filipino people. In the original statue, an inscription is written: Ama ko, sumilang (or sumikat) nawa ang aming pagsasarili (Our Father, may the day of our joyful independence rise). In the following year, Bishop Aglipay’s Pagsisiyam ng Birhen sa Balintawak, translated by Juan Evangelista, was published. Such liturgical celebrations advocating Philippine Independence saw other complementing activities in the church. On February 26, 1930, the First Independence Congress organized by Bishop Aglipay unanimously adopted the desire of the Filipinos to be free and independent. In the ensuing years until the institution of the Commonwealth, Bishop Aglipay issued statements exhorting the priests and faithful to join in the activities that spearhead or advocate independence. He also issued a statement justifying the participation of the clergy in such kind of politics since “beneath their robes, they are Filipinos.” On March 28, 1931, Bishop Aglipay with Bishops Isabelo de los Reyes, Jr. and Santiago Fonacier left the Philippines for Boston to attend the Annual Convention of the Unitarian Association. The party was feted in almost every large city of America by various local groups of Unitarians. The Unitarian Convention passed resolutions for Philippine Independence and admitted the IFI to the International Association of Liberal Christianity. Bishop Aglipay was also given an honorary degree by Meadville Theological School in Chicago. In 1939, Dr. Louis C. Cornish of the American Unitarian Association visited the Philippines and was made Honorary President of the IFI. This seemingly tied the two bodies. However the closeness of these two bodies remained at the level of the national hierarchy, the rank and file of the clergy and laity remained Trinitarians in belief and Bishop Aglipay’s stand was regarded to be contrary to the majority. On October 10, 1938, Don Belong died. There are claims that he retracted and returned to the Roman Catholic Church but his son, Isabelo de los Reyes, Jr. who later became Obispo Maximo vehemently opposed said claim. On August 30, 1940, Bishop Fonacier, after having been informed by Bishop Jamnias, went to see Bishop Aglipay who was lying motionless after a stroke. Bishop Fonacier immediately called up Dr. Arzaga, Bishop de los Reyes and others. After making the calls, he returned to the side of the Supreme Bishop who finally was able to speak two words which turned out to be his last – Gracias Que. When Dr. Arzaga, Bishop de los Reyes and others arrived, the Supreme Bishop was already in coma and they decided to bring him to the clinic of Dr. Arzaga. On September 1, Bishop Gregorio Aglipay, one of the founding fathers and the first Obispo Maximo of the IFI died at the age of 80. As an old guerrilla fighter and patriot, he was given an impressive funeral to which the President of the Commonwealth, his Cabinet, and the most of the highest state officials came to pay their respect. Newspapers bade farewell to the Martin Luther of the Philippines. His remains are now kept at the Aglipay Shrine in Batac, Ilocos Norte. On October 14, Bishop Fonacier, an ex Senator from Ilocos Sur was elected Obispo Maximo of the Church for a period of three years by a General Assembly. In said election, Bishop Servando Castro withdrew in favor of Bishop Fonacier with the agreement that the Church shall respect and implement the “Bacarra Formula”. Bishop Isabelo de los Reyes, Jr. was also elected as the General Secretary, a position that was provided for in the revision of the DRC. The new Obispo Maximo was installed in a solemn ceremony attended by some high government officials as among the sponsors on November 21. Year 1945-1969 A Mellowing Nationalism On September of 1961 the General Convention of the American Episcopal church in one of its great moments, approved a Concordat of Full Communion with the Iglesia Filipina Independiente. By such historic action the American Church has laid down a bridge of recognition between the America and Filipino Churches that shall assuredly promote a healthy trade of spiritual riches between the Christians of America and the Philippines. Through this Concordat the Filipino Church has strengthen its roots and has been welcomed into the open road that leads towards the reservation of its own identity and independence while simultaneously assuring for its clergy and laity a gradual increase of living contacts with the national Churches of the Anglican Communion…We rejoice, beyond the power of words to express, at the termination of our half-century of isolation and no longer feel ourselves the orphans of the Pacific. And while we are pledge to carry on our revolt and prove worthy of the Concordat but in terms of all our nothing, but adopting the principle of moderation and love for truth that, in the words of Albert Camus, is the main characteristic of all proper revolutions. Supreme Bishop Isabelo de los Reyes, Jr. On the Cross Roads During the Japanese occupation, the church leaders fought for their convictions as they had done through the years. Good relations with the Japanese authorities enabled the clergy to obtain passes and therefore mobility to serve the people. The Japanese authorities attempting to obtain cooperation of the Filipino people however befriended the church leadership. The political crisis constrained the hierarchy of the Church to cooperate with Japan. The Obispo Maximo and the General Secretary were made to broadcast favorable accounts of Japanese occupation of the Philippines as part of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere. However, a deviating opinion started to be articulated by the General Secretary when he started proclaiming that true nationalism means unity of all Filipinos in defending their nation from all forms of foreign invasion. The post-war period ushered in a new episode in the history of the Filipino people. It was the time when the campaign for ‘nation building’ infected the air, being the normal consequence, not so much the result of the Japanese invasion, but rather with the American bombings of Manila. In September 1945, after the surrender of the Japanese, government was turned over to the Commonwealth under President Osmeña. Trouble started in the new Church when Fonacier asked Bp. Remollino to transfer from the Diocese of Cavite to Cebu. Events that followed led to a Supreme Council of Bishops meeting on December 4. The Obispo Maximo was charged with violating the Constitution in consecrating bishops, removing the church headquarters to another town and failure to give an accounting of church funds. On January 21 and 22, 1946, the Supreme Council of Bishops met upon the summons of Bishop Aguilar, and removed Bishop Fonacier from office and elected Bishop Gerardo Bayaca as his successor. The General Assembly that met on September 1, 1946 duly elected Bishop Isabelo de los Reyes, Jr. as the Obispo Maximo. Thus, a rift befell the Iglesia Filipina Independiente. On May 17 1950, the Court declared Bishop Isabelo de los Reyes, Jr. as the sole and legitimate bishop of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente and ordered Bishop Fonacier to render an accounting of his administration of the properties and funds of the church. On May 20, 1950, Judge Felix Martinez of the Court of First Instance, Manila handed down a decision in which Bishop de los Reyes, Jr. was declared the legal head of the IFI. On January 28, 1955, the Supreme Court of the Philippines declared Bishop Isabelo de los Reyes, Jr. as the legitimate incumbent Obispo Maximo of the IFI. Bishop Fonacier eventually formed the Independent Church of Filipino Christians (ICFC) and seceded from the Iglesia Filipina Independiente. Earlier applauding the US granting of independence to the Philippines and enticed by the neo-colonial spell of ‘participation in nation building’, Bishop de los Reyes transmuted the revolutionary nationalism of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente into ‘sentimental philippinism’ that was coupled with a passionate pursuit for ecumenism. Likewise, the rationalism and socialism of Bishop Aglipay and De los Reyes Sr. were abrogated and affiliation with revolutionary movements were severed. Observably, in contrast with the figure of Bishop Aglipay, the hierarchy withdrew itself from any significant participation in the revolutionary struggle. On August 4 1947, the IFI General Assembly petitioned the House of Bishops of the Episcopal Church to bestow the Iglesia Filipina Independiente the gift of Apostolic Succession. The following day, the Declaration of Faith and Articles of Religion (DFAR) and a new Constitution and Canons were approved. The House of Bishops of the Episcopal Church of the USA granted the IFI petition during their meeting on November 4-7 1947. On April 7, 1948, in a service, held at the St. Luke’s Pro-Cathedral in Manila, three bishops of the IFI – Isabelo de los Reyes, Jr., Gerardo Bayaca and Manuel Aguilar, received the gift of apostolic succession from the hands of Norman Binsted, Bishop of Missionary District of the Philippines, acting for the Presiding Bishop of the ECUSA, Robert Franklin Wilner, Suffragan Bishop of the Missionary District of the Philippines, and Harry Scherbourne Kennedy, Bishop of the Missionary District of Honolulu. On September 2, 1957, the General Assembly of the IFI ratified the proposed amendments to the 1947 Constitution extending the term of office for the Obispo Maximo to four years. During the General Assembly of the IFI on May 8, 1961, the major amendment was the “supplication” of the Oficio Divino by the Filipino Missal and the Filipino Ritual. The two books became the official books of worship and administration of the Sacraments in the IFI. The English translation of the Luwalhati stripped its meaning and the Bendicion was totally deleted. The Prefacio was also revised in such a way that the petition for independence, freedom and abundant life for the nation was deleted. In many instances, however, the Prefacio was be revised in such a way that the petition was changed into succor for the maintenance of the Independence which was already granted. On one hand, these liturgical revisions were primarily responsible for the watering down of the nationalism in the IFI. On a more positive note, these actions paved the way for broader international and interdenominational relations. On August 8, 1958, the Iglesia Filipina Independiente became an active member of the World Council of Churches. On August 21, 1958, the WCC unanimously welcomed the IFI as a regular member. In 1961, the Church participated in the Third Assembly of the WCC held in New Delhi, India where Bishop Macario V. Ga was elected member of the Central Committee for a term of seven years. Bishop Ga was elected for another term during the Fourth Assembly held in Uppsala, Sweden, in 1968. On May 8, 1960, when the Church celebrated the first Centenary of the birth anniversary of Bishop Gregorio Aglipay, Churches around the world sent messages during the celebrations. During the occasion, the SCB and General Assembly unanimously voted on the proposal for the Church to enter into a concordat with PECUSA. The House of Bishops received the proposal and recommended that such concordat be entered. When the concordat relation was approved in 1961, a Joint Council was created to concretize the relations between the two churches. Shortly after that historic concordat signing, similar Concordat of Full Communion was established by the IFI with the following: Province of the West Indies, September 1, 1962; Church of the Province of Central Africa, November 12, 1962; The Church of the Province of West Africa, 1962; The Church of the Province of East Africa, 1962; The Church of India, Pakistan, Burma and Ceylon, January 18, 1963; The Nippon Sei Ko Kai, March 15, 1963; The Church of Ireland, third week of May, 1963; The Lusitanian Church, October 9, 1963; The Church of England, October 16, 1963; The Episcopal Church in Scotland, December 5, 1963; The Anglican Church of Canada, 1963; The Church of Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi, 1963; Spanish Reformed Church, 1963; The Church of the Province of South Africa, February 17, 1964; The Church of the Province of New Zealand, April 29, 1964. Catholic Church of Austria; The Old Catholic Church of Czechoslovakia; The Old Catholic Church of Germany; The Old Catholic Church of Holland; The Old Catholic Church of Switzerland; The Polish National Catholic Church of America; The Old Catholic Church of Yugoslavia; The Episcopal Church of Brazil. The PIC-PECUSA Joint Council formed a Student Work Program inside the UP campus, which eventually gave birth to the UP-Philippine Independent Church Student Association (UPPICSA). The UPPICSA played a crucial role in the radical transformation of the church youth organization into a socially conscious organization of students and young people by facilitating educational activities that sought to revive the nationalism of church youth. While the young people of the Church were further organizing and consolidating their ranks, the national leadership continued to forge solidarity with the provinces of the Anglican Communion in Asia. On January 18, 1963, the Concordat between the IFI and the Churches of India, Burma, Pakistan and Sri Lanka was established. It was the first concordat of full communion established between and among Asian Churches. On the other hand, on October 8, 1963, the Convocation of Canterbury received the Report of the Commission appointed by the Archbishop of Canterbury to examine the Faith and Order of the IFI. The Convocation agreed to the establishment of Full Communion between the Church of England and the IFI on the basis of mutual acceptance. The IFI has been co-opted member of the CCEA from 1964 because of its Concordat relation with PECUSA. CCEA is mainly composed of the churches within the Anglican Communion in East Asia. On November 7, 1963, the Inaugural Assembly and First General Convention of the National Council of Churches in the Philippines took place at the Episcopal Cathedral of St. Mary and St. John, Quezon City. Bishop de los Reyes, Jr. was elected as the first Chairman of the Council. On April 1964, the IFI established its first contact with the Orthodox Churches of the East. Bishop de los Reyes and Bishop Pasco, at the invitation of Bishop Arthur Michael Ramsey of Canterbury, attended the first meeting of the wider Episcopal Fellowship. On February 25, 1966, the Presiding Bishop of ECUSA, the Most Rev. John E. Hines, on behalf of the Domestic and Foreign Society of the PECUSA, transferred and conveyed to the IFI the possession of the 3,500 sq. m. residential lot at the corner of Taft Avenue, Manila. On September 22, 1966, the Solemn Commemoration of the Fifth Anniversary of the Concordat of the IFI and ECUSA was held. On November 2, 1967, the Concordat of Full Communion between the Church of the Province of East Africa and the IFI was ratified. In 1968, Bishop Soliman Ganno and Fr. Vic Esclamado represented the IFI in the fourth Regional Assembly of the East Asia Christian Conference (EACC) formerly called Asian Council Ecumenical Missions (ACEM). In 1963 when the IFI became a member of NCCP, it also became its regular member, beginning from the third EACC assembly in Bangkok. In 1973, EACC was renamed as Christian Conference in Asia (CCA) during the Fifth Regional Assembly in Singapore. The IFI as she participated in the ecumenical life abroad has been overwhelmed with those successes. Unfortunately, however, her victories led the IFI to seemingly forget her revolutionary or nationalist heritage. The IFI even produced church leaders that propagated reactionary ideas though these “reactionary tendencies of the Church were not left unchallenged. In 1968, IFI students and some IFI seminarians at St. Andrew’s Theological Seminary who were drawn by the wave of the Second Propaganda Movement started to question the direction and orientation of the IFI. Some youth leaders from UPPICSA who were exposed to the World Council of Churches Youth Assembly in Uppsala, Sweden, paved the way for the young people to be engaged in the ecumenical youth movement. The UPPICSA and the IFI were caught in the vortex of political unrest against the much-hated US-Marcos dictatorship. The rising nationalist current and restlessness of the militant students and mentors swept the universities and colleges. Worker and peasant movements in the countryside have been mounting and intensifying. The revolutionary fervor has inevitably challenged the IFI to look back to its origin and define its present task amidst the escalating social upheavals. Recognizing the Role of the Lay People The organization of the lay sectors into a national level was also taken care of. First to be organized was the Women’s Auxiliary of the Philippine Independent Church. The first national convention of the women was held at St. Andrew’s Theological Seminary (SATS) on May 10-11, 1957. The first set of permanent officers was elected with Miss Ella Cabreza as the first President of the Women’s Auxiliary of the Philippine Independent Church. Permission to become a national organization was granted to the men even earlier in June 18, 1956 by the Supreme Council of Bishops in its session held at the Pro-Cathedral Church in Paco, Manila. The first election of officers was held only on September 2, 1957 when the laymen delegates to the Church’s General Assembly of September 1 convened to elect the first set of national officers. Mr. Apolonio Pisig was elected President. Notions for an organization of the Youth surfaced later. In 1960, the Philippine Independent Church Regional Youth Movement was organized with Atty. Raymundo Beltran of Cavite as the first President. A national movement of the youth came into being only in 1969. The intended purposes of the national organizations would be where the energies of the IFI were concentrated up to that year however. This was the construction of a National Cathedral to supplant the Cathedral in Tondo that was destroyed during the War. In 1957, it was made clear in the Constitution of the National Laymen’s Commission that one of its primary purposes would be the construction of a national cathedral. The fourth Obispo Maximo later deputized this body to take charge of such project. However, until 1960 nothing had been done and so another commission composed of multi-sectoral representatives was created with a Bishop as Chairman. Three years later, the Obispo Maximo took over the helm. It took another six agonizing years before this project was realized. The National Cathedral of the Holy Child of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente was consecrated during the celebration of the 109th Birthday of Bishop Gregorio Aglipay on May 8, 1969. The fourth Obispo Maximo appealed for the next project which was the construction of the national offices. However, the members of the church especially the youth who on this year would organize themselves into a national movement, issued another call Year 1969-Present Journeying with the People’s Continuing Struggle I have said this again and again to brothers in the ministry and to friends, and I dare express it again: that the stirring spirit that gave birth to our Church is seen to be totally paled by time and circumstances if we forever hold our peace before the unfolding drama of the whole Filipino people. The IFI has a place under the sun only if she can recapture once again that spirit of an outer-oriented movement – a movement that wholeheartedly embraces the aspirations of the poor who make up the vast majority of our people. After all, she started with her twin sister, La Union Obrera Democratica, the fortress of the Filipino workingman. And to state proudly, the “wretched of the earth” were her pristine company. Fr. Jerry Aquino, Letter to the IFI from Prison, 1980 The Church and Youth Activism The twilight years of the 1960s witnessed the spirited movements of church youth that resulted in the first ever National Youth Assembly in 1969. Bishop de los Reyes realized the potential of the youth and led the church into recognizing their rank as a dynamic sector in the decision making process of the church. Militancy characterized the assembly with the youth condemning the semi-feudal and semi-colonial conditions of the Philippine society, challenging the church to make clear its stand on this matter. The assembly gave birth to the National Youth Movement of the PIC (NYV-PIC) and elected Ms. Carmencita Karagdag as its chairperson. NYV-PIC later changed its name to KILUSANG PAMBANSA NG KABATAAN ng Iglesia Filipina Independiente (KPK-IFI) to hold true to its nationalist character. This event signaled the consolidation of the youth sector and the national level geared towards reclaiming the nationalist heritage of the IFI. The youth since then unwrapped itself into becoming a more progressive and militant segment in the church, with the KPK-IFI playing the vanguard role in uniting the youth of the IFI, asserting their role in the church and promoting ecumenism among the young people of the various churches. The KPK-IFI held their Second National Assembly on April 28 to May 1, 1972 at UP Los Baños, Laguna with the theme: “PIC Youth Face the Challenge of the 70’s”. The assembly denounced and opposed the unholy trinity of imperialism, bureaucrat capitalism, and feudalism, and issued a direct challenge to the conservative, opportunists and reactionary elements of the church on its open collaboration with the ruling regime. The same demanded reforms in the church and the restoration of the genuine teachings and history of the church.” When the First Quarter Storm erupted, the KPK-IFI joined the student protestations on the streets. When Marcos declared Martial Law on September 21 1972, members of the KPK-IFI were included in those who were arrested and detained. The situation compelled the KPK-IFI to disappear as a sectoral organization, branded as subscribing to communist ideology. Nonetheless, the highly politically conscious members of the organization strove underground thus preserving a core group of militant leaders in the church who would resurface by the late 1970s. In April 1976, a National Youth Consultation was held from at SATS. Seventy youth representatives from the thirty dioceses came to the consultation and expressed the need to restructure the National Youth Organization and adopt a National Constitution and By-laws. The consultation also came up with several recommendations addressed to the Supreme Council of Bishops expressing demands for concrete reforms in the church, the democratization of the church and deeper lay participation in the life of the IFI. The consultation also called for the creation of a National Youth Office and representation in the General Assembly of the church. This clamor of the youth sector was realized when at the National Consultative Assembly held on October 21-24, 1976 at the National Cathedral; the youth of the Church was for the first time, formally represented. The National Youth Assembly was held in April 1977 at the Parish of Our Lady of Peace and Good Voyage, La Paz, Iloilo City. Mr. Fructuoso Sabug Jr. was elected president of the NYM. A Constitution and By-Laws of the National Youth Movement was also approved and adapted. Reawakening of the Nationalist Heritage When the young people of the church, especially the students began criticizing the complacency of church leaders in the late 1960s, Bishop de los Reyes made the prudent gesture of welcoming them as consistent to the nationalist tradition of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente. However sincere Bishop de los Reyes’ action maybe in recognizing the youth’s clamor, it certainly led to the consequent formation of the Kilusang Pambansa ng mga Kabataan ng Iglesia Filipina Independiente (KPK-IFI) in 1969 marking the reawakening of the revolutionary nationalism and re-politicization of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente. Paradoxically, when martial law was imposed in 1972, barely a year after Bishop Macario Ga succeeded Bishop de los Reyes, the latter along with other leaders of the Roman Catholic and Protestant churches, were fettered to collaborate with the status quo, critically or otherwise. Interestingly, and quite ironically, the attitude taken by the hierarchy did not permeate the whole Iglesia Filipina Independiente as the rank and file of the clergy along with a significant number of the laity rejected such position. The generation of young clergy and progressive youth of the church registered their opposition to the perfidy of supporting the anti-muslim and anti-communism crusade and new society ideology of Marcos, rightfully seeing them as demonstrations of unveiling state fascism Bishop Ga continued to staunchly support Marcos while both the Roman Catholic and Protestant leaders were gradually and openly becoming critical of the despotic leader. The hierarchy willingly made the church a cultural apparatus for the moral justification of the strongman’s garnering of absolute political power. Eventually, the clergy, seriously disturbed by the hierarchy’s politicking, started to openly criticize its unapprised gesture of condoning the dictatorship. Irritations started to grow between the hierarchy and a number of bishops, and the progressive clergy and laity. The tension was increased when the latter mounted a criticism on the anomalous practices of some bishops and the hierarchy and with their crusade to clean up the church bureaucracy. Albeit the suspicion of an antagonistic and an increasingly apprehensive hierarchy, the clergy organized themselves under the National Priest Organization in 1978 determined to work for the renewal of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente and to recapture its legacy of revolutionary nationalism. Undoubtedly, the formation of the NPO increasingly sharpened the contrast between the conservative pro-martial law hierarchy and the progressive young priests, who were now labeled as subversives, and further widened the gulf that separated them. The hierarchy anathematized its own clergy and laity that were involving themselves with peoples’ organization while the national leadership cast the pretension of having the whole of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente one with the Obispo Maximo in supporting President Marcos. Many priests and youth were put under military surveillance, while some others were arrested and incarcerated as political detainees. The incident that occurred in 1981, with Bishop Ga congratulating the constabulary unit that apprehended Fr. Jeremias Aquino while on his way to join the revolutionary movement in the Cordilleras, was an evidence of the heightening conflict between the two groups. Collaborating with a number of sympathetic bishops and laity, these progressive priests rallying under the banner of the NPO, effected the election of Bishop Abdias de la Cruz as Obispo Maximo in the General Assembly in 1981. Bishop Ga thereupon filed a petition with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an attempt to nullify the election of Bishop de la Cruz. When the Court of Appeals executed the decision in favor of Bishop de la Cruz in 1987, Bishop Ga, with his followers of bishops and priests, thereafter formed the Iglesia Catolica Filipina Independiente (ICFI). Bishop de la Cruz, cognizant of the organizational significance of the NPO in consolidating the rank and file of clergy from the various regions and in campaigning for church programs, established a close working relationship with its leaders. Consultations between bishops and priests were conducted and continuing theological education seminars were held enthusiastically to bring about relevant renewal in the church and recapturing its revolutionary nationalism. Militancy in the Clergy Sector In 1971 the Concerned Individuals for Renewal of Church Leadership (CIRCLE) was formed. Committed to resurrecting the Church from more than three decades of slumber, it initiated studies of liberation theology and provided a critical eye to what were transpiring in the Church. The potential of this organization to initiate a cultural struggle and theological battle within the Church can be seen in the influence they have exerted with the formulation and adoption of the Statement of Church Mission in 1976. Their struggle to organize into a national organization was given fulfillment in the 1977 Constitution and Canons. In May 1978, sixty-seven priests organized themselves into the National Priest Organization, in an organizational convention held at St. Andrew’s Theological Seminary. When the NPO was organized it pursued a program on continuing theological education for the clergy. The organization became instrumental in the formation of the integrated national program of the church under Bishop de la Cruz in 1981. Guided by a conscious attempt to recover the national and democratic heritage of the Church, the organization articulated the concept of Peoples’ Religious Nationalism. This period, characterized by militancy of the young generation of laity and clergy, made the Church increasingly conscious of her historic vocation of Pro Deo Et Patria. When the NPO supported the candidacy of Bishop de la Cruz, the organization was confident that the excesses committed by his predecessor would never be repeated. However, relations between the national leadership and the organization started to tumble when the organization ventilated criticisms over the way the hierarchy was handling the faction. Over the years, the NPO has become a distinct institution in comparison with the mandated sectors of the Church. It has asserted its influence in consolidating and uniting the clergy on critical matters, and has always provided strength to the national leadership in times of crisis. The NPO can also claim credit in the development of the curriculum of the seminaries, the Aglipay Central Theological Seminary (ACTS) and St. Paul Theological Seminary (SPTS). Even at Saint Andrew’s Theological Seminary (SATS), the NPO was instrumental in the inclusion of the course on the history of the Church in the curriculum. It was through the consistent support of the organization on the ordination of women that made the SCB finally accept women to the ordained ministry. Time and again, the NPO through its Governor-General and the Board of Governors issued statements related to national issues and support to the various sectors struggling for justice and peace. In 1991 the NPO, through its Governor General, Fr. Apolonio Ranche, released a statement of support for the hunger-striking teachers camping at the National Cathedral. In the statement, the organization admonished the Aquino government to reinstate the teachers and compensate their salaries and benefits. It has issued joint statement with the SCB, particularly on the issue of electoral process in the presidential election of 1992. By the late eighties however, all sectors had caught the revived nationalist fervor. The National Consultative Assembly of 1976 From October 21-24, 1976, the National Consultative Assembly was held at the National Cathedral of the Holy Child. Bishops, priests and lay people were all represented in the consultation with the purpose of assessing the mission of the church, particularly in the light of the growing demand for greater participation of the laity in the governance and administration of the church. The assembly gave birth to two vital documents – the final draft of the 1977 Constitution and Canons (to be confirmed in the 1977 National Assembly), and the Statement on Church Mission. The first General assembly under the 1977 Constitution and Canons was held on May 8, 1981 attended by 232 bishops, priests and lay people. The assembly overwhelmingly elected Bishop Abdias de la Cruz, the former Secretary General, as the sixth Obispo Maximo, against Bishop Macario Ga. The overwhelming victory of Bishop de la Cruz reflected the clamor of Aglipayans for change and paved the way for younger blood to take significant positions in the national leadership of the church. On May 9, 1977 the General Assembly approved the new Constitution of the Church. The new constitution radically changed the structures of the Church and mandated the creation of a national organization of priests. Bishop Ga filed a petition at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) a week later to restrain Bishop de la Cruz and other officers elected from performing their functions. The SEC denied Bishop Ga’s petition for a Writ of Preliminary Injunction the following May 30. Immediately, Bishop Ga filed a motion for reconsideration. On August 27 1985, the SEC handed down the decision declaring Bishop de la Cruz as the validly elected Supreme Bishop, Bishop Ga, with his bishops and priests, thereafter formed the Iglesia Catolica Filipina Independiente (ICFI). While the legal battle was in the court of law, the paralegal battles took a violent form with the Central Office taken over by the camp of Bishop Ga. Only with the resolute action of Bishop Alberto Ramento, leading a group of seminarians, priests and lay people, to eject the former. The sympathizers of Bishop Ga followed suit by taking over some parishes, most violent were the taking over and retaking of the church in Pandacan, Manila, as well as in Bacoor, Cavite. While these upheavals were occurring, the NPO provided support and counsel to the new church leadership, and kept vigil over the decisions and actions of the Obispo Maximo. However, when the NPO learned of the decision of the SCB to consecrate twelve priests to the episcopacy, the organization immediately registered its violent objection and refused to comply when asked by the Obispo Maximo to endorse those who were elected, fearing such would only complicate the situation. Hitherto began the indifference between the organization and the church leadership that would not be over for more than a decade. Rediscovering the Revolutionary Heritage of the Church A progressive and perceptive impulse for the Church to become a socially and politically relevant institution became evident in the election of Bishop Soliman Ganno as Obispo Maximo on May 8 1987. The Supreme Council of Bishops (SCB) published two consecutive pastoral letters in May of 1988 (Our Heritage, Our Response) and 1989 (Witnessing: Sharing in the Pilgrimage) respectively that contain an articulation and elucidation of the nationalist heritage of the Church. In the two pastoral letters, the Church also reiterated its advocacy to the people’s agenda, support to nationalist industrialization and genuine land reform, and boldly condemned foreign intervention in the political governance of the country. It was during Bishop Ganno’s term that the Statement on Development was issued on July 30 1987. The statement laid down the agenda of the church for renewal on the various aspects of its organizational and institutional life. The statement likewise reflected the continuous and conscious effort of Aglipayans to recapture the church’s historical heritage by offering herself to witness for and in behalf of the people who were socially and politically marginalized by the system, and to work for the integral transformation of society’. However, Bishop Ganno did live come to witness the fruits of this labor as he passed away on May 26 1989 after two years of fruitful leadership. A Special General Assembly convened on June 22 and elected Bishop Tito Pasco, General Secretary of the Church, to serve the unfinished term of the late Bishop Ganno. Bishop Pasco pursued the agenda set forth by his predecessor and initiated concrete programs towards self-reliance. He is the author of the Three-Year Vision Program that was aimed to enhance stewardship and education in the Church to achieve a self-reliance, self-governance and self-propagation status within three years. The Three-Year Vision of the Church was launched at the National Cathedral on October 6 1990. An important document appeared in May 1990 entitled “Peace Building Mission of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente”, signed by the SCB. The document addressed the situation of violence in the country brought about by the inequitable sharing of economic wealth among the people, the fragmentation of the social system, military-political factionalism, and the proliferation of fundamentalist religious groups supporting the status quo. In here the church declared the opening of its institutions as sanctuaries of the people and peace zones, to negotiate peace talks among the warring parties in the country, and to provide help to those victimized by the situation of war. The militancy of church leaders penetrated the sectoral organizations, especially the youth organization. Even the Kababaihan ng Pambansang Katedral – IFI issued a resolution n October 27 1991 asking the clergy to desist from conducting marriages of Filipinas with foreigners that are pre-arranged by travel or marriage agencies, when the issue of mail-order bride was exposed. Bishop Pasco led the Church in launching the Centennial Decade Celebration at the Folk Arts Theater on August 3 1992 to mark the beginning of a ten-year celebration prior to the centennial anniversary of the Church on 2002. It was in the same occasion that the Decade Agenda was presented to the people of the IFI. The succeeding celebrations were held at in Ilocos Norte (1993), Cagayan de Oro (1994), Iloilo City (1995), Cavite City (1996), Rosales, Pangasinan, (1997), Oroquieta (1998), Cabadbaran, Agusan del Norte (1999), and Dumaguete (2000). The 99th year anniversary celebration was celebrated in the local dioceses. Late in 1991 the Supreme Council of Bishops issued a letter to the Aquino government and the NDF to renew the peace negotiations between them. The unrelenting call for peace was rewarded when peace negotiations began to take place under the Ramos government in 1998. The social importance of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente as an institution, is demonstrated when Bishop Ramento was recommended by the National Democratic Front to be a member of the monitoring committee on the observance of the CARHRIHL along with Bishop Roman Tiples, then NCCP General Secretary, and to constitute the third party depository of documents for the peace negotiations. A year later, Jose Maria Sison, Bishops Ramento and Tiples then jointly signed a Communique of Dialogue. The national leadership of the Church has also played a significant role in negotiating for the safe release of prisoners of war held by the New Peoples Army. During the period of intensified armed offensives of the NPA against the military and paramilitary groups in 1997, Bishop Ramento and Bishop Tiples, along with other international organizations, facilitated the release of a number of prisoners of war. When Estrada was elected president, the IFI immediately issued a statement “Calling the Estrada Administration to Resume the Formal Peace Negotiation” on February 27 1999. On April 26, 1999, the IFI issued a statement concerning her commitment to peace-building ministry entitled, “On Being Peace Maker.” However, the NDFP-GRP peace talks collapsed after the Estrada regime refused to carry out the CAR-HRIHL, imposed new conditions on the agreed principles of the negotiations and ratified the VFA. Military encounters resumed and hostilities intensified between the AFP and NPA soon after Estrada suspended the peace talks. Between March and April 1999, the NPA released captured military elements, including a brigadier general of the Philippine Army, in Davao and Laguna provinces. Bishop Ramento, Bishop Roman Tiples, Bishop Calang and Bishop Millamena helped facilitate the releases of the prisoners of war in these provinces. Again, on January 9 2000, Bishop Millamena left for Utrecht, The Netherlands with Senator Loren Legarda and Bishop Jesus Varela of the Roman Catholic Church, to appeal to the leadership of the National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP) for the release of NPA captives Major Noel Buan and PNP Chief Inspector Abelardo Martin. On April 6 2001, Bishop Millamena, together with some clergy and staff of the Central Office joined with peace advocates in Mansalay, Oriental Mindoro to welcome the release of prisoner of war, Major Noel Buan. When the Arroyo administration declared its willingness to resume the peace talks in January 2001, and released political detainees to display her sincerity, the Church acclaimed the resumption of the peace negotiations. On April 8 2001, a group of IFI members lead by Bishop Millamena, along with members of the National Council of Churches in the Philippines and other people’s organizations, welcomed the arrival of the NDF negotiating panel at the Philippines. Ten days later, a number of clergy and laity of the Church attended the Conference for Genuine and Lasting Peace, hosted by the National Council of Churches in the Philippines (NCCP) and Catholic Bishops Conference in the Philippines (CBCP). On April 27 Bishop Millamena joined with the GRP-NDFP Negotiating Panels in Oslo, Norway to mark the resumption of the Peace Talks. The election of Bishop Ramento as Obispo Maximo in May 1993 corresponded with an increasing recognition of the Church of her prophetic role in the building of a just society. Though internal renewal remained to be a priority for the leadership of the Church, the context and conditions of society required an inevitable response. Bishop Ramento was instrumental in facilitating the release of many prisoners of war held by the revolutionary movement. He represented the prophetic role of the Church as peacemaker when he was endorsed by the NDF as member of the monitoring committee on the peace process in 1998. A gradual yet definite and decisive steps were taken by the SCB to articulate the revolutionary heritage of the Church. On the occasion of the 93rd Proclamation Anniversary the SCB issued a statement entitled “Remembering and Continuing the Unfinished Revolution”, which declared the struggle of the progressive movements in the country to be the continuation of the 1896 national democratic revolution. The theme for the 98th celebration, “Pagsamba at Pakikibaka: Ang Ating Buhay na Pamana”, unveiled the success of the endeavor began by the pre-martial law youth whose militancy set the clergy aflame for recapturing the revolutionary tradition of the Church. The Church embarked on a theological articulation of her nationalist heritage. The SCB adopted the documents of Towards a Common Vision of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente and the Statement on Aglipayan Spirituality in May 1998. These documents speak clearly of the historical heritage of the Church of being Pro Deo Et Patria. The Bishops-Priests Consultation the following October elaborated on the theological framework of the two documents and affirmed the national and democratic heritage in the manuscript of the Statement on Ministry. The NPO, on their part, designed a curriculum for education to include courses on IFI Heritage and Aglipayan Spirituality in 1999. The courses, facilitated in the regional organizations, were met with appreciation of both bishops, priests and laity of the Church. Recapturing the historical heritage of the Church was, however, proven to be precarious. In July 1999 Bishop Millamena, the newly elected Obispo Maximo, exposed the recruitment attempt on clergy by the military. In August 1999, Bishop Emer Foja testified that high-ranking military officers were persuading him to enroll himself and his clergy as enlisted reservists in the Philippine Army. In advocating for the people’s struggle, many bishops and priests of the Church were placed under surveillance and harassment by the military. The Rev. Noel Dacuycuy and Rev. Emelyn Gasco-Dacuycuy were issued a warrant of arrest for the murder of Fr. Conrado Balweg of the CPLA, along with other twelve peasants on December 1999. Another lay church-worker, Lorna Rivera-Baba, was abducted by the military and detained for months on the accusation of being an NPA. There were even reports that a number of bishops and other priests were listed in the order of battle of the military in their counter-insurgency operations. These prompted the Executive Commission of the Church to condemn the Estrada government for the unprincipled conduct of the military in harassing the clergy in September 1999. Saluting the Centenary of the Church Bishop Tomas A. Millamena was elected as the Tenth Obispo Maximo in May 1999, and thus holds the apostolic staff to lead the people of the Iglesia Filipina Independiente in welcoming and celebrating the centenary of the Church. Upon assuming leadership in June 1999 he led the Executive Commission in approving and implementing the Three-Year Rolling Plan of the Church. One of his major steps in ensuring a joyful celebration of the centennial is to assess how prepared is the Church in welcoming her centenary. Thus, to look into the resources of the Church, the IFI Lawyers League (IFILL) was organized on September 1999. The Bishops-Lawyers Consultation followed the creation of IFILL on February 2000. Two highly important national consultations followed, the Consultation on the Centralization of Funds and Consultation on the Ministry of the Laity in February and May 2000, respectively. These consultations, attended by bishops, priests and laity, were aimed at ordering the organizational life of the Church in terms of making the most of the material, financial and human resources of the whole Church. The Obispo Maximo conducted pastoral visits to the different dioceses and parishes to meet congregations and to campaign for the centennial of the Church. The Lakbay – Alay sa Bayan at Simbahan was conceived to encourage enthusiasm among the faithful. The Central Office launched its landmark project for the centennial on May 8 2001. On the commemoration of the 141st birth anniversary of the first Obispo Maximo Gregorio L. Aglipay, Bishop Millamena led the groundbreaking ceremony for the building of the IFI Jubilee House at the National Cathedral Compound. Under the chairmanship of the General Secretary of the Church, Bishop Godofredo J. David, a IFI History Committee was also created tasked with writing the history of the Church to be incorporated in the Centennial Bible. Preparations for the centenary, however, did not hinder the Church from asserting her prophetic role. When the people called for the ousting of Estrada for immorality and corruption, the Church joined the thousands of people daily marching the streets to demand his resignation. In December 2000, the Executive Commission issued a statement calling for the resignation of President Estrada. The bishops and prelates of the Church who met at Manila on January 16 2000 likewise issued a statement that declared President Estrada culpable. When Arroyo was declared president four days later, Bishop Millamena sent a letter to her reminding her not to forget the true heroes of People Power II who are the basic masses. However, a year after, the SCB, in May 2001, declared that the government had made no substantial programs that addressed the situation of the basic masses. In May 2001, on the eve of the national elections, Bishop Millamena offered the National Cathedral to host the campaign meeting of Bayan Muna, a political party of the national democratic movement. Solidarity with the ecumenical group remained to be one of the priorities of the national leadership. Bishop Millamena was elected NCCP chairperson in November 1999. When Estrada disclosed the plan for the VFA, the Church joined the Peoples’ Movement Against VFA in 1999. Likewise, when Estrada declared his all-out war policy on the MILF, bishops and priests joined other churches in registering their protest by launching the Inter-Faith Solidarity for Justice and Peace – Mindanao in May 2000. Bishop Millamena was one of the conveners for the launching of the Ecumenical Jubilee Conference Network 2000 (EJCN) in July 2000. In February 2, 2002, the centennial commemoration of the establishment of the Union Obrera Democratica was held at the National Cathedral. The Iglesia Filipina Independiente and the Kilusang Mayo Uno jointly spearheaded the affair and celebrated the one hundred years of trade unionism in the country. Attending the occasion were congregations from neighboring churches and dioceses of Manila, a number of clergy and representatives of the national sectoral organizations, and member organizations of the KMU all over the National Capital Region. The celebration demonstrated the burning fervor of the IFI to reclaim her historical relation with the working class and the masses that gave birth to her a hundred years ago. It manifested a reaffirmation of her ministry and mission of serving and advancing the welfare of those who live in the periphery of society; and also an assertion of her prophetic commitment to struggle against systems and structures that hinder the creative potentials of the people. The Iglesia Filipina Independiente is celebrating her 100th proclamation anniversary on August 03, 2002. Despite the multifarious problems caused by internal and external factors or forces, the Iglesia Filipina Independiente has persevered in preserving her institutional life and in pursuing her mission in the country and elsewhere, ever faithful and true to her heritage as the church of the working class and, according to Teodoro Agoncillo, the only tangible result of the 1896 Philippine Revolution. She has never wavered from, nor abandoned, her pastoral and prophetic ministry even during the worst of times. Internal conflicts and limited resources have not dampened the zeal to undertake the best efforts in fulfilling her missionary tasks although many times her best efforts were not sufficient enough. Such tenacity to the calling and devotion to the tasks, notwithstanding the many obstacles along the way, has served as the strong and steady sail that enabled the Iglesia Filipina Independiente to survive in its journey toward its first centenary. The Church is ever grateful to the continuous grace and guidance of God the Almighty and to the countless women and men who never hesitated “to cast their nets into the deep”, willingly walked the thorny path through times, and gladly shared their self through sufferings and sacrifices so that the IFI could attain its present stature. One hundred years of faithfulness to God and country through missionary work and service is an achievement and calls for a grand celebration indeed. A celebration that would further edify the IFI faithful through a fuller grasp and understanding of the Church’s history, heritage, beliefs, doctrines, and perspective. A celebration that would foster a better perception/understanding of what the Church is, the beliefs, values and ideals that she stands for, thereby fortifying the IFI’s role as a strong pillar of Philippine society. The grand celebration will also serve as the culminating event of a program launched by the Church a decade ago that brought the annual anniversary celebration to the various regions of the Philippines for ten years. IFI History Committee, 2002

Apostolic Catholic Church[edit]

The Apostolic Catholic Church (ACC) is a catholic denomination founded in the 1980s in Hermosa, Bataan. It formally separated in the Roman Catholic Church in 1992 when Patriarch Dr. John Florentine Teruel registered it as a Protestant and Independent Catholic denomination. Today, it has more than 5 million members worldwide. The largest international congregations are in Japan, United States and Canada.

Orthodoxy[edit]

Orthodoxy has been continuously present in the Philippines for more than 200 years.[34] It is represented by two groups, by the Exarchate of the Philippines (a jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople governed by the Orthodox Metropolitanate of Hong Kong and Southeast Asia), and by the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Mission in the Philippines (a jurisdiction of the Antiochian Orthodox Church governed by the Antiochian Orthodox Archdiocese of Australia, New Zealand, and All Oceania). Today, there are about 560 Orthodox in the Philippines.[35]

Protestantism[edit]

Protestantism arrived in the Philippines with the coming of the Americans at the turn of the 20th century. In 1898, Spain lost the Philippines to the United States. After a bitter fight for independence against its new occupiers, Filipinos surrendered and were again colonized. The arrival of Protestant American missionaries soon followed. Protestant church organizations established in the Philippines during the 20th century include the following:

Members Church of God in Jesus Christ Worldwide[edit]

Members Church of God in Jesus Christ Worldwide (also known as Miembro de la Iglesia de Dios en Todo el Mundo Inc.) is an independent Christian organization with headquarters in the Philippines led by Wilfredo "Bro. Willy" Santiago, one of the top evangelists of Eliseo Soriano. The group split from the Members Church of God International (MCGI) last October 2009 over disputes over church leadership and changes in doctrines (such as Prostrating towards the east in prayer). The church is currently building a new church headquarters in Malolos, Bulacan and its members are composed of mostly Filipinos and former members of Ang Dating Daan (MCGI).

Mormon[edit]

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) in the Philippines was founded during the Spanish–American War in 1898. Two men from Utah who were members of the United States artillery battery, and who were also set apart as missionaries by the Church before they left the United States, preached while stationed in the Philippines. Missionary work picked up after World War II, and in 1961 the Church was officially registered in the Philippines.[37] In 1969, the Church had spread to eight major islands and had the highest number of baptisms of any area in the Church. A temple was built in 1984 which located in Quezon City and another in Cebu City, completed in 2010. Membership was 710,764 in 2015.[38]

History[edit]

The first contact the church had with the Philippines began in the Spanish–American War in 1898, when two LDS men named Willard Call and George Seaman, who were part of the United States artillery battery, were set apart as missionaries and began to proselytize after being deployed to the Philippines. They met with little success.[39] Active proselytizing stopped on the onset of World War II.[38]

The first Filipino to join the LDS Church was Aneleta Pabilona Fajardo in 1945, who was introduced to the church by Maxine Grimm, who was in the Philippines with the Red Cross in the aftermath of World War II.[39]

The Luzon Serviceman's district was organized during the Korean War under the Japanese Mission for American servicemen stationed in the Philippines. In August 1955, the district was then transferred to the newly organized Southern Far East Mission, which was established by President of the Church Joseph F. Smith.[39] During this time, Smith visited the Philippines. Due to legal issues, the LDS Church could not send missionaries. Missionary work, however, was done by some LDS servicemen and American residents.[39] Kendall B. Schaefermeyer, a returned missionary serving in the U.S. Navy was one in particular.[39] He had baptized four native Filipinos by October 1957 and was teaching more than 20 others.[39]

During 1960, Gordon B. Hinckley, then an Assistant to the Twelve, and apostle Ezra Taft Benson, visited the Philippines.[39] The purpose of the visit was mainly to see the work of the LDS servicemen groups but they brought back encouraging reports of the missionary work being done among the native Filipinos.[39]

The church obtained official recognition in the Philippines in 1961 when Robert S. Taylor, president of the Southern Far East Mission, filed the paperwork with the Philippine government.[39] Subsequently, the church rededicated the Philippines. This dedication was done by Hinckley on 28 April 1961 in a meeting with servicemen, American residents, and Filipino members.[39] The first American missionary arrived in Manila two months later. Their names are Ray Goodson, Harry Murray, Kent Lowe and Nestor Ledesma.[39] One of the first converts after official recognition was the Jose Gutierez Sr. family. After the end of the years, six more were baptized.[39]

Due to growth that followed, the Philippines was organized into its own mission by 1967 with the first president being Paul S. Rose.[39] In 1969, the church spread across the islands, having the highest amount of baptisms compared to every other area of the world.[38] This led to the division of the Philippines mission in 1974 into two separate missions, the Philippine Manila Mission and the Cebu City Mission.[39]

The first stake in the Philippines was formed in Manila on 20 May 1973.[39][40]

Church president Spencer W. Kimball presided over two area conferences, one in 1975 and another in 1980.[39] During the area conference in 1980, Kimball met with the Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos at the presidential palace.[39] Afterwards in 1987, Manila became the headquarters of the Philippines/Micronesia Area of the church.[39]

Augusto A. Lim, the first Filipino general authority, was called to the Second Quorum of Seventy in June 1992.[39]

The Book of Mormon was translated into Tagalog in 1987. The translation is credited to Ricardo Cruz, a native of the Philippines, with the assistance of Posidio Ocampo and Ananias Bala on the final stages of production.[41] Translations of the Book of Mormon are now in several languages of the Philippines.

Temples[edit]

Temple of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Manila, 2009).jpg

29. Manila Philippines edit

Location:
Announcement:
Dedication:
Coordinates:
 Size:
Style:

Quezon City, Philippines
1 April 1981
25 September 1984 by Gordon B. Hinckley
14°36′4.881599″N 121°4′11.34479″E / 14.60135599972°N 121.0698179972°E / 14.60135599972; 121.0698179972 (Manila Philippines Temple)
26,683 sq ft (2,479 m2) and 115 ft (35 m) high on a 3.5 acre (1.4 ha) site
Modern adaptation of six-spire design - designed by Church A&E Services with Felipe M. Mendoza & Partners

133. Cebu City Philippines edit

Location:
Announcement:
Dedication:
Coordinates:
 Size:
 Notes:

Cebu City, Philippines
18 April 2006
13 June 2010 by Thomas S. Monson
10°19′45.22439″N 123°53′57.37919″E / 10.3292289972°N 123.8992719972°E / 10.3292289972; 123.8992719972 (Cebu City Philippines Temple)
29,556 sq ft (2,746 m2) and 140 ft (43 m) high on a 11.6 acre (4.7 ha) site
Announced by letter to local priesthood leaders in April 2006.[42]

168. Urdaneta Philippines (Announced) edit

Location:
Announcement:
 Size:
 Notes:

Urdaneta City, Philippines
2 October 2010
TBD
Announced by Thomas S. Monson in General Conference, 2 October 2010.[43]

Other Christians[edit]

Islam[edit]

Mosque in Marawi City in the Philippines.

As of 2013. According to CIA World Factbook, the Muslim population of Philippines reported by the 2000 census was 6%.[6] The vast majority of Muslims in Philippines follow Sunni Islam of Shafi school of jurisprudence, with small Shiite and Ahmadiyya minorities.[5] Islam is the oldest recorded monotheistic religion in the Philippines. Islam reached the Philippines in the 14th century with the arrival of Muslim traders from the Persian Gulf, Southern India, and their followers from several sultanate governments in Maritime Southeast Asia. Islam's predominance reached all the way to the shores of Manila Bay, home to several Muslim kingdoms. During the Spanish conquest, Islam reached a rapid decline as the predominant monotheistic faith in the Philippines as a result of the introducing of Roman Catholicism by Spanish missionaries and in other instances via Spanish inquisition. The southern Filipino tribes were among the few indigenous Filipino communities that resisted Spanish rule and conversions to Roman Catholicism.

History[edit]

Mosque in Isabela City.

In 1380 Karim ul' Makhdum the first Arabian trader reached the Sulu Archipelago and Jolo in the Philippines and through trade throughout the island established Islam in the country. In 1390 the Minangkabau's Prince Rajah Baguinda and his followers preached Islam on the islands.[49] The Sheik Karimal Makdum Mosque was the first mosque established in the Philippines on Simunul in Mindanao in the 14th century. Subsequent settlements by Arab missionaries traveling to Malaysia and Indonesia helped strengthen Islam in the Philippines and each settlement was governed by a Datu, Rajah and a Sultan.

By the next century conquests had reached the Sulu islands in the southern tip of the Philippines where the population was animistic and they took up the task of converting the animistic population to Islam with renewed zeal. By the 15th century, half of Luzon (Northern Philippines) and the islands of Mindanao in the south had become subject to the various Muslim sultanates of Borneo and much of the population in the South were converted to Islam. However, the Visayas was largely dominated by Hindu-Buddhist societies led by rajahs and datus who strongly resisted Islam. One reason could be due to the economic and political disasters prehispanic Muslim pirates from the Mindanao region bring during raids. These frequent attacks gave way to naming present-day Cebu as then-Sugbo or scorched earth which was a defensive technique implemented by the Visayans so the pirates have nothing much to loot.[50][51]

Moro (derived from the Spanish word meaning Moors) is the appellation inherited from the Spaniards, for Filipino Muslims and tribal groups of Mindanao. The Moros seek to establish an independent Islamic province in Mindanao to be named Bangsamoro. The term Bangsamoro is a combination of an Old Malay word meaning nation or state with the Spanish word Moro. A significant Moro rebellion occurred during the Philippine–American War. Conflicts and rebellion have continued in the Philippines from the pre-colonial period up to the present.

Muslim Mindanao[edit]

The Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) comprises the Philippines' predominantly Muslim provinces, namely: Basilan (except Isabela City), Lanao del Sur, Maguindanao, Sulu and Tawi-Tawi, and the Islamic City of Marawi. It is the only region with its own government. The regional capital is at Cotabato City, although this city is outside of its jurisdiction.

Judaism[edit]

Even since the 1590s some Jews fleeing from The Inquisition were recorded to have come to the Philippines. As of 2005, Filipino Jews number at the very most 18,500 people. As of 2011, Metro Manila boasts the largest Jewish community in the Philippines which, as of 2008, consisted of roughly 100 families.[52]

The country's only synagogue, Beth Yaacov, is located in Makati.[52] There are other Jews elsewhere in the country,[52] but these are obviously fewer and almost all transients,[53] either diplomats or business envoys, and their existence is almost totally unknown in mainstream society. There are a few Israelis in Manila recruiting caregivers for Israel, some work in call centers, businessmen and a few other executives. A number are converts to Judaism.

Hinduism[edit]

The Srivijaya Empire and Majapahit Empire on what is now Malaysia and Indonesia, introduced Hinduism and Buddhism to the islands.[54] Ancient statues of Hindu-Buddhist gods have been found in the Philippines dating as far back as 600 to 1600 years from present.[55]

The archipelagoes of Southeast Asia were under the influence of Hindu Tamil people, Gujarati people and Indonesian traders through the ports of Malay-Indonesian islands. Indian religions, possibly an amalgamated version of Hindu-Buddhist arrived in Philippines archipelago in the 1st millennium, through the Indonesian kingdom of Srivijaya followed by Mahapajit. Archeological evidence suggesting exchange of ancient spiritual ideas from India to the Philippines includes the 1.79 kilogram, 21 carat gold Hindu goddess Agusan (sometimes referred to as Golden Tara), found in Mindanao in 1917 after a storm and flood exposed its location.

Another gold artifact, from the Tabon caves in the island of Palawan, is an image of Garuda, the bird who is the mount of Vishnu. The discovery of sophisticated Hindu imagery and gold artifacts in Tabon caves has been linked to those found from Oc Eo, in the Mekong Delta in Southern Vietnam.[56] These archaeological evidence suggests an active trade of many specialized goods and gold between India and Philippines and coastal regions of Vietnam and China. Golden jewelry found so far include rings, some surmounted by images of Nandi – the sacred bull, linked chains, inscribed gold sheets, gold plaques decorated with repoussé images of Hindu deities.[57]

Today Hinduism is largely confined to the Indian Filipinos and the expatriate Indian community. Theravada and Vajrayana Buddhism, are practiced by Tibetans, Sri Lankan, Burmese and Thai nationals. There are Hindu temples in Manila, as well as in the provinces. There are temples also for Sikhism, sometimes located near Hindu temples. The two Paco temples are well known, comprising a Hindu temple and a Sikh temple.

Atheism and agnosticism[edit]

Dentsu Communication Institute Inc., Research Centre for Japan said in 2006 that about 11% of the population are Atheist or Agnostic.[58] Discussions on atheism are active in academic institutions such as the University of the Philippines.[citation needed]

In February 2009, Filipino Freethinkers[59] was formed. Since 2011, the Philippine Atheists and Agnostics Society has held its OUT Campaigns in Rizal Park and Quezon Memorial Circle. Also it held two feeding programs "Good without Religion" in Bacoor, Cavite.[60] The society also is a member affiliate and associate of various international atheist organizations such as the Atheist Alliance International, Institute for Science and Human Values, and the International Humanist and Ethical Union, as one among secular organizations that promotes free thought and scientific development in the Philippines.

Religion and Politics[edit]

The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines declares: The separation of Church and State shall be inviolable. (Article II, Section 6), and, No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed. No religious test shall be required for the exercise of civil or political rights. (Article III, Section 5). Joaquin Bernas, a Filipino Jesuit specializing in constitutional law, acknowledges that there were complex issues that were brought to court and numerous attempts to use the separation of Church and State against the Roman Catholic Church, but he defends the statement, saying that the fact that he [Marcos] tried to do it does not deny the validity of the separation of church and state.[61]

On April 28, 2004, the Philippines Supreme Court reversed the ruling of a lower court ordering five religious leaders to refrain from endorsing a candidate for elective office.[62][63] Manila Judge Conception Alarcon-Vergara ruled that the "head of a religious organization who influences or threatens to punish members could be held liable for coercion and violation of citizen's right to vote freely". The lawsuit filed by Social Justice Society party stated that "the Church’s active participation in partisan politics, using the awesome voting strength of its faithful flock, will enable it to elect men to public office who will in turn be forever beholden to its leaders, enabling them to control the government". They claimed that this violates the Philippine constitution's separation of Church and State clause. The named respondents were Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila Luis Antonio Cardinal Tagle, El Shaddai Movement Leader Mike Velarde, Iglesia ni Cristo Executive Minister Eduardo V. Manalo and Jesus Is Lord Church leader Eddie Villanueva. Manalo's Iglesia ni Cristo practices bloc voting. Former Catholic Archbishop Jaime Cardinal Sin had been instrumental in rallying support for the assumption to power of Corazon Aquino and Gloria Arroyo. Velarde supported Fidel V. Ramos, Joseph Estrada, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and Benigno Aquino III while Villanueva endorsed Fidel Ramos and Jose De Venecia. The papal nuncio agreed with the decision of the lower court[64] while the other respondents challenged the decision.[65][66]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Philippines in Figures : 2014, Philippine Statistics Authority.
  2. ^ Philippines. 2013 Report on International Religious Freedom (Report). United States Department of State. July 28, 2014. SECTION I. RELIGIOUS DEMOGRAPHY. The 2000 survey states that Islam is the largest minority religion, constituting approximately 5 percent of the population. A 2012 estimate by the National Commission on Muslim Filipinos (NCMF), however, states that there are 10.7 million Muslims, which is approximately 11 percent of the total population. 
  3. ^ RP closer to becoming observer-state in Organization of Islamic Conference. (2009-05-29). The Philippine Star. Retrieved 2009-07-10, "Eight million Muslim Filipinos, representing 10 percent of the total Philippine population, ...".
  4. ^ McAmis, Robert Day (2002). Malay Muslims: The History and Challenge of Resurgent Islam in Southeast Asia. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 18–24, 53–61. ISBN 0-8028-4945-8. Retrieved 2010-01-07. 
  5. ^ a b R Michael Feener; Terenjit Sevea. Islamic Connections: Muslim Societies in South and Southeast Asia. p. 144. Retrieved June 7, 2014. 
  6. ^ a b c d e f g "The World Factbook — Central Intelligence Agency". 
  7. ^ a b c d Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: Philippines. Pew Research Center. 2010.
  8. ^ "Buddhism in Philippines, Guide to Philippines Buddhism, Introduction to Philippines Buddhism, Philippines Buddhism Travel". 
  9. ^ a b "Philippines - Pew-Templeton Global Religious Futures Project". 
  10. ^ The Largest Baha'i Communities. (2005-09-30). Retrieved 2010-04-26 from www.adherents.com.
  11. ^ Note: The Irreligious population is taken from the Catholic majority. The 65% is from the Filipino American population which have a more accurate demographic count sans the Muslim population of the Philippines.
  12. ^ a b "Table 1.10; Household Population by Religious Affiliation and by Sex; 2010" (PDF). 2015 Philippine Statistical Yearbook. East Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines: Philippine Statistics Authority: 1–30. October 2015. ISSN 0118-1564. Retrieved 15 August 2016. 
  13. ^ Hassall, Graham; Austria, Orwin (January 2000). "Mirza Hossein R. Touty: First Bahá'í known to have lived in the Philippines". Essays in Biography. Asia Pacific Bahá'í Studies. Retrieved 2008-06-01. 
  14. ^ Effendi, Shoghi (1944). God Passes By. Wilmette, Illinois, USA: Bahá'í Publishing Trust. ISBN 0-87743-020-9. 
  15. ^ Universal House of Justice (1986). In Memoriam. The Bahá'í World. XVIII. Bahá'í World Centre. Table of Contents and pp.513, 652–9. ISBN 0-85398-234-1. 
  16. ^ "Most Baha'i Nations (2005)". QuickLists > Compare Nations > Religions >. The Association of Religion Data Archives. 2005. Retrieved 2009-07-04. 
  17. ^ filipinobuddhism (8 November 2014). "Early Buddhism in the Philippines". 
  18. ^ "Buddhism in Philippines, Guide to Philippines Buddhism, Introduction to Philippines Buddhism, Philippines Buddhism Travel". 
  19. ^ "History; Philippines". Sangha Pinoy. Archived from the original on August 20, 2008. Retrieved 2008-05-13. 
  20. ^ "The World Factbook — Central Intelligence Agency". 
  21. ^ "Iglesia ni Kristo". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica. 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-05. 
  22. ^ Sanders, Albert J., "An Appraisal of the Iglesia ni Cristo," in Studies in Philippine Church History, ed. Anderson, Gerald H. (Cornell University Press, 1969)
  23. ^ Bevans, Stephen B.; Schroeder, Roger G. Constants in Context: A Theology of Mission for Today (American Society of Missiology Series). Orbis Books. p. 269. ISBN 1-57075-517-5. 
  24. ^ Carnes, Tony; Yang, Fenggang (2004). Asian American religions: the making and remaking of borders and boundaries. New York: New York University Press. p. 352. ISBN 978-0-8147-1630-4. 
  25. ^ Kwiatkowski, Lynn M. Struggling With Development: The Politics Of Hunger And Gender In The Philippines. Westview Press. p. 286. ISBN 978-0-8133-3784-5. 
  26. ^ Palafox, Quennie Ann J. 'First Executive Minister of the Iglesia ni Cristo (Church of Christ)' "National Historical Institute"
  27. ^ "I.N.C. holds 19 simultaneous grand evangelical missions nationwide". 2012-04-02. Archived from the original on December 4, 2014. Retrieved 2015-11-13. 
  28. ^ "Lingap Sa Mamamayan | Iglesia Ni Cristo Media". incmedia.org. Retrieved 2015-11-13. 
  29. ^ "Fact sheet: INC resettlement and eco-farming site". Eagle News. Retrieved 2015-11-13. 
  30. ^ "Events - Members Church of God International (MCGI)". 
  31. ^ Philippine Red Cross
  32. ^ "Religions in the Philippines". pinoysites.org. Retrieved 2007-03-07. 
  33. ^ "Religions in the Philippines". philippine-directory.com. Archived from the original on July 15, 2011. Retrieved 2007-04-07. 
  34. ^ "Orthodox Christians in Philippines". Orthodox Church in the Philippines. Retrieved 2007-08-02. 
  35. ^ Article Provided By Rev. Philemon Castro. "The Orthodox Church In The Philippines". Dimitris Papadias, Professor at the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Hong Kong. Retrieved 2007-08-02. 
  36. ^ "Union Espiritista Cristiana de Filipinas, Inc.". 
  37. ^ "News of the Church: New Temple Announcement Answers Members' Prayers". Liahona. September 2006. Retrieved 2008-11-23. 
  38. ^ a b c "Facts and Statistics – Philippines". Newsroom – The Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints. Retrieved May 6, 2015. 
  39. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s "Philippines: Church Country Information". Newsroom (Philippines) – The Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints. Retrieved November 17, 2013. 
  40. ^ "Country Information: Philippines", Church News Online Almanac, Deseret News, February 1, 2010, retrieved 2012-10-18 
  41. ^ Warnick, Lee (January 9, 1988). "Book of Mormon in 80th language". Church News. Deseret News Publishing Company. 
  42. ^ "New Temple Announced in Cebu, Philippines" (Press release). Newsroom - The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 29 April 2006. Retrieved 2015-05-06. 
  43. ^ Taylor, Scott (2 October 2010). "President Thomas S. Monson opens conference by announcing 5 new temples". Deseret News. Retrieved 2010-10-02. 
  44. ^ 2003 Yearbook of Jehovah’s Witnesses, p.154
  45. ^ Awake! January 8, 1994, p.22
  46. ^ G.R. No. 95770 March 1, 1993. Chanrobles.com. Retrieved on 2012-03-27.
  47. ^ "2014 Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses". Watch Tower Society. 
  48. ^ Philippines, Adventist Atlas.
  49. ^ "Kerinduan orang-orang moro". TEMPO- Majalah Berita Mingguan. June 23, 1990. Archived from the original on 2012-02-19. 
  50. ^ "A Rapid Journal Article Volume 10, No. 2". Celestino C. Macachor. Retrieved August 11, 2012. 
  51. ^ "The Aginid". Maria Eleanor Elape Valeros. Retrieved August 11, 2012. 
  52. ^ a b c Philippines Jewish Community (May, 2008). Jewishtimesasia.org. Retrieved on 2015-01-24.
  53. ^ Schlossberger, E. Cauliflower and Ketchup.
  54. ^ "History of Buddhism". Buddhism in the Philippines. Retrieved 2008-03-16.  External link in |publisher= (help)
  55. ^ Thakur, Upendra (1986). Some Aspects of Asia and Culture. Abhinav Publications. 
  56. ^ Anna T. N. Bennett (2009), "Gold in early Southeast Asia", ArcheoSciences, Volume 33, pp 99-107
  57. ^ Dang V.T. and Vu, Q.H., 1977. "The excavation at Giong Ca Vo site." Journal of Southeast Asian Archaeology 17: 30–37
  58. ^ Dentsu Communication Institute Inc., Research Centre for Japan (2006)(Japanese)
  59. ^ "Filipino Freethinkers Official Website". Retrieved 2009-08-20. 
  60. ^ Catholic Philippines gains its first atheist society. Freethinker.co.uk. Retrieved on 2012-03-27.
  61. ^ Joaquin G. Bernas (1995). The Intent of the 1986 Constitution Writers. Published & distributed by Rex Book Store. p. 86. 
  62. ^ Philippine Daily Inquirer. News.google.com (2004-05-01). Retrieved on 2012-03-27.
  63. ^ Velarde vs Social Justice Society : 159357 : April 28, 2004 : J. Panganiban : En Banc : Decision. Sc.judiciary.gov.ph. Retrieved on 2012-03-27.
  64. ^ No role for Church in politics. Manila Standard. June 22, 2003
  65. ^ Philip C. Tubeza Iglesia appeals court ruling infringing on group's belief. Philippine Daily Inquirer. July 20, 2003
  66. ^ SC ruling sought on sect's vote. Philippine Daily Inquirer. April 1, 2004