Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

9 September 2024

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< September 08	September 10 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Santhosh Suvarna

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, lacking WP:SIGCOV outside specialist poker websites. Does not appear to have won any notable, major tournaments. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Games, and Karnataka. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The Nagaland Post and the APN News are definately independant non-specialized sources. sportskeeda is specialized in sports but not specificially poker. PsychoticIncall (talk) 16:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JOJ WAU

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably not notable. I could only find this: [1], [2], [3]. This probably does not constitute significant coverage. Janhrach (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Slovakia. Janhrach (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to TV JOJ. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I am not sure about the merits of the proposed redirect as the article lists that target page (TV JOJ) as the sister station to this one. Any additional thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 19:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SEFF Binghamton: Student Experimental Film Festival in Binghamton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Student film festival that doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:EVENTCRIT. The only coverage I can find comes from student newspapers or non-independent sources. Orphaned for over a decade, not a likely search term. hinnk (talk) 22:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and New York. hinnk (talk) 22:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

South Africa women's national under-18 softball team

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent, third party coverage uncovered for this subject to meet the WP:NTEAM or WP:GNG. The only sources in the article now are primary. Let'srun (talk) 23:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Softball, and South Africa. Let'srun (talk) 23:50, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete wiyh prejudice. Usual OR/unreliable sourced crud from Laura Hale. SerialNumber54129 23:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already at AFD (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singapore women's junior national softball team) so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rouzbeh Rafie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:COMPOSER. None of the sources here establish WP:GNG notability, either on account of not being independent (personal website, profile at Ulysses platform, which appears to allow self published pages, Ermes 404 a publisher of his music, an interview with Rafie), reliable (wordpress blog) or significant (pretty much all the other sources).

Criterion 3 of COMPOSER states that those who have written a composition that has won (or in some cases been given a second or other place) in a major music competition not established expressly for newcomers. may be notable, but none of the competitions he has won appear to be "major" (at the very least, they don't have Wikipedia articles) Mach61 23:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Iran, and Italy. Mach61 23:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added a few more reliable independent sources (e.g. Association of Iranian Contemporary Music Composers (ACIMC)).

In my opinion, Rafie meets criteria for Wikipedia:NMUSICOTHER, saying "Composers and performers outside mass media traditions may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria: Has composed a number of notable melodies, tunes, or standards used in a notable music genre."

The competitions are notable from my point of view, especially considering the small world of contemporary experimental (classical) music. E.G. a festival like MUSEQUAL https://www.kokonainenfestival.fi/?lang=en has a very good reputation, even without a wiki article Klaviermusikfan1972 (talk) 08:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Klaviermusikfan1972 None of the sources you added move the needle with regard to being independent and in-depth. (for example this is a profile on the website of an organization Rafie is a member of).

Rafie does not meet that criterion of NMUSICOTHER, because a "notable" composition is one that qualifies for an article, by having sources cover it. None of Rafie's originals have gotten that. Mach61 17:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, we need more participation here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Police Officers (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM, no WP:SIGCOV anywhere, no critical reception whatsoever. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:32, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Redirect to List of Kannada films of 2022~~: see article talk page -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. 2 strong sources, the second of which is very long [4]. The film had an alternative title of Police Officer. @Mushy Yank: @Vanderwaalforces: What do you think of the second source, which mentions box office? Did you do a WP:BEFORE? DareshMohan (talk) 23:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I had looked vaguely at the time of the discussion but I’ll change my !vote. Thanks. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Given the review presented and coverage about production, there’s enough all in all to keep an article, I think. Very opposed to deletion anyway.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Réjane Magloire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NMUSICIAN. Couldn't find any significant coverage or chart listings. C F A 💬 23:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and New York. C F A 💬 23:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’m not sure about this one. The current stub focuses on her acting as a supporting role in a film that lacks its own article (although it could be notable - Denzel Washington played opposite her. Can we hear from the relevant projects? Can someone please tag or list them? Bearian (talk) 01:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC) I vaguely recall this film, Wilma, because it was so terrible, like cult-status bad. Bearian (talk) 01:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. She had three charting singles and an album in multiple countries. I found a lot online. I’m not sure how deep the nom searched, or if they asked any Gen X person, or if they looked into stage and band names. Her acting career was marginally notable, but her musical career was big stuff. Even Mariah Carey covered one of her songs. Bearian (talk) 02:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CGCG 396-2

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant or non-trivial coverage in media or studies, not in a catalogue of note, not visible to the naked eye, and not discovered before 1850. SkyFlubbler (talk) 15:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. SkyFlubbler (talk) 15:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think this article should be kept. It was notable enough for HST to observe it, being voted by Galaxy Zoo users. "Following a public vote, a selection of the most astronomically intriguing objects from the Galaxy Zoo were selected for follow-up observations with Hubble. CGCG 396-2 is one such object, and was captured in this image by Hubble’s Advanced Camera for Surveys." ^[1] Phantomdj (talk) 22:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ HST page for this object

Keep per Phantomdj ‹hamster717🐉› ^{(discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠)} 15:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm afraid the Hubble site is the only source that has some non trivial commentary on the object. Don't think it is enough. --C messier (talk) 13:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 (talk) 23:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Main Event (Chamillionaire song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are to non third-party sources or places where the song is available for streaming. Never charted, cannot find sources, fails WP:NMUSIC Roasted (talk) 22:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Roasted (talk) 22:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TayJay

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notable tag team. Just 16 sources: 8 of them, WP:RESULTS, the others didn't mention the team, just individual accomplishments. There are not enough reliable sources focusing on the team to prove notability. It's just an alliance between wrestlers. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 Hapoel Tel Aviv F.C. season

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article without any type of notoriety or references Alon9393 (talk) 21:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 9. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Israel. Shellwood (talk) 22:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No content, nothing worth keeping. Geschichte (talk) 23:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irakli Bagration-Imeretinsky

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think it’s now pretty well established at AfD that we don’t keep articles on members of pretend monarchies that haven’t existed for centuries. Mccapra (talk) 21:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Georgia (country). Mccapra (talk) 21:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Buerge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notable for only being the main bachelor of The Bachelor (American TV series) season 2, the target that the nominated page should be redirected to. (The Bachelor (American TV series) is an alternative, but I prefer just season-specific.) His activities outside the series don't measure up to make WP:BIO1E (if not WP:BLP1E) inapplicable. Furthermore, the second season of The Bachelor may not have been a major event as it is perceived or marketed to be, despite good or decent viewership. If the cited rules don't apply, how about WP:PAGEDECIDE instead? George Ho (talk) 21:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Television, and Missouri. George Ho (talk) 21:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 Maccabi Petah Tikva F.C. season

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In the intro he talks about a football team then it becomes empty and irrelevant Alon9393 (talk) 21:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Israel. Shellwood (talk) 21:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 9. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Article can easily be fixed up if wanted, there are sources for transfers and matches for the club. Israel does have good news coverage for Premier League seasons there. So you can easily build an article if you want, GNG wouldn't be an issue. I have nothing against this being delete either. It's down to what people want to do with the article. Regards. Govvy (talk) 21:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. At best, this should be draftified. It can be fixed, but not much is lost if it's deleted. Geschichte (talk) 23:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Belfast Bulls

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NSPORTS / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 20:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CAF Cepia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per discussion on the talk page (Talk:CAF Cepia), editors have asserted that the existence of a CAF Cepia or CAF Sepia model is not verifiable as of when this article was created in April of 2020. Searching online, I was only able to find a single Russian publication using referring to a model by this name ([5]), and it dates to 2 years later in addition to otherwise being of unclear reliability and leaving some uncertainty as to the "correct" spelling given the high likelihood of confusion when transliteration s, c, r and p between Cyrillic, Latin and Turkish. Available evidence would appear to suggest that, irrespective of whether Turkish State Railways has bought trains manufactured by CAF, none of them are known as Sepia or Cepia and thus there should be neither a redirect nor an article at this title. A WP:BLAR was essentially challenged at an RfD discussion, with that discussion recommending it be sent to AfD. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation, Spain, and Turkey. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom. None of the sources indicate CAF ever marketing the trains under that name. Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 22:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Royal Yacht Squadron members

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NLIST. Might be WP:A3 eligible. Conyo14 (talk) 18:12, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It looks like before it was removed, the list was mostly sourced from this unsourced (random?) list of supposed members of the squadron. cyberdog958^Talk 20:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dorell Anthony

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, article about a non-notable actor and filmmaker. Don't it satisfies criteria for WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG, possible WP:COI. Jamiebuba (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and United States of America. Jamiebuba (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't find much of anything for coverage, one article confirming the person joined Days of our Lives [6], but that's not enough for build an article or to prove notability. What's used now in the article isn't helpful, imdb and a local newspaper. Oaktree b (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, New York, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Meets WP:CREATIVE with at least one very notable production to which his contribution was essential. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:48, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is the one good article but in a local paper. He did apparently write and produce a series (Pride: The Series), but that article has even fewer references so I suspect it won't be deemed notable. Even checking the fan sites and IMDB there isn't much (if any) engagement. Other than that he has had what seem to be minor roles in various soap operas and not terribly visible TV series. Lamona (talk) 02:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV need more sources. Xegma(talk) 19:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Linxea

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unlikely to be notable: its a brokerage, that is only relevant in France, and doesn't make any claims for notability. Sadads (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and France. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet NCORP — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:29, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep French sources are notable and reliable enough to meet NCORP. The page could be shortened, though. --美しい歌 (talk) 10:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resoomer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has heavy coverage in industry press release type venues, but doesn't make a case for lasting notability, looks like SEO or COI editing. Sadads (talk) 20:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:14, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Public image of Mother Teresa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Started as a WP:POVFORK [7] and since then it has changed quite a bit but it never really improved. This article is not about her public image, which is overwhelmingly positive, (and not a notable topic which does not pass WP:GNG), it is about certain criticisms of her. For some reason the article got moved [8]. Criticism should be in the main article and this POVFORK should be removed. Polygnotus (talk) 19:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Christianity, India, and Albania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nutan (Nepalese actor)

Previous AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Nutan (actor)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted in January as Nutan (actor). Still doesn't seem to meet WP:NACTOR. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Nepal. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As the person who accepted this article, initially I thought he might meet the general notability guideline, but now looking back, yeah, he doesn't. Delete. OhHaiMark (talk) 12:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Search about him on Google, YouTube and other websites. I think he meets the general notability guideline. Most of his articles are in Nepalese language, so you might be thinking that way. Thanks! 111.119.49.66 (talk) 14:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion, so relisting to come to clearer consensus to delete the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 20:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Klaus Boesch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NARTIST. No indication of significance. Promo puff piece article. scope_creep^Talk 18:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Austria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pontic uprising

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

source articles are very clearly biased and take a strongly ethnonationalist point of view, denigrating pontic greeks and armenians while glorifying the turks. I am additionally not certain of the notability of this event. Insanityclown1 (talk) 18:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, and Turkey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Constantine Spandagos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPROF. scope_creep^Talk 18:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Engineering, Environment, Greece, England, and New Hampshire. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dara Greaney

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Cited sources routinely mention him as CEO, but none of them go in detail and mostly are about the company, BuyAutoParts.com. Gheus (talk) 18:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Randall Rossilli Jr.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The claim of notability as a media entrepreneur is weak and lacks the in-depth reliable and verifiable sources required to back up the claim. Recording songs for release on iTunes is an even weaker claim of notability, not does his work as a teacher reach any notability standard. I was unable to find any meaningful in-depth coverage for him in a Google search. Alansohn (talk) 18:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Film, and New Jersey. Alansohn (talk) 18:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Businesspeople, Journalism, and Television. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability not found, Xxanthippe (talk) 22:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Zahrisaurus

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another Malkani dinosaur. References are exclusively predatory journals. This is not a real dinosaur, or even a notable fake one. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I notice it was previously "soft" deleted, ~~potentially making this eligible for WP:CSD#G4~~? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Organisms, and Pakistan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, though perhaps in future creating a page similar to List of informally named dinosaurs would be useful as a place to consolidate this information without making standalone articles (see other Malkani taxa such as Balochisaurus are entries on the page). IJReid ^{{{T - C - D - R}}} 19:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This article is pointless. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 19:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of urban areas in Scotland

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced (sources are mentioned but not cited anywhere) and is essentially an unnecessary spin-off of List of towns and cities in Scotland by population, using same methodology as the Settlements list (the figures differ slightly due to taking the figures from different years). De-prodded by editor who possibly didn't realise that the above article contains sections for both Localities and multi-locality Settlements, i.e urban areas. Crowsus (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Scotland. Crowsus (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK probably merge with List of towns and cities in Scotland by population#Settlements, I indeed hadn't noticed that section. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

River Lyvennet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of sources. Xegma(talk) 17:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a source about the walk though its from the national park so may not be secondary. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see an encyclopedic development other than an informative pamphlet. Alon9393 (talk) 21:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adebayo Adeleke

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. Refs are primary on a WP:BLP made up of interviews, profiles, podcasts. No indication of significance. scope_creep^Talk 17:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Military, Nigeria, and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Theory of Interstellar Trade

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable speculative article; the sole sources about are the author and a single commentary in a blog. The author himself confesses that it was a tongue-in-cheek endeavor. --Altenmann >talk 17:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I dunno, it's been cited 65 times, which seems high for a tongue-in-cheek joke article! It's been discussed quite a lot in books as well, in addition to Tyler Cowen's commentary that's already in the article. I think it's arguable that this article could be treated as notable under WP:BKCRIT #5, with an author "so historically significant that any of the author's written works may be considered notable. This does not simply mean that the book's author is notable by Wikipedia's standards; rather, the book's author is of exceptional significance and the author's life and body of written work would be a common subject of academic study." I could be convinced to redirect, since it's likely a valid search term, but I'm on keep for now. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Economics and Spaceflight. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I've found some decent coverage. In rough order of significance:

An article in the Economist (archived)
A section of a CBC business article
A paragraph in a NYT opinion piece (archived)
A paragraph in Coined: The Rich Life of Money and How Its History Has Shaped Us at Google Books
A paragraph in Fake Physics: Spoofs, Hoaxes and Fictitious Science, p. 76, at Google Books
A paragraph in Academia Obscura: The Hidden Silly Side of Higher Education at Google Books
A paragraph in The Cosmos Economy: The Industrialization of Space, p. 193, at Google Books
A parenthetical aside in Cosmology for the Curious, p. 58, at Google Books
A footnote in What Led Eminent Economists to Become Economists?
A mention in Earth Economics: An Introduction, p. 4, at Google Books
A mention in The Space Value of Money: Rethinking Finance Beyond Risk & Time at Google Books
A mention in Asteroids: How Love, Fear, and Greed Will Determine Our Future in Space at Google Books
An excerpt in Issues in General Economic Research and Application: 2011 Edition, p. 592, at Google Books

jlwoodwa (talk) 18:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn; speedy keep‎. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Address to the Nation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is WP:SYNTH and thus fails WP:GNG by violating WP:NOR. The article cites no source describing the concept of an "address to the nation" or "national address" as a global phenomenon; instead, it describes specific examples in particular countries (relying primarily on WP:PRIMARYSOURCES) and strings them together in what is definitionally original research. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Politics. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep – I agree that we don't need an article about the topic of national addresses, but I think it could be converted to a reasonable list of national addresses. jlwoodwa (talk) 18:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a reasonable outcome. I'll withdraw and move the article. Keep. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Amla Sadarpur Secondary School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Well-established but ultimately non-notable school. None of the sources cited contribute anything towards notability, and a BEFORE search finds nothing more than the usual social media accounts, directory listings, etc. (If someone can find non-English sources that satisfy the WP:GNG standard, please do.) Declined at AfC but published by the author regardless, so here we are. Clearly fails WP:ORG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Bangladesh. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

British army in the Eureka Rebellion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary content fork. Content could easily be merged into Eureka Rebellion and List of Eureka Stockade defenders. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 16:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
keep not at all a WP:CFORK. I see almost no overlaps. And we don't merge large articles into huger ones. --Altenmann >talk 17:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Just wanted to note that 860 words of readable prose is hardly a large article. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Wayshak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article and a WP:BEFORE search turns up no WP:SIGCOV in independent, secondary, reliable sources for this comic artist -- just WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS and WP:PRIMARYSOURCES. Thus the subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO; the subject also meets no criterion of WP:NARTIST. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Comics and animation. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the deletion of Daniel Morcombe which did get undeleted. Kellpb93ke (talk) 16:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC) — Kellpb93ke (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

What has this got to do with Morcombe? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kellpb93ke What does Daniel Morcombe have to do with Jonathan Wayshak? Did you mean to comment on a different discussion? Unless this comment was posted mistakenly, there is no actual rationale offered to keep the article. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete Poorly referenced. --Altenmann >talk 17:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cullen Sheehan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a lobbyist, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for lobbyists. The attempted notability claim here is that he had political consultancy roles, like campaign manager or chief of staff, before registering as a lobbyist, but those are completely unsourced for the purposes of turning them into notability claims, while his work as a lobbyist is referenced entirely to a single directory entry that isn't support for notability. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass WP:GNG on third-party reliable source coverage in media about him and his work. Bearcat (talk) 14:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 14:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I did find [9] but again it is not an in-depth source about Sheehan. LizardJr8 (talk) 14:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Newspaper coverage has about as much as the comment above found [10], brief mentions but nothing for notability. I don't see anything else we can use for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 15:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It's easy to find this person is/was a lobbyist as mentioned in the article. But as far as what he achieved in that capacity, just isn't available. — Maile (talk) 15:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Needs cleanup to stub level. Kellpb93ke (talk) 16:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC) — Kellpb93ke (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Please provide sources to support notability Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Art of Sound (exhibition)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 15:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Music. Netherzone (talk) 16:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

James P. Covey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a diplomat and politician, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for diplomats or politicians. The attempted notability claim here is that he was nominated for a subcabinet position but was never confirmed into the role by the senate, which is not "inherently" notable in and of itself -- the notability bar at WP:NPOL is holding a notable office, not just being nominated for one -- but the article says absolutely nothing else about his career up to that point to suggest any other basis for preexisting notability, and it's referenced 2/3 to primary sources that are not support for notability at all. And while there is one reliable source to a piece of media coverage, one of those isn't enough all by itself. Bearcat (talk) 14:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 14:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Rather brief political career [11], then back into obscurity. I don't see enough sourcing to use for an article. Even the position held was a low-level one, for a brief period of time. Oaktree b (talk) 15:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not notable. His diplomatic nomination never saw fruition, and no other information about him is available. — Maile (talk) 16:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and convert to stub. If we can do it for Daniel Morcombe we can do it for this. Kellpb93ke (talk) 16:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC) — Kellpb93ke (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note This editor has since been blocked for vandalism. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Oaktree b. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Bernard Djambou

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor Olympian with virtually no source coverage. Allan Nonymous (talk) 13:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cycling and Cameroon. Allan Nonymous (talk) 13:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV need to add more sources. Xegma(talk) 13:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

North Malabar Institute of Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This exists, but even the very stubby article doesn't prove it. Its own website server fails to respond. Not inherently notable. Fails WP:NCORP 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Kerala. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Back in 2015 the creating editor twice removed a {{merge to}} template, refusing to discuss it. I am not averse to a merge if deemed appropriate 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Engineering, and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Kannur University. LibStar (talk) 00:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 13:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and increase to a stub article. Win-win ending. Kellpb93ke (talk) 16:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC) — Kellpb93ke (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete The Institute have no individual sources fails WP:NCORP. Xegma(talk) 17:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Friends Communication

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find sufficient reliable news coverage independent of the topic here, per WP:CORP Loewstisch (talk) 10:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Loewstisch (talk) 10:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and West Bengal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:50, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify it for now. Xegma(talk) 14:05, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 13:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oladipupo Olayinka

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any other sources talking about him. Only WP:PASSINGMENTION Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Nigeria. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Tennis. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the Review Exceptionalmagic (talk) 13:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete need more sources. Xegma(talk) 13:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sportsman's notability. --Altenmann >talk 17:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:SPORTCRIT, WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lister Storm GTM002

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable vehicle chassi, information is out of scope of Wikipedia. However, having a hard time figuring out where would be an appropriate rederict/merge -- the race team? Sadads (talk) 12:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Motorsport and Transportation. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Baffling to find an article about such a specific, unspecial chassis - not even a model! Don't see any encyclopaedic value in it. No mainspace links to it exist ([12]). Think a suitable redirect target would be Lister Storm or Lister Storm#GT, but we've got to consider deleting it altogether. MSport1005 (talk) 17:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Brook

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The only RS coverage is run of the mill high school sports coverage in local news outlets. Being " most successful boys basketball coach in the history of Sebring McKinley High School" certainly does not establish notability. GPL93 (talk) 12:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball and Ohio. GPL93 (talk) 12:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Hall of fame might be notable with decent sourcing, but the lack of sources isn't helping. I don't find anything we can use, sources now in the article are primary/related to the sports teams. Oaktree b (talk) 15:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think any of them are notability-lending. One is the high school he attended, the high school where he coached, and one specific to Ohio high school basketball coaches by the Ohio basketball coaches association. Both high schools appear to have had and still have rather low enrollments. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New FM

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2010 Golikom (talk) 11:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 12:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV. Xegma(talk) 12:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Broadcast Operations Group per ATD. Nate • (chatter) 16:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gurukripa Career Institute

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The institute is a coaching centre for the preparation of competitive exams, not an government approved educational establishment. It does not meet WP:NSCHOOL. See WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Also several new SPAs are engaged in suspicious editing this page. They have even tried to manipulate the List of institutions of higher education in Rajasthan by creating a new section for "Coaching institutes" and adding this coaching centre, which is not an appropriate category. Charlie (talk) 11:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, India, and Rajasthan. Charlie (talk) 11:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NCORP which schools must pass nowadays. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I have spent some time removing promotional and repeated content. What's left doesn't meet NCORP (just routine reporting). Paul W (talk) 11:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Yes, there was some promotional content in this article, but I believe deletion is not the solution. I have visited this institute, and many others visit it as well. However, there is no proper source that provides accurate information about this institute. Therefore, I think we should add correct and reliable information instead of deleting it. This way, it will help people find the right information about the institute, which has a large number of students. Every year, many students try to get information about this institute, but they struggle to find reliable and proper sources.

Sandeep Kumar Kajla (talk) 12:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the students can't find any sources, and you can't find sources, that indicates this isn't a notable institution. Oaktree b (talk) 15:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : I think we should keep this article as it will reflect the truth of coaching industry.

Mike20008 (talk) 12:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Deletion is not in order here. The article provides a good beginning for information on a major institute. With an update using credible and accurate data, we can do much better to serve the needs of interested individuals. Semsuineas.wiki (talk) 12:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie, I think you've read the List of Institutions of Higher Education in Rajasthan properly. At the top, some private engineering colleges are mentioned, and their pages have also been published. Therefore, I don't believe we can't add private institutes.

Mike20008 (talk) 12:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Removing the article is not a solution. The institute is very important to a lot of students. By re-writing with known and verified information, we could offer a valuable page to those looking for correct information.

Maggidi (talk) 13:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CharlieMehta, I do not want to get caught in this controversy but would like to say one thing that instead of deleting, everyone should try to improve, because even today there are many articles which are not correct and the recent information is also not updated, so more focus should be kept on improving. Let's all decide together whether to keep it or not @Maggidi, @Mike20008, @Paul W, @Semsuineas.wiki, @Skajlajjn1996, @Timtrent

Thanks Devidafrica.villager (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Five accounts with less than 100 edits (three of which have less than 10) all commenting within an hour of each other saying the same thing. At the risk of stating the obvious, it seems there is some sock/meatpupperty going on in this discussion with the goal of WP:Bludgeoning. 🌸wasianpower🌸 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Poor sources and per nom, page does not satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. RangersRus (talk) 20:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thibault Duplessis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. No indication of signification found in the before. scope_creep^Talk 11:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Sportspeople, Software, and France. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edie Rodriguez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable business woman. Article has been an orphan for 7 years, sources are all trade press puff. Golikom (talk) 10:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Travel and tourism, New Jersey, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Uttar Pradesh train derailment

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS, title is ambiguous as there are other (albeit non notable) derailment incidents in the state, including a recent one just hours ago. ToadetteEdit (talk) 10:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Transportation, and Uttar Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify it for now, need to add more sources. Xegma(talk) 16:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

University of the Philippines College of Mass Communication

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:BRANCH. No indication of significance. scope_creep^Talk 10:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Article is about a degree-granting unit of the national university of the Philippines. Though I do admit that I haven't been able to flesh out the article yet, it seems hardly accurate to say that it has no indication of significance considering that it's about a part of the larger University of the Philippines Diliman but otherwise wouldn't fit on that page. Brly31415 (talk) 10:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Schools, and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Matej Rehák

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rehák played a total of 19 minutes at professional level before being sent to lower leagues, then disappeared. The only secondary source I found is SME but it's paywalled. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Slovakia. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, lack of achievements and corresponding lack of sources. Geschichte (talk) 22:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Technology Connections

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I still believe this fails SIGCOV and notability for the same reasons discussed in the last AfD discussion two months ago. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Illinois. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep enough independent sources with significant coverage to meet the bar for WP:GNG. If that would not be the case, Alec Watson meets WP:NAUTHOR anyway. PhotographyEdits (talk) 12:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which sources do you consider to meet the bar for each of those paths? Sdkb ^talk 14:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per the comment of DigitalIceAge. PhotographyEdits (talk) 17:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is getting tedious. We have significant coverage about the channel itself in multiple reliable sources: The Physics Teacher source is expressely about his channel, the Lifehacker source dedicates over 100 words about his channel, Jancovic 2023 is a published book that spends an entire page praising Watson's deducition skills. Almost all of the rest of the sources contain enough editoralizing about his channel to constitute sigcov of Technology Connections. Per WP:WEBCRIT it passes the bar. DigitalIceAge (talk) 16:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Monument Mythos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail notability guidelines. Most of the article’s sources are student newspapers by the author’s own description. Could not find reliable significant coverage in my search. Has been previously deleted. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Nomad Vagabond)} 14:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This is about all there is [13] for sourcing and it's not enough. Rest of what's used is marginally reliable sources per Source Highlighter, so not much of anything we can use for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kashif Aslam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable makeup artist. This was created after the deletion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kashee's Beauty Salon by the same user. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 09:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG and none of the awards he received are significant. --— Saqib (talk I contribs) 13:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CalDigit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for companies. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Technology. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Checking in Google News, there are hundreds (20 pages of links) of independent appearances in media. Still, it's true they are mostly reviews of their products, not talking about the company itself. The company consumer products have been pretty popular, but maybe that fame is not enough. Tbh I'm not sure. Janeender (talk) 09:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Raihan Merchant

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tamgha-e-Imtiaz is a minor (4th grade) award, according to our article. There is no direct or in-depth coverage about him. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 09:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 09:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

'4th grade' makes it sounds like it isn't a real award at all, whereas it definitely is and only conferred upon high-achievers. It is the 'medal of excellence' after all. Raihan Merchant is actually a super influential figure in Pakistan media and advertising. Sharan Shias (talk) 10:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ACM Gold

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable forex broker. Coverage is mostly paid/PR-based. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 09:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and South Africa. Shellwood (talk) 09:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irfan Pardesi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable forex trader. Lacks unpaid independent in-depth secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 09:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Undisclosed paid editing. Fails GNG. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 13:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I think this is about him [14] but it's not extensive coverage regardless. I don't see notability with the sources now used, which appear in PR items, industry trade magazines, or about this person talking to media. Oaktree b (talk) 15:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Kule

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

8 games in Albania’s highest league, continued in the semi-pro second tier, did get 4 more games on the top level. With sources not being better than this, this or this, I don't think it meets WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. What do you think? Geschichte (talk) 08:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Albania. Shellwood (talk) 08:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vidhi (2023 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently 123telugu was declared unreliable by the Indian cinema taskforce. Given that Indiaglitz is also considered unreliable, there are no reliable reviews (had there been at least 1, I would have let this slide). There was a FilmyFocus review on the page but that is also likely non notable (all unreliable sources can't be listed there). Given that the fact that the longest source is an interview from 123telugu, this film has no notability.

The TV9 Telugu source is a small snippet only mentioned that Vishwak Sen was invited for the film's launch while the NTV source mentions where the film is streaming. All in all, the only notable reliable source is the NTV source [15], which isn't enough to keep an entire Wikipedia article of a 2023 film. This isn't even a pre Internet film.

P. S. I had tried my best to improve the film's sourcing to no avail. DareshMohan (talk) 07:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have no comment on this. Either delete, or redirect to List of Telugu films of 2023. My main aim to create this article was to add more entries to Vidhi, but this also does the job. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Telugu films of 2023 (not opposed to Keep myself, see article talk page) -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 12:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List_of_Telugu_films_of_2023#October–December. Per nom. RangersRus (talk) 20:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sadush Danaj

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are profile and no significant coverages. Xegma(talk) 07:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Albania. Shellwood (talk) 08:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I honestly have no idea what the coverage is like in Albania and for the clubs he played for, there are two in the list that are a fair size and get good support. If someone does build a decent article with sources ping me please. Govvy (talk) 21:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PGC 2387685

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant or non-trivial coverage in media or studies, not in a catalogue of note, not visible to the naked eye, and not discovered before 1850. SkyFlubbler (talk) 15:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. SkyFlubbler (talk) 15:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: the interacting companion galaxy, SDSS J161330.18+510335.5, has at least one paper published.[16] Praemonitus (talk) 01:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Helge Rasche

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:FOOTYN as he never played nor coached at top level. Coverage is only of his death, which does not automatically establish notability. 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 06:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Football, and Germany. 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 06:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - clearly does not pass WP:FOOTYN as a player, while his coaching achievement (not managership) consists solely of an Under-19 role and nothing in a senior capacity. I detect some kind of personal sympathy voting as an inspiration for the creation and expansion of this article. Ref ^(chew)(do) 07:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. NB that FOOTYN is meaningless. Giant Snowman 18:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Giant can have your say on the relevance of Abdul Hannan (singer).Alon9393 (talk) 18:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CANVASS. Giant Snowman 18:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Giant The issue is that no one has an opinion on whether it should be maintained or eliminated, it is abandoned.Alon9393 (talk) 18:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Giant - essays such as WP:FOOTYN are not binding; however, they are intrinsically relevant or else they would not exist as essays due to their irrelevance. WP:FOOTYN is merely a yardstick by which to measure the nominated's article for signs of notability, not a directive or guideline, and as such is not as meaningless as you might feel. Ref ^(chew)(do) 21:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All-know tragic, and having a look at sources on the article and online, I really only see what you call a WP:routine type of coverage on the announcement of his death. What's impressive know is that it is covered fairly globally, I saw sources from, America, Africa, Europe. But it's all the same thing, which is the announcement, I don't see how this is WP:LASTING. Regards. Govvy (talk) 21:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Sanskrit authors from lower communities

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very unclear whether this group of "lower communities" which includes e.g. Sat-Sudra (considered higher castes), is a commonly accepted grouping with a clear definition, or some division created specifically for this article. Also not clear if the topic (Sanskrit texts by caste division) is a topic of study and whether these people are grouped together scholarly, or if this is some novel WP:SYNTH list. Fram (talk) 08:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Language, Hinduism, and India. Fram (talk) 08:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia article of Sat-Sudra is very badly written. I have suggested an edit but my edit is reverted. Please check. Sat-shoodras are only higher than other shudras (asat shudras) and lower than every other varna. That is, Lower than Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vaishya. See the note on sat-shoodra there. Caste boundaries can't be clearly defined due to their complexities. The main castes are mentioned themselves which are considered lower nonetheless. Sat-shoodra only highlights their status in varna system. This is a dynamic list and more people from other communities can be added by everyone. The topic of debate has always been whether lower communities have contributed to sanskrit among scholars. This article helps in breaking the myths of denial of education and lack of scholarship among lower communities and foster inclusivity. Mohit Dokania (talk) 09:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:NLIST and WP:RS. Almost 60 % of the sources are unreliable. Andhraportal, wisdomlib, jainqq.org, sanskritkosha,sndp, sanskritdocuments etc., are not RS. A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent, reliable sources, which I find none here. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All references to Wisdomlib, Jainqq.org and sanskritkosha are of published books available on those sources. Which are both reliable and accurate. All the information provided are as accurate as possible. You can challenge any misinformation in talk page. This has always been the matter of debate among scholars to assess the contribution of lower communuties in Sanskrit literature. See this. Mohit Dokania (talk) 15:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete "Lower communities" is ambiguous. Are Vaishyas and Reddys lower communities? The list is a product of WP:SYTH and fails WP:NLIST.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Tanha Dar Mazrae

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources (a.k.a. no wiki links) and no reliable reviews. This may fail Wikipedia:Notability (films). This article about a short film is short because no other sources exist.

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayeye Penhan. I am also nominating the following related page because it is also is sourced by a similar website (akhbarrasmi, is it notable?):

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Iran. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, no participation so far.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinch to Punch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This lacks WP:SIGCOV even the article knows it limited information has surfaced online. Oricon yield no result, Natalie yield no result, even the Japanese article has one source, the only thing I could find that is RS is from the Media Arts Database Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 06:12, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga and Japan. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 06:12, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating this related articles with the same reason as above

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 06:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Keep) and improve with sources from the Japanese WP, that has a lot considering it's a 1969-1970 series! -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Education, and Transportation. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(My initial !vote above is about Zen-chan Tsū-chan). I hadn't seen this was a bundled nom when I !voted through the assisted script. Procedural keep. These series have very little in common. And it's hard to discuss and improve the 3 at the same time without long tedious explanations and comments about what precisely is relevant to each case. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC) (The nominator indicates they nominated the pages "with the same reason" but the 2nd article has >10 references to reliable newspapers on JaWP, for example.)[reply]
I'll just seperate the 2nd one. Thanks for pointing out Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 13:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, my mention of ’the 2nd article’ is unclear: for the record, I mean Zen-chan Tsū-chan. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 22:03, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirects to the respective networks should also be considered.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to see some way to keep the content, and suggest a merge to Fuji Television. For the ones which are made by Fuji, which doesn't include Zen-chan (please, please, don't do combined nominations of disparate articles!). Not sure about Zen-chan, as like @Mushy Yank this came up as a single article for me and I hadn't given it any thought before starting this comment
On Pinch to Punch it's unfortunate that there is so little secondary material out there although it seems even the primary material has been lost. This attests to its importance in the context of the development of Anime. This article could be perfectly happy as a stub, verified by what little information is out there, but it's hard to make a case for IAR on this. Oblivy (talk) 07:09, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The issue with developing these articles would be our inability to access archives which would have information about an anime series from 50 years ago. Hard to imagine that Pinch and Punch, a series with 156 episodes airing on a national TV channel, wouldn't be notable with access to the correct archives. If someone is interested, perhaps Fuji or the National Film Archive of Japan can help? I would personally either keep or merge the articles at a minimum. DCsansei (talk) 07:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is no consensus here. But I don't see any support for Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yes lack of WP:SIGCOV.

Note - maximum sources are databases. and it's an enough reason to delete. Xegma(talk) 13:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perak railway station

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NTRAINSTATION. cyberdog958^Talk 06:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Stations, Transportation, and Pakistan. cyberdog958^Talk 06:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rohri–Chaman Line or List of railway stations in Pakistan. Easy to resume the work this way - if someone curious like me finds offline coverage in future. Gheus (talk) 10:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No sources 🌀Typ hoon Ampil ^Tools 10:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As per nom Kingsmasher678 (talk) 13:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rohri–Chaman Line#Stations. This is a plausible search term and there's no reason not to redirect. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 14:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rohri–Chaman Line#Stations as plausible search term. Djflem (talk) 17:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

North American Grappling Association

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails GNG and NCORP for not having signification coverage from independent, reliable sources for verification. Cassiopeia talk 06:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Cassiopeia talk 06:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and North America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV and no independent sources. Xegma(talk) 13:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribution Corporation Limited

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Single ref is effectively WP:OR. No indication of significance. scope_creep^Talk 06:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Andhra Pradesh. Shellwood (talk) 08:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Significant organization, state-owned power distributor having vast network and consumer base, has more than one reliable citations now. Thewikizoomer (talk) 18:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We will go through your new references to check them. scope_creep^Talk 19:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted‎ under WP:G5 by CactusWriter. (non-admin closure) ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 17:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tafsir-e-Zakaria

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of significant coverages and unsourced sections. Xegma(talk) 06:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Islam. Shellwood (talk) 08:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Andhra Pradesh Eastern Power Distribution Company Limited

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. No indication of significance. scope_creep^Talk 06:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Andhra Pradesh. Shellwood (talk) 08:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Significant organization, state-owned power distributor having vast network and consumer base. Google search reflects a lot of sources showing the kind of significance the org. holds. Thewikizoomer (talk) 18:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Limited

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Single ref is effectively WP:OR. scope_creep^Talk 06:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Andhra Pradesh. Shellwood (talk) 08:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Significant organization, state-owned power distributor having vast network and consumer base, has more than one reliable citations now. Thewikizoomer (talk) 18:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barren Earth (DC Comics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any reliable source talking about it so it clearly fails WP:GNG. The article only cites 1 sources which they repeated twice Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV need to add published sources. Xegma(talk) 13:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Gotham TV Award for Outstanding Performance in a Drama Series

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's hard to decide if I will draftify this article but this feels like it's too soon to have the a standalone article. The award and the 1st edition of the award itself is notable but this specific category as of now, seems no notable. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating this article for the same reason:

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Awards, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: as a WP:SPLITLIST or redirect to the main page. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:50, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gotham Awards#Gotham TV Awards for now; assuming that the next ceremony includes these categories, these lists would no longer copy information from a single article and could be recreated then. I would also support redirecting Gotham TV Award for Outstanding Performance in a Comedy Series for the same reasons. RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 05:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep has source but need more sources. Xegma(talk) 13:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Evening News (song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Never charted and fails Wikipedia:Notability (music). Roasted (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Roasted (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Full of unsourced, original research and does not demonstrate notability. cyberdog958^Talk 07:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom 🌀Typ hoon Ampil ^Tools 10:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Search only brings up Spotify, other streaming/video sites and lyrics. I don't see sources we can use for notability. Being sourced to mp3.com is a bit of a throwback, but doesn't help notability either. Oaktree b (talk) 15:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ultimate Victory per above + I also found no additional sources/notability. Redirecting a song article to the album it's from is standard, and there aren't any other songs with this name listed at Evening News (disambiguation) so ambiguity is a non-issue. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 17:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

James L. Enos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No clear indication of notability. Being the first president of the National Teachers Association isn't enough. No significant coverage in cited sources. Before search found nothing significant. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Iowa. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Journalism, Iowa, New York, and Wisconsin. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Peace

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV. The book seems to notable but not the individual. Note tag placed on it. Coverage is all for the book. scope_creep^Talk 04:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and New Jersey. Shellwood (talk) 08:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

International Communal Studies Association

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No relevance. Article without notoriety and without independent or reliable sources. Alon9393 (talk) 03:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 9. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Israel. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete promotional and fails NCORP. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NCORP. Xegma(talk) 05:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A small charity. Can find much on them at all. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 18:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find much coverage of them at all, let along SIGCOV. EytanMelech (talk) 22:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2028 Northern Territory general election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Article only has one source, and it does not say anything about the election in 2028. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Australia. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Thought about a redirect but I really couldn't find a suitable target. Esolo5002 (talk) 04:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
redirect to Northern Territory Legislative Assembly maybe? otherwise yeah delete Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 22:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cañapa Lake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one source, not enough to meet the general notability guideline. And the source does not have the lake as its primary topic and hence is not SIGCOV. Stanley Joseph Wilkins (talk) 04:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Bolivia. Stanley Joseph Wilkins (talk) 04:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WSJP-LD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV, Fox affiliation notwithstanding. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Puerto Rico. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Fox affiliates. No sources, no article and all but the Fox affiliation does bring in an argument they should become one with the Fox affiliation list articles. --Danubeball (talk) 02:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. There is a Merge suggestion but you must provide a link to the preferred target article. Thank you.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Miranda (engine)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a rocket engine under development which has no proven notability as it does not yet exist. Clear case of WP:TOOSOON. As part of WP:NPP it was draftified for improvement, for instance waiting until it has proven to be viable. Novice editor removed tags, moved back to main and made comments that violate politeness code. This article and approach is inappropriate for Wikipedia. Since the editor has rejected draftification, deletion now is the approach. If the motor ever works and becomes useful, then and only then would it be appropriate for Wikipedia. Ldm1954 (talk) 01:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Spaceflight. Ldm1954 (talk) 01:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

N.B., this page used to be a redirect to a short description in the Firefly Aerospace page. Within that page it can be OK; however creating a new article by replacing a redirect must pass the same bar as the creation of any new page. Ldm1954 (talk) 01:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lean keep Unlike a lot of these fledgling companies, that end up promising a lot of vaporware, this case is likely different. This engine has the backing of Northrop Grumman, which needs it to power its Antares rocket, which it needs to lift the Cygnus spacecraft into space to resupply the International Space Station per the terms of its Commercial Resupply Services contract witch NASA. So there’s a lot riding on this program, which all adds to its notability. Furthermore, if this engine program fails, that itself may be notable if it ends the entire Antares rocket program. RickyCourtney (talk) 05:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While you make interesting points, I think keeping the article would also contradict Wikipedia:NOTACRYSTALBALL (I.e. Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not) since the engine is still a prototype. Let's see other opinions. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and try this at BE-4 or Raptor pages first as a precedent... KroOoOze (talk) 18:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That’s a poor comparison as the BE-4 and Raptor have both flown and this engine has not. RickyCourtney (talk) 05:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On test\certification flights. Raptor 3 have not flown at all. In either case we rely on official informations from the companies, and things like Isp is fundamentally impossible to independently verify, and we cannot be sure with what specs they will ultimately end up with (and that is ok). Invoking CRYSTALBALL is frivolous and agaist the spirit\intention of the guideline. KroOoOze (talk) 18:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS: but fine. What about New Glenn or Artemis II articles? By this twisted logic, should they be deleted? KroOoOze (talk) 18:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern, however I’ll point out that this engine has completed several hot fire tests, that were shared by Northrop Grumman. So in my opinion, it’s not entirely correct to point to WP:CRYSTALBALL. This isn’t just a product announcement or rumors when they actually have a working product and a deadline to deliver that’s just months away at this point. RickyCourtney (talk) 05:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has many problems, but reference information being readily available ain't one of them. With consideration to how this frivolous demand was brought up, I suggest to summarily dismiss this and not waste any more of anyone's time. Whether this is inlined and put under another pointless redirection is a distinction without difference to normal people. So if anyone wants to waste his time doing this, whatever. But don't deny access to the users in the process by (soft or hard) deleting it.

|

The engine was test-fired, so it has more than sufficient physicality. People expect to find all this basic information here. I don't think there is precedent, and purging all development engines from Wikipedia is, on the face of it, bizzare idea. The template itself has a state available for whether the engine is in development or in any other stage; i.e. it is normal and expected there would be articles about engines in development.

|

The petitioner out of the blue tried to draftify the article, with complete disregard for any links to it. He tried do draftify it despite it existing more than 90 days (years in fact). Now it is clear the motivation was as a prelude to deletion. In this discussion several frivolous reasons for deletion are thrown around simply trying to see what sticks, while concern over what actually most benefits the users is not considered. Any large rocket engine is very much "notable" to people in the field as well as fans, regardless whether currently in development or not. One could claim Too_soon with maybe some concept that will be renamed two more times and doesn't have anything but the name in the first place, but hardly this engine at this stage. KroOoOze (talk) 18:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not provide incorrect information. As I clarified, the earlier page was a {{redirect}}. If it was a real page then it was not eligible for draftification. However, it was a new page and as such goes through the standard Wikipedia:New pages patrol process.

Please note the Wikipedia:Five pillars "Wikipedia's editors should treat each other with respect and civility" Ldm1954 (talk) 20:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Firefly Aerospace per WP:NSUSTAINED, WP:FUTURE, WP:PAGEDECIDE, WP:NOTPROMO, etc etc. While a few reliable sources have briefly covered the testing of this engine, it fails WP:GNG - there is not yet enough detailed coverage to warrant a standalone article. I think this is a clear case of WP:TOOSOON. This engine may well become independently notable in the future, but currently, there simply is not enough coverage to provide all but the most basic information on it. Until further SIGCOV appears, this seems better handled as a subsection of the Firefly Aerospace article. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 03:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. We have arguments to Delete, Merge and one editor Leaning Keep so there is no consensus here yet. We determine notability on Wikipedia not based on editors' opinions but by coverage by reliable, secondary independent sources. Could anyone provide a further source assessment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source analysis: There are 5 sources. 1, 2, 5 are all web articles by the manufacturer, so are not independent and (IMO) weak. Both sources 3 & 4 are from specialized science web news sites, and mainly repeat statements by the two companies, so are also weak on independence; there are no comments from independent experts. They are not from, for instance, a major national or international newspaper, and there is no comment from NASA, JPL etc experts. I do not consider that the current article has any reliable, secondary and independent sources. Ldm1954 (talk) 03:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the source listed in the article currently, I found the following:

Two press releases[17][18]
A paywalled article in Aviation Week [19], a reputable publication
A few short articles on niche aerospace news websites[20][21][22] of unclear reliability/independence, and one particularly shameful article[23] that just reads like an ad

Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 06:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While SpaceNews isn’t a household name, Jeff Faust has become quite respected among the small cadre of full-time space journalists. He’s also probably the only one with a PhD from MIT. I’d argue he’s a reliable source.

While I don’t recognize the name of the journalist from Space.com, the site does have the green check of approval as a reliable source for Wikipedia.

-- RickyCourtney (talk) 06:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

E-Z Moving

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely to fail WP:NCORP KH-1 (talk) 02:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. KH-1 (talk) 02:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:A7. Local company that does not meet WP:GNG and listed sources read like WP:SPONSORED. cyberdog958^Talk 06:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of South Korea, Dublin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article based on primary sources, fails WP:ORG LibStar (talk) 02:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, South Korea, and Ireland. LibStar (talk) 02:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I searched in the Korean language and none of what I read passes the threshold of notability. These are the closest I could find: [24][25] seefooddiet (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logan Taggart

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV. He was a member of the town board of a town with a population of 862. Grahaml35 (talk) 02:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Population of a town should not be a factor. He deserves notoriety for being the youngest politician in Colorado history. Bobsmithian (talk) 06:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wiki there is basis to keep the article as it does meet standards as I created the article with enough legitimate citations showing he received tens of thousands of votes, spoke on live television and radio and holds a record in politics. @Grahaml35 @CAPTAIN RAJU. I want to make sure there is no political bias in this decision process. Bobsmithian (talk) 06:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - just because an individual has been on television or radio does not automatically qualify them as being notable for a Wiki article. I only mentioned the town size as a bit of information nothing more. The sources on the article and what I could find online are mostly passing mentions and lacks SIGCOV Grahaml35 (talk) 12:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is not political bias, as this person isn't in office and editors aren't all in the US regardless. Oaktree b (talk) 15:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN. Based on the creator's contributions, I also strongly suspect this is a paid-for article. I have requested they declare any COI. Number 5 7 15:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Small town politician, being the youngest in the state... Might be notable, but coverage is all PR items or "what is the politician" doing articles, which are not helpful. I don't find coverage, other than talking his high school/college choices. Oaktree b (talk) 15:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Poland, Dublin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marked for notability concerns since December 2020. The only sources provided is its own website. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 02:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Ireland, and Poland. LibStar (talk) 02:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of significant coverages and fails WP:NORG. Xegma(talk) 05:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Ireland–Poland_relations#Resident_diplomatic_missions. As WP:ATD-R. While the building/office/institution likely has no independent notability, there is some value (and certainly nothing inappropriate) about retaining the title. As a redirect to the article in which the topic/subject is covered. Guliolopez (talk) 09:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Shevchuk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Name gets mentioned a lot in punk zines, but as far as I'm aware, none of those are considered reliable, and he's not mentioned frequently enough outside of them to pass notability. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Pennsylvania. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete i can see it's need more sources. Xegma(talk) 05:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cambridge High School, New Zealand

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any sigcov. Can be redirect to Cambridge, New Zealand#Education Traumnovelle (talk) 01:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and New Zealand. Traumnovelle (talk) 01:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - If you click on any of the links on this nomination template: "Find sources: "Cambridge High School, New Zealand" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR", a whole lot of sourcing comes up to help verify Cambridge High School, New Zealand. — Maile (talk) 02:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And which of those sources are reliable, secondary, and in depth? Traumnovelle (talk) 04:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, an unnotable school lacking in sigcov. Esolo5002 (talk) 04:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV. Xegma(talk) 05:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Yemin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yemin's name gets mentioned a lot in punk zines, but as far as I'm aware, none of those are considered reliable, and he's not mentioned frequently enough outside of them to pass notability. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First Digital USD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable stablecoin. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 01:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. RS coverage fails WP:ORGDEPTH and Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Cryptocurrencies. An independent search for RS coverage found just routine crypto-oriented articles. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fabio Mancini

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This biography fails WP:GNG as it lacks WP:SUSTAINED direct and in-depth coverage. Gheus (talk) 01:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. models.com is WP:USERGENERATED. Polygnotus (talk) 01:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You'd think an Italian supermodel would have an article on it-WP. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah:[26][27] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

was deleted for no reason many years ago( you can check it here:https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabio_Mancini_(modello)?uselang=it ) and nobody one try to open a new one. He have million of sources in Italian, but the question is, why some admin don't help to create and Italian one too? strange he have 15 different version no? just a simple question.. ;) @Polygnotus @Gråbergs Gråa Sång 151.35.228.55 (talk) 17:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
good morning everyone, can I ask you why you are deleting the page of a model who made the history of Italian fashion with one of the greatest stylists in the world? instead of deleting the article wouldn't it be better to complete it and put it in order? I study at the Marangoni University of Fashion, and Fabio Mancini is for us Italians one of the major points of reference for Italian men's fashion in the world. I think that a well-curated entry is the best solution instead of deleting it @CAPTAIN RAJU@Polygnotus@Gheus 109.52.120.95 (talk) 06:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Read WP:GNG. What are the 3 best sources you can think of that are at the same time reliably published (WP:RS), independent of the subject and about the subject in some detail? Non-English sources can be used. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
actually in all the best models wikipedia profile are covered by models.com sources - references ( have a look in Naomi Campbell references / 2nd ref one MODELS.COM! , like in David Gandy's wiki page too / ref n.9 ). So the question is.. what problem have FABIO MANCINI ? why the Italian icon can't have it, and for the other models there are NO PROBLEMS? where is equality in Wikipedia guideline rules???? @Gråbergs Gråa Sång 151.35.228.55 (talk) 17:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: A couple of better-than-passing-mention hits on ProQuest:[28][29]. This [30] also mentions him, but can't access it. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noting that the latter 2 are The Daily Telegraph (Sydney)/The Sunday Telegraph (Sydney), may not be WP:BLP-good. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Something:[31][32], same text in both. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Tennis player and race driver with similar names that pop up, nothing for this person. I did enjoy meeting this hottie [33], but that doesn't help. Daily Telegraph is a RS [34], but one article isn't enough. Oaktree b (talk) 15:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And it's paywalled, so I can't comment how good it is, I suspect it's an interview. Oaktree b (talk) 15:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Same as this one:[35] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That Daily Telegraph might be a little iffy:Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_384#The_Daily_Telegraph_(Sydney) Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Help: Hello everyone,
everyday you all talk in the guideline about equalize the article.

Can I ask how less than 550.000 images of this person in google will be not enough to have a wiki article? Guys sorry how is possible? he did 15 years of fashion show, advertising campaign in all the major billboards the world with GIORGIO ARMANI, and his totally an ICON in Italy and in the fashion industry of all the world????

How is possible Pietro Boselli who is a very cheap model in Italy have a wiki page in English? and did 2% of Mancini's Career? I think you have to check his socials (personal instagram with more than 360K and Facebook with less than 150K people all over the world ) to understand how is an icon for the fashion industry.

Try to search Fabio Mancini-Giorgio Armani in google and you'll see what I'm trying to explain.

Thank you all for the patience @Oaktree b @Gheus@Gråbergs Gråa Sång@CAPTAIN RAJU 151.35.228.55 (talk) 17:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Fails GNG. C F A 💬 20:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from talkpage by Polygnotus (talk) 22:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
fabio mancini is an internationally renowned model and his experience in my opinion deserves to be spread. he is a boy with values who can be an example for the new generations. the page could be corrected without deleting it. what do you think? Iolanda.chinellato (talk) 22:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chimele Usuwa Abengowe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Firstly, the content on ref 1 which is a magazine can't be verified by any reliable source same as ref 5. Ref 2 and ref 5 are also the same link on the article current state. The only source here was this which just only talk about his death. Ref 7 which is a YouTube video showcasing a church service cant be use as a source neither any YouTube link can be use as a source. Ref 3 which just only mentioned his name as part of the medical list and not like he was talked about. Subject just totally fails WP:GNG. Gabriel (……?) 01:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, and Nigeria. Gabriel (……?) 01:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly a much respected citizen but WP:NOTMEMORIAL Xxanthippe (talk) 01:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]
thank you for your response. Please note that @Gabriel601 has been trolling my articles and marking them for deletion. There's an established case of "nominations in bad faith here". Cfaso2000 (talk) 05:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

welcome again for marking another article of mine for deletion. After the last episode, you should have recused yourself from my articles and leave other editors to go through and arrive at their own conclusions. Cfaso2000 (talk) 05:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't verify certain details about this person like the date of birth and death. My search for the various information yielded "result not found" and I was wondering about the origin of other information like the award, OFR. After all these, I can say that the article doesn't meet WP:NPROF and WP:SIGCOV. Also, Gabriel's source analysis is thorough and well-documented. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brenda Schad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG for not having significant coverage from independent, reliable sources. COI history doesn't help either. Gheus (talk) 01:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

comment: From the article: "Brenda and Jeannine McCann co-founded the company Tribe of Two". So all those references are primary sources, too. _signed,Willondon (talk) 01:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Japan, France, Italy, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Johan Ghazali

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails GNG for not having significant coverage from independent, reliable source for verification. One Champion is not reliable and indepdent source as this is the combat promotion company where the subject is under contract. www.iloveborneo, www.iluminasi and https://www.sportskeeda all are not reliable sources. Cassiopeia talk 00:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Martial arts and Malaysia. Cassiopeia talk 00:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete need more significant coverages and also "Personal life" section is unsourced. Xegma(talk) 04:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nom, and unsourced section and fails WP:GNG. Lekkha Moun (talk) 12:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete My search found no significant independent coverage of him that I think meets WP:GNG. As for meeting any SNG, he's not even ranked by the promotion he's fighting in, much less in the world. His family connections do not add to his WP notability (WP:NOTINHERITED). He may become notable, but right now that requires a WP:CRYSTALBALL. Papaursa (talk) 20:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Crabtree Brewing Co.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP. The first source is a blog. 2nd is not sigcov and third is very local coverage as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 00:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Colorado. LibStar (talk) 00:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV and unsourced sections. Xegma(talk) 05:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Skagit Environmental Endowment Commission

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP for not having significant coverage of independent, reliable sources for verification. Cassiopeia talk 00:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Cassiopeia talk 00:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Airnav.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't seem to find any WP:SIGCOV and there is no clear reason why this is a notable website. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 00:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The article itself has no reference. I cannot find any sources talk about it, only WP:PASSINGMENTIONS Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 01:17, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It is very heavily cited (see Google books, Google scholar). There is a page of coverage here and a paragraph of coverage here. I imagine there is more so I suggest participants take a good look at Google books for significant coverage. C F A 💬 02:14, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a fixed Google books link. tedder (talk) 01:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Websites. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, while CFA didn't cast a "vote" in this discussion, they have brought sources to the discussion which should be reviewed. Soft deletion doesn't seem appropriate as deletion is no longer "uncontroversial".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There's hardly more than a passing mention to be found (who runs it? etc), but wow, the quantity of mentions in articles, journals, and websites is - in this case - informative. tedder (talk) 01:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Presbyterian Church in Korea (BoSuHapDong III.)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A follow-up to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korea Jesus Presbyterian Church with a single page nominated rather than a bundle.

Bosu Hapdong (Korean: 보수합동) translates as "Conservative Union". The only source is a database of Church denominations, which "did not manage to contact this church". This is insufficient sourcing to keep this as an article.

Furthermore, the title is mangled with an unnecessary . character, and the Roman Numeral may be an invention of reformiert-online. Korean Wikipedia does not have an article on this; a cursory search in Korean did not find an immediate result for (or about) any group of this name.

For a potential redirect, it is unclear what the target would be: Presbyterian Church of Korea, Presbyterianism in South Korea, or a new page. Walsh90210 (talk) 00:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and South Korea. Walsh90210 (talk) 00:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Presbyterianism in South Korea. seefooddiet (talk) 09:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bandial railway station

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely no claim to notability, and no sources. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 00:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and no sources. Xegma(talk) 05:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of railway stations in Pakistan for now. Colonial era station, likely notable. Someone with access to local library may find good amount of coverage. Gheus (talk) 10:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Morse

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable congressional candidate and state government official. Page previously created and deleted back in 2018 (though that was before her state government service). Of the 24 sources cited on the page: 5 are WP:ROTM coverage of her campaigns, 3 are press releases, 6 are articles about wildfires that quotes her a few times, 3 only mention her in passing, 2 are pages on government websites, 2 are recordings of state legislative committee hearings, 1 doesn't even mention her at all, and only 3 are actual in-depth interviews or profiles with local outlets. Someone is not inherently notable just because they ran for Congress and held a relatively minor position in state government, and the coverage I'm seeing here doesn't convince me that she meets GNG. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 00:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. You're right that running by itself does not make one notable. However, she's still notable for her work regarding wildfires which came after the page was deleted originally, and as I see it she definitely meets GNG. First there's this Sacramento Bee story, which despite being "local" as you say, is still 27th largest paper in the U.S., so it's not exactly a small town paper. This is also, though local, still notable enough to help with GNG I think. Then of course there's this profile which is not local at all. There are also things like this, which while they aren't profiles, are more than just passing mentions or quotes, and treat her as notable. If that wasn't enough though I've found a few other things as well via a quick Google search: this 2022 interview on KQED (second half turns into an interview of her background and life after talking about wildfires), this is a Dailykos profile, which although about the election still goes into detail about her; and finally here is another Sac Bee story, this one on her getting the Deputy Secretary job. There's more, but I think with the things I've already mentioned she safely passes GNG. Relinus (talk) 02:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This is not her first run for office, and most likely will not be her last. What makes her notable, are her public services, within California as well as on a national level. — Maile (talk) 03:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nisar Safdar Khan Jadoon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being a member of the Provincial Assembly has nothing to do with being Notable especially when theres zero significant coverage of the subject neither sources to proof notability. Gabriel (……?) 00:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Politicians. Gabriel (……?) 00:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV. Xegma(talk) 04:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Clearly passes NPOL — Saqib (talk I contribs) 13:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have to state a reason why it clearly passes NPOL and where did the NPOL says without a significant coverage or sources rather than the 2 source of just being mention as a member on the article, a public figure of a person is to have a Wikipedia page. Gabriel (……?) 15:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian American Women Foundation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Isn't a notable organization. jwtmsqeh (talk) 07:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There appears to be sources for this organization including the LA Times, Santa Monica Daily Press, an interview with a local radio station, and a doctoral dissertation. I'll add them to the article a bit later tonight or tomorrow, just wanted to put them here for anyone else to evaluate etc. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Santa Monica Daily Press seems like a press release? The LA Times is actually a localized sub paper, not sure if that or the local radio is considered since Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) specifies that articles "solely from local media (e.g., the weekly newspaper for a small town), or media of limited interest and circulation (e.g., a newsletter exclusively for people with a very unusual job), is not an indication of notability". Also, the article is about an event but the same guideline says "an organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it". Happy to withdraw this if I'm misreading though. jwtmsqeh (talk) 20:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Support As per the wiki notability principle I don't think this article fulfil the minimal criteria prior to Subject Consideration possible reason fair enough भारतसरकार-विभाग (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 00:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I see a rough consensus that, while the article needs improvement, the subject meets WP:AUTHOR. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:46, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jon M. Sweeney

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article appears to be promotional and has been edited extensively by user:Jonmsweeney, user:Jonmsweeney1234 and user:Friedsparrow, all SPA accounts who have also added Sweeney's name to other articles.

Much promo text has been removed since the article was raised at COIN [36], what remains is poorly sourced and it does not seem clear that notability criteria have been met. Axad12 (talk) 06:54, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 July 31. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:09, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Christianity, and Illinois. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:40, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep & fix article issues (or draftify). Yes, the article has had extensive edits by CoI accounts. However, as noted in the nom, much of the promo text has been addressed. Poorly sourced is not the same as unsourced, and it also is different from "unsourcable". A quick look through JSTOR shows that Sweeney is an often referenced academic in his field, and I think that the subject would be found to be notable with a little bit of effort. Fixing an article's issues is generally preferable to deletion (WP:ATD), and if that can't be done, it should be draftified. ButlerBlog (talk) 12:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Butlerblog

Hi, yes point taken. Just to clarify on the issue of sources...

When I said "poorly sourced" above I meant that some of the material is entirely unsourced and some of the sources that do exist are either written by Sweeney himself or are to YouTube or are promotional links to where his books can be purchased on Amazon.

With regards to your comment re: "unsourcable", I think it's worth noting that the only person to have contributed to this article to any significant degree is the subject himself. If the subject has been unable to provide sourcing for basic info like his date of birth, place of birth, and details of his family history and educational history, then I think it's reasonable to assume that those details are indeed "unsourcable". Adding [citation needed] to that sort of thing would just be overly optimistic.

So, it seems to me that there are genuine issues on the sourcing here for about 50% of the material in the current article. That being the case, I would also support your secondary suggestion of draftify.

I take on board also the comments below re: reviews and WP:NAUTHOR. Axad12 (talk) 11:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Correcting myself, in my post above I said "The subject" but I ought to have said "the subject or someone editing on his behalf " Axad12 (talk) 12:02, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and address issues. Sweeney meets WP:NAUTHOR as multiple books have been the subject of reviews in reliable sources. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:04, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. While there are COI issues it isn't TNT level bad, so there's no use deleting this when he is notable. PARAKANYAA (talk) 07:58, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given the comments below, where is the evidence that the subject is notable? Axad12 (talk) 19:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I did find a few reviews of his books (and added one to the article). But most of his books are un-reviewed because citing Publisher's Weekly merely means that the book was published - PW's role in the world is to provide one-paragraph "reviews" (often no more than listings) to everything they receive so that bookstores and libraries can see what has been published. Those "reviews" do not provide notability. And even if he has a few notable books, an article about a person requires reliable sourcing about that person. I went through many pages of search results and did not find any independent biographical information. I can change my mind if someone finds that information. Lamona (talk) 23:49, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lamona: Sweeney's book have been reviewed by PW, Kirkus, Booklist, and Library Journal, which are often used to establish notability. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:12, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All of those are trade publications that review EVERYTHING. And their reviews are very brief. The policy says "non-trivial" and those are essentially the essence of trivial. Yes, they can be used as sources but no, they don't show notability. Aside from that, a review might show notability of an individual book, and this is an article for the author. "Wrote a lot of books" is not one of our notability criteria. Lamona (talk) 16:42, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lamona: If they review "EVERYTHING", why haven't they reviewed all of Sweeney's books? ETA: Per NBASIC, "Non-triviality is a measure of the depth of content of a published work, and how far removed that content is from a simple directory entry or a mention in passing ('John Smith at Big Company said...' or 'Mary Jones was hired by My University') that does not discuss the subject in detail." I would argue that having a single article dedicated to a book is not trivial -- even if the review is only a paragraph or two. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:46, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Detail" A single paragraph does not provide either detail nor much analysis. But again, this is an article for a PERSON. At least one WP:AUTHOR criterion must be met. You appear to think that he meets #3 of that policy. I would need more indication that he is considered "...an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors." That would be met when we would find other theologians referencing his works or writing about him. Lamona (talk) 03:55, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be arguing that since not all of his books have been reviewed, that demonstrates that he must be notable. That seems like a very questionable claim.

Evidently, if a non-notable author publishes a great many books the chances of some of them not appearing on the Publisher's World radar is rather high.

That doesn't indicate that the author is notable, if anything it indicates that he is not notable.

Realistically there will be 100s of 1,000s of non-notable authors worldwide who have published an endless stream of non-notable books. Some of their books will have been reviewed online either by PW or by some tame outlet which the author has connections to. That does not infer notability. Axad12 (talk) 08:14, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Axad12: How do you determine which types of reviews are worthwhile to determine notability? According to WP:GNG, "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The sources provided are considered reliable and independent, and given that they have full articles dedicated to each book, they also provide significant coverage. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:10, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Significa liberdade

To be honest, I'm not sure. However, I'd assume reviews in locations which (a) do not attempt to review vast numbers of books for internal publishing industry purposes, (b) can be reliably assumed to be independent of the author, (c) carry some kind of weight (i.e. not local newspapers, blogs, fringe publications, etc.), i.e. the sorts of basic qualifications that one would expect to see in relation to other Wikipedia policies on sourcing, notability, etc.

If any book review counts towards notability then pretty much every author ever published would qualify as notable for Wikipedia purposes - which I think we can agree cannot be correct.

I feel to some extent that the fact that we are having this discussion on reviews demonstrates the lack of notability. E.g. for a genuinely notable author it wouldn't be necessary to consider this point because reviews in well known newspapers, magazines and periodicals would be available in abundance. Axad12 (talk) 15:30, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to be adding a lot of Library Journal reviews to the page. Isn't that basically just another industry publication which mass produces reviews? Axad12 (talk) 15:40, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Axad12: Personally, I consider LJ, PW, Kirkus, and Booklist to be 1) reliable and 2) independent. Given that they provide significant coverage of each book (not just a trivial mention), I argue that they confirm notability. Can you explain why you do not consider them to be reliable or independent? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't say that. It was Lamona who said, above, "All of those are trade publications that review EVERYTHING".

My opinion is that a review in a source which reviews everything, or almost everything, cannot possibly confer notability because, if it did, almost all authors who have ever had a book published would be notable by Wikipedia standards - which evidently cannot be true.

Or do you believe that every single author who has ever had a book or two reviewed in those sources is notable by Wikipedia standards? Axad12 (talk) 17:13, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Axad12: I believe any "person has created or played a major role in co-creating a [...] collective body of work" that has "been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews" is notable. My understanding is that means that any author who has had multiple books reviewed in reliable trade magazines is notable by Wikipedia's standards. Can you point to guidelines or past AfD discussions that claim otherwise? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:19, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Axad12: I found three additional book reviews through JSTOR. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:14, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you have so much time to spare, maybe try finding some sources for the content of the actual article, which is currently notably bereft of sources.

Do be aware, however, that the subject (or someone very close to him) has been extensively COI editing the article under 3 accounts since it was set up 8 years ago, and even he was apparently unable to find sourcing for half of the material in the present article.

Good luck!

(P.S.: This is why 'draftify' is a very serious proposition.) Axad12 (talk) 17:20, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Axad12: Given the above, three people have !voted to keep and one delete, though they have not further replied. Personally, I believe that if we draftified, this article would pass through AfC and be back in the main space, given that it has at least three reliable, independent sources. For a suitable alternative, I could move the article to something like Jon M. Sweeney bibliography if biographical information cannot be found. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:31, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, at present it is 3:2 (rather than 3:1) in favour of Keep because, you also need to including my Delete vote as nominator. However, 2 of the 5 voters would also accept Draftify - so I would say that it is fairly close at present and the AfD really needs extra eyes on it rather than more comments from you and I.

I brought the AfD mainly on the strength of comments on the article talk page and a feeling that the extreme WP:PROMO nature of the article a few weeks ago indicated that there were potential issues over notability.

We've covered some issues above and I think that has been very useful, but I really think what is needed now is more eyes.

With regard to your idea above (J.M.Sw bibliography) I would say that that would be fine as it would prevent the article from becoming clogged up again with huge amounts of COI fluff, which will be the very likely result if the result of this AfD is Keep.

Best wishes and thanks for your thoughts above. Axad12 (talk) 17:49, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as nominator. Axad12 (talk) 17:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

your nomination statement counts as your delete vote Atlantic306 (talk) 18:54, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as passes WP:AUTHOR due to multiple reviews including academic coverage on JSTOR. Anything unsourced can be removed, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 18:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[1] HST page for this object

[1]