Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by India2685 (talk | contribs) at 01:31, 25 September 2013 (→‎File:1920 census Bolton.jpg). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

Request for undeletion (NAI LAC)

Church on the Living Edge

I was creating this page with consent of the church administrator, I was in the process of creating the page when it had gotten deleted for a reason that was not necessary. I would like to have it un-deleted or limited to access by only me until I complete it. PLease help me and i will make sure the page is done under the Wikipedia Guidelines and copyright rules.

Kind Regards, Jkm2900 -Jkm2900 (talk) 22:12, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I don't know what you mean by "a reason that was not necessary", but the article violated at least two Wikipedia policies, and at least one guideline. Apart from anything else, it was unambiguous promotion from start to finish. Wikipedia is not a medium for any organisations, including churches, to publish pages telling the world how wonderful they are. As for limiting access to one user, that is not possible, and completely contrary to the whole spirit of Wikipedia: anything you write is free to be edited by any other Wikipedia editor. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:16, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lana Buchyk

I now have reliable sources to insert in the article -Atevs3 (talk) 22:34, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Lana buchyk was a copyright violation from http://lanabuchyk.com/?page_id=69, so cannot be restored - see WP:Copy-paste. In any case, it was in a far too promotional and unencyclopedic style: "Due to her charisma and extroverted personality, new opportunities soon flooded in... " etc. You will have to write in your own words, and take care to use a neutral point of view - no opinions, no glowing adjectives, just plain facts of what she has achieved, cited to reliable sources. Read WP:Your first article for advice. JohnCD (talk) 10:12, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hot Dry Rock (HDR) Geothermal Energy

Duchane (talk) 22:48, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. A glitch in the coding (references need to be closed with "</ref>" not "<ref>") meant that only the first sentence was visible; that is probably why the submission was declined. I have sorted that out; suggest you check it over and re-submit. JohnCD (talk) 10:33, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bardel Entertainment

This page was first deleted through WP:PROD and subsequently through WP:CSD. I would like all of the revisions of this page (that is, from all three deletions) to be restored. I attempted to discuss this with the deleting administrator of the most recent revision, but the administrator in question simply ignored my request to explain the refusal to restore. Note that I am willing to edit the article to address the concerns brought up, but I would like as much material to work with as possible. -Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 07:34, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, partly. I have omitted a number of revisions from the second creation which were copyright violations from the company's website http://www.bardel.ca/company. I made a fearful hash of the partial restore (not enough coffee) but have finally got it right. As this title was salted by Bbb23 (talk), I have userfied it for you to User:Dogmaticeclectic/Bardel Entertainment. I restored the protection on the original title, and you should check with Bbb23 for permission to post your new version. JohnCD (talk) 11:10, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There is absolutely no reasonable justification whatsoever for the create protection, and I would therefore ask that you remove it immediately. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 11:40, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No, I will not overturn Bbb23's protection. Show him your draft and ask him. Failing that, you know the way to DRV. JohnCD (talk) 21:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WATG Designing Destinations - Wimberly Allison Tong & Goo

reasoning -Andreawestrich (talk) 21:12, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Triopoly (board game)

reasoning -72.67.21.191 (talk) 01:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC) There is no reason I can see to have deleted such page. Things do not need to be very notable to be mentioned here, and I can find plenty of third-party sources by googling the name. Being down on the list of Amazon sales is no reason to delete its Wiki page.[reply]

Meriton Group

reasoning -Mikihendler (talk) 02:41, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Meriton Group

I would like to get access to my initial information i wrote just for personal use.

Michele Wallace Campanelli

Michele Wallace Campanelli is an American writer. Her works include: Hero of Her Heart, Margarita, Keeper of the Shroud, Black Widow, Bigfoot Monster of the Ice. She has been published multiple times by Whiskey Creek Press and Chicken Soup for the Soul series.


Michele Wallace Campanelli is an American writer. Her works include: Hero of Her Heart, Margarita, Keeper of the Shroud, Black Widow, Bigfoot Monster of the Ice. She has been published multiple times by Whiskey Creek Press and Chicken Soup for the Soul series. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.102.67.167 (talk) 03:35, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • For this we will need to have a proper deletion review. In my opinion A7 does not apply, however the references do not prove anything. What we need are the actual newspaper pages and magazine articles about the person, not repetitions of things that they did not totally write. If you are in fact Michele Wallace Campanelli be aware it is best to let someone else write about you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

M.O.R.A. - more of radical architecture

relevant because it is a project by Christian Borngräber, producer and composer, collaborations with Conrad Schnitzler, Ernstalbrecht Stiebler and Ulrich Hornberg, producer and publisher of artists like Ofra Haza, Howard Jones, Richard Strange etc. -93.219.12.26 (talk) 11:02, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anamika mishra

Anamika Mishra is a notable new Indian Author. Various sources around the web justify that she is a real notable writer and blogger. There are various Indian websites like flipkart.com , Infibeam.com , BookAdda.com etc which are having her novel too hard to handle available for purchase. Her novel's fan page of facebook has over 3k likes and goodreads have over 9 reviews by various readers. Wikipedia is requested to undeletion of the page -115.244.131.76 (talk) 13:57, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mervyn52/sandbox

I, Mervyn52, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Mervyn52 (talk) 15:45, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

irish haggis

reasoning -Mervyn52 (talk) 15:46, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Replogle

I, 108.29.153.135, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 108.29.153.135 (talk) 01:13, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yukio Utada

I, Esm0070, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Esm0070 (talk) 01:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yukio Utada

This article was originally declined because of a claim that the sources were not verified, yet Yukio Utada is indeed a well known aikido instructor with rank given by the Yoshinkan style, which any simple google search could verify. I would like to figure out precisely what more needs to be done to the article to make sure it satisfies Wikipedia standards -Esm0070 (talk) 01:58, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • If you can come up with two independent reliable substantial references I will consider undeleting. YouTube is not reliable and the association founded by the person is not independent, so let me know if there are such sources. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:52, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

a very important national info wiki talking elaborately on Municipalities of Bangladesh, vital info about the top municipilities (pouroshovas) are not accessible thru this wiki.. KINDLY URGENTLY BRING THE BACKUP. -3gneoz (talk) 10:34, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Khopadi

I, Mahesh darade1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Mahesh darade1 (talk) 12:26, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. What this needs is references to confirm what it says. Check out the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source." JohnCD (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Cullather

reasoning -Baratta0810 (talk) 19:06, 19 September 2013 (UTC) I, Baratta0810, request the undeletion of this article deleted under CSD G4. I don't have access to the original article, so I am unsure of its contents and my version would have to be substantially different. My article followed the guidelines for reliable sources and was not unambiguously promotional like the previous version. Please userfy or restore as appropriate.[reply]

 Not done per WP:CSD#G5. This user also admits being a hired contractor "posting articles according to someone else's instructions" and in view of the subjects chosen this is clearly yet another of the banned Morning277 large-scale spamming group. JohnCD (talk) 21:31, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew James Allen

This is Andrew James Allen and the page that was created on my behalf was totally correct and I was happy with it and would like it to be restored please. Thank you. reasoning -Racer77 (talk) 19:25, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Schaefer

This page was deleted under the speedy deletion procedures since it was not fully completed. The page did not feature the articles about Rose and did not have enough time for the Jeopardy! fan community to contribute. This page should at least have 1 week for other contributors to add pictures, details, links, and references to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nvielmette (talkcontribs) 20:42, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/California Proposition 226 (1998)

edit and resubmittal -Forrman67 (talk) 22:22, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:16, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Washington Area Secular Humanists

I, PhillipCK1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. PhillipCK1 (talk) 23:36, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:34, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Felicks Book

Its the fastest growing most popular website at college campuses. -Felicks1993 (talk) 01:08, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about websites. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and, in regard to "fastest growing", see XKCD. JohnCD (talk) 09:31, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Goliath Technologies

I, Vtmhealy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Would like to rewrite for submissionVtmhealy (talk) 02:13, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page and submit it when ready; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:11, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Northey

This article was originally deleted because an editor said it didn't fit the guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia. It was re-created adding multiple national citations and substantiation for why it should be included - and its conformity with Wiki rules for inclusion. Several national magazines and publications authenticated the content and were cited in the re-created article. This person is a significant figure in the emerging digital media and social media genre. All citations were national in scope. I respectfully ask that it be re-instated -SweetSocial (talk) 04:05, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Northey, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user J04n (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.

Karim Vessal

He is a well known person in the field of radiology in Iran and the founding editor of the first medical journal in Iran this article was going to be expanded within few days}}. -HabibzadehParham (talk) 05:07, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:HabibzadehParham/Karim Vessal. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Bbb23 (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines WP:N, WP:BIO, WP:PROF - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. JohnCD (talk) 09:57, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dodmoor House

I, 81.178.135.21, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 81.178.135.21 (talk) 08:30, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. On inspection, this was an advertisement, posted by user Dodmoorhouse (talk). Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion. JohnCD (talk) 09:44, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brighton Gay Men's Chorus

46.65.53.252 (talk) 08:33, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - this was substantially a copy of the group's website, and so cannot be restored for copyright reasons. It would not be worth making a formal copyright release, because it was also too promotional in tone for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view. Read WP:Your first article and make another draft in your own words, making sure you have the references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources necessary to establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:25, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Luc Vandevelde

Luc Vandevelde · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

<extended text removed> - — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChangeCapital (talkcontribs) 09:55, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This is not the place to write a new article. The previous version will not be restored, because it was a copyright violation from http://www.famousbelgians.net/lucvandevelde.htm. If you wish to write a new article in your own words, you are welcome; advice on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 10:04, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

the house on the lake

reasoning -81.154.184.196 (talk) 11:41, 20 September 2013 (UTC) currently running at the Melbourne fringe festival. A midnight dreary, with Stefan Taylor. An audio preview can be found here.[reply]

Pingu (series 1)

It was deleted for no apparent reason by GiantSnowman -Visokor (talk) 17:26, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This was deleted by PROD, the reason given being "No references whatsoever. I can't establish notability"; but it cannot be restored because it is a blatant copyright violation from http://www.ovguide.com/tv_season/pingu-season-1-75669#. JohnCD (talk) 19:49, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Folkvang

I, Coldnorthernblood, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Coldnorthernblood (talk) 22:09, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joss-Ink

I, 212.183.128.248, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 212.183.128.248 (talk) 22:54, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Net4 is Notable company.

Yesterday, I created Net4 page. User:Virgininfatuation has tagged for deletion and suggest "that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion", I totally agree. But within 15 minute User:Jimfbleak deleted this page, all this happen within 5 hours. This is a panic action by User:Jimfbleak, which is unfortunate. Net4 is a company, founded in year 1985 and was no. 1 position as ISP, Domain registration and Web hosting many years. Company is still no. 1 in Hosting in India. I think this is not promotion and may need some time to add information about company. -GKCH (talk) 04:28, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Earth Girls Are Easy.jpg

It should be added again in Earth Girls Are Easy. -George Ho (talk) 04:58, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

paladi veera bhanu prakash

need people to know about the person paladi veera bhanu prakash -Pvbp2702 (talk) 12:12, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Poeta Callejero

They can not erase on article, because I write an article for a singer -Ottonielblanco119 (talk) 15:19, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the above user (Ottonielblanco119) has been indefinitely blocked as a sockpuppet of a user (Ottoniel Blanco) who was indefinitely blocked in February 2013 for inappropriate article creation and other violations. Consider his comment above accordingly. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 16:09, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted per G5. Creations by banned or blocked users. Dougweller (talk) 16:52, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Asian Peach Day

This article was written and supposedly taken down by the user. I was given an Assignment from my Current School to try and get a copy of this page. If it is possible i could get a copy or have the page undeleted, That would be wonderful. Also, I Am not entirely sure of the title of the page. I may be "Asian Peach Day" or something alongs those lines. Thank You. -68.147.53.102 (talk) 17:26, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done because I can't find the page in question. Thank you for saying that you weren't sure about the title, because I knew that I should look for alternate names. Unfortunately, I can't find anything that's at all similar, so I will not be able to help you. If you find or remember the page title in the future, please come back and ask again. Nyttend (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

zarsoo enterprises

reasoning -Surajx4u1 (talk) 19:56, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing promotional or advertisement in the content. Last content seem promotional, no problem but doesn't seem now!

lars rüetschi

reasoning -178.194.107.232 (talk) 20:14, 21 September 2013 (UTC) http://www.music-chart.info/Switzerland/archive/genre/2/Blues/2013/08/10#21[reply]

(Non-administrator comment)There's a deletion log for Lars Rüetschi, but it indicates there was only a redirect there (I don't know whether it led to anything useful. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lars Rüetschi has been restored, but hasn't been approved as an article because better sources are needed. Peter James (talk) 22:04, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/List of startups in Portland, Oregon page

I, Hobsonlane, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Hobsonlane (talk) 21:15, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Midual

Company still exists, based in the city of Angers (France),official name is RDMO, bike is still in development -88.74.141.162 (talk) 23:08, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shanye Skov

reasoning -Matabs2000 (talk) 23:08, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Steel Wars, Full Armor Combat competition

Request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.5.233.115 (talk) 23:27, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


I did not know I had to update the page every six months. I am sorry. -108.5.233.115 (talk) 23:30, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not update every 6 months, but make pogress towards being accepted as an article. Hasteur (talk) 00:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Andy Griffith

Please restore article deleted at this location to my user space -Jax 0677 (talk) 00:03, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Jax 0677/Template:Andy Griffith. King of 00:25, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vrishanana yogini

reasoning -117.239.184.218 (talk) 13:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pisi Linux

Accept the need for improvements and ask that the article be undeleted to enable editing. -86.29.131.84 (talk) 19:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bay Area Women's and Children's Center

I, 4bawcc, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 4bawcc (talk) 22:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:Before restoration, please observe that user's name could be construed as a role/COI based accont as "For Bay Area Women's and Children's Center). Hasteur (talk) 00:21, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • 4bawcc please change your user name as users here have to represent people not organisations. Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bay Area Women's and Children's Center (BAWCC)

I just received updates from the BAWCC for the article. I'm sorry that it has taken so long. Thanks in advance. -4bawcc (talk) 22:46, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:Before restoration, please observe that user's name could be construed as a role/COI based accont as "For Bay Area Women's and Children's Center) Hasteur (talk) 00:23, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Finite Congruence Lattice Problem

I, 98.25.165.203, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 98.25.165.203 (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ventimeglia

{{subst:refund|1= pageName |2=reasoning


The "Ventimeglia" is a customized Starbucks order defined by a very popular Youtube Celebrity. Many viewers like to know and have a place to refer to regarding it's contents, in order to get one of their own at Starbucks. There are no other applicably valid websites that have official documentation for the fans of the celebrity. Please undo the deletion of this article, as it is a notable subject of interest. Information will and can be added to the page upon it's return.


Thank you.

The Church and Internet

This is now a redirect. Perhaps recover deleted history logs? -George Ho (talk) 06:29, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creating Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Concentration (psychology)

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Samwass (talk) 10:17, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Forden

Deleted via WP:PROD due to alleged lack of notability, however, composer has done many scores for videogames, including scores for Mortal Kombat. -—Locke Coletc 10:42, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

plate heat exchanger

reasoning -59.95.14.32 (talk) 12:23, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Article has not been deleted (though this IP had blanked its content and it was promptly restored by another editor). DMacks (talk) 13:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maarouf Mawloud

it is really not logical why the page is deleting many times since that guy has the opportunity to have his name on wikipedia cause he is the younger journalist in fiba world cup and he is one of the famous young journalist in lebanon add on he is a technical staff in First basketball division team and i provided you with references so it is not logical a page for a famous journalist has been deleted -Lebanonsports (talk) 16:50, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. DMacks (talk) 13:56, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Janna McMahan

I, Dbloom803, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Dbloom803 (talk) 19:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at user:Dbloom803/Janna McMahan. DMacks (talk) 14:01, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Storyofmenstruationtitle.jpg, File:Story of menstruation 2.jpg

See below -TJRC (talk) 20:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See below -TJRC (talk) 20:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

These two files were believed to be in the public domain, and were therefore transwikied to Commons and deleted here in 2011. The public domain conclusion was premised on the fact that the film was published pre-1964 and the assertion that its copyright was never renewed. However, in June 2013, an IP editor noted that the copyright had in fact been renewed, and the film was not in the public domain: [1]. Although this edit was unsourced, and I was initially skeptical (in fact, I initially reverted it as unsourced), I have followed up and confirmed that it was renewed; see renewal registration no. R564909, Dec. 3, 1973, recorded in Catalog of copyright entries. Ser.3 pt.12–13 v.24–27 1970–1973 Motion Pictures. U.S. Copyright Office. 1973. p. 118.

Because of the renewal, the film and its screenshots are not public domain, and will need to be deleted from Commons. However, they certainly are allowable as fair use, so I'd like them to be restored here before I move to delete from Commons, to retain their origin and history, as required by the applicable CC or GFDL license and to avoid the article The Story of Menstruation being messed up. TJRC (talk) 20:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done both. Pleae update their licensing status on the description-pages. DMacks (talk) 20:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Telegin

Please restore edit history of this recently recreated article. -Dolovis (talk) 17:43, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done King of 00:28, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orange County Waves (WPSL)

I came to start this article then saw it was deleted under G7 in January 2012. I wasn't the original author but I want to make it again (it meets all relevant notability guidelines etc.) Please could it be restored or sent to my userspace for me to improve it first? Thank you in advance. Clavdia chauchat (talk) 20:27, 24 September 2013 (UTC) -Clavdia chauchat (talk) 20:27, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Clavdia. I have userfied the article to User:Clavdia chauchat/Orange County Waves and made some tweaks. Remember to remove the nowiki tags around the categories I added before you move the page to the mainspace. Also, note that the title should not have "(WPSL)" in it. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:23, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Modelo causal de Rubin

Es una traducción al español de la página Rubin causal model -LKs (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done This is the English Wikipedia. If you want to translate this article into Spanish, that belongs at the Spanish Wikipedia, which is a separate website. Also note that you must provide copyright attribution to the source of your translation. The way to do this (at the Spanish Wikipedia, which I linked) is to provide in the edit summary a note such as "Translating article from the English Wikipedia at [[:en:Rubin causal model]]". I will place a machine translation of this message below. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:52, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No realizado. Esta es la Wikipedia en Inglés. Si quieres traducir este artículo en español, que pertenece a la Wikipedia Español, es un sitio web independiente que. También tenga en cuenta que debe proporcionar la atribución de derechos de autor a la fuente de su traducción. La manera de hacer esto (en la Wikipedia española, que he vinculado) es proporcionar en el edit summary una nota como "artículo Traducir de la Wikipedia en Inglés [[:en:Rubin causal model]]". Saludos--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:52, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Db-g13/sandbox

Was erroneously deleted as CSD:G7 which was never requested. -Technical 13 (talk) 22:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done King of 00:34, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Db-g13/testcases

Was erroneously deleted as CSD:G7 which was never requested. -Technical 13 (talk) 22:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done King of 00:34, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/YPA Streetball

I, 24.4.209.239, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 24.4.209.239 (talk) 23:38, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Andy LoCascio

Subject is in fact notable and entire article is factual. Additional citations could easily be added. Subject is the host and founder of one of longest running fishing TV shows in the USA (neangling.com). Subject is the founder of Sound Strategies (soundst.com) creators of the new scotusblog.com domain which is the first web site to receive a Peabody Award and a leading development and SEO firm in NY. No reply was recieved from user Legoktm regasrdnig this deletion. -Locascioa (talk) 23:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:1920 census Bolton.jpg

image was deleted but is used as a reference in an article, deleter only looked to see if image was displayed and did not check if it was used as a reference -Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 00:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Enso Care

I could edit the article created to make it more Encyclopedia - befitting which may have come across as promotion as written previously. The reason given was that it was written in an improper manner. Would request you to evaluate the content first and see if it is befitting Wikipedia's criteria for importance -India2685 (talk) 01:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vaibhav Maloo

Circumstances evolving around him have changed and he has been in constant limelight and is second in command ( Managing Director, as of 2013 )of a USD 7 billion group. He is chairman of the largest PPP in healthcare in India and is an alumnus of Oxford, Carnegie Mellon and Cambridge. He is the legal heir to this gigantic empire and is more noteworthy than Vanisha Mittal, Siddharth Mallya and Reddy who have been given space on this credible, reliable and complete website, that is, Wikipedia. He has had over 200 press releases in this year alone and has over 50000 twitter followers and 2000 likes on his fan page on facebook. because we tried to create his page several times and there may have been incidents of sabotage, his page has been blocked for creation, please advise whether he fits wikipedia's criteria for undeletion and whether I should bother creating a page for him -India2685 (talk) 01:22, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]