Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Theproeditor7 (talk | contribs) at 14:40, 11 July 2020 (→Lightstep, Inc.: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests to unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests to unprotect, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

    This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

    Shortcuts

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in two cases. The first case is restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or stale Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. In the second use case, this page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as a draft or emailed to you; this way, the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). Be clear as to which namespace is intended, when requesting a refund of a deleted article.

    This means that content deleted after discussion – through deletion processes – may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process but through deletion review instead. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided.

    Do not request that pages or media deleted under speedy deletion criteria F7, F9, F11, U5, A7, A9, A11, G3, G4, G10, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

    Instructions for special cases:

    Enter the page's title:

    Deletion discussions
    Articles
    Templates and modules
    Files
    Categories
    Redirects
    Miscellany
    Speedy deletion
    Proposed deletion


    Draft:Des Plaines Park District Yacht Club

    I, 73.44.164.5, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 73.44.164.5 (talk) 17:46, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please not that this appeases to have significant problems with notability, and has no inline citations. I would advise that you discuss it with the most recent reviewer, DGG, or at the Teahouse, before trying to resubmit it for review. Please read our guideline for the notability of organizations and Refwerencing for Beginners. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 14:41, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Nepal BIM Forum

    I, Karkimahesh, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Karkimahesh (talk) 19:10, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please note Karkimahesh that multiple independent published reliable sources will be needed, each offering significant coverage, for this to be approved. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 15:28, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Craig Reynolds (drummer)

    I, Hyu678, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hyu678 (talk) 09:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Have more info and reliable sources —Hyu678 (talk) 09:04, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please note, Hyu678, that multiple reliable sources each offering significant coverage will be needed for this to be approved. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 15:22, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:DZMM TeleRadyo 2014.svg

    File that was deleted by @Explicit:, on the basis under CSD F5 for not being unused non-free media file after becoming an orphan on this revision, in which this needs to be restore back to the originated article and it is also licensed under Fair Use. —Movies Time (talk) 09:04, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Module:Set

    The reasoning at TfD was that the module is unused. However, it is actually used by Module:Parameters. ——⁠andrybak (talk) 11:16, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Kaleigh Riehl

    page was deleted for failing WP:NFOOTY. Now passes WP:NFOOTY as Riehl played in a competitive game between two teams from fully professional leagues [1] —Joeykai (talk) 15:55, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:AndresHemps

    User:AndresHemps · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions] I want to set up my profile page, deleted it without considering its benefits — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndresHemps (talk • contribs) 17:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done AndresHemps, The page User:AndresHemps never had any content except for a request to delete it, as far as I can see. There is thus no point in undeleting it. You may create a new user page at any time you wish -- the old one does not need to be undeleted first. Please read our policy on user pages. In general your user page sho0uld be a description of you as a Wikipedia editor. This may include any or all of: brief biographical info; lists of interests; past articles edited (the more significant ones); to-do lists; statements of Wikipedia policy or philosophy; brief quotes; a few freely licensed images; barnstars and other accomplishments; service awards; and/or other content related to Wikipedia. It shoul;d not be a draft of an article, or something that looks like an article about yourself. it should not be an advertisement or promotion for anything. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 19:30, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:List of soccer matches with highest attendance by U.S. state

    I, Quidster4040, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Quidster4040 (talk) 17:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

     Done -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:06, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Courtesy ping Quidster4040 per talk page suggestion. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Manufacting

    I, Zimm1111, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Zimm1111 (talk) 20:51, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

     Done -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:07, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Courtesy ping Zimm1111 per talk page suggestion. Please be aware that while I have acceded to the undeletion request, I was unable to find any evidence that the neologism actually exists. Accordingly I have nominated it for speedy deletion as a likely hoax. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Blue_Riband/sandbox

    I requested deletion because I had left Wikipedia. I'm now back to actively editing. —Blue Riband► 21:10, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Welcome back! -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Courtesy ping Blue Riband per talk page suggestion. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    King Jomo

    I, Happinesskalu, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Happinesskalu (talk) 02:02, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    •  Already done by Justlettersandnumbers. 23:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

    Adam Karol Czartoryski

    The subject may be notable and deserves an AfD. Here's a quick ref to satisfy BLP concerns: [2] —Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    DoneI added in the source you supplied, Piotrus, and removed a good deal of puffery from the article. But it will need additional sources if it is to survive an AfD. I suspect that they are out there. IMO it could also use further cleanup. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 16:06, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    chingari app

    most viral tiktok rival application of India, people are searching for its wiki but there was no such info present. I submitted one. "Publish changes" button below —103.211.55.174 (talk) 07:49, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done The page was here: Chingari app, but it was very promotional in tone. It does look to be a notable topic. However I would consider making this a draft if you are willing to cut the puffery. Alternatively a registered user could recreate this as a neutral article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:25, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Please see if you can do that draft thing, that would be helpful for all. --103.211.55.189 (talk) 12:03, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Dating

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —129.205.124.34 (talk) 08:14, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Robert Queen

    I, KATianga, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. KATianga (talk) 14:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Q101.2

    Just recreated as a redirect to topic. The articles on the rest of the stations in this network are in dire shape and it's no wonder this got prodded. Is it possible to get it userfied to User:Raymie/Q101.2 so I can see if it had anything salvageable? —Raymie (t • c) 19:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Graeme Bartlett: Thanks! I took the cats from there and added them to the Q101.2 redirect before tagging for U1. Raymie (t • c) 00:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    2601:3C7:200:85D0:6D4D:E904:EECE:545E

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 2601:3C7:200:85D0:6D4D:E904:EECE:545E (talk) 06:18, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft: Nibulismul

    I, 5.12.42.214, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 5.12.42.214 (talk) 12:31, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done. This draft was entirely in a language other than English, apparently Romanian at least according to Google Translate. If you choose to register an account, IP editor, and leave a message for me, I will email you the text through the "email this user" function (not available for unregistered users) and you can translate it if you so choose. Not that it did not cite sources, which would be needed. I cannot judge its notability at this time. Or you can start over with an AfC draft. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 15:05, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Naturesave Insurance

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Sheridan C Doyle (talk) 16:09, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I have had my page deleted for Naturesave Insurance that I made today. I wrote this in 2011 and it was fine until 2018 when another person made some changes to it and it was deleted but I don't know why. I then put up my original (as i know this complied fine) and added changes with fresh news from the business' website to make it more interesting. This page however again got deleted. Can I go in and remove some of the articles as if I take out the services this may then read better as I didnt realise it was noncompliant having written the original page almost a decade ago.

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naturesave Insurance, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. In addition, Sheridan C Doyle, the most recent version was apparently an infringement of copyright. Until a version can be crested that does not infringe copyright, and deals with the issues discussed in the deletion discussion (largely notability) there will not be an article. Note that the article having been present without challenge for several years does not mean that it was OK, merely that no one happened to notice it and take the trouble to nominate it for deletion. Note also that is is not your page, it is Wikipedia's article.
    I would suggest that you start a draft if you think the company can pass WP:NCORP. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 16:51, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Āya to Majo logo.png

    Article about the subject of the non-free logo was moved back to the main namespace. —Thibaut (talk) 18:58, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ken Charles (footballer)

    I, Wennith, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wennith (talk) 20:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    HungerStation

    HungerStation is one of the most popular online food ordering platform in Saudi Arabia and it is used by many peoples which means that it is popular and must be published in wikipedia, so i think it's illogical to retarget the page,—Aziz bm (talk) 00:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done Three versions created were very promotional. If there were actually independent references to support an article, then once could replace a redirect. But such an article must contain no puffery such as "ease" "favorite" "confort", and will not be written in the voice of the company. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I’ve just edited the page in draft, see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:HungerStation should this get published ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aziz bm (talk • contribs) 14:45, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Kwak Sang-hoon

    I, Ericgyuminchoi, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ericgyuminchoi (talk) 05:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Hybrid workplace

    I, Djm-leighpark, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Djm-leighpark (talk) 07:47, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. SoWhy 11:08, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    List of sex symbols

    Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sex symbols (4th nomination) was closed as "delete". The last paragraph of the closing statement said:

    While we are fond of saying that AfD is not cleanup, I am ultimately convinced that the "delete" side's argument that the lack of consensus about inclusion criteria prevents us from writing a high-quality list with this title is a strong one. Together with the "delete" side's numerical majority, I am satisfied that we have rough consensus for deletion until there is a solid consensus among interested editors for establishing inclusion criteria. To establish such consensus, the article can be draftified or userfied, and if such consensus can be established, the article can be restored.

    Would an admin draftify List of sex symbols and Talk:List of sex symbols to Draft:List of sex symbols and Draft talk:List of sex symbols so that the community can work on establishing inclusion criteria for the list? The closing admin suggested asking at WP:REFUND for draftifying the pages. Thanks, —Cunard (talk) 09:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    •  Doing... Will take me a while because of the history. Regards SoWhy 09:34, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • information Note: I somehow thought that the deletion and restore limit for admins was 5,000 revisions but apparently it's now(?) 997 revisions. I first thought it's my browser so I'll go {{trout}} myself for taking a while to get it. I posted a request to the stewards' request board for restoration of the rest. Regards SoWhy 10:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:The Elder Scrolls VI

    I, AirshipJungleman29, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:54, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. SoWhy 11:08, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Timeline of computing 2020–29

    I, Enrinor, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Enrinor (talk) 15:04, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. But, Enrinor this has no significant content, just a frame so far. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 15:13, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Bude Tunnel

    I, Chess, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Chess (talk) (please use {{ping|Chess}} on reply) 16:20, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that no one ever submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Please note, Chess, that the draft does not yet have any cited sources at all. Some will be needed before this becomes an article. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:04, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    GeoTrust

    Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeoTrust. Not uncontested - if anything lack of consensus as it only had one vote which was keep I listed more detail below —PKIhistory (talk) 01:06, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I request undeletion of GeoTrust as a "soft delete" as I originally contested this but decided to step away to prevent an editing war. GeoTrust is an important part of TLS/SS history and User:Dyork was the only vote which was a keep vote. If anything this should be kept for lack of consensus but it is not an uncontested Prod and appears to have been on Wikipedia since 2007. Every other certificate authority has a wikipedia page and GeoTrust invented the domain validated certificate technique. I request the page be undeleted so better sources can be cited. There are reputable, notable sources listed and you can find much information on the company from a google search, scholar and many books on certificate authorities/ encryption.

    @Graeme Bartlett: - Thank you for the undeletion. I will aim to work on improving the sources over the next couple of weeks. - Dyork (talk) 01:13, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Joseph Pamplany

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —2409:4073:181:E56A:8C6F:2587:BD4D:5B0F (talk) 04:22, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Udit Batra

    I, Jasonpark81, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jasonpark81 (talk) 05:20, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    draft:Irdeto

    I, Pedrogolo, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pedrogolo (talk) 08:53, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Tattoo Tom

    I, Hufflife, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hufflife (talk) 09:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Pharmaceutical Reference Standards

    the content is still up to date and of value for readers Andrea Alfredo Lodi (talk) 12:02, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Victor North

    I, 23.92.143.145, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 23.92.143.145 (talk) 13:58, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:53, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Pak Choong-hoon

    I, Ericgyuminchoi, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ericgyuminchoi (talk) 14:13, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    David_Katz_(author)

    I am the author of 3 books on the music and culture of Jamaica and the broader Caribbean, including the authorised biography of Jamaican producer and performing artist Lee 'Scratch' Perry. I have contributed to many other books and have produced several documentaries for Public Radio International, the BBC and other entities. I have also run a monthy music event in Brixton, south London, for over 16 years. The page must be reinstated! —82.29.123.254 (talk) 15:00, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Are you sure you want this? That article was a blatant advertisement, and if it were undeleted, it would be sent to Articles for Deletion immediately, if not speedily deleted. It also looks as if you have been editing it yourself, is that the case? Guy (help!) 15:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Mother India poster.jpg

    It was deleted under WP:CSD#F8, but since the Commons file has been deleted (DR), this file should be restored, albeit at a smaller size (and placed on Mother India, with the caption and alt text restored from this revision). —-BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 16:46, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Bandai Namco logo.png

    Restore the non-free logo image for use in Bandai Namco Holdings as the logos on Commons were deleted. —Wcam (talk) 17:42, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    David Katz (author)

    I am the author of three books about the music and culture of Jamaica and the wider Caribbean, including the authorised biography of Jamaican producer and perfomer Lee 'Scratch' Perry. My books have been published in English, Japanese, Italian and French and I have contributed to many music anthologies and other books about culture. I have also produced documentaries for Public Radio International, the BBC and other entities. The wikipedia page I set up at David_Katz_(author) is valid and in regular use, please undelete the page now. --1dubwize (talk) 21:29, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:33, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Ready Player Two

    I was wondering if the redirect for the page (which I created) can be restored —Starzoner (talk) 22:02, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done Starzoner the redirect, which pointed to Ready Player One, has been replaced by an article about the novel Ready Player Two which includes a link to Ready Player One. Did you really want the article deleted and the redirect restored? That seems unlikely and unhelpful. If not, please explain just what you did want, and please ping me. Thank you. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 15:23, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Category:Boy Scout Councils in Georgia (U.S. state)

    Category is not empty —--evrik (talk) 04:08, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    New Pampas Stadium

    I, VelikiMeshtar, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VelikiMeshtar (talk) 14:30, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Stadium is under construction, will be finished soon —VelikiMeshtar (talk) 14:32, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Indrajit Banerjee

    I, Nikbanterjee, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nikbanterjee (talk) 22:38, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:53, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Five point scale

    I want to see if there is usable content at the article Five point scale which could be added as a section to Autism therapies. It didnt make it as a standalone article twelve years ago and it still wouldnt today, but searching for material is hampered by the fact that now, as then, the term "five point scale" can refer to so many other things and that even when I search specifically for its use in autism-related settings I only find uses that are different from what I remember. It's possible that my vote in 2008 was too kind and that the content was unusable all along, but I am no longer an admin and cannot see the page. Thank you, —Soap— 22:42, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Soap, there's nothing to salvage. The full contents of the deleted page, aside from the AfD template, follows: The five point scale is a guide used for high function autistic persons whos actions are acceptable the being most and the 5 being the least acceptable. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:53, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay thank you. I am going to have to try to get access to the book I read, and see if that book states where the method came from, and then go there to see if they're still using it. I won't be able to do that for a while, but I should be able to handle it on my own. Thanks again for checking the deleted text. —Soap— 22:58, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Down Town Mystery (album)

    Deleted the page because the info was included at Down Town Mystery, but there is a consensus to split the page and to use this page again. —reppoptalk 00:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Abdorrahman Boroumand Center

    I, Iakrg, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Iakrg (talk) 00:08, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Emilian people

    The Emilians are an ethnic group, like the Sards, but the formers aren't just anthropologically interesting as the latters to people. They speak their own language in all its dialects, they share part of their ancestry, they have common mythological beliefs. So Catalans are considered an ethnic group just because they are under mediatic attentions? Friulians just because their language was recently recognized as such instead of an Italian dialect (Illogical to think such a different language is an Italian dialect, but many people still believe this)? I understand the lack of sources and labelling as WP:OR my article, but this:
    " Entirely unsourced WP:OR essay trying to present the population of a regional subdivision of Italy as if it were a separate "ethnic group". [Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)] "

    This makes me really annoyed, Emilia is not a regional subdivision of Italy (that's Regione Emilia-Romagna, created in 1970 by Italian Gov.t without completely respecting cultural and linguistical borders), rather a millenaire historical area, modern Italy is a way younger concept than Emilia. I am not requesting the page undeletion, I am going to find the necessary reliable sources to request it, but respect, respect for an ethnic group, because it is, with or without sources. Some of Italy ethnicities:

    -Sardinians;
    -Friulians;
    -Sicilians;
    -Ladins;
    -Arbëreshës;
    -Occitans;
    -Catalans;
    -Francoprovençals/Arpitans;
    -Grikos;
    -several Germanic peoples, such as Walser, Cimbrian, Mochens, Austrians (Südtirolers), etc... ;
    -Corsicans;
    -Lombards (modern);
    -Piedmontese people;
    -Ligurians;
    -Venetians;
    -Emilian-Romagnols (Emilians and Romagnols);
    -Romani people;
    -all the immigrates.

    The rest of Southern Italy is more complicated to list, but still has its ethnicities. I am surely forgetting some.

    Italian is not a real ethnicity, but a superethnicity, like Germans and Europeans (anyways I know all Italian ethnicities have been historically linked, who more who less, but all the Europeans folks too).

    A lot of other nations and ethnicities are still not recognized, maybe there are not sources to publish their ethnical status on Wikipedia, so they are condemned to be forgotten and their tongues, customs and traditions to burn out.

    Bye, --Liviojavi (talk) 01:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Category: Jimmy Neutron characters

    • Category: Jimmy Neutron characters · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions] Two decades ago this Nickelodeon related category was deleted because it was not notable enough compared to the other categories. And here we are in a brand new decade, by me creating pages for five of the series’ characters namely his robot canine Goddard, Carl Wheezer, his own parents, and Libby Folfax. Yes he is a NickToon series and character, but listing him under that category would be redundant right? It should be restored completely without any exceptions. Thank you and good night.

    I had re-evaluated two of the aforementioned drafts yesterday after Robert McClenon rejected them. And when the other five characters are done with the evaluation goodbye redirects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.81.163.178 (talk) 13:27, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Impute.me

    I, Yinwang888, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Yinwang888 (talk) 07:03, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Franklin Fiifi Fiavi Kwetey

    Franklin Fiifi Fiavi Kwetey suffers unduly from the the current portrayal on the Wikipedia page. Wikipedia is a good and useful media that are used by millions for information on individuals and other subjects. The current portrayal of Fiifi is a deliberate lie calculated to embarrass him and reduce his standing not only among Ghanaians but his friends and associates around the world.

    The portrayal on Wikipedia which bears the name Fiifi Kwetey as it is now is part of sustained negative campaigning by political opponents calculated to cause Fiifi disaffection and ill will. Beside this is also not true of the personality we have come to know in the last two decades.

    Fiifi is a household name in Ghana for decades, this is the result of years of political leadership and activism, public service and youth mobilisation for entrepreneurship and National development.

    From his student's days at the University of Ghana Fiifi has been part of political discussion on major radio and television stations and for all these years no complaint was made about him about his comments about Islam.

    Fiifi was the Publisher of a well-known newspaper called the Crystal Clear Lens which had a wide Circulation in every part of Ghana; the paper was never once reported or cited for publishing anti-Islamic sentiments.

    Fiifi became the National Communications Secretary of National Democratic Congress, the Political Party that has ruled Ghana longer than any other party in Ghana. This Party is known for having massive support among Muslims and communities of Muslim inhabitants in Ghana, not once has any member of this community raised issues of Islamophobia against Fiifi.

    Between 2009 and 2017 Fiifi was nominated for and appointed to the positions of Deputy Minister of Finance, Minister of State at the Presidency, Minister of Agriculture and Minister of Transport of the Republic of Ghana; for these positions Fiifi was vetted by the Appointments Committee of Parliament whose membership included seasoned politicians of the Opposition New Patriotic Party, through all these vettings which had memos submitted from the general Public not once was the issue of anti Islamic comments raised in the vetting.

    For Close to 8yrs Fiifi has been the member of Parliament for the Biggest Constituency in Ghana. In all these elections Fiifi have have won through landslides. The Ketu South Constituency has large sections of Muslim Inhabitants but not once has it been mentioned that Fiifi has ever made anti Islamic Sentiments anywhere.

    Ghana has a vibrant media with hundreds of radio stations and Television Stations and even more newspapers. On a daily basis there is always reports on the activities of Franklin Fiifi Fiavi Kwetey but none of them has ever reported on any anti-Islamic comments by Fiifi.

    We invite your organisation to do a thorough investigation to find out the veracity or otherwise of what the current post says about Fifi.

    Sir, i will be very happy to post a balanced report on Franklin Fiifi Fiavi Kwetey that will reflect his contributions to Socioeconomic and Political development in Ghana for the benefit of all your millions of readers after your assessment.

    Fiifi is only trying to put out the most accurate information on your medium. If there is anything else we can do to bring our page back or correct the existing information on Fiifi, please let us know.

    Thank you. —Jahcure45 (talk) 13:06, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    There is no deleted article under that name. I assume you're referring to Fiifi Kwetey which isn't deleted. Praxidicae (talk) 13:37, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Motorcycle Roadracing Association

    I, Jjbbrewer, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jjbbrewer (talk) 14:59, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Jjbbrewer This has been restored 3 times after three G13 deletions, but you have made exactly one edit to it sicne 2016. I think this should be the last restore for this draft, please work on it or indicate that you do not plan to do so. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 15:52, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:C I D.jpg

    This redirect was speedy deleted erroneously by a bot since at the time, it targeted File:C I D. (1956 movie poster).jpg, which was speedy deleted per WP:G7 after its former content was moved to File:C.I.D. 1956 poster.jpg. Please restore this redirect and if necessary, have it target File:C.I.D. 1956 poster.jpg, the place where this title's file is currently located. (Also, please restore its respective talk page.) —Steel1943 (talk) 15:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Also, FWIW, please see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 February 17#File:C I D.jpg for further information. Steel1943 (talk) 19:47, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Victor M Torres

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Selah210 (talk) 16:05, 10 July 2020 (UTC) I want to retrieve submission for corrections (also Draft talk:Victor M Torres)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Selah210 this will need a lot of work. Please read Wikipedia's golden rule, referencing for Beginners, and Your First Article. Please remember that Wikipedia articles must be neutral not promotional. I have donesome limited cleanup and copy editing, but there is more to do here than I have time for. After reading the pages at those links, you may want to visit the Teahouse for further assistance]]. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 16:36, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Cranley, Suffolk

    I, Crouch, Swale, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:20, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Bayside_Community_Emergency_Relief

    I, Tralis2, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tralis2 (talk) 05:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Template:Solar Hijri calendar

    I, 95.49.1.187, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 95.49.1.187 (talk) 13:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Lightstep, Inc.

    {{subst:refund Lightstep, Inc. The article was purely written using references from various reputed news agencies. Not even a single line was written without reference. I don't know how it was Unambiguous advertising or promotion? Lightstep,_Inc. has raised more than $40 Million in fundings and this story has been covered by many big and reputed news agencies. Such an organization will inspire many people so I think the article deserves to be on Wikipedia. Also, I've tried contacting the user(s) who deleted the article but no response from their side. }}

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=967164198"