User talk:Scalhotrod

User	Talk	Contributions	eMail	Articles	WikiProjects	Bookmarks	My Sandbox

• "When trying to justify the addition of criticism, please don't emphasize that it's factual and sourced. That is not the issue. Being factual and sourced is NEVER enough to justify adding anything to an article. Just stick to trying to convince us that's it due. HiLo48 (talk)"

• "Here on Wikipedia, it's OK to be an idiot or do something stupid as long as you are willing to take responsibility and own up to it when you are called on it." - Source Unknown

• Just as "ignorance of the law" is no excuse for breaking it, personal ignorance of any subject here on Wikipedia is no excuse for deletion, significant change, or general mucking up of ANY article. WP policy not-with-standing, extolling whatever rule that suits an interest under the guise of being an ignorant dolt is never justification for any edit.

• Sadly, I am the author of this article... WikiBigotry

		The Barnstar of Diplomacy
		Thank you for helping to peacefully resolve a great many of the challenges that we're seeing in some of our firearms articles. Justanonymous (talk) 19:12, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	For your recent (fantastic) articles on things as varied as architects, popular culture and the banjo, I award you this barnstar. Keep up the great work! :). Ironholds (talk) 02:01, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

The Barnstar of Diplomacy

I just want to say you are doing a great job of taking the workload of working on the lede in the Second Amendment article. Im making quibbles to make improvements that I see, but I do not want you to interpret that as anything other than collaboration - you are doing the tough job of proposing text, and getting shot down by everyone else :). I think the various revisions are noticeably better from revision to revision, and we are narrowing in on something that everyone can agree to. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:59, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Scalhotrod. You have new messages at Cavarrone's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

International Harvester Metro photo

Hello, Scalhotrod. You have new messages at SJ Morg's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

IMFDB

Hello, Scalhotrod. You have new messages at Zackmann08's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Death's Apprentice, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, MrX

ANI on Andy

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
709		Defence mechanisms (talk)						Add sources
249		Playboy Online (talk)						Add sources
70		Caplock mechanism (talk)						Add sources
28		Allison Parks (talk)						Add sources
41		Tactical pants (talk)						Add sources
10		EnvisionTEC (talk)						Add sources
386		Hillary Fisher (talk)						Cleanup
720		Occupational safety and health (talk)						Cleanup
5,228		Narcissistic personality disorder (talk)						Cleanup
1,178		2012 Aurora shooting (talk)						Expand
286		Gun law in the United States (talk)						Expand
367		Border Security Force (talk)						Expand
124		Shae Marks (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,377		Usage share of web browsers (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,156		Legal status of Internet pornography (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
290		Playboy Enterprises (talk)						Merge
89		Larry Elder (talk)						Merge
75		Consumer-to-consumer (talk)						Merge
5		Tshegofatso Seakgoe (talk)						Wikify
11,660		Internet Movie Database (talk)						Wikify
0		Neocollyris compressicollis (talk)						Wikify
49		April Summers (talk)						Orphan
1		Scott Windiz (talk)						Orphan
13		Jade Fairbrother (talk)						Orphan
92		Hiromi Oshima (talk)						Stub
188		Tina Marie Jordan (talk)						Stub
16		Sharon Johansen (talk)						Stub
15		Tom Stevens (politician) (talk)						Stub
2		Jeanne Flanagan (talk)						Stub
61		Christa Speck (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. --

Remington

Unfortunately my "edit" of the remington NMA article didn't really come across as intended. The system has greatly complicated uploading pictures and somehow, the caption didnt' make it to the article. Basically, the picture shows a 45 colt R&D conversion cylinder group at 12 0'clock and a ball/fffg group to the right both fired one-handed from 25 yards. User:Michael E. Cumpston (talk | contribs) at 09:08, February 4, 2014

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cristina Patwa may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• franchises as well as [[Hasbro Studios]] and the [[Hub Network]] with [[Discovery Communications]]), [[HSN]] (created HSN Arcade), [[Telefonica]] and [[JCPenney]].<ref name="LATimes"/><ref name="

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:24, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beretta may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• **[[Benelli (firearms)|[Benelli USA]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:04, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Have some Jamesons!

Thank you for your help at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Jenna Jameson/archive1. It's strongly appreciated. --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 14:31, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

You know, I don't think Eric Corbett is such a bad person. He is not just criticizing, but if you check the article history, he is actually helping with the clean up. And ... I don't know how to put this ... but he is a rather famous character around here, not just in the sense that he can put together a well written article, but he has been known for at times verbally ripping out people's innards, shall we say, far, far more than he has done here. We're getting off lucky. :-) --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 14:27, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
		Liberalism in the United States (talk)						Add sources
		AVN Best New Starlet Award (talk)						Add sources
		Digital Playground (talk)						Add sources
		Katie Morgan (talk)						Add sources
		Al Bundy (talk)						Add sources
		XRCO Award (talk)						Add sources
		Main battle tank (talk)						Cleanup
		Face (professional wrestling) (talk)						Cleanup
		Layered clothing (talk)						Cleanup
		Artificial vagina (talk)						Expand
		College (talk)						Expand
		1953 Iranian coup d'état (talk)						Expand
		Racial segregation in the United States (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Alt.sex.stories (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Murder of Jane Longhurst (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		John Brisco (talk)						Merge
		Park51 controversy (talk)						Merge
		Child pornography laws in India (talk)						Merge
		Belladonna (actress) (talk)						Wikify
		Racism in the United States (talk)						Wikify
		Gun politics in Finland (talk)						Wikify
		Kelly Shore (talk)						Orphan
		Ambedkar Polytechnic (talk)						Orphan
		Batul Soltani (talk)						Orphan
		Skow for Girlfriends Films (talk)						Stub
		Phoenix Marie (talk)						Stub
		Nikodem Dyzma (film) (talk)						Stub
		Meterik (talk)						Stub
		Juicy Pink Box (talk)						Stub
		Dani Daniels (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Bohemian Club members

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Bohemian Club members. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 18:44, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Your reverts

Go to ANI if you don't like it but my comment is not a personal attack and as I'm in part refuting your attempt to argue a ridiculous bases for notability you are misrepresentating the state of discussion when you do that. Please stop edit/revert warring. if you have a problem with a specific part of my comment then drop me note on my talkpage to explain exactly where the issue is but frankly you need to grow a thicker skin. You have said equally strong things about other editors who you disagree with but that doesn't seem to bother you. Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

You had options of where to post your comment and how you worded it, but you chose to do it publicly and directed specifically at me. I made a comment based in logic from a data analysis or statistical perspective and you attacked me for it. I have never used ANI before and letting others weigh in on your comment might be a good instance to use it for the first time, thank you for your suggestion. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 15:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Celebrity sex tape

Your recent editing history at Celebrity sex tape shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
The opening section of the article is clear: it deals only with recordings "made available publicly". In addition, rumored or unverified claims generally fail WP:V and WP:RS; here, the claim is also a BLP violation. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Hullaballoo Wolfowitz, thank you for your comment and for getting around to signing it. I realize that you appear to have an intense interest in Porn related articles and I thank you for your efforts. I would have to say due largely in part to your interest and efforts that you have been indirectly responsible for the creation of more Porn related content in the last few months than any one else I have observed. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 15:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Scalhotrod. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 16:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Carmen Hart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to G4 and Easy Riders

Katie Morgan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jill Kelly

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Declined speedy

I've declined the speedy and moved the article for China Spy back to the editor's userspace. It wasn't so unambiguously promotional that I'd have speedied it for that, although it could have been speedied as a recreation of a page deleted (sort of) at AfD. But since the edits are recent, I moved it back to the userspace. Now if they do re-add it to the mainspace, you can always speedy it under WP:G4 or re-take it to AfD, I suppose. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:16, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Fair enough, I was new page patrolling when I came across it. I checked several of the sources could not find a release date anywhere for the movie. It's like someone is trying to drum up support to make it, not actually document a film that its any stage of production. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 16:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

• To be honest, that was one of my first thoughts as well and I was tempted to delete it because it looks like it's one of those things that will likely never release and if it does, won't gain coverage. However since it was previously userfied, I figure moving it back was probably the right way to go. If he re-creates it then it can be speedyable through other means, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

• Cool, thanks... :) --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 05:50, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Meaningless message begins now...

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 22:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

I mean this with sincerity and due respect, but HUH? What are you talking about? --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 17:56, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, assumed you'd know.[1] where you said "Expanding article with content and sources from related articles". I clearly should have tweaked the message as nothing's been attributed anyway. Dougweller (talk) 08:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
		AVN Adult Entertainment Expo (talk)						Add sources
		Pornography by region (talk)						Add sources
		Angela Devi (talk)						Add sources
		KSEX (talk)						Add sources
		Shelley Lubben (talk)						Add sources
		Sex industry (talk)						Add sources
		Pierre Woodman (talk)						Cleanup
		Freedom of speech in Canada (talk)						Cleanup
		Cooking school (talk)						Cleanup
		El Dorado High School (Placerville, California) (talk)						Expand
		Ilo Ilo (talk)						Expand
		Newtown, Connecticut (talk)						Expand
		Internet pornography (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Fetterman Fight (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Exploitation of women in mass media (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Fetish model (talk)						Merge
		Sadism and masochism in fiction (talk)						Merge
		Hunter Moore (talk)						Merge
		Ilona Staller (talk)						Wikify
		Malcolm Shabazz (talk)						Wikify
		Zoophilia and the law (talk)						Wikify
		Operation Blue Orchid (talk)						Orphan
		On-Site.com (talk)						Orphan
		Holly Sweet (talk)						Orphan
		Airtel-Vodafone (talk)						Stub
		Meese Report (talk)						Stub
		Alexis Ford (talk)						Stub
		Dee (pornographic actress) (talk)						Stub
		Roxy Reynolds (talk)						Stub
		Taylor St. Claire (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:19, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Taylor Wane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Genesis, Oui, A Beautiful Life and Frost/Nixon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Your contributed article, A Beautiful Life (2009 film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, A Beautiful Life (2009 film). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – A Beautiful Life (2008 film). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at A Beautiful Life (2008 film) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

That other article did not come up when I searched, please ask Spartaz or another Admin to delete it, thanks. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 23:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 2 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Joanna Angel page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Favor, please

Could you do me and other editors on the Gun politics in the U.S. page and not make lots of edits in one edit - and leave better edit summaries? Edits like this one.[2] I used to do these kinds, for which I'd get my head chewed off. Thanks. Lightbreather (talk) 23:00, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

While I can appreciate your perception of my edits, I'm editing in the same way that I do on any article, gun related or otherwise. Difs can be perceived both ways, I'm not someone who is trying to quickly rack up an edit count, but I do try to edit in "manageable chunks". Its not unusual for me to do "full article" edits and completely overhaul a stub or badly formatted article.

As for my edit summaries, sure, I'm happy to add more detail. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 23:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm not asking you to change your habits across Wikipedia - only on gun related articles. I think that's fair, since others (including myself) have been asked to do so. Lightbreather (talk) 23:17, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Like I said, I'm happy to add more detail to the Summaries, but I'm not making any promises regarding my edit style. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 23:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

OK. But if anyone gives me any crap about doing "big" edits like that, I hope you won't join in... and maybe even help me. :-) Lightbreather (talk) 00:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Hey, I'll be the first to defend good editing, grammar, vocabulary usage, and reasonable thinking even if it means a complete reversal of an opinion I hold. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 00:04, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Where should we discuss this?

Obviously we have a disagreement about the 21st century advocacy section and sources. I though this last edit and summary of yours was a little harsh.[3] Where shall we discuss? If not here, would you start the discussion? Lightbreather (talk) 00:18, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

I already started it here... --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 00:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Huh? That link seems to be about the Types of firearms section, which I think is overblown for the article - so I thank you for that. Lightbreather (talk) 00:23, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

My apologies, you meant the explanation stuff. OK... here. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 00:29, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Stripper. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. BMK (talk) 04:22, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
		Sexual fetishism (talk)						Add sources
		Sexual stimulation (talk)						Add sources
		Overview of gun laws by nation (talk)						Add sources
		The Golden Nymphs (talk)						Add sources
		AVN Award (talk)						Add sources
1,136		Anikka Albrite (talk)						Add sources
		Human rights in the United States (talk)						Cleanup
		Media portrayal of lesbianism (talk)						Cleanup
		John D'Agostino (poker player) (talk)						Cleanup
		Adult Industry Medical Health Care Foundation (talk)						Expand
		Gail Dines (talk)						Expand
		Raven Rockette (talk)						Expand
		Gary Owens (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Sex show (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Sex position (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine (talk)						Merge
		Mozarabs (talk)						Merge
552		Censorship in Turkey (talk)						Merge
		Kinniku Banzuke (talk)						Wikify
		Religious views on pornography (talk)						Wikify
		National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (talk)						Wikify
		Sable Communications of California v. FCC (talk)						Orphan
		Ear embryology (talk)						Orphan
		Elena Berkova (talk)						Orphan
		Peter Birkett (talk)						Stub
		Mark Ashley (talk)						Stub
		Hazel Tucker (talk)						Stub
79		Genesis (magazine) (talk)						Stub
		Just Before Losing Everything (talk)						Stub
		Leilani Leeane (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Faye Reagan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Girls Gone Wild

Joanna Angel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Scrapper

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Sandy Hook article

I think you're being a bit unreasonable here, particularly since the initial edit you reverted treated the President's comment as a statement of fact. My edit clearly attributed it to him and added the NRA because he directed his comment at Republicans and the NRA. I think you should compare my initial edit to the version before. --75.68.97.241 (talk) 18:28, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

It's quite clearly you that being unreasonable. I removed the commentary entirely, no president's remarks, no parties, no NRA. The article is about the shooting and the section is about things related to gun control since the incident. What's unreasonable about keeping the political debate and rhetoric out of this artile? --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 18:37, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

The entire section is about commentary. It's the subsection under "Reactions" covering "Gun control". The push for more gun control (and resultant push against it) was perhaps the most prominent national reaction to Sandy Hook. The section opens with a direct quote from the President explaining his intentions, the body of the section contains quotes and reactions from various politicians and groups on both sides of the debate, and the closing covers the defeat of the only Bill that saw a vote at the national level, and quotes from both sides of the aisle, including the President. That's not just neutral, that's good writing, I think. The only part I took out was a single word that treated Obama's words as fact (and since he was criticizing Republicans and the NRA, that's clearly not neutral), and adding the NRA, since in the quote he specifically directs his criticism at both Republicans and the NRA.

I'm note sure what you're classifying as rhetoric, but your suggestion to keep politics out of a section specifically covering a political issue confuses me. If anything this section should cover legislative reaction to Sandy Hook (ie, new gun control laws in Colorado, New York, Maryland and Connecticut) in far more detail. --75.68.97.241 (talk) 19:47, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

From my perspective you seem to be confusing rhetoric (and editorial) with facts. The President's remarks about the push for gun control are appropriate, his views on the parties regarding the legislation not going he wanted it to are not. Do you understand the difference? The comments invite other editorial opinion and that is not what the article is about, plain and simple. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 00:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

That's a reasonable take, but I still disagree, largely because the president was the focal-point for gun control efforts, so when they failed it's reasonable to include his reaction. The section also includes analysis from the NRA and a reaction from a Republican lawmaker. Wikipedia can't endorse a specific viewpoint (as some of the editors on the talk page certainly did), but it can report the viewpoints of others. It's reasonable to believe that readers will agree with one and disagree with another, and as evidence I'll use another comment from the talk section from an editor who apparently felt the article unfairly represented the pro-gun rights side. As it stands I feel the article fairly covers both while endorsing neither. --75.68.97.241 (talk) 18:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Just FYI - it seems there have been some pretty drastic changes to the article over the past 48 hours. I've made my opinions known and will now likely recuse myself of further edits, outside reverting vandalism and keeping an eye on the conspiracy theory article. Thanks for your time, and I'm sorry you and I could not come to a consensus. --75.68.97.241 (talk) 19:11, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the help, but...

• Although I truly appreciate your efforts in saving articles for notable pornographic actors and actresses, I'm afraid you might be a little confused about WP:PORNBIO. If pornography is all a certain actor/actress is known for, s/he isn't automatically notable if s/he won any porn award (group and scene-related awards don't qualify, although they did in the past). Of course, there are exceptions when the actor is also notable elsewhere; for example, Raven Rockette is still notable because she also did some mainstream work.

Have a nice day. :) Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 01:35, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Circa the end of January when the edit you're referring to was made, I'd have to say that many of us were "confused" regarding the PORNBIO guidelines. I'm not sure of when I became aware of the "scene awards don't qualify" exception, but I am now. I realize that we, for the most part, are trying to work together for the betterment of the site, but a lot has happened with the Porn guidelines in the last few months. Even I'll admit that there are more than a few articles that should have never been created to begin with. Regards, --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 17:56, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
68		Single bond (talk)						Add sources
113		Angelica Costello (talk)						Add sources
477		Brianna Love (talk)						Add sources
2,774		The World's End (film) (talk)						Add sources
1,100		Pornography in Japan (talk)						Add sources
119		Alexandra Quinn (talk)						Add sources
29		Agnews Developmental Center (talk)						Cleanup
841		School shooting (talk)						Cleanup
36		LGBT history in Singapore (talk)						Cleanup
723		Sexual revolution (talk)						Expand
1,433		Kung Fu Panda (talk)						Expand
13		Park golf (talk)						Expand
154		Editing of anime in American distribution (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
591		Sean Paul Lockhart (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
260		Militia movement (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
148		Anal vibrator (talk)						Merge
110		International cybercrime (talk)						Merge
41		Anti-pedophile activism (talk)						Merge
44		Sam and Twitch (talk)						Wikify
31		1997 in home video (talk)						Wikify
98		Mobile phone overuse (talk)						Wikify
94		Anja Juliette Laval (talk)						Orphan
174		Sabrina Blond (talk)						Orphan
69		Amber Sym (talk)						Orphan
78		Eric Edwards (pornographic actor) (talk)						Stub
292		Roxy Jezel (talk)						Stub
26		Adultcon (talk)						Stub
33		Sin City (studio) (talk)						Stub
390		Alexis Love (talk)						Stub
657		Adrianna Luna (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:40, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Relevant Talk Page

Talk:US_Airways Already started a discussion on it. Let's hope it won't get removed again. But I won't hold my breath. Tutelary (talk) 16:50, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

When I saw that articles about what happened and the fact that their Twitter page was outranking their home page and the Wikipedia article, I knew that this was no ordinary incident. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 16:56, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gina Lynn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Belladonna

Melissa Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Paul Thomas

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

I hear you

I've been staying away from that article for the most part as it is a complete mess, but I almost threw an "Essay" tag on it last night because that's how it reads. Thanks for taking the initiative to fix it. --Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 17:11, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

I also clarified the NFA/GCA verbiage as it was focused just on machine guns which we know was not the intention. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 17:15, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Michaëlle Jean

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Michaëlle Jean. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
221		President of North Korea (talk)						Add sources
223		Exxxotica (talk)						Add sources
649		Franceska Jaimes (talk)						Add sources
85		Opposition to pornography (talk)						Add sources
412		Diamond Foxxx (talk)						Add sources
12,047		Bitcoin (talk)						Add sources
39		International Lonestar (talk)						Cleanup
1,244		Sexism (talk)						Cleanup
274		Side-scan sonar (talk)						Cleanup
112		Features of the Opera web browser (talk)						Expand
36		Scooby-Doo's Haunted Mansion (talk)						Expand
682		Erotic literature (talk)						Expand
730		Legal status of Internet pornography (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,759		History of sex in India (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
588		Annabel Chong (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
163		Eternal President of the Republic (talk)						Merge
1,026		MILF pornography (talk)						Merge
338		Is Anyone Up? (talk)						Merge
2,351		M. Night Shyamalan (talk)						Wikify
61		Julia Parton (talk)						Wikify
350		Timeline of LGBT history (talk)						Wikify
20		Freddy Dalton (talk)						Orphan
28		Jazella Moore (talk)						Orphan
52		Alexsander Freitas (talk)						Orphan
27		Harmony Lessons (talk)						Stub
22		Tony Kelly (photographer) (talk)						Stub
17		Dan O'Connell (director) (talk)						Stub
133		Fans of Adult Media and Entertainment Award (talk)						Stub
1,093		Samantha Saint (talk)						Stub
4		Huldreich Georg Früh (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:31, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tanya Hyde, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and AFD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Notice of RfC and request for participation

There is an RfC in which your participation would be greatly appreciated:

• Talk:Gun_control#RfC:_Remove_Nazi_gun_control_argument.3F

Thank you. --Lightbreather (talk) 14:55, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Notice of RfC 2 and request for participation

There is an RfC on the Gun politics in the U.S. talk page which may be of interest to editors who participated in "RfC: Remove Nazi gun control argument?" on the Gun control talk page.

• RfC: Replace existing Nazi gun control paragraphs?

Thank you. --Lightbreather (talk) 22:26, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Why?

The original percentages in numerals were MOS compliant. Why do you insist on spelling them out? Lightbreather (talk) 01:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Simple, words force the reader to actually read the text in its context and not just skim it. It actually helps to convey the information in a cohesive manner. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 01:55, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

According to whom? I follow the AP Styleguide and it say no such thing. Lightbreather (talk) 02:16, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

I follow my experience from twenty-five years of editing, then again I'm just as capable of writing crap as anyone. I'm also in favor on not dumbing down articles to a 5th grade reader level like most newspapers. If you choose to use a writing guide, that's your prerogative. Please don't be upset when others do not wish to have it inflicted on them. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 02:28, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

That reply was a bit harsh. Wikipedia follows std style rules unless there's an agreement on an exception. You have 3 Rs on Gun control after the Sandy Hook Elementary school shooting, I think. I hope you'll let it go. Lightbreather (talk) 02:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Any perception of harshness is entirely in your interpretation. Please own up to that and stop blaming others for how you feel. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 03:00, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

To be fair, wikipedia follows wikipedia's style guide. AP is a nice guide, but it has no relevance to the wiki. Both forms are allowed in MOS:NUMERAL and this is an item that will just have to be dealt with via consensus. But to both of you, aren't there real issues where our energy is better spent than bickering over what format we put numbers in? Gaijin42 (talk) 02:40, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

From WP:MOS:

Style and formatting should be consistent within an article, though not necessarily throughout Wikipedia. Where more than one style is acceptable, editors should not change an article from one of those styles to another without a good reason. Edit warring over optional styles is unacceptable. If discussion cannot determine which style to use in an article, defer to the style used by the first major contributor.

The 2nd and final sentences apply especially here, I think. Lightbreather (talk) 02:51, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

You're absolutely correct, you're the one that took offense by the change and reverted it. If you're going to cite a policy that allows for both styles and then state that "Edit warring over optional styles is unacceptable", then this perceived problem is entirely your creation. I'm not the one that others have accused of OWNERSHIP and this kind of behavior is an example of that. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 03:00, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

I fear on this issue, I think LB has the better of you. Between the bit quoted above, and WP:STATUSQUO the onus would be on you to develop a consensus to change. Gaijin42 (talk) 03:06, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

That's understandable stance, but the fault here still lies with LB for reverting the change. If its truly an optional style, then it should not have mattered, but it did and now she's defending it. That's a pretty straightforward indication of WP:OWNERSHIP. I made a change, LB made an "issue" out of it. We would not be having this discussion if it were not the case. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 03:11, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

"Where more than one style is acceptable, editors should not change an article from one of those styles to another without a good reason." More than one style is acceptable. You changed from the one that was already used to another, without giving a good reason.[4] You gave your reason, after I asked you here, but it doesn't sync with what journalists and other writers are taught. But please, let's let it go - especially the character stuff. Lightbreather (talk) 03:30, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

What part of "Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia" do you not get? Since when are journalists or other writers taught to write for encyclopedias? --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 03:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

My point is that trained writers, including those that write for encyclopedias, use style guides. Here is a link to an Encyclopedia Britannica article:

Assault Weapons: Year in Review 2013. Do they spell out numbers over nine, or use numerals? Lightbreather (talk) 03:51, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Nice example, is the horse sufficiently dead or would you like to beat it more? --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 04:00, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

revert

I only meant to revert that last change, not the one before. Sorry. I have re-implemented your prior edit. Gaijin42 (talk) 02:14, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Note to Lightbreather and Scalhotrod on that, I am not taking a stand either way on the numeral change, I just didn't mean to revert that, so I undid my own change. I shouldn't be counted toward consensus either way on that point. Gaijin42 (talk) 02:17, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

No worries, thanks for letting me know. BTW, I reverted the restoration of the appointment. The source cited makes no connection to the Sandy Hook incident. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 02:19, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 28 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Gun control after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
646		AVN Best New Starlet Award (talk)						Add sources
200		Scott Nails (talk)						Add sources
190		Award (talk)						Add sources
135		Fashionistas (talk)						Add sources
189		Shoppers Drug Mart (talk)						Add sources
39		Caballero Home Video (talk)						Add sources
83		SNL Financial (talk)						Cleanup
133		Layered clothing (talk)						Cleanup
52		Gun politics in Finland (talk)						Cleanup
2,782		Phil Coulson (talk)						Expand
377		Outline of human sexuality (talk)						Expand
152		Rape pornography (talk)						Expand
1,458		City (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
88		Bondage pornography (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
93		Little Oral Annie (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
699		Female dominance (talk)						Merge
628		President of South Africa (talk)						Merge
239		G-Spot vibrator (talk)						Merge
521		Omorashi (talk)						Wikify
673		Emmalyn Estrada (talk)						Wikify
95		Attraction to disability (talk)						Wikify
16		Saffron Taylor (talk)						Orphan
224		April Summers (talk)						Orphan
15		Alie Layus (talk)						Orphan
255		Avy Scott (talk)						Stub
136		Sarah Shevon (talk)						Stub
120		Jesse Capelli (talk)						Stub
5		Morgans Bay (talk)						Stub
1,294		Nicole Aniston (talk)						Stub
42		CP 55,940 (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:07, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

3RR warning

Your recent editing history at Gun politics in the United States‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Cwobeel (talk) 16:04, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, you're not on the side of the train riders, so they will do everything they can to fuck with you and eventually block or ban you.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 16:51, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Trains...?! Cool, I love trains... :) I'm not worried in the slightest. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 14:10, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm not either, apparently some button clicker who never heard the F word thinks I'm a dirty whore because I used it once and has to keep mentioning it everytime his action's are questioned, but if I was a cowardly limey nancy boy who said it in every other sentence that would be ok, because as long as you're on their side of the atlantic ocean or political aisle profanity is not uncivil.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 18:18, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gun politics in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Spitzer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Heads up

You made a series of nine big edits on the GPUS article. Some of them I liked, some of them I have no strong opinion about one way or another, some I disagree with. Some of your edit summaries were complete and accurate; some were not. I am going to make a series of edits, too. Just a heads up, and let's take it easy with each other on any edit summaries or talk-page comments, OK? Lightbreather (talk) 16:41, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Works for me... :) --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 16:27, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Explanation

Could you please explain your most resent revert at Gun politics in the United States‎‎ at the talk page there. As mentioned at the policy you pointed too isn't about establishing notability for people who are sourced, it is about establishing notability for articles. Notice, your at your third revert. Thenub314 (talk) 19:44, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Between you and Lightbreather, I'm not sure who made the edit, but the material was removed because the notability of the people making the editorial statements was not established. None of them have WP articles, so they are not WP:NOTABLE (or WP:PEOPLE if you prefer) in that regard. Listing a bunch of names and then saying effectively "these random people agree on this, so it must be true" does not work on Wikipedia. Are any of them worthy of articles on their own? --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 21:13, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

You have your policy mixed up. See WP:Reliable Sources for a guideline as to which sources should be used for citation. WP:NOTABLE is just not at issue. These are Books and Journal Articles referencing the effects of various events on the gun politics in the US, how are they no appropriate? Do you mean to tell me if I check back at ever reference you've added, the author's will all have a WP page, and if they don't I am free to remove the insufficiently referenced material? Thenub314 (talk) 21:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop

Please stop deleting this sourced material from the GPUS article. (This is the diff: [5], with edit summary, "Switching to non-controversial source and removing redundant content again per WP:MOS")

First, I disagree that OpenSecrets.org is controversial. Second, even if it were (for argument's sake), there is no policy that says controversial sources cannot be used. Third, the material you keep replacing this with is sourced with an OK source, but it pre-dates Super PACs. Fourth, your preferred source is included with the one you don't like in the material you keep deleting (in case you didn't notice). And fifth - I explained all of this in the GPUS discussion of just one month ago Presenting OpenSecrets.org figures - and the material stayed. Please add something if you think it will improve the article, but deleting this material does not improve the article, so please stop. Thanks. Lightbreather (talk) 20:15, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

1) Disagree all you want, others have commented that its editorial material is suspect. 2) Yes there is and there is policy that gives preference to established and especially print sources. 3) I've deleting redundant material that is meant to be supplemented by Wikilinks and their related articles. Please stop "dumbing down" the article. 4) The source is fine for factual material, you should be happy I'm using it at all. 5) Your explanation does not override policy or consensus of which there was no consensus and the lack of it does not justify your edits. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 20:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Assault weapons ban article's name

Re renaming Assault weapons ban as "Assault weapons legislation": WP:V, WP:RS and the majority of the general populace call them assault weapons bans. Please start a discussion on that article's talk page, with sources supporting the change, if you want to consider changing its name. Thanks. Lightbreather (talk) 21:04, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Do you worry or even consider how much evidence you're piling up against yourself for a case of WP:OWNERSHIP to be made for a myriad of articles? --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 21:12, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Those in glass houses... Thenub314 (talk) 21:24, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Indeed, but I'm not the one who has authored most of these articles nor am I trying to accomplish anything other than an adherence to policy. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 21:28, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Ownership? No. WP:STEWARDSHIP? Yes. Also, you might want to review Examples of ownership behavior. ... What I'm seeing in regards to this topic - and have seen for some months - is a push by a number of editors who don't seem to want to acknowledge to Wikipedia readers that there are in-force assault weapons bans, or that there ever was any assault weapons ban except for the federal ban that expired 10 years ago. Lightbreather (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

3RR warning

Your recent editing history [6][7][8][9] at Assault weapons ban shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

--Lightbreather (talk) 21:22, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

To quote you from Mike's page, Hey Pot, how's its going? From, the Kettle. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 21:25, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

FWIW: I believe that you're quoting Mike from my page: [10] Lightbreather (talk) 21:32, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

If the shoe fits... --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 21:33, 5 May 2014 (UTC)