User talk:Gildir

Welcome!

Hello, Gildir, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --rogerd 17:22, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your message at Requests for feedback

	Hello Gildir. Replies have been posted to your message at Requests for feedback. Please acknowledge the feedback and ask for additional assistance if you need it. If you do not respond to the feedback, your message and the replies thereto will be archived in a few days. Thank you! Lucimundatene89, formerly Aroni125 (talk) 18:47, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
	You can remove this notice at any time - click on this section's [edit] link and remove the section.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10th Kingdom character articles

Both Vary and I seem to think that if the articles are radically shortened and put in a list of 10th Kingdom characters (per WP:FICT for lesser important characters), there'd be no need for deletion. I'd even be willing to do the grunt work. Would you please return to the deletion debate and consider changing your vote to a shorten, merge and redirect into a list? - Mgm|^(talk) 09:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Middle-earth tense

Thnks for your recent edits to the Middle-earth related articles. I have only one objection: using of present tense. WP:WAF indeed states that articles on fictional characters are to be written in present tense, but M-e related pages are among the few exceptions. The reason is that not a book plot is being discussed, but rather a history of a world - indeed, as JRRT himself wrote, the history of our own world. A consensus was reached on WT:Me to use past tense, and before editing pages to present the discussion at least must be renewed - though there's little hope in changing current standards. Súrendil 16:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Want to join a project?

I noticed that you are doing a lot of Olympic Games articles. Would you be interested in joining in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Olympics? If so, you can sign up at the link. Chris (talk) 20:55, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your additions to the List of Fictional Astronauts

Thanks for your additions to the list I've tended to focus on the literary side of things and left the film/TV side of it slide. In answer to your question about the Zeus crews from Dr Who I'd suggest that you put them in the 'Futuristic' section. It's what I did with 'Hunter-Killer' where you have something that does not quite fit into the orderly sequence of things. Just remember to include both date of publication and the date the episodes are supposed to be set which is the 1980's from memory.Graham1973 (talk) 11:57, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you find a copy of Apollo at Go? I've been looking for it where I am for while now.Graham1973 (talk) 14:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I ordered Apollo at Go by inter-library loan from the Boston Public Library. Gildir (talk) 14:25, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you've changed the reference format for Apollo at Go. I'd like to propose we reformat the whole reference section (Books at least) to conform to the same format. Obviously it's going to be quite a time consuming task, so perhaps we split it?Graham1973 (talk) 02:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am certainly willing to work on this as time allows. :-) Gildir (talk) 22:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw the changes you made, thanks for doing those. Though you did beat me to it I had planned to work on it tonight.Graham1973 (talk) 11:30, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :-) Gildir (talk) 18:25, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Added a few recent purchases with Astronaut characters. Slowly updating the citation format.Graham1973 (talk) 15:25, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Samuel scott leaping from a bridge.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Samuel scott leaping from a bridge.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:09, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

Template talk:Did you know

Hi. I've nominated Maurice Fargues, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Obsidi♠n^Soul 16:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Maurice Fargues

On 29 June 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Maurice Fargues, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another one

Also nominated Robert Emmet Odlum for a DYK placement. please keep up the good work. W Nowicki (talk) 19:13, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Robert Emmet Odlum

On 9 July 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Robert Emmet Odlum, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that swimming instructor Robert Emmet Odlum died from the first jump off the Brooklyn Bridge? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chase Rettig proofing and new article removal

Hello there Gildir. Would you care to exchange proofing? We both posted requests today. I am looking for feedback and 'new article' tag removal for The Virtual Stage. If you care to do that, I will return the favour for the same for the Chase Rettig page.

Randomlyacting (talk) 02:58, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New messages.

You have a new message at Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/2011_August_22#Chase_Rettig and my talk page.--Ykraps (talk) 15:17, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Gildir/Craig McKinley (physician) has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Craig McKinley (physician), this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 20:52, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Craig McKinley (physician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Chzz ► 06:09, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Jonathan Dory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Backpacking, Mitchell High School

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:48, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph B. MacInnis

Hello, I read the Joseph B. MacInnis article with interest. What is your relationship to him?--Wpwatchdog (talk) 16:24, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No relationship whatsoever. Joseph B. MacInnis is one of a long series of articles I have been writing on aquanauts and people connected to underwater diving. Gildir (talk) 14:16, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. He is definitely notable in the underwater diving world.--Wpwatchdog (talk) 13:03, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:File:Dewey_Smith_through_viewport.jpg

Re:File:Dewey_Smith_through_viewport.jpg

Thank you for uploading free images/media to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view your previous uploads). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading! Bulwersator (talk) 23:28, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Autopatrolled

You should look into having Autopatrolled status. See Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. I could nominate you, or you can nominate yourself. Then your new articles will be accepted without being in the new article list. --DThomsen8 (talk) 18:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the flattering suggestion! I have now nominated myself for this status. (I deleted an earlier reply to you on this page because I realized that I had created 49 articles rather than 47.) Thanks again for your feedback. :-) Gildir (talk) 20:21, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An award for you

Golden Wiki Award

In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.0.87 (talk) 21:25, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.2.2 (talk) 00:45, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiThanks

You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this past month! 66.87.2.10 (talk) 13:31, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dewey Smith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dewey Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dewey Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I think it's personally acceptable for you to recommend a "keep" or "delete" article author or not. You have a say in this just as much as any editor. Feel free to change your comment into a "keep". Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 00:46, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestion, Jauerback. I have now changed my "comment" to "keep". Gildir (talk) 16:29, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Joachim Wendler

Date of birth: 06.06.1939; Place of birth: Erfurt, Germany — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.39.148.240 (talk) 21:55, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Arrhichion

I reviewed your new article Arrhichion, and added to the templates on the talk page. Perhaps you might consider a sentence describing the sport without making the casual reader follow the links. --DThomsen8 (talk) 21:27, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review and the suggestion. I have now added the phrase "a martial art blending boxing and wrestling" to the Arrhichion article. Gildir (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sam Bowser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middletown, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:01, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dolgov PI.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Dolgov PI.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Meir

Hi Gildir. Jessica Meir has been nominated for deletion. You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion. Thank you, Gobōnobō ⁺ ^c 23:08, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very good article, so I have already added several WikiProject templates to the article, and I will do more. I will keep in touch with you on this talk page. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:18, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject templates

You did good work with creating Shinji Kazama, which I was pleased to review, along with several other new articles you have created. I added a talk page with the appropriate templates. If you create other new articles, I would appreciate it if you would consider learning how to create talk pages with appropriate WikiProject templates. In many instances there are like articles with existing templates that can be copied. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:04, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-a-thon

Hi Gildir, looking forward to seeing you tomorrow for the Wikipedia intro and edit-a-thon tomorrow morning! Hope you can still make it. We'll have an intro for beginners at 10am; if you're a more experienced Wikipedian, join us at 11am.

Click here for directions: Offices of EchoDitto, 1 Davis Square, Somerville. (Next to the Red Line station, upstairs from CVS.) -Pete (talk) 23:21, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I see you had removed your name. Well, maybe next time! Happy new year, -Pete (talk) 00:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Middlemore

Hi Gildir, I've just started a page on Thomas Middlemore, and when I clicked on the tab 'What links here' I saw that you have made a page on him (more extensive and better than mine) but haven't uploaded it yet. Apologies. These things happen. Would you mind incorporating your material to mine? I only made the page because a user oddly linked Middlemore in the Les Droites page that I started to a page on the saddle company and I told this user that I'd start a page on Middlemore himself. Had I known of your work I'd have added to it when you uploaded it. Ericoides (talk) 17:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Thanks! Gildir (talk) 18:12, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just seen your WIP on Henri Cordier. Was it not Louis Cordier who married a niece of Ramond, rather than Henri being Ramond's nephew? It would be interesting to know what Henri's relation was to to Louis. Ericoides (talk) 13:24, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to Henri Cordier's obituary in the Alpine Journal, he was a grandson of the geologist and a great-nephew of Ramond. I have corrected the WIP accordingly. Gildir (talk) 20:47, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gildir, thanks for your good work on Middlemores Saddles and Thomas Middlemore. I just thought of this, my first article was http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Sir_William_Hawkslow_Middlemore which was rejected 3 times on notability, can you make it acceptable at all? After 3 rejections I wasn't ever expecting anything more, so if you can't - no problem :) Middle More (talk) 23:14, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem re Maund; it's nice that you're starting all of these interesting pages. I don't do DYK any more, but I see that you do: it would be good, if you can be bothered to do so, if you could propose a hook including Middlemore, Cordier and Maund (best be quick as Middlemore was written on 12th; 17th is therefore the deadline). How about ... that on the first ascent of the Cordier Couloir on the Aiguille Verte, Thomas Middlemore, John Oakley Maund and Henri Cordier were "nearly obliterated by rockfall"? Ericoides (talk) 21:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestion, Ericoides. I have now made the nomination, using your suggested hook as the first of three alternatives (see below). Once again, I really appreciate your help and collaboration. :-) Gildir (talk) 21:47, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great, good show (US: job)! I've added a pic to the nom. Ericoides (talk) 07:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Henri Cordier (mountaineer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Glénat and Pau

Piz Bernina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Goring

Thomas Middlemore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Goring

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination

Hi

Because of a stroke, I am limited in what I can do. Please do not thank me for reviews now,--DThomsen8 (talk) 23:43, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry to hear that. (I had seen a message mentioning that you had a health issue.) I will comply with your request. All the best. Gildir (talk) 23:06, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Middlemore, John Oakley Maund, Henri Cordier (mountaineer)

Gildir, please stop by the nomination page; we need you to address the issues raised in last week's review of your DYK nomination. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:05, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the material requiring citations from the three articles. Gildir (talk) 20:36, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Thomas Middlemore

On 9 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Thomas Middlemore, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that on the first ascent of the Cordier Couloir on the Aiguille Verte (pictured), Thomas Middlemore, John Oakley Maund and Henri Cordier were nearly obliterated by rockfall? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Nyttend (talk · contribs) 08:04, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work, all of these! Ericoides (talk) 08:06, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for John Oakley Maund

On 9 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Oakley Maund, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that on the first ascent of the Cordier Couloir on the Aiguille Verte (pictured), Thomas Middlemore, John Oakley Maund and Henri Cordier were nearly obliterated by rockfall? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Nyttend (talk · contribs) 08:04, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Henri Cordier (mountaineer)

On 9 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Henri Cordier (mountaineer), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that on the first ascent of the Cordier Couloir on the Aiguille Verte (pictured), Thomas Middlemore, John Oakley Maund and Henri Cordier were nearly obliterated by rockfall? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Nyttend (talk · contribs) 08:04, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jessica Meir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessica Meir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Meir (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Veryhuman (talk) 21:40, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Alberto Ascari.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Alberto Ascari.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Break 'silence' deadlock on Slashdot?

I noticed your recent change on this article and wonder if you can help.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Slashdot#WP:BOLD_readability_changes_to_lead

Jump straight to last entry. WykiP (talk) 01:56, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to NASA Astronaut Group 21 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Candidate_Class.html|title=NASA To Seek Applicants For Next Astronaut Candidate Class|author=[[National Aeronautics and Space Administration|date=October 3, 2011|publisher=NASA|accessdate=June

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:36, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you re: ICE

Thank you for finding out the CSM/LM names for the Apollo 19 mission in the novel ICE. I've been hunting a copy of that one for a while.Graham1973 (talk) 14:36, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, Graham. I always enjoy contributing to List of fictional astronauts. :-) Gildir (talk) 14:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, was the Apollo 20 CSM/LM named in ICE as well? Graham1973 (talk)

Not sure -- I'll have to look again. Gildir (talk) 13:13, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to add as many details of the fictional Apollo 18 mission as the author provides (Excepting the real astronauts he names.) If you have the publication details (Title, author, publisher, year, isbn) feel free to add them to the reference listing.Graham1973 (talk) 17:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you, Graham. :-) Gildir (talk) 23:55, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your latest updates, I'm going to have to start sorting out the books on my "to do" list. Something else I plan to sort out is the "Apollo ??" situation, there are a number of books where you have Apollo missions mentioned without specific mission numbers ("'The Falling Astronauts'" has two for example.) and I cannot help feeling we need a better way to distinguish them.Graham1973 (talk) 11:14, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just had an idea, where it is clear that the fictional mission went to the Moon (& landed) use Unnamed CSM/LM instead of Apollo??. Also regarding the fictional missions in "The Cassandra Project", perhaps refer to them as AS-(Number), author Joe Poyer did this with his fictional Gemini mission where instead of calling it Gemini IX he called it GT-9.Graham1973 (talk) 07:07, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have now replaced Apollo ?? with Unnamed CSM/LM for the Cassandra Project missions. The Cassandra Project gives no numbers for the two missions at all; since they preceded Apollo 10, presumably the authors didn't want to get into the issue of whether they should be Apollo 8 and 9, or 7 and 9, superseding the real missions with those numbers. Gildir (talk) 13:38, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kramer Williamson

The article Kramer Williamson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NSPORT, WP:NMOTORSPORT or WP:GNG. Tragic for his loss, but WP:NOTMEMORIAL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 17:20, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Opting in to VisualEditor

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 50 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:23, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of Fictional Astronauts

Gildir - I do not have a problem with it. If you have the times and the means to do so then make use of it. I have just not had the time I once had to read/make note of characters of late.Graham1973 (talk) 01:29, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gildir - I am planning to do a clean-up of the List, could you please hold off adding anything for one week. Graham1973 (talk) 16:31, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly. Thank you, Graham. Gildir (talk) 16:27, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Alberto Ascari.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Alberto Ascari.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:42, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alberto Ascari.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alberto Ascari.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:33, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Big Blue Crane collapse

added a link pointing to The Daily Reporter

Teamwork (sculpture)

added a link pointing to The Daily Reporter

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bill Vukovich.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bill Vukovich.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:41, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Piantanida.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Piantanida.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject United States Coast Guard Auxiliary

As a current or past contributor to a USCG Auxiliary article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject United States Coast Guard Auxiliary, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

COASTIE I am (talk) 01:20, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Night of the Auk (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

The proposed article is not suitable for Wikipedia. Because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, articles on fictional subjects should cover their real-world context and contain sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's development, impact or historical significance—not just a summary of the plot. You may wish to add this content to an existing article. As anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are free to do so yourself.

The comment they left was:

WP articles are not plot summaries. You should remove the plot summaries and the details about the characters and limit the article to what is said in third-party sources about the play.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Night of the Auk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 01:37, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Gildir, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 01:37, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Glen H. Taylor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Ranger. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Night of the Auk has been accepted

Night of the Auk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 04:12, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Coming back to the list of fictional astronauts

I've come back to this after a long break. Got back into the cleaning up of the references where possible. Something I noticed when watching the extended Audi 8 advert from 2016, the very first shot of the advert reveals that the unnamed astronaut is also a Mercury veteran.

I thought I'd discuss that with you prior to making the edit. Graham1973 (talk) 02:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please, go ahead and make the edit, Graham. Once again, it's good to have you back, and thank you for everything you're doing. :-) Gildir (talk) 13:24, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Night of the Auk

On 2 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Night of the Auk, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a 1960 telecast of Night of the Auk was the first time William Shatner played a spacecraft crew member on television? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Night of the Auk. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:01, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Having problem with a footnote on List of fictional astronauts

I've created a footnote for the List of Fictional astronauts to indicate that the authors name for the novel version is a pseudonym, but for some reason it is not appearing and there is a very unhelpful error message at the bottom of the rerence listing.

I have not been able to figure out just what I did wrong, you might want to have a look at the formatting and see what you can do.Graham1973 (talk) 13:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the formatting, and the footnote now appears in the list of references. If you would rather have it appear with the footnotes, I might be able to do that, too. Thanks, Graham. Gildir (talk) 15:31, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fix, was trying to get it to appear in the footnotes rather than the references, if you can get that to work fine, but if not, I'm not that worried. Still searching YouTube for anything interesting film wise.Graham1973 (talk) 16:02, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've now put the footnote in the list of footnotes. Thanks again for everything you're doing, Graham. Gildir (talk) 16:12, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, both for your assistance and for keeping the list going, as noted it may never be completed, but it's a fun journey researching and finding new things to add to it.Graham1973 (talk) 01:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Sheriff & The Astronaut

I was just doing a curiosity search for the unsold TV drama "The Sheriff & The Astronaut" and stumbled across an old 'Coming up Next' promo on YouTube, looks like the only(?) episode produced may have aired, but from the looks of it I can see why it didn't prosper.

The clip is linked below, this might and I stress might be worth further research.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOjOCSydBKg

I've also managed to locate via GoogleNews a TV listing dated May 24, 1984 that confirms that it was planned to air the pilot and another article from May 31, 1984 confirming that it did in fact air. I'm now wondering if it made it onto VHS.

The Free Lance-Star, May 24, 1984 - The TV listing is on page 16 https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=9fRKRCJz75UC&dat=19840524&printsec=frontpage&hl=en

Star-News, May 31, 1984 https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1454&dat=19840531&id=I05OAAAAIBAJ&sjid=HRQEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5037,8166557

Graham1973 (talk) 01:37, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uncovered an actual review:

People Magazine, May 28, 1984 http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20087876,00.html Graham1973 (talk) 14:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Graham. The final shot of the shuttle launching behind the sheriff on the rearing horse is quite amusing. Gildir (talk) 14:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I thought so too. Hopefully you might have a better chance (Being in the USA) of locating a copy of the full episode.Graham1973 (talk) 17:27, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, Graham, but I don't know about that. I'm not good at finding films online, only when they're available from my library through interlibrary loan. I'll keep looking for other things, though. Gildir (talk) 14:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Small Step (short story) (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:One Small Step (short story) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333 -blue 06:52, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Helsinki 1952 torch

Why is the picture of Helsinki 1952 torch missing in the articles Olympic flame and list of Olympic torch designs? --85.76.73.226 (talk) 19:45, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Small Step (short story) has been accepted

One Small Step (short story), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chenzw Talk 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Antonio Ascari.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Antonio Ascari.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gildir. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Fictional Astronauts

I've added to the talk page a music video with a space theme, that you might want to watch. It is a possible for inclusion but I wanted a consensus about it if possible. Also I am going to be going over the page to fix the titling. Book titles are supposed to be in italics not "quotation marks".Graham1973 (talk) 23:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Graham. I should have watched it already but I have a lot going on this week. Hope to see it in a few days. Always great to work with you on the list. Gildir (talk) 22:06, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you can run down a copy of the spy novel (Assignment - Mara Tirana) I added to the list. I could only go on what was included in the summary. I've no idea what details the author included in the book. Given the year of publication it's most likely a Mercury capsule, but you can never tell with these authors. Graham1973 (talk) 22:36, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I read the first 39 pages of the book and skimmed the rest. Stepanic's spacecraft is launched by an Atlas rocket with a second-stage Thor-Able (p. 17). The capsule is described as a "one-ton mushroom bell", "not more than ten feet long and six feet wide" (p. 121), but the name "Mercury" is never used. I found one occurrence of the name "NASA" (p. 122). Gildir (talk) 14:25, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nate Bender for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nate Bender is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Bender until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:57, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion on File:Bruce Harlan.jpg

Hello. WP:PROD now applies to files. The File:Bruce Harlan.jpg is replaced by File:Bruce Harlan 01.jpg, uploaded on Commons. Therefore, I nominated "File:Bruce Harlan.jpg" for deletion. If you object, please reinsert the image at Bruce Harlan and then remove the PROD tag. Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 19:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugenio Ruspoli has been accepted

Eugenio Ruspoli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:11, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Des majorettes dans l'espace (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jcc was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article contains no references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Des majorettes dans l'espace and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:46, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dave Rahm has been accepted

Dave Rahm, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 18:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Des majorettes dans l'espace has been accepted

Des majorettes dans l'espace, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 18:51, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Gildir/Alex Amidon

User:Gildir/Alex Amidon, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gildir/Alex Amidon and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Gildir/Alex Amidon during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 13:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nodar Kumaritashvili images

In regards to why I deleted the image of the accident, I have the article at FAC, and the image review noted there is no clear source for the copyright holder on the image. As I wrote in my reply on that, I would prefer to keep the image there (as it is indeed a defining part of the article), but couldn't find the original owner (the image's information links to a user-upload on Youtube, which is clearly not the copyright holder). So if/when that is sorted out, it is probably best to keep the image off, though if you can find the original owner of the video and update the image's information, that would make it easier. Kaiser matias (talk) 11:53, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thanks, Kaiser. Gildir (talk) 03:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of fictional astronauts into several new pages. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:22, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gildir. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Onofre Marimon.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Onofre Marimon.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Target Books, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Whitaker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2000 Commonwealth Avenue collapse.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 22:55, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gildir. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Monika Schultz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monika Schultz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monika Schultz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:09, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of fictional last words, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rohan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of fictional astronauts (futuristic exploration of Moon), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One Small Step (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:43, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Thank you for continuing to make Wikipedia the greatest project in the world. I hope you have an excellent holiday season. Lightburst (talk) 03:52, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Thanksgiving Promise, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi Gildir, I noticed you added a redlink for Archer Christian on the Joseph J. Himmel article. I'm only somewhat familiar with the events surrounding his death and the changes to college football. Is he notable, i.e. would he pass the notability criteria to have a standalone article? Ergo Sum 23:46, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Honesty about my edit

Hello there. I saw that you removed my edit, which is "Krankenschwester...Krankenschwester...Ich kann nicht atmen...du auf meinem Atemschlauch stehst". You said that this is "probable vandalism". It's not "probable vandalism". The reason why I did that is that I found this subreddit which claims that Albert Einstein's last words are "Krankenschwester...Krankenschwester...Ich kann nicht atmen...du auf meinem Atemschlauch stehst". Unfortunately, there's no link to back up the claimed last words. I simply searched "walter aldridge albert einstein" and there's no website or books about it. So, in my mind, I decided to put the claimed last words, hoping that someone came across it and will search for any sources to back up what it's said there. If they don't, then they'll remove it. I'm gonna leave you with four questions:

Did you fail to find any sources to back up the claim?
Do you believe that Walter Aldridge is real?
Do you believe that the claim is true?
Do you believe that the elderly woman and her granddaughter are real?

I'll reply as soon as you replied.

Emotioness Expression (talk) 10:36, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You need to find reliable sources before you post something so bizarre, which sounds like a joke, and which concerns one of the most renowned people ever to have lived. The burden of proof is on you. Gildir (talk) 20:22, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answer. Also, I did find any reliable sources for other pages before. But like I said, I'm gonna leave you with four questions:

Did you fail to find any sources to back up the claim?
Do you believe that Walter Aldridge is real?
Do you believe that the claim is true?
Do you believe that the elderly woman and her granddaughter are real?

Again, I'll reply as soon as you replied.

Emotioness Expression (talk) 08:59, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just found the subreddit you mentioned, and it's a response to a "writing prompt" -- in other words, it's a work of fiction. I apologize for not searching for it sooner. Gildir (talk) 11:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. I'm fine with it. Anyway, do you answer all of the questions? Let me know. Also, did you not see the linked word (subreddit)? Emotioness Expression (talk) 15:58, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't bother to click on the linked word. I replied in haste. In any case, the only Google search result for "Walter Aldridge" and "European Physical Society" is the subreddit in question, strongly suggesting that there are no other sources. Since the subreddit is a work of fiction, the answers to your second, third, and fourth questions are all "no". Once again, I apologize for replying in haste. Gildir (talk) 16:06, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answers. Again, it's okay. I'm fine with it. Also, I'm honest enough to put a reason for doing that as opposed to someone who likes vandalizing stuff with no honest reason. Emotioness Expression (talk) 16:16, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know. I also apologize for referring to the edit as "probable vandalism". Thanks for your feedback. Gildir (talk) 16:21, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. Next time, do some searching to confirm the claim made by people on Wikipedia. Also, you're welcome. And also, it's a lesson for me that if I stumbled upon a fake source, don't fell for that trap. Instead, just look at what its content is and do some searching about the claims it made. Emotioness Expression (talk) 16:45, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Crew Dragon Demo-2

Thanks for your edit. CRS-20 (talk) 22:06, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of last words

You're welcome. Emotioness Expression (talk) 10:34, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Space Force officers

Hi, I noticed you have been changing categories of some officers from USSF personnel to USSF officers. Technically, they are not commissioned officers of the United States Space Force. They might be soon, upon transferring from USAF, but currently they are USAF officers assigned at USSF.--AFLBulawan (talk) 10:38, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, AFLBulawan. I've been correcting some of the mistakes I made. Gildir (talk) 10:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, Gildir. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Oleg Grigoriyevich Kononenko.
Message added 11:55, 16 August 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:55, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Oleg Grigoriyevich Kononenko

Hello! Your submission of Oleg Grigoriyevich Kononenko at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --evrik ^(talk) 04:54, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gilder, based on comments on the nomination page, this will be marked for closure on August 25 if you haven't replied there by then. Please stop by in the next day or so if you wish to continue with this DYK nomination. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Before adding a category to an article, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Please stop adding tags to movies that are not about the Coast Guard. ZimZalaBim ^talk 17:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Harvnb/harvid in List of last words

I HATE the harv method because it adds a single citation in the references section for every single entry, AND you can't thereafter hover over the footnote number and see a pop-up of the actual citation details (just the harv shorthand). You undid a good method already in use and I'd really like to re-do it for you. I much prefer the method that was already in the article, such as

<ref name="Shields 196"/>

and then adding a page number after it, if needed, like this:

<ref name="Shields"/>{{Rp|196}}

This method does NOT add extra citations. There is one single entry in the references list, and each use of the citation gets a tiny page number after it. There's a sample of how this is done in the History section of Tsavo Man-Eaters#History. Take a look. Normal Op (talk) 21:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the citation changes in question; feel free to make any further changes you would like. Thank you for your feedback, Normal Op. Gildir (talk) 22:01, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I see you reverted it. I'll take over and put in some page numbers and stuff (if you're done editing it for the moment). Normal Op (talk) 23:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Normal Op. Gildir (talk) 23:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done. Take a look and tell me what you think. Normal Op (talk) 00:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks classy. Thanks, Normal Op. Gildir (talk) 00:31, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

somewhere in the states

here in oz - (the deepest south in many senses) - we have the notion of elsewhere - temptation to offer commentary about project tagging - but... JarrahTree 12:01, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited January 1968, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Praeger.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William H. Nation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amfreville.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suicide note, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cato.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of last words, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Wilson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	For your copyedits and other contributions to the Brian Sicknick article. I appreciate that you've kept a watchful eye on that article to ensure the utmost quality. Edge3 (talk) 15:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, Edge3. I really appreciate it. Gildir (talk) 00:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Group discussion on Category:Months in the 20th century articles

In that you've been a major contributor to the articles in Category:Months in the 20th century, you are invited to participate in a discussion among the contributors about a basic framework for the project, at [1] Mandsford 16:28, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dashing

MOS:RANGE specifies en dashes for date separators. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:31, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Bobby Younkin" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bobby Younkin. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 27#Bobby Younkin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. - ZLEA _T\^C 22:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Alex Harvill

On 22 June 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Alex Harvill, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 23:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Martian 2014.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Martian 2014.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

request

Greetings, You can upload the File "Knud Jensen lying in road.jpg" file to Wikimedia Commons? Neriah • talk • 12:56, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, unfortunately, I can't. As far as I know the image is copyrighted. I uploaded it to Wikipedia at an extremely low resolution as a fair use image, to appear only in the Knud Enemark Jensen article. I wish that it could appear at a higher resolution in List of last words (20th century)#1960–1969 and on the Commons page for Category:1960-08-26, but to the best of my knowledge that's not possible. Gildir (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Neriah • talk • 14:31, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited March 1975, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hypoxia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:58, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited January 1974, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conservationist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited January 1974, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Pacific.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EranBot

Hi Gildir! Regarding Special:Diff/1039261243: EranBot reviews all edits over a certain size and screens them for potential copyright violations. Each of the bot's reports is reviewed manually before any action is taken. Because there are a lot of Wikimedia mirrors (external websites that copy from Wikipedia), sometimes there are false positives. In this case, your edit was matched to a Wikipedia mirror. Because you properly attributed the copying from the 1978 article, there is no issue here and you should feel free to restore the edit and ignore the bot. Hope that makes sense; let me know if you have any questions about that. DanCherek (talk) 17:48, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to disambiguation pages

Please check every link you make to ensure that it leads where you intend. In your edit to April 1978 you linked to disambiguation page Stephen Murphy. I've fixed it.

There is an easy way to avoid linking to disambiguation pages: if you go to "Preferences", "Gadgets", and look under "Appearance" you'll see "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange" towards the bottom of the section. Select that tickbox, and whenever you Preview a page you'll be able to see whether you've accidentally linked to a disambiguation page. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 05:57, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited February 1900, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Scribner and American Book Company.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

May 1982

added links pointing to Food stamp and Puerto Rican

November 1963

added a link pointing to Varsity Blues

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited May 1982, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mikhaylovka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited October 1903, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Indians.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited December 1988, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Malinao and Thomas Pickering.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited June 1989, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Television Academy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited November 1930, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magician.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited November 1903, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cable car.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited November 1967, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rizzoli.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited February 1901, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Posse.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited December 1903, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Californian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited July 1903, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lynch mob and Moonshiner.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited February 1904, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bethany College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lynching of Richard Dickerson

Thank you for your edits on Lynching of Richard Dickerson. I may nominate it for DYK and you will be a contributor. Regarding the patrolman's name. I see him referred to as Collins in the (Cleveland) paper. I know some news calls him Collis. So I went with Collins. I was thinking the Collis version was a typo. But I am not sure. Just wanted to let you know why chose Collins. Bruxton (talk) 17:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited July 1903, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enfield.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abrey Kamoo

Hi, I started a discussion at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard#Abrey Kamoo where you might want to chime in. It is not intended to attack you, the article was clearly created in good faith and based on reliable sources, but nonetheless I have many questions... Fram (talk) 17:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, don't worry about it. My colleague based his article on the obituary, and it was only when I looked into it later that I found the story had holes. I'm not to Wikipedia so I'm still learning how to edit sources. I've found that BU Theological Library has more issues of Zion's Herald from the late 1800's/early 1900's, and from them I found that Abrey Kamoo joined the church in 1885. I also found a marriage record on Ancestry.com that showed her son William Kamoo married Sadie Williams on April 4th or 5th, 1889 by Reverend John Hood at the First United Presbyterian Church in Boston, now Newton Presbyterian Church. Sadie Williams was born about 1865 in Cedarville, New Jersey, to Henry and Ann Williams. The marriage certificate lists William as a "porter" born in New Orleans and Sadie as a "domestic". People's Temple merged with different churches over the years and is now Old West Church in Boston. Sadly they don't have any records of Mrs. Kamoo, so I would recommend the BU Theological Library for more info. I hope that helps!

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NW54-F29 — Preceding unsigned comment added by HenshinforPie (talk • contribs) 15:53, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't gild trash

I hate to upset you, but with your edit you made a bit of vandalism 'prettier'.

Had you read the article? A 21-year-old PLA soldier in 1960's China fervent for the revolution... had children and then grand-children? But the children/grandchildren changed the family name from 'Lei' to 'Leo', but kept the given name Feng the same?

Mindless wikifying can end up just rearranging the trash into 'nicer' piles. Don't do that. Shenme (talk) 08:20, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of last words for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of last words, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of last words until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yevhen Malyshev for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yevhen Malyshev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yevhen Malyshev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Curbon7 (talk) 09:20, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Deaths by person in Maine has been nominated for deletion

Category:Deaths by person in Maine has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 11:52, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited November 1901, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Northern Railway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Input on page name for Stephen [sic] Tarabalka

Greetings, Gildir! Your input would be appreciated on a query, Talk:Stephen Tarabalka#Page name. Cheers! -- Deborahjay (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional astronauts

Thank you very much for all of your fictional astronaut lists. Just came upon them recently and the amount of detail and sourcing on them is extraordinary. Great work! Randy Kryn (talk) 14:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, Randy. I didn't actually create the list to begin with -- User:Rvolz did, originally as a single list. Other users (such as User:Graham1973) and I significantly expanded it, to the point where other editors suggested that it had gotten too long to read; therefore, I split it into its current 13 separate lists (based on the organization of the previous single list). Once again, thank you so much for your appreciation, Randy. Gildir (talk) 01:12, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gildir is being modest. I created the list years ago, but I did very little work on it. It's fantastic now, with scads of entries that would never have occurred to me. I may have created the spark, but without Gildir it would have died long ago! I appreciate the work done every time I come here! --Roland 15:00, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Roland. You and Randy have made my week. Gildir (talk) 15:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For your extraordinary comprehensive work on 'Fictional astronaut' lists. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Don Fleming.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Don Fleming.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Milady de Winter

Hello,

I usually contribute on the french WP. An anonymous IP tries to add the first name of Laurence to the name of this fictional character on WP in several languages (spanish and italian in particular). As we check on the French WP, the name of Laurence does not appear on the whole Dumas novel. This looks like a spam to a Facebook page.

Thank you for your help v_atekor (talk) 20:44, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Images in month articles

Let's see if we can figure a way to working with whatever challenges the new format might present for placement of images. The contents box has always had a massive amount of blank space around it, and the images are a good way to alert the reader to some of the highlights of the month described in the text that follows. As you know, Wikipedia has recently gone to featuring a small image that shows up in the results of any search, which is an improvement IMO over the text only display that used to be returned on searches. I appreciate the work that you do on keeping the sourcing and copy-editing at the highest professional standards. Moving images down the page on every article in the project, however, is an extreme when there may be other ways to work with the calendar box. I'm open to discussing ideas, although I'm not sure that I see much difference between the old skin and the new skin. Thanks. Mandsford 23:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for thinking about this, Mandsford. I do think that many of the month articles looked awkward with the previous placement of images and the new skin, but I'll certainly tinker with ways to restore some of the lead images, and I'd be interested to hear what ideas you have. Thanks again. Gildir (talk) 02:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for being open to discussion. In many ways, it would be good if only one large (300px or so) photo for a defining event could be put at the beginning, on the right side of the contents box, and I'd like to see at least one "front page" photo up top. As we've all seen, some months had more than one big moment. BTW, Gildir, I have an account with newspapers.com, and if you'd ever like to use the service every once in awhile to get more detail from the news accounts at the time-- or to solve a mystery of "whatever happened to....?" please let me know.Mandsford 14:42, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I also like the idea of having one large image on the top right, which is what I've tried to do in the past. At the moment I'm restoring, and in some cases modifying, the work other people had done in adding lead images, which I had hastily undone. Thank you for the newspapers.com offer, Mandsford; I really appreciate it. Gildir (talk) 14:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as April 1963. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Please see the following links for more information: https://copypatrol.toolforge.org/en/?id=96370794

https://api.ithenticate.com/en_us/dv/20220511?lang=en_us&o=96370794 MrBauer24 (talk) 13:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright on March 1966

Did you, in this edit, copy from here? Because the text is the same. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 10:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, I copied from here, which is a public domain source and which I credited in the citation. Astronautix presumably copied from the same source. Gildir (talk) 10:43, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great thanks for the reply. It popped up on CopyPatrol Thats why I asked. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 10:46, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You plan on using {{Template:Source-attribution}}? 1AmNobody24 (talk) 10:53, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for the suggestion. Gildir (talk) 06:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gemini program

Hi, Gildir-- do you have any future plans for shortening the length of the additions from the Grimwood and Brooks chronologies of the daily events of the Gemini program? I recognize the need to add material, to be pared down later, from a source that may not always be available. That said, almost all of these could be abridged down to the most relevant details, and some of these events are less significant than others. At some point, I will attempt my own edit of some of the articles. As a courtesy, I'll alert you to the edit so that you can review it and see if you want to put a different spin on abridging it. Mandsford 14:56, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I realize they need to be abridged, and I would be very pleased if you could take a crack at it. Thanks for paying attention to these things; I really appreciate it. Gildir (talk) 14:57, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can see the pattern I'm following in the edits to October 1961‎, November 1961 and December 1961‎. I'll be starting on January 1962 next. Mandsford 00:54, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What you're doing looks wonderful, Mandsford. I've made a few tweaks to it. Thanks again. Gildir (talk) 05:38, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gildir— I appreciate your kind words of April 28. think you've done a great job in compressing (and in some cases, deleting) the space exploration information while leaving intact the most important aspects. I learned quite a lot in going over the progress of the Gemini program, and I know you spent a lot of the month of April editing this. We've got a good team of people on the months of the 1900s project-- not just you and me, but folks like Deb and Freeman1856. The offer of access to newspapers.com stands, of course. Let me know anytime you want to explore it. Mandsford 02:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on December 1957

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page December 1957, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 1957

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1957, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited December 1957, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Collier.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on September 1970

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page September 1970, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Dangla, in italiano

ciao, qui puoi trovare un articolo su di lui, nel caso possa servirti. 2.237.220.21 (talk) 15:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for thanking me

I wanted to let you know how much I appreciate your thanks for my edits to List of unusual deaths. Feels a little odd to thank someone for thanking me, but I wanted you to know! That's a weird and messy page, and I'm glad I'm not the only one keeping watch on it. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 15:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello Gildir!

The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Felice Bonetto.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Felice Bonetto.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Deaths by person in Azerbaijan

A tag has been placed on Category:Deaths by person in Azerbaijan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding Bert R. J. Hassell to September 1924

Gildir, thank you for bringing attention to Bert Hassell, one of the unsung heroes of aviation. I had never heard of him, but after reading his obituary of 9/12/74 from the New York Times, I realize that he made an important contribution with the Great Circle Route, which I've heard called (not accurately) as "flying over the North Pole". Unfortunately, Wikipedia has no adequate article about that route-- there's an overly technical feature about great circle navigation that doesn't mention what it's used for or when it came into use, let alone who pioneered it. Hassell does get brief mention as one of the many redlinks in Early Birds of Aviation, so I've made reference to that to keep this from being a red link for now. Definitely someone who needs his own article, and I think that plenty of sources can be found to back it up. I'll try to start one sometime; if you start one, I'll help find sources and try to explain the significance of something I don't entirely understand. Great find! Mandsford 23:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Richard G. Thomas

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Richard G. Thomas, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bill Vukovich 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bill Vukovich 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of fictional astronauts (Project Apollo era)

I'm not sure how to classify the entry for the short story "Does the Name Grimsby Do Anything To You?" The story takes place after a successful Moon landing in July 1969. However, the story alludes to a previous successful Moon landing by a Civil War era engineer named Franklin Grimsby, who landed on the Moon on 11 July 1865. It's currently listed under the 1969. --Roland 20:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:History of sports in Canada by team

Hello, Gildir,

Category redirects are different from article redirects. Please look at the code/template on this page so you know how to format a category redirect properly. Don't feel bad, few editors have a reason to create category redirects so few know how to make them. But it's very simple, you just use a different code. I just thought I'd point it out in case you wanted to correct any others you have made. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you, Gildir (and User:Deb as well), for joining the discussion that we recently had with another editor about our views on organization within the month articles. My feeling is that we've all tried to abide by the idea that notability is the primary concern, i.e., that some events are more notable than others; and I feel that there's an objective measure of notability, based on the extent to which something is covered in books, newspapers and other media. I also feel that shifting around items with no reasonable explanation (or reverting other people's choices about shifting items in a pattern that can be explained, such as WP:GNG or WP:N would qualify as disruptive editing, if not worse. I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on how things should be organized.Mandsford 16:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for contacting me, User:Mandsford, and for all the work you do on these articles. I don't really have any further suggestions for organizing the daily entries than what I described on the other editor's talk page. I previously tried to put the entries in the order in which they happened during the day, which in practice I usually could only approximate by placing them in geographical order from east to west. I realize now that it's better to place them in approximate order of decreasing importance instead, but I haven't gone back and redone all the days I organized the other way (for example, see October 1903#October 31, 1903 (Saturday), where the situation is further complicated by the fact that I included two images in the entry). Once again, thanks for reaching out. Gildir (talk) 02:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Gildir, and as I've said before, I appreciate everything you do. In July, after the "truce" with Arcadia expires, I'd like to use the talk page at least one of the months articles for the 1960s, "pinging" the different editors who have been working on those (you, Deb, Arcadia and other frequent editors) to get a consensus on ranking events. At the moment, no hurry on that, but it would be good to have a consensus in place.Mandsford 14:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. Thanks, Mandsford. Gildir (talk) 14:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm interested in hearing your thoughts about organization.

Misuse of tag

I would like to know why you tagged IMDB as an "unreliable source", considering that it is operated by the studios themselves. Captain Bipto (talk) 21:58, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, "The content on IMDb is user-generated, and the site is considered unreliable by a majority of editors." Gildir (talk) 04:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on April 1978

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page April 1978, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Births and deaths

Hi, Gildir-- the multiple "Born" entries aren't meant to be redundant; the ones in the first group are those for which a notable accomplishment was visible from the Wikitpedia article, like the president of a world nation, or the winner of a gold medal in the Olympics or a world championship, an actor or a singer who won a major award (e.g. Oscar, BAFTA, Grammy, Tony) or a footballer who was on the national team, etc. Good example would Philibert Tsiranana, first president of Madasgascar, who shared a date of birth with military governor Lucius Clay. The second group of "Born" entries are those who have feature because they are inherently notable, and might have something to distinguish themselves from other actors, athletes, singers, politicians, but not yet documented. A good example of the latter would be Francis X. Bushman Jr., who took the name of his father, a very accomplished actor, Francis X. Bushman, but who was mostly uncredited in his film roles. Mandsford 19:33, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification, Mandsford. Sorry if I caused extra effort. Thanks again for all your work on these articles. Gildir (talk) 20:15, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all you do as well, and there's no problem.Mandsford 12:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page patrol

Hello, Gildir. If you make any changes that are reverted without an explanation-- or at least without an adequate explanation-- please let me know, and I'll be happy to step in. I'm getting ready to go over the 1960s month articles and begin arranging the sequence of events in individual sections, based on the WP:N, an objective standard based upon the amount of mention of such events in books and newspaper accounts as the measure of notability of an event. I don't intend to delete any additions that are cited to reliable and verifiable sources, but on any rearrangements that have been done without an edit summary to explain the reason for the repositioning, I will feel free to make fixes based on a notability standard. If you know any other editors who have faced the same problem, please alert them. Thanks.Mandsford 14:46, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. Thanks, Mandsford. Gildir (talk) 15:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bringing you up to date.... I did get a reply from Arcadia16 as follows:

Hello Mandsford, we've discussed about your plan to revert my edits I did between March and May of this year and I need to know this. So about the "which article is "notable" and which article isn't" talk back in late May, I wanna know why in one of your changes on the June 17, 1963 section you did not put the infamous Vietnam riots in the top? Wouldn't that be more notable? I fail to see how that is not notable then the articles on that section. You probably know what I'm talking about since I just saw your edits in June 1963. Also, I wanna know more about why my edits aren't allowed for the 1960s wiki pages. Are my edits breaking any rules here or is it just because you don't like the way I changed all the stuff in order of how my sentences they have? I am genuinely curious about why it is a big deal. Arcadia (talk) 09:05, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also sent this reply to him or her:

Hello, Arcadia16. I appreciate your statement. Please feel free to put put the Vietnam riots entry on top of the June 17 section if you believe that that event is more notable. Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and perhaps the Vietnam riots were the more notable even of the day. In addition, additional events that you've discovered through your own research are welcome anytime. However, I've seen from your talk page that you seem to believe that everyone else who has done the work of researching and writing has created "a jumbled mess" and that you intend to re-arrange items to satisfy your criteria that you have "changed all the stuff in order of how many sentences they have." Notwithstanding that this number-of-sentences isn't the way that almanacs or encyclopedias are usually organized, or that by that measure a person could move an event upward or downward by adding or deleting sentences, there is a policy summarized in Wikipedia:Notability (events), in particular the section about Inclusion criteria (which can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (events)#Inclusion criteria. The ranking in the criteria includes "enduring historical significance" and "widespread (national or international) impact" or having been "widely covered in diverse sources", or having the notability of being re-analyzed afterward. You asked whether your edits are breaking any rules, and I would note that "changing all the stuff" in an arbitrary manner would likely be considered disruptive editing. You aren't the first editor to attempt a mission of wanting to change everything, though attempting to change all 120 of the 1960s articles is a wider ambition than we usually see. Rather than looking at the other editors as unworthy opponents, joining us in collectively building and adding to a project. We've worked hard on building these articles, and we invite you to add to them, as well as to add to the project by addressing those that have not been covered (an example cited before would be January 1957, which is simply a redirect to 1957. You can make a lot of great contributions to Wikipedia. However, attempting a massive overhaul of what others have done will receive a response.Mandsford 15:43, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for the long statement. We may hear more; however, I would recommend editing articles as you see fit, in that Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Mandsford 15:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update, Mandsford. I appreciate it. Gildir (talk) 15:59, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Rauchut.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Rauchut.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 21:50, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rauchut.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rauchut.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bernd Brandes.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bernd Brandes.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Andrew Pontious.png

The file File:Andrew Pontious.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free file being used in a decorative manner to illustrate an individual entry in a list article which fails WP:NFCC#1, WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFLISTS. Non-free images of deceased individuals can be used, but typically only for primary identification purposes in the main infoboxes or at the tops of stand-alone articles about the individual themselves; such images are pretty much never allowed to illustrate indvidual entries in list articles, unless the image itself (not the subject but the actual image) is the subject of sourced critical commentary. If someone feels the subject is Wikipedia notable and want to create an stand-alone article about them, then a non-free image could most likely be used in said article; however, there's really no way to justify its use in this article per Wikipedia's non-free content use policy.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:38, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Andrew Pontious.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Andrew Pontious.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:03, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Oz and Commons thanks!

Thanks for the likes on my edits over on Commons! All of that is part of a larger organizing and clean up I am doing in relation to WikiProject Oz! I know you have been around for a while (2005!) so you might have interacted with this project in a prior state. I am working on reviving it at the moment. Please let me know what you think of the page so far and if you have any suggestions. And feel free to join it as well, or if you want to ask any questions I am here to answer. SDudley (talk) 14:05, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1957 months

Hello, appreciate your contributions on Wikipedia. Just wanted to let you know more article for months in 1957 need to be created. What’s the update there? 2600:100C:A209:D108:79EF:11AB:5E62:2263 (talk) 23:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]