User talk:TheWikiholic/archive 4

Cultural impact of Michael Jackson

Hi Akhiljaxxn, can you explain the revert for Cultural impact of Michael Jackson? Isaacsorry (talk) 19:39, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry. Your additions were excessive and unnecessary and it was fully forked content from other wiki pages. And there are many debates on these regarding the article's talk page like what should be there and what shouldn't be there. I hope you read it thoroughly before you make further edits. Thank you. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 17:15, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Paris Jackson (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paris Jackson (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paris Jackson (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vaporgaze (talk) 10:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter December 2019

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	Rosguill (talk)	47,395	Patrol Page Curation
2	Onel5969 (talk)	41,883	Patrol Page Curation
3	JTtheOG (talk)	11,493	Patrol Page Curation
4	Arthistorian1977 (talk)	5,562	Patrol Page Curation
5	DannyS712 (talk)	4,866	Patrol Page Curation
6	CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk)	3,995	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	3,812	Patrol Page Curation
8	Boleyn (talk)	3,655	Patrol Page Curation
9	Ymblanter (talk)	3,553	Patrol Page Curation
10	Cwmhiraeth (talk)	3,522	Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Onam festival

BJP-RSS propaganda in Onam article to make it more Hindu than secular and to alter its myth by diminishing the importance of Mahabali over Vamana. It was done by Snowcream and Ms Sarah Welch. Restoring problematic content and source despite this discussion. 137.97.120.85 (talk) 15:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Can you invite Malayali Wikipedians for discussion. Onam is a featured article in Malayalam Wikipedia. 137.97.18.129 (talk) 16:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter – December 2019

WikiProject India

Newly recognized content

December 2019 recognized content includes:

• List of India national football team hat-tricks
• Blue Pilgrims

Newly nominated content

• Chandrayaan-2
• Surat
• Golaghat

Created by Bellus Delphina

News

• The holiday season has begun. WikiProject India Wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade. We look forward to working with you in 2020!
• Editor Uanfala started a conversation about Lists of notable people in articles about places back in November and it still needs more editor's opinion on the subject.
• Join a disscusion about formatting writing credits and music credits. The discussion is about Indian films having some differences from Western films in terms of writing and music credits.
• India Search Result is a bot-generated page that tracks newly created articles related to India. It is a place to look out for new page pages. The page is updated daily and make sure to add it to your watchlist.

Miscellaneous

• There are 17 Did You Know nominations, 20 Good Article nominations, and 1 Featured Articles candidates to be reviewed.
• You can join the discussion at Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#Citizenship_Amendment_Act_protests.
• There are 3 articles waiting to be peer-reviewed.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Contribute
• Subscribe/Unsubscribe
• Archive

Sent by CAPTAIN MEDUSA on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 08:40, 26 December 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)

New message from DBigXray

Hello, TheWikiholic. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Onam_being_changed_from_Secular_to_Hindu_Festival.
Message added 14:47, 1 January 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

on Onam Happy New Year! ᗙ DBigXrayᗙ 14:47, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to Michael Jackson.
The specific details of these sanctions are described here:-

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

qedk (t 桜 c) 17:13, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

Hello, I'm Kutyava. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sriram Venkitaraman without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kutyava (talk) 11:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Reverts on Dangerous

Hello Akhiljaxxn, can you give me a reason why you reverted my edits on Dangerous as you didn't explain in the edit summary. This would be much more helpful in the future and less confusing. Thanks :) Isaacsorry (talk) 10:43, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:T. G. Mohandas

There has been a technical problem with the refund of Draft:T. G. Mohandas being done by cut and paste and I am currently sorting out a work around.

• Please don't edit that draft or its replacement (currently at Draft:T. G. Mohandas 2 ) until I've finished and removed in-use.
• You will have to do link removal again ... but please don't do it until in-use is removed. This is simply because I really would like confirmation from Padavalamkuttanpilla their contributions from the bad draft have been duplicated faithfully and they are happy with the attribution.

Sorry for the inconvenience. Djm-leighpark (talk) 19:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

I have now removed the In-use Draft:T. G. Mohandas 2 which is now the good fork. I need to mention in terms of completeness that while most of external links have already been removed and you may need to consider whether those that remain are appropriate in your view. ( I am giving this from a technical point of view of clerking out the bad fork which is independent of any views I may have of whether particular external links are/were appropriate ). Thankyou for your patience. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

Hello TheWikiholic,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources

• There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
• A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
• A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
• A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.

Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Public image section

It's not clear why did you made this revert. It's just a copyedit, the previous version had several issues, including lack of context, connecting unrelated sources, and non-neutral (WP:CSECTION). For example, the first sentence begins with "in 2013" when it actually happened in 2018 per source, and it is unrelated to the second sentence but both are connected together – the incident mentioned in second sentence happened in 2013. The third sentence "opposition by a graduate student" has no context as the incident was not mentioned before. Statements about transgender and autism was redundantly mentioned two times. The section was nonsensical to readers who don't know about the subject. What additionally added was Rajith's point-of-view – previously it was one sided, public's reaction, and gave context to the others. No new sources has been added, all changes were made based on the content in the existing sources itself. Now it's balanced and makes sense. 137.97.68.17 (talk) 17:40, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

NPOL

Hi Akhil, Can you please quote the line from NPOL that talks about the party president ? you can respond here, since it is about the policy and less on AfD --DBigXrayᗙ 17:42, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

DBigXray I apologize for the line about the President, because this was the policy on the Malayalam Wikipedia. The subject meets NPOL since it passes one of the two policies: Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage; and also passes WP:GNG.- Akhiljaxxn (talk) 18:20, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Ok, Please fix this error on the AfD. You can remove my comment as it will no longer be needed. I allow you to remove my comment, you can state it in edit summary. Asking so that other AfD folks are not confused by this. --DBigXrayᗙ 18:25, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of All India Professionals Congress for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All India Professionals Congress is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All India Professionals Congress until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 03:51, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Meera Jasmine page

That page requires an edit . She is divorced now . But it shows as still in relationship/marriage . Jawharvt (talk) 09:34, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Convener of Aam Aadmi Party (Punjab, India)

Hello, What is the exact reason for nominating this article for deletion? Manakpreet Singh (talk) 02:50, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dangerous (Michael Jackson album)

The article Dangerous (Michael Jackson album) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Dangerous (Michael Jackson album) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Abryn -- Abryn (talk) 22:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Asianet News

Please see Asianet News, the page is being vandalized and just speculative information is kept for the ban. 42.109.136.221 (talk) 07:26, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Congrats

Congrats on ur edit on 2022 elections. Keep it on. Nahtrav (talk)

Use of rollback

Hi, per WP:ROLLBACKUSE, please don't use rollback to revert good faith edits. If you disagree with a good faith edit that doesn't meet the requirements for one of the five permitted uses of rollback, use another method of reversion and include an edit summary to explain your reasoning. Thanks. Aoi (青い) (talk) 19:09, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Manjappada

Please don't undo the article Manjappada or How can I improve it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamfrzu07 (talk • contribs) 11:35, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

AnjaliMonteiro

Hello Akhil

I have seen that you have placed notability template in the article. I am aware of that wikipedia notability policy. I think you might didn't noticed the persons notability as well. I kindly request you to remove the template.  ::Thank you! -- User:Mustafdesam (User talk:Mustafdesam) 03:30, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

 Removed.- Akhiljaxxn (talk) 05:04, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello Akhil

Thank you! -- User:Mustafdesam (User talk:Mustafdesam) 10:39, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

reason

That was indeed a valid reason. I apologize but the paper you furnished has 99% of copied stuff.— Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

March 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at List of ATK players. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Dey subrata (talk) 16:15, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Dey subrata Understood, and thanks; I appreciate you've given the other editor a similar message.– Akhiljaxxn (talk) 16:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Inappropriate Canvassing

Hi. I'm Barkeep9, an administrator here. I have been closing AfDs tonight have come across two different nominations (and perhaps there are others) where there is a concern that you were canvassing people. Please read (or re-read) WP:CANVASS and let me know if you have any questions either by pinging me here or leaving a note on my talk page. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:24, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Barkeep49, I messaged a few editors who are known for their expertise in the field of discussions related to AfD. I wanted to draw a wider range of informed but uninvolved editors' input for this. And my message was "I would like to bring your attention: for your input here (link 1), here (link 2) and here (link 3)." I thought WP:APPNOTE allowed this.- Akhiljaxxn (talk) 07:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Akhiljaxxn, the note itself wasn't the issue. It was going to a select group of editors. Posting to a project is OK. Posting to a defined list of editors (e.g. those who participated in an earlier AfD) is OK. Going to editors you respect - even if you don't know how they will !vote is not really permitted by CANVASS, at least in my reading of it. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 12:39, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

It wasn't going to a select group of editors. If it was like you said, two out of three that I messaged wouldn't make an issue out of it. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Relist bias/3rd relists

Hi there - I saw your relist at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adivishnu. I'm not sure if you've ever read WP:RELISTBIAS but I think it does a good job of explaining why non-admins should be cautious about relisting at AfD. Beyond that, our deletion guideline says that for a third (or more) relist a statement is called for. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

No, You are correct. I never read WP:RELISTBIAS before, and my reasons for the relist were well described in there. I will be more cautious next time when I do so. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Priyanka Gandhi

She is not vacating the MP accommodation despite not being a Member of Parliament. Why have you rolled back the edit? She is a criminal and you are a vandal on Wikipedia.

Pushpam Priya Choudhary

Akhiljaxxn Hi, you just marked the page of Pushpam Priya Choudhary for speedy deletion. Please reconsider it as the current version is not promotional at all and the subject is a Politician and the president of a Political Party. Would request you to reconsider it. WikiNav 13:51, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

References

New Page needs to be reviewed.

Hi, I have written an article about an actress in Kannada film industry. Could you please help review it and move it from draft into an article if all criterions are met. Please find the link below. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nisha_Ravikrishnan Thanks and Regards Cinemapremi Cinemapremi (talk) 09:30, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Rajasthan Legislative Assembly

There Are 13 Independents How Can You Join Them In INC

So Please Don't Revert The Edit Brother

They Joined Congress But Should Be Indicated Separately

Independents Should Not Be Merged With Party They Joined KumarVenati (talk) 14:57, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

WP:ARE

Hi Akhil, I have mentioned you at WP:ARE#Venue9, but the ping probably did not go through. If you have any comments, please add them. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

No more comments since the user have been blocked indef. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 03:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Now's the Time (Francissca Peter album)

Hello Akhiljaxxn. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Now's the Time (Francissca Peter album), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: artist has an article (see Francissca Peter). Thank you. SoWhy 06:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Vijoo Krishnan

To evaluate the worth of notable peasant leaders and social activists based on wether they contest election is really obscure.

He is India's notable peasant activist and specialist Writer on Agrarian economy. He has earned enough National and International Media attention for mobilising lakh of farmers in national capital and in many other states.

Kindly reconsider your speedy deletion proposition.

Kerala

Largest city is needed every state has a Largest city in Wikipedia page not only India every country in the world Ktdk (talk) 03:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Kerala

Kochi is not largest city Kochi covers an area of 93sqkm Thiruvananthapuram covers an area of 217sqkm Ktdk (talk) 08:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

India 10,000 challenge

Hello TheWikiholic. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}} Thanks, Dey subrata (talk) 12:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge

Hello TheWikiholic. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}} Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

For Redirecting the page of Shri Krishna Sinha from Shri Krishna Singh(Politician)

Hello, I don't know why you have redirected the page of Shri Krishna Sinha from Shri Krishna Singh(Politician). No one knows him by that Shri Krishna Singh Name. It is just a political party agenda to remember his name by that.ItWiki97 (talk) 10:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)ItWiki97

Square One

There was no message for me as you claimed, therefore no explanation why you reverted my edits which used Wikipedia guidelines as a source. Jordan Chandler was the boy who alleged sexual abuse by Michael Jackson so the page is wrongly claiming it was Evan Chandler. The court case is well documented to prove it was Jordan Chandler, it's not debatable.

Proof it was he:

Back in 1993, when the first charges of sexual abuse were leveled at Michael Jackson by a 13-year-old boy named Jordan “Jordie” Chandler

In mid-August 1993, during an appointment set up by Chandler with psychiatrist Dr. Mathis Abrams, Jordan described being molested by Jackson, including incidents of kissing, masturbation and oral sex, which Abrams reported to the authorities.

Jackson was first accused of child abuse in 1993 by Jordan Chandler. That accusation led to an extensive law enforcement investigation but no indictment. Jackson reportedly settled a civil lawsuit in 1994 with an undisclosed payment to Chandler's family.

On August 17, Chandler took his son to a psychiatrist, where Jordan revealed the details of Jackson’s abuse, including fondling and oral sex. Per California law, the allegations were then reported to the police, who launched an investigation into Jackson.

"In January 1994, Jackson settled the case for $23 million, with $5 million going to the family’s lawyers. Prosecutors dropped the criminal case after the boy declined to cooperate."

07:06, 24 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bananasasas (talk • contribs)

Indian National Congress

Hi mate, hope you are doing good. I was trying to put image file on their respective mentioned section. But it's not working. Can you please help with this issue.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^☣ 13:02, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Tell me how it looks now. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 13:27, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

For instance, I changed image position from upperright to left but file is still at upperright. changes aren't reflecting.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^☣ 10:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Please reply

Akhiljaxxn, I asked a question here, please reply.-Dr2Rao (talk) 19:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

We had a detailed discussion on this regard a few days ago, and there you can read my reply and the consensus on this regard. Thank you...- Akhiljaxxn (talk) 20:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Need to talk

Need to talk — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndianAnon (talk • contribs) 12:40, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

notability issue for biographies

Hi..On Manoj S Nair's page found a notability issue for biographies..is the references are not enough??added more news clippings from archives.Would request you to reconsider it..please answer.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aniyanz (talk • contribs) 03:45, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020

Hello TheWikiholic,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

• A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
• Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
• A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
• Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Avtar Singh Makkar

Can you please tell the exact reason for nominating this article for deletion? Manakpreet Singh (talk) 01:27, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Page mover granted

Hello, Akhiljaxxn. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• Category:Articles to be moved, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac (talk) 22:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

why was my wikipedia page "Dravya Shetty" deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrudula S 1808 (talk • contribs) 15:57, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

why was my wikipedia account "Dravya Shetty" deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrudula S 1808 (talk • contribs) 15:59, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael Jackson impersonator for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Jackson impersonator is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Jackson impersonator (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. YorkshireLad  ✿  ^(talk) 12:42, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Nominate article

Hi, can you please help me how to nominate a article to be featured article. PK743 (talk) 03:00, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

PK743 Please have a look at here to know more about FA articles and its nomination process.- Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:03, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Okay, Thank you. PK743 (talk) 06:20, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Editor who claimed this image as their own work

Hi Akhil, Please be noted that Romanch is an actor from Kerala, The picture which you have claimed as wrong is his own picture. He acted in Kayamkulam Kochunni as one of the lead role. Please be notted that this picture will not listed in google search because its from his new movie. which is going to be released soon. And there is no relation with this image and copyright infringement. Pinging @Akhiljaxxn. Please check that properly and revert that back... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanju388 (talk • contribs) 08:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Rishi Kumar Notability

Congressional candidate Rishi Kumar has Clearly has the notablity req based on media coverage. Why did you put up the tag? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PoliticalEddy (talk • contribs) 20:39, 15 August 2020 (UTC) --PoliticalEddy (talk) 20:41, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Alders (surname)

Thankyou for moving that but you probably shouldn't have suppressed the Alders redirect which should point either to Alder or Alder (disambiguation). Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Created a new redirect to Alder (disambiguation). Akhiljaxxn (talk) 03:39, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, TheWikiholic. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Shahoodu (talk) 06:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Waiting for the reply

Replied- Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:35, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Apology for opening an SPI

Dear Akhiljaxxn, On further investigation, I think I am wrong. I apologize for opening an SPI investigation against you. I was too quick to judge, I think it is the Padavalamkuttanpilla who needs to be investigated further. Sorry, if it came about as rude to you. Hunting for socks isn't my forte, I just started on it today, found 2 socks, and thought I am good it, but I was wrong. Sorry for wasting your time or if it hurt your sentiments in any way. I would like to withdraw the SPI against you but I am not aware of the procedure to undo. Hope you accept my apology. Angus¹⁹⁸⁶ TALK 19:54, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Draftification

Hi, when moving to drafts, it's best to notify the author and to tag the draft with the "Submit this article" button (otherwise they don't have a clue about what their next steps are). The script User:Evad37/MoveToDraft does that automatically. – Thjarkur (talk) 19:09, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the suggestions and script. Regards. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 20:00, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Help regarding an Article

Hello Akhil, this is Sarath, a new user in Wiki, I have created a new article on a Film called Thattsserry koottam, starring Arjun Ashokan, which now nominated for deletion, could you help me out and make me understand what I could have improved next time ? This is a Malayalam film, hope you’ld help so that I can improve next time

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thattassery_Koottam Kjsarat (talk) 09:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

I am ready to raise the issue to the closing admin

Like your suggestion I am going to submit my concerns to the admin so that I can submit that for AFC again.Please reply to my mail Shahoodu (talk) 10:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Requesting Guidance

Hi, I am new on Wikipedia, I aim to create new articles on Wikipedia. But I got a deletion tag on my last article which is about an Indian film producer named fareed khan. Could you please help me to keep the article ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fareed_Khan_(producer) Ambili123 (talk) 16:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Your opinion

Please comment your opinion regarding https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2020_September_25?markasread=200645887&markasreadwiki=enwiki#Draft:Manjappada_Kerala_Blasters_Fans Shahoodu (talk) 05:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

MB related meats and socks

I have reported some of the meats here Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajarshi Mondal 17. I saw you provided some vital links in the ANI. Can you add your statements in the report? ❯❯❯   S A H A 19:55, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

 Done. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 20:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

COI and UDP tag

hi this is sabbir. in one of my articles https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanta_Jahan related a celebrity you have put COI and UDP tag. to be honest i have nothing to do with the celebrity nor did i got any monetary help or undisclosed payment have been made. it was my first biography related article, and i uploaded that image so that i can use it in my sandbox to edit my article before publishing. that is why i uploaded it first and there was no close connection between me and that celebrity. i did texted her in the Instagram whether i can use her image and her agent said if it is non-profit then yes. but the problem is i made a mess with the licensing term, that was a mistake. later i realized that mistake and removed the licensing tag. i am using Wikipedia for a long time and it happened never that i was being a suspect of a false allegation. i believe in free editing and discourage any paid articles. i have told all the true things. i hope you will reply, i too replied on that pages talk page but you did not respond. Sabbir31x♥ 06:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tag

Hi, Akhiljaxxn,

You tagged Delete for speedy deletion for having no content but the page is a redirect that had just been blanked by an IP editor. Please check pages like this before tagging in case they have been a target of vandalism. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Sure. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 18:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Page mover granted

Hello, Akhiljaxxn. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• Category:Articles to be moved, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 02:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Tell your opinion

An admin has place gng tag in the article West Block Blues now and it has been proposed to merge.As you were in previous afd tell your opinion there. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:West_Block_Blues#Merge_Request

WhiteFalcon1 (talk) 02:14, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

ATKMB thing

Well, talkpage discussions wont lead anywhere if meats and socks arent kept out. Although we can try for RfC/ARB.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  19:11, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

ArnabSaha We can request temporary extended confirmed protection on talk pages and pages conducting RfCs related to the topic area based on the past meat puppetry or sockpuppetry allegations.-- Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Continuity of Mohun Bagan football division

Hello Akhil, I would like to draw your kind attention to the facts related to Mohun Bagan which are being distorted on several occasions by East Bengal fans. I have been keeping an eye on whatever is being done with Mohun Bagan related pages on wikipedia. Probably your views on the matter have been skewed by some ardent East Bengal fans. I think it would help you to get a clearer picture of whatever is happening. As you seem to be a neutral, so called outsider like me (I don't like the term though), I think if I can present you with the factual evidences, it would be beneficial. The brand identity of Mohun Bagan Football Club (India) Private Limited (established in 2017) has been transferred to the ATK Mohun Bagan Private Limited (established in 2020). This new company is the owner of ATK Mohun Bagan FC. This team will participate in the AFC Cup 2021. If you can kindly have a quick look at the Entry Manual for AFC Club Competitions (2021 edition) it might be very helpful. The Sporting criteria for a club to enter AFC Competitions include as the first point,

9.1. To meet the sporting criteria, a club must have earned one (1) of the following (which shall be applied in descending order to determine the representative clubs of a Member Association): 9.1.1. winner of the domestic top division league; 9.1.2. winner of the domestic cup; 9.1.3. runner-up of the domestic top division league; 9.1.4. third place of the domestic top division league; 9.1.5. fourth place of the domestic top division league (only if there is no domestic cup applicable for Article 9.1.2). So, if ATK Mohun Bagan was any new club it could not qualify for the AFC Cup 2021. Now, coming to the continuity of Mohun Bagan... The business takeover resulted in change of the name of the football division of Mohun Bagan AC which was registered as Mohun Bagan Athletic Club at IFA (WB) (the governing body of football in West Bengal). The name was changed into ATK Mohun Bagan. Please see this link in which an official letter from IFA Secretary has been shown which proves that ATK Mohun Bagan FC is simply a rebranded version of the football department of Mohun Bagan. I think it would help you get the real taste of what has happened. I have edited each time the sanctity of wikipedia as a reliable encyclopaedia has been in the question. Wikipedia needs to be protected from social media fan fights. One user accused me of being Mohun Bagan fan (look at my talk page) which I am not; I gave him an answer. I am pretty much clear to myself that I shall try to protect wikipedia pages from being hijacked by misinformation campaign being run on social media irrespective of whoever (Mohun Bagan or East Bengal fans) are trying to do that. It is our collective duty as responsible editors. I would like to request you to kindly have a close look into the matter. I would appreciate questions from you if that helps to clear up any doubt.  Thank you very much! M Kariyappa (talk) 08:41, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Paris Jackson album

Hey, I saw her release for Paris Jackson an album you mean maybe open it ?? King G.A (talk) 11:38, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy Diwali 2020

Happy Diwali

Hello Akhiljaxxn,
Hope you are doing well.
Wishing you a happy, safe, and prosperous Diwali. Stay safe. Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 18:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Titodutta Thank you. I wish the same for you and yours.— Akhiljaxxn (talk) 19:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. --Titodutta (talk) 19:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your edits and Happy Diwali 2020

Happy Diwali

Dear Akhil, Happy Diwali. Many thanks for making enhancements to the Dhalan article. Please feel free to further enhance my work. Thanks for your "iterative approach of collaboration". 58.182.176.169 (talk) 19:14, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Ramya

I don't know why u retrieving sourceless awards. Tigerikkada (talk) 17:52, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Cyclatoms

Hi, I created the article "cyclatom" and it seems it is you who put it to draft. Could you please put it back to normal article. You complained there is no sources but you put it to draft exactly at the time I was slowly working on them few minutes after I created it. This term entered the US English through the US leading Physics Journal the Physical Review Letters as I put the citations and I think it deserves to be on wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:E7:FF49:A59E:91F8:DECB:4E61:D36E (talk) 21:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Ahmed Patel

Hello Akhil , Why did you remove the rape and corruption allegations ? The sources and references were given. If you were to go to the references, the articles will further refer to newspaper articles. These allegations are very specific and these claims must be known to common people. These court cases are never discussed in mainstream media Red dragonz19 (talk) 21:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Deletion

This is a biography page of shahid anwer. please let me know if any changes needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahidskt786 (talk • contribs) 12:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Kalaripayattu

Religious fanatics are taking ownership at Kalaripayattu and not allowing any edits deviating from their agenda. The worst part is it is pending-changes protected and they all are confirmed accounts who can make changes without scrutiny. None of them give proper explanation for reverting, and sometimes blatantly reverts multiple edits (edited with proper edit summary) without explanation. Two of them have COI as evident from their usernames (Kalari). Their main business is promoting their POV and highlighting Hinduism part, though Kalaripayattu do have rituals based on Hinduism, the art itself is not a "Hindu art", it just happened to have originated when only Hindu "religion" was prevalent in Kerala. It is a martial art practised by all religious communities, many of the masters are Muslims, the Christians even have a folk dance derived from Kalaripayattu. Some Hindu extremists are "making statements" by projecting Hinduism on an otherwise communally harmonious martial art. BTW, I am also a Hindu, but this is too much.

The first time my edit got reverted (see history here onward), I never thought it was religious agenda, but now it's becoming clearer, as User:Kalariwarrior changed "Indian mythology" to "Hindu mythology" (source says former), and User:Kalari Poothara's recent Hinduism promotion in lead, and as Outlander07 is now trying to re-insert Hinduism claims (not in the source) in lead which I had removed; he had also removed a sourced mention about a Hindu lower-caste community – Thiyya. There are multiple legends on the creator - Parashurama, Shiva, Agasthya; they want Parashurama, not only that, they don't want to attribute it as "legend" (I agree with [1]). I suspect Outlander07 and Kalariwarrior to be the same person, all three are incompetent in editing. The article requires serious cleanup for sourcing and NPOV. Should I report this activity to WP:ANI, or somewhere else, or what? Please help. 2409:4073:2016:2138:D049:39FF:BF04:3F17 (talk) 19:48, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Akhiljaxxn, why haven't this editor who go by various socks Othayoth shankaran, Kalari Poothara, Kalangot, Kadathanadan chekavar, Adhithya Kiran Chekavar not yet been blocked in Malayalam Wikipedia? He has been editing there with multiple accounts. He's already blocked here [2][3]. Additionally, if you check this inserted reference, it's a self-published manual written by "Adhithya Kiran". In one of his sock accounts he has revealed that he is the secretary of Thiyya Mahasabha [4]. He's editing and socking only to promote his caste.--157.44.166.40 (talk) 16:44, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ATK Mohun Bagan FC logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ATK Mohun Bagan FC logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello TheWikiholic,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Akhiljaxxn!

Happy New Year!

Akhiljaxxn,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
 Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  16:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

MB related discussion

Hi, How are you? Wanted to discuss something. I wrote this in WT:FOOTY but was unanswered. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 137#Mohun Bagan  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  08:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Navi (impersonator)

Hello, I'm Beagleforceone. I work closely with Navi (impersonator), and noticed your recent action on his page to alter information. This page is continually being altered with incorrect, disruptive information. Please note that the edits and information that I provide are accurate and authorised by the person named on the page. Please ensure they are always reverted to MY edit if they are altered by anyone else. Thank you. (If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page Beagleforceone (talk) 12:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Your opinion

I have opened a second AFD for the article Rehna Fathima. Since yoy were involved in the first onez you can tell your opinion there. Regards https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rehana_Fathima_(2nd_nomination)#Rehana_Fathima Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 14:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Unexplained revert

Can you please provide the reason for this revert? You did not provide an edit summary. --Muhandes (talk) 16:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for restoring it. --Muhandes (talk) 13:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Ranjitha Menon

April 7, 2021- Hello, I have completed the draft that you left incomplete of the Malayalam Actress Ranjitha Menon for you. You may access it here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranjitha_Menon Takeshidjome (talk) 08:35, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

sorry for nora fatehi page editing

sorry for nora fatehi page editing and after that i want to help wikipedia and provide valuable content for user

I want tell about an important matter

Until the 2016 and 2011 Kerala Assembly elections, the votes you got for each of the three fronts in each constituency were given on Wikipedia, but not in 2021. That's why I gave it the 2nd Runner-up column. Mins pk (talk) 18:49, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Mins pk I think you better raise these issues on the article talk page. TheWikiholic (talk) 16:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok Mins pk (talk) 15:34, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

created a draft

Hi, I created a draft that I made myself, which was a translation. As soon as the user created it, he marked it to delete it. Was his work correct?--Khadempour322 (talk) 19:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of presidents of the Indian National Congress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tripuri. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	I wholeheartedly appreciate and thank you for your kind efforts to resolve issues raised on List of presidents of the Indian National Congress FL page. I am not able to give required time because of work. Thanks again mate. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣✅ 13:41, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

stubs

Please take care not to waste other editors' time by adding {{stub}} to articles which are not stubs, such as James Bond in popular culture. Thanks. PamD 07:21, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Request to move a page

I couldn't move the page "Karunanidhi ministry" to a more specific title "Fifth Karunanidhi ministry" which redirects to another article indicating 13th Tamil Nadu Assembly. I also tried and failed to move the page using technical request. I hope you can help me Mehboob Nambrath (talk) 07:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Mehboob Nambrath  Done. TheWikiholic (talk) 07:53, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Edited template

Hi, Wikiholic! I'm a Wikiholic too, but in Ukrainian Wikipedia (100 000 + edits, 3200+ articles created, 20 000+ edited) :)

I started to translate an article and put {{edited}} in the beginning of it. Furthermore, I supposed that the {{edited}} template protects the article from renaming it to the Draft space. As far as I understand, after finishing the translation (adding references and links) I, as an experienced user, may rename the article to the Main space. May I? --Perohanych (talk) 12:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

@Perohanych: Of course. My only concern about the article was it wasn't well-sourced. Once you add more sources, you are free to move the page into the mainspace. TheWikiholic (talk) 06:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Request on 07:12:49, 26 May 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by 27.142.113.192

• 27.142.113.192 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Sarah Louise Young (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I submitted an article which is a direct translation of an existing French Wikipedia page at https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Louise_Young In fact, Sarah Louise Young has existing Wikipedia pages in Arabic Catalan Danish German Spanish Finnish and Polish (all linked from the French page shown). The submitted article lists an extensive filmography and a list of International awards that she has won for her work. In short, even a cursory reading would demonstrate that she is a noteworthy person. And THIS EXACT ARTICLE SUBJECT AND TEXT-word-for-word (in French)--is already accepted and in use in the French Wikipedia. So I do not understand the basis for the rejection of this article in the English Wikipedia.

Please explain 1. Given her multiple awards and film appearances listed, explain why you think that she is not noteworthy 2. Given her other multiple current Wikipedia pages, explain why she should not be accepted into the English Wikipedia 3. Given that this translated text is already accepted and in use in the French Wikipedia, explain why is is unacceptable in the English Wikipedia

I will not alter the accepted French text pending these explanations.

Just to elaborate on this, here are the Wikipedia standards for "Notability" and why they apply here

Any biography The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times. Sarah Louise Young has received multiple Interbational Awards, which are listed in the article

The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. Sarah Louise Young has an extensive filmography starring herself, which is listed in the article

Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. She was an extremely popular star in the 1990s, and still maintains fans today.

Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. As the article mentions, she was the first adult star to receive a $1,000,000 fee for a single adult movie (which gives an indication of how popular she was).

Finally, I should mention that I was personally looking for bio information on her and was shocked to find that the foreign Wikipedias listed her, but the English one did not. This seems like an unnecessary, arbitrary and unhelpful decision, and led me to submit the current draft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.142.113.192 (talk) 07:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC) 27.142.113.192 (talk) 07:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Sarah Young was deleted twice from en.Wikipedia, in 2010 (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Louise Young and in 2020 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Young (pornographic actress). The draft fails to cite any reliable sources to support the content or establish notability. — TheWikiholic (talk) 07:19, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vellinakshatram (2004 film)

You need to revert your closure. It is baseless.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:11, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Done. Please see the conversation here as to why I closed it.— TheWikiholic (talk) 13:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello

I hope you are doing well and keeping safe, when writing this essay I had you in mind. I hope you read and internalize it. Celestina007 (talk) 19:58, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

, I know I was not supposed to close that AFD then. That's why I restored it the very next moment Bbb23 asked me to. However, the way he is nominating pages citing he has done WP:Before is simply misleading other editors. To be honest, it is amazing to see how fast people are learning to nominate pages for deletion and filing an SPI within 20 days of creating their account.— TheWikiholic (talk) 20:28, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

What you are implying is a situation I have found myself involved in several times when fighting undisclosed paid editing, in which the user is barely three months old and is extremely knowledgeable about the inner workings of Wikipedia even triumphing that of veteran editors. However, for record sake, allow me state that, I am not in agreement with you that Powerful Karma is a returning blocked user evading a block and at the same time, I am not saying that you are wrong, but you have to approach this with utmost care and until you have cogent evidence you would be casting aspersions which could lead you to be “burned” and by “burned” I mean either blocked or getting an IBAN. The situation you make reference to mirrors this comment by Lugnuts. AFAIK, the collaborative project has no text book method on dealing with new users who are too new to be vast in policy, so for now or until an RFC is opened to address this specifically all we can do is watch closely. Celestina007 (talk) 21:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

I'm not doing anything to sanction IBAN me. I left that topic with my last comment on your talk page. As you can see, I do lots of other things that interest me, and of course, I'm happy to know that I'm one of the reasons why the community got an essay .— TheWikiholic (talk) 13:16, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

haha, Keep up the good work. Celestina007 (talk) 20:05, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Death of Michael Jackson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tsutomu Sato.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

MJ videography copy-edit

Hi. As you have probably noticed, I've been copy-editing the MJ videography article following GOCE request and I see you've already made some improvements. I'll be back here with some suggestions after I've gone through the whole article. Bye for now. Leoseliv (talk) 20:10, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

@Leoseliv: Thanks for your works and suggestions. I think the descriptions for the music videos are not consistent in style. For instance, some are in the past tense and some in the present tense.— TheWikiholic (talk) 03:12, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Moving pages out of mainspace

Make sure you're only moving articles that need more proof of notability into draftspace. COVID-19 vaccination in Japan was definitely notable. More people will see it and be able to help the article if it's left in mainspace, too. Anarchyte (talk) 09:46, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

See this. This is how the page looked when I moved the page into the draft space. There were many empty sections on the page and the creator of the page has not made any edits for some time (and you can see he hasn't made a single edit since then). And there were no templates in the article to show the evidence of active improvement. I know the subject is notable, and that's why I moved the page into draft space per WP:DRAFT instead of nominating for deletion.— TheWikiholic (talk) 11:14, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

WP:DRAFTIFY clearly states that there needs to be "no evidence of active improvement". You moved it 24 minutes after the author made an edit. There's no rush. I find it very disingenuous of the whole AfC and NPP system when reviewers shove everything into draftspace instead of fixing it themselves. Anarchyte (talk) 06:42, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

I often try to improve the article by adding citations, wikilinks, and small types of copy editing.— TheWikiholic (talk) 18:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello WIkiholic

Hello Wikiholic, I have just started contrubuting on wikipedia. I still have a lot to learn.

I am kind of confused with the your comment on a page I created. I created the page of an author; after reading the book I found his life story fascinating. So I wrote with all the information and references I could find on the internet. For the image, I found that it was owned by an organization; so I asked them if I could use it and they gave me permission to use it. I can't seem to understand if that is a copyright infringment and could you please guide me what should I do?

And the image is already licenced under CC license.

replied on the article's talk page.— TheWikiholic (talk) 17:00, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

I see you pissed somebody off

I got this message on my tp but removed it because I saw what they were trying to do. Classic tale sign of shady behavior. I haven’t look into their contributions but a 4 year old editor with 92 edits doesn’t look straight to me. You have definitely heard of sleeper accounts right? You might want to try that angle.(if you haven’t already). Celestina007 (talk) 14:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

I think I did, unfortunately. The possibility of being a sleeper account is quite possible. One of the other articles created by him was also tagged for COI and UDP by Aspening.— TheWikiholic (talk) 15:32, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sitaram Kesari.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sitaram Kesari.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

List of presidents of the Indian National Congress

Hi, the list has received significant supports and all set to be FL. What could be the reason behind it's taking longer? I cannot nominate other list because of its delay.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^☣✅ 19:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

25 Cents FC I don't know why it takes too long. But I think you can still nominate since your last nomination got support from multiple reviewers.— TheWikiholic (talk) 07:58, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations. List is finally FL. I appreciate your hard work mate.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^☣✅ 07:37, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

it's my pleasure.— TheWikiholic (talk) 07:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Redirect an article to a section in the Sikkim LS constituency page

What do you say to blanking 2019 Indian general election in Sikkim and redirecting it to Sikkim (Lok Sabha constituency)#General election 2019, since there is only one LS constituency in Sikkim? The 2019 section there has more information that this article. Obviously the same reasoning applies to the 2014, 2009 and 2004 pages as well. I'm asking you in particular since you converted 2019 Indian general election in Sikkim from a redirect into an article. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

MPGuy2824 I have no issues if it doesn't have enough content to warrant a standalone article.— TheWikiholic (talk) 14:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Michael Jackson videography

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Michael Jackson videography has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the FLC when you get to it.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:44, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Twofingered Typist Thanks for your edits. During my last FLC attempt, more than one reviewer has expressed that the descriptions for the music videos are not consistent in style. For instance, some are in the past tense and some in the present tense. I guess your edits helped to improve this. — TheWikiholic (talk) 17:17, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

@TheWikiholic: You're welcome. Yes, the descriptions should be in the present tense for an article like this because, in theory, all the videos etc... can still be viewed somewhere. Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:15, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Number Ones

Hello. Have you happen to know a source talking about worldwide sales for Number Ones? A range of 10-14 million looks fine. BTW, if you're interested you can participate in this ongoing discussion. Regards, --Apoxyomenus (talk) 19:17, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Unfortunately no. Chartmasters, and a few fan site only.— TheWikiholic (talk) 11:14, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Isak Hansen-Aarøen

Hello! In May you accepted the article Isak Hansen-Aarøen from Draft:Isak Hansen-Aarøen to mainspace. Yesterday the article was speedy deleted. As an experienced user who checked this article could you share your opinion on this topic here? Thanks. --Corwin of Amber (talk) 09:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello TheWikiholic:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 2400 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Indian National Congress

Hi mate, need your help. I am working on Indian National Congress. Article has got few table. I was trying to an add additional column of Ref(s) to few tables but not able to do so. Please help me. Thanks --25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^🍁 05:45, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for you help mate. I would like to have your help in improving the article, the way we worked for List of presidents of the Indian National Congress and took it to FL.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^🍁 06:14, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

25 Cents FC I don't think the lead page adequately summarize the article. There are a few things like the split of INC and the formation of INC (I), which is currently missing in the lead, and I think it should be there.— TheWikiholic (talk) 08:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Need your help in writing the lead. So, I would request please go ahead and re-write the lead part. I am actually not sure what to include and what not to. Meanwhile, I will work on other parts of the aricle like refs, Current structure and composition, etc.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^🍁 05:21, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Jawaharlal Nehru

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Jawaharlal Nehru has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. There are a number of references in the article to a publisher Lulu. Apparently this firm simply self-publishes authors' books for them and is not a legitimate publisher. You may want to try to find other more reliable sources.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:21, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your work and suggestions. I know it was a huge article. I have already replaced sources published by lulu. Thanks again.— TheWikiholic (talk) 18:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

New message from ArnabSaha

Hello, TheWikiholic. You have new messages at ArnabSaha's talk page.
Message added 18:21, 10 September 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  18:21, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Guy Scheiman

Hi Wikiholic, I was looking at the draft going back and forth about it meeting notability. For my education, do you mind sharing how to you it meets NMUSICIAN? I am not debating if it does; you are much more experienced, just trying to learn. S0091 (talk) 18:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

S0091 The subject has been nominated for an award which is notable for Independent artists. I also discovered that the subject got coverage from sources such as the USA Today and Billboard. If you found it doesn't meet the NMUSIC or WP:Basic you are free to move the page back to draft space.— TheWikiholic (talk) 19:11, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Oh, I am not debating at all your acceptance is correct so please do not think that is why I was asking. I am new to AfC so simply trying to learn. When I was looking at it, I was not sure if the Independent Music Awards was considered "major". I had not completed a review of all the sources. Your reasoning is helpful to me for future reviews. Thank you for taking the time and I welcome any other guidance, tips/tricks, etc. Thanks again. S0091 (talk) 19:27, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Well, I'm also not sure if it is a major award or not while looking at its coverage on Google. Anyway, I've unreviewed the page so other reviewers can decide if it's notable or not. Regards,— TheWikiholic (talk) 06:21, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello TheWikiholic,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

delhi fc

https://www.instagram.com/p/CT7SCyeN2pK/?utm_medium=copy_link

Read facts before vandalising articles and grammar errors!!!

Dear Sir/Madam

I am Sahil Iqbal an Indian Artist/Actor , Please Don’t delete my article.

New message from ArnabSaha

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:ATK Mohun Bagan FC. Some users (old and new) or meatpuppets are back again. Kindly check, as they are going out of hand  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  11:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog drive

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. (t · c) buidhe 01:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

I-League vandalism

sentence "...and official second tier football league in Indian football league system ." Needs to be fixed, "second" moved (open system link) and grammar space corrected — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.1.207.155 (talk) 06:44, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Jackson albums discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Album of the Year.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Best of luck. Very good contributor Md Nahid Islam Sumon (talk) 05:48, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Ping

Hi, any chance you could answer my question at the MJ talk page? Alyo (chat·edits) 20:55, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jawaharlal Nehru

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jawaharlal Nehru you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DiplomatTesterMan -- DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 09:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Please review my article Mahesh Chander Singer and remove objections because it is cleaned and i have added references also. Thank you for your kind aproach to my article.

Please review my article Mahesh Chander Singer & remove objections because it is cleaned up and i have added references also. Thank you for your kind co opriation مالڪ سولنڪي (talk) 11:47, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jawaharlal Nehru

The article Jawaharlal Nehru you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jawaharlal Nehru for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DiplomatTesterMan -- DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 15:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your participation in the November 2021 New Pages Patrol drive

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		For reviewing at least 50 articles during the drive.

Thank you for reviewing or re-reviewing 59 articles, which helped contribute to an overall 1276-article reduction in the backlog during the drive. (t · c) buidhe 12:36, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Aditi Rai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aditi Rai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aditi Rai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ab207 (talk) 07:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Regarding your rejection of musical artist Jessica.

Hi, thank you for your attention.

I have noted 3 criteria for notability: Releases on major music labels. Has performed music for a work of a notable film. Is a prominent representative of the Vocaloid style Only one of these criteria has to be met to qualify of notability. These are the notability requirements for musicians: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(music) In addition to these criteria also being one of the highest ranked DJs in the world would be a notability criterion in its own. So there are even 4 criteria met. Jessica is ranked 246th in the world by The Official Global DJ Rankings, which is the defacto independent website for DJ Rankings and the go to site for Google when searches are made for DJ Rankings.

As Examples: Fritz Kalkbrenner ranked 252 Groove Armada ranked 253 Little Louie Vega ranked 263

Most of the top 5000 DJs are on Wikipedia, but around 400 are not entered yet. A few friends of mine and I are in the process of entering those missing DJs. There are approximately 7000 DJs listed on Wikipedia. Any DJ in the top 10K is considered a major artist and has typically released remixes or albums on major labels. This is how The Official Global DJ Rankings describes it: https://djrankings.org/about_rankings “The Official Global DJ Rankings ranks the TOP 10.000 DJs in the world (TOP 10K). One may speculate that making it to the TOP 10K intrinsically does not sound like an achievement – but in fact it is a preeminent accomplishment. In 2020 The Official Global DJ Rankings did a comprehensive study to determine how many professional DJs there are in the world. The study conducted individual geographical case studies and used an advanced mathematical algorithm, taking into consideration aspects such as: population, rural incomes, segmentation of clubs, GDP, religious and cultural factors. To define a professional DJ, the study set as criteria that the DJ was able to sustain a living solely based on salary earned from DJ work. The study concluded that there are approximately 1¼ million professional DJs in the world in 2020.”

It is not my objective to source substantial information for the artist’s Wikipedia page, that is for the Wikipedia editor community to do. I focus only on the few criteria necessary for notability, and source those. Then the Wikipedia community continue the editing of the profiles with more interesting facts. I plan to put up at least 400 missing DJ profiles, and I will argue their notability.

By the way Jessica should alone qualify for notability criteria due to having performed cast lead vocals for one of the highest grossing movies of all times, and certainly the highest grossing music film.

Also please note that another criteria for notability is having received a gold record. Due to the evolution of music industry this has evolved into amount of streams instead as that is the criteria today. Spotify publishes stream counts and followers of all artists.

I have worked as a volunteer on Discogs.com for 15 years, so we have a shared interest in the music industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aucgruppen (talk • contribs) 02:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2022!

Hello TheWikiholic, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2022. Happy editing, Orlandofoster (talk) 16:20, 24 December 2021 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Happy New Year, TheWikiholic!

Happy New Year!

TheWikiholic,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 12:45, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Regarding Ashok Kumar (IPS)

Dear TheWikiholic, I've some doubt regarding the notability of this entity - Ashok Kumar (IPS) as well as the on the creator of the page. Since you have patrolled it. Would you mind if I take this to an AfD discussion? Your nod is important. -Hatchens (talk) 16:22, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Hatchens The subject is the head of the police in the Indian state of Uttarakhand. There are enough sources presented in the article to satisfy the subject WP:GNG. I haven't looked into the detail in the contributions of the creator, to be honest. In any case, I don't mind if you took the subject to AFD.— TheWikiholic (talk) 23:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

I trust your decision. In the meanwhile, I'll focus on creator's other work. Thank you for your kind and unbiased response. - Hatchens (talk) 16:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

PHOTO DELETED

Hi, my self Bilal. i had created a page name as P.K Abdul majeed. (https://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B4%AA%E0%B4%BF.%E0%B4%95%E0%B5%86._%E0%B4%85%E0%B4%AC%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%A6%E0%B5%81%E0%B5%BE_%E0%B4%AE%E0%B4%9C%E0%B5%80%E0%B4%A6%E0%B5%8D) i had added some photos three days before. today i have seen that you removed them. may i know the reason ?. iam sure that there will not have any copyright issue since all matters and photos are genuine and all of them taken from the articles that came about him. I'm sure there will be no problem publishing it . request you to please allow me to keep them in profile please.

thanks and Regards, Bilal — Preceding unsigned comment added by BILAL NTK (talk • contribs) 07:39, 23 January 2022 (UTC) https://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B4%89%E0%B4%AA%E0%B4%AF%E0%B5%8B%E0%B4%95%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%A4%E0%B4%BE%E0%B4%B5%E0%B5%8D:BILAL_NTK BILAL NTK (talk) 05:18, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Mozhaysk railway station

Hello! I added sources and refs to Draft:Mozhaysk railway station where it's necessary (in other cases it doesn't). Please, convert draft to an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Эдуард91 (talk • contribs) 08:45, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Sent you a mail

Hi user:TheWikiholic,. I sent you an email via gmail. Pls check.. Thanks. user:TheWikiholic, pls check ur email.

Request on 17:14:52, 11 February 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Elisa Ostet

• Elisa Ostet (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Arent Weevers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for reviewing my draft for Arent Weevers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Arent_Weevers I've added some references to the article. Hope this is sufficient!

Best regards, Elisa

Elisa Ostet (talk) 17:14, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Harout72 (talk) 19:39, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Woman Grammy

Who holds the Record for most overall Grammy wins by a woman. I used wiki and answered Beyonce as it says she is #1. According to the Quiz on Google. That is incorrect. It stays Alison Krauss. Just asking which is the correct answer?? 2601:987:201:2F10:A1B7:5663:3644:D535 (talk) 14:53, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Alison Krauss has won 27 Grammy Awards from 42 nominations, whereas Beyoncé has won 28 awards.— TheWikiholic (talk) 17:12, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Indian National Congress

Hi there, hope you are doing good. I need your help with regards to Indian National Congress. In last few days I have worked extensively developing this article to GA level. However the problem is I am not able to write proper lead part. I would be glad if you could help me with lead section of the article.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^🍁 21:42, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thanks for reviewing that article.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:49, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jawaharlal Nehru

The article Jawaharlal Nehru you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Jawaharlal Nehru for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DiplomatTesterMan -- DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 04:21, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Photos Deleted

Hi Sir,

ഞാൻ പി.കെ അബ്ദുൾ മജീദ് എന്നൊരു താൾ ഉണ്ടാക്കിയിരുന്നു. അതിൽ അദ്ദേഹത്തിനെ കുറിച്ച് വന്ന ചില ലേഖനങ്ങളും,ചിത്രങ്ങളും ഉൾപ്പെടുത്തിയിരുന്നു. ആ ദ്യം അത് നീക്കംചെയ്യപ്പെട്ടപ്പോൾ , അവയെല്ലാം ഞാൻ വിക്കി കോമൺസിൽ അപ്‌ലോഡ് ചെയ്‌ത്‌ വീണ്ടും താളിൽ കൂട്ടിക്കിച്ചേർത്തു. കുറച്ചുനാളുകൾക്ക് ശേഷം തങ്ങൾ അത് വീണ്ടും മാറ്റിയതായി കണ്ടു. ആ ലേഖനങ്ങളും , ചിത്രങ്ങളും പി.കെ അബ്ദുൾ മജീദിനെക്കുറിച്ച് വന്ന ലേഖനങ്ങളിൽ നിന്നും,പുസ്തകങ്ങളിൽ നിന്നും ശേഖരിച്ചവയാണ്. അതുകൊണ്ടുതന്നെ അവയിൽ യാതൊരുവിധ കോപ്പിറൈറ് പ്രശ്നങ്ങളും ഉണ്ടാകില്ലെന്ന് ഉറപ്പാണ്. ആയതിനാൽ അവ ആ താളിൽ നിലനിർത്തുവാൻ താങ്കളോട് വിനീതമായി അഭ്യർത്ഥിക്കുന്നു.BILAL NTK (talk) 05:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, TheWikiholic

Thank you for reviewing Sanjay Singh Gangwar.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

It is recommended to add an article to relevant wikiprojects after reviewing it. See the bottom of File:NPP flowchart.svg.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Regarding Notability tag placed by you

Hi, hope you are going well. Yesterday, you placed a Notability tag on Deepak Kalal which I earlier believed to be notable passing GNG and he has been in the news various times. Well, later I added more citation and information to prove the Notability. I think now this is notable article and you can remove your tag. Also, you can review it. Thank you, have a nice day!. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 06:26, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Hey there, I still don't think the subject meet WP:ENT and the sources provided are mostly passing in mentions.— TheWikiholic (talk) 16:55, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of Michael Jackson albums discography

Congratulations, TheWikiholic! The list you nominated, Michael Jackson albums discography, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of International reactions to the 2020 United States presidential election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International reactions to the 2020 United States presidential election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International reactions to the 2020 United States presidential election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Addition of references on my Authentic Article.

Dear Sir/Ma'am,

With all due respect the operation that I stated in my article is a well known Operation in Pakistan. However as the Operation was held in 1992 it is not as frequent in the news as it should be. What makes the operation and its story unique is that this operation was responsible for the unification of the dress code for both an officer and a soldier. Regards,

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello TheWikiholic,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 809 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 861 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Request for a Review

Hello, Hope you are doing well As you reviewed and accepted an article Dharmaveer (Marathi film) which was recently created by me , I would request if you can please review this article Draft:Tanuj Garg cause it has not been reviewed since a month.Rockpeterson (talk) 16:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Superficial review

Hi, TheWikiholic. I'm afraid I think you went to quickly when reviewing Draft:Diane Hessan earlier. I've moved it back to draftspace. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

I didn't check each source to know if they are collaborating the statement. I had doubts and needed a second opinion that's why I unreviewed the page just after accepting the submission and I'm happy to see you had a detail look at it. Regards. TheWikiholic (talk) 09:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Review if you can get time

Hello, I hope you are well. I am reaching out to you because I had created an article (Radhakrishnan Pillai),and I didn't knew that the page is already deleted several time for wp:g11 and for that this time the page got deleted with same reason. Thought I didn't put any promotional word. So I again I made draft(Draft:Radhakrishnan Pillai) with reliable sources. So please check the draft and review if possible and if there is any issue with the draft then suggest me what changes should I do there. I hope to hear from you soon. Thanks Samir Bishal (talk) 12:51, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

"Draft:TheWikiholic" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Draft:TheWikiholic and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 6#Draft:TheWikiholic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- TruthGuardians (talk) 14:52, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello TheWikiholic,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 15077 articles, as of 02:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Notes

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, TheWikiholic

Thank you for creating Ravinder singh balyan.

User:Pppery, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Per Wikipedia:New pages patrol#Articles for deletion (AfD), you should generally mark articles as reviewed when you AfD them, because the AfD will decide their fate.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Pppery}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:37, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Damson Idris Girlfriend

This probably should not have drafified. Besides being an obvious copyvio of some type of gossip blog (which I found here), it was also clear WP:A10 CSD in relation to the Damson Idris article. Singularity42 (talk) 17:09, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

NPP drive award

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		This award is given to TheWikiholic for 59 reviews in the July NPP backlog reduction drive. Your contributions played a part in the 9895 reviews that took place during the drive. Thank you for your contributions. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 08:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Jackson singles discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Variety and Vibe.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022

New Page Review queue August 2022

Hello TheWikiholic,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination

MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.

Open letter to the WMF

The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.

TIP - Reviewing by subject

Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.

New reviewers

The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Harout72 (talk) 03:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Hey

You forgot to sign the statement below mine on the ANI you originally created it as one comment and then added the header, but didn't sign above. Just letting you know. FrederalBacon (talk) 15:59, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Noted TheWikiholic (talk) 16:13, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP Award

		The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award
		For over 360 article reviews during 2021. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:51, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP message

Hi TheWikiholic,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP Award for 2020

		The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award
		For over 360 article reviews during 2020. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:54, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2020. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are just getting caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply (with a ping) to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:54, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP Award for 2019

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For over 100 article reviews during 2019. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:53, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are almost caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:53, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP Award for 2018

		The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award
		For over 360 article reviews during 2018. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:18, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2018. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We have just caught up with giving out deserved barnstars. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:18, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of Michael Jackson singles discography

Congratulations, TheWikiholic! The list you nominated, Michael Jackson singles discography, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Vedieka Dutt

Hey, Sir vedieka dutt is an Indian movie actress, she has done many movies,Web series and ads. Kindly check link : https://g.co/kgs/B585YX I kindly request you to review and approve the draft "Vedieka Dutt" Thank you Kindly 59.89.208.40 (talk) 13:21, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TheWikiholic. Thank you for creating Bharat Jodo Yatra. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Article for my Own Intellectual Property

How else do I reference something that I've created? I've linked all existing evidence for my web comic in my references, what else can I possibly do? Jahrio553 (talk) 21:53, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Please read and follow

Please read and follow WP:BLUDGEON. Venkat TL (talk) 09:44, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Sanction alert

Special:Diff/1116008203/1116061732 You said I should check? What makes you think I did not check?

When did you get an alert before ? diff ? because I cannot find any [5]

If you read the page you are expected to read, you will find that it is only valid for a year, and need to be given every year. Venkat TL (talk) 19:17, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2022 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Venkat TL (talk) 20:38, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

BRD

Hi, Are you familiar with the WP:BRD process. If you add something and it gets removed by another user, you should not add it until a consensus is achieved according to the WP:DISPUTERESOLUTION methods.

Right now both articles are protected and have been reverted to a version that is not mine and is a version before the recent edit warring disputes. I need your support and cooperation to prevent any further edit warring on the election pages. Or else the admins will protect the page and it cannot be updated anymore. If WP:BRD is violated and a second revert is made, those should be reported. I have said more on Talk:2022_Himachal_Pradesh_Legislative_Assembly_election#Status_Quo_version_of_5_October_restored and Talk:2022_Gujarat_Legislative_Assembly_election#Status_Quo_version_of_11_October_restored. Venkat TL (talk) 11:40, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello TheWikiholic,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Early end of the backlog drive

A few days ago, new page patrollers got the backlog to zero. Due to the unprecedented success of the backlog drive, it will be ending early—at the end of 24 October, or in approximately two hours.

Barnstars will be awarded as soon as the coords can tally the results. Streak awards will be allocated based on the first three weeks of the drive, with the last three days being counted as part of week three.

Great work everyone! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of awards and nominations received by Manju Warrier

The article List of awards and nominations received by Manju Warrier has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I have just moved the article to the main page of the actress Manju Warrier. After going through the article its too small there is no need of this sub page. As a reader moving to another page is time consuming for a small article. In recent scenarios many articles are not sub divided to post awards and filmography to another sub page if the lists are small. In this scenario this article is small and can be added to the main page itself

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Drive Awards

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This award is given to TheWikiholic for collecting more than 25 points doing reviews and re-reviews, in the October NPP backlog reduction drive. Thank you for your contributions. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 09:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

		Worm Gear Award
		This award is given to TheWikiholic for collecting more than 7 points per week doing reviews, in the October NPP backlog reduction drive. Thank you for your contributions Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 09:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

About Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indira Shoban

Thanks for your information in the discussion. However, if you want me to reply you next time, please "@" me because I cannot put everything into my watchlist. I would not have known that you replied if I didn't conduct random checks. Same case for Lionfox0909; I don't think the user can read your reply unless he/she checked the discussion or put every article he/she edited into his/her watchlist. All in all, thanks for your hard work on AfD! Timothytyy (talk) 10:42, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I would like to ask for assistance involving adding Sam Smith to the best selling artists page

Now I added everything and checked everything twice now I can provide links if you need them but here are Sam’s certifications, of which they sold over 100M units

USA 🇺🇸 Certifications: Certified Single Sales: 55,000,000 Certified Album Sales: 8,000,000 Total: 63,000,000

UK 🇬🇧 Certifications: Certified Singles Sales: 20,400,000 Certified Album Sales: 3,546,440 Total: 23,746,440

Australia 🇦🇺 Certifications: Certified Singles Sales: 3,080,000 Certified Album Sales: 420,000 Total: 3,500,000

Canada 🇨🇦 Certifications: Singles Certified Sales: 1,800,000 Albums Certified Sales: 240,000 Total: 2,040,000

New Zealand 🇳🇿 Certifications: Singles: 375,000 Albums: 97,500 Total: 472,500

Denmark 🇩🇰 Certifications: Albums: 160,000 Singles: 1,890,000 Total: 2,050,000

Mexico 🇲🇽 Certifications: Albums: 240,000 Singles: 900,000 Total: 1,140,000

Italy 🇮🇹 Certifications: Albums: 75,000 Singles: 950,000 Total: 1,025,000

France 🇫🇷 Certifications: Albums: 200,000 Singles: 800,000 Total: 1,000,000

Norway 🇳🇴 Certifications: Total: 450,000

Germany 🇩🇪 Certifications: Total: 2,000,000

Sweden 🇸🇪 Certifications: Total: 1,175,000

Total: 101,598,940 HengeBoy (talk) 18:24, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

HengeBoy This 101 Million certification is mostly generated by streaming and digital downloads and is not equivalent to 100 M units in sales. So I would recommend you wait until he adds a few more million to the totals.— TheWikiholic (talk) 03:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

In general or an certain market? HengeBoy (talk) 04:32, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

In general TheWikiholic (talk) 04:37, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

But Post Malone is in with 80M, clearly not all of that is sales. HengeBoy (talk) 04:37, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Post Malone has more total available  certifications  (174.4M) compared to Sam Smith. That's why he is in the 80 M sales club. TheWikiholic (talk) 04:56, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Shouldn’t Sam still good for the 80M mark since their obviously passed the 100M? HengeBoy (talk) 12:13, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

No. Since Sam Smith and Post Malone began charting the same period, Sam Smith needs to have a similar amount of certified sales as Post Malone TheWikiholic (talk) 13:53, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Ok, Sam has a lot of USA eligible certifications which would put them in the 120M WW units, where would that put them? HengeBoy (talk) 15:17, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Artist certifications are rarely up to date. So it's not appropriate to add an artist based on eligible certifications unless it's been covered by multiple independent reliable sources. Please have a look here TheWikiholic (talk) 16:37, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Yes, of course, what I’m asking is when Sam has 120M certified units WW, would that put that them in the best selling list with 80M? HengeBoy (talk) 16:55, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Chris Brown's several missing certification.

Hello! TheWikiholic. I think some of Chris Brown's records certification is missing in the mean time. Can you add these list?

• Yung Bleu - "Baddest ft. Chris Brown & 2 Chainz" - Gold (US). (source)
• Meek Mill - "All Eyes on You ft. Chris Brown & Nicki Minaj" - Gold (Denmark). (source)
• Rvssian, Rauw Alejandro & Chris Brown - "Nostalgico" - 3x Platinum (Spain). (source)
• Chris Brown - "Under the Influence" - Platinum (New Zealand). (source)
• Chris Brown - "Under the Influence" - Platinum (US). (source)
• Chris Brown - "No Guidance ft. Drake" - Gold (France). (source)
• Chris Brown - "Under the Influence" - Gold (France). (source)
• Chris Brown - "Under the Influence" - Gold (UK). (source)
• Chris Brown - "Under the Influence" - Platinum (Swiss). (source)
• Chris Brown - "Under the Influence" - Gold (Denmark). (source)
• Chris Brown - "Under the Influence" - Platinum (Canada). (source)
• Chris Brown - "Under the Influence" - Gold (Austria). (source) HeartbreakOnAFullMoon (talk) 16:05, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done TheWikiholic (talk) 07:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Article titles

Hello. I thought you were experienced in creating articles and were familiar with where they should be located, but you created Del Rey's song article at an article title with a capital "A" in the middle of a sentence and a curly apostrophe. Please see MOS:CT and bear in mind that we do not use curly apostrophes on Wikipedia, including in titles, per MOS:CURLY, as they cannot be typed by the majority of keyboards readers use. Thanks. Ss112 00:31, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

I think the NME article that I cited says the title of the article the way I wrote it. Would it still be proper to ignore how it was written in the cited source? TheWikiholic (talk) 01:44, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

New Article

Hey there,

Sorry for the inconvenience, I am texting as you were marked my previous article reviewed and thank you. I created a new article Nalla Samayam. Can you please take a look Ameer al safar (talk) 17:27, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Category:Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse allegations has been nominated for deletion

Category:Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse allegations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Sandstein 13:44, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Oasis Worldwide sales ?.

Hello how are you doing merry xmas to you. Can you give me a worldwide figure for Oasis please i know this must have sold 75 million worldwide or be very close ?. Kind Regards 178.167.199.201 (talk) 20:19, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

NPP Award for 2022

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For over 100 article reviews during 2022. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:25, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Oasis worldwide sales figure ?.

Hello how are you doing ?. Can you give me a worldwide total for Oasis please ?. 178.167.150.216 (talk) 20:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC) Thanks

Invitation

Hello TheWikiholic:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a two week long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 14 January 2023.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2400 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help! ❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 13:54, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

Hello TheWikiholic,

New Page Review queue December 2022

Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Oasis worldwide album sales figure

Hello can you give me a figure for Oasis please ?. They have sold well over 70 million records. I think from varifications they maybe over the 75 million records sold and should be added to the artists in that bracket. can you help me out please ?. Thank you 80.233.80.33 (talk) 19:49, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Oasis worldwide album sales figure

Hello; you moved the article I started, Elizabeth Bowen(Actor) to draftspace. Could we move it out again? The article as is is a stub, but all the information is sourced and she's a notable figure. I don't have time to expand the article, but I figured if people could see it, others would improve it, as per the wikipedia way. With it in drafts it's just going to sit there, which doesn't seem helpful to anyone who would like to find information about her. NoahB (talk) 02:49, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

How does this help me that Oasis should have global sales of over 75m worldwide at the stage. Can you help me out with the figure please ?. 92.251.238.25 (talk) 02:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Please submit it

I request you to submit Draft:Sankar Roy (Indian Politician). If you add others can improve it's quality. My native language isn't English. Indo British Wikipedian (talk) 06:47, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

E-mail

Hey Wikiholic, hope you're doing well, I've just seen your reply on the list of the best-selling music artists' talk page, and I'd like if you'd send me your e-mail so that I can send u the files.

Cheers :) Moh8213 (talk) 10:31, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation project to improve PageTriage

Hi, as an active New Page Patroller, I wanted to make sure you were aware of an upcoming Wikimedia Foundation project to improve the PageTriage extension. We recently published results of user interviews, and have some findings that we would value patrollers' opinions on. If you haven't yet, please consider adding the project page to your watchlist to stay up to date with our progress! Samwalton9 (WMF) (talk) 13:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Adding Template:reflist-talk to ANI got reverted?

I'm assuming this revert was a misclick? FWIW, the refs the subject of the discussion added were spilling on the next discussion, hence me stepping in with {{reflist-talk}}. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 03:20, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, it was a misclick. Thank you for reverting that. Regards TheWikiholic (talk) 07:50, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Draft:List of best-selling Latin music artists

Hi there! Since you do a lot of updates for the List of best-selling music artists, I was wondering if you'd be interested in doing the same for Draft:List of best-selling Latin music artists. See, the list is almost done, but we just need certifications from available markets outside of the Latin countries. Plus it could use an outsider's point of view. Would you be able to help out? Erick (talk) 02:20, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Request for review of drafts

Hey. Please review my drafts mentioned below.

Request for your time.

Pathuri Nagabushanam
Our Youth Social Community

Thank you Lakshmijourno (talk) 06:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Chris Brown's several missing certification.

Hello! TheWikiholic. I think some of Chris Brown's records certification is missing in the mean time. Can you add these list? Thank you.

• Jack Harlow - "Already Best Friends ft. Chris Brown" - Platinum (US). (source)

 Done. TheWikiholic (talk) 14:22, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

• Ludacris - "What Them Girls Like ft. Chris Brown & Sean Garrett" - Gold (US). (source)

 Done. TheWikiholic (talk) 14:22, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

• Lil Dicky - "Freaky Friday ft. Chris Brown" - 5x Platinum (US). (source)
• Danileigh - "Easy ft. Chris Brown" - 4x Platinum (US). (source)
• Chris Brown - "Run It! ft. Juelz Santana" - Gold (Germany). (source)

 Done.— TheWikiholic (talk) 18:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

• Chris Brown - "Loyal ft. Lil Wayne & Too $hort" - Gold (Germany). (source)

 Done.— TheWikiholic (talk) 18:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

• Chris Brown & Tyga - "Ayo" - Platinum (Germany). (source)
• Chris Brown - "Questions" - Gold (Germany). (source)

 Done.— TheWikiholic (talk) 18:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

• Deorro x Chris Brown - "Five More Hours" - Platinum (Germany). (source)
• Jordin Sparks - "No Air ft. Chris Brown" - Gold (Germany). (source)
• Chris Brown - "No Guidance ft. Drake" - Gold (Germany). (source)
• Chris Brown - "Beautiful People ft. Benny Benassi" - Gold (Germany). (source)
• Metro Boomin, Future & Chris Brown - "Superhero (Heroes & Villains)" - Platinum (Canada). (source)
• Davido & Chris Brown - "Blow My Mind" - Gold (Canada). (source)
• Chris Brown - "No Guidance ft. Drake" - Gold (Poland). (source)
• Chris Brown - "Call Me Every Day ft. WizKid" - Gold (Swiss). (source)
• Chris Brown - "Don't Check On Me ft. Justin Bieber & Ink" - Gold (Denmark). (source)

 Done.— TheWikiholic (talk) 15:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

• Chris Brown - "Back to Sleep" - Gold (Denmark). (source)

 Done.— TheWikiholic (talk) 15:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

• Rvssian, Rauw Alejandro, Chris Brown - "Nostálgico" - Platinum (Mexico). this song was re-certified in January 5, 2023. (source)
• Rvssian, Rauw Alejandro & Chris Brown - "Nostálgico" - Platinum + Gold (Mexico). this song was re-certified in March 10, 2023. (source)

 Done.— TheWikiholic (talk) 15:27, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

• Chris Brown - "Under the Influence" - 2x Platinum (New Zealand). (source)
• Chris Brown - "Under the Influence" - 2x Platinum (Swiss). (source)
• Chris Brown - "Under the Influence" - Platinum (Poland). (source)
• Chris Brown - "Under the Influence" - Platinum (Sweden). (source)
• Chris Brown - "Under the Influence" - 3x Platinum (Australia). (source) HeartbreakOnAFullMoon (talk) 11:25, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive

New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Article patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here! There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Klete Keller. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Wes sideman (talk) 11:10, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

UPE on the AfC

Hello TheWikiholic. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:TheWikiholic. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=TheWikiholic|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. US-Verified (talk) 16:30, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

It is apparent now that you're accepting AfC drafts for pay (i.e. one specific client based on the behavior evidence). Per the terms of use, you're required to disclose the paid edits. Please note that if you won't dislose this then I will share the evidence with the relevant sysops/checkusers and this would result in an indefinite block. Please cooperate and disclose honestly. US-Verified (talk) 16:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

This is one of the most ridiculous allegations that I ever heard. I'm a proud volunteer who have been editing Wikipedia since my school days. I challenge you to prove your allegations. Tbh these allegations are derogatory to me as well. TheWikiholic (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Firstly, I'd like to clarify that participation in "paid editing" is not inherently derogatory. Your long-standing commitment as a volunteer editor since your school days is truly commendable, particularly your contributions to Michael Jackson-related topics. Nevertheless, it is apparent that in the past one to two years, you have engaged in reviewing several articles or accepting them through AfC in exchange for payment. Private evidence, which is sufficiently clear, backs this, and it could potentially lead to an indefinite block.

You've to understand that the client you're working with is banned on Wikipedia. As someone of your experience and wisdom, I trust that you'll understand the implications of this subtle hint. I would kindly ask you to disclose this truthfully, as no actions will be taken against you for being transparent. Thanks. US-Verified (talk) 22:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

I consider being part of any kind of UPE to be unethical and being accused of it hence derogatory to me.

You cannot simply come and accuse someone with some random editors who were already blocked ages ago.

You have already accused another editor of similar allegations here and you are also accused of the same here. And can you please explain to me what types of edits are these? 1, 2, 3, 4,5,6

Do you have any other alternative accounts? Your editing behavior is certainly not of a new editor. TheWikiholic (talk) 13:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

• Comment @US-Verified: I'd like to ask (and I'm not making an accusation, just merely asking) whether this editor was paid to intervene on behalf of a blocked user at Klete Keller. Defeedme had an obsession with the lead of that article, and after being blocked, has continued to harass from countless IP addresses. TheWikiholic, despite having no previous interest in Jan. 6 participants or Olympic athletes, showed up out of nowhere on 6 April 2023 and advocated vehemently for Defeedme's position. It's all circumstantial evidence but it seems like too much to just be mere coincidence. Wes sideman (talk) 12:54, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

If you have any such concerns you better take the issue to a cu.— TheWikiholic (talk) 13:33, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

I did not ask if you were a sockpuppet/sockmaster. I asked if you were paid for editing Klete Keller. Wes sideman (talk) 14:23, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

I think I've already explained it above. You can accuse me of anything like I'm careless or even have personal bias. But this is beyond that and personally very excruciating to me as well. TheWikiholic (talk) 14:56, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Wes sideman Good point raised. Please share your thoughts and diffs on the SPI: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheWikiholic. Thank you. US-Verified (talk) 18:18, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

List of state numbers of official vehicles of Ministers of Kerala

ഈ Notability എന്നത് കൊണ്ട് എന്താണ് ഉദ്ദേശിക്കുന്നത്? ഞാൻ ഒരു Wikipedia article ഉണ്ടാക്കി, അത് കേരളത്തിലെ മന്ത്രിമാരുടെ വാഹനങ്ങളും നമ്പറും വി. ഐ.പി കൾച്ചർ നേ ഒക്കെ അതിൽ ഉൾപ്പെടുത്തിയിരിക്കുന്നു. കേരളത്തിൽ പൊതുവെ സിനിമയിലായാലും പൊതു ഇടത്തിൽ ആയാലും ഈ വിഷയങ്ങൾ കൂടുതൽ പ്രതിപാദിക്കുന്നുണ്ട്.ഈ article ലെ പോരായ്മകൾ തിരുത്താൻ സഹായിക്കുമോ? List of state numbers of official vehicles of Ministers of Kerala Nairsalmaan (talk) 03:08, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, TheWikiholic. Thank you for your work on Imitiyaz Ahmad. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey, you missed out on adding maintenance tags to this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:31, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheWikiholic. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 17:49, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Please see my full comment at the SPI. It elaborates on the removal of your new page reviewer and autopatrolled perms and includes a warning: Going forward, you must treat these accounts as if they were alts of the same person, whether or not you acknowledge meatpuppetry has occurred here. In particular see WP:ILLEGIT bullets "Creating an illusion of support" and "Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts". Further tag-teaming will likely lead to indefblocks without further warning. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 17:50, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheWikiholic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The evidence in the SPI doesn't prove Truthguardian is my sock or I ever had offline or online coordination with them. I have been editing Michael Jackson-related articles for almost 10 years now and I don't feel the decision to block me and revoke my flags is without considering my arguments and the truth. I have no connection with TruthGuardian and I don't need any kind of help from them to edit Wikipedia. The CU investigation clearly says I'm not connected with them. For the allegations of I'm using a VPN and proxy, I've already sent the photos of my passports to (to Tamzin) to prove my arguments and to better paint a picture of reality. Please have a look and reconsider your decision. I'm not Truthguardian nor do I know them. If I was any other editor or had more than 1 account, I would have already disclosed it long ago. I'm not foolish enough to get blocked like this and risk the removal of my flags. If there is anything that needs to be clarified please let me know. Thanks in advance. TheWikiholic (talk) 19:43, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

While some of the specifics continue to get slightly different thoughts between here and the SPI page, the fundamentals have now been reviewed by four individuals (not including myself) and been endorsed as such. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheWikiholic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The fundamentals have kept evolving around me and Truthguardian being the same editor, to similar edits on one specific topic, and to overlapping on the same wikiproject. At this point I am legitimately confused as to what the block is actually for. If you have all gone through the past allegations related to these allegations it's obvious that TruthGaurdian’s presence has always caused me trouble with similar meat puppetry allegations. I have told the truth, provided proof of my travels, and went a step above to provide details including my passport details to prove that I'm not using any proxy servers or VPN. 'I would be somewhat surprised if these two accounts were operated by the same individual. These kind of remarks are mere speculations. Is it not possible to check the IPs of TruthGuardians to confirm this? If their IP is constant in one area or based on a specific region or country? Mine should be based in one specific region until about mid-February. I am truly at a lost as to how we can both be considered the same individual. How on earth can these two accounts can be operated by the same individual? If I had been operating both accounts, I would have preferred to disclose it rather than going through this kind of harassment and trouble. Like I said before, I’ve worked incredibly hard and passionately here on Wikipedia over the years to have all of my accomplishments despite legal threats, through Wikipedia and abusive messages and comments through my social media accounts from pro-government supporters. What is happening now is nothing short speculations at the highest order and they have become very disheartening and discouraging. TheWikiholic (talk) 18:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I've reviewed what you've said, what the checkusers have said, the SPI, and so on. Whether or not you use proxies is not really the issue (it's not prohibited to use a proxy if it's not currently blocked), but rather the substantial evidence that your and TruthGuardian's editing has been coordinated in some way or another. This is not the first time that's come up, there's a lot of evidence toward it, and I am inclined to believe that something is going on there that we aren't getting the full picture on. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 01:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TheWikiholic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The evidence produced in the SPI was related to reviewing three pages within about 15 minutes in the last two or three months or so that was accepted by Truthguardian through AFC. Even if I'm not a prolific reviewer like Onel5969, JTtheOG, or Mccapra I was also always listed among the top 50 reviewers in the past. And during my reviews, I mostly reviewed pages that were recently submitted.There was a similar discussion when I moved a page from the main space to the draft space as well. I never reviewed the pages because Truthguardisn accepted these pages or asked me to. Ever. As you all know the page curation tool never shows who accepted the pages. Instead, they only show who created it. I only checked the edit history of the page to see if the creator is a blocked editor. When it comes to the old SPI allegation against Truthguardian It's clear that I'm not part of it. I've been editing Wikipedia for more than 9 years now and I used to edit various topics including Michael Jackson. Compared to me, Truthguardian is a relatively new user as he only started editing Wikipedia in 2019. Compared to Truthguardian, my edits are far more diverse in topics. So I believe it's not fair to make a decision based on article overlap. If that's the case, I have far more article overlap with these editors 1,2 and 3,4.It's been almost two weeks now since I've been blocked for something I have never done. Again, I repeat, these sock puppetry allegations and meat puppetry allegations, and these alleged coordination activities are not based in reality and I swear that I never engaged in such activities, nor will I ever engage in such activities in the future. I humbly request that this decision is reconsidered and with a deeper perspective.TheWikiholic (talk) 17:58, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Block expired. (non-admin closure) –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Acknowledging receipt of your email, TheWikiholic. I have said everything I have to say about this block at this time. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 07:43, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Your email

This is to acknowledge that I received your email. Please do not send me the documents you proposed sending. There is nothing I would do with them other than delete them (and @Tamzin I recommend you do the same). They would not have any bearing on your block and are not the sort of thing you should be sharing anyway. I have already reported the findings of my checkuser investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheWikiholic and the confidentiality requirements imposed on me by WP:CUPRIVACY prevent me from saying anything further. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:53, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

I don't see any reason, personally, to delete the files (which don't contain any personally identifiable information) unless TheWikiholic wants me to, but I've already commented at the SPI regarding why their contents don't change anything. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 20:05, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

I had a feeling that those who commented on the SPI had a feeling that Truthguardian and I are the same person. Even Tamzin said, I lean toward these accounts probably not being the same person (maybe 55% confidence). So it means you also had some doubts. I wanted to make it very clear that I'm not any other editor, nor do I ever use any proxy whatsoever, because I don’t need to. I don't know how to prove this meat puppetry allegation is wrong, to be honest. I've been on the wiki since 2013 and TruthGuardian has been on the wiki since 2019 only. I've edited the pages that we overlapped way before them. Perhaps I can show you more editors that I have similar (even greater) article overlap, including admins. Could this too be taken as evidence of meat puppetry? Not only do I feel as though there is sufficient evidence of such allegations, I am devastated over these false allegations. I’ve worked incredibly hard here on Wikipedia over the years and to have all of my accomplishments flushed down the toilet over this is disheartening, discouraging, and wrong. TheWikiholic (talk) 03:55, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

@Tamzin @Spicy @RoySmith - apologies for bucking against the trend of editors I respect, but my review of the admin and public evidence is that the evidence may be suggestive of sock/meat-puppetry but could be also reasonably explained by poor judgement. That's not a great defence, but certainly preferable. I'm aware that we usually prefer to avoid using AN for review of sock/meat cases, but what is the logical appellate route otherwise here? Some mutually agreed reviewers? ArbCom? Community and damned be the messiness? tl;dr I'm not convinced this isn't poor judgement/checking rather than outright 'puppets. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

@Nosebagbear: If I thought this were the purest kind of meatpuppetry, i.e. one editor acting only as a proxy for the other, I would have indeffed (or at least indeffed the newer account). The reason for these month-long blocks is because I found adequate evidence of inappropriate coordination, but not enough to conclude that's all the accounts were here for. That said, the last thing I ever want is to mistakenly block someone as a sockpuppet/meatpuppet/inappropriate-off-wiki-coordinator, especially because many admins dislike reviewing such determinations de novo in unblock requests, so I absolutely welcome further scrutiny here. I think the best approach would be to either ask at WT:SPI/C if 2 or 3 clerks/CUs would be interested in reviewing the evidence here, or alternately at WP:AN (and, if you don't want this to become a community review, making clear that the post is just a request for admins to come comment here). -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 21:50, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

@Nosebagbear Although the block isn't a checkuser-block, for various reasons, I think it would be best if the review was performed by a CU. There are some notes in cuwiki which may be relevant but can't be made public. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:50, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

@RoySmith@Tamzin - that seems reasonable, and if there is a bit to review on cuwiki then obviously a CU or two would be the best route. Any particularly logical reviewers? Yamla and Blablubbs? Nosebagbear (talk) 22:12, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

I'd leave it to the normal self-selection process. I'd imagine there's a few CUs watching this page. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:59, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

@Nosebagbear: I'm not sure if I count as particularly logical, but I'm somewhat familiar with the case so I'll give it a shot:

TheWikiholic has occasionally used proxies to connect to Wikipedia. Regardless, they have a distinct technical profile from TruthGuardians, and I think "technically unrelated" is a fair assessment here; CU cannot prove negatives, but I would be somewhat surprised if these two accounts were operated by the same individual.

That said, I think behaviour is the far more interesting element here, and – even from a fairly surface-level examination – the behavioural convergence pointed out by Spicy is indicative of something untoward going on here – and that's before we consider the content of the pages under discussion in the SPI. I've trained both Spicy and Tamzin as clerks, and if both of them are in agreement that they hear quacking, then I'm fairly comfortable stating that there is most probably a duck in the room. --Blablubbs (talk) 23:09, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Fair enough, I felt it worth additional eyeballs and if those align with the current viewpoint than all the better. Cheers, Nosebagbear (talk) 23:17, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Now that Blabbs has chimed in, I'll add that from my point of view, I'm concerned that TWH continues to deny proxy use when the CU evidence makes that hard to give credence. Once you can no longer trust what a person is saying, your options are limited. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:00, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Nosebagbear, Blablubbs, and RoySmith, I have never used a proxy or VPN to edit Wiki. Back in India I mostly either used my mobile data or wifi in my home to edit Wikipedia. Similarly, I edit Wiki from my mobile data and one of two wifi networks while in the UAE. I used Wifi in Oman as well. On one or two occasions, I used the free wifi in the metro as well, but I don't remember editing Wikipedia during this time. I can assure you that me and Truthguardian are 100% different editors/people. They only began using Wikipedia in 2019. Compared to me it's a relatively new account. If you check the past SPI investigation against them, they passed them, even during a time when there were a lot of new accounts created. Even though TruthGuardian presence often favours my edits, it has always caused me trouble with similar meatpuppetry allegations. I always tried my best to avoid such allegations by carefully choosing not to edit some of the same pages (pages on my watchlist) that he’s already edited, because of the overzealousness of some editors to make similar false allegations of meat/sock puppetry. It’s an unnecessary headache, but at the same time unfair to me as I have edited Wikipedia and some of the articles far longer. As I can recall, I have not even added a messages to his talk page too to avoid canvassing allegations. If I ever even noticed that those pages were already accepted by Truthguardian I would never had marked them as patrolled. I never needed any kind of help or support from Truthguardian or any other editor ever. I've been editing Wiki way before they even knew was an edit was. If there is anything that needs to be clarified or need any proof regarding the proxy or VPN please let me know. I want to prove these allegations false. Apart from editing, I'm not really good with this technical side so please let me know how I can prove I never used any proxy or VPN. Thanks in advance. TheWikiholic (talk) 15:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

GS alert

Sorry, I should have done this at the same time I blocked, but I'd frankly forgotten this was a GS area, and you don't seem to have been notified of it previously. Going forward, please be aware of the following:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in Michael Jackson. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Thanks. Feel free to remove this alert if you wish. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 19:03, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

Hello TheWikiholic,

New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp ^connect on IRC.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Regarding Mohun Bagan

Why did you reopen the merger discussion and restore the Mohun Bagan SG page? Even involved users can proceed with merger if consensus is there. There was little objection to the merger. Before I took the final step, the thread was lying inactive with overwhelming support for merger. Even after merger, no one objected to it. So I am reverting your unilateral action. You are welcome to start a discussion in the Mohun Bagan AC talk page if you have any objection. Mohunbagani (talk) 14:13, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

I have started a new discussion at Talk:Mohun Bagan SG. Please have a look. TheWikiholic (talk) 15:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol needs your help!

New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello TheWikiholic,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)