User talk:Graeme Bartlett/archive 21

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Graeme_Bartlett/archive_21.


	Older talk is in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 archives. Please add your talk at the bottom of the page:

DYK for South Tibetan Detachment[edit]

On 19 November 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article South Tibetan Detachment, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the South Tibetan Detachment inserted the Greater Himalayan Crystalline complex between the Lesser Himalayan Sequence and the Tethyan Himalayan Sequence? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/South Tibetan Detachment. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Douglas Saunders[edit]

The article Douglas Saunders has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1 03:42, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Could you please be more careful when approving articles for DYK? I don't know if it is only a problem with the contributions of LauraHale, or a more general one, but you have approved a number of articles which were not fir for the main page at all.

Today, I have pulled Template:Did you know nominations/Gibraltar Falls from the queue for some serious sourcing and padding issues. I then noted that you recently approved some other articles by LauraHale as well, including e.g. Women's football in Africa, which is a very poor article, badly written. E.g. "During the late 1970s, the national football federation started to set up women's league across the country" is a nice sentence, but which country? This omission renders it meaningless.

"While women were not always playing the game, they supported Footballs development by the 1920s women took on support roles that freed up time and resources which allowed men to actively participate" needs some work to become intelligible. " In South Africa in the 1960s, women several tried to create women's football clubs including Jessie Maseko who tried to create a girls high school football club in 1962." Women several tried?

Mother City Girls is described as a high school team, but the source[1] doesn't mention any link to a high school.

"In Africa, this was true with for many countries including Burundi and Madagascar with their senior national sides having yet to play a FIFA sanctioned match" Um, what? Even after deciphering what is meant, what makes Burundi and Madagascar so special that they deserve a separate mention, and e.g. Togo doesn't?

Why do you let such articles grace the Main Page? DYKs don't need to be exhaustive and they don't need to be flawless, but they do need to be intelligible, basically correct, and give the impression of giving a minimal overview of the topic. Why are there e.g. no mentions of the appearances and results at the FIFA Women's World Cup, where African teams have been present from the first edition on? Or no informantion on the African Women's Championship?[2]. It's hard to take an article on "Women's football in Africa" serious when it doesn't even mention this Championship... Fram (talk) 14:32, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: and of course, what is the hook for Women's football in Africa about? "that by the 1960s female leaders of women's football in Africa began to emerge?" This refers to the local school girls in South Africa who tried with little or no success to start a local team, only to fade back into obscurity? How are they "leaders of women's football in Africa"? Fram (talk) 15:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It seems from looking a bit further that you were only the messenger on this one, i.e. you delivered the DYK message to her talk page, but didn't actually review or post the DYK. This means that my comments are rather misdirected here. I'll repost them at Wikipedia talk:Did you know instead, you may disregard them (at least you shouldn't take them personally!). Fram (talk) 15:11, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well my extra check is that the hooks make enough sense, and are not controversial, taht the prep area has been there for enough hours to get some polishing work done, and that the pictures are free to use. You do seem to be setting a higher standard for the DYKs than the rules, particularly in regards to information missing from the article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:43, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Andy Bor[edit]

You approved a completely incorrect hook, which has now appeared on the main page for some 7 hours. Please be a lot more careful when checking DYKs. The approval was at Template:Did you know nominations/Andy Bor, the discussion is at Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Error on mainpage. Fram (talk) 07:41, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Western Interior Seaway anoxia[edit]

On 24 November 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Western Interior Seaway anoxia, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that excessive nutrients from volcanoes caused the loss of oxygen in the Western Interior Seaway which linked the Caribbean to the Arctic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Western Interior Seaway anoxia. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Tectonic influences on alluvial fans[edit]

On 24 November 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tectonic influences on alluvial fans, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the timing of mountain building can alter the shape and thickness of alluvial fans? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tectonic influences on alluvial fans. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AWB[edit]

Hey,

Would you mind looking into the AWB request I made about three weeks ago? You asked a question and I replied to it, but since then the request has remained open. I guess other admins aren't going to get involved here. Thanks. Widr (talk) 16:39, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Thick-skinned deformation[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Thick-skinned deformation at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Allen3 ^talk 17:47, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Graeme, I don't see that the edits you made back on the 24th addressed the problem, which was that there were only two sources, and two paragraphs completely unsourced in contravention of DYK rules. Were you planning on getting this fixed, or have you given up on the nomination? Please respond on the nomination template. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:43, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting protection for Queen article[edit]

Hi Graeme. Requesting page protection for Queen due to persistent ip vandalism. Thanks. Chie one (talk) 10:34, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:00, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for North Atlantic breakup[edit]

On 27 November 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article North Atlantic breakup, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the North Atlantic breakup resulted in the separation of Eurasia from North America, forming the North Atlantic Ocean? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/North Atlantic breakup. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Reviews[edit]

Hey Graeme, if you do a couple reviews of other noms, I'll take a look at Grouse Creek block and Intraplate deformation. They look interesting, and I need to do two for a double nom. Best, The Interior (Talk) 04:28, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Goodman Beaver[edit]

Graeme, could you please assign an appropriate icon to your review here? I can't tell whether you were giving an interim or final review on it: sometimes, people say that much when they still have some facets left to finish, like close paraphrase checks. Many thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:44, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah its a partial review only. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:03, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation needs YOUR help![edit]

Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2433 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk.

Do you have what it takes?

Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script!
Thanks in advance, Nathan2055^{talk - contribs}

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation at 22:28, 29 November 2012 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for letting me know that the article on Henry Wriothesley, 2nd Earl of Southampton, was published today on 'Did You Know'. Obviously a lot of work goes into making that Wikipedia feature happen. NinaGreen (talk) 18:52, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Grouse Creek block[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Grouse Creek block at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 06:30, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also some minor issues with Template:Did you know nominations/Intraplate deformation to be addressed. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:32, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Grouse Creek block[edit]

On 8 December 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Grouse Creek block, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the 2.5 billion year old Grouse Creek block forms part of the basement of North America? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grouse Creek block. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wyoming craton[edit]

Wyoming craton really needs your expertise. Would you vet my recent edits there, which are intended to improve its reader-friendliness, emphasis and clarity, but not meant to change interpretations or facts. And some questions that remain obscure are at Talk:Wyoming craton. --Wetman (talk) 18:51, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Intraplate deformation[edit]

On 9 December 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Intraplate deformation, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that tectonic plates in the Earth's crust are not completely rigid but can be deformed by the melting of an ice cap? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Intraplate deformation. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting help[edit]

Hi Graeme. There has been some problems with the last two DYK articles above (approved by me), and I'd really appreciate some clarification on the issues raised. The threads are at my talk page, and at WP:AN. I'm finding this whole experience a bit troubling. The Interior (Talk) 23:05, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, I misunderstood and blew the whole thing way out of proportion. I've apologised to The Interior and asked for forgiveness, unstriken the DYK review, and am doing whatever I can to show that he didn't do anything wrong. Nyttend (talk) 07:03, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at MatthewVanitas's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:08, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at MatthewVanitas's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Query[edit]

I was just struck by your comment here. It seems wrong-headed and/or uninformed. No? Best. Biosthmors (talk) 23:33, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking at how many different references were used and th authors of them. However if you think that they are not on the topic then fair enough to discount them. Don't be too stressed if I want to include articles that others would like to delete. I will accept the consensus. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:27, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. But in this case it was a new thing, and the article cited a bunch of old articles that couldn't have possibly mentioned the new thing. Biosthmors (talk) 00:43, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You[edit]

~~~ has given you a plate of hummus! Hummus is a specialty of the Middle East. With some pita bread, they are delicious and promote WikiLove. Hopefully, this one has added flavor to your day.

Spread the goodness of hummus by adding {{subst:Hummus}} to someone's Talk page with a friendly message! Give a plate of hummus to someone you've had disagreements with in the past, or to a good friend.

Thank you for adding WB access Hasteur (talk) 13:19, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ronni Povlsen[edit]

Hi Graeme,

Concerning the undeletion of an article about Niels povlsen (see first link below), I've found a log file stating, that the page was deleted on May 5th 10:32 (see last link). I'm new to this undeleting of articles at wikipedia, so please instruct me if you're not the guy I should talk to this about :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_79#Niels_povlsen

http://da.newikis.com/Speciel:Loglister/Harthacnut.html

Best regards, Ronni Povlsen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.208.71.5 (talk) 14:45, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since your IP is hopping around I will answer here. The article was not on the English Wikipedia. What you pointed out is a copy of a log for the Danish Wikipedia. The deletion log shows that you should ask da:user talk:Harthacnut about it. I am only an administrator at the English Wikipedia here. To get a deleted article back on the Danish one you need to ask an administrator there such as Harthacnut. Presumably Ronni Povlsen is different to Ronni Poulsen. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:41, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moved counter RM result, again[edit]

FYI, as db-G6 admin. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:44, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kauffner moved at least one other article contrary to the same RM, Thanh Hoa here. I made Kauffner aware of these issues, though he appears unwilling to correct them.Cúchullain ^t/c 13:52, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Technical Barnstar
	For your efforts to fix the technical problems with DYK! ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:25, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Asega and Cuneus Frisionum mmight interest you.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 18:27, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

THANKS, I have project tagged them! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:22, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Created a few more stubs on your missing articles. The science ones need an expert such as yourself!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 20:58, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Usually I don't start unless I have more than a stub's worth of content. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:34, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! indeed the further back we go the less content we have.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:18, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Madelon Szekely-Lulofs[edit]

Many thanks for your great help on that page - it is being appreciated .

Glemmens1940 (talk) 20:52, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Card of thanks[edit]

Thank you. I will try to use my powers for good. ;)
kcylsnavS{^screech_harrass} 23:26, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	Great job on adding some examples of good work to the new trophy case page for editors in the Wikipedia Education Program! JMathewson (WMF) (talk) 22:56, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unwatched pages[edit]

Hi Graeme!

Could you please send me another copy of Special:UnwatchedPages, as I have not asked for one in a while?

Thanks! Thine Antique Pen (talk) 23:09, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter[edit]

The WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter

The WikiProject Articles for creation Newsletter
Volume I, No. I – December 2012

Visit the Articles for creation homepage

Project news

Five changes have been proposed to the AfC policy. Join the discussion here.
Another change has been proposed to the courtesy blanking policy. It involves CSDing distributive submissions. Discuss it here.
The beta script still needs testing. Learn how you can help here.
The backlog is at emergency status and another drive has been proposed here and suggestions on changes to the structure have been proposed here.
Discussion on updating the backlog notification is underway here.
A discussion on whether autoconfirmed users are allowed to skip the backlog is going on here.
Discussion on users not adding categories and not checking copyvios is going on here.

Backlog news^[1]

There are 2431 pending submissions in the backlog. You can help!

Article rankings^[1]

WikiProject Articles for creation articles by quality Refresh
FA	GA	B	C	Start	Stub	FL	List	Category	Disambig	Draft	File	Project	Redirect	Template	NA	???	Total
0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

From the Editors

This is the very first newsletter for WikiProject Articles for creation! If you find any errors or have suggestions on what to improve/include in future newsletters, please leave a message here.

Contributors to this Issue

Dom497 (talk · contribs)
Nathan2055 (talk · contribs)

Notes

^ ^a ^b Information may not be current due to caching. Click here to purge this page's server cache.

Script corner: Stable: v4.1.15 - Beta: v4.1.16b2

v4.1.16b2 is now available in the beta channel! Reviewers can use the beta version of the script by following the instructions here and should report bugs here! Release notes can be found here as well as in the source code.

If you are JavaScript savvy, please contact Nathan2055 (talk · contribs) if you wish to help with development.

Reviewing articles and more since 2005!

Delivered 00:59, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

CLIPSAS[edit]

Thank you. JASpencer (talk) 12:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Season's tidings![edit]

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:22, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting a Vandal[edit]

Somebody under the name of wikiprincess5 have specifically signed into wikipedia with the solely purpose of vandalize Rodolfo Valentin article. I have reversed it to the original, prior version. But this person is doing the samething all over the internet using different names like "Mark Joseph" or "Adam C" using same wording. I will like to know the IP address from which the vandalism was done but I do not know how to find it in wikipedia. Can you please also help to protect Rodolfo Valentin article for a while?. Thank you very much! Happy holidays!96.232.128.193 (talk) 20:50, 22 December 2012 (UTC)justicebemade[reply]

Protected another month. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:36, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Holiday cheer[edit]

		Holiday Cheer
		Michael Q. Schmidt ^talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings.

Cryogenian[edit]

Hi. I saw you re-added Category:Article Feedback 5 to Cryogenian. I'm curious why. --MZMcBride (talk) 23:24, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All the feedback for this topic was useful. I think you will find that the more serious topics will get meaningful feedback, as compared to popular culture where 99% may not be of any use. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:52, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at Patchy1's talk page.
Message added 11:45, 28 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

-- Patchy1 11:45, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Braintonikgames logo2.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Braintonikgames logo2.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion of UFC 156[edit]

Hello there, regarding Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion#UFC 156 - it seems something went wrong, because I can't find the page in my user space. UFC 157 was fine though. Thanks. Oskar Liljeblad (talk) 08:05, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SDK[edit]

Hi, thanks for helping to move SDK Azylber (talk) 14:51, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/torque amplifier[edit]

Graeme, I've shortened the hook that you noted was too long, and Maury seems to like it. Can you please stop by again and see whether you can approve the new hook (and the article along with it)? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:00, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for registration[edit]

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage.
Message added 06:58, 2 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I would ask you to reconsider my request for registration. I would be a very caution and mindful use of AutoWikiBrowser. Here is a request I made for a bot to do a task I can probably do myself with the help of this application. አቤል ዳዊት (Janweh) (talk) 06:58, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation page[edit]

Hello, Graeme. For your information, your description of the move of the SDK disambiguation page as "uncontroversial" was inaccurate. As explained on WP:MDP, accepted practice is not to move a disambiguation page if doing so would break existing links. In this case, moving the page broke at least several dozen existing links that relied on the old redirect from SDK to Software development kit. I've fixed these now, but in future please be aware that moving a disambiguation page over an existing title is not uncontroversial nor consistent with consensus if there are incoming links to that title. Thanks. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 01:07, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timothy Sykes for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timothy Sykes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Sykes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:23, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm nominating it for deletion, although I'm semi-neutral on it. If you can work some magic and find more sources, I'm open to withdrawing the nom.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:23, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RFC/U[edit]

Uh quick question, I know its been nearly a week, but I think that you deleted the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Tomcat7 improperly. At least one other user had put forth their concerns, while the ANI basically got straight to the point and the matter was dropped as the editor got the point. Why was it deleted? The editor in question did not put it under certifier 2 probably because they did not realize that their comments about trying to fix the problem counted as being the other editor. Certifier is a weird term, as like someone who certifies the problem exists, not that they tried to resolve it. Either way, could you help me understand it if I am wrong. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 23:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AWB Permissions Request Backlog[edit]

Hello Graeme Bartlett! I'm contacting you because there are a few undecided AWB requests, including some where the user hasn't responded to a question which should be declined. Since you'be been active in this area, it would be great if you could take a look. Many thanks, Vacation^nine 16:11, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1,1-Ethanedithiol[edit]

On 7 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1,1-Ethanedithiol, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the durian-scented food flavouring 1,1-ethanedithiol smells so bad that it is sold as a 1% solution? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1,1-Ethanedithiol. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Da-Wen Sun[edit]

Hello. I note that you disagree with my speedy deletion of Da-Wen Sun as promotional. I maintain that the speedy deletion was valid. But in any case, I consider that you misused your administrator tools by undoing that deletion without prior discussion with me. This is because, as you know, the forum to contest disputed deletions is WP:DRV. Administrators are not exempt from following normal deletion processes, including WP:DRV, just because they have the technical ability to do so. In addition, the policy WP:ADMIN requires that administrators should not undo each others' actions except in case of clear error, and normally not without discussion. I therefore ask you to restore the deletion and contest it on WP:DRV if you still disagree with it. Thanks, Sandstein 21:47, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Because you have not replied to my message, but have edited in the interim, I assume that you do not object to my re-deleting and re-salting the page. If you still disagree with this, you can contest it in the proper forum, at WP:DRV. Regards, Sandstein 15:02, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Absent any reply of yours, I have done so. I also suggest that you re-read the administrator policy on occasion. In addition to not carelessly undoing others' actions, the policy also requires administrators to "respond promptly and civilly to queries about their Wikipedia-related conduct and administrator actions" (WP:ADMINACCT), which in this case you did not. Sandstein 00:10, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not appreciate your response Sandstein, and I had already explained myself on your talk page. The idea here is to improve Wikipedia, not to delete things that you do not like. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Canberra meetup invitation: January 2013[edit]

Canberra Meetup

Next: 9 January 2013

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Wednesday 9 January 2013. Yes, that is tomorrow. Sorry about the short notice.

Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Canberra/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:43, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)

tantalum(V) ethoxide[edit]

Hi Graeme, I noticed that you have reviewd the tantalum(V) ethoxide article for DYK - thank you. I was wondering what you think of the article overall? I am wondering if a GA nomination is a good idea or if there are glaring problems that I am missing. Many Thanks, EdChem (talk) 12:46, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some comments on the talk page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:42, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Laos Provinces[edit]

Thank you very much for the Review of the Articles of Provinces of Laos. I greatly appreciate the huge efforts you have put in to read all the 17 articles and clear them as per DYK rules.--Nvvchar. 02:53, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/IL Hødd[edit]

Hi there. You are doing a fantastic job with DYK, but I believe you started a review, that you forgot to complete. Are there anything I could do to make Template:Did you know nominations/IL Hødd ready for the main page? Cheers, Mentoz86 (talk) 22:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Manuel Antonio Caro[edit]

Sorry Graham but I'm already reviewing Template:Did you know nominations/Manuel Antonio Caro. There are some unresolved issues. Could you please undo your tick? Prioryman (talk) 10:32, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just place your cross and say how you think there is a problem, I will just cause you more ECs! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:34, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I already have, it's above yours! You added your review after mine. You need to undo your review, as it just duplicates mine, which I did before you. Prioryman (talk) 10:38, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well I did see that review, but it hardly mentioned the DYK criteria, so I assessed the criteria. Also I confirmed your proposed hook. However I have removed my tick. But I think it passes DYK requirements. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:51, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for removing the tick - I agree that it almost passes DYK requirements, but as I said in the review, there are a couple more things that need to be done. It shouldn't take the nominator long to sort it out. Prioryman (talk) 10:53, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All done now. Thanks for your help with this! Prioryman (talk) 22:05, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassadors update[edit]

Hi! You're getting this message because you are or have been a Wikipedia Ambassador. A new term is beginning for the United States and Canada Education Programs, and I wanted to give you an update on some important new information if you're interested in continuing your work this term as a Wikipedia Ambassador.

You may have heard a reference to a transition the education program is going through. This is the last term that the Wikimedia Foundation will directly run the U.S. and Canada programs; beginning in June, a proposed thematic organization is likely to take over organizing the program. You can read more about the proposal here.

Another major change in the program will take effect immediately. Beginning this term, a new MediaWiki education extension will replace all course pages and Ambassador lists. (See Wikipedia:Course pages and Help:Education Program extension for more details.) Included in the extension are online volunteer and campus volunteer user rights, which let you create and edit course pages and sign up as an ambassador for a particular course.

If you would like to continue serving as a Wikipedia Ambassador — even if you do not support a class this term — you must create an ambassador profile. If you're no longer interested in being a Wikipedia Ambassador, you don't need to do anything.

Please do these steps as soon as possible

First, you need the relevant user rights for Online and/or Campus Ambassadors. (If you are an admin, you can grant the rights yourself, for you as well as other ambassadors.) Just post your rights request here, and we'll get you set up as quickly as possible.

Once you've got the ambassador rights, please set up at a Campus and/or Online Ambassador profile. You can do so at:

Going forward, the lists of Ambassadors at Special:CampusAmbassadors and Special:OnlineAmbassadors will be the official roster of who is an active Ambassador. If you would like to be an Ambassador but not ready to serve this term, you can un-check the option in your profile to publicly list it (which will remove your profile from the list).

After that, you can sign on to support courses. The list of courses will be at Special:Courses. (By default, this lists "Current" courses, but you can change the Status filter to "Planned" to see courses for this term that haven't reached their listed start date yet.)

As this is the first term we have used the extension, we know there will be some bugs, and we know the feature set is not as rich as it could be. (A big wave of improvements is already in the pipeline. And if you know MediaWiki and could help with code review, we'd love to have your help!) Please reach out to me (Sage Ross) with any complaints, bug reports, and feature suggestions. The basic features of the extension are documented at Wikipedia:Course pages, and you can see a tutorial for setting up and using them here.

Communication and keeping up to date

In the past, the Education Program has had a pretty fragmented set of communication channels. We're trying to fix that. These are the recommended places to discuss and stay up-to-date on the education program:

The education noticeboard has become the main on-wiki location for discussion of the Education Program. You can post there about broad education program issues as well as issues with individual courses.
The Ambassadors Announce email list is a very low-traffic announcements list of important information all Ambassadors need to be aware of. We encourage all Ambassadors (and other interested Wikipedians) to subscribe to the list; follow the instructions on the link to add your email address.
If you use IRC regularly, or need to try to reach someone immediately, the #wikipedia-en-ambassadors ^connect IRC channel is the place to find me and fellow Ambassadors.

Ambassador training and resources

We now have an online training for Ambassadors, which is intended to be both an orientation about the Wikipedia Ambassador role for newcomers and the manual for how to do the role. (There are parallel trainings for students and for educators as well.)

Please go through the training if you feel like you need a refresher on how a typical class is supposed to go and where the Ambassadors fit in, or if you want to review and help improve it. If there's something you'd like to see added, or other suggestions you have for it, feel free to edit the training and/or leave feedback. A primer on setting up and using course pages is included in the educators' training.

The Resources page of the training is the main place for Ambassador-related resources. If there's something you think is important as a resource that's not on there, please add it.

Finally, whether or not you work with any classes this term, I encourage you to post entries to the Trophy Case whenever you see excellent work from students or if you have great examples from past semesters. And, as always, let students (and other editors!) know when they do things well; a little WikiLove goes a long way!

--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 20:52, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification[edit]

As you were one of a number of editors who participated in Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options last September, I thought I would notify you that I have suggested a change to the wording of the restrictions to clarify what is being restricted. Please see WT:DYK#Proposed minor wording change to Gibraltarpedia restrictions for the details. Prioryman (talk) 22:05, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request Revision History Deletion[edit]

To begin with, please forgive me if I am not following proper protocol as I am new to this. I am requesting that the revisions history made under my account name jayfriday be deleted from the article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sephardic_Temple_Tifereth_Israel I believe that my account was used without my knowledge to post revisions. I have been receiving a great deal of inappropriate feedback as a result, and would appreciate it if the revisions history under my account name be deleted, or at least, that the user name is not shown. Thanks for your help, and once again sorry if I am not following proper protocol. Jayfriday (talk) 04:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I took care of the deletions of the edit history entries. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 07:31, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Good Olfactory, although I would do this sort of thing, I may not be fast! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:46, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages on simple[edit]

Hi and thanks for your removal of cross-wiki spam post on simple.wiki. When they target talk pages, please do not ask for speedy deletion of the page but just replace the content with {{talkheader}} which is what we usually do over there. (I've sent you this message here on en.wiki since I see you're not very active over there). Thanks a lot and happy changing! --Mark91it's my world 13:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Australia Day! Thank you for contributing to Australian content![edit]

	Australian Wikimedian Recognition (AWR)
	Thank you for your contributions on English Wikipedia that have helped improve Australian related content. :D It is very much appreciated. :D Enjoy your Australia Day and please continue your good work! Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:11, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at Plasmic Physics's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Plasmic Physics (talk)

Discussion on the AFT5 Request for Comment[edit]

Hey Graeme Bartlett - this is to notify you that there is a discussion starting on the Article Feedback RfC talkpage that has ramifications for the RfC itself. Your input is much appreciated :). Thanks! and apologies if I've missed anyone Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:40, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Del Rev[edit]

A deletion you have restore was deleted again by another admin, Da-Wen Sun and has been appealed at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 January 29. (now blue=linked because I temp-restored it for deletion review). I have made some comments there. DGG ( talk ) 19:05, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Iron(I) hydride[edit]

Please insert this prepared chembox into Iron(I) hydride. Plasmic Physics (talk) 02:45, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at Plasmic Physics's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Plasmic Physics (talk) 11:27, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at Plasmic Physics's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

In case you missed it. Plasmic Physics (talk) 01:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at Plasmic Physics's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please tell me if this template is neccessary, I'd prefer not to use it. Have a look at Nickel hydride, it could do with some expansion, and it's within your interests. Plasmic Physics (talk) 02:44, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No need to use the template, as a piece of text here alerts me in the same way as a square template. Even a note on your talk page would eventually get my attention, but it may be days. I have added some referenced material, but where did you get your info? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:07, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination of Anne St. Leger[edit]

This one seems to be worth expediting? Moonraker (talk) 20:45, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You had better ask someone who knows how to build a prep area! I can check nominations or promote, but have never built a prep. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:54, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Need 2nd opinion at ANI[edit]

Hello Graeme, could you please have a look at this thread? We might have a compromised account so I wonder if it should be indeffed right now just to be on the safe side. Regards, De728631 (talk) 10:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of discussion[edit]

A few months ago, you participated in a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Did you know about Gibraltar-related DYKs on the Main Page. I am proposing that the temporary restrictions on such DYKs, which were imposed in September 2012, should be lifted and have set out a case for doing so at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Gibraltar-related DYKs. If you have a view on this, please comment at that page. Prioryman (talk) 22:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal address block request[edit]

Hello. I know that this is a stale report because the vandalism incident last ocurred seven hours ago while I was away from my computer. But I'll say it anyway. Can you block 61.247.51.78 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)? This addressed was used today (and several days ago) by the Indonesian NBC/anime/movie studio/telenovela misinformation vandal. Children's programming on NBC and The Transformers: The Movie are two of the vandals "favorite" articles to butcher. Will wait for your action ASAP. Thanks! - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 09:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

blocked. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:03, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Metal hydrides[edit]

Thank you for your continued role in the project chemistry. You are starting to see that, in Plasmic Physics, we are dealing with someone with rather strong views. Coupled with a lot of time devoted to editing, he is a formidable editor. The net result is almost always useless, IMHO, but that's life.

If you or anyone hints at splitting an article, he will seek to split many articles. We have been dealing with this fanaticism for years. One benefit from this recurring pain is that the community is forced to carefully define rules and criteria.

More specific to the issue at hand, I was going to eventually recommend that we follow Beetstra's advice on (1) de-splitting copper hydrides and (2) indicate in our MOS that we typically will not split compound articles regarding gas vs solid materials without achieving consensus by consultation at the Project Chemistry. In addition to Beetstra, Ben, also a regular, supports this de-splitting. I bring this up because I sense that you at one time toyed with the idea of creating articles on species detected in the interstellar medium. In the past we have incorporated such content into the articles on the non-gaseous state. But I am open to your ideas.

Since we have no article on MgH or CaH and they have no chance of existence in condensed phase, I support short articles on these species. Why not? Where I would want to discuss is when some composition is found in both gas or condensed phases. For example, I think TiO occurs in in the interstellar medium, but we would not need a separate article on it the gaseous form.--Smokefoot (talk) 01:34, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That article plan sounds OK to me! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Canberra meetup invitation: February 2013[edit]

Canberra Meetup

Next: 24 February 2013

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Sunday 24 February 2013. Sorry about the short notice.

Details and attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Canberra/February 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 08:08, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in ACT)

Resurrection of Jesus[edit]

You have made some edits to that page, and I think you know the topic. I had been keeping an eye on it, but will not be any more. I think it will be good if you keep an eye on it now. Thanks and good luck. History2007 (talk) 13:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resetting BLP Prod[edit]

Dear Graeme, I was patrolling my watchlist earlier, and noticed that you reset the BLP prod on Maryse Letarte without providing a reason for doing so. The BLP Prod had been placed for 10 days, as required by policy, and had expired. I was going to request the deletion of the work today, when I noticed what you'd done. Since you did not provide a reason, and the work is still unreferenced, I'll be jiggered if I'm going to wait another 10 days to get done, what should already have been done. Please don't reset BLP Prods without providing a reason, thanks. Fish ^Barking? 22:37, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A person had offered to supply references, If you checked you would have seen that the page was deleted and restored. It is useless to restore it and have it immediately deleted! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:40, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since I am not an admin, I have no way of seeing anywhere in the system that the article was previously deleted - and I cannot see any note on the talk page, or in the article's history noting that there is any offer to provide references. Can you show me where this offer was made please? Fish ^Barking? 22:46, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was made at WP:REFUND, I see I should have mentioned it in the edit summary. For prods including BLPPROD restores are made on request, but for BLPPROD reset the timer to make sure it gets deleted again if there is no action. You should be able to see the delete log at this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Maryse+Letarte&year=&month=-1&tagfilter= Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:37, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How do you do it?[edit]

517 articles have been published on "copper hydride". How many of these do you plan to cite? What are your criteria? Certain (western?) journals? Certain authors that you find authoritative? Certain techniques that think are important? It would be very interesting to see your criteria for citation.

This predicament puzzles me about your editing style with these articles, and my continued surprise that a senior editor has decided that the rules do not apply to you, i.e. WP:UNDUE, WP:SECONDARY. Why not mainly cite reviews?

I recognize you are a dedicated and well-intentioned editor. So I am hoping to get you to announce your criteria and perhaps we can codify this priority system so that less experienced editors would know how to sift through 500+ sources. Your advice would be a service, seriously.--Smokefoot (talk) 14:38, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to cite the facts as included. CuH in stars evidence looks a little weak, so I would like to find someone that refutes it. You will be pleased to note that DOI 10.1039/B001200I is a review article. Much of my use of "primary" sources is reporting and summary of other sources, which makes it a secondary source. When I use a secondary source like this I would also include the primary source it was based on if it is available. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:40, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Potential copyright violation: Office Picture Manager[edit]

Hi. There is a copyvio issue in need of the attention of an administrator at :File talk:Office Picture Manager icon.png § Picture Manager icon. Hopefully, it does not need much discussion. I hope it isn't much trouble for you. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 06:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted this and requested use of an alternate name, since that is a different image. I can also confirm that the 2005 upload is the icon. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:29, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you. By the way, did the links that I posted there (as proofs) work properly for you? I have one report of them not working properly (though they work well here). Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 13:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yellow Lantern listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yellow Lantern. Since you had some involvement with the Yellow Lantern redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). BDD (talk) 22:34, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Acidic (band), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Azusa and Orange County Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Woolley Moor United FC[edit]

Hi Graeme many thanks for restoring this page for us, i have been trying to make the page stronger but I'm struggling as all history of the club is in old news papers so not available on the net to reference. Is there anything that you else I can do i.e add more categories etc. So it will not be in danger of being deleted?? This is my 1st attempt at a Wiki page and I have found it very stressful. Thanks again — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnWoolley (talk • contribs) 20:32, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John B. Kimble[edit]

Hi Graeme, I was wondering how we can appeal the arbitrary deletion of the John B. Kimble article on the behavioral scientist's article. He has run for political office many times and I believe the afd review was not done properly. In 2011 one of the deletion requesters was a wiki uses/editor that from viewing the arguments was acting outside of the scope of consensus and the person seems to be involved again in the current debates. I appreciate your service to wikipedia.2001:558:6020:192:78BE:D5:281D:41AA (talk) 07:48, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus is what is decided in the AFD debates and the DRV. These are not just supposed to be a vote, but present arguments that support the voters opinion. If you can find several newspaper articles on the person that would help the case for an article. Generally candidates that don't get elected miss out on articles. Also people that vote and never do anything else are called single purpose accounts (SPA). These sort of people would be better off writing the material for magazines and newspapers to produce the independent coverage required. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:15, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you Graeme. I was looking through the Wikipedia archives and found the google search from Wikipedia that showed many articles that the article used for notability. I think too much emphasis was placed on politician because there has been nationwide coverage of the scientist when he ran for office and notability still seems sufficient to me. My daughter was writing a report for her school newspaper and found the information on Wikipedia to be very helpful. I appreciate the input about single purpose accounts. I was looking at the requests for undeletion and the three levels but they seem to be very similar. I appreciate having Wikipedia around because it is a useful encyclopedia.2001:558:6020:192:78BE:D5:281D:41AA (talk) 12:11, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You![edit]

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:56, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Titanium hydride[edit]

A new section has been added, and given your previous work with Chromium hydride, your input towards expanding that section would be appreciated. Plasmic Physics (talk) 08:01, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see "There is also a electrochemical method for producing titanium hydride", surely you could have written more your self! What we need are more references for some of the other statements. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:36, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geology of the Iberian Peninsula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Madrid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:52, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Iberian geology maps[edit]

Hi Graeme, thank you for translating the images and congratulations for your great work in geology and your knowledge of the iberian geology. Greetings from Spain, --PePeEfe (talk) 22:22, 12 March 2013 (UTC) (main user talk: es:Usuario Discusión:PePeEfe)[reply]

Hi Graeme. I have changed some things in your traslation of the History of geology in the article Geology of the Iberian Peninsula. Please, check it, because I don't know so much english. Thank you and congratulations for your work. --Shalbat (talk) 08:56, 13 March 2013 (UTC) (main user talk: es:Usuario Discusión:Shalbat)[reply]

Thanks for that. Your work looks good. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request unprotection of Yasser Arafat[edit]

Hello. A couple of years ago, on 11 May 2011, you protected the article Yasser Arafat due to persistent vandalism. I'm sure by now the vandal has moved on. I would like to request that the article be unprotected. Thank you. 24.22.75.14 (talk) 22:08, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I only removed pending changes, However I still think that this page is too high risk to allow no protection. You can register an account, edit enough and wait for a few days and you will then be able to contribute. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:28, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked IP still vandalizing?[edit]

Hello Graeme

I do not know what to make of this: [3] An IP address which you have blocked for vandalism can edit? Is there something I am missing? (Well, I am sure there is...)

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 06:33, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

the Block had expired, reblocked. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:50, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Project for RfA nominators[edit]

As one of the supporters of a related proposal in the 2013 RfC on RfA reform, you are invited to join the new WikiProject for RfA nominators. Please come and help shape this initiative. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 21:41, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:58, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

regulated rewriting[edit]

This article, which you curated in 2007, has a repeated phrase which I think is missing a word? I left a message on the talk page. Regards, --Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 10:46, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:John-hiatt7.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:John-hiatt7.jpg, which you've attributed to Jose Pacot. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:55, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Satellite television in the United States, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages G4 and WSBK (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:19, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

REF: Edit count and AWB[edit]

HI and thanks for leaving me a message. My plan is a simple one in the short term I was hoping to use AWB to manage the Wikipedia pages I started and am main contributor to for fixing typos and other errors made by my Dyslexia in the longer term as I develop as an editor I would look at helping to fix such error in the wide Wikipedia community. Thanks for your apology, even due you did not owe me one. Robcamstone (talk) 14:05, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding me to the AWB list and for your kind words of encouragement. Robcamstone (talk) 21:52, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of John Milton Hawks[edit]

Hello! Your submission of John Milton Hawks at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Nick-D (talk) 10:39, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk back[edit]

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at KumiokoCleanStart's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I replied again.:-) Kumioko (talk) 01:07, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi![edit]

Sorry for the inconvenience, but I re-listed Center for Coastal Marine Sciences for deletion. I think the speedy deletion might have not been the right way to do it, but the article (in my opinion) lacks notability per WP:ORG. You might want to weight-in your opinion on the matter on the talk page. Thank you. -- Marco Guzman, Jr Talk 19:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Russ Witte[edit]

Thanks for doing the heavy lifting on Russ Witte. I'm sure the submitter thanks you as well. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:37, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Collodictyon revert[edit]

I have responded to your message on my Talk page. Thank you! -- MisterDub (talk | contribs) 21:34, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eamcet_mock_counselling page[edit]

Hi,

Recently, you have deleted Eamcet_Mock_Counselling page citing that it is duplicate of Engineering_Agricultural_and_Medical_Common_Entrance_Test page. I would like to tell you that more than 75% of the new page content is different from the existing page.

Actually, mock counseling is a tool used by the students before participating in actual counseling process. The page you are referring to doesn't have any data related to mock counseling or the process of mock counseling.

I have given illustrations and a few scenarios to explain how Eamcet score is calculated
I have given the formula for calculation of Eamcet score
I have given list of resources for mock counseling.

I must say that I am utterly disappointed that you have deleted the page without full consent and also, I feel very sad and demotivated to have spent 1 whole weekend of mine trying to help other people. I am sorry to say that I don't feel wikipedia is a place to share useful information with others and I should never waste my precious time here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nash2925 (talk • contribs) 23:23, 18 May 2013 (IST)

Actually, the first page was created to share complete details about mock counseling but I left it in between due to some reasons. I am fine if you are merging the Eamcet_mock_counselling with Engineering_Agricultural_and_Medical_Common_Entrance_Test page, but you have deleted the most important information ... i.e., mock counseling information which is most important and significant part of entire article. Nash2925 (talk 11:23, 19 May 2013 (IST)

Vipin Lather[edit]

I deleted this article because it was the Ron Jeremy article with the names changed. Latherv15139 (talk · contribs) has been trying to get his autobiography/advertisement for his web page on Wikipedia for the past few hours. I left him a warning, but I suspect that he will continue. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:20, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for John Milton Hawks[edit]

On 19 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Milton Hawks, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that John Milton Hawks recruited emancipated slaves to serve in the Union Army? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Milton Hawks. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:52, 19 May 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Himansh Kohli[edit]

May I know whats the issue with Himansh Kohli article? References I had provided as to Which films is he making his debut with, which serial he has already played the male protogonist, Provided with Imdb link as well. Why an actor who has acted for more than 1.5 years in prime time television serial - be denied a page in wikipedia? The lead actress of teh same serial has a wiki page - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abigail_Jain. Then why not of Himansh Kohli??? Its a relevant article as he is Indian TV actor at present and aslo making debut opposite a well established south actress Rakul Preet Singh.Alos the film Yaariyan, which is about to release in July 2013 already has a wiki page and its being produced by Bhushan Kumar, who aslo has a wiki page.Lionbase1234 (talk) 05:31, 20 May 2013 (UTC) So Kindly put the article back into as it was earlier or else create that draft page. But the artcile which i had put on May 19th was well imrpoved one - so better restore that version.Lionbase1234 (talk) 05:42, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the past versions - they did not have any valid references - infact they gave reference to blogs, tvforums. so they were removed. But at present - what changes you want me to make to the article? I have provided my justifiction of why article should not be removed -(in bold letters above).Lionbase1234 (talk) 05:52, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I guess now you can restore the present versions as appearing in - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lionbase1234/Himansh_Kohli — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lionbase1234 (talk • contribs) 06:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An earlier version was a copyright violation so I left it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, actually the references in the userfied version are the same that were in the article that was deleted in the AfD last fall. I remember that since I spent too much time trying to find references for it, and those timesofindia.com articles which mention Kohli very briefly and - as per the AfD outcome - do not constitute WP:SIGCOV were the only refs found then. As well as now, evidently. --bonadea contributions talk 11:32, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am hoping that Lionbase1234 can dig some more up. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:31, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fydell House[edit]

I speedied this as an obvious copyright infringement of the Boston.uk site, which claims copyright, before I saw your decline in the history

The link in the article doesn't work, and I can't find the content on the Fydell House web site, so I can't check either the veracity of the claim or whether it is explicitly PD (which I doubt).

I didn't intend to wheel, and you are welcome to restore if you think the text posted by the COI creator is in the public domain, but personally I think it's up to Fydell House to show us the PD licensed content Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:50, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I listed it on copyright problems and asked the writer to prove permission. The writer was not the original author either so the original writer will have to do the OTRS. I doubt that it is PD without any release! So it can be restored by the OTRS team if they ever see permission. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:58, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm[edit]

I just saw your review of a approved hook in the approved hooks holding area. Hmmm.?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 11:35, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well presumably it was on on the list of unfinished nominations, which I have been working through. That must be the one held over for June, with no finality on hook choice! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:42, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am referring to Template:Did you know nominations/Vanya and Sonia and Masha and Spike. You also commented on Template:Did you know nominations/The Assembled Parties, which I have augmented based on your concerns.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 12:30, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skullyboard.jpg[edit]

Thanks Graeme, yeah it was my picture. Thanks for the tip. I couldn't find something like that when I looked. Chris M. (talk) 12:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at Talk:Sixthsense_publications.
Message added 13:43, 22 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 13:43, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nom second pass[edit]

Graeme, I wonder if you have time to revisit Template:Did you know nominations/Siri Engberg. The change you suggested has been made. Thank you for your review! -SusanLesch (talk) 13:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library![edit]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!
	Hi Graeme Bartlett! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 18:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Graeme Bartlett! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 18:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Hi, I think your concerns have been addressed.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 18:42, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Protected areas of Namibia[edit]

Hi! Graeme Bartlett,

In this case, the articles listed in the table have Wikilinks to well referenced articles. Hence, I did not fix references and now I find that I have deleted the file in which I had the referenced text. Now, I may take some time to find all the references and fix them in the article. Pl bear with me.--Nvvchar. 01:39, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have more time. I expected you could reuse the references from the other paragraphs on the areas. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:34, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is sorted.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 22:06, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eamcet Mock Counselling[edit]

Hi Graeme, I would like to bring your notice people are miss-using the article Eamcet_mock_counselling that I have written. They are spamming it with their own website links. I was removing the spam links and again they are placing the spam links. Can you please remove the spam links [last 3 references] And also, can you please intimate those users not to spam. I tried telling telling them, but they are not listening. nash2925 (talk) 12:01 PM, 31 May 2013 (IST) —Preceding undated comment added 06:31, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomataras[edit]

Hi Graeme Bartlett! Thank you very much for helping to make the article about the punk band Nomataras remain in Wikipedia Language English Best regards --FaSol (talk) 14:45, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer Permission[edit]

Can you take a look at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Reviewer. I have posted a request there and noticed that you decide there. Can you take a look? Thanks. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 10:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC) 23:12, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Rollback. I will not use it much to start (only in clear cases of vandalism, to start), but as I take more classes, such as CVUA and my mentoring program, I'll use it more. Thanks. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 10:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC) 23:32, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bleach - The DiamondDust Rebellion.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bleach - The DiamondDust Rebellion.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Am I ready?[edit]

Hi there i am about to request for rollback but before I request, do you think I'm ready for roll back privileges I have asked but got declined a month ago and those were for silly mistakes I made not related to vandalism. Anyways if you think I'm ready or not, feel free to ring in and tell me. Cheers! PrabashWhat? 10:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at reverts of JackFrost2121, I think you need to explain yourself more. Twinkle often gives no reason, some of the material you are removing is vandalism, some spam, other stuff looks to be good faith, but in any case there is no explanation about it in the edit summary. Rollback is only to be used to remove obvious bad stuff, otherwise use undo with an explanation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:44, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh about JackFrost, that's my alternate account and I don't plan to use it at all. I have done more descriptive edits in this account "PBASH607" with an edit summary adding in notes like good faith, test, vandalism etc. though thanks for your feedback :) --PrabashWhat? 11:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually PBASH607 seems to have much better edit summaries with STIKI SO you have improved in the last week. But really I should check that the reverts match the summary! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will not rquest for rollback in another 5 months or so, as I have more work to do! PrabashWhat? 13:36, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

(cur | prev) 05:39, 25 August 2012‎ Graeme Bartlett (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (15,338 bytes) (0)‎ . . (Graeme Bartlett moved page Vung Tau to Vũng Tàu: per my talk page request) (undo | thank)

Hi Graeme, same old problem I'm afraid, FYI your move has just been undone by new User TenMuses, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kauffner. May not be necessary to mention that the db6 you reverted connects the requester with the new User, as it's only one of dozens of moves. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AN[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Pseudonymous Rex (talk) 22:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I am too late to make any comments. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:13, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not ready[edit]

Hi, Graeme. You gave me rollback, which I appreciate, but I think there are still too many concerns being brought up. Could we wait another 3-5 weeks and/or 250-500 good edits that do not receive warnings? Thanks. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 10:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC) 23:40, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ammonium iron(II) sulfate[edit]

Hi, and thanks for all that you are doing for wikipeida. I am curious about your selection of specific articles for ammonium iron(II) sulfate. For example, why this rather specialized report: {{cite journal|last=Khodabakhshi|first=Saeed|coauthors=Mojtaba Baghernejad|year=2013|title=Mohr's Salt Hexahydrate: A Novel, Cheap and Powerful Reagent for Green Synthesis of Biscoumarins on Water|journal=Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society|volume=60|issue=5|pages=495–498|issn=00094536|doi=10.1002/jccs.201200489}}</ref>? 3100 journals citations apply to the hydrate and anhydrous forms of this material, and my experience is that articles in Chinese Chem Society are probably not the most general ones. What would you say if we worked on finding some more general articles to avoid the appearance of capriciousness? For example we could describe its use in industry, its structure, or some high impact article based on citations? I confess to being worried about the appearance of cherry picking of semi-random articles, I realize that perhaps some citations are better than none.--Smokefoot (talk) 13:16, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject AFC needs your help... again[edit]

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.

Delivered at 13:01, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC

Proposed deletion of Kevin Robles[edit]

The article Kevin Robles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable minor league player.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Protection of Periyar E. V. Ramasamy‎[edit]

Hi Graeme,

In 2010 you placed Periyar E. V. Ramasamy‎ under indefinite semi-protection due to an edit-war. Given the age of this dispute would you consider lifting the protection? Even if you think it still needs it, the edit rate is slow enough that pending changes seems like it would be appropriate. Regards, Crazynas^t 19:24, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:02, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!Crazynas^t 23:35, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Graeme,

I was hoping you would reconsider the deletion of Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Randall P. Dark: HDTV Pioneer for (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of source URL) and restore the article. Or be more specific on how I can solve this issue. Thanks,

Sfishel1 Sfishel1 (talk) 14:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 11:54, 6 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Capsule of Funaria, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tetrad and Epidermis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In Regards to File:Egyptian Infobox.jpg[edit]

The permission for the three discussed images can be found here,

http://www.flickr.com/photos/92278137@N04/9247659928/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/92278137@N04/9247711012/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/92278137@N04/9244933883/

I believe they are in fair use for use on Wikipedia. Thank you for your consideration.

Although the license there looks OK, I find it hard to believe that such a disparate collection of photos was taken by this flickr user, particularly the black and white image. Tineye found a match for the first image, so we will need more convincing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:20, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know[edit]

Too Much of Heaven an afc you accepted has gone afd. 68.116.51.210 (talk) 14:04, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:14, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Submissions/Festivus For The Rest Of Us[edit]

Hello Graeme Bartlett. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Submissions/Festivus For The Rest Of Us.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Submissions/Festivus For The Rest Of Us}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hasteur (talk) 15:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reviving Heavyweight Yoga entry?[edit]

Hi Graeme, my article http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/HeavyWeight_Yoga&oldid=561715287 was marked by you for speedy deletion, then was edited to avoid that fate. It's now in my Talk section. Can you tell me if it will get another review? I modified it on June 26, 2013, just a few days after it was revived from Speedy Deletion. Thanks, Ron SeyboldRonseybold (talk) 16:34, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sherry Wolf (artist)[edit]

Hey—I saw that you reversed the PROD on Sherry Wolf (artist), but could you restore the talk page too? Thanks czar · · 18:27, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

czar · · 02:15, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Precious again[edit]

help
Thank you for your constant and efficient work on the flow of the DYK section, filling preps, moving sets, bringing the good news, also for your help at the reference desk and your detailed article plans, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (15 May 2010)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 195th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:00, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ilana Salama Ortar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Migration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good save[edit]

Saved to become Subisu. Nice. Thank you. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:14, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ersatz[edit]

Graeme Bartlett - either we have or there are different interpretations for "transwiki(ed)", or I there is something seriously wrng with your conclusion that "content has not been transwikied to http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ersatz". Care to elabrate? Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 16:01, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transwikied would mean that the content was transferred to another Wiki. Although there is a Wiktionary entry it does not include the material here. This article has been around a long time edited by many. Therefore I do not think that speedy delete is appropriate. It would need a consensus. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:17, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:HeritageSummers/sandbox[edit]

I didn't see until I had deleted this that you had declined and it had been re-tagged - apologies In fact I deleted it not because it was spammy but because HeritageSummers (talk · contribs) was evidently a company account. I gave them the courtesy of uw-causeblock though, looking further, it seems like a commercial operation, based in Dubai. There are amazingly fierce rules - sign in by 9:30 pm, in room by 11 pm, corridors are patrolled, bedroom visits mean expulsion... I suppose to reassure parents from stricter culures. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:09, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No big loss to Wikipedia here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of OpenProject[edit]

The article OpenProject has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of WP:notability. Only primary sources given and google searches not finding anything significant. A fork of a fork of an open source project with no notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Disambiguation link notification for August 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mel Buttle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to The Drum, Courier Mail, Josh Thomas and Barry Award

Mercy Health System (Delaware Valley) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Montgomery County, Delaware County and Chester County

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:55, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of OpenProject for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OpenProject is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenProject until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. noq (talk) 20:26, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Southwest Airlines Flight 345 userification to user:Mareklug/Southwest Airlines Flight 345[edit]

Hi. Thanks for attempting to do this per WP:REFUND, but it did not quite work out as it should. The article that got placed there is the Southwest Airlines article that the new Southwest Airlines Flight 345, the redirect, points to. I of course need the genuine article that existed at the time of AfD and its edit history. :) --Mareklug ^talk 22:42, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was all there in the history.

Any way I have popped that latest version to the top of the history for you and neutered the cats and AFD. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much. I did look at the history before writing to you, but obviously not thoroughly enough. --Mareklug ^talk 16:00, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JB Young Ltd concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JB Young Ltd, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SockmasterProven page protection[edit]

Hello! As far as I can see, the Template:SockmasterProven was full-protected only because one user (who is currently blocked) kept adding a {{Db-policy}} notice, requesting that the template be speedily deleted. For this reason, I ask you to consider lowering the protection to allow auto-confirmed users; aside from this user, I haven't seen any other disruption to this template. Thanks in advance, Hey mid (contribs) 22:03, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for lowering the protection! Appreciated. :) Best regards, Hey mid (contribs) 08:28, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AWB request[edit]

Hi, can you view my AWB request on Wikipedia talk:AWB/Check page? And see if my request can be approved. Thanks. Jianhui67 Talk 13:19, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are the next to be considered. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:41, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How many article improvement edits must I make to get the AWB right? Jianhui67 Talk 13:32, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Around 300 more would be good. Otherwise a convincing reason that you have proved capability to do can be given. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC Reviewer permission[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC Reviewer permission. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:35, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pacaline Edwards, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Forbidden Fruit and A Stab in the Dark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rolf Harris[edit]

Thanks for protection on this page, I was just about to ask at WP:AN. However can you go back and do some del-rev on the page history as well please. LGA _talk^edits 11:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry User:Nick-D got to it. LGA _talk^edits 11:36, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sigh[edit]

It would have been better if they'd just deprodded Arden Leigh before I got to it. Dloh cierekim 13:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ruislip Eagles Handball Club logo.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ruislip Eagles Handball Club logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).