Jump to content

Wikipedia:Baltic States notice board: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Digwuren (talk | contribs)
11,308 edits
Line 195: Line 195:
*[[Talk:Władysław II Jagiełło]] Since Jogaila is a key figure in Lithuania's history, you may be interested to vote. [[User:Juraune|Juraune]] 15:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
*[[Talk:Władysław II Jagiełło]] Since Jogaila is a key figure in Lithuania's history, you may be interested to vote. [[User:Juraune|Juraune]] 15:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
*Would any Latgalians be able to comment on whether [[Dabasu Durovys]] is a prominent local band or otherwise passes WP:MUSIC? It's on AFD right now. [[User:Kappa|Kappa]] 04:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
*Would any Latgalians be able to comment on whether [[Dabasu Durovys]] is a prominent local band or otherwise passes WP:MUSIC? It's on AFD right now. [[User:Kappa|Kappa]] 04:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
*Just notifying about AfD on [[Soviet occupation denialism]] - [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soviet occupation denialism]] [[User:DLX|DLX]] 08:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)


==Requested articles==
==Requested articles==

Revision as of 08:15, 20 May 2007

Welcome to the notice board for the Wikipedians interested in the Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania)!
Shortcut
Regional notice boards
Africa
Americas
Asia
Europe
Oceania
Languages
See also: WikiProject directory

If you are interested in one of those countries or the region in general, you are welcome to add this notice board to your watchlist, so that you could see when it is updated and thus take part in any projects, initiatives, and improvements relating to articles about the Baltic States. Also, you are welcome to report your own articles here so they could be peer-reviewed and possibly expanded by other contributors. Or you can ask any questions about the Baltic States on the talk page of this board.

Arbitration on the use of the term "Soviet occupation"

First my apologies for having been less than active in the Baltics. ...5-6 hour commutes to the only job available at the time, rebuilding a dead PC of late, the slaying of some other Wikidragons, and some new more pleasant activities, including webmaster to the Latvian Song and Dance Festival in Indianapolis this July, have seriously eaten into my Wikitime.
     After combining mine and the other article on the Soviet occupation of Latvia, things were quiet for a while. After which there was some POV tagging (but no real vanadalism)--I spent a fair amount of time responding to each "it was not an occupation" statement on pretty much all the Baltic articles, including as the result of being solicited to respond to some of those. Then I got sidetracked on "what ever happened to" the OMON who killed freedom demonstrators in the Baltics (and found them in Transnistria)....
     Lack of time and energy kept me from getting embroiled early on as the whole Soviet occupation of Latvia began boiling to a head--to the point where arbitration has now been requested.
     Under the request for arbitration workshop, I have taken the opportunity to state my position as (still) the primary author and requested protection against POV tagging for the use of the term "Soviet occupation" as it relates to the Soviet presence, for its entire duration, in all three Baltic States. Please take the time to read, comment, and contribute: see arbitration request and workshop (template includes provision for comments by "others"). Whatever is decided will likely apply to the Wiki portrayal of the Soviet occupation of all three Baltic states.
     Finally, and most of all, I sincerely thank Constanz for having the fortitude to try and get this settled once and for all.  —  Pēters J. Vecrumba 17:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vecrumba, I came here accidentally to announce a Janis Tilbergs article I wrote and I see this stuff above. Just to let you know, if your personal ethics somehow did not warn you, the WP:Canvassing is generally frown upon. --Irpen 07:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article you link to quotes an arbitrator, Irpen: "Briefly, I think a reasonable amount of communication about issues is fine." Since this issue is central to any article about the Baltics 1940-1991, i.e., the period of occupation, and affects many a relevant article -- Pēters' announcement seems to me to be... fine, and very necessary. --Pēteris Cedriņš 13:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

New articles, added manually

Here please announce new articles related to the Baltic States that you or someone else has recently created. Add new articles at the top of this list.

And already nominated for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soviet occupation denialism

Archive of this section

New articles, found by AlexNewArtBot

This list was generated from these rules. Questions and feedback are always welcome! The search is being run daily with the most recent ~14 days of results. Note: Some articles may not be relevant to this project.

Rules | Match log | Results page (for watching) | Last updated: 2024-10-17 19:41 (UTC)

Note: The list display can now be customized by each user. See List display personalization for details.

Articles in need of attention

Here please list the articles related to the Baltic States that are tagged as violating NPOV, lacking refferences, needing attention, copyeditting, or general clean up. As well, list here stubs that deserve to be expanded. Please add new entries at the top of this list and please describe what needs to be done.

Discussions about articles

Here please list the current ongoing important discussions about articles related to the Baltic States, so that other contributors would became aware of the debates and could voice their opinions. Add new articles at the top of this list and briefly outline the issue.

Requested articles

Please request articles and discuss proper naming, necessity of the requested articles and related issues here. Add new requests at the top of the list

Resources

A New Impetus

Our own home page, LATVIANS.COM, starts off with the introduction: "Get to know Latvia and the Latvians through our personal pictures and travelogues and our reference materials. While the 'CIA World Factbook' article on Latvia ranks #1 on Google when searching on 'Latvia' and is rich with statistics, it's not the most insightful." Well, I hadn't checked in a few months and today found that the CIA Factbook has been dethroned. The King is dead, long live the King! Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania now rank as the #1 choices for their respective countries. If there were ever a time to insure quality, now is that time! If there were ever an opportunity to document that Russia's position that the Baltics were "not occupied" is untenable, now is that time! If there were ever a time to celebrate the uniqueness and ancient richness of the Baltic cultures—to show our love for our cultures and make a difference—now is that time! Thoughts? Comments? Suggestions? (...as if it were necessary to ask...) —Pēters J. Vecrumba 19:41, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it is (necessary to ask), Ghirla did mention it's been quiet here lately. (and moved to bottom) —Pēters J. Vecrumba 20:27, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for asking. A relentless campaign by various trolls and other creeps have evidently caused many contributors to find it difficult to focus on the necessary job to help build this encyclopedia from a Baltic perspective, where it is applicable. Thank you, Ghirlandajo and Pēters, for your help in putting many of these disruptive influences in their place, over and over again. And for not tiring or wavering in the face of it. Yes, thanks. Dr. Dan 03:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome :) --Ghirla -трёп- 08:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Baltic_States_notice_board&oldid=132177988"