Antisemitism in the British Labour Party

Allegations of antisemitism in the UK Labour Party have been made since Jeremy Corbyn was elected as leader in September 2015, particularly after comments by Naz Shah and Ken Livingstone in 2016 resulted in their suspension from membership. Shah was subsequently reinstated while Livingstone resigned.

The allegations prompted Corbyn to establish the Chakrabarti Inquiry in 2016. The inquiry found that, although antisemitism and other types of racism were not endemic within Labour, there was an "occasionally toxic atmosphere". The all-party Home Affairs Select Committee held an inquiry into antisemitism in the United Kingdom in the same year and found "no reliable, empirical evidence to support the notion that there is a higher prevalence of antisemitic attitudes within the Labour Party than any other political party", but that the leadership's lack of action “risks lending force to allegations that elements of the Labour movement are institutionally antisemitic".

In 2017, the party rules were changed to make the expression of hate speech a discplinary matter and investigations have led to some party members resigning, being expelled, receiving formal warnings or other sanctions.

Although mainstream Jewish organizations have raised concerns, some left-wing Jewish groups have disputed the claims. Corbyn himself was criticized in 2018 for his 2012 Facebook comment on the removal of Freedom for Humanity, an allegedly antisemitic mural, was publicised, and for being a member of Facebook groups with antisemitic content.

In July 2018, Labour's National Executive Committee (NEC) adopted a new code of conduct that defines antisemitism for the purposes of disciplinary cases brought before the National Constitutional Committee. It included the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition and seven of its proposed examples, removed or amended four relating to Israel and added three, leading to controversy. However, in September 2018, the NEC decided to add all 11 IHRA examples (unamended) to the definition of antisemitism and include them in the Party's code of conduct.

In February 2019, the Labour Party issued information on the staffing for, and results of, investigations into complaints of antisemitism against individuals over the previous nine months.

On 19 February 2019, seven Labour MPs left to form The Independent Group, citing the leadership's handling of allegations of antisemitism within the party and handling of Brexit. An eighth member resigned on 20 February and a ninth on 22 February, alleging an antisemitic environment in the party.

The Jewish-Labour relationship

In the early 20th century, antisemitism was common throughout British society, both inside and outside the Labour movement. Antisemitic conspiracy theories were promoted by figures of the anti-war Labour left during the Second Boer War, with prominent Labour leaders such as Keir Hardie asserting that Jews were part of a secretive "imperialist" cabal that promoted war. The Independent Labour Party, Robert Blatchford's newspaper The Clarion, and the Trade Union Congress all blamed "Jewish capitalists" as "being behind the war and imperialism in general".

British Jews have traditionally supported the labour movement and party. The Jewish Labour Movement, the UK arm of Poale Zion, supported the Labour Party, affiliating to the party in 1920. The Labour Party had a historical affinity for Israel, both because the labour movement was part of a broad, political left that historically supported national movements, and because it felt an affinity for labour Zionism, which was the dominant movement within pre-state political Zionism, and the political identity of the founding government of Israel in 1948 and Israeli government until the election of Menachem Begin in 1977.

Despite leaning towards Labour in the immediate postwar decades, along with most other immigrant communities, much of the Jewish population supported Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s, especially in her own seat of Finchley. Many Jewish voters returned to Labour in the late 1990s under New Labour, with polling generally showing Jews as evenly split between Labour and Conservatives, which remained the case in 2010 when Labour appointed its first Jewish leader Ed Miliband.

However, in August 2014, Miliband came under pressure from Jewish donors and supporters of the Labour Party over his stance towards Israel's ground incursion into Gaza in summer 2014, after describing it as "wrong and unjustifiable". Subsequently, Jewish support for Labour fell to an estimated 15% in the May 2015 general election (compared to 64% for the Conservatives). After Miliband was defeated, Jeremy Corbyn was elected as Labour leader. He had extensively campaigned for Palestinian rights and came under sustained accusations of antisemitism. During the 2017 snap general election, held under his leadership, it is estimated that 26% of Jews voted for Labour.

Labour views on the Palestinians

Although antisemitic attitudes were rare in the Party in the 1980s, in his 2016 book, The Left's Jewish Problem, Dave Rich attributes what he believes to be the origin of new antisemitism in the Labour Party to attitudes that began to develop in the early 1970s among Young Liberal British political activists concerned with the fate of Palestine. James R. Vaughn says that an "Arab Lobby" is to blame for anti-Zionism in the Labour Party, specifically mentioning the creation of the Labour Middle East Council in 1969 by Christopher Mayhew as laying a foundation of radical anti-Zionism. According to Rich, Mayhew founded the Council in order to change the "pro-Israel" position of the Labour Party.

Richard Seymour wrote in 2018 that "Palestinian rights have been a growing concern in the British Left since 1982, and Sabra and Shatila" when "the British trade union movement and the Labour Party began to break with Israel in response". The Labour Committee on Palestine was formed in June 1982 to challenge the Labour Middle East Council, which supported a two-state solution, and to oppose the "Zionist state as racist, exclusivist, expansionist and a direct agency of imperialism". Labour politicians Ken Livingstone of the Greater London Council and Ted Knight of the Lambeth London Borough Council were early supporters; the chair was former BAZO activist Tony Greenstein. The new Committee backed a resolution at the party 1982 Party national conference to recognise the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) as the "sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people", which passed at conference, "embarrassing" the Party leadership.

According to June Edmunds, University Lecturer in Sociology of the University of Sussex, the party's leadership, initially supportive of Israel, shifted to support Palestine instead in the early 1980s, though the membership did not; later challenges to this shift eventually resulted in more balanced support for both and broad support for a two-state solution. Edmunds credits the shift to more moderate appeals by Palestinians combined with a sharp shift to the right in Israeli politics that alienated Labour supporters on the left, as well as the rise of broad anti-colonial politics among a British the Left that increasingly saw Israel as opposing their values. Paul Kelemen, in his 2012 book, The British Left and Zionism: History of a Divorce, likewise ascribes the shift to Israel's increasingly right-leaning politics and opposition to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, while rejecting the idea that the shift was caused by antisemitism. Daniel L. Staetsky, a Senior Research Fellow for the Institute for Jewish Policy Research, stated in his 2017 study Antisemitism in Contemporary Great Britain: A Study of Attitudes Towards Jews and Israel that in the 1980s parts of the political left assumed strong pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel positions, and faced accusations of antisemitism in the Labour Party.

2000-2015

In the early 21st century, several incidents were subject to charges that they involved antisemitism.

Allegations of undue influence

In 2003, Labour MP Tam Dalyell claimed that "there is far too much Jewish influence in the United States" and that "a cabal of Jewish advisers" was directing American and British policy on Iraq. In 2010, Labour MP Martin Linton said, in reference to the Israel lobby, "There are long tentacles of Israel in this country who are funding election campaigns and putting money into the British political system for their own ends." Community Security Trust spokesman Mark Gardner responded: "Anybody who understands antisemitism will recognise just how ugly and objectionable these quotes are, with their imagery of Jewish control and money power." In 2015, Labour MP Gerald Kaufman, who was Jewish, said that "Jewish money, Jewish donations to the Conservative Party ... [and] support from the Jewish Chronicle" had made the Conservatives more sympathetic to Israel; Corbyn condemned Kaufman's remarks at the time as "completely unacceptable". Shortly afterwards, Mick Davis, president of the council of members and chairman of the board of trustees of the Jewish Leadership Council of the United Kingdom, the umbrella body of the largest Jewish charities and Institutions in the UK responsible for the strategic imperatives of UK Jewry, and Chairman of the Holocaust Memorial Commission of the United Kingdom, became treasurer, and a year later CEO, of the Conservative Party.

Posters

In 2005, Labour Party posters tested with party members depicted the faces of Conservative Party leader Michael Howard and Shadow Chancellor Oliver Letwin, who are Jewish, superimposed upon the bodies of flying pigs and of Michael Howard swinging a pocket watch on a chain in a hypnotizing pose, said by some to be reminiscent of Shakespeare's Shylock from The Merchant of Venice or Fagin from Oliver Twist. Labour denied any antisemitic intent and insisted that the messaging was of the implausibility of Tory spending and fiscal proposals. The posters were not used and the Board of Deputies of British Jews refused to get involved.

Deir Yassin Remembered

Jeremy Corbyn and Jewish Labour MP Gerald Kaufman have attended events of "Deir Yassin Remembered" (the massacre of over 100 Palestinian villagers in 1948), founded by Holocaust denier Paul Eisen. However, Corbyn has said that this had taken place before Eisen had made his views known publicly, and that he would not have associated with him had he known. It was reported that his views were known in 2005 and that he had written an article in 2008 entitled "My life as a Holocaust denier".

On 14 August 2015, as Jeremy Corbyn emerged as a front-runner in the Labour Party leadership election, The Jewish Chronicle devoted its "front page to seven questions regarding Corbyn's record on antisemitism", including Corbyn's endorsements of individuals known for promoting antisemitic ideas; his relationship with Islamist organisations Hezbollah and Hamas, organisations that Corbyn called "friends" (although he has stated he disagrees with their views); and his failure to object to antisemitic banners and posters that "dominate" the London Quds Day rallies supported by the organisation, Stop the War Coalition, of which Corbyn was national chair from 2011 to 2015.

Labour MP Diane Abbott defended Corbyn by calling his critics part of a "Westminster elite" afraid of Corbyn's anti-austerity agenda. 47 prominent Jewish activists, including Laurence Dreyfus, Selma James, Miriam Margolyes, Ilan Pappé, Michael Rosen and Avi Shlaim were signatories to a letter criticising The Jewish Chronicle's reporting of Corbyn's association with alleged antisemites.

2016

Naz Shah and Ken Livingstone

In April 2016, it was revealed that Labour MP for Bradford West Naz Shah had, during the 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict, shared a graphic showing an image of Israel's geographic outline superimposed on a map of the U.S. under the headline "Solution for Israel-Palestine conflict – relocate Israel into United States", with the comment "problem solved". Ken Livingstone appeared on BBC Radio London to defend Shah and said he had never heard anyone in the Labour Party say anything antisemitic. He added: "When Hitler won his election in 1932 his policy then was that Jews should be moved to Israel. He was supporting Zionism before he went mad and ended up killing six million Jews." Both were suspended pending investigation. After accepting conditions such as apologising for bringing the party into disrepute and agreeing to engage with the Jewish community, Shah was reinstated. In May 2016, American political scientist Norman Finkelstein (whose graphic was shared by MP Naz Shah) described the controversy as "obscene". Referring to those on the right of the Labour Party allegedly using the scandal as a means of undermining Corbyn, Finkelstein asked "What are they doing? Don't they have any respect for the dead? ... All these desiccated Labour apparatchiks, dragging the Nazi holocaust through the mud for the sake of their petty jostling for power and position. Have they no shame?" After being suspended for a year, Livingstone was suspended from standing for office or representing the party at any level for a further year after a hearing in April 2017 over three days by the National Constitutional Committee, for breaching rule 2.1.8, relating to prejudicial and detrimental conduct. In May 2018, he resigned from the party, saying the issues surrounding his suspension had become a distraction. In a statement Livingstone said, "I do not accept the allegation that I have brought the Labour Party into disrepute – nor that I am in any way guilty of anti-Semitism. I abhor anti-Semitism, I have fought it all my life and will continue to do so." In the wake of the furore, the Labour Party suspended for statements judged to be anti-Semitic some 56 members:0.4% of the parliamentary group, 0.07% of Labour councillors, and 0.012% of the Party membership.

Inquiries

Following the suspensions, Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn launched an internal inquiry into racism on 29 April 2016, led by Shami Chakrabarti, the former head of the human rights advocacy group Liberty, who joined the Labour Party when she was appointed. The inquiry had two deputy chairs: Jan Royall, who was at the time holding an investigation into antisemitism at Oxford University Labour Club, and Director of the Pears Institute for the Study of Antisemitism David Feldman, whom Chakrabarti defended as a signatory to Independent Jewish Voices, which had claimed that some of the allegations of antisemitism within Labour were "baseless and disingenuous". In June, the Chakrabarti Inquiry found "no evidence" of systemic antisemitism in Labour, though there was an “occasionally toxic atmosphere” and made 20 recommendations on tackling instances of racism within the party. Its report was described as a "whitewash for peerage scandal" by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, referring to Labour’s subsequent nomination of Chakrabarti to a seat in the House of Lords. British author Howard Jacobson called the internal inquiry "a brief and shoddy shuffling of superficies" that "spoke to very few of the people charging the party with anti-Semitism and understood even fewer of their arguments". Jacobson also suggested that Corbyn nominating Chakrabarti for a peerage was showing contempt for those who had raised issues over antisemitism in the party.

Following allegations of antisemitism within the Oxford University Labour Club, an inquiry was launched by Labour Students, chaired by Jan Royall. The party's National Executive Committee accepted the report in May 2016. Some of the report was published, but the full report was deemed confidential until Royall leaked it. The report found that, whilst there was a "cultural problem" in which "behaviour and language that would once have been intolerable is now tolerated" leading to some antisemitic behaviour, there was also "no evidence the club is itself institutionally anti-Semitic".

In October, the all-party House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee held an inquiry into antisemitism in the United Kingdom. Evidence presented to the committee suggested 75% of political antisemitism comes from the far-right. The committee found "no reliable, empirical evidence to support the notion that there is a higher prevalence of antisemitic attitudes within the Labour Party than any other party." However, it was critical of Corbyn's response to antisemitic incidents against Labour MPs and described the Chakrabarti inquiry as "ultimately compromised". The report also found that "the failure of the Labour Party to deal consistently and effectively with anti-Semitic incidents in recent years risks lending force to allegations that elements of the Labour movement are institutionally anti-Semitic".

Jackie Walker

In May 2016, the vice-chair of Momentum, Jackie Walker, who describes herself as of being mixed Jewish and African descent and whose mother was Jamaican, was investigated by the party over comments she made exaggerating the role of Jews in the Atlantic slave trade. No further action was taken following the investigation. Jon Lansman, the chair of Momentum, defended her against these claims, describing the media campaigning against Walker as "a 'lynch mob' whose interest in combating racism is highly selective".

Following the September 2016 Labour Party conference, when Walker proposed extending Holocaust Memorial Day to include pre 1940 genocides such as the Atlantic slave trade, Manuel Cortes, the general secretary of the TSSA union, said their funding of Momentum would be reconsidered if Walker failed to be removed from her position. On 3 October 2016, the organisation's steering committee decided she should cease being vice-chair, but would remain a member of the committee. Lansman now wrote that they considered Walker's comments about Holocaust Memorial Day "to be ill-informed, ill-judged and offensive" but not antisemitic. Walker was also told that she would be the subject of a further investigation by the party and was consequently suspended from party membership. Walker said that she "utterly condemn[s] antisemitism", that her words were taken out of context and that "I would never play down the significance of the Shoah. Working with many Jewish comrades, I continue to seek to bring greater awareness of other genocides, which are too often forgotten or minimised. If offence has been caused, it is the last thing I would want to do and I apologise."

Alleged accommodation to Muslims

In May 2016, Baroness Deech said that "Too many Labour politicians cravenly adopted the anti-Semitic tropes and anti-Israel demonization they think will get them British Muslim votes, rather than standing up to the prejudice that exists in the community". Dr. Manfred Gerstenfeld said that, while not all of the most extreme antisemitic slurs were made by Muslim representatives of Labour, they represent a disproportionately large proportion of antisemitic perpetrators. According to Gerstenfeld, Labour's issue with antisemitism "demonstrate what happens when a party bends over backward to attract Muslim voters".

2017

Election

During the 2017 general election campaign, Jeremy Newmark, the chairman of the Jewish Labour Movement, said that "Jeremy Corbyn appears to have failed to understand the nature of contemporary anti-Semitism in the same way that it's understood by most of its target group". Labour MP Wes Streeting also criticised the party's record on antisemitism, saying "I don't think many Jewish voters in my constituency have been very impressed with the way the Labour Party as a whole have responded", but denied that Corbyn was antisemitic.

The significance of the Jewish vote was argued to have manifested in the "Bagel belt", consisting of four seats in north-west London with a dense Jewish population: Finchley and Golders Green, Hendon, Chipping Barnet and Harrow East. Early predictions held that they would see upset victories for Labour, but the Labour "surge" was weaker in them than elsewhere, and Labour failed to capture them. Analysis by University of Leicester sociologist Daniel Allington found a statistical relationship under which "The higher [an area's] Jewish population, the lower the rise in the Labour vote this election." Analysis by election analysts Prof Stephen Fisher, Prof Rob Ford, Prof Sir John Curtice and Patrick English based on The British General Election of 2017 by Philip Cowley and Dennis Kavanagh suggests Labour may have underperformed in the constituencies with the most Jewish people before the antisemitism row intensified. There are five UK constituencies where, according to the 2011 Census, more than 10% of the population identify as Jewish: Finchley and Golders Green, Hendon, Hertsmere, Hackney North and Stoke Newington and Bury South. In these seats, Labour's vote share at the 2017 general election increased by seven points in comparison to the 2015 election, below the 9.8 point average increase.

Conference

During the 2017 Labour Party Conference, new rules proposed by the Jewish Labour Movement and supported by Jeremy Corbyn were adopted on hate speech. Previously, party members could not be disciplined for “the mere holding or expression of beliefs and opinions”. Under the new rules, those who express antisemitic or other forms of hate speech, including racism, Islamophobia, sexism and homophobia, or other "conduct prejudicial to the Party", can be disciplined.

Critical letter

In November 2017, British authors Howard Jacobson, Simon Schama, and Simon Sebag Montefiore commented on what they saw as Labour's failure to address antisemitism within the party in a letter to The Times, saying "We are alarmed that during the past few years, constructive criticism of Israeli governments has morphed into something closer to antisemitism under the cloak of so-called anti-Zionism", further stating "Although anti-Zionists claim innocence of any antisemitic intent, anti-Zionism frequently borrows the libels of classical Jew-hating," and adding "Accusations of international Jewish conspiracy and control of the media have resurfaced to support false equations of Zionism with colonialism and imperialism, and the promotion of vicious, fictitious parallels with genocide and Nazism".

2018

Events from previous years

Talk by Hajo Meyer

In 2010, during the UK's Holocaust Memorial week, Labour MP Jeremy Corbyn co-chaired a meeting in the House of Commons with the main talk by anti-Zionist Auschwitz survivor Hajo Meyer entitled "The Misuse of the Holocaust for Political Purposes" where Israel was compared to the Nazis. Meyer said "Judaism in Israel has been substituted by the Holocaust religion, whose high priest is Elie Wiesel." In August 2018, Louise Ellman MP told the BBC that she was "absolutely appalled" at Corbyn for chairing Meyer's talk. When asked about his involvement with the meeting, Corbyn said that "Views were expressed at the meeting which I do not accept or condone. In the past, in pursuit of justice for the Palestinian people and peace in Israel/Palestine, I have on occasion appeared on platforms with people whose views I completely reject. I apologise for the concerns and anxiety that this has caused”.

Renaming of HMD

In January 2011, a motion was submitted to rename Holocaust Memorial Day to "Genocide Memorial Day", supported by 23 MPs, mainly from the Labour Party and including Jeremy Corbyn. Karen Pollock, chief executive of the Holocaust Educational Trust said in 2018 that "Holocaust Memorial Day already rightly includes all victims of the Nazis and subsequent genocides, But the Holocaust was a specific crime, with anti-Semitism at its core. Any attempt to remove that specificity is a form of denial and distortion." Labour responded by saying that "this was a cross-party initiative, jointly sponsored by a senior Conservative MP, to emphasize the already broader character of Holocaust Memorial Day. It is not our policy to seek a name change for this important commemoration".

Response to mural

The 2012 Freedom for Humanity was a street mural painted in east London by American artist Mear One. The artwork depicted what Mear One described as an "elite banker cartel" of the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, and the Morgans and others sitting around a Monopoly-style board game on the backs of men with dark complexions. The mural was later removed by Tower Hamlets council. Lutfur Rahman, then Mayor of Tower Hamlets, said "the images of the bankers perpetuate antisemitic propaganda about conspiratorial Jewish domination of financial and political institutions". In response, Mear One denied that the mural was antisemitic; he said that the mural was about "class and privilege", and pointed out that the figures depicted included both "Jewish and white Anglos".

Corbyn, who responded to a post from the artist lamenting the mural's removal and referencing freedom of expression, before it had been criticised in the media, asked "Why? You are in good company. Rockerfeller(sic) destroyed Diego Viera's mural because it includes a picture of Lenin," referring to Nelson Rockefeller's destruction of Diego Rivera's Man at the Crossroads fresco in 1934. In march 2018, Labour MP Luciana Berger set off a firestorm of controversy when she tweeted about the post, asking Corbyn why he had questioned the mural's removal. Corbyn's spokesman issued a statement later in the day: "Jeremy was responding to concerns about the removal of public art on grounds of freedom of speech. However, the mural was offensive, used antisemitic imagery, which has no place in our society, and it is right that it was removed". Berger said the response was "wholly inadequate". In his own statement, Corbyn said: "I sincerely regret that I did not look more closely at the image I was commenting on, the contents of which are deeply disturbing and antisemitic," he said. "The defence of free speech cannot be used as a justification for the promotion of antisemitism in any form. That is a view I've always held." Karen Pollock of the Holocaust Educational Trust said that the mural was "indefensible" as it "was blatantly anti-Semitic, using images commonly found in anti-Semitic propaganda – it is impossible not to notice". Jeremy Gilbert, Professor of Cultural and Political Theory at the University of East London argued that this accusation is based on a logical fallacy, saying that the allegation "amounts to a mere argument from resemblance: because anti-capitalist discourse and anti-Semitic discourse share some structural features, they are fundamentally the same". For example, both anti-capitalist discourse and antisemitic discourse are often conspiratorial in nature; but similarity does not denote the same motive or intent.

The coverage over the mural was followed by an open letter from the Board of Deputies of British Jews and the Jewish Leadership Council stating that Corbyn was "repeatedly found alongside people with blatantly anti-Semitic views", concluding that Corbyn "cannot seriously contemplate anti-Semitism, because he is so ideologically fixed within a far-left worldview that is instinctively hostile to mainstream Jewish communities". Following the open letter's publication accusing Corbyn of siding with antisemites "again and again", hundreds of people outside Parliament Square gathered to protest 'Enough is Enough' against antisemitism in the Labour Party, demanding that Corbyn does more to tackle anti-Jewish feeling in Labour Party ranks. Jewish Voice for Labour organised a smaller counter-demonstration. A Jewish Voice for Labour spokesman said after the event: "There is a massive difference between saying that more needs to be done within the party and a demonstration like this which is implicitly trying to force him [Corbyn] out ... This protest is unnecessary, inflammatory and politicised." The organisation said in a statement that it was "appalled" by the Board of Deputies' letter. "They do not represent us or the great majority of Jews in the party who share Jeremy Corbyn's vision for social justice and fairness. Jeremy's consistent commitment to anti-racism is all the more needed now." Jewish Voice for Labour's Chair Jenny Manson defended Corbyn on Daily Politics, saying he had taken "enormously strong action" to deal with the issue in his party.

Comments about certain Zionists

In a January 2013 meeting in Parliament, the UK Palestinian Authority representative Manuel Hassassian said that Jews are "the only children of God ... because nobody is stopping Israel building its messianic dream of Eretz Israel [the Land of Israel]". Pro-Israel activists at the meeting then challenged Hassassian. In August 2018, MailOnline released footage of comments that Corbyn had made a few days after this event at Friends House in Euston, convened by the Palestinian Return Centre. There, he defended the earlier comments made by Hassassian on the history of Palestine, which, he said, were "dutifully recorded by the thankfully silent Zionists" in the audience. Corbyn went on to say that these "Zionists" had approached Hassassian and "berated him afterwards for what he had said", and that these "Zionists" had "two problems": "One is that they don't want to study history and secondly, having lived in this country for a very long time, probably all their lives, they don't understand English irony either. Manuel [Hassassian] does understand English irony and uses it very, very effectively so I think they need two lessons which we can help them with." His comments were accused by some of being coded antisemitism, including by Labour MPs Luciana Berger, Wes Streeting, Mike Gapes, Catherine McKinnell, and political strategist John McTernan. A number of Conservative MPs reported Corbyn to the parliamentary standards watchdog over the comments. Historian Deborah Lipstadt, writing in The Atlantic, asserted that Corbyn had crossed the line from anti-Zionism to antisemitism. However, Corbyn's remarks were defended by shadow chancellor John McDonnell, who argued that the comments were "taken out of context". A Labour spokesperson said that parts of the speech which contexualised Corbyn's language were "edited out of the footage ... He had been speaking about Zionists and non-Zionist Jews and very clearly does not go on to use Zionists as any kind of shorthand for Jews."

Membership of Facebook groups

In March 2018, it was reported that, in 2014, Corbyn and some of his staff had been members of three Facebook groups containing antisemitic content, including "Palestine Live" and "History of Palestine". A spokesman said that Corbyn had been added to the first two groups by others, had little involvement in them, and had either left them already or left following the reports. The Labour Party stated that a full investigation would be undertaken and action taken against any member involved.

Facebook groups

At the beginning of April 2018, The Sunday Times reported that it had uncovered over 2,000 examples of antisemitic, racist, violent threats and abusive content in non-public Corbyn-supporting Facebook groups, including frequent attacks on Jews and Holocaust denying material. The 20 largest pro-Corbyn Facebook groups, which have a combined membership of over 400,000, were reported to have as members 12 senior staff who work for Corbyn and shadow chancellor John McDonnell. The messages repeatedly targeted Labour MP Luciana Berger and Jonathan Arkush, president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews. A Labour Party spokesperson said the groups "are not officially connected to the party in any way". However, Labour MPs urged Corbyn to instruct his supporters to shut down abusive groups. Subsequently, Corbyn deleted his own personal Facebook account that he had set up before becoming Labour leader although his official page remained.

Christine Shawcroft resignation

In late March, Christine Shawcroft, the recently appointed head of the Labour Party's disputes panel resigned from the panel after it emerged she had opposed the suspension of Peterborough council candidate Alan Bull who in 2015 had shared an article to a closed facebook group which suggested that the Holocaust was a hoax, to "invite discussion and debate". "I'm not an anti-Semite, I am not a holocaust denier - I support equal rights for Palestinian people," Bull later said. In the leaked email, Shawcroft said she was "concerned" to hear about the suspension of Alan Bull for "a Facebook post taken completely out of context and alleged to show anti-Semitism". However, she later said that she had not seen the "abhorrent" Facebook post which led to his suspension. Subsequently, a group of 39 Labour politicians, both MPs and peers, in an open letter to Corbyn called on him to suspend her from Labour's National Executive Committee. Two days later, on 1 April, she resigned from the committee.

Jewdas Passover event

In April, Corbyn attended a "third night" Passover Seder celebration held by the radical Jewish group Jewdas, which has suggested that allegations of antisemitism within Labour are a political plot aimed at discrediting the party as well as tweeting that Israel is "a steaming pile of sewage which needs to be properly disposed of". Jewdas stated that "Jeremy Corbyn accepted our invitation to join the Jewdas community Seder. Jeremy was a 10/10 guest and provided delicious maror from his allotment." Corbyn was criticised by the Jewish Leadership Council for attending the event. The president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, Jonathan Arkush, said: "If Jeremy Corbyn goes to their event, how can we take his stated commitment to be an ally against anti-Semitism seriously?" A number of Labour MPs criticised his decision to attend. Charlotte Nichols, Young Labours' women's officer and member of Jewdas, commended Corbyn for attending the event, arguing that it was "absolutely right" for Corbyn to "engage with the community at all levels" and that many of the event attendees "are absolutely part of the 'mainstream community.'"

Meeting with community leaders

In April 2018, following a meeting with Corbyn to discuss antisemitism in the Labour Party, the Jewish Leadership Council and the Board of Deputies said "We are disappointed that Mr Corbyn's proposals fell short of the minimum level of action which our letter suggested. In particular, they did not agree in the meeting with our proposals that there should be a fixed timetable to deal with antisemitism cases; that they should expedite the long-standing cases involving Ken Livingstone and Jackie Walker; that no MP should share a platform with somebody expelled or suspended for antisemitism; that they adopt the full International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism with all its examples and clauses; that there should be transparent oversight of their disciplinary process." Corbyn however described the meeting as "positive and constructive" and re-iterated that he was "absolutely committed" to rooting out antisemitism in the Labour Party.

Criticism by other Labour Parties

In April 2018, the Israeli Labor Party led by Avi Gabbay announced it would cut ties with Corbyn and his office due to their handling of antisemitism, but still retain ties with the UK Labour Party as a whole. In a letter to Corbyn, Gabbay wrote of "my responsibility to acknowledge the hostility that you have shown to the Jewish community and the antisemitic statements and actions you have allowed".

On 13 September 2018 Femke van Zijst, spokesperson of the Labour Party of the Netherlands, declared that her party found “recent reports worrisome” about Corbyn and the growth of anti-semitism in the Labour Party of the United Kingdom.

Working definition of antisemitism

Main article: Working Definition of Antisemitism

Criticism of the working definition

In December 2016, Labour adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) Working Definition of Antisemitism. In May 2017, Stephen Sedley said: "Anti-Semitism, where it manifests itself in discriminatory acts or inflammatory speech, is generally illegal. Criticism of Israel or of Zionism is protected by law. The IHRA working definition conflates the two by characterising everything other than anodyne criticism of Israel as anti-Semitic." Labour formally adopted the definition at its September 2017 Conference. Jewish Voice for Labour's Jonathan Rosenhead described it as intentionally "vague", allowing for "the protection of Israel" via "a side door" and thus "encouraging the presumption that criticism of Israel is likely to be antisemitic". The organisation saw the change as an "anti-democratic restriction on political debate", and offered their own definition.

In July 2018, 39 left-wing Jewish organisations in 15 countries, including six in the UK, declared that the definition was "worded in such a way as to be easily adopted or considered by western governments to intentionally equate legitimate criticisms of Israel and advocacy for Palestinian rights with antisemitism, as a means to suppress the former" and that "this conflation undermines both the Palestinian struggle for freedom, justice and equality and the global struggle against antisemitism. It also serves to shield Israel from being held accountable to universal standards of human rights and international law." Writer and scholar of antisemitism Antony Lerman said "Jewish leaders claim exclusive rights to determine what is antisemitism, potentially putting Jewish sentiment above the law of the land. The fundamental principle that IHRA is so flawed it should be abandoned, not tinkered with. The answer to hate speech is more speech, not suppression of offensive views."

Revised working definition

In July 2018, Labour's National Executive Committee (NEC) adopted a new code of conduct defining antisemitism for disciplinary purposes, intended to make the process more efficient and transparent. It included the IHRA definition, but amended or omitted four of the eleven examples, all relating to Israel, and adding three others. Two examples were described, not as antisemitic, but as wrong, "Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations", or to be resisted, “comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis”. The omitted examples were "the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor" and “Requiring higher standards of behaviour from Israel than other nations”. Jennie Formby, the General Secretary, said the code supplements the definition "with additional examples and guidance", creating "the most thorough and expansive Code of Conduct on anti-Semitism introduced by any political party in the UK". NEC member Jon Lansman said "Clear and detailed guidelines are essential to ensure that antisemitism isn't tolerated, while protecting free speech on Israel's conduct, within a respectful and civil environment. This is what Labour's code of conduct provides."

Criticism of revised definition

The Board of Deputies of British Jews and the Jewish Leadership Council said that the new rules "only dilute the definition and further erode the existing lack of confidence that British Jews have in their sincerity to tackle anti-Semitism within the Labour movement". Margaret Hodge MP told Corbyn he was a "fucking anti-Semite and a racist." Law lecturer Tom Frost said the code ignored the Macpherson Principle that "A racist incident is any incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person." On 16 July, over 60 British rabbis, including Harvey Belovski, Laura Janner-Klausner, Danny Rich and Jonathan Wittenberg said that Labour had "chosen to ignore the Jewish community", that it was "not the Labour party's place to rewrite a definition of antisemitism", and that the full definition had been accepted by the Crown Prosecution Service, the Scottish parliament, the Welsh assembly and 124 local authorities. Later in July, in an unprecedented move, three UK Jewish newspapers, The Jewish Chronicle, Jewish News and Jewish Telegraph, carried a joint editorial saying that a Corbyn government would be an "existential threat to Jewish life" in the UK and "Had the full IHRA definition with examples relating to Israel been approved, hundreds, if not thousands, of Labour and Momentum members would need to be expelled." A Labour spokesman said the party posed "no threat of any kind whatsoever to Jewish people".

Defence of revised definition

Human rights solicitor Geoffrey Bindman said that "The new code of conduct on antisemitism seeks to establish that antisemitism cannot be used as a pretext for censorship without evidence of antisemitic intent in line with the view of the all-party Commons home affairs select committee in October 2016 that the IHRA definition should only be adopted if qualified by caveats making clear that it is not antisemitic to criticise the Israeli government without additional evidence to suggest antisemitic intent… Far from watering down or weakening it, Labour's code strengthens it by addressing forms of discrimination that the IHRA overlooked." Geoffrey Robertson QC made a similar point. Philosopher and scholar of antisemitism Brian Klug said "The IHRA code is a living document, subject to revision and constantly needing to be adapted to the different contexts in which people apply its definition. This is the spirit in which the drafters of Labour's code have approached their task."

Outcome and media review

In September 2018, all 11 examples were accepted by the NEC, while Jeremy Corbyn said that they would not prevent criticism of the Israeli government or advocating Palestinian rights. Also in September 2018, the Media Reform Coalition examined over 250 articles and broadcast news segments covering the issue, and found over 90 examples of misleading or inaccurate reporting. The research found evidence of "overwhelming source imbalance", in which Labour's critics dominated coverage which failed to include those defending the code or critiquing the IHRA definition, and omitted contextual facts about the IHRA definition, concluding these were "systematic reporting failures" disadvantaging the Labour leadership.

Other events

In August 2018, prominent backbencher MP and former Minister Frank Field resigned the Labour whip over "excuses for the party's toleration of antisemitism" and a "culture...of nastiness". He retained his party membership, announcing that he would sit as an "independent Labour MP". It was suggested by Owen Jones that the resignation had little to do with antisemitism, and Andrew Grice (a columnist for The Independent) and others have suggested that Field left before he was deselected by his local party, as he had lost a vote of confidence in his constituency over his support for Theresa May's Brexit plans in a recent parliamentary vote.

In November 2018, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick announced that they had been passed details of allegations of antisemitic hate crimes by Labour Party members and had a duty to look into them.

Jeremy Corbyn's responses

In March 2018, in response to claims that he may be seen as antisemitic, Corbyn stated, "I'm not an anti-Semite in any form" and that he challenges "anti-Semitism whenever it arises and no anti-Semitic remarks are done in my name or would ever be done in my name". In the same month, Corbyn also said that he would not tolerate anti-Semitism "in and around" Labour. "We must stamp this out from our party and movement", he said. "We recognise that anti-Semitism has occurred in pockets within the Labour Party, causing pain and hurt to our Jewish community in the Labour Party and the rest of the country. I am sincerely sorry for the pain which has been caused."

In August 2018, he said that antisemitism was a "problem that Labour is working to overcome". He said that some criticism of Israel may stray into antisemitism at times, but denied that all forms of anti-Zionism were inherently racist, and pledged to "root out antisemitism" within the party, saying: "People who dish out anti-Semitic poison need to understand: You do not do it in my name. You are not my supporters and have no place in our movement." In the same month, Corbyn said that the notion that he or Labour posed an "existential threat" was "overheated rhetoric", but agreed that factions of the Labour Party had issues with antisemitism and that there was work to be done for Labour to regain the trust of British Jews.

In September 2018, at the Labour Conference, Corbyn said he wants Labour and the Jewish community to "work together and draw a line" under antisemitism. He went on to attack the record of the Conservative Party for accusing Labour of "anti-Semitism one day, then endorse Viktor Orbán's hard-right government the next day".

In February 2019, Corbyn reiterated, "As leader ... I wish to set out my own commitment along with that of the wider shadow cabinet as the leaders of the Labour Party in parliament to root out antisemitism. I am determined we will defeat racism wherever we see it and I know that antisemitism is one of the oldest, nastiest and most persistent forms of racism." A week later, he said in Parliament, “(Antisemitism has) no place whatsoever in any of our political parties, in our lives, in our society".

2019

Disciplinary processes

In February 2019, the Labour General Secretary, Jennie Formby, announced to Labour MPs that, since April 2018, complaints relating to antisemitism had been received about almost 700 members, around 0.1% of Labour’s over half a million membership. Some complaints related to social media posts dating back a number of years. A further 400 individuals about whom complaints had been received were not party members. Investigations had resulted in 12 expulsions and 49 resignations from the party, and in 187 formal warnings, while some complaints received relatively recently were still being investigated. She said that gaps in investigatory staff due to illness and departures had been resolved and that the number of such staff had additionally been doubled. She noted that around one third of complaints received and two thirds of dossiers received related to individuals who turned out not to be Labour Party members. Some Labour MPs responded by questioning the accuracy of the statistics.

In February 2019, it was announced that Lord Falconer had been invited to examine Labour’s processes in order to increase transparency about how antisemitism cases are considered. Formby asked that a request by Deputy Leader of the Labour Party (UK) Tom Watson MP to Labour parliamentarians, asking that complaints about antisemitism be copied to him for monitoring, be disregarded on the grounds that this would disrupt the official process and be in breach of data protection law.

In March 2019, the Equalities and Human Rights Commission said it was considering launching a formal investigation into antisemitism in the party and asked it to take action alongside them to improve its processes. This followed complaints the Commision had received from the Jewish Labour Movement and the Campaign Against Antisemitism.

Resignation of MPs

The Independent Group, a breakaway group of MPs, was formed by seven Labour MPs citing their dissatisfaction with the Labour leadership's approach to Brexit and to allegations of antisemitism in the party. One, Luciana Berger, said that Labour had become "sickeningly institutionally racist". Two days later, Corbyn said in Parliament, in response, “(Antisemitism has) no place whatsoever in any of our political parties, in our lives, in our society".

Rebuttals

Labour movement activists

In September 2017, general secretary of Unite the Union, Len McCluskey said that the row "was created by people who were trying to undermine Jeremy Corbyn". He stated that he had never heard antisemitic language at a party meeting, adding "Unfortunately at the time there were lots of people playing games, everybody wanted to create this image that Jeremy Corbyn's leadership had become misogynist, had become racist, had become anti-Semitic and it was wrong."

In December 2017, Momentum founder Jon Lansman said that antisemitism in the Conservative Party is as widespread as in Labour. He categorized the latter into three: petty xenophobic remarks, of which he "[doesn't] think there's much" in the Labour party; old-school blood libel type antisemitism, which, according to Lansman, is "extremely rare"; and, then, there's the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, whereby, Lansman says, "we all understand that when that conflict heats up, it results in dreadful antisemitism. It shouldn't result in that, but it does."

Jewish activists and organisations

Some left-wing Jewish groups have disputed the antisemitism claims. These include Jewish Voice for Labour, Jews for Justice for Palestinians, Jewish Socialists' Group, Jewdas and Independent Jewish Voices; all of whom have said that accusations of antisemitism against the Labour Party have a twofold purpose: firstly, to conflate antisemitism with criticism of Israel in order to deter such criticism and, secondly, to undermine the Labour leadership since Corbyn was elected leader in 2015.

In August 2015, dozens of prominent Jewish activists signed an open letter criticising The Jewish Chronicle for what they viewed as its "character assassination" of Corbyn. They wrote: "Your assertion that your attack on Jeremy Corbyn is supported by 'the vast majority of British Jews' is without foundation. We do not accept that you speak on behalf of progressive Jews in this country. You speak only for Jews who support Israel, right or wrong." They continued, "There is something deeply unpleasant and dishonest about your McCarthyite guilt by association technique. Jeremy Corbyn's parliamentary record over 32 years has consistently opposed all racism including antisemitism." Signatories to the letter included Laurence Dreyfus, Selma James, Miriam Margolyes, Ilan Pappé, Michael Rosen and Avi Shlaim.

In April 2016, Richard Kuper, spokesperson for Jews for Justice for Palestinians, said that, while "there is some antisemitism in and around the Labour party – as there is in the wider society in Britain", "there is clearly also a coordinated, willed and malign campaign to exaggerate the nature and extent of antisemitism as a stick to beat the Labour party" under Corbyn. In the same month, Ian Saville, a Jewish Socialists' Group and Labour Party member, said he is "disturbed" by the way antisemitism has "been used to attack the left in the Labour Party."

In April 2016, the Jewish Socialists' Group said that antisemitism accusations were being "weaponized" in order to "attack the Jeremy Corbyn-led Labour party with claims that Labour has a "problem" of antisemitism". It added "A very small number of such cases seem to be real instances of antisemitism. Others represent genuine criticism of Israeli policy and support for Palestinian rights" The statement concluded "The Jewish Socialists' Group sees the current fearmongering about antisemitism in the Labour Party for what it is – a conscious and concerted effort by right-wing political forces to undermine the growing support among Jews and non-Jews alike for the Labour Party leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, and a measure of the desperation of his opponents."

Later that month, 82 "Jewish members and supporters of the Labour party and of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership" wrote an open letter to The Guardian stating that they "do not accept that antisemitism is 'rife' in the Labour party" and that "these accusations are part of a wider campaign against the Labour leadership, and they have been timed particularly to do damage to the Labour party and its prospects in elections in the coming week." The Jewish members and supporters included Miriam David, Ivor Dembina, Professor Stephen Deutsch, Selma James, Miriam Margolyes, Stephen Marks, Charles Shaar Murray, Ian Saville and Lynne Segal.

In December 2017, Jewdas suggested that the allegations are aimed at discrediting the party and called the reaction to them a "bout of faux-outrage greased with hypocrisy and opportunism", saying it was "the work of cynical manipulations by people whose express loyalty is to the Conservative Party and the right wing of the Labour Party".

In March 2018, Joseph Finlay, the former Deputy Editor of Jewish Quarterly magazine and co-founder of several grassroots Jewish organisations, wrote in the Jewish News defending Corbyn, describing him as "one of the leading anti-racists in parliament", and that; "Antisemitism is always beyond the pale. Labour, now a party of over half a million members, has a small minority of antisemites in its ranks, and it suspends then whenever it discovers them. I expect nothing less from an anti-racist party and an anti-racist leader." He continued, "There are many threats to Jews – and we are right to be vigilant. These threats come primarily from resurgent nationalism, anti-immigrant sentiment and a Brexit narrative that seeks to restore Britain to a mythical age of ethnic purity. The idea that Britain's leading anti-racist politician is the key problem the Jewish community faces is an absurdity, a distraction, and a massive error."

In April 2018, Jenny Manson, Chair of Jewish Voice for Labour, in reference to a Campaign Against Antisemitism survey, said: "Evidence, including very recent evidence commissioned by a Jewish body, suggests the very worst antisemitism is still on the right, on the far right and always has been."

In May 2018, the Palestinian-Israeli Socialist Struggle Movement said that they "view Corbyn as a strong opponent of antisemitism and see the attacks being made on him for what they are: attempts to discredit a left-wing politician who has put forward a manifesto seen by capitalists as too radical in favour of working class interests ... The smear campaign against Corbyn is a dangerous attempt to sabotage the struggle for left and socialist solutions".

In September 2018, an open letter signed by 29 rabbis from London Haredi communities said they were "shocked to learn about those that are claiming in the media that the Jews of Britain are outraged towards the Labour Party’s respected leader, Jeremy Corbyn". and went on to state that they had "no connection whatsoever" with what they described as "these irresponsible remarks". The letter was reproduced by a Twitter account calling itself "True Torah Jews" which is linked to the anti-Zionist Satmar Hasidic group. The authenticity of the signatories was initially dismissed as fake by the Jewish Community Council of North London, but they later backed down. However, the two activists who took responsibility for the letter, Shraga Stern and Naftoli Friedman, said it is genuine and claimed to have gained an extra five signatures since the letter was published, taking the total to 34.

In February 2019, over 200 Jewish members and supporters of the Labour party signed a letter published in The Guardian, calling the party under Jeremy Corbyn an ally in the fight against bigotry, including antisemitism. They also welcomed Labour’s support for freedom of expression on Israel and Palestinian rights. They felt that the focus on antisemitism on the left, which they said was abhorrent but relatively rare, was disproportionate.

Academics and researchers

In April 2016, independent researcher Jamie Stern-Weiner's review of the cases of antisemitism found that some were tendentiously represented in the media, so that crude or tone-deaf comments about "Zionists" were treated as equivalent to antisemitic conspiracy theory and Holocaust denial. As of May 2016, just 0.4% of the parliamentary party, 0.07% of the councillors, and 0.012% of the membership had been suspended for antisemitism, which was a total of 56 just people. In May 2016, Israeli historian and Oxford University Professor of International Relations Avi Shlaim argued that "charges of Jew-hatred are being deliberately manipulated to serve a pro-Zionist agenda." In the same month, Norman Finkelstein said: "The only plausible answer is, it's political. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the factual situation; instead, a few suspect cases of antisemitism – some real, some contrived – are being exploited for an ulterior political motive. As one senior Labour MP said the other day, it's transparently a smear campaign."

In January 2017, John Newsinger, Professor of History at Bath Spa University, wrote: "There has been a sustained attempt made to discredit the Corbynites by alleging that they are somehow responsible for the Labour Party having a serious problem with anti-Semitism, that the Labour left and the left outside the Labour Party is, in fact, anti-Semitic... There are two points worth making here: first that the allegations are politically motivated smears, perpetrated by people completely without shame, and second that they do considerable damage to the real fight against anti-Semitism." Also in 2017, linguist and philosopher Noam Chomsky said: "I wholeheartedly support the right of anyone to criticise Israel without being branded antisemitic. That goes in particular for Jackie Walker."

In April 2018, 42 senior academics wrote to The Guardian condemning anti-Corbyn bias in coverage of the debate and suggested that "Dominant sections of the media have framed the story in such a way as to suggest that antisemitism is a problem mostly to do with Labour and that Corbyn is personally responsible for failing to deal with it. The coverage has relied on a handful of sources such as the Board of Deputies, the Jewish Leadership Council and well-known political opponents of Corbyn himself." They continued: "It is not 'whataboutery' to suggest that the debate on antisemitism has been framed in such a way as to mystify the real sources of anti-Jewish bigotry and instead to weaponise it against a single political figure just ahead of important elections. We condemn antisemitism wherever it exists. We also condemn journalism that so blatantly lacks context, perspective and a meaningful range of voices in its determination to condemn Jeremy Corbyn." The academics included Lynne Segal, Annabelle Sreberny, Beverley Skeggs, Gary Hall, Neve Gordon, Margaret Gallagher, Maria Chatzichristodoulou, Jill Daniels and Ruth Catlow. Jane Dipple, one of the signatories to the letter, was investigated for sharing antisemitic posts on social media. Later that April, Israeli historian and socialist activist Ilan Pappé stated that "Corbyn is not an anti-Semite and the Labour Party, until his election, was a pro-Israeli bastion..." and "there is anti-Semitism among all British parties – and much more on the right than on the left." He continued: "It is not the Labour Party that is infested with anti-Semitism; it is the British media and political systems that are plagued by hypocrisy, paralysed by intimidation and ridden with hidden layers of Islamophobia and new chauvinism in the wake of Brexit." In May 2018, Stephen Sedley, a former Court of Appeal judge, dismissed the charge that the Labour Party is "institutionally" or "culturally" antisemitic. He wrote that "an undeclared war is going on inside the party, with pro-Israeli groups such as the Jewish Labour Movement seeking to drive out pro-Palestinian groups like the Jewish Voice for Labour by stigmatising them, and Corbyn with them, as anti-Semitic." He believes that outside bodies like the Board of Deputies of British Jews and the Jewish Leadership Council – "neither noted for balanced criticism of Israel" – weigh in, aided by "generous media coverage".

In July 2018, philosopher and scholar of antisemitism Brian Klug wrote: "It's paradoxical if, at the moment Labour wakes up to the necessity of combating antisemitism in its ranks, it is shouted down because of its failure to deal with it in the past." In October, he wrote: "It appears that two different objectives are being conflated by Jewish leadership: confronting antisemitism and toppling Corbyn." In August 2018, Lorna Finlayson, a lecturer in political philosophy at the University of Essex stated that "No one has yet produced any evidence either that antisemitism is more prevalent in the Labour Party than elsewhere in British society (within the Conservative Party, for instance), or that its incidence within Labour has increased since Corbyn became leader." In September, Professor Rebecca Ruth Gould, a literary theorist, said that "Labour must recognise the internal diversity of the Jewish community and not allow a political faction to silence other points of view, as is happening now to an unprecedented degree."

In October 2018, Goldsmiths, University of London-owned Media Reform Coalition published a report on the coverage of the revised Labour's code of conduct on antisemitism examining "over 250 articles and broadcast news segments." It reportedly found "over 90 examples of misleading or inaccurate reporting." In relation to the IHRA definition of antisemitism, the research found evidence of "overwhelming source imbalance", which over-represented critics of Labour, failed to report on those defending the code or critiquing the IHRA definition and excluded "contextual facts about the IHRA definition." A group including Noam Chomsky, Yanis Varoufakis, Ken Loach, and Brian Eno wrote to The Guardian protesting against the newspaper's reporting. In November the report's main author Dr Justin Schlosberg, wrote an open letter to the Reader's Editor of The Guardian (whom the report had been critical of) criticizing the newspaper's lack of reporting or comment on the research, despite it being "endorsed by a wide range of experts as well as public figures." and having "sparked considerable debate on social media platforms and attracted significant attention from independent media outlets."

Journalists and authors

In July 2018, writer and scholar of antisemitism Antony Lerman wrote: "It's hard to believe, after the battering Labour has experienced over the issue of antisemitism in the party since Jeremy Corbyn was elected leader and the fact nothing the party has done has succeeded in fully placating its critics, that officials expected anything approximating universal approbation. But the new code had barely seen the light of day before it was being condemned in the harshest terms by all and sundry..." In September, he noted "...The default mode of almost all the mainstream media is to take as given that the party is institutionally antisemitic" and "the ever wilder doubling-down on painting Corbyn an antisemite and the increasingly desperate attempts to oust him from the leadership using hatred of Jews as a weapon with which to achieve this."

In August 2018, author Lev Golinkin wrote: "so many others are, too, for anti-Semitism that's at least as dangerous. And yet the same leaders and institutions who are up in arms over Britain's Labor Party have failed, over and over, to express appropriate outrage" and "a case can be made that for many of these institutions, people like Corbyn and Farrakhan are manna from heaven, because they allow them to show the world how fiercely they fight anti-Semitism without actually having to do so in places where it's inconvenient." Israeli journalist and author Gideon Levy called Corbyn "a paragon of a leftist, one who has fought his whole life for the values he believes in." He added: "Leave the incitement campaign against Corbyn and wish him luck: He's a man of conscience, and I hope he'll be Britain's prime minister. It could be good for Israel as well." American scholars Noam Chomsky and Norman Finkelstein called the criticism of Corbyn and Labour 'insane' and 'hysteria' and led by powerful interests, with Chomsky arguing that the aim is to undermine Corbyn's attempt to create a political party responsive to the electorate, and Finkelstein asserting that, given the lack of evidence, the campaign was a calculated hoax. Writer Richard Seymour wrote: "...allegations that Labour is institutionally antisemitic, or that Corbyn himself is a racist, cut against, rather than with, the grain of what people already suspect to be true. Those who dislike Corbyn overwhelmingly think he's a politically correct peacenik, not a Jew-hater."

Surveys and studies

General population

In 2015, 2016 and 2017, the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) commissioned YouGov to survey British attitudes towards Jews. The 2017 survey found that supporters of the Labour Party were less likely to hold antisemitic views than those of the Conservative Party or the UK Independence Party (UKIP), while those of the Liberal Democrats were the least likely to hold such views. 32% of Labour supporters endorsed at least one "antisemitic attitude", as defined by the CAA, compared to 30% for the Liberal Democrat, 39% for UKIP supporters, and 40% for the Conservatives. Further analysis by the blog Evolve Politics of the survey data revealed that, among Labour Party supporters, antisemitism had declined between 2015 and 2017.

A Populus poll during August 2018 found the wider British public did not pay much attention to the prominent news coverage over antisemitism in the Labour Party. No more than 5% rated it as the news story they had noticed most.

A study into contemporary antisemitism in Britain by the Institute for Jewish Policy Research (JPR) in September 2017 study found that those on the political left were no more likely than average to hold antisemitic attitudes, but were more likely to hold anti-Israel attitudes, especially those on the far-left. When discussing the link between political views and antisemitism, the study found that "Levels of antisemitism among those on the left-wing of the political spectrum, including the far-left, are indistinguishable from those found in the general population. Yet, all parts of those on the left of the political spectrum – including the 'slightly left-of-centre,' the 'fairly left-wing' and the 'very left-wing' – exhibit higher levels of anti Israelism than average." It continued: "However, in relation to anti-Israel attitudes, the very left-wing lead: 78% (75–82%) in this group endorse at least one anti-Israel attitude, in contrast to 56% in the general population, and 23% (19–26%) hold 6–9 such attitudes, in contrast to 9% in the general population. Elevated levels of anti-Israel attitudes are also observed in other groups on the political left: the fairly left-wing and those slightly left-of-centre. The lowest level of anti-Israel attitudes is observed in the political centre and among those who are slightly right-of-centre or fairly right-wing." The report however found that "...anti-Israel attitudes are not, as a general rule, antisemitic; but the stronger a person's anti-Israel views, the more likely they are to hold antisemitic attitudes. A majority of those who hold anti-Israel attitudes do not espouse any antisemitic attitudes, but a significant minority of those who hold anti-Israel attitudes hold them alongside antisemitic attitudes. Therefore, antisemitism and anti-Israel attitudes exist both separately and together." The study stated that in "surveys of attitudes towards ethnic and religious minorities... The most consistently found pattern across different surveys is heightened animosity towards Jews on the political right..." and that "The political left, captured by voting intention or actual voting for Labour, appears in these surveys as a more Jewish-friendly, or neutral, segment of the population."

British Jews

CAA commissioned a poll of 1,864 British Jewish adults in 2017. A majority believed that the Labour Party was too tolerant of antisemitism. Of those surveyed, 83% (in 2016 this was 87%) stated that racist sentiments were not adequately challenged by Labour MPs, party members, or supporters.

A poll by The Jewish Chronicle prior to the 2017 election found that just 13% of Jews intended to vote for Labour, and that, when asked to rank the degree of "antisemitism among the political party's members and elected representatives" between 1 (low) to 5 (high), Jews ranked Labour at 3.94, compared with 3.64 for UKIP, 2.7 for Liberal Democrates, and 1.96 for Conservatives.

In September 2018, a Survation survey found that 85.9% of British Jews considered Jeremy Corbyn antisemitic, and 85.6% considered the Labour Party to have "high" or "very high" levels of antisemitism within the party's members and elected representatives. This compares to 1.7% and 6.1% for Theresa May and the Conservative Party respectively. This was an increase from 69% who considered the party to have "high" or "very high" levels of antisemitism in 2017.

Labour Party members

YouGov have surveyed Labour Party members for The Times. In May 2016, a poll found 5% of Labour members thought that antisemitism is a bigger problem in Labour than in other parties and 47% agreed that it was a problem, but "no worse than in other parties." In March 2018, a poll showed 77% of Labour members believed the charges of antisemitism to be deliberately exaggerated to undermine the leader or stop criticism of Israel, while 19% said it was a serious issue.

See also

• Antisemitism in the UK Conservative Party
• Antisemitism in the United Kingdom
• Racism in the UK Conservative Party
• Islamophobia in the UK Conservative Party
• The Lobby (TV series)

Bibliography

• Asthana, Anushka (16 May 2016). "Labour antisemitism inquiry will not seek evidence from Ken Livingstone". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 November 2017. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Beauchamp, Zack (30 June 2016). "The anti-Semitism controversy roiling the UK Labour party, explained". Vox. Retrieved 25 November 2017. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Bodkin, Henry (20 August 2017). "Labour 'too tolerant' of anti-Semitism – new poll". The Telegraph. Retrieved 25 November 2017. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Boffey, Daniel; Sherwood, Harriet (16 October 2016). "Jeremy Corbyn accused of incompetence by MPs over antisemitic abuse". The Observer. Retrieved 2 December 2017. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Donaldson, Kitty (27 September 2017). "New Anti-Semitism Scandal Prompts U.K. Labour to Tighten Rules". Bloomberg. Retrieved 25 November 2017. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Elgot, Jessica (26 September 2017). "Labour to adopt new antisemitism rules after conference row". The Guardian. Retrieved 25 November 2017. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Feldman, David (28 December 2016). "Will Britain's new definition of antisemitism help Jewish people? I'm sceptical". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 July 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Finklestein, Norman G. (28 August 2018). "Why the UK Labour Party should not adopt the IHRA Definition or any other definition of anti-Semitism". Mondoweiss. Retrieved 5 September 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
• Finlay, Joseph (26 March 2018). "The Labour Party, Israel, and antisemitism". Jewish News. Retrieved 26 March 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Finlayson, Lorna (27 September 2018). "Corbyn Now". London Review of Books. 40 (18). Retrieved 24 September 2018. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Fisher, Stephen; Ford, Rob; Curtice, John; English, Patrick (28 September 2018). "Anti-Semitism row: How has it affected Labour's support?". BBC News. Retrieved 30 September 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Freedland, Jonathan (18 March 2016). "Labour and the left have an antisemitism problem". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 November 2017. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Golinkin, Lev (21 August 2018). "Jeremy Corbyn And The Hypocrisy Of The American Jewish Leadership". The Forward. Retrieved 1 September 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
• Gould, Rebecca Ruth (3 September 2018). "'Labour must recognise the diversity of the Jewish community, and not allow a political faction to silence other points of view'". Morning Star. Retrieved 6 September 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
• Hirsh, David (2017). Contemporary Left Antisemitism. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138-23530-4. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Hope, Christopher (26 September 2017). "Labour activists compare Israel to Nazi Germany as Jeremy Corbyn accused of behaving like 'ostrich' over anti-Semitism". The Telegraph. Retrieved 25 November 2017. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• ITV (16 October 2016). "Labour accused of 'incompetence' in dealing with anti-Semitism allegations". ITV. Retrieved 30 November 2017. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Jacobson, Howard (6 October 2017). "The Phony Peace Between the Labour Party and Jews". The New York Times. Retrieved 1 December 2017. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Jenkins, Simon (20 April 2018). "Online anonymity has turned a global village into a lynch mob". The Guardian. Retrieved 27 May 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Jewish Voice for Peace (17 July 2018). "First-ever: 40+ Jewish groups worldwide oppose equating antisemitism with criticism of Israel". Jewish Voice for Peace. Retrieved 2 September 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Josephs, Jonathan (2 June 2017). "Election 2017: Corbyn 'failing to grasp anti-Semitism'". BBC. Retrieved 25 November 2017. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Klug, Brian (17 July 2018). "The Code of Conduct for Antisemitism: a tale of two texts". openDemocracy. Retrieved 21 July 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Klug, Brian (20 July 2018). "Labour's code of conduct isn't antisemitic – it's a constructive initiative". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 July 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Klug, Brian (17 October 2018c). "The Left And The Jews: Labour's Summer of Discontent". Jewish Quarterly. Retrieved 2 November 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Lawson, Shaun (23 July 2018). "Enough of these disgraceful slurs against Jeremy Corbyn". openDemocracy. Retrieved 23 July 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Lerman, Antony (16 July 2018a). "Why turning to Jewish exceptionalism to fight antisemitism is a failing project". openDemocracy. Retrieved 22 July 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Lerman, Antony (4 September 2018). "Labour should ditch the IHRA working definition of antisemitism altogether". openDemocracy. Retrieved 6 September 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
• Levy, Gideon (9 August 2018). "Jeremy Corbyn for U.K. Prime Minister". Haaretz. Retrieved 20 August 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Mandelbaum, Moran (16 July 2018). "Do we need a (legal) definition of anti-Semitism?". openDemocracy. Retrieved 19 July 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Mendick, Robert (20 May 2017). "Jeremy Corbyn's 10-year association with group which denies the Holocaust". The Telegraph. Retrieved 30 November 2017. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Newsinger, John (2 January 2017). "Anti-Semitism row: How has it affected Labour's support?". International Socialism. No. 153. Retrieved 1 October 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Pappé, Ilan (6 April 2018). "The Labour Party, Israel, and antisemitism". Middle East Eye. Retrieved 2 June 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Peck, Tom (26 March 2018). "Labour's Antisemitism Affair". The Independent. Retrieved 27 May 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Perryman, Mark (15 August 2018). "How to break the impasse on Labour's anti-semitism mess". openDemocracy. Retrieved 11 September 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
• Rich, Dave (2016). The Left's Jewish Problem: Jeremy Corbyn, Israel and Anti-Semitism. Biteback. ISBN 978-1-78590-120-1. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Robertson, Geoffrey (31 August 2018). "IHRA definition of antisemitism is not fit for purpose". Doughty Street. Retrieved 1 September 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Sedley, Stephen (10 May 2018). "Short Cuts". London Review of Books. 40 (9). Retrieved 23 May 2018. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Sedley, Stephen (4 May 2017). "Defining Anti-Semitism". London Review of Books. 39 (9). Retrieved 23 May 2018. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Sedley, Stephen (17 July 2018). "Debate continues over Labour's code on antisemitism". The Guardian. Retrieved 1 August 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Sedley, Stephen; Janner-Klausner, Laura; Bindman, Geoffrey; Rose, Jacqueline; Kahn-Harris, Keith (27 July 2018). "How should antisemitism be defined?". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 July 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Seymour, Richard (6 April 2018a). "Labour's Antisemitism Affair". Jacobin. Retrieved 28 May 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Seymour, Richard (5 September 2018b). "The Labour Right's pyrrhic victory". Patreon. Retrieved 9 September 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
• Shlaim, Avi; Daniel, Gwyn (7 May 2016). "The Labour Party, Israel, and antisemitism". openDemocracy. Retrieved 27 May 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Staetsky, Daniel L. (September 2017). Antisemitism in Contemporary Great Britain: A Study of Attitudes Towards Jews and Israel. Institute for Jewish Policy Research. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Stern-Weiner, Jamie; Finkelstein, Norman (3 May 2016). "The American Jewish scholar behind Labour's 'antisemitism' scandal breaks his silence". openDemocracy. Retrieved 11 September 2018. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
• Sugarman, Daniel (27 June 2017). "Making Chakrabarti a peer was Corbyn's sign of contempt for Jews, says Howard Jacobson". The Jewish Chronicle. Retrieved 30 November 2017. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• ToI Staff (7 October 2016). "UK Jews fume as lawyer in 'whitewash' anti-Semitism report gets top Labour job". The Times of Israel. Retrieved 30 November 2017. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Tomlinson, Hugh (8 March 2017). "In the Matter of the Adoption and Potential Application of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance Working Definition of Anti-Semitism" (PDF). Matrix Chambers. Retrieved 17 July 2018. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Tran, Mark (17 February 2016). "Labour opens inquiry into antisemitism allegations at Oxford student club". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 November 2017. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Weaver, Matthew; Elgot, Jessica (26 September 2017). "Labour fringe speaker's Holocaust remarks spark new antisemitism row". The Guardian. Retrieved 25 November 2017. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• White, Ben (22 April 2016). "Shifty antisemitism wars". openDemocracy. Retrieved 14 December 2017. {{cite news}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

Further reading

• Kushner, Tony (1 January 2001). "Antisemitism in Britain: Continuity and the Absence of a Resurgence?". In McElligott, Anthony; Herf, Jeffrey (eds.). Antisemitism Before and Since the Holocaust: Altered Contexts and Recent Perspectives. Palgrave MacMillan. pp. 253–276. ISBN 978-3-319-48866-0. Tony Kushner is professor of the History of Jewish/non Jewish Relations at the University of Southampton.
• Klaff, Lesley (2016). "Jeremy Corbyn: Why the British Labour Party is no longer a safe place for Jews". Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations. 4 (7): 427–433. Retrieved 7 October 2018. Lesley Klaff is a senior lecturer in law at Sheffield Hallam University and editor of the Journal of Contemporary European Antisemitism.
• Schindler, Colin (2016). "From Zionist to Corbynist: The Evolution of Britain's Labour Left". Jewish Quarterly. 63 (2): 38–41. doi:10.1080/0449010X.2016.1202579. Colin Schindler is Emeritus Professor at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, and the founding chair of the European Association of Israel Studies.
• Johnson, Alan (June 2016). "Antisemitic anti-Zionism: the root of Labour's crisis" (PDF). Labour Party Inquiry into Antisemitism and Other Forms of Racism. Retrieved 7 October 2018. Alan Johnson is a British political theorist and activist.
• Sivanandan, Ambalavaner; Fekete, Elizabeth; Bourne, Jenny (30 September 2016). "Submission from the Institute of Race Relations to the Labour Party Inquiry into anti-Semitism and other forms of racism, including Islamophobia". Race & Class. 58 (2): 64–69. doi:10.1177/0306396816657724. Ambalavaner Sivanandan was Director Emeritus of the Institute of Race Relations; E. Fekete is its Director; Jenny Bourne is co-editor of Race & Class.
• Comparison of IHRA and Labour Party Definitions of Antisemitism, Jewish Voice for Labour, 21 July 2018
• "The text of that speech by Jeremy on the Palestinian ambassador to the UK: English irony and certain Zionist critics". Labour Briefing. 29 August 2018. Retrieved 12 September 2018.