Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 695: Line 695:
== Chris Tyson ==
== Chris Tyson ==


*{{revisions|Page name goes here}} Chris Tyson
*{{revisions|Chris Tyson}}
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —[[User:Soccerg7932|Soccerg7932]] ([[User talk:Soccerg7932|talk]]) 20:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —[[User:Soccerg7932|Soccerg7932]] ([[User talk:Soccerg7932|talk]]) 20:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:39, 8 June 2020

"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests to unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests to unprotect, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

    This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

    Shortcuts

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in two cases. The first case is restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or stale Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. In the second use case, this page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as a draft or emailed to you; this way, the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). Be clear as to which namespace is intended, when requesting a refund of a deleted article.

    This means that content deleted after discussion – through deletion processes – may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process but through deletion review instead. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided.

    Do not request that pages or media deleted under speedy deletion criteria F7, F9, F11, U5, A7, A9, A11, G3, G4, G10, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

    Instructions for special cases:

    Enter the page's title:

    Deletion discussions
    Articles
    Templates and modules
    Files
    Categories
    Redirects
    Miscellany
    Speedy deletion
    Proposed deletion


    Philadelphia Association for Critical Thinking

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —alteripse (talk) 19:10, 30 May 2020 (UTC) I will add references and resubmit. thanks[reply]

    Help please! I am grateful that you wrote "Done", but all I see on my user page is another notice that it was deleted. Where can I find the text? thanks user:alteripse

    @Alteripse: The text is here: User:Alteripse/Philadelphia Association for Critical Thinking. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Sergei Millian

    I, codyave, am requesting an undeletion for Sergei Millian.

    I created a new wikipedia page for Mr. Millian a couple of days ago, but he has just informed me on Twitter that he had an active page many years ago. He says, however, that sometime in January 2017, it was deleted without his awareness (he has provided screenshots in his tweet as proof).

    At the time of deletion, he was a public figure, and reportedly is currently involved in the FBI's investigation into Trump-Russia collusion.

    Codyave (talk) 20:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    To be clear, I would be okay with the page being fully reverted back to its c. 2017 state.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergei_Millian

    https://twitter.com/sergeimillian/status/1266801195785601024

    Codyave (talk) 21:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyave (talk • contribs) 20:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done Nothing to undelete that I can see. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:37, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hmm...interesting.

    Just for clarificiation: this means there are no records of a wikipedia page for Sergei Millian, prior to the one I just created a few days ago, right? Codyave (talk) 16:14, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Look at the history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sergei_Millian&action=history where you will see that there was a version. I cannot see any history logs that it was deleted or restored though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Agree. No article ever existed at Sergei Millian until your creation on the 29th, barring something unusual like the whole thing being oversighted. —Cryptic 15:30, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Graeme Bartlett, I'm not sure if I totally understand what happened, so bear with me, and please help me understand it. It appears that JJMC89 took my sandbox/research subpage and redirected it the non-existent Sergei Millian, thus creating an article with the history of my sandbox. That made it possible for Codyave to then create the article. I have no problem with the creation of the article. It was needed. I do have a problem with my private subpage being used in the process. Now my subpage is gone, and its history is part of the new article. I want my subpage and its history restored, and that part of the Sergei Millian article history removed. Codyave should have a "clean start" for his article.
    JJMC89 made my page a redirect and deleted its content. (The article history shows that the size of the deleted content at the redirect matches the size of the existing content when the article was created.) That is so wrong. I have never seen that done before. My subpage should not have been touched, much less deleted. I have requested on their talk page that they fix it, but they do not respond.
    Here's the log for the redirect. Pinging Muboshgu, as they too should look at this. -- Valjean (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Holy shit! This gets weirder. I just noticed the dates for the merge in that log, and see that the merge was done the next day, after Codyave had started his article. What the heck happened here? -- Valjean (talk) 15:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    It happened right after the creation of this thread. -- Valjean (talk) 15:30, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Codyave: did you find my subpage and start editing it and use it as the start of your article? What's the timeline here? -- Valjean (talk) 15:20, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Looks like User:JJMC89 history merged Codyave's article and your sandbox. I don't see any obvious justification for it; they seem editorially independent. —Cryptic 15:30, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree. There is no need for attribution as they are completely independent. -- Valjean (talk) 15:31, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    This is weird. But, resolved? – Muboshgu (talk) 15:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Muboshgu: it isn't resolved yet. I want my subpage restored, with its history, and for the new article's history to start fresh, without any mention of the history from my subpage. I have never seen this happen before. It is very weird. -- Valjean (talk) 16:50, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Valjean, it is, and I still don't really understand what happened. This was done by JJMC89, and they should undo it. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I left two messages on their talk page, but they will not respond. What happened is not an unforgivable sin (maybe just poor judgement?), but the lack of a response is concerning behavior for an admin. Poor judgement is human, but maturity requires accepting responsibility, and that is a requirement for an admin if they wish to retain their position/tools. -- Valjean (talk) 19:13, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Still no response, so pinging here: @JJMC89: -- Valjean (talk) 23:09, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Valjean, I'll look into this later today. I'm not at my home base atm. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:36, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Muboshgu I remembered wrong. It turns out that my subpage's history was not deleted, so I have just reverted. It appears that JJMC89 has removed the history from my subpage from the [new article's history] so it now starts fresh. That's good.
    There is an improper edit warring deletion which I shouldn't touch, but someone else needs to restore the proper content to the lead, and the IPs need to be stopped. Maybe protect the article.-- Valjean (talk) 16:20, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Zonic

    Refund along with talk page to Draftspace Draft:Zonic for potential redevlopment/improvement. No object from AfD/DRV closers at User talk:Anthony Bradbury#Zonic draftification. Userification also accepted but prefer draft. Will only return article to mainspace if significantly improved and credibly seeming to meet WP:THREE. Thankyou. —Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at Draft:Zonic. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Nebraska–Penn State volleyball rivalry

    I, HuskerPower, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Calebsmith (talk) 00:48, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Bagzamilleon

    The page is not fake. The artist is well known in New Yowk, USA and has a great list of work. I will add more reference to it to make sure it is well according to the guidelines. —Imdavid21 (talk) 05:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BAGZAMILLEON, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:36, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Michael Wang (visual artist)

    I, Mrshawesome, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Since creating this page, the artist has been covered by several international news outlets. Mrshawesome (talk) 06:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Trve

    I, samuel would want to work on the article perfectly before submitting again. i request for TRVE to be undeleted so, i can start working on the article to meet up with wikipedia standard. —Samuel.honkmagazine (talk) 09:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done Both Trve and Draft:Trve have been deleted by CSD and will not be undeleted here. Go to deletion review if you disagree. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Health and Social Care (Northern Ireland) logo.svg

    I recently nominated for deletion from Commons, whenever if some NHS logos are protected by Crown copyright. —TheMuscovian (talk) 12:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm leaving this request for someone British, who understands Crown copyright. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Martin Stranka

    I wish to address the raised issues with the article and edit it to have it published —M Stranka (talk) 16:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Please read WP:Autobiography. —A little blue Bori v^_^v 2020's a bust; thanks SARS-CoV-2 18:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:27, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:01800 series (Boston)

    I, Tkefan29, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tkefan29 (talk) 16:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Information Technology Society of Sri Lanka

    I, Patel99, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Patel99 (talk) 17:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Red River Radio Amateurs

    I, SteveRRRA, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SteveRRRA (talk) 17:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Homenetmen

    Homenetmen is an international scouting and athletic organization. Established in 1918 with over 100 years of history, it has just been brought to my attention that the entire article regarding the organization has been deleted. Homenetmen is the guiding force behind the Boy Scouts of Armenia, as well as the companion organization to scouting organizations throughout the world. Moreover, as an athletic organization, competitions and events revolving around its activities continue almost daily throughout the diaspora. —76.103.13.5 (talk) 18:48, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done Treated as a soft delete by the closing admin. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:16, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I, Daffdaemon, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Daffdaemon (talk) 19:24, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Ashfield Mall

    To view the history and do a lot of editing —BugMenn (talk) 08:25, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Stewart Vaughan

    I, Kirkleyditch, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kirkleyditch (talk) 12:22, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Sports Reference Logo.svg

    Re-licensed PD-logo. Deleted revisions should be restored so that the file can be moved to Commons. —– Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:27, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Tom Nolan

    Page was tagged for copyright issues, however, when I ran copyvio there appeared to be no issues. Don't know why this was tagged in the first place. —ili (talk) 13:48, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done we don't restore pages deleted as copyright violations here, you will need to talk to the deleting admin or use WP:DRV. This page was deleted because it was written by somebody with a long history of copyright problems, as outlined by policy. I assume you ran it through an automated copyvio detector, those certainly do not guarantee that something is not a copyright violation - they frequently miss content which has been closely paraphrased, copyright violations where the source has gone dead, copyright violations of printed sources, etc. Hut 8.5 16:54, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/R. Raman Nair

    I, Sambhu2020, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sambhu2020 (talk) 18:07, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:20, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Genetics Home Reference

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Medlib.here (talk) 20:35, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    BB&T

    The article for BB&T was redirected to Truist Financial because the two companies where involved in a merger in late 2019. The problem is that according to the new company the merger will not be completed for like two years. So the redirect was completely premature since people still need information about BB&T until the companies are actually merged. Even then I think redirecting would be questionable though. Since BB&T is a notable enough company to warrant it's own article even after it is fully dissolved. There are plenty of Wikipedia articles about defunct notable companies and I see no reason why BB&T should be treated any differently. So, i'd appreciate if the article was restored at least until the merger is actually completed in a few years, if not permanently as a historical record of the company. —Adamant1 (talk) 06:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I guess what would be restored is the article being under the BB&T article title again and the info panel being reverted to contain BB&Ts information instead of Truist Financial. Plus changing some other minor things to reflect that the merge hasn't completed yet. They should be two separate articles under different titles, with different infoboxes, until the merger is complete though. Since they are still separate companies. I assume I can't just get get rid of the redirect and restore the BB&T article to how it was pre-redirect, with the proper infobox etc, on my own though? --Adamant1 (talk) 07:36, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, I mean "restore" in the sense of undeleting a deleted page. There is no deleted page here so there is nothing to undelete. The content is all still there, it's just been moved somewhere else and edited. It sounds like what you're after is splitting the article in two or moving the article back to its old title, both of those can just be done as part of normal editing and neither has anything to do with deletion. Hut 8.5 12:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Farid Hamedi Rohina

    First of all, this is not fairو Secondly, I want my page information,The official who deleted my page , does not accept her work and says that she did not delete it Is there anyone here to help me? please read my deleted page,Give me my page to fix it.Why did you delete it all? Part of it was objectionable."Publish changes" button below —Farid Hamedi Rohina (talk) 06:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • First of all you've left a number of messages for Theroadislong about this. As s/he has said, Theroadislong did not delete your page, and indeed can't delete pages. This page was deleted by User:Fastily. Secondly given the reason for deletion you'll have to either ask Fastily for it to be restored or use WP:DRV to appeal the deletion (although if you use that you should still contact Fastily first). The page was deleted because it looked like you were using it as a personal web host, which isn't what Wikipedia is supposed to be used for. If you just want the contents I can email that to you. Hut 8.5 06:48, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • 13:11, 2 June 2020 Deb talk contribs blocked Farid Hamedi Rohina talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Using Wikipedia for promotion or advertising purposes) Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:36, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Peak Games

    Due to recent news the firm has gained an importance that deserves undeletion. Zynga to Buy Peak for $1.8 Billion in Its Largest Deal Ever —Mavromatis (talk) 09:35, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I remember that AfD. I'm pretty sure the acquisition by Zynga was mentioned in the article at the time of it being deleted. Since the article was deleted on 12 May and the news about it was before that. Plus, I just remember it being in the article. So, it's not really recent news in the respect that it was factored in to the AfD. That said, acquisitions aren't normally enough to make a company notable on their own anyway. So, likely if the article is restored just on those grounds it will be AfDed and deleted again. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:44, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Trumpinglish

    I was waiting for permission for further edit Inactivity was due to unfamiliarity of the process —Scbang (talk) 15:51, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. However this does not look to be a topic suitable to become an article. You will need independent reliable sources to prove the worth of the topic. I can't see such sources myself, and everything looks to be Wikipedia mirrors. You need no permission to have a break in your editing. Since you are not banned or blocked you can edit. But you should check out the purpose of Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:OpenSync (software)

    I, Nealmcb, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ★NealMcB★ (talk) 15:51, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Beyond Radio

    I, ChrispyUK, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ChrispyUK (talk) 17:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:MotherFund

    I, Bisapa, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bisapa (talk) 20:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Alexis Quezada Cardenas

    I, Iamsportaddictt34, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Iamsportaddictt34 (talk) 22:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:UpsandDowns1234

    That is my old user page. I was wondering if an admin (when they get time to) can undelete and merge the history of my old user page with my current user page. If that is not possible, I completely understand :) —Aasim 01:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Awesome Aasim/User:UpsandDowns1234. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:42, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Bochum Cricket Club Restore

    As Germany is known as Football loving Nation and it’s not easy to introduce new Sport like Cricket, but still we are working very hard to promote Cricket in this region. Our Mission is to establish Bochum Cricket Club as proper and professional organization.

    We are very proud of what Bochum Cricket Club has achieved over the last 20 years. Our members are increasing very fast. We are working very hard to provide our members proper Indoor and Outdoor Cricketing facilities. We are working very closely with Bochum city to have our own Cricket ground ( which we has had already ) but Ground was taken by Municipality to build the refugee shelters.

    Please restore the WP Page. —85.22.126.163 (talk) 04:59, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    PBS Velká Bíteš

    Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PBS Velká Bíteš. Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Marc Lacoste (talk) 07:21, 3 June 2020 (UTC) Aircraft engines are considered notable enough to be worth an article even if there is minimal support, often because it is a blurb, additional references are easy to find. Best to discuss it in the Aircraft Wiki Project.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 07:21, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Dynamo Gaming

    Because i have'nt violated any of the conditions and i am not promoting anything.Also all the information is verifird. —Rahulraop (talk) 08:23, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Nat James

    I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:33, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:39, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Lorna_Docken

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —158.51.54.86 (talk) 13:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I respectfully request a review of the deletion of the page for Lorna Docken.

    I am the person whom the article was about. I have no idea why it was deleted or who made the request. That is unsurprising, as I did not have anything to do with the original page. It could be due to political reasons as politics is a cutthroat business and leaders are targets?

    I feel that I have contributed to the evolution of Métis self determination and recent history of the Metis Nation. I was the first woman to lead an Indigenous organization in Saskatchewan when I became Interim President of The Métis Nation Saskatchewan in January 2004. I have been involved with the Métis Movement since writing my first proposal for a youth project at age 14 in 1974. I have been on staff or serving on boards and committees since that time. I was elected to the Métis Nation Saskatchewan executive twice.

    Of note, is the fact that I am the mother and management team member, of Joey Stylez who has a page in Wikipedia.

    My married name is Lorna Ledoux.

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:40, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Kartikeya Gummakonda

    Hi, can you please unprotect this page that was protected by RA Haworth who is no longer an admin. I'd like to publish Draft:Kartikeya Gummakonda as he passes WP:NACTOR with four starring roles subsequent to the 2018 AfD, Atlantic306 (talk) 18:46, 3 June 2020 (UTC) —Atlantic306 (talk) 18:46, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done Your AFC submission was declined last week. I don't appreciate you trying to game the system. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:49, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Did not write the article or edit it. I submitted it because the creator asked me to review it on my talk page which amounts to the same thing, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:54, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • I realize I erred there. This is RFUD, for undeletions. You're requesting undeletion of the page from 2018, which is in poor shape and will not be undeleted. You're looking for unprotection of the mainspace page, which is under the purview of WP:RFPP. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:24, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Traefik

    Please restore as draft so I may resubmit with additional references meeting criteria for creation —Kcmastrpc (talk) 22:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Spartaz, any objections? – Muboshgu (talk) 00:21, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Any update on this? In the meantime, would you please email me the article or put it in my sandbox? — Kcmastrpc (talk) 12:36, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:2003 European Rhythmic Gymnastics Championships

    I wish to update this page and bring sources from the UEG (results books from the Union of Europeans Gymnastics). My final goal is to make a wikipedia page for all the European Championships in rhythmic gymnastics since the UEG has now published all the results and information about Championships.—Clematisrg (talk) 22:53, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 22:58, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Aoba47

    I would like to refund the above page. I will be taking an extended break from Wikipedia as I am just burned out right now, but I would like to have my user page restored to just look back on my past work. Thank you in advance! —Aoba47 (talk) 00:20, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – Muboshgu (talk) 00:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you. Aoba47 (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Gregory Field II

    I, Kaimaraalba, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kaimaraalba (talk) 01:06, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:21, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Aoba47/Sources

    I would greatly appreciate if the above page can be restored as it has citations/sources that I would like to save for future projects. Thank you in advance! —Aoba47 (talk) 06:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    BochumCricketClub Restore

    Hello mz restore request has been declined already, Could you please email me the page so I can rewrite the content. Thank you —Amir321007 (talk) 08:48, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Dr. Muthana Sartawi

    I, Junaid0300, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Junaid0300 (talk) 10:08, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Shira Z. Carmel

    I, Shikuz, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ~shikuz (talk) 10:14, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ben Verdery

    I, Danzanfran, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Danzanfran (talk) 12:49, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Nate McMurray

    I, Naddruf, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 16:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:40, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Gbets

    Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gbets. This article should be restored as the subject is notable and it has significant, reliable resources from independent of the subject. And it is noted that discussion is uncontroversial and has minimal participation. The result is soft delete. —Gdrged (talk) 17:16, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:40, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Let's Talk (website)

    There is more coverage about LetsTalk.com (the subject in question) since I first submitted the article which I feel makes this article meet guidelines for publishing now —Tinachang14 (talk) 19:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Church of St-Christophe, Montferrand-du-Périgord

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) PattersonDrew (talk) 19:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Creating Draft:Church of St-Christophe, Montferrand-du-Périgord

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:40, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ako Mayama

    According to my Google search, she is clearly notable. —Taku (talk) 21:22, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:40, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Japan Library

    As I cannot see the deleted content, I don’t know what the draft is about. But if it’s about [1] then it might be notable (government stuff are often considered notable). —Taku (talk) 21:26, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Looch

    I, Joelclyne, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Joelclyne (talk) 21:32, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Looch

    What Im struggling with is that there are similar pages that have been accepted, but not mine. Im therefor looking at other pages to see what they have on them that Ive omited as Im unable to. I can cite examples if requested —Joelclyne (talk) 21:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Patrice Wood

    I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:45, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Dan Behrman

    I, Snowboarding enthusiast, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Snowboarding enthusiast (talk) 22:08, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Sapan Desai

    The original article was deleted mostly because it was a hagiography and in notability concerns. With the major media coverage on the Lancet article that he is a coauthor on, there is more than sufficient notability now. Having the page refunded would make it possible to update it to reflect germane information related To his Surgisphere company and the data that is now so disputed. —BoonDock (talk) 22:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The deletion was at AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sapan Desai. The current page is just a new redirect to Surgisphere. The AfD said that the article had been heavily edited by the nominator, I'd like to see the earlier versions. If you need a new a place to deposit the old article, please use User:Smallbones/Sandbox2 Smallbones(smalltalk) 22:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I suspect I haven’t explained myself correctly. I had nothing to do with the original article. I’ve just been contributing to the Surgisphere one and it makes sense to recreate (or create from scratch) an article on Desai BoonDock (talk) 23:03, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    In case it's not clear to the submitter what was done, there is still a redirect at Sapan Desai pointing to Surgisphere but the history under the redirect includes that of the original article on Sapan Desai that was deleted. There was also an original talk page at Talk:Sapan Desai (back in 2010) but it contained nothing but WikiProject banners. EdJohnston (talk) 04:09, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:José Romo Vargas

    I, Mromocarmona, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MRomoCarmona 23:03, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Jacek Jassem

    I, STwikiedit, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. STwikiedit (talk) 07:19, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    TradingView

    I, 86.11.126.233, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.11.126.233 (talk) 11:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:23, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Time Trapper

    The Time Trapper is a confusing DC comics character with a complex history; the previously existing page offered a lot of info which is not elsewhere so consolidated on Wikipedia. The article was deleted for reasons of being considered "comic trivia" and for its in-universe style. However, these things can be corrected and that doesn't seem to warrant the removal of the information. —SSBDelphiki (talk) 12:05, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done Nothing to undelete. The page was merged. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:24, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks for looking. Unfortunately, none of the content of the Time Trapper page was used to update the Controllers page. The content was simply replaced with a redirect to a page with almost zero information about the character in question. Is that really a merger? SSBDelphiki (talk) 19:08, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The history is visible here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Time_Trapper&action=history and you can improve the merge. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:13, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:SEA Foundation Tilburg

    I, All s 01, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. All s 01 (talk) 14:51, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:24, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Miya Poetry

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —117.194.215.101 (talk) 14:52, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done WP:CSD#G7 deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:25, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Many scholars from Miya community are trying to uplift the Miya society through poems. They have chosen Poverty, Child marriage, Population bomb, Illiteracy as their subject . The collection of these poems are termed as Miya Poetry. But in recent time due to context of some poems, it creates a controversy in Assam, especially among indigenous people of Assam.[1] [[2]]

    References

    1. ^ "Interview | There is a Conspiracy to Show Bengal-Origin Muslims as Anti-Assamese: Hafiz Ahmed". The Wire. Retrieved 2019-07-27.
    2. ^ https://bengali.indianexpress.com/opinion/assam-miya-poetry-history-politics-identity-135975/ আসামের মিঞা কবিতার ইতিহাস, ভূগোল ও দেশপ্রেম

    Draft:Betty Lee Ongley

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jantastic 14:53, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    علياء المهدي

    The activist's page on Wikipedia Arabic (https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%A1_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%87%D8%AF%D9%8A) was deleted for no reason other than political disagreement and then click the "Publish changes" button below —151.177.65.233 (talk) 16:51, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done That's the Arabic Wikipedia. This is the English Wikipedia. There is no edit history at علياء المهدي on the English Wikipedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:23, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Festival_Ballet_Providence

    I, Jimpaz, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jimpaz (talk) 17:12, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Miami Nights 1984

    Was AfD'd however results from the discussion were promising as to a suitable article; and was deleted as a precaution, ex-admin Nakon stated " Please contact me if you would like the article userfied. " however has now unfortunately retired. I was looking to view the contents of the article and/or submit it to draftspace to work on it. Thank you! Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miami Nights 1984 —   Kadzi   (talk) 23:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Untitled

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 82.132.246.37 (talk) 00:22, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • (Non-administrator comment) The last edit the IP made before posting at REFUND was this one to The Amazing World of Gumball in May 2019. That edit was reverted, but perhaps the IP wants it restored. That type of thing doesn't really fall under the purview of this page, and if anything would be a content dispute which needs to be discussed at Talk:The Amazing World of Gumball. In this case, however, the edit was more like a WP:NOR type of personal comment that's not really suitable for a Wikipedia article than an encyclopedic improvement, and probably has no chance of achieving a WP:CONSENSUS in favor of re-adding. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:18, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The IP has no deleted contributions and hasn't specified a page title other than "maroon". You will need to give us the title of a deleted page for anything to be restored here. Hut 8.5 16:03, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Oleg Firer

    Article was deleted and proposed to be deleted unjust, I wrote an article about individual who is notable for being #1 on Inc. 500, being CEO of a NASDAQ-listed public company, and holds political office as an ambassador, reconsideration is warranted —Paymentguru (talk) 01:55, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleg Firer, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:32, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Lillee Jean Trueman

    I, Mattm80, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mattm80 (talk) 05:43, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Forced conversion to Islam in Pakistan

    There was nothing wrong on this page. Forced conversion is happening in Pakistan. The deletion should be undone. If the heading of the Page seems like attacking a particular religion (i.e Islam), then it could be changed to just "Forced conversion in Pakistan". I don't think it's a good idea to delete a whole wikipedia page which is about about grave human rights violation in Pakistan —Banksboomer (talk) 08:42, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:28, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alex H Parker (Counsellor Author)

    I, Arccstic, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Arccstic (talk) 09:58, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:John Weinman

    I, Bogle, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. bogle (talk) 10:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Siege of Bunratty

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Stephen Blackpool (talk) 14:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC) Hi they asked for citations but I wasn't paying attention for a few months so it got deleted. Can you please un-delete that and I will improve the article thanks[reply]

    Yofavgirlasia

    Yofavgirlasia. I did not do anything wrong just like people who write about Abraham Lincoln. I was writing about someone i know and someone i know who will make history. I did not give out there social media at all so its not like i was promoting them. I was staring information about them just like what everyone else does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C9:180:3A0:B1A7:7E9:1EA9:A869 (talk) 17:39, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? As you're requesting this from an IP, I can't look in userspace. Wikipedia is not for those who in your opinion will be famous someday; it is for those who already have some fame/notoriety. —A little blue Bori v^_^v 2020's a bust; thanks SARS-CoV-2 18:00, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I assume they refer to this which was a u5. Praxidicae (talk) 14:47, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion U5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
    Good find, Praxidicae. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:01, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Rob James (Politician)

    I, Volvicuk, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Volvicuk (talk) 21:24, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:36, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Myrtle Sheldon

    I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:38, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Serrana (composition)

    I was about to redirect it to the article on the composer, Jason Becker, but got sidetracked —Ingratis (talk) 02:51, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:37, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Exponential bound on capsets

    G13; I am requesting undeletion because I cannot access the deleted content and thus I cannot tell for example if there are some materials worth merged into the mainspace articles. —Taku (talk) 05:04, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:39, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Pramath Raj Sinha

    I, Tantrumzzz03, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tantrumzzz03 (talk) 05:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:40, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Pramath Raj Sinha

    I, Tantrumzzz03, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tantrumzzz03 (talk) 06:08, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ina_Maud_Sheldon-Williams

    I, Little antipodes, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Little antipodes (talk) 10:33, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:41, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Student politics in Venezuela

    I, Kingsif, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kingsif (talk) 16:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:13, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Pride of the Americas

    Draft was deleted due to inactivity. My intent was to update with more supporting documentation and resubmit but due to the pandemic, my attention had shifted. I would still like this opportunity to edit the page and resubmit. Would you please undelete the page so that I can do this? Thank you! —MiikMartorell (talk) 18:59, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:15, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Arise from Darkness

    Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arise from Darkness. Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Michael.j.schwartz (talk) 20:36, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arise from Darkness. Hello, I'm requesting that the article be moved to the Draftspace, so that I may improve it and see if someone can review it (I have conflict of interest because I'm part of the film studio). An editor proposed the deletion and all of the movie and studio articles were deleted. I am suspecting an intentional reprisal due to the fact two days prior an email was sent to our film studio asking for precise wordage to be removed from several of our Wikipedia articles in relationship to a movie. Within 48 hours all of the studio and movie pages on Wikipedia were proposed to deletion, claiming that none of the references used were valid (a reviewer checked and published the article years ago, with those same references). I understand that there may be discrepancies, but can there be such a wide criterion to evaluate a group of references? Thank you very much for your help. —Michael.j.schwartz (talk) 20:36, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. You can now find it at Draft:Arise from Darkness. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:42, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    All India Sunni Jamiyyathul Ulama

    Request refund to draft (or failing that userification) of both article page and talk page. Previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All India Sunni Jamiyyathul Ulama. Intention to develop article as lede of Grand Mufti of India (oldid=961149600) indicates and is sourced to indicate importance of organisation in election process of the Grant Mufti incumbent. Attempted to contact XfD closer contacted at User talk:Yunshui#All India Sunni Jamiyyathul Ulama first but no response within 48 hours (closer seems taking a short break from WP and is certainly entitled to RL) so coming to WP:RFU for refund. Please remember to restore talk page as well or indicate if talk page not present. Thankyou. —Djm-leighpark (talk) 23:19, 7 June 2020 (UTC) Djm-leighpark (talk) 23:19, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at Draft:All India Sunni Jamiyyathul Ulama. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Rishabh Dubey

    I, Gitpush, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gitpush (talk) 00:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:36, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Aleksi Godard

    I, Silex158, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Silex158 (talk) 01:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:36, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Rabbi Chaim Bentzion Raskin

    I, מענדל סופרין, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. מענדל סופרין (talk) 03:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:33, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    UpCounsel

    Please restore UpCounsel to Draft:UpCounsel. I found out that the article had been deleted through this edit removing it from a list. I would like to work on improving the article to address the {{db-a7}} concerns. —Cunard (talk) 07:00, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at Draft:UpCounsel. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Iridescent (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:33, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Nicholas_Kharkongor

    I, Ved.Maddison, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ved.Maddison (talk) 07:52, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:30, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Bad bitch

    This article succumbed to a PROD on June 16, 2017. I'd like it restored to user space to see if anything can be done with it. —gobonobo + c 09:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    sunil nihal duggal

    G13: Abandoned draft or AfC submission and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Madan Dhawan (talk) 18:47, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Radhesh Aria

    {{subst:refund|1= Radhesh Aria |2= This article is a college project and we would very much appreciated if we could work on it , thanks


    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Pmo17 (talk) 20:34, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Chris Tyson

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Soccerg7932 (talk) 20:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=961498517"