Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.

Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit

this header: view • edit

Current requests for protection

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Duncan Norvelle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Anom IP vandalism. // A Raider Like Indiana 04:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Farah Pahlavi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. Persistent anon switches IP-addresses to vandalise the page. Parishan (talk) 03:56, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Transformers: Revenge of The Fallen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. AcesUpMaSleeve (talk) 03:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Altaf Hussain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Article is of a controversial Pakistani politician, is being frequently targetted by IP vandals to disparage them. Fences&Windows 02:24, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - KrakatoaKatie 03:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Up (2009 film)‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, for 14 days or so would be nice. Due to frequent hoax/vandal edits from numerous new and anon users, which seems to be the case on this and many other Pixar-related film articles currently (with UP being popular at the box office, this is to be expected, I'm sure.) SpikeJones (talk) 01:31, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jamie^☆S93 02:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

List of film trilogies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, Same as the duologies. One user adding redlinks, no articles and grouping unrelated films together. Darrenhusted (talk) 23:32, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. KrakatoaKatie 03:01, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Poverty in Pakistan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection ip User:70.112.205.43 and ip 24.28.79.43 are both seperate editors who are prolific socks who have been baneed but keep coming back they constantly pov push on the article and i have tried and failed to stop them i am taking the chance now to ask for protection against there attacks as they may soon come back yet again there are other articles too which they attack 86.154.149.144 (talk) 23:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC) I also require urgent help in containing both the socks attacks please could some one assist in protecting the articles they attack please ensure that you undo the edit they make and then protect as you can see both the users have a nexus of pov pushing and when one gets blocked the other jumps in to re insert the pov edits 86.154.149.144 (talk) 23:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Here is the proof of ip 70 being a sock of Hkelkar [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.154.149.144 (talk) 23:32, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Please see User:Thegreyanomaly/Nangparbat the evader. This ip is a warring sock of banned user Nangparbat. It would undermine the credibility of wikipedia if admins were to use technical means to support the edits of a banned user.24.28.76.153 (talk) 23:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

See now he attacks admins as i said before once ip 70 gets blocked ip 24 pops up to rescue the pov this is surely blatant proof of sock nexus 86.154.149.144 (talk) 23:41, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

See This edit summary by the Pakistani sockpuppet.24.28.76.153 (talk) 23:42, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I unwittingly stepped into this mire and just as quickly extricated myself - too messy for someone not familiar with the situation and I don't have the hour required to determine which IP is which. Sorry if you see actions on my part that don't seem complete. Tan | 39 23:46, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

see this edit by the indian pov pushing Hkelkar[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/70.112.205.43]and his sock pal Disallowedtoveiw[2] very similair edits proof no doubt of sock nexus 86.154.149.144 (talk) 23:53, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I just blocked both editors for disruptive editing. That was surely enough of that nonsense. Tan | 39 23:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

List of film duologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, One user (User:86.156.235.250) is obsessed with adding films which have not been made to this page. Despite my best efforts he/she is not willing to talk about it, and deliberately and wilfully ignores WP:NFF. A few days break would be handy. Darrenhusted (talk) 23:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. - KrakatoaKatie 02:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Madiga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, Page has seen a high number of "undo" edits - probably just 2 dynamic IP users, as it alternates from 86.x.x.x and 70.x.x.x.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

IP70 XXX is a sock of banned user Hkelkar just to let admins know 81.158.129.71 (talk) 00:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

IP 86.x.x.x is sock of banned troll Nangparbat.24.28.72.170 (talk) 00:04, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Observe attempt to WP:CANVASS supporters [3].24.28.72.170 (talk) 00:10, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Observe nexus of Hkelkar aka ip 70 xxx [4] and ip 24 xxx aka Disallowedfromveiwing [5] both are using dynamic ips to push the same pov over the same articles this is getting very tiresome I shall deal with Hkelkar(ip70) and Disallowedtoveiw(ip24) have fun boys while you can ;-) 81.158.129.71 (talk) 00:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Power Rangers: RPM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. IPs keeping adding unconfirmed information, stuff that hasn't happened, etc. ---Shadow (talk) 05:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Starship_Troopers_3:_Marauder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism Page has consistently been vandalized by a dynamic IP user. The individual refuses to discuss edits, and seems to cycle between simply adding linkspam (a fansite) to removing parts of the article to slant the page's POV from neutral to one in which the movie is purported to have been very very good (reviews are mixed at best). In the past, a semi-protection of a couple weeks has seemed to quiet the vandalism for that period of time, and a subsequent set of 2 or 3 weeks. Considering the consistent nature of this vandal (returning again and again for the same purpose over many many months now), perhaps a slightly longer period of semi-protection could delay the attacks for a longer time? Thanks in advance for the help. JasonDUIUC (talk) 22:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Wexford Collegiate Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection vandalism, Article has seen a ridiculous amount of vandalism in the past few days, and not all of it from IP users either. Showing no signs of letting up. If full protection is not an option, I'm requesting semi-protection at least. —LedgendGamer 21:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If autoconfirmed editors vandalize, those can be blocked one by one. Enigma^msg 22:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Persecution of Christians (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection dispute, Requesting semi-protected indefinite protection (1-2 weeks?). Some sort of edit war between IP editors. I've managed to get them talking to some extent, but it's devolving again. I'll handle the edit war, I just need page protection to help stop the reverts. I think the correct wrong version to leave it at is this. tedder (talk) 20:16, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Brought to you courtesy of Mazca (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (congrats BTW, welcome to the ranks :) ) Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 04:01, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Gerald Walpin firing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

full protection vandalism, Users repeatedly introducing copyright violations; see WP:ANI#ChildOfMidnight. Sceptre ^(talk) 20:13, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined Best to keep this at ANI. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 20:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

2009 FIFA Confederations Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection Target for sneaky vandalism, changes to incorrect scores and information, massive speculation added and similar problems. I have been working on the article, so I'm requesting protection here for a neutral admin to decide. Would probably be required 28 June 2009 but anything is probably useful at this point. Regards SoWhy 19:55, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma^msg 20:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Rosa DeLauro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Since this diff in late April, this page has seen about 44 edits, of which a full 15 are vandalism, nearly all of which are exactly that same edit (and nearly all of which come from IPs starting with 99, usually 99.18 and 99.147). That makes about one-third of all edits vandalism, and another third reverting those. I have no idea why, but it's excessive. ~ Amory (user • talk • contribs) 19:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigma^msg 19:55, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Day26 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection vandalism and edit warring. The IP's want to fight me on the record sales when they do not have sources. I keep on rolling back, but this is becoming an edit war. The only source they've had to back up their claim was a forum in france, not very reliable. IHelpWhenICan (talk) 19:27, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Nerissa Corazon Soon-Ruiz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Request Semi-Protect, repeated inclusion by anonymous users of unsourced negative content.Martinlc (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Tough one. It may need a semi because the IP is dynamic. It's clearly one user. Maybe an admin is willing to apply a rangeblock? I blocked the latest IP. Enigma^msg 19:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

(ec) I semi protected it for 2 weeks because this seems an ongoing violation by a dynamic IP. Feel free to revert protection if you think it necessary. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 20:00, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Michael Cooke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Request Semi-Protect, anonymous user (who often creates one-day accounts as well) is repeatedly vandalising this article multiple times a day, for over a week, removing information, changing quotes and adding likely-spurious invented details. Sherurcij ^{(speaker for the dead)} 16:32, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Walter Cronkite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection dispute, Dispute about "reliable sources" regarding his reported illness. Willking1979 (talk) 16:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't want to decline this yet, as it will probably need to be protected, but based upon discussion at ANI this hasn't reached that point yet. Need to keep an eye on this though.---Balloonman ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 16:38, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Depleted uranium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, Edit warring by acknowledged COI, SPA, registered yesterday to edit war on this article and file SSP report on several users. See Special:Contributions/RadTek. Abd (talk) 13:05, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Fully protected for three days. Tan | 39 14:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

British Isles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection dispute, Edit warring. Despite previous page protection and lack of consensus, an editor keep on adding his content. MITH 12:51, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. by another admin. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Max Mosley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism on a high trafficked article. Apterygial 09:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma^msg 14:18, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Ilham Aliyev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite full protection dispute, This page requires protection due there are lots of vandalism and users keep adding irrelevant information. NovaSkola (talk) 04:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined Far from being lots of vandalism, the article has not been vandalized in four weeks. Enigma^msg 14:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Cleveden Secondary School (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection vandalism, This page usually vandalized by anonymous IP's. NovaSkola (talk) 04:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined Enigma^msg 14:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Barbara Boxer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection Getting popular for editorial commentary since today's new coverage. JNW (talk) 04:00, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma^msg 04:58, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Freddy Krueger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Move Protection. Although no moves have been attempted, there is no reason for this page to be moved ISTHnR | Knock Knock | Who's There? 01:53, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. -Royalguard11(T) 02:46, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Titusville, Florida (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection Excessive vandalism by IP users. Suggest one month.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 01:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--RegentsPark (My narrowboat) 01:53, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

North Korea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection dispute, Protection until the dispute for the headers stops. Fixman^{Praise me} 01:29, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

• Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 01:51, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Steve Beshear (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection dispute, Edit war developed over the past few days. Willking1979 (talk) 00:44, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. by Kurt Shaped Box (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). -Royalguard11(T) 03:16, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Robin van Persie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection vandalism, RVP's page has endured some serious vandalism since rumours of a move to Manchester United. . ThaKid555 (talk) 00:38, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - KrakatoaKatie 03:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Nürburgring lap times (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection persistent IP vandalism. --LiamE (talk) 00:10, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined It's really just one IP. I warned the IP, and it will be blocked if it continues. Enigma^msg 14:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Hank Baskett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, IP vandalism, no good IP edits in a long time. RF23 (talk) 22:35, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma^msg 00:55, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Créćé (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite create-protection, Repeatedly re-created nonsense. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Creation protected for 3 months Icestorm815 • Talk 22:13, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Zezimathemighty (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

full protection user talk of blocked user, User talk of indef blocked user, who is making personal attacks. Timmeh!_{(review me)} 21:12, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Timmeh!_{(review me)} 21:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Jeopardy! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

temporary full protect Edit warring, which I want to stop. FMAFan1990 (talk) 21:06, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Done for 24 hours. Toddst1 (talk) 21:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Can you make it longer please? FMAFan1990 (talk) 21:11, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Farah Pahlavi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. Parishan (talk) 21:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigma^msg 05:02, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. I blocked the latest IP sock. It's one user with a dynamic IP. Enigma^msg 05:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Lots of IP vandalism, I suggest a long SP. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 20:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 20:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Wrestlicious (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. King Bedford I ^{Seek his grace} 18:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

More specifically one user keeps redirecting the website, despite being told to stop. The IP concerned has switched after going through 3RR, a lock on the page for a few days seems like the easiest way to stop them rather than chasing IP blocks. Darrenhusted (talk) 19:56, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 20:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Wesley College, Dublin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full Protection. This page is being vandalised continuously until the point that it no longer makes any sense - I have had to revert it back to an edit from mid March 2009 in order to clear all the vandalism. Without a doubt it will return within a couple of days - the issue has been raised already on the discussion page of the article. 17:42, 18 June 2009 (BST).

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Tan | 39 16:49, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Republican Party (United States) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection frequent vandalism, Constant vandalism from people that incite hateful counter-productive edits to the infobox as well as subtle changes of factually incorrect content in the body of the article as well. Be sure to look at the article's history on several pages and notice all the instinces where revisions were undone because of vandalism. Its a constant battle with these people. Burningview (talk) 16:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Enigma^msg 18:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Current requests for unprotection

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Christopher Gilbert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Christopher Gilbert has been locked deleted. on a user page i have a proposed page for this poet: [6] appears notable to me. Pohick2 (talk) 01:39, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

i have also made an edit request to the talk page: Talk:Christopher Gilbert Pohick2 (talk) 02:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

thanks, hopefully the good content will deter the bad. Pohick2 (talk) 14:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: Reviewed and done by MSGJ (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). SoWhy 20:56, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Unprotection goes to Disney XD & Super Smash Bros. Brawl!--151.199.133.61 (talk) 13:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Fulfilled/denied requests

Template:Infobox MLB player (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Return to full protection. This page was fully protected until this morning. There is a debate about adding a parameter, and one of the users made this request to have it unprotected. The admin agreed, but this was not wise. The page should remain protected until there is a concensus to change something. Timneu22 (talk) 16:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Fully protected - It is used on many, many pages. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Buri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full protection. Users associated with someone who has previously had his article deleted continue to add redlinks to him on this dab page. Also interferes with other cleanup. Dekimasuよ! 16:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined, involved user(s) can be handled directly. SoWhy 20:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Final Destination 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, Excessive amounts of vandalism and fan spamming (inclusions of excessively long and detailed plots, original research, extremely detailed character descriptions, etc.). This has been a long-time issue with this article, as well as Final Destination and Final Destination 3. The page history for all three articles is almost 100% vandalism/spamming and reverts of these unhelpful edits. I'm requesting semi-protection for this article, as well as the other two I mentioned above. Thanks for any help. 13² 15:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 20:46, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

American Idol (season 8) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection Edit warring by (mostly) IP's regarding tables in the article. The Seeker 4 Talk 13:15, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined, seems to have stopped for now. SoWhy 20:44, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Irwin Schiff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Schiff, through phone conversations from his prison, has "said he wanted us to go and redo Wikipedia. The IRS and the goons from squatloos has gone in there and left false information about Irwin. Someone wrote to him about it and he wants it corrected." [[7]] This should warrant a page protection for WP:SOCK and specifically WP:MEATPUPPET.93.174.88.67 (talk) 13:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Enigma^msg 18:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:NawlinWiki (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Page is getting barraged by vandals. Vivio Testarossa^Talk 08:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined Semi is useless against autoconfirmed. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Cardmaker)} 08:13, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

The accounts vandalizing are not autoconfirmed. I don't see why my protection was removed. The user is going to keep going. While NW is away, the protection should be kept. I see he's returned now. Enigma^msg 16:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

At least one of the accounts was autoconfirmed, Enigmaman; he went to my talk page (which is semi'd) and bragged about it, and another one vandalized it later that night. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Cardmaker)} 18:33, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

They were all autoconfirmed sleeper socks that were created in March and April (and maybe earlier, I got bored checking the logs). Tan | 39 18:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

It was my understanding that accounts have to make ten edits to become autoconfirmed. Enigma^msg 23:30, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

OK, I see now that the edits were in user and user talk, pages which were later deleted. Enigma^msg 00:27, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Jet (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full-protect. Article was fully protected about a wekk ago. After the protection was lifted, genre edit warring has immediately resumed, and hasn't relented yet. Request long term/indef full protection of teh article. Frvernchanezzz (talk) 07:45, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This ceased to be a content dispute and is now simply vandalism with IPs removing references despite multiple reverts. SoWhy 20:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Croats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection Appears to be an edit war, with one editor switching to different IPs after receiving final warning. Needs overview from someone with knowledge on the subject. JNW (talk) 06:13, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm going to join the discussion to try to calm things down. I request 48 hours or so. ZooFari 07:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Hasn't calmed. You know how folks get about cultural identity. Re-requesting. JNW (talk) 15:35, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

• Can someone please semi-protect the page and ban the obnoxious IP for a few days? --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 16:04, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Clear evidence of an ongoing edit war. I have not blocked anyone, as it's time for me to go to bed, but feel free to bring that topic up elsewhere. Dekimasuよ! 16:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Sarah Geronimo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, Anon editors keep on inserting unsourced/POV/vandalised statements. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 20:35, 18 June 2009 (UTC)