Jump to content

User talk:Chzz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rlm2010 (talk | contribs) at 17:29, 1 May 2010 (→‎thanks!: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Where has my message gone?
My talkpage is very active, so please check the archives.
Put your user name or article name into this box, and 'search'-----→
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35

Undid Changes

Hello Chzz, There were some changes to page Adi shankara which clearly looks like done with ill-intention or if you call it Vandalism. Check this [[32]]. I undid the changes, please have a look and take further action if any. --Ashok Prabhu (Talk) 08:10, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think what you did is OK, but I have a few comments;
  • Be careful of saying that something is 'vandalism' if it is not obviously so; I do not know the topic area, so I don't know if changing "Shankara" to "Brastacharya" / "Fraudacharya" is vandalism per se - if it is, then forgive my ignorance. If it is questionably a 'content dispute', then consider instead warning for "introducing deliberate factual errors", or "addition of unsourced or improperly cited material" - see below.
  • When 'warning' users, it helps to use the standard templates - these are detailed in WP:WARN.
  • Issuing warnings is greatly simplified if you enable twinkle in your user preferences/gadgets.
Best,  Chzz  ►  11:18, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestions. To explain you on words used, "Brastacharya" in a weired way of saying 'Corrupt Master' (A mix of Indian Langauage) and "Fraudacharya" is nothing but meaning 'Fraudulent' (Again mix of Fraud + Acharya (Learned). - These are not the words to be used for a great monk like Adi Shankarachaya. Any-one who has little knowledge on Indian Philosophy or Adi shankara may testify it. So I am saying it indeed a Vandalism. Cheers --Ashok Prabhu (Talk) 03:04, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Epic One Media

Hi Chzz,

This message was for Closedmouth but so far he did not respond to our message. We saw that you edited the message to remove the email address, so we thought you might help us with this topic. Here is our original message; "Dear editor,

This is to be read by anyone who has approval or is capable of accepting this request for a listing of a wikipedia page.

We are Epic One Media and run a Men's Luxury lifestyle magazine called Affluent Page. For unknown circumstances our page was deleted. We are trying to comply with the rules in accordance of being a viable listing in the Wiki data base and would appreciate a guideline to solidify this request. To expedite the claim whatever you need changed will be completed immediately following your response. I appreciate your help in this urgent matter.


Tristan Michael

email-address Senior Vice President Affluent Page"

thanks --Timonur (talk) 20:20, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there.
The Affluent Page Magazine was deleted as "Unambiguous advertising or promotion" (Wikipedia:CSD#G11). It contained, for example, a high quality, full-color glossy, featuring insightful editorial about a myriad of luxury topics - I hope you can appreciate that this is not a neutral point-of-view.
Our policies strongly recommend that companies do not write about themselves, for very good reasons. Please read the business FAQ. I also suggest you read this recent article. As it says, "would you expect to be able to advertise/promote clients in the Encyclopedia Britannica?"
If the organization meets our guidelines, then eventually someone else will write about it. You may also wish to place a request in requested articles.
Please help us to edit other articles instead. Wikipedia is not for advertising. Best,  Chzz  ►  02:35, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NoobQ

So when us noobs create a ton of minor edits that have to real utility other than to show the initial build of the page, is there a mechanism for removing them from the database to make space for more important content?Svanslyck (talk) 00:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not a problem - Don't worry about performance. Wikis depend on keeping a record of all edits, no matter how unimportant.
Right now, we have 61,018,164 pages, 1,229,661,131 edits. If you refresh this page, those numbers will have changed.
I have just taken the liberty of creating your user page, User:Svanslyck, with links to some non-existent userspace areas. You can click on those red links and make those pages to test things out, or work on a draft article. You can, of course, edit the page and add more links, or whatever you wish. You can get to that page any time by clicking your user name at the top of all Wikipedia pages (when logged in).
If you need help with anything at all, give me a shout. Best,  Chzz  ►  00:52, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From At-par

Thanks for your suggestions. Will do them at another time - Meanwhile someone may edit it.. I am aware of your suggestions, the bottomline is time. Do not feel offended if I blankout my pages - it's my style. This is just a hobby when time prevails. I do not get offended if soemone deletes my pages or writes nasty/good things. I read them weth good spirit and erase. Thanks.--ukioe (talk) 14:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, no problem; just trying to help. The links etc. are, of course, in the page history. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  14:08, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks!

thanks so much for all your help! i saw that the page had been updated, but didn't know whom to thank or how to do it :)