User talk:Serial Number 54129

Archives

No archives yet.

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Thank you for defending me at WP:ANI against User:WordSeventeen. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

You were right.

and I was wrong. I think you may know what I'm talking about. You were absolutely correct in your assumptions. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 02:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Cheers User:78.26. Wasn't sure what you were referring to, as haven't edited for a couple of days, but think I've just found what you mean. Connected to a recent AN/I report, perchance? Thanks for your message in any case. Have a good (remainder of a ) weekend! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

You are as right now as you were then! . 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Remember the expression, even a stopped clocked is right twice a day! Guess that must be me: appreciate your message mate _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Judo do

Hello Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Judo do, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a test page. Although the author is going about things the wrong way, and currently seems to have thrown his toys out of the pram, there is a possible subject here and he should be given the chance to develop it if he can. The earlier "hoax" deletions were because of claims that it was an Olympic sport, but this seems to be a real, though doubtfully notable, variant of Judo. JohnCD (talk) 21:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Ed course pages

Hi there! I saw that you marked Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/North Dakota State University/PSYC 480 History and Systems of Psychology (Fall, 2015) for speedy deletion. I've undone this. That page is the on-wiki version of a course page for a course participating in Wiki Education Foundation's Classroom Program. Student editors in these classes are aware that their usernames and wiki activities are public, and we ask instructors to discuss with their students ahead of time the implication of choosing an identifiable or anonymous username. Thanks for looking out for malicious outing, though... it's definitely a problem in other contexts!--Sage (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:03, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Beaumont, 1st Viscount Beaumont, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lancastrian and Stand-off (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TeaLover1996

Sometimes when you look at a case that has been archived but there's no archive link, it's because of the Wikipedia software. All you have to do is use the purge link in your interface if you have one, or use the key combination that does the same thing in your browser. At that point, the link should just pop in and it will look normal. If it doesn't, don't manually edit the page. Instead, let an SPI clerk know of the problem. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Cheers User:Bbb23, I thought I was going mad! I'm sure it wasn't there when I posted that, and yet when I looked back through the history it was there all along! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Inappropriate comments

Could you please stop the unhelpful, inappropriate comments on Talk pages, SPI and the such; especially related to TeaLover1996. I have reverted many of your edits now and it's becoming disruptive. JMHamo (talk) 17:15, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Please desist from refactoring other users' edits. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:34, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Specifically stuff like - [1] JMHamo (talk) 17:39, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Did you get it? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 18:06, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Karanvir Bohra's Signature.png

Hi, I just wanted to notify you I declined deletion of File:Karanvir Bohra's Signature.png. Signatures do not necessarily generate copyright, see WP:SLP, so this is not clear enough of a case for speedy deletion. You may want to take to WP:FFD for discussion though. Regards, Jujutacular (talk) 17:29, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Jujutacular; it got trashed all the same, 06:19 this morning under G12. Ciao! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:47, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Fortuna! Jujutacular (talk) 17:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

I thought it was funny though, because by then it had no tag on it- and hadn't for many hours! Know what I mean? Cheers Jujutacular _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

It was actually re-tagged by another user :) Jujutacular (talk) 17:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Right, thanks!_Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Henry VI of England may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• became completely unresponsive to everything that was going on around him for more than a year. (Henry may have been suffering from a form of [[schizophrenia]], according to modern authorities, as

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 Done

Hello, I noticed that you deleted my edit. It is just that the ref that is on Hillsborough's article is not only undated, It is also no longer on Sheffield City Councli's Website. Croydon173314 (talk) 15:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

karan singh grover

can u please have a look at this page? digvijay and another editor is vandalising this page by continuing to remove valuable informationHollywoodbollywood22 (talk) 14:56, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

You will soon be reported to WP:3RR actually :) _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:58, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

this is ridiculous, why different rules for different pages? please have a look at how much well sourced and important information was removed on karan singh grover page and was called trivial why different rules for this page??Hollywoodbollywood22 (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

If you wish to dispute the content, fine- do so on the talk page in consensus with other editors. You are currently involved in an edit-war, and even if you think you are in the right, that is not how things are done around here! Cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

please have a look at the page I have mentioned, and see how the user digvijay has removed loads of well sourced information and has violated the page? and then conveniently is calling me a vandaliser for kvb's page? it is a requestHollywoodbollywood22 (talk) 15:09, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Princess Johanna of Hesse and by Rhine

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Could you give Princess Johanna of Hesse and by Rhine a look over and add it to your watchlist? Paul Austin (talk) 15:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Paul, have done so; the article looks OK to me, or am I blindly missing something? -not an impossibility by any means! I will say that the '"Family curse" section seems not particularly relevant to her personally, but I wouldn't insist. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi}

My concern is, that as a number of Wikipedians have pointed out, Germany legally abolished royal and noble titles and styles in 1919, the Grand Duchy of Hesse ceased to exist in 1918 and i doubt that the Hesse-Damstadt family would have provoked the known anti-monarchical Hitler by giving her an overt royal title. Paul Austin (talk) 16:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Good point. It's out of my period I'm afraid but it is rather obvious now you come to mention it. So it should be moved to simply Johanna of Hesse and by Rhine then? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

I think it should. Feel free to move or edit or change. She was never a Princess of Hesse and by Rhine. This is a relic of monarchist fanboys editing Wikipedia. She was never Princess Johanna. Paul Austin (talk) 16:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Paul- that's done. I guess the monarchists will go mad, if there's any still around. Does this affect any other articles do you know? -I'd expect so, but wouldn't know where to start! Anyone alive after 1919??? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: from what i've seen, a lot of living German and Austrian members of former royal, grand ducal and princely families have Wikipedia articles calling them by titles which ceased to exist after WWI. Again, monarchists at work. Both Germany and Austria have not had royal and noble titles since c. 1919. Paul Austin (talk) 16:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Princess Johanna of Hesse and by Rhine

I undid the page move as the reasoning behind it is a clear violation of Wikipedia's policy for no original research: regardless of whether she was legally entitled to it or not, she did use the title of "Princess" and it is definitely part of her common name. German (non-)royals are even still using it today.Cebr1979 (talk) 18:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

You do not know what you are talking about. What they self-identify as is irrelevant. Cheers! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

No, it's not. Please review.Cebr1979 (talk) 19:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

This is to be discussed on the article's talk page, not here. Goodbye. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Reply to trolling

Sorry... do you think you can 'ban' people from your talk and carry on posting on others? Grow up. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 06:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Trolling this TP

Excellent work. We may have to nuke it from orbit though. Have a biscuit. -Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 15:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

lolz etc _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 08:05, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

I knew I knew you from somewhere. I've had so much fun with Jeremy today, while making a point I believe is right, but I'll stop now. -Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 23:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

thank you

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Thank you for being here for me. I've been given an off-wiki tongue lashing and been told I have to give Johanna the title of "Princess" and style of Her Grand Ducal Highness, neither of which she legally held, especially when you take into account the famously anti-Second Reich Hitler regime. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 11:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Well I think you're fighting the good fight Paul. Not that it should be a fight at all, but these monarchist-types are blinkered beyond recovery. They all want to live in the Middle Ages eh; I had one of them pissing over my TP the other day too. Anyway I personally suggests that whatever happens off-Wiki stays off wiki; they should sling it. Keep up the good work. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your reversion on WP:ANI

I removed that on purpose. A sinebot of my signature isn't necessary for the edit that marked the discussion as resolved. I think you just reverted it by mistake (no big deal, it happens); I just wanted to give you a heads up and let you know :-) ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:50, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

No worries User:Oshwah, just in case archive bot has problem without a time stamp. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism

Sorry for the things I've done in Colin Baker page. My purpose wasn't vandalism. I do translates from English to Turkish in trwiki, you can check this page. You can see my working pages like this in this my page. I've done nearly 45 translate and another ones are coming too. I was working on the Doctors' companions in the TV-series Doctor Who and I'm using my phone, not computer. Because of some reasons I don't know, my change in trwiki page suddenly became in enwiki page. I didn't want to do anything like vandalism. Have a nice day. Lmattdavidsmithl (talk) Lmattdavidsmithl (talk) 11:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jawad Botmeh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestinian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

¿Why?

Sorry, ¿why you deleted my message?.... it was incoherent.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ulof4 (talk • contribs)

Yes. That was why. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Karanvir Bohra

an edit war is going on that page, I was wondering if you could resolve it? the user digvijay seems biased towards the page, he/she has removed information from pages of his contemporaries but gets upset when the same is happened to this page! Don 05:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turehnde (talk • contribs)

:...reply to User: Turehnde.

Ha! Maybe need to put a File:Anti.svg over that. DMacks (talk) 15:31, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Right! Yes in matters of socks, precision is probably required! How do I use the .svg file, DMacks? Cheers _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

I uploaded it as File:No socks.png. Works equally well for the WP context and those who are barefoot. DMacks (talk) 16:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks! I was well proud of myself too, getting it centred, new text and all! Live and learn eh Cheers _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

So reverting

My changes to omallur were restructuring.... You accidentally reverted everything Blisspop 13:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rortosthanos (talk • contribs)

Not accidentally, I assure you. PLease provide reliable sources for any material you add. And please remember to sign your bloody comments. Cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't see why you can't respond in a polite way. Blisspop 15:59, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

What do you find impolite? And who the hell is Bisspop? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Once again-the word 'bloody' doesn't need to be used and blisspop is my hat for all it matters to you Blisspop 17:46, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Well; if you used ~~~~ to sign your sodding posts, I wouldn't have to ask. Cheers! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Comment

Every so often I see you post an inscrutable comment. What is this supposed to mean? HighInBC ^{(was Chillum)} 15:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

HighInBC ...just sometimes better than confrontation. In that particular case, I wondered how the editor would respond. I'm not pro extremes of religion myself (or, realistically, religion at all); but if you look at some of his Userboxes, you might see what I mean. Examples: "This user is totally anti islam," "This user thinks psychopaths only use religion as pretext in order to fight," and "This user is for Race purity but is not racist," all seem unnecessarilly provocative and not sitting easilly within the framework of assuming good faith. Thanks for message: inscrutable = under-used word of the week! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:50, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Your comment makes a lot more sense now. Thanks for explaining. HighInBC ^{(was Chillum)} 16:02, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Cheers! In your professional opinion do you think they're suitable? (Re. perhaps a future WP:UfD?) _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

No I don't think they are suitable. A deletion discussion may be productive, though perhaps just asking them to take them down fist may be enough. HighInBC ^{(was Chillum)} 16:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Right, will do. Thanks! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:12, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

@HighInBC:, I attempted to raise the issue of the userboxes twice (here and here- both messages delated (as vandalism), a message banning me from his talk (so end of discussion, such as it was), and even an attempt to take me to AN/I (although only an attempt). So... how does one initiate an MfD for other editors' UBs? Can't find a straight forward guide to nominating a private userbox?

Cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't think this is a new user. I suspect that ANI may just handle this as a behavioural problem rather than a content issue. HighInBC ^{(was Chillum)} 14:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice Chillum... on a lighter note, when I saw you post under the modern moniker I thought you were a (new) user to liked get high in BC... _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

I've always thought Chillum was a toker.-Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 16:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Around here, it would probably count as medicinal usage! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:11, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
14		Percy–Neville feud (talk)						Add sources
34		John Neville, 1st Marquess of Montagu (talk)						Add sources
11		Paul Murray Kendall (talk)						Add sources
29		Louis, Prince of Hesse and by Rhine (talk)						Add sources
1,442		Francisco Franco (talk)						Add sources
46		Henry Percy, 2nd Earl of Northumberland (talk)						Add sources
392		2014–15 India–Pakistan border skirmishes (talk)						Cleanup
15		Phineas Banning High School (talk)						Cleanup
51		NYC Ghosts & Flowers (talk)						Cleanup
91		Peace Companies (talk)						Expand
55		Dual monarchy of England and France (talk)						Expand
426		Dublin Airport (talk)						Expand
372		Economy of North Korea (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,213		Triskaidekaphobia (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
33		Famous Brands (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
424		Military activity of ISIL (talk)						Merge
40		Ein Karem (talk)						Merge
28		Maternal influence on sex determination (talk)						Merge
21		Catholic sexual abuse cases in Europe (talk)						Wikify
315		History of Palestine (talk)						Wikify
249		Al-Biruni (talk)						Wikify
2		Przegląd Tomistyczny (talk)						Orphan
3		Periyaoor (talk)						Orphan
2		Ayyapuram (talk)						Orphan
14		Anne de Beauchamp, 15th Countess of Warwick (talk)						Stub
24		Michael Hicks (talk)						Stub
5		G. L. Harriss (talk)						Stub
8		A. J. Pollard (talk)						Stub
2		Thalikkunu Shiva Temple (talk)						Stub
7		Charles Ross (historian) (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:22, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Friendly Notice.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Signed,

NotAlpArslan (talk) 08:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC).

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please stop posting in my user page

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Please to stop writing in user page, amically,
thank you
signed
NotAlpArslan (talk) 10:56, 22 September 2015 (UTC).

For the record, Fortuna has never posted on your User page. You must stop your silly behaviour or face banning from the project imho. Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 11:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: your repeating baiting of this user is not constructive. Please stay away from them and their talk page, okay? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Please note that user is now blocked / UP blanked / and the cretinious ANI report dismissed with a boomerang. Thank goodness I didn't take your advice. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

User:MSGJ, no disrespect, but I advise you to keep well out of this. Defending this editor will not cover you with glory. It is not 'baiting' (whatever that is, outside of a playground). You would of course know that if you looked just slightly deeper into the situtation. Sorry to be robust, but I find your unfounded remarks extremely offensive. Thanks. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 12:57, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Agree with Fortuna totally. Look at the history, there isn't much. -Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 13:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

• Note

1. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive899#User_by_the_name_of_ProKro_using_an_untolerable_language
2. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive899#Clear_vandalism_by_Kintetsubuffalo

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Howvto use

Wiki Rehan Qasim Kumbher (talk) 13:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Not vandalism

Hi there Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. Thanks for your work patrolling. Please don't use the vandalism template for edits that are not vandalism, like you did here. There's a specific template for advert edits: {{Uw-advert1}}, and it's offered by Twinkle. If you're not finding what you need on the Twinkle selections, there's more options available at Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. -- Diannaa (talk) 01:20, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

do wot That character whose username you suggested showed a CoI has already changed it once already. Fucking classic: Being discussed with the user. I hope!!! All the best, cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 10:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

What happens to these is they go in the holding pen and get checked again in a week or two to see what they are up to. The vast majority (over 99 per cent) cease editing when they are made aware of the policy. Any who persist get blocked. I wish the folks doing the renaming would be a little more careful and make sure the new username does not also violate policy. Alas -- Diannaa (talk) 13:41, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Indeed Diannaa. Thanks too for pointing out that error and also for direction to that template page, very useful! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:49, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Username

I have to compliment you on the most awesome username I've come across at Wikipedia. My hat's off to you! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Dan. It makes me look cultured... but really I just used to like the Old Spice advert. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 12:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Terry Hurlock

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Piss off, cretin. 77.130.195.17 (talk) 18:00, 23 September 2015 (UTC) You're very quick with the templates. How about some original thought? Can you explain what were the "bizarre unsourced alterations" that you think we are edit-warring about? 77.130.195.17 (talk) 18:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Are you unable to answer my question?77.130.195.17 (talk) 18:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irish general election, 1977, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish general election (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

 Done cheers _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: Henry Percy (Hotspur)

Hi - looks like you are very quick off the mark! You undid some of my work while I was still adding information, and then you undid some more of it while I was hunting down a reliable reference. A bit more patience would have saved us both a bit of time and effort. I've added three reliable sources to the Tottenham link now - they're everywhere, and it would have been far easier to check that rather than risking an edit war. I can add more if you like. Next time, waiting more than a handful of minutes before reverting would be advisable, and refraining from shouting would be nice. PS - did you really think that someone could confuse the Tottenham Marshes and Welsh Marches? Grutness...wha? 00:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Well; at least you learnt, Grutness... shame it took multiple reversions for you to do so. Ciao. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 08:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Miss Nobody (American murder victim)

Can you take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Miss Nobody (American murder victim) ? Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 14:38, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Mundi how do you do?

Just wanted to say hi! Hope u are keeping well and like a bell.

Take a look at this poem!!!!!

The Owl and the Pussy-cat went to sea In a beautiful pea green boat, They took some honey, and plenty of money, Wrapped up in a five pound note. The Owl looked up to the stars above, And sang to a small guitar, 'O lovely Pussy! O Pussy my love, What a beautiful Pussy you are, You are, You are! What a beautiful Pussy you are!'

Pussy said to the Owl, 'You elegant fowl! How charmingly sweet you sing! O let us be married! too long we have tarried: But what shall we do for a ring?' They sailed away, for a year and a day, To the land where the Bong-tree grows And there in a wood a Piggy-wig stood With a ring at the end of his nose, His nose, His nose, With a ring at the end of his nose.

'Dear pig, are you willing to sell for one shilling Your ring?' Said the Piggy, 'I will.' So they took it away, and were married next day By the Turkey who lives on the hill. They dined on mince, and slices of quince, Which they ate with a runcible spoon; And hand in hand, on the edge of the sand, They danced by the light of the moon, The moon, The moon, They danced by the light of the moon. Blisspop (talk) 17:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
68		Ralph Neville, 1st Earl of Westmorland (talk)						Add sources
56		Dead Realm (talk)						Add sources
314		House of York (talk)						Add sources
3,632		2015 Ankara bombings (talk)						Add sources
51		Henry Beaufort, 3rd Duke of Somerset (talk)						Add sources
20		Ralph Neville, 1st Baron Neville de Raby (talk)						Add sources
221		United States bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade (talk)						Cleanup
60		National Governors Association (talk)						Cleanup
117		Ashworth Hospital (talk)						Cleanup
2,337		Coffee (talk)						Expand
2		The International Library of Psychology, Philosophy and Scientific Method (talk)						Expand
112		Louis IV, Grand Duke of Hesse (talk)						Expand
1,800		Hindi (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
121		Dominant minority (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
943		Human overpopulation (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
135		National Defence Forces (Syria) (talk)						Merge
116		AMIA bombing (talk)						Merge
567		Scottsboro Boys (talk)						Merge
0		Rajendra Prasad Singh (talk)						Wikify
11		Will Christopher Baer (talk)						Wikify
13		Camden New Journal (talk)						Wikify
1		Together for Trees (talk)						Orphan
0		Visions of Order (talk)						Orphan
2		Euro-Sinica (talk)						Orphan
30		Jack Davis (actor) (talk)						Stub
5		Job Getcha (talk)						Stub
28		Hilal-i-Imtiaz (talk)						Stub
1		Pig Point (talk)						Stub
9		Inter Leipzig (talk)						Stub
20		Pakistani poetry (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
14		House of Beaumont (talk)						Add sources
13		Dominic Mancini (talk)						Add sources
113		Touching Spirit Bear (talk)						Add sources
178		George Plantagenet, 1st Duke of Clarence (talk)						Add sources
85,809		November 2015 Paris attacks (talk)						Add sources
100		Anglo-Irish Agreement (talk)						Add sources
40		Xenogenesis (film) (talk)						Cleanup
56		Timeline of the 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict (talk)						Cleanup
661		History of McDonald's (talk)						Cleanup
56		New Mexican Spanish (talk)						Expand
1		IDF outpost bombing attack (December 2004) (talk)						Expand
8		Mental Health Review Tribunal (England and Wales) (talk)						Expand
17		Gaba Corporation (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
181		International availability of McDonald's products (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
127		Asiya Andrabi (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
13		Philosophical Gourmet Report (talk)						Merge
226		Ideology of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (talk)						Merge
73		Kumhar (talk)						Merge
4		PrepStar College Recruiting (talk)						Wikify
13		North Carolina Mutual Life Insurance Company (talk)						Wikify
434		Machete (talk)						Wikify
2		Juan Rafael Allende (talk)						Orphan
0		Khizr-i-Rah (talk)						Orphan
1		Issa Batran (talk)						Orphan
27		Ralph Neville, 2nd Baron Neville de Raby (talk)						Stub
9		International Socialism (magazine) (talk)						Stub
18		Kentucky Thunder (talk)						Stub
9		Valerie Anand (talk)						Stub
15		Croyland Chronicle (talk)						Stub
10		Act of Accord (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 16:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi!

Happy New Year!

Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 23:46, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi!

(Charles R. Knight, 1922)

Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, I wish you and those dear to you golden days of love and joy in a Happy New Year 2016! Best regards, Sam Sailor Talk! 03:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC) Pass on! Send this greeting by adding {{subst:User:Sam Sailor/Templates/HappyNewYear}} to user talk pages. Automatic level-2 heading and auto-signing included.

(Unknown artist, Norway, 1916)

Happy New Year, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi

Peppy Paneer (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! Welcome the 2016. Wishing you a happy and fruitful 2016 with good health and your wishes come true! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2016 go well for you.

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:User:Pratyya Ghosh/Happy New Year}} to their talk page with a Happy New Year message.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
9		Jim Keats (talk)						Add sources
37		Believe Me, if All Those Endearing Young Charms (talk)						Add sources
1,321		University of Cambridge (talk)						Add sources
119		Rise Records (talk)						Add sources
8		Gandhi Foundation (talk)						Add sources
4		Episode 1 (Ashes to Ashes series 1) (talk)						Add sources
24		Crooked Timber (talk)						Cleanup
54		Thodupuzha (talk)						Cleanup
1,920		Terrorism (talk)						Cleanup
10		Benoît Régent (talk)						Expand
32		The Phenomenon of Man (talk)						Expand
11		Louis II, Landgrave of Lower Hesse (talk)						Expand
7,471		Israel (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
2,356		Al-Qaeda (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
557		Pope Pius XII (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
684		Genovese crime family (talk)						Merge
69		Eternity of the world (talk)						Merge
1,125		Muhammad Iqbal (talk)						Merge
257		Mötley Crüe Final Tour (talk)						Wikify
29		Kashmiri literature (talk)						Wikify
44		Tewkesbury Abbey (talk)						Wikify
3		Journal of Asthma & Allergy Educators (talk)						Orphan
280		Military equipment of ISIL (talk)						Orphan
1		Andrei Stelmakh (talk)						Orphan
44		Cpplint (talk)						Stub
2		Michael Hicks (historian) (talk)						Stub
2		Kudappanakunnu (talk)						Stub
100		Mustache Pete (talk)						Stub
15		Princess Elisabeth of Prussia (talk)						Stub
5		The Case Against the Fed (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:28, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello!

I am not trying to get myself banned from on Wikipedia's articles, but I have to ask: How am I vandalizing the 2016 Istanbul bombing, if the infobox incorrectly states it occurred in 2014? Thanks, and have a good day! --PootisHeavy (talk) 18:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Note: I just saw the mistake corrected. Thanks!

@User talk:PootisHeavy... sorry about that _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 18:53, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Name

Have to congratulate you on your clever choice of name. ~ P-123 (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Whether it is an appropriate name I cannot comment! ~ P-123 (talk) 16:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, thank you! Not particularly at the moment, but I'm hoping it will tempt fate cheers _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:48, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

~ P-123 (talk) 16:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits

Hi there.

I'm a little confused over a couple of your recent edits - Talk:Masturbation and Club International[2] seem to be somewhat out of line? Chaheel Riens (talk) 21:50, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

HI

Hello, I don't see how is that important for Belarus as a country. It looks to me as just another western agenda. Wikipedia has to be independent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlisterZarkovic (talk • contribs) 17:34, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Malformed electioneering not relevant to Belarussians? Interesting, if bizarre, perspective. Could you also please sign your posts with ~~~~. I enk yow. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

I just don't think it has to be one of the first things to see on that page. At least it should be moved from top. Just trying to be neutral. Thanks User talk:AlisterZarkovic —Preceding undated comment added 17:51, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Reversing Edits

I was adding links to Thomas Percy, 1st Baron Egremont. How is that an unnecessary alteration? Furthermore, how was consensus established when it hasn't been discussed?Chchn (talk) 20:40, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

thanks to God.is not thanks God

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

I just to be thankful，thanks to God.mayby “thanks God haha”is wrong mind，so I change，please forgive me，and Fortuna（you） misunderstand my mind.say “...not for very long, perhaps...”so please delete，I cant delete.

Qed237  said“Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Qed237, you may be blocked from editing.” Qed237  said

so please you delete“...not for very long, perhaps...” you misunderstand my mind.mayby “thanks God haha”let you think I am a bad men?haha,it is really mistake.I am happy,Because the thing is over.I have depression you know.I was very friendly, just afraid of injury,and afraid of injury anybody you and me......I am happy very happy everyone is ok!I think you are the same to me,right? thanks to God. Adsafe (talk) 15:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Qed237 is very very very afraid to delete your edit,alas...

I am very happy to get your help but.......they are free，right？I think you can know what I say.you will be the best wiki men always（come on!）.Adsafe (talk) 16:30, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

and I am sorry to modify it always.I am a depressed patient.I am afraid of injury you， so I must do my best and perfect letter to you.and because this my edit always again and again.so sorry please fogive me. Adsafe (talk) 16:46, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

UPDATE: Sock now [3] Blocked by User:Huon _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"My" threats are not cretinous

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

They have plenty of io, dean

Badoom, tish! 92.54.161.242 (talk) 19:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

But no-one gives a fuck. As you have had somewhat succintly demonstrated before you. Ciao _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:17, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

What the hell man?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

[4] Fine I won't help you guys out if you don't care...even so, was there really any need to be so rude? 78.40.158.50 (talk) 07:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

I refer you to the remarks I made to you above. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 07:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

You emailed it yet? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=next&oldid=699265359

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Try to be a bit more serious, thanks

Look, could I recommend you pleaee start acting a bit like a serious user? Suggesting others to mail their colon is not particularly serious, nor is suggesting that anyone who reported your disruptive buddy be banned just because, well, because you want them to be banned. It becomes especially ridiculous when you want to ban users for a month just for having posted in an ANI discussion where you yourself has posted more frequently than some of them. Jeppiz (talk) 15:39, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

If you have investigated your case against FLCC and presented it as thoroughly as you presented that one, you'd be begging for an award of punishment :D you've randomly found a diff without having a clue about context. A word of advice: that way ^ the boomerangs fly :D ciao _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:41, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Actually there is plenty of context. You have a very long pattern of dropping in silly comments in situations where they are not helpful and this is but one example out of many. I echo what Jeppiz says and ask you to stop making silly little comments everywhere, they add heat to situations without adding anything useful. I assure you that any boomerang will fly in an oddly straight direction in this situation. HighInBC 16:44, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Actually I'd like to know why that AN/I remark was out of place? I was deadly serious in my response to FLCC's offer. And am certainly not the one tying up thousands of bytes on that page :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (talk • contribs) 16:46, 18 January 2016‎

Obviously none then. Cheers! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Hi, thanks for your overall maintenance work on Wikipedia. I really appreciate work you do on various admin boards. We need more editors like you to keep Wikipedia clean. Thanks. -- Human3015 It will rain  18:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your note Regarding assuming good faith

Since you seem to have appointed yourself my better [5], kindly explain to me where I went wrong in eventually assuming bad faith in Qed237 (talk · contribs), who is someone who repeatedly edit warred with me, without any explanation of what they were doing or why, and whose only interaction with me was an increasing level of warnings and threats? I explained my actions at every stage, I opened discussions, I did everything asked of me, and the end result, as you can see, is that none of my changes to the article have actually happened - even though most of them appear to be entirely uncontroversial, and not even Qed237 objects to them being done. He made a series of completely unjustified reverts, just because he objected to one small part of my changes. If I am not allowed to assume bad faith in those circumstances, might you permit me to assume he is simply incompetent? Now, with that said, I'm off to make those edits yet again, and finally, someone will have actually improved Wikipedia by turning a shit article into a less shit one. Rabono26 (talk) 19:39, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Do as I say and not as I do? Cassianto^Talk 22:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Rather hypocritical I think: since it was a direct response to you. However, more importantly, since you "banned" me from your TP, what exactly do you think gives you the right to troll mine? The answer, if you're unaware, is none. Ciao! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

That seemed a satisfactory response! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.39.212.59 (talk) 15:36, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
15		George Neville, 1st Baron Latimer (talk)						Add sources
30		Battle of Ludford Bridge (talk)						Add sources
89		Stubby Kaye (talk)						Add sources
15		Battle of Ferrybridge (talk)						Add sources
25		Paula Gunn Allen (talk)						Add sources
10		Fair License (talk)						Add sources
321		Shabu-shabu (talk)						Cleanup
745		Islam in India (talk)						Cleanup
18		History of the English fiscal system (talk)						Cleanup
19		Names of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (talk)						Expand
104		Willem Holleeder (talk)						Expand
164		Waste container (talk)						Expand
279		Toastmasters International (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
93		Stop the War Coalition (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
471		Irish Mob (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
7		History (journal) (talk)						Merge
268		ISIL territorial claims (talk)						Merge
16		Sailfish Alliance (talk)						Merge
344		Judge Turpin (talk)						Wikify
195		Timeline of ISIL-related events (2015) (talk)						Wikify
2		London Topographical Society (talk)						Wikify
2		Z. G. Muhammad (talk)						Orphan
8		Ingrid Vanderveldt (talk)						Orphan
7		Linkem (talk)						Orphan
25		Winter (Tori Amos song) (talk)						Stub
11		Stephen Mulhall (talk)						Stub
59		Bernard Haykel (talk)						Stub
5		Eleanor Neville, Countess of Northumberland (talk)						Stub
93		Jean-Hugues Anglade (talk)						Stub
228		Rise of the Footsoldier (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
		Henry Percy, 2nd Earl of Northumberland (talk)						Add sources
		Louis, Prince of Hesse and by Rhine (talk)						Add sources
		Pakistan (talk)						Add sources
		Percy–Neville feud (talk)						Add sources
		Syrian–Turkish border clashes during the Syrian Civil War (talk)						Add sources
		Arthur (TV series) (talk)						Add sources
		Timeline of ISIL-related events (2014) (talk)						Cleanup
		Southampton (talk)						Cleanup
		Syringe Tide (talk)						Cleanup
		University of Saskatchewan (talk)						Expand
		Istanbul (talk)						Expand
		Islamic terrorism (talk)						Expand
		Three Colors: White (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		All Parties Hurriyat Conference (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Abdel Bari Atwan (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Involuntary action (talk)						Merge
		September 11 attacks (talk)						Merge
		Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War (talk)						Merge
		Urdu literature (talk)						Wikify
		Bowers' operators (talk)						Wikify
		Socialist Workers Party (United States) (talk)						Wikify
		Alencar Guimarães (talk)						Orphan
		Abla Khairy (talk)						Orphan
		Artiphanes (talk)						Orphan
		Anne de Beauchamp, 15th Countess of Warwick (talk)						Stub
		Raini Rodriguez (talk)						Stub
		Essex Boys (talk)						Stub
		Holly Carpenter (talk)						Stub
		A. J. Pollard (talk)						Stub
		Rajesh Mirchandani (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:24, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Starring

Hello, there's currently a discussion here and I need your opinion on it. This is related to that Titanic discussion you were in a few months ago. Thanks. -- Wrath X (talk) 03:30, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

New Buckenham

Hello (2). I have now found some material on my talk page that I think is some references that you were referring to, which I can see you have provided in good faith, but what you have sent relates to Old Buckenham which is a neighbouring parish, and aspects of the history of New Buckenham that are unrelated to the material I am trying to post. please don't be offended but could I ask if you have read the material I tried to post, in the revised and sourced/ referenced version?... are you an official editor - how does this work ? thanks Observer900 (talk) 15:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your message, if it is from you, you have said you have provided a wealth of information, can you please let me know where you have put it, how will I receive what you have sent ? I am trying to be collegiate by trying to 'talk' with the person who keeps deleting my input but they do not reply ? Observer900 (talk) 14:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, can you please explain why you have deleted my edit on this page, the material I have shown has sources and referencing displayed. are you an official editor, could you please explain ??, thanks.... Observer900 (talk) 14:40, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Observer900: I have already replied to you at User talk:Charlesdrakew. Although this discussion should be taking place on your own talk page, not others'! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

you have deleted an edit, please explain what you mean in your comment ?, I suspect you don't know this place, my sources are accurate, the wording is factually correct, could you please explain why you completely deleted what I carefully entered ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Observer900 (talk • contribs) 12:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

If you continue to make edits without providing reliable, secondary independant sources, then they will be continuously reverted. You have been told this now multiple times by different editors; and I for one am heartilly sick of having the same discussion over and over. Since you seem incapable of listening to or taking advice, I see no profit to either of us in continuing this converstaion. I consider this topic closed. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

3RR warnings

Hi - before you report someone to AN3, please be sure to give them a 3RR warning using {{uw-3rr}}. The user you reported is new, and I can't block him for 3RR when he only got a level 3 unsourced content warning. It's not the same, and we can't assume the newbies know that we have a 3RR policy. I've warned him appropriately now, so if he reverts after this he has no excuse. I didn't say this in my close, but both edit-warring editors should have been warned and reported, not just the new one. Thanks for the report, and let us know if it continues. :-) Katie^talk 18:54, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Check _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 22:19, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Trolling from User:Shivam8540

So you deleted the full edit without a second thought. Cool, you might be a real idiot.

I'll make changes more appropriately this time.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shivam8540 (talk • contribs)

Email

I'm not sure what you want me to do. Is there something I can help with? — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:07, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Well, the editor has been blocked now. But I thought you might like to revert our discussion as a) it wasn't very friendly, and b) not very pleasant for him to return to when he was helpless to do anything about it. Cheers, _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:14, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Need your advice

I am taking very seriously your warning but I need to know something. If a user post something unsourced, can I at least tag the unsourced section? What if the user claims that the edit is sourced but refuses to give any explanation in the Talk page. Is it edit-warring if I keep tagging? Silvio1973 (talk) 10:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

I understand your point. But I honestly have to say that if someone reported you both now, there would probably be a couple of 24-hour blocks handed out! The other editor should be careful too. Any admin going through that history- well, it just shows a couple of editors edit-warring every day, going away; eating; sleeping; waking up; then coming back to do the same thing all over again! Remember, too, that {{cn}} templates etc ''are'' also subject to 3RR. C'mon! This really needs sorting out mate._Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:02, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Well, in this case let's take a rest. At the end of the day it is not worth it. --Silvio1973 (talk) 11:31, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

What happened to this, by the way? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Nothing, the conduct of the user was acknowledged by an administrator as problematic but not enough for treatment at ANI. --Silvio1973 (talk) 11:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

There is still something I do not understand. We have a user (Tuvixer) who kept posting unsourced material and another one (Silvio1973) who cn tagged the unsourced material. Now you might say that both those users were edit-warring. Well, the point is that Tuvixer was questioned by two users [[6]] about the missing sourcing but did not give any explanation. Hence, can we really speak of edit warring? Don't you think that in this case it would be more appropriate to say that one user is pushing unsourced material refusing to explain why? Silvio1973 (talk) 19:32, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

If it was me, I'd consider the previous ANI report prematurely closed. If there is a pushing of an agenda. But maybe WP:NPOVN? That will draw other editors into the discussion; at the moment, it seems that anything will lead to an edit-war! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

There is an RfC going on, let's not mix things. However please note this is a crazy situation. I don't know what to do. I cannot edit the lead because allegedly the object of the modification is not sufficiently developed in the body of the article, but if I try to touch the body of the article Tuvixer removes the material. This is the proof:[[7]] Please mind well that I supported my edit with many sources and I am ready to add more sources and material, if only I was given the possibility to touch the article. There is a clear issue of WP:OWN going on here. Silvio1973 (talk) 19:54, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Silvio, why don't you present the changes you want to make, to the article body, on the Talk page of the article, so everyone can see them and discuss them. It is fair that such changes can be discussed and, that all parties can in the end contribute to the article, not just you. I have suggested this many times before, but always when I do so you ignore my advice. It is really hard to work with a user who ignores what he does not like.

Also on the ANI you can see that another user has accused you for disruptive editing, and he has stated that you do that often. Tnx --Tuvixer (talk) 20:33, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Well, the only disruptive user is you. The proof is that you follow me. I don't follow you. Silvio1973 (talk) 20:53, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Harry Potter children's film list

WP:DENY
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
To back Dcasey98 up, this is an editing notice posted at the top of the page, therefore I'm deleting Harry Potter from the page too: PLEASE NOTE BEFORE ADDING ITEMS TO THIS LIST: Do not add films which carry teen/adult ratings or are marketed to teens/adults. In the case of films which carry a pre-teen rating, such as the MPAA's G rating or the BBFC's PG rating, please note these are only content guidance ratings that indicate suitability for children and in most cases do not indicate whether children are the primary audience Other films with a PG-13, like The Golden Compass, should therefore be removed as well. Bellatrix2017 (talk) 12:53, 16 March 2016 (UTC) You are an edit-warrior and a WP:SOCK. Goodbye. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:58, 16 March 2016 (UTC) To back Dcasey98 up, this is an editing notice posted at the top of the page, therefore I'm deleting Harry Potter from the page too: "PLEASE NOTE BEFORE ADDING ITEMS TO THIS LIST: Do not add films which carry teen/adult ratings or are marketed to teens/adults. In the case of films which carry a pre-teen rating, such as the MPAA's G rating or the BBFC's PG rating, please note these are only content guidance ratings that indicate suitability for children and in most cases do not indicate whether children are the primary audience" Other films with a PG-13, like The Golden Compass, should therefore be removed as well. Bellatrix2017 (talk) 12:58, 16 March 2016 (UTC) Please explain to me what you are doing right by posting films that violet the criteria of being a children's film to this list. They don't qualify. I'm following the rules. You're not. Bellatrix2017 (talk) 12:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC) violate Bellatrix2017 (talk) 12:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC) To back Dcasey98 up, this is an editing notice posted at the top of the page, therefore I'm deleting Harry Potter from the page too. "PLEASE NOTE BEFORE ADDING ITEMS TO THIS LIST: Do not add films which carry teen/adult ratings In the case of films which carry a pre-teen rating, such as the MPAA's G rating or the BBFC's PG rating, please note these are only content guidance ratings that indicate suitability for children and in most cases do not indicate whether children are the primary audience" Other films with a PG-13, like The Golden Compass, should therefore be removed as well. Bellatrix2017 (talk) 14:44, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Why are you deleting relevant information?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

What are you doing and why? I am adding good content and you guys are just deleting it as if you don't want new info in the article!! Please stop deleting info. Instead contribute information or give proper structure to the page but please stop just deleting. Just deleting is not any kind of contribution! — Preceding unsigned comment added by K Sikdar (talk • contribs) 15:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

• Note Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi will now refer K Sikdar to Isambard Kingdom's edit summary. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

What is wrong?

You are behaving like some wiki mafia!! You guys are just deleting new info! Please stop imposing your opinion and check the correctness of info we are adding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by K Sikdar (talk • contribs) 15:51, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

ANEW

I was the reporter, not reported. The actions of others stepping in to revert the edit-warrior made the complaint moot, so I rescinded it.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  23:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

I wasn't making test edits. I changed "Neither the bacchanal that takes place in the third episode nor the explicit romance between Vera and Lombard, which never got physical in the novel", which is an incomplete sentence and does not make a lot of sense, to the grammatically correct "The bacchanal that takes place in the third episode does not happen in the book, nor the explicit romance between Vera and Lombard, who never got physical in the novel." -- Noneofyourbusiness (talk) 05:55, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you :-)

I just wanted to thank you for watching over my talk page while I was away from Wikipedia and for starting the ANI thread. I get these kinds of messages all the time; it's completely normal to me ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:17, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (William Harrington (knight)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating William Harrington (knight), Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi!

Wikipedia editor NearEMPTiness just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for writing the article about Sir Billy as he might have been known to his friends and familiy. Do you find the coat of arms or any other picture that could be added to the article?

To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Your edit on Alstom Metropolis & Shanghai Electric C751C

Hi, can you stop reverting the the page, Alstom Metropolis & Shanghai Electric C751C because it was true that 9 trainsets is good. Don't revert it again. If you revert, we will blocked you from editing as your userpage taken down.