User talk:Serial Number 54129

This editor is a Tutnum and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge.

Two Staffordshire Bull Terriers demonstrating what has been described as 'inherent colliagilty.'

		The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar
		And for helping out in general. Very much appreciated! 2601:188:1:AEA0:EDF4:356E:4D91:F8E4 (talk) 22:08, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your support, lets drink it together. — TOG 14:56, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	For teamwork on discovering a nasty sockpuppet. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 19:31, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Thank you for defending me at WP:ANI against User:WordSeventeen. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	Loving the humour earlier! Because It made me laugh, here is a barnstar! You have a really good sense of humour. Enjoy! Class455fan1 (talk) 15:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

		The Anti-Flame Barnstar
		Heated Conflict Not A Problem For You --VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 09:51, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for creating another article at Wikipedia. Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant 18:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Hi, thanks for your overall maintenance work on Wikipedia. I really appreciate work you do on various admin boards. We need more editors like you to keep Wikipedia clean. Thanks. -- Human3015 It will rain  18:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	:-) Adamstraw99 (talk) 18:28, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your continued diligence and civility -- samtar talk or stalk 14:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

You were right.

and I was wrong. I think you may know what I'm talking about. You were absolutely correct in your assumptions. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 02:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Cheers User:78.26. Wasn't sure what you were referring to, as haven't edited for a couple of days, but think I've just found what you mean. Connected to a recent AN/I report, perchance? Thanks for your message in any case. Have a good (remainder of a ) weekend! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

You are as right now as you were then! . 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Remember the expression, even a stopped clocked is right twice a day! Guess that must be me: appreciate your message mate _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Karanvir Bohra's Signature.png

Hi, I just wanted to notify you I declined deletion of File:Karanvir Bohra's Signature.png. Signatures do not necessarily generate copyright, see WP:SLP, so this is not clear enough of a case for speedy deletion. You may want to take to WP:FFD for discussion though. Regards, Jujutacular (talk) 17:29, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Jujutacular; it got trashed all the same, 06:19 this morning under G12. Ciao! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:47, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Fortuna! Jujutacular (talk) 17:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

I thought it was funny though, because by then it had no tag on it- and hadn't for many hours! Know what I mean? Cheers Jujutacular _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

It was actually re-tagged by another user :) Jujutacular (talk) 17:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Right, thanks!_Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

karan singh grover

can u please have a look at this page? digvijay and another editor is vandalising this page by continuing to remove valuable informationHollywoodbollywood22 (talk) 14:56, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

You will soon be reported to WP:3RR actually :) _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:58, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

this is ridiculous, why different rules for different pages? please have a look at how much well sourced and important information was removed on karan singh grover page and was called trivial why different rules for this page??Hollywoodbollywood22 (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

If you wish to dispute the content, fine- do so on the talk page in consensus with other editors. You are currently involved in an edit-war, and even if you think you are in the right, that is not how things are done around here! Cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

please have a look at the page I have mentioned, and see how the user digvijay has removed loads of well sourced information and has violated the page? and then conveniently is calling me a vandaliser for kvb's page? it is a requestHollywoodbollywood22 (talk) 15:09, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Trolling this TP

Excellent work. We may have to nuke it from orbit though. Have a biscuit. -Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 15:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

lolz etc _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 08:05, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

I knew I knew you from somewhere. I've had so much fun with Jeremy today, while making a point I believe is right, but I'll stop now. -Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 23:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

thank you

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Thank you for being here for me. I've been given an off-wiki tongue lashing and been told I have to give Johanna the title of "Princess" and style of Her Grand Ducal Highness, neither of which she legally held, especially when you take into account the famously anti-Second Reich Hitler regime. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 11:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Well I think you're fighting the good fight Paul. Not that it should be a fight at all, but these monarchist-types are blinkered beyond recovery. They all want to live in the Middle Ages eh; I had one of them pissing over my TP the other day too. Anyway I personally suggests that whatever happens off-Wiki stays off wiki; they should sling it. Keep up the good work. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Your reversion on WP:ANI

I removed that on purpose. A sinebot of my signature isn't necessary for the edit that marked the discussion as resolved. I think you just reverted it by mistake (no big deal, it happens); I just wanted to give you a heads up and let you know :-) ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:50, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

No worries User:Oshwah, just in case archive bot has problem without a time stamp. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism

Sorry for the things I've done in Colin Baker page. My purpose wasn't vandalism. I do translates from English to Turkish in trwiki, you can check this page. You can see my working pages like this in this my page. I've done nearly 45 translate and another ones are coming too. I was working on the Doctors' companions in the TV-series Doctor Who and I'm using my phone, not computer. Because of some reasons I don't know, my change in trwiki page suddenly became in enwiki page. I didn't want to do anything like vandalism. Have a nice day. Lmattdavidsmithl (talk) Lmattdavidsmithl (talk) 11:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

¿Why?

Sorry, ¿why you deleted my message?.... it was incoherent.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ulof4 (talk • contribs)

Yes. That was why. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Karanvir Bohra

an edit war is going on that page, I was wondering if you could resolve it? the user digvijay seems biased towards the page, he/she has removed information from pages of his contemporaries but gets upset when the same is happened to this page! Don 05:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turehnde (talk • contribs)

:...reply to User: Turehnde.

Ha! Maybe need to put a File:Anti.svg over that. DMacks (talk) 15:31, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Right! Yes in matters of socks, precision is probably required! How do I use the .svg file, DMacks? Cheers _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

I uploaded it as File:No socks.png. Works equally well for the WP context and those who are barefoot. DMacks (talk) 16:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks! I was well proud of myself too, getting it centred, new text and all! Live and learn eh Cheers _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

So reverting

My changes to omallur were restructuring.... You accidentally reverted everything Blisspop 13:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rortosthanos (talk • contribs)

Not accidentally, I assure you. PLease provide reliable sources for any material you add. And please remember to sign your bloody comments. Cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't see why you can't respond in a polite way. Blisspop 15:59, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

What do you find impolite? And who the hell is Bisspop? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Once again-the word 'bloody' doesn't need to be used and blisspop is my hat for all it matters to you Blisspop 17:46, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Well; if you used ~~~~ to sign your sodding posts, I wouldn't have to ask. Cheers! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Comment

Every so often I see you post an inscrutable comment. What is this supposed to mean? HighInBC ^{(was Chillum)} 15:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

HighInBC ...just sometimes better than confrontation. In that particular case, I wondered how the editor would respond. I'm not pro extremes of religion myself (or, realistically, religion at all); but if you look at some of his Userboxes, you might see what I mean. Examples: "This user is totally anti islam," "This user thinks psychopaths only use religion as pretext in order to fight," and "This user is for Race purity but is not racist," all seem unnecessarilly provocative and not sitting easilly within the framework of assuming good faith. Thanks for message: inscrutable = under-used word of the week! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:50, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Your comment makes a lot more sense now. Thanks for explaining. HighInBC ^{(was Chillum)} 16:02, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Cheers! In your professional opinion do you think they're suitable? (Re. perhaps a future WP:UfD?) _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

No I don't think they are suitable. A deletion discussion may be productive, though perhaps just asking them to take them down fist may be enough. HighInBC ^{(was Chillum)} 16:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Right, will do. Thanks! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:12, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

@HighInBC:, I attempted to raise the issue of the userboxes twice (here and here- both messages delated (as vandalism), a message banning me from his talk (so end of discussion, such as it was), and even an attempt to take me to AN/I (although only an attempt). So... how does one initiate an MfD for other editors' UBs? Can't find a straight forward guide to nominating a private userbox?

Cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't think this is a new user. I suspect that ANI may just handle this as a behavioural problem rather than a content issue. HighInBC ^{(was Chillum)} 14:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice Chillum... on a lighter note, when I saw you post under the modern moniker I thought you were a (new) user to liked get high in BC... _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

I've always thought Chillum was a toker.-Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 16:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Around here, it would probably count as medicinal usage! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:11, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Friendly Notice.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Signed,

NotAlpArslan (talk) 08:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC).

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please stop posting in my user page

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Please to stop writing in user page, amically,
thank you
signed
NotAlpArslan (talk) 10:56, 22 September 2015 (UTC).

For the record, Fortuna has never posted on your User page. You must stop your silly behaviour or face banning from the project imho. Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 11:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: your repeating baiting of this user is not constructive. Please stay away from them and their talk page, okay? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Please note that user is now blocked / UP blanked / and the cretinious ANI report dismissed with a boomerang. Thank goodness I didn't take your advice. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

User:MSGJ, no disrespect, but I advise you to keep well out of this. Defending this editor will not cover you with glory. It is not 'baiting' (whatever that is, outside of a playground). You would of course know that if you looked just slightly deeper into the situtation. Sorry to be robust, but I find your unfounded remarks extremely offensive. Thanks. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 12:57, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Agree with Fortuna totally. Look at the history, there isn't much. -Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 13:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

• Note

1. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive899#User_by_the_name_of_ProKro_using_an_untolerable_language
2. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive899#Clear_vandalism_by_Kintetsubuffalo

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Howvto use

Wiki Rehan Qasim Kumbher (talk) 13:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Username

I have to compliment you on the most awesome username I've come across at Wikipedia. My hat's off to you! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Dan. It makes me look cultured... but really I just used to like the Old Spice advert. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 12:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Terry Hurlock

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Piss off, cretin. 77.130.195.17 (talk) 18:00, 23 September 2015 (UTC) You're very quick with the templates. How about some original thought? Can you explain what were the "bizarre unsourced alterations" that you think we are edit-warring about? 77.130.195.17 (talk) 18:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Are you unable to answer my question?77.130.195.17 (talk) 18:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mundi how do you do?

Just wanted to say hi! Hope u are keeping well and like a bell.

Take a look at this poem!!!!!

The Owl and the Pussy-cat went to sea In a beautiful pea green boat, They took some honey, and plenty of money, Wrapped up in a five pound note. The Owl looked up to the stars above, And sang to a small guitar, 'O lovely Pussy! O Pussy my love, What a beautiful Pussy you are, You are, You are! What a beautiful Pussy you are!'

Pussy said to the Owl, 'You elegant fowl! How charmingly sweet you sing! O let us be married! too long we have tarried: But what shall we do for a ring?' They sailed away, for a year and a day, To the land where the Bong-tree grows And there in a wood a Piggy-wig stood With a ring at the end of his nose, His nose, His nose, With a ring at the end of his nose.

'Dear pig, are you willing to sell for one shilling Your ring?' Said the Piggy, 'I will.' So they took it away, and were married next day By the Turkey who lives on the hill. They dined on mince, and slices of quince, Which they ate with a runcible spoon; And hand in hand, on the edge of the sand, They danced by the light of the moon, The moon, The moon, They danced by the light of the moon. Blisspop (talk) 17:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 16:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi!

Happy New Year!

Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 23:46, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi!

(Charles R. Knight, 1922)

Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, I wish you and those dear to you golden days of love and joy in a Happy New Year 2016! Best regards, Sam Sailor Talk! 03:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC) Pass on! Send this greeting by adding {{subst:User:Sam Sailor/Templates/HappyNewYear}} to user talk pages. Automatic level-2 heading and auto-signing included.

(Unknown artist, Norway, 1916)

Happy New Year, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi

Peppy Paneer (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! Welcome the 2016. Wishing you a happy and fruitful 2016 with good health and your wishes come true! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2016 go well for you.

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:User:Pratyya Ghosh/Happy New Year}} to their talk page with a Happy New Year message.

Hello!

I am not trying to get myself banned from on Wikipedia's articles, but I have to ask: How am I vandalizing the 2016 Istanbul bombing, if the infobox incorrectly states it occurred in 2014? Thanks, and have a good day! --PootisHeavy (talk) 18:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Note: I just saw the mistake corrected. Thanks!

@User talk:PootisHeavy... sorry about that _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 18:53, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Name

Have to congratulate you on your clever choice of name. ~ P-123 (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Whether it is an appropriate name I cannot comment! ~ P-123 (talk) 16:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, thank you! Not particularly at the moment, but I'm hoping it will tempt fate cheers _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:48, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

~ P-123 (talk) 16:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

HI

Hello, I don't see how is that important for Belarus as a country. It looks to me as just another western agenda. Wikipedia has to be independent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlisterZarkovic (talk • contribs) 17:34, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Malformed electioneering not relevant to Belarussians? Interesting, if bizarre, perspective. Could you also please sign your posts with ~~~~. I enk yow. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

I just don't think it has to be one of the first things to see on that page. At least it should be moved from top. Just trying to be neutral. Thanks User talk:AlisterZarkovic —Preceding undated comment added 17:51, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

thanks to God.is not thanks God

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

I just to be thankful，thanks to God.mayby “thanks God haha”is wrong mind，so I change，please forgive me，and Fortuna（you） misunderstand my mind.say “...not for very long, perhaps...”so please delete，I cant delete.

Qed237  said“Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Qed237, you may be blocked from editing.” Qed237  said

so please you delete“...not for very long, perhaps...” you misunderstand my mind.mayby “thanks God haha”let you think I am a bad men?haha,it is really mistake.I am happy,Because the thing is over.I have depression you know.I was very friendly, just afraid of injury,and afraid of injury anybody you and me......I am happy very happy everyone is ok!I think you are the same to me,right? thanks to God. Adsafe (talk) 15:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Qed237 is very very very afraid to delete your edit,alas...

I am very happy to get your help but.......they are free，right？I think you can know what I say.you will be the best wiki men always（come on!）.Adsafe (talk) 16:30, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

and I am sorry to modify it always.I am a depressed patient.I am afraid of injury you， so I must do my best and perfect letter to you.and because this my edit always again and again.so sorry please fogive me. Adsafe (talk) 16:46, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

UPDATE: Sock now [1] Blocked by User:Huon _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Starring

Hello, there's currently a discussion here and I need your opinion on it. This is related to that Titanic discussion you were in a few months ago. Thanks. -- Wrath X (talk) 03:30, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

New Buckenham

Hello (2). I have now found some material on my talk page that I think is some references that you were referring to, which I can see you have provided in good faith, but what you have sent relates to Old Buckenham which is a neighbouring parish, and aspects of the history of New Buckenham that are unrelated to the material I am trying to post. please don't be offended but could I ask if you have read the material I tried to post, in the revised and sourced/ referenced version?... are you an official editor - how does this work ? thanks Observer900 (talk) 15:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your message, if it is from you, you have said you have provided a wealth of information, can you please let me know where you have put it, how will I receive what you have sent ? I am trying to be collegiate by trying to 'talk' with the person who keeps deleting my input but they do not reply ? Observer900 (talk) 14:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, can you please explain why you have deleted my edit on this page, the material I have shown has sources and referencing displayed. are you an official editor, could you please explain ??, thanks.... Observer900 (talk) 14:40, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Observer900: I have already replied to you at User talk:Charlesdrakew. Although this discussion should be taking place on your own talk page, not others'! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

you have deleted an edit, please explain what you mean in your comment ?, I suspect you don't know this place, my sources are accurate, the wording is factually correct, could you please explain why you completely deleted what I carefully entered ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Observer900 (talk • contribs) 12:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

If you continue to make edits without providing reliable, secondary independant sources, then they will be continuously reverted. You have been told this now multiple times by different editors; and I for one am heartilly sick of having the same discussion over and over. Since you seem incapable of listening to or taking advice, I see no profit to either of us in continuing this converstaion. I consider this topic closed. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Trolling from User:Shivam8540

So you deleted the full edit without a second thought. Cool, you might be a real idiot.

I'll make changes more appropriately this time.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shivam8540 (talk • contribs)

Need your advice

I am taking very seriously your warning but I need to know something. If a user post something unsourced, can I at least tag the unsourced section? What if the user claims that the edit is sourced but refuses to give any explanation in the Talk page. Is it edit-warring if I keep tagging? Silvio1973 (talk) 10:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

I understand your point. But I honestly have to say that if someone reported you both now, there would probably be a couple of 24-hour blocks handed out! The other editor should be careful too. Any admin going through that history- well, it just shows a couple of editors edit-warring every day, going away; eating; sleeping; waking up; then coming back to do the same thing all over again! Remember, too, that {{cn}} templates etc ''are'' also subject to 3RR. C'mon! This really needs sorting out mate._Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:02, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Well, in this case let's take a rest. At the end of the day it is not worth it. --Silvio1973 (talk) 11:31, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

What happened to this, by the way? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Nothing, the conduct of the user was acknowledged by an administrator as problematic but not enough for treatment at ANI. --Silvio1973 (talk) 11:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

There is still something I do not understand. We have a user (Tuvixer) who kept posting unsourced material and another one (Silvio1973) who cn tagged the unsourced material. Now you might say that both those users were edit-warring. Well, the point is that Tuvixer was questioned by two users [[2]] about the missing sourcing but did not give any explanation. Hence, can we really speak of edit warring? Don't you think that in this case it would be more appropriate to say that one user is pushing unsourced material refusing to explain why? Silvio1973 (talk) 19:32, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

If it was me, I'd consider the previous ANI report prematurely closed. If there is a pushing of an agenda. But maybe WP:NPOVN? That will draw other editors into the discussion; at the moment, it seems that anything will lead to an edit-war! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

There is an RfC going on, let's not mix things. However please note this is a crazy situation. I don't know what to do. I cannot edit the lead because allegedly the object of the modification is not sufficiently developed in the body of the article, but if I try to touch the body of the article Tuvixer removes the material. This is the proof:[[3]] Please mind well that I supported my edit with many sources and I am ready to add more sources and material, if only I was given the possibility to touch the article. There is a clear issue of WP:OWN going on here. Silvio1973 (talk) 19:54, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Silvio, why don't you present the changes you want to make, to the article body, on the Talk page of the article, so everyone can see them and discuss them. It is fair that such changes can be discussed and, that all parties can in the end contribute to the article, not just you. I have suggested this many times before, but always when I do so you ignore my advice. It is really hard to work with a user who ignores what he does not like.

Also on the ANI you can see that another user has accused you for disruptive editing, and he has stated that you do that often. Tnx --Tuvixer (talk) 20:33, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Well, the only disruptive user is you. The proof is that you follow me. I don't follow you. Silvio1973 (talk) 20:53, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Harry Potter children's film list

WP:DENY
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
To back Dcasey98 up, this is an editing notice posted at the top of the page, therefore I'm deleting Harry Potter from the page too: PLEASE NOTE BEFORE ADDING ITEMS TO THIS LIST: Do not add films which carry teen/adult ratings or are marketed to teens/adults. In the case of films which carry a pre-teen rating, such as the MPAA's G rating or the BBFC's PG rating, please note these are only content guidance ratings that indicate suitability for children and in most cases do not indicate whether children are the primary audience Other films with a PG-13, like The Golden Compass, should therefore be removed as well. Bellatrix2017 (talk) 12:53, 16 March 2016 (UTC) You are an edit-warrior and a WP:SOCK. Goodbye. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:58, 16 March 2016 (UTC) To back Dcasey98 up, this is an editing notice posted at the top of the page, therefore I'm deleting Harry Potter from the page too: "PLEASE NOTE BEFORE ADDING ITEMS TO THIS LIST: Do not add films which carry teen/adult ratings or are marketed to teens/adults. In the case of films which carry a pre-teen rating, such as the MPAA's G rating or the BBFC's PG rating, please note these are only content guidance ratings that indicate suitability for children and in most cases do not indicate whether children are the primary audience" Other films with a PG-13, like The Golden Compass, should therefore be removed as well. Bellatrix2017 (talk) 12:58, 16 March 2016 (UTC) Please explain to me what you are doing right by posting films that violet the criteria of being a children's film to this list. They don't qualify. I'm following the rules. You're not. Bellatrix2017 (talk) 12:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC) violate Bellatrix2017 (talk) 12:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC) To back Dcasey98 up, this is an editing notice posted at the top of the page, therefore I'm deleting Harry Potter from the page too. "PLEASE NOTE BEFORE ADDING ITEMS TO THIS LIST: Do not add films which carry teen/adult ratings In the case of films which carry a pre-teen rating, such as the MPAA's G rating or the BBFC's PG rating, please note these are only content guidance ratings that indicate suitability for children and in most cases do not indicate whether children are the primary audience" Other films with a PG-13, like The Golden Compass, should therefore be removed as well. Bellatrix2017 (talk) 14:44, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Why are you deleting relevant information?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

What are you doing and why? I am adding good content and you guys are just deleting it as if you don't want new info in the article!! Please stop deleting info. Instead contribute information or give proper structure to the page but please stop just deleting. Just deleting is not any kind of contribution! — Preceding unsigned comment added by K Sikdar (talk • contribs) 15:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

• Note Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi will now refer K Sikdar to Isambard Kingdom's edit summary. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

What is wrong?

You are behaving like some wiki mafia!! You guys are just deleting new info! Please stop imposing your opinion and check the correctness of info we are adding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by K Sikdar (talk • contribs) 15:51, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Thank you :-)

I just wanted to thank you for watching over my talk page while I was away from Wikipedia and for starting the ANI thread. I get these kinds of messages all the time; it's completely normal to me ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:17, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (William Harrington (knight)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating William Harrington (knight), Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi!

Wikipedia editor NearEMPTiness just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for writing the article about Sir Billy as he might have been known to his friends and familiy. Do you find the coat of arms or any other picture that could be added to the article?

To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

No, soz _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

WP:DENY
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Your edit on Alstom Metropolis & Shanghai Electric C751C Hi, can you stop reverting the the page, Alstom Metropolis & Shanghai Electric C751C because it was true that 9 trainsets is good. Don't revert it again. If you revert, we will blocked you from editing as your userpage taken down. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.66.229.67 (talk) 13:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

ANI case

A case has been filed at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Dcasey98_reported_by_User:Betty_Logan_.28Result:_.29 in which you are involved should you wish to comment. Betty Logan (talk) 07:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

you are not an administrator

Please mind your own business. You are not an administrator. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by K Sikdar (talk • contribs) 10:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Ah. So you spent your block learning how to take advice and reading WP:CIVIL or WP:AGF...?

No??? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:02, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

That rather seems to have settled that.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Hello, I'm Andy Dingley. Your recent edit to the page East_London_(bus_company) appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=East_London_(bus_company)&diff=711381814&oldid=710765493 I don't know what your game is, but one minute you're bulk reverting real editors as "socks" and the next you're adding nonsense about London running trolleybuses in 1972. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:22, 22 March 2016 (UTC) Perhaps you would prefer the previous edit to have remained? You are not welcome to repy here I'm afraid. You behaviour now has all the hallmarks of stalking. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:29, 22 March 2016 (UTC) You added the phrase "until Trolleybuses [ended]" to a sentence about London in 1972. This is nonsense; either obvious nonsense or else not-obvious to someone who should at least recognise they don't have the subject knowledge to be editing anything like that. Would I prefer the previous edit? Yes, of course I would - you added nonsense. If you don't wish to discuss it here, then you know where WP:ANI is. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:34, 22 March 2016 (UTC) Don't make me laugh. Like you lodged an SPI?! Before I edited it, the article said "They remained in service at Leyton ended in 1972." Make much sense? No. And that's what you would prefer... brilliant! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:48, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Revert

Bocked edit-warrior.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Revert Hi Truth should trump (talk) 19:25, 23 March 2016 (UTC) Revert I have given reference and explained in talk page Truth should trump (talk) 19:27, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Truth should trump

Editor was blocked at exactly the same time as your AN3 filing. Thanks for filing the report anyway - much appreciated. --Ches (talk) (contribs) 20:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Great minds eh? Cheers for info Chesnaught555. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 20:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Most definitely! No problem at all. :-) --Ches (talk) (contribs) 20:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

the person awarding me a Jimmy Saviile barnstar

this person calling me Jimmy Savile should be actionable, shouldn't it? Its legally defamation. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 13:22, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

On the assumption that they don't think you'd be good on the radio mate... I should say almost definitely yes! Where? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) The person who has been doing that has been all over the place over time. I got that piece of garbage maybe 4–6 months ago. On top of anything else, you can have a revdel on that stuff. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:10, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

It wasn't exactly an original change of name was it... _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

rollback

Hi Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Katie^talk 21:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Received / understood. Thanks, KrakatoaKatie. On the case. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 21:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Rona Ambrose is a pro-life feminist

Hello Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi,

You have recently reverted an edit on Pro-life feminism claiming that the information was unsourced. There were 4 sources in the article alone, and several more on the talk page. Please undo your reversion as there were many sources afterall. Ontario Teacher BFA BEd (talk) 19:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

I appreciate the point, and the work you are doing. Unfortunately, however, it is not the number of sources per article that is relevant, but sources per assertion. The assertion you made, whilst possibly true, needs verification. May I point you to the essay, which is rather apposite at this juncture, WP:VNT- for Wikipedia, verifiabilty is more important than an abstract truth, or a belief in such a truth. Also, it is worth pointing out that the assessment of these sources as reliable rests not on individual editors, but on the consensus of the community of editors watching that page. Who doubtless have also seen the sources on the TP. Cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

You have recently claimed that the articles by The National Post, The Globe and Mail, and The Calgary Herald are "blogs". These are major Canadian newspapers, not blogs. Please undo your reversion. Ontario Teacher BFA BEd (talk) 14:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Sorry

I am terribly sorry if I caused any trouble I was just joking with a friend and thought there would be no harm. It will not happen again. REDTMR1 (talk) 18:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

AN/I

Just making you aware of this - when you left a comment regarding Wikicology's indef block proposal, your signature did not display correctly (precisely the "Fortuna" bit; the coding for the green writing must've been broken). I'm not sure how to fix it, otherwise I would've done it for you. Link to diff: Here. Best, --Ches (talk) (contribs) 13:49, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the note, Chesnaught555- I was on my phone this morning, which explains the typos- but I can't for the life of me resolve the sig. I even retyped it off-wiki (notepad), and it still comes out the same there Seems OK now- I had to redo the four tildes though. Got a bit worried when I saw the new message there! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

No problem - sorry for worrying you with the message! --Ches (talk) (contribs) 16:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Ha! I thought it was the old 'there is a discussion taking place about you at...' Cheers Chesnaught555. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 18:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Perhaps I should've thought of a better title... my apologies :-) --Ches (talk) (contribs) 18:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Bahar Kimyongür

Hi, i've opened up a discussion in Talk:Samandağ about this matter. Thanks GroGaBa (talk) 14:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Correction of English

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hi I don't want to remove my comments from the talk pages. But can you please correct my English a bit? These are the articles I have commented on: Achaemenid empire, Parthian empire, Sasanian Empire. Arman ad60 (talk) 15:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Thank you

Your comments at AIV are appreciated. I knew we'd crossed paths recently, at Alice Lai Nga Yu. To my minor chagrin, my usual IP was jogged to this one, at least for the moment. Cheers, 2601:188:0:ABE6:60FC:44F0:F227:C4AF (talk) 14:09, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

No worries. I began by editing as an IP, and frankly eventually registered an account because it was too much hard work- automatically being considered a noob, and frankly a second class editor. Your resilence is admirable! And yes, I see you are (were) CD63- it must be annoying to do a tonne of edits and then get the counter reset to zero. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:22, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Profile of Abhishek Verma (businessman)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Can you please add a photo of Abhishek Verma to his wikipedia profile that you have been updating / editing? The photo from Abhishek Verma's Google+ profile is below. It does not have copyright issues as it is on the net.

AV photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Authorincharge (talk • contribs) 11:27, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm afraid everything that's 'on the net' is usually owned by someone- people just don't realise it. See WP:F. Cheers! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Shame

As someone who's been around a while, you should know better than to do this: [4].

My vote counts just as much as anyone else's.142.105.159.60 (talk) 16:08, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Indeed I should, and of course it does: and I do apologise. I obviously hadn't woken up! Thanks for letting me know; and yes- I know- WP:HUMAN! All the best, _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:16, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

142, Fortuna did not remove your comment at ANI. It was still there - the formatting was just off. I have taken the liberty of reformatting it and removing your now-redundant second "vote". I hope this clears things up. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

I 'just' refactored it then? Thanks to Edgar181 for pointing that out and 142.105.159.60 for raising it. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:36, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Alice Lai Nga Yu

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hi Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, I removed passages of unacceptable content from the article again, but didn't stop to check whether that removed copyright violations, your rationale for a speedy deletion nomination. My apologies if I mucked things up. Just so tired of the crap they keep off-loading there. Thank you for your good work, 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:07, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

No problems CD63, thanks for doing that, I totally agree with your assesment. The copyvios were every sentence that I found, just scattered throughout. But it was still the right thing to do- cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 18:53, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Thanking me into a bucket...!

Drmies that was really rather clever... How d'you do it?!?! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 18:17, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

• It was, wasn't it? And I misspelled "vomiting"? Oh, wait--see User_talk:Drmies#User:Erolatccsgroup. :) Drmies (talk) 18:21, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Should've noticed the spelling. You do have some imaginitive fans, if tending towards the foetid! Cheers, _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 18:26, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

• Opposites attract, no doubt. Drmies (talk) 18:27, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 11:16, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Understood Widr, will do, and many thanks. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:17, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your WP:AN3 report

Hi, It looks like I just beat you in lodging a report about that edit warring. It might simplify things if you removed your report - please feel free to merge your superior diff summaries into mine if you choose to do so. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 11:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

It's more the fact that the reported editor has already replied. Stand by. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:41, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes - it might work best if I merged my report into yours now Nick-D (talk) 11:42, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

I've just deleted my report - thanks for also doing this! Nick-D (talk) 11:44, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

No worries- Ironically I just got an edit conflict trying to merge with yours! Cheers, _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:47, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

At least you didn't revert me :) Nick-D (talk) 11:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Then we could have reported each other... what fun it could be! All the best! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Anca Verma profile on WIKIPEDIA

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hi there,

We have created a Wiki profile of ANCA VERMA (wife of Indian billionaire Abhishek Verma (businessman)). She is a public personality as you would see on her page. We need your help in formatting, editing, grammar and other aspects such as adding sections etc.

Please help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Authorincharge (talk • contribs) 13:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes... I left you an edit-summary, too. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:08, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please do

I fart in your general direction. Ah! That feels a thousand times better than being called obsessive and dealing with admins who just slap on templates without much thought.

Please, enjoy your admins notice board, a hell hole of my own making that I have often regretted starting over the last decade. - 203.217.39.91 (talk) 18:07, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Since you're quite patently not and a noob nor were acting like one, I don't really see the point in directing me to a page that tells me what I already know. But Monty Python is always appreciated on this TP.

PS: You're fooling yourself if you think this is a democracy.

_Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 18:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes, a democracy has more commonsense, less agendas and less politicians than this place. Which says less about democracy than it does Wikipedia. - 203.217.39.91 (talk) 20:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Surely this is an anarchist collective...? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 20:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

With a centralised governance model and a group of people who enforce it? And core policies that form a site constitution that need majority consensus to alter (i.e. will never happen) and law like policies that can be altered when a large majority of editors feel they need to be altered? That rather seems like another form of collective governance... or am I delusional? - 203.217.39.91 (talk) 20:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

It's a pretty sound analysis: couldn't argue against it. Keep in touch. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 21:11, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

You see now I'm confused. Are you saying my analysis is correct that I am delusional, or that Wikipedia is indeed some sort of retarded democracy? Now I grant you these two things may not be mutually exclusive, but I have an inquiring mind and dislike uncertainty so clarification is rather urgently requested! - 203.217.39.91 (talk) 21:28, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

tut tut

Exemplia gratia. Now who gets spanked for not knowing their Latin is it you or me (hope it's me) (laughing) Si Trew (talk) 13:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Actually Impetratrix I am never sure is right. Well as a bloke it is all right. But with dominatrix I am never sure should it be dominatrice or domintrix it reallx depends on which language you choose. In French yours would go imperiatrice that would be say Marie Antoinette she probably wasn't but you see my point but the -ix -ice usually distinguishes the male from female in Latin but not in English so that is where I get the toin coss in English. Like we have dominatrix I am not sure have not checked Dominatrice. There is a limit to what we do on English Wikipedia so I always find those ones a bit tough. I could do stacks of London Bus Routes because there is no doubt what a London Bus looks like but the language ones are how may I put it, they are tricky if you don't know the language. As soon as you know the language your eyes switch left and right wondering should it be or not? I have stacks of dictionaries and whatever that is not the point would people use that phrase. I dunno sometimes because my bedside TV is covered with porridge when someone says on BBC "they are planning ahead" as if you could plan somehow retrospectively and it all goes over the TV but then my bible is Modern English Usage which is a bit old fashioned. Si Trew (talk) 13:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

I seem to remember you bollocking me for my pig Latin somewhere before ;) "You! -Yes YOU! STAND STILL LADDIE!!!" Does that mean that you spent your time dealing with Neelrice redirects...?! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Disruptive editing by user:Tnguyen4321

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

I think you should do something with that user. He continues his disruptive editing even when the issue has been posted on the AN/I. Thanks.

p/s: I've tagged his OR instead of reverting his editing so you can see it more clearly. Dino nam (talk) 01:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Amazing trick: I don't even notice the introduction of the OR tag in the content of the article. It is how he goes around without being blocked even he is triggering a edit warring. Here is what our wolf in sheep's clothing intends to achieve with his OR tagging subterfuge. The tag will be dated. Other editors are constraint by a deadline. Two eventualities could happen: one, nobody care to comment on the issue; or two, editors can argue with him until they are blue in the face, he would say he is not convinced, and still maintains it is an OR and declares it should me removed according to Wikipedia policy. And he would remove it on his own authority, not on consensus. He then would just blank it or replace with his own version pertaining to this specific material.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 13:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Do you care reverting Dino nam's last editing to previous version [5]? Thanks.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 14:38, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

You've just done it haven't you? And what exactly is wrong with "Col. Nguyen Huu An later admitted that insertion of the 1/7 Air Cavalry Battalion at LZ X-Ray in the morning of November 14 had the effect of making the B3 Field Front to postpone the attack of the Pleime Camp"? -which was sourced? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:42, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

No, you got things wrong. I just deleted "Col. Nguyen Huu An later admitted that insertion of the 1/7 Air Cavalry Battalion at LZ X-Ray in the morning of November 14 had the effect of making the B3 Field Front to postpone the attack of the Pleime Camp" which had been stated previous in section The air assault of the 1/7 Air Cavalry Battalion at LZ X-Ray (14-16 November): The air assault insertion of the 1/7 Air Cavalry Battalion at LZ X-Ray in the morning of November 14 had the effect of making the B3 Field Front to postpone the attack of the Pleime Camp. And at the same time fix the orphaned referencing not defined as alerted by AnomieBOT. I did not revert Dino nam's OR-tagging.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 15:12, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Ah, I see, sorry. I don't know enough about it to say if it's OR or not; but why is the article so long? It's immensely (and probably unnecessarilly) detailed, with long paragraphs hanging off a single source. I reckon it should be about 25% of its current size. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

It's so long because it is a very important battle (the first big one for each side) in the eyes of both the American and the Viet Cong (North Vietnamese Communist) and controversial too. Yes, the OR notion is very difficult to grasp, until you have to wrestle with it.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 15:32, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Agree with your point. That whole section which I used to blank contains info that had been previously stated in other sections. In fact, it doesn't even talk about the things in its headline: there are about only one out of four or five sentences that talks about the air strike itself. Dino nam (talk) 16:18, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Since there is editing done in between versions, you cannot just "undo" but have to do it manually. Would you allow me to do it instead?Tnguyen4321 (talk) 15:23, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Reminder: do you care to remove the 3 bogus OR tags[6] that Dino nam had pinned after been warned not to start an editing war? Thank you.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 13:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, go ahead, if you think they're undeserved. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:21, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 15:16, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: I think you should better visit the talk page first. And of course, he will think that it's undeserved, because he's the one who've created the OR. Dino nam (talk) 16:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

I did. He resumes editing war [7], ignoring your [8].Tnguyen4321 (talk) 20:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Please explain what does it means when the noticeboard is archived with no result and what is the next step. Thanks.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 05:40, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

References

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Re: LeonRaper

Nothing wrong with being sympathetic. BMK (talk) 04:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Don't ever expect to become an administrator by acting like a bully...

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

... and projecting that behavior and motivation upon others. You need to grow up. 71.184.228.118 (talk) 06:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Well. That didn't seem too profitable did it, after all? Let me know when you're back. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 09:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

thank you

Deliberately I am not looking into the WP:ANI#SimonTrew because that is for others to decide. If I get banned, all I can say in my defence is you have lost a good editor who speaks a lot of languages, translates, tidies, and so on. Yes, lately, I have been tidying up a lot of Neelix redirects and have been getting a lot of flak from various users who are not aware of the WP:G6 neelix concession. That is fine, I am a big man, but yes it does hurt when someone personally attacks you. I have no problem with someone disagreeing with me. This is no attempt to WP:CANVASS but for someone occasionally to send a wink to see what I am trying to do, which is to make Wikipedia better, it means a helluva lot to me.

I still not sure it shouldn't be imperatrice but I'll have to get my Shortbread Eating Primer to check that. Oh Shorter Latin Primer, if you rub out the oh well you get it. Si Trew (talk) 20:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

@SimonTrew: You're doing the dirty possibly dull work behind the scenes mate, which most people wouldn't do, and I think it's a hypocrisy for you to be some sort of Aunt Sally for others' personal opinions. Bon appetite with that Latin Shortbread! (Think Hadrian might have brought some back?!). Luck, _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 20:13, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

I think I am being put up as something of an Aunt Sally I hadn't thought of that analogy. I have done about a hundred Neelix ones today. Neelix created them in good faith and I will say that until people get it into their thick heads. Just many now, with the better search engine, are not necessary are harmful. They are not harmful because Neelix created them, that is kinda coincidental, they are harmful because they block people trying to find information. When I started in 2009 I think the search engine was frankly awful and so all these kinds of redirects were absolutely necessary. I am no WP:DELETIONIST but I think if we want to make it better get readers to where they are likely to want to go sometimes getting rid of redirects is the right way to do it. Not always. Sometimes we can create them to get them where we want to go. Not so much an Aunt Sally as a Stooge really, i think the anger against Neelix has suddenly somehow been transferred onto me. I'm a big man I can take it. But yes, it does hurt sometimes. In real life if someone tried that I would look them in the eyes and they would back off. Never had to resort to physical violence in my life, you look em in the eyes ask them what they said they back off. Never hit a man (or woman for that matter) in my life. In real life I am very good at calming aggression but on Wikipedia it is not so easy to do because I can't look em in the eyes. Si Trew (talk) 20:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

You know how well I forget which president Woodrow Wilson I am bound to get the wrong one said "Speak softly and carry a big stick". That's the way to do it. I wear size eleven steel toecap boots nicely polished every day. And speak very softly. I don't need to threaten anyone. I have innate resepect where I live because of what I do for the community around me. I kinda think the word "respect" has been forgotten from Wikipedia. That is the one word I would define my life by, "respect". Respect others, respect yourself, respect your neighbours, respect your firends,respect your family, don't care if you're black white jewish muslim hindustani or even Dutch but "respect" seems to have disappeared. We should make that more prominent. Si Trew (talk) 20:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Spot on. Respect is more important than civilty; you can be civil without respecting someone, and it's obvious if you don't. i mean we know how easy it is to avoid NPA just by being polite. Which stinks, breaking the spirit if not the letter of the law. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 20:37, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Thank you once again. To spend half an hour or so ranting off with you has made it all worthwhile. Thank you for letting me spiel I needed that. Sorry to spoil your talk page, you can delete it. Right so let's take the next batch of redirects. What may they be? Wait and see. If they're not CSD they will be RfD. Si Trew (talk) 20:40, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Feel free to use this page as a shooting gallery User:SimonTrew; it's more friendly than most. Keep in touch :) _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 21:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

That is so kind of you. You are cheaper than a trick cyclist and twice as good. Si Trew (talk) 21:07, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

This may amuse you this is just anecdotal. At some football match in the UK thirty years ago from the terraces they were all shouting "Bring on Wilson" and then someone shouted Woodrow Wilson and someone else Harold Wilson and Jocky Wilson and so on. So they all started calling for whatever Wilson they could think of. No idea who the substitute Wilson was, he was never brought on. Good if true. 21:12, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Brilliant :) was it Notts Forest? must've been bad if they were calling for Harold Wilson! I remember Basil Fawlty has a bit of a thing about him, great stuff :) "Bloody Wilson!!!'"

I love that series. I think the best one is Communication Problems with I know the actress but can't think of her name not Joan Sims she acted that superbly. As Clive James notes in his Observer TV reviews it is just kinda exactly wrong. "He did not just go out to look at the window, he went out the door, back again, into the room, out of the room, then back up the ladder and then fell off". Clive James loved those. You could never remake em now they have kinda achieved such classic status you could never remake them. Joan Sanderson.

Yes, yes madam here is the view. "I expect to sea the sea. When I come to a seaside hotel I expect to see the sea". Yes yes Madam you can see it it is over there between the land and the sky.

What James drily observed was that poor old Fawlty just had the wrong temperament to run a hotel. I don't think this is from Fawlty I think this is just one of mine but I can be the same "this job would be all right if it wasn't for the customers". Si Trew (talk) 21:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Yp, she was great. Joan Sanderson "You scabby old bat I'll put a bat up your night dress", also in East of Ipswich I think, playing an old bag of a B&B hostess. Clive James a small genius too, tragic circumstances, wtf him and his wife?! You ever been at work and some bugger says 'the customer is always right'- and you think no, the customer is bloody well wrong! Anyway Trew, got to do important stuff now... watch The Man With the Golden Gun anyway. Take acre! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 21:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Brian Clough

Was tough enough

To turn Notts F

into a byword

The F in Notts F

Stands for Forest

But only in Nottingham.

Do you like my clerihew

Clough was tuff

In the ruff

Off the cuff

And in the buff

Not sure that qualifies! (ironically, like Forest) :p _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 21:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Valery Surkoff

Yeah, I get irritated too. But they're indeffed and I don't see them ever being unblocked. Please don't twit them. Bishonen | talk 20:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC).

It wasn't so much irritation- just a suggestion as to what the underlying problem was. Gotcha though. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 21:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

"Trolling"

Hi, why'd you revert my edit to User talk:SimonTrew? It wasn't "Trolling" and you obviously didn't assume good faith. This user has been stalking Neelix's edits; I think that is a valid reason to give them a warning for harassment. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

I have not been "stalking" Neelix redirects. (How is that possible to stalk a list that is WP:G6 Neelix concession and a list is not a person? ""Walking" the list certainly but not stalking it. What does that mean?) I have been patiently and diligently going through the User:Anomie#Neelix list and keeping, listing at CSD, or listing at RfD as I see fit. I didn't even see what you posted User:Anarchyte but feel free to post it again. It's An administrative list created in a one off run by a bot. How can I possibly stalk that? Can it sue me?

See the ANI for User:SimonTrew. I really get fed up explaining my actions over and over again. Take it there. If you look at my edit history even this morning (UTC+2) you will see I have actually kept and rcatted far more Neelix redirects than I have listed at RfD and CSD.

I really do not understand this at all. The redirect silvery-leaved which was recently created (21 May) taken as WP:R3 by User:Iridescent nothing to do with the WP:G6 Neelix concession, was not actually created by Neelix, (or Neelix is back in which case he's more than welcome to edit anyway but not to create redirects, that is the entire extent of his "ban", he has essentially banished himself Wikipedia hasn't and he made thousands of thousands of good redirects when the search engine was not as good as it is now), as a non-admin I can't see the history of who created it but I imagine it was in good faith as indeed Neelix created redirects in good faith.

I didn't list it at CSD, we had a couple of similar ones for silver trees which I was not entirely sure about and took them to RfD so that our botanic experts could check them out for sanity and they said they were fine and they are speedily withdrawn by me as keep earlier this morning and really essentially waiting for another editor to close them since as an involved party I can't really close them myself {{nac}} or not, that would be unfair. What's this "stalking" nonsense? I think you must be mistaken.

I'm going to copy/paste this to my talk page.

No if Fortuna doesn't mind us squatting at this user's talk page for a bit, I might as well just @Anarchyte: and leave the conversation in one place.

Si Trew (talk) 09:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

No worries both! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

ANI

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hey, this might be interesting to you. --Jayron32 14:25, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Indeed! Cheers, _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

@Jayron32: Might be missing something here, but wouldn't the common response to an editor recreating the same deleted thing four times usually- all things being equal- be a preventative (at the least) block? As disruptive behaviour, if nothing else? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:53, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

That's what we're discussing. --Jayron32 14:54, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Right. Allow me to to gee things along a bit. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

May 2016

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Henry VI of England, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.205.197.158 (talk) 17:54, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

• In my attempt to look into why I would have been invoked here at all, I discovered the strangest thing: the IP tagged themself as a "suspected sockpuppet" of me, for no immediately apparent reason as I can't identify any topic on which we ever would have interacted. So yeah, I'm putting my money on "unproductive editor, trolling". Bearcat (talk) 18:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Cheers, Bearcat, I reported it to AIV, don't know whether it was really vandalism. Nice of him to own up to your socking for you though! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 18:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

I hate to say that I was wrong, but...

judging from your recent edits/comments, I was most certainly wrong to judge you and to state that your comments were not welcome on my talk page.

It seems very obvious to me, that your comments/edits are fair and designed to improve wikipedia.

I apologize for being a defensive and judgmental ass. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 06:34, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

@Spacecowboy420: No worries, and thank you for that. We just got off on the wrong foot; it happens. You do good work here- removing swathes of unsourced crap is an interest of mine too (and if it's POV bigotry, all the better!) Cheers! _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:49, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Made me smile

I hope I'm not the only one to catch the humor in this edit--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:14, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Well caught Sphilbrick; didn't think anyone would notice... _Muffled ^Pocketed 15:25, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Imelda Marcos

Imeldific bocked 24-hours by EdJohnston; also note the former's retaliatory AN3 here. Muffled Pocketed 10:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Please discuss at the talk page]. Those edits are with WP:SAMESURNAME. Imeldific (talk) 22:31, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bonville–Courtenay feud

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bonville–Courtenay feud you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Wrong. Count them.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Nope, wrong. I only made 3 (the multiples only count as one because they were partial). Too Small a Fish to Fry (talk) 13:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Excellent. Thanks for the confession, Too Small a Fish to Fry. _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:38, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

VarunFEB2003

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

I'd not say hi your conduct is really very bad. you have no right to delete something from someone elses user page. Moreover ur user page says u are an apprentice editor and ur talk page says u are a tutunum or veteran editor. This is very bad and very confusing. pls correvt it and display the correct badge of service awards And pls leave my user and talk page alone If u wanna reply use ping. i am not interested in opening ur page again --VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 09:09, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

You are a very new editor, and I'm afraid you do not know what bad conduct is. You should not pretend to be something you are not; even for a so-called joke, that is unacceptable in an online community. You repeatedly ignored more than one editor before eventually (partially) rectifying the issue. You pretended to be an administrator; an 'awesome-Wikipedian'; and to have your own day. None of these things are true, as you have only been here a few weeks. Those are things that are awarded by the community as a sign of trust and respect and they have to be earned. They cannot be just taken. And those barnstars: did you create those accounts as well? @VarunFEB2003:. _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

I told u i was constructing my page i had copied the items ill remove them now pls my construction hasnt finished ill remove conflicting material dont edit pls--VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 09:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

@VarunFEB2003: You did not answer my question about the barnstars I see. You have until this evening, your time, to remove everything on your user page that isn't true, or I will seek administrative attention. _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: I have asked at the help desk of wikipedia if any user is allowed to award himself barnstars or copy the editor of the week box AND THE ANSWER WAS YES. you wont find it there now because it is in archives of Help Desk. Go and search it and see. I QUESTIONED THERE FIRST BEFORE PLACING ANYTHING ON MY PAGES So I'd better tell u that u dont interfere in my page it will be good for u. You have no right to do anything to anybody elses wikipedia user page. It is not an Encyclopaedia article that you can make changes whenever u want. So it will be a lot good if u better forget about me. MOREOVER I HAVE WRITTEN THEY ARE FALSE AND FOR HUMOR ONLY. (i HAVE REMOVED MY OWN DAY AND ADMIN THING)

--VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 15:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Dear VarunFEB2003, how good to hear from you again. Yes I know what you were told here; I have already told you what other editors might think if they realised you were deliberately misleading them (for fun? This is not really the place for that, as you might be realising). I note you have not explained what the accounts are that you awarded the barnstars to yourself in the name of are- why did you set them up? That's something else that is looked at with a jaundiced eye. Your attitude certainly seems to tend towards the aggressive; you may think it amusing to do so, but it will make you few friends. In fact, many people are already watching your account; and remember, everything you type, everything you remove, is always there in the history. So it is really better not to go around threatening people like you have. May I suggest that instead of concerning yourself with the arcane (such as bots, recognition, and awards), you demonstrate your willingness to contribute to the project; if people think you are not listening to them or only here for your own aggrandizement, then your career as a Wikipedia editor, such as it is, may end sooner than you would like. Goodbye. _Muffled ^Pocketed 15:28, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Bro i have nothing personally against anyone Now u see the editor of week box it NOMORE SAYS EDITOR OF WEKK IT SAYS NOT THE EDITOR OF WEEK IS IT OKAY NOW? And sorry for my aggression I was just too angry, sorry. The barnstarts do not point to anyone so u can already see they are false and I have also mentioned. Its getiing night here Ill come to reply tomorrow morning. Pls do not edit my page anymore I have removed or edited all conflict material that misleads VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Okaaaay... Nothing wrong with enthusiasm; sometimes a gentle step is needed though! Sleep well bro :) _Muffled ^Pocketed 15:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks and I just got up. a sleep really did good : cooled my brain. I am really sorry for my last nights conduct. Is my page okay now? Anything still that is conflicting. Pls reply. Thanks and regards. Could U pls ping me as I open lot of pages and I forget them, sorry VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 06:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

@VarunFEB2003: Sorry I didn't get back to you, I didn't see the message alert. No worries! I say we're probably all a-👌 !!! Good man. _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks but how u made that nice sign of the hand VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 10:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

That was on my phone I'm afraid, but if you go to WP:EMOTE there's loads there to use- and someone else who knows slut those things might even show you how to make more (if that's possible, I don't know). _Muffled ^Pocketed 10:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Your GA nomination of Bonville–Courtenay feud

The article Bonville–Courtenay feud you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Bonville–Courtenay feud for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 07:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

DAB done, cheers Muffled Pocketed 10:52, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Loveday (arbitration), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christine Carpenter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Minnow

Misused. Muffled Pocketed 10:05, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Plip! ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 11:08, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your post at User talk:73.133.140.233, though I'll mention that Bishzilla doesn't like it when I'm edit conflicted. Go back in pocket! Bishonen | talk 19:15, 15 June 2016 (UTC).

• MMMMFFFFFUUUUURGH!* The other editor's view was understandable- I think the anon had been leading him a runaround for sometime! I name-checked you on his page too. *Finds baconbits for 'zilla* _Muffled ^Pocketed 19:23, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Did someone say bacon? -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 19:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

@Samtar: It would certainly get his career back on track- one way or another! _Muffled ^Pocketed 19:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

I am not a VANDAL

Trolling. Currently at An/I wishing he was wearing an anti-WP:BOOMERANG hat... Muffled Pocketed 10:04, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
You have blocked me as an Vandalism only account, why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BerendWorst (talk • contribs) 09:49, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference desk trolling

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

You reverted good faith edits at the Reference desk (which can only be trolling) and had the nerve to claim you were reverting a troll. Are you incapable of doing anything constructive? 79.77.28.185 (talk) 18:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

I know. I love it. Easy Like Sunday Morning. _Muffled ^Pocketed 18:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Disjointed Reply

Yup. That was the first thing that came to mind. I'm trying not to make accusations but the quacking is pretty loud. Glad I wasn't the only one brushing off feathers. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

@Chris troutman: Check! _Muffled ^Pocketed 11:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Harrington (Yorkist knight), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Affinity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for letting me know about the incident. Very kind of you. Im slightly puzzled about why it was created, but, hey ho! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.46.20.240 (talk) 00:44, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Dan Wagner

Your recent change to Dan Wagner article has been reverted by User:Techtrek. It has been reported that this user may have an undeclared interest in the subject, http://uk.businessinsider.com/techtreks-wikipedia-edits-on-powa-founder-dan-wagner-2016-3. Please can you assist? 2A02:C7F:C207:A800:B997:C880:E1FA:C5EB (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much for that, 2A02:C7F:C207:A800:B997:C880:E1FA:C5EB. Feel free to email. That behaviour seems pretty consistent over the last few years? _Muffled ^Pocketed 19:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your assistance. Unfortunately, they've reverted your changes again. You are correct, this has been going on for a number of years. It always turns into a pr puff piece. Suspect the account ia him or his or company flame pr as the account contributed the profile picture with the copyright belonging to flamepr

2A02:C7F:C207:A800:B997:C880:E1FA:C5EB (talk)

Please do not interfere

Hspa.22 blocked as a sock. Surprise surprise. Muffled Pocketed 12:10, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Its between me and material scientist do not interfere old...pls DO NOT.....!! AND DK NOT SEND WIKI MESSAGES WHILE I AM IN COLEEGE LECTURE...!! Hspa.22 (talk) 09:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC) (talk page stalker) @Hspa.22: huh? Maybe you should be focusing on your lecture instead of edit warring over a unreferenced (and mostly fluff) sentence? Please stop shouting, and calm down -- samtar talk or stalk 09:05, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Pls stop attacking me...!!

See above ^^^
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Please stop sending messages on my talkpage.., Hspa.22 (talk) 09:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC) If you do not wish to receive messages about your bad behaviour, then may I suggest you improve it? Many thanks. Muffled Pocketed 09:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

	The Original Barnstar
	If we work together, we can improve wikipedia. Keep wondering y u keep revising my edits when all I wanna do is sort the list alphabetically and add missing names. Makes it easier for people to find names and see which ones are missing. If u wanna point any mistakes I'm making, I'm open to suggestions and ways to improve 1960boy (talk) 11:49, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Will keep this here for VarunFEB2003: Aide-memoire.

== Some Advice RE: Your editing ==

I just thought I'd give you a little advice: Right now, it really feels like you do not understand what Wikipedia is about. You have just under 1,500 edits, and over 1,200 of them are to User or User Talk pages. You have a total of 63 149 edits to Talk and Mainspace pages combined, less than 10% of your edits. [9] This is an encyclopedia, not a social media site. Barnstars, awards, and gussying up your User Page are all minor distractions to the main one: The Encyclopedia.

There have been users blocked in the past due to not being here to improve the Encyclopedia. You should probably take note of the second bolded line under WP:!HERE. Between the fact that your contribution percentages are so far out of balance, the fact that you are trying to keep a non-free file without even trying to understand why you can not do that, and the fact that you keep asking everyone to sign your guestbook like we are on MySpace, I am afraid you will probably head toward a block due to disruption sooner rather than later, unless you change how you are doing things. 2602:306:C41D:E880:C957:2302:5BD5:3869 (talk) 23:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Hspa.22

Yes, it was Saatvik.Jacob Material Scientist I was thinking of. Sorry I was a bit cryptic, I was dashing out of the house at the time! Still, all's well that ends well as a countryman of mine once wrote. I'm keeping an eye on {{noping|Hspa.20}] but I'm not sure yet that it's him. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:07, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

@Malcolmxl5: He mentioned Hspa.17 and Hspa.19 on his TP too- although also claimed they were administrators- and they don't seem to be registered- YET! Keeping an eye out for them to do so though. Cheers mate _Muffled ^{<for nt color="red">Pocketed} 16:19, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Yes, those don't exist. I'm hesitating about Hspa.20 because they didn't use a mobile like the others but we can wait and see. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Right; although just to let you know that here he acknowledges he is on a mobile at that time, but also that he has a laptop at home (30 miles away- not that far!)- so it could well be that being used? _Muffled ^Pocketed 16:55, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Hspa.20 (talk · contribs · count) is  Confirmed.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:04, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Cheers bbb. Call me Van Helsing _Muffled ^Pocketed 17:08, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

You mean Dr. Van Helsing. I wonder if he's related to Drmies.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Sock Smeller Persuivant at your service :) The doc's rocks meeces! _Muffled ^Pocketed 18:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Catherine of Lancaster

I apologize for reapplying my edit without explanation--I didn't realize you'd undone my previous edit before I reapplied it (I thought I might have mixed that page up with another one). That seems to be the new format for the house section of the royalty infobox (see pages of people from more well-known houses such as the Houses of Hanover, Plantagenet, and Windsor), as the "House of" part is rather redundant. ~ Iamthecheese44 (talk) 07:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

@Iamthecheese44: Please show me the MoS guideline and consensus for this change. _Muffled ^Pocketed 08:39, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

required arbcom notice

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#I wish for some resolution of the harassment, wikihounding, wikistalking, and attempts to WP:OUTING of me over the approximately last 60 days by user HappyValleyEditor and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant 01:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Refactoring comment

Re: refactoring, Doc refactored our comments, not me. I asked him not to do it three times, per WP:TALK. Furry-friend (talk) 10:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for moving this around from talk page to talk page, there is some sort of bug with the diff template that I tried to sort out. Furry-friend (talk) 10:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes I noticed how you made a total mons out of it. It right naused up this page!

The point was that putting a section header above my comment made it appear as if I had started a new section. Which I hadn't. Thus it was refactoring the spirit of my post rather than the letter of it. _Muffled ^Pocketed 11:03, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes, exactly. Doc put the section header above my comment to make it appear as if I had started a new section. Which I hadn't. Thus it was refactoring the spirit of my post rather than the letter of it. We agree 100% Furry-friend (talk) 11:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

If he does this again you can point him to WP:TALKO: "Never edit or move someone's comment to change its meaning." Furry-friend (talk) 11:07, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

No. _Muffled ^Pocketed 11:07, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

A moment

Can we just take a moment to appreciate sine bot becoming an activist. The edit summary is lovely [10]. Mr rnddude (talk) 10:38, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Brilliant Can we get Sinebot to Syria... the bot will sort it out!!! _Muffled ^Pocketed 10:41, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Let no signature go unsigned. Yes, stall them with bureaucracy, then nothing will get done. Wait, wait, wait, are those weapons signed? no? well we can't have that now, can we.  :) Mr rnddude (talk) 10:47, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

My talk page

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Please don't post on my talk page again. Thanks, Mathsci (talk) 09:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Dear Mathsci; as a so-called regular, you should know better than to leave uncivil edit-summaries. Which is everyone on WP's business. Ta. _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Leaving this diff here, so we can all remember Mathsci's edit summary... _Muffled ^Pocketed 10:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Please don't ping me. Thanks, Mathsci (talk) 11:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Mathsci Please do not post here. _Muffled ^Pocketed 11:16, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Please do not warn me to stop stalking here, thanks. — TOG 11:20, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Dead dog = shit editor

One of our dogs has just died. Stella, on the right up there.

Very sorry to hear that Fortuna :-( --Zero^talk 20:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I too am sorry for your loss. DrChrissy ^(talk) 20:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

As am I. She looked like a right badass. Hang on in there. Draco^E 17:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

(talk page watcher)Really sorry to hear that Fortuna 😢. Class455fan1 (talk) 17:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

I see I'm rather late to this, and I hope you don't mind me chiming in now, but as someone who has loved and lost many dogs over the years, I felt compelled to say something. A dog, really is a man's best friend. I rescued my little Staffie as an abused puppy in 2011 and I cannot imagine life without her. I do get most upset when I hear of someone losing a dog, more so than I do a human, I regret to say. I wish you a speedy grieving process. Now, aside from this remark, and all of the frankly shocking "thanks" we are awarding each other of late, let's get back to hating each other. Life was much more fun! Cassianto^Talk 08:20, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Good man. Thanks for that Cassianto, much appreciated. Rescuing staffies = a Raison d'être eh! Ours are all rescues too. Oh and by the way

You're a total ****** ****** ****, your edits are ***** ******* and ****** *****, ****** ***** you. OK?

;) _Muffled ^Pocketed 11:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination

I can assure you that the sources used are genuine (I have all the books listed as references) but I can see your point that parts of the article in question are similar to the website. I will rewrite in due course. ThanksRacingmanager (talk) 14:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Racingmanager: No-one disputes whether the sources are genuine: it was the fact that 90% of it was copied verbatim from [11]. Anyway; I note you have rectified that particular article, so I enk yow for that. _Muffled ^Pocketed 17:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Do not insult others

I see you are repeatedly insulting me in your comments on User talk:Spacecowboy420. Insulting others is not allowed. If you continue to attack me I shall have no choice but to complain you. This is not a threat to scare anyone but a plea to you to follow rules and not to attack others. Please maintain a civil behaviour towards others. 103.232.148.4 (talk) 11:51, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

IP, could you substantiate this claim with an example? -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 11:58, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

If you cannot substantiate with an example, be aware that WP:ASPERSIONS applies. Mr rnddude (talk) 12:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

I already had pointed it out. 103.232.148.4 (talk) 12:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Well you've specified a page, which has a lot of recent edits - are you referring to this edit perhaps? -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 12:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Samtar, I'm almost certain you've linked the wrong diff... Mr rnddude (talk) 12:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

I think what Samtar is referring to is this [12]. Mr rnddude (talk) 12:56, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

@Mr rnddude: I linked ASPERSIONS, hope you don't mind. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 12:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Not at all. Mr rnddude (talk) 12:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

We have to go.... deeper. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 12:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Ah yes, thank you Mr rnddude -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 13:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

I meant this. I see now Spacecowboy420 has removed all comments from the time after I came on his talk page. Fortuna has insulted me twice. First in his comment he calls me a "jester" then he insultingly termed my comments as "matinée" in his edit summary, like they're entertaining and funny. This is outright unacceptable behaviour especially as I didn't even say anything to him yet he insults me without reason. 103.232.148.4 (talk) 12:56, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

No doubt it is slightly uncivil, and could have easily be done without - hopefully this can all be water under the bridge if Fortuna accepts the fact that the comment was unnecessary -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 13:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

I have let it go, water under the bridge. But I do hope he does not make any uncivil remarks to anyone from now on. 103.232.148.4 (talk) 13:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Unbelievable- never had so many messages in one day. Nice to be wanted eh :) unfortunately I can't see all the yellow boxes because my wikibreak thing won't let me log on for another 1.5 hours. Never mind! Have a goood evening all. You too, 103.232.148.4 (talk · contribs), and thanks for the informations. 2A02:C7F:BE16:8400:E0CD:5D40:475A:C250 (talk) 15:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

You have a thing that doesn't let you log on in some times? Eh, I might need that. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 15:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

The average 'eh sayer

I missed all the fun yesterday! Gutted, or wot. That ANI didn't seem to achieve much even after it had been opened and closed again :D _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

• 103.232.148.4

Edit war?

Hi there. I am not "engaged in an edit war"; so I allowed myself to remove your message on my talk page. — Regards, Pro patria semper 14:00, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Pro patria semper, you're allowed to remove any warning notifications from your talk page. By removing it you acknowledge that you have read it. As a heads up, refer to WP:3RR for the reason you recieved a warning. No more than 3 reverts are allowed on any page in any 24 hour period except to prevent vandalism, copyright violations and a couple other problems. On that note, I will extend the same courtesy to Prototype who is also in violation of 3RR. Mr rnddude (talk) 14:03, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Thank you for your answer, Mr rnddude. Eventually, I thought the modifications I reverted consisted in vandalism; unfortunately, I can't avoid it anymore. — Regards, Pro patria semper 14:09, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Edits at RfPP

You're talking rubbish as usual. I reverted the edits at RfPP. 92.8.222.87 (talk) 16:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

You're unbelievable. You claimed to have reverted an edit I made at RfPP. You did no such thing. All you did was troll my talk page (twice). 92.8.222.87 (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

You trolled RFPP and then deleted it. Goodbye. _Muffled ^Pocketed 16:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Just in case you're not familiar with this particular breed of troll: Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Vote (X) for Change. Favonian (talk) 16:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

• @Favonian: Thanks for the info- have come across him before, but not usually at close encounters. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 16:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Copyright issues

Please note that the website in question now carries a no copyright wikipedia recommended message. Please do not revert the article. Thanks Racingmanager (talk) 17:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

@Racingmanager: No: you do not tell other editors what to do. You see, you have recently demonstrated phenomenally poor judgement over copyright, so we will let Diannaa (for example) be the arbitor of that. :Also: since the article "'now carries" that notice, are we to assume that you have some connection to the website? It seems coincidental to say the least that it suddenly decides to release all its material under CC license, at a time when you were about to be sanctioned for misusing it.

Just a thought. _Muffled ^Pocketed 17:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

There are other issues, which I have raised with Racingmanager but to which they did not respond. They relates to WP:SPS and the fact that the various PDFs hosted on the site in question do not carry citations. I'm afraid that this is going to get very messy - I suspect RM is very knowledgeable about the subject area but is going to fall foul of our sometimes almost self-defeating policies etc. I'm also still unhappy that they creating new stuff but not addressing the hundreds of existing problems, including that of purple prose. Frankly, I suspect most of what they're adding would be best left on their website and not transposed on Wikipedia. People would still be able to find it (well, until someone stops paying for the hosting etc). - Sitush (talk) 18:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Sitush, so you think there is a connection between Racingmanager and that website? If then, it's an WP:NRS then I guess the information it supposedly sources should probably be nuked from orbit. _Muffled ^Pocketed 18:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

See this. It is all very unfortunate. Each article needs to be reconstructed from the underlying books etc, assuming that Racingmanager is not also the author of any of those. It's a fairly niche area, I should imagine. - Sitush (talk) 19:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Eg: they created 1953 English Greyhound Derby in the last few hours but I just know that the Competition Report section is not all in the one cited source. I know that because they've previously said that such reports are compiled by them from several sources. - Sitush (talk) 18:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

I recommended that each individual PDF should carry the required license, not just the website main page carrying a notice "The text of this website ...". Also, Sitush has valid concerns about citing your own (unsourced) work and whether or not the material as a whole can be considered as a reliable source for this wiki. — Diannaa (talk) 18:44, 24 July 2016 (UTC) Adding: Failing that, what you need to do is make it clearer on the home page that all the PDF subpages are also licensed. Also, attribution needs to be added to the Wikipedia pages, specifying that the material is copied from the source website. Here is an example of how to do that. All this is moot if the material is deemed not to be a reliable source for this wiki. — Diannaa (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Warning on Nepali Keto

Just so you know that wasn't Keto posting in another language but re-posting this diff from Constantin, which seems to say that he's a new account of Mujtaba!. Happy laundry day, hope you have sufficient quarters! —SpacemanSpiff 17:45, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Classic! Hope he pays his sock factory minimum wage at least ;) Thanks for that info though. _Muffled ^Pocketed 17:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gadri. They don't pay me enough for all this crap! —SpacemanSpiff 18:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Was that Roger Murtaugh?! ;) this is really bizarre. So the editor involved against a sockmaster is himself a sockmaster...? I think WP:MONTY PYTHON applies! _Muffled ^Pocketed 18:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Less Murtaugh and more my former boss, but any newbie who loves to hangout at SPI is definitely suspicious IMO. —SpacemanSpiff 18:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Please do not delete my article "Leung Tsang"

Hi Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, I am creating the article "Leung Tsang". You said the page appears to be a direct copy from http://web.eecs.umich.edu/~leutsang/Professional%20Services.html. Well somehow this is true. In fact this external link belongs to me. I am the owner of this link. I will put a notice on the bottom of this link and grant permission to other people. So please do not delete this article. Joestc (talk) 14:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

@Joestc: I did not delete it; that was Administrator RHaworth, whom I am pinging to alert of this discussion. _Muffled ^Pocketed 14:58, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - regarding Racingmanager. - Sitush (talk) 00:01, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Can you please have a look at the Administrator page and provide feedback if necessary. Many thanks.Racingmanager (talk) 12:48, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Wilhelm Ramsøe

Hey little Muffled. (Perhaps I should be writing to you c/o the pocket?) If you're at home with WP:DYK, as I'm not — I find it quite thorny — have you thought of proposing this nice new article for it? I have to admit I have trouble thinking of a thrilling hook... but still. Just a thought. Bishonen | talk 10:28, 31 July 2016 (UTC).

Dear Bishonen. That's a nice idea; but I have to say that I've never even visited DYK. I got the impression it was as bad as ANI sometimes! And like you say, the hook... "Did you know that a Danish conductor also played in Norway and Russia" is all I can think of! _Muffled ^Pocketed 10:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Very difficult to reply to messages in pocket... I have locked myself in the mini-bar  ;)

Suggest lock self in fridge! (First fridge, then fat camp.)[13] bishzilla _ROARR!! 12:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC).

‎Ban proposal for Tikeem cumberbatch uttp tcgp own close

I think you made a mistake. The user was blocked in April, not three minutes after the proposal was filed. Linguist 111 Please reply on the current talk page and ping me by typing {{ping|Linguist111}} before your message as a courtesy 17:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

subversive categorisation

You know you are not supposed to do that, don't you?

Wikipedia:User categories: "user categories should not be used as "bottom-of-the-page" notices.[7] If a Wikipedian wishes to have such a notice, they may edit their user page and add the notice in some other way (such as by adding text or a userbox), rather than inappropriately creating a category grouping.[8]" Rathfelder (talk) 20:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Knock it off. It's doing literally zero harm, and it's humorous. Pointless legalism is not welcome, and in any case, the page you cite is only a guideline. I see from your talk page you've been rubbing several people up the wrong way over this. BethNaught (talk) 20:16, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

ANI

Hi, Since you reverted my edit at ANI which will be the right place to report COI. VarunFEB2003 ^{I am Online} 12:56, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

VarunFEB2003, that would be WP:COIN. Mr rnddude (talk) 12:57, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Mr rnddude- also @VarunFEB2003: consider going to WP:RFPP and requesting the article name to be WP:SALTED, that way it cannot be recreated. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed

Thanks VarunFEB2003 ^{I am Online} 13:11, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

A well deserved barnstar

		The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar
		And for helping out in general. Very much appreciated! 2601:188:1:AEA0:EDF4:356E:4D91:F8E4 (talk) 22:08, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

lookin' fine, '99! Many thanks- that's a bit different isn't it. Always a pleasure working with you! _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi

You recently (just) undid my edit at the Indian Human rights page. Can you please tell me why you restored an outdated version of the Human rights report? I had merely copied the opening para from the report to the page and gave it in quotes as should be the norm. How can it be against a neutral point of view when the exact words of the organization have been quoted? TouristerMan (talk) 12:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

@TouristerMan: My apologies, I didn't notice the →dates- I have restored your later version. Although, I note that a lot of your edits are' being questioned- careful, eh. _Muffled Pocketed 13:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi ty for that. Yes it seems India/Pakistan is a touchy feely topic here lol. An editor was literally harassing me on my talk page just because there was like half a line of extra text in an article. And instead of removing those 5 words he took it upon himself to just remove my entire contribution and then start hassling me. I wish wikipedia had some administrators (I have already been told that this is not a forum......). It should not be allowed for users to just start a campaign on another users page, they should use the page of the related article. Anyway, ty very much for the edit. I hope to see you around TouristerMan (talk) 02:57, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Need AN/I's help?

No, I'm WAY past that :) Thanks for the close. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:56, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

No worries  ;) did I guess right? _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Nope, Vote (X) actually. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Curses- I guessed it had to be one or the other, but couldn't remember which one was (supposedly) in London. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 14:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Next time

Hi,

It would be appreciated if you find something on the article, which as put it "makes little sense," instead of tagging it, or calling the whole nation for it, fix it yourself. Thank you, Mona778 (talk) 22:20, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Mona778 I'll bear that in mind. I'm not sure what you mean exactly. But I hope you'll let me know! :) _Muffled ^Pocketed 22:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

You know exactly what I meant, don't pretend you don't. True, we had a bad start, but that doesn't mean we'll remain that way forever. Of course, it 'll all depend on how we behave toward each other from now on. Bye. Mona778 (talk) 00:32, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Mona778. The tags are actually meant to help improve the encyclopaedia. Editors like me lookout for articles with tags and then help to improve them. So when Fortuna tagged it, it was in good faith. Sometimes, editors go through lots of articles and don't have time to fix each of them. So we just tag them at that time and either fix later or wait for someone to fix. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:25, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Lemongirl942, would you please stay out of this and mind your own business. I don't think I have mentioned you anywhere in my post, which prompted you to make a comment here. By the way, I mean no disrespect, but I think your edits need to be tagged and copy edited as well, especially after those I saw you made to that article. Ah, I almost forgot! Do not ping me again, please. Thank you. Mona778 (talk) 12:08, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Since it's not your talk page, perhaps don't tell people to stay out (or off) of it. That is a courtesy reserved for the person to whom this talk page belongs (in this case Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi) and even they have limited rights to prevent editors coming here. That said, your request not to be pinged by the editor is acceptable, if unnecessary and not conducive to a co-operative environment. Mr rnddude (talk) 12:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Please read WP:CIVIL. Wikipedia is everyone's business, so telling me to stay out is not considered good for collaborative environment. And please point out which of my edits need copyediting and tagging. Your edits seriously needed copy editing. Everyone is willing to contribute, but you need to listen to others as well. When multiple people are telling you that your edits need copyediting, it would do better if you listen. I hope you will change your attitude. Cheers. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC) Update:Snarkiness removed as it is a new user. Thanks Mr rnddude.--Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:28, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Recent Edit

I dont understand what you are up to. You just removed relevant content with enough references blatantly. What reason this time? Is this some kind of joke?--Truebrother (talk) 06:32, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Firstly, please read WP:DNTTR. Thank you.

Secondly, your edits have been reverted by multiple editors because they are crap. They are in violition of WP:RS, WP:SYNTH, WP:OR, WP:UNDUE, WP:DETAIL, etc etc. If you insist on everting against established consensus, it is liable to constitute edit-warring, for which you can be reported. Now: go from here and hence to the talkpge.

_Muffled ^Pocketed 09:45, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Your attacks against me

Your attacks againt me will not be tolerated. This is a blocking warning. Be respectful to me and I will respect you back. Foleo (talk) 07:45, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

@Foleo: No; you do not give block warnings. It is that kind of WP:BATTLEGROUND behaviour that NeilN recently rewarded you with an extended block, which you have just finished.This version of your Talk Page will show other editors what brought you here. Goodbye! _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

They've been blocked again (not by me). BTW, you're lucky. You got off with a warning. I'm "blocked". --NeilN ^{talk to me} 09:27, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Unbelievable! Shouldn't chuckle, but ;)

I'm sure it's a preventative block! _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:32, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

"Other contributors or people", who else is contributing other than people? Mr rnddude (talk) 09:45, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Prehistoric creatures are contributing plenty Mr rnddude! bishzilla _ROARR!! 14:49, 4 August 2016 (UTC).

Note new threads belong on the bottom of a talk user's page. This is to ensure ease of accessibility to both yourself and the editor involved. Also FIM, for the love of god, start archiving your talk page. I could barely get my laptop to move this and each letter of my comment took at least 5 seconds to show up. Mr rnddude (talk) 07:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Red Bull

OK, I won't, but I'm curious as to why I shouldn't? (I'm aware I've already done 2 reverts today). Eagleash (talk) 11:57, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

@Eagleash: Apologies if that sounded like an instruction! I didn't mean it that way, but the IP had just switched addresses, and carrying on removing that stuff. I realised that, if he could change addresses every three or four minutes, then we'd both end up on 1000RR in no time but Kuru semi'd the page which stopped us having to be involved (thanks be to him of course).

Good work catching him in the first place though! Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 12:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

No problem. The page is on my watchlist for some reason or other, so it wasn't hard to spot a repetition of an earlier similar edit. I know all about disruptive IP hoppers from battling with one at the F1 Project over the last year. :P Eagleash (talk) 14:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

I think the first line under the 'Endorsements' sub heading could be changed so that it doesn't give the impression that only sports should be included. By the IP's definition the chess player should be removed also, but I don't think anyone would seriously consider that. Eagleash (talk) 16:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Totally agree- it's a bit specific for what is an increasingly blurred area. Cheers! _Muffled ^Pocketed 18:29, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

I've changed it but it's a bit unwieldy... If you feel like taking a look, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. Regards, Eagleash (talk) 21:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Problem in user page

You have a problem in your user page (in Template:User-orcp) is it intentional or accidental ?
by the way nice dogs :)--Yufitran (talk) 19:34, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Warnings

Dear User!

Really shocked to read your warning on my talk page regarding my additions on Inter_Services_Intelligence and their unfairly undoing by some users whose country was defamed for false allegations against ISI and their Govt. accepted that allegation were false. So this information needed to be included in article and that's what i did. But as a matter of fact, this thing was not digestible by Indians as they have a history of Blaming Pakistan for every incident. Ok, now you tell me would not it be unfair if anyone tries to conceal history which is not in his/her interests?? Wikipedia is a place to share accurate, verifiable and up to date information to those relying on Wikipedia. But revisions and warnings are not fair. Think about it. Thanks AKJatt (talk) 05:06, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

@AKJatt: You've already passed the three revert rule by a mile. You could currently be blocked, however I suggest you visit the talk page of the article and discuss the issue before you are. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 07:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, DatGuy. Just so. _Muffled ^Pocketed 08:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

DatGuy Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (talk · contribs) WHAT A HYPOCRISYYYYYYYYY???? Does 3-Revert-Rule only applies to me or to User:Spartacus too??? If i have made 8 revisions rightfully, he have made plenty of revisions wrongfully. See the revision history and you will see SPARTACUS everywhere. Perfect example of Double Standards. If u wanna block me, GO AHEAD. I will not stop making true additions to ISI. Do whatever you can. HunhhhhAKJatt (talk) 10:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

@AKJatt: Borderline harassment. Creating an Edit war report now. I am talking to Spartacus on User talk:Spartacus!. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 10:53, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

David Irving

Sorry, I didn't mean to rollback your edit - twinkle got me. I intended to revert it as this doesn't seem to be cruft - Irving was a commercially very successful author for quite some time. Nick-D (talk) 10:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

@Nick-D:, although undoubtedly true, I'm just not sure it's a relevant sentence at that point in the article. No worries though. _Muffled ^Pocketed 10:43, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Humphrey Stafford (died 1413) has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. Humphrey Stafford (died 1413), an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:00, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Your message

Fortuna, please stay out. Applications in arbitration proceedings are not personal attacks. They are the oil which keeps things running smoothly. 31.54.202.183 (talk) 02:08, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

The only oil required is WP:DENY. Please continue to make personal attacks on high-profile pages, and please continue to revel in your reversion. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 02:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

• And thank you for providing the links to the evidence for your LTA. Good to know that even Vote (X) for Change feels the urge for confession occasionally. Delightfully Catholic. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 02:43, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Re: Goa Public Service Commission

Re your message: Thanks. I deleted it again. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:43, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

That third one was a good catch. Published at 0643, deleted 0643. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 05:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

@Gogo Dodo: And it has been recreated. I suggest deleting it again and putting the good ol' block hammer on the creator. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 15:11, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

I think this is the fourth creation. Perhaps time to have a little WP:SALT with it... Thanks for the info DatGuy, can't log in at the mo. 2A02:C7F:BE16:8400:7CCC:6172:BDEF:9E11 (talk) 15:37, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Humphrey Stafford (died 1413)

On 28 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Humphrey Stafford (died 1413), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in his will, Humphrey Stafford left his household servants £1 each, his grooms 6s.8d each, his pages 3s.4d each, and £8 for masses for his soul? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Humphrey Stafford (died 1413). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Humphrey Stafford (died 1413)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Reviews

Two more done, here and here, with some more tonight. Cassianto^Talk 18:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much Cassianto- I won't have a lot of time this week due to irl commitments, but they're appreciated all the same. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 07:30, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Merger discussion for rhythm and dance

An article that you have been involved in editing—rhythm and dance—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. WannaBeEditor (talk) 18:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

No. I called you a troll, a vandal and a LTA. And, of course, I was right. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 08:41, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for dealing with the troll. According to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/49.196.159.137, this has been a problem since February. This person reverts the recent edits of anyone who stands up to them, then tries to report them. I hope we can get a rangeblock or something like that. Again, thanks. Sro23 (talk) 12:11, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

@Sro23: Thanks for the background and the link. No worries! Did it ever have a named account, do we know? _Muffled ^Pocketed 12:16, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

I have no idea, I am only aware of the disruptive usage of multiple IP's. Sro23 (talk) 12:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Another notice

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Specifically: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Request ban for User:PoetryFan. Thanks. Phil wink (talk) 02:01, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Closing AFDs

Remember you have to remove the AFD template from the article and add a template to the talk page. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:28, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

@NeilN: Of course-! I forgot about the actual article itself. Sorry about that. The close itself OK though? _Muffled ^Pocketed 17:36, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Discussion was thin but yes, right call. It may have closed as No consensus defaulting to keep had PoetryFan made the right arguments. Many of the present refs come from press releases or non-independent sources, notability is not inherited, no in-depth coverage, etc. But the job of the closer is not to make arguments for the sides so again, right call. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:12, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the Autopatrol endorsement, really appreciated! Amkilpatrick (talk) 21:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

It was no more than is deserved- you do good work here! Cheers, and all the best, Amkilpatrick. _Muffled ^Pocketed 22:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Apologies

Hello! I want to apologize for poaching the article Roly Bain. When I saw the conversation about him at Drmies's talk page, I somehow missed seeing that you had already started a draft. So I went ahead and created the article. I was unaware of your draft until User:Polentarion added some material to the article and cited your draft. I wish I could add you to the DYK as co-author, but I'm not sure if they'd buy it, since you do not appear as a contributor in the history. What do you think, shall I do it anyhow? --MelanieN (talk) 16:12, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Hey MelanieN, no worries. You did a good job, that's all that matters! I couldn't have done it so soon because we only got the info in the evening (my time), so logically you were much better placed time-wise to deal with it. I noticed Polentarion's edit and meant to point out the article was elsewhere, but totally forgot. On a lighter note- liked your 'Ta-da!' Very cockney thanks for the nice message, but please don't worry about it! Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 16:21, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Just do it. As I have referred to Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi's draft in my edit summaries, she's part of the contributions. Polentarion Talk 16:25, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Nope, doesn't matter, but very WP:CIVIL of you both. Well done on your Latin, by the way @Polentarion:! ;)_Muffled ^Pocketed 16:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Well, thanks for your cheerful and forgiving spirit. The DYK has been approved; not yet queued, but watch for it on the front page sometime soon. Bain was such a character, he inspired some marvelous hooks! --MelanieN (talk) 17:00, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks ;) ironically my 'cheerful and forgiving spirit' doesn't extend as far as DYK, where I've had a couple of mildly irritating experiences to the extent that I'd prefer not to be associaited with that aspect of the project. But best of luck with it anyway. On a lighter note, yep, he was one of those classic English eccentrics, eh- it's good to know that in these occassionally drab and colourless two-dimensional times there's still characters like him around! At least there were. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 17:06, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

I hear you. I have had, over the years, some tear-your-hair-out frustrating experiences at DYK that caused me to quit that project for months at a time. It seems to be much more stable now - I think the bot clerking has helped - but one never knows with that project. Anyhow I did add your name, but don't worry about it; if anything hits the fan, I will be the one that gets splattered. --MelanieN (talk) 17:15, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Kaiserliche Hoheit gained some points with the soapy-water-treatment of dero keyboard. Sigh, its a Kleine de:Latinum, but it seems to work still now and then. Curtsey bow - gschamster diener Polentarion Talk 16:50, 9 September 2016 (UTC) PS.: I saw that Modest proposal on the front side, interesting. I had learned about such proposal from Bernhard Mandeville first, less from Swift.

Modest proposal about poaching

I had translated Pius Walder. Georg Jennerwein still waits for an enWP article. The rather politically correct main article "poaching is still not covering the alpine version of the story. Would you like to adress that topic together with me? Polentarion Talk 19:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Sorry Polentarion for the late reply- what did you mean, poaching? _Muffled ^Pocketed 12:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Yes. I just started to bavarify poaching. Polentarion Talk 14:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

@Polentarion:, do you mean, as in translate into Bavarian? _Muffled ^Pocketed 14:23, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Ah no, I wouldn't be able to write for the bavarian WP. I translated Akira_Kurosawa for pfl.wp and Muggeseggele for the Englisher and als.wp.

The early version of poaching was quite US oriented, rather politically correct and did not mention the alpine aspects, so bavarizing has been about bavarian content ;) Polentarion Talk 14:39, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Impact of the privatisation of British Rail

Thanks for your comment on the AfD nomination of this article. You might be interested in the discussion going on in the "Neutrality" section of the talk page - I am not sure how to respond to the editor in question. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 12:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

objections based on policy

re special:diff/738666683 "Ranze failed to make any policy-based objections, merely conjectural"

My objections were based on on the policy Wikipedia:Redirect/Deletion reasons.

Specifically WP:RKEEP (Reasons for not deleting) numbers 3 and 5 which I'll quote for you, as I assume based on your commentary you must have missed my citing policy the first time around during the redirect discussion:

• 3. They aid searches on certain terms.
• 5. Someone finds them useful. Hint: If someone says they find a redirect useful, they probably do. You might not find it useful—this is not because the other person is being untruthful, but because you browse Wikipedia in different ways.

I also referred to WP:RDEL (Reasons for not deleting) in pointing out that several people calling for deleting were citing reasons which did not conform to any of those 10 reasons.

Does this change your opinion or do you maintain that I did not make policy-based objections?

Do you recall specifically which objection I voiced which you interpret as being conjectural rather than policied? I would like to review them so if I erred I can apologize and avoid doing so in future argument. Ranze (talk) 02:32, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the opportunity to expand, Ranze; I think I'll just sit back and watch your CANING @ANI continue. Cheers! _Muffled ^Pocketed

You have not addressed your claim that I did not make policy-based objections. Do you stand by that in spite of the evidence otherwise or recant it? I figure I should make one last ditch at WP:AGF toward you in spite of the mocking tone of this reply. Ranze (talk) 05:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

I'm not sure I need to address this now. _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

OCA

Since you use it how do you define where it needs to archive? Thanks! VarunFEB2003 13:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

@VarunFEB2003: This should work for you- everytime an archive is big enough, just change the number counter. More info (I'm not a tech), see WP:OCA, and specifically this perhaps?

{{archive box|search=yes|<center> [[/Archive 1|Archive 1]]. [[/Archive 2|Archive 2]] [[/Archive 3|Archive 3]].}}
{{Archive basics
|archive = User talk:VarunFEB2003/Archive %(counter)d
|counter = 1
}} 

_Muffled ^Pocketed 13:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. I'll just check VarunFEB2003 15:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your speedy nomination

Done. And then.nn - mass delete is a great tool. I'm tired of these socks, they keep popping up. Doug Weller talk 15:53, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: thanks very much for the update; I was a little concerned when my original CSD was refuted- I questioned my judgement for a minute. On a lighter note, 'mass delete' sounds fun- a kind of Death Star for the sock rebellion?! Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 16:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

It got a reaction from an IP sock who posted something weird on the bottom of my talk page. Yes, it's a really useful tool at times, saves a lot of work. Doug Weller talk 16:36, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

To do tomorrow?

Inverted detective story should surely have a mention of Columbo? _Muffled ^Pocketed 21:01, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Just wondering

What does this mean? Are you referring to the edits on the article itself? Thank you for clarifying.Volunteer Marek (talk) 13:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Mmmm. 1,511 bytes-worth. _Muffled ^Pocketed 14:04, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, still don't get it.Volunteer Marek (talk) 15:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

That's some super cute dogs btw.Volunteer Marek (talk) 15:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

The one on the right is dead now. I was suggesting that the edit-count per 'concerned editor' was rather anomolous... especialy in the context of one of those parties being accused of making too many edits in any one time.

That's all. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 15:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Ah, thanks, and sorry to hear that.Volunteer Marek (talk) 21:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the wb

Thank you for the wb, I made legal threats but I hope that is sorted now... I have not had much time to reply because I said when unbanned that I would do some gnomework at uncontroversial things like PNT then headlong plunged into an article at PNT in Spanish about an obscure Spanish party, a one man band essentially (I didn't know this before I translated it) so was not as uncontroversial as I first thought. The discussion has been taken out of PNT by co-editors and now resides on its talk page, Talk:Unión de Todos.

I am not sure what you mean by existentialist comments, wasn't it Jean-Paul Sartre who said that we have to make ourselves again every day? But then he was a chain smoker and alcoholic, unlike me... well ok a bit like me except he spoke French better than me.

Since patently everyone should have exactly the same view of the world and what is wrong with it, I think I might also start my own one man band, do I have your vote? My manifesto is fairly simple

• People who drop litter on the street should be shot on sight
  • People who drop chewing gum should be forced to lick it off the pavement, while I mercifully shoot them in the back of the head
• Anyone in a BBC vox pop interview who says "you know" as a filler more than fourthree times in a sentence should be shot through my television, by some kind of new device that allows me to shoot them by remote control
  • People who do not know that "none" is singular should also be shot
  • Announcers who say "here is the news where you live" where they don't know where I live should also be shot

• People who think they can speak Latin and can't as they don't have a Shortbread Eating Primer, er Shorter Latin Primer, should definitely be shot. Present company excepted, of course.
  • Anybody who says "present company excepted" should be immediately shot.
  • Anyone who says "I don't mean to be personal, but" is definitely shot. "I don't mean to be personal, but, would you mind putting your clothes back on? It looks like a penis, only smaller" or anything like that. Any words following "I don't mean to be personal, but" are guaranteed to be personal. These people are definitely to be shot.
• Anyone who ever interrupts me when I am speaking and am making a terse and cogent argument lasting no longer than 45 minutes.
• Doors that are locked for no reason will, by law, have a sign on them saying "this door is locked for no reason".
• Any kind of supermaket meal deal will be abolished, because they are a rip off anyway, and unless you are two or four you end up with half of it going to the cat or have to buy two and three of the eight goes to the cat.
  • Cats will definitely be abolished.
  • By law, things in the supermarket will be where I say they will be, and not tucked at the back for all the essentials so I have to trawl the whole store.
• By the Law, energy saving light bulbs are abolished. They do not save energy, that is the Second Law of Thermodynamics. What they do is save energy "wasted" as heat. Well if the temperature of my room is colder than I want it to be, a light bulb is as efficient as any other kind of heater.
• For a trial period of one year, it shall be allowed to smoke everywhere currently one cannot smoke, and banned to smoke everywhere one can currently smoke.
  • Anyone who coughs when I walk down a busy street with a cigarette is immediately shot, when they have these awful polluting cars and buses and trucks whizzing past them coughing much more into their lungs than my little cancer stick.
    • All private transport will be banned. Walk or bike or take public transport.
      • Women who use their cars as some kind of portable wardrobe are definitely banned.
      • Women's handbags are also banned as being the mathematical definition of a set: an infinite collection of objects, no two of which are alike.
        • • Women generally are banned, for no reason except I said so.
• Clothes shops will be forced to rearrange their, er, arrangements, so the men's stuff is at the front and the women's stuff is three flights of stairs up in a dingy back room. Harry_Gordon_Selfridge's tomb shall be immediately ransacked.
• Lillibulero to be reinstated as the hour mark on the BBC World Service.
  • Also, the BBC's habit of saying "this hour". There is no such expression in English as "this hour". It used to be "oh eight hundred hours, Greenwich Mean Time" then Lilibullero.
• -*On BBC Radio 4 to reinstate the Radio 4 UK Theme at start of play each morning (it was, after all, written by an Austrian-German Jew refugee, Fritz Spiegl, so of course it is nationalistic but tell me a national anthem that is not nationalistic? As Orwell said, there would be no point in them if they were not nationalistic, and it is a far better melody than God Save The Queen, which is rather a dirge and nobody except me knows the words beyond the first couple of verses anyway. Damn them their politics! confound their knavish tricks! Best lines in the whole thing, and you never get to sing them. Plus we have Marshall Wade rushing in in the fourth verse to quell the Scots, well what could be better than that. Now I am all for the Queen being saved, and let's face it, if you want a saviour, God's the chap to do it, but it is a pretty terrible tune and pretty terrible words.)
• Mobile phones, cellular phones, "Handy"s in German, should have a cigarette lighter built into them. THis is not actually hard so I blame Nokia and Motorola and so on for not thinking of it. You only need a little piezo-electric lighter on the top of the thing running off the battery. Not really rocket science. Here is my Dragon's Den suggestion for the day.

Is that enough existentialism for one night? I hope so :)

Pax vobis fortuna imperiatrix, salute Si Trew (talk) 00:33, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Re: removal of WP:CRUFT, WP:PROMO, WP:ADVERT, WP:UNSOURCED, WP:NRS and WP:TRAVELGUIDE from Kottayam article

I can't see any reason why you keep on disturbing the article Kottayam. Do you even know where is Kottayam. Well it is a city in Indian state of Kerala. You are simply keeping on reverting the article. You don't even know our culture. Our city Kottayam knows what it needs in it's article. But please stop deleting contents from it. Everything in it was planned and discussed among us Kottayamkar. It may seem as commercial promotion, political or vandalism to you foreigners. But please stop it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thommuvtt (talk • contribs) 10:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Dear Thommuvtt No: you are repeatedly inserting crap, and have been repeatedly asked not to. Please read what Wikipedia is not, and also how everything you wish to add must be neutral in tone and backed up by reference to reliable sources. It would also be a profitable use of your time to familiarise your self with the policy regarding repeatedly reverting edits. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 11:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

PS, and please sign your posts and start a new section on new talk-pages. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 11:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Well the content is neutral in tone. Please notify me the thing you would like to alter before deleting it on large scale. I will change it if it is needed to be so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thommuvtt (talk • contribs) 10:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Thommuvtt I have already told you what was wrong with the article. Also suggest you read the pages I linked to above. Please do not keep reinserting the dud material; it will be removed, and you may be reported. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 11:22, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

I think you havent told me what was wrong. Sorry for disturbing you. Please mention what was wrong here. I will edit it. Please don't completely delete it from our page.