User talk:CLCStudent/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, CLCStudent! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! --I am k6ka ^{Talk to me!} _{See what I have done} 20:36, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Install/Uninstall testing

why are you flagging the article for removal? How it is promoting any product etc? Expecting your response soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awaisraad (talk • contribs) 17:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot deleted CSD tags from articles that you created even if they are wrong. CLCStudent (talk) 17:35, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CLCStudent, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi CLCStudent! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My apology

I am sorry for editing that page of the history of Barbados. Please forgive me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.82.208.231 (talk) 20:13, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello how will I upload my biography? Cyrexofficiall (talk) 18:42, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wp:Biography CLCStudent (talk) 18:44, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

None of the IPs you listed are currently editing. Giant Snowman 20:48, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Pandit Aditya (talk) 16:10, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 20:52, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your idea

Some latitude is allowed as we are humans, not robots. For newbies, "Hi, I'm Bob" is a plausible first edit and we definitely don't want to WP:BITE them for that. For veteran editors, there's likely some minor chit-chat going on on their talk page or in the archives. As for warnings, they're not badges of shame. Any competent admin will check talk page history and most recent change patrollers will do the same. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:14, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How to deal with a content dispute

This is about your post to WP:AN. I was about to close that, but someone else got there first. Please read WP:BRD which explains how to deal with a disagreement about content: in brief, discuss it on the article talk page, and try to reach WP:Consensus. If you can't reach consensus, see WP:Dispute resolution. Admins have no special authority about content: the "drama-boards" WP:AN (or preferably WP:ANI for an individual incident rather than a policy question) are the last resort for intractable disputes, not the first place to go. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:21, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Death of Mahfiruz Hatice Sultan is unknown. Some sources support that she died in 1605 when her son Osman I was 2 years old. Others support that she died in 1620 and she became Valide Sultan. Sadiqmehralizade (talk) 17:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tonight Belongs to U

Exactly how is redirecting Tonight Belongs to U from Jeremih to Tonight Belongs to U! (the Jeremih song in question) unconstructive? - 37.157.50.235 (talk) 19:54, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tip

Thanks for your help reverting vandalism. I noticed you are manually warning vandals. Using WP:Twinkle makes this task much easier. You can enable/disable Twinkle in your Preferences under 'Gadgets'. Regards– Gilliam (talk) 19:54, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CLCStudent

The question on the page of Van Halen is the overuse of scarce sources of cohesion in the use of musical genres from classic bands , I am a staunch enemy of sites as " allmusic.com " , " rollingstone " and the like, it looks like trainees 15 year-old , writing evaluations, employing a lot of duplicity , bad faith and spelling errors and analysis, as I wrote in another discussion page , there are more laborious and honest ways to make co -reports , speed is not quality! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.95.113.94 (talk) 21:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

pending changes reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Katie^talk 07:19, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for pointing it out I guess I was just to eager to make changes I’ll only use facts related and appropriate for the topic Janeeyreboyz (talk) 17:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 14:09, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your help. FYI, warning vandals might be easier using WP:TWINKLE - you can enable (or disable) it at your Preferences under 'Gadgets'.– Gilliam (talk) 00:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

With this ever dramatic world including WikiDrama, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day!

This e-tea's remains have been e-composted SwisterTwister talk 07:16, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi clcstudent. Just reaching out as i was updating a a wiki page on me to increase its accuracy. And add a image. Mark Ludbrook (talk) 02:06, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Libertyville High School

No biggie, but I undid your restore of some deleted material in this article. The information concerning the 2003 State championship game is already in the preceding paragraph. Meters (talk) 17:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your diligent efforts to protect the wiki from vandalism. Keep it up! — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:31, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes

Please don't ever accept pending changes that introduce unsourced personal information to biography articles as you did at Richard Wisker. It is these types of edits that pending changes was enabled to prevent. Thank you, --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:19, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I was going through the recent changed in anatomy [1] and found some shady edits that needed reverting. I somehow missed that you had already done that, so sorry for accidentally reverting you. CFCF 💌 📧 18:18, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You could consider

putting something, anything, on your user page. This will change your signature, as well as the "User Page" tab at the top left of this page, from being a red link (which sort of stands for "dead end) into a blue link. This is a pretty standard move for editors who plan on staying around. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 18:46, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uw-userspacenoindex

All pages in the user namespace are now NOINDEXed by default, though I am unable to find the discussion that implemented this change. What do you think should we do with this template? 103.6.159.86 (talk) 14:59, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Black Ops III

I was trying to fix the sentence where Paint it Black was played three times in the teaser trailer, launch trailer and live-action tv spot that's all.72.64.207.76 (talk) 20:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tristan Nunez and Fire Suppression System

Hi. You wrote to me saying you had removed my changes on the articles Tristan Nunez and Fire Suppression System. There may be some confusion, as I have never edited either of those pages. Yours sincerely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.150.142 (talk) 14:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Quezon City Science High School

Hey,

I'm editing the page as it needs updating, and you just reverted everything without explanation. All the information I am supplying is valid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.144.245.144 (talk) 18:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Quezon City Science High School

Why do you keep reverting it back to the original? The information I am providing is valid! I would not dare vandalize the page of my alma mater, just so you know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.144.245.144 (talk) 19:15, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't do anything since our last conversation. CLCStudent (talk) 19:56, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IP editor block request

Hi there; I saw your request on my talk page, but Favonian just beat me to the block. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks anyway. CLCStudent (talk) 22:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your second report: the block given by another admin was a day only; I have changed it to a month. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 22:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: vandal IP

That may be [2], but it's a longterm disruptive account. If I see another such edit I'll ask for a user block. Thanks for all your contributions, and happy holidays. 73.159.24.89 (talk) 20:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a longterm warning, based on a series of edits by the account in the last few days, as well as a much longer history. 73.159.24.89 (talk) 20:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 20:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Glover (composer)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

With this in mind it would be good to let sleeping dogs lie as teh Mirror has been proven to lie using illegal phone tapping so who is to say that the supposed interview is actually legitimate. this is why the section keeps getting removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.241.181.171 (talk) 18:39, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions

Why are you deleting templates without reason or justification? Quis separabit? 21:32, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

mistake

What I put there is actually correct and used multiple sources to support my information — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.140.59.74 (talk) 15:00, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protecting a segregationist

You're protecting a very well documented racist on Byrd Stadium why? "Wikipedia policy"? The president of Maryland just said the name needs to come down. Proof. --166.175.56.39 (talk) 21:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The bottom line is that him being a segregationist is unnamable even if he is. CLCStudent (talk) 21:27, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

what does that sentence even mean? "is unnamable"? Why because you say it's not? He ran as a segregationist. What logic so you have for it being unsaid unless you're trying to protect his name? He literally made his politician career on being a racist. At least your edit record will show where you stand. --166.175.56.39 (talk) 21:31, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We will have administration decide on the next move. CLCStudent (talk) 21:33, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That source is a reliable source, but those "facts" aren't coming from them, they are attributing them to other parties, so you can't say he was a racist according to that source. The fact that the board is considering renaming the stadium might actually be worth a note, paying close attention to WP:DUE, but under no circumstance would that source prove he is a racist. To be clear, this isn't an administrator position, this is my opinion as an established and experienced editor. Content issues are decided by editors, not admin. Behavior issues, like edit warring...that is a different story. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 21:37, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

😄👍 Guess you must be really sad now! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.175.56.39 (talk) 20:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage protection

Given that six of the eight edits to your userpage (excepting only its creation and a typo fix) have been vandalism or vandalism-reversion, I've semiprotected the page indefinitely. If you disagree now, or disagree at any point in the future, please leave a note at my talk page or at WP:RFPP requesting unprotection; I'm sure that the first admin to see your note will unprotect the page. Nyttend (talk) 02:00, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Respectfully it was not vandalising the page of Bob Cooper (politician), it was simply adding the names of his children. Noted however it should have been referenced, but such extreme responses are not called for. Kind Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.24.57.153 (talk) 16:55, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A warning I gave

I put a vandalism warning on User talk:209.23.185.226's page for edits made to Heat. You changed it to Temperature, though the IP address edited both and I was warning for what I reverted, which was Heat. Might be better to put down a new warning rather than altering another editors. Cheers, JCO312 (talk) 18:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry.CLCStudent (talk) 18:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change the information unless you know it's correct

As you changed maharana pratap Vivekmalv (talk) 18:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vivekmalv, my edit was not concerning information, but formatting. somebody messed with title format, and I corrected it if you look at the edit. I did not change any information. CLCStudent (talk) 18:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ninjas in Pyjamas

Hey, I saw you were busy cleaning it up--I don't know if you reported at AIV or RFPP, but that's always a good thing to do, even if it's a bit slow sometimes. And don't be afraid to paste warning templates--some admins really want to see increasingly serious warnings on a user talk page, from 1 to 4, before they block. As a side note, that was one hell of a mess, with a lot of IPs from Czech and Slovakia; guess they have plenty of internet vandals as well. As another side note, I can't believe this is a "sport" and we have articles on it. Drmies (talk) 18:55, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Hello, I heard you were a student

Karabalik 18:34, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	Hello, I heard you were a student Karabalik 18:35, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

additions to page deleted

I tried to add the names of a couple prominent alumni from The Hartt School on the school's page. The names of these people were removed, apparently because the additions were not helpful. Can you please provide additional information on the problem with these proposed additions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.68.58 (talk) 19:02, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Beaten to the button

I've not been around much this week (busy in another of my lives...), but I checked out your message and then found MaterialScientist had already made the block. Thanks for asking me, anyway. If I'd not been there my page does have stalkers, some of whom are admins - so it's not a bad place to try. Peridon (talk) 21:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Collins

Hello, my name is Maciek, I'm forty years old and I'm an engineer. It was not an experiment or something. I just wanted to say no to promote on Wikipedia pure hate and some frustrated "artists" or "journalists" making fun or even their life purpose of disdaining anyone. So I changed the article and some roderick, who is really silly, still keeps undoing my changes. I hope we may clarify the situation and there will be no need to continue this silly "ping pong game". I await your answer. Regards, Maciek — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.149.252.162 (talk) 14:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that you're removing sourced information just because "you don't like it", are operating under multiple IP accounts (always a suspicious sign) and insulting longstanding editors who have bothered to log in says a lot to me. Rodericksilly (talk) 15:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be silly, Roderick, please! I use different devices - PC, mobile etc. Hence different IP's. I usually forget to login, but have my own account. Taking it as "suspicious" says a lot to me about you. By the way, for your information: the way "longstanding editors" treat my edits doesn't differ if I am logged in or not. You seem to treat this page as your personal farm and behave not maturely. Being a "longstanding" editor doesn't mean being infallible. I had been a moderator on some hobby forum for years and never behaved like this. I understand that you have engaged yourself in this project/article, made a lot of improvements here and you seem devoted to them. But ruthless cancelling other users edits doesn't speak well of you. Take an example from other editors who at least write any explanations! You say I insulted you? Your behavour against my edits was also insulting. And it's not that "I don't like something". There are common rules in the web e.g. not to spread hatred that "longtime editor" should know. Those informations have source? This is really silly. If I do an edit with quotes from "Meinkampf", will it not have a source? Will you accept it? Don't answer, please.

Ok, I counted that we may agree here, pity. I still count on your cooperation, because I will not leave it like this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.149.252.162 (talk) 12:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for ignoring you

... it wasn't intentional; the javascript I use to move my notifications around is apparently broken, so I didn't your the message until after you removed it. —Cryptic 17:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because you thanked me

CLCStudent, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...
YOU'RE WELCOME!
It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! Marianna251TALK

19:34, 25 February 2016 (UTC) Marianna251TALK 19:34, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

footy

Hey, you just came on IRC. After looking at the user you reported a bit more in depth, thier edits are fine, as they are updates to scores, which already have sources listed. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 19:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you for letting me know. CLCStudent (talk) 19:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my user page! In veritas (talk) 20:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit

I made an edit to a wet-plate photograph description changing "black or dark-colored" to "non-white" and was told it was no different. This is not the case.

Wet-plate photographs do not detect color like more modern film photographs do:

File:Http://www.thesewingacademy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/ColorWheel-KLowe1.jpg

A modern photograph of a color wheel

File:Http://www.thesewingacademy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/ColorWheel-KLowe-Wet.jpg

A wet-plate photograph of the same color wheel

The dark color in the photograph could just as easily be a bright red or orange; the only thing we can say for sure is that it is not white and not bright blue.

Heaving to as a storm tactic

At Heaving_to,

is the better punctuation rather than ; ... Look in Turabian or any other similar guide. My very minor correction was not vandalism.68.32.154.213 (talk) 01:06, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to revert back to the colon or should I? Basically we are discussing one compound sentence which uses semicolons to separate what could be stand-alone related sentences. The language is describing a numerical listing. The quantity on the left of the colon should equal the total of the quantities to the right of the colon. It could be written differently (which helped me see a missing semicolon).

During the ill fated 1979 Fastnet race, of 300 yachts, 158 chose to adopt storm tactics:

86 'lay ahull', whereby the yacht adopts a 'beam on' attitude to the wind and waves;
46 ran before the wind under bare poles or trailing warps/sea anchors; and
26 heaved to.

100 yachts suffered knock downs, 77 rolled (that is turtled) at least once. Not one of the hove to yachts were capsized or suffered any serious damage.^[1] The 'heave to' maneuver is described in the story of the first Golden Globe yacht race of 1968.^[2] 68.32.154.213 (talk) 21:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Pardey, Lin (2008). Storm Tactics Handbook, 3rd Ed., Modern methods of heaving-to for survival in extreme conditions. Arcata, California: Pardey Books. p. 97. ISBN 978-1-92921-447-1.
^ Nichols, Peter (2002). A Voyage For Madmen. London: Profile Books. p. 320. ISBN 978-1861974655.

Province of Carolina

You reverted this page back to:

In 1665, the charter was revised slightly (see Royal Colonial Boundary of 1665), with the northerly boundary extended to 36 degrees 30 minutes north to include the lands of settlers along the Albemarle Sound who had left the Virginia Colony. Likewise, the southern boundary was moved south to 29 degrees north, just south of present-day Daytona Beach, Florida, which had the effect of including the existing Spanish settlement at St. Augustine. The charter also granted all the land, between these northerly and southerly bounds, from the Atlantic, westward to the shores of the Pacific Ocean.[1]

I thought the change I made would be better. Foremost, the charter was not revised "slightly". I do see where you thought my insertion of "about 60 nautical miles" was vandalism though. The expansion to the north was about 60 nautical miles, the southern was much larger and the maximum distance to the west was huge -- the Pacific Ocean. I am going to consider changing the word "slightly" to "significantly".68.32.154.213 (talk) 18:44, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Global Citizen

You reverted the repetition for Global Citizen. If you look carefully at the External Links, you will see that there is indeed a lot of repetition at the end of this article.62.60.23.66 (talk) 14:52, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week for your determination and dedication to help the encyclopedia grow. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

Editor User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

Vandalism is the enemy of Wikipedia. It undermines the reliability of the encyclopedia and threatens its long-term value to our readers. There are many, many vandal fighting editors and to pick one may seem unfair to the rest. These editors perform the behind-the-scenes work that is normally not seen by the general community while safe-guarding our mutual commitment to verifiable knowledge. CLCStudent (talk · contribs · count · logs) has been actively chasing vandals for only a short time. He already has over 6000 edits, uses the edit summary 93% of the time, and almost half of his edits are to main space. 172 visits to WP:AIV and 100 to WP:Rpp display an new editor that understands the threat that vandals are. Voting in the Stewards Election of 2016 shows his concern for the care and well-being of WP. Let User:CLC be the recipient on behalf of all the other vandal fighters. This nomination was seconded by @Class455fan1:.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

Thanks again for your efforts! Buster Seven Talk 16:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for removing vandalism. Keep it up. e0steven(☎Talk\|✍Contrib) 02:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sinú, río de pasiones

Therefore it is placed low  by so it was not visible. I'm also guiding in this type of novels in which always the same dynamic is performed . Thank you. --186.84.46.227 (talk) 18:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Direct administrator requests

Hi CLCStudent, I'm the clerk who handled the Cassist investigation. If I might offer some informal advice: I urge you not to directly contact administrators on a talk page for a non-urgent matter; it looks like you went to two different completely unrelated administrators regarding the Cassist SPI (which was about as non-urgent as you could get). Admins know how to get to WP:SPI, and there (frankly) is a large backlog of cases, some of which are much more urgent than that one. Thanks for your work on vandal-fighting and at SPI. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:42, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Premature speedy delete nominations

Hi, you nominated Heather A. Knutson for speedy deletion only one minute after creation. For A7 this is totally inappropriate as more text couild be added very soon, and you can see that it was. Please wait for half an hour before A1 A3 A7 etc speedy delete nominations. However for attacks, and vandalism, and copyright violations, they can be nominated immediately. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:13, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revision to Martine Ouellett

Please note I removed an edit made earlier that evening that stated Martine Ouellett was a traitorous Canadian Politician , and instead put Member of Quebec National Assembly before I noticed it was stated in the second paragraph, so I replaced it with Canadian Politician. No matter what a person thinks of a politician, this is not the place for personal comments, only facts.

Regards Bruce Katkin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkatkin (talk • contribs) 05:51, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Canal 24 Horas

Hello, I'm actually Dung247. I need to edit in anonymous user because my account just stop being blocked in November. I'm also revoked user talk page access. So bad! The reason I've moved my edit is because I think there'll be wrong in the next day, because the schedule of Canal 24 Horas always changes. Sorry! I also want to tell to BilCat and any other people, the recent edit in BFMTV, Sky TG24, YTN, TVN24, all are made by me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dung247 (talk) 01:38, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vedic Ashram

In March, you were involved in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vedic Institute of Canada. This new AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vedic Ashram) could be of interest to you. The Banner talk 23:11, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing content

Why do you keep removing content from Pratap hada (see [3] and [4])? The article is probably going to be deleted anyway, but you're not helping the situation by not allowing editors to expand the minimal information initially presented. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:36, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moldova

Please check your edit - is that what you wanted to do? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:00, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't see anything wrong, but if you think a different revision is better, feel free to change it. CLCStudent (talk) 18:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You fixed it (the second undo). --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:56, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Domains

Well yes, have you read that section? It's unsubstantiated, it's a wall of text, and it's hard to read. Honestly the whole thing is just crap and adds nothing of value to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.31.103.237 (talk) 21:26, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

168.215.131.150 and warnings

Hallo!

You recently reverted some changes to a page, and that is good. However, this IP is a WiFi hotspot/internet cafe/whatever you call a shared wifi terminal. Later users won't understand why they got a warning for the last person.

Thanks, 168.215.131.150 (as NCFriend) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.215.131.150 (talk) 16:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Which you would have realized if you had actually read the page you were editing. If you're not reading what you're editing, why are you editing in the first place? --168.215.131.150 (talk) 21:11, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dungy

Tony Dungy is an outspoken opponent of gay marriage, and has even appeared in commercials to that effect. How is that not relevant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.113.233.13 (talk) 23:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Buffoon

Yes you are making a mistake. Check the reference. 2601:186:381:7B21:40D0:7F0E:FBFE:B160 (talk) 19:53, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you, but that is not notable to that article. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 19:56, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So find another example - if you can. 2601:186:381:7B21:40D0:7F0E:FBFE:B160 (talk) 20:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My post from sometime ago

This is Maxwelldas. I became a wiki editor accidentally a few months back when I tried to fix an error. I don't post much. Maybe three times in all. I just noticed that my previous post was removed for not being constructive a little over a month ago. It is OK by me. I am not going to fight it. It was just a minor grammatical and syntactical pickiness on my part. Just FYI: The common notice in passenger sideview mirrors is "Objects in mirror are closer than they appear". Nobody is confused by what it means, and that is all that is required of signs like that. However, if you think about convex mirrors and virtual images, it would be more precise to say (with exactly the same words), "Objects are closer than they appear (or seem) in mirror". It s fine for you to regard it as not constructive! I wouldn't spend any more energy than I already have defending my correction. Thanks. Maxwelldas (talk) 20:16, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Maxwelldas: I took a look at your edit and it sounded like your personal opinion or commentary on something. As such I would've supported the reversion of that edit, as Wikipedia isn't a place for commentary (You have Reddit for that). —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 21:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thanks for the work you do patrolling medical articles :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:24, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LAD... (Furness Academy)

Simon Laheney has been headteacher of the school for over a year mate. Bit overzealous if I do say myself http://www.nwemail.co.uk/news/barrow/Furness-Academy-in-Barrow-appoints-new-headteacher-62bcfaa5-5531-47df-bf47-91a80ca529be-ds 78.148.200.126 (talk) 20:21, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gonna do the edit again if you aren't gonna roll it 'forward' 78.148.200.126 (talk) 20:24, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I am sorry. CLCStudent (talk) 20:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No hard feelings, bet it was my mad edit message that raised your suspicions 78.148.200.126 (talk) 20:28, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, that is what raised my suspicions. CLCStudent (talk) 20:28, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EGO GAMING‎

I don't see how an article containing nothing but the title can be vandalism. You could have speedied this no-content but even if other edits by the user were vandalism (and I have not looked to see) this should not have been tagged vandalism. I've changed the speedy request to g7 since the creator has requested deletion on teh talk page. Meters (talk) 20:34, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There was vandalism, but I accidentally deleted it when I tagged it. CLCStudent (talk) 20:35, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing it. Here's the article as created by the user [5] with nothing but the title. Where's the vandalism? Meters (talk) 20:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

185.24.68.68

Hi there. Just so you know, I am not an admin so I can't help. Sorry Jkmaskell (talk) 20:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC) Khalaf Smoqi (talk) 08:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC) Hi, Can you please try to edit my draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Yazda ? It has been denied 4 times and I'm out of ideas how to make it work. Please feel free to add, delete or do anything necessary to make be accepted. Thank you in advance Khalaf Smoqi (talk) 08:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pages Created

What is unconstructive about putting up

the number of pages created based on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_article_count#1.E2.80.931000 173.52.99.208 (talk) 17:27, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, if you feel that way, undo all of those that I have done. 173.52.99.208 (talk) 17:30, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Beer Die

You changed the edits to the page Beer die that I made. The edits simply cleaned up the grammatical errors and added more details about the proper rules of the game. I would like to have permission to edit the page. I run an Instagram account called Dyeislife which has over 7,000 followers so I know what i'm talking about.

Thanks.

98.189.99.201 (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

-Tanner — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.189.99.201 (talk) 19:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undone contributions

Hello. Recently I've been receiving some messages warning me that my edits to some articles have been undone. I can't remember the pages or how many of them (the latest one was Alchemy), but I've never edited any of these pages. I don't really edit Wikipedia at all, so I don't know why these messages are being sent to me. 177.156.73.244 (talk) 21:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Improving chart at Legality of cannabis by U.S. jurisdiction

This article is the most-viewed page for cannabis issues in the US (~1,500 views/day). I think we can streamline it to make it less clunky and more intuitive for readers, especially now that we have state-specific articles for all US states. Your feedback is invited: Talk:Legality_of_cannabis_by_U.S._jurisdiction#Changes_to_chart.3F. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 19:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Compassion Fills the Void does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! This is the edit in question. My edit was explained and rather reasonable. 208.81.212.224 (talk) 20:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CLCStudent. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You always warn vandals before I do. I've seen talk pages where all the warnings for one month were issued by you. Good job! Phil roc^{My contribs} 17:46, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, another one.

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I know you've got a few already but hey, that's no reason not to give one. I keep seeing you around, reverting the BS. Keep it up! Yintan 20:14, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Hello CLCStudent: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Class455 (Merry Christmas!) 16:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Ghalegay

Sometimes I wonder if we should spin off an Indian Wikipedia with a deleted WP:V Jim1138 (talk) 08:15, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week seeking nominations (and a new facilitator)

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

In addition, the WikiProject is seeking a new facilitator/coordinator to handle the logistics of the award. Please contact L235 if you are interested in helping with the logistics of running the award in any capacity. Remove your name from here to unsubscribe from further EotW-related messages. Thanks, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, CLCStudent!

Happy New Year!

CLCStudent,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Class455 (talk | stand clear of the doors!) 17:29, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Non-notable episodes

Why did you restore articles for non-notable episodes of Law & Order

Sir, I think they are notable. Some of the content you deleted may be non notable, but you should not just blank the entire page for that. CLCStudent (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible for you to improve them?

I do think they might be improvable. I would look through them to see if there is any content that does not seem notable. Lets just be aware of the content that is notable. CLCStudent (talk) 18:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gorillaz

A song and further confirmation of a new album by that band is more relevant to a band's page then info from last year stating they're due to release new material in 2017. I can understand you being trigger happy as this is a shared IP address and may have previously been used for vandilism but if you're going to moderate a band's wiki page at least stay up to date on their activities and maybe check out the reference where the new song premiered?? THANKS. 178.167.254.103 (talk) 16:32, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, CLCStudent. You have new messages at Meretechnicality's talk page.
Message added 20:29, 19 January 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Meretechnicality (talk) 20:29, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accidentally reverted your revert of vandalism

Don't be alarmed, I intended to rollback the previous editor's unexplained changes, before the vandalism and your revert. Apologies for notification! Rob984 (talk) 17:40, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit at Anthem of Adygea

I reverted back to old revision (without Diabedia's transliterations) to prevent conflict.

Yeah, I realized I made a mistake. Sorry. CLCStudent (talk) 16:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Magín Díaz

You appear to be engaged in an edit war on the article about Magín Díaz. You have already violated the three revert rule and are in danger of being blocked. I urge you to perform no more reversions on this page, but to join in a discussion on Talk:Magín Díaz regarding the content dispute. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You responded to this message by deleting it with the edit summary:

The other guy was performing obvious vandalism and has been blocked already.

I would disagree that his actions were obvious vandalism, as his intent appeared to be to set right the name of the label on which Diaz records. As I can find no source to support either label (Konn or NONAME) as being correct, I can't say that his edit introduced incorrect information. I will admit that he became belligerent in the face of your reverts, but that's what happens sometimes when people are called vandals for trying to improve an article. I think you could have been less bitey by engaging in a discussion rather than blind reverting with little or no explanation. I have appealed to Widr to unblock the other user so that you and he can engage in a useful discussion about the content dispute. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Trafalgar

This is not vandalism. Please do not bite the newbies, you and I were newbies once! Feel free to start a discussion at the article talk page re loose/looser if you feel that strongly about the wording. Either seem fine to me. Mjroots (talk) 08:13, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sylvan Muldoon

I have tried to edit Sylvan's year of death from 1949 to 1969 because it is clearly documented as such in the first reference of the page (https://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=108792150). Please change accordingly. Thank you. 72.65.116.122 (talk) 16:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dissolution Testing and USP Dissolution Apparatus Merger Discussion

Hi I am reaching out to editors who have recently edited Dissolution testing because I feel that the discussion for merging the article is not getting enough attention. If you would like you can join the discussion here Dissolution testing#Merger proposal --Have a great day :) , Sanjev Rajaram (talk) 17:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I never understood how to use sandbox mode. Qqoejrjfjdksldlwkfn (talk) 22:41, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Tron characters

You have dealt with the IP editor who has been writing on this page. I'm not familiar with the Tron franchise so I need your opinion. Do you think the changes there are genuine or more vandalism? I don't want to revert that many edits without being positive.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 22:17, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Dan Stevens IP vandalism

The IP sending this message is a mobile-specific shared IP (AT&T) and probably changes hands constantly. Probably wouldn't hurt to block it. 2600:387:2:811:0:0:0:AE (talk) 06:25, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Heathcliff (reversion of my edits)

Hi you just reverted an edit I was halfway through completing on the 'Heathcliff' page. I was adding a citation to the 2018 film info you hold generally. I looked and you had reverted my link to Paul Eryk Atlas who stars in it prior to me creating a page for him. I will be doing many revisions on the Wuthering Heights topic and it's characters including this and just wanted to give you a heads up. Thanks x Faireycave 19.12 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faireycave (talk • contribs) 18:13, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mislabeling edits as vandalism

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at RAADHIYA SAHA, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Gamebuster19901 (Talk║Contributions) 15:56, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

I'd like to add my co-host Chuck Freimund to the notable alumni section of his high school, Martin Luther High School. He is a radio broadcaster and has been in Wisconsin radio for 30 plus years. One of his classmates, Jason Wilde is listed with a similar background, yet every time I add Chuck the name is deleted. Why am I unable to add him without it being deleted right away? Please advise why I have no say over this and it keeps being deleted Bradsilvers (talk) 16:18, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Busy morning...

at Martin Luther High School is it not? It may be time to request page protection. Dan D. Ric (talk) 16:18, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I tried, but it told me that a request has already been made. CLCStudent (talk) 16:19, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well I guess I won't try then. We'll have to just keep reverting. Dan D. Ric (talk) 16:28, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Candice Michelle was an actual alumni of the school. Why was the edit removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chongofirst (talk • contribs) 16:38, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Chongofirst:Because you need to provide a published source to back that up. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:21, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@CLCStudent: First line of this article https://onmilwaukee.com/ent/articles/candicemichellewwe.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chongofirst (talk • contribs) 22:13, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

American College of Greece

Hi, I'm reverting the revert you made to American College of Greece as I think we're both trying to sort out damage by repeated vandalism today. I believe I was wrong in leaving one edit in, namely the change of President from David Horner to Pandelis Karasavvas. A search on the ACG website yields numerous results for Horner see here, but not one for either element of the alternate surname or first name (if that's what the words are). There's also no such results returned on a Google search. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 22:29, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Add Fala the Laker as Mascot to Roosevelt University

All other university pages have their mascot listed. I added Fala the Laker as the mascot as it is in line with other university pages and is the university mascot as of March 2016: http://www.rooseveltlakers.com/article/2145.php 192.175.17.15 (talk) 15:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for reverting the hate messages on my page! :) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:50, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IP

You might want to keep a close eye on this one. --Money money tickle parsnip (talk) 19:33, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I already saw it. CLCStudent (talk) 20:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jinx

You owe me a coke. See: instantaneous vandalism warnings to IP ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ^ᐁT₳LKᐃ 14:57, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting an article

Hi! I noticed you tried to add an article to Wikipedia talk:Requested articles. The right place for new articles would be a draft. See Wikipedia:Article wizard for a page where you can create articles. Feel free to ask me at my talk page if you have any questions! Enterprisey (talk!) 19:08, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is weird because I did not attempt to add any new articles that I can remember. CLCStudent (talk) 22:01, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One of you two needs to drink less... 5.12.166.30 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:29, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I interpreted Special:Diff/779869594 as you writing the content, not restoring it after a deletion. But anyway, why put the content back? Enterprisey (talk!) 18:16, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uk main languages

On your uk main languages i noticed you havent added malayalam. There are roughly 104, 000 malayalees in uk. Hope you can update the article thankyou. Unniii 08 (talk) 03:25, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle

I don't understand how come you can revert edits in seconds with Twinkle. I use the same tool but it takes forever! Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Im mark ludbrook and i was delighted to see that someone like yourself added my history to a wiki page. My comments and additions are accurate and can easily verified. I would also like to post an image if possible. Let me know what i can do to assit with the accuracy of the wiki page. mdlubrook@gmail.com happy to chat. And thinakyou

Mark ludbrook

I would like to update the information in my wiki page. Adding an image if possible Mark Ludbrook (talk) 02:08, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, go ahead and do it. CLCStudent (talk) 02:08, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

University of Texas Shooting 1966

I think the final victim shouldn't included in the final death toll, since he died 35 years after it happened. There should be a note that says "+1 (who died in 2001)". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:B80B:53D0:AC33:5CF9:6EF1:4AFB (talk) 01:17, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dragons Breath Chilli

Hi CLCStudent I made changes to this article and cited the BBC, Nottingham Post for correct information.

Mike Smith tried to rip us off with respect to the source of the Dragons Breath Chilli Plant and after his illicit pre-announcement corrections went into the sources I changed.

I want this corrected as the Dragons Breath Chilli was created by ChilliBobs Ltd - My son Neal - and was leant to Mike Smith for him to show at Chelsea.

His claims were outrageous - kill you.... weapons grade etc... This article shows that Neal Price was creator or the plant: http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/dragons-breath-worlds-hottest-chilli-13083936 This article - NottsTV shows the correct information - https://nottstv.com/watch-nottingham-dancers-launch-worlds-hottest-chilli-chelsea-flower-show/ This article - BBC - was a retraction from a previous article where Mike had claimed it was his: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-north-east-wales-39946962

I had included these items in the changes I made. This was not vandalism but the facts.

Can we please have this changed. I thought I had corrected the references properly but maybe you saw another error?

Many thanks

Bobprice (talk) 19:53, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Thank you for catching my mistake! — Kralizec! (talk) 17:31, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! CLCStudent (talk) 17:32, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Belfast Royal Academy

pupil, both edits were correct and accurate — Preceding unsigned comment added by BRARUGBYGIMP (talk • contribs) 17:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CLCStudent. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Texas A&M Commerce Notable Alumni Page

You keep removing a notable alumni I'm trying to add along with the source. I'm not really sure why this is the case.--173.185.164.58 (talk) 17:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oops!

Sorry about the unintentional block. I was trying to quickly block the harassing IP and forgot I was looking at a diff on your talk page. Ack. I apologize. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about this.[6]. Didn't realize it was an incorrect block until afterwards. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 00:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boomer Vial, users are allowed to remove active block notices. See OWNTALK. Drmies (talk) 01:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies Oh. I was mixing active block notices up with the "Declined unblock requests regarding a currently active block" bullet. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 01:05, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Keep up the good counter vandalism work! Cheers, FriyMan ^{Per aspera ad astra} 15:54, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong title

The title on Hillbark Hotels Wikipedia site is incorrect. It is currently reading Hill Bark and this is incorrect and having an impact on the searches for this hotel. It has referred me to you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.133.142.220 (talk) 16:40, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why the undo?

In History of Nepal wikipage, why have you undone my edit? any reasons for it? All the citations are linked and of a reliable source. Nothing in my edit isn't supported by a citation and I've tried to make the page unbiased unlike before where the Prehistoric section seemed to be biased toward one group of people while ignoring others and without citations.

I don't remember why I undid it. CLCStudent (talk) 12:25, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a good answer, CLCStudent. People really should be careful when fighting vandalism. Careless reverts can really do some harm and scare beginners off. --Avoided (talk) 12:28, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rian Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nathan Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle is slow

Which browser are you using? Twinkle is working very slowly on my computer and it is taking around 10 seconds to revert an edit. It is very much a surprise that you are able to revert edits as fast as Huggle can with only Twinkle! Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:23, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am using Safari. CLCStudent (talk) 16:23, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. It is very slow on Chrome. Are you using mobile or computer? Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:25, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Computer. Also not,e I am using a very fast WiFi network. CLCStudent (talk) 16:26, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When I use Twinkle, I press the open in wiki nutton on Real Time Recent Changes and it takes 10 seconds for the Twinkle revert links to pop up. Why could this be the case? Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:32, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure. CLCStudent (talk) 16:32, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was telling the truth on hedley court

DRMC Hedley court don't give rehab or support if your already leaving the services, this is factual so to deny it is to cover up the truth.

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thank you for your reverts here and elsewhere. Keep up the good work! -- Guerillero \| Parlez Moi 16:58, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Fake News Awards

An article that you have been involved in editing—Fake News Awards—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. DARTHBOTTO_talk•cont 23:12, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dasha Zhukova

Hey,

The Trump-Putin connection thing is bogus. We allll love the Mueller investigation but people like Louise Mensch have gone off the deep end with this stuff.

This is that. I represent Ms. Zhukova and she was not at the inauguration.

This is the only source, cited anywhere, for the claim.

https://twitter.com/JakeSherman/status/822182850132840449

Doesn't the fact that she gave a lot of money to Hillary Clinton tell you that she probably wouldn't attend this, no matter how close she and Ivanka are? (Which isn't very close, btw.)

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Ok, but you need to explain that in the edit summary. CLCStudent (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Vicksburg

I made a edit correcting a mistake on the infobox about the Siege and it was reverted, |partof is spelled as "|part of" on the infobox, and because of this, it doesn't show which War the siege was part of.

Ok, now I see. CLCStudent (talk) 20:24, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UAA reports on users with no edits

Generally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI: "Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.

For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. So we add the {{wait}} tag to the report, it goes to WP:UAA/HP for a week or more, and must then be reviewed again to see if the account has since become active before removing it. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:55, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain what vandalism I'm doing?

You keep reverting the vandalism.

-16,000?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.198.12.86 (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What you are putting on the page is wrong. Please listen to Arjay and myself. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 17:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't put anything on the page?? I'm just reverting blanking.

Well, that is the same thing as putting something on the page. CLCStudent (talk) 17:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No it isnt. And even if it was its still better than blanking the page which is what you two clowns seem to thyink is constructive. If you think its wrong you should post about it in the talk page and build a consensus before doing this mass deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.198.12.86 (talk) 17:26, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can't justify your position or build a consensus so you just use your pals admin privileges to get your way. That isn't how wikipedia is supposed to be. If an edit is contested you're supposed to discuss it. Not hurl vandalism accusations and stop people from editing.

I am not the one who blocked you. Widr blocked you because I reported you, and he agreed with me. If you were right, Widr would have just as easily turned on me. You know that what you did was wrong, and you are currently evading a block. Also, for your information, I have been doing this job for over two years, and Arjay has been here even longer. We both know exactly how Wikipedia works. CLCStudent (talk) 17:57, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will you stop it with the vandalism accusations?? Just because somebody doesn't think the same as you doesnt mean its vandalism. That user has a talk page full of warnings. How come your so happy to hurl vandal accusations at me but not at actual vandals?

Because you are doing vandalism. You are also refactoring my comments, which is not allowed by any mean. CLCStudent (talk) 18:06, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How does warning a vandal constitute vandalism? That person has a talk page full of vandalism warnings, so clearly a vandal. Im warning them, which is what we're supposed to do. Whats the problem?

The problem is that you are changing the warnings that I put. CLCStudent (talk) 18:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

well now my warning is clearly seperate

Thank you . CLCStudent (talk) 18:13, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Young Men

Just curious, but what’s not constructive about my addition? I’m just trying to spread awareness on the activities of the real Young Men and what they’re about. It adds information on the age group shown, giving more specific details. If you’d be so kind and explain how that’s not constructive, I’d really appreciate it. Yourboy97 (talk) 21:58, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your description was too commentary. CLCStudent (talk) 15:10, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	It was nice anti-vandalizing with you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U\|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 20:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ENGVAR

Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand or Ireland, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. --John (talk) 19:50, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor with a problem with your revert

HI -- you made a revert (using tools, no less) just now to revert a completely proper edit. You have failed completely to assert why it is not. --2604:2000:E016:A700:B49B:7B31:1E5:3777 (talk) 19:39, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I saw that. Sorry. CLCStudent (talk) 19:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

WP:UAA reports on users with no edits

Generally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI: "Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.

For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. So we add the {{wait}} tag to the report, it goes to WP:UAA/HP for a week or more, and must then be reviewed again to see if the account has since become active before removing it. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:11, 17 March 2018 (UTC) Beeblebrox (talk) 19:11, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:20, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please deleted this wiki:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bekir_brun%C4%8Devi%C4%87s

I cannot delete pages because I am not an administrator. CLCStudent (talk) 14:05, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Essad Pasha Toptani

Essad Pasha Toptani never was an Albanian king. Never. -- 83.220.236.216 (talk) 14:34, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Destructive reversion

I received the following message:

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to La Nación have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 18:37, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My edit that you reverted consisted of adding one single letter to the article, by changing "26-story Post-modern office building" to "26-storey Post-modern office building".

In case of doubt about edits like this, I would suggest consulting a dictionary before reverting them and serving the boiler-plate excuse that the edit "did not appear constructive".

I will now proceed to revert your reversion. 2A02:2149:A000:8200:4DBE:3AC5:36D:6D0C (talk) 15:13, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Why are my addition to Jordan Swing’s page not constructive? How would you like me to validate it? Samy18 (talk) 20:58, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:SroTwentyTThree

I see no utility in reverting a vandal who writes an abusive unblock request, and you've probably violated WP:TALK and WP:UP#CMT by doing so. Also, why warn a vandal who's already blocked and already received a 4im warning? Just leave it alone and let an admin remove talk page access. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) Chris Troutman (talk) 21:37, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Hello!

Rexlikescheese (talk) 23:44, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Post on User_talk:2605:E000:1610:84F8:0:BDE2:559C:9D2E

Hello, User:CLCStudent, I'm assuming that the message you left on User:2605:E000:1610:84F8:0:BDE2:559C:9D2E talk page "Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 22:33, 24 July 2018 (UTC)" was intended for them and not for me. Can you do me a favor the next you post a message like that please make sure that you identify the person you are directing the message to especially if it is under a single post that has discussions by multiple users such as the paragraph i.e. == July 2018 ==. Thank you and your cooperation is appreciated. YborCityJohn (talk) 01:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Global marketing

You're doing tons of good work but PLEASE leave edit summaries. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:52, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. CLCStudent (talk) 15:58, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

Great job removing the personal attack on my talk page! IanDBeacon (talk) 16:46, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your constant reverting of vandalism across Wikipedia :) CoconutOctopus talk 16:35, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts for reverting and protecting enwiki from Vandalism PATH SLOPU^(Talk) 05:13, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute on changes to The Office/Lice

The current synopsis of the episode is inaccurate. Meredith does not react with "delight", she reacts with anger. And "Darryl tells the others about this so that they will be careful what they say to Val" is simply not correct. Were these changes I made arbitrarily denied just because you think I lack authority? Or are you familiar with the episode itself and disagree with them? 24.10.223.20 (talk) 20:10, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I must have meant to revert something else. CLCStudent (talk) 13:45, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Kimmel

@CLCStudent: His mother's name is Joann Iacono (already mentioned), she is from an island called Ischia ! 59.24.15.175 (talk) 22:27, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tsai Ing-wen

Your revert to this was valid. It was vandalism. Well, at least the last time I heard, Taiwan is not a province of the People's Republic of China! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:49, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

a suggestion

When you see edits such as made by User:2409:4072:629D:9EF1:D4B6:2876:D527:13E0, it would probably be better if you didn't give them a vandalism warning, because they would probably never recognize their personal beliefs as vandalism. Instead, they might understand the template:uw-nor template a little better. Just a thought, and I hope its helpful. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:37, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Burnsville, North Carolina

Be careful about reverting edits for the reason "unexplained removal of content", especially when the content being removed is unsourced. In your revert here I think you inadvertently restored vandalism. In general, if the content being removed is unsourced, I generally assume that it is being removed on that basis that it is unsourced, which is protected by policy in that an editor cannot restore the challenged content without a citation to a reliable source. Mz7 (talk) 08:25, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Thought you might find this link useful. - wolf 13:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please consider archiving this page, its a real pain to navigate. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 13:59, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Pardey, Lin (2008). Storm Tactics Handbook, 3rd Ed., Modern methods of heaving-to for survival in extreme conditions. Arcata, California: Pardey Books. p. 97. ISBN 978-1-92921-447-1.

[2] Nichols, Peter (2002). A Voyage For Madmen. London: Profile Books. p. 320. ISBN 978-1861974655.

[1]

[2]