User talk:Hawkeye7/Archive 2015

Archives:

2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update

No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

Congratulations

		2012 "Military historian of the Year"
		By order of the Members of the Military History WikiProject, for I award you this Golden Wiki in recognition of placing first in the 2012 Military historian of the year.   AustralianRupert (talk) 09:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Oh. My. God. Wow. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:53, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations, Hawkeye! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 19:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you Ed. I've been going through a rough patch lately, and coming from people like you, this award means a lot to me. Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:14, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Belated congrats mate -- this award is long overdue...! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:52, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Well done Hawkeye, really well deserved. I've appreciated your guidance in reviews. And happy new year! Peacemaker67 (send... over) 05:42, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations!

		The Military history A-Class medal with swords
		On behalf of the coordinators of the Military history WikiProject, I'm pleased to award you the A-Class medal with swords for your work on the Leslie Morshead, Hugh John Casey and Operation Sandstone articles, which were promoted to A-Class between November and December of this year. Kirill [talk] 01:18, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

History of the US space program

Dropping by your talk page as I wanted to ask you what you know about the history of the US space program? The reason I ask is that I have recently been reading about various space missions, including the Mariner program, and just tonight watched a biographical documentary on Neil Armstrong. What you said about biography at the James Bryant Conant FAC really struck a chord with me, and the biographies you have worked on in relation to the Manhattan Project remind me a lot in some ways of some of the biographies of those who worked on the space program (i.e. individuals working within, leading, or overseeing, a massive team). Like the Manhattan Project, the US space program (and the one in the USSR) was a massive outpouring of technology and engineering, with military connections, and I was wondering if you have an interest in articles related to the history of the US space program? Is there a techno-military equivalent of the article on Big Science (maybe military–industrial complex)? I see the Manhattan Project is mentioned there, but not the space programs, should they be mentioned there? Anyway, on that subject, I recently created two articles on people from JPL (then part of NASA) who worked on the Mariner program: Jack N. James and Robert J. Parks (the early history of JPL does involve missiles, so there is a military connection). The number of people quoted for Mariner 2 is about 250, nothing like the numbers that worked on the Manhattan Project or the Apollo program. But the tension between telling the story of individuals (both scientists and engineers), and the story of a large program with many (largely anonymous) individuals contributing to the overall mission, is still there. I did also find some final bits on Conant, but will drop those on the article talk page. Carcharoth (talk) 22:44, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

I have long had a fascination with the US space program, especially its technical and administrative aspects, and have several shelves of books on the subject, along with biographies of most of the early astronauts. The space program is a classic example of Big Science, so of enormous interest to me. It was definitely my intention to develop some of the space articles over the next year or so, although I've already bitten off two projects that are too big to chew. James B. Conant is part of a mini-series of articles of the administrators of the Manhattan Project. I've done the military ones - Groves, Farrell, Nichols and Parsons - and now the civilians - Bush, Conant and Oppenheimer. I brought Conant to FAC early because I wanted to put him on the front page on his 120th birthday in March 2013. The Manhattan Project articles have years of work ahead of them. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:42, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Years of work, yeah... It is difficult to know where to start and when to stop. Best of luck with that, and I'll keep an eye out for some of the articles. Out of interest, apart from the astronauts (though I have read about Armstrong and Gagarin among others), which do you think are the most famous engineering/administration names from the US and Soviet space programs? So much is focused on the astronauts and the technology that I don't know as many of the names of the managers and engineers as I should. Wernher von Braun and Sergei Korolev spring to mind, but after that my mind goes blank a bit (though one of the names from Apollo 11 stuck in my mind - Deke Slayton is who I was remembering). But looking through Apollo program I see numerous mentions of generals, managers, and aerospace engineers, though that is likely only scratching the surface (and of course there are many 50th anniversaries coming up for the space program). Anyway, as I said, all the best with whatever you end up working on next. Carcharoth (talk) 02:03, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Well James Webb obviously. Don Ostrander, Samuel C. Phillips, Donald L. Putt... Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

2 Aust Corps?

Hello - first, congratulations! Second ☺ , what is the appropriate wikilink for Berryman's "2 Aust Corps"? See the letter on Morton C. Mumma if curious as to why. JMOprof (talk) 18:51, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Tank you. Much appreciated. The link you want is II Corps (Australia). I wrote Berryman's article, which is featured. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:10, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Tank you, too ☺ Link made. You may be interested in this for brother Al on M. C. Morton Sr. Jr is coming along. He was in Life magazine. Happy New Year. ...best, JMOprof (talk) 21:04, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 December 2012

• From the editor: Wikipedia, our Colosseum

• In the media: Is the Wikimedia movement too 'cash rich'?

• News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser a success; Czech parliament releases photographs to chapter

• Technology report: Looking back on a year of incremental changes

• Discussion report: Image policy and guidelines; resysopping policy

• Interview: Interview with Brion Vibber, the WMF's first employee

• Featured content: Whoa Nelly! Featured content in review

• WikiProject report: New Year, New York

• Recent research: Wikipedia and Sandy Hook; SOPA blackout reexamined

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 05:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Morton C. Mumma

Hello, Hawkeye - Anything more I'd think to do for Morton would be polishing cannon balls, but I am sure there are things I've missed. I'd appreciate a critical hawk's eye view of it for anything that occurs to said hawk, if you have the time. I haven't finished reading Bulkley, but I'm past the time of Mumma and New Guinea. ...best, JMOprof (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

And that is why you are Military Historian of the year. Thank you. I'll start with the citation dates needed. Is it a legacy that Mortons III and IV are also shooters? Is there a way to get this in the public domain, maybe as free use? Thank you again. If you ever need submarine help, please think of me first. I have a copy of this, as well as Blair and Roscoe (my expansion). ...best JMOprof (talk) 21:40, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Resysopping

As you have made comments regarding the interaction between WP:RFA and the proposed resysopping practices, you are specifically invited to comment on the newly proposed Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Resysopping practices#Option 18. Thryduulf (talk) 21:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Raymond D. Tarbuck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Germantown, Pennsylvania, Army Air Corps and Supreme Commander

Albert G. Mumma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Oak Ridge and National Research Council

Armed Forces Special Weapons Project (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Megaton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

FYI

Just as an FYI: your 2012 archive is linked to the 2011 archive page. Might want to look into fixing that :) TomStar81 (Talk) 11:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

		Best wishes for the New Year!
		Wishing you and yours a joyous, healthful, and productive 2013! Please accept a belated thank you for the well wishes upon my retirement as FAC delegate this year, and apologies for the false alarm of my first—and hopefully last—retirement; the well wishes extended me were most kind, but I decided to return, re-committed, when another blocked sock was revealed as one of the factors aggravating the FA pages this year. Maintaining standards in featured content requires vigilance, dedication and knowledge of people like you, who are needed; reviews are always welcome at FAC, FAR and TFA requests. Somehow, somehow we never ever seem to do nothin' completely nice and easy, but here's hoping that 2013 will see a peaceful road ahead and a return to the quality and comaraderie that defines the FA process, with the help of many dedicated Wikipedians! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:01, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Split trail merger

I am working on improving the artillery pages, and would like to clear up a mess at Split trail. To do so, I need a consensus on a change before I begin. Can you take a moment and help me out on my next step? Please take a look at what I want to do at Split trail. Thanks, Buster40004 Talk 21:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Raymond D. Tarbuck at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:36, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for James D. Ramage

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Date formats

Apologies - I did not realise that the US military used the British format of '7 January 2013' as opposed to the US format of 'January 7, 2013'. GiantSnowman 10:51, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

No worries! It was drilled into us at the Hood. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:54, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

You know what rhymes with Ray?

"GA". GA rhymes with Ray.

Anyways, Herbert Ray is now a GA.

Cheers, Sven Manguard Wha? 22:27, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

IRC cloak request

Hello Hawkeye7. You recently applied for a Wikimedia IRC cloak, but it looks like you forgot to register your nickname first. Could you please log on to IRC and do:

/msg NickServ REGISTER <password> <email>

where <password> is a password of your choice and <email> is your e-mail address? After you do that, please follow the instructions that are e-mailed to you to confirm your e-mail address. When you're done with that, I just need you to confirm your cloak request:

/msg MemoServ send wmfgc IRC cloak request

After you finish all of that, I'd be happy to get you a cloak. :-) If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my Meta talk page. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:10, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Douglas MacArthur

I "parked" him here, on the 50th anniversary of his death, what do you think? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:16, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Pessimistic about its chances. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:34, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

• Op-ed: Meta, where innovative ideas die

• WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Episode IV: A New Year

• News and notes: 2012—the big year

• Featured content: Featured content in review

• Technology report: Looking ahead to 2013

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 12:07, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Albert G. Mumma

Nyttend (talk) 00:03, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Australian Army in World War II

Hello again Hawkeye7. The review for this is here Talk:Australian Army in World War II/GA1. You've done quite a bit to improve this article over the years so if you are interested your involvement in the review would be most welcome. Thanks again. Anotherclown (talk) 13:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

G'day, Hawkeye, this has passed GA now. Do you have any objections to the article being nominated for A-class this weekend? Sorry to rush you, but I'm heading away for six-seven weeks in February, so I'd like to try to get this one through ACR before then. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 21:30, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

No, none at all. Go for it! Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Cheers, Nick is going to make some tweaks to the POW section today, so I will look to nom tomorrow. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 21:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup

I've noticed you've been doing a lot of quality work lately, have you ever considered joining the Wikicup? You would certainly be in first place right now if you did. —Ed!^(talk) 19:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

I have signed up. I don't think I stand much of a chance against someone like Sturmvogel_66. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

B-class review

Hi Hawkeye, would you mind having another look at Samuel Frickleton which you assessed as start class earlier today? I have added a cite to the paragraph that was missing one and also fixed the inconsistency about the number of brothers if that was the hiccup with it getting to B-class. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 10:01, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for that. Zawed (talk) 21:55, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

October to December 2012 Milhist Peer, A-class and FAC reviews

		The Content Review Medal of Merit
		By order of the Military History WikiProject coordinators, for your devoted work on the WikiProject's Peer, A-Class and Featured Article Candidate reviews for the period Oct–Dec 2012, I am delighted to award you this Content Review Medal. AustralianRupert (talk) 10:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Hawkeye7. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/United States v. Lara/archive1.
Message added 15:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I've addressed all but the last issue, and I'm looking for the source on that one. If you could take another look, I would appreciated it. Thanks, GregJackP Boomer! 15:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2013 WikiCup!

Hello, Hawkeye7, and welcome to the 2013 WikiCup! Your submissions' page is here. The competition begins at midnight UTC. The first round will last until the end of February, at which point the top 64 scorers will advance to the second round. We will be in touch at the end of every month, and signups are going to remain open until the end of January; if you know of anyone else who may like to take part, please let them know! A few reminders:

• The rules can be found here. There have been a few changes from last year, which are listed on that page.
• Anything you submit must have been nominated and promoted in 2013, and you need to have completed significant work upon it in 2013. (The articles you review at good article reviews does not need to have been nominated in 2013, but you do need to have started the review in 2013.) We will be checking.
• If you feel that another competitor is breaking the rules or abusing the competition in some way, please let a judge know. Please do not remove entries from the submissions' pages of others yourself.
• Don't worry about calculating precisely how many points everything is worth. The bot will do that. The bot may occasionally get something wrong- let a judge know, or post on the WikiCup talk page if that happens.
• Please try to be prompt in updating submissions' pages so that they can be double-checked.

Overall, however, don't worry, and have fun. It doesn't matter if you make the odd mistake; these things happen. Questions can be asked on the WikiCup talk page. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 22:29, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

James Gwyn

Hi Hawkeye, did you have any comments regarding the citations in specific such concerns over sources, sections, quotations, material? I used James Longstreet as a baseline. This was my first attempt at a historical and civil war related article so any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks so much! Mkdw^talk 07:20, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

I classify dozens of articles at a time according to a rigid set of rules. Go through the article and replace all the {{citation required}} tags with references. And while you are at it, find out what Smith (1892) is. Then come back here or to the review page and I'll reclassify the article as a B. have fun! Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:46, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi Hawkeye, thanks for adding those. That helps me a lot in where my attention should be. I read the criteria but wasn't sure exactly where specifically, so thanks for that. Phew, it's been a long while since I last edited an article extensively. I ended up removing a lot of the sentences with {{cn}} as the details were trivial such as the address of his dried goods business or overall outcomes of a campaign (where the 118th was not directly involved). I've been in contact with some sources such as the Woodlands Cemetery where they forwarded me some historical documents via email. What is the standard practice to use these as a reference? (Upload them and link the file in the reference?) I fixed the Smith reference so it properly links to the full reference if you click on Smith; its a book, mainly eyewitness accounts from soldiers, from the 118th published by John L. Smith hosted at The Library of Congress. Once again, much appreciated for you taking time to answer my questions. Regards, Mkdw^talk 22:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

There are restrictions on primary documents; they can only be used for facts. If you have a site that you can upload to, fine. Otherwise you can try WikiSource and then link from there. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:27, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I didn't even know about WikiSource. Yes I'm aware; they're mainly records like immigration, burial cards, and business/banking receipts for land/plots. Do you have any recommendations that I should undertake in preparation for A? Mkdw^talk 03:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

• Investigative report: Ship ahoy! New travel site finally afloat

• News and notes: Launch of annual picture competition, new grant scheme

• WikiProject report: Reach for the Stars: WikiProject Astronomy

• Discussion report: Flag Manual of Style; accessibility and equality

• Special report: Loss of an Internet genius

• Featured content: Featured articles: Quality of reviews, quality of writing in 2012

• Arbitration report: First arbitration case in almost six months

• Technology report: Intermittent outages planned, first Wikidata client deployment

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 13:33, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Raymond D. Tarbuck

Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Gun carriage

Re: first section. It does seem out of place, but the purpose needs to be somewhere, one would think. What would help? Buster40004 Talk 00:52, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Enrico Fermi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Rome (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Sector Clock

Thanks Sector clock Please re assess modified stub, maybe B class? Cmpltd (talk) 19:14, 15 January 2013 (UTC) Not a chance. It needs to be fully referenced. Also: correct the raw URLs. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:26, 18 January 2013 (UTC

Sharp response! This is a very limited subject. 'Referencing?' are you referring to the final portion about the plotting table? If so I can expand but it is not directly relevant to the topic of the clock.Cmpltd (talk) 14:26, 19 January 2013 (UTC) Got it..! correct the circular referencing.. Cmpltd (talk) 14:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 9783540692904

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 9783540692904 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dwaipayan (talk) 19:02, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Big problem with infobox

Hello Hawkeye, during the browsing of Wikipedia, I found page Commandant of Cadets in very bad condition. Some inexperienced user damaged it and I dont know how to revert his changes. Please, can you check it and possibly repair it?

Thank you in advance --AntonyZ (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

• Done. Amazing how a simple blunder can cause all that. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

• • Thank you very much Hawkeye :)

--AntonyZ (talk) 13:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Nello Carrara

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:33, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Editor review for Banaticus

Hello, Hawkeye7. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Editor_review/Banaticus#Reviews.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Question

I know you've been doing a lot of work on Pacific War American commanders, do you have any designs on any of the Fleet Admirals? I've been collecting sources to do more military biographies and didn't want to step on your toes. —Ed!^(talk) 16:51, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Only Ernie King. I've been meaning to get back to him. But we can collaborate on him if you like. Hawkeye7 (talk) 16:59, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2013/Submissions/Hawkeye7

Hi there- I'm afraid I removed your featured article, as it's very much "last year's" article. Sorry about that. J Milburn (talk) 10:32, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Chain Home

This is a B article which I've been working on. Suggestions for further improvement please.Cmpltd (talk) 11:10, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

RE:Fermi

Hallo Hawkeye,
thanks for your kind appreciation, and for your very good job on Enrico's :-) page. This is a very good question, since outside Italy there is much confusion about the Italian University system. First of all, in the last 30 years much has changed, and now the Italian system resembles much the American one. At Fermi's time (and also my time, I graduated in the early eighties), in Italy there was only the so called Laurea, that is, there was NO graduate school. The Laurea in scientific and technical subject (Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, Engineering) followed always the same pattern:

• The first two years ("biennio") devoted to basic studies (Calculus, Physics, Chemistry, etc.) and basically the same for all the faculties;
• The second two (for Physics and Mathematics) or three (for Engineering and Chemistry) years devoted to specialized courses (but not "equivalent to graduate school" as it was erroneously written in the article);
• In the end, a Thesis work with final examination;
• After that, the student got the title of "Dottore";

This last point brings a lot of confusion among foreigners, since they think automatically that the person holding this title completed a Ph.D., which was NOT the case.

Although at a first glance this could have resembled an undergraduate study (for example in the U.S.), there were differences. The courses were mainly held yearly (October to May), they were time intensive and very hard (in my case, for example, 36 people started Calculus I, only 2 passed) and the examinations (no mid-term) were always written and oral. The Thesis work could have taken a long time (also a couple of years for experimental work) being so comparable with a Ph.D. Thesis. This explain why for a good italian student attending a graduate Study abroad was often an easy task (I got an M.S. in USA in 9 months, and was like vacation :-)).

Regarding Fermi then, you should consider that he was a "Normalista". Students enrolled at the Normale were (and still are) automatically enrolled also at the University of Pisa, and they follows always two courses (and take two examinations) per each subject, one at the Normale and one at the University. They cannot fail an exam, and their score must be consistently high (I think at least 27/30), otherwise they must quit the normale. This, together with a very hard admission test, the exceptional academic body, and the very small number of students, explains why the Normale is the University which holds worldwide the highest ratio between future Nobel laureates and students.

I hope that with this I answered your question. Otherwise, ask me again! Bye, and keep the good job! Alex2006 (talk) 07:56, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes. Thank you very much. That cleared up a lot of questions for me. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:50, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Hawkeye,

always glad to answer to your questions! Well, the answer is simple: in Italy one or more university chairs were assigned after a "Concorso", that is a public and official (i.e., held by the State: due to that, the result could be appealed in front of an administrative court) competition among several candidates. Usually the "Concorso" was "per esami e titoli" . The latter were degrees (in the case of Fermi, a "Laurea" in Physics), published papers, and so on, which each candidate should have necessarily held. The former was one or more examinations. At the end, the examiners (other university Professors) compiled a ranking list of the persons who are considered "idonei" (capable) for this chair. The first n candidates among the "idonei" got the n chair, the others went away empty-handed. Fermi failed to win the first "Concorso" (if I remember well, it was for a chair in Cagliari), but won the second, thanks to the important aid of Corbino. Moreover, there was also the "Libera docenza", which allowed someone to give lectures at the university without being a professor. This was analogue to the German "Habilitation". Alex2006 (talk) 09:08, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Mongol naval power Op-ed: Crisco 1492 on war films

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Fermi review

Hi Hawkeye,

I started the GA review for Enrico Fermi this morning. A few issues need attention; take a look when you get a chance. Thanks for all your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:52, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

• News and notes: Requests for adminship reform moves forward

• WikiProject report: Say What? — WikiProject Linguistics

• Featured content: Wazzup, G? Delegates and featured topics in review

• Arbitration report: Doncram case continues

• Technology report: Data centre switchover a tentative success

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 22:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

United States v. The Progressive

Very interesting read and quite well done. Thanks for writing it. NW (Talk) 02:20, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) My favorite line: "It now began to occur to him that his hobby might not be legal." Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 10:14, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks both of you. I will be nominating it for featured. Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:59, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alfred E. Montgomery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Monitor and Philippines campaign

Enrico Fermi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Euclidean

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Hey did you get my message? I send you an email.

Did you? XXzoonamiXX (talk) 04:18, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I did. (1) I am not an admin. (2) I will have a look at the page. Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:40, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

So did you get it? Did you see my article talk page of the Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?XXzoonamiXX (talk) 10:35, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Happy Australia Day

Thanks Hawkeye7 for your kind thoughts. Much appreciated - :D though I do try to be balanced. If the infantry war diaries were available on the web it would help enormously. All the best, kind regards, --Rskp (talk) 22:10, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, and a happy Australia Day to you too. But why use exactly the same message that Laura used last year, complete with the grammattical error (is -> are) and the emoticons (which I didn't think were part of *your* regular editing style on WP)? Graham87 00:33, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

not only that but some are not even regular editors anymore and some of the weirder hard cases of the australian project have never been thanked ever... sats 02:35, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

If you have somebody in mind, let me know. The day is not over yet. {smiley}} Hawkeye7 (talk) 05:07, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks from me too. It's especially nice when such acknowledgement comes from people with whom I've really had little interaction. To be honest, I didn't notice the grammattical[sic] error, the spirit of the message is what matters. Cheers. --AussieLegend (✉) 07:18, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Hehe, touché! Graham87 09:38, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

The template that laura sent out last year was when there seemed to be a need to acknowledge editors workand it seemed like a good day in the year to acnowledge australian editors (I fail to see how the reading of the item as flag waving and mis-directed nationalism, but hey thats wikipedia for you) - the point I was trying to make is the general appraisal of some of the more outlandish bad tempered and obsessed Australian Afd participants, or other very weird corners of the australian project rarely get acknowledged.. (mind you some would probably revert with an edit summary of bugger off - spam) - even for some who have 25,000 + watchlists they might not even pickup on the obscure corners. There a very few high edit people left, but lots of small edit people who would probably have appreciated acknowledgement - but then it would probably take up a lot of time to sort through the mass of currently active Australian editors, then you get those who dont even acknowledge their state or their australianness to be appreciated. sats 14:47, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring Enrico Fermi to Good Article status-- keep up the good work! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:25, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

flag-waving

Hawkeye, please don't send me one of those templates. I find the whole thing cringe-inducing. Nationalism goes nowhere but bad places, sooner or later. Tony (talk) 11:15, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

However I appreciated the greeting. There is no need to cringe. Happy 27/1/2013! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:16, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Well, I for one appreciated the sentiment. Hope you had a pleasant (and less wet than mine) Australia Day! Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:11, 28 January 2013 (UTC).

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

• In the media: Hoaxes draw media attention

• Recent research: Lessons from the research literature on open collaboration; clicks on featured articles; credibility heuristics

• WikiProject report: Checkmate! — WikiProject Chess

• Discussion report: Administrator conduct and requests

• News and notes: Khan Academy's Smarthistory and Wikipedia collaborate

• Featured content: Listing off progress from 2012

• Arbitration report: Doncram continues

• Technology report: Developers get ready for FOSDEM amid caching problems

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 17:12, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mark Soyer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Falls Creek and WorkCover

Battle of the Bismarck Sea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Joe Hewitt

Marty Mayberry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Slalom

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Alfred E. Montgomery

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 January newsletter

Signups are now closed; we have our final 127 contestants for this year's competition. 64 contestants will make it to the next round at the end of February, but we're already seeing strong scoring compared to previous years. Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) currently leads, with 358 points. At this stage in 2012, the leader ( Grapple X (submissions)) had 342 points, while in 2011, the leader had 228 points. We also have a large number of scorers when compared with this stage in previous years. 12george1 (submissions) was the first competitor to score this year, as he was last year, with a detailed good article review. Some other firsts:

• 12george1 (submissions) was also the first to score for an article, with the good article Hurricane Gordon (2000). Again, this is a repeat of last year!
• Buggie111 (submissions) was the first to score for a did you know, with Marquis Flowers.
• Spencer (submissions) was the first to score for an in the news, with 2013 Houphouët-Boigny stampede.
• Status (submissions) was the first to score for a featured list, with list of Billboard Social 50 number-one artists.
• Adam Cuerden (submissions) was the first to score for a featured picture, with File:Thure de Thulstrup - L. Prang and Co. - Battle of Gettysburg - Restoration by Adam Cuerden.jpg.

Featured articles, portals and topics, as well as good topics, are yet to feature in the competition.

This year, the bonus points system has been reworked, with bonus points on offer for old articles prepared for did you know, and "multiplier" points reworked to become more linear. For details, please see Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. There have been some teething problems as the bot has worked its way around the new system, but issues should mostly be ironed out- please report any problems to the WikiCup talk page. Here are some participants worthy of note with regards to the bonus points:

• Ed! (submissions) was the first to score bonus points, with Portland-class cruiser, a good article.
• Hawkeye7 (submissions) has the highest overall bonus points, as well as the highest scoring article, thanks to his work on Enrico Fermi, now a good article. The biography of such a significant figure to the history of science warrants nearly five times the normal score.
• HueSatLum (submissions) claimed bonus points for René Vautier and Nicolas de Fer, articles that did not exist on the English Wikipedia at the start of the year; a first for the WikiCup. The articles were eligible for bonus points because of fact they were both covered on a number of other Wikipedias.

Also, a quick mention of The C of E (submissions), who may well have already written the oddest article of the WikiCup this year: did you know that the Fucking mayor objected to Fucking Hell on the grounds that there was no Fucking brewery? The gauntlet has been thrown down; can anyone beat it?

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 01:04, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

• Special report: Examining the popularity of Wikipedia articles

• News and notes: Article Feedback Tool faces community resistance

• WikiProject report: Land of the Midnight Sun

• Featured content: Portal people on potent potables and portable potholes

• In the media: Star Trek Into Pedantry

• Technology report: Wikidata team targets English Wikipedia deployment

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 00:51, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Australia women's national wheelchair basketball team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sarah Stewart

Australia women's national wheelchair basketball team at the 2012 Summer Paralympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sarah Stewart

Edina Müller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Brühl

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Your name came up at Talk:Audie Murphy

Over on the Audie Murphy talk page, an IP editor suggested you might be helpful. In a nutshell, the Audie Murphy article needs a lot of cleaning up and reconstructing. I'd like to see this be a FA on the front page, but it will take a lot to get it there. I set it up for Peer review, and user MarcusBritish has made a number of suggestions. I can do a lot of clean-up and general editing on Wikipedia, but I have no experience with military subjects. Is there is anything you can edit on the military section of the article to help bring it along? Anything you feel you can do is appreciated. — Maile (talk) 01:23, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Keep up the great work

		The Military history A-Class medal with swords
		On half of the Military History project's coordinators, I am very pleased to present you with the A class medal with Swords for your work on the Donald Wilson (general), United States v. The Progressive, and Colin Hall Simpson articles. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 05:34, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Magdalena Neuner

Hi, I tried to get the article featured, but it failed three times, so I've given up on it. The nomination usually received very little feedback. If I remember correctly, the main concerns were: reads too much like a list and needs a copy edit. EnemyOfTheState_|talk 20:41, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

If you don't mind, I would like to co-nom it. I'll do all the work, which will probably not be much, and I'll make sure that it gets reviewed properly. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:37, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Feel free to try your luck. The text is probably slightly out of date, some parts read like she's still active, and nothing has really been added since her retirement one year ago. EnemyOfTheState_|talk 13:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 14 February 2013 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:46, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

WWI edit-a-thon

Hi Hawkeye,

Here is the link to the proposed WWI edit-a-thon in June? You would obviously be a man to have on board for the Canberra component. Do you know of articles about the Australian contribution or the impact on Australia that are missing and needed to be added, or are poor and need improving? They could be added to the list to assist with preparation. I have put three on the project page. Whiteghost.ink (talk) 03:05, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

• Op-ed: An article is a construct – hoaxes and Wikipedia

• Featured content: A lousy week

• WikiProject report: Just the Facts

• In the media: Wikipedia mirroring life in island ownership dispute

• News and notes: UK chapter governance review marks the end of a controversial year

• Discussion report: WebCite proposal

• Technology report: Wikidata client rollout stutters

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 07:03, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Notification of discussion

A few months ago, you participated in a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Did you know about Gibraltar-related DYKs on the Main Page. I am proposing that the temporary restrictions on such DYKs, which were imposed in September 2012, should be lifted and have set out a case for doing so at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Gibraltar-related DYKs. If you have a view on this, please comment at that page. Prioryman (talk) 22:06, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Edina Müller

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:50, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

GA nomination

You may not have noticed, but I've begun my review of your nomination at Talk:Alfred E. Montgomery/GA1--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:05, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! I had not noticed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:38, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Hawkeye i have a big problem here?

In the Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki article, Binksternet keeps on believing that Hiroshima was given a leaflet warning with 12 cities on the list and Hiroshima was not. I don't want to go any further as things will gets ugly in the "leaflet section "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki#Leaflets". I attempted to remove it in the "leaflet" section, and Bink kept on reversing it back to way it was without providing any legitimate explanation to me whatsoever. Everytime i tried to edit out the problem and everytime i tried to explain he keeps on telling me to go to the talk article and he kept on reversing the back the way it was and scuffs those as I was lying. The whole thing is he keeps on believing that the Hiroshima was given a leaflet warning with 12 cites with Hiroshima not on the list which no major sources ever said it. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki&action=history Earlier, he puts on this last sentence," One such leaflet is on display at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum; it lists 12 cities targeted for firebombing: Otaru, Akita, Hachinohe, Fukushima, Urawa, Takayama, Iwakuni, Tottori, Imabari, Yawata, Miyakonojo, and Saga. Hiroshima was not listed." I then remove it then Bink kept on adding in with the sources that claim to have the Hiroshima city warned with 12 leaflets and Hiroshima was not on the list. Besides, he claimed that the leaflets were warned based on the link he provided and said this: One such leaflet lists 12 cities targeted for firebombing: Otaru, Akita, Hachinohe, Fukushima, Urawa, Takayama, Iwakuni, Tottori, Imabari, Yawata, Miyakonojo, and Saga. Hiroshima was not listed." He kept on saying this because he believes that Hiroshima was given a 12 city warning when i saw no evidence providing to the contrary whatsoever. And he claimed it was based on this: http://books.google.com/books?id=adI-6jRDipgC&pg=PA43#v=onepage&q&f=false Would you read it and does it REALLY says that Hiroshima was given such as 12 city leaflet? I don't think so. XXzoonamiXX (talk) 02:25, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Hey did you get my message? XXzoonamiXX (talk) 06:00, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I got the message! Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:44, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Niels Bohr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyrol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2013/Submissions/Hawkeye7

Hi- sorry to be such a bore, but I'm afraid I've had to trim off a few others which would really count as last year's. I appreciate that the rules are a little irritating, but it's the only fair way to do it, really. The big scorer is still there, so I've no doubt you'll come out near the front this round anyway. For more information, see Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, and if you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks! J Milburn (talk) 23:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Battle of the Bismarck Sea

Do you want me to see if some TFA shuffling is possible? Bencherlite^Talk 23:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

It would be nice if we could catch the 70th anniversary of the battle on 2-4 March. I prepared a blurb for it here Hawkeye7 (talk) 05:48, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Done. In fact, although I spotted your reply earlier, I forgot that you had already written a blurb, but I don't think the differences between your one and Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 3, 2013 are critical. Feel free to have another go at my attempt, though. Which image do you think is best? The burning ship is quite striking, I thought, although the watermark is a bit annoying. In the photo in your blurb, everything's a bit small to make out what's happening. Perhaps File:B24Shipbombing.jpg even though it's not in the article? Bencherlite^Talk 21:07, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

It's a nice pic, but during the A class review there were doubts that it was from the Battle of the Bismarck Sea. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:18, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

... which would explain why it's not in the article! I suppose one burning ship in black and white looks much like another <runs away after committing MILHIST heresy!> Bencherlite^Talk 21:29, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Cheers!

*clink* Abyssal (talk) 20:21, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

TB

Hello, Hawkeye7. You have new messages at Srich32977's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

• WikiProject report: Thank you for flying WikiProject Airlines

• Technology report: Better templates and 3D buildings

• News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation declares 'victory' in Wikivoyage lawsuit

• In the media: Sue Gardner interviewed by the Australian press

• Featured content: Featured content gets schooled

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 17:58, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Patton ACR

I think I've responded to all of the comments you posted there. Let me know if there's anything else I should fix. —Ed!^(talk) 13:07, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Australia women's national wheelchair basketball team at the 2012 Summer Paralympics

Carabinieri (talk) 00:02, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George S. Patton, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mohammed V and Lorraine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

More Ray-La pleae

See article talk. 71.246.150.230 (talk) 00:30, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Bump

Don't make me SOFIXITYOURSELF...TCO (talk) 00:00, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

did you like how it had a cami pattern (you know the milhist allusion)? Or did you even look at the clothes...;-) TCO (talk) 00:02, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Johanna Welin

Carabinieri (talk) 16:02, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Annabel Breuer

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:02, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination for Ernest Bohr

I've reviewed your nomination and left some comments and suggestions at Template:Did you know nominations/Ernest Bohr. Although it may look like a lot of comments, I actually don't think they should be that hard to address, and overall I think the article is in very good shape. BRMo (talk) 05:22, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at US Army leadership since World War II

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Niels Bohr

I reverted your edit to Niels Bohr which deleted some formulas because it did not seem to be an improvement. It would help greatly if you provided a rationale or purpose in the WP:EDITSUMMARY. If you feel your edit was valid, please do it again but this time, provide an edit summary. Thanks! —EncMstr (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Yworo (talk) 04:27, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

• In the media: Ex-WMF trustee creates "Wikipedia Corporate Index" for PR agency

• Recent research: Wikipedia not so novel after all, except to UK university lecturers

• News and notes: "Very lucky" Picture of the Year

• Discussion report: Wikivoyage links; overcategorization

• Featured content: Blue birds be bouncin'

• WikiProject report: How to measure a WikiProject's workload

• Technology report: Wikidata development to be continued indefinitely

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 04:33, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 February newsletter

Round 1 is now over. The top 64 scorers have progressed to round 2, where they have been randomly split into eight pools of eight. At the end of April, the top two from each pool, as well as the 16 highest scorers from those remaining, will progress to round 3. Commiserations to those eliminated; if you're interested in still being involved in the WikiCup, able and willing reviewers will always be needed, and if you're interested in getting involved with other collaborative projects, take a look at the WikiWomen's Month discussed below.

Round 1 saw 21 competitors with over 100 points, which is fantastic; that suggests that this year's competition is going to be highly competative. Our lower scores indicate this, too: A score of 19 was required to reach round 2, which was significantly higher than the 11 points required in 2012 and 8 points required in 2011. The score needed to reach round 3 will be higher, and may depend on pool groupings. In 2011, 41 points secured a round 3 place, while in 2012, 65 was needed. Our top three scorers in round 1 were:

1. Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), primarily for an array of warship GAs.
2. Miyagawa (submissions), primarily for an array of did you knows and good articles, some of which were awarded bonus points.
3. Casliber (submissions), due in no small part to Canis Minor, a featured article awarded a total of 340 points. A joint submission with Keilana (submissions), this is the highest scoring single article yet submitted in this year's competition.

Other contributors of note include:

• Sven Manguard (submissions), whose Portal:Massachusetts is the first featured portal this year. The featured portal process is one of the less well-known featured processes, and featured portals have traditionally had little impact on WikiCup scores.
• Sasata (submissions), whose Mycena aurantiomarginata was the first featured article this year.
• Muboshgu (submissions) and Wizardman (submissions), who both claimed points for articles in the Major League Baseball tie-breakers topic, the first topic points in the competition.
• Toa Nidhiki05 (submissions), who claimed for the first full good topic with the Casting Crowns studio albums topic.

Featured topics have still played no part in this year's competition, but once again, a curious contribution has been offered by The C of E (submissions): did you know that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire? With April Fools' Day during the next round, there will probably be a good chance of more unusual articles...

March sees the WikiWomen's History Month, a series of collaborative efforts to aid the women's history WikiProject to coincide with Women's History Month and International Women's Day. A number of WikiCup participants have already started to take part. The project has a to-do list of articles needing work on the topic of women's history. Those interested in helping out with the project can find articles in need of attention there, or, alternatively, add articles to the list. Those interested in collaborating on articles on women's history are also welcome to use the WikiCup talk page to find others willing to lend a helping hand. Another collaboration currently running is an an effort from WikiCup participants to coordinate a number of Easter-themed did you know articles. Contributions are welcome!

A few final administrative issues. From now on, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 01:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Alcohol laws of New Jersey

I noticed that you often review feature article candidates. Would you be able to review alcohol laws of New Jersey? It has been nominated as a feature article. DavidinNJ (talk) 01:46, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Oscar H. Banker

Issues fixed. Thank you! Proudbolsahye (talk) 16:52, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Ernest Bohr

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Bohr GA

Just letting you know, I passed it, thanks for nominating! ★★RetroLord★★ 12:21, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing! Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Niels Bohr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Fission, John Wheeler, Frederick IX and Arthur von Hippel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:21, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Hilde Levi at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:02, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Hilde Levi

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

• Op-ed: We must do more to turn readers into editors

• News and notes: Outing of editor causes firestorm

• Featured content: Slow week for featured content

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Television Stations

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 20:11, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

LW10

Here's the mail! [1]

So I've reviewed this article, and passed it. Congrats! Glad you were able to get to it. Since I did this for you, would you mind some reciprocity? I have a couple of articles that have stalled out at FLC and FAC, and could use additional eyes: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of honors received by Maya Angelou/archive2 and Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sesame Street research/archive3. It would be greatly appreciated. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:28, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Mareike Adermann

Hello! Your submission of Mareike Adermann at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Bagumba (talk) 01:09, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Mareike Adermann

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:12, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stadtfriedhof (Göttingen), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wilhelm Weber (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:53, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

• From the editor: Signpost–Wikizine merger

• News and notes: Finance committee updates

• Featured content: Batman, three birds and a Mercedes

• Arbitration report: Doncram case closes; arbitrator resigns

• WikiProject report: Setting a precedent

• Technology report: Article Feedback reversal

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 07:12, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta

Hello, Hawkeye7. You have new messages at Crisco 1492's talk page.
Message added 19:13, 13 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

He seems to be offline Tito Dutta (contact) 19:13, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

United States v. The Progressive

You've got a support on prose, so a second one probably won't help ... but let me know if I can help with anything. - Dank (push to talk) 03:26, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Dan. Much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:39, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Main Page appearance: James Bryant Conant

This is a note to let the main editors of James Bryant Conant know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on March 26, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or one of his delegates (Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), Gimmetoo (talk · contribs), and Bencherlite (talk · contribs)), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 26, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

James Bryant Conant (1893–1978) was a chemist, President of Harvard University, and the first U.S. Ambassador to West Germany. As a Harvard professor, he was one of the first to explore the relationship between chemical equilibrium and the reaction rate of chemical processes. He studied the biochemistry of oxyhemoglobin, helped to elucidate the structure of chlorophyll, and contributed insights that underlie modern theories of acid-base chemistry. It was during his presidency of Harvard (1933–53) that women were first admitted to Harvard Medical School and Harvard Law School. As chairman of the National Defense Research Committee during World War II, he oversaw the Manhattan Project, which developed the first atomic bombs. After the war, he served on the Joint Research and Development Board that coordinated defense research, and on the General Advisory Committee of the Atomic Energy Commission. In his later years at Harvard, he taught the history and philosophy of science, and wrote about the scientific method. In 1953 he became the U.S. High Commissioner for Germany, overseeing the restoration of German sovereignty, and then was U.S. Ambassador to West Germany until 1957. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Stadtfriedhof (Göttingen)

The DYK project (nominate) 16:01, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Bismark Sea

Hi mate, this must've been published just as the WP Article was completing FAC... Haven't read it yet but letting you know in case you wanted to add anything to the article -- even just a Further Reading entry -- while it's still fresh... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 06:08, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Fokker Scourge

Anything we can do to bring it up to B? --Soundofmusicals (talk) 19:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

It needs to be fully referenced. At least every paragraph needs to end with a reference. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:33, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

• News and notes: Resigning arbitrator slams Committee

• WikiProject report: Making music

• Interview: Meeting in the middle: Wikipedia and libraries

• Featured content: Wikipedia stays warm

• Arbitration report: Richard case closes

• Technology report: Visual Editor "on schedule"

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 06:48, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

A-Class medal with Diamonds for your great work

		The Military history A-Class medal with diamonds
		On behalf of the other coordinators of the Military History Wikiproject I am very pleased to present you with the inaugural A-Class medal with Diamonds in recognition of your great work in developing the Paul Wurtsmith, Australian Army during World War II and Thomas Farrell (general) articles to A-class status. Congratulations on being the first person to qualify for this award. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 22:10, 22 March 2013 (UTC)