Talk:India

Guidelines for editing the India page

• Text to be written in Indian English (spellings are modelled on British English)
• Units in metric should be spelled out with the converted English units abbreviated in parentheses per Manual of Style.
• Only external links pertaining to India as a whole, or official government of India links are solicited on this page. Please add other links in their respective articles.
• All sections are a summary of more detailed articles. If you find any points missing, please add it in the section's main article rather than on this page to keep this page size within reasonable limits.
• You may also discuss India related matters at: Wikipedia:Notice board for India-related topics.

Two events mentioned in this article are an August 15 selected anniversary and January 26 selected anniversary.

• India is the 29th most referenced article on the English Wikipedia. It was registered with 23,177 incoming links in January 2006.
• India was English Wikipedia's 79th most popular page, and the 6th most popular country after U.S., Germany, France, UK and Japan and the first developing country in February 2004.
• India was English Wikipedia's 25th most popular page, and the 2nd most popular country after U.S in November 2006.
• India is the 23rd most revised page, as of 18 Nov 2006.

---

Project Countries main pageTalkParticipantsTemplatesArticlesPicturesTo doArticle assessmentCountries portal This WikiProject helps develop country-related pages (of all types) and works toward standardizing the formats of sets and types of country-related pages. For example, the sets of Culture of x, Administrative divisions of x, and Demographics of x articles, etc. – (where "x" is a country name) – and the various types of pages, like stubs, categories, etc. WikiProject Countries articles as of May 7, 2024 What's new? Article alerts Articles for deletion 10 Sep 2024 – Gallery of sovereign state flags (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Howardcorn33 (t · c); see discussion (10 participants) 07 Sep 2024 – État pied-noir (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Mccapra (t · c) was closed as delete by Liz (t · c) on 14 Sep 2024; see discussion (2 participants) Proposed deletions 02 Sep 2024 – Sindh Sultanate (talk · edit · hist) PRODed by Ixudi (t · c) was deleted Categories for discussion 13 Sep 2024 – Category:Violence against LGBT people by country (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by BlasterOfHouses (t · c); see discussion 13 Sep 2024 – Category:Persecution of LGBT people by country (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by BlasterOfHouses (t · c); see discussion 13 Sep 2024 – Category:LGBT writers by nationality (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by BlasterOfHouses (t · c); see discussion 13 Sep 2024 – Category:LGBT women by nationality (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by BlasterOfHouses (t · c); see discussion 13 Sep 2024 – Category:LGBT women by nationality and occupation (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by BlasterOfHouses (t · c); see discussion 13 Sep 2024 – Category:LGBT women by occupation and nationality (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by BlasterOfHouses (t · c); see discussion 13 Sep 2024 – Category:LGBT theatre by country (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by BlasterOfHouses (t · c); see discussion 13 Sep 2024 – Category:LGBT sportswomen by nationality (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by BlasterOfHouses (t · c); see discussion 13 Sep 2024 – Category:LGBT sportspeople by nationality (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by BlasterOfHouses (t · c); see discussion 13 Sep 2024 – Category:LGBT sportsmen by nationality (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by BlasterOfHouses (t · c); see discussion (89 more...) Templates for discussion 11 Sep 2024 – Template:List of sovereign states strapline (talk · edit · hist) was TfDed by Jonesey95 (t · c); see discussion Redirects for discussion 31 Aug 2024 – Canada. (talk · edit · hist) →Canada was RfDed by 1234qwer1234qwer4 (t · c); see discussion 31 Aug 2024 – Verenigd Koninkrijk (talk · edit · hist) →United Kingdom was RfDed by Cremastra (t · c); see discussion 27 Aug 2024 – Hispanized Southeast Asia (talk · edit · hist) →Philippines was RfDed by StarTrekker (t · c); see discussion Good article nominees 09 Sep 2024 – Saybrook Colony (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Gazingo (t · c); start discussion 17 Jul 2024 – Sultanate of Bijapur (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Flemmish Nietzsche (t · c); see discussion 19 Apr 2024 – First Republic of Armenia (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Olympian (t · c); start discussion 06 Mar 2024 – Rai dynasty (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by TrangaBellam (t · c); see discussion Featured article reviews 30 Oct 2023 – Byzantine Empire (talk · edit · hist) was put up for FA review by SandyGeorgia (t · c); see discussion Good article reassessments 09 Sep 2024 – England (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for GA reassessment by Z1720 (t · c); see discussion 09 Sep 2024 – Kingdom of Sicily (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for GA reassessment by Z1720 (t · c); see discussion Requests for comments 27 Aug 2024 – Silla (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by Remsense (t · c); see discussion 26 Aug 2024 – Algeria (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by Kovcszaln6 (t · c); see discussion 22 Aug 2024 – Morocco (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by NAADAAN (t · c); see discussion Requested moves 11 Sep 2024 – Bahmani Sultanate (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Bahmani Kingdom by PadFoot2008 (t · c); see discussion 10 Sep 2024 – List of national flags of sovereign states (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to List of national flags by Howardcorn33 (t · c); see discussion 10 Sep 2024 – Transnistria (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Pridnestrovie by 2A03:F680:FE04:45D2:2C72:43DD:63F1:682C (t · c); see discussion 09 Sep 2024 – Macedonia (ancient kingdom) (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Kingdom of Macedonia by Iskandar323 (t · c); see discussion 13 Aug 2024 – Qi (Henan) (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Qǐ (state) by Yinweiaiqing (t · c); see discussion 02 Sep 2024 – Free area of the Republic of China (talk · edit · hist) move request to Taiwan Area by Donttellu8 (t · c) was moved to Taiwan Area (talk · edit · hist); see discussion 05 Aug 2024 – Palestinian territories (talk · edit · hist) move request to Occupied Palestinian Territory by Selfstudier (t · c) was moved to Occupied Palestinian territories (talk · edit · hist) by Amakuru (t · c) on 12 Sep 2024; see discussion Articles to be merged 12 Sep 2024 – Occupied Palestinian territories (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to State of Palestine by Onceinawhile (t · c); see discussion 06 Sep 2024 – List of World War II flying aces by country (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to List of World War II flying aces by MisterBee1966 (t · c); see discussion 06 May 2024 – General Command of the Armed Forces of South Russia (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Armed Forces of South Russia by Nederlandse Leeuw (t · c); see discussion 25 Feb 2024 – Spanish East Indies (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Captaincy General of the Philippines by Mr. Information1409 (t · c); see discussion 16 Feb 2024 – Sierra Leone (1961–1971) (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Sierra Leone by Snow Lion Fenian (t · c); see discussion Articles for creation 02 Sep 2024 – Draft:French Bengal (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Adam Islam Ali (t · c) 18 Aug 2024 – Draft:Tulunid Emirate (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Magedsaleh392 (t · c) 04 Aug 2024 – Draft:Sons of Liberty flag (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Caner~nowiki (t · c) undated – Draft:Vahika (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC 29 Jul 2024 – Draft:Kingdom of Kashmir (1754–1762) (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by Iwaqarhashmi (t · c) was accepted to Kingdom of Kashmir (1754–1762) (talk · edit · hist) by OhHaiMark (t · c) on 12 Sep 2024 Updated daily by AAlertBot — Discuss? / Report bug? / Request feature? Click to watch (Subscribe via  RSS  Atom) · Find Article Alerts for other topics! To do list Scope This WikiProject is focused on country coverage (content/gaps) and presentation (navigation, page naming, layout, formatting) on Wikipedia, especially country articles (articles with countries as their titles), country outlines, and articles with a country in their name (such as Demographics of Germany), but also all other country-related articles, stubs, categories, and lists pertaining to countries. Navigation This WikiProject helps Wikipedia's navigation-related WikiProjects (Wikipedia:WikiProject Outline of knowledge, WikiProject Categories, WikiProject Portals, etc.) develop and maintain the navigation structures (menus, outlines, lists, templates, and categories) pertaining to countries. And since most countries share the same subtopics ("Cities of", "Cuisine of", "Religion in", "Prostitution in", etc.), it is advantageous to standardize their naming, and their order of presentation in Wikipedia's indexes and table-of-contents-like pages. Categories Subpages List of all subpages of this page. Formatting Many country and country-related articles have been extensively developed, but much systematic or similar information about many countries is not presented in a consistent way. Inconsistencies are rampant in article naming, headings, data presented, types of things covered, order of coverage, etc. This WikiProject works towards standardizing page layouts of country-related articles of the same type ("Geography of", "Government of", "Politics of", "Wildlife of", etc.). We are also involved with the standardization of country-related stubs, standardizing the structure of country-related lists and categories (the category trees for countries should be identical for the most part, as most countries share the same subcategories – though there will be some differences of course). Goals Provide a centralized resource guide of all related topics in Wikipedia, as well as spearhead the effort to improve and develop them. Create uniform templates that serve to identify all related articles as part of this project, as well as stub templates to englobe all related stubs under specific categories. Standardize articles about different nations, cultures, holidays, and geography. Verify historical accuracy and neutrality of all articles within the scope of the project. Create, expand and cleanup related articles. Structure and guidelines Although referenced during FA and GA reviews, this structure guide is advisory only, and should not be enforced against the wishes of those actually working on the article in question. Articles may be best modeled on the layout of an existing article of appropriate structure and topic (See: Canada, Japan and Australia) Main polities Main article: Country A country is a distinct part of the world, such as a state, nation, or other political entity. When referring to a specific polity, the term "country" may refer to a sovereign state, states with limited recognition, constituent country, or a dependent territory. Lead section See also: WP:Lead section Opening paragraphs The article should start with a good simple introduction, giving name of the country, general location in the world, bordering countries, seas and the like. Also give other names by which the country may still be known (for example Holland, Persia). Also, add a few facts about the country, the things that it is known for (for example the mentioning of windmills in the Netherlands article). The etymology of a country's name, if worth noting, may be dealt with in the Etymology or History section. Naming disputes may also belong in the Etymology or History section. Overly detailed information or infobox data duplication such as listing random examples, numbered statistics or naming individuals should be reserved for the infobox or body of the article. Example: . Canada and Japan as below . Y A developed country, Canada has a high nominal per capita income globally and its advanced economy ranks among the largest in the world, relying chiefly upon its abundant natural resources and well-developed international trade networks. Recognized as a middle power, Canada's strong support for multilateralism and internationalism has been closely related to its foreign relations policies of peacekeeping and aid for developing countries. Canada is part of multiple international organizations and forums. N A highly developed country, Canada has the seventeenth-highest nominal per-capita income globally and the sixteenth-highest ranking in the Human Development Index. Its advanced economy is the tenth-largest in the world and the 14th for military expenditure by country, Canada is part of several major international institutions including the United Nations, NATO, the G7, the Group of Ten, the G20, the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement, the Commonwealth of Nations, the Organisation internationale de la Francophonie, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum, and the Organization of American States. Y Japan is a highly developed country and a great power, with one of the largest economies by nominal GDP. Japan has renounced its right to declare war, though it maintains a self-defense force that ranks as one of the world's strongest militaries. A global leader in the automotive, robotics, and electronics industries, the country has made significant contributions to science and technology, and is one of the world's largest exporters and importers. It is part of multiple major international and intergovernmental institutions. N Japan is a member of numerous international organizations, including the United Nations (since 1956), the OECD, and the Group of Seven. Although it has renounced its right to declare war, the country maintains Self-Defense Forces that rank as 10th for military expenditure by country, After World War II, Japan experienced record growth in an economic miracle, becoming the second-largest economy in the world by 1990. As of 2021, the country's economy is the third-largest by nominal GDP, the fourth-largest by PPP and ranked "very high" on the Human Development Index. Infobox There is a table with quick facts about the country called an infobox. A template for the table can be found at the bottom of this page. Although the table can be moved out to the template namespace (to e.g. [[Template:CountryName Infobox]]) and thus easen the look of the edit page, most Wikipedians still disapprove as of now, see the talk page. The contents are as follows: The official long-form name of the country in the local language is to go on top as the caption. If there are several official names (languages), list all (if reasonably feasible). The conventional long-form name (in English), if it differs from the local long-form name, should follow the local name(s). This is not a parameter to list every recognized language of a country, but rather for listing officially recognize national languages. The conventional short-form name of the country, recognised by the majority of the English-speaking world; ideally, this should also be used for the name of the article. A picture of the national flag. You can find flags at the List of flags. A smaller version should be included in the table itself, a larger-sized version in a page titled Flag of <country>, linked to via the "In Detail" cell. Instead of two different images, use the autothumbnail function that wiki offers. A picture of the national coat of arms. A good source is required for this, but not yet available. It should be no more than 125 pixels in width. Below the flag and coat of arms is room for the national motto, often displayed on the coat of arms (with translation, if necessary). The official language(s) of the country. (rot the place to list every recognized or used language) The political status. Specify if it is a sovereign state or a dependent territory. The capital city, or cities. Explain the differences if there are multiple capital cities using a footnote (see example at the Netherlands). If the data on the population is recent and reliable, add the largest city of the country. Land area: The area of the country in square kilometres (km²) and square miles (sq mi) with the world-ranking of this country. Also add the % of water, which can be calculated from the data in the Geography article (make it negligible if ~0%). Population: The number of inhabitants and the world-ranking; also include a year for this estimate (should be 2000 for now, as that is the date of the ranking). For the population density you can use the numbers now available. GDP: The amount of the gross domestic product on ppp base and the world ranking. also include the amount total and per head. HDI: Information pertaining to the UN Human Development Index – the value, year (of value), rank (with ordinal), and category (colourised as per the HDI country list). Currency; the name of the local currency. Use the pipe if the currency name is also used in other countries: [[Australian dollar|dollar]]. Time zone(s); the time zone or zones in which the country is relative to UTC National anthem; the name of the National anthem and a link to the article about it. Internet TLD; the top-level domain code for this country. Calling Code; the international Calling Code used for dialing this country. Lead map There is a long-standing practice that areas out of a state's control should be depicted differently on introductory maps, to not give the impression the powers of a state extend somewhere they do not. This is for various types of a lack of control, be it another state (eg. Crimea, bits of Kashmir) or a separatist body (eg. DPR, TRNC). Sections Further information: Wikipedia:Summary style and Wikipedia:Too much detail A section should be written in summary style, containing just the important facts. Undue weight can be given in several ways, including but not limited to the depth of detail, the quantity of text, prominence of placement, the juxtaposition of statements, and the use of imagery. Main article fixation is an observed effect that editors are likely to encounter in county articles. If a section it is too large, information should be transferred to the sub-article. Avoid sections focusing on criticisms or controversies. Try to achieve a more neutral text by folding debates into the narrative, rather than isolating them into sections. Articles may consist of the following sections: Etymology sections are often placed first (sometimes called name depending on the information in the article). Include only if due information is available. History – An outline of the major events in the country's history (about 4 to 6 paragraphs, depending on complexity of history), including some detail on current events. Sub-article: "History of X" Politics – Overview of the current governmental system, possibly previous forms, some short notes on the parliament. Sub-article: "Politics of X" Administrative divisions – Overview of the administrative subdivisions of the country. Name the section after the first level of subdivisions (and subsequent levels, if available) (e.g. provinces, states, departments, districts, etc.) and give the English equivalent name, when available. Also include overseas possessions. This section should also include an overview map of the country and subdivisions, if available. Geography – Details of the country's main geographic features and climate. Historical weather boxes should be reserved for sub articles. Sub-article: "Geography of X" Economy – Details on the country's economy, major industries, bit of economic history, major trade partners, a tad comparison etc. Sub-article: "Economy of X" Demographics – Mention the languages spoken, the major religions, some well known properties of the people of X, by which they are known. Uncontextualized data and charts should be avoided. (See WP:NOTSTATS and WP:PROSE) Sub-article: "Demographics of X". Culture – Summary of the country's specific forms of art (anything from painting to film) and its best known cultural contributions. Caution should be taken to ensure that the sections are not simply a listing of names or mini biographies of individuals accomplishments. Good example Canada#Sports. Sub-article: "Culture of X". See also – Aim to include relevant information within the article and reduce the See also section See WP:See also. ('See also" sections of country articles normally only contain links to "Index of country" and "Outline of country" articles, alongside the main portal(s)). References – Sums up "Notes", "References", and all "Further Reading" or "Bibliography" External links – Links to official websites about the country. See WP:External links Size Main pages: Wikipedia:Article size and Wikipedia:Summary style § Article size Articles that have gone through FA and GA reviews generally consists of approximately 8,000 to 10,000 words as per WP:SIZERULE, with a lead usually four paragraphs as per MOS:LEADLENGTH. Australia = Prose size (text only): 60 kB (9,304 words) "readable prose size" Bulgaria = Prose size (text only): 56 kB (8,847 words) "readable prose size" Canada = Prose size (text only): 67 kB (9,936 words) "readable prose size" Germany = Prose size (text only): 54 kB (8,456 words) "readable prose size" Japan = Prose size (text only): 51 kB (8,104 words) "readable prose size" East Timor = Prose size (text only): 53 kB (8152 words) "readable prose size" Malaysia = Prose size (text only): 57 kB (9092 words) "readable prose size" New Zealand = Prose size (text only): 62 kB (9761 words) "readable prose size" Philippines = Prose size (text only): 62 kB (9178 words) "readable prose size" Hatnote The link should be shown as below: Avoid link clutter of multiple child articles in a hierarchical setup as hatnotes. Important links/articles shoukd be incorporated into the prose of the section. For example, Canada#Economy is a summary section with a hatnote to Economy of Canada that summarizes the history with a hatnote to Economic history of Canada. See WP:SUMMARYHATNOTE for more recommended hatnote usages. Y== Economy == Main article: Economy of Canada N== Economy == Main article: Economy of Canada See also: Petroleum industry in Canada and Agriculture in Canada Further information: Economic history of Canada and Early Canadian banking system Charts As prose text is preferred, overly detailed statistical charts and diagrams such as economic trends, weather boxes, historical population charts, and past elections results, etc, should be reserved for main sub articles on the topic as per WP:DETAIL as outlined at WP:NOTSTATS. Galleries Galleries or clusters of images are generally discouraged as they may cause undue weight to one particular section of a summary article and may cause accessibility problems, such as sand­wich­ing of text, images that are too small or fragmented image display for some readers as outlined at WP:GALLERY. Articles that have gone through modern FA and GA reviews generally consists of one image for every three or four paragraphs, see MOS:ACCESS#FLOAT and MOS:SECTIONLOC for more information. Footers As noted at Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and series boxes the number of templates at the bottom of any article should be kept to a minimum. Country pages generally have footers that link to pages for countries in their geographic region. Footers for international organizations are not added to country pages, but they rather can go on subpages such as "Economy of..." and "Foreign relations of..." Categories for some of these organizations are also sometimes added. Templates for supranational organizations like the European Union and CARICOM are permitted. A list of the footers that have been created can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Countries/Templates/Navboxes, however note that many of these are not currently in use. Transclusions Transclusions are generally discouraged in country articles for reasons outlined below. Further information: Wikipedia:Transclusion costs and benefits Like many software technologies, transclusion comes with a number of drawbacks. The most obvious one being the cost in terms of increased machine resources needed; to mitigate this to some extent, template limits are imposed by the software to reduce the complexity of pages. Some further drawbacks are listed below. Transcluded text may have no sources for statements that should be sourced where they appear, have different established reference styles, contain no-text cite errors, or duplicate key errors. (To help mitigate these, see Help:Cite errors) Excerpts break the link between article code and article output. Changes made to transcluded content often do not appear in watchlists, resulting in unseen changes on the target page. Transcluded text may cause repeated links or have different varieties of English and date formats than the target page. Transclusions may not reflect protection levels, resulting in transcluded text perhaps having a different level of protection than the target page. See Cascading protection {{excerpt}} and related templates may require using <noinclude>, <includeonly> and <onlyinclude> markup at the transcluded page to have selective content; that would require monitoring that the markup is sustained. Excerpts cause editors to monitor transcluded pages for "section heading" changes to ensure transclusion continues to work. (To help mitigate this, see MOS:BROKENSECTIONLINKS) Excerpts can result in content discussions over multiple talk pages that may have different considerations or objectives for readers. Lists of countries To determine which entities should be considered separate "countries" or included on lists, use the entries in ISO 3166-1 plus the list of states with limited recognition, except: Lists based on only a single source should follow that source. Specific lists might need more logical criteria. For example, list of sovereign states omits non-sovereign entities listed by ISO-3166-1. Lists of sports teams list whichever entities that have teams, regardless of sovereignty. Lists of laws might follow jurisdiction boundaries (for example, England and Wales is a single jurisdiction). For consistency with other Wikipedia articles, the names of entities do not need to follow sources or ISO-3166-1. The names used as the titles of English Wikipedia articles are a safe choice for those that are disputed. Resources Sisterlinks Related WikiProjects WikiProject Former countries WikiProject Micronations WikiProject Limited recognition Popular pages Wikipedia:WikiProject Countries/Popular pages

Template:FARCfailed

Template:V0.5

Template:Mainpage date

Template:FAOL

Archives
Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10	Archive 11	Archive 12
Archive 13	Archive 14
Archive 15	Archive 16

Steady increase in page India's popularity?

As a result of user Chanakyathegreat's kindly making the statistics utility available, I compiled the statistics for the most popular country pages since August 2006. India has shown a steady improvement both in terms of the average number of daily hits and in the relative ranking. The format is: (Country rank, Country, number of hits per day, overall rank). Here are the statistics for the different months:

• August 2006 (India not in first 200):

1. United States. 34,677 (3)
2. Morocco. 14,833 (25)
3. Iran. 12,667 (42)
4. Germany. 11,333 (61)
5. Israel. 10,333 (75)
6. Philippines. 8,333 (172)
7. Switzerland. 8,333 (176)
8. Colombia. 8,000 (195)

• September 2006:

1. United States. 23,067 (8)
2. Canada. 11,200 (28)
3. Japan. 10,900 (32)
4. Germany. 10,533 (34)
5. Brazil. 10,167 (35)
6. China. 9,100 (45)
7. Australia. 9,067 (46)
8. United Kingdom. 8,500 (54)
9. Mexico. 8,400 (58)
10. Israel. 8,000 (61)
11. France. 7,867 (65)
12. India. 7,733 (70)

• October 2006:

1. United States. 23,742 (5)
2. North Korea. 13,419 (21)
3. Mexico. 12,258. (26)
4. Canada. 10, 968. (33)
5. India. 10,903 (35)
6. United Kingdom. 10,710 (37)
7. Germany. 9,355 (47)
8. France. 8,935 (53)
9. Australia. 7,613 (67)
10. Israel. 6,677 (94)

• November 2006 (first 16 days):

1. United States. 25,500 (8)
2. India. 14,375 (25)
3. Kazakhstan. 14,000 (27)
4. United Kingdom. 13,125 (35)
5. Australia. 12,750 (44)
6. Canada. 11,625 (55)
7. Germany. 9,750 (77)
8. China. 8,875 (95)
9. Netherlands. 8,750 (97)
10. Italy. 8,625 (99)

One should be wary, though, for many reasons: (a) the utility is still being tested, so the statistics may be faulty, (b) there is a percentage error in these estimates that can vary between 10% to 30% or more, (c) sometimes the popularity of a certain page like Kazakhstan in November or North Korea in October may be a reflection of Hollywood movie releases or world politics ... or it may have to do with the dynamics of the academic year in schools and colleges.

Fowler&fowler 20:05, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Khazakastan has overtaken India. =Nichalp «Talk»= 02:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Darn it. That Borat movie. :) Fowler&fowler 02:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Talking about Borat, well he surely has made Kazakhstan popular! --Incman|वार्ता 20:14, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Poor quality

This article has deteriorated in quality since I last edited it. At 522 kb it is too bloated and needs to be pruned to about 35 kb which it originally was. I will begin shortly. =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank god. Welcome back. Let us know if you want help. Saravask 07:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

A copyedit and a refinement of the related topics would be helpful. :) =Nichalp «Talk»= 14:22, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

I am assuming you meant 52.2 kb. I did a search of other featured country pages. Here are their sizes: Australia (49kb), Bangladesh (45kb), Belgium (43), Bhutan (42), Cambodia (40), Canada (78), Libya (54), Nepal (43), Pakistan (53), China (69), and South Africa (65). Why does the India article have to be 35 kb? Fowler&fowler 23:29, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

The longer the article, the harder it is to read. Around 30 kb in raw page count is about the maximum that a casual reader can read in one sitting. Any longer, it becomes more tedious to read. I'm not saying that 35 kb be kept as an arbitary number. Having a lower count allows us to be more flexible when welcoming newer additions. If the size was set at 45 kb, it would very well have ballooned to 60 kb by now. Granted, most of the country articles are more than 35, but you've also accounted for infoboxes, references and other meta data. I also have worked on Bhutan and Nepal to FA status and at the time of it being promoted, both were 30 odd kb. It hasn't been maintained since then. As for other countries, I have commented about the same for SA and China in the past, even dragging China to FARC. Please note that at the time of promotion, a lot of these FAs were much lower in page size. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 02:08, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Oh, OK. That makes sense. Thanks. Fowler&fowler 03:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Improvements

I have made some edits to the page to bring back some semblance of a featured article. However the text is still choppy in some places and needs a good copyedit. I have also introduced a couple of featured images in the text, request all to provide a good caption. The article can still be improved, currently Australia is the best written country article. =Nichalp «Talk»= 14:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Home to the Indus Valley Civilization, a centre of important trade routes and vast empires, India has long played a major role in human history. Hinduism, Sikhism, Buddhism and Jainism, all have their origins in India, while Islam and Christianity enjoy a strong cultural heritage. Colonised as part of the British Empire in the nineteenth century, India gained independence in 1947 as a unified nation after an intense struggle for independence. The country has the most diverse populations, wildlife, geographical terrain and climate systems found anywhere in the world.

I don't know about the rest of the article, but the present lead (especially the 2nd paragraph quoted above) is problematic. I understand the need to be succinct, but an encyclopaedia article's lead also needs to provide information that is then used by a new reader to infer credibility and to read on. The lead re-inserted by user Nichalp will certainly resonate with Indian readers (and perhaps with readers knowledgeable of India), but it provides little meaningful information to readers new to the topic. I quote from, WP:LEAD

The lead should be capable of standing alone as a concise overview of the article, establishing context, explaining why the subject is interesting or notable, and describing its notable controversies, if there are any. ... (the lead) should be carefully sourced as appropriate...

Here are the things in the lead that people have objected to in the last couple of months:

• "Home to the Indus Valley Civilization": For someone a reader who doesn't know about IVC, it doesn't provide any meaningful information without using the use of the link. To Pakistanis, it may seem a little disingenuous.

The IVC is a well known civilzation and is taught in schools around the world. I'm afraid but we can't really cater to the absolute minority who haven't heard of the IVC or can't deduce the context from the text.

Done. I've kept "Indian subcontinent" though in first sentence.

• "India has long played a major role in human history." This is very normative. What is "major"? It could be applied to China, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Japan, the U.K., the U.S., France, Germany, the Netherlands, Mexico, Peru, Egypt, Greece, Italy, ..., and not least, Africa, the birthplace of human history. What real information does it give a new reader about India?

Good point

• "... enjoy strong cultural heritage." Again, what does that mean? It could be used euphemistically, for example, by many countries of Europe, like Britain, Germany, Italy, Denmark, Sweden, ... with recent burgeoning Muslim immigration.

Good point but the current draft is too restrictive. Shows that India only influenced areas east of it when it also influenced western Asia.

Removed restrictive sentence.

• "Colonised as a part of the British Empire ..." India was colonised by Great Britain and consequently became a part of the British Empire. Again, given the size of the British Empire at its height, it doesn't distinguish India, for example, from Zimbabwe, Botswana, Sudan, or Egypt--countries that the British arrived in late in the 19th century.
• "...after an intense struggle for independence" When was any struggle for independence not intense?

The current draft is better

• "The country has one of the most diverse populations, wildlife, geographical terrain and climate systems found anywhere in the world." This is very problematic. Biological and geophysical diversity are complicated concepts: best not to mention them. For example, India may not have any more biological diversity than Costa Rica. Diversity after all is not only about "charismatic mega fauna." The statement could be made about scores of countries--Madagascar, Papua and New Guinea, and Chile, to name three. Human diversity is similarly problematic. Are we talking about genetic diversity or linguistic diversity? Since all human lineages trace back to Africa, most countries of Africa (especially East Africa) will in general have more genetic diversity than countries in other continents.

I've put back a sentence in par3 end addressing diversity.

• Etymology. No reason to include etymology in the lead. It is not of paramount interest to a new reader.

And why so?

Well, it is of interest to me, but unless it is one sentence (as in Bangladesh) it takes away from other content in lead. All the other FAs including Australia, Canada, Pakistan, ..., and even the one's you worked on Bhutan and Sikkim have etymology/history of name in separate section.

• Finally what the lead excludes: no mention is made of contemporary India. In some earlier versions, India's recent achievements (4th largest, 2nd fastest growing, bomb, rocket, IT, etc.) were included. But the news of the bottom fifth (the 220 million undernourished citizens, who don't edit Wikipedia) is surely as relevant as that of the top fifth.

Current draft is too specific. Too much facts and figures on the economy

Removed most facts and figures.

• Here are two examples of readers objections from the talk page: Example 1 and Example 2.

I am replacing user Nichalp's lead with the last version before his edit. I understand that the article needs to be pared down, but the lead is not the place to skimp (within reason). I'm not a fan of latinate constructions, but, for better or worse, they are often more precise and more informative. I would like to get other readers' responses. But please don't simply revert to Nichalp's lead without discussing the issues I have raised. (PS. I've copy edited the new lead since. Fowler&fowler 19:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC))

Fowler&fowler 15:43, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

See my above replies in blue. I've refrained from editing the lead, but I'm not happy with it's current status although it is an improvement. To begin with,

1. The lead should be free from footnotes (it should summarises content, shouldn't introduce standalone content that needs to be referenced)

Removed all footnotes, but two. You are welcome to remove those too.

1. Is too long and specific. (living on less than $2 a day, Buddhist cave monuments at Ajanta &ndash why single these out?)

I've removed that particular stats. I've kept the cultural examples because they are concrete examples of "major role in human history." I think of them as historical equivalents of "featured images," i.e. they give the reader a quick fact to latch on to and they break the tedium of abstract sentences. They could be changed to other examples in time (to mix it up).

1. Contains weasel phrases and possible POV (a venue of cultural flowering; Modern India is a large and complex country that defies easy assessment) -- according to who?

 :) Good point. Removed them.

1. second fastest growing economy – the source is poor. The source should actually lead to a survery or ranking conducted by a reputable organisation. Linking the reference to a secondary source does not necessarily make it credible.

Haven't found a source for that yet. Will look. Do you have any?

See this. Saravask 05:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! Done.

Fowler&fowler 05:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

The lead should be pared down, there's a lot of content that doesn't belong there. Request you to take care of these issues and snip the size. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 10:37, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Have answered your particular objections above in

dark goldenrod

What do you think of the size? One request I have is to not change "most populous liberal democracy" back to "largest liberal democracy." I've had a lot of headache over that. I know that "largest democracy" used widely in India, but its usage is not standard worldwide. In particular, Britannica reserves "largest" for area (unless it qualifies it). See correspondence here. Fowler&fowler 00:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

The size is ok, but the lead still has specifics (animals). Something seems to be messed with the infobox too (the coordinates), could you have a look at that too? And lastly, the history section seems to have a lot of pakistan bashing, request that the version I recently reverted be restored. Thanks! let me know. =Nichalp «Talk»= 00:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Haven't touched the history section or the info box. Please feel free to change as you will. Have replaced "pandering" last sentence with animals by a previous "diversity" statement (last sentence lead). If you think there's too much blue there, please let me know and I'll unlink. Will keep working on replacing the other specifics (decimals, ajanta, taj). Fowler&fowler 02:29, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Dear Nichalp, I've reinserted your original history text. Very well written, I have to say! Fowler&fowler«Talk» 17:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Reaching 10,000 revisions

We are very near to reach 10,000 revisions of the article. As last updated Mostrevisions on 03:33 UTC, 18 November 2006, India has 9,791 revisions. After that 157 revisions has been made as of 06:47 UTC, 20 November 2006. So India has 9,948 revisions as of now. Shyam ^(T/C) 06:47, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Retaining edits made by the ip

I've retained the edits made by the ip (which Fowler removed) as they were fair. Can Fowler please explain how Pongal, Diwali and Holi are notable and good enough to merit a mention in the article but not Ugadi and Sankranti (I havent added Sankranti yet, but I will soon add)?? Pongal is the harvest festival in Tamil Nadu and Sankranti is the harvest festival in Karnataka. So how is Pongal more notable than Sankranti?? Similarly, Ugadi is new year day in Karnataka and Andhra. How on earth do you think that it is not 'notable'?? How is Yakshagana not notable?? Yakshagana to its eternal credit has also given birth to Kuchipudi. Do not revert edits if you dont understand something. And please do not bite. And nobody really should be expected to explain edits like this on talk, least of all newbies. These are common sense/common knowledge edits. Just because an article is FA is no reason to prevent common sense edits. Sarvagnya 03:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I only reverted one edit that changed "Carnatic music" to a vernacular version and I said that name changes should be discussed on the talk page. The other reversions happened because we were editing at the same time and I wasn't aware of the ip's rapid fire edits. Many apologies. As for explaining edits, my understanding is that unexplained edits by ips and vandals is what required this recent rollback and extra work by users Nichalp, Saravask, and others. (See Rollback ) Fowler&fowler 04:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Exactly. With respect, this article is a summary. It is not a grouping of vast, comprehensive lists. This is why, out of hundreds of Indian writers, only Tagore is mentioned. Readers can get details on others from Indian literature. Another example: [1]. Endless expansion of what are meant to be lists of a few selected examples helps explain the article's spectacular degradation over the past few months. I'm certain that the anon meant well. But his additions were poorly written and failed to use proper naming conventions. However, it is not our job to give each one an 'A' for effort, allowing their endless additions to stand. Our purpose is to point readers to selected and salient examples, not to cause their eyes to glaze over from witnessing a zoo of details. Saravask 04:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Everybody knows it is a summary. Tagore is mentioned because he is a nobel prize winner and hence is arguably more 'notable' than other literatteurs. But with the festivals its different. If Diwali and Pongal can be 'notable', so can Ugadi and Sankranti. I see that my edits have been reverted(I dont know by whom) and I consider these bad faith and sneaky reverts especially given that neither is it mentioned in the edit summaries nor has it been said on talk. Please put them back. I'm signing off now. I'll take another look tomorrow. Sarvagnya 07:15, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Ever so sorry, but you apparently missed the lengthy explanation provided by user: Saravask in his revert: (Culture - rv -- replacing bulky list with the four most widely celebrated holidays listed at List of Indian holidays; add any others to subarticles.) Fowler&fowler 07:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Four most widely celebrated holidays? eh! And hth did you decide Sankranti and Ugadi were not widely celebrated, but Pongal and Holi were! Sarvagnya 15:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

And talking of most widely celebrated festivals, Ganesh Chaturthi doesnt even figure!! What kind of list is that? Either get your facts right or let people who know do the editing. Sarvagnya 15:48, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Dear user Sarvagyna, I have my sympathies. Please work on the List of Indian holidays page. Establish authoritatively what the four most popular festivals are and we'll include them instead. Meanwhile for the India page, brevity will remain the overarching compact. Warm regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 16:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

This edit borders on vandalism — a section heading has been removed while grammatical flubs and eyesores have been introduced. I've already discussed my opposition to the unsourced listcruft, and I will continue to revert such bad edits in the future. Regards. Saravask 16:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Obviously it happened by mistake while being in a hurry to revert POV pushing and misinformed reverts. No need to call it vandalism. Sarvagnya 16:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I do not need to 'authoritatively' establish that my additions to the list of festivals are as popular if not more popular than those that you have listed. If you want, you go read up on relevant books, talk to people and do the 'establishing' yourself. A list of 'most popular' Indian festivals without Ganesh Chaturthi in it is the most ridiculous thing I've seen on Wikipedia so far. Sarvagnya 16:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Dear user Sarvagnya, Thank you for your input. Please don't insert messages out of (time) order--it can be confusing to readers. Please address user by name instead. I have rearranged the messages in time order. Wikipedia's recommendations on Talk page layout are given here. Regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 17:37, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Sarvagnya, we want to list only the festivals with the highest brand recollect. So while Diwali, Dussera and Holi are very popular, user:Sundar a few others and I came to the understanding that N Indian festivals were dominating the list, and the most recognizable S Indian one be also added to balance it. There is no point adding any more to the list, Ugadi is hardly a festival celebrated outside S India (I have never heard of it to be frank, and I do have friends from the region where the festival is celebrated). The current list is ok, we don't want bloat. Please do something about the quality of articles instead of unnecessary rants. Thanks! =Nichalp «Talk»= 01:32, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

• This is what I call introducing systemic bias into Wikipedia even where it can be avoided. What do u mean brand recollect? Holi's 'brand recollect' is thanks to Amitabh Bachan dancing in a rain of colours more than anything else. Bollywood propogates systemic biases and stereotypes and you perpetuate it on Wikipedia. The government of India neglects the North East and basically the hindi belt hogs a lion's share of the media space and you faithfully reproduce it here. This has to stop.
• Sankranti/Ugadi-Pongal : What extraordinary discussions did you all have and how did you conclude that Pongal has more 'brand recollect'(whatever thats supposed to mean) than Ugadi or Sankranti. When you say you havent even heard about Ugadi, you are emphatically confessing that you know next to nothing about Indian festivals. Ugadi is the Kannada new year day. Also the Telugu new year day. Sankranti is the Karnataka harvest festival. Pongal is the Tamil Nadu state harvest festival. So how is Pongal more 'notable' than Sankranti?? Both are confined to their own respective states. Infact, Sankranti(more precisely Makar Sankranti) unlike Pongal, I am sure is celebrated in other parts of India also. Ugadi, Sankranti and Dasara are government holidays in Karnataka. Ugadi is a government holiday in Andhra also. Holi, in most parts of India including all of South is a 'restricted' holiday.
• To be frank, I am flabbergasted that even common sense, common knowledge edits like this is being met with such stiff resistance even from admins who surely should know better than acting like they 'own' articles. Fowler so very condescendingly asks me to establish 'authoritatively' that my entries are valid. I think WP:citing sources doesnt require me to establish 'authoritatively' anything that is common sense or common knowledge. And Ganesh Chaturthi not finding a place on a list of India's most widely celebrated festivals has got to be the biggest joke I've heard in a long time. How did this article even make it to FA?
• Forget this small issue of list of festivals, even the rest of this article and many other India-related articles elsewhere on Wiki also reek of the kind of systemic bias I've described above(the north east is all but forgotten just like in the real world. that, to me is sad)
• As senior editors and admins here, people like you and Svarask etc., should do a little more 'listening'. I was aghast that Sundar somewhere even prayed for special controls on newbies. I am sure he meant well for the article, but certainly such ideas dont augur well for WP. This is supposed to be the encyclopedia 'anybody can edit'. That is what Jimbo Wales says. But unfortunately, I have to say that in reality WP has in some places has degenerated into its own small isolated fiefdoms. Sarvagnya 02:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• And how did you decide that Pongal is the most recognisable South Indian festival? Why not Ugadi? Why not Onam? Sarvagnya

I read your comments. You seem to be confused on several points. So let's set the record straight:

• Pongal is the Tamil Nadu state harvest festival ... No. It is celebrated across most of South India, not just in TN. Most of Andhra Pradesh (75 million people) celebrates it. In many regions of AP (Vijayawada, etc.), it's called "Pongal" ("Pongal" is not just a Tamil word; it's also a word in Telugu); in other regions (Hyderabad), it is called "Sankranti". It is the same festival with the same calendar date and the same types of food, designs, offerings, etc. By the way, in AP (the biggest and most populous state in South India), Pongal is more important than Ganesh Chaturthi, Onam, etc (Onam is confined to Kerala, and is a truly regional festival). That's probably why Sundar and Nichalp decided Pongal is most representative of South India.
• See one and two. Hope this helps. Saravask 05:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Saw both links. And no. It doesnt help. Because Pongal is not just a festival. Apart from Pongal-the festival, there is also a Pongal - the popular food preparation. Your google fight obviously doesnt make a distinction between the two. And no. It is NOT 'Pongal' in AP, it is 'Sankranti'. And Sankranti or Makar Sankranti is celebrated all over India and even Nepal. Refer Sankranthi. Sarvagnya 05:28, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

You can say what you like, but where I was born, it definitely was called "Pongal". We never called it "Sankranthi". And the food is referred to as "pongali", not "pongal". Saravask 05:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Saravask, please refer to the disambiguation message put in Pongal article. The dish name too is Pongal.

Thanks. - KNM ^Talk 06:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Sarvask, you can say what you like and I dont know where you were born, but the dish is certainly called Pongal and not Pongali as you can see in the link that KNM has pointed out above. And in any case, I am not sure if your google fight can make out the difference between pongali and pongal. Sarvagnya 06:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I would like to add few points here.

Makar Sankranti, Sankranthi and Pongal all are same and is the biggest harvest festival in India. It is called as Makar Sankranti in North-India, Sankranthi in Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, and Pongal in Tamilnadu. It would be lot more logical and neutral, if we include the name as Sankranti which contains a) links to all these three names, along with b) the information on, in which region what name is used. Also, please refer to this and this regarding more details on this festival.

Ugadi is one of the most widely celebrated festivals and also new year day in Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Karnataka.

To be noted that, it is the first day of the Hindu calendar year (first day of the first month, "Chaitra").

This citation says, it is the most important festival for Hindus.

More details on Ugadi is here and here.

Ganesh Chaturthi is certainly one among the most widely celebrated among the festivals of India and is known for the celebration all over the world, by Hindus. Please refer to this.

More importantly, it is not a regional festival and is one among the very few festivals which are celebrated in each and every place of India, unlike the other regional festivals. Please refer to this and this.

Also, it is the festival which has historical importance to India. With the efforts from Balgangadhar Tilak the festival was started being celebrated publicly. Please refer to this.

I believe this is more than enough to establish the required notability to include Ganesh Chaturthi, Sankranti and Ugadi in the culture section of this article.

I propose to have the below five festivals instead of the four currenly existing in the article now.

Ganesh Chaturthi, Diwali, Sankranti, Dussehra, Ugadi. Thanks. - KNM ^Talk 05:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Here are the results of Google boolean search (to avoid confusion between festival and food/recipe). Note that Dussehra/Dusshera and Sankranti/Sankranthi are alternate spellings.

1. "diwali festival -food -recipe" 557,000
2. "holi festival -food -recipe" 331,000
3. "pongal festival -food -recipe" 86,400
4. a) "dussehra festival -recipe -food -dusshera" 60,000 b) "dusshera festival -recipe -food -dussehra" 10,300. Total 70,300
5. "ganesh chaturthi festival -food -recipe" 63,700
6. a) "sankranti festival -food -recipe -sankranthi" 38,600. b) "sankranthi festival -food -recipe -sankranti" 676. Total: 39,276
7. "ugadi festival -food -recipe" 25,000

Fowler&fowler«Talk» 06:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

PS Dussehra has a number of other spellings that add another 5,000 to it. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 06:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

This is a ridiculous exercise in futility. Google fights are no way to establish notability of Indian festivals. I think KNM's links establish enough notability and I will be making the changes accordingly. Also I should point out that while I have been harassed for proof, I see no proof from fowler, sarvask and co for the edits already there. And btw(Fowler), if it was sarcasm that you were attempting by your nonsensical search strings, should just say that you failed miserably. Sarvagnya 15:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

It's no more ridiculous than referring to "www.udupipages.com" a as a bona-fide "citation" (e.g., what reliable sources did they reference? Who wrote it?). As for your "approach", all the other links turn out to merely be normative descriptions making no referenced or authoritative statements on the relative importance of the relatively obscure festivals you are shilling for. Do try again. Saravask 16:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

• Talking of google fights, here's some links -
  

[2]-Sankranti in te. script

[3] - Pongal in te. script. Guess these links speak for themselves.

• Also note the first hit for "పొంగల్"(Pongal in telugu script). Also note what the wikipedia article for "సంక్రాంతి"(Sankranti reads). It reads,

".... ఆంధ్ర ప్రదేశ్, కర్ణాటక లలో సంక్రాంతి అని; తమిళనాడు లో పొంగల్ అని; మహారాష్ట్ర, గుజరాత్ లలో మకర్‌సంక్రాంతి అని..."

• which means, "....sankranti in andhra pradesh, karnataka, pongal in tamil nadu, makar sankranti in maharashtra, gujarat..." Sarvagnya 16:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Another link which shows what telugu people call the festival. సంక్రాంతి గ్రీటింగ్ కార్డులు - Sankranti greeting cardulu reads the title of the page. Obscure. huh. Sarvagnya 16:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Again, you can dig up all the unreliable junk links you want ("www.telupu.com", etc.), since finding "proof" on the internet is rather like reading entrails or interpreting scripture — for any given argument you want to make, you're sure to find sites "confirming" it. I've already stated how my region contrasts with your blanket stereotypes of AP. But the real issue is not regional variations among Andhra people; rather it regards how the majority of Indians refer to their holidays and which four holidays they most celebrate. In the absence of definitive, authoritative rankings (which you have repeatedly failed to provide), Fowler's binaries are the next best thing. They gauge empirically how Indians themselves refer to their holidays; further, unlike selected sets of dubious links, they are absolute and cannot be manipulated. And the binaries strongly suggest that pongal and the other four holidays selected by Nichalp and Sundar are by far the more common festival names. Your attempts to obfuscate this fact by pasting handfuls of self-selected and non-authoritative links is approaching the point of disruption. Saravask 21:07, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

A few quick points:

• Sankranti, Makara Sankranti, and Pongal are the same festival, and the festival is celebrated all over India. However, it's only called Pongal in Tamil (historically, also in some parts of AP, but that usage is dying / has died out), so it doesn't make sense to refer to it as Pongal in this article. It seems to me that it would make most sense to use a descriptive name and call it "the midwinter harvest festival", which we pipelink to Sankranthi. The reason I would prefer not to use just "Sankranthi" in the article is that that term, technically speaking, refers to *any* movement of the sun from one asterism to another, and if you're an orthodox Hindu, there actually are observances for just about every Sankranti. There are certain tarpanams and shraddas for Mesha Sankranti and Tula Sankranti, some others for Krakata sankranti, and so on. "Midwinter harvest festival" avoids impreciseness, and is also more descriptive to the average uninformed westerner (who, at the end of the day, are likely to be the people reading this). I do not feel very strongly about this, however, this is just a suggestion.
• As far as TN goes, everyone celebrates Pongal - Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Tamil Jains, Bahais and Dravidian rationalists. I'm not sure how it works in other states, but at any rate it is not an exclusively "Hindu" festival, and shouldn't be classified as such. This I do feel strongly about.
• Similarly, for the New Year: my suggestion would be to simply say "the various Indian New Year's days", and link to a disambiguation page which lists all the New Years celebrated in India. Otherwise, believe me, there will be quite a bit of bickering about whether more people celebrate the March lunar new year (Ugadi, Padwa, Cheti Chand), or the April solar new year (Bihu, Baisakhi, Vishu, Noboborsho, Varudappirappu). Speaking in more general terms avoids this, and also lets us include things like the Gujarati new year, the various Parsi New Years, etc. Again, only a suggestion which you can take or leave as you see fit.
• I think talking about "balancing" the section by mentioning something from the South is ridiculous. The North-East is being totally ignored in this section. Apart from a token reference to Manipuri (which is anyway recognised as being a classical dance), there's nothing about north-eastern culture. Nothing. Not a thing. Just because the majority of Indians haven't heard about the Lai Haraoba festival it's not a notable part of Indian culture?
• Finally, the next sentence - "India has three national holidays" - is a little silly as it stands. Either say what they are, or take the sentence out. Needless to say, only my opinion. -- Arvind 19:02, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Wow, Arvind. Finally someone who share my concern on what I call systemic bias. I know that information about North East is not easy to find as there arent as many websites and 'national' newspapers and blogs covering that part of the country as you would find for say, the south or west or north of the country. But in such cases, an article like this shouldnt make it past a peer review. How did this make it past the peer review and become an FA. I am sure an FAR is not too far away in the future.

The token references that are made for the NE is almost 'condescending' and is almost like we are doing them a big favour by even talking about them. And by following the stupid 'google fight' logic I dont think 'Lai Haraoba', 'Bihu' etc., will make it into this article any time in the near future, if ever. This simply is no way to write such an important article in an encyclopedia.

And Arvind, as for your comment about Tula Sankranti etc., I am sure that in many parts of the country the term used is 'Sankramana'. But then I am not averse to your idea of creating diambig pages like 'Harvest festivals of India', 'Various New Year days in India' etc., and linking to those. I also think that it would be a good idea.

But then, who will bell the cat? Even making the smallest of changes to the article is being met with such stiff opposition. Sarvagnya 20:39, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

The article deals with India as a whole. I don't see how there is a systemic bias where NE India is concerned. There are references to NE India in the article including an image from Arunachal Pradesh. The article is meant to summarise the salient points of India, and NE India as a specific reference has been omitted. This is also true for Gujarat, Goa, Maharashtra, Punjab and a lot of other states. Starting with the history section, note that only events that have made a difference to India today are mentioned. All specific references to anything else are omitted. We have a mention of NE India in the geography (Himalayas and the Brahmaputra), and an indirect mention in Demographics. So the talk about systemic bias is really loud a pitch to be valid for this article.

Now when we talk about culture, we are talking about the most well known aspects of the country. No matter how much you may speak about the Lai Haraoba ishei festival, it is NOT a mainstream festival. If such festivals were to be added, it would open the floodgates to people adding minor festivals such as Navroze, Losar, Loosong etc. This is why we are limiting the number of festivals to just the most significant. Now measuring the popularity of festivals is an impossible task, so we've just included a maximum of the three most well known ones to illustrate this point. Please read Wikipedia:Summary style before accusing us of being pseudo conspiracy thoeorists, introducing systemic biases, owning articles, and what not. We admins are here to guide you on wikipolicy, why we defend certain reversals, and discuss matter on talk. Please do assume good faith in the future, and learn the ropes of the trade from senior admins. Thanks =Nichalp «Talk»=

Does Afghanistan border India?

Unless they want enervating editing wars, readers should come to some consensus on Afghanistan as a neighbour of India. I would lean towards not including Afghanistan, but having a footnote explaining India's claim over Pakistan's disputed Northern Areas which border Afghanistan. (Note: Jammu and Kashmir page itself doesn't mention Afghanistan as a neighbour!) That seems to be the convention: mention the administering country in the text and describe the dispute in the footnote. See the pages on K2, Eight-thousander, Nanga Parbat, Karakoram Highway, Khunjerab Pass.

Fowler&fowler«Talk» 14:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Agree. Without some sort of explanatory note providing background info, it's an unbalanced POV. I don't know why people are making these sorts of unhelpful edits when this article is lacking in several important areas. For example, where is India#Flora and fauna? Why not contribute to creating it? Saravask 19:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

(I'm happy to work on Flora and Fauna. Since this talk is about another topic, will ask more questions on your talk page. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 20:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC) )

The footnote serves its purpose ever since September 2004, and has not been revised ever since. Indian administered territory does not border Afghanistan, but the claimed territory does. So, as per the ground situation, a footnote is more logical than in the lead. =Nichalp «Talk»= 00:32, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Bharat

What's the meaning and significance of the name "Bharat"? Hindu/Indus was explained well, but what about Bharat? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.135.60.33 (talk • contribs) .

Why is Indus Valley even in this article?

Ok Lets get a few things straight. This is the history of MODERN INDIA, which is not the home of IVC, and the people of India have very little to do with IVC. IVC is a predominantly Pakistani civilisation, as it belongs to the people who HAVE ALWAYS LIVED IN PAKISTAN, regardless of what they now call themsleves.

Ancient India (including Pakistan) was a the name given to the entire sub continent. Ancient India (just modern India) only includes the history within its own borders. So please dont refer to IVC as Ancient India. Feel free to mention the settlements within India, but IVC is not Indian.

The Term "ancient Indian" should be changed to Ancient South Asian, or Ancient Pakistani, unless you are referring to history within Indias own borders.

I am willing to discuss this if you are. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Unre4L (talk • contribs) .

u are a fucking wanker!!!! There was no fucken pakistan or idependent state of pakistan before 1947!! infact most of the "pakistanis" are real indians of the muslim faith which were conerted by the arabs. I hate you people that attempt to leach of indias majestic history before you pakistanis cant get your own food, own laguage ( urdu is at least 50% hindi), own identity and own land. India has given so much land to you, to avoid conflict ad now you want to take away our ancient civilisations??? I have had enough!!! Indus Valley was indian land, occupied by indian people!!! gOD GAVE INDIA TO THE INDIANS NOT THE PAKISTANIS.... REMEMBER, PAKISTAN IS INDIAN LAND.... SO IS KASHMIR AND JAMMU!!!

It was not only in ancient times that the area that is now Pakistan was part of India. That area was part of India during the lifetime of people now living. --BostonMA ^talk 22:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

India was a name given to the subcontinent. Ancient India was not a country.

India was created in 1947. Prior to that the region was called British India, and prior to that India was a name of the entire subcontiment, which contained counties of every ethnic group now living in south asia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Unre4L (talk • contribs) .

I think the consensus of editors is that this article is not merely about the state that came into existence in 1947. Have a nice day. Sincerely, --BostonMA ^talk 00:16, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

If my history and geography serves me correct:

1. The River Indus partially flows through India
2. The inhabitants of the IVC had ethnic ties to people in southern India
3. The influence of the IVC extended into mordern day Gujarat and Rajasthan

Next, any history article deals with the the way the country has evolved ever since man has inhabited the greater portion of the territory, not from a sudden date when current boundaries are drawn. =Nichalp «Talk»= 00:40, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

____

Thats not what I am trying to say.

I am saying that Pakistan and India have never been part of the SAME country. They have been part of the same british Empire, and before that they were a part of the same subcontinent called India. And South Indians dont have ethnic ties to people in southern India. That theory was discarded. Indians make this claim aswell as saying that IVC is related to Hinduism, without any evidence.

New evidence suggestes that people of Punjab and Sindh are descendants of IVC, mixed with persians, arans, turks, muguls... Check out harappa.com

Please get this right. Pakistanis arent doing anything about this as they love to shun any pre Islamic history of theirs. I am half Indian and half Pakistani and I feel we should get this right. I know Indians dont want to side with Pakistan, but I think the evidence is overwhelming. Better change this with dignity. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Unre4L (talk • contribs) .

____ You have sources for what you say? =Nichalp «Talk»= 01:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Dear BostonMA Unre4L, (Please sign your posts in the future. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 05:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC))I am not sure what part of harrapa.com you are talking about, but the section,

Indus Civilization Geography there, clearly says, "Indus civilization remnants have been discovered from as far south as Mumbai [Bombay], in Maharashtra State, India, and as far north as the Himalayas and northern Afghanistan."

Please provide the exact link on harrappa.com which supports your thesis, in the same way as I have above. Also, when you say, "people of Punjab and Sindh are descendants of IVC, mixed with persians, arans, turks, muguls," please clarify whether you mean "cultural" mix or a "genetic mix." And if you mean genetic mix (for example, the result of a 16S ribosomal RNA study) please cite paper and publication, not just harrappa.com. I should warn you genetic studies involving markers from present day inhabitants of the Harrappa region are not enough to establish your claim.

As for including Indus Valley Civilization in India, as user Nichkalp has stated above, country pages have a brief historical section. For example the France page mentions ancient Gaul which included present-day northern Italy, France, Belgium, western Switzerland and the parts of the Netherlands and Germany on the west bank of the Rhine river.

As the standard histories below (all searchable) show, Indus civilization is a part of the history of India.

• Keay, John. 2001. India: A History]. Harper Collins. 480 pages. ISBN 0006387845
• Kulke, Hermann and Dietmar Rothermund. 2004. A History of India. Routledge. 448 pages. ISBN 0415329205
• Wolpert, Stanley. 2003. A New History of India. Oxford University Press. 544 pages. ISBN 0195166787

Again, please provide exact references in the same way as I have. Warm regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 02:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

______________________________________

France existed at the time of the empire they have included themself in. Modern India did not exist in the era of IVC, and the capital cities of IVC are not in India. If you want to try and understand me, then please read this.

--- Lets for the sake of argument say that Germany changes its name to Europe. Does this give (the new) Europe right claim its history as “ancient European”, and include the Roman, British and Portuguese empire as its own? This is exactly what has happened in South Asia. Please read and discover the events.

“India” prior to 1947 was never a country. It was a name given to the entire subcontinent. When the British invaded the subcontinent, they grouped the entire region as a Country, and called it British India. This has lead to the misunderstanding that India before 1947 was one country. In 1947, two countries were born in South Asia. One of the countries took up the former name of the subcontinent, giving the impression that it was the “parent country”. Therefore it is important to note that Ancient Indian history is the history of Modern India. Not South Asia. IVC should be categorised under Ancient South Asian history if not Ancient Pakistani History

Indus valley is an interesting topic. Indians from all over the world seem to claim Indus valley civilisation as Indian history, because they are under the impression that modern India is the parent country, which was once the entire subcontinent of South Asia. Apart from the name, IVC has almost nothing to do with Modern India.

Indus Valley settlements are located all over Southern Asia. These include, Iran, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, northwest India, and of course Pakistan. However, the Main IVC cities, aswell as the majority are in Pakistan. The main ones being, Harappa and Mohenjodaro.

Many people argue that Pakistan was born in 1947. It doesn’t have an ancient history. Well the history belongs to the Pakistani people. They do have an ancient history. India has nothing to do with the Pakistani people, and it is absurd to let them claim the History of the Pakistani people. The people of Pakistan have always lived there. Indus Valley Civilisation history belongs to the people of Pakistan regardless what they call themselves. Boundaries changed, however the people didn’t.

There is no denying Pakistan was a part of British India, or the “Indian subcontinent” (aka South Asia), but referring to Pakistan’s ancient history as Ancient Indian history, is Very misleading, as the continent is no longer called India. India today is a modern country born in 1947, which has its own Ancient history limited to within the boundaries of Modern India. IVC can be referred to as Ancient South Asian history, if the approximate region of the civilisation needs to be given.

For the sake of correctness and knowledge of Ancient civilisations, I hope this misunderstanding can be corrected. Even the Ancient Indian history should be broken down into more detailed sub categories. India is the home to a lot of different people. Grouping the history of all these people to give the impression that India has always contained one group of people and Ancient Indian history belongs to this one group, is misleading.

This is the reason why it is incorrect to even label IVC as Ancient South Asian history. South Asia is home to 1.6 billion people, which is way too broad to describe the people of Indus valley, which is now Pakistan. Sure this is no harm in mentioning the settlements outside of Pakistan (India, Iran, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan and Kashmir), however one has to remember that Pakistan is the home of it.

Comment was added by Unre4L

____________________________

Here are some other articles to cover up what I have said. I cant help it if you decide to knock the articles because they are not written by Indian scholars. But instead read and understand the articles and it makes perfect sense. To satisfy you, the Geocities links include sources from hindu texts.

Harappans and Rig Vedic Aryans were NOT Hindu http://www.geocities.com/pak_history/nonhindu.html

Indian hijacking of Pakistan's history http://www.geocities.com/pak_history/hijack.html

Hindu Dharma and Pakistan http://www.geocities.com/pak_history/Hindu.html

Pakistani history is very different from indian history http://www.islamicaweb.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52631

Comment was added by Unre4L

______________________

Please don't keep changing the terms of your argument. I gave you the benefit of a dialog. You said the reference was on harrappa.com. I asked you to either provide me the exact reference on harrappa.com or if you are talking about studies involving genetic markers, provide the citation from a respected journal like Human Genetics or Genome Research. Outside of those references I am not interested in bogus sites on the web. My advice: if you are really earnest about your program, please first cut your teeth by writing to Oxford University Press, Harper Collins, and Routledge and get them to to take out the chapter on "Indus Valley Civilization" from the three books I cited above. When you are able to do that, I will be happy to talk to you. Until then, you will not hear a peep from me, no matter how eloquently you write on these pages. Good luck. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 23:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Unre4L, please provide credible sources to support your claim. webpages hosted by Geocities and forum threads are not notable or credible by any means. By our non-negotiable policy on citing credible sources (Wikipedia:No original research), we cannot entertain such claims. We hope you understand. Thanks! =Nichalp «Talk»= 02:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Britannica, Encarta, and Google on Major Hindu Festivals: New Compromise Language

I thought it would be a good idea to see what both Britannica and Encarta say about major Hindu festivals. Here is what I found:

• 1) Encyclopaedia Britannica: Hindu Festivals: India page says the following about major Hindu festivals:

  Virtually all regions of India have their distinctive places of pilgrimage, local saints and folk heroes, religious festivals, and associated fairs. There are also innumerable festivals associated with individual villages or temples or with specific castes and cults. The most popular of the religious festivals celebrated over the greater part of India are Vasantpanchami (generally in February, the exact date determined by the Hindu lunar calendar), in honour of Sarasvati, the goddess of learning; Holi (in February–March), a time when traditional hierarchical relationships are forgotten and celebrants throw coloured water and powder at one another; Dussehra (in September–October), when the story of the Ramayana is reenacted; and Diwali (Divali; in October–November), a time for lighting lamps and exchanging gifts. The major secular holidays are Independence Day (August 15) and Republic Day (January 26).

• 2) Encarta: Table of Major Hindu Festivals (arranged by time of year)
• Mahashivaratri 'Great Night of Shiva' when Shiva, his wife Parvati, and their child Ganesha are honored; offerings are made to Shiva between midnight and sunrise and the 24-hour fast is broken at dawn. 13th or 14th day of dark half of Magh (February/March)
• Sarasvati Puja Sarasvati, the patron of the arts and learning, is celebrated with music and by wearing yellow clothes, symbolizing the warmth of spring. First day of spring season (Phalgun)(February/March)
• Holi The pranks that Krishna played as a child are celebrated, and the story of Prahalad, a prince who was willing to sacrifice himself for Vishnu, is remembered; offerings are made around bonfires and colored water or powder is sprayed in high-spirited games. Full moon day of Phalgun (March)
• Rama Naumi Celebrates the birthday of the god Rama, hero of the epic Ramayana that is recited during the festival; offerings are also made in temples to a statue of the baby Rama. Ninth day of the bright half of Caitra (April)
• Ratha Yatra A statue of Vishnu, also called Jagganath, Lord of the Universe, is placed on a large wooden chariot and pulled through the streets where lamps, flowers, and other offerings are laid in his path. 16th day of Asadha (June/July)
• Raksha Bandhan Sisters tie rakhis, silk threads decorated with flowers, onto their brothers' wrists as a symbol of protection. Full moon day of Sravana (August)
• Janmashtami The birth of Krishna is celebrated as an image of the child Krishna is washed with yogurt, ghee, honey, and milk, and then placed on a swing. Eighth day of Bhadrapada (August)
• Navaratri Dusshera The festival of Dusshera follows immediately after Navaratri; over nine nights different manifestations of the goddess Durga are honored; in the form of Durga she is the destroyer of evil, as Kali she is the destroyer of time, and as Parvati she is the faithful wife of Shiva; at Dusshera, an effigy of the demon Ravana is burned to celebrate Durga's power over demons. First ten days of the bright half of Aswin (October)
• Divali (also spelled Diwali) Accounts are settled at this time and worship is given to Lakshmi, goddess of wealth and good fortune; colored patterns are made on the ground; windows are illuminated with lamps and candles; this festival also celebrates the return of Rama and Sita from exile, a story told in the Ramayana. 15th day of Kartika (October/November)

• 3) Google Boolean Search for various festivals:

• As I explained above, I did a Google Boolean search for each of the potential major festival. I should explain what this means. First of all, I am not on any side in this debate. I am not religious myself and have no stake in seeing any one festival listed over another. Initially, I must admit, I was trying to preserve the status quo, but today I thought it would be worth seeing what the numbers actually turn out to be--and I was surprised a little by the results. (Also, I am not trying to be sarcastic: believe me, if I were looking to be sarcastic, I would find a quicker way of doing it!)

• Let me then explain the syntax for the boolean search. When you type: "pongal -food -recipe" in the Google box, Google's (page rank) algorithm searches for all instances of the words "pongal" but discards the results that also have the words "food" or "recipe" in them. The "-" sign means "exclude." It is therefore a way of searching for only "pongal" (the festival) and not have it confused with "pongal (the food preparation). Similarly, when you are searching for diwali, which is also spelled divali, you have to search for both "diwali -divali" and "divali -diwali" (that way you don't double count). The reason why I have elaborate strings like: "diwali -divali -puja -food -recipe" is that I have to standardize the search for all festivals. Here were the results of the Google search:

• diwali/divali:
  • "diwali -divali -puja -food -recipe" 1,470,000
  • "divali -diwali -puja -food -recipe" 229,000
  • Total: 1,699,000

• Holi
  • "holi -puja -food -recipe" 1,490,000

• dussehra/dusshera/durga puja/navaratri/vijay dashmi:
  • "durga puja -recipe -food -dussehra -dusshera -vijay -dashmi -navaratri" 256,000
  • "dussehra -food -recipe -durga -puja -dusshera -vijay -dashmi -navaratri" 71,600
  • "navaratri -food -recipe -dussehra -dusshera -durga -puja -vijay -dashami" 44,000
  • "dusshera -food -recipe -durga -puja -vijay -dashmi -navaratri -dussehra" 14,300
  • "vijay dashmi -food -recipe -durga -puja -dusshera -dussehra -navaratri" 389
  • Total: 386,289

• pongal/sankranthi/makar sankranti:
  • "pongal -food -recipe -puja -sankranthi -makar -sankranti" 142,000
  • "sankranthi -food -recipe -puja -pongal -makar -sankranti" 36,500
  • "makar sankranti -food -recipe -puja -pongal -sankranthi" 17,700
  • Total: 196,200

• Shivaratri/Shivratri
  • "shivaratri -puja -recipe -food -shivratri" 67,300
  • "shivratri -puja -recipe -food -shivaratri" 44,500
  • Total: 111,800

• Ganesh Chaturthi
  • "ganesh chaturthi -puja -food -recipe" 98,400

• Janmashtami
  • "janmashtami -puja -food -recipe" 68,500

• Ugadi
  • "ugadi -puja -food -recipe" 65,000

I think it is fair to include only four festivals. In light of the results from 1) Encyclopaedia Britannica, Encarta, and the Google Search, I propose the following compromise:

The most widely celebrated include the Hindu festivals of Diwali, Holi, Durga Puja/Dussehra, and Pongal/Sankranthi. (in that order and with those spellings).

Unfortunately, Ganesh Chaturthi and Ugadi don't cut it. In order to include Ganesh Chaturthi, one would need to include Shivaratri (which is included in Encarta, while Ganesh Chaturthi is not; and which has more Google hits.) Similarly, in order to include Ugadi, one would need to include Janmasthmi (which is included in Encarta, while Ugadi is not; and which has more Google hits).

I feel that this is fair. I also feel that if further changes are made, or if people resort to more novel hermeneutics, then admins need to step in and restore the peace. But the India article cannot include everyone's favorite Hindu festival.

Fowler&fowler«Talk» 04:30, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

1. Can you please provide the hyperlinks to your google searches? ....and..
2. What is your logic for using strings like "ugadi -puja -food -recipe", "janmashtami -puja -food -recipe" etc.,. I hope you arent under the impression that there is a dish called "ugadi" and a dish called "janmashtami" on the lines of Pongal-the festival and Pongal-the dish. Sarvagnya 05:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

TO UNRE4L

tHIS IS IN REFERENCE TO UR STUPID COMMENTS ABOUT INDUS VALLEY NOT BEING INDIAN....

u are a fucking wanker!!!! There was no fucken pakistan or idependent state of pakistan before 1947!! infact most of the "pakistanis" are real indians of the muslim faith which were conerted by the arabs. I hate you people that attempt to leech off indias majestic history before you pakistanis cant get your own food, own laguage ( urdu is at least 50% hindi), own identity and own land. India has given so much land to you, to avoid conflict ad now you want to take away our ancient civilisations??? I have had enough!!! Indus Valley was indian land, occupied by indian people!!! gOD GAVE INDIA TO THE INDIANS NOT THE PAKISTANIS.... REMEMBER, PAKISTAN IS INDIAN LAND.... SO IS KASHMIR AND JAMMU!!!