Mustafa Kemal Atatürk: Difference between revisions

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
	File:MustafaKemalAtaturk.jpg
1st President of Turkey
	In office; 29 October 1923 – 10 November 1938
Succeeded by	İsmet İnönü
1st Prime Minister of Turkey
	In office; 3 May 1920 – 24 January 1921
Succeeded by	Fevzi Çakmak
1st Speaker of the Parliament
	In office; 24 April 1920 – 29 October 1923
Succeeded by	Ali Fethi Okyar
1st Leader of the R.P.P.
	In office; 1919–1938
Succeeded by	İsmet İnönü
Personal details
Born	May 19, 1881; Selânik (Thessaloniki)
Died	10 November 1938 (aged 57); Dolmabahçe Palace, İstanbul
Nationality	Turkish
Political party	Republican People's Party
Spouse	Lâtife Uşaklıgil (1923–25)
Signature

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 00:56, 27 November 2008

Template:Infobox Mustafa Kemal Ataturk extension

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (19 May 1881 – 10 November 1938) was a Turkish army officer, revolutionary statesman, and founder of the Republic of Turkey as well as its first President.

Mustafa Kemal established himself as an intelligent and extremely capable military commander while serving as a division commander at the Battle of Gallipoli. He later fought with distinction on the eastern Anatolian and Palestinian fronts, making a name for himself during World War I.^[1] Following the defeat of the Ottoman Empire at the hands of the Allies, and the subsequent plans for its partition, Mustafa Kemal led the Turkish national movement in what would become the Turkish War of Independence. Having established a provisional government in Ankara, he defeated the forces sent by the Entente powers. His successful military campaigns led to the liberation of the country and to the establishment of the Republic of Turkey.

As the first President of Turkey, Atatürk embarked upon a major programme of political, economic and cultural reforms. An admirer of the Enlightenment, Atatürk sought to transform the ruins of the Ottoman Empire into a modern, democratic, secular, nation-state. The principles of Atatürk's reforms are often referred to as Kemalism and continue to form the political foundation of the modern Turkish state.

Early life

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk was born in the Ottoman city of Salonika (Turkish: Selânik; modern-day Thessaloniki in Greece) in the spring of 1881 to Ali Rıza Efendi, his father, and Zübeyde Hanım, his mother. Born as Mustafa, his second name Kemal (meaning Perfection or Maturity) was given to him by his mathematics teacher in recognition of his academic excellence.^[2] In his early years, his mother encouraged Mustafa to attend a religious school (the Mahalle Mektebi (translated as Neighborhood School)), though a reluctant Mustafa completed only a brief stay there. Then he had a fight with one of his teachers and left home, his father had him go to Şemsi Efendi school,which gave modern education. His parents wanted him to have education in trade, but he secretly entered an exam for getting into a military junior high school in Selânik (the Selânik Askerî Rüştiyesi) in 1893. In 1896 he enrolled into a military high school (the Manastır Askerî İdadisi) in the Ottoman city of Manastır (today's Bitola, in the Republic of Macedonia.) In 1899 he enrolled into the War College (the Mekteb-i Harbiye-i Şahane) in Constantinople (modern Istanbul) and graduated in 1902. He later graduated from the War Academy (the Erkân-ı Harbiye Mektebi) on 11 January 1905.

Military career

After his graduation in 1905, he was assigned to Damascus as a lieutenant. He joined a small secret revolutionary society of reformist officers called "Motherland and Liberty." In 1907, he was promoted to the rank of captain and assigned to Manastır. He joined the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP). However, in later years he became known for his opposition to, and frequent criticism of, policies pursued by the CUP leadership. In 1908, the Young Turk Revolution seized power from Abdülhamid II. He played a role in this revolution. In 1910, he took part in the Picardie army maneuvers in France. In 1911, served at the Ministry of War for a short time. Later in 1911, he was posted to the Ottoman province of Trablusgarp (present-day Libya) to oppose the Italian invasion. He returned to the capital in October 1912 following the outbreak of the Balkan Wars. During the First Balkan War, he fought against the Bulgarian army at Gallipoli and Bolayır on the coast of Thrace. In 1913, he was appointed military attaché to Sofia and promoted to the rank of lieutenant colonel in 1914.

The Ottoman Empire entered World War I and engaged with the Allies in the Middle Eastern theatre. Mustafa Kemal was given the task of organizing and commanding the 19^th Division attached to the 5^th Army during the Battle of Gallipoli. The Gallipoli campaign became a disastrous defeat for the Allies. Mustafa Kemal became the outstanding front-line commander and gained much respect from his former enemies for his chivalry in victory. Following the Battle of Gallipoli, Mustafa Kemal served in Edirne until the 14 January 1916.

He was assigned to the command of the XVI^th Corps of the 2^nd Army and sent to the Caucasus Campaign. The massive Russian offensive had reached the Anatolian key cities. On 7 August, Mustafa Kemal rallied his troops and mounted a counteroffensive.^[3] Two of his divisions captured not only Bitlis but the equally important town of Muş, greatly upsetting the calculations of the Russian Command.^[4] On 7 March 1917, Mustafa Kemal was appointed from the command of the XVI Corps to the overall command of the 2^nd Army. The Russian Revolution erupted and the Caucasus front of the Czar's armies disintegrated.^[3] Mustafa Kemal had already left the region and was assigned to the command of the 7^th Army at the Sinai and Palestine Campaign.

He returned to Aleppo on 28 August 1918, and resumed his command. Liman von Sanders had lost the Battle of Megiddo. Nothing stood between General Allenby's forces and Mustafa Kemal. Concluding that he didn't have enough men to engage the British forces, Mustafa Kemal retreated towards Jordan to establish a stronger defensive line. He was appointed to the command of Thunder Groups Command (Turkish: Yıldırım Orduları Gurubu), replacing Liman von Sanders. Mustafa Kemal's position became the base line for the Armistice of Mudros.

Kemal's last active service to the Ottoman Army was organizing the return of the troops that were left behind the south of his line. At the end of the war, he was 37 years old. Mustafa Kemal returned to an occupied Constantinople on 13 November 1918. Along the established lines of partitioning of the Ottoman Empire, British, Italian, French and Greek forces began to occupy Anatolia. The occupation of Constantinople along with the occupation of İzmir mobilized the establishment of the Turkish national movement and the Turkish War of Independence.^[5]

Leadership during the War of Independence

File:Time Ataturk.JPG

TIME 24 March 1923. Atatürk, the title reads 'Where is a Turk his own master?'

Mustafa Kemal's active participation in the national resistance movement began with his assignment as a General Inspector to oversee the demobilisation of remaining Ottoman military units and nationalist organizations. On 19 May 1919, he departed from the Ottoman capital to Samsun. The first goal in his mind was the establishment of an organised national resistance movement against the occupying forces. In June 1919, he and his close friends declared that the independence of the country was in danger. He resigned from the Ottoman Army on 8 July. The Ottoman government issued a warrant for his arrest. Later he was condemned to death.

Mustafa Kemal called for a national election to establish a new Turkish Parliament that would have its seat in Ankara.^[6] On 12 February 1920, the last Ottoman Parliament gathered in the capital. This parliament was dissolved by British forces after it declared the National Pact (Turkish: Misak-ı Milli). Mustafa Kemal used this opportunity to establish the "Grand National Assembly" (GNA). On 23 April 1920, the GNA opened with Mustafa Kemal being the speaker. On 10 August 1920, Grand Vizier Damat Ferid Pasha signed the Treaty of Sèvres. It finalized the plans for the partitioning of the Ottoman Empire including the regions what Turkish nationals accepted as their heartland. Kemal insisted on complete independence and the safeguarding of the interests of the Turkish majority on Turkish soil. He persuaded the GNA to gather a National Army. The Army faced the Allied occupation forces and fought on three fronts: in the Franco-Turkish, the Greco-Turkish and the Turkish-Armenian wars. After a series of initial battles during the Greco-Turkish war, the Greek army advanced as far as the Sakarya River, just eighty kilometers west of the GNA. On 5 August 1921, Mustafa Kemal was promoted to Commander in chief of the forces.^[7]. The Battle of Sakarya from 23 August to 13 September 1921 ended with the defeat of the Greeks. The Allies, ignoring the extent of Kemal's successes, hoped to impose a modified version of the Sèvres treaty as a peace settlement on Ankara. Kemal rejected their proposal. The final battle, the Battle of Dumlupınar, was fought during August and September of 1922. He launched an all-out attack on the Greek lines at Afyonkarahisar.

The Conference of Lausanne began on 21 November 1922. In accordance with the directives of Mustafa Kemal, İsmet İnönü refused any proposal that would compromise Turkish sovereignty,^[8] major matters regarding the control of Turkish finances, the Capitulations, the Turkish Straits, justice, and the like. On 24 July 1923, the Treaty of Lausanne was signed. The final outcome of the independence war came with the proclamation of the Republic of Turkey on 29 October 1923.

Presidency

For conceptual analysis, see Kemalist ideology and Atatürk's Reforms

In 1930 leaving the parliament after the 7th year celebration meeting

The Treaty of Lausanne ended the Turkish War of Independence and recognized the new nation's independence. Mustafa Kemal was 42 years old when the Republic of Turkey was formed. However, efforts to modernise the country had just started; institutions and constitutions of Western states such as France, Sweden, Italy, or Switzerland were yet to be analyzed and adapted according to the needs and characteristics of the Turkish nation. Highlighting the public's lack of knowledge regarding Kemal's intentions, the public cheered: "We are returning to the days of the first caliphs".^[9] In order to establish reforms Mustafa Kemal placed Fevzi Çakmak, Kazım Özalp and İsmet İnönü in the important positions. Mustafa Kemal capitalized on his reputation as an efficient military leader and spent the following years, up until his death in 1938, instituting wide-ranging and progressive political, economic, and social reforms, transforming Turkish society from perceiving itself as Muslim subjects of a vast Empire into citizens of a modern, democratic, and secular nation-state.

Domestic policies

A basic political principle for Kemal was the complete independence of the country; the independence of the country was not negotiable for him.^[10] He was well aware that independence could not be maintained solely by use of physical power. He clarified his position:

...by complete independence, we mean of course complete economic, financial, juridical, military, cultural independence and freedom in all matters. Being deprived of independence in any of these is equivalent to the nation and country being deprived of all its independence."^[11]
— Mustafa Kemal

He led wide ranging reforms in the social, cultural, economical aspects, and as a result the new Republic's backbone of legislative, judicial, and economic structures were put in place.

Mustafa Kemal created a banner to mark the changes between the old Ottoman and the new Republican rule. Each concept was symbolized as an arrow. The fundamentals on nationalism, populism and etatism were defined under this banner. The new citizens of the Republic, who were just a couple of years ago the subjects of the Ottoman Empire, carried this banner to remind them about the major concepts of this new establishment. It become the defining ideology of the Republic of Turkey. It is referred to as the "Six Arrows" or Kemalist ideology. Kemalist ideology was based on Mustafa Kemal's conception of realism and pragmatism.^[12] These fundamentals were not new in world politics, or among the elites of Turkey. What made them unique was that these interrelated fundamentals were formulated specifically for Turkey's needs. A good example is the definition and application of secularism. The Kemalist secular state significantly differed from predominantly Christian states.

Emergence of the state, 1923-1924

File:Mustafa Kemal golden scoop political caricature of single party system.png

A political satire of the single-party period depicting Mustafa Kemal, the leader of RPP, choosing the party candidates for the MPs. In the single-party state, the candidates had only one party's (RPP) list to join.

Mustafa Kemal's private journals show that, even before the establishment of the republic in 1923, he believed in the importance of the sovereignty of the people, as opposed to the sovereignty of the absolute monarch, which was the case in the Ottoman Empire. In forging the new republic, the Turkish revolutionaries turned their back on the perceived corruption and decadence of cosmopolitan Istanbul and its Ottoman heritage.^[13] For instance, Ankara, then some provincial town deep in Anatolia which was turned into the center of the independence movement, became the country's new capital. He wanted a "direct government by the Assembly"^[14] and visualized a parliamentary sovereignty (a representative democracy), where the National Parliament would be the ultimate source of power.^[15] However, in the following years, He took the position that the country needed an immense amount of reconstruction, and "direct government by the Assembly" could not survive in this environment. The revolutionaries regularly faced challenges from the supporters of the old Ottoman regime, and also from the supporters of relatively new ideologies such as communism and fascism. Mustafa Kemal saw the consequences of fascist and communist doctrines in the 1920s and 1930s and rejected both,^[16] preventing the spread of totalitarian party rule which held sway in the Soviet Union, Germany and Italy.^[17] Some perceived his opposition and silencing of these ideologies as a means of eliminating competition, others believed it was a necessary means to protect the young Turkish state from succumbing to the instability of new ideologies and competing factions.

The heart of the new republic, GNA, was established during the Turkish War of Independence upon the call of Mustafa Kemal.^[18] The role of deputies at the GNA were to be the voice of the Turkish society by expressing its political views and preferences. The elections were free, and the system was an egalitarian electoral system, based on general ballot.^[18] The GNA had the right to select and control both the government and the Prime Minister. The GNA acted as a legislative power, controlled the executive and, if necessary, acted as an organ of scrutiny.^[18] The Turkish Constitution of 1924 set a loose separation of powers between the legislative and the executive organs of the state, whereas the separation of these two within the judiciary system was a strict one. The President, then Mustafa Kemal, occupied a powerful position in this political system.

The single-party regime was established de facto in 1925 after the adoption of the 1924 constitution. The only political party of the GNA was the "Peoples Party" that was founded by Mustafa Kemal at the initial years of the independence war. Later it was renamed as the Republican People's Party (Turkish "Cumhuriyet Halk Fırkası") on 9 September 1923.

Civic independence and the Caliphate, 1924-1925

Abolition of the Caliphate was an important dimension in Mustafa Kemal's drive to reform the political system and to promote the national sovereignty. Caliphate was the core political concept of Sunni Islam, by the consensus of the Muslim majority in the early centuries.^[19] Abolishing the sultanate was easier. The survival of the Caliphate at the time satisfied the partisans of the sultanate. This produced a two-headed system: The new republic on one side and an Islamic form of government with the Caliph on the other side. Kemal and İnönü worried that "it nourished the expectations that the sovereign would return under the guise of Caliph...^[20] " The Caliph Abdülmecid II was seated after the abolishment of the sultanate (1922). The Caliph had his own personal treasury. It was not bound to the republican treasury. His personal service included military personnel. Mustafa Kemal said that there was no "religious" or "political" justification for this, as Caliph Abdülmecid II appeared to be following in the steps of the sultans in domestic and foreign affairs: accepting and responding to foreign representatives and reserve officers, and participating in official ceremonies and celebrations.^[21] He wanted to integrate the powers of the Caliphate into the powers of the GNA. His initial activities began on 1 January 1924.^[22] He acquired the consent of İnönü, Çakmak and Özalp before the abolition of the Caliphate. The Caliph made a statement to the effect that he would not interfere with political affairs.^[23] On 1 March 1924, at the Assembly, Mustafa Kemal said

The religion of Islam will be elevated if it will cease to be a political instrument, as had been the case in the past."^[24]
— Mustafa Kemal

On 3 March 1924, the Caliphate was officially abolished and its powers within Turkey were transferred to the GNA. The debate as to the validity of Turkey's unilateral abolition of the Caliphate was taken up by other Muslim nations in order to decide whether they should confirm the Turkish action or appoint a new Caliph.^[23] A "Caliphate Conference" was held in Cairo in May 1926 and a resolution was passed declaring the Caliphate "a necessity in Islam", but failed to implement this decision.^[23] Two other Islamic conferences were held in Mecca (1926) and Jerusalem (1931), but failed to reach a consensus.^[23] Turkey did not accept the re-establishment of the Caliphate and perceived it as an attack to its basic existence; while Mustafa Kemal and the reformists continued their own way.^[25]

The removal of the Caliphate was followed by an extensive effort in establishing the separation of the governmental and religious affairs. Education was the corner stone in this effort. In 1923, three main horizontal institutions existed, which were closed to each other. It was unlike any other "Public school" system of today. The first and most common institutions were local schools and medreses based on Arabic, Koran and memorizing. The second were reformist schools of Tanzimat called idadî and sultanî. The third were schools educating in foreign languages, like colleges and minority schools. Under Kemal the old medrese education was modernized.^[26] Mustafa Kemal changed the classical Islamic education with a vigorously promoted reconstruction of educational institutions along the line of an enlightened pragmatism.^[26] Kemal linked the educational reform to the liberation of the nation from the dogma, which he believed was even more important than the Turkish war of independence.

Today, our most important and most productive task is the national education [unification and modernization] affairs. We have to be successful in national education affairs and we shall be. The liberation of a nation is only achieved through this way."^[27]
— Mustafa Kemal

In the summer of 1924, Mustafa Kemal invited American educational reformer John Dewey to advise him on ideas for reforms and recommendations aimed at modernizing the Turkish educational system.^[26] His public education reforms aimed to enhance the public literacy and thus better prepare citizens for roles in public life. He wanted to institute compulsory primary education for both girls and boys; since then this effort has been an ongoing task for the Republic. He pointed out that one of the main targets of "Education in Turkey" had to be raising a generation nourished with what he called the 'public culture'. The state schools, public education, established a common curriculum. The common curriculum became known as the "unification of education." Unification of education was put into force on 3 March 1924 by the law of "National Education No: 430". With the new law, education became inclusive, and organized and operated on a deliberate model of the civil community. In this new design all schools submitted their curriculum to the "Ministry of National Education." It was a government agency modeled after other Ministry of Educations of its time. It established a contemporary route to the traditional social structure; by causing or gaining contemporary citizen consciousness. The law of "National Education No: 430" passed on the same day as the abolishment of the Caliphate. Concurrently, the Republic abolished the two ministries and subordinated the clergy to the department of religious affairs. The change was one of the foundations of secularism in Turkey. The unification of education under one curriculum was the end of "clerics or clergy of the Ottoman Empire." It was not the end of religious schools. They were moved to higher education until consequent governments pulled them back to secondary education after Mustafa Kemal's death.

In 1925, Atatürk with his Panama hat just after the Kastamonu speech

In the fall of 1925, Mustafa Kemal encouraged the Turks to wear modern European attire.^[28] He was determined to force the abandonment of the sartorial traditions of the Middle East and finalize a series of dress reforms, which were originally started by Mahmud II.^[28] Fez was established by Sultan Mahmud II in 1826 as part of the Ottoman Empire's modernization effort. The Hat Law of 1925 introduced the use of Western style hats instead of the fez. Mustafa Kemal first made the hat compulsory to the civil servants.^[28] The guidelines for the proper dressing of students and state employees (public space controlled by state) was passed during his lifetime. After most of the relatively better educated civil servants adopted the hat with their own free will, in 1925 Mustafa Kemal wore his "Panama hat" during a public appearance in Kastamonu, one of the most conservative towns in Anatolia, to explain that the hat was the headgear of civilized nations. The last part of reform on dress emphasized the need to wear modern suits instead of antiquated religion-based clothing such as the veil and turban in the Law Relating to Prohibited Garments of 1934.

Even though he personally promoted modern dress on women, Mustafa Kemal never made specific reference to women’s clothing in the law. In the social conditions of the period, he believed that women would adapt to the new way with their own will. He was frequently photographed on public business with his wife Lâtife Uşaklıgil, who originally covered her head in accordance with Islamic tradition, but then threw off the hijab and urged Turkish women to do the same.^[29]. He was also frequently photographed on public business with women wearing modern clothes. But it was Atatürk's adopted daughters like Sabiha Gökçen and Afet İnan who provided the real role model for the Turkish women of the future. He wrote: "The religious covering of women will not cause difficulty ... This simple style [of headcovering] is not in conflict with the morals and manners of our society."^[30]

On August 30 1925, Mustafa Kemal's view on religious insignia used outside times of worship introduced at Kastamonu speech. This speech also had another position. He said:

In the face of knowledge, science, and of the whole extent of radiant civilization, I cannot accept the presence in Turkey's civilized community of people primitive enough to seek material and spiritual benefits in the guidance of sheiks. The Turkish republic cannot be a country of sheiks, dervishes, and disciples. The best, the truest order is the order of civilization. To be a man it is enough to carry out the requirements of civilization. The leaders of dervish orders will understand the truth of my words, and will themselves close down their lodges [tekke] and admit that their disciplines have grown up. ^[10]
— Mustafa Kemal, Kastamonu Nutku

On September 2, the day Mustafa Kemal talk to the leaders at the parliament, the government issued a decree closing down the all Sufi orders, and the tekkes. Bektashis moved to Albania. Soon after in 1929, the Bektashi order hold their third Bektashi Congress in the southern city of Korca and decided to relocate the headquarters to Tirana. Mustafa Kemal ordered the dervish lodges to be converted to museums, such as Mevlana Museum in Konya. The institutional expression of Sufism was simply become illegal in Turkey, but the politically neutral form of Sufism, functioning as social associations, given permission to exist. The orders which can make this transform like the Mevlevi order still exits. After Mustafa Kemal's death, the 1950s government legalized the Mevlevi order as an association.

The abolition of the Caliphate and other cultural reforms faced with a fierce opposition. The conservative elements were not happy and they launched attacks on the Kemalist reformists.^[23]

Opposition, 1924-1927

Atatürk during one of his Anatolian tours

In 1924, while the "Issue of Mosul" was on the table, Sheikh Said Piran began to organize the Sheikh Said Rebellion. Sheikh Said Piran was rich, Kurdish hereditary, and chieftain (Tribal chief) of a local Naqshbandi order. Said Piran emphasized the issue of religion; he not only opposed the abolition of the Caliphate, but also the adoption of civil codes based on Western models, the closure of religious orders, the ban on polygamy, and the new obligatory civil marriage. Said Piran stirred up his followers against the policies of the government, which he considered to be against Islam. In the name of the restoration of the Holy Law using the Islamic green banner, Said Piran's forces moved through the countryside, seized government offices and marched on the important cities of Elazığ and Diyarbakır.^[31] Members of the government saw the Sheikh Said Rebellion as an attempt of a counter-revolution. They urged immediate military action to prevent its spread. The "Maintenance of Public Order Law" was passed to deal with the rebellion on March 4 1925, which gave the government exceptional powers. The law was repealed on 4 March 1929. The law included all the tools and authority to shut down subversive groups.

There were also parliamentarians in the GNA who were not happy with these changes. There were so many members who were denounced as opposition sympathizers at a private meeting of the CHP that Mustafa Kemal expressed his fear of being among the minority in his own party.^[32] He decided not to purge this group.^[32] A censure motion gave the chance to have a breakaway group. Kazım Karabekir, along with his friends, established the break-away group on 17 October 1924. The censure became a confidence vote at the CHP for Mustafa Kemal. On 8 November the motion was rejected by 148 votes to 18, and 41 votes were absent.^[32] CHP held all but one seat in the parliament. The majority of the CHP chose him against his critics regarding all the arguments.^[32] Mustafa Kemal said "the Turkish nation is firmly determined to advance fearlessly on the path of the republic, civilization and progress" on 1 November 1924.^[32]

On 17 November 1924, the breakaway group officially established the Progressive Republican Party (PRP) with 29 deputies. The first multi-party system began. The PRP's economic program suggested liberalism, in contrast to state socialism of CHP, and its social program was based on conservatism in contrast to modernism of CHP. Leaders of the party strongly supported the Kemalist revolution in principle, but had different opinions on the cultural revolution and the principle of secularism.^[33] The RPR was not against Mustafa Kemal's main positions as declared in its program. The program supported the main mechanisms for establishing secularism in the country and the civic law, or as stated, "the needs of the age" (article 3) and the uniform system of education (article 49).^[32] These principles were set by the leaders at the onset. The only legal opposition became a home for all kinds of differing views.

During 1926 a plot to assassinate Mustafa Kemal was uncovered in İzmir. It was found to originate with a former deputy who had opposed the abolition of the Caliphate and had a personal grudge. Quickly the trail turned from inquiry of planners of this attempt to an investigation carried out ostensibly to uncover subversive activities and actually used to undermine those with differing views regarding the cultural revolution. The sweeping investigation brought before the tribunal a large number of political opponents, including Karabekir, the leader of PRP. A number of surviving leaders of the Committee of Union and Progress, who were at best second-rank in the Turkish movement, including Cavid, Ahmed Şükrü, and Ismail Canbulat were found guilty of treason and hanged.^[34] During these investigations there was a link, a support, that was uncovered among the members of the PRP to the Sheikh Said Rebellion. The PRP was dissolved following the outcomes of the trial. The pattern of organized opposition, however, was broken. This action was the only broad political purge during Atatürk's presidency. Mustafa Kemal's saying:

My mortal body will turn into dust, but the Republic of Turkey will last forever
— Mustafa Kemal

was regarded as a will after the assassination attempt.^[35]

Modernization efforts, 1927-1930

File:Sabihagokcen.JPG

Atatürk contributed to the progress of his adopted daughter Sabiha Gökçen to become world's first female combat pilot

Mustafa Kemal said

We must liberate our concepts of justice, our laws and our legal institutions from the bonds which, even though they are incompatible with the needs of our century, still hold a tight grip on us.^[36]
— Mustafa Kemal

On March 1, 1926 the Turkish penal code was passed. It was modeled after the Italian Penal Code. On October 4, 1926, Islamic courts were closed. Establishing the civic law needed time, so instead of insisting early on, he delayed the inclusion of the principle of laïcité until February 5, 1937.

He began to develop the concepts of his social reforms very early, as was evident in his personal journal. He and his staff constantly discussed issues like abolishing the veiling of women and the integration of women to social life. The Ottoman practice discouraged the social interaction between men and women aligned with the sex segregation and Islam. The clue on how he was planning to tackle the issue was stated in his journal on November 1915;

The social change can come by (1) educating capable mothers who are knowledgeable about life; (2) giving freedom to women; (3) a man can change his morals, thoughts, and feelings by leading a common life with a woman; as there is an inborn tendency towards the attraction of mutual affection.^[37]
— Mustafa Kemal

Mustafa Kemal needed the civil code to establish his second major step in giving freedom to women. First one was education of girls. It was established as part of unification of education. On October 4, 1926, the new Turkish civil code passed. It was modeled after the Swiss Civil Code. He did not consider gender a factor in social organization. According to his view, society marched towards its goal with all its women and men together. He believed that it was scientifically impossible for him to achieve progress and to become civilized if the gender separation continued as in the Ottoman times.^[38] During a meeting he declaimed:

To the women: Win for us the battle of education and you will do yet more for your country than we have been able to do. It is to you that I appeal.
To the men: If henceforward the women do not share in the social life of the nation, we shall never attain to our full development. We shall remain irremediably backward, incapable of treating on equal terms with the civilizations of the West.^[39]
— Mustafa Kemal

In 1927 the State Art and Sculpture Museum (Turkish: Ankara Resim ve Heykel Müzesi) advocated by Mustafa Kemal opened its doors. The State Art and Sculpture Museum, like other institutions he supported, aimed to establish collections for inspiration and learning for society. He believed that "culture is the foundation of the Turkish Republic."^[40] and described modern Turkey's ideological thrust as "a creation of patriotism blended with a lofty humanist ideal." He included both his own nation's creative legacy and what he saw as the admirable values of global civilization. The pre-Islamic culture of the Turks became the subject of extensive research, and particular emphasis was laid upon the fact that, long before the Seljuk and Ottoman civilizations, the Turks have had a rich culture. He instigated the policy of studying the Anatolian civilizations such as the Phrygians and Lydians, foremost of which being the Sumerians and Hittites. To link the cultural signatures of the past into public attention, he personally named the "Sümerbank" (1932) after Sumerians, and "Etibank" (1935) after the Hittites. He also stressed the folk arts of the countryside as a wellspring of Turkish creativity.

File:LIllustrationCover13October1928.jpg

October 1928 issue of L'Illustration showing Atatürk introducing the new Turkish alphabet to the people of Sinop

On 24 May 1928, the Turkish alphabet was decreed replacing the Arabic script as an extension of Mustafa Kemal's solution to the literacy problem. Dewey noted that learning on how to read and write in Turkish with Arabic script took roughly three years on the elementary level with rather strenuous methods.^[26] Literate citizens comprised as little as 10% of the population at the time. They used the Ottoman Language written in Arabic script with Arabic and Persian loan vocabulary.^[26] The creation of the new Turkish alphabet as a variant of the Latin alphabet was undertaken by the Language Commission (Turkish: Dil Encümeni) at the initiative of Atatürk.^[26] The tutelage was received from an Ottoman-Armenian calligrapher.^[41] The first Turkish newspaper was published with the use of the new alphabet on December 15 1928. Kemal himself actively encouraged people. He made many trips to the countryside in order to teach the new alphabet. The new alphabet adapted very quickly. Beginning with 1932, the People's Houses (Turkish: Halk Evleri) opened throughout the country. Older population received help at People's Houses. There were congresses for discussing the issues of copyright, public education and scientific publishing. The literacy reform was also supported by strengthening the private publishing sector with a new Law on Copyrights.

Mustafa Kemal promoted the modern teaching methods in primary education in which Dewey took a place of honour.^[26] Dewey presented "Report and Recommendation for the Turkish educational system" which was a paradigmatic recommendation for an educational policy of developing societies moving towards modernity at the time.^[26] Besides general education, he was interested in forming a skill base in the country through adult education. As mentioned before, his adult education ideas found their way in People's Houses. Turkish women taught not only child care, dress-making and household management, but also the tools which they could use to become part of general economy. His new "unified" educational system designated a responsible citizen as well as a useful and appreciated member of the society.^[26] Turkish education become a state supervised system which was designed to create a skill base for the "social" and "economic" progress of the country.^[42] Turkish education became an integrative force, alleviation of poverty and force for a gender equality using female education.

During this period Mustafa Kemal constantly tried to generate mediums to propagate modern education. He instigated official education meetings named "Science Boards" and "Education Summits." At these meetings the quality of education, training issues and certain basic educational principles were discussed. He said "Our schools [curriculum] should aim to provide opportunities for all pupils to learn and to achieve" and personally engaged with the development of two textbooks. The first one was "Turkish: Vatandaş İçin Medeni Bilgiler" (1930). The second one was the "Geometry" (1937) for high schools. The "Vatandaş İçin Medeni Bilgiler" ("Civic knowledge for the citizens") introduced the science of comparative government and explained about means of administering public trust by explaining the rules of governance as applied to the new state institutions. His vision of education of the public while developing the functions and responsibilities of these new institutions was an extraordinary vision and a brave move for his time and context.

Opposition, 1930-1931

On August 11, 1930, Mustafa Kemal decided to try a democratic movement once again. He assigned Ali Fethi Okyar to establish a new party. In Mustafa Kemal's letter to Ali Fethi Okyar, laicism was insisted on. At first, the brand-new Liberal Republican Party succeeded all around the country. But once again the opposition party became too strong in its opposition to Atatürk's reforms, particularly in regard to the role of religion in public life.

Menemen Incident was a chain of incidents starting with the rebellion of Islamic fundamentalists in Menemen, a small town in the Aegean region of Turkey, in 1930.

Finally, seeing the rising fundamentalist threat and being a staunch supporter of Atatürk's reforms himself, Ali Fethi Okyar abolished his own party and Mustafa Kemal never succeeded in establishing a long lasting multi-party parliamentary system. He sometimes dealt sternly with the opposition in pursuing his main goal of democratizing and modernizing the country. There have been criticisms of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, arguing that he did not promote democracy by dominating the country with his single party rule. In response to such criticisms, his biographer Andrew Mango wrote that: "between the two wars, democracy could not be sustained in many relatively richer and better-educated societies. Atatürk's enlightened authoritarianism left a reasonable space for free private lives. More could not have been expected in his lifetime."^[43] Even though, at times, he did not appear to be a democrat in his actions, Atatürk always supported the idea of eventually building a democratic state. In one of his many speeches about the importance of democracy, Mustafa Kemal said in the year 1933:

Republic means the democratic administration of the state. We founded the Republic, reaching its tenth year. It should enforce all the requirements of democracy as the time comes."^[44]
— Mustafa Kemal

Modernization efforts, 1931-1938

Another important part of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's emphasis was on establishing institutions to advance Turkish language and history. The establishment of the Turkish Language Association (Turkish: Türk Dil Kurumu) was archived in 1931 for conducting research works on Turkish language. The establishment of the Turkish Historical Society (Turkish: Türk Tarih Kurumu) was archived in 1932 for conducting research works on history. Many teachers were employed in Turkish History and Language Institutions. Mustafa Kemal Atatürk declared that the advancement of education called for the endeavors of the private sector and he summoned society to take part in the effort.^[45] Kemal established the Turkish Education Association on 1 January 1928.^[45] Association become active in the field of education, supporting intelligent and hard-working children in financial need as well as making material and scientific contributions to the educational life.

In 1933, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk ordered the reorganization of the Istanbul University into a modern institution and later established the Ankara University in the capital city to make sure that the principles that are the expressions of a modern society, such as science and enlightenment, are held dear and protected.^[46]

Atatürk personally engaged with the translation of scientific terminology.^[47] Atatürk wanted the Turkish language reform based on a methodological base. The Turkish language has an integral structure and without modelling this structure any attempt to 'clean' the Turkish language from foreign influence was inherently wrong for him. Mustafa Kemal Atatürk personally engaged with the Sun Language Theory (Turkish: Güneş Dil Teorisi), which was a linguistic theory proposing that all human languages are descendants of one Central Asian primal language. Atatürk's interest started with the works by the French scientist Hilaire de Baranton entitled "L'Origine des Langues, des Religions et des Peuples", that all languages originated from hieroglyphs and cuneiform used by Sumerians^[48] and the paper of Austrian linguist Dr. Hermann F. Kvergić of Vienna entitled "La psychologie de quelques elements des langues Turques" ["the psychology of some elements of the Turkic Languages"].^[49] Atatürk introduced the Sun Language Theory into Turkish political and educational circles in 1935, at the high point of attempts to 'cleanse' the Turkish language of foreign influences. After 1936, Atatürk saw the extremist aspects of the purification campaign and corrected them.^[47]

On 5 December 1934 moved for granting of full political rights to women, well before several other European nations. The Swiss civil code which defined the rights of women in a marriage as equal to those of men was passed earlier.^[50] The place of women in Mustafa Kemal's cultural reforms was best expressed in the civic book which was prepared under his supervision.^[51] Mustafa Kemal said that

There is no logical explanation for the political disenfranchisement of women. Any hesitation and negative mentality on this subject is nothing more than a fading social phenomenon of the past. ...Women must have the right to vote and to be elected; because democracy dictates that, because there are interests that women must defend, and because there are social duties that women must perform."^[52]
— Mustafa Kemal

However, the change was not easy. In the 1935 elections, which was the last election Atatürk had the chance to observe, there were only 18 female MPs out of a total of 395 representatives.

In 1934, upon Mustafa Kemal's order the first ever Turkish opera work "Özsoy" composed by Adnan Saygun and led by Semiha Berksoy staged at the People's House in Ankara.^[53]

Beginning with 1932 several hundred "People's Houses" (Turkish: Halk Evi) and "People's Rooms" (Halk Odası) across the country allowed greater access to a wide variety of artistic activities, sports, and other cultural events. The visual and the plastic arts, whose developers had, on occasion, been arrested by some Ottoman officials claiming that the depiction of the human form was idolatry, were now highly encouraged and supported by Atatürk, and these flourished in the new Turkish Republic. Many museums were opened, architecture began to follow modern trends, and classical Western music, opera, and ballet, as well as the theatre, also took greater hold. Book and magazine publications increased as well, and the film industry began to grow.

Mustafa Kemal commissioned the translation of the Quran into Turkish and he had it read in front of the public in 1932.^[54] According to Mustafa Kemal, a progressive nation also was progressive in understanding its belief system. In Mustafa Kemal's world there was no dualism. He enforced his ideas to the full extent.

Foreign policies

Atatürk's foreign policy was aligned with his motto “peace at home and peace in the world.” Atatürk's perception of peace was not simply the absence of war but linked to his project of civilization and modernization.^[55] The base and the expected outcome(s) of Kemal's policies depended on the power of the parliamentary sovereignty (justice, moral superiority, and social structure of the nation) that was established by the Republic.^[56] The Turkish War of Independence was the last time Atatürk used his military might in dealing with other countries. The foreign issues were resolved by peaceful methods during his presidency.

Issue of Mosul

The "Issue of Mosul" was one of the first foreign affairs related controversy of the new Republic. It was the dispute with Great Britain over the control of the Mosul Province. General Marshall at Mesopotamian campaign following the instruction "every effort was to be made to score as heavily as possible on the Tigris before the whistle blew" from the British War Office, captured Mosul three days after the signature of Armistice of Mudros (30 October 1918) that ended the hostilities in the Middle Eastern theatre .^[57] In 1920, the Misak-ı Milli, which consolidated the "Turkish lands" based on a common past, history, concept of morals and laws, declared that the Mosul Province was a part of the historic Turkish heartland. The British were in a precarious situation with the Issue of Mosul, and were adopting almost equally desperate measures to protect their interests. The Iraqi revolt against the British was put down by the RAF Iraq Command during the summer of 1920. Presumably, from a British perspective, if Mustafa Kemal Atatürk succeeded in securing the stability in his side, he would have turned his attention to recovering Mosul and penetrate into Mesopotamia, where the native population would probably join him, thus an insurgent and hostile Muslim nation would be brought up to the very gates of India. In 1923, Mustafa Kemal tried to persuade the GNA that accepting the arbitration of the League of Nations at Treaty of Lausanne over the Mosul did not mean giving up Mosul, but rather waiting for a time when Turkey might be stronger. The artificially drawn border had an unsettling effect on both sides of the population. Later on it was claimed that Turkey began where the oil ends as the border was drawn by the British geophysicists based on the oil reserves. Atatürk did not want this separation.^[58] The British Foreign Secretary attempted to disclaim any existence of oil in the Mosul area. On 23 January 1923, Lord Curzon argued that the existence of oil was no more than hypothetical.^[57] However, according to Armstrong, "England wanted oil. Mosul and Kurds were the key."^[59]

While three inspectors from the League of Nations Committee was sent to the region to oversee the situation in 1924, the Sheikh Said rebellion, beginning in 1924 and escalating until 1927, broke out to establish a new government positioned to cut Turkey's link to Mesopotamia. The relationship between the rebellion and British support was questioned. The British assistance was sought realizing that the rebellion, or its expected outcome, could not stand by itself.^[60]

In 1925, the League of Nations formed a three-member committee to study the case while the Sheikh Said Rebellion was on the rise. Partly because of the continuing uncertainties along the Northern frontier [North of Iraq], the committee recommended that the region should be connected to Iraq with the condition that the UK would hold the British Mandate of Mesopotamia. By the end of March 1925, the necessary troop movements were completed, and the whole area of the Sheikh Said rebellion was encircled.^[61] The revolt was put down. Britain, Iraq and Kemal made a treaty on 5 June 1926, which mostly followed the decisions of the League Council. In 1926, Kemal faced growing opposition to his reform policies, a continuing precarious economic situation, and a defeat in the Mosul issue. A big section of the Kurdish population along with the Iraqi Turkmens were left at the other side of the border. The Sheikh Said Rebellion hastened both the imposition of the Republican Party and the speed of Atatürk's reforms. In 1925, the population was largely illiterate and disparate, Turkey was in ruins, reconstruction was difficult, poverty was everywhere and people were in pain, which easily fed separatist violence.^[62] Mustafa Kemal attributed the rebellion to certain notables rather than a section of the population, who had been found guilty by the courts (kanunen mucrim olan bazi muteneffizan) and who used the mask of religion to conceal the interests of landlords, feudal tribal leaders and other 'reactionaries' on 7 March 1925.^[63]

Relations with the Soviet Union

Mustafa Kemal wanted positive relations with his country's northern neighbor. Relations extended to the period neither the Republic of Turkey, nor the Soviet Union was established. He signed the Treaty of Moscow with the Bolshevist Russia. The relations were cordial but had a distinct character of the common interests. The basic character of the relations during Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's leadership of the independence war established on the fact that they were fighting against a common Enemy: England and the West.^[64] He cooperated with Soviets during the war of independence in order to establish the new state.

“Friendship with Russia” said Mustafa Kemal, is not to adopt their ideology communism for Turkey^[64]. He declared: “Communism is a social issue. Social conditions religion and national traditions of our country confirm the opinion that Russian Communism is not applicable in Turkey.^[65]” On November 1 1924 in a speech “Our amicable relations with our old friend the Soviet Russian Republic are developing and progressing every day. As in past our Republican Government regards genuine and extensive good relations with Soviet Russia as the Keynote of our foreign policy. ^[64]”

The cordial relations were tested during the "Issue of Mosule." Curzon insisted during Lozan conference (1923) that Mosul belonged to Iraq, and it would be under British Mandate of Mesopotamia. In 1923, Kemal refused to accept this position, and on the same day signed a Pact of Non-Aggression and Security with Soviet Russia in Paris. This conceived postponing the issue to the League of Nations to be resolved in 1925. The Non-Aggression and Security with Soviet Russia remained in effect until unilaterally abrogated by the Soviet Union in 1945.

The second most notable man in the Soviet Union, the War Minister Kliment Voroshilov who was definitely more popular though less potent than Joseph Stalin was invited to the tenth year celebrations by Mustafa Kemal.^[66] Kemal explained his position regarding toward realization of his plan for a Balkan Federation economically uniting Turkey, Greece, Rumania, Yugoslavia and Bulgaria. He answered the questions of Voroshilov on his vision which Russia also have interest in the region and as Turkey wanted to cleave to Russia, until recently the only friend. The visit had historical importance as no member of the Politbureau or Steering Committee of Moscow's ruling Communist Party had ever ventured outside the Soviet Union since it was founded^[66].

During the second half of the 1930s Mustafa Kemal tried to get close to England as part of improving relations with West. Franklin D. Roosevelt quoted the Foreign Affairs Minister of the Soviet Union, Maxim Litvinov. "Litvinov told me that the most valuable and interesting leader in the world does not live in Europe but beyond the Straits in Ankara and that he was the President of the Turkish Republic, Mustafa Kemal. ^[67]"

Turkish-Greek alliance

File:AtaturkAndVenizelos.jpg

Hosting the Greek Prime Minister Eleftherios Venizelos (at left) on October 1932

Mustafa Kemal did not believe in concepts of permanent friendship or holding a grudge. The postwar leader of Greece Eleftherios Venizelos was also determined to establish normal relations between the two states. The war had devastated the lands of Western Anatolia, and the financial burden of Ottoman Muslim refugees from Greece brought obstacles to the rapprochement. Venizelos moved forward with the agreement despite the accusations of making many concessions on the issues of the naval armaments, and of the properties of the Ottoman Greeks from Turkey according to the Treaty of Lausanne.^[68] Similarly, Kemal resisted the pressures of historic emnities or atrocity-mongering between the societies. In spite of Turkish animosity against the Greeks, Kemal showed acute sensitivity to even the slightest allusion to these tensions. Kemal at one instance ordered immediate removal of a painting showing a Turkish soldier plunging his bayonet to a Greek soldier by stating "What a revolting scene!".^[69]

Ultimately, many Greeks consider the reconciliation with Turkey among the greatest foreign policy achievements of Venizelos' final term as Prime Minister. Greece renounced all its claims over Turkish territory. The two sides concluded an agreement on 30 April 1930; on 25 October, Venizelos visited Turkey, and signed a treaty of friendship.^[70] Even after his fall from power, Greco-Turkish relations remained cordial. Indeed, Venizelos' successor Panagis Tsaldaris came to visit Atatürk in September 1933 and signed a more comprehensive agreement, called the Entente Cordiale. Entente Cordiale become a stepping stone for the Balkan Pact.

Greek Premier Ioannis Metaxas said of Atatürk and the Turkish-Greek alliance, that "...Greece, which has the highest estimation of the renowned leader, heroic soldier, and enlightened creator of Turkey. We will never forget that President Atatürk was the true founder of the Turkish-Greek alliance based on a framework of common ideals and peaceful cooperation. He developed ties of friendship between the two nations which it would be unthinkable to dissolve. Greece will guard its fervent memories of this great man, who determined an unalterable future path for the noble Turkish nation."

Treaty of Saadabad

One of the main goals of the Mustafa Kemal was to establish security and peace on the eastern border of the new republic. These states had high stakes in preserving their common frontiers. Consulting together in all matters of common interest benefited them more than keeping the channels closed. The relations developed slowly during this period, which Treaty of Saadabad became the highest point in this goal.

Mustafa Kemal was implementing his reforms, when he found a cooperative Afghanistan. Afghanistan was in the midst of a reformation period during the reforms of Amanullah Khan and civil war as part of European influence in Afghanistan. Afghan Foreign Minister Mahmud Tarzi was follower of Kemal Atatürk's domestic policy. He encouraged the Amanullah Khan in social and political reform but urged that reforms should be gradually built upon the basis of a strong government. During the late 1920s Anglo-Afghan relations soured over British fears of an Afghan-Soviet friendship. On May 20 1928 Anglo-Afghan politics gained a positive perspective, when Amanullah Khan and the Queen were accepted by Mustafa Kemal in Istanbul. This meeting was followed by a Turkey-Afghanistan Friendship and Cooperation pact on May 22 1928. Mustafa Kemal supported Afghanistan's integration into international organizations. In 1934 Afghanistan's relations with the international community gained a huge boost with the joining of the League of Nations.^[71] In 1937, King Zahir Shah became a signatory of the Treaty of Saadabad. Mahmud Tarzi received Mustafa Kemal's personal support until he died on 22 November 1933 in Istanbul.

Mustafa Kemal and Reza Shah had a common approach to regarding British imperialism and its influence in their region. This climate created a slow but continuous rapprochement between Ankara and Tehran. Both governments sent diplomatic missions and messages of friendship to each other during the Turkish war of independence.^[72] The policy of the Ankara government in this period was to give moral support in order to assure Iranian independence and territorial integrity.^[73] The relations were strained after the abolishment of Caliphate. The Iran's Shi'a clergy did not accept Kemal's position. The Iranian religious power centers perceived the real motive behind Atatürk's reforms was to undermine the power of the clergy.^[73] An admirer of Mustafa Kemal and close student of his reforms, Reza Shah followed same type of modernization efforts. By the mid-1930s, Reza Shah's efforts had caused intense dissatisfaction to the clergy throughout Iran, thus widening the gap between religion and government.^[74] Mustafa Kemal feared the occupation and dismemberment of Iran as a multi-ethnic society by Russia or Great Britain.^[73] Reza Shah wanted to secure Iran's borders, so Kemal. Reza Shah visited him in 1934. In 1935 the draft of what will be known as Saadabad Pact was paragraphed in Geneva but the signing of it was delayed because of border dispute between Iran and Iraq. Iran challenged the validity of both the Treaty of Erzerum and the Constantinople Protocol in 1934.

On 8 July 1937 Saadabad Pact was signed at Tehran by Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan. The signatories undertook to preserve their common frontiers, to consult together in all matters of common interest and to commit no aggression against one another’s territory. Treaty united common points between the Afghan King’s call for greater Oriental-Middle Eastern Cooperation, Reza Shah's goal in securing the relations with the Turkey (a third force) that would help Iran free herself from Soviet and British influence, and Mustafa Kemal's foreign policy based on common interest to secure the stability in the region. The immediate outcome was to deter Mussolini from adventures in the region for Mustafa Kemal.^[75] The pact did not survive too long. The pact died only four years after Kemal's death.

Turkish Straits

On July 24 1923, Lausanne Straits Agreement, a supplement to the Treaty of Lausanne, was signed. Lausanne Straits Agreement made the straits open to all commercial vessels. Seizure of foreign war vessels was subjected to certain limitations during the peacetime. Turkey as a neutral state could not limit any military passage during the war time. The water passage was demilitarized. The management of the water ways was left to the straits commission. The demilitarized zone heavily restricted Turkey's domination and sovereignty over the straits. The defense of Istanbul was impossible without having the sovereignty over the water that passed through it.

In March 1936, Hitler's reoccupation of the Rhineland gave Mustafa Kemal the opportunity to resume full control over the straits. "The situation in Europe", he declared "is highly appropriate for such a move. We shall certainly achieve it"^[76]. The foreign minister of the time was Tevfik Rüştü Aras. Aras initiated a move to revise the straits regime. The signers agreed to join the conference as unlimited military passage became unfavorable to all. Aras claimed that he was directed by President, rather than his Prime Minister Ismet Inonu. Inonu was worried on harming the relations between Britain, France, and Balkan neighbors. Mustafa Kemal gathered the best minds of the foreign office. He demanded from them that the solution had to declare the full control over the water ways to Turkey. One of the best minds of foreign office, Cevat Açıkalın, became the secretary-general of the Turkish delegation. Montreux Straits Conference established between June 22 and July 20 of 1936.

The Montreux Convention became the primary instrument, a legal cornerstone, that governed the passage of the commercial and war vessels through the strait. It was signed with the participation of Bulgaria, Great Britain, Australia, France, Japan, Romania, the Soviet Union, Turkey, Yugoslavia and Greece on July 20 1936. It was ratified by the GNAT on July 31 1936. It entered into force November 9 1936. It has kept its importance and validity since its entrance into force.

Balkan Pact

Until the early 1930s, Turkey followed a modern neutral foreign policy with the west through developing joint friendship and neutrality agreements. These bilateral agreements were aligned with Mustafa Kemal's worldview. There were fifteen joint agreements with western states by the end of 1925. Some of these agreements lasted a long time. The neutrality pact signed with the Soviet Union remained effective until unilaterally abrogated in 1945.

From the early 1930s, the changes and developments in the world politics required Turkey to make multilateral agreements to improve its security. Mustafa Kemal strongly believed that a close cooperation between the Balkan states based on the principle of equality would have an important effect over European politics. These states were ruled by the Ottoman Empire for centuries. During that period they formed a powerful force. While the origins of the Balkan agreement may go back as far as 1925, the Balkan Pact came to being in the mid-1930s. Several important developments in the Balkan Peninsula and in Europe helped the original idea to materialize. In inter-Balkan relations, improvements in the "Turkish-Greek alliance," the rapprochement between Bulgaria and Yugoslavia are worth mentioning.

The Balkan Pact was negotiated by Mustafa Kemal with Greece, Romania, and Yugoslavia. This mutual-defence agreement intended to guarantee the signatories' territorial integrity and political independence against attack by another Balkan state such as Bulgaria or Albania. It countered the increasingly aggressive foreign policy of fascist Italy and the effect of a potential Bulgarian alignment with Nazi Germany. He thought of the Balkan Pact as a medium of balance in the relations with the European countries.^[77] All of his hopes, desires and struggles were aimed at establishing a region of security and alliances in the west of Turkey and in the Balkan Europe, which would extend as far as Dobruja ^[78]

The Balkan Pact provided for regular military and diplomatic consultations. It was regarded as a big step forward in consolidating the free world's position in southeast Europe, although contained no specific military commitments. The importance of the agreement was best displayed on the message which Atatürk sent to the Greek Premier Ioannis Metaxas:

The borders of the allies in the Balkan Pact are a single border. Those who covet this border will encounter the burning beams of the sun. I recommend avoiding this. The forces that defend our borders are a single and inseparable force.^[79]”
— Mustafa Kemal

It was signed by GNA on Feb 28. The Greek and Yugoslav Parliaments ratified the agreement a few days after. The unanimously ratified Balkan pact become a reality on 18 May 1935. It lasted until 1940.

The Balkan Pact turned to be an ineffective organization for reasons that were beyond Atatürk’s control. What he wanted to prevent with the Balkan Pact was realized by Bulgaria’s attempt to put the Dobruja issue into the agenda after a series of international events ended with Italian invasion of Albania on 7 April 1939. These conflicts spread rapidly, which sometimes represented as long series of conflicts of European Civil War, ending with World War II . The goal of Atatürk, to protect southeast Europe, failed with the dissolution of the pact. Only state which arose intact after the war was Atatürk's Republic of Turkey.

Issue of Hatay

Inonu was very conscious of the foreign policy issues. During the second half of the 1930s Atatürk tried to get close to England. The given risks of this policy change put these man on two different sides, only the Hatay issue and the Lyon agreement were two important developments in foreign policy that played an important role in the severing of relations between Atatürk and Ismet.

In 1936 Atatürk raised the "Issue of Hatay" at the League of Nations. Hatay was based on the old administrative unit of the Ottoman Empire named the Sanjak of Alexandretta. On behalf of the League of Nations, the representatives of France, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Belgium and Turkey prepared a constitution for Hatay, which established it as an autonomous sanjak within Syria. Despite some inter-ethnic violence, in the midst of 1938 an election was conducted by the local legislative assembly and it was convoked. The cities of Antakya (Antioch) and İskenderun (Alexandretta) joined Turkey in 1939.

Economic policies

For the conceptual analysis see Economic reforms

Mustafa Kemal instigated economic policies not just to develop small and large scale businesses, but also to create social strata (industrial bourgeoisie along the peasantry of Anatolia) that were virtually non-existent during the Ottoman Empire. The primary problem faced by the politics of his period was the lag in the development of political institutions and social classes which would steer such social and economic changes.^[80] Mustafa Kemal's vision regarding early Turkish economic policy was apparent during the İzmir Economic Congress of 1923 which was established before the signing of the Lausanne Treaty.

State intervention, 1923–1929

The initial choices of Mustafa Kemal's economic policies were a reflection of the realities of his period. After World War I, due to the lack of any real potential investors to open private sector factories and develop industrial production, Kemal's activities regarding the economy included the establishment of many state-owned factories for agriculture, machinery, and textile industries. Mustafa Kemal and İsmet İnönü had a national vision in their pursuit of the state controlled economical polices. Kemal and İsmet wanted to knit the country together, eliminate the foreign control of the economy, and improve communications. Istanbul, a trading port with international foreign enterprises, was deliberately abandoned and resources were channeled to other, relatively less developed cities, in order to establish a more balanced development throughout the country.^[81]

For Mustafa Kemal, as for his supporters, tobacco remained wedded to his policy in the pursuit of the economic independence. Turkish tobacco was an important industrial crop, where its cultivation and manufacture were French monopolies under capitulations of the Ottoman Empire. The tobacco and cigarette trade was controlled by two French companies the "Regie Compagnie interessee des tabacs de l'empire Ottoman", and "Narquileh tobacco."^[82] Ottoman Empire gave the tobacco monopoly to the Ottoman Bank as a limited company under "Council of the Public Debt". Reigie, as part of Council of the Public Debt, had the control over production, storing, distribution (including export) with an unchallenged price control and Turkish farmers were depended on the company for their livelihood.^[83] In 1925, this company was taken over by the state and named as "Tekel." The second biggest industrial crop was cotton. Cotton planting during this period was promoted to furnish raw material for the new factory settlements in Turkey.^[84] One of these factory settlements was in Nazilli. Nazilli beginning with the establishment of Cotton mills and then followed by the first Turkish cotton print factory "Nazilli Calico print factory (1935)" become a major center.^[85]^[86] The control of tobacco was the biggest achievement of the Kemalist political machinery's "nationalization" of the economy for a country that did not produce oil. They accompanied this achievement with the development of cotton related industry.

Atatürk considered the development of a national rail network as another important step for industrialization, and this was addressed by the foundation of the Turkish State Railways in 1927, setting up an extensive railway network in a very short time. The road network was 13,885 km ruined surface roads, and 4.450 km stabilized roads, and 94 bridges. This stayed the same until 1935. In 1927 Kemal ordered the integration of road construction goals into development plans. In 1935 a new entity was established under the government named "Sose ve Kopruler Reisligi" which will be the driving force of the new roads after the World War II. However, in 1937 total roads inside the boarders were 22,000 km which were mainly a system to aid the railways.

There was a growing and deeply rooted sentiment signaling the need for a truly national establishment and the birth of a banking system which was capable of the financing means to back up economic activities, managing funds accumulated as a result of policies providing savings incentives and where necessary extending resources which could trigger industrial impetus, as a result with the initiative of Kemal the first Turkish bank İş Bankası established in 1924. Kemal was the first member of İş Bankası. The Ottoman Bank's role during the initial years as a central bank remained, however it was extended on a temporary basis due to the Kemals's intention to establish Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, which was realized in 1931. Along the İş Bankası, banks like Sümerbank (specialized in industrial agriculture products) and Etibank (specialized in mineral and related industries) were also founded during this period.

The national group who had Kemal as the leader developed many projects within the first decade of the republic, but the Turkish economy was based on agriculture, with primitive tools and methods; roads and transportation facilities were far from sufficient; and the management of the economy was inefficient. The Great Depression brought many changes to this picture.

The Great Depression, 1929–1931

The young republic like the rest of the world, found itself in a deep economic crisis during the Great Depression: the country could not finance essential imports; its currency was shunned; and zealous revenue officials seized the meager possessions of peasants who could not pay their taxes.^[81] Mustafa Kemal had to face the same problems which all the countries faced: political upheaval.

The establishment of a new party with a different economic perspective was needed and Mustafa Kemal asked Ali Fethi Okyar to fulfill this need. The Liberal Republican Party came out with a liberal program and proposed that state monopolies should be ended, foreign capital should be attracted, and that state investment should be curtailed. Mustafa Kemal supported İnönü's point of view that "it is impossible to attract foreign capital for essential development." However, the effect of free republicans was felt strongly and state intervention was replaced with moderate state intervention, which was not close to capitalism; but a form of state capitalism. One of Mustafa Kemal's radical left-wing supporters, Yakup Kadri Karaosmanoğlu (from the Kadro (The Cadre) movement), claimed that Mustafa Kemal found a third way between capitalism and socialism in his Marxist journal.^[87]

Liberalization and planned growth, 1931–1939

The first two of "five year economic plans" were performed under the supervision of Mustafa Kemal. However, with the death of Kemal and the rise of World War II changed the use of economic plans drastically. Governments from then on [death of Kemal] began to take measures which harmed the economic productivity in various ways.^[88]

Mustafa Kemal had to deal with the turbulent economic issues with a "high debt" which was known as Ottoman public debt. Turkish private business can not acquire-exchange credits and it was impossible to integrate Turkish economy without a solution. Atatürk pursued a treaty signed in 1929 with the Ottoman Debt Council. While paying the Ottoman debt, Kemal's economic policies got recognition by the very first foreign borrowing credited from a private USA company amounting to 10 million dollars in 1930. This slowly followed with the replacement of previously isolated-economic policies to the integrated economic policies. At Atatürk's request, Celal Bayar became Minister of Economy and served from 1932 to 1937.^[89] Celal Bayar was a liberal economist who was raised from small a business practice who became a major industrialized player of his time. During this period of mixed economy with private initiative, textile, sugar, paper and steel factories as well as many industrial establishments, power plants, banks [such as the Halk Bank], and insurance companies were established. On 25 October 1937 Mustafa Kemal appointed Celal Bayar as the prime minister of the 9th government. Integrated economic policies reached its peak with the signing of the 1939 Treaty with Britain and France which signaled another turning point in the Turkish history.^[88] It was the first step towards an alliance with the "West".^[88] Celal Bayar continued to serve as prime minister when Atatürk died and İnönü became president in 1938. The differences of opinion with Inönü [state control] without the protection of Mustafa Kemal led Celal Bayar [liberal] to lay down his office on 25 January 1939.

The success of the 1930s due to early implementation of the economic system was an achievement credited to the national policies of the Mustafa Kemal and his team.^[90] Atatürk supported the development of automobile industry that had not existed before. He did not just want to initiate an industry but an industry that would be a center to its region. The motto of the Turkish automobile association, as supplied by Atatürk, is, "The Turkish driver is a man of the most exquisite sensitivities."^[91] Atatürk realized the important role of aviation, summing it up in the words, "the future lies in the skies".^[92] Turkish Aeronautical Association was founded by the directive of Mustafa Kemal, in 1925.^[93] Mustafa Kemal also ordered the establishment of Turkish Aircraft Association Lottery to found the projects. Instead of the traditional raffle prizes, this new lottery paid money prizes but the major part of its income transferred to establishment of a new factory. Kemal watched the first national aircraft (MMV-1) in 1932. Mustafa Kemal did not see the flight of the first Turkish military aircraft build at the factory but soon after his death before the onset of World War II , American Curtiss Hawk fighters were operational.

During 1935, Turkey was coming up as an industrial society on the Western European model with the guides set out by Atatürk.^[94] In his death, most regions of Turkey had viable micro-economic stability and macro economic stability was in a viable state. The sign of sound economic policies were marked by the first-ever emergence of the local banks. However, the gap between Mustafa Kemal’s goals in his speeches and the achievements of the socio-political structure of the country was not aligned.^[94]

Personal life

Mustafa Kemal married Latife Uşaklıgil. They divorced after 3 years of marriage. Atatürk adopted seven daughters and a son. In his leisure time, he enjoyed reading, horseback riding, chess and swimming. He was also an avid dancer and enjoyed both the waltz and traditional Zeybek folk dances. Atatürk published many books and kept a personal journal. The "Nutuk," a thirty-six hour speech written and given by Mustafa Kemal to the Grand National Assembly over the course of six days that describes events leading to the formation of the Republic of Turkey, was first published in 1927 and then has been re-published several times.

During 1937, indications of Atatürk's worsening health started to appear. In the early 1938, while he was on a trip to Yalova, he suffered from a serious illness. He was recommended to go to İstanbul for treatment, where he was diagnosed with cirrhosis of the liver.^[95] During his stay in İstanbul, he made an effort to keep up with his regular lifestyle for a while. He died on 10 November 1938, at the age of 57. Atatürk's funeral called forth both sorrow and pride in Turkey, and seventeen countries sent special representatives, while nine contributed with armed detachments to the cortège.^[96] On November 1953, Mustafa Kemal's remains were taken from the Ethnography Museum of Ankara.^[97] Atatürk finally came to rest at his mausoleum, the Anıtkabir. In his will, he donated all of his possessions to the Republican People's Party, bound to the condition that, through the yearly interest of his funds, his sister Makbule and his adopted children will be looked after, the higher education of the children of İsmet İnönü will be funded, and the Turkish Language Association and Turkish Historical Society will be given the rest.

Legacy

Peace at home, peace in the world

Mustafa Kemal said; "What particularly interests foreign policy is the internal organization of the state. It is necessary that foreign policy should agree with the internal organization." He eternalized this view with the famous motto "peace at home, peace in the world." His foreign policy choices were not a random. The quest for peace in the region was an extension of the domestic needs of the newly established state; as the internal organization and stability of the young Turkish Republic depended on the application of this foreign policy. He worked to establish this vision, which was evident in his funeral.^[96]

Mustafa Kemal participated in forging close ties with the former enemy, Greece, culminating in a visit to Ankara by the Greek premier Eleftherios Venizelos, in 1932. Venizelos even forwarded Atatürk's name for the 1934 Nobel Peace Prize,^[98] highlighting the mutual respect between the two leaders. Mustafa Kemal was visited by General Douglas MacArthur in 1931. During which the two exchanged their views on the state of affairs in Europe. He was worried that there could be an outbreak of World War II. MacArthur expressed his admiration of Atatürk on many occasions and stated that he "takes great pride in being one of Atatürk's loyal friends."^[99]

Since its inception by Mustafa Kemal, "Peace at Home, Peace in the World" is the motto of the Republic of Turkey.

Turkey

File:Anitkabir.HB.jpg

Anıtkabir, the mausoleum of Kemal Atatürk, in Ankara, Turkey

The mausoleum Anıtkabir designed by Emin Onat and Orhan Arda is the final resting place of Atatürk and İsmet İnönü.

He is commemorated by many memorials throughout Turkey, such as the Atatürk International Airport in Istanbul, Atatürk Bridge over the Golden Horn (Haliç), Atatürk Dam, Atatürk Stadium. Atatürk statues are established in many Turkish cities, and practically any larger settlement has its own memorial to him. His face and name are seen and heard everywhere in Turkey: his portrait can be seen in all public buildings, in schools, in all kinds of school books, on all Turkish lira banknotes, and in the homes of most Turkish families.^[100]

At the exact time of his death, on every 10 November, at 09:05 a.m., almost all vehicles and people in the country's streets pause for one minute in remembrance of his memory.^[101] In 1951, the Turkish Parliament issued a law (5816) outlawing insults to his reminiscence (Turkish: Hatırası) or destruction of objects representing him.^[102] The demarcation between a criticism and an insult was defined as a political argument and the minister of Justice (a political position) was assigned in Article 5 to execute the law rather than the public prosecutor.

Worldwide

File:HRH QEII HandWriting Signature.jpg

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk by HM Queen Elizabeth II

In 1981, the centennial of Atatürk's birth, the memory of Atatürk was honored by the United Nations and UNESCO, which declared it The Atatürk Year in the World and adopted the Resolution on the Atatürk Centennial. The Atatürk Memorial in Wellington, New Zealand (which also serves as a memorial to the ANZAC troops who died at Gallipoli); the Atatürk Memorial in the place of honour on ANZAC drive in Canberra, Australia; the Atatürk Forest in Israel; and the Atatürk Square in Rome, Italy, are only a few examples. He has roads named after him in several countries, like the Kemal Atatürk Marg in New Delhi, India, Kemal Atatürk Avenue in Dhaka, Bangladesh, the Atatürk Avenue in the heart of Islamabad in Pakistan, and Mustafá Kemal Atatürk street in the central and upscale Naco district of Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. His statues have been erected in numerous parks, streets and squares of many different countries in the world. The famous Madame Tussauds Museum in London has a wax statue of Atatürk. The entrance to Princess Royal Harbour in Albany, Western Australia is named Atatürk Channel.

Notes

^ Zürcher, Turkey : a modern history, 142
^ "Mustafa Kemal Atatürk". Turkish Embassy website. Retrieved 2007-08-07.
^ ^a ^b Lengyel, They called him Atatürk, 68
^ Kinross, Atatürk: The Rebirth of a Nation, 100
^ Mustafa Kemal Pasha's speech on his arrival in Ankara in November 1919
^ Ahmad, The Making of Modern Turkey, 50
^ editorial staff. "A short history of AA". Anadolu Ajansı Genel Müdürlüğü. Retrieved 2008-01-01. Ikdam newspaper dated 9 August 1921, reproducing the dispatches of AA dated 5 August and 6th, 1921, announced that Mustafa Kemal Pasha was promoted to Chief Commander
^ Shaw, History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey, 365
^ Mango, Atatürk, 394
^ ^a ^b Mango, Atatürk, 367 Cite error: The named reference "mango367" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
^ Gerd Nonneman, Analyzing Middle East foreign policies and the relationship with Europe, Published 2005 Routledge, p. 204 ISBN 0714684279
^ Webster, The Turkey of Atatürk: social process in the Turkish reformation, 245
^ Mango, Atatürk, 391–392
^ Mango, Atatürk, 362
^ Mango, Atatürk, 362
^ Landau, Atatürk and the Modernization of Turkey, 252
^ Mango, Atatürk, 501
^ ^a ^b ^c Koçak, Cemil (2005) 'Parliament Membership during the Single-Party System in Turkey (1925-1945)', European Journal of Turkish Studies
^ John O. Voll: Professor of Islamic history at Georgetown University http://www.nationalinterest.org/Article.aspx?id=13296
^ Mango, Atatürk, 403
^ Mango, Atatürk, 401
^ Mango, Atatürk, 401
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Majid Khadduri (2006) War and peace in the law of Islam, The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., ISBN 1584776951 page 290-291
^ Mango, Atatürk, 404
^ Eksi, Oktay (2008-04-16). "Paralardaki resimler". Hurriyet. Retrieved 2008-04-24. İsmet Paşa "kurumlaşma" ile neyi kastettiğini de şöyle anlattı:
Biz Cumhuriyeti kurduğumuz zaman onu yaşatıp yaşatamayacağımız en büyük sorun idi. Çünkü Saltanatın ve Hilafetin lağvına karşı olanların sayısı çoktu ve hedefleri de Cumhuriyetti. Cumhuriyetin 10 yaşına bastığını görmek o yüzden önemliydi. Nitekim büyük Atatürk'ün emriyle 10'uncu yıl kutlamaları çok büyük bir bayram oldu. Biz de Cumhuriyetin ve devletin kurumlaştığını göstermeye bundan sonra hep itina ettik...
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Wolf-Gazo, John Dewey in Turkey: An Educational Mission, 15–42.
^ Republic Of Turkey Ministry Of National Education. "Ataturk's views on education". T.C. Government. Retrieved 2007-11-20.
^ ^a ^b ^c İğdemir, Atatürk, 165–170
^ Article: "Atatürk, his wife and her biographer". Emrah Güler. Turkish Daily News. 25 August 2006. Retrieved 2007-09-29. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
^ Quoted in Atatürkism, Volume 1 (Istanbul: Office of the Chief of General Staff, 1982), 126.
^ Patrick Kinross, Atatürk, The Rebirth of a Nation, 397
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Mango, Ataturk, 418 Cite error: The named reference "PRP" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
^ Weiker, Book Review of Zürcher's "Political Opposition in the Early Turkish Republic: The Progressive Republican Party, 1924–1925", 297–298
^ Touraj Atabaki, Erik Jan Zürcher, 2004, Men of Order: authoritarian modernization under Ataturk and Reza Shah, I.B.Tauris, ISBN 1860644260, page 207
^ http://www.tsk.mil.tr/eng/Anitkabir/p24.html TSK Anitkabir sayfa 24
^ Atillasoy, Atatürk : The First President and Founder of the Turkish Republic, 13.
^ Mango, Atatürk, 164
^ Tüfekçi, Universality of Atatürk's philosophy
^ Kinross, Ataturk, The Rebirth of a Nation, p. 343
^ Atillasoy, Atatürk : first president and founder of the Turkish Republic, 15
^ Dundar, Can (2005-04-25). "Türkeş, Atatürk'ün imzasını hatırlattı". Milliyet (in Turkish). Atatürk'ün imzasını bir Ermeni güzel yazı hocasının çizdiğini duymuş muydun?
^ Özelli, The Evolution of the Formal Educational System and Its Relation to Economic Growth Policies in the First Turkish Republic, 77–92
^ Mango, Atatürk, 536
^ İnan, Atatürk Hakkında Hatıralar ve Belgeler, 260)
^ ^a ^b "About Us". Retrieved 2008-02-01.
^ Saikal, Democratization in the Middle East: Experiences, Struggles, Challenges, 95
^ ^a ^b Geoffrey L. Lewis (1999), The Turkish Language Reform: A Catastrophic Success, Oxford University Press ISBN 0198238568 page 66
^ "Turks Teach New Theories", The New York Times, Istanbul, 1936-02-09{{citation}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
^ Laut (2002)
^ Ömür, Modernity and Islam: Experiences of Turkish Women
^ Atatürk, Vatandaş İçin Medeni Bilgiler
^ İnan, Medeni bilgiler ve M. Kemal Atatürk'ün el yazıları
^ Paydak, Selda (January 2000). "Interview with Semiha Berksoy". Representation of the European Commission to Turkey. Archived from the original on 2003-04-18. Retrieved 2007-02-11.
^ Cleveland, A History of the Modern Middle East, 181
^ Prof. Dr. Hamza Eroğlu. "Peace at home and peace in the world" (in Turkish). Retrieved 2008-01-01. "Yurtta Sulh" herşeyden önce ülkede, o insanın, insanca yaşamasını, insanlık tıynetinin gereğinin tanınmasını ifade eder".
^ Enver Ziya Karal. Atatürk’ten Düşünceler (in Turkish). p. 123. "Haricî siyaset bir heyet-i içtimaiyenin teşekkülü dahilisi ile sıkı surette alâkadardır. Çünkü teşekkül-ü dahiliyeye istinat etmeyen haricî siyasetler daima mahkûm kalırlar. Bir heyet-i içtimaiyenin teşekkül-ü dahilisi ne kadar kuvvetli olursa, siyaset-i hariciyesi de o nisbette kavi ve rasin olur."
^ ^a ^b Peter Sluglett, "The Primacy of Oil in Britain’s Iraq Policy", in the book "Britain in Iraq: 1914-1932" London: Ithaca Press, 1976, pp. 103-116
^ Can Dundar. "Atatürk yaşasaydı" (in Turkish). Retrieved 2008-01-01. ... Ata'nın öncelikli dış politika sorununun Musul olduğunu söylüyor. Musul'u bırakmama konusunda aktif bir politika izlenmesinden yana olduğunu belirtiyor...
^ Harold Courtenay Armstrong Gray Wolf, Mustafa Kemal: An Intimate Study of a Dictator. page 225
^ Olson, Robert W. (1989) The Emergence of Kurdish Nationalism and the Sheikh Said Rebellion, 1880-1925, p.45
^ Kinross, 401
^ ASD: Speeches and statements by Ataturk, volume I pages 361-363 published by Atatuk Culture, language and history Higher Institude, Ankara 1989
^ Andrew Mango, Atatürk and the Kurds, Middle Eastern Studies, Vol.35, No.4, 1999, 20
^ ^a ^b ^c Yılmaz Altuğ, Foreign Policy Of Atatürk, Ataturk arastirma merkezi dergisi, Vol VI, No 16, November 1989
^ Yılmaz Altuğ, Türk Devrim Tarihi Dersim, 1919-1938, 1980 s. p. 136.
^ ^a ^b "Oh, What Happiness!". Time Magazine. November 6, 1933. pp. 37–39. Retrieved 2007-08-07.
^ QUOTES ON ATATÜRK
^ Karamanlis, 1995, p. 95-97
^ Sosyal, Ismail, 1983, "Turkey's Diplomatic treaties", TTK, Ankara page 29
^ Clogg, Richard (2002). A Concise History of Greece. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521004799. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help) p. 107
^ Jentleson, Bruce W. (1997). The American Journal of International Law. Oxford University Press. p. 24. ISBN 0195110552. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
^ Narli, Nilüfer (1993): “Turco-Iranian Relations from the Islamic Revolution to Gulf War and Beyond: Co-operation or Competition in the Muslim World”. CEMOTI. (15): 265-295
^ ^a ^b ^c Gokhan Cetinsaya Essential friends and natural enemies: the historical roots of Turkish-Iranian relations. Middle East Review of International Affairs Volume 7, No. 3 - September 2003
^ Rajaee, Farhang, Islamic Values and World View: Farhang Khomeyni on Man, the State and International Politics, Volume XIII (PDF), University Press of America. ISBN 0-8191-3578-X
^ Mango, Ataturk, page 510
^ Sosyal, Ismail, 1983, "Turkey's Diplomatic treaties", TTK, Ankara page 493
^ Yilmaz Altuð, "Atatürk'ün Dis Politikasý," B.Ü. Uluslararasi Atatürk Konferansý Tebligleri, 10-11 November 1980, Vol. II, Istanbul 1981, p. 486.
^ Þevket Süreyya Aydemir, Tek Adam, Vol. 3, Ýstanbul 1988, p. 331.
^ Atatürk'ün Milli Dýþ Politikasý, Vol. 2, p. 355
^ Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies, 347–357
^ ^a ^b Mango, Atatürk, 470
^ Shaw, History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey, 232–233.
^ Aysu, Abdullah (2003-01-29). "Tütün, İçki ve Tekel" (in Turkish). BİA Haber Merkezi. Retrieved 2007-10-10.
^ Webster, The Turkey of Atatürk: Social Process in the Turkish Reformation, 260
^ Doğan, Formation of factory settlements within Turkish industrialization and modernization in 1930s: Nazilli printing factory
^ Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Culture and Tourism. "Aydın—Historical Ruins". T.C. Government. Retrieved 2007. Nazilli cotton print factory was established over an area of 65.000 m2 on the Nazilli Bozdoğan highway. It is the "first Turkish cotton print factory" the foundation of which was laid on 25 August 1935 and which was opened by Atatürk with great ceremony. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
^ Mango, Atatürk, 478
^ ^a ^b ^c Barlas, Etatism and Diplomacy in Turkey: Economic and Foreign Policy Strategies in an Uncertain World, 1929–1939
^ Dilek Barlas, Etatism and Diplomacy in Turkey: Economic and Foreign Policy Strategies p. 61
^ Emrence, Turkey in economic crisis (1927–1930): a panaromic vision. Journal Middle Eastern Studies
^ Stone, Norman “Talking Turkey”. National Interest, Fall2000, Issue 61.
^ "Skylife". Retrieved 2007-11-26.
^ "History of Turkish Aeronautical Association". Retrieved 2007-11-26.
^ ^a ^b Eastham, The Turkish Development Plan: The First Five Years, 132–136
^ "Kemal Atatürk". NNDB. Retrieved 2007-08-07.
^ ^a ^b Mango, Atatürk 526
^ "The Burial of Atatürk". Time Magazine. 23 November 1953. pp. 37–39. Retrieved 2007-08-07.
^ Nobel Foundation. The Nomination Database for the Nobel Prize in Peace, 1901–1955.[1]
^ Handnote by General Douglas MacArthur on display at Anıtkabir
^ Navaro-Yashin, Yael (2002). Faces of the State: Secularism and Public Life in Turkey. Princeton University Press. pp. 196–99. ISBN 0691088454. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
^ Morrison, Terry (1994). Kiss, Bow, Or Shake Hands: How to Do Business in Sixty Countries. Adams Media. p. 392. ISBN 1558504443. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
^ Yonah, Alexander (2007). Turkey: Terrorism, Civil Rights, and the European Union. Routledge. p. 137. ISBN 0415441633. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)

References

Prints

Ahmad, Feroz (1993). The Making of Modern Turkey. London ; New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0415078351.
Armstrong, Harold Courtenay (1972). Grey Wolf, Mustafa Kemal: An Intimate Study of a Dictator. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press. ISBN 978-0836969627.
Atillasoy, Yüksel (2002). Atatürk: First President and Founder of the Turkish Republic. Woodside, NY: Woodside House. ISBN 978-0971235342.
Barber, Noel (1988). Lords of the Golden Horn: From Suleiman the Magnificent to Kemal Ataturk. London: Arrow. ISBN 978-0099539506.
Barlas, Dilek (1998). Statism and Diplomacy in Turkey: Economic and Foreign Policy Strategies in an Uncertain World, 1929–1939. New York: Brill Academic Publishers. ISBN 978-9004108554.
Cleveland, William L (2004). A History of the Modern Middle East. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. ISBN 978-0813340487.
Doğan, Çağatay Emre (2003). Formation of Factory Settlements Within Turkish Industrialization and Modernization in 1930s: Nazilli Printing Factory (in Turkish). Ankara: Middle East Technical University. OCLC 54431696.
Huntington, Samuel P. (2006). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, Conn.; London: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300116205.
İğdemir, Uluğ (1963). Atatürk. Ankara: Turkish National Commission for UNESCO. pp. 165–170. OCLC 75604149. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
İnan, Ayşe Afet (2007). Atatürk Hakkında Hatıralar ve Belgeler (in Turkish). Istanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları. ISBN 9944881401. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help)
İnan, Ayşe Afet (1998). Medeni bilgiler ve M. Kemal Atatürk'ün el Yazıları (in Turkish). Ankara: AKDTYK Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi. ISBN 978-9751612762. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
Kinross, Patrick (2003). Atatürk: The Rebirth of a Nation. London: Phoenix Press. ISBN 978-1842125991. OCLC 55516821.
Kinross, Patrick (1979). The Ottoman Centuries: The Rise and Fall of the Turkish Empire. New York: Morrow. ISBN 978-0688080938.
Landau, Jacob M (1983). Atatürk and the Modernization of Turkey. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. ISBN 978-0865319868.
Lengyel, Emil (1962). They Called Him Atatürk. New York: The John Day Co. OCLC 1337444.
Mango, Andrew (2002) [1999]. Ataturk: The Biography of the Founder of Modern Turkey (Paperback ed.). Woodstock, NY: Overlook Press, Peter Mayer Publishers, Inc. ISBN 1-58567-334-x. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: invalid character (help)
Mango, Andrew (2004). Atatürk. London: John Murray. ISBN 978-0719565922.
Saikal, Amin (2003). Democratization in the Middle East: Experiences, Struggles, Challenges. Tokyo: United Nations University Press. ISBN 978-9280810851. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
Shaw, Stanford Jay (1976–1977). History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521212809. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
Spangnolo, John (1992). The Modern Middle East in Historical Perspective: Essays in Honour of Albert Hourani. Oxford: Middle East Centre, St. Antony's College. ISBN 978-0863721649. OCLC 80503960.
Tunçay, Mete (1972). Mesaî : Halk Şûrâlar Fırkası Programı, 1920 (in Turkish). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi. OCLC 1926301.
Tüfekçi, Gürbüz D (1981). Universality of Atatürk's Philosophy. Ankara: Pan Matbaacılık. OCLC 54074541.
Yapp, Malcolm (1987). The Making of the Modern Near East, 1792–1923. London ; New York: Longman. ISBN 978-0582493803.
Webster, Donald Everett (1973). The Turkey of Atatürk; Social Process in the Turkish Reformation. New York: AMS Press. ISBN 978-0404563332.
Zürcher, Erik Jan (2004). Turkey: A Modern History. London; New York: I.B. Tauris. ISBN 978-1850433996.

Journals

Eastham, J. K. (1964). "The Turkish Development Plan: The First Five Years". The Economic Journal. 74 (298). New York: Macmillan: 132–136. doi:10.2307/2228117. ISSN 0013-0133. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
Emrence, Cem (2003). "Turkey in Economic Crisis (1927–1930): A Panaromic Vision". Middle Eastern Studies. 39 (4). London: F. Cass.: 67–80. doi:10.1080/00263200412331301787. ISSN 0026-3206.
Ömür, Aslı (2002). "Modernity and Islam: Experiences of Turkish Women". Turkish Times. 13 (312). ISSN 1043-0164. Retrieved 2007-10-10. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
Özelli, M. Tunç (1974). "The Evolution of the Formal Educational System and its Relation to Economic Growth Policies in the First Turkish Republic". International Journal of Middle East Studies. 5 (1). London: Cambridge University Press: 77–92. ISSN 0020-7438. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
Stone, Norman (2000). "Talking Turkey". The National Interest. 61. New York: National Affairs, Inc: 66. ISSN 0884-9382.
Volkan, Vamik D. (1981). "Immortal Atatürk—Narcissism and Creativity in a Revolutionary Leader". Psychoanalytic Study of Society. 9. New York: Psychohistory Press: 221–255. ISSN 0079-7294. OCLC 60448681.
Wolf-Gazo, Ernest (1996). "John Dewey in Turkey: An Educational Mission". Journal of American Studies of Turkey. 3. Ankara, Turkey: American Studies Association of Turkey: 15–42. ISSN 1300-6606.
"Mustafa Kemal Atatürk". TP Editors. pp. 7–8. Retrieved 2008-04-29.

"The Burial of Atatürk". Time Magazine. 23 November 1953. pp. 37–39. Retrieved 2007-08-07.

Political offices
Preceded by founded	Prime Minister of Turkey 25 April 1920–24 January 1921	Succeeded by Fevzi Çakmak
Preceded by founded	Speaker of the Parliament of Turkey 24 April 1920–29 October 1923	Succeeded by Ali Fethi Okyar
Preceded by founded	President of Turkey 29 October 1923–10 November 1938	Succeeded by İsmet İnönü
Party political offices
Preceded by founded	Leader of the Republican People's Party 9 September 1923–10 November 1938	Succeeded by İsmet İnönü

Template:Persondata {{subst:#if:Ataturk, Mustafa Kemal|}} [[Category:{{subst:#switch:{{subst:uc:1881}}

|| UNKNOWN | MISSING = Year of birth missing {{subst:#switch:{{subst:uc:1938}}||LIVING=(living people)}}
| #default = 1881 births

}}]] {{subst:#switch:{{subst:uc:1938}}

|| LIVING  = 
| MISSING  = 
| UNKNOWN  = 
| #default =

}}

Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA

[zurcher142-1] Zürcher, Turkey : a modern history, 142

[2] "Mustafa Kemal Atatürk". Turkish Embassy website. Retrieved 2007-08-07.

[lengyel68-3] Lengyel, They called him Atatürk, 68

[kinross100-4] Kinross, Atatürk: The Rebirth of a Nation, 100

[5] Mustafa Kemal Pasha's speech on his arrival in Ankara in November 1919

[feroz50-6] Ahmad, The Making of Modern Turkey, 50

[AA-7] torial staff. "A short history of AA". Anadolu Ajansı Genel Müdürlüğü. Retrieved 2008-01-01. Ikdam newspaper dated 9 August 1921, reproducing the dispatches of AA dated 5 August and 6th, 1921, announced that Mustafa Kemal Pasha was promoted to Chief Commander

[8] Shaw, History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey, 365

[9] Mango, Atatürk, 394

[mango367-10] Mango, Atatürk, 367 Cite error: The named reference "mango367" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).

[11] Gerd Nonneman, Analyzing Middle East foreign policies and the relationship with Europe, Published 2005 Routledge, p. 204 ISBN 0714684279

[12] Webster, The Turkey of Atatürk: social process in the Turkish reformation, 245

[13] Mango, Atatürk, 391–392

[14] Mango, Atatürk, 362

[15] Mango, Atatürk, 362

[16] Landau, Atatürk and the Modernization of Turkey, 252

[17] Mango, Atatürk, 501

[single-18] Koçak, Cemil (2005) 'Parliament Membership during the Single-Party System in Turkey (1925-1945)', European Journal of Turkish Studies

[19] John O. Voll: Professor of Islamic history at Georgetown University http://www.nationalinterest.org/Article.aspx?id=13296

[20] Mango, Atatürk, 403

[21] Mango, Atatürk, 401

[22] Mango, Atatürk, 401

[Calipinternational-23] Majid Khadduri (2006) War and peace in the law of Islam, The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., ISBN 1584776951 page 290-291

[24] Mango, Atatürk, 404

[25] Eksi, Oktay (2008-04-16). "Paralardaki resimler". Hurriyet. Retrieved 2008-04-24. İsmet Paşa "kurumlaşma" ile neyi kastettiğini de şöyle anlattı:
Biz Cumhuriyeti kurduğumuz zaman onu yaşatıp yaşatamayacağımız en büyük sorun idi. Çünkü Saltanatın ve Hilafetin lağvına karşı olanların sayısı çoktu ve hedefleri de Cumhuriyetti. Cumhuriyetin 10 yaşına bastığını görmek o yüzden önemliydi. Nitekim büyük Atatürk'ün emriyle 10'uncu yıl kutlamaları çok büyük bir bayram oldu. Biz de Cumhuriyetin ve devletin kurumlaştığını göstermeye bundan sonra hep itina ettik...

[dew-26] ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ Wolf-Gazo, John Dewey in Turkey: An Educational Mission, 15–42.

[27] Republic Of Turkey Ministry Of National Education. "Ataturk's views on education". T.C. Government. Retrieved 2007-11-20.

[UNESCO-28] İğdemir, Atatürk, 165–170

[29] Article: "Atatürk, his wife and her biographer". Emrah Güler. Turkish Daily News. 25 August 2006. Retrieved 2007-09-29. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)

[30] Quoted in Atatürkism, Volume 1 (Istanbul: Office of the Chief of General Staff, 1982), 126.

[31] Patrick Kinross, Atatürk, The Rebirth of a Nation, 397

[PRP-32] ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Mango, Ataturk, 418 Cite error: The named reference "PRP" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).

[33] Weiker, Book Review of Zürcher's "Political Opposition in the Early Turkish Republic: The Progressive Republican Party, 1924–1925", 297–298

[34] Touraj Atabaki, Erik Jan Zürcher, 2004, Men of Order: authoritarian modernization under Ataturk and Reza Shah, I.B.Tauris, ISBN 1860644260, page 207

[35] ttp://www.tsk.mil.tr/eng/Anitkabir/p24.html TSK Anitkabir sayfa 24

[36] Atillasoy, Atatürk : The First President and Founder of the Turkish Republic, 13.

[mango164-37] Mango, Atatürk, 164

[38] Tüfekçi, Universality of Atatürk's philosophy

[39] Kinross, Ataturk, The Rebirth of a Nation, p. 343

[atillasoy15-40] Atillasoy, Atatürk : first president and founder of the Turkish Republic, 15

[41] Dundar, Can (2005-04-25). "Türkeş, Atatürk'ün imzasını hatırlattı". Milliyet (in Turkish). Atatürk'ün imzasını bir Ermeni güzel yazı hocasının çizdiğini duymuş muydun?

[42] Özelli, The Evolution of the Formal Educational System and Its Relation to Economic Growth Policies in the First Turkish Republic, 77–92

[43] Mango, Atatürk, 536

[44] İnan, Atatürk Hakkında Hatıralar ve Belgeler, 260)

[TED-45] "About Us". Retrieved 2008-02-01.

[46] Saikal, Democratization in the Middle East: Experiences, Struggles, Challenges, 95

[Geoffrey-47] Geoffrey L. Lewis (1999), The Turkish Language Reform: A Catastrophic Success, Oxford University Press ISBN 0198238568 page 66

[48] "Turks Teach New Theories", The New York Times, Istanbul, 1936-02-09{{citation}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)

[49] Laut (2002)

[50] Ömür, Modernity and Islam: Experiences of Turkish Women

[51] Atatürk, Vatandaş İçin Medeni Bilgiler

[52] İnan, Medeni bilgiler ve M. Kemal Atatürk'ün el yazıları

[53] Paydak, Selda (January 2000). "Interview with Semiha Berksoy". Representation of the European Commission to Turkey. Archived from the original on 2003-04-18. Retrieved 2007-02-11.

[cleveland178-54] Cleveland, A History of the Modern Middle East, 181

[55] Prof. Dr. Hamza Eroğlu. "Peace at home and peace in the world" (in Turkish). Retrieved 2008-01-01. "Yurtta Sulh" herşeyden önce ülkede, o insanın, insanca yaşamasını, insanlık tıynetinin gereğinin tanınmasını ifade eder".

[56] Enver Ziya Karal. Atatürk’ten Düşünceler (in Turkish). p. 123. "Haricî siyaset bir heyet-i içtimaiyenin teşekkülü dahilisi ile sıkı surette alâkadardır. Çünkü teşekkül-ü dahiliyeye istinat etmeyen haricî siyasetler daima mahkûm kalırlar. Bir heyet-i içtimaiyenin teşekkül-ü dahilisi ne kadar kuvvetli olursa, siyaset-i hariciyesi de o nisbette kavi ve rasin olur."

[britainsoil-57] Peter Sluglett, "The Primacy of Oil in Britain’s Iraq Policy", in the book "Britain in Iraq: 1914-1932" London: Ithaca Press, 1976, pp. 103-116

[58] Can Dundar. "Atatürk yaşasaydı" (in Turkish). Retrieved 2008-01-01. ... Ata'nın öncelikli dış politika sorununun Musul olduğunu söylüyor. Musul'u bırakmama konusunda aktif bir politika izlenmesinden yana olduğunu belirtiyor...

[59] Harold Courtenay Armstrong Gray Wolf, Mustafa Kemal: An Intimate Study of a Dictator. page 225

[60] Olson, Robert W. (1989) The Emergence of Kurdish Nationalism and the Sheikh Said Rebellion, 1880-1925, p.45

[61] Kinross, 401

[62] ASD: Speeches and statements by Ataturk, volume I pages 361-363 published by Atatuk Culture, language and history Higher Institude, Ankara 1989

[mangokurds20-63] Andrew Mango, Atatürk and the Kurds, Middle Eastern Studies, Vol.35, No.4, 1999, 20

[Yılmaz-64] Yılmaz Altuğ, Foreign Policy Of Atatürk, Ataturk arastirma merkezi dergisi, Vol VI, No 16, November 1989

[65] Yılmaz Altuğ, Türk Devrim Tarihi Dersim, 1919-1938, 1980 s. p. 136.

[BalkanFed-66] "Oh, What Happiness!". Time Magazine. November 6, 1933. pp. 37–39. Retrieved 2007-08-07.

[67] QUOTES ON ATATÜRK

[68] Karamanlis, 1995, p. 95-97

[69] Sosyal, Ismail, 1983, "Turkey's Diplomatic treaties", TTK, Ankara page 29

[70] Clogg, Richard (2002). A Concise History of Greece. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521004799. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help) p. 107

[71] Jentleson, Bruce W. (1997). The American Journal of International Law. Oxford University Press. p. 24. ISBN 0195110552. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

[72] Narli, Nilüfer (1993): “Turco-Iranian Relations from the Islamic Revolution to Gulf War and Beyond: Co-operation or Competition in the Muslim World”. CEMOTI. (15): 265-295

[iran-73] Gokhan Cetinsaya Essential friends and natural enemies: the historical roots of Turkish-Iranian relations. Middle East Review of International Affairs Volume 7, No. 3 - September 2003

[74] Rajaee, Farhang, Islamic Values and World View: Farhang Khomeyni on Man, the State and International Politics, Volume XIII (PDF), University Press of America. ISBN 0-8191-3578-X

[75] Mango, Ataturk, page 510

[76] Sosyal, Ismail, 1983, "Turkey's Diplomatic treaties", TTK, Ankara page 493

[77] Yilmaz Altuð, "Atatürk'ün Dis Politikasý," B.Ü. Uluslararasi Atatürk Konferansý Tebligleri, 10-11 November 1980, Vol. II, Istanbul 1981, p. 486.

[78] Þevket Süreyya Aydemir, Tek Adam, Vol. 3, Ýstanbul 1988, p. 331.

[79] Atatürk'ün Milli Dýþ Politikasý, Vol. 2, p. 355

[80] Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies, 347–357

[mango470-81] Mango, Atatürk, 470

[82] Shaw, History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey, 232–233.

[83] Aysu, Abdullah (2003-01-29). "Tütün, İçki ve Tekel" (in Turkish). BİA Haber Merkezi. Retrieved 2007-10-10.

[84] Webster, The Turkey of Atatürk: Social Process in the Turkish Reformation, 260

[85] Doğan, Formation of factory settlements within Turkish industrialization and modernization in 1930s: Nazilli printing factory

[86] Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Culture and Tourism. "Aydın—Historical Ruins". T.C. Government. Retrieved 2007. Nazilli cotton print factory was established over an area of 65.000 m2 on the Nazilli Bozdoğan highway. It is the "first Turkish cotton print factory" the foundation of which was laid on 25 August 1935 and which was opened by Atatürk with great ceremony. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)

[87] Mango, Atatürk, 478

[etatism-88] Barlas, Etatism and Diplomacy in Turkey: Economic and Foreign Policy Strategies in an Uncertain World, 1929–1939

[89] Dilek Barlas, Etatism and Diplomacy in Turkey: Economic and Foreign Policy Strategies p. 61

[90] Emrence, Turkey in economic crisis (1927–1930): a panaromic vision. Journal Middle Eastern Studies

[91] Stone, Norman “Talking Turkey”. National Interest, Fall2000, Issue 61.

[92] "Skylife". Retrieved 2007-11-26.

[93] "History of Turkish Aeronautical Association". Retrieved 2007-11-26.

[5year-94] Eastham, The Turkish Development Plan: The First Five Years, 132–136

[nndb-95] "Kemal Atatürk". NNDB. Retrieved 2007-08-07.

[mango526-96] Mango, Atatürk 526

[burial-97] "The Burial of Atatürk". Time Magazine. 23 November 1953. pp. 37–39. Retrieved 2007-08-07.

[nobel-98] Nobel Foundation. The Nomination Database for the Nobel Prize in Peace, 1901–1955.[1]

[macarthur-99] Handnote by General Douglas MacArthur on display at Anıtkabir

[100] Navaro-Yashin, Yael (2002). Faces of the State: Secularism and Public Life in Turkey. Princeton University Press. pp. 196–99. ISBN 0691088454. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)

[101] Morrison, Terry (1994). Kiss, Bow, Or Shake Hands: How to Do Business in Sixty Countries. Adams Media. p. 392. ISBN 1558504443. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

[102] Yonah, Alexander (2007). Turkey: Terrorism, Civil Rights, and the European Union. Routledge. p. 137. ISBN 0415441633. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

[33]

[34]

[35]

[36]

[37]

[38]

[39]

[40]

[41]

[42]

[43]

[44]

[45]

[46]

[47]

[48]

[49]

[50]

[51]

[52]

[53]

[54]

[55]

[56]

[57]

[58]

[59]

[60]

[61]

[62]

[63]

[64]

[65]

[66]

[67]

[68]

[69]

[70]

[71]

[72]

[73]

[74]

[75]

[76]

[77]

[78]

[79]

[80]

[81]

[82]

[83]

[84]

[85]

[86]

[87]

[88]

[89]

[90]

[91]

[92]

[93]

[94]

[95]

[96]

[97]

[98]

[99]

[100]

@@ Line 280: / Line 280: @@
 {{Main|Gazi Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's personal life}}
-Mustafa Kemal married [[Latife Uşaklıgil]]. They divorced after 3 years of marriage. Atatürk adopted seven daughters and a son. In his leisure time, he enjoyed reading, horseback riding, chess and swimming. He was also an avid dancer and enjoyed both the waltz and traditional Zeybek folk dances. Atatürk published many books and kept a personal journal. The "[[Nutuk]]," a thirty-six hour speech written and given by Mustafa Kemal to the Grand National Assembly over the course of six days that describes events leading to the formation of the Republic of Turkey, was first published in 1927 and then has been re-published several times. Atatürk was exceedingly fond of animals and maintained an entire menagerie where each of his pets was named Abdul.
+Mustafa Kemal married [[Latife Uşaklıgil]]. They divorced after 3 years of marriage. Atatürk adopted seven daughters and a son. In his leisure time, he enjoyed reading, horseback riding, chess and swimming. He was also an avid dancer and enjoyed both the waltz and traditional Zeybek folk dances. Atatürk published many books and kept a personal journal. The "[[Nutuk]]," a thirty-six hour speech written and given by Mustafa Kemal to the Grand National Assembly over the course of six days that describes events leading to the formation of the Republic of Turkey, was first published in 1927 and then has been re-published several times.
 During 1937, indications of Atatürk's worsening health started to appear. In the early 1938, while he was on a trip to [[Yalova]], he suffered from a serious illness. He was recommended to go to İstanbul for treatment, where he was diagnosed with [[cirrhosis]] of the liver.<ref name=nndb>{{cite web |url=http://www.nndb.com/people/449/000092173/ |title=Kemal Atatürk |publisher=[[NNDB]] |accessdate=2007-08-07}}</ref> During his stay in İstanbul, he made an effort to keep up with his regular lifestyle for a while. He died on 10 November 1938, at the age of 57. Atatürk's funeral called forth both sorrow and pride in Turkey, and seventeen countries sent special representatives, while nine contributed with armed detachments to the [[cortège]].<ref name=mango526>Mango, ''Atatürk'' 526</ref> On November 1953, Mustafa Kemal's remains were taken from the [[Ethnography Museum of Ankara]].<ref name=burial>{{cite news | title=The Burial of Atatürk| url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,860125,00.html | work=Time Magazine | pages= 37–39 | date= 23 November 1953 | accessdate=2007-08-07}}</ref> Atatürk finally came to rest at his mausoleum, the [[Anitkabir|Anıtkabir]]. In his [[will (law)|will]], he donated all of his possessions to the Republican People's Party, bound to the condition that, through the yearly interest of his funds, his sister Makbule and his adopted children will be looked after, the higher education of the children of İsmet İnönü will be funded, and the [[Turkish Language Association]] and [[Turkish Historical Society]] will be given the rest.

v t e Presidents of Turkey
List List by education
Presidents	Mustafa Kemal Atatürk İsmet İnönü Celâl Bayar Cemal Gürsel Cevdet Sunay Fahri Korutürk Kenan Evren Turgut Özal Süleyman Demirel Ahmet Necdet Sezer Abdullah Gül Recep Tayyip Erdoğan
Acting presidents	Abdülhalik Renda İbrahim Şevki Atasagun Tekin Arıburun İhsan Sabri Çağlayangil Hüsamettin Cindoruk

v t e Prime ministers of Turkey
Government of the Grand National Assembly (1920–1923)	Mustafa Kemal Atatürk Fevzi Çakmak Rauf Orbay Fethi Okyar
Republic of Turkey (1923–2018)	İsmet İnönü Fethi Okyar İsmet İnönü Celâl Bayar Refik Saydam Ahmet Fikri Tüzer Şükrü Saracoğlu Recep Peker Hasan Saka Şemsettin Günaltay Adnan Menderes Cemal Gürsel Fahri Özdilek İsmet İnönü Suat Hayri Ürgüplü Süleyman Demirel Nihat Erim Ferit Melen Naim Talu Bülent Ecevit Sadi Irmak Süleyman Demirel Bülent Ecevit Süleyman Demirel Bülent Ecevit Süleyman Demirel Bülent Ulusu Turgut Özal Ali Bozer Yıldırım Akbulut Mesut Yılmaz Süleyman Demirel Erdal İnönü Tansu Çiller Mesut Yılmaz Necmettin Erbakan Mesut Yılmaz Bülent Ecevit Abdullah Gül Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Ahmet Davutoğlu Binali Yıldırım
Italics denote acting prime ministers.