Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.

Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit

this header: view • edit

Current requests for protection

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Farah Pahlavi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. Parishan (talk) 21:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Lots of IP vandalism, I suggest a long SP. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 20:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 20:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Wrestlicious (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. King Bedford I ^{Seek his grace} 18:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

More specifically one user keeps redirecting the website, despite being told to stop. The IP concerned has switched after going through 3RR, a lock on the page for a few days seems like the easiest way to stop them rather than chasing IP blocks. Darrenhusted (talk) 19:56, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 20:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Wesley College, Dublin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full Protection. This page is being vandalised continuously until the point that it no longer makes any sense - I have had to revert it back to an edit from mid March 2009 in order to clear all the vandalism. Without a doubt it will return within a couple of days - the issue has been raised already on the discussion page of the article. 17:42, 18 June 2009 (BST).

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Tan | 39 16:49, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Republican Party (United States) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection frequent vandalism, Constant vandalism from people that incite hateful counter-productive edits to the infobox as well as subtle changes of factually incorrect content in the body of the article as well. Be sure to look at the article's history on several pages and notice all the instinces where revisions were undone because of vandalism. Its a constant battle with these people. Burningview (talk) 16:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Enigma^msg 18:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Current requests for unprotection

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Christopher Gilbert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Christopher Gilbert has been locked deleted. on a user page i have a proposed page for this poet: [1] appears notable to me. Pohick2 (talk) 01:39, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

i have also made an edit request to the talk page: Talk:Christopher Gilbert Pohick2 (talk) 02:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

thanks, hopefully the good content will deter the bad. Pohick2 (talk) 14:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: Reviewed and done by MSGJ (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). SoWhy 20:56, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Fulfilled/denied requests

Template:Infobox MLB player (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Return to full protection. This page was fully protected until this morning. There is a debate about adding a parameter, and one of the users made this request to have it unprotected. The admin agreed, but this was not wise. The page should remain protected until there is a concensus to change something. Timneu22 (talk) 16:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Fully protected - It is used on many, many pages. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Buri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full protection. Users associated with someone who has previously had his article deleted continue to add redlinks to him on this dab page. Also interferes with other cleanup. Dekimasuよ! 16:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined, involved user(s) can be handled directly. SoWhy 20:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Final Destination 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, Excessive amounts of vandalism and fan spamming (inclusions of excessively long and detailed plots, original research, extremely detailed character descriptions, etc.). This has been a long-time issue with this article, as well as Final Destination and Final Destination 3. The page history for all three articles is almost 100% vandalism/spamming and reverts of these unhelpful edits. I'm requesting semi-protection for this article, as well as the other two I mentioned above. Thanks for any help. 13² 15:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 20:46, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

American Idol (season 8) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection Edit warring by (mostly) IP's regarding tables in the article. The Seeker 4 Talk 13:15, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined, seems to have stopped for now. SoWhy 20:44, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Irwin Schiff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Schiff, through phone conversations from his prison, has "said he wanted us to go and redo Wikipedia. The IRS and the goons from squatloos has gone in there and left false information about Irwin. Someone wrote to him about it and he wants it corrected." [[2]] This should warrant a page protection for WP:SOCK and specifically WP:MEATPUPPET.93.174.88.67 (talk) 13:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Enigma^msg 18:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Awesome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, This page get constantly vandalised. IP users add their personal comments, thinking they are awesome... Protection would help a lot. Thanks!. LouriePieterse (talk) 11:02, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:08, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Antarctic Treaty System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, This page get constantly vandalised. Protection would help a lot. Thanks!. LouriePieterse (talk) 11:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:06, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:NawlinWiki (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Page is getting barraged by vandals. Vivio Testarossa^Talk 08:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined Semi is useless against autoconfirmed. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Cardmaker)} 08:13, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

The accounts vandalizing are not autoconfirmed. I don't see why my protection was removed. The user is going to keep going. While NW is away, the protection should be kept. I see he's returned now. Enigma^msg 16:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

At least one of the accounts was autoconfirmed, Enigmaman; he went to my talk page (which is semi'd) and bragged about it, and another one vandalized it later that night. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Cardmaker)} 18:33, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

They were all autoconfirmed sleeper socks that were created in March and April (and maybe earlier, I got bored checking the logs). Tan | 39 18:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Jet (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full-protect. Article was fully protected about a wekk ago. After the protection was lifted, genre edit warring has immediately resumed, and hasn't relented yet. Request long term/indef full protection of teh article. Frvernchanezzz (talk) 07:45, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This ceased to be a content dispute and is now simply vandalism with IPs removing references despite multiple reverts. SoWhy 20:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Croats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection Appears to be an edit war, with one editor switching to different IPs after receiving final warning. Needs overview from someone with knowledge on the subject. JNW (talk) 06:13, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm going to join the discussion to try to calm things down. I request 48 hours or so. ZooFari 07:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Hasn't calmed. You know how folks get about cultural identity. Re-requesting. JNW (talk) 15:35, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

• Can someone please semi-protect the page and ban the obnoxious IP for a few days? --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 16:04, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Clear evidence of an ongoing edit war. I have not blocked anyone, as it's time for me to go to bed, but feel free to bring that topic up elsewhere. Dekimasuよ! 16:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Blood+ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection vandalism, Editor being discussed at AN/I continues attempting to introduce factual errors and attack the article to attack the editors. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Sally Ford (same editor who caused need to protect Naruto Uzumaki). -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 04:39, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. –xeno^talk 05:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Problem gambling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection. Anon editor has been pasting the entire text of the gambling into the problem gambling page. 2005 (talk) 03:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just one editor? Just did it twice? Treat it as a user issue. DMacks (talk) 03:53, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Sarah Geronimo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, Anon editors keep on inserting unsourced/POV/vandalised statements. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 20:35, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Chad Ochocinco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection 4 different IPs have vandalized/edited against talk page consensus today. Last semi-protection expired two days ago. –Megaboz (talk) 02:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 02:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Janet Hubert-Whitten (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection vandalism, Article is repeatedly being vandalized. Elockid (talk) 00:28, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined. Report was good at the time, but it appears that the vandalism has stopped, at least for now. If it starts up again, please re-report. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 02:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Naruto Uzumaki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection dispute, Edit warring and vandalism over the last 24-hours. Farix (Talk) 00:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:39, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Karl Marx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, It seems like this page is vandalized frequently, mainly by IP users. . Marx01 (talk) 00:13, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Multiregional origin of modern humans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection Temporary semi protection dispute, Edit warring from an IP. Martin451 (talk) 22:56, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Fully protected 3 days by User:Rodhullandemu. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 02:23, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Cavendish School (Hemel Hempstead) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection vandalism, Multiple vandalisms in a short period of time. Jared555 (talk) 22:45, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected 4 days by User:Zzuuzz. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 02:21, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Tinchy Stryder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Vandalism by many Anon IPs recently, Hopefully a short spell of semi protection will make them lose interest in the article and give me a chance to wade my way back trying to sort fact from fiction.  ⊃°HotCROCODILE...... (talk) 21:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 02:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Daisy of Love (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, This article has had a recent spate of vandalism (mostly unsourced future information, but general vandalism as well). It would be great to try semi-protection for a bit to see if that helps. Thanks!. Plastikspork (talk) 20:15, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigma^msg 20:41, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Robert W. Baird & Co. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect, Corporate site. Do not want non-employees making edits and changes to the information presented 12.155.246.10 (talk) 20:01, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined Enigma^msg 20:38, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Trillionaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite create-protection KMFDM FAN ^(talk!) 19:56, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. hasn't been recreated since the AFD closure. –xeno^talk 20:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Romeo and Juliet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection vandalism. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 19:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Attention yellow.png (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite create-protection, Used in high-visibility system message. ViperSnake151  Talk  19:44, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Shouldn't the system message link to the SVG version instead? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:51, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Amish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, a lot of vandalism today. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 19:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:51, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Roblox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, New article. Some editors are not fully aware of wiki policies and are causing some disruption. . gordonrox24 (talk) 19:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined We've also got some helpful IP edits thrown in there. I'm guessing that the disruptive IP and the disruptive new accounts are one and the same. I'd suggest a personal note from you explaining the problems with the edits, then escalate to AIV if needed.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:48, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Red Hot Chili Peppers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, recent IP vandalism: About 4 vandals in the last 24 hrs. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 19:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined We've also got constructive IP edits recently. Best to report the vandals to AIV.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Squirrel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi protection vandalism, Has been protected numerous times before. The last 25 edits were all ip vandalism or the reversion thereof. Request a loooong semi. Why do vandals like to pick on the squirrel so much? We may never know. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:19, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jamie^☆S93 17:26, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Extended to 1 year by Enigmaman. In retrospect, 1 month was indeed a weak choice for protection time. Jamie^☆S93 22:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Friday the 13th (2009 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection - An IP keeps revertinb back both POV wording to the plot, and a source that I have repeatedly told them is not reliable to use. I have explained that the source they are using is from a reliable website, just not a reliable page. The page itself changes week to week, and thus when it changes again the info they are citing will no longer by verifiable. They refuse to acknowledge this, and keep blindly reverting it back.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 17:02, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Icestorm815 • Talk 17:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Philip Michael Jonathan Guiver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite create-protection, Repeatedly re-created. Speedied twice and AFD'd the last time. Also Philip guiver, a redirect to this. . Beeblebrox (talk) 16:56, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Creation protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've added it to my watch list, so I can take further measures if needed.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:02, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Carrie Prejean (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full-protection - For quite some time now several regular users have debated against others regarding some of the information being put in. It has gotten to the point where policies such as WP:HARM, WP:Undue weight, WP:Coatrack, WP:Attack page, WP:BLP and neutrality are being violated. John Asfukzenski (talk) 16:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Have fun working it out on the talk page.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:55, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Paul Krugman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary Semi protection - Problem with violations of WP:BLP. Due to the appearance of this issue on a few social news websites and blogs (eg. [3], [4]), the Krugman page as been suffering from a spate of anon IP editors who keep on reintroducing the criticism that Krugman advocated the creation of a housing bubble in 2002. This criticism is improperly sourced to a quote from a 2002 opinion piece, taken out of context. LK (talk) 15:41, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined Looks like there's some autoconfirmed accounts in this edit war, too. Let us know if you want full protection instead.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:58, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

IBM POWER (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection - Persistent vandalism as a previous three-day semi protect has expired. Rilak (talk) 14:24, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined. Since the last semi-protection expired, only one IP has been vandalizing (repeatedly), and received their first warning just now. If disruption continues from multiple editors, relist here. Jamie^☆S93 17:10, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

New York Goes to Work (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, This article has been experiencing an increase in general vandalism as well as "unsourced future information"/spoiler/speculation vandalism. It would be great to try semi-protection for a bit to see if that helps. Thanks! . Plastikspork (talk) 13:26, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

User:HellinaBucket (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection vandalism, multiple vandal attempts overnight. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected. SoWhy 13:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Australia's Next Top Model, Cycle 5 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Adding spoilers in future episodes, it could be unverifiable and unsourced. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 11:05, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined, Not vandalism, and not so disruptive as to protect at this time. Annoying I admit, and I admire you guys who have the patience to edit in these areas, but this isn't egregious enough for me to protect at this time. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 11:16, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Igor Stravinsky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection due to being linked on Google. Multiple ip-address vandalism edits. Neu_tralle 09:47, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. by Werdna (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 11:12, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

ER (season 15) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite protection for edit-warring. high-visiblity template Editor Q103josh persists in edit warring over a series of ER-related pages. He is currently engaged in edit wars on ER: Season 15] along with ER: Season 9 and two character pages, which has previously resulted in two two-week (for John Carter (ER) and Season 9) and one indefinite protection (for Luka Kovac). He refuses do attend to edit summary requests for consensus, removes appropriately sourced materials and generally behaves as though he is the final word on ER. Page protection stops the wars temporarily, but as soon as they're off, he resumes edit warring. These are the only articles he edits. This has come to the attention of several editors, and we are discussing further action. A recent request on his part to remove the protection from Luka Kovac was declined because the edit warring had not stopped. Page should be protected with edits listing Goran Visnjic as main cast in place. Drmargi (talk) 08:57, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined, the user can be dealt with directly instead (use WP:ANEW). SoWhy 09:44, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Nadya Suleman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, Article has been previously protected four times. After each protection expires, vandals come back. Last protection expired a few days ago, 100% of edits since that time have been vandalism or other problematic edits from new or ip users, or the reversion of those edits. I thought this would have calmed down by now, but apparently it hasn't. Beeblebrox (talk) 07:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 09:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Template:Infobox MLB player (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

semi-protection high-visiblity template, This should be changed from indef fully protected to at the most, indef semi-protected. No reason it should be full indefed as it is now. - ALLST✰R▼^echo _{wuz here @} 07:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: Please ask the protecting admin first. SoWhy 09:37, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Relapse (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection, again, a lot of IP's making unsourced/unconstructive edits. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 06:14, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 06:28, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Shohreh Aghdashloo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, multiple vandalism attempts by different editors. CardinalDan (talk) 05:28, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 06:25, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Abdul-Qadir Gilani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Permanent full protection Perennial edit war here and constant removal of sourced books on Persian background by ip vandals. --Nepaheshgar (talk) 05:27, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 06:24, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Dan Debicella (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Permanent full protection Perennial edit war here. I tried moderating this months ago, and gave up. A month-long page protection followed, but it did nothing to stop this. It's the same political spin business, and it's embarrassing. Makes you wish we didn't have pages on state reps. JNW (talk) 03:52, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both users blocked 24 hours by DMacks (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) for 20RR or something close. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 04:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC)