Talk (2010–2019)

Proposed deletion of Lee Soo-Chul

The article Lee Soo-Chul has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 12:44, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Owner

FC Seoul doesn't have Owner. The owner of something is the 'PERSON' to whom belongs. K-Leauge clubs like FC Seoul are not be owned by person. So, they don't have owner, just have Parent-company. z4617925 (talk) 15:12, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of K-League ‘Fan'tastic Player Award

A tag has been placed on K-League ‘Fan'tastic Player Award requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Phearson (talk) 15:39, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at K-League ‘Fan'tastic Player Award

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from K-League ‘Fan'tastic Player Award, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 15:44, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with K-League ‘Fan'tastic Player Award. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 15:46, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with K-League ‘Fan'tastic Player Award. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 15:48, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with K-League 'FAN'tastic Player. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 05:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

non-free image use

Hi. It may have escaped your attention, but the image you have inserted here is tagged as non-free. That means, that a detailed fair-use rationale should be on the image description page, telling why the image is necessary on each page where it is displayed. At the moment, there is a fair-use rationale for the use on Anyang LG Cheetahs, but not for FC Seoul, and that was why I removed the image (and no, that is not vandalism, it is bringing a page in line with the relevant policies that are linked in my edit summary - please take care with calling things vandalism). May I ask you to write a fair-use rationale for that image? Thank you. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 09:56, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(copied from my talkpage):

No, I mean that you have to add a second rationale to the image description page for the other page where it is displayed. In principle you can copy the rationale that is there, paste it a second time on the same page, and then adapt both the name of the page in the new rationale (so it points to the correct page), and the reason why it should be displayed on the second one. In the end, it needs a rationale for every display of the image (and that can be one rationale if it is displayed on one page, or even a hundred separate rationales if it is displayed on 100 independent pages). I hope this explains. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 11:53, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Footwiks, I know you don't understand how to solve it, but that is not a reason to re-insert the image without actually solving the problem. The image needs a rationale, and I am sorry, but I don't know the rationale here. You need to

Go to the image description page: File:Anyang LG Cheetahs logo.svg
You need to edit that page, and state on that page on which page you are going to use it (FC Seoul) and why you think that that image is needed, before re-inserting. Please, do not insert that image without a rationale.

Alternatively, please ask on the talkpage of FC Seoul about the image, and give an explanation, and wait for another user to insert the image. I hope this explains. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 09:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. Please note that we take very seriously our criteria on non-free image uploads and users who repeatedly upload or misuse non-free images may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. ΔT _{^{The only constant}} 00:52, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SSID (mascot)

The article SSID (mascot) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mascot isn't notable as there isn't sufficient coverage in independent and reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mrmatiko (talk) 16:12, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FC Seoul Away Jersey

Hi, can you find some pictures of the FC Seoul 2005 away jersey? Greetings Luxusfrosch (talk) 17:04, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Luxusfrosch (talk) 08:50, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please explain your changes. If you're changing club names because they have changed on Wikipedia, it would be useful to know that rather than cause misunderstanding and bad edits. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:55, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care how accurate your changes are, your activities look suspicious when you don't comment. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:03, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FC Seoul old jersey revise

Hi, I found two different versions of the 2002-2003 jersey. One with dark adidas stripes: http://postfiles16.naver.net/20110725_239/lzmania_13116048282542xe6a_JPEG/K-20110725-850105.jpg?type=w2
and one with white adidas stripes: http://stg.olpost.com/post/image/573x0/1982/1982217.jpg. When were they used? Luxusfrosch (talk) 12:21, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

King's Cup and Korea Cup

제가 관련 문서를 만든 것은 클럽대항전을 기준으로 만든 것입니다. 80~90년대의 킹스컵은 대한민국 클럽들이 참가하긴 했지만, 국가대표팀을 비롯하여 청소년팀, 올림픽대표팀이 참가하여 완전한 클럽대항전으로 보기엔 무리가 있어서 포함시키지 않았습니다. 그리고 코리아컵 역시 그러한 의미에서 포함시키지 않았습니다. 홍콩 구정컵의 경우 최근 들어 클럽대항전으로 치뤄지고 있어서 포함시키게 되었습니다. 구정컵 역시 이전의 대표팀과 경기했던 클럽팀을 제외시켰다는 점 양해바랍니다. Saint9016 (talk) 08:13, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

유럽의 경우 기권패와 기권승의 경우 3대0으로 표기합니다. 그럴 경우 전적에 포함시킵니다. 아시아의 경우 예전 기록들은 기록관리가 제대로 이루어지지 않은 측면도 있고, 경기가 치뤄지기 이전에 기권하는 경우가 많았기 때문에 기록에는 포함시키지 않았습니다. 최근의 알사드와 세파한의 몰수승 같은 경우는 전적에 포함되는 것이지요. 전적에 포함시키는 경우는 성남일화가 마카오팀과 1995-96시즌에 기권승이 있는데 3대0으로 기록되어 있는 건 포함시켰습니다. Saint9016 (talk) 16:52, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mutamba Kabongo

The article Mutamba Kabongo has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 20:41, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of FC Seoul transfers 2000-2004 seasons

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of List of FC Seoul transfers 2000-2004 seasons, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: List of FC Seoul transfers 2005-2009 seasons. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:46, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of FC Seoul transfers 1990-1994 seasons

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of List of FC Seoul transfers 1990-1994 seasons, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: List of FC Seoul transfers 2005-2009 seasons. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:51, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of FC Seoul transfers 1984-1989 seasons

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of List of FC Seoul transfers 1984-1989 seasons, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: List of FC Seoul transfers 2005-2009 seasons. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:52, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of FC Seoul transfers 2005-2009 seasons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Baek Jong-Chul

The article Baek Jong-Chul has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SwisterTwister talk 03:37, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Choi Ki-Bong

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Choi Ki-Bong, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Ham Hyun-Gi. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Yong-Gab

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Kim Yong-Gab, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Ham Hyun-Gi. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Won-June

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Lee Won-June, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Ham Hyun-Gi. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation templates

Hi there - you do not need to add both succession boxes AND navigation templates (as you have done at Park Chang-Sun) - the latter will suffice. Regards, Giant Snowman 11:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

선수정보 검색관련

K리그 홈페이지에서 기록실>>각종기록>>팀별개인기록 으로 들어가서 "대회년도", "대회명", "구단명"을 선택하면 선수들의 플레이 정보가 나옵니다. 선수들 이름을 클릭하면 선수개인기록을 볼 수 있습니다. 참고하실 점은 선수개인기록의 경기수, 득점, 도움이 K리그와 리그컵을 합친 숫자입니다. 따라서 리그와 리그컵을 별도로 표시하는 위키 영문판에서는 대회년도와 대회명을 하나하나 확인하셔야 할 것입니다. 그럼 좋은 하루 되세요. Saint9016 (talk) 02:13, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jung Byung-Tak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Korean national football team

Moon Jung-Sik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Korean national football team

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GS Sports

A tag has been placed on GS Sports requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Lakokat (Drop me a line) 13:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New football player articles

You added alot of new football player articles over the past day. There is a problem with them in that you copied and pasted the same infobox for all of them. You have them being born on one of two dates, attending same universities, etc. Could you please correct the infobox and persondata fields. Bgwhite (talk) 06:27, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Sung-Jae (born 1976) is a good example. You have him winning rookie player of the year in 1997 and 1999, but started playing in 1991. You had a message at the top saying his Korean family name was Yang. Bgwhite (talk) 07:40, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Footwiks. You have new messages at Bgwhite's talk page.
Message added 06:41, 29 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Bgwhite (talk) 06:41, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with List of Eintracht Frankfurt international footballers. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 01:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with List of Eintracht Frankfurt international footballers. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 08:18, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:foreign players article

If you're suggesting I have some kind of ulterior motive for this then you're wrong. Both of the clubs I nominated already have lists for all players, why the need for a seperate article? In Seoul's case I simply renamed it so it could include Koreans and foreigners alike. If I'd known your club didn't have this article before I wouldn't have tagged it for deletion, so apologies for that. J Mo 101 (talk) 11:03, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Gwangyang Football Stadium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gyo-dong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Busan I'Park

By all means nominate template:Busan I Park for deletion but before you do so you must fix the articles that use it. Similarly for 2012 Busan I Park season. I will let others decide whether it should be "IPark", "I Park" or "I'Park" but given that {{Busan IPark}} was consistent in using "I'Park" for the season articles, then the 2012 article should, at least for the time being, do the same. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ssangyong Cement FC

A tag has been placed on Ssangyong Cement FC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Yasht 101 09:09, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Ssangyong Cement FC

Hi Footwiks, you recently removed a deletion tag from Ssangyong Cement FC. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 14:04, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 FC Seoul season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kim Jin-Kyu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

저기

저번에 욕했으면 사과정도는 해야 하지 않겠습니까?

그냥 싹 지우지 말고? 씨발이라고 욕해놓고 입싹 닦으면 그걸로 끝입니까?

알아보지도 않고 경솔하게 쪽지 날리고 사과한마디 없는 footwiks님이 과연

이런 오픈 백과사전에서 활동할 자격이 있는걸까 생각해 보게 되는군요.

claims require sources

re your edit and summary [1] you will need to actually provide those sources that claim "powerhouse". but the "legend" terminology will never be acceptable WP:PEACOCK. -- The Red Pen of Doom 04:18, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

and links to commercial sites are not acceptable WP:ELNO -- The Red Pen of Doom 04:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the claims etc in [2] appear to be coming from folks affiliated directly with the team and are therefore not acceptable. "This is commonsense in Korea" is not acceptable for article content. When challenged, which you have been, you need to provide a reliable source. -- The Red Pen of Doom 16:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re: Football League 100 Legends - as it stands it is probably NOT a valid article, but it is still a valid use of the word "legend" because it is about a specific article/award called "Football League 100 Legends" whereas your insistence on using the term in the FC Seoul is completely unsourced and completely irrel to the actual subject of the article, the team, AND just used to impart important status because you are tagging his name with a puffed up utterly meaningless show title.

and note that you are edit warring against multiple policies. -- The Red Pen of Doom 02:41, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

you should also read WP:VANDAL and not describe as vandalism acts which are not vandalism, but supported by policies and guidelines. you should also read WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA and stop making comments such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATheRedPenOfDoom&diff=487768439&oldid=487675237 "Do you lose your job or Do you broke up your girl friend?" -- The Red Pen of Doom 12:07, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

talk page etiquette

as a note, each comment on a talk page does not need to be in a new section. related comments should be in the same section, and indented using a ":".

also, you should sign your talkpage comments. -- The Red Pen of Doom 12:33, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Footwiks. You have new messages at Talk:FC Seoul.
Message added 13:35, 17 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 13:35, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

RE: Seoul FC

Stating that Seoul is the capital most populous city in South Korea is irrelevant to the article.Curb Chain (talk) 01:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Right, FC Seoul. Sure MAYBE foreigners don't know details about Seoul, so they can go to the article to to know more about Seoul, but putting this information is just poor writing as it is irrelevant.Curb Chain (talk) 05:23, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[3]

I'm going to try to work with you on this article. In the above diff, feel free to reinsert the sentence if you have a source.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FC_Seoul&diff=prev&oldid=487951593

In the above diff, what articles claim that they are they are one the most football clubs?Curb Chain (talk) 05:29, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

edit war notice

I suggest that you revert yourself [4] your edit warring against consensus and policy will lead you to being blocked. -- The Red Pen of Doom 04:45, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Treat other editors civilly

If you want to be able to continue editing, you will STOP calling other editor's idiots [5] calling them ("abnormally obsessed " or otherwise attempting to belittle them "Do you lose your job or Do you broke up your girl friend? "

if your intention was to get me to leave the article alone, you have failed.

see WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL -- The Red Pen of Doom 05:41, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to the above:

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Curb Chain (talk) 05:48, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, you claim that powerhouse and legend are used by sources in http://100.naver.com/ but it looks like a homepage of a website so if this was true, where would it be on the page, as I highly doubt it is on THAT page, but in a page out of a list of search items searched from that page? Also, can you sign your posts as since you repeatedly do not, it seems like you are trying to evade scrutiny.Curb Chain (talk) 05:59, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at FC Seoul, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

your continued insertion of unsourced or poorly sourced claims[[6]] , against the consensus on the talk page, is unacceptable behavior. -- The Red Pen of Doom 10:55, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re your justification that the Manchester United article has a similar claim - the claim in that article is supported by 4 count'em FOUR reliable sources. -- The Red Pen of Doom 11:11, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1) sign your posts

2) it is not just "my opinion" - there have been 3, yes count 'em, THREE, experienced editors who have said that our policies say that you need proper sourcing for that claim.

3) just because other articles are in bad shape, why would that be a reason to let another article descend into suckiness?

4) sign your damn posts. -- The Red Pen of Doom 23:27, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All of the above. I second. Especially signing your posts. I have to go to the history to get to your user talk page. And the list of homework you gave to User:TheRedPenOfDoom: I checked Jeonbuk Hyundai Motors. There were none of the haughtiness/haughty phrases found in FC Seoul. I suspect you are being disruptive.Curb Chain (talk) 23:46, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And unless i am completely off, the source that you added to support the claim that FCSeoul is popular and financially successful is just a quote from the president of the club pimping his team. You need a source not related to the team to be making the claims. -- The Red Pen of Doom 01:18, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for not continuing to edit war on the article.Curb Chain (talk) 07:31, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i think your thanks were a bit premature. -- The Red Pen of Doom 12:43, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Your recent editing history at FC Seoul shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- The Red Pen of Doom 12:42, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion at the Administrators notice board

There is a discussion about events in which you have been involved taking place at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Footwiks. -- The Red Pen of Doom 13:11, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of football clubs with over 60,000-capacity stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of football clubs with over 60,000-capacity stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of football clubs with over 60,000-capacity stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cloudz 679 06:05, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ROK Marine Corps FC

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of ROK Marine Corps FC, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: ROK Army FC. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 11:12, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ROK Air Force FC

A tag has been placed on ROK Air Force FC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:30, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Seoul Trust Bank FC

A tag has been placed on Seoul Trust Bank FC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:30, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ROK Army FC

A tag has been placed on ROK Army FC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:30, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ROK Navy FC

A tag has been placed on ROK Navy FC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:30, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ROK Marine Corps FC

A tag has been placed on ROK Marine Corps FC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:30, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: About korean football club deletion

Last April, all of these articles were deleted as the result of a deletion discussion (found here). The articles you created are not substantively different from the ones that were deleted three months ago and do not address the concerns brought up in the discussion, meaning they qualify for speedy deletion per WP:CSD#G4. If you can address these concerns by providing significant coverage of these clubs in reliable sources, I will gladly drop my objections to their inclusion in the encyclopaedia. As for your argument concerning certain American clubs, I refer you to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Each article is to be adjudged on its own merits. Also please be aware, that the creator of an article is not permitted to remove speedy deletion tags from it. Finally, when posting on a talk page please type four tildes (~~~~) after your comment. Doing so displays your username, and the time and date you posted it, which makes it easier to keep track of who said what. I hope that clarifies things. Best Regards. Sir Sputnik (talk) 09:53, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sock pupper invesitagion

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pfrd. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 10:42, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ROK Army FC

A tag has been placed on ROK Army FC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:12, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Korea Automobile Insurance Company FC

The article Korea Automobile Insurance Company FC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTABILITY

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 13:24, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ROK Air Force FC

A tag has been placed on ROK Air Force FC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 09:58, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ROK Navy FC

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as ROK Navy FC, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sir Sputnik (talk) 09:59, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ROK Navy FC

A tag has been placed on ROK Navy FC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 09:59, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ROK Marine Corps FC

A tag has been placed on ROK Marine Corps FC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 10:00, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Korea Exchange Bank FC

A tag has been placed on Korea Exchange Bank FC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 10:00, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Seoul Trust Bank FC

A tag has been placed on Seoul Trust Bank FC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 10:00, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Commercial Bank of Korea FC

A tag has been placed on Commercial Bank of Korea FC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 10:00, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Korea Automobile Insurance Company FC

A tag has been placed on Korea Automobile Insurance Company FC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 10:01, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Korea First Bank FC

A tag has been placed on Korea First Bank FC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 10:02, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Word of warning

Repeatedly recreating articles previously deleted by AfD constitutes vandalism. Continuing to do so will result in your being blocked from Wikipedia. Sir Sputnik (talk) 10:04, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User repeatedly recreating articles that were deleted via AfD.. Thank you. Bgwhite (talk) 20:19, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning for sockpuppetry

What you have done, as documented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pfrd is sockpuppetry and is not allowed here. If you pull that again, you will be blocked. Regards, --MuZemike 23:32, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2012 FC Seoul season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Forward

Huh Ki-Tae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Defender

List of FC Seoul transfers 2010–2014 seasons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Forward

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Footwiks. You have new messages at Talk:Super Match.
Message added 08:48, 5 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Yunshui 雲‍水 08:48, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Footwiks. You have new messages at Yunshui's talk page.
Message added 06:48, 6 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Yunshui 雲‍水 06:48, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FC Seoul in Asian football, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yan Song (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2013 FC Seoul season

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of 2013 FC Seoul season, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: 2012 FC Seoul season. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 08:11, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Park Lee-Chun

The article Park Lee-Chun has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- MST☆R ^{(Merry Christmas!)} 13:36, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lucio Filomeno, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nueva Chicago (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of FC Seoul transfers 1984-1989 seasons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of FC Seoul transfers 1984-1989 seasons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of FC Seoul transfers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. C 679 19:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of FC Seoul transfers 1990-1994 seasons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of FC Seoul transfers 1990-1994 seasons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of FC Seoul transfers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. C 679 19:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of FC Seoul transfers 1995-1999 seasons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of FC Seoul transfers 1995-1999 seasons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of FC Seoul transfers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. C 679 19:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of FC Seoul transfers 2000-2004 seasons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of FC Seoul transfers 2000-2004 seasons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of FC Seoul transfers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. C 679 19:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of FC Seoul transfers 2005-2009 seasons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of FC Seoul transfers 2005-2009 seasons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of FC Seoul transfers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. C 679 19:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on biased users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence User talk:DUCKISJAMMMY. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 04:10, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't even notice the "canvassing" post until now, but I took the courtesy of replying to you. You can read the answer at my talk page. Mentoz86 (talk) 03:01, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

talkback

Hello, Footwiks. You have new messages at Cloudz679's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

talkback

Hello, Footwiks. You have new messages at Cloudz679's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

South Korean football

Please read the second paragraph of WP:CFD — established categories should not be emptied without a discussion. For that reason, my actions were simply restoring things to the way they were before you emptied the category out of process. If you take the category to CFD and obtain consensus, I'll definitely not obstruct the change of categories. Nyttend (talk) 12:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I said before, stop attempting to move categories out of process. Moreover, why are you moving lots of pages from their previous "K-League" titles without any explanation? As WP:MOVE says, the "Reason for move" portion is as essential as an edit summary. Nyttend (talk) 06:29, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Again, this is prohibited by policy. You're tagging categories under C1, which does not apply to categories whose contents have been removed out of process. Please file some CFDs if you want to see these categories moved; my lack of knowledge about the situation means that I have no opinion on whether these moves be needed or not. Nyttend (talk) 13:10, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am a volunteer also. There are other people here who understand both Korean and English and pay attention to football. When I attempt to edit other languages' Wikipedias, I do my best to follow their policies, and if I find that I've done something problematic, I stop. Nyttend (talk) 13:20, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm only asking you to participate in building consensus and helping others to know why you're doing what you're doing. When I first mentioned this issue yesterday, I wasn't yet impatient: I don't expect newcomers to understand the way we do things. The problem is that you continue despite my links and warnings. Nyttend (talk) 13:32, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't care less about Korean football. Go with a CFD or drop the issue. Nyttend (talk) 14:47, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I found it while patrolling our speedy deletion category, since you had tagged a page for speedy deletion that did not qualify, and you continued asking me to ignore our policies and objecting that they were not accurate. It is surely good to improve accuracy, but not in a way that can cause chaos. Please look through Category:User ko-3, Category:User ko-4, or Category:User ko-N to find someone who speaks good English (look for someone who is also in Category:User en-3, en-4, or en-N) and who has made contributions recently. You can use Korean to tell this person why you want the category to be moved, and he will then be able to explain in English what to do. You could also go to the language reference desk, explain that you need help starting a WP:CFD, and write in Korean the reasons for trying to get the category moved. Someone will be able to translate your reasons and start the process of moving the category. Nyttend (talk) 15:48, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's my responsibility to stop people who disrupt the encyclopedia, especially when they repeatedly refuse polite attempts to point them in the correct direction. I'm trying to work around your unfamiliarity with English, but since you blame me for the situation and refuse to take advantage of assistance, I don't particularly see much reason to continue to try to help you. I will continue to watch for disruptive editing, whether emptying categories out of process or ignoring consensus on navboxes, and you will end up being blocked if you cannot participate in building consensus. Nyttend (talk) 01:42, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Nyttend (talk) 01:54, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confused

Just out of interest - what is this about? Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 21:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Footwiks. You have new messages at Panyd's talk page.
Message added 13:56, 21 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 13:56, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FC Seoul

You seem to be the main editor of the Template here as far as I can see, I don't think it needs to have the honours on it, {{Manchester United F.C.}} and {{Arsenal F.C.}} doesn't, maybe you want to bring it more in line with that style of template? Govvy (talk) 17:16, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also please note, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Template:FC Seoul, I did bring it up on the project page and I am giving you a chance to change it before I change it myself. Govvy (talk) 11:44, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the excess information, this is not needed at all and is not standard on football navboxes. Giant Snowman 13:39, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you join in the discussion at WT:FOOTY, there is consensus that the information is excessive. Giant Snowman 12:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Osan Middle School FC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Osan Middle School FC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osan Middle School FC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. C 679 17:37, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

talkback

Hello, Footwiks. You have new messages at Cloudz679's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

C 679 15:20, 23 January 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Footwiks. You have new messages at Cloudz679's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

C 679 14:48, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Choi Ki-Bong

The article Choi Ki-Bong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:38, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Osan High School FC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Osan High School FC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osan High School FC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. C 679 12:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

School teams to Youth articles.

May I suggest instead of creating school team pages, that you actually use the information and put it in Reserve and Academy pages for the actual clubs instead. regards, Govvy (talk) 21:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Park Hee-Seong

The article Park Hee-Seong has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. IShadowed (talk) 13:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Dongdaemun derby, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Dongdaemun derby" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 01:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of New York City FC

The article New York City FC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete and redirect to Expansion of Major League Soccer#New York City. The article is based on a single NY Times story with only unnamed sources and zero confirmations, and the the NY Times piece only says that it "COULD be named New York City F.C.".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mosmof (talk) 18:23, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please join the discussion about a possible merge at Talk:Expansion of Major League Soccer#Proposed merge with New York City FC. 16:14, 2 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.244.214.109 (talk)

Nomination of New York City FC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New York City FC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York City FC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. p b p 18:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Police FC may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:23, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cho Duck-Je may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:45, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits on Seoul National University

Dear user, we have detected that you are making disruptive edits on the 서울대학교 Seoul National University page. If you wish to raise an issue, put it forth on the SNU talk page. You seem to be deleting because WP:IDONTLIKEIT. As we wrote about the Kyungsung issue. Either you write it Gyeongseong Daehak (Revised Romanization) or Kyŏngsŏng Taehak (McCune-Reischauer). You wrote this, "But We don't change accurate name because of foreigners confusing". Yes, we did change the name to not confuse foreigners, and we changed it in 1997. 강원대학교 uses Kangwon University because the institution still exists, and it continues to use the McCune-Reischauer system for proprietary reasons. 전남 Dragons uses Chunnam because it still exists today. Snowfalcon cu Snowfalcon cu (talk) 04:18, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,,,Are you Korean? I explain why I edited them. Before 2000, Korean wrote Kyungsung Kyonggi (Location Name),Koo (Family name), But 2000 We is wrighting Gyunsung, Gyeonggi, Goo..... I hope that you understand themFootwiks (talk) 02:02, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

네 안녕하세요. As we wrote in the tag line, after 1997, the Korean government decided to write the old name 경성대 as Gyeongseong in the Revised Romanization system. Kyungsung University, in Busan, still used the Mccune-Reischauer system for its name. Snowfalcon cu (talk) 02:07, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
They do so to now confuse the two institutions. Snowfalcon cu Snowfalcon cu (talk) 04:18, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
See Keijo Imperial University page for details. Either you write Gyeongseong Daehak (Revised Romanization) or Kyŏngsŏng Taehak (McCune-Reischauer), but not Kyungsung, which is another institution in 부산. Snowfalcon cu (talk) 04:18, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kyungsung University used before 1950s under Japanese rulling, We can't change the name at that time by current Revised Romanization. In Korea, Old School, Hospital, Sport Club used still old Revised Romanization. For example Kangwon National University, Chunnam Dragons. Kyungsung University and Kyungsung University of Seoul's counfusing is not important. Just foreigners are confusing. But We don't change accurate name because of foreigners confusing.Footwiks (talk)

경성대학교(慶星大學校) in Busan 경성제국대학교(京城, 게이조)in Seoul

Kyungsung University in Busan and Kyungsung University in Seoul are same Korean prononcitiona but Chineases letter is differtent. So meaning is different. Why Kyungsung University in Seoul change to Gyeongsoung. Actually Kyungsung Univerisity in Seoul is older thant Busan's.Footwiks (talk)

Let's debate later on. At the moment I'm busyFootwiks (talk) 02:39, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no debate on this matter. Korean government rule applies here, not Wiki user preference. You may write Gyeongseong Daehak or Kyŏngsŏng Taehak, but you may not write Kyungsung University, which is an extant university in Busan. If you have an issue, bring it up on the SNU Talk page. Snowfalcon cu (talk) 04:18, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also think that there is no debate on this matter. This is just foreinger's ingnorance. Don you know proper noun?

Korean government rule applies only things with government. School name, Hospital name , Sport club name, Company nanem, Personal name are not applied. Revised Romanization is not law. We can use still old Romanization at School name, Hospital name , Sport club name, Company name. Kyungsung University in Seoul before 1950s is not related Korean government.Footwiks (talk)

Foreigners do not apply name rules to Korean institutions, but we Koreans do. We keep telling you, you may write Gyeongseong or Kyŏngsŏng, but not Kyungsung. It is not foreign ignorance because Koreans apply this rule. Take a look at this article when the Koreans wrote it. Since 2003
Seoul_National_University&oldid=5366022.
Seoul_National_University&oldid=9569272

Even more important, not only is your spelling wrong, it also confuses. To be sure, we went to Google search. When I type Gyeongseong University, I get 5170 results that link to the original university. But, when I type Kyungsung University, I get 191,000 results that link to Busan. Snowfalcon cu (talk) 04:18, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As we wrote before, you may address the issue in the SNU Talk Page. Fortunately this has nothing to do with foreign ignorance. Snowfalcon cu (talk) 04:18, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As we wrote above in several places, you are welcome to write Gyeongseong University (국어의 로마자 표기법) or Kyŏngsŏng University (매큔-라이샤워 표기법). Both names written above are official by Seoul National University (서울대학교). SNU Wiki article has been using "Gyeongseong University" since 2003. Visit search.snu.ac.kr/popup.jsp. Snowfalcon cu (talk) 12:26, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sangju Sangmu FC

Hi Footwiks, the article was already at requested moves before you contacted me, so best to let the RM run it's course. If you wish to support or oppose the move you should express your opinion here. Regards ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 22:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of FC Seoul players in major competitions

The article List of FC Seoul players in major competitions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pure WP:LISTCRUFT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 13:37, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of FC Seoul players

The article List of FC Seoul players has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:OR (no criteria used to decide why some players are "notable"), and also violates WP:NOTSTATS and WP:LISTCRUFT. No justification/need for a separate article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 13:41, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Super Match

The article Super Match has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence in reliable sources that this is a significant, notable football rivalry

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 13:52, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Super Match for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Super Match is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Match until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Magyedaejeon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lee Sang-Yoon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of FC Seoul players in major competitions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of FC Seoul players in major competitions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of FC Seoul players in major competitions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Giant Snowman 19:23, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page that is under discussion at AFD. Giant Snowman 13:03, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of FC Seoul players for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of FC Seoul players is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of FC Seoul players until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Giant Snowman 19:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Association football clubs by capital

Category:Association football clubs by capital, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 04:42, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chung Mong-gyu

Hello Footwiks,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Chung Mong-gyu for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TRL (talk) 05:35, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of FC Seoul players

Please do not continue to add an indiscriminate list of players; use the article talk page and stop acting like you OWN the page at once. Giant Snowman 10:48, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I implore you again to use the article talk page; you should also stop accusing other editors of vandalism, and stop violating WP:OWN. Giant Snowman 11:53, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree with GiantSnowman here. The article was (and still is) in a terrible state. You claim that the !voters in the AfD didn't have a problem with the article content, when quite the opposite was true. There are several "List of ... players" articles at Featured List status, and I suggest we model this article on those. If you have a problem with that, I suggest you set up your own FC Seoul wiki, but don't treat Wikipedia as your own personal FC Seoul project. – Pee Jay 21:05, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Footwiks, your edits here are becoming increasingly concerning and disruptive, and if they continue in this vein then we might need to take further action against you. None of us want to see it come to that. Giant Snowman 14:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GiantSnowman, Comply with the result of disscution. 3 years ago, List of FC Seoul players was independent article, But after discutions, we merged this articled to List of FC Seoul players. On this article, We can wright anyting about FC Seoul players. There are several "List of ... players" articles. Why is this problem? This articel is giving various information to wiki users. Do you think that your edition is informative? That is just name list. Put yourself in wikiuser's place. Many people visit wikepedia, In order to find useful and various information. Which edition is informative? I hope you have flexibility. Wikepedia is not military system.

Don't suppress freedom of editing. I thnk that you want to delete this articel. But you failed so you everyday vandal again. Concentrate on a fruitful thing and take it easy. My edition exist 3 years. But anything don't happen on Wikipedia.Footwiks (talk) 14:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, please do not mess with my signature. Secondly, what discussion do you refer to? if you mean the recent AFD, there was consensus there that the topic was notable but the current state of the article was far from deal. Myself and another user have attempted to solve that problem, by both editing the article and posting on the talk page - all you have done is blindly revert. When you say "my edition" you are showing severe and disturbing signs of page ownership which you need to stop at once. Giant Snowman 15:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Remember that, When we debate Many people don't point out contents of article, After fail of deleting, Everyday you point out contents of article, After creation, any people don't point out contents of article, you are first man. If the ariticle have serious problem. Why artice exist 3 years more. I appreciate of your controlling for wikipedia. But Please believe wiki users and Concentrate on a fruitful thing and take it easy. My mother tongu is not English. Don't get my expresion wrong. If you debate in korean language or another language. You also can't communicate exactly. Footwiks (talk) 15:26, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Engish is very poor which is making discussion with you very difficult. All you need to understand is that a number of editors have raised new concerns about the content of an article, it is being discussed on the talk page, and you are editing against that in a disruptive manner. Giant Snowman 15:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are editing against the consensus om the article talk page and becoming increasingly disruptive. Please use the article talk page to discuss changes to the article rather than blindly reverting. Giant Snowman 13:22, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Posting on talk archives

Please stop posting on my talk archives - there are very clear instructions at the top of the page not to do so. Not only does this mean I am very unlikely to see your posts, it is also a WP:COMPETENCE issue. Giant Snowman 13:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DRN

Please see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:List of FC Seoul players. Giant Snowman 18:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:List of FC Seoul players". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 18:32, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Giant Snowman 12:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Giant Snowman 14:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Super Match, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kim Jin-Kyu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:54, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for demonstrating either a inability or unwillingness to understand the concerns of other editors with regard to your editing, to the point of disruption. Wikipedia does not discriminate against "poor English speakers", but we do require that they have sufficent competence in the language to be able to communicate with other editors. Your consistent approach in both the previous AN/I thread and this one indicates that either you don't comprehend what is being explained to you - indicating you do not have the competence to edit en.wikipedia - or that you are willingly ignoring what is being explained to you. I'm willing to assume good faith that it's the former, but AGF is not a suicide pact, and the fact you have, repeatedly, espressed the sentiment that the issue is others, not you, and you keep referring to "past consensus" for your preferred version when it has been pointed out to you repeatedly that that consensus has changed, indicates that at this time an indefinite block is in order, until it is demonstrated that you are capable of communicating, both to and from other editors, in a way that both they and you are capable of understanding, and that you are capable of understanding both en.wiki's policies and how your editing up until now has been in variance with community standards, something that, thus far, you have singularly indicated a lack of ability to do. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 15:42, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kim Bo-Kyung may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Kim Bo-Kyung was big fan of [[FC Seoul]], But [[K League]] was under [[Draft (sports)|draft at that time. So He can't join the club which he want to play.<ref>{{cite news|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:17, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ublocking request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Footwiks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood why I blocked, I studied and perceived the rull of WP:CIR. If you relive the unblocking, I'll raise competence to edit and discuss on English Wikipedia and I'll comply with all rulls of Wikipedia sincerely. As you know, There was no malice in what I acted. Except this case, I never cause any dispute including vandal or tell a swear word since I edited on Wikipedia. I ask for favorable arrangements. Finally, I'm really sorry for troubling all users

Accept reason:

Has agreed below to abide by article restriction, AGF Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 00:46, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would you kindly explain "I understood why I was blocked" with appropriate examples of how you applied policy incorrectly and how you would apply it correctly since you've understood how you were in error before. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 05:26, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did a disruptive editing on List of FC Seoul players repeatedly. I neglected the consensus.

And how long do you expect to take to raise your degree of competence in the English language to the necessary level? Because right now it is clearly not adequate. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll raise my degree of competence in the English language as soon as possilbe. I'll study English everyday. 2 weeks is enough.

If Footwiks agrees to stop editing the List of FC Seoul players article for a bit, and instead use the article talk page to come to an agreement on format and inclusion criteria, then I say we should unblock. If any similar disruption/editing patterns occur in the future then we should re-block. Giant Snowman 16:29, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(1)"I did a disruptive editing on List of FC Seoul players repeatedly. I neglected the consensus." is demonstration of adequate communication skills, I've been communicating in English all my life, yet often I am heckled for it being woeful. So two weeks sounds like being a little too optimistic. (2.0) I suggest you use spell check before you save your talk page edits. (2.1) Do you mean Footwiks that you would'nt revert anyone who undoes your edits? That would be a wonderful policy to follow, it is a little frustrating to begin with, but in the long run it keeps one out of trouble. My experience. (3)Footwiks I think you should take GS's advice regarding List of FC Seoul players as a formal topic ban directive. Wikipedia is a huge place 4 million articles, enjoy other places too. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 20:20, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One area of competence that needs attention - not posting in talk page archives - this is something you have already been told about before! Giant Snowman 14:10, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I agree to stop editing the List of FC Seoul players article. I'll use the article talk page to set a informative format and incusion critera about article.Footwiks (talk) 17:15, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When am I unblocked? Please review my appeal and unblock me.Footwiks (talk) 17:13, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dejan Damjanović (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to 2013 K League

K League Top Scorer Award (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to 2013 K League

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

K League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to 2013 K League

K League MVP Award (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to 2013 K League

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mergers

You need to use WP:MERGE. Giant Snowman 12:24, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Astore

None of the references you quoted on my talk page are valid as none of them are independent of the company. Deb (talk) 12:01, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perivaldo Dantas

I am glad i could help. Happy 2014 --AL (talk) 15:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Claude Parfait Ngon A Djam may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

He joined [[Seongnam FC]] (as then knowns Chean Ilhwa Chunma]]. But He only appeared 4 matches in [[Korean League Cup|League Cup]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:58, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of foreign K League Challenge players may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

FC]], 2008–2009 [[Ulsan Hyundai FC|Ulsan Hyundai]], 2011 [[Incheon United FC|Incheon United]], [[ 2013–present [[Gwangju FC]])

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:35, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jean-Kasongo Banza may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|Gençlerbirliği]], in South Korea for [[Chunnam Dragons]] and [[Seongnam FC|Cheonan Ilhwa Chunma]] (currently [[Seongnam FC]], in Tunisia for [[Club Sportif Sfaxien|CS Sfaxien]] and [[Olympique Béja]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:23, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Oleg Elyshev may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

search/view.aspx?type=total&all=LG+%uc62c%ub808%uadf8&idm=86191 Photograph at Anyang LG Cheethas]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:05, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Simo Krunić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bosnian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Posting in talk page archives

Please do not post in my talk page archives, as you have done here and here - if you want to contact me you need to use my talk page. Giant Snowman 13:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I made a mistake, SorryFootwiks (talk) 14:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 FC Seoul season

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of 2014 FC Seoul season, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: 2013 FC Seoul season. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 05:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

István Nyúl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hungaria

Lajos Zentai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hungarian

Rubén Dario Rossi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to San Lorenzo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jean-Kasongo Banza may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|Gençlerbirliği]], in South Korea for [[Chunnam Dragons]] and [[Seongnam FC|Cheonan Ilhwa Chunma]] (currently [[Seongnam FC]], in Tunisia for [[Club Sportif Sfaxien|CS Sfaxien]] and [[Olympique Béja]]
[[Category:Jeonnam Dragons players]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tuta (footballer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[S.S.C. Venezia|Venezia]], of [[Italy]], in 1998-99, [[FC Seoul]], then known as Anyang LG Cheetahs]], of [[South Korea]], [[K League]], in 2002 and [[Suwon Samsung Bluewings]], also of South Korea,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lee Jun-Young may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

26, 1982) is a [[South Korea]]n [[football (soccer)|football]] player. He previously played for [[[FC Seoul]] and [[Incheon United]].<ref>{{cite web|publisher=[[K-League]]|title=이준영 player record|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:21, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Park Dong-Suk may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

for [[FC Seoul]], then known as Anyang LG Cheetahs and [[Gwangju Sangmu FC]] (Military service)).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:40, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to South Korea national football team results – 1990s may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|[[lU

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re Template:Pusan Daewoo Royals managers

I've reverted your edit because the template is still used in articles, and there is no speedy deletion criteria which covers it. As such you need to nominate it for deletion following these instructions. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:37, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually never mind, just realised that you removed it from the articles it's used in. Are you sure that this will be completely uncontroversial? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:39, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry man, Busan Daewoo Royals and Busan IPark officialy same club. And articles also merged. And I removed templates on Busan Daewoo managers. This templeate not used any more. I'm sure that it will be completely uncontroversial. In Korean wikepedia, Also There isn't Busan Daewoo Royals manger templete.Footwiks (talk) 12:49, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, well in that case I've redirected them to Template:Busan IPark managers in case anyone uses them accidentally and to preserve the edit history. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:53, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Soccerdatabase.eu is a copyvio website

Please do not use it. Giant Snowman 14:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC) OK, I got it. I didn't know.Footwiks (talk)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Footwiks. You have new messages at R'n'B's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FC Seoul award winners, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2013 K League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2014 FC Seoul season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cho Jun-Ho

FC Seoul (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cho Jun-Ho

FC Seoul Reserves and Academy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cho Jun-Ho

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cut & paste move

Hello. I just noticed that you "moved" the APEP F.C. article by cutting and pasting to a new title. This is not allowed. If you want to move an article, you have to use the move tab. If this doesn't work, you must follow the WP:RM process. Thanks, Number 5 7 00:27, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sim Sang-Min

The article Sim Sang-Min has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of one-club men, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kim Jin-woo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmos vs New York Cosmos

Any particular reason you dropped the "Cosmos" listing from the teams of NASL chart? The franchise did change for the 1977 & 1978 seasons by dropping "New York" from the name. Part of their rational was b/c they'd moved out of the city to Giants Stadium in NJ in 1977, the other was b/c they felt they'd become a global brand like Santos or Juventus. Every NASL game program and newspaper story I've read from that time frame referred to them as the "Cosmos" only. In fact the 1979 NASL programs that contained stats from 1978 season listed the players as playing for "Cosmos" while every other team was listed by "City & Mascot" (e.g. Washington Diplomats). Some NPs even poked fun at the presumptuous nature of the name change. Of course the franchise then returned to the original name in 1979.

Based on these facts, I think it's correct to list a franchise known as "Cosmos" on the chart, since it did in fact exist for 2 years. This is no different than the Atlanta Chiefs becoming the Apollos in 1973 (i.e. same franchise, same owners, same location, different name) or the Miami Gatos becoming the Miami Toros. I'll leave it to you. Kind regards. -Creativewill (talk) 14:26, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your visiting. I was interested in old NASL. So I already aware of name change of New York Cosmos. But current NASL chart, It is easy to misconstrue. Chart is displayed like New York Cosmos and Cosmos are separate club. As you know, New York Cosmos (1971-76, 1979-84) and Cosmos (1977-78) are officialy same club. It's a just team name change. So I correct them.

Anyway I have a question. At that time, if the club relocated, officially considerd an new team by NASL?. So history and competitive records would not be transferred? For example, Are Belows club officially same club or separate club?

Washington Darts, Miami Gatos / Toros, Fort Lauderdale Strikers, Minnesota Strikers

Were they case by case? Some relocated club considered an same one club, Some relocated club considered an separted clubs?

I think NASL Chart have to be improved to be easy to understand. For Average men without NASL backgrounds, This chart is difficult.

Firstly, In relocation case, Distingish same club case and separate club case.

If the Washington Darts, Miami Gatos / Toros, Fort Lauderdale Strikers, Minnesota Strikers are same club, regadless of relocation, Items in chart and articles in Wikipedia have to be merged.

Please refer to this section, All-time K League Clubs part at K League, Similary, many clubs in K League had name change and relocation, But Chart is easy to understand about franchise and club name changing history.

I hope that NASL Chart have to be improve like All-time K League Clubs part. Thanks. Footwiks (talk) 02:35, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because the NASL has a finite history, none of the teams are currently active (unlike in other leagues) and therefore the list will not continue to grow over time as might occur in other leagues, regardless of the sport. The purpose of the chart is to show every team-name that existed, no matter how subtle or drastic the change. Also, there are those who only remember one team in a particular city, when there were actually two, three or even four! This list facilitates that. Previously the chart was not chart, but instead just a list containing only the information now found in the third column. It was difficult to view and it was difficult to find teams, if you didn't know their entire naming history. The four-columned chart clarified the list.

I'm not sure what confuses you about the chart. The columns are clearly defined. The column heading that says "evolution of franchise" indicates that all teams in that progression are the same franchise.

1. The chart is done in such a way that you can clearly reference every NASL franchise by any name the franchise ever used (column one).

2. You can clearly see how long the franchise existed (column two).

3. You can clearly see all of the names the franchise used chronologically (column three).

4. You can clearly see what other league(s) the franchise played in (column four).

I wonder if your confusion comes from your lack of 100% proficiency with the English language. This is not meant as an insult. I say this only because your comments contained NUMEROUS minor errors that are consistent with some who does not use English as their primary language. It's not uncommon to miss the subtleties of a second language when conversing with a native speaker.

As I said, because the original NASL no longer exists, none of the teams are currently active and the list will NOT continue to grow over time as might occur in places like the K League. In conclusion, I would ask you to consider your edit, by reverting your changes to the chart. As it currently reads with your changes, you have created confusion by making it appear that the "Cosmos" never existed as an official team name of the old NASL, which you clearly know is incorrect. -regards, Creativewill (talk) 04:11, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I admit and understand your chart has advantage that you explained and intended. But your chart also has disadvantage. Your chart don't have function that distinguish club change history - including team name, franchise and just team name change history and just franchise change histroy.

Therefore, your chart have too many rows about teams unnecessarily .

Your chart have 67 teams. 67 teams including New York Cosmos and Cosmos as each separate teams. New York Cosmos have to be counted as one team. In addition, regarless of relocations, If the predecessor and relocated club are officially considerd as an same club by NASL, So history and competitive records are transferred to relcocated club, involved all clubs have to be counted as on team.

OK, your chart has unique advantage and purpose. So I accept that and I don't care about English Wikipedia.

But in old NASL article of Korean wikepedia, I want to arranged them as belows

1. One club has only one row.

For example

New York Cosmos (1971-84) : New York Cosmos (1971-76) -> Cosmos (1977-78) -> New York Cosmos (1979-84)

2. Regadless of franchise relocation, Officail successor club has one row including all predecessor changing history.

For example

Minnesota Strikers (1970-1984) : Washington Darts (1970-1971) -> Miami Gatos (1972) -> Miami Toros (1973-1976) -> Fort Lauderdale Strikers (1977-1983) -> Minnesota Strikers (1984)

Refer to St. Louis Rams article, I want to express club change history as bellows. Cleveland Rams (1936–1945) Los Angeles Rams (1946–1994) St. Louis Rams (1995–present)

About 2 principle, I need your help, I don't have informations about decision of connecting predecessor and successor at that time. I think, some club considered as an same club, some club considered as an each club by NASL at that time, Where can I check out them?

If you have informaitons, I hope to create new chart including club change history like St. Louis Rams article. Footwiks (talk) 12:29, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you are making this more difficult than it needs to be. All of the information you seek is within that chart. It will just require some time to extract it for your purposes on the Korean wiki. What is clear in one language or culture may not be the same in another. In the English chart, if the names all appear in Column 3 together, then it is the same franchise. Therefore I would say to use Column 3 of the chart as a starting basis for what you want to do on the Korean wiki page (but please return the English chart to the way you found it). Regarding using Column 3 from the NASL teams chart; since those names are linked to the NASL teams' pages you can find the time frames you are searching for by navigating to the links. For example in the 5th row: the Baltimore Comets, San Diego Jaws, Las Vegas Quicksilvers, and the San Diego Sockers are all the same franchise. The oldest comes first and the most recent is listed last. It requires some time to do it the way you want, but all of the information (the dates) is already there for you. The only ones that are really tricky would be the 2nd Atlanta Chiefs franchise, the 2nd Washington Diplomats franchise (because they recycled a name when they moved), and the whole Toronto Metros, Metros-Croatia, Blizzard evolution (it was a team, then a merger, then a split). I think every NASL team named has its logo and its final kit used listed on its page, therefore you can grab those as well for your purposes on the Korean wiki.

So in the end I think you will have about 43 different NASL franchises that used 67 names. Exactly how you think is the best way to display them on the Korean wiki, is not for me to say. That is because my knowledge of your culture and language is very limited. I am not qualified. Regards -Creativewill (talk) 15:13, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see no "chart" on the St. Louis Rams page pertaining to team evolution. Creativewill (talk) 15:17, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted to chart that you created on a team names basis. So New York Cosmos has two rows. But Your chart have to take a note about the total number of teams. 67 teams are wrong. There were just 67 team names. About 43 teams or 43 clubs is accurate.

Including Premier League , All leagues over the World, In this case, Bellow comment is general

3 teams that played in the Premier League,

Not commented like your chart

7 teams that played in the Premier League,

For example

Royal Arsenal -> Wollich Aresla -> Asenal FC (counted as one team)

Newton Heath FC -> Manchester United FC (counted as one team)

St Domingo's F.C. -> Everton FC (counted as one team)

I think '67 teams' is a misleading information.

So I hope that you take a note about the total numbur of teams and the total numbur of team names in detail. Footwiks (talk) 06:19, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

English Grammar Lesson

The way you've edited the sentence, the meaning is now untrue. First of all if it were true, the math used in the sentence changes, but you failed to recognize that fact and edit thusly.

Now for the big part of the lesson:

Originally the sentence read, "Over half of the 67 teams that played in the NASL over the course of its 17 seasons were relocations of existing franchises, while a handful were merely name changes of existing teams like the Apollos, Cosmos and Earthquakes."

This statement was correct as it stood because the predicate nominative (i.e. relocations of existing franchises) correctly re-identifies the subject (i.e. Over half of the 67 teams) as being the same franchises –which is what you keep trying to say with your misguided edit. Moreover, in layman's terms (in the English language anyway) very few would ever think of the Baltimore Comets (for example) as the same "team" as San Dego Sockers, even though they are clearly the same franchise.

Is it a coincidence that the only person who seems to have had an issue with the wording of this section of the NASL page is a non-native English speaker? I see from your reading your talkpage history that this is not the first time the language barrier has created issue for you with other editors. I understand that your intentions are well-meant, but please get a better command of English before you edit anymore English wiki pages. Once again please revert the section to the correct English language meaning. Kind regards -Creativewill (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rafael Costa may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

On 19 January 2014, it was announced that Rafael joined [[South Korean] side [[FC Seoul]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Martin Rennie may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

On 17 July 2017, He appointed as manager of newly formed [[South korea]n side [[Seoul E-Land FC]] in [[K League Challenge]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:20, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of foreign K League Classic players may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Adrian Madaschi]] 2012–2013 [[Jeju United FC|Jeju United]])
* '''[[Éverton Santos]]''' (2011–2012 [[Seongnam FC|Seongnam Ilhwa Chunma], 2014-present [[FC Seoul]])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:38, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Brendan Hamill (footballer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Category:K League Challenge players]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:29, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2001 Korean FA Cup may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[Jeonbuk Hyundai Motors]], ([[2000 Korean FA Cup]] winner), [[Seongnam FC|Seongnam Ilhwa Chunma]] ([[2000 Korean FA Cup]] Runners-up, [[FC Seoul|Anyang LG Cheetahs]], [[Daejeon Citizen]], [[Pohang

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2008 Korean FA Cup may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* Bye : [[Chunnam Dragons]] ([[2007 Korean FA Cup]] winner, [[Pohang Steelers]] ([[2007 K League]] winner)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Middlesex Wanderers A.F.C.

The article Middlesex Wanderers A.F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 19:48, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Middlesex Wanderers A.F.C. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Middlesex Wanderers A.F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middlesex Wanderers A.F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Giant Snowman 11:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Soccer = football again

I have begun a thread at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Football in Australia)#Full names of soccer clubs to discuss how we should use the "fullname" parameter in the Infobox template. Unfortunately it seems to be being used by some to continue to now sneakily press the claim that their game is called football. Please join the discussion. HiLo48 (talk) 08:54, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seo Dong-won (footballer born 1973), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Yun Ju-tae, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 15:32, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Yun Ju-tae. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 12:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, as you have been previously advised please do not post in my talkpage archives! Giant Snowman 10:05, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rafael Costa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brazilian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nikola Komazec, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 16:36, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hwaseong Sports Complex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hwaseong. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jin Soon-jin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'''Jin Soon-jin''' (born 1 March 1974 in is a retired South Korean [[Association football|footballer]].
He played for [[FC Seoul]], then as known Anyang LG Cheetahs, [[Daegu FC]] and [Jeonnam Dragons]]. In 1999, He had an serius car accident.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://sports.news.naver.com/sports/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:38, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cho Jung-hyun

added a link pointing to Forward

Je Yong-sam

added a link pointing to Je

Jin Soon-jin

added a link pointing to Jin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2008 K League Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kim Eun-Jung. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fabrício Silva Cabral may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* {{ko icon} {{K League player|20050149}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:50, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Elpídio Silva may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* {{K League player|20060176}} {{ko icon}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:05, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cho Seong-hwan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FC서울 경기일정 추가 관련

안녕하세요. 우선 경기 일정 기여에 대한 지적 감사합니다. 링크만 걸어두신 의도 또한 이해했구요. 단지 1)순수한 팬심 2)공식 홈페이지 영문판에 스코어만 있고 세부 기록은 없는 점 2가지로 인해 경기일정 추가를 하기로 했다는 점 아셨으면 합니다. 2013, 2014년은 시작한 만큼 어느정도 완성은 시켜놓고 2015 시즌 경기 일정은 추후에 생각해보겠습니다. 마지막으로 제 기여 기록 그대로 보존해주신 거에 대해서 감사드립니다. Three97 (talk) 12:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

토론 페이지 글 잘 읽었습니다. 일단 2014 시즌 경기 일정은 거의 마무리 되었기에 완성시키고, 문서 하단의 스탯 기록의 경우 FC 서울 문서 상세기록 부분에 이전에 추가시켜놓은 것이 있어 그대로 쓰면 될 것 같아요. 다가오는 2015 시즌 역시 일정 기여는 하지 않고 대신 스탯 및 이적시장, 포메이션 부분 기여에 집중하기로 했습니다. 좋은 지적 감사드립니다. Three97 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 04:37, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't vandal?

You upload a non-free image (according to our guidelines it IS non-free, you didn't provide any authorization), and you call ME a vandal? You're the one removing a 100% reliable image, dude.

Get your facts straight before calling someone a vandal, I'm here for five years. MYS 77 ^✉ 15:40, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And only because the player is not playing for that club anymore, you don't need to remove the pic of him while in that club. Bruno Peres is not at Santos, Alessio Cerci is not at Torino and Robinho is not at Milan. MYS 77 ^✉ 15:47, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm here 7 years, I already knew the guidelines, if this photo is non free image, I don't upload.

This photo original source is as belows. http://www.fcseoulpics.com/pics/picsDetail.jsp?pic_code=20141111027&cid=1&pg=2&searchFromIndex=

This photo is done by FC Seoul. But FC Seoul provide this photos to publice free. Anyone can download and post this photo. This is why FC Seoul create photo service website.

Osmar is now playing for FC Seoul. My recent photo is more suitable.Footwiks (talk) 15:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Suitable" or not, you don't need to remove the other image. Feel free to thank the "vandal" here. MYS 77 ^✉ 15:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to removing, I didn't think that moving the photo to the text. current version is good.Footwiks (talk) 15:58, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mass cross-wiki renaming of Ajinomoto Stadium

Please STOP renaming all the Wikipedia articles of Ajinomoto Stadium to the old name of the stadium with no justification and without asking the local community first, or i'll be forced to ask a steward to global lock your account. Thanks. Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:52, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Moon Seon-min

A tag has been placed on Moon Seon-min, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:12, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Park Chu-young, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saitama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Moon Seon-min

A tag has been placed on Moon Seon-min, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:18, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Martin Rennie, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. The fact that you know it's true and that there is a source is immaterial. A source must be provided. The link you have me on my talk page indicates only American nationality. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:46, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Football in Paris

Hello Footwiks,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Football in Paris for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Nrwairport (talk) 04:52, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

In future, please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Football in Paris. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:46, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On another issue, please remember to complete the summary field when making edits. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 01:01, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Son Heung-min

Hi, on Son's page there is a ref error in the honours section, where a 'ref name' (where the same ref is used more than once) seems not to have been correctly formatted. I think this may be one of your edits but am not certain. If so, perhaps you would be able to identify the point in the article where the ref name was originally used and correct appropriately. (I cannot find the original citation). Thanks. Eagleash (talk) 13:41, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, a Bot has fixed it. Eagleash (talk) 14:47, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dettmar Cramer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page USA national football team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Osama Abdul Mohsen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Osama Abdul Mohsen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osama Abdul Mohsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. clpo13_(talk) 06:17, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of FC Seoul records and statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lee Young-jin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:00, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Asian Club Championship and AFC Champions League finals

Why do you revert my edits ? it was not vandalism ! I just change to be some like on other articles ! I undo you edits ! Thank you !--Alexiulian25 (talk) 15:55, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Park Sung-hwa

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Park Sung-wha a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Park Sung-hwa. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Sawol (talk) 02:12, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1986 K League Championship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lee Young-jin

Lee Tae-hong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Korea national football team

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

If you want to, please take a look at the article about Carina Jaarnek that I have created. Any help is appreciated.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:11, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm SLBedit. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of association football rivalries, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SLBedit (talk) 17:44, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FC Seoul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franchise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dejan Damjanović

Hello, where did you get stats for Dejan for Beijing? because both Soccerway and National-football-teams (two of the most realible sources) have 45/25 league stats for chinese super league 86.58.36.235 (talk) 11:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to CSL offcial stats from http://csldata.sports.sohu.com/ssb.html and Goalscorer section at 2014 Chinese Super League, 2015 Chinese Super League

Don't believe soccerway. Beijing was Round of 16 in 2015 AFC Champions League. But your stats that Dejan played 9 matches. Group Stage - 6 matches and Round of 16 - 2 matches. Dejan can't play 9 matches in 2015 AFC Champions League.

Please believe meFootwiks (talk) 11:58, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But he played against bangkok glass in the playoffs, so 1 playoff, 6 group stage, 2 round of 16 = 9 apps 86.58.36.235 (talk) 12:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I checked out ACL playoff. 9 match is right.

But From chinese source, Chinese League Stats are accuate as belows

Dejan 5 Goals in Jiangsu Suning F.C. 2014

Dejan 10 Goals in Beijing 2014

Dejan 16 Goals in Beijing 2015

Is csldata.sports.sohu.com/ssb.html an official website of chinese super league? It looks like some sports news website, not official website run by Chinese Football Association 86.58.36.235 (talk) 12:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Almost offcial site about Chises Super League Stast. I think more reliable than Soccerway and national football teams.com. Soccerwy and national football teams.com have so many mistakes.

When Dejan come back December 2015, FC Seoul Official news, Dejan stats were 31 goals and 56 matches in CSL. http://www.fcseoul.com/news/news_view.jsp?news_seq=2&news_type=NEWS_LIST&part=News&seq=3453 Footwiks (talk)

Ok I believe you, but Flashscore which have live results reads 14 goals too (probably 5 for jingsu and 9 for beijing), maybe one of his goals was later listed as own goal / someone else's goal, and that chinese site forgot to change it ? 86.58.36.235 (talk) 12:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I will also checked out again through chinese internet. If I found a mistake. I'll change it. Footwiks (talk)

Transfermarkt has 10 goals for beijing in 2014 so you are probably right, the match against Zhejian Yiteng on 31 August 2014 is probably a problem, transfermarkt claims that he scored 2 goals in this match, while soccerway claims one goal on that match, i will try to find youtube highlights for that match to see how many times he scored 86.58.36.235 (talk) 13:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yup he scored twice in that match YouTube highlists so the stats are correct, soccerway is wrong 86.58.36.235 (talk) 13:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good job. If you have a qustion about K League stats and FC Seoul player stats, Feel free to leave a message. I am updating through official source Don't belive soccerway and betting site too much.

I have a question. where are you from? Footwiks (talk)

Slovenia 86.58.36.235 (talk) 19:18, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of Dejan's serbian club career and stats? Do you think that career is accurate? Can you check out Dejan's serbian club career and stats before 2007? Footwiks (talk) 02:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand serbian so I will try and check, but I think its pretty accurate 86.58.36.235 (talk) 10:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The stats were here http://www.srbijafudbal.net/zeleznik/otisli/damjanovic_d.htm but the link is dead and there is no archived page, http://www.national-football-teams.com/player/28136/Dejan_Damjanovic.html those stats are probably 99% correct (with exception of one missing beijing goal) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.58.36.235 (talk) 11:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why are k-league stats on official website different (LINK), for example 2008 = 33 games/18 goals, while on wikipedia career stats table is 29/15, are those playoff games (semifinal/final), or league cup/KFA cup games inlcuded ? 86.58.36.235 (talk) 11:11, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Until 2011, There is a Korean League Cup and League Cup was the part of K League. Because two competions are managed by Korea Professional Football League. So K League Official stats, Regular League stats + League Cup Stats. Dejan in 2008 Season, League 29/15, League Cup 4/0. I can check out Reguar League and League Cup Stats separately. But English Offcial Stats are aggreagted. Since 2012, There is only Regular League and stats are same. Footwiks (talk) 11:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Former Yugoslavian players

I have a one more quesion. Can you find out some information about these players Boro Janičić , Željko Vyjeta. These players played for FC Seoul in 1990s. But We don't have Basic Birthday information. Can you check out throung serbian interent.

That would be very hard, but I found some stats for him (Janičić) -->

1990/1991 SUTJESKA 32 1
1989/1990 SUTJESKA 31 0
1988/1989 SUTJESKA 23 0

I will try to find date of birth, but that will be hard since he is unknown player 11:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.58.36.235 (talk)

Željko Vyjeta (??) is probably wrong name, vyjeta is 101% not serbian last name and i cant find anything about him, probably some korean sources translated the name wrongly ? 86.58.36.235 (talk) 11:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Name is uncertain. In Korean newspaper, His name was Baijeta Zeliko or Vaijeta Zeliko under the just prononciation. Is it possilbe Vyjeta Željko? is Željko surname?Footwiks (talk) 12:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, Željko is first name, im still searching 12:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.58.36.235 (talk)

Maybe Željko Simović? He was born in 1967 too, and played in korea in 1994, but for Royals not for Cheetahs 86.58.36.235 (talk) 12:36, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

K-league profile has "70/07/01" as birthdate for Boro 86.58.36.235 (talk) 12:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Željko Simović and Željko Vyjeta are different player. I know they are same name Željko and they played 1994 too. I have a fanbook 1994 LG Cheetahs. In Fanbook, Boro's birthday is just 1967. I think that K League Official Site made a mistake. Footwiks (talk) 15:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)15:41, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no info about any of those players anywhere, I found only this Link, its 2015 interview with Boro when he saved some kid who was drowing in the river, but it is not mentioned anything else, just that he was former player of Sutjeska, Obilić, Bodućnost and LG, so he probably end his career after 1994 86.58.36.235 (talk) 16:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think I found it, Željko Bajčeta, the name Vyjeta and Bajčeta sounds somehow similar, and he played in Cyprus in early 1990s too, I am 95% that this is the player 86.58.36.235 (talk) 20:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What a Great. I also think that this man is the player who I find. There is a it:Željko Bajčeta and his career is almost same in comparison to his career in korean newspaper. Thanks a lot.Footwiks (talk) 01:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you do me a favor one more? Please check out these player information. Especially Aleksandar Jozević don't know birthday and former career.

Aleksandar Vlahović – K League stats at kleague.com (in Korean)

Aleksandar Jozević – K League stats at kleague.com (in Korean)

Vlahović played for Sutjeska Nikšić (27 caps/4 goals) in the 1990/91 season and 2 caps/0 goals in the 1987/88 (Sutjeska), and for Vojvodina 3 caps/0 goals in the same 1987/88 season, other then that i didnt find anything, but will look for more now 86.58.36.235 (talk) 11:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are 0 sources about Jozević, player with that name didnt played a single game in the Yugoslav First League (maybe he played in 2nd divison, but its impossible to find any career stats/date of births for that), maybe the name is wrong here too, but Jozović sounds correct to me, its virtually impossible to find full date of birth for those unknown average players born before 1975 86.58.36.235 (talk) 12:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I understand and I also check out his name again. Thanks for your trouble.Footwiks (talk) 14:44, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One more question. How do I prononciate Bajčeta? Let me know the prononciation. What is the similar English prononciation. Baicheta or Baijeta? Baiseta? or Bacheta? or Bajeta? or Baseta?Footwiks (talk)

I sent the correct information to K League Official Stat Controller. They will fix the wrong information soon.Footwiks (talk) 14:50, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Bye-che-tah", like "bye" in "goodbye", "che" like in "Chelsea" 86.58.36.235 (talk) 14:53, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I got it, Thanks a lot. Final ask...Can you fill out the manigial career of Jasmin Mujdža. He came FC Seoul as new fitness coach.

He managed only Segesta for a few months, and was previously an assistant manager at the same club 86.58.36.235 (talk) 16:08, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, according to Template:Infobox football biography#Parameters, there should be no "coach", "fitness coach" etc. in the infobox, it reads "The first club that the person has served within the capacity of team manager. Please do not list positions other than team manager (such as assistant or coach positions, or director of football roles where this role is not considered managerial) unless that position is a significant part of the person's career;" 86.58.36.235 (talk) 16:22, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Footwiks. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football.
Message added 16:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SLBedit (talk) 16:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. SLBedit (talk) 21:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to England national football team does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Class455fan1 (talk) 12:33, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Ulsan Dolphins, you may be blocked from editing. Fenix down (talk) 17:29, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ulsan Dolphins. this edit is not acceptable. Just because you don'tagree with a decision does not mean you should use the main space to air your grievances. So far you ha eEtried to start another rm despite clear consensus as to the club's globally common name, then just moved the article anyway and now are posting your own unsupported opinions in the article main space. You'reediting of this topic is becoming ddisruptive. Please stop or you will be blocked. Fenix down (talk) 06:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ulsan Hyundai Mipo Dockyard Dolphin FC

Ulsan Hyundai Mipo Dockyard FC sound OK to me 86.58.36.235 (talk) 12:29, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Team by that name did not play in 1994/95 anywhere in top4 divisions in czech republic, maybe it does but with different name http://www.rsssf.com/tablest/tsje95.html 86.58.36.235 (talk) 09:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it was Slovan Liberec 86.58.36.235 (talk) 09:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no move proposal, you have to use {{subst:Requested move|Ulsan Hyundai Mipo Dockyard FC |reason= Why}} at the talk page 86.58.36.235 (talk) 08:22, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Probably the less games played to reach 150 goals or something like that, I alredy edited it a little bit on his page, can you give me some news article that confirm this record so I can add a reference, I searched http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/ but there the record is not mentioned, only the result 86.58.36.235 (talk) 15:03, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot about double nationality rule in korea, I thought he has both korean and argentine passport 86.58.36.235 (talk) 13:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I watched FC Seoul vs. man united in july 2009 solely because of snsd performance on halftime, and I started to follow korean football and baseball since then, I'm 25 86.58.36.235 (talk) 13:55, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it was that match, i remember that dejan scored two goals...I would love to but its kind a expensive to go to korea, only plane tickets alone for both ways costs over 1,500 euros (around two million won) 86.58.36.235 (talk) 14:08, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How is "완전이적" translated? It is oppose of "free transfer" I guess, but how do you call this in English? Google translated is "perfect transfer" but that doesnt sound right 86.58.36.145 (talk) 10:58, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Footwiks. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete content without a reason

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sangju Sangmu FC, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 09:18, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I noted a comment. Don't Get me wrong. Gwangju Sangmu FC and Sangju Sangmu FC is officially different club. Offcially, Sangju Sangmu FC is founded in 2011. So I divided honours.

If the Gwangju Sangmu FC and Sangju Sangmu FC articles are merged, All honours are listed at Sangju Sangmu FC Footwiks (talk) 11:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	How do we collect foreign players playing in the Japanese league, 2 articles changed to 1 article and their country, footwiks(ok)? Fadlanmaulana16 (talk) 12:08, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marguerite Higgins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Korean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category moves

Hi Footwiks

I have just reverted a number of undiscussed moves by you of category pages, mostly before any of the pages were recategorised.

Moving a category involves changes to all the articles. So if it is disputed and reverted, many many pages get changed.

It's much better to get consensus first. If the proposed move meets the relevant criteria for a speedy move, you can list it at WP:CFDS. Otherwise it needs a full discusission at WP:CFD. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:51, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

moved from User talk:BrownHairedGirl:

There is a consensus about article title [[7]]

In order to move category, Do I discuss again? --Footwiks (talk) 09:56, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please How to move this category?

Category:Lokomotiv Tashkent players
Category:FC Lokomotiv Tashkent managers
Category:FC Lokomotiv Tashkent seasons

Footwiks (talk) 10:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, WP:C2D applies per Talk:PFC_Lokomotiv_Tashkent#Requested_move_13_December_2018.

Feel free to list the relevant categories at WP:CFDS.

But absolutely no more move-warring of categories, as you did before. It is massively disruptive. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, This is last. But I can't move. Can you move that instead of me?

I confirmed the message: The page could not be moved, for the following reason:

Category:Lokomotiv Tashkent players => Category:PFC Lokomotiv Tashkent players
Category:FC Lokomotiv Tashkent managers => Category:PFC Lokomotiv Tashkent managers
Category:FC Lokomotiv Tashkent seasons => Category:PFC Lokomotiv Tashkent seasons

Footwiks (talk) 10:08, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I said NOT to move.

List the pages at WP:CFDS. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Directors

Agree, I think it means corporate directors only. 'Directors of football' (as a job title) would be in Category:Manchester United F.C. non-playing staff. Giant Snowman 11:56, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot07:47, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

'Non-playing staff' includes any coaches, scouts etc. - but not managers, who have their own category. Giant Snowman 08:39, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Association football scouts

Please can you hold off on creating any more categories before we have consensus at WT:FOOTBALL? Thanks. Giant Snowman 14:35, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I just created Category:association football scouts...Because other sports scout categroy already existed. For example Category:National Football League scouts, Category:Major League Baseball scouts Footwiks (talk) 14:38, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS might apply, but it's worth joining in the discussion. Link is Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Category:Association football scouts. Giant Snowman 14:47, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Park Kyung-ho (footballer)

The article Park Kyung-ho (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 20:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, After creation of article. At that time I was very busy. He was not famous globally. But He is the doyen of the South Korean football. There are so many references and I'll improve the article with references over time. Don't worry and take it easy and Take time. All users are editing for hobby. It's not your and my full time job.Footwiks (talk) 04:46, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ode to Joy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UEFA European Qualifiers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Daegu Park

See sources on K League website match shedule or AFC Champions League official website match schedule and Yonhap News Agency, they are all using Forest Arena. Also its Balaídos not Abanca-Balaídos, Dean Court not Vitality Stadium, Falmer Stadium not American Express Community Stadium, Kirklees Stadium and not John Smith's Stadium, Stadio Friuli not Dacia Arena etc., we dont have to use sponsorship name for the article title. Snowflake91 (talk) 10:49, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this article and watch the photos.

DGB대구은행파크 개장 마케팅…축구꿈나무에 티켓 1천장

In Photo, Stadium have sign which is spelled as DGB Daegu Bank Park strictly. Daegu Forest Arena is not the official name and common name. This is just working name. But In AFC Champions League, They don't use DGB Daegu Bank. Likie UEFA Champions League Because DGB Financial Group is not the AFC Sponsors. So They made a dicision to use Daegu Forest Arena in AFC Champions League. That's all. This is not my opinion.

This is announed at newspaper.^[1]

Daegu FC. This is first appearance in AFC Champions League. Just 3 to 7 matches will be placed as name Daegu Forest Arena.

If you want to move, Firstly, move Emirates Stadium => Ashburton Grove or Arsenal Stadium, Allianz Arena => Fußball Arena Münche, Ajinomoto Stadium => Tokyo Stadium

One more. This is not the Kirklees Stadium, Stadio Friuli, City of Manchester Stadium case. These stadiums used as name Stadio Friuli, City of Manchester Stadium long time. In 1990 FIFA World Cup, Stadium name was also Stadio Friuli. They changed Dacia Arena and Etihad Stadium as sponsorship reason recently.

But Daegu Forest Arena is just working name and just will be use only in AFC Champions League some matches. Daegu FC is not the frequent pparticipant in AFC Champions League

Moreover, In South Korea, DGB Daegu Bank Park is definatlly common name.

I hope that you understand what I mean.

Footwiks (talk) 01:13, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

세이버스

Hey, how is "세이버스" translated? Is this "sabres" like Buffalo Sabres, or "savers", which means "a person who regularly saves money through a bank or recognized scheme"? Its the former name of women's basketball team which won the title today Snowflake91 (talk) 13:07, 25 March 2019 (UTC) Snowflake91 (talk) 13:07, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cheongju KB Kookmin Bank Savers (청주 KB 국민은행 세이버스) - Savers is translated into Korean world 저축인
Buffalo Sabres (버팔로 세이버스)- Sabres is translated into Korean world 군도(軍刀), But we also call ko:사브르

Succession boxes

Should not be used anywhere in external links, neither on clubs articles neither on players articles, there is already a template where all K League winners are listed (1, 2, 3) Snowflake91 (talk) 12:57, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of International A Match

The article International A Match has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LukeSurl^{t c} 10:15, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In Chang-soo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, In Chang-soo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 11:33, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Pak Min-gyu

Hello, Footwiks,

Thanks for creating Pak Min-gyu! I edit here too, under the username SportingFlyer and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SportingFlyer}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SportingFlyer T·C 01:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:In Chang-soo has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:In Chang-soo. Thanks! SportingFlyer T·C 04:30, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: In Chang-soo has been accepted

In Chang-soo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Taewangkorea (talk) 09:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Seoul United FC

A tag has been placed on Category:Seoul United FC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:34, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Amrokgang Sports Club players

A tag has been placed on Category:Amrokgang Sports Club players requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:18, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Kyonggongop Sports Club

A tag has been placed on Category:Kyonggongop Sports Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Amrokgang Sports Club

A tag has been placed on Category:Amrokgang Sports Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:K League Promotion-Relegation Playoffs

A tag has been placed on Category:K League Promotion-Relegation Playoffs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

To be honest you're better off posting at WP:RSN for wider input, including specific details of the publisher etc. Giant Snowman 11:01, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FC Seoul players

I've updated stats at List of FC Seoul players, but I'm not 100% sure if its correct.

I removed Song Jin-hyung stats as I cannot find sources for 2003-2007 and the info is probably not correct.
Is 395 for Go Yo-han correct? It was 368 before this season according to this article, in 2019 he has 35 league + 1 cup game, so it should be 404? But according to namu wiki and stats on Korean wiki FC Seoul players, he has 23 total appearances in FA Cup and 55 apps in ACL as of 2019, so with 305 league games and 10 league cup games, it should be 395 (including 2 apps in promotion-relegation 2018), unless something else is missing. Snowflake91 (talk) 13:39, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

^ 'DGB대구은행파크'…대구FC 전용경기장 상업권 장착하며 새출발

[1] 'DGB대구은행파크'…대구FC 전용경기장 상업권 장착하며 새출발

[1]