Korean War
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template. |
| Korean War | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part of the Cold War | |||||||||
| File:Korean War Montage.jpg Clockwise, from top: American trucks crossing the 38th parallel, F-86 Sabre flying over Korea, the port in Incheon where the Battle of Incheon commenced, Chinese soldiers being welcomed back after the war, and USMC 1st Lt Baldomero Lopez climbing the seawall in Incheon. | |||||||||
| |||||||||
| Belligerents | |||||||||
|
Naval Support and Military Servicing/Repairs: Medical staff:  Sweden |
North Korea and Allies:
 Soviet Union | ||||||||
| Commanders and leaders | |||||||||
|
 Tahsin Yazıcı |
Georgy Malenkov | ||||||||
| Strength | |||||||||
|
|
Total: 1,212,000 Note: All figures may vary according to source. This measures peak strength as sizes changed during the war. | ||||||||
| Casualties and losses | |||||||||
|
South Korea: |
North Korea: | ||||||||
| Civilians killed/wounded (total Koreans) = 2 Million (Est.)[23] | |||||||||
The Korean War refers to a period of military conflict between North Korea (officially the Democratic People's Republic of Korea) and South Korea (officially the Republic of Korea) with major hostilities beginning on June 25, 1950, pausing with an armistice signed on July 27, 1953. North Korea has since unilaterally withdrawn from that armistice, having announced its intent to do so on May 27, 2009.[24] The conflict arose from the attempts of the two Korean powers to re-unify Korea under their respective governments. The period immediately before the war was marked by escalating border conflicts at the 38th Parallel and attempts to negotiate elections for the entirety of Korea.[25] These negotiations ended when the North Korean Army invaded the South on June 25, 1950. The United States and her allies intervened on behalf of South Korea. After rapid advances in a South Korean counterattack, North-allied Chinese forces intervened on behalf of North Korea, shifting the balance of the war and ultimately leading to an armistice that approximately restored the original boundaries between North and South Korea.
While some have referred to the conflict as a civil war, many other factors were at play.[26] Each side was supported by external powers and the conflict expanded, becoming a proxy war in the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union. The term has also been used to describe both the events preceding and following the main hostilities.
Name of the conflict
In South Korea, the war is often called 6·25 or 6·25 War (Template:Lang-ko), from the date of the start of the conflict or, more formally, Hanguk jeonjaeng (Hangul: 한국전쟁; Hanja: 韓國戰爭, literally "Korean War"). In North Korea, while commonly known as the Korean War, it is formally called the Joguk haebang jeonjaeng or Fatherland Liberation War (Hangul: 조국해방전쟁; Hanja: 祖國解放戰爭). In the United States, the conflict was officially termed a police action — the Korean Conflict — rather than a war, largely in order to avoid the necessity of a declaration of war by the U.S. Congress. The war is sometimes called The Forgotten War or The Unknown War because it is a major conflict of the 20th century that gets far less attention than World War II, which preceded it, and the Vietnam War, which succeeded it.[27] The war was a unique combination of the techniques utilized in both World War I and World War II, beginning with swift, fast-paced infantry advances following well-choreographed bombing raids from the air by the American military and its UN allies. However, following both sides' failures at holding the land captured, battles quickly evolved into World War I-type trench warfare in January 1951, lasting until the essential border stalemate at the end. In China, the conflict was known as the War to Resist America and Aid Korea (抗美援朝), but is today commonly called the "Korean War" (朝鮮 戰爭 Chaoxian zhanzheng,[28] 韓國戰爭 Hanguo zhanzheng, or simply 韓戰 Hanzhan).
Japanese rule
 |
Korea had been a unified country since the 6th century. In 1895, Japan defeated China in the First Sino-Japanese War of 1894–5, and their Japanese forces remained in Korea, occupying strategically important parts of the country. To Japan, a late arriving player in the game of great powers, Korea seemed a natural fit in their sphere of influence.[29]
Ten years later, the Japanese defeated the Russian navy in the Russo-Japanese War (1904–5), contributing to Japan's emergence as an imperial power.[30] Following the end of the Russo-Japanese War, the Japanese declared Korea was their protectorate and expanded their control over local institutions despite Korean opposition. In August 1910, a treaty of Annexation was signed.[31]
While Korean nationalists from both North and South Korea have their own versions of life under Japanese rule, it was clear that Japanese policies were harsh.[32]: 23 Educated Koreans and nationalists were all endangered and most fled. The harshness intensified as Japan became increasingly militant in the 1930s; Korean and its literature were banned from schools and conscription began in 1938. During the Second World War, 2.6 million Koreans were conscripted for forced labour, in addition to the kidnapped comfort women. Japan, especially as the American submarine campaign intensified, stripped out all livestock, rice stocks, and metal–causing much hardship.[33]
At the close of World War II, forces of both the Soviet Union and the United States occupied the peninsula in accordance with an agreement put forth by the United States government to divide the Korean peninsula. This decision, which was made without consultation of the Korean people, was made by then Colonel Dean Rusk and Army officer Charles Bonesteel.[34] The Soviet forces entered the peninsula on August 10, 1945 and remained north of the 38th parallel waiting for the US forces to arrive. A few weeks later, the American forces entered through Incheon led by U.S. Army Lt. Gen. John R. Hodge and formally accepted the surrender of Japanese forces south of the 38th parallel on September 9, 1945 at Government House in Seoul.[35]
Division of Korea
Though the eventual division of Korea was considered at the Potsdam Conference,[32][35]: 24–25 the wishes of the Korean people to be free of foreign interference were not considered.[32][36]: 25 British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, Chinese Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek and U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt had stated a determination for Korean independence and freedom at the Cairo Conference.[32]: 24 [37] During the earlier Yalta Conference in February 1945, Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin called for “buffer zones” in both Asia and Europe.[38] Stalin believed that Russia should have preeminence in China, and the US requested that the USSR join in the war against Japan “three months after the surrender of Germany.”[38] On August 6, 1945, the Soviet Union declared war on the Japanese Empire and, on August 8, it began the liberation on the northern part of the Korean peninsula. As agreed with the United States, the USSR halted its troops at the 38th parallel on August 26.[32]: 24 However, on September 3, Lt. Gen. John R. Hodge, commander of XXIV Corps and designated U.S. Commander in Korea, received a radio message from Lt. Gen. Yoshio Kozuki, commander of the Japanese 17th Area Army in Korea, reporting that Soviet forces had advanced south of the 38th parallel only in the Kaesong area.[35] Hodge decided to trust the Japanese reports of events in Korea. U.S. troops arrived in the southern part of the peninsula in early September 1945.[32]: 25
On August 10, 1945, with the Japanese surrender imminent, the American government was unsure whether the Soviets would adhere to the proposal arranged by the U.S. government. A month earlier, Colonels Dean Rusk and Charles Bonesteel, after deciding in their 1/2 hour session that at least two major ports should be included in the U.S. zone, had drawn the dividing line at the 38th parallel using a National Geographic map for reference.[35][39][40][41] Rusk, later U.S. Secretary of State, commented that the American military was “faced with the scarcity of U.S. forces immediately available and time and space factors which would make it difficult to reach very far north before Soviet troops could enter the area.”[38]
The USSR agreed to the 38th parallel being the demarcation between occupation zones in the Korean peninsula, partly to better their position in the negotiations with the Allies over eastern Europe. It was agreed that the USSR would receive surrendering Japanese troops on the northern part of Korea; the U.S., on the southern side. The Soviet forces entered and liberated the northern part of the peninsula weeks prior to the entry of American forces. In accordance with the arrangements made with the American government, the Soviet forces halted their advance at the 38th parallel.
The American forces arrived in Korea in early September.[32]: 25 One of Hodge’s first directives was to restore many Japanese colonial administrators and collaborators to their previous positions of power within Korea. This policy was understandably very unpopular among Koreans who had suffered horribly under Japanese colonial rule for 35 years, and would prove to have enormous consequences for the American occupation.[25][neutrality is disputed]
A second policy set forth by Hodge was to refuse to recognize the existing political organizations that had been established by the Korean people. Hodge sought to establish firm U.S. control over events throughout the southern half of the peninsula.[30] These policies would help give rise to the later insurrections and guerrilla warfare that preceded the outbreak of the civil war.[30][36]
In December 1945, the United States and the Soviet Union agreed to administer the country under the U.S.-Soviet Joint Commission, as termed by the Moscow Conference of Foreign Ministers. It was agreed by the US and the USSR, but not the Koreans, that Korea would govern itself independently after five years of international oversight.[42] However, both the U.S. and the USSR approved Korean-led governments in their respective halves, each of which were favorable to the occupying power’s political ideology.[32]: 25–26 Some elements of the population responded with violent insurrections and protests in the South.[30] The USAMGIK tried to contain civil violence by banning strikes on December 8 and outlawing the revolutionary government and the people's committees on December 12. Events spiraled quickly out of US control, however, when Koreans[36] staged a massive strike on September 23, 1946 by 8,000 railway workers in Busan which quickly spread to other cities in the South. The Daegu uprising occurred on October 1, in which police attempts to control rioters caused the death of three student demonstrators and injuries to many others, sparking a mass counter-attack killing 38 policemen. It should be noted that at this time, the vast majority of members of the South Korean police force officers had been members of the Japanese police force during the colonial period.[36] When the US forces sided with these former collaborators, it discredited the US in the eyes of many Koreans.[36] Over in Yeongcheon, a police station came under attack by a 10,000-strong crowd on October 3, killing over 40 policemen and the county chief. Other attacks killed about 20 landlords and pro-Japanese officials.
In South Korea, an anti-trusteeship right wing group known as the Representative Democratic Council emerged, this group came to oppose these U.S. sponsored agreements.[43] Because Koreans had suffered under Japanese colonization for 35 years, most Koreans opposed another period of foreign control. This opposition caused the U.S. to abandon the Soviet-supported Moscow Accords.[44] The Americans did not want a communist government in South Korea, so they called for elections in all of Korea,[32]: 26 but the Soviets opposed this idea.[45]
The government that emerged was led by anti-communist U.S.-educated strongman Syngman Rhee, a Korean who had been imprisoned by the Japanese as a young man and later fled to the United States.[46] The Soviets, in turn, approved and furthered the rise of a Communist government in the North.[32]: 26 Bolstered by his history as an anti-Japanese fighter, his political skills, and his connections with the Soviet Union, Kim Il-sung rose to become leader of this new government and crushed any opposition to his rule by the summer of 1947.[26] In the south, those who supported Communism were driven into hiding in the hills, where they prepared for a guerrilla war against the American-supported government.[26]
South Korean President Syngman Rhee and North Korean General Secretary Kim Il-Sung were each intent on reuniting the peninsula under his own system.[32]: 27 Partly because of numbers of Soviet tanks and heavy arms, the North Koreans were able to escalate ongoing border clashes and go on the offensive,[32]: 27 while South Korea, with only limited American backing, had far fewer options. The American government believed at the time that the Communist bloc was a unified monolith, and that North Korea acted within this monolith as a pawn of the Soviet Union.
Course
Invasion of South Korea
 | This section possibly contains unsourced predictions, speculative material, or accounts of events that might not occur. Information must be verifiable and based on reliable published sources. (August 2008) |
In a little known event prior to the start of the Korean War, a CIA officer named Douglas Mackiernan stationed in China gathered intelligence that predicted the war. MacKiernan had volunteered to stay in China when all other diplomats had left the country. He gathered valuable intelligence on the intent of the North Koreans and their allies, the Chinese. He and his local CIA-trained security were forced to flee, and they spent months trying to get over the Himalayas on horseback. MacKiernan was killed within miles of the Tibetan city of Lhasa. His men did make it with this valuable information and they turned it over to the US officials there. The North Koreans crossed the 38th parallel 13 days later. MacKiernan posthumously received the CIA's award for valor, the coveted Intelligence Star, for his actions.[47]
Under the guise of a counter-attack, the North Korean Army struck in the pre-dawn hours of Sunday, June 25, 1950, crossing the 38th parallel behind a firestorm of artillery.[32]: 14 The North claimed Republic of Korea Army (ROK) troops under the “bandit traitor Syngman Rhee" had crossed the border first, and that Rhee would be arrested and executed.[35] While certainly true that both Southern and Northern militaries had for the past year exchanged gunfire and crossed over the 38th parallel, the attack on June 25 was considered by some nations to be an extension of the North's plan to unify the country and not a direct result of a particular attack from the South.
The United Nations Security Council was convened in a few hours and passed the UNSC Resolution 82 condemning the North Korean aggression unanimously. The resolution was adopted mainly because the Soviet Union, a veto-wielding power, had been boycotting proceedings since January, in protest that the Republic of China (Taiwan) and not the People's Republic of China held a permanent seat on the council.[48] President Truman had made a statement on June 27, 1950 ordering the United States air and sea forces to give the South Korean regime support. While the United Nations Security Council was convened and had been debating the issue from the invasion forward it only issued Resolution 83 on June 27 which definitively recommended member-states militarily assist the Republic of Korea. The Soviet Union's foreign minister accused the United States of starting armed intervention on behalf of the Republic of Korea before the Security Council was summoned to meet on June 27, and confronting the UN with a fait accompli.[49]
Critics charged that the information on this resolution was based on U.S. sources referring to reports of the South Korean army. The DPRK was not invited to sit as a temporary member in the UN which some say violated Article 32 of the UN Charter. It was argued that the situation in Korea did not fall within the scope of the UN Charter since the initial clashes between North and South Korean forces would have to be classified as a civil war. Since the USSR representative decided to boycott the United Nations with the announced purpose of preventing action by the Security Council, the legality of UN action was challenged; legal scholars argued that unanimity among the five permanent members was required to take action on important matters.[50][51]
At the outbreak of war, the North Korean Army was equipped with 274 Type 58 tanks, about 150 YAK fighters, 110 attack bombers, 200 artillery pieces, 78 YAK trainers and 35 reconnaissance planes. Around 231,000 North Korean soldiers invaded South Korea.[35] These forces were assigned to the invasion while 114 more fighters, 78 bombers, 105 Type 58 tanks, and 30,000 soldiers were stationed in North Korea. Their navy had several small warships, and launched attacks on the South Korean Navy. North Korea's logistics system was able to quickly move supplies south as the army advanced.
According to Roy E. Appleman in "South to the Naktong - North to the Yalu", the South Korean Army had 98,000 soldiers of whom only 65,000 were combat troops. Unlike their northern opponents the South Korean military had no tanks at all, and the South Korean air force consisted of a mere 12 liaison-type aircraft and 10 advance trainers (AT6). There were no large foreign combat units in the country when the war began, but there were large American forces stationed in nearby Japan.[35]
The North's well-planned attack with about 231,000 troops achieved surprise and quick successes.[35] North Korea attacked a number of key places including Kaesŏng, Chuncheon, Uijeongbu and Ongjin.
Within days, South Korean forces, often of dubious loyalty to the Southern regime, were in full retreat or defecting en masse to the North.[32]: 23 As the ground attack continued, the North Korean Air Force conducted bombing of Kimpo Airport near Seoul. North Korean forces occupied Seoul on the afternoon of June 28. An air battle took place over the city in which 37 South Korean fighters were shot down while only 9 North Korean fighters were downed. Two days later, the largest battle between only North and South Korean forces happened. The North Koreans destroyed 89 tanks, 76 artillery pieces, 19 bombers, and 21 fighters. South Korean casualties were 7,000, while 16,000 were captured. Many of these South Koreans later fought for North Korea. Many South Koreans deserted after the battle.[citation needed] However, North Korea's hope for a quick surrender by the Rhee government and the reunification of the peninsula evaporated when the United States and other foreign powers intervened with UN approval.[citation needed]
U.S. intervention
.jpg)
Despite the post-World War II demobilization of U.S. and allied forces, which caused serious supply problems for American troops in the region,[32]: 42 the United States still had substantial forces in Japan to oppose the North Korean military. These American forces were under the command of General Douglas MacArthur. Apart from British Commonwealth units, no other nation could supply sizable manpower.
On Saturday June 24, President Harry S. Truman received an emergency phone call from Secretary of State Dean Acheson informing him that the forces of the Communist government of North Korea had crossed the 38th Parallel and invaded the American-backed South Korea.[52] Truman and Acheson began extensive discussions of the unfolding events and assembled a meeting of top state and defense department officials. The officials shared a conviction that the United States was obligated to respond to blatant acts of aggression.[53] The group drew parallels with Hitler's aggressions in the 1930s and believed that the mistakes of appeasement could not be repeated. President Truman recognized the situation as critically relevant to the global containment of communism:
Communism was acting in Korea, just as Hitler, Mussolini and the Japanese had ten, fifteen, and twenty years earlier. I felt certain that if South Korea was allowed to fall communist leaders would be emboldened to override nations closer to our own shores. If the Communists were permitted to force their way into the Republic of Korea without opposition from the free world, no small nation would have the courage to resist threat and aggression by stronger communist neighbors.[54]
American intentions were announced as President Truman issued, in his first public statement concerning the fighting, that the United States Government would counter "unprovoked aggression" and "vigorously support the effort of the security council to terminate this serious breach of peace".[55] In Congress, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Omar Bradley, spoke out against "appeasement" and declared that Korea was as good a place as any "for drawing the line" against Communist expansion. Truman and Acheson then prepared Congress to appropriate funds for additional military expenses essential to the goals of NSC-68 and in August 1950, $12 billion for military expenses in Asia was authorized.[56]
Upon the recommendation of Acheson, U.S. President Truman then ordered MacArthur to transfer ammunition, arms and equipment to the ROK Army while using air cover to protect the evacuation of U.S. citizens. Truman did not agree with his advisors, who called for unilateral U.S. airstrikes against the North Korean forces, but did order the Seventh Fleet to protect Chiang Kai-Shek's Taiwan. The Nationalist government (confined to the island of Taiwan) asked to participate in the war. Their request was denied by the Americans who felt that it would only encourage intervention by the People's Republic of China (PRC).[57]
The first significant foreign military intervention was the American Task Force Smith, part of the U.S. Army's 24th Infantry Division based in Japan.[32]: 45 On July 5, it fought for the first time at Osan and was immediately defeated with 1,416 casualties and 785 taken prisoner.[32]: 45–47 The victorious North Korean forces advanced southwards, and the 24th Division was forced to retreat to Taejeon, which also fell to the Northern forces.[32]: 48 There were 3,602 casualties and 2,962 soldiers taken prisoner, along with Major General William F. Dean, commander of the division.[32]: 48 18 American fighters were shot down in this battle compared to five North Korean fighters. 29 U.S. bombers were shot down by North Korean fighters and anti-aircraft fire in these actions.
By August, the South Korean forces and the U.S. Eighth Army under General Walton Walker had been driven back into a small area in the southeast corner of the Korean peninsula around the city of Pusan.[32]: 53 As the North Koreans advanced, they rounded up and killed civil servants.[32]: 56 On August 20, MacArthur sent a message warning Kim Il Sung that he would be held responsible for further atrocities committed against UN troops.[32][46]: 56
By September, only the area around Pusan—about 10 percent of the Korean peninsula—was still in coalition hands. With the aid of massive American supplies, naval and air support, as well as ground reinforcements, the UN forces managed to stabilize a line along the Nakdong River. This desperate holding action became known in the United States as the Pusan Perimeter.
Escalation of the Korean war
In the face of fierce North Korean attacks, the allied defense became a desperate battle called the Battle of Pusan Perimeter by Americans. However, the North Koreans failed to capture Pusan.
American air power arrived in force, flying 40 sorties per day in ground support actions[citation needed] Strategic bombers (mostly B-29s based in Japan) closed most rail and road traffic by day, and destroyed 32 critical bridges necessary for the conduct of warfare.[32]: 47–48 Trains used by military and civilians alike waited out the daylight hours in tunnels.[32]: 66
Throughout all parts of Korea, the American bombers knocked out the main supply dumps and eliminated oil refineries and seaports that handled imports. The bombing was designed to starve North Korean forces of ammunition and other martial supplies. Naval air power also attacked transportation choke points. The North Korean forces were already strung out over the peninsula, and the destruction caused by American bombers prevented needed supplies from reaching North Korean forces in the south.[32]: 58
Meanwhile, supply bases in Japan were pouring weapons and soldiers into Pusan.[32]: 59–60 American tank battalions were rushed in from San Francisco; by late August, America had over 500 medium tanks in the Pusan perimeter.[32]: 61 By early September, UN-ROK forces were decidedly more powerful and outnumbered the North Koreans by 180,000 to 100,000. At that point, they began a counterattack.[32][35]: 61
South Korean and allied forces move north
In the face of these overwhelming reinforcements, the North Korean forces found themselves undermanned and with weak logistical support.[32]: 61 They also lacked the substantial naval and air support of the Americans.[32]: 58 In order to alleviate pressure on the Pusan Perimeter, General MacArthur, as UN commander-in-chief for Korea, argued for an amphibious landing far behind the North Korean lines at Incheon.[32]: 67
On 06 July, General MacArthur called Major General Hobart Gay, Commanding General, 1st Cavalry Division and informed him to plan for the 1st Cavalry Division to make an amphibious landing at Inchon. Between 12 and 14 July, the division loaded on ships in the Yokohama area. Its mission was to reinforce the 24th Infantry Division.[2]
The violent tides and strong enemy presence made this an extremely risky operation.[32]: 66–67 MacArthur had started planning a few days after the war began, but he had been strongly opposed by the Pentagon.[32]: 67 When he finally received permission, MacArthur activated the X Corps under General Edward Almond (comprising 70,000 [citation needed] troops of the 1st Marine Division and the Army's 7th Infantry Division and augmented by 8,600 Korean troops) and ordered them to land at Incheon in Operation Chromite.[32]: 68 By the time of the attack on September 15, thanks to reconnaissance by guerrillas, misinformation and extensive shelling prior to the invasion, the North Korean military had few soldiers stationed in Incheon, so the U.S. forces met only light resistance when they landed, though extensive shelling and bombing destroyed much of the city.[32]: 70
The Inchon landing was an immediate success and allowed the 1st Cavalry Division to break out of the perimeter to start fighting north. It was during this massive offensive that the 3rd Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, "C" Company and the "I" & "R" Platoon of the 70th Tank Battalion made the historical mission of "Task Force Lynch", the Pusan Perimeter Breakout through 106.4 miles of enemy held territory to link up with the 7th Infantry Division at Osan. [3]
The landing was a decisive victory, as X Corps rolled over the few defenders and threatened to trap the main North Korean army.[32]: 71–72 MacArthur quickly recaptured Seoul.[32]: 77 The North Koreans, almost cut off, rapidly retreated northwards; about 25,000 to 30,000 made it back.[58][59]
Invasion of North Korea
The United Nations troops drove the North Koreans back past the 38th parallel.[32]: 79–94
The UN forces crossed into North Korea in early October 1950.[32]: 81 The U.S. X Corps made amphibious landings at Wonsan and Iwon, which had already been captured by South Korean forces advancing by land.[32]: 87–88 The Eighth U.S. Army, along with the South Koreans, drove up the western side of Korea and captured Pyongyang on October 19.[32]: 90 By the end of October, the North Korean Army was rapidly disintegrating, and the UN took 135,000 prisoners.
The UN offensive greatly concerned the Chinese, who worried that the UN forces would not stop at the Yalu River, the border between North Korea and China, and might extend their rollback policy into China.[32]: 83 Many in the West, including General MacArthur, thought that spreading the war to China would be necessary and that since North Korean troops were being supplied by bases in China, those supply depots should be bombed. However, Truman and the other leaders disagreed, and MacArthur was ordered to be very cautious when approaching the Chinese border.[32]: 83
Chinese intervention
On June 27, 1950, before China entered the conflict, President Truman ordered the 7th Fleet to enter the Taiwan Straits, in order to protect Taiwan from Chinese Communist forces.[60] The PRC warned American leaders through neutral diplomats that it would intervene to protect its national security.[32]: 83 Truman regarded the warnings as “a bald attempt to blackmail the U.N.” and did not take it seriously.[61] The PRC Government argued that in making Japan its main war base in the Far East, launching an invasion against Korea and the Chinese province of Taiwan, and carrying out active intervention in other countries in Asia, the United States was building up a military encirclement of China.[62] The PRC Government reported that prior to China's entry in the Korean conflict, the United States violated Chinese airspace, bombing peaceful towns and villages.[63]
On October 15, 1950, Truman went to Wake Island for a short, highly publicized meeting with MacArthur.[32]: 88 MacArthur, saying he was speculating, saw little risk.[32]: 89 MacArthur explained that the Chinese had lost their window of opportunity to help North Korea's invasion. He estimated the Chinese had 300,000 soldiers in Manchuria, with between 100,000-125,000 men along the Yalu; half could be brought across the Yalu. But the Chinese had no air force; hence, “if the Chinese tried to get down to Pyongyang, there would be the greatest slaughter.”[58][64]
On 10 October, the 89th Tank Battalion was attached to the 1st Cavalry Division to strengthen the armor support for the Northern offensive. On 15 October, after moderate resistance, the 7th Cavalry Regiment and "C" Company, 70th Tank Battalion secured the city of Namchonjam. On 17 October, they made a flanking movement to the right of the main highway to Pyongyang, with the objective being Hwangju. On 19 October, troopers of the 1st Cavalry Division captured Pyongyang, the capital city of North Korea.
On October 8, 1950, the day after American troops crossed the 38th parallel, Chairman Mao Zedong issued the order to assemble the Chinese People's Volunteer Army. Seventy percent of the members of the PVA were Chinese regulars from the Chinese People's Liberation Army. Mao ordered the army to move to the Yalu River, ready to cross.[citation needed] Mao sought Soviet aid and saw intervention as defensive of the broader revolutionary situation in Asia: “If we allow the United States to occupy all of Korea, Korean revolutionary power will suffer a fundamental defeat, and the American invaders will run more rampant, and have negative effects for the entire Far East.” he told Stalin. Premier Zhou Enlai was sent to Moscow to add force to Mao's cabled arguments. Mao delayed while waiting for substantial Soviet help, postponing the planned attack from October 13 to October 19. However, Soviet assistance was limited to providing air support no nearer than sixty miles (100 km) from the battlefront. The Soviet MiG-15s in PRC colors did pose a serious challenge to UN pilots. In one area, nicknamed “MiG Alley” by UN forces, they held local air superiority against the American-made Lockheed F-80 Shooting Stars until the newer North American F-86 Sabres were deployed. The Chinese were angry at the limited extent of Soviet involvement, having assumed that they had been promised full scale air support.[citation needed]
The Chinese made contact with American troops on November 1, 1950. Thousands of Chinese had attacked from the north, northwest, and west against scattered U.S. and South Korean (Republic of Korea or ROK) units moving deep into North Korea. The Chinese seemed to come out of nowhere as they swarmed around the flanks and over the defensive positions of the surprised United Nations (UN) troops.[65]
The Chinese march and bivouac discipline also minimized any possible detection.[32]: 102 In a well-documented instance, a Chinese army of three divisions marched on foot from An-tung in Manchuria, on the north side of the Yalu River, 286 miles (460 km) to its assembly area in North Korea, in the combat zone, in a period ranging from 16 to 19 days. One division of this army, marching at night over circuitous mountain roads, averaged 18 miles (29 km) per day for 18 days. The day's march began after dark at 19:00 and ended at 03:00 the next morning. Defense measures against aircraft were to be completed before 05:30. Every man, animal, and piece of equipment were to be concealed and camouflaged. During daylight, bivouac scouting parties moved ahead to select the next day's bivouac area. When Chinese units were compelled for any reason to march by day, they were under standing orders for every man to stop in his tracks and remain motionless if aircraft appeared overhead.[32]: 102 Officers were empowered to shoot any man who violated this order.[35]
In late November, the Chinese struck in the west, along the Chongchon River, and completely overran several South Korean divisions and successfully landed a heavy blow to the flank of the remaining UN forces.[32]: 98–99 The ensuing defeat of the U.S. Eighth Army resulted in the longest retreat of any American military unit in history.[66] Mostly because of the successful but very costly rear-guard action by the Turkish Brigade at Kunuri during November 26 to 30th, which slowed the Chinese onslaught by 3–4 days, the U.S. 8th Army escaped complete annihilation by the Chinese. In the east, at the Battle of Chosin Reservoir, a 3,000 man Regimental Combat Team from the U.S. 7th Infantry Division and a 12,000 to 15,000 man division of the U.S. Marine Corps was also unprepared for the Chinese tactics and was soon surrounded, though they eventually managed to escape the encirclement, albeit with over 15,000 casualties from the two units and the other of X Corps units which were providing covering and supporting fire.[67]
While the Chinese soldiers initially lacked heavy fire support and light infantry weapons, their tactics quickly adapted to this disadvantage, as explained by Bevin Alexander in his book How Wars Are Won:
The usual method was to infiltrate small units, from a platoon of fifty men to a company of 200, split into separate detachments. While one team cut off the escape route of the Americans, the others struck both the front and the flanks in concerted assaults. The attacks continued on all sides until the defenders were destroyed or forced to withdraw. The Chinese then crept forward to the open flank of the next platoon position, and repeated the tactics.
Roy Appleman further clarified the initial Chinese tactics as:
In the First Phase Offensive, highly skilled enemy light infantry troops had carried out the Chinese attacks, generally unaided by any weapons larger than mortars. Their attacks had demonstrated that the Chinese were well-trained disciplined fire fighters, and particularly adept at night fighting. They were masters of the art of camouflage. Their patrols were remarkably successful in locating the positions of the UN forces. They planned their attacks to get in the rear of these forces, cut them off from their escape and supply roads, and then send in frontal and flanking attacks to precipitate the battle. They also employed a tactic which they termed Hachi Shiki, which was a V-formation into which they allowed enemy forces to move; the sides of the V then closed around their enemy while another force moved below the mouth of the V to engage any forces attempting to relieve the trapped unit. Such were the tactics the Chinese used with great success at Onjong, Unsan, and Ch'osan but with only partial success at Pakch'on and the Ch'ongch'on bridgehead.[35]
The U.S. forces in northeast Korea, who had rushed forward with great speed only a few months earlier, were forced to race southwards with even greater speed and form a defensive perimeter around the port city of Hungnam, where a major evacuation was carried out in late December 1950.[32]: 104–111 Facing complete defeat and surrender, 193 shiploads of American men and material were evacuated from Hungnam Harbor, and about 105,000 soldiers, 98,000 civilians, 17,500 vehicles, and 350,000 tons of supplies were shipped to Pusan in orderly fashion.[32]: 110 As they left, the American forces blew up large portions of the city to deny use to the communists.[58][68]
Aftermath of Chosin Battle-Operation Glory
Following the conflict, the United Nations dead were buried at a temporary gravesite near Hŭngnam. Operation Glory occurred from July to November 1954, during which the dead of each side were exchanged; remains of 4,167 U.S. soldiers and marines were exchanged for 13,528 North Korean and Chinese dead. In addition, 546 civilians who died in United Nations prisoner of war camps were turned over to the South Korean government.[69] After "Operation Glory" 416 Korean War "unknowns" were buried in the Punchbowl Cemetery. According to a DPMO white paper [70] 1,394 names were also transmitted during "Operation Glory" from the Chinese and North Koreans (of which 858 names proved to be correct); of the 4,167 returned remains were found to be 4,219 individuals of whom 2,944 were found to be Americans of whom all but 416 were identified by name. Of 239 Korean War casualties unaccounted for: 186 not associated with Punchbowl unknowns (176 were identified and of the remaining 10 cases 4 were non-Americans of Asiatic descent; one was British; 3 were identified and 2 cases unconfirmed). In 1990-1994 North Korea excavated and returned more than 200 sets of remains-very few have been identified because of co-mingling of remains.[71] From 1996 to 2006 220 remains were recovered from near the Chinese border. [72]
Fighting across the 38th Parallel (early 1951)
In January 1951, the Chinese and North Korean forces struck again in their 3rd Phase Offensive (also known as the Chinese Winter Offensive). The Chinese repeated their previous tactics of mostly night attacks, with a stealthy approach from positions some distance from the front, followed by a rush with overwhelming numbers, and using trumpets or gongs both for communication and to disorient their foes. Against this the UN forces had no remedy, and their resistance crumbled; they retreated rapidly to the south (referred to by UN forces as the “bug-out”).[32]: 117 Seoul was abandoned and was captured by communist forces on January 4, 1951.
To add to the Eighth Army's difficulties, General Walker was killed in an accident.[32]: 111 He was replaced by a World War II airborne veteran, Lieutenant-General Matthew Ridgway, who took immediate steps to raise the morale and fighting spirit of the battered Eighth Army, which had fallen to low levels during its retreat.[32]: 113 Nevertheless, the situation was so grim that MacArthur mentioned the use of atomic weapons against China, much to the alarm of America's allies.[citation needed]
UN forces continued to retreat until they had reached a line south of Suwon in the west and Wonju in the center, and north of Samchok in the east, where the front stabilized.[32]: 117 The People's Volunteer Army had outrun its supply line and was forced to recoil.[32]: 118 The Chinese could not go beyond Seoul because they were at the end of their logistics supply line[citation needed] — all food and ammunition had to be carried at night on foot or bicycle from the Yalu River.
In late January, finding the lines in front of his forces deserted, Ridgway ordered reconnaissance in force, which developed into a full-scale offensive, Operation Roundup.[32]: 121 The operation was planned to proceed gradually, to make full use of the UN's superiority in firepower on the ground and in the air;[32]: 120 by the time Roundup was completed in early February, UN forces had reached the Han River and re-captured Wonju.[32]: 121
The Chinese struck back in mid-February with their Fourth Phase Offensive, from Hoengsong in the center against IX Corps positions around Chipyong-ni.[32]: 121 A short but desperate siege there fought by units of the U.S. 2nd Infantry Division, including the French Battalion, broke up the offensive;[32]: 121 in this action, the UN learned how to deal with Chinese offensive tactics and be able to stand their ground.
Roundup was followed in the last two weeks of February 1951, with Operation Killer, by a revitalized Eighth Army, restored by Ridgway to fighting trim.[32]: 121 This was a full-scale offensive across the front, again staged to maximize firepower and with the aim of destroying as much of the Chinese and North Korean armies as possible.[32]: 121 By the end of Killer, I Corps had re-occupied all territory south of the Han, while IX Corps had captured Hoengsong.[32]: 122
On March 7, 1951, the Eighth Army pushed forward again, in Operation Ripper, and on March 14 they expelled the North Korean and Chinese troops from Seoul, the fourth time in a year the city had changed hands.[32]: 122 Seoul was in utter ruins; its prewar population of 1.5 million had dropped to 200,000, with severe food shortages.[59]
MacArthur was removed from command by President Truman on April 11, 1951 for insubordination, setting off a firestorm of protest back in the U.S.[32]: 123–127 The new supreme commander was Ridgway, who had managed to regroup UN forces for the series of effective counter-offensives.[32]: 127 Command of Eighth Army passed to General James Van Fleet.[32]: 130
A further series of attacks slowly drove back the communist forces, such as Operations Courageous and Tomahawk, a combined ground- and air-assault to trap communist forces between Kaesong and Seoul. UN forces continued to advance until they reached Line Kansas, some miles north of the 38th parallel.[32]: 131
The Chinese were far from beaten, however; In April 1951 they launched their Fifth Phase Offensive (also called the Chinese Spring Offensive).[32]: 131 This was a major effort, involving three field armies (up to 700,000 men).[32]: 132 The main blow fell on I Corps, but fierce resistance in battles at the Imjin River and Kapyong, blunted its impetus, and the Chinese were halted at a defensive line north of Seoul (referred to as the No-Name Line).[32]: 133–134
A further Communist offensive in the east against ROK and X Corps on May 15 also made initial gains, but by May 20 the attack had ground to a halt.[32]: 136–137 Eighth Army counterattacked and by the end of May had regained Line Kansas.[32]: 137–138
The decision by UN forces to halt at Line Kansas, just north of the 38th Parallel, and not to persist in offensive action into North Korea, ushered in the period of stalemate which typified the remainder of the conflict.
Stalemate (July 1951–July 1953)
The rest of the war involved little territory change,[32]: 175–177 large-scale bombing of the north,[32]: 175–177 and lengthy peace negotiations, which began on July 10, 1951 at Kaesong.[32]: 145 Even during the peace negotiations, combat continued. For the South Korean and allied forces, the goal was to recapture all of South Korea before an agreement was reached in order to avoid loss of any territory.[32]: 159 The Chinese and North Koreans attempted similar operations, and later in the war they undertook operations designed to test the resolve of the UN to continue the conflict. Principal military engagements in this period included the Battle of Bloody Ridge[32]: 160 and Battle of Heartbreak Ridge[32]: 161–162 in 1951, the Battle of Old Baldy, the Battle of White Horse, the Battle of Triangle Hill and the Battle of Hill Eerie in 1952, the sieges of Outpost Harry, the Battle of the Hook and the battle for Pork Chop Hill in 1953.
The peace negotiations went on for two years,[32]: 144–153 first at Kaesong, and later at Panmunjon.[32]: 147 A major issue of the negotiations was repatriation of POWs.[32]: 187–199 The Communists agreed to voluntary repatriation but only if the majority would return to China or North Korea, something that did not occur.[32]: 189–190 Since many refused to be repatriated to the communist North Korea and China, the war continued until the Communists eventually dropped this issue.[32]: 242–245
In October 1951, U.S. forces performed Operation Hudson Harbor intending to establish the capability to use nuclear weapons. Several B-29s conducted individual simulated bomb runs from Okinawa to North Korea, delivering “dummy” nuclear bombs or heavy conventional bombs; the operation was coordinated from Yokota Air Base in Japan. The battle exercise was intended to test “actual functioning of all activities which would be involved in an atomic strike, including weapons assembly and testing, leading, ground control of bomb aiming,” and so on. The results indicated that nuclear bombs would be less effective than anticipated, because “timely identification of large masses of enemy troops was extremely rare.”[73][74][75][76][77]
On November 29, 1952, U.S. President-elect Dwight D. Eisenhower fulfilled a campaign promise by going to Korea to find out what could be done to end the conflict.[32]: 240 With the UN's acceptance of India's proposal for a Korean armistice, a cease-fire was established on July 27, 1953, by which time the front line was back around the proximity of the 38th parallel, and so a demilitarized zone (DMZ) was established around it, presently defended by North Korean troops on one side and by South Korean, American and UN troops on the other. The DMZ runs north of the parallel towards the east, and to the south as it travels west. The site of the peace talks, Kaesong, the old capital of Korea, was part of the South before hostilities broke out but is now part of the North. North Korea and the United States signed the Armistice Agreement, with Syngman Rhee refusing to sign.[78]
The total numbers of casualties suffered by all parties involved may never be known. Each country's self-reported casualties were largely based upon troop movements, unit rosters, battle casualty reports, and medical records.
The Western numbers of Chinese and/or North Korean casualties are based primarily on battle reports of estimated casualties, interrogation of POWs and captured documents. Most scholars provide a wide range of estimates on the number of death and wounded. A good compilation of these sources is in the democide web site (see Table 10.1).[79]. US sources state that the number of American Korean area deaths were 36,940 [80]. These sources state that Chinese deaths ranged from 100,000 to 1,500,000; most estimates are in the 400,000 range. The North Korean battle dead estimates were 214,000 to 520,000; the most common estimates were in the 500,000 range. South Korean civilian estimated deaths were in the 245,000 to 415,000 dead. Total civilian deaths were in the 1,500,000 to 3,000,000 range with most estimates in the 2,000,000 range.
The Chinese estimation of UN casualties states that the joint declaration of the Chinese People's Volunteers and the Korean People's Army said their forces "eliminated 1.09 million enemy forces, including 390,000 from the United States, 660,000 from South Korean, and 29,000 from other countries." The vague "eliminated" number gave no details to that of dead, wounded and captured. Regarding their own casualties, the same source said that "the Chinese People's Volunteers suffered 148,000 deaths altogether (among which 114,000 died in combat, incidents, and winterkill, 21,000 died after being hospitalized and 13,000 died from diseases); 380,000 were wounded and 29,000 missing, including 21,400 POWs (of whom 14,000 were sent to Taiwan, 7,110 were repatriated)." This same source concluded with these numbers for North Korean casualties, "the Korean People's Army had 290,000 casualties and 90,000 POWs; there was a large number of civilian deaths in the northern part of Korea, but no accurate figures were available."[81]
The casulties of the various UN forces are listed in the infobox, along with their estimates of Chinese and North Korean casualties.
Characteristics
Armored warfare
In the initial invasion stage of the war, North Korean armor was able to establish dominance using their Soviet-supplied Type 58 medium tanks.[82] The WW2-vintage North Korean tanks were facing a South Korean force with no tanks of their own and few modern anti-tank weapons.[32]: 39
The South Korean army had anti-tank rockets but these were World War II vintage 2.36 inch (60 mm) M9 bazookas. The bazooka rocket could easily penetrate the 45 mm side armor of the Type 58 at any range, but the bazooka was nonetheless found to be ineffective.[citation needed]
As U.S. forces arrived in Korea, they were accompanied only by light M24 Chaffee tanks which had been left in Japan for post-WWII occupation duties (heavier tanks would have torn up Japanese roads).[citation needed] These light tanks were ineffective against the larger North Korean Type 58.[citation needed] U.S. 105 mm howitzers were used on at least one occasion to fire HEAT ammunition over open sights.[citation needed]
As the U.S. buildup continued, shipments of heavier American tanks such as the M4 Sherman, the M26 Pershing, the M46 Patton, and the British Centurion as well as American and Allied ground attack aircraft were able to reverse the Communists' tank advantage.[32]: 182–184
However, in contrast to World War II's heavy emphasis on armor, few open tank battles actually occurred over the course of the Korean War. The country's heavily forested and mountainous terrain, as well as the poor road network, meant that tanks were able to operate only in small groups.
Air warfare
The Korean War was one of the last major wars where propeller-powered fighters such as the P-51 Mustang, F4U Corsair and aircraft carrier-based Hawker Sea Fury and Supermarine Seafire were used.[32]: 174 Turbojet fighter aircraft such as F-80s and F9F Panthers came to dominate the skies, overwhelming North Korea’s propeller-driven Yakovlev Yak-9s and Lavochkin La-9s.[32]: 182
From 1950, North Koreans began flying the Soviet-made MiG-15 jet fighters, some of which were piloted by experienced Soviet Air Force pilots, a casus belli[32]: 182 deliberately overlooked by the UN allied forces who were reluctant to engage in open war with the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China. At first, UN jet fighters, which also included Royal Australian Air Force Gloster Meteors, had some success, but the superior quality of the MiGs soon held sway over the first-generation jets used by the UN early in the war.[83]
In December 1950, the U.S. Air Force began using the F-86 Sabre.[32]: 183 The MiG could fly higher, 50,000 vs. 42,000 feet (12,800 m), offering a distinct advantage at the start of combat. In level flight, their maximum speeds were comparable — about 660 mph (1,060 km/h). The MiG could climb better, while the Sabre could turn and dive better. For weapons, the MiG carried two 23 mm and one 37 mm cannon, compared to the Sabre’s six .50 (12.7 mm) caliber machine guns. The American .50 caliber machine guns, while not packing the same punch, carried many more rounds and were aimed with a superior radar-ranging gunsight. The U.S. pilots also had the advantage of G-suits, which were used for the first time in this war. However, maintenance was an issue with the Sabre, and a large proportion of the UN air strength was grounded because of repairs during the war.[citation needed]
Even after the Air Force introduced the advanced F-86, its pilots often struggled against the jets piloted by Soviet pilots.[citation needed] The UN gradually gained air superiority over most of Korea that lasted until the end of the war — a decisive factor in helping the UN first advance into the north, and then resist the Chinese invasion of South Korea.[32]: 182–184 The Chinese and North Koreans also had jet power, but their training and experience were limited. With the introduction of the F-86F in late 1952, the Soviet and American aircraft had virtually identical performance characteristics.
After the war, the USAF claimed 792 MiG-15s and 108 additional aircraft shot down by Sabres for the loss of 78 Sabres, a ratio in excess of 10:1.[citation needed] Some post-war research has been able to confirm only 379 victories, although the USAF continues to maintain its official credits and the debate is possibly irreconcilable.
The Soviets claimed about 1,100 air-to-air victories and 335 combat MiG losses at that time. China's official losses were 231 planes shot down in air-to-air combat (mostly MiG-15) and 168 other losses. The number of losses of the North Korean Air Force was not revealed. It is estimated that it lost about 200 aircraft in the first stage of the war, and another 70 aircraft after Chinese intervention. Soviet claims of 650 victories over the Sabres, and China's claims of another 211 F-86s, are considered to be exaggerated by the USAF. According to a recent U.S. publication, the number of F-86s ever present in the Korean peninsula during the war totaled only 674[citation needed] and the total F-86 losses from all causes were about 230.[84]
Direct comparison of Sabre and MiG losses should be tempered by the fact that the primary targets for MiGs were heavy B-29 Superfortress bombers and ground-attack aircraft, while the primary targets for Sabres were MiG-15s.
By early 1951, the battle lines hardened and did not change much for the rest of the conflict. Throughout the summer and early fall of 1951, the outnumbered Sabres (as few as 44 at one point) of the 4th FIW continued to seek battle in MiG Alley near the Yalu against an enemy fielding as many as 500 planes, although only a fraction of these were operational and active. Following Colonel Harrison Thyng's famous message to the Pentagon, the 51st FIW reinforced the beleaguered 4th in December 1951.[85] For the next year and a half, the combat continued in generally the same fashion.
_off_Inchon_on_1_September_1952_(80-G-477573).jpg)
The Korean war was the first time the helicopter was used extensively in a conflict.[86] While helicopters such as the YR-4 were used in World War II,[88] their use was rare, and Jeeps like the Willys MB were the main method of removing an injured soldier. In the Korean war helicopters like the H-19 partially took over in the non combat Medevac area.[89]
The helicopter proved to be a valuable military asset for the United States in Korea. Improvements made to helicopters since World War II were tested in combat. The need for close air support helicopters was seen, and by the time of the Vietnam conflict gunships like the AH-1 Cobra had been produced. Helicopters like those used in the Korean war for Medevac missions and troop movement were also seen to work well in combat, and designs were also improved upon. This "combat test" for helicopters was important to the development of the military helicopter.[86]
Bombing Campaigns
The bombing of cities and villages in North Korea and partially in South Korea was comparable to that having occurred in Germany and Japan during World War 2. Remarkably, napalm was used widely for the first time. On August 12 1950 the US Air Force dropped 625 tons of bombs on North Korea. Two weeks later, the daily load amounted to about 800 tons. 18 of North Korea's cities were more than 50% destroyed. General William Dean, who had been in North Korean captivity, reported that most of the North Korean cities and villages he had seen were in ruins or were simply snow-covered wastelands. [90]
Naval warfare
As North Korea had no significant naval presence, naval battles were infrequent. The only significant "battle" took place on July 2, 1950, between the U.S. cruiser Juneau, the British cruiser Jamaica, and the British frigate Black Swan, against four North Korean torpedo boats and two North Korean mortar gunboats. The torpedo boats attempted to attack but they were quickly destroyed by the Anglo-American fleet. Numerous other communist ships were sunk during the war. Supply and ammunition ships were sunk by U.N. forces, denying use of the sea to the North Koreans. Juneau sunk several ammunition ships that had been present in her previous battle. The last instance of ship-to-ship battle in the war occurred at Inchon a few days before the battle, when the ROK ship PC 703 sank an enemy mine-laying craft and three other vessels in waters off the Yellow Sea port. For the remainder of the war, the role of the navies was to provide shore bombardment.[91]
Proposed use of nuclear weapons
Historian Bruce Cumings believes that Truman's allusions to the possibility of nuclear weapons use at a press conference on November 30, 1950 "was a threat based on contingency planning to use the bomb, rather than the faux pas so many assumed it to be." Cumings argues that Truman sought MacArthur's removal primarily because he felt that MacArthur would not be reliable enough in a situation in which Washington had decided to use atomic weapons. Cumings notes that the same day as the press conference, orders were sent between top Air Forces generals for the Strategic Air Command to "augment its capacities and that this should include “atomic capabilities." According to Cumings, the U.S. reached its closest point of using nuclear weapons during the war in April 1951. At the end of March, after the Chinese had moved large amounts of new forces near the Korean border, U.S. bomb loading pits at Kadena air base in Okinawa were made operational, and bombs were assembled there "lacking only the essential nuclear cores." On April 5, the Joint Chiefs of Staff released orders for immediate retaliatory attacks using atomic weapons against Manchurian bases in the event that large numbers of new Chinese troops entered into the fights or bombing attacks originated from those bases. On the same day, Truman gave his approval for transfer of nine Mark IV nuclear capsules "to the air force's Ninth Bomb Group, the designated carrier of the weapons" and "the president signed an order to use them against Chinese and Korean targets." Remarking that the signed order was never sent, Cumings offers two reasons why this was the case. Firstly, Truman had used the crisis to convince the Joint Chiefs of the necessity of MacArthur's removal (announced April 10) and secondly, since the war was not thereafter escalated by the Chinese and Soviets, no necessity of using them presented itself.[36][verification needed]
This viewpoint is contradicted however by the facts, as on November 30, 1950, President Truman at a press conference, remarked–no doubt extemporaneously–that the use of the atomic bomb was under active consideration, unintentionally implying to some observers that its use would be left to the discretion of General MacArthur. Even though subsequently he attempted to subdue the storm of protest and consternation which followed by pointing out that only he could authorize use of the atomic bomb and that he had not given such authorization, he could not avoid the real issue that any decision to use the bomb would be a United States, not a United Nations, decision. This led to a meeting December 4 with British Prime Minister Clement Attlee (who also represented the leaders of the other Commonwealth nations) and with French Premier René Pleven and Foreign Minister Robert Schuman, to discuss their concerns over the possible use of the atomic bomb. Indian Ambassador Pannikkar recalls, "that Truman announced that he was thinking of using the atom bomb in Korea. But the Chinese seemed totally unmoved by this threat... The propaganda against American aggression was stepped up. The 'Aid Korea to resist America' campaign was made the slogan for increased production, greater national integration, and more rigid control over anti-national activities. One could not help feeling that Truman's threat came in very useful to the leaders of the revolution to enable them to keep up the tempo of their activities."[58][92][93]
Six days later, on December 6, 1950, after the Chinese intervention had forced the UN forces into a retreat from northern North Korea, General J. Lawton Collins (Army Chief of Staff), General MacArthur, Admiral C. Turner Joy and General George E. Stratemeyer, with key staff officers Major General Doyle Hickey, Major General Charles A. Willoughby, and Major General Edwin K. (Pinky) Wright, met in Tokyo for a full discussion of what moves to take against the Chinese. They projected three hypothetical scenarios covering the next few weeks or months.[58]
In the first, they theorized that if the Chinese continued their all-out attack but with the UN Command forbidden to mount air attacks against China, no blockade of China set up, no reinforcements sent to Korea by Chiang Kai-shek, and that there would be no substantial increase in MacArthur's U.S. forces until April 1951 when four National Guard divisions might be sent, then the atomic bomb might be used in North Korea.[58]
Under the second scenario, the conferees assumed a situation in which the Chinese attack would continue but with an effective naval blockade of China put in effect, air reconnaissance and bombing of the Chinese mainland allowed, Chinese Nationalist forces exploited to the maximum, and the atomic bomb to be used if tactically appropriate. Given these conditions, General MacArthur said he should be directed to hold positions in Korea as far north as possible.[58]
Under the third scenario, in which the Chinese would agree not to cross south of the 38th parallel, MacArthur felt the United Nations should accept an armistice. The conditions of the armistice should preclude movement of North Korean and Chinese forces below the parallel. North Korean guerrillas should withdraw into their own territory with the Eighth Army remaining in positions covering the Seoul-Inch'on area, while X Corps pulled back to Pusan. A United Nations commission should supervise the implementation of armistice terms.[58]
So, while the U.S. had contemplated using the atomic bomb in Korea, Truman did not publicly threaten to use the bomb immediately after the Chinese intervention, but instead remarked about the consideration of using the bomb around 45 days later and only after UN forces were in retreat and had suffered some serious losses. MacArthur and other military leaders did not work on scenarios for using the bomb until after Truman's inadvertent remark during a press conference 6 days earlier. The decision not to use the atomic bomb also was not due to "a disinclination by the USSR and PRC to escalate" but rather due to pressure from UN allies, notably Britain, the British Commonwealth, and France, who were concerned that if the United States became involved in a war with Communist China, American commitments to NATO would, through sheer necessity, go by the board. China then might have little difficulty in persuading the Soviets to move into western Europe, and without U.S. resistance to this aggression, they could take all of Europe at little cost.[58][94]
War crimes
Crimes against civilians
“It is reported that large groups of civilians, either composed of or controlled by North Korean soldiers, are infiltrating U.S. positions. The army has requested we strafe all civilian refugee parties approaching our positions. To date, we have complied with the army request in this respect.”
The document goes on to recommend establishing a policy revising the practice.
When parts of South Korea were under North Korean control, political killings, reportedly into the tens of thousands, took place in the cities and villages. The communists systematically killed former South Korean government officials and others deemed hostile to the communists, and such killing was intensified as North Koreans retreated from the South.[95]
South Korean military, police and paramilitary forces, often with U.S. military knowledge and without trial, executed in turn tens of thousands of leftist inmates and alleged communist sympathizers in the incidents such as the massacre of the political prisoners from the Daejeon Prison and the bloody crackdown on the Cheju Uprising.[96] Gregory Henderson, a U.S. diplomat in Korea at the time, put the total figure at 100,000, and the bodies of those killed were often dumped into mass graves. Recently, the South Korean Truth and Reconciliation Commission has received reports of more than 7,800 cases of civilian killings in 150 locations across the country where mass killings of civilians took place before and during the war.
Korean forces on both sides routinely rounded up and forcibly conscripted both males and females in their area of operations; thousands of them never returned home. According to the estimate by R. J. Rummel, a professor at the University of Hawaii, some 400,000 South Korean citizens were conscripted into the North Korean Army.[95] Before the September 1950 liberation of Seoul by the U.S. forces, an estimated 83,000 citizens of the city were taken away by retreating North Korean forces and disappeared, according to the South Korean government; their fate remains unknown.[97] North Korea insists the South Koreans defected voluntarily and were not held against their will.[98]
For a time, American troops were under orders to consider any Korean civilians on the battlefield approaching their position as hostile, and were instructed to "neutralize" them because of fears of infiltration. This led to the indiscriminate killings of hundreds of South Korean civilians by the U.S. military at places such as No Gun Ri, where many defenseless refugees — most of whom were women, children and old men — were shot at by the U.S. Army and may have been strafed by the U.S. Air Force. Recently, the U.S. admitted having a policy of strafing civilians in other places and times.[99][100]
Bodo League massacre
South Korea massacred civilians who were suspected as members of the Bodo League. The casualties were from 10,000 to 100,000 (see Wiki Link on Bodo League massacre), other estimates say the casualties were 200,000 to 1,200,000.[101]
At least 100,000 people were hastily shot by the South Korean authorities and dumped into makeshift trenches, abandoned mines or the sea before and after North Korea invaded the south in June 1950. Declassified records show U.S. officers were present at one of these sites and that at least one U.S. officer sanctioned another mass political execution if prisoners otherwise would be freed by the North Koreans. Uncounted hundreds were subsequently killed, witnesses reported. Some mass killings were carried out before the war; many came in the first weeks after the June 25, 1950, invasion, and others occurred later in 1950 when U.S. and South Korean forces recaptured Seoul and the southerners rounded up and shot alleged northern collaborators.[102]
The South Korean Truth and Reconciliation Commission[103] says petitions relating to executions of leftists outnumber by 6-to-1 those dealing with right-wingers' deaths. It should be noted that this figure reflects the absence of North Korean participation in the Commission. Survivor Kim Jong-chol, 71, reported his experience in Namyangju as follows;
When the people from the other side (North Korea) came here, they didn't kill many people," he said, contrasting that with "indiscriminate" killing by southern authorities.
— Kim Jong-chol [102]
The AP has reported that declassified U.S. military documents show U.S. Army officers took photos of the assembly line-style executions outside the central city of Daejeon, where the commission believes between 3,000 and 7,000 people were shot and dumped into mass graves in early July 1950. Other once-secret files show that a U.S. Army lieutenant colonel reported giving approval to the killing of 3,500 political prisoners by a South Korean army unit he was advising in Busan, if the North Koreans approached that southern port city, formerly spelled Pusan.[102] The files show the U.S. command was aware in other ways as well of the organized bloodbaths.[citation needed] Although at the time U.S. diplomats reported confidentially they had urged restraint on the South Koreans, there was no sign the U.S. military, with formal command over the southerners, tried to halt the mass executions.[102]
Crimes against POWs
|
According to the U.S. Government, the North Koreans have mistreated prisoners of war.[104] Some made allegations of frequent communist-imposed beatings, starvation, forced labor, summary executions, and death marches on UN prisoners.[105] North Korean forces allegedly committed several massacres of captured U.S. troops at places such as Hill 312 and Hill 303[106] on the Pusan Perimeter, and in and around Daejeon; this occurred during early "mopping-up" actions. A U.S. Congressional report alleges "two-thirds of all American prisoners of war in Korea died as a result of war crimes."[107][108]
North Korean forces claimed to have captured more than 70,000 South Korean soldiers, repatriating 8,000. (In contrast, South Korea repatriated 76,000 North Korean POWs.)[109] In addition to some 12,000 deaths in captivity, some 50,000 South Korean POWs might have been press-ganged into the North Korean military.[95] According to the South Korean Ministry of Defense, by 2008 there were at least 560 POWs still alive being held captive in North Korea. More than 30 South Korean prisoners managed to escape the North between 1994 and 2003, including a soldier captured in the war who escaped in 2003.[110] Pyongyang denied holding any POWs.
The state controlled Korean Central News Agency claims that the United States and its allies killed at least 33,600 POWs of the Korean People's Army, and that tens of thousands more were wounded or crippled. On May 27, 1952 it was alleged that at least 800 POWs were killed by flame throwers at the 77th camp on Koje Island for rejecting "voluntary repatriation" and insisting on their repatriation to the North Korea. According to the North Korean Central News Agency, some 1,400 prisoners of war had been secretly sent to the United States to be subjected to experiments with atomic weapons. It has also been alleged that on July 19, 1951, a total of 100 prisoners of war had been shot by machine-gun fire in the prisoner-of-war camp No. 62, in order to give the machine-gunners training in shooting at moving targets.[111][112]
Legacy
The Korean War was the first armed confrontation of the Cold War and set the standard for many later conflicts. It created the idea of a proxy war, where the two superpowers would fight in another country, forcing the people in that nation to suffer the bulk of the destruction and death involved in a war between such large nations. The superpowers avoided descending into an all-out war with one another, as well as the mutual use of nuclear weapons. It also expanded the Cold War, which to that point had mostly been concerned with Europe.
The Korean War damaged both Koreas heavily. Although South Korea stagnated economically in the decade following the war, it was later able to modernize and industrialize. In contrast, the North Korean economy recovered quickly after the war and until around 1975 surpassed that of South Korea.[citation needed] However, North Korea's economy eventually slowed. Today, the North Korean economy is virtually nonexistent while the South Korean economy is expanding. The CIA World Factbook estimates North Korea's GDP (PPP) to be $40 billion, which is a mere 3% of South Korea's $1.196 trillion GDP (PPP). The North's per capita income is $1,800, which is 7% of South Korea's $24,500 per capita income.
A heavily guarded demilitarized zone (DMZ) on the 38th parallel continues to divide the peninsula today. Anti-Communist and anti-North Korea sentiment still remain in South Korea today, and most South Koreans are against the North Korean government. However, a "Sunshine Policy" was used by the then controlling party, the Uri Party. The Uri Party and former South Korean President Roh, often disagreed with the United States in talks about North Korea. The Grand National Party (GNP), the Uri Party's main opposing party, maintains an anti-North Korea policy today.
The war affected other nations as well. Turkey's participation in the war helped it become a NATO member.[113]
According to a September 7, 2007 NPR report, U.S. President George W. Bush stated that it is his administration's position that a formal peace treaty with North Korea would be possible only when the North abandoned its nuclear weapons programs.[114] According to Bush, "We look forward to the day when we can end the Korean War. That will end — will happen when Kim verifiably gets rid of his weapons programs and his weapons."[115] Some have characterized this as a reversal of Bush's stated policy of regime change with respect to North Korea.[116]
At the second Inter-Korean Summit in October 2007, South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun and North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il signed a joint declaration calling for international talks towards a peace treaty formally ending the war.[117]
In May 27, 2009, North Korea announced it was withdrawing from the armistice which ended the Korean War, citing what they see as South Korea's violation of its terms. [118][119] Although this has been portrayed as a provocation to war, it should be noted that although North Korea has nullified the armistice, South Korea did not even become a signatory member.[120]
Depictions
Art
Artist Pablo Picasso's painting Massacre in Korea (1951) depicted violence against civilians during the Korean War. By some accounts, killing of civilians by U.S. forces in Shinchun, Hwanghae Province was the motive of the painting.[citation needed] Ha Jin's War Trash contains a vivid description of the beginning of the war from the point of view of a Chinese soldier and of the fear of retribution Chinese POWs felt from other Chinese prisoners if they were suspected of being unsympathetic to communism or to the war.
Photography
-
The wreckage of a bridge and North Korean tank south of Suwon, Korea. The tank was caught on a bridge and put out of action by the U.S. Air Force. October 7, 1950.
-
Scene of war damage in residential section of Seoul, Korea. The capitol building can be seen in the background (right). October 18, 1950. Sfc. Cecil Riley. (U.S. Army) -
An aged Korean woman pauses in her search for salvageable materials among the ruins of Seoul, Korea. November 1, 1950. Capt. C. W. Huff. (U.S. Army) -
Korean women and children search the rubble of Seoul for anything that can be used or burned as fuel. November 1, 1950. Capt. F. L. Scheiber. (U.S. Army) -
A small South Korean child sits alone in the street, after elements of the U.S. 1st Marine Div. and South Korean Marines invaded the city of Inchon, in an offensive launched against the North Korean forces in that area. September 16, 1950. Pfc. Ronald L. Hancock. (U.S. Army) -
Long trek southward: Seemingly endless file of Korean refugees slogs through snow outside of Kangnung, blocking withdrawal of ROK I Corps. January 8, 1951. Cpl. Walter Calmus. (U.S. Army) -
Marilyn Monroe, motion picture actress, appearing with the USO, poses for pictures after a performance at the 3rd U.S. Inf. Div. area. February 17, 1954. Cpl. Welshman. (Army) -
Lt. R. P. Yeatman, from the USS Bon Homme Richard, is shown rocketing and bombing Korean bridge. November 1952. (U.S. Navy) -
Bob Hope sits with men of U.S. X Corps, as members of his troupe entertain at Womsan, Korea. October 26, 1950. (U.S. Army)
.jpg)
Film
Unlike World War II, there are relatively few Western feature films depicting the Korean War.
- The Steel Helmet (1951) is a war film directed by Samuel Fuller and produced by Lippert Studios during the Korean War. It was the first studio film about the war, and the first of several war films by producer-director-writer Fuller.
- Battle Hymn (1957) stars Rock Hudson as Colonel Dean Hess, who became a preacher after bombing a German orphanage during World War II. He later volunteered as a USAF fighter pilot instructor in Korea.
- The Bridges at Toko-Ri (1955) stars William Holden as a Naval Aviator assigned to destroy the bridges at Toko Ri, while battling doubts; it is based on an eponymous James Michener novel.
- The Forgotten (Korean War Movie) (2004) features a decimated tank unit, lost behind enemy lines, battling the vicissitudes of the war, as well as their own demons.
- The Hunters (1958), adapted from the novel The Hunters by James Salter, stars Robert Mitchum and Robert Wagner as two very different United States Air Force fighter pilots in the midst of the Korean War.
- The Hook (1963), starring Kirk Douglas, portrays the dilemma of three American soldiers on board a ship who are ordered to kill a Korean Prisoner of War.
- Inchon (1982) portrays the Battle of Inchon, a turning point in the war. Controversially, the film was partially financed by Sun Myung Moon's Unification Movement. It became a notorious financial and critical failure, losing an estimated $40 million of its $46 million budget, and remains the last mainstream Hollywood film to use the war as its backdrop. The film was directed by Terence Young, and starred an elderly Laurence Olivier as General Douglas MacArthur. According to press materials from the film, psychics hired by Moon's church contacted MacArthur in heaven and secured his posthumous approval of the casting.
- The Manchurian Candidate, a 1959 thriller novel, was cinematically adapted to The Manchurian Candidate (1962), directed by John Frankenheimer, and featuring Frank Sinatra and Angela Lansbury. It is about brainwashed POWs of the U.S. Army, and an officer's investigation to learn what happened to him and his platoon in the war.
- MASH: A Novel About Three Army Doctors, by Richard Hooker (pseudonym for H. Richard Hornberger), was later adapted into a successful film and a television series; the TV series had a total of 251 episodes, lasted 11 years, and won awards, and its final episode was the most-watched program in television history.[121] Yet the sensibilities they presented were more of the 1970s than of the 1950s; the Korean War setting was an oblique and uncontroversial treatment of the then-current American war in Vietnam.[122]
- Pork Chop Hill (1959) is a Lewis Milestone-directed film with Gregory Peck as an infantry lieutenant fighting the bitterly fierce first Battle of Pork Chop Hill, between the U.S. Army's 7th Infantry Division, and Chicom (Chinese Communist) forces at war's end in April 1953. The movie is lampooned by the Firesign Theatre album Don't Crush That Dwarf, Hand Me the Pliers in the story of Lieutenant Tirebiter.
There were several South Korean films, including:
- Tae Guk Gi: The Brotherhood of War (2004), directed by Kang Je-gyu, became extremely popular in South Korea and at the 50th Asia Pacific Film Festival, Taegukgi won the "Best Film", while Kang Je-gyu was awarded the "Best Director". Taegukgi saw a limited release in the United States.
- Welcome to Dongmakgol (2005) shows the effect of the warring sides on a remote village. The titular village soon becomes home to surviving North Korean and South Korean soldiers, who in time lose their suspicion and hatred for each other and work together to help save the village after the Americans mistakenly identify it as an enemy camp.
North Korea has made many films about the war, mostly by the government supporting forceful, armed reunification of the North and South of Korea. [citation needed] These have portrayed war crimes by American or South Korean soldiers while glorifying members of the North Korean military as well as North Korean ideals.[123][verification needed]
Battle on Shangganling Mountain (Shanggan Ling, Chinese: 上甘岭) is a depiction of the Korean War from the Chinese point of view, made in 1956. The movie is about a group of Chinese soldiers blocked in Triangle Hill area for several days and survive until they are relieved.
See also
- Joint Advisory Commission, Korea
- List of wars extended by diplomatic irregularity
- UNCMAC - the UN Command Military Armistice Commission operating from 1953 to the present
- UNCOK - the 1950 United Nations Commission on Korea
- UNCURK - the 1951 UN Commission for the Unification and Rehabilitation of Korea
- Pyongyang Sally
- Vietnam War
- M*A*S*H
Notes
- ^ "On This Day 29 August 1950". BBC. Retrieved 2007-08-15.
- ^ "Veterans Affairs Canada — The Korean War". Veterans Affairs Canada. Retrieved 2007-08-15.
- ^ a b "Filipino Soldiers in the Korean War (video documentary)". Retrieved 2008-03-24.
- ^ Walker, Jack D. "A brief account of the Korean War". Retrieved 2007-08-15.
- ^ "French Participation in the Korean War". Embassy of France. Retrieved 2007-08-15.
- ^ Thomas, Abbott & Chappell (1986), pp. 22-23
- ^ "South Korean POWs". Retrieved 2007-08-15.
- ^ "All POW-MIA Korean War Casualties". Retrieved 2007-08-15.
- ^ "The UK & Korea, Defence Relations". Office of the Defence Attache, British Embassy, Seoul. Retrieved 2007-08-15.
- ^ a b c Hickey, Michael. "The Korean War: An Overview". Retrieved 2007-08-16.
- ^ "The Turks in the Korean War". Retrieved 2007-08-15.
- ^ "Canadians in Korea: Epilogue". Veterans Affairs Canada. 1998-10-06. Retrieved 2007-10-27.
- ^ "Korean War 1950–53: Epilogue". Australian War Memorial. 2007-10-16. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
- ^ "Departure of the French batallion". French newsreels archives (Les Actualités Françaises). 2003-11-05. Retrieved 2007-08-16.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ " Greek Expeditionary Force". Korean War.com.
- ^ Oprichting van Nederlands VN-detachement bestemd voor Korea
- ^ Belgium United Nations Command
- ^ Belgium United Nations Command
- ^ New Zealand in the Korean War
- ^ "South Africa in the Korean War". korean-war.com. November 20, 2006.
- ^ Xu, Yan. "Korean War: In the View of Cost-effectiveness". Consulate-General of the People's Republic of China in New York. Retrieved 2007-08-16.
- ^ Кривошеев Г. Ф., Россия и СССР в войнах XX века: потери вооруженных сил. Статистическое исследование (Krivosheev G. F., Russia and the USSR in the wars of the 20th century: losses of the Armed Forces. A Statistical Study Greenhill 1997 ISBN 1-85367-280-7) Template:Ru icon
- ^ "US cuts Korean war deaths". News Asia-Pacific. BBC.
- ^ http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5goGcm6AL4tHyTt3gp1PUV6rNu9fA
- ^ a b Hermes, Jr., Walter (1966). Truce Tent and Fighting Front. Center of Military History. pp. 2, 6, 9.
- ^ a b c "The Korean War, 1950–1953 (an extract from American Military History, Volume 2—revised 2005)". Retrieved 2007-08-20.
- ^ "Remembering the Forgotten War: Korea, 1950-1953". Naval Historical Center. Retrieved 2007-08-16.
- ^ "War to Resist US Aggression And Aid Korea Marked in DPRK". (China's) Peoples Daily (English version). Retrieved 2007-08-16.
- ^ Stokesbury, James L (1990). A Short History of the Korean War. New York: Harper Perennial. ISBN 0688095135.
- ^ a b c d James F, Schnabel. "United States Army in the Korean War, Policy and Direction: The First Year". pp. pp. 3, 18. Retrieved 2007-08-19.
{{cite web}}:|pages=has extra text (help) - ^ "Treaty of Annexation (Annexation of Korea by Japan)". USC-UCLA Joint East Asian Studies Center. Retrieved 2007-08-19.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az ba bb bc bd be bf bg bh bi bj bk bl bm bn bo bp bq br bs bt bu bv bw bx by bz ca cb cc cd ce cf cg ch ci cj ck cl cm cn co Stokesbury, James L (1990). A Short History of the Korean War. New York: Harper Perennial. ISBN 0688095135.
- ^ R. Whelan "Drawing the Line: the Korean War 1950–53; London, 1990.
- ^ McCullough, David (1992). Truman. Simon & Schuster Paperbacks. pp. 785, 786. ISBN 0671869205.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Appleman, Roy E (1998). South to the Naktong, North to the Yalu. Dept. of the Army. pp. 3, 15, 381, 545, 771, 719. ISBN 0160019184.
- ^ a b c d e f Cumings, Bruce (1981). Origins of the Korean War. Princeton University Press. chapter 4. ISBN 89-7696-612-0.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|nopp=ignored (|no-pp=suggested) (help) Cite error: The named reference "Cumings1" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). - ^ Becker, Jasper (2005). Rogue Regime: Kim Jong Il and the Looming Threat of North Korea. New York: Oxford University Press, USA. p. 52. ISBN 019517044X.
- ^ a b c Goulden, Joseph C (1983). Korea: The Untold Story of the War. McGraw-Hill. p. 17. ISBN 0070235805.
- ^ McCune, Shannon C (1946-05), "Physical Basis for Korean Boundaries", Far Eastern Quarterly, May 1946 (No. 5): 286–7
{{citation}}:|issue=has extra text (help); Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ Grajdanzev, Andrew (1945-10), "Korean Divided", Far Eastern Survey, XIV: 282
{{citation}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ Grajdanzev, Andrew, History of Occupation of Korea, vol. I, p. 16
- ^ Becker, Jasper (2005). Rogue Regime: Kim Jong Il and the Looming Threat of North Korea. New York: Oxford University Press, USA. p. 53. ISBN 019517044X.
- ^ "For Freedom". TIME. 20 May 1946. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
Rightist groups in the American zone, loosely amalgamated in the Representative Democratic Council under elder statesman Syngman Rhee, protested heatedly...
{{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=(help); Unknown parameter|curly=ignored (help) - ^ "The Failure of Trusteeship". infoKorea. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
- ^ "Korea Notes from Memiors by Harry S. Truman". The U.S. War Against Asia (notes). III Publishing. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
U.S. proposed general elections (U.S. style) but Russia insisted on Moscow Agreement.
- ^ a b "The Korean War, The U.S. and Soviet Union in Korea". MacroHistory. Retrieved 2007-08-19.
- ^ Gup, Ted (2000). The Book of Honor: Cover Lives and Classified Deaths at the CIA.
- ^ Malkasian, Carter (2001). The Korean War: Essential Histories. Osprey Publishing. pp. p.16.
{{cite book}}:|pages=has extra text (help) - ^ Statement by the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the USSR, July 4, 1950
- ^ Leo Gross, "Voting in the Security Council: Abstention from Voting and Absence from Meetings", The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 60, No. 2 (Feb., 1951), pp. 209–57.
- ^ F. B. Schick, "Videant Consules", The Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 3 (Sep., 1950), pp. 311–25.
- ^ Hess, Gary R. Presidential Decisions for War : Korea, Vietnam and the Persian Gulf. New York: Johns Hopkins UP, 2001.
- ^ Graebner, Norman A. The Age of Global Power: The United States Since 1939. Vol. V3641. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1979.
- ^ Truman, Harry S. The Autobiography of Harry S. Truman. Ed. Robert H. Ferrell. New York: University P of Colorado, 1981. 1955
- ^ Hess, Gary R. Presidential Decisions for War : Korea, Vietnam and the Persian Gulf. New York: Johns Hopkins UP, 2001.
- ^ Hess, Gary R. Presidential Decisions for War : Korea, Vietnam and the Persian Gulf. New York: Johns Hopkins UP, 2001
- ^ Korea: The Limited War|Rees|David |1964|MacMillan|London|p. 27
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Schnabel, James F (1992). United States Army In The Korean War: Policy And Direction: The First Year. Center of Military History. pp. 155–92, 212, 283–4, 288–9, 304. ISBN 0-16-035955-4.
- ^ a b Korea Institute of Military History (2000). The Korean War: Korea Institute of Military History 3 Volume Set. Bison Books, University of Nebraska Press. vol. 1, p.730, vol. 2, pp. 512–529. ISBN 0803277946.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|nopp=ignored (|no-pp=suggested) (help) - ^ http://history.sandiego.edu/GEN/20th/korea.html
- ^ Another Such Victory: President Truman and the Cold War, 1945–1953, p. 390, Published 2002 Stanford University Press, ISBN 0804747741.
- ^ Yearbook of the United Nations, 1950.
- ^ Communist China's Changing Attitudes Toward the United Nations, International Organization, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Autumn, 1966), pp. 677–704.
- ^ Donovan, Robert J (1996). Tumultuous Years: The Presidency of Harry S. Truman 1949-1953. University of Missouri Press. p. 285. ISBN 0826210856.
- ^ "The Korean War: The Chinese Intervention". US Army.
- ^ Cohen, Eliot A (2005). Military Misfortunes: The Anatomy of Failure in War. Free Press. pp. 165–195. ISBN 0743280822.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help) - ^ Hopkins, William (1986). One Bugle No Drums: The Marines at Chosin Reservoir. Algonquin.
- ^ Rear Admiral Doyle, James H; Mayer, Arthur J (April 1979), "December 1950 at Hungnam", U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, vol. 105 (no. 4): 44–65
{{citation}}:|issue=has extra text (help);|volume=has extra text (help) - ^ "Operation Glory". Army Quartermaster Museum, U.S. Army. Retrieved 2007-12-16.
{{cite web}}: Text "location:Fort Lee, Virginia" ignored (help) - ^ [1]
- ^ JPAC Wars And Conflicts
- ^ Remains from Korea identified as Ind. soldier - Army News, opinions, editorials, news from Iraq, photos, reports - Army Times
- ^ Hasbrouck, S. V (1951), memo to file (November 7, 1951), G-3 Operations file, box 38-A, Library of Congress
- ^ Army Chief of Staff (1951), memo to file (November 20, 1951), G-3 Operations file, box 38-A, Library of Congress
- ^ Watson, Robert J (1998). The Joint Chiefs of Staff and National Policy, 1950–1951, The Korean War and 1951–1953, The Korean War (History of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Volume III, Parts I and II). Office of Joint History, Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. part 1, p. v, part 2, p. 614.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|nopp=ignored (|no-pp=suggested) (help) - ^ Commanding General, Far East Air Force (1951), Memo to 98th Bomb Wing Commander, Okinawa
- ^ Far East Command G-2 Theater Intelligence (1951), Resumé of Operation, Record Group 349, box 752
{{citation}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "Syngman Rhee Biography: Rhee Attacks Peace Proceedings". Korean War Commemoration Biographies. Retrieved 2007-08-22.
- ^ "North Korean Democide: Sources, Calculations and Estimates". Retrieved 2009-04-25.
- ^ "U.S. death toll from Korean War revised downward, Time reports". CNN. 2000-06-04.
- ^ Xu, Yan (2003-07-29). "Korean War: In the View of Cost-effectiveness". Consulate General of the People's Republic of China in New York. Retrieved 2007-08-12.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ Stokesbury, James L (1990). A Short History of the Korean War. New York: Harper Perennial. pp. 14, 43. ISBN 0688095135.
- ^ CW2 Sewell, Stephen L. "FEAF/U.N. Aircraft Used in Korea and Losses by Type". Korean-War.com. Retrieved 2007-08-22.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "Korean War Aces, USAF F-86 Sabre jet pilots". AcePilots.com. Retrieved 2007-08-22.
- ^ "Harrison R. Thyng". Sabre Jet Classics. Retrieved December 24.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|accessdate=(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=(help); Unknown parameter|accessyear=ignored (|access-date=suggested) (help) - ^ a b c "The Rise of the Helicopter During the Korean War". History Net.
- ^ "World War II thru early Vietnam era helicopters". Historic US Army Helicopters. US Army.
- ^ "WW II Helicopter Evacuation". Olive Drab.
- ^ "M.A.S.H./Medevac Helicopters". Centennial of Flight. US Centennial of Flight Commission.
- ^ http://monde-diplomatique.de/pm/2004/12/10/a0034.text
- ^ Marolda, Edward. "Naval Battles". US Navy. Retrieved 2008-11-02.
- ^ Knightley, Phillip (1982). The First Casualty: The War Correspondent as Hero, Propagandist and Myth-maker. Quartet. p. 334. ISBN 080186951X.
- ^ Panikkar, Kavalam Madhava (1981). In Two Chinas: Memoirs of a Diplomat. Hyperion Press. ISBN 0830500138.
- ^ Truman, Harry S (1955–1956). Memoirs (2 volumes). Doubleday. vol. II, pp. 394–5. ISBN 156852062X.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|nopp=ignored (|no-pp=suggested) (help)CS1 maint: date format (link) - ^ a b c Rummel, R.J. Statistics of Democide. Chapter 10, Statistics Of North Korean Democide Estimates, Calculations, And Sources.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|nopp=ignored (|no-pp=suggested) (help) - ^ "AP Impact: Thousands killed in 1950 by US' Korean ally". News.
{{cite web}}: Text "publisher Yahoo!" ignored (help) - ^ Choe, Sang-Hun (2007-06-25). "A half-century wait for a husband abducted by North Korea". International Herald Tribune:Asia Pacific. Retrieved 2007-08-22 l.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|accessdate=and|date=(help) - ^ "S Korea 'regrets' refugee mix-up". British Broadcasting Corp. (BBC). 2007-01-18. Retrieved 2008-08-22.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ Hanley, Charles J. (2006-05-29). "U.S. Policy Was to Shoot Korean Refugees". The Washington Post. Associated Press. Retrieved 2007-04-15.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help) - ^
Hanley, Charles J. (2007-04-13). "Letter reveals U.S. intent at No Gun Ri". New Orleans Times-Picayune. Associated Press. Retrieved 2007-04-14.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help) - ^ 최소 60만명, 최대 120만명! The Hankyoreh Plus
- ^ a b c d CHARLES J. HANLEY and JAE-SOON CHANG (December 6, 2008). "Children 'executed' in 1950 South Korean killings" (HTML). Associated Press. Retrieved 2008-12-15.
- ^ South Korean Truth and Reconciliation Commission
- ^
Potter, Charles (December 3, 1953). "Korean War Atrocities" (PDF, online). United States Senate Subcommittee on Korean War Atrocities of the Permanent Subcommittee of the Investigations of the Committee on Government Operations. US GPO. Retrieved 2008-01-18.
We marched 2 days. The first night we got some hay and we slept in the hay cuddling together to keep warm. The second night we slept in pigpens, about six inches space between the logs. That night I froze my feet. Starting out again the next morning, after bypassing the convoy, I picked up two rubber boots, what we call "snow packs". They was both for the left foot; I put those on. After starting out the second morning, I didn't have time to massage my feet to get them thawed out. I got marching the next sixteen days after that. During that march all the meat had worn off my feet, all the skin had dropped off, nothing but the bones showing. After arriving in Kanggye they put us up, there, in mud huts, Korean mud huts. We stayed there—all sick and wounded, most of us was—stayed there, in the first part of January 1951. Then the Chinese come around in the night, about twelve o'clock, and told us those who was sick and wounded they was going to move us out to the hospital, which we knew better. There could have been such a thing, but we didn't think so. —— Sgt. Wendell Treffery, RA- 115660.
{{cite news}}: line feed character in|quote=at position 1097 (help) - ^ Carlson, Lewis H (2003). Remembered Prisoners of a Forgotten War: An Oral History of Korean War POWs. St. Martin's Griffin. ISBN 0312310072.
- ^ Lakshmanan, Indira A.R (1999). "Hill 303 Massacre". Boston Globe. Retrieved 2007-08-22.
- ^ Van Zandt, James E (2003). "'You are about to die a horrible death'—Korean War — the atrocities committed by the North Koreans during the Korean War". VFW Magazine. Retrieved 2007-08-22.
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - ^ American Ex-Prisoners of War (PDF). Department of Veterans Affairs.
- ^ Lee, Sookyung (2007). "Hardly Known, Not Yet Forgotten, South Korean POWs Tell Their Story". AII POW-MIA InterNetwork. Retrieved 2007-08-22.
- ^ "S Korea POW celebrates escape". British Broadcasting Corp. (BBC). 2004-01-19. Retrieved 2007-08-22.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ Korean Central News Agency, DPRK Foreign Ministry memorandum on GI mass killings, Pyongyang, March 22, 2003
- ^ United Nations Yearbook, 1950, 1951, 1952.
- ^ M. Galip Baysan,"Turkish Brigade in Korean War- Kunuri Battles, Turkish Weekly, 09 January 2007
- ^ Gonyea, Don (2007-08-07). "U.S., South Korea Differ over North Korea". National Public Radio (NPR). Retrieved 2007-08-22.
- ^ "N. Korea Agrees to Allow Nuclear Inspectors". National Public Radio (NPR). 2007-08-07. Retrieved 2007-08-22.
- ^ Goldenberg, Suzanne (2007-08-05). "Policy Shift Offers US Hope of N Korea Success". Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2007-08-22.
- ^ "Korean leaders issue peace call". BBC News. 2007-10-04. Retrieved 2007-10-04.
- ^ "N Korea threatens military action". BBC News. 2009-05-27. Retrieved 2009-05-27.
- ^ "Pyongyang revokes 1953 armistice with South Korea". The Australian. 2009-05-28. Retrieved 2009-06-19.
- ^ "The Korean War armistice". BBC News. 2003-07-22. Retrieved 2009-06-19.
- ^ "What is M*A*S*H". Retrieved 2007-08-22.
- ^ Halberstam, David, The Coldest Winter: America and the Korean War, p. 4
- ^ Delisle, Guy Pyongyang: A Journey Into North Korea, pp. 63, 146, 173. Drawn & Quarterly Books.
References
- Brune, Lester and Robin Higham, eds., The Korean War: Handbook of the Literature and Research (Greenwood Press, 1994)
- Edwards, Paul M. Korean War Almanac (2006)
- Foot, Rosemary, "Making Known the Unknown War: Policy Analysis of the Korean Conflict in the Last Decade," Diplomatic History 15 (Summer 1991): 411–31, in JSTOR
- Goulden, Joseph C., Korea: The Untold Story of the War, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1982.
- Hickey, Michael, The Korean War: The West Confronts Communism, 1950-1953 (London: John Murray, 1999) ISBN 0719555590 9780719555596
- Ho, Kang, Pak (Pyongyang 1993). "The US Imperialists Started the Korean War". Foreign Languages Publishing House.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Kaufman, Burton I. The Korean Conflict (Greenwood Press, 1999).
- Knightley, P. The First Casualty: The War Correspondent as Hero, Propagandist and Myth-maker (Quartet, 1982)
- Korea Institute of Military History, The Korean War (1998) (English edition 2001), 3 vol, 2600 pp; highly detailed history from South Korean perspective, U of Nebraska Press. ISBN 0-8032-7802-0
- Leitich, Keith. Shapers of the Great Debate on the Korean War: A Biographical Dictionary (2006) covers Americans only
- James I. Matray, ed., Historical Dictionary of the Korean War (Greenwood Press, 1991)
- Millett, Allan R, “A Reader's Guide To The Korean War” Journal of Military History (1997) Vol. 61 No. 3; p. 583+ full text in JSTOR; free online revised version
- Millett, Allan R. "The Korean War: A 50 Year Critical Historiography," Journal of Strategic Studies 24 (March 2001), pp. 188–224. full text in Ingenta and Ebsco; discusses major works by British, American, Korean, Chinese, and Russian authors
- Summers, Harry G. Korean War Almanac (1990)
- Sandler, Stanley ed., The Korean War: An Encyclopedia (Garland, 1995)
- Masatake, Terauchi (1910-08-27). "Treaty of Annexation". USC-UCLA Joint East Asian Studies Center. Retrieved 2007-01-16.
Further reading
Combat studies, soldiers
- Appleman, Roy E. South to the Naktong, North to the Yalu (1961), Official U.S. Army history covers the Eighth Army and X Corps from June to November 1950
- Appleman, Roy E.. East of Chosin: Entrapment and Breakout in Korea (1987); Escaping the Trap: The U.S. Army in Northeast Korea, 1950 (1987); Disaster in Korea: The Chinese Confront MacArthur (1989); Ridgway Duels for Korea (1990).
- Blair, Clay. The Forgotten War: America in Korea, 1950-1953 (1987), revisionist study that attacks senior American officials
- Field Jr., James A. History of United States Naval Operations: Korea, University Press of the Pacific, 2001, ISBN 0-89875-675-8. official U.S. Navy history
- Farrar-Hockley, General Sir Anthony. The British Part in the Korean War, HMSO, 1995, hardcover 528 pages, ISBN 0-11-630962-8
- Futrell, Robert F. The United States Air Force in Korea, 1950–1953, rev. ed. (Office of the Chief of Air Force History, 1983), official U.S. Air Force history
- Halberstam, David. The Coldest Winter: America and the Korean War, Hyperion, 2007, ISBN 1401300529.
- Hallion, Richard P. The Naval Air War in Korea (1986).
- Hamburger, Kenneth E. Leadership in the Crucible: The Korean War Battles of Twin Tunnels and Chipyong-Ni. Texas A. & M. U. Press, 2003. 257 pp.
- Hastings, Max. The Korean War (1987). British perspective
- James, D. Clayton The Years of MacArthur: Triumph and Disaster, 1945-1964 (1985)
- James, D. Clayton with Anne Sharp Wells, Refighting the Last War: Command and Crises in Korea, 1950-1953 (1993)
- Johnston, William. A War of Patrols: Canadian Army Operations in Korea. U. of British Columbia Press, 2003. 426 pp.
- Kindsvatter, Peter S. American Soldiers: Ground Combat in the World Wars, Korea, and Vietnam. U. Press of Kansas, 2003. 472 pp.
- Millett, Allan R. Their War for Korea: American, Asian, and European Combatants and Civilians, 1945–1953. Brassey's, 2003. 310 pp.
- Montross, Lynn et al., History of U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950–1953, 5 vols. (Washington: Historical Branch, G-3, Headquarters, Marine Corps, 1954–72),
- Mossman, Billy. Ebb and Flow (1990), Official U.S. Army history covers November 1950 to July 1951.
- Russ, Martin. Breakout: The Chosin Reservoir Campaign, Korea 1950, , Penguin, 2000, 464 pages, ISBN 0-14-029259-4
- Toland, John. In Mortal Combat: Korea, 1950-1953 (1991)
- Varhola, Michael J. Fire and Ice: The Korean War, 1950-1953 (2000)
- Watson, Brent Byron. Far Eastern Tour: The Canadian Infantry in Korea, 1950–1953. 2002. 256 pp.
Origins, politics, diplomacy
- Chen Jian, China's Road to the Korean War: The Making of the Sino-American Confrontation (Columbia University Press, 1994),
- Cumings, Bruce. Origins of the Korean War (two volumes), Princeton University Press, 1981, 1990
- Goncharov, Sergei N., John W. Lewis; and Xue Litai, Uncertain Partners: Stalin, Mao, and the Korean War, Stanford University Press, 1993, ISBN 0-8047-2521-7, diplomatic
- Kaufman, Burton I. The Korean War: Challenges in Crisis, Credibility, and Command. Temple University Press, 1986), focus is on Washington
- Matray, James. "Truman's Plan for Victory: National Self Determination and the Thirty-Eighth Parallel Decision in Korea," Journal of American History 66 (September, 1979), 314–33. Online at JSTOR
- Millett, Allan R. The War for Korea, 1945–1950: A House Burning vol 1 (2005)ISBN 0-7006-1393-5, origins
- Schnabel, James F. United States Army in the Korean War: Policy and Direction: The First Year (Washington: Office of the Chief of Military History, 1972). Official U.S. Army history; full text online
- Spanier, John W. The Truman-MacArthur Controversy and the Korean War (1959).
- Stueck, William. Rethinking the Korean War: A New Diplomatic and Strategic History. Princeton U. Press, 2002. 285 pp.
- Stueck, Jr., William J. The Korean War: An International History (Princeton University Press, 1995), diplomatic
- Zhang Shu-gang, Mao's Military Romanticism: China and the Korean War, 1950–1953 (University Press of Kansas, 1995)
Primary sources
- Bassett, Richard M. And the Wind Blew Cold: The Story of an American POW in North Korea. Kent State U. Press, 2002. 117 pp.
- Bin Yu and Xiaobing Li, eds Mao's Generals Remember Korea, University Press of Kansas, 2001, hardcover 328 pages, ISBN 0-7006-1095-2
- S.L.A. Marshall, The River and the Gauntlet (1953) on combat
- Matthew B. Ridgway, The Korean War (1967).
External links
Definitions from Wiktionary
Media from Commons
News from Wikinews
Quotations from Wikiquote
Texts from Wikisource
Textbooks from Wikibooks
Resources from Wikiversity
- U.S. Army Korea Media Center official Korean War online video archive
- Korea Defense Veterans of America
- Korean War Ex-POW Association
- Korean War Veterans Associtaion
- The Center for the Study of the Korean War
- Korean War Documentary
- Korean Children's War Memorial
- Calvin College on the Impact of the War on the Korean People
- Facts and texts on the War
- BBC: American Military Conduct in the Korean War
- Atrocities against Americans in the Korean War
- Atrocities by Americans in the Korean War
- Quicktime sequence of 27 maps adapted from the West Point Atlas of American Wars showing the dynamics of the front.
- Animation for operations in 1950
- Animation for operations in 1951
- POW films, brainwashing and the Korean War
- CBC Digital Archives - Forgotten Heroes: Canada and the Korean War
- Chinese 50th Anniversary Korean War Memorial
- North Korea International Documentation Project
- Collection of videos on Korean War
- Documents on the Korean Conflict at the Dwight D. Eisenhower Presidential Library
- U.S. Army Korea Media Center official Korean War online image archive
- Grand Valley State University Veteran's History Project digital collection
- Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes from October 2008
- Articles with minor POV problems from February 2009
- Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes from September 2008
- Wikipedia articles needing factual verification from June 2009
- Cold War
- Korean War
- History of Korea
- Wars involving Australia
- Wars involving Canada
- Wars involving Belgium
- Wars involving the People's Republic of China
- Wars involving Ethiopia
- Wars involving France
- Wars involving Greece
- Wars involving Japan
- Wars involving New Zealand
- Wars involving South Africa
- Wars involving Turkey
- Wars involving Thailand
- Wars involving the Netherlands
- Wars involving the Philippines
- Wars involving the Soviet Union
- Wars involving the United Kingdom
- Wars involving the United States
- United Nations operations in Asia