Vijayanagara Empire: Difference between revisions
SandyGeorgia (talk | contribs) →Social life: this is one page, pls check throughout for similar |
SandyGeorgia (talk | contribs) →History: There is a persistent problem throughout the citations with faulty WP:ENDASHes, which are not spaced on page ranges, please re-do throughout, and the template foils the script that could be used to fix them |
||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
Before the early 14th-century rise of the Vijayanagara Empire, the Hindu states of the Deccan – the [[Seuna Yadavas of Devagiri|Yadava Empire]] of Devagiri, the Kakatiya dynasty of [[Warangal]], the [[Pandyan Empire]] of [[Madurai]] had been repeatedly raided and attacked by [[Muslim]]s from the north, and by 1336 these upper Deccan region (modern day Maharashtra, Telangana) had all been defeated by armies of Sultan [[Alauddin Khalji]] and [[Muhammad bin Tughluq]] of the [[Delhi Sultanate]].{{sfn|Nilakanta Sastri|1955|p=216}}<ref name="invade">{{harvnb|Chopra|Ravindran|Subrahmanian|2003|loc=Part II, p. 22}}</ref> |
Before the early 14th-century rise of the Vijayanagara Empire, the Hindu states of the Deccan – the [[Seuna Yadavas of Devagiri|Yadava Empire]] of Devagiri, the Kakatiya dynasty of [[Warangal]], the [[Pandyan Empire]] of [[Madurai]] had been repeatedly raided and attacked by [[Muslim]]s from the north, and by 1336 these upper Deccan region (modern day Maharashtra, Telangana) had all been defeated by armies of Sultan [[Alauddin Khalji]] and [[Muhammad bin Tughluq]] of the [[Delhi Sultanate]].{{sfn|Nilakanta Sastri|1955|p=216}}<ref name="invade">{{harvnb|Chopra|Ravindran|Subrahmanian|2003|loc=Part II, p. 22}}</ref> |
||
Further south in the Deccan region, a Hoysala commander Singeya Nayaka-III (c.1280{{endash}}1300) declared independence after the Muslim forces of the Delhi Sultanate defeated and captured the territories of the Yadava Empire in 1294 CE.{{sfn|Stein|1989|pp= |
Further south in the Deccan region, a Hoysala commander Singeya Nayaka-III (c.1280{{endash}}1300) declared independence after the Muslim forces of the Delhi Sultanate defeated and captured the territories of the Yadava Empire in 1294 CE.{{sfn|Stein|1989|pp=18–19}}<ref name=gilmartin300/> He created the [[Kampili kingdom]], but this was a short lived kingdom during this period of wars.{{sfn|Stein|1989|pp=18 {{endash}} 19}}<ref name=talbot281/> Kampili existed near [[Gulbarga]] and [[Tungabhadra River]] in northeastern parts of the present-day [[Karnataka]] state.<ref name=talbot281>{{cite book|author=Cynthia Talbot|title=Precolonial India in Practice: Society, Region, and Identity in Medieval Andhra |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pfAKljlCJq0C&pg=PA281 |year=2001|publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-803123-9|pages=281 {{endash}} 282}}</ref> It ended after a defeat by the armies of Delhi Sultanate. The triumphant army led by Malik Zada sent the news of its victory, over Kampili kingdom, to Muhammad bin Tughluq in Delhi by sending a straw-stuffed severed head of the dead Hindu king.<ref name="Storm2015p311"/> Within Kampili, on the day of certain defeat, the populace committed a ''[[jauhar]]'' (ritual mass suicide) in c.1327{{endash}}28.<ref name="Storm2015p311">{{cite book|author=Mary Storm|title=Head and Heart: Valour and Self-Sacrifice in the Art of India |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0sJcCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT311 |year=2015|publisher=Taylor & Francis|isbn=978-1-317-32556-7|page=311}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|first=Kanhaiya L |last=Srivastava|title=The position of Hindus under the Delhi Sultanate, 1206-1526|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-cMgAAAAMAAJ|year=1980|publisher=Munshiram Manoharlal|page=202|isbn=9788121502245}}</ref> Eight years later, from the ruins of the Kampili kingdom emerged the Vijayanagara Kingdom in 1336 CE.<ref name=gilmartin300>{{cite book|first1=David |last1=Gilmartin|first2=Bruce B. |last2=Lawrence|title=Beyond Turk and Hindu: Rethinking Religious Identities in Islamicate South Asia|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9ZhT5Ilq5kAC&pg=PA321|year=2000|publisher=University Press of Florida|isbn=978-0-8130-3099-9|pages=300 {{endash}} 306, 321 {{endash}} 322}}</ref> |
||
[[File:South India in AD 1400.jpg|thumb|left|Map of South India showing extent of kingdoms c.1400]] |
[[File:South India in AD 1400.jpg|thumb|left|Map of South India showing extent of kingdoms c.1400]] |
Revision as of 22:57, 16 May 2021
Vijayanagara Empire | |
---|---|
1336–1646 | |
Flag | |
![]() Extent of Vijayanagara Empire, 1446, 1520 CE | |
Capital | Vijayanagara, Penukonda, Chandragiri, Vellore [1] |
Common languages | Kannada, Telugu, Sanskrit[2] |
Religion | Hinduism |
Government | Monarchy |
King | |
• 1336–1356 | Harihara I |
• 1642–1646 | Sriranga III |
History | |
• Established | 1336 |
• Earliest records | 1343 |
• Disestablished | 1646 |
Currency | Varaha |
Today part of | India |
The Vijayanagara Empire, also called Karnata Kingdom,[3] was based in the Deccan Plateau region in South India. It was established in 1336 by the brothers Harihara I and Bukka Raya I of the Sangama dynasty,[4] members of a pastoralist cowherd community that claimed Yadava lineage.[5] The empire rose to prominence as a culmination of attempts by the southern powers to ward off Islamic invasions by the end of the 13th century. At its peak it had subjugated almost all of South India's ruling families and the Sultans of the Deccan region, thus becoming a notable power.[6] It lasted until 1646, although its power declined after a major military defeat in the Battle of Talikota in 1565 by the combined armies of the Deccan sultanates. The empire is named after its capital city of Vijayanagara, whose ruins surround present day Hampi, now a World Heritage Site in Karnataka, India.[7] The writings of medieval European travelers such as Domingo Paes, Fernão Nunes, and Niccolò de' Conti, and the literature in local languages provide crucial information about its history. Archaeological excavations at Vijayanagara have revealed the empire's power and wealth.
The empire's legacy includes many monuments spread over South India, the best known of which is the group at Hampi. Different temple building traditions in South and Central India came together in the Vijayanagara Architecture style. This synthesis inspired architectural innovation in Hindu temples' construction. Efficient administration and vigorous overseas trade brought new technologies such as water management systems for irrigation. The empire's patronage enabled fine arts and literature to reach new heights in Kannada, Telugu, Tamil, and Sanskrit, while Carnatic music evolved into its current form. The Vijayanagara Empire created an epoch in the history of Southern India that transcended regionalism by promoting Hinduism as a unifying factor.
Alternative name
Karnata Rajya (Karnata Kingdom) was another name for the Vijayanagara Empire, used in some inscriptions[8] and literary works of the Vijayanagara times including the Sanskrit work Jambavati Kalyanam by King Krishnadevaraya and Telugu work Vasu Charitamu.[9]
History
Differing theories have been proposed regarding the origins of the Vijayanagara empire.[10] Historians propose two theories. One is that Harihara I and Bukka I, the founders of the empire, were Kannadigas and commanders in the army of the Hoysala Empire stationed in the Tungabhadra region to ward off Muslim invasions from the Northern India.[11][12][13][14] Another theory is that Harihara and Bukkaraya were Telugu people, first associated with the Kakatiya Kingdom, who took control of the northern parts of the Hoysala Empire during its decline. They were believed to have been captured by the army of Ulugh Khan at Warangal.[15] Irrespective of their origin, historians agree the founders were supported and inspired by Vidyaranya, a saint at the Sringeri monastery to fight the Muslim invasion of South India.[16][17] Writings by foreign travelers during the late medieval era combined with recent excavations in the Vijayanagara principality have uncovered much-needed information about the empire's history, fortifications, scientific developments and architectural innovations.[18][19]
Before the early 14th-century rise of the Vijayanagara Empire, the Hindu states of the Deccan – the Yadava Empire of Devagiri, the Kakatiya dynasty of Warangal, the Pandyan Empire of Madurai had been repeatedly raided and attacked by Muslims from the north, and by 1336 these upper Deccan region (modern day Maharashtra, Telangana) had all been defeated by armies of Sultan Alauddin Khalji and Muhammad bin Tughluq of the Delhi Sultanate.[16][20]
Further south in the Deccan region, a Hoysala commander Singeya Nayaka-III (c.1280–1300) declared independence after the Muslim forces of the Delhi Sultanate defeated and captured the territories of the Yadava Empire in 1294 CE.[21][22] He created the Kampili kingdom, but this was a short lived kingdom during this period of wars.[21][23] Kampili existed near Gulbarga and Tungabhadra River in northeastern parts of the present-day Karnataka state.[23] It ended after a defeat by the armies of Delhi Sultanate. The triumphant army led by Malik Zada sent the news of its victory, over Kampili kingdom, to Muhammad bin Tughluq in Delhi by sending a straw-stuffed severed head of the dead Hindu king.[24] Within Kampili, on the day of certain defeat, the populace committed a jauhar (ritual mass suicide) in c.1327–28.[24][25] Eight years later, from the ruins of the Kampili kingdom emerged the Vijayanagara Kingdom in 1336 CE.[22]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2e/South_India_in_AD_1400.jpg/220px-South_India_in_AD_1400.jpg)
In the first two decades after the founding of the empire, Harihara I gained control over most of the area south of the Tungabhadra river and earned the title of Purvapaschima Samudradhishavara ("master of the eastern and western seas"). By 1374 Bukka Raya I, successor to Harihara I, had defeated the chiefdom of Arcot, the Reddys of Kondavidu, and the Sultan of Madurai and had gained control over Goa in the west and the Tungabhadra-Krishna River doab in the north.[26][27] The original capital was in the principality of Anegondi on the northern banks of the Tungabhadra River in today's Karnataka. It was later moved to nearby Vijayanagara on the river's southern banks during the reign of Bukka Raya I, because it was easier to defend against the Muslim armies persistently attacking it from the northern lands.[28]
With the Vijayanagara Kingdom now imperial in stature, Harihara II, the second son of Bukka Raya I, further consolidated the kingdom beyond the Krishna River and brought the whole of South India under the Vijayanagara umbrella.[29] The next ruler, Deva Raya I, emerged successful against the Gajapatis of Odisha and undertook important works of fortification and irrigation.[30] Italian traveler Niccolò de' Conti wrote of him as the most powerful ruler of India.[31] Firuz Bahmani of Bahmani Sultanate entered into a treaty with Deva Raya I of Vijayanagara in 1407 that required the latter to pay Bahmani an annual tribute of "100,000 huns, five maunds of pearls and fifty elephants". The Sultanate invaded Vijayanagara in 1417 when the latter defaulted in paying the tribute. Such wars for tribute payment by Vijayanagara repeated in the 15th century, such as in 1436 when Sultan Ahmed I launched a war to collect the unpaid tribute.[32]
Deva Raya II (called Gajabetekara)[33] succeeded to the throne in 1424. He was possibly the most successful of the Sangama Dynasty rulers.[34] He quelled rebelling feudal lords as well as the Zamorin of Calicut and Quilon in the south. He invaded the Sri Lanka and became overlord of the kings of Burma at Pegu and Tanasserim.[35][36] By 1436 the rebellious chiefs of Kondavidu and the Velama rulers were successfully dealt with.[37] After a few years of tranquility wars broke out with the Bahamani Sultanate in 1443. The Persian visitor Firishta attributes Deva Raya II's war preparations which included augmenting the his armies with Muslim archers and cavalry to be the cause, where as the contemporary Persian ambassador Abdur Razzak claims the Bahamani Sultan may have tried to take advantage of confusion caused by an internal revolt including an attempt on the Raya's life by his brother as the reason for the war.[38]
Deva Raya II was succeeded by his elder son Mallikarjuna Raya in 1446. Mallikarjuna Raya had to contend with the growing ambitions of the Gajapati king of Orissa. The Gajapati king succeeded, at least temporarily, in unseating the Vijayanagara control over the Tamil country by occupying the Reddi kingdom of Rajahmundry, Kondaveedu, Kanchi and Tiruchirpalli. These defeats reduced the empires prestige, aptly described by an inscription which described the Gajapati king as "a yawning lion to the sheep of the Karnatak King".[39] Mallikarjuna's successor Virupaksha Raya II (1465) led a life of pleasure perusing wine and women leading to the loss of Goa and much of Karnataka to the Bahamani Sultan's astute general Mahmud Gawan. However his able governor Saluva Narasimha helped stem the loss of territory by successfully holding almost all of coastal Andhra Pradesh south of the Krishna river, Chittoor, the two Arcots and Kolar. He defeated the Gajapatis and held Udayagiri, drove out the Pandyas from Tanjore and took procession of Machilipatnam and Kondaveedu. Taking advantage of the assassination of Mahmud Gawan, Saluva Narasimha routed the Bahamani armies and recovered most of their earlier losses.[40]
After the death of Virupaksha Raya II in 1485, Saluva Narasimha led a coup that ended the dynastic rule while continuing to defend the empire from raids by the Sultanates created from the continuing disintegration of the Bahmani Sultanate in its north.[41] Saluva Narasimha left his two adolescent sons under the care of general Tuluva Narasa Nayaka who ably defended the kingdom from their traditional enemies, the Gajapati king and the Bahamani Sultan. He also subdued rebelling chiefs of the Chera, the Chola and the Pandya territories. Despite many attempts by nobles and members of the royal family to overthrow him, Narasa Nayaka retained control as a regent king till 1503.[42]
In 1503, Narasa Nayaka's son Vira Narasimha had prince Immadi Narasimha of the Saluva dynasty assassinated and took over the rule in a coup thus becoming the first of the Tuluva dynasty rulers. This did not go well with the nobles who revolted. Seeing internal troubles grow, the Gajapati king and the Bahamani Sultan began to encroach on the empire even as the governors of Ummattur, Adoni, and Talakad colluded to capture the Tungabhadra-Krishna river doab region from the empire.[43] The empire came under the rule of Krishna Deva Raya in 1509, another son of Tuluva Narasa Nayaka.[44] Initially Krishnadevaraya faced a many obstacles including dissatisfied nobles, the rebellious chief of Ummattur in the south, a resurgent Gajapati kingdom under King Prataparudra, a growing threat from the newly formed Adil Shahi Sultanate of Bijapur under Yusuf Adil Khan and Portuguese interest in controlling the west coast.[45] Not one to be unnerved by these pressures he strengthened and consolidated the empire, one victory at a time. He was an astute king who hired both Hindus and Muslims into his army.[46] In the following decades, the empire covered Southern India and successfully defeated invasions from the five established Deccan Sultanates to its north.[47][48]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9a/Panaromic_view_of_the_natural_fortification_and_landscape_at_Hampi.jpg/220px-Panaromic_view_of_the_natural_fortification_and_landscape_at_Hampi.jpg)
The empire reached its peak during the rule of Krishna Deva Raya when Vijayanagara armies were consistently victorious.[49] The empire gained territory formerly under the Sultanates in the northern Deccan, such as Raichur and Gulbarga from the Bahamani Sultanate, territories in the eastern Deccan from wars with Sultan Quli Qutb Shahi of Golkonda, and Kalinga region from the Gajapatis of Orissa. This was in addition to the already established presence in the southern Deccan.[50][51] Many important monuments were either completed or commissioned during the time of King Krishnadevaraya.[52]
Krishna Deva Raya was followed by his younger half-brother Achyuta Deva Raya in 1529. When Achyuta Deva Raya died in 1542, Sadashiva Raya, the teenage nephew of Achyuta Raya was appointed king with the caretaker being Aliya Rama Raya, Krishna Deva Raya's son-in-law and someone who had previously served Sultan Quli Qutb al-Mulk from 1512 when al-Mulk was assigned to Golkonda sultanate.[53] Aliya Rama Raya left the Golconda Sultanate, married Deva Raya's daughter, and thus rose to power. When Sadashiva Raya – Deva Raya's son – was old enough, Aliya Rama Raya imprisoned him and allowed his uncle Achyuta Raya to publicly appear once a year.[54] Further Aliya Rama Raya hired Muslim generals in his army from his previous Sultanate connections, and called himself "Sultan of the World".[55] Aliya Rama was fickle minded, yet an ambitious ruler. He was keen on playing off various Muslim powers against one another. He destroyed mosques and temples in the territory of his enemies as well as in the territories of his Muslim allies when he interfered in the internal affairs of the sultanates. This had already made him very unpopular among the people and the rulers.[56] Further he entered in to a commercial treaty with the Portuguese whereby the supply of horses to Bijapur was stopped, then he completely defeated the Bijapur ruler and also inflicted humiliating defeats on Golconda and Ahmednagar.[57] Ultimately all the successor sultanates decided to eliminate their biggest threat which was the Vijayanagar Empire under the tyrannical rule of Aliya Rama Raya.[58]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/22/Vijayanagara_royal_insignia.jpg/220px-Vijayanagara_royal_insignia.jpg)
The Sultanates to the north of Vijayanagara united and attacked Aliya Rama Raya's army, in January 1565, in a war known as the Battle of Talikota.[59] There are several theories about the battle. According to one theory, the Vijayanagara side was winning the war, state Hermann Kulke and Dietmar Rothermund, but suddenly two Muslim generals (who were not from Vijayanagara, but recently served as mercenaries) of the Vijayanagara army switched sides and turned their loyalty to the Sultanates. The generals captured Aliya Rama Raya and beheaded him on the spot, with Sultan Hussain on the Sultanates side joining them for the execution and stuffing of severed head with straw for display.[60][61] The beheading of Aliya Rama Raya created confusion and havoc in the still loyal portions of the Vijayanagara army, which were then completely routed. The Sultanates' army plundered Hampi and reduced it to the ruinous state in which it remains; it was never re-occupied.[62]
After the death of Aliya Rama Raya in the Battle of Talikota, Tirumala Deva Raya started the Aravidu dynasty, moved and founded a new capital of Penukonda to replace the destroyed Hampi, and attempted to reconstitute the remains of Vijayanagara Empire.[63] Tirumala abdicated in 1572, dividing the remains of his kingdom to his three sons, and pursued a religious life until his death in 1578. The Aravidu dynasty successors ruled the region but the empire collapsed in 1614, and the final remains ended in 1646, from continued wars with the Bijapur sultanate and others.[64][65][66] During this period, more kingdoms in South India became independent and separate from Vijayanagara. These include the Mysore Kingdom, Keladi Nayaka, Nayaks of Madurai, Nayaks of Tanjore, Nayakas of Chitradurga and Nayak Kingdom of Gingee – all of which declared independence and went on to have a significant impact on the history of South India in the coming centuries.[67]
Governance
The rulers of the Vijayanagara empire maintained the well-functioning administrative methods developed by their predecessors, the Hoysala, Kakatiya and Pandya kingdoms, to govern their territories and made changes only where necessary.[68] The King (Svamin), ministry (Amatya), territory (Janapada), fort (Durga), treasury (Kosa), army (Daiufa), and ally (Mitra) formed the seven critical elements that influenced every aspect of governance.[69] The King was the ultimate authority, assisted by a cabinet of ministers (Pradhana) headed by the prime minister (Mahapradhana). Other important titles recorded were the chief secretary (Karyakartha or Rayaswami) and the imperial officers (Adhikari). All high-ranking ministers and officers were required to have military training.[70] A secretariat near the king's palace employed scribes and officers to maintain records made official by using a wax seal imprinted with the ring of the king.[71] At the lower administrative levels, wealthy feudal landlords (Goudas) supervised accountants (Karanikas or Karnam) and guards (Kavalu). The palace administration was divided into 72 departments (Niyogas), each having several female attendants chosen for their youth and beauty (some imported or captured in victorious battles) who were trained to handle minor administrative matters and to serve men of nobility as courtesans or concubines.[72]
The empire was divided into five main provinces (Rajya), each under a commander (Dandanayaka or Dandanatha) and headed by a governor, often from the royal family, who used the native language for administrative purposes.[73] A Rajya was divided into regions (Vishaya Vente or Kottam) and further divided into counties (Sime or Nadu), themselves subdivided into municipalities (Kampana or Sthala). Hereditary families ruled their respective territories and paid tribute to the empire, while some areas, such as Keladi and Madurai, came under the direct supervision of a commander.[74]
On the battlefield, the king's commanders led the troops. The empire's war strategy rarely involved massive invasions; more often it employed small scale methods such as attacking and destroying individual forts. The empire was among the first in India to use long range artillery commonly manned by foreign gunners (those from present day Turkmenistan were considered the best).[75] Army troops were of two types: The king's personal army directly recruited by the empire and the feudal army under each feudatory. King Krishnadevaraya's personal army consisted of 100,000 infantry, 20,000 cavalrymen and over 900 elephants. This number was only a part of the army numbering over 1.1 million soldiers, a figure that varied as an army of two million has also been recorded along with the existence of a navy as evidenced by the use of the term Navigadaprabhu (commander of the navy).[76] The army recruited from all classes of society (supported by the collection of additional feudal tributes from feudatory rulers), and consisted of archers and musketeers wearing quilted tunics, shieldmen with swords and poignards in their girdles, and soldiers carrying shields so large that no armour was necessary. The horses and elephants were fully armoured and the elephants had knives fastened to their tusks to do maximum damage in battle.[77]
The capital city was completely dependent on the water supply systems constructed to channel and store water, ensuring a consistent supply throughout the year. The remains of these hydraulic systems have given historians a picture of the prevailing surface water distribution methods in use at that time in the semiarid regions of South India.[78] Contemporary records and notes of foreign travelers describe how huge tanks were constructed by labourers.[79] Excavations have uncovered the remains of a well-connected water distribution system existing solely within the royal enclosure and the large temple complexes (suggesting it was for the exclusive use of royalty, and for special ceremonies) with sophisticated channels using gravity and siphons to transport water through pipelines.[80] The only structures resembling public waterworks are the remains of large water tanks that collected the seasonal monsoon water and then dried up in summer except for the few fed by springs. In the fertile agricultural areas near the Tungabhadra River, canals were dug to guide the river water into irrigation tanks. These canals had sluices that were opened and closed to control the water flow. In other areas the administration encouraged the digging of wells monitored by administrative authorities. Large tanks in the capital city were constructed with royal patronage while smaller tanks were funded by wealthy individuals to gain social and religious merit.[81]
Economy
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a4/Hampi_marketplace.jpg/220px-Hampi_marketplace.jpg)
The economy of the empire was largely dependent on agriculture. Sorghum (jowar), cotton, and pulse legumes grew in semi-arid regions, while sugarcane, rice, and wheat thrived in rainy areas. Betel leaves, areca (for chewing), and coconut were the principal cash crops, and large-scale cotton production supplied the weaving centers of the empire's vibrant textile industry. Spices such as turmeric, pepper, cardamom, and ginger grew in the remote Malnad hill region and were transported to the city for trade. The empire's capital city was a thriving business centre that included a burgeoning market in large quantities of precious gems and gold. Prolific temple-building provided employment to thousands of masons, sculptors, and other skilled artisans.[82]
Land ownership was important. Most of the growers were tenant farmers and were given the right of part ownership of the land over time. Tax policies encouraging needed produce made distinctions between land use to determine tax levies. For example, the daily market availability of rose petals was important for perfumers, so cultivation of roses received a lower tax assessment.[83] Salt production and the manufacture of salt pans were controlled by similar means. The making of ghee (clarified butter), which was sold as an oil for human consumption and as a fuel for lighting lamps, was profitable.[84] Exports to China intensified and included cotton, spices, jewels, semi-precious stones, ivory, rhino horn, ebony, amber, coral, and aromatic products such as perfumes. Large vessels from China made frequent visits, some captained by the Chinese Admiral Zheng He, and brought Chinese products to the empire's 300 ports, large and small, on the Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal. The ports of Mangalore, Honavar, Bhatkal, Barkur, Cochin, Cannanore, Machilipatnam, and Dharmadam were the most important.[85]
When merchant ships docked, the merchandise was taken into official custody and taxes levied on all items sold. The security of the merchandise was guaranteed by the administration officials. Traders of many nationalities (Arabs, Persians, Guzerates, Khorassanians) settled in Calicut, drawn by the thriving trade business.[85] Ship building prospered and keeled ships between 1000 and 1200 bahares (burden) were built without decks by sewing the entire hull with ropes rather than fastening them with nails. Ships sailed to the Red Sea ports of Aden and Mecca with Vijayanagara goods sold as far away as Venice. The empire's principal exports were pepper, ginger, cinnamon, cardamom, myrobalan, tamarind timber, anafistula, precious and semi-precious stones, pearls, musk, ambergris, rhubarb, aloe, cotton cloth and porcelain.[85] Cotton yarn was shipped to Burma and indigo to Persia. Chief imports from Palestine were copper, quicksilver (mercury), vermilion, coral, saffron, coloured velvets, rose water, knives, coloured camlets, gold and silver. Persian horses were imported to Cannanore before a two-week land trip to the capital. Silk arrived from China and sugar from Bengal.[86]
East coast trade hummed, with goods arriving from Golkonda where rice, millet, pulses and tobacco were grown on a large scale. Dye crops of indigo and chay root were produced for the weaving industry. A mineral rich region, Machilipatnam was the gateway for high quality iron and steel exports. Diamond mining was active in the Kollur region.[87] The cotton weaving industry produced two types of cottons, plain calico and muslin (brown, bleached or dyed). Cloth printed with coloured patterns crafted by native techniques were exported to Java and the Far East. Golkonda specialised in plain cotton and Pulicat in printed. The main imports on the east coast were non-ferrous metals, camphor, porcelain, silk and luxury goods.[88]
Mahanavami festival marked the beginning of a financial year from when the state treasury accounted for and reconciled all outstanding dues within nine days. At this time, an updated annual assessment record of provincial dues, which included rents and taxes, paid on a monthly basis by each governor was created under royal decree.[69]
Temples were taxed for land ownership to cover military expenses. In the Telugu districts the temple tax was called Srotriyas, in the Tamil speaking districts it was called as Jodi. Taxes such as Durgavarthana, Dannayivarthana and Kavali Kanike were collected towards protection of movable and immovable wealth from robbery and invasions. Jeevadhanam was collected for cattle graze on non-private lands. Popular temple destinations charged visitor fees called Perayam or Kanike. Residential property taxes were called Illari.[89]
Culture
Social life
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/81/Evidence_of_Vijaynagar_pomp.jpg/220px-Evidence_of_Vijaynagar_pomp.jpg)
The Hindu caste system was prevalent, influenced daily life in the empire and the rulers who occupied the top of this hierarchy assumed the honorific Varnasramadharma (lit, "helpers of the four castes"). According to Talbot, caste was determined not just by the family lineage (Gotra) or the broad distinction described in sacred Hindu texts (the four Varnas; namely the Brahmin or priestly, the Kshatriya or warrior, the Vaishya or merchant and the Shudra or artisan), but more importantly by occupation or the professional community people belonged to. Further complicating the multilayered structure of society were the presence of sub-castes (Jati) and caste clusters.[90] According to Vanina, caste as a social identity was not fixed and was a constantly on the change for reasons including polity, trade and commerce, and was usually determined by context. Identification of castes and sub-castes was made based on temple affiliations, lineage, family units, royal retinues, warrior clans, occupational groups, agricultural and trade groups, devotional networks and even priestly cabals. It was also not impossible for a caste to loose its position and prestige and slip down the ladder while others rose up the same.[91] Epigraphy studies by Talbot suggests that members within a family could have different social status based on their occupation and the upward movement of a caste or sub-caste was not uncommon based on the breakthroughs achieved by an individual or a group of individuals from the commmunity.[92]
Caste affiliation was closely tied to craft production and members of a common craft formed collective memberships. Often members of related crafts formed inter-caste communities. This helped them consolidate strength and gain political representation and trade benefits.[93] According to Talbot, terminology such as Setti was used to identify communities across merchant and artisan classes while Boya identified herders of all types.[94] Artisans consisted of groups such as blacksmiths, goldsmiths, brasssmiths and carpenters. These communities lived in separate sections of the city to avoid disputes and quarrels that may arise, especially when it came to social privileges. Conquests led to large scale migration of people leading to marginalization of natives of a place. The Tottiyans were shepherds who later gained marginal ruling status (poligars), the Sourastras were traders who came from Gujarat and rivaled Brahmins for some benefits, the Reddys were agriculturists and the Uppilia were salt makers.[95]
According to Chopra et al., in addition to their monopoly over priestly duties, Brahmins occupied high positions in political and administrative fields. The Portuguese traveler Domingo Paes observed an increasing presence of Brahmins in the military.[96] The separation of the priestly class from material wealth and power made them ideal arbiters in local judicial matters, and their presence in every town and village was a calculated investment made by the nobility and aristocracy to maintain order.[97] Vanina notes that within the warrior Kshatriya class was a conglomerate of castes, kinship and clans that usually originated from land holding and pastoral communities that ascended the social ladder by abandoning their original occupations and adopting to a martial code of living, ethics and practices. In South India they were loosely called the Nayakas.[98]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ac/Vijayanagar_snakestone.jpg/220px-Vijayanagar_snakestone.jpg)
Sati practice is evidenced in Vijayanagara ruins by several inscriptions known as Satikal (Sati stone) or Sati-virakal (Sati hero stone).[99] There are controversial views among historians regarding this practice including religious compulsion, marital affection, martyrdom or honor against subjugation by foreign intruders.[100][101][102]
The socio-religious movements that gained popularity in the previous centuries, such as Lingayatism, provided momentum for flexible social norms that helped the cause of women. By this time South Indian women had crossed most barriers and were actively involved in fields hitherto considered the monopoly of men such as administration, business, trade and the fine arts.[103] Tirumalamba Devi who wrote Varadambika Parinayam and Gangadevi the author of Madhuravijayam were among the notable women poets of the Sanskrit language.[26] Early Telugu women poets such as Tallapaka Timmakka and Atukuri Molla became popular. Further south the provincial Nayaks of Tanjore patronised several women poets. The Devadasi system as well as legalized prostitution existed and members of this community were relegated to a few streets in each city. The popularity of harems among men of the royalty and the existence of seraglio is well known from records.[104]
Well-to-do men wore the Petha or Kulavi, a tall turban made of silk and decorated with gold. As in most Indian societies, jewellery was used by men and women and records describe the use of anklets, bracelets, finger-rings, necklaces and ear rings of various types. During celebrations men and women adorned themselves with flower garlands and used perfumes made of rose water, civet musk, musk or sandalwood.[104] In stark contrast to the commoners whose lives were modest, that of the king and the queens were full of ceremonial pomp. Queens and princesses had numerous attendants who were lavishly dressed and adorned with fine jewellery. The numbers ensured their daily duties were light.[105]
Physical exercises were popular with men and wrestling was an important male preoccupation for sport and entertainment. Even women wrestlers are mentioned in records.[106] Gymnasiums have been discovered inside royal quarters and records mention regular physical training for commanders and their armies during peacetime.[107] Royal palaces and market places had special arenas where royalty and common people alike amused themselves by watching sports such as cock fight, ram fight and female wrestling.[107] Excavations within the Vijayanagara city limits have revealed the existence of various types of community-based gaming activities. Engravings on boulders, rock platforms and temple floors indicate these were popular locations of casual social interaction. Some of these games are in use even today and others are yet to be identified.[108]
Dowry was in practice and can be seen in both Hindu and Muslim royal families of the time. When a sister of Sultan Adil Shah of Bijapur was married to Nizam Shah of Ahmednagar the town of Sholapur was given to the bride by her family.[109] Ayyangar notes that when the Gajapati King of Kalinga gave his daughter in marriage honoring the victorious King Krishnadevaraya he included several villages as dowry.[110] Inscriptions of the 15th and 16th centuries record the practice of dowry among commoners as well. The practice of putting a price on the bride was a possible influence of the Islamic Mahr system.[111] To oppose this influence, in the year 1553, the Brahmin community passed a mandate under royal decree and popularized the kanyadana within the community. According to this practice money could not be paid or received during marriage and those who did were liable for punishment. There is a mention of Streedhana ("woman's wealth") in an inscription and that the villagers should not give away land as dowry. These inscriptions reinforce the theory that a system of social mandates within community groups existed and were widely practiced even though these practices did not find justification in the family laws described in the religious texts.[112]
Religion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bd/Karnataka_Hampi_IMG_0730.jpg/220px-Karnataka_Hampi_IMG_0730.jpg)
The Vijayanagara kings were tolerant of all religions and sects, as writings by foreign visitors show.[113] The kings used titles such as Gobrahamana Pratipalanacharya (literally, "protector of cows and Brahmins") and Hindurayasuratrana (lit, "upholder of Hindu faith") that testified to their intention of protecting Hinduism and yet were at the same time staunchly Islamicate in their court ceremonials and dress.[114] The empire's founders, the Sangama brothers (Harihara I and Bukka Raya I) came from a pastoral cowherd background (the Kuruba people) that claimed Yadava lineage.[115] They were devout Shaivas (worshippers of Shiva) but made grants to the Vaishnava order of Sringeri with Vidyaranya as their patron saint, and designated Varaha (the boar, an Avatar of Vishnu) as their emblem.[116] Over one-fourth of the archaeological dig found an "Islamic Quarter" not far from the "Royal Quarter". Nobles from Central Asia's Timurid kingdoms also came to Vijayanagara. The later Saluva and Tuluva kings were Vaishnava by faith, but worshipped at the feet of Lord Virupaksha (Shiva) at Hampi as well as Lord Venkateshwara (Vishnu) at Tirupati. A Sanskrit work, Jambavati Kalyanam by King Krishnadevaraya, refers to Lord Virupaksha as Karnata Rajya Raksha Mani ("protective jewel of Karnata Empire").[117] The kings patronised the saints of the dvaita order (philosophy of dualism) of Madhvacharya at Udupi.[118] Endowments were made to temples in the form of land, cash, produce, jewellery and constructions.[119]
The Bhakti (devotional) movement was active during this time, and involved well known Haridasas (devotee saints) of that time. Like the Virashaiva movement of the 12th century, this movement presented another strong current of devotion, pervading the lives of millions. The haridasas represented two groups, the Vyasakuta and Dasakuta, the former being required to be proficient in the Vedas, Upanishads and other Darshanas, while the Dasakuta merely conveyed the message of Madhvacharya through the Kannada language to the people in the form of devotional songs (Devaranamas and Kirthanas). The philosophy of Madhvacharya was spread by eminent disciples such as Naraharitirtha, Jayatirtha, Sripadaraya, Vyasatirtha, Vadirajatirtha and others.[120] Vyasatirtha, the guru (teacher) of Vadirajatirtha, Purandaradasa (Father of Carnatic music[121][122]) and Kanakadasa[123] earned the devotion of King Krishnadevaraya.[124][125][126] The king considered the saint his Kuladevata (family deity) and honoured him in his writings.[127] During this time, another great composer of early carnatic music, Annamacharya composed hundreds of Kirthanas in Telugu at Tirupati in present-day Andhra Pradesh.[128]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a6/LAKSHMI-NARASIMHA_statue_at_Hampi.jpg/170px-LAKSHMI-NARASIMHA_statue_at_Hampi.jpg)
The defeat of the Jain Western Ganga Dynasty by the Cholas in the early 11th century and the rising numbers of followers of Vaishnava Hinduism and Virashaivism in the 12th century was mirrored by a decreased interest in Jainism.[129] Two notable locations of Jain worship in the Vijayanagara territory were Shravanabelagola and Kambadahalli.[130]
Islamic contact with South India began as early as the 7th century, a result of trade between the Southern kingdoms and Arab lands. Jumma Masjids existed in the Rashtrakuta empire by the 10th century[131] and many mosques flourished on the Malabar coast by the early 14th century.[132] Muslim settlers married local women; their children were known as Mappillas (Moplahs) and were actively involved in horse trading and manning shipping fleets. The interactions between the Vijayanagara empire and the Bahamani Sultanates to the north increased the presence of Muslims in the south. In the early 15th century, Deva Raya built a mosque for the Muslims in Vijayanagara and placed a Quran before his throne.[133] The introduction of Christianity began as early as the 8th century as shown by the finding of copper plates inscribed with land grants to Malabar Christians. Christian travelers wrote of the scarcity of Christians in South India in the Middle Ages, promoting its attractiveness to missionaries.[134] The arrival of the Portuguese in the 15th century and their connections through trade with the empire, the propagation of the faith by Saint Xavier (1545) and later the presence of Dutch settlements fostered the growth of Christianity in the south.[135]
Epigraphs, sources and monetization
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8c/Ornate_pillared_mantapa_at_the_Virupaksha_temple_in_Hampi.jpg/170px-Ornate_pillared_mantapa_at_the_Virupaksha_temple_in_Hampi.jpg)
Stone inscriptions were the most common form of documents used on temple walls, boundary of properties and open places for public display. Another form of documentation was on copper plates that were meant for record keeping. Usually verbose inscriptions included information such as a salutation, a panegyric of the king or local ruler, the name of the donor, nature of the endowment (generally either cash or produce), the manner in which the grant would be used, obligations of the donee, share received by the donor and a concluding statement that officiated the entire donation and its obligations. Some inscriptions even record an instance of victory in war or religious festival, and retribution or a curse on those who do not honor the grant.[136]
Most Vijayanagara empire inscriptions recovered so far are in Kannada, Telugu and Tamil, and a few in Sanskrit.[137] According to Suryanath U. Kamath about 7000 stone inscriptions, half of which are in Kannada, and about 300 copper plates which are mostly in Sanskrit have been recovered.[138] Bilingual inscriptions had lost favor by the 14th century.[139] According to Mack, majority of the inscriptions recovered are from the rule of the Tuluva dynasty (from 1503 to 1565) with the Saluva dynasty (from 1485 to 1503) inscribing the least in its brief control over the empire. The Sangama dynasty (from 1336 to 1485) which ruled the longest produced about one third of all epigraphs inscribed during the Tuluva period.[140] Despite the popularity of Telugu language as a literary medium, majority of the epigraphs in the language were inscribed in the limited period from 1500 to 1649. Talbot explains this scenario as one of shifting political solidarity. The Vijayanagara empire was originally founded in Karnataka, with Andhra Pradesh serving as a province of the empire. However, after its defeat to the Sultanates in 1565 and the sacking of the royal capital Vijayanagara, the diminished empire moved its capital to Southern Andhra Pradesh creating an enterprise dominated by Telugu language.[141]
The sources of Vijayanagara history, in addition to epigraphs and coins are the accounts of foreign travelers, literary sources in Sanskrit, Kannada, Persian and Telugu. The Portuguese visitors to the empire were Domingo Paes, Fernão Nunes (Fernão Nuniz),[142] Durate Barbosa and Barradas, and Athanasius Nikitin came from Russia.[143] Niccolò de' Conti (1420),[144] Ludovico di Varthema(1505), Caesar Fredericci (1567) and Filippo Sassetti (1585)[145][86] were travelers from Italy and Abdur Razzak[146] visited from Persia. Contemporary Muslim writers who have left valuable works are Barani, Isamy (Fatuhat us salatin), Syed Ali Tabatabai (Burhan-i-Maisar, 1596), Nisammuddin Bakshi, Firishta (Tarik-i-Firishta) and Rafiuddin Shirazi (Tazkirat ul Mulk, 1611).[147] The important Sanskrit works that shed light on the empire are Vidyaranya Kalajnana, Dindima's Ramabhyudayam on the life of King Saluva Narasimha, Dindima II's Achyutabhyudayam and Tirumalamba's Varadambika Parinayam. Among Kannada literary works, Kumara Ramana Kathe by Nanjunda Kavi, Mohanatarangini by Kanakadasa, Keladiripavijayam by Linganna and the recently discovered Krishnadevarayana Dinachari are useful sources, and among Telugu works, Srinatha's Kashikanda, Mallayya and Singayya's Varahapuranamu, Vishvanatha Nayani's Rayavachakamu, Nandi Timmanna's Parijathapaharanamu, Durjati's Krishnaraja Vijayamu, Peddanna's Manucharitamu and King Krishnadevaraya's Amuktamalyada are important sources of information.[148][149]
The Persian visitor Abdur Razzak wrote in his travelogues that the empire enjoyed a high level of monetization. This is especially evident from the number of temple cash grants that were made. Coins were minted using gold, silver, copper and brass and their value depended on material weight. Coins were minted by the state, in the provinces and by merchant guilds. Foreign currency was in circulation. The highest denomination was the gold Varaha (or Hun/Honnu, Gadyana) weighted 50.65 – 53 grains. The Partab or Pratapa was valued at half a Varaha, the Fanam , Phanam or Hana, an alloy of gold and copper was the most common currency valued at a third of the Varaha. A Tar made of pure silver was a sixth of a Phanam and a Chital made of brass was a third of the Tar. Haga, Visa and Kasu were also coins of lower denominations.[150][151]
Literature
During the rule of the Vijayanagara Empire, poets, scholars and philosophers wrote primarily in Kannada, Telugu and Sanskrit, and also in other regional languages such as Tamil and covered such subjects as religion, biography, Prabandha (fiction), music, grammar, poetry, medicine and mathematics. The administrative and court languages of the Empire were Kannada and Telugu, the latter was the court language and gained even more cultural prominence during the reign of the last Vijayanagara kings.[152][153] Telugu was a popular literary medium, reaching its peak under the patronage of Krishnadevaraya.[153]
Most Sanskrit works were commentaries either on the Vedas or on the Ramayana and Mahabharata epics, written by well known figures such as Sayanacharya (who wrote a treatise on the Vedas called Vedartha Prakasha whose English translation by Max Muller appeared in 1856), and Vidyaranya that extolled the superiority of the Advaita philosophy over other rival Hindu philosophies.[154] Other writers were famous Dvaita saints of the Udupi order such as Jayatirtha (earning the title Tikacharya for his polemicial writings), Vyasatirtha who wrote rebuttals to the Advaita philosophy and of the conclusions of earlier logicians, and Vadirajatirtha and Sripadaraya both of whom criticized the beliefs of Adi Sankara.[126] Apart from these saints, noted Sanskrit scholars adorned the courts of the Vijayanagara kings and their feudal chiefs. Some members of the royal family were writers of merit and authored important works such as Jambavati Kalyana by King Krishnadevaraya,[9] and Madura Vijayam (also known as Veerakamparaya Charita) by Princess Gangadevi, a daughter-in-law of King Bukka I, dwells on the conquest of the Madurai Sultanate by the Vijayanagara empire.[155]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c4/Poetic_Kannada_inscription_of_Manjaraja_dated_1398_CE_at_Vindyagiri_hill_in_Shravanabelagola.jpg/170px-Poetic_Kannada_inscription_of_Manjaraja_dated_1398_CE_at_Vindyagiri_hill_in_Shravanabelagola.jpg)
The Kannada poets and scholars of the empire produced important writings supporting the Vaishnava Bhakti movement heralded by the Haridasas (devotees of Vishnu), Brahminical and Veerashaiva (Lingayatism) literature. The Haridasa poets celebrated their devotion through songs called Devaranama (lyrical poems) in the native meters of Sangatya (quatrain), Suladi (beat based), Ugabhoga (melody based) and Mundige (cryptic).[156] Their inspirations were the teachings of Madhvacharya and Vyasatirtha. Purandaradasa and Kanakadasa are considered the foremost among many Dasas (devotees) by virtue of their immense contribution.[157] Kumara Vyasa, the most notable of Brahmin scholars wrote Gadugina Bharata, a translation of the epic Mahabharata. This work marks a transition of Kannada literature from old Kannada to modern Kannada.[158] Chamarasa was a famous Veerashaiva scholar and poet who had many debates with Vaishnava scholars in the court of Devaraya II. His Prabhulinga Leele, later translated into Telugu and Tamil, was a eulogy of Saint Allama Prabhu (the saint was considered an incarnation of Lord Ganapathi while Parvati took the form of a princess of Banavasi).[159][160]
At this peak of Telugu literature, the most famous writing in the Prabandha style was Manucharitamu. King Krishnadevaraya was an accomplished Telugu scholar and wrote the celebrated Amuktamalyada.[161] Amuktamalyada ("One who wears and gives away garlands") narrates the story of the wedding of the god Vishnu to Andal, the Tamil Alvar saint poet and the daughter of Periyalvar at Srirangam.[162][163][164] In his court were eight famous scholars regarded as the pillars (Ashtadiggajas) of the literary assembly. The most famous among them were Allasani Peddana who held the honorific Andhrakavitapitamaha (lit, "father of Telugu poetry") and Tenali Ramakrishna, the court jester who authored several notable works.[165] The other six poets were Nandi Thimmana (Mukku Timmana), Ayyalaraju Ramabhadra, Madayyagari Mallana, Bhattu Murthi (Ramaraja Bhushana), Pingali Surana, and Dhurjati. This was the age of Srinatha, the greatest of all Telugu poets of the time. He wrote books such as Marutratcharitamu and Salivahana-sapta-sati. He was patronised by King Devaraya II and enjoyed the same status as important ministers in the court.[166]
Though much of the Tamil literature from this period came from Tamil speaking regions ruled by the feudatory Pandya who gave particular attention on the cultivation of Tamil literature, some poets were patronised by the Vijayanagara kings. Svarupananda Desikar wrote an anthology of 2824 verses, Sivaprakasap-perundirattu, on the Advaita philosophy. His pupil the ascetic, Tattuvarayar, wrote a shorter anthology, Kurundirattu, that contained about half the number of verses. Krishnadevaraya patronised the Tamil Vaishnava poet Haridasa whose Irusamaya Vilakkam was an exposition of the two Hindu systems, Vaishnava and Shaiva, with a preference for the former.[167]
Notable among secular writings on music and medicine were Vidyaranya's Sangitsara, Praudha Raya's Ratiratnapradipika, Sayana's Ayurveda Sudhanidhi and Lakshmana Pandita's Vaidyarajavallabham.[168] The Kerala school of astronomy and mathematics flourished during this period under such well known scholars as Madhava who made important contributions to Trigonometery and Calculus, and Nilakantha Somayaji, who postulated on the orbitals of planets.[169]
Architecture
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9d/The_Stone_Chariot%2CHampi.jpg/220px-The_Stone_Chariot%2CHampi.jpg)
Vijayanagara architecture is a vibrant combination of the Chalukya, Hoysala, Pandya and Chola styles, idioms that prospered in previous centuries.[170] Its legacy of sculpture, architecture and painting influenced the development of the arts long after the empire came to an end. Its stylistic hallmark is the ornate pillared Kalyanamantapa (marriage hall), Vasanthamantapa (open pillared halls) and the Rayagopura (tower). Artisans used the locally available hard granite because of its durability since the kingdom was under constant threat of invasion. While the empire's monuments are spread over the whole of Southern India, nothing surpasses the vast open-air theatre of monuments at its capital at Vijayanagara, a UNESCO World Heritage Site.[7]
In the 14th century the kings continued to build vesara or Deccan-style monuments but later incorporated Dravida-style gopuras to meet their ritualistic needs. The Prasanna Virupaksha temple (underground temple) of Bukka and the Hazare Rama temple of Deva Raya are examples of Deccan architecture.[171] The varied and intricate ornamentation of the pillars is a mark of their work.[172] At Hampi, though the Vitthala temple is the best example of their pillared Kalyanamantapa style, the Hazara Ramaswamy temple is a modest but perfectly finished example.[173] A visible aspect of their style is their return to the simplistic and serene art developed by the Chalukya dynasty.[174] A grand specimen of Vijayanagara art, the Vitthala temple, took several decades to complete during the reign of the Tuluva kings.[175]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e9/An_aerial_view_of_Madurai_city_from_atop_of_Meenakshi_Amman_temple.jpg/220px-An_aerial_view_of_Madurai_city_from_atop_of_Meenakshi_Amman_temple.jpg)
Another element of the Vijayanagara style is the carving and consecration of large monoliths such as the Sasivekaalu (mustard) Ganesha and Kadalekaalu (ground nut) Ganesha at Hampi, the Gommateshwara (Bahubali) monoliths in Karkala and Venur, and the Nandi bull in Lepakshi. The Vijayanagara temples of Kolar, Kanakagiri, Sringeri and other towns of Karnataka; the temples of Tadpatri, Lepakshi, Ahobilam, Tirumala Venkateswara Temple and Srikalahasti in Andhra Pradesh; and the temples of Vellore, Kumbakonam, Kanchi and Srirangam in Tamil Nadu are examples of this style. Vijayanagara art includes wall-paintings such as the Dashavatara and Girijakalyana (marriage of Parvati, Shiva's consort) in the Virupaksha Temple at Hampi, the Shivapurana murals (tales of Shiva) at the Virabhadra temple at Lepakshi, and those at the Kamaakshi and Varadaraja temples at Kanchi. This mingling of the South Indian styles resulted in a richness not seen in earlier centuries, a focus on reliefs in addition to sculpture that surpasses that previously in India.[176]
An aspect of Vijayanagara architecture that shows the cosmopolitanism of the great city is the presence of many secular structures bearing Islamic features. While political history concentrates on the ongoing conflict between the Vijayanagara empire and the Deccan Sultanates, the architectural record reflects a more creative interaction. There are many arches, domes and vaults that show these influences. The concentration of structures like pavilions, stables and towers suggests they were for use by royalty.[177] The decorative details of these structures may have been absorbed into Vijayanagara architecture during the early 15th century, coinciding with the rule of Deva Raya I and Deva Raya II. These kings are known to have employed many Muslims in their army and court, some of whom may have been Muslim architects. This harmonious exchange of architectural ideas must have happened during rare periods of peace between the Hindu and Muslim kingdoms.[178] The "Great Platform" (Mahanavami Dibba) has relief carvings in which the figures seem to have the facial features of central Asian Turks who were known to have been employed as royal attendants.[179]
See also
- History of India
- History of South India
- Military of Vijayanagara
- Political history of medieval Karnataka
Notes
- ^ Howes, Jennifer (1998). The Courts of Pre-colonial South India: Material Culture and Kingship. Psychology Press. p. 43. ISBN 978-07-0071-585-5.
- ^ Bridges, Elizabeth J. (2016). "Vijayanagara Empire". In Dalziel, N.; MacKenzie, J. M. (eds.). The Encyclopedia of Empire. pp. 1–5. doi:10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe424. ISBN 9781118455074.
- ^ Stein 1989, p. 1.
- ^ Sen, Sailendra (2013). A Textbook of Medieval Indian History. Primus Books. pp. 103–106. ISBN 978-93-80607-34-4.
- ^ Dhere, Ramchandra (2011). Rise of a Folk God: Vitthal of Pandharpur South Asia Research. Oxford University Press, 2011. p. 243. ISBN 9780199777648.
- ^ Stein 1989, p. xi
- ^ a b "Group of Monuments at Hampi-Cultural Sites". UNESCO. World Heritage Centre, Paris, France. 1986. Retrieved 27 April 2021.
- ^ Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 268
- ^ a b Fritz & Michell 2001, p. 14.
- ^ Jackson 2016, pp. 43–44
- ^ Historians such as P. B. Desai, Henry Heras, B.A. Saletore, G.S. Gai, William Coelho and Kamath in (Kamath 2001, pp. 157–160)
- ^ Karmarkar 1947, p. 30.
- ^ Kulke & Rothermund 2004, p. 188.
- ^ Rice 2001, p. 345.
- ^ Sewell 1901; Nilakanta Sastri 1955; N. Ventakaramanayya; B. Suryanarayana Rao in (Kamath 2001, pp. 157–160)
- ^ a b Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 216.
- ^ Kamath 2001, p. 160.
- ^ Portuguese travelers Barbosa, Barradas and Italian Varthema and Caesar Fredericci in 1567, Persian Abdur Razzak in 1440, Barani, Isamy, Tabataba, Nizamuddin Bakshi, Ferishta and Shirazi and vernacular works from the 14th century to the 16th century. (Kamath 2001, pp. 157–158)
- ^ Fritz & Michell 2001, pp. 1–11.
- ^ Chopra, Ravindran & Subrahmanian 2003, Part II, p. 22
- ^ a b Stein 1989, pp. 18–19.
- ^ a b Gilmartin, David; Lawrence, Bruce B. (2000). Beyond Turk and Hindu: Rethinking Religious Identities in Islamicate South Asia. University Press of Florida. pp. 300–306, 321–322. ISBN 978-0-8130-3099-9.
- ^ a b Cynthia Talbot (2001). Precolonial India in Practice: Society, Region, and Identity in Medieval Andhra. Oxford University Press. pp. 281–282. ISBN 978-0-19-803123-9.
- ^ a b Mary Storm (2015). Head and Heart: Valour and Self-Sacrifice in the Art of India. Taylor & Francis. p. 311. ISBN 978-1-317-32556-7.
- ^ Srivastava, Kanhaiya L (1980). The position of Hindus under the Delhi Sultanate, 1206-1526. Munshiram Manoharlal. p. 202. ISBN 9788121502245.
- ^ a b Kamath 2001, p. 162
- ^ Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 317
- ^ Chopra, Ravindran & Subrahmanian 2003, Part II, p. 24
- ^ The success was probably also due to the peaceful nature of Muhammad II Bahmani, according to Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 242
- ^ From the notes of Portuguese Nuniz. Robert Sewell notes that a big dam across was built the Tungabhadra and an aqueduct 15 miles (24 km) long was cut out of rock (Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 243).
- ^ John Stewart Bowman (2013), p.271, Columbia Chronologies of Asian History and Culture, Columbia University Press, New York, ISBN 0-231-11004-9
- ^ Eaton 2006, pp. 89 – 90 with footnote 28.
- ^ Also deciphered as Gajaventekara, a metaphor for "great hunter of his enemies", or "hunter of elephants" (Kamath 2001, p. 163).
- ^ Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 244
- ^ From the notes of Persian Abdur Razzak. Writings of Nuniz confirms that the kings of Burma paid tributes to Vijayanagara empire Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 245
- ^ Kamath 2001, p. 164
- ^ Chopra, Ravindran & Subrahmanian 2003, part II, p. 31
- ^ Chopra, Ravindran & Subrahmanian 2003, part II, p. 2
- ^ Chopra, Ravindran & Subrahmanian 2003, part II, p. 33
- ^ Chopra, Ravindran & Subrahmanian 2003, part II, p. 34
- ^ Eaton 2006, pp. 86–87.
- ^ Chopra, Ravindran & Subrahmanian 2003, part II, p. 35 – 36
- ^ Chopra, Ravindran & Subrahmanian 2003, part II, p. 36
- ^ Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 250
- ^ Chopra, Ravindran & Subrahmanian 2003, part II, p. 37
- ^ Eaton 2006, pp. 87–88.
- ^ Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 239
- ^ Kamath 2001, p. 159
- ^ Eaton 2006, pp. 88–89.
- ^ The notes of Portuguese Barbosa confirms a very rich and well provided Vijayanagara city. (Kamath 2001, p. 186)
- ^ Chopra, Ravindran & Subrahmanian 2003, part II, p. 37 – 39
- ^ Most monuments including the royal platform (Mahanavami Dibba) were actually built over a period spanning several decades. (Dallapiccola 2001, pp. 66)
- ^ Eaton 2006, p. 79, Quote: "Rama Raya first appears in recorded history in 1512, when Sultan Quli Qutb al-Mulk enrolled this Telugu warrior as a military commander and holder of a land assignment in the newly emerged sultanate of Golkonda.".
- ^ Eaton 2006, p. 92.
- ^ Eaton 2006, pp. 93–101.
- ^ Pillai, Manu S. (2020). Rebel Sultans:The Deccan from Khilji to Shivaji. New Delhi: Juggernaut Books. pp. 116–118. ISBN 9789353451066.
- ^ Chopra, Ravindran & Subrahmanian 2003, part II, p.43
- ^ Reddy, Krishna (2011). Indian History. McGrawHill Education. pp. B166. ISBN 978-0-07-132923-1.
- ^ Eaton 2006, pp. 96–98.
- ^ Kulke & Rothermund 2004, p. 191"When battle was joined in January 1565, it seemed to be turning in favor of Vijayanagara – suddenly, however, two Muslim generals of Vijayanagara changes sides. Rama Raya was taken prisoner and immediately beheaded."
- ^ Eaton 2006, pp. 98, Quote: "Husain (...) ordered him beheaded on the spot, and his head stuffed with straw (for display).".
- ^ Eaton 2006, pp. 98–101.
- ^ Eaton 2006, pp. 100–101.
- ^ Kamath 2001, p. 174.
- ^ Vijaya Ramaswamy (2007). Historical Dictionary of the Tamils. Scarecrow Press. pp. 11–12. ISBN 978-0-8108-6445-0.
- ^ Eaton 2006, pp. 101–115.
- ^ Kamath 2001, pp. 220, 226, 234.
- ^ A war administration, (K.M. Panikkar in Kamath 2001, p. 174)
- ^ a b Mahalingam, T.V (1940). Administration and social life under Vijayanagara. Madras University Historical Series, No. 15. University of Madras. pp. 9, 101, 160, 239, 244, 246, 260.
- ^ From the notes of Persian Abdur Razzak and research by B.A. Saletore (Kamath 2001, p. 175)
- ^ From the notes of Nuniz (Kamath 2001, p. 175)
- ^ Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 286.
- ^ From the notes of Duarte Barbosa (Kamath 2001, p. 176). However, the kingdom may have had nine provinces (T. V. Mahalingam in Kamath 2001, p. 176)
- ^ Kamath 2001, p. 176 – 177.
- ^ Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 287.
- ^ From the notes of Abdur Razzaq and Paes respectively (Kamath 2001, p. 176)
- ^ From the notes of Nuniz (Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 288)
- ^ Davison-Jenkins 2001, p. 89.
- ^ From the notes of Domingo Paes and Nuniz (Davison-Jenkins 2001, p. 98)
- ^ Davison-Jenkins 2001, p. 90.
- ^ Davison-Jenkins 2001, p. 88 – 99.
- ^ From the notes of Duarte Barbosa. (Kamath 2001, p. 181)
- ^ From the notes of Abdur Razzak in Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 298
- ^ From the notes of Abdur Razzak in Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 299
- ^ a b c From the notes of Abdur Razzak in Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 304
- ^ a b Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 304 – 305.
- ^ Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 305.
- ^ Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 306.
- ^ Reddy, Soma. "Taxation of Hindu Temples in the Telugu districts of the Vijayanagara Empire (1978)". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 39: 503–508. JSTOR 44139388.
- ^ Sinopoli 2003, pp. 98–99
- ^ Vanina 2012, pp. 129–130
- ^ Vanina 2012, pp. 131–132
- ^ Sinopoli 2003, pp. 98, 21–22
- ^ Sinopoli 2003, p. 99
- ^ Chopra, Ravindran & Subrahmanian 2003, part II, pp. 155 – 156
- ^ Chopra, Ravindran & Subrahmanian 2003, part II, p. 156
- ^ According to Sir Charles Elliot, the intellectual superiority of Brahmins justified their high position in society (Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 289)
- ^ Vanina 2012, p. 140
- ^ Verghese 2001, p. 41
- ^ John Stratton Hawley (1994). Sati, the Blessing and the Curse: The Burning of Wives in India. Oxford University Press. pp. 150–151. ISBN 978-0-19-536022-6.
- ^ Lindsey, Harlan, Professor of Religious Studies (2018). Religion and Rajput Women: The Ethic of Protection in Contemporary Narratives. University of California Press. p. 200. ISBN 9780520301757.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ H.G, Rekha (2019). "Sati Memorial Stones of Vijayanagara Period - A Study". History Research Journal. 5 (6): 210.
- ^ B.A. Saletore in Kamath 2001, p. 179
- ^ a b Kamath 2001, p. 180
- ^ From the writings of Portuguese Domingo Paes (Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 296)
- ^ Kamath 2001, p. 179.
- ^ a b Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 296.
- ^ Mack 2001, pp. 39.
- ^ Babu, Dr.M.Bosu (2018). Material Background to the Vijayanagara Empire (A Study with Special reference To Southern Āndhradēśa From A.D. 1300 To 1500). K.Y.Publications. p. 189. ISBN 978-9387769427.
- ^ Ayyangar, Krishnaswami (2019). Sources of Vijayanagar History. Alpha Editions. p. 116. ISBN 978-9353605902.
- ^ Dr.B. S. Chandrababu, and Dr.L. Thilagavathi (2009). Woman, Her History and Her Struggle for Emancipation. Bharathi Puthakalayam. p. 266. ISBN 9788189909970.
- ^ Mahalingam, T.V (1940). Administration and Social Life under Vijayanagar. Madras: University of Madras Historical Series No.15. pp. 255–256.
- ^ From the notes of Duarte Barbosa (Kamath 2001, p. 178)
- ^ Wagoner, Phillip B. (November 1996). "Sultan among Hindu Kings: Dress, Titles, and the Islamicization of Hindu Culture at Vijayanagara". The Journal of Asian Studies. 55 (4): 851–880. doi:10.2307/2646526. JSTOR 2646526.
- ^ Dhere, Ramachandra Chintaman (2011). Rise of a Folk God: Vitthal of Pandharpur. Oxford University Press. p. 243. ISBN 978-0-19977-764-8.
- ^ Kamath 2001, p. 177
- ^ Wagoner 2001, p. 14
- ^ Kamath 2001, pp. 177–178
- ^ Naik, Reddy, Krishna, Ramajulu (2007). "Impact of endowments on society during the Vijayanagara period: A study of the Rayalaseema region, 1336–1556". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 68: 286–294. JSTOR 44147838.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Shiva Prakash 1997, pp. 192, 194–196
- ^ Iyer 2006, p. 93
- ^ Quote:"Was the pioneer and doyen of Carnatic music", Quote:"He is acclaimed as the Pitamaha of Carnaic music".(Narayan 2010, Introduction, p.3)
- ^ Shiva Prakash 1997, p. 196
- ^ Shiva Prakash 1997, p. 195.
- ^ Kamath 2001, p. 178.
- ^ a b Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 324.
- ^ Sinha, Madhubala (2009). Encyclopaedia of South Indian Literature – Volume 2. Anmol Publications, 2009, New Delhi. p. 271. ISBN 9788126137404.
- ^ Kamath 2001, p. 185
- ^ Kamath 2001, pp. 112, 132
- ^ Kamath 2001, pp. 197; Bang & Kolodziejczyk 2012, pp. D23.
- ^ From the notes of Arab writer Al-Ishtakhri (Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 396)
- ^ From the notes of Ibn Batuta (Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 396)
- ^ Rice 2001, p. 479.
- ^ From the notes of Jordanus in 1320–21 (Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 397)
- ^ Doss, M. Christhu (1 November 2018). "Indian Christians and The Making of Composite Culture in South India". South Asia Research. 38 (3): 247–267. doi:10.1177/0262728018798982. ISSN 0262-7280. S2CID 149596320.
- ^ Mack 2002, pp. 77–78
- ^ Mack 2002, p. 79
- ^ Kamath 2001, pp. 10, 157
- ^ Thapar 2003, pp. 393–395
- ^ Mack 2002, pp. 81–82
- ^ Talbot 2002, pp. 25–28
- ^ Davison-Jenkins 2001, p. 63,72,98,99
- ^ Chopra, Ravindran & Subrahmanian 2003, Introductory ix,x
- ^ Sattar, Sharma & Pokharia 2010, p. 245
- ^ Savile 1996, p. 858
- ^ Sinopoli & Morrison 2001, p. 101,104
- ^ Chopra, Ravindran & Subrahmanian 2003, Introductory ix, part II, p. 9
- ^ Kamath 2001, pp. 157–158
- ^ Chopra, Ravindran & Subrahmanian 2003, Introductory p. ix
- ^ Sinopoli 2003, p. 105
- ^ Kamath 2001, pp. 176
- ^ Nagaraj 2003, pp. 378
- ^ a b
Royal patronage was also directed to the support of literature in several languages: Sanskrit (the pan-Indian literary language), Kannada (the language of the Vijayanagara home base in Karnataka), and Telugu (the language of Andhra). Works in all three languages were produced by poets assembled at the courts of the Vijayanagara kings
The Telugu language became particularly prominent in the ruling circles by the early 16th century, because of the large number of warrior lords who were either from Andhra or had served the kingdom there
— Asher & Talbot 2006, pp. 74–75 - ^ Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 321.
- ^ Devi, Ganga (1924). Sastri, G Harihara; Sastri, V Srinivasa (eds.). Madhura Vijaya (or Veerakamparaya Charita): An Historical Kavya. Trivandrum, British India: Sridhara Power Press. Retrieved 21 June 2016.
- ^ Ayyappapanicker in (Shiva Prakash 1997, pp. 164, 193–194, 203)
- ^ Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 365.
- ^ Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 364.
- ^ Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 363.
- ^ Rice 2001, p. 68.
- ^ During the rule of Krishnadevaraya, encouragement was given to the creation of original Prabandhas (stories) from Puranic themes (Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 372)
- ^ Rao, Pappu Venugopala (22 June 2010). "A masterpiece in Telugu literature". The Hindu. No. Chennai. Retrieved 9 June 2016.
- ^ Krishnadevaraya (2010). Reddy, Srinivas (ed.). Giver of the Worn Garland: Krishnadevaraya's Amuktamalyada. Penguin UK. ISBN 978-8184753059. Retrieved 9 June 2016.
- ^ Krishnadevaraya (1907). Amuktamalyada. London: Telugu Collection for the British Library. Retrieved 9 June 2016.
- ^ Like the nine gems of King Vikramaditya's court, the Ashtadiggajas were famous during the 16th century (Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 372)
- ^ Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 370.
- ^ Nilakanta Sastri 1955, p. 347.
- ^ Durga Prasad 1988, pp. 268–270.
- ^ Kak, Subhash (2010). Sengupta, Pradip Kumar (ed.). History of Science and Philosophy of Science: A Historical Perspective of the Evolution of Ideas in Science. Vol. XIII, part 6. Pearson Longman. p. 91. ISBN 978-81-317-1930-5.
- ^ Art critic Percy Brown calls Vijayanagara architecture a blossoming of Dravidian style (Kamath 2001, p. 182).
- ^ Fritz & Michell 2001, p. 9.
- ^ Nilakanta Sastri about the importance of pillars in the Vijayanagar style in Kamath 2001, p. 183
- ^ "Drama in stone" wrote art critic Percy Brown, much of the beauty of Vijayanagara architecture came from their pillars and piers and the styles of sculpting. (Hampi, A Travel Guide, pp. 77)
- ^ About the sculptures in Vijayanagara style, see Kamath 2001, p. 184
- ^ Several monuments are categorised as Tuluva art (Fritz & Michell 2001, p. 9)
- ^ Some of these paintings may have been redone in later centuries (Rajashekhar in Kamath 2001, p. 184)
- ^ Fritz & Michell 2001, p. 10.
- ^ Philon 2001, pp. 87.
- ^ Dallapiccola 2001, pp. 69.
Bibliography
- Jackson, William (2016). "Refletions on Vidyaranya and the Hinduness of Islamicate Vijayanagara". Viyanagara Voices: Exploring South Indian History and Hindu Literature. New York: Routledge. ISBN 9780-7546-3950-3.
- Asher, Catherine B.; Talbot, Cynthia (2006). "Creation of Pan South Indian Culture". India Before Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-00539-5.
- Savile, Charles (1996). "vol 5, Asia & Oceania". In Schellinger, Paul E.; Salkin, Robert M. (eds.). International Dictionary of Historical Places. New York: Routledge. ISBN 1-884964-04-4.
- Bang, Peter Fibiger; Kolodziejczyk, Dariusz, eds. (2012). "Ideologies of state building in Vijayanagara India". Universal Empire: A Comparative Approach to Imperial Culture and Representation in Eurasian History. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-02267-6.
- Chopra, P. N.; Ravindran, T. K.; Subrahmanian, N. (2003). "Medieval Period". History of South India. New Delhi: Rajendra Ravindra Printers. ISBN 81-219-0153-7.
- Dallapiccola, Anna L. (2001). "Relief carvings on the great platform". In Fritz, John M.; Michell, George (eds.). New Light on Hampi: Recent Research at Vijayanagara. Mumbai: MARG. ISBN 978-81-85026-53-4.
- Davison-Jenkins, Dominic J. (2001). "The Greater Metropolitan Region". In Fritz, John M.; Michell, George (eds.). New Light on Hampi: Recent Research at Vijayanagara. Mumbai: MARG. ISBN 978-81-85026-53-4.
- Sinopoli, Carla M.; Morrison, Kathleen D. (2001). "Hydraulic works". In Fritz, John M.; Michell, George (eds.). New Light on Hampi: Recent Research at Vijayanagara. Mumbai: MARG. ISBN 978-81-85026-53-4.
- Sattar, Mofarahus; Sharma, S.D.; Pokharia, Anil K. (2010). Sharma, D.S. (ed.). Rice: Origin, Antiquity and History. Boca Raton, Florida: Science Publishers, CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-4398-4056-6.
- Durga Prasad, J. (1988). History of the Andhras up to 1565 A. D. (PDF). Guntur: P.G. Publisher. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 April 2006. Retrieved 27 January 2007.
- Eaton, Richard M. (2006). A social history of the Deccan, 1300–1761: eight Indian lives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-71627-7.
- Hampi Travel Guide. New Delhi: Eicher Goodearth supported by Department of Tourism, Government of India. 2003. ISBN 978-81-87780-17-5. LCCN 2003334582.
- Iyer, Panchapakesa A.S. (2006). Karnataka Sangeeta Sastra. Chennai: Zion Printers.
- Kamath, Suryanath U. (2001) [1980]. A concise history of Karnataka: from pre-historic times to the present. Bangalore: Jupiter books. LCCN 80905179. OCLC 7796041.
- Karmarkar, A.P. (1947). Cultural history of Karnataka: ancient and medieval. Dharwad: Karnataka Vidyavardhaka Sangha. OCLC 8221605.
- Kulke, Hermann; Rothermund, Dietmar (2004). A History of India (4th ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-32919-4.
- Wagoner, Phillip (2001). "Architecture and Early Authority under the Early Sangamas". In John M. Fritz; George Michell (eds.). New Light on Hampi: Recent Research at Vijayanagara. Mumbai: MARG. ISBN 978-81-85026-53-4.
- Mack, Alexandra (2001). "The temple district of Vitthalapura". In John M. Fritz; George Michell (eds.). New Light on Hampi: Recent Research at Vijayanagara. Mumbai: MARG. ISBN 978-81-85026-53-4.
- Mack, Alexandra (2002). "Vijayanagara Inscriptions as History and Archeology". Spiritual Journey, Imperial City: Pilgrimage to the temples of Vijayanagara. New Delhi: Vedams. ISBN 81-7936-004-0.
- Fritz, John M.; Michell, George (2001). "Introduction". New Light on Hampi: Recent Research at Vijayanagara. Mumbai: MARG. ISBN 978-81-85026-53-4.
- Nagaraj, D.R. (2003). "Tensions in Kannada Literary Culture". In Pollock, Sheldon (ed.). Literary Cultures in History: Reconstructions from South Asia. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California. ISBN 978-0-520-22821-4.
- Nilakanta Sastri, K. A. (1955) [reissued 2002]. A history of South India from prehistoric times to the fall of Vijayanagar. New Delhi: Indian Branch, Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-560686-7.
- Narayan, M.K.V. (2010). Lyrical Musings on Indian Culture:A Sociological Study of the Songs of Sant Purandaradasa. New Delhi: Readworthy. ISBN 978-93-80009-31-5.
- Philon, Helen (2001). "Plaster decoration on Sultanate-styled courtly buildings". In Fritz, John M.; Michell, George (eds.). New Light on Hampi: Recent Research at Vijayanagara. Mumbai: MARG. ISBN 978-81-85026-53-4.
- Rice, B. Lewis (2001) [1897]. Mysore Gazetteer Compiled for Government. Vol. 1. New Delhi, Madras: Asian Educational Services. ISBN 978-81-206-0977-8.
- Shiva Prakash, H.S. (1997). "Kannada". In Ayyappapanicker (ed.). Medieval Indian Literature:An Anthology. Sahitya Akademi. ISBN 978-81-260-0365-5.
- Sinopoli, Carla M. (2003). The Political Economy of Craft Production Crafting Empire in South India, C.1350–1650. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139440745.
- Sewell, Robert (1901). A Forgotten Empire Vijayanagar: A Contribution to the History of India.
- Stein, Burton (1989). The New Cambridge History of India: Vijayanagara. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-26693-2.
- Thapar, Romila (2003). The Penguin History of Early India. New Delhi: Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-302989-2.
- Talbot, Cynthia (2002). Precolonial India in Practice:Society, Region and Identity in Medieval Andhra. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-513661-6.
- Vanina, Eugenia (2012). Medieval Indian Landscapes-Space.Time.Society.Man. Delhi: Primus Books. ISBN 978-93-80607-19-1.
- Verghese, Anila (2001). "Memorial stones". In Fritz, John M.; Michell, George (eds.). New Light on Hampi: Recent Research at Vijayanagara. Mumbai: MARG. ISBN 978-81-85026-53-4.
Further reading
- Michell, George (2008). Vijayanagara: Splendour in Ruins. Ahmedabad: Mapin Publishing and The Alkazi Collection of Photography. ISBN 978-81-89995-03-4.
- Oldham, C. E. A. W. (1936). "Reviewed Work: Vijayanagara: Origin of the City and the Empire by N. Venkata Ramanayya". The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1): 130–131. JSTOR 25182067.
- Rice, E.P. (1982) [1921]. A History of Kanarese Literature. New Delhi: Asian Educational Services. ISBN 978-81-206-0063-8.
- Pujar, Narahari S.; Rao, Shrisha; Raghunandan, H.P. "Sri Vyâsa Tîrtha (1460–1539) – a short sketch". Dvaita. Archived from the original on 28 March 2016. Retrieved 31 December 2006.
- Ramesh, K. V. "Introduction". South Indian Inscription. Vol. 16: Telugu Inscriptions from Vijayanagar Dynasty. New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India.
External links
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fa/Wikiquote-logo.svg/34px-Wikiquote-logo.svg.png)
- Philip B Calkins, Vijayanagara Empire at the Encyclopædia Britannica
Media related to Vijayanagara Empire at Wikimedia Commons
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg/38px-Wikisource-logo.svg.png)