Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous

Welcome to the miscellaneous section
of the Wikipedia reference desk.

skip to bottom

Select a section:

• Computing
• Entertainment
• Humanities
• Language
• Mathematics
• Science
• Miscellaneous
• Archives

Want a faster answer?

Main page: Help searching Wikipedia

   

How can I get my question answered?

• Select the section of the desk that best fits the general topic of your question (see the navigation column to the right).
• Post your question to only one section, providing a short header that gives the topic of your question.
• Type '~~~~' (that is, four tilde characters) at the end – this signs and dates your contribution so we know who wrote what and when.
• Don't post personal contact information – it will be removed. Any answers will be provided here.
• Please be as specific as possible, and include all relevant context – the usefulness of answers may depend on the context.
• Note:
  • We don't answer (and may remove) questions that require medical diagnosis or legal advice.
  • We don't answer requests for opinions, predictions or debate.
  • We don't do your homework for you, though we'll help you past the stuck point.
  • We don't conduct original research or provide a free source of ideas, but we'll help you find information you need.

Ready? Ask a new question!

How do I answer a question?

Main page: Wikipedia:Reference desk/Guidelines

• The best answers address the question directly, and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice.

See also:

• Teahouse
• Help desk
• Village pump
• Help manual

June 19

Rice

Yeah I'm the only man you'll ever find interested in that white grain. Why do westerners like their rice not clumped, but Easterners(I hope that is what you call most Asian cultures and whoever else likes their rice clumped) like their rice clump? Personally, clump rice is the best there is no mess to clean up. How do I clump rice the way Easterners do?Cardinal Raven (talk) 00:49, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

After cooking, stuff the rice in a cup then tap the cup lightly to put the rice in the plate. Now you have a measured and clumped rice.--Lenticel ^(talk) 01:18, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Well more or less I mean sticky. Cause the moment I began to eat the measured clump of rice it will just fall into a nice little pile. Also I want to eat my rice with chopsticks and just measuring won't do much when you want to eat it with chopsticks.I guess I'm asking how do I get my rice sticky enough to eat with chopsticks?Cardinal Raven (talk) 01:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh... we don't use chopsticks here. Glutinous rice or malagkit is usually too "tasty" accompany vegetables or meat. Filipinos prepare it differenly as a seperate dish such as bebinca, suman and champorado.--Lenticel ^(talk) 02:48, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

If you're referring to "sticky rice", which you can roll into a ball (such as in Thai or Lao cooking), then see Glutinous rice. It's a specific type. (That article also has many links that you mind find useful in tracking down types of rice.) Gwinva (talk) 01:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't know why. But, I'd have to agree. I don't like my rice sticky, but they do in the Philippines were I have spent a considerable amount of time. Useight (talk) 01:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Part of it is for practical reasons. Glutinous rice - as hinted at above - is far easier to eat with chopsticks than other rice. And there's nothing better than a hot place of satay beef on a bed of rice, eaten with chopsticks. Yum. Grutness...wha? 02:04, 19 June 2008 (UTy

Glutinous rice, such as you'd have in a Thai restaurant, is one way to eat sticky rice. Another is the way Hawaii locals like it, which is to start with medium-grain calrose rice. If you have a rice cooker, use about 1.5 parts water for every 1 part rice. Perfect sticky rice-ball quality rice almost every time. If you're cooking on the cooktop, cook in a small pot on low, and use about twice as much water as rice. Mitchell k dwyer (talk) 05:45, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Generally Long-grain rice is the loose type generally used for fried rice, which absorbs the least amount of water. Then you have the Medium/Short grain rice which clump and can be eaten with chopsticks, but not sticky like glutinous rice. This is the type I (south Chinese) normally eat, and it's also used in Sushi's. Then there's glutinous rice, which is very very sticky and leaves much more a mess than the other 2 types of rice, and generally only used in special dishes in Chinese cuisine. Westerners may be accustomed to the fried-rice style rice and thus like them more. To the OP: depending on what you're eating you don't necessarily need to eat rice with chopsticks. In Chinese cuisine the chopsticks are used as a scoop to scoop it up in bowls. --antilived^{T | C | G} 08:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure OP didn't mean glutinous rice, but trying to cook long grain rice to be sticky, or short/medium grain rice without it being so dry, so I think only Antilived hit the mark. If you're cooking with long grain, switch to short/medium grain, and if you're using short/medium grain, try adding a little bit more water (like in a rice cooker, I add 1 parts rice with 1.5 parts of water, and it comes out not too hard and not too sticky). But if you're preparing it in a pot, I have actually never made rice in a pan other than boxed rice. --Wirbelwindヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 15:59, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and I forgot. In some rice cookers, it's better to let it sit even after it's done for awhile (like 30 minutes), and it usually dries the surfaces and leaves the rice itself moist and sticky still. But I'm not sure if this only applies to old style rice cookers. --Wirbelwindヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 16:02, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

In almost ALL rice-cookers is it better to let the rice sit for twenty minutes or so (depending on how much rice you've made). The rice cooker knows when to shut itself off based on the temperature of the pot (when most of the water has steamed off, the pot itself gets hotter). The manufacturers of rice-cookers count on your allowing the rice to sit. The original poster has specifically used the word onigiri, and I submit that the rice he or she is looking for is most definitely medium-grain calrose rice, such as I described in my first response.Mitchell k dwyer (talk) 03:23, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

First off I was thinking of buying a rice cooker. Second off I wanted clumpy or sticky rice because not only do I want to eat my rice with chopsticks I wanted to make certain things such as onigiri and other stuff that requires my rice not to fall apart. Maybe I should have asked in the very beginning do I have to have special rice to do that? Because even that question is answered. Personal reminder, add all questions. All well I like my answers so its okay.Cardinal Raven (talk) 16:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

As to your question about why Westerners don't like their rice clumped: the types of rice grown in the West before trade opened up were naturally less prone to clumping, because they had less starch in their outer layers. Westerners also associate clumpy food with poor preparation, especially with respect to savory food: sweet food can be sticky, but clumpy rice is up there with lumpy mashed potatoes and stuck-together pasta - the texture was simply "wrong". And so many Western (or westernized) rice dishes like paella, pilaf and casserole require rice that doesn't glom together. --NellieBly (talk) 21:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Just soak the long grain rice in water for 10-20mins and drain, add more water (more than you usually would) and cook slowly until the water is just about evaporated. It will then be 'sticky'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.20.19.4 (talk) 15:58, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Not all Asian cultures have equally sticky rice. For example, Indian Basmati rice is waaay less sticky than Japanese. 74.14.117.135 (talk) 01:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

A couple of Continental exceptions to fluffy and free also exist in dishes using arborio rice, such as paella and risotto

Wikipedia Hierachy

I've always been curious to know the hierarchy of WP. From what I understand, the account hierarchies goes like this, increasing status:

• Banned user
• Unregistered user
• Registered user
• Bot
• Administrator/SysOp
• Checkuser and Oversight
• Bureaucrat
• Steward
• Developer
• Autoconfirmed/founder

Is this correct? Are Checkusers and Oversights on the same level? Thanks. Acceptable (talk) 02:29, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

No user is "above" another, however, I suppose if you wanted to sort by number of rights each account type has, I definitely wouldn't put a bot "above" a registered user. Bots don't think for themselves. Bots can't comment in discussions. It is true that bureaucrats, stewards, checkusers, and oversighters can do things that an admin cannot, they don't carry more weight in a discussion to find consensus. Useight (talk) 05:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

You've left off autoconfirmed (and founder, I suppose). Algebraist 06:53, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

In terms of who carries more clout in a discussion, in between "Registered user" also breaks down, in my experience, into "Registered user with more than a handful of edits and a user page" and "Registered user with a handful of edits or no userpage". Also you left Jimbo off the list—he is sort of his own category, in terms of policymaking and clout in discussions. --98.217.8.46 (talk) 12:33, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Number of edits certainly counts. I once saw a bunch of admins refuse to acknowledge the vote of a user because he/she had fewer than 500 main-space edits. I thought it was ridiculous but the fact that it counts remains. Zain Ebrahim (talk) 17:44, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Nobody has more "clout" in a discussion, though naturally you can expect admins etc to have more common sense (Well, maybe not :-p), though there are plenty of people, like say, User:SandyGeorgia who are just noraml users and are very well respected, more so than many admins (I suppose admins make a lot of enemies...)--Serviam (talk) 23:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Nobody is supposed to have more clout in a discussion. Unfortunately, many Admins pretty much ignore anyone who isn't at least an Admin. This is because, if they piss off another Admin they can be blocked, but they have nothing to fear from pissing off ordinary users. Really just another example of power corrupting. I've had an Admin outright tell me my opinion meant nothing an AN/I, because I wasn't an Admin. This inequity could be resolved if we got rid of the concept of "Admin for life", which means, as long as an Admin never upsets another Admin, they can engage in behavior which would have prevented their election to Admin, violate promises they made when the vote occured, etc., and still remain an Admin. If they had to periodically stand for election they would show more respect to the users, or they would be gone. StuRat (talk) 15:42, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

I can say from my own experience as someone who has an admin account, a few non-admin accounts, and often edits from an IP, that who you officially "are" does matter in most discussions. If I post concerns with something about how Wikipedia is run from an IP address, no matter how wonderfully worded it is, it has significantly less impact than if I do it from the admin account. If I apply "normal reasoning" to a problem it has less impact than if I "reason through specific policy decisions"—lots of acronyms and other signs that I am "in the know". Is it a problem that such inequity exists? Not in my opinion. Yes, it goes against the digital populism ideal of Wikipedia, and it in many instances seems to me to calcify the Wikipedia bureaucracy, but I think it is fairly unavoidable, and in the end things basically still work.

Additionally, as StuRat says, banning policies can be rather draconian. Slip up as an admin or an established user, and you'll be given a little time-out, a few reprimands, etc. Slip up as a brand new user or an IP, expect to be banned permanently. --98.217.8.46 (talk) 16:30, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

This page lists out the different privileges and indeed shows bots as having more privileges (well, kind of) than standard users. Matt Deres (talk) 04:41, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Trying To Find a Pair of Glasses Frames Like These

50's-style scientist glasses. Like #6 on this page:

http://www.propspecs.com/glasses/rocknroll.htm

Unfortunately, that site is just for "prop" frames, so I can't really get them from there. I need to either find actual vintage frames or a modern version that looks pretty much the same. E^robson (T^alk) 04:00, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Nothing to stop you replacing the pane with prescriptions. On closer inspection, they're an actual frames company using that name for their marketing niche. My messy post, Julia Rossi (talk) 05:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Second hand, vintage or charity shops, garage boot sales and antique fairs will be time consuming but you will end up finding them. 200.127.59.151 (talk) 15:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Dare I suggest... eBay? Search for "horn rim frames" there. Warning: vintage frames like that ain't always cheap. --98.217.8.46 (talk) 19:12, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Velpeau’s Law

I recently came across the term “Velpeau’s Law”, which is apparently used to describe the experience of a doctor seeing a patient with a very rare condition, then a short time later has another, entirely unrelated, patient with the same rare condition. This was in a book about synchronicity. I can’t find anything about Velpeau's Law on the web, and the only Velpeau we have an article on says nothing about it either.

Then, a few days later, I was reading a different book, on the subject of things people said that they might have wished they hadn’t said, and I found this quote: "The abolishment [sic] of pain in surgery is a chimera. It is absurd to go on seeking it." (Dr Alfred Velpeau, 1839). Our article confirms he did indeed have scepticism about pain-free surgery, so I can nail that one down.

I thought finding these 2 references to the previously unheard-of (by me) Velpeau in a short space of time was a nice example of both synchronicity and Velpeau’s Law in a non-medical context. But that aside, is the term “Velpeau’s Law” generally used by the medical fraternity, and does it originate, as I assume, from Alfred Velpeau, or from another Velpeau? -- JackofOz (talk) 07:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Until a Velpeaunik drops by, I'd call it occult. You're a spooky possum, Julia Rossi (talk) 12:43, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

I've never heard the term, but I only work with MDs—I'm not one myself. I can find only one web reference to Velpeau's law (in this blog entry) where it is defined exactly as JackOfOz describes.

Really, though, the phenomenon can stem from a number root causes. It can arise purely through a combination of psychological priming and a misunderstanding of statistics. Consider that there are some thousands of different diseases which are known to modern medicine. Over the course of Doctor X's career, he sees thousands upon thousands of patients, most of whom have quite common ailments. A small group contract rare and unusual diseases. Let's say that Dr. X sees fifty patients with rare diseases; for simplicity's sake, let's say that among them they contract twenty-five unique ailments, with two cases of each.

Sprinkle those cases randomly over Dr. X's career, and most of the pairs will end up years, even decades, apart. A few, by pure chance and coincidence, will end up very close together in time—almost certainly the same year, possibly the same month or week. (The odds of a coincidence are actually quite a bit higher than one's intuition might suggest—see birthday problem.) Dr. X says to himself, "Well isn't that odd...two such unusual cases just a month apart, and I haven't seen any others in twenty years of work." Of course, he doesn't think about the twenty-four other rare diseases which were evenly distributed over his career.

That leaves aside the effect of cases that are related in a way that the doctor doesn't know about: two strangers who sat next to each other on the bus; the mailman who passed a genetic defect on to the lonely housewife's son. This analysis also neglects the possibility that there were other cases of the rare disease in Dr. X's career, but he missed the diagnosis, the diagnosis was made by a specialist but the paperwork was lost, or Dr. X forgot about the case after ten or twenty years. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 14:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

That blog is more significant than you know, Ten. The book I referred to above, where I first came across the term, was in part a collection of contributions from people from all over the world about their experiences of synchronicity. (For those interested, the book was ‘’Soul Moments: Marvelous Stories of Synchronicity- Meaningful Coincidences from a Seemingly Random World’’. It was put together by Phil Cousineau, with a foreword by Robert A. Johnson). This particular story was written by one Roberto Takaoka, a doctor working in Sao Paolo, Brazil. The blog you located is written by Walter Whitton Harris, who lives in, you guessed it, Sao Paolo, Brazil. Takoaka's story was dated 16-22 November 1993, and the blog was written December 2007: so unless Takaoka and Harris know each other, "Velpeau’s Law" seems to be term used by Sao Paolians and not much elsewhere. How odd. Yet another bit of sychronicity. I agree with everything you say about the scientific/rational analysis of these coincidences; but from the metaphysical angle, they are indeed meaningful. Just what they mean, though ...... -- JackofOz (talk) 07:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

For a related adage named after a person, I only found Littlewood's law on WP. ---Sluzzelin talk 11:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

South Africa + Restaurants + Take-aways etc.

Please please

I need some help?

I am trying to do some Market Research and I need some information as follows:

How many Restaurants are there in South Africa? How many fast-food outlets are there in South Africa? How many liquor stores are there in South Africa? etc

please could you put me in the right direction?

Thank you thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.208.40.15 (talk) 08:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

The Yellow Pages at http://www.yellowpages.co.za/search.jsp?query=Restaurants&location= may give you some idea on the numbers of these types of commercial enterprises. --Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM (talk) 11:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Problem is, not everyone is in the Yellow Pages. I would guess a search on the CIPRO page would give you a more accurate result, as everyone has to register at the DTI. Otherwise give Markinor a call and I'm sure they would be helpful in guiding you. Sandman30s (talk) 12:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Insects

Are all insects attracted to light, or is it just some families/genera, or just some individual species? Thanks in advance. 80.123.210.172 (talk) 08:49, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

No. Some, for example Woodlice and Cockroaches, move away from light because they have negative phototaxis, and some for example moths and flies are attracted to light because they have positive phototaxis. D0762 (talk) 10:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

That doesn't really answer the question though... If I'm following correctly... Why then would one species have negative phototaxis and another have positive? Dismas|^(talk) 16:59, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

The behaviour of moths is discussed at Moth#Attraction to light. Woodlice live mostly in the dark, so I assume their light-aversion serves to keep them in their habitat and away from the eyes of predators. It might also stop them drying out. Algebraist 17:25, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Exactly. Woodlice need a damp environment because they breathe through gills. They are also detritivores which means they mainly eat dead plant matter that would need dampness to decompose well. In fact, Woodlice are not insects at all but crustaceans (they have seven pairs of legs, whereas insects have three). Generally, insects which move away from light do so to keep cool, damp, and out of view from predators, while those that move towards light do so to keep warm or for navigation. D0762 (talk) 19:35, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Becoming a microbiologist.

Let's say I want to become a microbiologist, but I don't know how. Where do I start? What degrees and/or studies would I need? How can I become a good microbiologist? Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ann Caitlyn Johnson (talk • contribs) 09:18, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Become a biologist, then get a mad scientist to use his shrink ray on you ? StuRat (talk) 09:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

But seriously, first you will need a good background in science and math, with, of course, the emphasis on biology. Then, in your later years at college, you can narrow the focus of your studies to microbiology. StuRat (talk) 09:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Assuming you want to be a proper researcher and not just a lab technician, then you pretty much have to get a PhD. I am not sure which country you are in but the general idea is the same, I'm in the UK and I'm not a microbiologist but I am a biologist which is close. At high school you will want to specialise in science subjects. I did Maths, Chemistry and Biology at A-Level (16-18) add Physics if you want. Do an undergraduate degree in Biology, it needn't be Microbiology specifically as you will probably get to pick the modules that interest you. A 2.1 (the second top grade roughly a B) or better is generally required if you want to do a PhD. I personally think that if you are certain you are going to do a PhD then a Masters is a bit of a waste of time and money so I would recommend to go straight from undergraguate to PhD. Find a poject and a lab you think you will enjoy enough to stick at it. Once you have your PhD, get a job, hey presto! you are a microbiologist.Franmars (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

To clarify Franmars, I think when he/she says go straight to a PhD I believe he/she means that you need to apply to a PhD program. That is the way it is in the US and I don't think the UK is that different. After your undergraduate education you can apply to either a terminal Masters program or a PhD program. Terminal masters programs tend to be for people who have not distinguished themselves in the undergraduate career and will need a bit more time to develop their skills/recommendations/resume before applying to a PhD program. At the terminal masters program you will work towards your masters only. Whereas in a PhD program you will first get your masters then work towards a PhD. I know that information about terminal programs is true for the US, but it may be less true in other countries, so be sure to verify this if you are in another country.

If you have not started your undergraduate education I would highly recommend you go to your local library and try to find a book that deals with "careers in biology" or another related book (or buy one from Amazon or local equivalent). They tend to explain what is generally required before you apply to graduate school, the types of courses you need to take, the GPA requirements, any standardized tests, what you should expect from the PhD program.

Also you may want to try to find a mentor of sorts at the school you do your undergrad work at. Ask them what needs to be done before you apply to school. Often times professors are willing to help students out who show an interest. And one last recommendation, again this is true for US universities but I don't know how widespread this is, you may want to try to work/intern in research labs as an undergrad, even if it is grunt work (cleaning slides or equipment, setting up basic equipment). There are several benefits: experience doing actual science, vivid examples of how to operationalize a question, a good recommendation, maybe (if you're lucky) your name on the tail end of some paper.--droptone (talk) 12:30, 19 June 2008 (UTC)--

I think things are somewhat different in much of the Commonwealth, including I think the UK. A PhD is a PhD and it is rare you will start off with a Masters. However to do a PhD in the UK and in a number of Commonwealth countries, you will usually need to have either done a Masters, or a (probably first class) Honours degree as part of your B.Sc. In the UK, an Honours is fairly automatic provided you do well enough. In Australia and NZ it isn't for most science degrees, you have to do an extra year which usually involves some postgraduate study and research. Note that in a lot of the Commonwealth, PhDs are intended to be completed within 3 years (even if few achieve that). You are therefore usually expected to have some idea of what you are doing when you start your PhD and will likely have a problem coping if not. This is I believe unlike the US where as Droptone mentioned, you often start off with a Masters which becomes a PhD hence you are not really expected to have much experience in a real lab (although it doesn't hurt) and are usually I believe given up to 5 years to complete your PhD. Nil Einne (talk) 12:13, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

That isn't necessarily so. In biological sciences in the UK, the lower threshold for acceptance to a PhD-track program is usually a 2:1 Honours degree, not a first class degree. Moreover, in the UK one almost always actually registers for a MPhil, then after one year transfers to a PhD. For most PhD-track students this a mere formality, so its often assumed one registers immediately for a PhD. But that is rarely the case. Rockpocket 00:16, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

As Franmars said (at least in the U.S.) it is often not necessary or desirable to get a Master's on the way to getting a PhD - just do the Phd and get on to the post-doc work. Rmhermen (talk) 18:52, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, often at a certain point in your Ph.D. studies, they'll give you a Master's just for filing the appropriate form. For me I think it was "complete 11 (quarter) classes and pass two quals, one of them being Algebra". Couldn't see any reason not to file the form. It struck me that if what you really wanted was the Master's, the quickest way to get it was to enter the Ph.D. program. --Trovatore (talk) 08:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

New Olympic Sporting Events

How many countries does a sport like say lacrosse need to be played in before it can become partof the Olympic Games? 71.231.122.22 (talk) 09:58, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

It's at the discretion of the IOC and its subcommittees. There is not fixed requirement of the sort you suggest. — Lomn 13:00, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

It also isn't just a matter of number of countries, but also how widespread the sport is. If it's only played on one or two continents, but in few other places in the world, the IOC will generally not consider it. I've often wondered why roller skating competitions haven't been made Olympic sports. They're big in the Pan Am Games, and I can't imagine roller skating isn't big outside of the Western Hemisphere. Corvus cornix_talk 17:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Sports need to be widespread and there has to be a well developed international competition calendar, including world championships, etc. This is where Women's ski jumping had issues with getting into the Winter Olympics. - Eron^Talk 19:20, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Number of countries is but one of many hurdles a sport has to go through. part of the problem is that, for logistics reasons, the IOC has a strict limit on the number of sports played at the Olympics. even sports played in many countries with well-developed international competitions struggle (cricket, for instance, is played at international level in over 100 countries and in all continents bar Antarctica - from Estonia to Afghanistan, Brazil to Japan - and has had world championships since the 1970s, but it consistently fails in its bids to be adopted as an Olympic sport). Because of the limit, a sport has to be dropped before a new one is adopted, and that causes massive lobbying among both sports. Grutness...wha? 00:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC) (Roller skating is an organised sport? Who knew?)

This link [1] from the article Olympic Sports. Shows that baseball and softball were voted off the Olympic programme after the Athens 2004 Olympics. There was a consequent vote to nominate two sports to fill the spaces, Karate, Roller Sports, Rugby, Squash and Golf were the options and Squash and Karate won. However, neither succeeded in a subsequent vote to add them to the summer games. So it seems for the 2012 games there will be two fewer sports. Franmars (talk) 08:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Roller skating has speed events and artistic events just like ice skating does. Corvus cornix_talk 17:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Polska

I wish to ask a question on the Polish wiki ref desk, and thus get replies from Poles. Can some one please give me a link. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.115.175.247 (talk) 13:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

The sidebar at Wikipedia:Reference desk has an interwiki link to pl:Wikipedia:Pytania merytoryczne. I don't read Polish, but that appears to be the right place. Algebraist 15:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Bull ring stunt

What are the origins of the stunt where a person stands inside a bull ring blind folded and smoking a cig? I've seen this stunt pulled in one of the Jackass movies and in a Tom and Jerry cartoon. --Endless Dan 15:13, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Bull games go back through history. The cigaratte stunt is just a gimmick. Unless sacrifice is involved they operate much as an American rodeo with catchers (or whatever they are called) monitoring events. In the south of France the bull games are not lethal. Ribbons and cockades are tied to the bull's horns and young men leap to secure them. A cash value is placed on each. The bulls play more often than the individual men and so get very skilful at avoiding. Sometimes a man is injured, but very very seldom a bull.86.209.154.30 (talk) 14:03, 20 June 2008 (UTC)DT

Of course, the blindfold and cigarette is the standard protocol for someone executed by firing squad, hence the joke in Jackass is they're acknowledging that it's suicidal. That movie is the only time I know of it being paired with a bullring stunt. --D. Monack | talk 04:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Sport gender question

Watching the Germany-Portugal game in the football European Championship 2008 and thinking about my earlier question about samba carnivals made me realise something. Why are the players in these sports championships always invariably all men? Surely women like to play sports as well. Why are not half of the players men and half women? Of course, given that football is a contact sport, mixed men and women would not probably work out. But why are there not separate men's games and women's games in the championships? Why do only men play all games? Is it because women are generally not interested in such tough contact sports, or because the longer history of men's sport has made the men's teams better players and more famous? I was just thinking about how I still had not got a real answer to why samba carnivals only feature women, and then I realised the opposite is true for sports championships. JIP | Talk 19:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Women do play these sports, and they have their own championships; see FIFA Women's World Cup for example. Women also play competitive ice hockey, rugby union, basketball, etc. Your question may more be about why the women's events are not as popular or well-known. - Eron^Talk 19:16, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, that certainly helps. If there are women's championship games too, why are they not played in combination with the men's championship games? Why do people get all excited about the men's games and only pay attention to the women's games for the explicit sake of equality? On the other hand, I still haven't got an answer to why samba carnivals only feature women. But that is another question. I have realised I have all this time subconsciously been thinking it's all right when only men do something, but when only women do something, it raises my curiosity. This is bad for gender equality and I must try to be more objective. JIP | Talk 19:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

You are essentially describing the phenomena of gender roles and expectations. --98.217.8.46 (talk) 21:09, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

It's not just about gender expectations. In most sports, the top male players are enormously better than the top female players. Thus, the top male event is the top event in the sport. It's natural for this to be the thing people are most interested in. The first example that comes to mind of a sport where this is not the case is eventing. Here women are at no particular disadvantage, and compete alongside men (in the Olympics for example). Algebraist 21:15, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Tennis is an exception to that. Men are infinitely better but women still get a relatively large share of the popularity. I wonder why that might be. Zain Ebrahim (talk) 21:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

First off I have to say how much I hate sports. Its just a couple of guys chasing after a ball on nice green grass...whoopy!(no offense to you.) Part of the answer to your question has to do with history. Woman in history were only viewed as property.(I don't know how to phrase that better.) Certain cultures and religions in modern time still believe woman as nothing. One of the religious groups that believes woman aren't part of society are the Muslims.

www.thenoor.org/muslimwomaninsociety.htm - 35k

Now I'm not sure if those historical views carry on today even in sports. So I looked up some stuff. I don't want sound like an expert when I only know half of what I am saying.

www.womenssportsfoundation.org...Equity-Issues...Values-and-Sports.aspx - 31k

www.accessmylibrary.com - 32k

So I help all the links work, they help, and I at least answered some of your question correctly.Cardinal Raven (talk) 20:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't wish to side track this into a debate, but surely you could have provided your views on the question without making an overly generalized criticism of one religion. Many religions and cultures, to this day, fail to accord women equal status with men. - Eron^Talk 22:44, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't think the "women used to be viewed as property" thing is a factor so much as the physical fact that men tend to be stronger. So much of competitive sports depends on muscular strength of one kind or another that people expect the top male players to automatically be better than the top females. And spectators usually want to watch the best players.

Of course, there is also a stereotyping issue as mentioned above, i.e. the belief that doing sports and watching sports both are or should be things mostly done by men, which is somewhat self-perpetuating.

I can certainly think of sports where women's championships are covered in much the way that ment's are: curling, figure skating, gymnastics, and tennis come to mind for starters. But all of them are non-contact sports and some are the kind where the score involves artistic judgement, which may be considered a different kind of endeavor altogether.

--Anonymous, 21:30 UTC, June 19, 2008.

Beach Volleyball? Nil Einne (talk) 12:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

One of the issues has to do with the depth of the field. For a variety of reasons - cultural, social, psychlogical, physiological, who knows - there still seems to be a broad-based mindset that certain sports are appropriate for boys, and certain for girls. Pretty much all of the contact sports, and many of the physically active team sports, are still considered boys sports. More agressive or demanding individual sports are also seen this way. Parents who choose a sport for their child gravitate towards the sports that are considered gender-appropriate. Children participating in sport also tend to express interest in the sports that they see are gender-appropriate. As a result, there are many more boys playing sports like ice hockey, American football, or rugby union than there are girls. If we assume that only a tiny fraction of the children who take up a sport have the capacity, skill, and drive to succeed at the highest levels, then this effect is multiplied as they progress through the ranks.

For example, If 0.01% of children who take up ice hockey have the potential to be national team players, and if the sport is taken up by girls at 10% the rate at which it is taken up by boys, then for every 100,000 boys who start to play ice hockey, we will see 10 national calibre eighteen year old men - and one woman. As a result, in many of these sports there are not sufficient numbers of girls and women in the sport to sustain high level national and international level competition.

These trends are changing, albeit slowly. In North America, for example, soccer is becoming more and more a gender neutral sport. I've also noted anecdotally that, in Canada at least, triathlon is a very equitable sport at the developmental levels. - Eron^Talk 13:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

In the US, at least, women's figure skating and women's gymnastics are much more popular than their male equivalents. For example, the US Women's Figure Skating Championships are shown live in prime time TV, whereas men's and pairs are shown on tape delay, days later, and usually on Saturday morning or afternoon. Corvus cornix_talk 17:55, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

June 20

www.penisaur.com

Does anyone own this website? I'd check by going to the site myself but I'm scared it'll give me a virus.

Apparently, nobody owns it yet... Dismas|^(talk) 00:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

(ec) Indeed. So, happy blogging! - Eron^Talk 00:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Too bad both penisaurus.com and penisaurusrex.com are taken. (Note that both are porn sites.) By the way, an easy way to check if someone owns it—in fact, a much more reliable one than "going to the site"—is just checking on a DNS registrar, like GoDaddy.com. --98.217.8.46 (talk) 01:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

This site is now registered. It is a web comic that uses a penisaur as its mascot/logo.

Dishwashing detergent

I have a completely ordinary dishwasher, which has in the usual fashion two detergent cups: one open, one with a lid. The "Normal" wash cycle actually fills the cabinet with water, sprays it around for a while, then pumps it out three times; it is during the second and longest of these cycles that the closed detergent cup opens, and the bulk of the washing happens.

If I leave the open cup empty, then the first cycle is called the Pre-Rinse cycle, and its function is primarily to knock off the loose stuff. But, if I put detergent in the open cup, then the first cycle is called a Pre-Wash cycle, and presumably does a better job of loosening up some of the dried-on crud. In either case, at the end of this cycle the dirty water and whatever came loose is pumped out and the main wash cycle begins.

So, (finally) my question: suppose I wish to use only one spoonful of detergent. Am I better off dividing it in half or 40/60 or whatever, so that some detergent is used up and discarded and then replaced by "fresh"; or should I leave the small cup empty, let plain water do whatever it can and have the full shot of detergent applied only in the second cycle?

(Please do not advise to RTFM -- or the fine Box in this case -- as I believe the goal of detergent manufacturers is to sell as much detergent as possible.)

P.S. This is not a homework question, I know that's a hot issue for some people :-). --Danh, 70.59.79.230 (talk) 00:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I will suggest RTFMing anyway -- not the detergent manual but the dishwasher manual. Alternatively, experiment. At worst you'll get dishes that aren't clean and you have to run the thing another time. --Anonymous, 05:20 UTC, June 20/08.

Morrowind IV: Oblivion

Good evening. I am having a bit of a issue here. Its hard to trust the little box. Morrowind IV: Oblivion has a Game of the Year Edition that comes with all the other expansion. Will I need Xbox Live to use the expansion packs or are the expansions been put into the game on one disk? Also, how much is the cost of Game of the Year Edition compared to just the game? Thank you for answering my question. I really appreciate it. Have a positively wonderful evening.Rem Nightfall (talk) 01:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Morrowind and Oblivion are different games. Do you mean The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind or The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion? Raven4x4x (talk) 03:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Elder Scrolls: Oblivion...I'm sorry I call the game Morrowind all the time I get confused and then I confuse other people. So I mean the fourth game Oblivion.Rem Nightfall (talk) 04:04, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

You don't need Xbox Live to play the expansions if you buy the Game of the Year version. The price difference on amazon.com at least is $30 - see [2] and [3]. However, they may be priced differently at other retailers. -Elmer Clark (talk) 01:17, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

baseball game question

So I was just watching the College World Series between LSU and North Carolina. It was the top of the first inning, and North Carolina was leading 2-0, with the bases loaded and 1 out. The game was immediately suspended following severe lightning storms. Does the game reset the following day with no score? I heard that if less than five innings were complete, the game restarts, but if five or more innings are complete the game is called. Anyone know the ruling on this?76.194.67.13 (talk) 03:11, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

That's what it is in the majors, where teams usually have multiple opportunities to make up a called game. However, according to this story ([4]), the game will be resumed Friday, which makes sense for an event that has to end on schedule. Mitchell k dwyer (talk) 07:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Bezel II

after reading the above question on bezels, I'm prompted to ask about my watch. It's from a gift from Mazda and it has a counterclockwise rotating dial with the code: reading from the left (3 letter break) POL LON PAH GAI MOW OXB NMI DSC RAA HKG IYO SYO NWW SKI MOY HNL ANC LAY BEN MEX MYC CCS RIO

what does this mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.240.203.201 (talk) 03:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

My guess...it's a secret decoder ring!!! Err...watch. Secret decoder watch. Yeah. Woo hoo! --Prestidigitator (talk) 04:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, either the manufacturer has goofed badly or or you have misread/miscopied several of the letters and left out one 3-letter code; and, in addition, the watch is out of date.

The "HNL ANC LAY BEN MEX MYC CCS RIO" part obviously should read "HNL ANC LAX DEN MEX NYC CCS RIO", standing for: Honolulu, Anchorage, Los Angeles, Denver, Mexico City, New York, Caracas, and Rio de Janeiro, whose time zones (ignoring daylight saving time) until recently were respectively 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, and 3 hours west of UTC. Interpreting and correcting the rest of the sequence, I leave as an exercise for the reader. :-) Unfortunately, Venezuela changed its time zone recently and Caracas is now 4:30 west of UTC. They would have done better to put HFX for Halifax instead.

--Anonymous, edited 05:43 UTC, June 20/08.

more like the watch maker goofed, the alphabetical sequence is copied correctly, oh well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.240.203.201 (talk) 16:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Others on the list include LON - London, MOW - Moscow, HGK - Hong Kong... but other than that it's a guess - is SYO really SYD - Sydney? IYO really TYO - Tokyo? Some of them seem to be odd mixes of national and city codes too... POL for Portugal, Lisbon, NWW for (NZW) New Zealand, Wellington? Is OXB meant to be UZB? A mysterious list... Grutness...wha? 00:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

You have done well, Grutness. I'm sure that LON, MOW, HKG (not HGK), SYO=SYD, and IYO=TYO are correct, since they all fit the time zone sequence. But Lisbon is on time zone 0, like London. Zone −1 is much less populated, but it includes the Azores, and I think the answer is to be found there. And New Zealand is on +12, not +11. I think NWW is Nouméa, New Caledonia; its correct IATA code is NOU, but perhaps someone was confused by its ICAO code, which is NWWW. The obvious city to use for zone +12 would be Auckland, and given the number of errors elsewhere in the list, I think it's reasonable to conjecture that SKI is a mistake for AKL -- the first letter is a typing error (adjacent keys) while the third letter represents a misreading, like in SYO and IYO.

I've decided this is fun enough to make a try at the complete list, but even using a list of airport codes that I downloaded a while ago in conjunction with the Wikipedia list of time zones, I was only able to get answers for 20 of the 23 codes. Here's what I have...

• I've deleted my original table, which had no solutions for MOY, NMI, and RAA; the others are the same as in the improved table below. --Anon, 05:40 UTC, June 23.

I wondered if MOY might be a mistake for MOI, but not only are the Cook Islands in zone +10, their main airport is at Rarotonga, not Mitiaro. So this seems most unlikely, but I don't have anything better.

The other two unsolved codes, NMI for zone +5 and RAA for +7, are in much more populous time zones, but I was not able to find plausible codes that they might have been errors for.

--Anonymous, 03:12 UTC, June 21, 2008.

P.S. (1) Isn't it impressive that more than half of the codes are wrong? (2) Two of the three unsolved codes are real airport codes, but too far from the proper time zones to be plausible errors. --Anon, 05:16, June 21.

Could NMI be intended to be KHI i.e. Karachi (or Jinnah International Airport)? Nil Einne (talk) 12:15, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I like that one! -- 21:52 UTC, June 21.

MOY would be MDY - Midway (Henderson Field, to be precise). That only leaves RAA, probably somewhere in Southeast Asia. Grutness...wha? 00:24, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm. come to think of it, does Yangon still use the code it had as rangoon? If so, that would probably be something like RAN. Grutness...wha? 00:30, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

But Burma/Myanmar is apparently on UTC+6:30 (according to UTC+6:30, anyways). UTC+7 is Laos, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, western Indonesia and Krasnoyarsk, Russia. None of these have cities that lend themselves to RAA. I agree about Midway, Grutness. Steewi (talk) 02:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Yep, MDY has got to be right; I'm slapping my head over missing it. And I like NMI being KHI. So that leaves only RAA to explain. Not only is the time zone wrong for Yangon/Rangoon, its code is RGN (and ICAO code VYYY); that seems like too many errors even for this watch.

Hold on, I have it! RAA has two letters wrong, and one of them is the repeated letter, with the same error repeated! R looks like B, A looks like K, right? So here, then, is the complete solution.

Zone	On watch	Correct	Errors	City	Location
−1	POL	PDL	1	Ponta Delgada	Azores, Portugal
0	LON	LON	0	London*	England, UK
+1	PAH	PAR	1	Paris*	France
+2	GAI	CAI	1	Cairo	Egypt
+3	MOW	MOW	0	Moscow*	Russia
+4	OXB	DXB	1	Dubai	UAE
+5	NMI	KHI	2	Karachi	Pakistan
+6	DSC	DAC	1	Dhaka	Bangladesh
+7	RAA	BKK	2	Bangkok	Thailand
+8	HKG	HKG	0	Hong Kong	China
+9	IYO	TYO	1	Tokyo*	Japan
+10	SYO	SYD	1	Sydney	NSW, Australia
+11	NWW	NOU	2	Nouméa	New Caledonia
+12	SKI	AKL	2	Auckland	New Zealand
−11	MOY	MDY	1	Midway I.	U.S. Minor Outlying Islands
−10	HNL	HNL	0	Honolulu	HI, USA
−9	ANC	ANC	0	Anchorage	AK, USA
−8	LAY	LAX	1	Los Angeles	CA, USA
−7	BEN	DEN	1	Denver	CO, USA
−6	MEX	MEX	0	Mexico City	DF, Mexico
−5	MYC	NYC	1	New York*	NY, USA
−4	CCS	CCS	1**	Caracas	Venezuela
−3	RIO	RIO	0	Rio de Janeiro*	RJ, Brazil
−2	missing		1

*These are codes in the IATA airport code series, but apply to the city rather than a specific airport.

**The code is right, but the time zone is out of date.

There! 20 different errors fixed. (Tosses chalk in air, catches it, sets it down and dusts off hands.)

--Anonymous, 05:52 UTC, June 23, 2008.

Thanks a whole bunch. That was one terrible watchmaker, oh well, hope at least you had fun with the puzzle. GO Wikipedians! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.240.203.201 (talk) 18:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Social support

Shall much appreciate an economist pointing me to a site where I can obtain comparative data on the amount of GDP each of the EU countries allocates to social support/welfare.86.209.154.30 (talk) 14:05, 20 June 2008 (UTC)DT

See Welfare_state#The_welfare_state_and_social_expenditure Mattnad (talk) 15:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Belgian postal codes

How precise are Belgian postal codes? Are they as precise as UK ones, or as imprecise as French ones? In other words, how many addresses would a four-digit Belgian code typically cover? Thanks!--85.158.139.99 (talk) 16:13, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I'd say less precise than in the UK where there can be several codes for one small street. In the capital, Brussels, the postal code fits the administrative commune (equivalent to the Parisian arrondissement or to the first half of a London postcode). Hope it helps. 200.127.59.151 (talk) 16:30, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks.--217.171.129.71 (talk) 07:02, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Pictures of George W. Bush

Where can I find copyright-free pictures of George W. Bush, preferably of high quality. Copyright-free only in as much as they would be used in art projects with a large 'fair use' umbrella. 200.127.59.151 (talk) 16:23, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

As far as I understand it, any photo of him that was taken by a government employee carrying out the duties of their job as a photographer would fall under public domain. See the image in the info box at George W. Bush for instance. This should suit your needs. So, I'd suggest going to the White House's home page and finding most any image that you like unless there is a disclaimer on that particular photo. Dismas|^(talk) 16:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Mmhh... The White House site doesn't seem to have a picture section and all the photographs they show are too small to be printed (less than 8oo pixels on a side). Any other source would really be appreciated. 200.127.59.151 (talk) 22:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Google Images can be your friend. --98.217.8.46 (talk) 00:30, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

How about simply using the wikimedia Commons:George W. Bush? All images there are of course available under a 'free-license' although depending on the art project, obeying the GFDL in particular could be difficult/annoying I guess Nil Einne (talk) 12:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Take a look at Air Force Link photos and Defenselinkmil Mac Davis (talk) 02:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Uk Sewers

If I were to venture down into the UK sewer system from a manhole on the street, what dangers should I expect to face and what precautionary measures should I take beforehand? How easy would it be to accurately navigate through the sewer system to reach a set destination, for example from my house to my place of work? Are there any people down there that may challenge my presence? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.188.252 (talk) 16:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm not an expert on this, but first, you probably know that there isn't a single UK sewer system but separate systems for each urban area. Now, as to what you are likely to encounter, of course there will be a stench. You will also be exposed to bacteria and other pathogens. Assuming that you could walk through the sewers, which I doubt, you would want a watertight covering at least up to your waist. The main collector sewers in major cities are likely to be large enough that you could walk through them, though you might have to crouch over, and walking bent over would eventually become painful. However, the feeder sewers, such as the one running from your house to the main collector sewer, are unlikely to be large enough for you to pass through. Or else, at best, you would have to crawl and slither through the sewer with most of your body immersed in the sewage, requiring watertight coverage of your entire body and probably oxygen tanks (if you could squeeze them into the sewer as well), because you do not want to risk inhaling or ingesting infectious sewage. As to whether parts of the sewer system are patrolled, I don't know but I doubt it. Marco polo (talk) 17:22, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Many places have separate rain sewers and sanitary sewers (where the toilets flush, which are completely sealed to prevent toxic and explosive gases from escaping). The rain sewers can have some gross things in them, too, like live or dead rats, but are open to the air. I'd assume you're asking about rain sewers. Navigation underground is a problem, as there are no landmarks to go off and I wouldn't expect any readable signs. StuRat (talk) 18:01, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Sewers are sometimes used by people to escape, such as smugglers, resistance fighters and those on the run. The Brighton sewers look big enough to walk though upright, as does the Cloaca Maxima, but I think you'd have trouble getting into them, and even more trouble getting out. And if you are down there and it starts to rain or there is a flash flood, you could easily drown if the water level rises too quickly and you cannot escape. Traveling through sewers is also a common plot device, but the unsanitary conditions or strong smell of the sewage is seldom mentioned, for example Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles or the vampire Angle who used sewers to travel during the day to avoid sunlight. JessicaN10248 18:52, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

The images of the Brighton sewers show the main collector sewers. These were built in Victorian times, when maintenance people were expected to walk through the main sewers. I'm not sure that they are still built as large, and I'm fairly sure that the collector sewers running beneath side streets are not as large. Marco polo (talk) 19:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I'd get a Leptospirosis innoculation before I even thought about going down and also take along a gas detector to make sure I wasn't walking into any potentially dangerous low oxygen areas (caused by build-ups of methane or other gases). Nanonic (talk) 22:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Very few sewers, whether sanitary,stormwater or combined are large enough to walk or crawl through. The manhole chambers you see in the street are large enough to enter but just to facilitate access to the pipes for water blasting, cameras etc - the pipes are much smaller. Apart from the infectious nature of whats in there, oxygen depletion and asphixiating gases can be a major problem and a quick google of sewer worker deaths or similar will show you it still happens. In terms of navigation, sewers virtually never follow the street layout, they need to use topography and gravity ( its difficult to push faecal matter up hill) so they often run with the land contours, always heading down hill. Mhicaoidh (talk) 02:02, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

However, tourists can visit the Paris sewers. An unforgettable day out!--Shantavira|^{feed me} 06:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

...and the Brighton sewers as well - see here.--217.171.129.71 (talk) 07:08, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Any sewer or other underground space reached via a manhole cover is likely to be full of bad smells, rats, cockroaches feces, urine and germs. It may fill with water unexpectedly and drown you. The air may be toxic or lacking in oxygen, or contain combustible gases. Best take a bus rather than a sewer to get where you're going. Edison (talk) 03:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Driving times in the UK

As regulars may know, I am planning a holiday that involves driving around the UK in a rental car. I have been planning an itinerary using driving times from Google Maps. Recently I posted here and in some other places that I was planning to drive from London (near Paddington) to Stonehenge, and that I expected the drive to take 1 hour and 45 minutes. Actually, according to Google Maps, it is 1 hour and 40 minutes. Using the Directions function of Multimap.com, an online map provider based in the UK, I get the same result. However, I got responses from several people who live near the route from Paddington to Stonehenge that this route could not possibly be driven in only 1 hour and 45 minutes, even if there is no traffic congestion. One person said that I should count on 2 hours and 15 minutes without traffic, and probably 2 hours and 30 minutes to be safe. So, I am left wondering, are the driving times provided by Google Maps and other online map providers completely unrealistic for the UK? If so, can I get realistic times by adding a certain percentage, say 50%? Thank you! Marco polo (talk) 17:39, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I wouldn't be surprised if they're unrealistically optimistic. In Edinburgh, such routers often use the city bypass as the 'fastest route' when in fact it's often the slowest possible route (since, at peak time, it's essentially a car park). I don't know the specific route here, though. Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 17:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

The driving times also seem unrealistic for Google maps and MapQuest in the US. I'm guessing they just assume everyone travels the speed limit on each road during the entire trip. Unfortunately, this means that just adding a percentage is not going to make it much more accurate. This is because city streets, with constant stop-and-go due to stop signs, traffic lights, construction, and traffic back-ups can make those much slower than this calculation method, while a nice clear highway with everyone driving 20 MPH over the limit can move much faster than this calculation. You also need to consider the need for stops during long trips; for fuel, food, and bathroom breaks. Those estimates seem so poor that I find it's better to just estimate them myself. StuRat (talk) 17:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Really? Google Maps times work for me in the US, especially for longer (intercity) trips. This may be because I tend to travel 14 mph above the speed limit when traffic permits, which more or less makes up for stretches where traffic puts me below the speed limit. Can anyone else in the UK comment on whether Google Maps consistently underestimates UK drive times? Also, what is the practice in the UK? In most of the US, most drivers exceed the speed limit on freeways/motorways. I have found that police generally don't object to speeds 15–20% above the limit. (Higher than that, though, and you will probably be pulled over and fined.) Are speed limits more strictly enforced in the UK? Marco polo (talk) 19:34, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

AA times tend to be a little more conservative (1 hr 52 for Paddington/Stonehenge). Having just tried a few routes I know well, it seems fairly accurate. I think the main problem is cities (as mentioned for London and Edinburgh); traffic in cities is less predictable, and the mapping makes no allowances for the differing times of the day, or significant congestion, so you'll need to add on a substantial amount of time if you're heading past/through any. For the open road, they seem quite reasonable averages (of the ones I tried, I've generally been slightly quicker rather than slower than the quoted times). Gwinva (talk) 21:09, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I too think the problem is that most mapping software takes no account of time of day or traffic conditions. If you are lucky, it might allocate different speeds based on the type of road (ie. faster on motorways). I read recently that the average traffic speeds in London is now under 10mph - lower than it was in the days of "horseless carriages".

If you left Paddington at 3am, you could reach Stonehenge 85 miles away in an hour and 45 mins. But if you left at 8am, it could take you over an hour to get on to the M25 motorway less than 20 miles into your journey. The morning run down the M3 might be OK, and by the time you will be turning onto the A303 (fast dual-carriageway for long stretches) the traffic could be freely flowing. I would tend to agree with what you've heard elsewhere - hope for 2 hours, plan for 2 and a half hours. However, you are on holiday and I certainly wouldn't schedule your trips too tightly.

As for driving speeds, many drivers exceed the limit where they think they can get away with it. Cars usually go 75-85 mph on motorways but generally stick to the 30 or 40 mph speed limit in towns. The major factor in this, is the presence of speed cameras along many urban roads. Fortunately, after complaints they were solely for raising money, they are now all painted reflective yellow to provide an effective deterrent. Strangely enough, there are no speed cameras on motorways except on the M25 (hidden in gantries over the road) and other some places were the speed limit is reduced below the usual 70mph. If you are unlucky, you could be caught in a temporary speed trap and flagged down by the police at the side of the road. And if you are really unlucky, the police will chase you with blue lights and everything. In my experience, it is much less likely to happen than in the US - then again maybe it's just my lead foot that got me in stopped several times whilst on holiday ;-)

Astronaut (talk) 03:00, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm not Briton, but I've read recently that around the solstice, the traffic to and from Stonehenge and Avebury gets a bit thick. I might have read that on Marco Polo's earlier question, though. Steewi (talk) 02:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Tanning Beds

If you lay in a tanning bed is it still ok to lay out in the sun? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.255.205.153 (talk) 19:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

What do you mean by "ok"? There is no law against it, but you will get a double does of ultraviolet radiation, which causes DNA mutations. The longer you do either for the more chance you have of developing problems. See Tanning bed#Risks and Sunlight#Effects on health. JessicaN10248 19:30, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

You might be interested in reading the history of tanning. Mac Davis (talk) 02:02, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

No! You will get burnt. In any case, tanning beds are now known to be harmful, as is sunbathing. I had a deep tanyears ago, and I recently had to have pre-canerous moles removed. I was lucky they had been spotted in time - good old NHS. 80.2.201.59 (talk) 23:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Template usage tracking

I made a template some time ago (User:The Vandal Warrior/Userboxes/GTA IV fan). Is there anyway I can see how many users are using this template on their user page? bsrboy (talk) 19:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Just click the "What links here" link in the toolbox section on the right side of the page. See this. The ones that say "transclusion" after them are the ones that display the userbox on the page. JessicaN10248 19:52, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! bsrboy (talk) 19:58, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Masters Degree in Sweden or Finland or any Nordic Countries.

Hello,

I am in the 3rd year(out of 4 years) of my Bachelor's Degree in Computer Science and Engineering. I have heard from a friend of mine that the Master's programmes in Sweden are completely subsidised by the State (i.e. They are free, no tuition fees). When I checked this on our own Wikipedia article, I found it to be true. However, it was stated that the Government is planning to discontinue this, and impose a tuition fee on all the foreign students(Not on students in the EU). I would like to know, if possible, when this might be imposed and if the subsidization is stopped, how much would the actual fee would be? (I would like to know the maximum fee that any University might have). I'll finish my Bachelor's in 2010 and will be applying the same year.

I also checked on the Education system of Finland, and it is subject to the same conditions as above(No tuition fees for now, and might be introduced in the future). And I would like the know the maximum fees that could be imposed in an Uni in Finland.

Is there a list of the countries that are providing Master's courses in this fashion?

How good exactly are these Universities in comparision to the Universities in other countries, such as USA, or Canada and so.

And I have one final question. I checked on a few of the universities in Sweden and Finland. In the requirements section, they mentioned a proficiency in English as a requirement and a minimum score in the [TOEFl] exam. While this is alright, I was surprised not to see any mention of the [GRE] exam. Does it mean that I dont need to write this exam? Or is it like a default requirement for all the Universities?

And also how strict is the intake process? Will my grade at the end of my bachelor's matter a lot? Or is it OK if I finish my degree with an average grade.

As you can see I am in quite a bit of confusion at the moment. I'd really appreciate it if you guys help me out here. :-)

Thanks a lot,

Jayant,19 Years, India • contribs 21:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I can't give you an unbiased assessment of the quality, so I'll skip that part of your question. Regarding the fees, the problem for you as a prospective student is that these things can change quite rapidly. While there are no fees at the moment, and no decision made to introduce them at any specific date, it may change. If the swedish parliament decides to introduce fees for non-EU students, it would not be unlikely to be done at six months notice, or so. Thus it won't be possible to say with any certainty what the situation will be like for semester 2, 2010 until about a year and a half from now. My knowledge about entry req's concerns only domestic students, so somebody with experience of applying to a swedish uni from abroad might be able to help you better with that. /Kriko (talk) 08:52, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh, this might also be of interest: As far as I recall from what was debated when this was last discussed, if fees are introduced, they will only be partial, i.e. not pay for the full costs. They'd be only a fraction (quarter? fifth?, even less) of what you'd expect from e.g. a good U.S. university /Kriko (talk) 09:11, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

One thing to keep in mind is that, for Finnish universities at least, the whole concept of a B.Sc. degree is relatively new, being introduced only in the past few years as part of the Bologna process. (You may want to specifically read Bologna process#Finland as well as the Education in Finland article.) For example, I'm just about to finish my Master's degree at the University of Helsinki despite not having a Bachelor's degree; when I started my studies, no such degree existed here yet. (Yeah, I know, it's taken me a while — I was working most of the time.) Even where the curriculum now includes a separate Bachelor's degree, many places still consider it just an intermediate step towards a full Master's degree. In particular, this is likely to mean that the entrance procedures for students who already have a Bachelor's degree may be much less formal or standardized: even though, from your viewpoint, you've finished one degree and are starting another, from the university's viewpoint you're essentially jumping in half-way through what is still, in many ways, a direct-to-M.Sc. programme.

As for the GRE, I doubt most nordic universities require it: the nordic countries tend to have their own standardized examination systems. The reason for requiring TOEFL is simply to ensure that the student actually understands the language they'll be mostly studying in. It's possible that some internationally recognized exams might count in your favor, even if they're not required, but this is likely to depend not only on the specific university but on the specific program you're applying for. It won't hurt to ask, though. The admissions procedure for international Master's programmes at the University of Helsinki says they require a degree certificate, a transcript of studies (including information on the grading system used), a language test score (they don't seem to specifically require TOEFL) and a written letter explaining your motivation for studying at that particular university and for choosing the specific program you're applying for; the letter is apparently not just a formality, but may constitute a significant part of the evaluation criteria. It also notes that you may be required to take an entrance exam. I didn't look at other universities, but from what I've heard in general, that all sounds fairly typical.

Regarding quality, about the closest thing there is to an objective assessment would be various ranking lists, where it seems the nordic universities generally tend to score fairly well. Googling for nordic university ranking led me to this page, which gives the ranks of various nordic universities on two of them. Of course, it's up to you how much value you put on such lists. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 10:43, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and apparently the range of tuition fees for foreign students from outside the EU proposed in 2005 by the Finnish Ministry of Education was 3,500–12,000 euros per year. (ref: [5], in Finnish) Any actual implementation of such fees would require passing a new law: the current Finnish law on universities (yliopistolaki 8 §) states that "education leading to a university degree is free of charge to the student". —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 11:08, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the replies. So, if I had to pay a fee, it would be far less than what I'd be paying in USA or some other uni in the West? And how much would I have to spend for my stay in Sweden? I understand that my general expenses might cost a lot of money in Sweden or Finland. And I have also read in the FAQ section of some Swedish uni that they would not provide any accomodation on campus and I'd have to find my own place to live. How much would that cost(Approximately, of course)? Are there any cheaper alternatives like staying as a Paying Guest or something? If a University did provide hostel accomodation, how would that compare to finding a place to live off campus (in terms of cost)?

It looks like most of the Nordic Universities do rank pretty well. I am considering applying to some of these Universities. I just need to find about 5 of the universities which might just take me in.

So, Ilmari Karonen, me having a bachelor's degree would make it easier for my acceptance? Or is it the other way round?

Thanks a lot again. Jayant,19 Years, India • contribs 13:43, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

On-campus living is very uncommon in Sweden. However, there is specific student housing in most Uni towns, though usually not run by the university itself. These are commonly located fairly convenient, though not on the actual campuses. You ought to be able to find links from the uni websites to the local housing companies that offer student flats. If not, try following links via the student unions at the respective univeristies. In Sweden, the rent could be maybe 250-300€/month for a room, sharing a kitchen and lounge with others.

If you already have a bachelor's degree, you shouldn't be applying to the longer Straight-to-master's programmes Ilmari mentions, but rather to those designed for people with a previous bachelor level degree. With the Bologna process now implemented, there should be plenty of these in both Finland and Sweden,. Due to the transitions being in progress, they may or may not be labelled International Masters Programmes. In some cases there may some confusion of naming as both a 5-year and a 2-year programmes can have the same name. In those cases, the first three years of the longer one would contain studies equivalent to a bachelor's, and the latter two years would be very similar to the actual Master's programme. A fairly brief look at the lenght of the programme and the entry requirements should tell you which kind they are. /Kriko —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.194.44.18 (talk) 23:09, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh! I think I understand it now. :-) . And 250 euros a month sounds a little high to me. Are there any other means of accomodation? Are there any other Nordic or European countries which offer a free Master's programs and also are slightly cheaper to live in? Maybe around 150 euros/ month? Thanks a lot again! I cannot stress enough how patient you guys have been with me. Thanks a ton! Jayant,19 Years, India • contribs 05:20, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

No problem. I doubt you're going to find any place in the nordic countries with significantly lower living costs, so yes, what you gain in free tuition you lose in expensive food and housing. This guide from the U. of H. says that "The estimated minimum cost of living is 500 to 600 euros per month. This estimate includes the cost for accommodation, transportation and meals." That's for Helsinki; rents are somewhat cheaper in smaller towns like Turku, Tampere, Oulu or Jyväskylä, but e.g. food prices are about the same. One possible option (besides applying for grants) is to try to find some work, either on or off campus: at least the Finnish student residence permit allows part-time working, and wages tend to be proportionately high as well. Mind you, so are the taxes.

As for the programmes, what Kriko says is essentially correct, but an additional complication is that Finnish universities, at least, tend to follow an "open course plan", which means that there are no specific, say, "4th year" courses. Generally, the courses are grouped in levels such as "basic", "intermediate" and "advanced", with the advanced courses mostly being the ones you should take after your Bachelor's degree (including some mainly intended for Ph.D. students), but it's not a hard-and-fast rule. For example, according to the study guide for the CS dept. at the U. of H., the general requirements for a Master's degree (for normal students) are: a Bachelor's degree, at least 40 ECTS credits of advanced CS studies (more or less freely chosen, but must include some courses appropriate for the specific programme), a 40 cr thesis and enough elective courses (usually with some constraints, such as at least 20 cr of math or "method sciences") to fulfill the total requirement of 120 ECTS credits. There are also some special M.Sc. programmes with a somewhat different structure, such as the Master's degree in Bioinformatics, but the general "pick and mix" style is still the same.

While looking for the info above, I also came across the international applicant's guide for the University of Helsinki, which might answer some of your questions. I couldn't find a good place to work that link into the text, so I'll just give it here. :-) —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 11:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

I notice no one has pointed this out so I probably should mention it. Although it's often possible to study in English nowadays in a number of countries where the native language is not English, you'll likely find it a lot easier and a lot more of a pleasent experience if at least learn one local language (if there are several) Nil Einne (talk) 14:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh, Thanks a lot for that guide. I am going through it right now. And how easy or hard is it to learn Swedish or Finnish? And would all the jobs involve talking to the local people? Are there any jobs on campus or something which I could get without learning the language? Not that I am not willing to learn the language. :-P Jayant,19 Years, India • contribs 10:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm somewhat guessing here, but I'd expect that English should be enough for most on-campus jobs that don't directly involve customer service (those are likely to have formal language requirements). In Finland at least, people often jokingly refer to English as the "third national language" (after Finnish and Swedish), and it's pretty much expected that anyone studying at a university should have at least a basic understanding of English. Also, with a degree in CS and engineering, it shouldn't be hard for you to find a job e.g. in programming; it's not 2000 anymore, but in my experience there's still plenty of jobs to go around in the IT sector for anyone who's even half-way competent. As for learning Finnish, it does have a reputation as a difficult language to learn. I'd say it's at least difficult to study from books; compared to English, the orthography is simple but the grammar is conversely complicated. Still, Finnish kids do manage to learn it by immersion in a couple of years, so there's no reason why you couldn't... :-) —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 20:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Ha ha.. Yeah, I probably could learn the language if I had to use it everyday. So, will an on campus job (or an off campus if I didn't have a choice) be enough for my living expenses? Atleast a significant part of the expenses? And Thanks a lot again!! I owe ya one! :-) Jayant,19 Years, India • contribs 10:34, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

My friend just told me that its hard to get a job after I finish my degree from anywhere in the EU because there are a lot of restructions on work permits or something. While I am not really worried about a getting a job after the degree right now, how far is it true? Is it that hard as he is saying? Jayant,19 Years, India • contribs 11:04, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I promise, one last question. How is Denmark? In terms of the job situation after degree and the cost of living while studying and everything. And all the other trivial things. :-P Jayant,19 Years, India • contribs 11:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

June 21

bonded

When a contractor who is going to do home improvements in your home is bonded. What does bonded mean —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.239.86.55 (talk) 00:42, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

"Bonded" likely means they have a performance bond, which guarantees that the contractor will meet his or her contractual obligations in a satisfactory manner. Failure will result in the payment of compensation by the bonding company. A bonded contractor should provide greater confidence that the job will be done properly, but they will also typically cost more than an unbonded contractor. See also Surety bond, for more general information on this type of 3-party contract. Rockpocket 03:00, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Also bonded contractors are likely to be licensed by the state (in the US), whereas an unbonded contractor may not only not be licensed, but may have had their license revoked. Corvus cornix_talk 00:08, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

DKR football stadium

Thank you for answering my previous questions. Sorry, but I have another one.

I looked on the article regarding the University of Texas's Darryl K. Royal Memorial football stadium, and it says that it has a current capacity of around 85,000. It also said that renovations were being undergone and the capacity would move up to 90,000. Does anyone know the exact capacity of the stadium once the renovations are complete? Will we ever find that out? Also, do you think Texas will break its attendance record on 89,418 this year?76.194.67.13 (talk) 00:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Do smoke detectors get triggered by cigarrette somke?

Does a modern smoke detector goes off with just cigarrette smoke? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.40.65.166 (talk) 01:04, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

I think it depends on the proximity of the cigarette to the smoke detector. If the cigarette is quite close, the smoke detector can pick up the smoke being emitted from the cigarette and possibly trigger itself. On the other hand, if it is far from the nearest smoke detector, it is possibly unlikely that the smoke detector will pick it up. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 01:18, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

If you ever take an airline flight, you've heard an announcement warning smokers that smoking is illegal even in the washrooms, and there are smoke detectors in there which it is also illegal to tamper with. Here's someone who found out the hard way that they will indeed detect cigarette smoke. But in a large room, as Sky says, it might well be a different matter. --Anonymous, 02:46 UTC, June 21, 2008.

Who's the oldest Daughter in all time?

I mean, the highest age's woman that her mother was Still alive. Breckinridge (talk) 07:23, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

If you really mean the oldest living daughter with a living mother then I have no idea. If you mean the living daughter with oldest living mother then Sarah Knauss's daughter is the oldest documented case as her daughter as still alive at the time of her death and she is the third oldest ever according to Oldest people Nil Einne (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

The Sky

I've lived in NZ my entire life but recently moved to Vermont (6 months ago) and I've noticed something odd about the sky - to me, it seems that the skies are a paler blue in New Zealand than they are in VT/NH. I know there's probably no scientific reason for this, but it just seems like that for me. Maybe its some nostalgic/homesick thing, or maybe its just that I'm noticing the sky more now that I live in a far more hilly area. Something about the clouds, too - there seem to be many more nimbus here, as opposed to cirrus (which seemed to be prevalent in NZ). 66.220.246.235 (talk)Slayton —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.220.246.235 (talk) 07:37, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Beware of people offering to answer your question for money. I am a fellow New Zealander however and can do you a good deal on some magic beans that came into my possession. Its a funny story...Mhicaoidh (talk) 11:09, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Is there by any chance a substantial elevation difference between the two locales ? I'd expect higher elevations to be paler blue during the day, as there's less air between you and space to refract sunlight into blue light. If this is the case, I'd also expect the Sun to appear more whitish-yellow where you have the pale sky and more reddish-orange where you have the deep blue sky. StuRat (talk) 15:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Surely the amount of water vapour present in the atmosphere is a significant factor in how blue the sky appears. I would suggest that the New Zealand atmosphere contains, generally, more moisture than that in VT/NH. Richard Avery (talk) 15:55, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Unless I misunderstand, according to this website [6] that is not actually the case Nil Einne (talk) 17:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, I withdraw my case Mi' Lord. Thanks for that Nil. Richard Avery (talk) 05:12, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Diffuse sky radiation may be helpful, although I'm too tired to think about it Nil Einne (talk) 17:36, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

As an aside, I noticed something similar when heading south from central Scotland to Cyprus. I wonder if it could be to do with the latitude? In terms of light passing through the atmosphere at a different angle and consequently passing through more atmosphere at more extreme latitudes, that is. Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 18:18, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

The question surprises me. I live in Australia, just across the way from New Zealand, and I've heard many people from Europe and other northern parts say that the Australian sky is a deeper blue than where they come from. Maybe there's something special about Vermont. -- JackofOz (talk) 21:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Having lived in several different places and travelled to more, I can testify that the sky in New England, and especially Northern New England, does tend to be a deeper blue than other places. I don't know why this is true. I think that it just might have to do with the frequency of dry continental high-pressure systems passing overhead. These form in central Canada and move southeast over New England especially in the fall (autumn) and winter. (Continental high pressure would also form over Australia, I suppose, but might tend to weaken over the Tasman Sea.) Marco polo (talk) 00:47, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

The light is quite different in NZ. (See also Scientific observations.) But no discussion of comparative sky colours can pass without quoting Bill Bryson, who suggested a winter spent in the UK was like living inside tupperware. In other words, the sky is a translucent white, not blue. Gwinva (talk) 23:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

legal rights

does a woman, who does not speak English, have a LEGAL right to a FEMALE interpreter when recieving NHS treatment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.210.166 (talk) 08:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

This is not legal advice but I doubt that you have the right to a female interpreter although you may have the right an interpreter. Anonymous101 (talk) 11:13, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

This is not legal advice (I don't live in the UK and I'm not a lawyer) my guess is if you have a good reason for wanting a female interpreter, you would probably be granted one and in the unlikely event one is refused a review or court case would like find your rights were violated. One example would be if you are seeking help for rape. Bear in mind that in many cases including I suspect this case this may not be spelt out in law so it's possible no one can no for sure until this is actually tested in court. Nil Einne (talk) 11:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Again, not legal advice, not sure but they probably have the right to an interpreter, though not specifically a female one...--Serviam (talk) 19:43, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

I have no idea of your legal rights or otherwise, but the NHS Interpreting & Translation Service notes that its interpreters can "to refuse to interpret if:... b. you are the wrong sex" suggesting there they are sensitive to issues of gender. Rockpocket 06:32, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

A lot of interpreters in the UK are for Urdu (because of the large Pakistani Moslem population). Whereas I don't think any interpreter would have problems interpreting about a sore ear, if the problem related to sex or reproductive organs a conservative female Moslem interpreter would not want to interpret for a man and a conservative Moslem female patient would not want to talk to a male interpreter. Though there have been fatwas that say a woman can be treated by a male doctor if no female doctor is available[7] I do not think this extends to interpreters. -- Q Chris (talk) 07:59, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Party problem

If I have a party for my birthday I'm going to lose my friends! Ok I'll explain. I would love have a party for my birthday in a month (it's a milestone age) with heaps of my friends but the small group of friends I hang out with daily (well, a girl and a guy) would be totally against it because for all my other friends to come there would be alcohol involved and my main friend considers herself "straight-edge". I don't want to leave out my best friends but they wouldn't come if I invited them to party with alcohol. I originally wanted to go play lasertag and then have pizza for my party but my friends aren't into that idea either (my friend says she doesn't like the arcade because "people look at you" and she doesnt eat pizza because she's a vegan too). I could shout my non-drinking friends to lunch and then have the rest of my friends at the party at night but I know my non-drinking friends would just whinge at me over who I'm inviting and why parties are wrong and blah blah blah all week and make me miserable... it's my birthday and I want a party but what am I supposed to do in this situation to make everybody happy? --124.254.77.148 (talk) 09:38, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

US translation: "shout my non-drinking friends to lunch" means to take them to lunch and pay their way. StuRat (talk) 15:09, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

The joys of having a party... Just do what you would do if it's the last day of your life. Would you binge drink your way out or spend quality time with the people you love? --antilived^{T | C | G} 10:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

They dont sound like friends, they sound like useful parts of your social networking. Unfortunately we cant assume you will die (see above ) after your party thus taking the easy way out. I would do what you want to do for your birthday. The straight couple know they are out of step with a lot of other people, for better or worse, without making value judgements, you need to decide what your birthday is. is it about you having fun,mirth with true friends or an opportunity to ingratiate yourself with these two a bit more. Mhicaoidh (talk) 11:46, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Hmm. It's your birthday and you're stressing about how to make everybody else happy. Funny, I could have sworn it was supposed to be the other way around. -- JackofOz (talk) 12:47, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Have you tried talking to her (the vegan)? Did you tell her that having a huge drunken party to celebrate your milestone birthday (with ALL your friends) is important to you? If she still doesn't understand after that, she's probably not worth all the trouble you're willing to go to, to accomodate her (on YOUR birthday). Zain Ebrahim (talk) 12:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

When you say "for all my other friends to come there would be alcohol involved" do you mean 1) When all my other friends come, there would likely be alcohol involved OR 2) If I want my other friends to come, I need to include alcohol as part of the party? If you mean 2, then I would have to say I question whether all your other friends are worth the trouble either... Nil Einne (talk) 13:17, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

I guess it depends on what you want; a small gathering of your closest friends or a mad (and probably expensive) party full of people who barely know you and, as you say, are probably there just for the beer. Your non-drinking friends shouldn't whinge at you if you want a big party - but you should respect them if they don't want to attend if it's totally not their scene. JessicaN10248 15:05, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

I should add that I am presuming here it would be legal for you and your alcohol drinkings friends to drink alcohol. If not, I think I can understand and even agree with the objections of your non-alcohol drinking friends to the party. I'm also presuming despite the alcohol you are intending to have controlled chaos rather then something like this guy and if not I can similarly understand the and even agree with the objections of your friends. Finally I'm also presuming by saying alcohol, you only mean alcohol and not any sort of illegal psychoactive drugs. While what people choose to do is up to them, and I'm not really opposed to the use of some drugs in controlled circumstances I personally believe allowing them in a party you are running is a recipe for disaster particularly given their illegality and your likely inability to ensure things don't get out of control and/or people do something extremely stupid like this and would similarly understand the objections of your friends otherwise. Nil Einne (talk) 17:22, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

I like your idea of taking the non-drinking friends out to lunch and having your drunken party later. For my part, if either party even partly objects to the party of the other party, then part with the party party which partly objects. I'm partially partial, neigh, particularly partial, to that party plan. StuRat (talk) 15:09, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

StuRat, my head just exploded. JessicaN10248 15:13, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

StuRat picks up the empty skull and uses it to scoop up the various chunks of brains scattered about...

Firstly, just to say that lasertag and pizza sounds like fun. Shame others wouldn't go for that. I generally agree with above: you're probably looking at lunch with the straight people, party with everyone else. But if you're going with running a party with alcohol, and you haven't run a big party with alcohol before, be careful. Make sure there's someone big and fierce on your side who isn't getting horribly drunk (a parent, an older sibling, the right sort of friend), don't let people in that you didn't expect, hide anything precious, breakable or stainable. If all else fails and it gets out of hand, you may want to call the police and say there are gatecrashers who won't leave... 79.66.20.219 (talk) 19:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Wow you're so considerate of others that you could diversify for fun and profit. You could then make a career out of specialist party programs: teetotal raves, vegan couch parties, party boy parties, X parties, wedding parties, parties for warring parties, all-food parties, interested parties... It's your birthday so maybe you need to work out what you really want and enjoy. Btw, how do straight-edgers have fun? Maybe just being present wearing their 24 t-shirts would do it for them.) Here's to your own best happy birthday, Julia Rossi (talk) 01:38, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Friends that wouldn't come to your party if they couldn't get hammered aren't friends, they're people that want to come to your party so they can get hammered. Mac Davis (talk) 02:00, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Your "Straight Edge" friends sound weird to me, and not just over the drinking thing. (Some kinds of weird are good, but not these ones). On the core issue, though, my reaction is that I have no problem at all with people who don't themselves drink, but to take it upon themselves to assert that nobody else should either, and then to effectively blackmail you over it, is to be unbelievably arrogant. I find it hard to advise you on what to do as I can't visualise being in the same situation myself - I can't imagine being friends with people who behave like that. 81.187.153.189 (talk) 13:20, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree with this, with the caveat given by Nil Einne. If you are under the age where drinking alcohol is allowed in your country, or in a country where alcohol is illegal then your friend could have valid concerns about the rest of you drinking. -- Q Chris (talk) 09:13, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

dennis m. arroyo

what is the biography of dennis m. arroyo who wrote smart studying? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.97.174.236 (talk) 11:22, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Ghits says he is a weather expert and smart study guides/books are written by other people. No personal article here – outshone by Gloria Arroyo and others. Best, Julia Rossi (talk) 01:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

C-Class

I assess many articles for WikiProject Devon and I've just noticed a new "C-Class" category appear on the assessment categories. I've never heard of C-Class and I can't find any information about it (all the categories are empty). Can anyone point me in the right direction? bsrboy (talk) 15:03, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

It comes from the article grading scheme. See the discussion here. There is also a category of C-Class articles JessicaN10248 15:09, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

You may also be interest Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment#Ratification vote on C-Class Nil Einne (talk) 17:05, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

HELP - Anti-shoplifter security device still attached to garment bought abroad?????

Help please - as above, I bought my wife a really expensive coat whilst on holiday in the Canary Islands and despite being able to walk out of the shop without sounding any alarms, we have just found upon our return to the UK that the security device is still attached to the coat. It is a finger long plastic affair that is pinned through the fabric and seems to be attached to a chrome-dome about half-an-inch in diameter inside the garment. I have tried separating the two parts with no success, and a friend advises against forcing it with pliers etc. as he says it is filled with a dye that will leak onto the garment if I do succeed in breaking it. So what can I do? The return airfare or the postage and return costs would make the effort non-viable when set against the cost of the coat. Is all lost or do you good people have a solution? Hope so. Many thanks in advance. 92.9.128.208 (talk) 18:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm rather skeptical about the dye packet, why would the shop want to destroy their own products ? I'd go ahead and force it, but wear old clothes and do it in the bathtub just in case. StuRat (talk) 18:55, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

No, this is very common. The ink is in there to deny the use of the product to the shoplifter and further discourage theft because people know that even if they can sneak it out, it won't be useful to them. Forcing it open is a great way to end up with a garment that screams "someone stole me". Jessica's freeze advice is probably the best so far, store-keepers are unlikely to assume anything other than 'this is shoplifted'. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 20:43, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Is it a well know supermarket chain? If so you could take it into the same shop in the UK with the receipt and explain the situation. They should detach it easily without much fuss. JessicaN10248 18:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

To the second response No, it was a very specialised high-fashion store and to StuRat, maybe you should consult Benefit-Denial within Wikipedia as I did before posing the request for help. More responses welcome please.92.9.128.208 (talk) 19:06, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Go to a shop where identical alarming gadgets are used (there seem to be only a few manufacturers) and explain your predicament. If the sales personnel is reasonably helpful, they will unlock the device with a special detacher. As you have not triggered an alarm when leaving the original shop, the gizmo has presumably been deactivated by the local sales person who forgot to remove it. Some (but not all) of these EAS (electronic article surveillance) gadgets do, indeed, contain ink capsules. As you state, it has the cute name of benefit denial.

Maybe your wife would appreciate an expensive polka-dotted coat? I have seen female leopards wear them... --Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM (talk) 19:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Maybe you could freeze it so that the ink doesn't go everywhere if you decide to break it. JessicaN10248 19:12, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

I know the security devices you're talking about, many clothes shops use them. Go to some shop that has similar devices and get them to remove it, show them your reciept.--Serviam (talk) 19:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Does your tag look at all like the one in this article? 79.66.20.219 (talk) 19:44, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Right - Good - Brilliant - Thanks. I am off to a local fashion store tomorrow who have promised to try to help me remove the tag - so long as I bring in the receipt which is not a problem. Failing that, I shall resort carefully to my toolshed - and trust that the all-knowing and ever-helpful StuRat will forgive me foregoing his suggestion of an early ink-bath. Thanks to all though. All suggestions muchly appreciated. 92.9.128.208 (talk) 20:36, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

My understanding is that removal (possibly separate from electronic deactivation) is done magnetically. The block at the till against which they press the tag is a powerful (possibly neodymium) magnet, and this retracts some ferrous latches inside the device so that the two halves can be separated. Worth a try? 81.187.153.189 (talk) 13:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi each. I am the OP and thought you all deserved an update. I did go to my local ASDA Superstore today where they were supremely helpful. At one point I had 4 assistants trying to remove the tag with their various devices but despite their valiant efforts the bl.... thing wouldn't budge. Along came the department manager who also tried with no luck. I was becoming extremely embarrassed that I was taking up so much of their time, though no other customers were at that time being inconvenienced, when along came the head of security who also failed to remove the tag. So he took the coat into his office (with me having to remain outside), and emerged several hammer-blows later with the coat in one hand and the now separated tag in the other. No ink, no dye stains, no screeching security signal - nothing. And he even escorted me through the security pillars to my car just in case I activated their system. Well done I say, and thanks immensely to everyone here and there. My wife shall go to the ball with her new coat after all. "Oh, what was his secret?" I hear you all ask. Well, he told me he didn't think the device was a dye-stainer so he just attacked it with a screwdriver and the device separated into 2 pieces, though the retaining pin did break off in the process. Thanks again to one and all, especially ASDA. 92.23.47.32 (talk) 18:39, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Hmm interesting. At least now we know not to shop-lift in the CIs... :-P I guess since it was a very expensive coat perhaps they could afford a fancy (and expensive) security tag. Nil Einne (talk) 19:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

It was nice of you to give us the rest of the story, and it's nice to know there are such nice, helpful people in retail. Mitchell k dwyer (talk) 07:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

So, I was right, there's no ink packet, and forcing it was the way to go. StuRat (talk) 12:38, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

If I was her I would have just worn it to the ball with the device intact to increase my street cred. --Sean 14:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Someone want my password on MySpace

I got a message from a friend on MySpace and she wants my E-mail address. I gave my E-mail addresses to her. Now, she wants my password. She says she will not give it to someone. Is this phishing? Should I report her to MySpace customer service? What should I do? Jet (talk) 22:59, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Why would you even consider giving this person your password? Your password is for you to edit your myspace page, to control your list of friends, to decide what appears in your profile, and so on. Giving your password to another person is giving all that "power" to them, including the power to change the password so you can no longer use your myspace account.

If you read the phishing article, you will quickly realise that this person's request is not a phishing attack. But if this person continues to harrass you for more personal details, then yes, do report them to customer service. Astronaut (talk) 00:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

If you don't actually know this person, it is a form of phishing. If they are your friend, then it is a friend asking you for your password, and you can decide to trust them or not. Mac Davis (talk) 01:57, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

What kind of friend would ask and expect you to give your password to them? Remember, power corrupts. Julia Rossi (talk) 04:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Could you clarify; do they want the password for your myspace account or your email account? Not that it really matters, either way I wouldn't give it to them - but if they got control of your email account they could do a lot more damage. For example, not only would they have your email, which they could use to impersonate you, but with a little work they could also gain control of every account on any site you have, including Wikipedia, via the "email my password to me" feature. I can't see any legitimate reason someone would need to know your account password. JessicaN10248 14:59, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Well some sites (not wikipedia though I think) have a secret question or similar thing before they will reset your password so depending on how close the friend is and what your question is, they may or may not be able to reset these passwords. However if you re-use your passwords, and many people do, then since some sites will still send your current password rather then resetting the password they may be able to get the password you use on many sites. Nil Einne (talk) 19:03, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Those secret question and answer setups are very low security, and seem like a really bad idea. When you set up a hotmail account, for example, a little bar rates the strength of your password and encourages you to select a good one in all the usual ways. But then it's compulsory to set up a question and answer to allow backdoor access to your account, and you can't write your own question any more; it has to be from a list of about 5 really obvious ones. It can't be hard to hack an account with a standard secret question and answer, if the average person set it up. 79.66.77.88 (talk) 01:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Why not ask the friend why they want it? You shouldn't give it to them in any case. You may consider the possibility that your friend's account has been compromised as well—it may not actually be your friend at all, it might be someone who is contacting all of the "friends" of your friend and seeing how many more accounts they can get. But again, don't give it out. You have honestly no reason to and they have honestly no valid reason to ask for it. --98.217.8.46 (talk) 23:51, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

What is significance of a hollow 5 pointed star tattoo?

In the last six months or so I have noticed a lot of girls that have this . I was wondering if you have a tattoo art page that can help me? Thanks, Hey, I'm Just Curious (talk) 23:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Does it look like this? Corvus cornix_talk 00:13, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

No. It's empty on the inside. It's bassically a five point outline.Hey, I'm Just Curious (talk) 01:42, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

I take it you want to know about the meaning of the shape, not how to do a tattoo. In tattooing, hollow means it's not coloured in afaik. Someone has been asking a similar question around the net with minor variations and got this answer[8] a pentagram is produced which is considered a symbol of mystical and magical significance. It has been associated with Venus and the worship of the Goddess Venus. So it is a possibility that your daughter has such inclinations. It also has associations with Freemasons. And another at that site about gaydar stars. That it? Julia Rossi (talk) 04:06, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

And, of course, the pentogram is a symbol of evil, devil worship, etc. I'd guess the girls with those tattoos are goths, meaning they pretend to believe in that stuff. StuRat (talk) 14:06, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Given that I severely doubt it is an 'upside-down' pentagram, it is far more likely to be worn by someone wishing to invoke the good symbolism, such as a wiccan. And if someone didn't know about goths and wanted to know what they actually are (in the modern sense), see goth subculture. 79.66.22.23 (talk) 15:01, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

The pentagram per se is not a symbol of evil, StuRat! It represents the human condition, with the points standing for the five senses and, as the above anon points out, is a positive, not negative symbol. Inverted, however, it represents the subversion of the five senses and is thus associated with evil (or, at least, the "left hand path"). Mind you, I suppose if the person getting the tattoo is a Wikipedian, it could be a barnstar ;) Grutness...wha? 23:57, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

In any case, an empty star is not a pentagram. The girls I've seen with them are not goths—they are usually "indy" or "punk" types, like this girl or this one. I don't think they have any strong, shared meaning. They just look "cool" and "different", and have a very different vibe than, say, "tribal" tattoos or pictures of naked ladies and the like. --98.217.8.46 (talk) 00:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree that these stars are just a fad with no deeper meaning. I see them everywhere, so in a few years they'll undoubtedly look as lame and hackneyed as tribal and Asian-character tattoos. Buyer beware. --Sean 14:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Possibly copying Tom Fletcher's tattoos. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:01, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Fwiw, OR and all, I asked an experienced tattooist at a ttatoo shop who said they're a "soft" version of the pentagram, a slippery slope to wicca and other things –– included for putting the wind up anyone who cares about these things, Julia Rossi (talk) 09:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

June 22

Kilometer pronunciation

Moved to the language desk, as requested by the questioner

Nationality

What would a person's nationality be? Country of birth, or parents, or citizenship country?

220.244.74.63 (talk) 05:13, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

That would be dependent if the country implements jus sanguinis (citizenship by blood, as in parents) or jus soli (citizenship by birth, as in being born in a country). In situations where a person born to parents whose citizenship is passed down by jus sanguinis is born in a country that implements jus soli (example: a baby born in the United States [jus soli] to Filipino parents [jus sanguinis]), there will be a case of multiple citizenship. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 05:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

So you can be multiple nationalities? 220.244.76.63 (talk) 09:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Many countries allow multiple citizenship. For those that don't often the child is allowed to keep citizenships granted at birth, until he or she reaches adulthood at which time the child is, in theory, supposed to choose whether to keep the citizenship of the country which does not allow multiple citizenship, and if so, give up on his or her other citizenships (or at very least refrain from exercising any rights as a citizen of the other country or countries). Nil Einne (talk) 11:39, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

There are examples of various situations of multiple citizenship in its article. Just to raise a point: pointing on the child born to Filipino parents in the United States example: usually, if you do not declare that your child was born to the nearest diplomatic post, recognition of that child as a citizen of the country where he/she acquires his citizenship from his parents through jus sanguinis (in this case, the Philippines) may not be granted. However, this depends from country to country, and likewise, you can request for recognition after birth through the appropriate agency or agencies. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 13:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Witness Protection

Suppose one is testifying against a major figure in organized crime and is protected under the United States Federal Witness Protection Program. After the trial, does this protection last indefinitely, similar to the formerly indefinite Secret Service protection given to ex-US Presidents? Does the duration of this protection change should a witness is testifying against a less "dangerous" suspect? Thanks. Acceptable (talk) 06:35, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi Acceptable, an overview: the first para in the article Witness protection seems to hit the spot. An example of long-term protection is Henry Hill, central figure of the book Wiseguy which formed the basis of the movie Goodfellas. I'm assuming in his case, the witness protection was long-term because his testimony included dangerous subjects and did not change with his testimony against lesser suspects. Someone else here will know more. Cheers, Julia Rossi (talk) 08:33, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Hill may be a good example of protection being dropped or an exception, depending on how you look at it. His numerous crimes after entering witness protection caused the government to kick him out of witness protection. So, yes, protection can be dropped but in this case, it's not in the way that the OP set out as an example, i.e. the "dangerous" level of the suspect. Dismas|^(talk) 09:41, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Wet room smell

I inadvertently left my window open in my apartment two nights ago before I left camping and it rained almost the entire time I was gone. None of the water got into the room, but it's very humid here and I think the walls or something got wet enough or it got steamy enough in here sometime in the last two days to leave a really bad smell when I came back. I've tried to look or a particular source but nothing smells when I put my nose up to it; the whole room just smells. I've also febrezed it up and tried to air it out, but the smell remains. Is there anything else I can do? I'm worried that some kind of bacteria might spread/be spreading, and I don't want it to get any worse. 210.254.117.186 (talk) 13:20, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Sounds like mold. Use a dehumidifier or air conditioner to remove the humidity, then wash all the clothes, bedding, drapes, etc., in the room, using bleach to kill the mold. The carpet may be the issue, too, so move all the furniture out and shampoo the carpet using diluted bleach. This will, however, make the room damp again. Don't spend any more time in the room than necessary until this problem is gone, as mold and bleach fumes can both present a health risk. Sleep somewhere else, like on a couch. Assuming you have a traditional bed, you may also need to replace your mattress (likely) and box spring (less likely). StuRat (talk) 13:47, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

alaska gold nuggets

Why do they say the nugget is between 18-24 carat gold? Susan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.188.228.43 (talk) 14:51, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

A karat measures in this case the purity of gold. 24 karats is considered as the finest form of gold. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 15:04, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Living in a sail ship

How big must be a ship to live on it? How much does the smaller ship where you can live cost? Any hint where I can start learning? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.6.118.85 (talk) 17:20, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Any size really, though I'd suggest something similar to a narrowboat, unless you are planning to live out at sea, which is probably a bad idea (very dangerous for a beginner). Prices will depend on age, condition etc, but a boat can be a lot cheaper than a house, and as long as it is well maintained there is really no more maintenance required. Try to get as much information as you can beforehand, maybe go down to the local marina and speak to people who are currently doing it, or apply for information from the local authority who manages the canals and rivers. JessicaN10248 17:33, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

It depends on the lifestyle that you're willing to tolerate. A square raft 2.5 meters (about 8 feet) on a side is enough room to set up a one-man tent and still have space for a small ice chest and a propane stove. (Think of it as a floating campsite.) If you're interested in additional amenities (a real berth, a full-sized bed, a double bed; sails, motor; on-board battery-powered lights, radio, AC power, television, air conditioning; satellite navigation; head (toilet), galley (kitchen), on-board laundry facilities; etc.) then the sky's the limit for prices.

Poking around the 'net, you can find yacht brokers and used boat dealers who can set you up with a used sailboat – including a small head, galley, berths for two to four (friendly) adults, well-used motor – for comfortably less than ten thousand USD. (Google 'yacht broker' or 'used boats' to find searchable lists of ads.) TenOfAllTrades(talk) 18:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

A modern sailboat with a cabin small kitchen appliance and reasonable bunk would be a minimum of 6 metres - although you could always live in an optimist I guess. You should be able to find some from the 80´s in reasonable states for six thousand US dollars up. This doesn´t include berthing fees, repairs, extra equipment you might want to buy in order to actually make you boat into a permanent residence (heater, bigger water tank, more security equipment) as opposed to a week-end/summer embarcation. I wouldn´t argue that it would be in any way very confortable though and you should be looking for 8-10 metres for confort on your own or with other people for short periods of time and 10-12 for real confort and security. Small boats are not designed for the high seas and are less secure than big boats - which can be rendered insubmersible (usually from 8 meters up). Aluminium hull can be a good choice too as they are practically unsinkable since it would take tremendous force to make a hole in one. Other points: boats cost a lot to maintain, there are a lot of small parts that are subject to extreme conditions - make the wrong decision, rip a sail and that sets you back at least five hundred dollars. You have to take into account berthing fees unless you have your own (protected) place. Good luck with your endeavour. Oh yes and LEARN before buying ... you might realise it´s not your cup of salty tea afterall. 200.127.59.151 (talk) 21:04, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

As for learning, where do you live? It is very easy to find lessons in places like Cowes or Auckland, but some seaside towns offer very few sailing opportunities. Inland, your options are fairly limited. Try googling "sailing lessons" with your local town; ring your local sailing or yacht club. If you live in a maritime place, then check out the local community colleges. Are you young? Then consider Sea scouts, or other local mariners clubs. Some tall ships run training programmes, or advertise berths for voyages. Also see Sail training. Most importantly, talk to sailors, people who own boats, and try and get out as much as possible. As the anon says above, there's a lot to it, and you don't want to find yourself in difficulties. Gwinva (talk) 20:11, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Cullinan Diamond Discovery Date

Article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cullinan_Diamond states that the rough cut diamond was discovered on January 25, 1905

The page for January 25: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_25 does not list the discovery.

However, the page for June 25: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/June_25 does list it.

I am uncertain which date is correct, and I am uncertain as to whom I should ask.

Rschwriter (talk) 20:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Rschwriter 6/21/2008

According to the book used as a source for the article on the diamond http://www.farlang.com/gemstones/goodchild-precious-stones/page_145, the January date is right. Is there a source given for the June listing? 79.66.22.23 (talk) 20:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

it is possible

could someone survive a bullet through the head —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.220.127 (talk) 20:48, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Sure, depending on what part of the head it goes through and how big the hole is. --98.217.8.46 (talk) 20:59, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

You might survive, but you probably wouldn't know you did —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spinage (talk • contribs) 21:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Adam Sandler shot Damon Wayans in the head in the movie Bulletproof,and he survived. So it must be possible!!-- Coasttocoast (talk) 22:07, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, if wikipedia says it's so, then it must be. I'll go do that now, and thanks for the medical advice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.220.127 (talk) 22:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

There have been recorded cases of people surviving a pole (an inch or two in diameter) through the head. A bullet is probably not too different. The problem is that it could destroy vital parts of your brain. One of the recorded cases (I forget which) ended up losing his behavioural centre (essentially gave himself a lobotomy) and had a large change in lifestyle and behaviour. Add the risk of infection, stroke, blood loss, etc., and it's not likely, but survival is possible with proper care. Steewi (talk) 02:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

You're probably thinking of Phineas Gage. More recently, Manish Rajpurohit got skewered by a pole and survived to tell of it. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the Phineas Gage reference. All I could come up with was Phileas Fogg, quite a different person. Edison (talk) 03:38, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Unity Mitford shot herself in the brain and survived for years, although the injury eventually contributed to her death. --Anonymous, 07:53 UTC, June 23, 2008.

Hey 79, if you had asked 'what should be treatment for one who has been shot through head?', then that is asking for medical advice. You must have realised that answers to the question 'whether someone could survive...' are opinions, not facts 203.129.237.147 (talk) 03:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Don't be silly. The OP asked if someone COULD survive, not WOULD survive; that's different from speculation, as has been demonstrated by those respondents who posted above you. Did you bother to click those links? Mitchell k dwyer (talk) 07:12, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

It may be possible to live without a head.--Shantavira|^{feed me} 08:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

From Dr. Bizhan Aarabi, director of neurotrauma at the Maryland Shock Trauma Center—approximately 20,000 people are killed by gunshot wounds to the head each year in the United States. In contrast, about 5% of victims will survive a shot to the head, but only three-fifths of those – 3% of the total gunshot victims – will enjoy a good quality of life afterwards (source). TenOfAllTrades(talk) 13:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Taxes

In the USA ... when you file your income taxes with the government (IRS), does that information then become a matter of "public record"? If so, can I (as a member of the tax-paying public) request a copy of, say, my next-door-neighbor's tax filing ... or, say, Cher's or Madonna's or any famous celebrity's? And if it's not public information, why is it not? Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 22:13, 22 June 2008 (UTC))

As far as I know, it is. You can always ask the IRS for a copy of said tax returns via a FOIA request. However, if the request is solely for personal use, or if the intention is an invasion of privacy, such request is most likely going to be denied. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 00:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Well, then ... what, for example, would constitute some valid reasons for which the request would not be denied ...? Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 01:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC))

You're welcome. To answer your follow-up, usually this would be for statistical, legal (as in law enforcement), judicial, government (as in Congressional investigations), archival or administrative uses, as regulated by the Privacy Act of 1974. I think there are also other valid uses, like when individuals or media outlets send FOIA requests for the tax returns of companies. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 01:41, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks ... I meant valid (non-deniable) reasons from an ordinary citizen / taxpayer ... not law, courts, government, etc., ... to see an individual's (not a corporation's) returns ... any ideas? Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 01:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC))

I checked again on the Privacy Act...you can request this information from an individual only with consent, and usually this would be for any purpose (except accusing someone of a crime, per the Government in the Sunshine Act). So if you're asking for the tax returns of your next-door neighbor via a FOIA request, either it has to be him/her who requests it, or you possess prior written consent from the person(s) involved before you request for it. There are exceptions where consent need not be granted and usually those are for the reasons I gave earlier. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 02:03, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I see. Thanks. So, for all practical purposes, tax returns are not "really" public records that are open for the public to see ... and I cannot go look at Cher's tax return just "because I want to" ... right? Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 02:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC))

I suppose so. And of course, you're very welcome. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 02:44, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

This sounds right to me. Consider the media hubbub around whether or not Hillary Clinton would release her tax returns for public viewing. If the media could get them without her consent, you can be sure they would have. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffjon (talk • contribs) 14:31, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

TWO QUESTIONS

1. If Bush lied to us about going to war in Iraq then what was the real reason? Don't tell me he really believed they had WMDs, don't tell me oil, don't tell me he wanted to finish his father's job, don't tell me the Israelis pushed him into it. What was the real reason?

2. Why did Jackie Kennedy climb onto the trunk of the car when JFK was shot? To grab a piece of his brain which was there? Then he must have been shot from the front left, not the book depository nor the grassy knoll. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.119.114.114 (talk) 22:29, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

I think for Question # 2 ... wasn't she merely doing what the Secret Service officers were telling her to do? (I believe.) (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 22:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC))

Consider that a small group of very influential people have made a fortune off of this war. Some of that is oil money, but a lot of it is simply our tax dollars. (See Blackwater Worldwide, Bechtel, Halliburton ) APL (talk) 23:13, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

1) Unless you are one of the types who is prone to believe 9/11 was actually a CIA plot, it is probably most reasonable to believe that Bush did indeed believe that Iraq was a serious threat to US security. There's a thing called confirmation bias - in short, you tend to put weight in even small evidence which confirms what you want to believe, but discount even mounds of evidence which contradicts it. Going into office, Bush had the believe that Saddam was a bad man, and bad men must be stopped (both entirely reasonable). Evidence which supported that view was looked on favorably, whereas doubts were dismissed as insignificant. There is also the echo chamber effect - Bush values loyalty, and surrounds himself with people who have a similar mindset (as do most people). Because of this, though, he isn't exposed to opposition viewpoints as much, and when he is, it's usually from "them", so it's so much easier to discount it. It is highly likely that he convinced himself that Iraq was a real and pressing danger that needed to be taken care of, otherwise the US faced imminent peril. He likely still believes he was correct in that assessment. (Oh, by the way, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball - the best you're going to get here is speculation. The only one who knows for sure is Bush.) 2) I believe that the president always has armored protection kept close at hand, to protect him in case of an assassination attempt. I've heard that the official presidential podiums are bulletproof, and in case of an attack, the president can climb inside. My guess is that the trunk of the convertible was reinforced to be bulletproof, and Jackie was placed there so that she was protected in case of further gunshots. This is just speculation, though. -- 128.104.112.147 (talk) 23:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Confirmation bias = "My mind is made up, don't confuse me with the facts." - George W. Bush

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.119.114.114 (talk) 18:27, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 

She didn't climb into the trunk, she climbed onto it - it does look like she is going to pick up pieces of brain, which maybe seemed reasonable at the time considering the extreme shock of the situation, who knows. Adam Bishop (talk) 07:37, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

There has been a lot of speculation about why Bush seemed dead set on going to war with Iraq from a very early period. One is that he had a personal grudge to settle, the whole "he tried to kill my dad" thing relating to Saddam, or that he was trying to finish what his father had started (Freudian theories run wild). Another was that he thought it would provide cheap oil to the US and give the US a good launching point in the Middle East in the post-9/11 era. Another is that he was urged by other neo-Conservatives to do it as part of an neo-Wilsonian effort to remake the world as he saw fit (and to profit certain American interests at the same time). Another is that he was trying to built up a solid "legacy" for his own presidency, as part of the remaking of his image he attempted in the post-9/11 era (where pre-9/11 he was best known for spending most of his time on vacation). Another is that he thought being "tough" there would encourage other "troublesome" nations (Libya, North Korea, Iran) to go along with his policies, etc. It's probably a large mix of things. There was certainly a great deal of confirmation bias in any case, but from all I've read about it, it sounds like he was always just looking for a rationale to do it once he decided to do it. The WMDs might have been official casus belli, but remember that there would have been other ways to deal with that other than unilateral action (well, not totally unilateral, but the "coalition of the willing" was no UN). Anyway, speculation, all. --98.217.8.46 (talk) 23:48, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Scott McClellan discusses the reasons for the Iraq war in What Happened.

Sorry but there is no one liner "The Reason".

There were many people involved in the decision to go to war; each had their own reasons and priorities. For some, the intelligence reports on WMDs were a major driving force; for others, replacing a rather nasty tyrant with democracy; for others encouraging the democracy movement in Iran (put it between two democratic nations); etc. A decision like that doesn't happen so that one guy has A Secret Reason and one day he suddenly decides to go to war.

McClellan writes how the White House made a big mistake in focusing on one reason (WMDs) in public speeches, assuming (perhaps correctly to some degree) that indeed a simple, dumbed down "The Reason" had to be presented to the people. A public discussion on the arguments for war would be too complex for people who want "The Reason" and want to see things in black and white.

Read the book, and try not to to think "Don't Tell Me" while doing so. The book won't give you a simple answer; some things in life are not simple. Even though political opposition may want to make you think so. 88.112.43.206 (talk) 09:37, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I believe his VP, Dick Cheney, was instrumental in silencing dissenters and convincing GWB to attack Iraq. I imagine Cheney wanted to provide lucrative, no-bid contracts for his old defense company, Halliburton, since this was the most effective way to raid the public treasury for his personal benefit. After Cheney leaves office, I expect Halliburton to reward his loyalty financially. StuRat (talk) 12:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you to all who replied. 2)JFK shot from front left confirmed by large exit wound on right rear skull. Secret service man at left rear of car made her get back into back seat and lie on floor. 1) Bush indeed surrounds himself with yes-men and despises dissent. Remember the "axis of evil" from before 9/11? He adamently refuses to consent to telling North Korea he has no intention of invading them. I do think Cheney was more than just instrumental in silencing dissenters but not for financial gain. I don't think McClellan was in a position to know the real reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.119.114.114 (talk) 13:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I find the phrasing of the first question interesting. I've got another one like it. Who was the first president of the US? And don't tell me George Washington, I want the real answer! DJ Clayworth (talk) 16:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Samuel Huntington, of course, was the first President of the United States in Congress Assembled. StuRat (talk) 18:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Samuel Huntington (July 16, 1731 [O.S. July 5, 1731] – January 5, 1796) was an American jurist, statesman, and revolutionary leader from Connecticut. He served as a delegate to the Continental Congress where he signed the Declaration of Independence, as Governor of Connecticut, and later as the first President of the United States in Congress Assembled, that is, the presiding officer of the Congress of the Confederation, the sole governing body of the first central government of the United States of America. His office was not that of today's President of the United States, which is a federal chief executive position created under the later United States Constitution.

That's a good one DJ Clayworth :-D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.119.114.114 (talk) 17:34, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

2)The drawings/photos of the Kennedy autopsy show that the piece of skull which popped off was consistent with a shot from the rear. When a high velocity bullet enters a closed fluid-filled container, the high pressure developed can indeed cause the target to move toward or away from the shooter, depending on how it exits. I have confirmed this to my own satisfaction by shooting melons and pop cans placed on a post. The jet of expelled material can exit in such a way as to push the target back toward the shooter. Other times it moves away from the shooter. It is not a block of wood, which could simply absorb the momentum of the projectile and always move away from the shooter. Edison (talk) 19:14, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Placer Gold

How much less is gold placer worth than gold nuggets and if you find gold placers is that a good sign that gold nuggets aren't too far off? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.127.99.11 (talk) 22:33, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

• I'm no expert but I imagine that the only thing that matters is the purity and weight of the gold. Source is irrelevant to value. Exxolon (talk)

It was my understanding that placer gold was like gold flakes you find in sand, that can't be worth much could it? But would that be a good indication that gold nuggets could be nearby? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.127.97.50 (talk) 23:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

A little synchronicity; I encountered the term 'gold placer' for the first time yesterday in an old book, and now I read it here. Funny world.

• Well it all depends on the amount you find. You're right that individually each flake is not worth much but if there are hundreds or thousands of flakes then you have a valuable property. Exxolon (talk) 02:14, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

June 23

Question about Teeth

I have a some questions about teeth. Does straight teeth give you any advantages? Does having white teeth give any advantages?Cardinal Raven (talk) 03:44, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Straight, white teeth are generally associated with youth and good health. So, if there are any advantages being thought youthful and healthy, white, straight teeth would be useful in accruing them. ៛ Bielle (talk) 03:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

From my experience, straight teeth are lot more important than you would think in language acquisition (usually SLA, but often even FLA). More frontal fricative sounds like "sh", "f", "th", and "j" (to a certain degree "l" and "r" too) all rely on the teeth in some way to create sound (often as the final barrier to the air flowing through your mouth, above your tongue), and straight teeth rarely cause any problems there. The more misaligned the childrens teeth are, there seems to be a higher likelihood that the child will use an alternate mouth alignment to produce the same sound. E.g., typically "sh" is produced by coaxing the air along the tongue across the alveolar ridge, and then toward the ridge of the teeth. When the teeth are noticeably misaligned, it seems that some children are forced to correct their aim, and will produce different (but similar) sounds to approximate the "sh". The same applies for other sounds.

Especially with second language acquisition, students with straighter teeth often seem to have more confidence producing sounds that don't exist in their mother tongue. My assumption is that people naturally avoid touching their teeth with their tongue, except when necessary, and children with misaligned teeth tend to loop into much more constrictive avoidance patterns because there are a lot more shapes inside the mouth getting in the way, and there is often also a greater risk of damage to the tongue. Students with straight teeth seem to have less reluctance to stick out their tongues, and thus with greater freedom of movement with their tongues, they may manage to master certain new sounds easier than those with misaligned teeth. I don't think it's a coincidence that all of my long-term 1 on 1 accent training sessions (this is all informal) have been with students with relatively or badly misaligned teeth. It is often clear that they also have problems (though they've found way around them) pronouncing certain sounds properly in their own language. 210.254.117.186 (talk) 04:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

And I disagree with the opinion that straight teeth are associated with youth. Maybe on TV they are, but especially more recently, it is the youth that struggle with misaligned teeth, and they are often corrected by the time they become adults. 210.254.117.186 (talk) 04:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Judging by the rest of your response, I'm guessing that SLA and FLA stand for Second & First Language Acquisition? Dismas|^(talk) 04:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I've linked the now. 210.254.117.186 (talk) 07:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

And let's not forget about the social advantages of straight, white teeth. In addition to helping with dating, they may also help you get a better job and advance faster in that job. StuRat (talk) 12:16, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

(Although you can't tell from our picture of him) Steve Buscemi might disagree about straight teeth versus job prospects, although I'm sure what you said is generally true.

Atlant (talk) 12:23, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

From what I can tell the importance of teeth varies a lot by country. In Europe, esp. Britain, the lack of straight teeth seems to be only a minor issue, whereas in the U.S. it is very common to shell out thousands of dollars to straighten teeth because it is seen as something of major import. (So says someone who had extensive oral surgery and rehabilitation for his not-very-crooked teeth as a child. But since said someone lives in the U.S., he feels this is perfectly normal. ;-) --98.217.8.46 (talk) 14:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Having naturally very white teeth could actually be a disadvantage as I've heard that slightly yellow teeth are stronger than white teeth. Of course this could be an urban myth so I stand to be corrected but a google provides a few links. I emphasise this refers to natural colour, not discolouration due to staining, disease, thinning enamel etc. Mike 87.113.67.104 (talk) 21:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Using flouride yellows teeth slightly, but I think its advantages outweigh this. In the UK you now see children with braces, when you didnt decades ago. Rather a shame really - I do not care for cheesy Mickey Mouse style artificial grins. 80.2.201.59 (talk) 23:39, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Staring through a pinhole

I am slightly nearsighted and occasionally wear glasses. I noticed that if I poke a very small hole with a pin in a piece of paper and hold it right up against my eye and look through it, everything becomes in focus. As the hole is small, this is not viable for looking at dark objects, however, when watching TV through this tiny hole, everything in the TV becomes in focus, just like as if I am wearing my glasses. Why does this phenomenon happen? Thanks. Acceptable (talk) 05:01, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

See depth of field. Basically you are constructing a pin-hole aperture, which increases the depth of field in your vision, making out of focus images clearer. Squinting your eye works in the same principle is well. --antilived^{T | C | G} 05:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Also perhaps of interest is Camera obscura (think that's the spelling) - essentially that same thing can be used in a very-dark room and it will project the image on to the wall (think it does it back-to-front and upside-down if my memory of seeing it on tv is correct). Very interseting stuff. 194.221.133.226 (talk) 08:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

There are also (surprisingly expensive)spectacles available which use this principle to amazing effect, however focussing is achieved at the cost of narrowing of the vision field. You might like to make a pair, check this link for details. [9] Richard Avery (talk) 09:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

See also pinhole camera. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 13:28, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

New Username

I'd like to change my username. Is that possible?? Also, is it possible to change my username without changing the location of my userpage?? Will my current page be deleted if I change my name?? Aanusha Ghosh (talk) 11:16, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Please see WP:USERNAME#Changing_your_username and WP:RENAME — Matt Eason ^{(Talk • Contribs)} 11:50, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Friends without money

What should I do about friends without money?

• Let them some money knowing that perhaps it will take ages for them to pay back?
• Invite them to go out and pay the bill?
• Let them and move on?
• Help them get a new job?

GoingOnTracks (talk) 15:34, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Translation for Americans: "Let them" = "Lend them some money". StuRat (talk) 18:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I think the first thing you need to ask is why don't they have any money. If their house has just burned down and they have lost their job, then I'd say help them - at least in the short term. If they've gambled it away on drink or the horses, then friendly advice and support is what I would give them, but don't get into the situation where they become entirely dependent on you and almost expect you to give them money whenever they turn up on your doorstep. JessicaN10248 15:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Since they are your friends I suppose that you will be able to talk about any problem that they may have. I suppose that you should help them in any emergency (or most of them). On the other hand if it just happens that they have less money than you (but are in a stable and happy position), you should remember that you don't have to do everything together. Try to find some activities that you all can share without putting strains on their budget. And don't mind having fun with other people in more expensive entertainment. 80.58.205.37 (talk) 16:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Help them get a new job. this will benefit everyone involved and will improve your friendship. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.115.175.247 (talk) 16:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I suggest you do things which are free, so your friend doesn't feel obligated to spend money. StuRat (talk) 18:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

And, if you do lend money, do it formally, with a written contract that makes it clear this is a loan, not a gift, and a schedule for when it will be repaid. StuRat (talk) 18:20, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

The simplest such written contract for them to execute is a post-dated check. --Sean 19:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm a software guy who has always dated artsy women, so this means I've generally made 2-5 times my various girlfriends' annual salary. My informal policy has always been that if I make X% of our totalled incomes, I pay the bill X% of the time. If not being able to go out to nice enough places with your friends has been cramping your style, you could try doing that without feeling resentful that it's unfair to you. --Sean 19:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

How about the obvious ... don't be concerned with their financial affairs ... and let that be their concern ...? You risk many problems when you try to "solve other people's problems" ... among them: becoming enabling, becoming codependent, becoming controlling, setting up "expectations", and engaging in the "martyr syndrome" (you try to solve everyone else's problems as a defense mechanism when you feel helpless to solve your own). There are many truisms to consider ... and they are time-tested truisms that have endured for good reason. Namely:

• Neither a borrower nor a lender be.
• A fool and his money are soon parted.
• Never lend money to friends or family.
• God helps those who help themselves.

Watch any episode of "Judge Judy" to see what often happens when you lend money to friends. If money is truly burning a hole in your pocket, donate some to the American Cancer Society or the Humane Society or your church, etc. A much better cause than financing your friends' ability to socialize. That is my arm chair psychology and my two cents on the issue. Best of luck. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 19:25, 23 June 2008 (UTC))

<sarcasm>Yeah, if I had to choose one of the following:

• help out friends in need by helping them find a job, or
• the obvious: ignore friends when they become poor and sit blissfully in front of the telly to a brand new episode of Judge Judy under the comforting "knowledge" that this is the way God wants it (while using any excess cash to fund the pastor's new holiday house),

I'd definitely choose the Judge.</sarcasm> Zain Ebrahim (talk) 19:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Your sarcasm is quite warranted. The American Cancer Society and the Humane Society are pretty much scams, right? Much better to throw one's money away at shiftless, lazy friends who won't (not, can't) work ... or who won't (not, can't) pay their own way. Yes, their social pursuits are a little more important than cancer and other activist causes. Not sure how I missed that. And let's get over the melodramatics and theatrics. I highly doubt that all of the OP's clique of friends were all simultaneously financially wiped out by some dire emergency. The OP is referring pretty much to all of his/her circle of friends. And if a dire emergency were truly a part of this picture: (a) the OP would not be asking whether or not to help; and/or (b) the OP would have made such a relevent point clear in the question. Your sarcasm misses the point of my reply. The OP needs to handle his/her own finaces and let his/her friends handle theirs. There is no dire emergency here. Just a bunch of friends who cannot afford to socialize ... and one who can. Cut the theatrics. The fact the the OP (a) is worried about his/her friends' finances and (b) is worried about lending them money and (c) is worried about helping them find a job ... sounds like the OP is a rather enabling person with some martyr complex. And, again, the OP is not referring to one single friend who has undergone financial emergency ... the OP is referring to all of his/her friends. Hence, the obvious in my original reply still stands. Best of luck. Don't enable the bums. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 02:58, 24 June 2008 (UTC))

And it would be quite the coincidence if all of the OP's friends have undergone some severe financial hardship that is swathing across the OP's nation ... and yet the OP is the only one unscathed ...? Come now ... (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 03:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC))

Of course the exact circumstances make a difference. If he is talking about normally wealthy friends, with a regular income who have said something like "We cannot afford to go out this month because the car broke down and we had unexpected bills" then I would probably pay for them to go out with an informal "take me out when you can afford it". If they have no regular job and are unlikely to ever have money then I would probably not help. Of course if you can help someone to get a new job without cost to yourself then I would say do it, but don't vouch for someone to your employer unless you really know they are reliable. -- Q Chris (talk) 07:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I may be getting cynical, but lately I've found friends (even clients) who complain they can't afford things but they really do have money somewhere (like investments, land or something). I've been poor and I've been flush, but the people who really can't afford something don't mention it. And when you're in a common state, like being students together, that's something else. One guy asked me to help him with a bond for a place to rent. I didn't. The next thing I know, he's emailing a lecturer from Club Med somewhere. Let your instiincts (not your generous impulses) guide you. I'm all for helping people get a better job. I'm all for getting a better job myself. Best, Julia Rossi (talk) 08:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

AGRICULTURE

SHIFTING AND AGRICULTURE PRACTICES IS SOUTH ASIA .REGIONS WHERE ARE THEY DONE.CROPS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayush ch09 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

See Swidden. Itsmejudith (talk) 21:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

What happened to your Cap Lock?--Faizaguo (talk) 16:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Musings...Why can't demons lie and why they like to color........

Every horror flick, series or reality show that I watch in which the characters use an Ouija Board to contact the spirit that is haunting a house assume that the demon they contact is telling the truth. Why? I was watching 'A Haunting' a show that my husband and I love to watch together as it is more ridiculous than scary (I know that if there was a half-buried skeleton sleeping on my basement floor that was drinking from my water hose in the middle of the night, I wouldn't stay long enough to turn off the water faucet, much less wait it out for a dispensation for an exorcisim from the Pope, but I digress). So when a family decides to get answers from the ghost that is haunting their home, they always ask; "What is your name?" The answer is 90% of the time is a common English name such as FRANK or MARY or perhaps even something more exotic like SETH. Never does the ouija board answer with a name that perhaps no-one in the house has ever encountered such as Aappikka or Auðfinnur etc, etc. Then the next question is usually "When were you born?" or "When did you die?" or "When did you live?". For example. one episode of 'A Haunting' that was on last week the ouija board replied "Never". Well the medium that was with the family explained (with much dramatic effect) that the entities response meant that it was not a ghost of a dead person in their house, that it was a DEMON!! I guess she based that on that 1 response. So I guess demons can't lie?

My husband and I also both noticed that everytime a child gets possessed by an evil demon/ghost/spirit that the child seems to always take up the pasttime of coloring. It is as if Satan himself is endorsing Crayola. So one can conclude that demonic possession leads to creativity and coloring inside the lines. Maybe the coloring takes the demon's mind off of the centuries of hate, gnashing of teeth and of course, having to tell the truth anytime anyone is equipped with an ouija board.

If anyone can shed some light on these two questions, please be so kind as to type a response. I am greatly puzzled. Thank You Darrrrksunshine —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.211.38.189 (talk) 20:04, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I think the explanation for these phenomena is that you have been watching shows made for a mass market and they are unoriginal and based on cliché. Itsmejudith (talk) 21:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

I think that a child doing childlike things, but in a slightly creepy way, is even more scary than if he just came right out and said "I'M THE DEVIL!" Digger3000 (talk) 22:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

There seems to be a notable paucity on serious (verifiable) scientific research into demons. My working hypothesis is that "good" and "evil" are absolute categories which are consistent, ie perfectly true to the concept. Like most most of my working hypotheses, this one may be, IYHO, BS.

Your question on truth is not applicable to demons as it is not applicable to angels (or to god). Ethics do not apply to such entities, as they do not apply to triangles or to gravity. Starting from St Augstine´s (Prost, FerkelP) De Civitate Dei humans have mused upon this question which easily fills an entire library. --Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM (talk) 22:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Passport entry stamps

I'm an American citizen in Rome, Italy at the moment, having entered via a flight from Athens. At customs, there was no passport control. Is there a simple way to get an entry stamp in Rome just to have one? Thanks! --213.140.21.227 (talk) 21:14, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Not a simple one, no. That creates an issue of two EU-entry stamps without an EU-exit stamp (or an entry-exit pair leaving you without an outstanding entry), which causes problems when you eventually leave. — Lomn 21:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

If you are in travelling in the EU, then you are, in a way, in the same country, except for the UK & Ireland. Have a peek at Schengen Agreement and Common Travel Area. Fribbler (talk) 23:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

If you have a multiple entry visa, it may be possible to get a stamp by travelling to a non-Schengen country, such as Switzerland (where the Schengen agreement is not yet fully implemented), and returning. AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 15:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I have found customs officers to be generally most helpful if you specifically ask to have your passport stamped, even in cases where the stamp isn't technically necessary. Try going to the customs office - there usually is one, even if you don't have to go through passport control. DJ Clayworth (talk) 18:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

June 24

College football and basketball

When does the NCAA SEC and ACC Conference start their regular college football season and regular college basketball season separately? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.14.118.218 (talk) 02:00, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Because the conferences (and the individual schools) are free to adapt their schedules within the overall bounds of NCAA guidelines. Current football guidelines, for instance, allow for something like 12 games in a 15-week span. The Big 10 uses this to ensure that the regular season is completed by Thanksgiving while other conferences continue play, though this is at the expense of either fewer games played or fewer weeks without a game for the relevant teams. — Lomn 03:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

York Lions

When does the York University Lions start their regular college football season? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.14.118.218 (talk) 02:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

September 1, according to their website. (Hey didn't you ask questions like this last year too?) Adam Bishop (talk) 06:11, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Tequila with Coke

When I pour a freshly-opened can of Coca-Cola into a glasses of Tequila, the coke loses its carbonation. Why does this happen? Thanks. Acceptable (talk) 02:53, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I believe it is because carbonation is simply carbon dioxide dissolved into a liquid. To keep the carbon dioxide in the liquid the vessel it is in must be pressurized, otherwise the carbon dioxide will come out (due to vapor pressure).--droptone (talk) 12:13, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't think that addresses the specifics at all, Droptone. Anyway, I recall from the Mythbusters coke-and-mentos episode that numerous chemicals (both in the coke and the foreign material) can catalyze the release of the carbon dioxide, as can nucleation sites. Nucleation is most unlikely if it's just a glass of tequila (tequila on the rocks would be another matter), but otherwise it's likely just one form or another of chemically destabilizing the carbonation. — Lomn 13:16, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

You can make a glass of Coca-Cola go flat right away by adding a little sugar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.119.114.114 (talk) 18:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Nordic walking, also known as ski walking, pole walking or fitness walking

Does anyone know where and/or can point out to where I could get phthalate and bisphenol A free Nordic walking, ski walking, pole walking and/or fitness walking poles?68.148.164.166 (talk) 03:56, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Here[10] with purchase of poles there are free DVDs, clinics and one "ski" but no free poles. However after the interest peaks, you may get lucky for cheap at opshops or by hanging around friends that get tired of their impulse buys. Julia Rossi (talk) 12:00, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Julia, I fear you have misread the question. The OP is asking for phthalate and bisphenol A free poles, i.e. poles that do not contain those substances (whatever they may be). Nordic walking is popular around these parts, I'll ask around. --Richardrj ^{talk email} 12:25, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I think OP is asking for poles that are free of those particular chemicals. You can of course get regular walking poles at any camping or outdoor shop. Or just pick up a couple of sticks for free in any forest. But why not save yourself the hassle and go walking stick-free? (Nordic walking?)--Shantavira|^{feed me} 12:23, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Bisphenol A is used in the production of (most) epoxy resins, which are a component of the glass and carbon fibre poles - so avoid those if you want to avoid bisphenol-A derived products. Aluminium or wood poles seem the obvious alternatives.

Phthalates are plasticisers which may be present in any flexible plastic material, but not rubbers. So you need to check out what the rubber handles are made of. Any PVC will be likely to contain that, but not neoprene or silicon rubbers 87.102.86.73 (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Each individual stick would need to be considered separately - I've just indicated likely sources of the chemicals, it's still possible that pthlates could occur in neoprene, or that a glass fibre poly be bisphenol A free.87.102.86.73 (talk) 13:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

What a difference a little hyphenation makes : )). I'm with Shantavira on that one, unless you want to be stylish. [Now if it had been on the science desk...] Julia Rossi (talk) 13:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

It is now Wikipedia:RD/S#Nordic_walking,_also_known_as_ski_walking,_pole_walking_or_fitness_walking87.102.86.73 (talk) 09:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

<nice move 80.102, sticks and all> Julia Rossi (talk) 09:54, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Ice

Ice is made out of water and water is clear. So why does water become white when it freezes into an ice cube and turns into snow. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 巨人 (talk • contribs) 05:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

File:Argentina-Perito Moreno-Glacier.jpg

Blue ice in a glacier

This question would have been suitable for the Science Desk, but it's simple enough, so I'll just answer it here. When ice is white it's because it's full of tiny air bubbles so that there are numerous air/ice boundaries and each one scatters the light a bit. Similarly, the airy structure of a snowflake means that a mass of snow also contains large amounts of air and many air/ice boundaries, so snow is also white. The ice and snow articles mention this briefly, but they aren't very clear about it.

It's quite possible for ice to form without air bubbles, and in that case it is transparent and blue. The blue color isn't intense enough to see in a chunk the size of an ice cube, so it just looks clear, but in thicker ice like an iceberg or glacier the blue color can be surprisingly strong.

--Anonymous, 06:25 UTC, June 24, 2008.

Creepy Image

I found a creepy picture (http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Image:Creepy_Thread.jpg) and I was wondering where it was taken. Thanks in advance.

Americanfreedom (talk) 07:44, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

A junkyard for old carnival rides? Dismas|^(talk) 08:16, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

It probably isn't - but what came into my head was a picture of Michael Jackson's Neverland Ranch today. That would be creepy -- Q Chris (talk) 10:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Why don't you ask the uploader on their talk page? (http://encyclopediadramatica.com/User_talk:Spacey)--Shantavira|^{feed me} 12:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

That is a common image. The uploader is unlikely to be the creator.--droptone (talk) 15:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

It's not part of the fairground in Pripyat,Ukraine thats been abandoned since Chernobyl went bang is it? Lemon martini (talk) 12:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

A question about a young female bodybuilder...

I was surfing on the Web earlier today, and suddenly I had came on some old news articles about some young Ukrainian female bodybuilder named Varya Akulova who was said to be "the strongest girl in the world". I then discovered that she also had a website. I wanted to send an e-mail to her about how interesting that kids this young would be able to take on big things, especially bodybuilding, but there was a problem: since Varya was born in the Ukraine, and she then moved tho the United States, I don't know if she is living in the U.S. or staying in the Ukraine. So, where does Varya Akulova live now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirdrink13309622 (talk • contribs) 14:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

It may be worth noting that where somebody lives isn't relevant for sending them an email. Is the real problem finding an email address? — Lomn 14:59, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I don't understand what you mean by "there was a problem". BTW, since you've done some research already you might want to add to Varya Akulova. Shockingly, she was born in 1992 and weighs 40kg but can lift 350kg. My word! Would anyone know how that could be possible? Zain Ebrahim (talk) 15:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Bah, there was a Swedish girl who could lift over 1,000 pounds before her twelfth birthday. ---Sluzzelin talk 18:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

About "there was a problem"...

By what I meant by "there was a problem" in my question about where Varya Akulova lives, it's about the time zones. If Varya was still living in the Ukraine, it might be late at nighttime there, when people sleep in which Varya wouldn't get my e-mail because she is asleep. If she lives in the U.S., then it would be day here, when people are active. I'm just worried if Varya's not there to read my e-mail when I send it to her. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirdrink13309622 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

You would only have a problem if she hardly checks her e-mails. If she does check it regularly, then she will see your inquiry and (hopefully) will reply. It's only a difference of, like, 8 hours.--Faizaguo (talk) 16:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Geese

What does geese taste like? Is it anything like turkey or chicken? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.119.61.7 (talk) 17:56, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Something like duck, or the dark meat of chicken/turkey, although goose (spelled with two 'o's when used as a mass noun describing food) is a bit fattier. Traditionally, goose was the Christmas dish served in England (as mentioned in Charles Dickens's A Christmas Carol), although I believe that recently turkey has replaced it, on account of the cheaper price. - Although there are some individual differences, "tastes like chicken" is a good approximation for most fowls. -- 128.104.112.147 (talk) 18:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Note also that there are specific dishes that are often prepared from goose—see foie gras for a popular example. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 14:34, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Roberto Benigni tickets to Dante

Sirs: My cousin and I are planning a trip to Italy in October and I would love to purchase tickets to see Roberto Benigni recite Dante. I have searched the internet and I have made some calls to Italy but I have come up short. If you have any information as to where Roberto Benigni will be appearing or where I can purchase tickets I would really appreciate it very much.

Thanking you in advance for any assistance you can give me. Italian2 (talk) 17:59, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I think Benigni's Tutto Dante tour ended last year. Since then, he has appeared on TV reciting Dante and also performed at the University of Malta last April, when he was awarded a honorary doctor's degree. I couldn't find the announcement of any planned public recitations in the near future here either, sorry. ---Sluzzelin talk 18:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Walking question

This question came up at work today. What is the longest distance anyone has ever walked in one go, meaning not using any other form of transportation in between, but stops and overnight stays are allowed? And how long did it take? JIP | Talk 18:13, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't have a number or winner, but Category:Pedestrian circumnavigators of the globe looks like one good place to start. ---Sluzzelin talk 18:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Not exactly what you were looking for, but 130km is the longest someone has walked with a milk bottle balanced on their head JessicaN10248 19:24, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

A famous account is The Long Walk by Sławomir Rawicz, a WWII Polish officer who claimed to have escaped from a camp in Siberia and walked 4000 miles to India, but since there is considerable doubt that it is a true account, so its probably not a good answer to your question. For another approach, look at Pilgrimage; these are traditionally undertaken on foot, and many pilgrims travel vast distances to reach their shrine or holy site. Gwinva (talk) 21:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

More about gender roles

Continuing on the topic of gender roles in sport and dancing.

It seems that men's sports are much more popular when it comes to sports that are purely based on physical skill, such as football or ice hockey, where women's sports are much more popular when there is an aesthetic and artistic element involved, such as figure skating or gymnastics. Is this right?

Looking back on the pictures I took of the Helsinki samba carnival, I see that yes, the dancers are still pretty much exclusively women, but the marching bands playing the samba music are predominantly men. The men's costumes are almost as flashy as the women's ones, but cover much, much more. This clear-cut gender division seems weird. I have never practiced samba myself, so I don't know if it's present in samba generally, or just in the carnivals. Which is it? JIP | Talk 18:24, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

To make a gross generalisation (partly tongue in cheek), men in very little clothing is not as interesting to women as women in very little clothing are to men. Remember, I say generalisation. It doesn't apply to everybody, by any means, but it does seem to be the more common thing. With regards to sports, physically women simply cannot keep up with men when it comes to speed and strength, so to a degree, there is a perception that because they'll never reach quite the same heights as the men, there isn't as much need to watch it - even if the logic involved in the perception is wrong. On the other hand, women's basketball, for example has a different approach. Because there is little focus on dunking and heavy blocking, there is more development of strategy, speed and technique. On a third hand (somehow), don't let anyone say that women's sport is less aggressive. Some of the women's hockey and rugby I've seen proves that wrong. Steewi (talk) 01:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Agree with Steewi. As well there's nothing quite like any floating body inscribing space one way or another (think floor gymnasts). One tiny vote for men in space in clothes: Australian Rules football? Length, heft, and ballet – eye candy when you catch it. Julia Rossi (talk) 09:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Houses in kept coma what

Suppose Joe Bloggs owns a house. He has no family, friends or next of kin. He is knocked down by a bus and taken to hospital where he remains in a coma for seven years. What happens to his house? Do the government sell it or keep it safe for him? What about his possessions, are they kept or burned or sold? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.76.225.252 (talk) 19:08, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

In the UK his affairs would be managed by the Court of Protection, [11] a social worker at the hospital would arrange this (hopefully). The Court of protection would then manage his affairs directly or appoint someone with Power of Attorney, possibly a local solicitor (lawyer for US readers). The person with Power of Attorney in consultation with medical staff would then decide on the best course of action based on a medical prognosis. I would be surprised if his goods and chattels would be disposed of quickly. Richard Avery (talk) 20:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

leaking in the street

I heard once that if your caught short and need to take a wizz you can use the back left tyre of your car without it being illegal. Further, if a policeman is passing by they are obliged to shield you with their hat and cloak while you do the deed. If this true? 79.76.225.252 (talk) 19:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

In what jurisdiction? This sounds like an urban legend, in any case (but no-one can really answer without the answer to the first question). Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 19:15, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Great Britain —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.76.225.252 (talk) 19:16, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I have heard this before, with the jurisdiction being either the United Kingdom or England. (Great Britain is an island, not a jurisdiction.) According to this forum posting, "It is legal for a male to urinate in public, as long it is on the rear wheel of his motor vehicle and his right hand is on the vehicle. … One of many Hackney Carriage Laws that have been unaltered for over 100 years". Bovlb 2008-06-24T20:00:43Z

And a comment I found when researching an answer to this, on a police forum, was that in the opinion of the poster, the permission extended only to cabbies. Now we need to know whether these carriage laws are or are not still in force; and how they interact with other laws, such as on public decency. --Tagishsimon (talk) 20:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

According to the Dorset Echo, "The Town Police Clauses Act of 1847 said that a hackney carriage driver could urinate against the rear offside wheel." That act doesn't seem to mention the issue, except in S28 where it prohibits "Every person who wilfully and indecently exposes his person". Bovlb (talk) 22:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Except that all the "decency"-related clauses in that act were repealed (and replaced) by the Sexual Offences Act 2003. 81.187.153.189 (talk) 22:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Fly question

My father asked this question almost two decades ago, but neither he or I ever found a reply. When a fly flies to the ceiling and lands upside down, its feet sticking to the ceiling and its head towards the floor, which axis does it turn around in flight? JIP | Talk 19:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Here ya go. -- Coneslayer (talk) 20:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

dual 60s

Where did dual 60s come from for meaning gay? 79.76.225.252 (talk) 20:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

It's apparently an Air Force reference for those in the service that were found or suspected of being gay [12] as they were discharged under "Air Force Regulations 35-66" [13] [14] JessicaN10248 21:10, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Insect survey

For a project I'm doing I had to make this survey and get people to answer it. Could sevral people do so please? Here it is:

1. Do you think eating insects is gross?
2. Have you ever eaten an insect in any way?
3. What would be the last, non-poisonous insect you would want to eat?
4. If you had to eat an insect but were given the choice of which one you could eat, which one would you choose?
5. Let’s say you were also given the choice of what spice to put on the insect you chose in the previous question, what spice would you choose?--76.176.17.191 (talk) 20:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

1. yes
2. no
3. a centipede
4. grub
5. cinimmon(or however you spell it)

1 - Yes

2 - No. How many ways are there to eat an insect?

3 - Millipede

4 - A liquorice insect

5 - Curry powder JessicaN10248 21:08, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't think the Refdesk is an appropriate place for surveys. Sorry. Zain Ebrahim (talk) 21:16, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

yahoo answers might be a good place to ask. JessicaN10248 21:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Does this mean that I should not discuss my tasty meal of fried crickets in Mexico? Marco polo (talk) 00:51, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

I had the same in Laos. Tasty! Fribbler (talk) 00:53, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

1 - depends on the insect (some are apparently quite tasty, and is it any weirder than eating lobster or escargot?)

2 - no - and to answer Jessica, boiled, fried, raw...

3 - I'dthink twice about eating dung beetles (and neither a millipede nor a centipede is an insect! They're arthropods!)

4 - huhu grub, though apparently locusts are delicious

5 - depends on what they taste like without spice. Probably cinnamon would be a first choice, though.

Grutness...wha? 01:05, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Cicadas are delicious. I ate them in China. They're good fried in soysauce. Steewi (talk) 01:30, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Even though surveys aren't necessarily the right place for the reference desk. I'm going to answer anyway. ;)

1-No eating a big isn't weird

2-Once I ate an ant

3-Stink beetles you know the stink bugs

4-A cricket

5-Depends if the cricket taste good.Rem Nightfall (talk) 03:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

1. No. Eating shrimp or snails is every bit as odd as eating many types of insect.

2. Insect parts are a normal part of many kinds of agricultural product. I have probably eaten many ounces (or pounds) of insects unknowingly in my lifetime.

3. Loosely speaking, spiders are a type of insect I would hate to eat. (I know they aren't insects, but are neither are the 'pedes).

4. I would choose 17 year locusts (cicadas) which had just emerged, still white and tender.

5.I would douse the cicadas with garlic and butter and make kebabs, and have some ice cold vodka as a chaser. People ate them this way and said they were remarkably like shrimp. I think barbecue sauce might also be a good seasoning. Edison (talk) 03:59, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

1. Yes.

2. Yes, I won a city-wide Fear Factor by downing a cricket and earthworm shake (among other events).

3. Beetles

4. Ant (it's the smallest).

5. Sugar.

Hope that helps. Useight (talk) 04:18, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

1 - No

2 - I heard somewhere that the average person eats a few insects per night while sleeping (I can't remember the numbers). I havn't eaten any that I can remember, though. (I've always wanted to try a chocolate covered grasshopper, actually)

3 - A moth. The harrier, the worse. (By the way Edison, spiders aren't insects)

4 - Grasshopper (chocolate covered, if that counts)

5 - Chocolate doesn't count does it? I guess I'd pick cinnamon.

You're dreaming eh? 04:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Ha! You didn't read the entire post. Edison (talk) 15:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

1 – No. It's partly conditioning since in tribal life many peoples eat kinds of larvae and things like grasshoppers. Anything not meat, fish, fowl or vegetable can be challenging, depends where you're from.

2 – probably in a lettuce or... when someone told me it's all protein, I lost the yuk factor by about 50%. Don't mind crunchy things. Don't like slimy things. Australians sometimes do open their mouths and swallow a fly (though I've only seen it happen.)

3 – centipede? or spider. Can't detach from spiders as creatures Change that, maggot. Maggot is the last straw for me.

4 – if I had to survive, a witchetty grub? especially a small one. I could do that. I think.

5 – Sugar... sugar spruces up a lot of things like this ant lollipop[15]. (You probably won't catch me at this market (Entomophagy) though.Julia Rossi (talk) 05:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

1 - No, I as a Cantonese person will eat (almost) everything.

2 - Yes, worm-like things dwelling in sand (no idea what the English name is), quite crunchy and very tasty; and something quite small, and you mash it into a paste, add egg and steam it, very tasty is well.

3 - dung beetle.

4 - See 2

5 - Garlic, ginger, soy sauce, spring onion... --antilived^{T | C | G} 05:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

1. No, it's a reasonable source of protein.

2. Not knowingly.

3. A shield bug (stink bug in US)

4. A wood louse

5. A suspicion of cinnamon

Richard Avery (talk) 05:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

According to Jewish law, there are serious prohibitions on eating insects. Therefore many types of fruit, vegetables and other foodstuffs have to be checked for infestation before eating them. There are however four species of locusts which may be eaten (Leviticus chap.11 verse 22). Jews from Yemen and Morocco have a tradition to identify which locusts may be eaten, and at least in those countries they would eat them. Some years ago, a Kosher dinner was arranged in Israel, in which the menu consisted of numerous kinds of unusual Kosher animals, birds, etc. Included in the menu were these Kosher locusts. Simonschaim (talk) 06:43, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Entomophagy and Category:Insects as food is worth a peruse - Simon, you may be particularly interested in Kosher locust :) Grutness...wha? 07:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

There are many brave people here, but antilived can be the chef on the the next wikisafari. ;) Julia Rossi (talk) 08:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Lol seriously the bugs that I ate were very very nice... I have cravings for them now... --antilived^{T | C | G} 08:36, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Ah found a picture here. You clean the inside so it becomes like a white worm and then stir-fry it. --antilived^{T | C | G} 08:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Mother! I forgot stir fry and soy is the perfect solution for everything edible. You make the paste, antilived, the job's still yours! Julia Rossi (talk) 09:40, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

1. Yes. That's nasty
2. Yes, but no intentionally. Gnats and what not.
3. Cockroach
4. Death. Seriously. That's like asking how you'd rather die - drowning or burned to death. If I had to choose, it'd be something tiny. Like a gnat.
5. Adobo

Endless Dan 12:45, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

1. Yes, in the extreme

2. Yes, a praying mantis and a tarantula (!)

3. Cockroach

4. Whatever is the smallest

5. Ketchup

Paul Davidson (talk) 13:08, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

1. Not any grosser than eating animal species from other classes

2. Yes, mosquitoes while cycling open-mouthed, and a junebug in a memorable moment of childhood hazing.

3. Goliath beetle

4. A Dicopomorpha echmepterygis that died of a natural cause.

5. Tabasco

---Sluzzelin talk 14:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

1. Not inherently, though there are of course exceptions

2. Yes, at various insect museum restaurants, and in southern Africa

3. Cockroach

4. Mopane worms -- delicious!

5. Just salt.

--Sean 14:36, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks to everybody who answered. I have plenty of replys now. Thanks again.--76.176.17.191 (talk) 15:36, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi. You may disregard this answer if you are no longer accepting replies, but:

1. Yes, somewhat, but lots of people do.

2. Not purposely, but I'm pretty sure there's an occasional insect hidden in our vegetables and other food products from time to time.

3. Pubic lice (eww).

4. Something that doesn't taste too bad.

5. Chocolate.

Hope this helps. Thanks. ~AH1^(TCU) 21:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Reading

Is there any way to keep my mind from "wandering" when I'm reading? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.119.61.7 (talk) 21:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Read a book you're interested in. Mac Davis (talk) 23:36, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

If there's no choice, read quickly on the first run, more slowly the next, and do it in small bites if you're getting distracted. Is that why some people say the words in their mind as they go? I've wondered about that, Julia Rossi (talk) 02:07, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Yeah certainly I find reading it 'in my head' (i.e. mentally saying the words) helps aid my concentration. Also reading it somewhere where there is relatively consistent background noise helps me too (doesn't have to be quiet, just has to be something I can tune-out). I think lack of water is a cause of easily lost concentration so ensuring you drink plenty of water will help. 194.221.133.226 (talk) 07:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

I hope it is not rude to suggest the article Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder treatments Plasticup ^T/C 18:13, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

One thing I always find utterly distracting when I'm trying to read (which includes writing), is voices, whether it be conversation, TV, or radio/CD music with voices (songs, etc). Instrumental music doesn't bother me, as long as it isn't too loud. (The voices in my head, well, they're always there - hi, Mum). So I've learned to know what sort of music to have on in the background, and what not, when I'm reading or writing. Does any of this resonate with you, 64.119.61.7? -- JackofOz (talk) 23:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Reading 2

Is there a way to better remember what I read? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.119.61.7 (talk) 21:24, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Have a look at Memory, particularly the Memorisation section and the articles it links to. Fribbler (talk) 21:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Try putting it in your own words as you read it. StuRat (talk) 21:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

You can try taking a break after each section or page and recalling what you understand or remember. You can also make notes to read over later. Revising material or information is a standard way to cement something into your memory for study or other purposes. Julia Rossi (talk) 02:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

The best way to help remember non-fiction is to read two pages (left and right page of an opened book) and then record the important points which have been raised. If you're dealing with extremely dense material (like technical philosophy, etc) then you may want to record your thoughts after each page. I doubt this strategy will work well for fiction, but you can give it a shot.--droptone (talk) 12:55, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

I've done that for shakespearean plays as well, and that's fiction ;-), not sure it would work for your average novel though--Serviam (talk) 14:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

After reading the text properly the first time, try re-reading it at a later date, but only reading the first sentence of every paragraph. I found that a great way to bring the gist of non-fiction books to my mind in time for a test. In fact, if it was a well-written non-fiction book, I could get away without reading the thing in full at all and just doing the "first sentence only" method. A good non-fiction book will devote a paragraph to each concept, clearly stating that concept in the first sentence. That might also help with your mind wandering. Matt Deres (talk) 19:54, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Winter Olympics

After reading this, I am wondering which rules will be used? International or NHL? thanks in advance. West Brom 4ever (talk) 22:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I would think that international rules would still apply. Though I am not well versed in ice hockey, and don't really know the differences between the two sets of rules, I can tell you that the International Ice Hockey Federation governs all international ice hockey events, including the Olympics, and so unless they have changed their own rules recently, I'm sure they would continue to follow international rules. Jared (t)  02:43, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

The Olympics uses international rules. One difference is that the ice surface is wider. The article notes that this will be the first Olympic games to use NHL-sized ice, so in a way it will be a hybrid of NHL & international rules. --D. Monack | talk 02:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

thanks both of you! West Brom 4ever (talk) 12:51, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

The size of the rink doesn't really affect the rules though. It's sort of like soccer, soccer pitches can have a wide variety of lengths and widths, but the rules are still the same. The size affects the flow of the game, strategies, etc, and I suppose players who are used to playing in the NHL will have an advantage. Adam Bishop (talk) 14:43, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

June 25

Make a check payee a category?

I've always wondered whether, when you're writing a check, if you can make the "Pay to the order of" on a check a category. What I mean is, can you write something like "Pay to the order of... A while male, age 26"? Could someone fitting this description then cash the check if it were found on the street as if it were payable directly to him? There are endless possibilities if this were the case, if someone is looking for a little amusement, and doesn't mind writing out checks for a dollar or so to leave in the park for an unsuspecting passerby. :) Jared (t)  02:39, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

We are not able to give legal adice at Wikipedia Reference Desk. You may find the quaintly spelled article Cheque informative. It says that in the U.S., the Uniform Commercial Code governs checks. An "order check" is payable only to a named payee, but a "bearer check" is payable to anyone in possession of it. Scholarly books have been written on all the details of checks. Rules vary by jurisdiction around the world. Edison (talk) 03:51, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

That spelling is not "quaint". It's the standard British English spelling. --Richardrj ^{talk email} 05:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

From the American POV, British spellings are quaint. StuRat (talk) 16:15, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Well I wasn't looking for legal advise, it was just curiosity. Thank you though. Jared (t)  04:38, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps anything like that would be a signature and have to be signed that way? It's a creative idea, anyway. Julia Rossi (talk) 04:49, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Looks like this is theoretically possible. (Don't know what the bank teller would say, though.) For the US rules, check out UCC 3-110 here. A check is "payable to the person intended by the signer", and the "person to whom an instrument is payable may be identified in any way". Also, "If an instrument is payable to two or more persons alternatively, it is payable to any of them and may be negotiated, discharged, or enforced by any or all of them in possession of the instrument." Mangostar (talk) 09:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

COPYRIGHT

I'm writing a book, and I'm wondering if it is against copyright law to use the name wikipedia or information on its pages? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.150.168.208 (talk) 02:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

At the risk of giving legal advice... you're okay. A single word (like "Wikipedia") can't be copyrighted, neither can information. Unlike other encyclopedias, you can even copy whole articles verbatim as long as you comply with the GNU license. --D. Monack | talk 02:50, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

If someone published a book called "Wikipedia" wouldn't that tend to make the name generic., so that anyone could then create a website called Wikipedia in competition with this one? Isn't there a trademark issue for the name at least? I would expect that anyone could write a book about Wikipedia, or could quote any of the content of Wikipedia, with proper attribution. Edison (talk) 03:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

It's not a good idea to title the book "Wikipedia" as that might qualify as a trademark. I thought the OP was asking if they could use the word in the book should be fine. If you're writing an encyclopedia, I'd consult a lawyer first. --D. Monack | talk 04:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Note that since Wikipedia is licensed under GNU Free Documentation License a person uses any text directly out of Wikipedia in a book (not in a specific attributed quotation) they won’t be able to copyright the book. GNU includes a share-alike requirement. --S.dedalus (talk) 04:43, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Does that render the entire book without copyright, or does it keep the appropriated material copyright-free and unacquirable in the sense of copyright to the book's author? Julia Rossi (talk) 04:47, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Neither, really. The misused GFDL portions remain copyrighted by their original authors. Any content added by the new author is copyright to him. (I suppose if there is a derivative work involved, they both hold a copyright in it.) Of course, the new author is violating the original authors' copyright and could be sued for doing so. This is why a bit of free-licensed code accidentally (or lazily) stuck into Windows won't make Windows open source, it would just expose Microsoft to liability. Mangostar (talk) 09:31, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

And to answer the original poster's question, you should really just consult a lawyer about this. As a general rule, you can copy ideas freely, but not sentences. To reproduce the text of Wikipedia, you will need to abide by the GFDL. Mangostar (talk) 09:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

The word "Wikipedia" is a trademark and the logos are copyrighted, but the text in wikipedia is under GFDL, so using our text is fine so long as you say you got it from here. That text would be under GFDL, but the rest would be copyrighted to you.--Serviam (talk) 14:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi. Err, I don't think using the name of a website in a book would be infringement, as I have seen it mentioned in at least one book. I'm not so sure about titling the book Wikipedia, though, and if you make a notable book titled Main Page then that might cause some problems here :-) . Besides, if you copyrighted the name of a popular website, how are people going to refer to it in written text? Thanks. ~AH1^(TCU) 21:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Somebody isn't filing Properly

Good evening. In F.E.A.R (First Encounter Assault Recon) they have me search for information and upload it on many different computers. In reality couldn't you just upload all the information from one computer and not six separated computers? And if you couldn't get all the information from that one computer wouldn't it be easier to use one computer to hack through the systems? Does any of these actually work in reality? Thank you for answering my question. I really appreciate it. I hope my question isn't to confusing cause it was hard to phrase. Have a positively wonderful day.Rem Nightfall (talk) 02:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps the computers were on six separate intranets and not linked together in any way. Useight (talk) 04:12, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is set up like a scavenger hunt, they may intentionally force you to go to 6 different computers by checking the I/P address of each. You might be able to trick it if you have a dynamic I/P address, but they may also use cookies or other methods to determine if you are using the same computer. StuRat (talk) 10:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

buy vintage records...cheap

hey, im a college student, looking to decorate my bedroom next year. Im thinking It would look awesome if I got a bunch of old album covers and displayed them on the wall, rather than putting up posters the same way everybody else does. My question is, where can I buy album covers, I dont necessarily even need the album itself? preferably somewhere inexpensive. are antique stores a good bet? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.188.121.45 (talk) 04:45, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

It's a good idea, your bedroom will look great. I've been buying old records for many years, though, and I've hardly ever come across a place where you can just buy the covers. Normally, people want both the record and the cover, so the two are not going to become separated. Just go to a used record store and buy some of the cheapest records you can find that you also like the covers of. If you have a turntable - and you should - you can even play the records as well. Charity shops (called thrift stores in the USA, I believe) are another good source. --Richardrj ^{talk email} 05:49, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Sometimes thrift stores have some album covers that are empty, but you would be better off just buying the whole album than wasting a ton of your time looking for empty ones so you could ask the clerk for a deep discount. (Or, in the same vein, looking for extremely scratched/unusable ones and asking for a discount.) Mangostar (talk) 09:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

How about car-boot or garage sales? They may be advertised in your local newspaper or on the net. AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 13:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Search the net for them and print them off?--Serviam (talk) 14:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Wind

When there is strong wind near my house, I keep hearing a squeaky noise. What is this noise? Interactive Fiction Expert/Talk to me 10:34, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

High winds frighten mice, causing them to squeak.87.102.86.73 (talk) 12:05, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

More likely it's from trees bending in the wind, or something similar. AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 13:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, trees often "squeak" when tree branches or leaders rub against each other as the tree flexes in the wind.

Atlant (talk) 15:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Specifically one might be rubbing against the side of your house. That would make much more noise inside the house than an ordinary squeaking branch. DJ Clayworth (talk) 18:36, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Or something metal (and rusty?) like a gate/sign/hanging-basket swinging slightly in the wind. That would make a squeaking noise too. 194.221.133.226 (talk) 13:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Might be something crawling about in the cellar, looked down there recently?87.102.86.73 (talk) 17:50, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

It might be the foundations of your house. Check for subsidence. Moancical (talk) 18:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

How about a rusty iron gate moving on its hinges - do you have anything like that?87.102.86.73 (talk) 18:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Pet Odors

Is it harmful to one's health to breathe in or inhale pet urine/excrement odors? Also, apart from side effects such as diseases, etc., does it in any way impair brain function or cognative ability?

Also, what about household cleaning products? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.17.77.208 (talk) 16:18, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Difficult one to answer. On the one hand, this is the disproved Miasma theory of disease. On the other hand, in sufficient concentrations (and that's the key) certain chemicals have the capacity to impair bodily functions. I think the answer is, it's a matter of degree, but in the normal case, it's a bit pongy but not injurious. --Tagishsimon (talk) 17:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Check out the second paragraph of Toxoplasma gondii. Matt Deres (talk) 20:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Effect of Protein

I apologize beforehand if this qualifies as medical advice. Suppose someone introduces a large amount of protein into their healthy diet without changing anything else- no additional exercise, no additional nutrient or other foods. What would be the effect of that extra protein on one's body? By large amount, say previously one was taking 100% of the daily recommended protein intake and is now taking 200% of the recommended protein intake. Acceptable (talk) 17:51, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

See Protein in nutrition#Excess protein consumption for all we have. It's not possible, as you know, for us to make a link between the dosage amount you've specified in your question, and the effects in the case you're describing. --Tagishsimon (talk) 18:01, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

boil or zit

This is not a medical question as I am not asking for a prognosis. I have a large boil or zit or something on the end of my penis and it is really painful to masturbate or move the foreskin over the affected area. What shop available creams might be good to reduce the lump? Moancical (talk) 18:18, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

It is a medical question since you are asking for a suggested treatment. On that basis, it should not be answered directly. I suggest you visit your local chemist/pharmacist and ask them. --Tagishsimon (talk) 18:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

I'd skip the pharmacist to be honest. The end of your penis is a mucous membrane, and the occurance of pimples or boils is a medical matter. Fribbler (talk) 22:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Roswell

The cover for the books Roswell High feature the same actors as the television series Roswell (TV Series), however the books were published BEFORE the televisions series and served as inspiration for it. So, my question is, did the actors (or some of the actors) get their roles in the tv series as a direct result of first having been featured on the cover of the books? 79.75.149.90 (talk) 19:07, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Is it not more likely that the book covers are from reprints published after the TV series? --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:13, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

I though that too at first, but their hairstyles are wildly different and they look a lot younger. Plus only some of the same actors are featured, some are completely different than the show. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.149.90 (talk) 19:16, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Look at this [16]. It looks like there's two different versions of the first book. I'm not sure when the non-photograph version was published, but according to Amazon[17], the version with the photograph is the current edition, and it was published November 1, 1999. One month after the TV show first aired. (And it would have been in production for months before that.) APL (talk) 20:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Actually, if you go to Amazon and zoom in on the covers of the versions of the books with the photographs, they actually mention the TV show. So presumably the books were re-printed so that their covers would be a marketing tie-in with the TV show. (Like how the current edition of "I Robot" has Will Smith on the cover.) Hope this helps. APL (talk) 20:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Career

Hi, My name is Moses Jackson, I recently graduated from Canoga Park High School, and my question is that i don't know what career to study, please can you help me. Here is a List of the things i want to do: I want to travel around the world[especially on motorcycle or rv],to meet different kinds of people,to record all that i learned,saw and heard,to have a high paying job,to comment and analyze political situations,appeared and worked on television or radio, being famous,to give my opinion on issues,to interview and hang out with globally important people,to draw cartoons and design, to write articles in magazines or newspapers,to create stories,poems and essays,to lie?, to help,teach,inform,serve the community[people],to investigate and solve mysteries,be powerful, have influence over poeple's opinions,to dress good?,to act,be funny and tell jokes,to visit,explore and discover historical,archaeological,natural sites, have my own column in a important newspaper or magazine,to have adventures,to be on the site of the action and conflict, work in groups, to take pictures and film documentaries and movies, to have my own office,to give lectures,reading,speeches and conferences and to have contact with nature and animals.Please help me choose my career. Thank You —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.170.104.24 (talk) 19:07, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Archaeologist? 86.131.210.33 (talk) 22:45, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Rouge admins

How come this page apparently doesn't exist yet still has a list of content in it? 79.75.149.90 (talk) 19:13, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

It's a category page, which combines your common or garden page, and supplements it with a list of articles belonging to the category. It's quite possible to categorise articles, before creating the corresponding category page. The effect is the one you see. (Hope that makes some sort of sense) --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

(ec)The category was deleted at UCD, but some of the roguish of them refuse to remove themselves from the category regardless of its deleted state. So although it doesn't exist, the category is still populated. --Onorem♠Dil 19:23, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Not to mention that rogue is spelled r o g u e, yet your link points to "rouge" admins, whom are presumably pinkish in color. --LarryMac | Talk 20:08, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

It is rouge, a play on rogue. See Wikipedia:Rouge admin and Category:Rouge editors. To the OP: it's supposed to be a humorous, tongue-in-cheek "we're not a cabal, because there aren't any" in joke. I can't be bothered reading the CfD, but presumably the joke wore thin. Gwinva (talk) 21:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

bringing beer on an airplane

I'm going to travel to Europe in a short while, and was wondering if I was allowed to carry beer? Can you have beer in your checked luggage?76.194.67.13 (talk) 19:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Not in this day & age, since the alleged liquid explosive plot. --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

The fallout of that alleged conspiracy affects the contents of one's carryon bags, not checked luggage. Nonetheless, it is not advisable to place something so fragile into a suitcase that will be handled by barely trained monkeys at the beginning and end of the journey. And if you're thinking cans might be better, sacrifice one to your freezer tonight and check on it in the morning. --LarryMac | Talk 20:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

But how much beer can you bring? Can you bring whole 12 packs into your luggage? And what if I used bubble wrap around the cans/package?76.194.67.13 (talk) 20:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Again, think about the luggage hold on an airplane, along the atmospheric pressure and the ambient temperature at 30,000 feet. Consider also that there are strict baggage weight limitations on international flights. They do sell beer in Europe. --LarryMac | Talk 20:43, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi. Although I'm not sure about Europe, in some places such as Canada, you are allowed to bring a certain amount of alcohol, depending on the concentration and source. However, the same might not be true in other parts of the world, so you might want to check the website for the aviation security regulations for your country and/or the places you are travelling to. Hope this helps. Thanks. ~AH1^(TCU) 21:25, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

You can bring beer on board an aircraft as carry-on, so long as it was bought after you passed through the security check. But, that means buying whatever the airport store has available and they are unlikely to sell you a large quantity. You can also put beer in your checked baggage, but don't be surprised if the can or bottle freezes and breaks during. In theory, between countries in the EU, the limit is "personal use" which is normally understood (at least when travelling by car) to be 100 litres, but in practice that is a hell of a lot of beer and you would never be able to take that on a plane even as checked baggage.

But honestly, why would you want to? The various countries of Europe all make great beers, so why not buy a fresh supply when you arrive in a new country? Astronaut (talk) 21:45, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Isn't bringing beer to Europe like bringing sand to the beach? Why do you want to do this? --D. Monack | talk 21:28, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, he seems to be from San Diego -- maybe he wants to bring along some Arrogant Bastard Ale. I don't think you can get anything like that in, say, Germany, where their taste in beer is very different (and not to my personal liking). --Trovatore (talk) 21:33, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

RAT-TAILED MAGGOTS

What is the best way of getting rid of Rat-Tailed Maggots —Preceding unsigned comment added by ONY44 (talk • contribs) 19:27, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi. Please also see the article on rat-tailed maggots, although other than that I myself am not sure. However, please do not write in ALLCAPS, as it may seem rude to some people. If this is a request for medical advice, please note that Wikipedia is not able to give out any. Thanks. ~AH1^(TCU) 21:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Your local fishing tackle shop is your best bet since these maggots are commonly used as bait. Medical advice? I shudder to think what for :-) Fribbler (talk) 22:39, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Presumably infection. Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 23:01, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Total EUI, didn't notice they wanted rid of them. Think I should bow out for the night. Though they were looking for maggots! ....Fribbler (talk) 23:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Soda pop

Will sealed soda pop go bad if it's been warm, then cooled, then warm again? 74.204.40.122 (talk) 19:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Not unless it's so old that the seal has gone bad. It likely goes through a few such changes on its travels to the store where you purchased it. Dismas|^(talk) 20:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Strange Muslim women's face device

When coming back from BoundCon, I saw something strange at Munich Airport. It was a Muslim family, with all the adult women dressed in burkhas, covering everything except their faces. This was all normal, but the oldest woman wore a strange metal gold-coloured thingy that covered the part of her face between her mouth and her eyes, including her nose. It seemed to be mostly decorative, neither helping or hindering her breathing or facial movements in any way. What the heck was that thing? JIP | Talk 19:37, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

A metal veil? Per [18]? Presumably it has another name. --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:50, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

About international mail and this company Nike Central

I ordered some shoes from a website called Nike Central. They are located in China and the shoes were suppose to arrive in 3-7 days. I still haven't recieved the shoes and wanted to know how long would it really take them to arrive in the U.S. They have an email address at the company but no other way to contact them. I was starting to think this was a fraud. I just want to know is a company and when will the shoes arrive? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.167.59.218 (talk) 20:16, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

It depends when the tide comes in :-)) Seriously though, you don't say how long you have been waiting, but numerous things can happen when ordering stuff from overseas so I would suggest waiting at least a couple of weeks. However, when I visited the site www.nikecentral.com my virus scanner went on high alert. It seems to be riddled with viruses and other malware and I certainly wouldn't shop there. As a precaution, it might be a good idea to ask your credit card company about recent transactions. Astronaut (talk) 22:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh - and scan your PC for viruses :-) Astronaut (talk) 22:05, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Please help with information on Tooloula

I am researching names for a restaurant. I was told that TOOLOULA was a greek god of food and beverages. I can not locate any information on TOOLOULA.

Can you help?

For Lawrence —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.15.38.48 (talk) 23:38, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Any relation to Tallulah? -- JackofOz (talk) 23:47, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Bullheads

Where in Connecticut can I buy live bullhead catfish for my pond? -anon