User talk:Yahadzija

Welcome!

Hello, Yahadzija, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Jppcap (talk) 01:24, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot!

Yahadzija (talk) 06:18, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Molimo vas da ne dodajete tekst na hrvatskom jeziku Wikipediji na engleskom jeziku. Vaši doprinosi su i više nego dobrodošli na Wikipediji na hrvatskom jeziku. Please do not contribute text in Croatian to English Wikipedia. Your contributions are more than welcome at the Croatian Wikipedia. Kharkiv07 (talk) 17:35, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of rivers of Bosnia and Herzegovina may have broken the syntax by modifying 6 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:21, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vrbas (river) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

The most important tributaries are the Desna river, the [[Pliva River|Pliva]], the [[Ugar (river|Ugar]], the [[Crna Rijeka]] river and the [[Vrbanja river|Vrbanja]] river which are located

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ugar (river) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Lašva]] rivers (i.e. Vrbas, at southwest) and Usora (i.e. [[Bosna (river)|Bosna]]) on northeast).

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ilomska may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Above the Ilomska there is Korićani Willage and a canyon below it ([[Korićanske stijene]]. There were the scaffold of more than 200 [[Bosniaks]] and [[Croats]] – the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:59, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vrbanja (river) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

i Hercegovina (1:250.000). Izdavačko preduzeće „Sejtarija“, Sarajevo.</ref><ref>Mučibabić B., Ed. (1998: Geografski atlas Bosne i Hercegovine. Geodetski zavod BiH, Sarajevo.</ref> The river occupies
], [[Sadika]], [[Grabovička rijeka]], [[Duboka river]], [[Vigošća]] /Vigošta, [[Cvrcka]] and [[Jakotina]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:01, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of rivers of Bosnia and Herzegovina may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:26, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jošavka (river) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

especially at the mouth is in [[Čelinac]] area.<ref>http://www.atvbl.com/poplave-u-celincu/</ref>(May, 15. 2014, and June, 8 2014, for example.<ref>http://kontaktradio.com/2014/08/celinac-stanje-je-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:32, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ilomska may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

</ref><ref>http://www.maplandia.com/bosnia-and-herzegovina/federacija-bosne-i-hercegovine/vlasic/]</ref><ref>[http://www.gosur.com/map/?satellite=1&gclid=CO2C9fCS670CFdShtAod72UA9g</ref>
[http://www.maplandia.com/bosnia-and-herzegovina/federacija-bosne-i-hercegovine/vlasic/]</ref><ref>[http://www.gosur.com/map/?satellite=1&gclid=CNWDpOfQ6r0CFUP3wgod3mYA_g</ref> The height of

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:22, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Demićka may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

is in [[Šiprage]]. From its down-river flow from the spring, Demićka enters into a short canyon (under Dunići village, i.e. Dunića stijene (Dunići's Rocks)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.furaj.ba/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:38, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Yahadzija/sandbox (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 10:05, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yahadzija, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Yahadzija! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 10:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Yahadzija/sandbox was accepted

Yahadzija/sandbox, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 10:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I made a mess when accepting. I HAVE accepted it, but the redirect os in the way, and it is now queued to be moved to main namespace Fiddle Faddle 10:18, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! With best regards,

Yahadzija (talk) 10:22, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Comments should only be posted on talk pages. To contest a speedy deletion, please follow the instructions in the box at the top of the article that was nominated. - Mr X 12:30, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Demićka was accepted

Demićka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 13:47, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Yahadzija! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 20:28, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pougarje (valley)

Pougarje is the name for long valley with a set of 18 villages (inhabited by Croats) which are located on the left bank of the river Ugar (Pougarje = By-Ugar).^[1] It spreads from Vitovlje village to entrance into Ugar's canyon. It spreads between the Ranča Mountain and Ugarske stijene (Ugar's Rockies), 20 kilometers from the Jajce.^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5]^[6]

Whole area along Ugar, from Vitovlje to Ugar's canyon is (by the local population) known as the Down Pougarje, while the area on Ranča's slopes is Upper Pougarje.

Pougarje (especially the slopes of Ranča) is a rich of coniferous and mixed deciduous-coniferous forests. The upper and middle part of the basin in the area still has the character of a salmonid water. Actually, there are only (brown trout) but huchen and grayling is (in the recent past) mostly disappeared. After the construction of the the hydroelectric power plant reservoair of „Bočac“, upstream and further penetrate and ciprinide; in some seasons, all the way to the Vitovlje. In the surrounding forests are inhabited by the big game (fox, wolf, bear, wild boar, and the others. At in a brushwood at the mouth of the Ilomska, in a protected hunting area, there is feeding place for the Carnivore (including corvine shoals). The landscape of the mouth of the Ilomske is particularly attractive, with two waterfalls, about three miles upstream. The higher is high even 40 m, and (due to the configuration of the terrain) it's quite inconspicuous, with the surrounding plateau.^[7]

Pougarje is up to the war was in the municipality of Skender Vakuf, and then a short time added to the municipality of Jajce, while today it is an independent municipality Dobretići.

Ilomska's mouth is downstream from the Vitovlje. Upstream along the Ilomska there are Korićanivillage and the Korićani cliff between the Korićanske stijene and the Imljani's plateau.

With a deep ravine of Korićanske stijene it was shuted over 200 Bosniaks and Croats, 21. August 1992. After shooting burst fire in the back, they are driving down the almost vertical rock creep. Only a few of them survived that massacre. The crime committed by members of the Serbs Police and the Army forces, which has been proven to the ICTY Tribunal in the Hague.^[8]^[9]^[10]

References

^ Miroslav Džaja (1995): Pougarje i njegova okolica. Monografija
^ Spahić M. et al. (2000): Bosna i Hercegovina (1:250.000). Izdavačko preduzeće „Sejtarija“, Sarajevo.
^ Mučibabić B., Ur. (1998): Geografski atlas Bosne i Hercegovine. Geodetski zavod BiH,Sarajevo.
^ http://www.rhmzrs.com/
^ https://maps.google.com/]
^ http://www.maplandia.com/bosnia-and-herzegovina/federacija-bosne-i-hercegovine/vlasic/
^ http://www.go2bosnia.com/upoznaj-bih/75-rijeka-ilomska-i-njeni-vodopadi
^ [1]
^ [2]
^ [3]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Šiprage

added links pointing to Hungaria, Buck, Grayling, SHS, Ključ and Bobovica

List of rivers of Bosnia and Herzegovina

added links pointing to Grabovica, Kruševica and Duboka

Bobovica (river)

added links pointing to Vrbas and Missing Persons

Crkvenica

added links pointing to Vrbas and Bosna

Ugar (river)

added links pointing to Vrbas and Bila

Duboka river

added a link pointing to Missing Persons

Jakotina

added a link pointing to Čemernica

Vrbanja (river)

added a link pointing to Bobovica

Ćorkovac

added a link pointing to Vrbas

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why

Which cited links are not allowed to be added to Wikipedia, article Večići?

Yahadzija (talk) 15:22, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating articles.

I don't think you should be contributing to the English Wikipedia. Your English is horrible. The articles you write are very hard to understand. It would be better if you contributed in your native language Wikipedia site. Bgwhite (talk) 05:16, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

en.Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

To Bgwhite & whom it concerns

Answer is in one of the messages abow. I remember Welcome sentence concerning the knowledge of English!

Yahadzija (talk) 06:03, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You do not understand what I'm writing and I do not understand what you are writing. English IS A REQUIREMENT in order to contribute to English articles. You are more than welcome to contribute in your native language's Wikipedia. Bgwhite (talk) 06:29, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT EDIT OTHER PEOPLE'S REPLIES!!!!!!! I'VE CHANGED BACK TO MY WRITING. Bgwhite (talk) 08:13, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Free Encyclopedia?!

I dont understand what You are meaning about sense of term Free. English articles creations are FREE. I expect Yours (& Adminisstrator's) help - not nostbombastic critism and sense censure.

Thanks a lot! Yahadzija (talk) 07:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you remember?

"Hello, Yahadzija, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay."

I am doing so!

Yahadzija (talk) 07:36, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My best

I am doing my best. Help me, please. On Večići article esspecially.

Yahadzija (talk) 08:26, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zdravo!

Zdravo, Yahadzija! :) Primjetio sam da imaš malih poteškoća s engleskim. Na stranu gramatika, više me zabrinjava što se izgleda ne trudiš ni da pravilno pišeš riječi. Naprimjer, sigurno si svjesna/svjestan da se riječ dolina piše "valley", a ne "volley". Naravno, to ne bi bio nikakav problem da se dešava pokatkad (jer se pokatkad dešava svima), ali krajnji rezultat kod tebe je potpuno nerazumljiv članak. Ne mogu ga razumjeti ni ja, a kamoli ljudi kojima je engleski maternji. Pokušaj koristiti jednostavnije rečenice i obavezno upotrebljava spell check, ili se koncentriši na takozvani wikignoming (uljepšavanje članaka, standardiziranje, infoboxes), dodavanje slika i slično. Za pisanje cijelih članaka ipak je potrebno poznavanje gramatike. Surtsicna (talk) 14:01, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding articles.

@Surtsicna:

You are once again adding new articles that make absolutely no sense. It is near impossible to know what you are writing.

Thanks to the protection nepristupačnog the Cvrcke, Većići are the longest in northern Bosnia, the international unbalanced attacks by Serbian forces (including the air!), and then, with the huge sacrifices made by the free territories of Travnik. It is gibberish. It means nothing. At this point NOBODY can help you because you do not read, write or understand English. I do not understand what you write.

Stop writing articles. Bgwhite (talk) 07:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let me introduce my adapted article

It were my technical errors. I have had a few tray to introduce new (adapted) article Većići. But it is forbiden! Whay so brutal?

Yahadzija (talk) 08:05, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yahadzija, it is very unfortunate but we cannot understand what you are trying to say. You might be right but if no-one can understand it then it is pointless, sorry. It really would be better if you contribute to the version of Wikipedia in your own language and then find someone there (or here) who can translate your information to use here. No-one here intends to be nasty - it is just impossible to deal with. Sorry. - Sitush (talk) 11:56, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From 1954 I do not live in that area, but I only started visiting when i was heard what happened witl local citizens (mostly) 1992 I used to cooperate on creating diferent Editions, including dictionaries in Bosnian. I wrote the encyclopaedic artivles and "Who's Who" publications. With a little help from my friends, I will try that my contributions will not be on Indian English (from western movies)!

Thanks, forward!

Yahadzija (talk) 23:34, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

Yahadzija, did you see my last replies to you on my talk page? I've just been notified that you have linked Jezerka to the Vecici article. I'm sorry but your new creation is another that is full of problems to the point that it does not make a lot of sense in English. Are you using Google Translate or something similar to copy content from other Wikipedias? - Sitush (talk) 23:20, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sitush. Yahadzija is still creating articles. Kruševo Brdo Bgwhite (talk) 21:26, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yahadzija, please can you stop. Let me try to review what you have done and let's see if we can fix some of the problems before you add more problems. I will let you know when I've checked your latest efforts and will give you some advice. You are probably very close to being blocked from contributing at all to the English-language Wikipedia because of issues relating to competence. If you slow down and keep me informed then just maybe some of what you are doing will continue to exist; if you do not then it is very likely that all of your effort will be a waste of your time. - Sitush (talk) 00:16, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I need Help

Thanks for the warning. I thought it was all OK when it have confirmed by two administrators. Articles Bosanka and Jezerka years ago, I edited for the bs.wikipedia. Their extended versions I was suggested to en.wikipedia.

PS: For translation of the articles I was used duble Google translator.

Yahadzija (talk) 07:10, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not put output from Google Translator into articles. See WP:MACHINETRANSLATION. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:14, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of populated places in Bosnia and Herzegovina

added links pointing to Grič, Lipovac and Zagrađe

Bila (river)

added a link pointing to Usora

Cvrcka

added a link pointing to Čemernica

Čemernica (Bosnia and Herzegovina)

added a link pointing to Vrbas

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Sitush

Thanks, OK. Can I repair started articles?

81.93.67.150 (talk) 06:12, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to fix problems in articles that you have already created then that is okay. But, please, if you see that someone else has changed something then do not change it back for now because the chances are high that they were fixing a problem relating to your own work. If something of that type really seems wrong to you then make a note of it here and I will take a look.

I did not get round to looking at your work yesterday, sorry. I am doing so today. - Sitush (talk) 06:51, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kruševo Brdo

added links pointing to Kingdom, Vrbas and Bobovica

Grabovica (Kotor Varoš)

added a link pointing to Missing Persons

Grabovička rijeka

added a link pointing to Duboka

Kotor Varoš

added a link pointing to Zabrđe

Sadika

added a link pointing to Austrian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation proposal

Proposal:

Stopan, village in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Kotor Varoš, Šiprage)
Vrbovo, village in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Kotor Varoš, Šiprage)

Yahadzija (talk) 18:35, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jakotina disambiguation

Jakotina, river of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Kotor Varoš)
Jakotina, village in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Kotor Varoš)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Vrbanja (river)

added links pointing to Borja, Zabrđe and Čemernica

Kotor Varoš

added a link pointing to Missing Persons

Kruševica (river)

added a link pointing to Borje

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. We need to find a way forward here, sorry. - Sitush (talk) 14:02, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hr.WP and Bosnian

I "can determine why it was that they ran into trouble at hr-WP". I warned them in good faith that Bosniaks lenguage does not mean the Bosnian. Bosnian has registered an international code. It is the original and the primary reason for our breakup!

With best regards, Yahadzija (talk) 18:02, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Obodnik ‎and Kruševica (river)

We asked you not to create any new articles. I have moved Kruševica (river) to User:Yahadzija/Kruševica (river) and Obodnik to User:Yahadzija/Obodnik. Articles you create makes no sense. When you make them into a readable state, then they will be moved back. Bgwhite (talk) 21:56, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK - Thanks

OK - I'll do my best! Yahadzija (talk) 07:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Compare please ISO 639 and hr-WP

Compare, please: Documentation for ISO 639 identifier: bos Identifier: bos Name: Bosnian Status: Active Code sets: 639-2 and 639-3 Equivalent: 639-1: bs Scope: Individual

Type:Living

– VS –

^[1]

Yahadzija (talk) 07:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bo%C5%A1nja%C4%8Dki_jezik

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vrbanja (river) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

i Hercegovina (1:250.000). Izdavačko preduzeće „Sejtarija“, Sarajevo.</ref><ref>Mučibabić B., Ed. (1998: Geografski atlas Bosne i Hercegovine. Geodetski zavod BiH, Sarajevo.</ref>There are many
12_Bosnia_Herzegovina_IFOR_SFOR.doc+&cd=4&hl=bs&ct=clnk&gl=ba&client=firefoxa]</ref><ref>[http://www.dodccrp.org/html4/research_bosnia.html]</ref><ref>[http://www.icty.org/x/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:56, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Uzlomac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kruševica. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pougarje (valley), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grayling. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Šiprage may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:44, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jošavka (river) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

in which the railroad [[Banja Luka]] - [[Doboj]] - [[Sarajevo]] - [[Ploče]] and local roads (over places Ukrina (downriver Ukrina) in Doboj.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:39, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Šiprage

added links pointing to Black pine, Grayling, White pine and Autochthonous

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:33, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not eqal et all

Bosnian (bs) is not equal to Bosniak's language. Say it to hr.wikipadia, please.

Sincerely Yours, Yahadzija (talk) 12:49, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Two mistakes

Big apologize for two mistakes in the article Chromatid. Undo, please!!!

Yahadzija (talk) 20:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Vrbanja (river)

added links pointing to Borja, Zabrđe and Čemernica

Korićani

added a link pointing to Partisan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kruševica (river)

added links pointing to Borja, Usora and Bobovica

Ranča

added a link pointing to Kobilja

Vrbanja (Banja Luka)

added a link pointing to Vrbanja

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Re Evolucijska genetika čovjeka - this is the English Wikipedia. Please don't post articles here that are written in other languages. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:13, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

My big mistake!!! I apologize.

Yahadzija (talk) 22:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maslovare, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BHT, Čemernica and Kruševica. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Maezaeis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Romans, Pliny, Illyricum, Krka (river), Una, Deuri, Dalmatian and Ardian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Xg antigen system, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Europa and Navajo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blood antigens secretor-nonsecretor polymorphism

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Blood antigens secretor-nonsecretor polymorphism, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Blood antigigens secretor–nonsecretor polymorphism. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:37, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Blood antigigens secretor–nonsecretor polymorphism

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Blood antigigens secretor–nonsecretor polymorphism. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Blood antigens secretor-nonsecretor polymorphism. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Blood antigens secretor-nonsecretor polymorphism – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Everymorning talk 22:23, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AB(O)H antigens secretion

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of AB(O)H antigens secretion, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cloud-clone.us/protein-antibody-elisa/Fucosyltransferase-2(FUT2)-5192.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Mendelovska genetika čovjeka

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Mendelovska genetika čovjeka to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 00:22, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Mendelovska genetika čovjeka

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Mendelovska genetika čovjeka to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Everymorning talk 00:22, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Verry sorry! I selected the wrong enter input on my desktop. I'll translate the article into English, as sun as possible.

Yahadzija (talk) 09:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mendelovska genetika čovjeka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amerika (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Venerine rupice

Hello Yahadzija,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Venerine rupice for deletion, because it's not written in English. To request a translation, please visit the translation page. If you'd like to contribute to another Wikipedia, take a look at our full list of language projects.

If you feel that I made a mistake, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kharkiv07 (talk) 17:40, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mea culpa

My translation from en.wiki I mistakenly put on en.wiki!!!

Sorry!

Yahadzija (talk) 18:12, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Oligogene) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Oligogene, Yahadzija!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I redirected Oligogenic inheritance to this stub because it was nearly identical. Both can be discussed in one article (e.g. we don't usually create an article on a plant and a separate article on that plant's growth. All the best!

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mendelian genetics of humans exophenotype, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Morphology and Feature (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nermin Gozukirmizi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polymorphism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Nermin Gozukirmizi.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nermin Gozukirmizi.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 22:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Kromanjonac

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Kromanjonac to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. BiH (talk) 18:38, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Kromanjonac

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Kromanjonac. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Cro-Magnon. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Cro-Magnon – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Very sorry because of my big mistake!

Yahadzija (talk) 19:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Arm folding, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. You made some changes to the article, but did not improve it. The English is still poor and needs to be fixed. Therefore, I have put the {{rough translation}} template back. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:16, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ref-bombing

Please do not add 22 references for one sentence.--Zoupan 17:19, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where?

Yahadzija (talk) 17:31, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits constantly include adding multiple references (27 for one sentence), most of which don't even relate to the fact that is referenced. Also, Donji Kraji is awkwardly straying from topic. Is the article about the medieval region or the overall history of Bosanska Krajina? --Zoupan 18:10, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Major problems with English and Wikipedia policies

I do not think that you should bother continuing editing English Wikipedia, as several users have told you before, several times. There are major problems with your English (impossible to have a discussion), and your edits are machine-translated. @Bgwhite: does WP:NOTHERE apply to this user?--Zoupan 19:34, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What does your team?

Help translation of important articles, please. For the rest I am going to find translators!

Yahadzija (talk) 20:14, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Baljvine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Division, Partisan, Caravan, Borja and SKY

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baljvine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Čemernica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Color blindness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scots (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Petrovo Polje (Skender Vakuf), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages NLA and King Peter II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Bosnian endemic venison a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:58, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which of two titles is better suited to the content of the article? Or some third? Thanks in advance. Yahadzija (talk) 21:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The second title appears to be more accurate (venison in English generally refers only to deer). However, the scope of the list seems rather arbitrary: is the collective endemic game animals of Bosnia (not just individual animals) a subject that is reliable discussed as a group or set by reliable sources (see WP:LISTN)? For comparison, many countries have guidebooks and other textbooks devoted to that country's fauna that routinely list all members and hence discuss them as a set (for instance List of mammals of Bosnia and Herzegovina or List of birds of Bosnia and Herzegovina). As I mentioned here, I'm not sure if this list is in line with existing similar articles, and the validity of some animals is unclear. What we don't want are indiscriminate lists of topics that have not been reliable discussed as a set, to prevent appearance of original research. The level of deatil in this list may be more appropriate for a field guide (i.e. instructing users how to identify endemic races/subspecies) than an encyclopedia), but I think there is some valuable information that might be incorporated with existing articles, or perhaps could set the stage for a more broader list such as Endemic mammals of Bosnia. All the best, --Animalparty! (talk) 21:53, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. A note on talk pages: when communicating with a particular user on your own talk page, or any other talk page, you can ping the user(s) who otherwise may not see the message. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:53, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bosnian endemic venison, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morphology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of ancient tribes in Illyria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tribus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Šiprage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illyrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vrbanja (river), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vlašić and Bila (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stopan

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Stopan to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Zoupan 05:07, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:SCOPE and WP:PROVEIT.--Zoupan 00:15, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stopan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illyrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Grabovica, Kotor Varoš (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Union

Kotor Varoš (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Union

Kruševo Brdo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Union

Maslovare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Union

Obodnik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Union

Večići (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Union

Vrbanjci (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Union

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting issues

Hi, please note: years not linked. No dots. Unspaced en dashes.

Dots, not commas, as decimal points.

Thanks for your work. Tony (talk) 07:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Mea culpa...

Yahadzija (talk) 08:34, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cormophyte

Blanking doesn't solve the problem, please demand deleting if you are sure.Xx236 (talk) 10:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm Largoplazo. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Cormophyte without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Largo Plazo (talk) 10:09, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly different

Cormophyte and Thalophyte are very different categories!!! The first have cormus (difrentiated organs), and the second: thalus (nondifferentiated organs).

Yahadzija (talk) 10:36, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then put the page up for deletion or other disposition. The best route is through Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. Just blanking it isn't helpful. —Largo Plazo (talk) 10:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cormophyte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stem (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cormus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stalk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move warring

Stop move warring. Discuss the matter on the talk page.--Zoupan 10:19, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33

I'm issuing this formally because you were moving the article Bosnian War twice in quick succession, without consensus. Since the ratio of mentions of "bosnian war" vs. "war against bosnia" on Google Books is something like 30 : 1, using the latter title is obviously contentious and is likely to be perceived as tendentious. If you're unaware of the complexities of the topic area you're editing in, you should steer clear of it. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 13:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am very familiar with the topic. It was a classic war against Bosnian people (Bosnian state, too), including me!

Yahadzija (talk) 17:48, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't change the fact that if you want to move the page, you need to propose that move on the article talk page once you've been reverted once. Please see Wikipedia:Requested moves#Undiscussed moves. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:31, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Edits like this or this or this are disruption of wikipedia. Please refrain from editing things you don't understand. - üser:Altenmann >t 02:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Multicellular animal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[Porphyridium cruentum|Porphyridium]]''), but it is possible that they are primitivelly unicellular).<ref>Seckbach, Joseph, Chapman, David J. [eds.]. (2010). ''Red algae in the genomic age''. New

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:46, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Multicellular organism a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 17:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into the local language

The Cure Award

In 2015 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further.

Thanks again :) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Earlobe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nicobar, Brooklin and Laponia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Acceleration (human development)

The article Acceleration (human development) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Topic's notability is not shown in the article and may not exist. The term does not appear to be widely used and does not accurately described the topic. Appears to conflate two notable phenomena, with only significant information on Human height. I propose to merge the useful material there.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Carwil (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cvrcka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Čemernica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Autogamy

Please explain your blanking.Xx236 (talk) 10:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Selfing

Yahadzija (talk) 11:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC) I don't understand you. Either a redirect or deletion, not blanking.Xx236 (talk) 11:03, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rediction is for selfing!

Yahadzija (talk) 11:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The original material was not perfect, but the Selfing page is not good either. The literature that you cite is very old and not available online, and the terms were apparently used very loosely, if you are citing the sources correctly. There has been a great deal of work on the mechanisms of fertilization since the 1960s, and in particular "automixis" is not an alternative term for self-fertilization, but a particular set of mechanisms of parthenogenesis and apomixis. Please look at modern dictionaries. The term "selfing" is frequently used for self-pollination, which does not necessarily involve fertilization. We need to work together to improve this material, rather than reverting edits and blanking pages. Nadiatalent (talk) 12:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Skakavac Duboka.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Skakavac Duboka.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:18, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Selfing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nucleus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Phylogenesis may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s and 5 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:10, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Non-allelic gene interaction (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Complementation, Duplication and Suppression

Phylogenesis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Epoch, Morphology and Method

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diphosphorus tetroxide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Yahadzija. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MEDMOS and WP:PHARMOS

Please read the above two style guidelines, and please stop making changes to the structure of articles about drugs that break with these style guidelines. That said they are flexible but breaks with them need to be justified. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 17:13, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What about plenty other standards? What with the multitude of most standards?

Yahadzija (talk) 17:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jytdog per your own advise please discuss editing issues on the respective talk pages. This is a two way street. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:2CA0:251:CDDB:AF0:F9B5:C7BA (talk) 18:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Killer paramecia

Unsourced.Xx236 (talk) 09:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, You are too quick for me!

Yahadzija (talk) 09:51, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 12:01, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Autoimunity

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Autoimunity. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Autoimmunity. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Autoimmunity – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fbergo (talk) 17:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Sorry, my entry was not found article title.if my attempt can contribute to fill an existing article, I suggest installing into the appropriate segment.

Yahadzija (talk) 17:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've redirected it to the existing article. You can contribute any content there. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Antisuppressor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Antisuppressor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://books.google.com.au/books?id=N9f6CAAAQBAJ&pg=PA34. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've just deleted this and nonsense suppression, because both articles were copied from the same book. Please read about copyright - we can't accept text copied from elsewhere with no evidence of appropriate licensing. Opabinia regalis (talk) 08:13, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it correct now?

Yahadzija (talk) 15:31, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Both of "suspected" articles are copied in second part to show that the first version is not stupid as somebody claimed! Dont vorry - be happy! Yahadzija (talk) 07:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks JJMC89, apparently I forgot to follow up on this, but nonsense suppression was also a problem, with very close paraphrasing to the point of outright copyvio. Also, Yahadzija, if you want to write biology articles you should be using sources that are current. A genetics glossary from 1976 is too old to be reliable for our purposes. Opabinia regalis (talk) 23:04, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know the differencwes between classical and modern definitioms of classical genetics terms?

Question is now? Yahadzija (talk) 23:47, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Your addition to Institute for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (INGEB), Sarajevo has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diana, thank you for your message. Pleasee note that used material is form a public domain with permission from the legal representative of the institution. Please advise on how this should be cited in Wikipedia materials.

Thanking you in advance, Yahadzija (talk) 10:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Triptofan tRNK-ligaza

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Triptofan tRNK-ligaza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Empire3131 (talk) 00:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Izogamija

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Izogamija requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! (Talk | Contributions) 09:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Epistasis a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into non-allelic gene interaction. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you.

This is verry partly download. I appreciate your advice, but I do not know how to achieve it. I think that both Article are needed. Non-allelic gene interaction is omnipresent.

Yahadzija (talk) 01:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oligogene

The article Oligogene has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This should be a dictionary definition (and all the sources are dictionaries), not a wikipedia article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Natureium (talk) 16:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have to! Because, someone doubted the accuracy of the definition that I have given!

Yahadzija (talk) 17:28, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Maezaeis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Illyricum

Previle Municipality, Kotor Varoš (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Macedonians

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Stecak-Siprage.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stecak-Siprage.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following licenses:

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.

If this file is eligible for relicensing, it may also be used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license.
The relicensing status of this image has not yet been reviewed. You can help.

You may select the license of your choice.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ilomska waterfalls (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Vlašić and Kneževo

Non-effective conjugation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Crossing over

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting

Please stop reverting and read WP:BRD and WP:3RR. Thanks. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 22:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Turbe, Travnik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kanton

Ukrina (river) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bosna

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Turbe, Travnik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Disruptive

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Šiprage. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Zoupan 20:51, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kotor Varoš, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Borje (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Adaptive type (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Feature, Type and Population structure

Ćorkovići, Kotor Varoš (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vitovlje

Šiprage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Spring

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Batonski.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Batonski.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 12:01, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Nine springs (2).jpg

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.

If this file is eligible for relicensing, it may also be used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license.
The relicensing status of this image has not yet been reviewed. You can help.

Thanks for uploading File:Nine springs (2).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:45, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Ilomska confluent basin.jpg

Template:GFLD

Thanks for uploading File:Ilomska confluent basin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Ploca-1.jpg

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.

If this file is eligible for relicensing, it may also be used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license.
The relicensing status of this image has not yet been reviewed. You can help.

Thanks for uploading File:Ploca-1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:01, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Waterfalls of Ilomska.jpg

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.

If this file is eligible for relicensing, it may also be used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license.
The relicensing status of this image has not yet been reviewed. You can help.

You blocked me at the File:Waterfalls of Ilomska.jpg?! Give me a oportunity for all of images...Yahadzija (talk) 23:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Waterfalls of Ilomska.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:45, 3 May 2017 (UTC) Template:GFLD[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Waterfalls of Ilomska.jpg

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.

If this file is eligible for relicensing, it may also be used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license.
The relicensing status of this image has not yet been reviewed. You can help.

A tag has been placed on File:Waterfalls of Ilomska.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 04:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please stop uploading copyright violations

Please stop uploading images that do not belong to you. Repeated copyright violations will result in your editing privileges being revoked. Anything you find online is considered to be copyrighted. Just because it is online does not mean it is licensed under a license we can use. If you have any questions please feel free to ask me but please stop uploading images. Majora (talk) 04:39, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop suspect all of my own images. A few online images are my records!

To whom should I improve the copyrights of my original images?! Yahadzija (talk) 07:31, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where images are genuinely your own creation, uploading them and releasing them under the CC-BY-SA or GFDL licenses is fine. But taking a photograph of a work, or modifying the work, does not make you the original author or make the image and original image. Scanning a photograph, or taking a photograph of a photograph, does not create an original image that you own, unless you also took the photograph you are scanning. Whoever took the original photograph still retains the copyright in the image and you must not upload such images to Wikipedia, except where they qualify for fair use.; If you continue to upload such images, you are very likely to be banned from doing so or blocked from editing altogether. I can't promise that you won't be banned or blocked on the basis of the files you've already uploaded, but commenting on the discussion at ANI, demonstrating that you understand what the problems are, will help you to avoid it. GoldenRing (talk) 23:26, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What is deadline-term of blockade? Stop insult me, please...

Yahadzija (talk) 09:25, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Ilomska-sliv.jpg

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.

If this file is eligible for relicensing, it may also be used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license.
The relicensing status of this image has not yet been reviewed. You can help.

Thanks for uploading File:Ilomska-sliv.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:45, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Cross project image copyvios. Majora (talk) 21:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changes in template documentations

Hello Yahadzija, I noticed you changed the template documentation at Template:No copyright information/doc and Template:PD-self/doc, and have reverted these changes. These /doc pages should only contain general-purpose documentation for all Wikipedia editors, not user-specific personal copyright statements. If you'd like to add additional information about your own uploads, please edit the image description pages of these files directly instead. Please make also sure to read the advice and messages above. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 22:17, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stecak-Siprage.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stecak-Siprage.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GFLD

File:Crna rijeka, Tributary of Ilomska.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Crna rijeka, Tributary of Ilomska.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Antisuppressor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Antisuppressor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://books.google.com.au/books?id=N9f6CAAAQBAJ&pg=PA34. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:43, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What's difference between classical and modern definitions of classical terms? Question is now?!

May 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:44, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Yahadzija (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Someone claimed that the article was stupid so I duly quoted the right authors and the text under quotation marks Yahadzija (talk) 11:12, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Technical only, the block has expired. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:22, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's the uploading of files with questionable copyright that's the problem, as described at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Cross project image copyvios (~~hmm, it looks like nobody informed you of that - I'd assumed they had, sorry~~). If you agree to not upload any more files until that discussion has concluded and to comply with any outcome, I'll be happy to lift the block. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:32, 5 May 2017 (UTC) (No, I see you were informed, here and I missed it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:36, 5 May 2017 (UTC))[reply]

What time is it?

Zebedee, You are not correct administrator! You do violence against my original images & my work at all. Invalid license is not a reason for delete of original images. Help me in license selection for my orihinal photos Yahadzija (talk) 09:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, yes, an invalid license *is* a very good reason for deleting uploaded images. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:56, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not justified blockade

Hi Zebedee, Why are you doing it?!

My own pictures from the field and private collections can not be violation of the rules and criteria. Are these the original recordings of museum exhibits? Your suspicion is hasty and unfounded!

Let me a fair wiki-activity Yahadzija (talk) 09:37, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said above, if you agree to not upload any files until that discussion is concluded, I will be happy to lift the block. After that, you must abide by the conclusion of the discussion. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blockade time is off one hour ago?! Yahadzija (talk) 09

58, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

OK, yes, the block has expired - I had forgotten it was so short. Please do not upload any more files while the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Cross project image copyvios is still open - but please do take part in it and provide your thoughts. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:21, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As soon as the previous block expired, you have resumed your copyright violations. To protect the integrity of the Wikipedia, I have replaced your block. --Yamla (talk) 11:27, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Deblockade request Yahadzija (talk) 11:52, 6 May 2017 (UTC) Yahadzija (talk) 11:52, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla's blockade is ununderstanding, without of real reasons. Which violation?! This is not a race of few seconds!Yahadzija (talk) 11: 55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Deblockade request for: 92.36.223.54, a oznaka blokade je #7459566.

Yahadzija (talk) 12:32, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yahadzija (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The background or reason isn't constructive. Please check the justification of reasons for blocking. See text above and my overall contributions. Yahadzija (talk) 21:01, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're blocked until you agree not to upload any images, or demonstrate an understanding of copyright. PhilKnight (talk) 00:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Deblockade request

Yamla blocked me permanently in the period when I had to be unblocked. Does it deserve such a rigorous blockade?! With best regards, Yahadzija (talk) 12:49, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You need to make a proper unblock request using {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yahadzija (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yamla blocked me permanently in the period when I had to be unblocked. Does it deserve such a rigorous blockade?! See my contributions in en-wiki and others Yahadzija (talk) 12:59, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This block followed the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Cross project image copyvios in which you elected not to participate. In order to be unblocked you will need either to recuse yourself from any editing involving images or convincingly demonstrate that you understand our copyright and images policies and that you will henceforth comply with those policies. Just Chilling (talk) 20:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yahadzija (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for the mistakes and misunderstandings about the expiry of the previous blockade Yahadzija (talk) 12:24, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This still doesn't show that you understand the reason for your block, namely the uploading of copyrighted pictures. You have to demonstrate that you understand our copyright policies with regards to imaging. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:29, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Yahadzija (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This blockage is the result of a misunderstanding. I realized my mistakes and apologize besause it! I can write more good articles: See my statistics and articles in Genetics and Geography of Bosnia

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This blockage is the result of a misunderstanding. I realized my mistakes and apologize besause it! I can write more good articles: See my statistics and articles in [[Genetics]] and Geography of Bosnia |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This blockage is the result of a misunderstanding. I realized my mistakes and apologize besause it! I can write more good articles: See my statistics and articles in [[Genetics]] and Geography of Bosnia |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This blockage is the result of a misunderstanding. I realized my mistakes and apologize besause it! I can write more good articles: See my statistics and articles in [[Genetics]] and Geography of Bosnia |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Yahadzija (talk) 22:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

?!

I just uploaded the original of my images. Yahadzija (talk) 09:40, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you're just going to scan photos, at least try to make them before 1923. Then, in the US, it's free. If you're planning to take photos of buildings, or objects, go ahead! I do know that you're blocked, and I could upload them if you send me a link, but they'll have to be free first. —JJ Be rs 15:06, 10 May 2017 (UTC) (I thought this editor was only a temp. block, not indef)[reply]

Please do not do this. While the user is blocked, they are not permitted to edit Wikipedia. This includes convincing other editors to edit on their behalf. See WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK. --Yamla (talk) 15:28, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All of my (original!) images are very important for my homeland! Yahadzija (talk) What is the problem (to hard) Yamla? Yahadzija (talk) 15:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is, you don't understand WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FU. For example, you claim to have personally taken a picture in 1943 (File:Pioneer troop in Šiprage, 1943.jpg), but we believe you simply scanned that picture. Once you can convince us you understand WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FU, we will be happy to unblock you.

It is true that I personally copied the image from my family collection. I could give it to anyone who wants, including You&Comp. Yahadzija (talk) 16:32, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]: Please fix your signature. It's broken. It's using a massive font and not even closing that font correctly. So, yes, thank you for admitting you are providing the wrong information on your image uploads. You'll have to stop doing that. That's required by WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FU. Once you convince us you understand all of this, any admin is welcome to unblock you. --Yamla (talk) 16:52, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, indeed, you *do not own the copyright* of a photo and it *is not your own work* just because you scanned it from a family album. Ownership of a print of a photograph *does not* convey copyright ownership of the image. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My mission

I participate in Wikipedias because I have a lot of unique sources of information and images from my homeland. Please be patient and helpful in the selection of licenses. Thanks a lot, in advance! What license do Yo suggest Zebedee, Haugh Yahadzija (talk) 17:06, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a question of selecting the right license! I'm suggesting that you might not have the right to upload it at all, and that the only images you can upload are ones you actually took yourself personally. If you did not take the original photo yourself, and you can not prove that whoever did has released it with a suitable license (or that its copyright has expired), then Wikipedia can not use it unless there is a valid fair use rationale (and I strongly suggest you don't even try to think of those until you have properly understood copyright itself). Now, the only way you are likely to be unblocked is if you agree not to upload any more images at all, and not add any more images to any articles, until the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Cross project image copyvios has concluded - and that you agree to take part in that discussion and abide by its outcome. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am the exclusive owner of photographs and author of copies. It would be strange if Wikipedia does not accept such gifts. I will seek another medium that will gladly accept. User talk:Haugh said Yahadzija Yahadzija (talk) 17:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"I am the exclusive owner of photographs and author of copies" is meaningless from a copyright perspective. Did you take the photos yourself, personally, with a camera? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:42, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, with 2-3 exceptions! I take the photos myself, personally, with different cameras. Yahadzija (talk) 17:46, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then the ones you took yourself you should probably be able to use, but not the others. What you need to do now is agree (temporarily) to not upload any more photos or add any photos to articles until you have discussed things at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Cross project image copyvios (and explain there what you have told me here) and you get an agreement by consensus for you to continue. Will you agree to that? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I expect answer, advice and recommendations. I'm not a liar nor a fraud...Yahadzija (talk) 18:22, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rifat_Had%C5%BEiselimovi%C4%87

Unblocked

On your assurance, above, that you will stop doing any image work until the discussion is completed, I have unblocked your account. Please now go over to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Cross project image copyvios and explain there that you will only upload photos you have actually taken yourself, and that you will also not copy any text from other places into Wikipedia, and wait until you get a decision there. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:36, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

I unblocked you under the strict condition that you did not upload any more images and did not add any more images to articles, but instead engaged in the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Cross project image copyvios and wait for and abide by its outcome. And you immediately added an image to an article again, with no attempt to join in that discussion. As you have abused my good faith, my unblock is therefore rescinded and you are indefinitely blocked again. I have done all I can to try to help, so I'm finished here now. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What play do You do

My former image Siprage.jpg you have returned (as Šiprage.jpeg), not me. I respected the recommendations. Why are you playing with my work? Yahadzija (talk) 08:32, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is you adding the image to an article, which violated the conditions under which I unblocked you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:36, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image Šiprage.jpeg returned Coommons (See history of it uplauding and deletion). I realized that the time allowed to their undisputed picture back in its place.Yahadzija (talk) 08: 50, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

I'm going further

I'm tired of your inconsistencies. I'm going further to more constructive media... See You... Yahadzija (talk) 10:01, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You could join this site (I have no clue how it works). —JJ Be rs 14:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
With pleasure, but how?!

Yahadzija (talk) 15:32, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You could look it up, but here's a link: Link. —JJ Be rs 15:54, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yahadzija (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unclear reasons of last nor new blocking

Decline reason:

This is not a valid appeal rationale - see WP:GAB. If you need further clarification of the reasoning behind your block then you may post a new message on this page. Please note that you do seem to have been given a full explanation and too many pointless requests may lead to your access to this page being revoked. Just Chilling (talk) 12:56, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I thought my explanation in the "Blocked again" section above was clear. If you cannot understand it, perhaps your command of English is insufficient for you to be working on the English language Wikipedia. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:16, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your answer is clear, but blockade reason not at all.

Yahadzija (talk) 13:07, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My unblock request #7470646

At what stage is my unblock request? Yahadzija (talk) 10:58, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your previous unblock requests have been declined and you have not made a new one on this page, so you do not have a current unblock request at any stage that can be addressed here. If you have made a WP:UTRS unblock request (which I guess from the "#7470646") then you would need to contact WP:UTRS again to ask about progress. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:00, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When You the file Siprage.jpg return to the Commons (as Šiprage.jpg), I have used it, but not before that. Why am I penalized?

Yahadzija (talk) 13:15, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You agreed "(temporarily) to not upload any more photos or add any photos to articles until you have discussed things at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Cross project image copyvios (and explain there what you have told me here) and you get an agreement by consensus for you to continue." (emphasis mine) This was the basis for your unblock. This agreement is the reason you were unblocked. Yet you violated that agreement by adding that photo to the article. And you violated the agreement by not discussing the situation, as you said you would. --Yamla (talk) 13:21, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. Restoring quoted image on Commons I understood as approval for the continuation of cooperation!

Yahadzija (talk) 13:56, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is going on?

What is going on with my unblock request?! Yahadzija (talk) 18:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have no open unblock request as far as I can see. It's unlikely one would be granted to you at the moment either, but you are welcome to request one. --Yamla (talk) 18:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request, again

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yahadzija (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think that last time I was unreasonably blocked. I used the image that had been returned to the Commons. Is it a big mistake?

Decline reason:

Boing has explained the reason for your block below. You violated the terms of your unblock. SQL ^{Query me!} 18:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yahadzija (talk) 19:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You "used the image that had been returned to the Commons" after explicitly agreeing not to use any images at all as a condition of your previous unblock (at least until your uploading of images had been resolved). And that has been explained to you several times already. You really don't seem to understand what is being said here, so I can't help thinking your English might not be sufficient for you to contribute to the English Wikipedia and maybe you should stick to the Wikipedia in your native language? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:57, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will it make you happy to dispel the associates? Yahadzija (talk) 17:23, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't the faintest idea what that means, because it is not coherent English. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yahadzija (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dont worry - be happy! Let me work...Yahadzija (talk) 18:51, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. you must first address the reasons for your block.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Yahadzija (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18337 was submitted on May 19, 2017 20:49:40. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:49, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock appeal

The Unblock appeal suggests to turn this way.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yahadzija (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This blockage is the result of a misunderstanding. I can write more good articles: See my statistics. IP-address: 89.111.226.75, Blockade #7470646.

Decline reason:

I see no indication that you understand why you were blocked or that you would be able to avoid further such "misunderrstandings" if I unblocked you. Huon (talk) 08:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yahadzija (talk) 22:06, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Team answer

Hello Yahadzija,

As you still have access to your talk page, and as there is no private information associated with your appeal, please post your unblock request to your user talk page for administrator review. You can follow these instructions.

Thank you,

Just Chilling English Wikipedia Administrator

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yahadzija (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I repeat:This blockage is the result of a misunderstanding. I can write more good articles: See my statistics and articles in Genetics and Bosnian Geogtaphy.

Decline reason:

Only one request is required. Closing this one, but leaving the older one open. SQL ^{Query me!} 03:36, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yahadzija (talk) 09:08, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Miroslav Džaja (1995): Pougarje i njegova okolica. Monografija

[2] Spahić M. et al. (2000): Bosna i Hercegovina (1:250.000). Izdavačko preduzeće „Sejtarija“, Sarajevo.

[3] Mučibabić B., Ur. (1998): Geografski atlas Bosne i Hercegovine. Geodetski zavod BiH,Sarajevo.

[4] ttp://www.rhmzrs.com/

[5] ttps://maps.google.com/]

[6] ttp://www.maplandia.com/bosnia-and-herzegovina/federacija-bosne-i-hercegovine/vlasic/

[7] ttp://www.go2bosnia.com/upoznaj-bih/75-rijeka-ilomska-i-njeni-vodopadi

[8] [1]

[9] [2]

[10] [3]

[11] ttps://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bo%C5%A1nja%C4%8Dki_jezik

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[1]