Novichok
Part of a series on | |||
Chemical agents | |||
---|---|---|---|
Lethal agents | |||
Incapacitating agents | |||
|
|||
Novichok (Russian: Новичо́к, "newcomer") is a series of nerve agents developed by the Soviet Union in the 1970s and 1980s.[1] Russian scientists who developed the agents claim they are the most deadly nerve agents ever made, with some variants possibly five to eight times more potent than VX.[2][3] They were designed as part of a Soviet program codenamed "Foliant".[4] Initially designated K-84 and later renamed A-230, there are more than 100 Novichok variants.[5] The most versatile was A-232 (Novichok-5).[6]
Novichok agents have never been used on the battlefield. Theresa May, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, said that one such agent was used in the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in England in March 2018.[7] Russia officially denies producing or researching Novichok agents.[8]
In 2013 the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons Scientific Advisory Board reported that it had insufficient information to comment on the existence or properties of Novichok agents,[9] and in 2011 it noted there was no peer reviewed paper on Novichok agents in scientific literature.[10]
Design objectives
These agents were designed to achieve four objectives:[11][12]
- To be undetectable using standard 1970s and 80s NATO chemical detection equipment;
- To defeat NATO chemical protective gear;
- To be safer to handle;
- To circumvent the Chemical Weapons Convention list of controlled precursors, classes of chemical and physical form.
All these objectives were claimed to have been achieved.
Some of these agents are binary weapons, in which precursors for the nerve agents are mixed in a munition to produce the agent just prior to its use. Because the precursors are generally significantly less hazardous than the agents themselves, this technique makes handling and transporting the munitions a great deal simpler. Additionally, precursors to the agents are usually much easier to stabilize than the agents themselves, so this technique also made it possible to increase the shelf life of the agents. This has the disadvantage that careless preparation may produce a non-optimal agent. During the 1980s and 1990s, binary versions of several Soviet agents were developed and are designated as "Novichok" agents.
Disclosure
Extremely potent fourth-generation chemical weapons were developed in the Soviet Union and Russia from the 1970s until the early 1990s, according to a publication by two chemists, Lev Fedorov and Vil Mirzayanov in Moskovskiye Novosti weekly in 1992.[13][14][a] The publication appeared just on the eve of Russia's signing of the Chemical Weapons Convention. According to Mirzayanov, the Russian Military Chemical Complex (MCC) was using defense conversion money received from the West for development of a chemical warfare facility.[2][3] Mirzayanov made his disclosure out of environmental concerns. He was a head of a counter-intelligence department and performed measurements outside the chemical weapons facilities to make sure that foreign spies could not detect any traces of production. To his horror, the levels of deadly substances were 80 times greater than the maximum safe concentration.[3][15]
The existence of Novichok agents was admitted by Russian military industrial complex authorities when they brought a treason case against Mirzayanov. According to expert witness testimonies prepared for the KGB by three scientists, Novichok and other related chemical agents had indeed been produced and therefore the disclosure by Mirzayanov represented high treason.[b]
Mirzayanov was arrested on 22 October 1992 and sent to Lefortovo prison for divulging state secrets. He was released later because "not one of the formulas or names of poisonous substances in the Moscow News article was new to the Soviet press, nor were locations ... of testing sites revealed."[3] According to Yevgenia Albats, "the real state secret revealed by Fyodorov and Mirzayanov was that generals had lied—and were still lying—to both the international community and their fellow citizens."[3] Mirzayanov now lives in the U.S.[17]
Further disclosures followed when Vladimir Uglev, one of Russia's leading binary weapons scientists, revealed the existence of A-232/Novichok-5 in an interview with the magazine Novoye Vremya in early 1994.[18]
Development and test sites
Stephanie Fitzpatrick, an American geopolitical consultant, has claimed that Novichok agents were produced at the Chemical Research Institute in Nukus, Soviet Uzbekistan,[19] and The New York Times has reported that U.S. officials said the site was the major research and testing site for Novichok agents.[20][21] Small, experimental batches of the weapons may have been tested on the nearby Ustyurt plateau.[21] Fitzpatrick also writes that the agents may have been tested in a research centre in Krasnoarmeysk near Moscow.[19] Precursor chemicals were made at the Pavlodar Chemical Plant in Soviet Kazakhstan, which was also thought to be the intended Novichok weapons production site, until its still-under-construction chemical warfare agent production building was demolished in 1987 in view of the forthcoming Chemical Weapons Convention.[22][23]
Since its independence in 1991, Uzbekistan has been working with the government of the United States to dismantle and decontaminate the sites where the Novichok agents and other chemical weapons were tested and developed.[19][21] Between 1999[24] and 2002 the United States Department of Defense dismantled the major research and testing site for Novichok at the Chemical Research Institute in Nukus, under a $6 million Cooperative Threat Reduction program.[20][25]
Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, a British chemical weapons expert and former commanding officer of the UK's Joint Chemical, Biological, Radiation and Nuclear Regiment and its NATO equivalent, "dismissed" suggestions that Novichok agents could be found in other places in the former Soviet Union such as Uzbekistan and has asserted that Novichok agents were only produced at Shikhany in Saratov Oblast, Russia.[26] Mirzayanov also says that it was at Shikhany, in 1973, that Novichok was first produced by scientist Pyotr Petrovich Kirpichev; Kirpichev was joined on the project by Vladimir Uglev in 1975. According to Mirzayanov, while production took place in Shikhany, the weapon was tested at Nukus between 1986–1989.[27]
Description of Novichok agents
The first description of these agents was provided by Mirzayanov.[15] Dispersed in an ultra-fine powder instead of a gas or a vapor, they have unique qualities. A binary agent was then created that would mimic the same properties but would either be manufactured using materials legal under the CWT[17] or be undetectable by treaty regime inspections.[21] The most potent compounds from this family, Novichok-5 and Novichok-7, are supposedly around five to eight times more potent than VX.[32] The "Novichok" designation refers to the binary form of the agent, with the final compound being referred to by its code number (e.g. A-232). The first Novichok series compound was in fact the binary form of a known V-series nerve agent, VR, while the later Novichok agents are the binary forms of compounds such as A-232.[33]
Mirzayanov gives somewhat different structures for Novichok agents in his autobiography to those which have been identified by Western experts. He makes clear that a large number of compounds were made, and many of the less potent derivatives were reported in the open literature as new organophosphate insecticides so that the secret chemical weapons program could be disguised as legitimate pesticide research.
The agents are reportedly capable of being delivered as a liquid, aerosol or gas via a variety of systems, including artillery shells, bombs, missiles and spraying devices.[19]
- Chemistry
A wide range of potential structures have been reported. These all feature the classical organophosphorus core (sometimes with the P=O replaced with P=S or P=Se), which is most commonly depicted as being a phosphoramidate or phosphonate, usually fluorinated (c.f. monofluorophosphate). The organic groups are subject to more variety; however, a common substituent is phosgene oxime or analogues thereof. This is a potent chemical weapon in its own right, specifically as a nettle agent, and would be expected to increase the harm done by the Novichok agent. Many claimed structures from this group also contain cross-linking agent motifs which may covalently bind to the acetylcholinesterase active site in several places, perhaps explaining the rapid denaturing of the enzyme that is claimed to be characteristic of the Novichok agents.
Effects
As nerve agents, the Novichok agents belong to the class of organophosphate acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. These chemical compounds inhibit the enzyme acetylcholinesterase, preventing the normal breakdown of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine. Acetylcholine concentrations then increase at neuromuscular junctions to cause involuntary contraction of all muscles. This then leads to respiratory and cardiac arrest (as the victim's heart and diaphragm muscles no longer function normally) and finally death from heart failure or suffocation as copious fluid secretions fill the victim's lungs.[34]
The use of a fast-acting peripheral anticholinergic drug such as atropine can block the receptors where acetylcholine acts to prevent poisoning (as in the treatment for poisoning by other acetylcholinesterase inhibitors). Atropine, however, is difficult to administer safely, because its effective dose for nerve agent poisoning is close to the dose at which patients suffer severe side effects such as changes in heart rate and thickening of the bronchial secretions which fill the lungs of someone suffering nerve agent poisoning, so that suctioning of these secretions and other advanced life support techniques may be necessary in addition to administration of atropine to treat nerve agent poisoning.[34]
In the treatment of nerve agent poisoning, atropine is most often administered along with a Hagedorn oxime such as pralidoxime, obidoxime, TMB-4, HI-6 which reactivates acetylcholinesterase which has been inactivated by phosphorylation by an organophosphorus nerve agent and relieves the respiratory muscle paralysis caused by some nerve agents. Pralidoxime is not effective in reactivating acetylcholinesterase inhibited by some older nerve agents such as soman[34] or the Novichok nerve agents, described in the literature as being up to 8 times more toxic than nerve agent VX.[35]
The agents may cause lasting nerve damage, resulting in permanent disablement of victims, according to Russian scientists.[36] Their effect on humans was demonstrated by the accidental exposure of Andrei Zheleznyakov, one of the scientists involved in their development, to the residue of an unspecified Novichok agent while working in a Moscow laboratory in May 1987. He was critically injured and took ten days to recover consciousness after the incident. He lost the ability to walk and was treated at a secret clinic in Leningrad for three months afterwards. The agent caused permanent harm, with effects that included "chronic weakness in his arms, a toxic hepatitis that gave rise to cirrhosis of the liver, epilepsy, spells of severe depression, and an inability to read or concentrate that left him totally disabled and unable to work." He never recovered and died in July 1992 after five years of deteriorating health.[37]
Use
1995 poisoning
A Novichok agent was reportedly used in 1995 to poison Russian banker Ivan Kivelidi, the head of the Russian Business Round Table, and Zara Ismailova, his secretary.[38][39][40] Vladimir Khutsishvili, a former business partner of the banker, was subsequently convicted for the killings.[38][41][42] The murder became "one of the first in the series of poisonings organized by Russia's security services", according to Yuri Felshtinsky and Vladimir Pribylovsky.
The Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs analyzed the substance and announced that it was a phosphorus-based nerve agent "whose formula was strictly classified".[43] According to Nesterov, the administrative head of Shikhany, he did not know of "a single case of such poison being sold illegally" and noted that the poison "is used by professional spies".[44]
2018 UK attack
On 12 March 2018, the UK government said that a Novichok agent had been used in an attack in the English city of Salisbury on 4 March 2018 in an attempt to kill former GRU officer Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia.[45] British Prime Minister Theresa May said in Parliament: "Either this was a direct action by the Russian state against our country, or the Russian government lost control of its potentially catastrophically damaging nerve agent and allowed it to get into the hands of others."[45] On 14 March 2018, the UK expelled 23 Russian diplomats after the Russian government refused to meet the UK's deadline of midnight on 13 March 2018 to give an explanation for the use of the weapon.[46].
After the attack, 21 members of the emergency services and public were checked for possible exposure, and three were hospitalised. As of 12 March, one police officer remained in hospital.[45] Five hundred members of the public were advised to decontaminate their possessions to prevent possible long-term exposure, and 180 members of the military and 18 vehicles were deployed to assist with decontamination at locations in and around Salisbury. The exact location of the attack has not been released.[45][47][48] Addressing the United Nations Security Council, Vassily Nebenzia, the Russian envoy to the UN, responded to the British allegations by denying that Russia had ever produced or researched the agents, stating: "No scientific research or development under the title novichok were carried out."[8]
Daniel Gerstein, a former senior official at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, said it was possible that Novichok nerve agents had been used before in Britain to assassinate Kremlin targets, but had not been detected: "It's entirely likely that we have seen someone expire from this and not realized it. We realized in this case because they were found unresponsive on a park bench. Had it been a higher dose, maybe they would have died and we would have thought it was natural causes."[49]
See also
References
Notes
- ^ Much of this information was published earlier in the newspaper Top Secret run by Artyom Borovik in September 1991. However the KGB did not arrest Mirzayanov earlier due to political turmoil in Russia at this time, according to a book by Yevgenia Albats
- ^ "[T]he talk [by Mirzayanov] about binary weapons was no more than a verbal construct, an argument ex adverso, and only the MCC [Russian Military Chemical Complex] could corroborate or refute this natural assumption. By entangling V. S. Mirzayanov in investigation, the MCC confirmed the stated hypothesis, advancing it to the ranks of proven facts."[16]
References
- ^ Tucker 2006, p. 232-233
- ^ a b Birstein 2004, p. 110
- ^ a b c d e Albats 1994, p. 325-328
- ^ Tucker 2006, p. 231
- ^ Tucker 2006, p. 233
- ^ Tucker 2006, p. 253
- ^ Barry, Ellen; Pérez-Peña, Richard (12 March 2018). "Britain Blames Russia for Nerve Agent Attack on Former Spy". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 March 2018.
- ^ a b Borger, Julian (15 March 2018). "UK spy poisoning: Russia tells UN it did not make nerve agent used in attack". The Guardian. Retrieved 15 March 2018.
- ^ Report of the Scientific Advisory Board on developments in science and technology for the Third Review Conference (PDF) (Report). Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. 27 March 2013. p. 3. RC-3/WP.1. Retrieved 15 March 2018.
- ^ Report of the Sixteenth Session of the Scientific Advisory Board (PDF) (Report). Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. 6 April 2011. p. 7. SAB-16/1. Retrieved 15 March 2018.
- ^ Salem & Katz 2014, p. 498-499
- ^ Kendall et al. 2008, p. 136
- ^ Darling & Noste 2016
- ^ Fedorov, Lev; Mirzayanov, Vil (1992). "Poisoned Politics". Moskovskiye Novosti. No. 39.
- ^ a b "Chemical Weapons Disarmament in Russia: Problems and Prospects; Dismantling the Soviet/Russian Chemical Weapons Complex: An Insider's View". Henry L. Stimson Center, Washington, D.C. 13 October 1995.
- ^ Fedorov, Lev (27 July 1994), Chemical Weapons in Russia: History, Ecology, Politics, retrieved 13 March 2018
- ^ a b Hoffman, David (16 August 1998). "Wastes of War: Soviets Reportedly Built Weapon Despite Pact". The Washington Post. Retrieved 20 July 2007.
- ^ Waller, J. Michael (13 February 1997). "The Chemical Weapons Coverup". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 14 March 2018.
- ^ a b c d Croddy, Wirtz & Larsen 2001, p. 201–202
- ^ a b Miller, Judith (25 May 1999). "U.S. and Uzbeks Agree on Chemical Arms Plant Cleanup". The New York Times. Retrieved 13 March 2018.
- ^ a b c d Hidalgo, Louise (9 August 1999). "US dismantles chemical weapons". BBC News. Retrieved 20 July 2007.
- ^ "Kazakhstan - Chemical". Nuclear Threat Initiative. April 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2018.
- ^ Bozheyeva, Gulbarshyn (Summer 2000). The Pavlodar Chemical Weapons Plant in Kazakhstan: History and Legacy (PDF) (Report). The Nonproliferation Review. Retrieved 14 March 2018.
- ^ Hogan, Beatrice (19 August 1999). "Uzbekistan: U.S. Begins Survey Of Chemical Weapons Plant". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Retrieved 14 March 2018.
- ^ Wolf, John S. (19 March 2003). "Hearing, First Session". Committee on Foreign Relations. United States Senate. Retrieved 13 March 2018.
Hon. John S. Wolf, Assistant Secretary of State for Nonproliferation: ... DOD completed a project to dismantle the former Soviet CW research facility at Nukus, Uzbekistan in FY 2002.
- ^ MacAskill, Ewen (14 March 2018). "Novichok: nerve agent produced at only one site in Russia, says expert". The Guardian. Retrieved 15 March 2018.
- ^ Birstein 2004, p. 110
- ^ Hoenig 2007, p. 79-80
- ^ Mirzayanov 2008, p. 142-145, 179-180
- ^ Ellison, D. Hank (2007). Handbook of Chemical and Biological Warfare Agents. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-420-00329-1.
- ^ Gupta 2015, p. 339–340
- ^ Foldi L, Vasarhelyi G. History of Russia’s chemical weapons. AARMS 2007; 6(1):135-146.
- ^ Peplow, Mark (13 March 2018), "Nerve agent attack on spy used 'Novichok' poison", Chemical & Engineering News, vol. 96, no. 12, p. 3
- ^ a b c Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. (30 September 2009). "LABEL: DUODOTE- atropine and pralidoxime chloride". Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health. Retrieved 9 April 2016.
- ^ Gupta 2015, p. 339–340
- ^ Stewart, Charles Edward (2006). Weapons of Mass Casualties and Terrorism Response Handbook. Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN 9780763724252.
- ^ Tucker 2006, p. 273
- ^ a b "И яд следовал за ним". Kommersant. 13 March 2018. Retrieved 13 March 2018.
- ^ Stanley, Alessandra (9 August 1995). "To the Business Risks in Russia, Add Poisoning". The New York Times. Retrieved 13 March 2018.
- ^ McGregor 2011, p. 166
- ^ "Theresa May accuses Russia of involvement in Skripal's poisoning, as Russian-made prohibited substance discovered". Crime Russia. 13 March 2018. Retrieved 13 March 2018.
- ^ Stewart, Will (13 March 2018). "Were these the first victims of nerve agent Novichok? Russian banker and secretary 'assassinated' in mysterious circumstances 20 years ago". Daily Mirror. Retrieved 13 March 2018.
- ^ Felshtinsky & Pribylovsky 2009, p. 453-457
- ^ Felshtinsky & Pribylovsky 2009, p. 453-457
- ^ a b c d "Russian spy: Highly likely Moscow behind attack, says Theresa May". BBC News. 12 March 2018. Retrieved 12 March 2018.
- ^ "Russian spy: UK to expel 23 Russian diplomats". BBC News. 14 March 2018. Retrieved 14 March 2018.
- ^ "Military deployed after spy poisoning". BBC News. 9 March 2018. Retrieved 9 March 2018.
- ^ "What are Novichok nerve agents?". BBC News. 12 March 2018. Retrieved 13 March 2018.
- ^ Barry, Ellen; Yeginsu, Ceylan (13 March 2018). "The nerve agent too deadly to use—until someone did in Britain". The New York Times. Retrieved 14 March 2018.
Bibliography
- Albats, Yevgenia (1994), The State Within a State: The KGB and Its Hold on Russia — Past, Present, and Future, translated by Fitzpatrick, Catherine A., New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux, ISBN 978-0-374-18104-8
- Birstein, Vadim J. (2004), The Perversion Of Knowledge: The True Story of Soviet Science, Westview Press, ISBN 0-8133-4280-5
- Darling, Robert G.; Noste, Erin E. (2016), "Future Biological and Chemical Weapons", in Ciottone, Gregory R. (ed.), Ciottone's Disaster Medicine (Second ed.), Amsterdam: Elsevier, doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-28665-7.00080-7
- Croddy, Eric A.; Wirtz, James J.; Larsen, Jeffrey A., eds. (2001), Weapons of Mass Destruction: The Essential Reference Guide, ABC-CLIO, ISBN 978-1-851-09490-5
- Felshtinsky, Yuri; Pribylovsky, Vladimir (2009), The Corporation: Russia and the KGB in the Age of President Putin, London: Encounter Books, ISBN 978-1-594-03246-2
{{citation}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|1=
(help) - Gupta, Ramesh C., ed. (2015), Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents, Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, ISBN 978-0-128-00494-4
- Hoenig, Steven L. (2007), Compendium of Chemical Warfare Agents, Springer, ISBN 978-0-387-34626-7
- Kendall, Ronald J.; Presley, Steven M.; Austin, Galen P.; Smith, Philip N. (2008), Advances in Biological and Chemical Terrorism Countermeasures, CRC Press, ISBN 978-1-420-07654-7
- McGregor, Paul (2011), Toxic Politics: The Secret History of the Kremlin's Poison Laboratory—from the Special Cabinet to the Death of Litvinenko, Praeger, ISBN 978-0-313-38746-3
- Mirzayanov, Vil S. (2008), State Secrets: An Insider's Chronicle of the Russian Chemical Weapons Program, Outskirts Press, ISBN 978-1-4327-2566-2
- Salem, Harry; Katz, Sidney A., eds. (2014), Inhalation Toxicology (3rd ed.), CRC Press, ISBN 978-1-466-55273-9
- Tucker, Jonathon B. (2006), War of Nerves, New York: Anchor Books, ISBN 978-0-375-42229-4