User talk:Onel5969

Onel5969's Talk
Onel5969's Talk
	Phoenix ... It's a dry heat ...
Born	New York city
Nationality	American

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34

Edit count

edit count

Wiki mark-up link

Hi! You might find these handy:

Simple guide to Wikipedia mark-up
- Advanced guide to Wiki mark-up

Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 22:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Links for new editors

If you're leaving a question regarding an article you're attempting to get onto Wikipedia, here are some links you might find helpful:

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into your local language via meta

The 2017 Cure Award

In 2017 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 02:55, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Hi. I wanted to know what was the issue for flagging the content I wrote for Pratibha Tiwari. It was original content with relevant links and citations. Could you please tell me why it doesn't meet the notability criteria of Wikipedia? Sidd13 (talk) 05:12, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sidd13 - Thanks for the baklava (even though it's not really my thing

). The article has now been moved into draftspace so that you can work on it. Right now, they have had a single notable role, therefore they don't pass WP:NACTOR, which is why I redirected in the first place. Barkeep49 has, in my opinion, rightly moved to draftspace, since the current version is undersourced and therefore doesn't show that they pass WP:GNG. Please read the guidelines on WP:GNG and WP:RS (for guidance on reliable sourcing). Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:06, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alan Aisenberg

Hey, I don't mean to be a brat but I've had this draft waiting for over 8 weeks and no reviewer's even left a comment on it. You've had a look at some of my contributions before so that's why I approached you. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 20:01, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Davykamanzi - Done. Although, if he hadn't won the Emmy, he probably wouldn't qualify under WP:NACTOR. His only notable role is in Orange is the New Black. Regardless, nice job. And you're not being a brat, AfC has a huge backlog, and sometimes it can take a long time. This actually should have been approved (imho) a while ago, since the Emmy makes it pretty much an easy decision. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:51, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Thanks for taking the time to review it. I know editors aren't meant to approach reviewers and ask them to review drafts so that's why I felt a bit bad asking you to do it. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 08:59, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dab fixes

Thank you for all your help in fixing the wikilinks to disambiguation pages. I'm very sad to see that you've been put in a position where you feel unable to continue. We all make mistakes, but overall you've consistently made great improvements to Wikipedia. I hope you'll be able to rejoin us when the time is right, but I'll understand if you feel that the project no longer deserves your support. We'll miss you. Certes (talk) 20:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Certes - Thanks for the kind words, and yes we do all make mistakes. Thought I was helping, but I try to stay away from negativity, and incivility. The fact that you have experienced editors make comments and then don't understand how they could be construed as uncivil is remarkable. The ANI chose not to focus on the tens of thousands of correct dab edits I made, and chose to focus on the 50 or so errors I had made. I admitted the mistakes I made on Theophany were absolutely a lack of understanding on my part (I misconstrued the difference between the two, and got about 30 out of 1200 dabs wrong). Regardless, keep up the good work, but I've given my word not to work within the project anymore. Take care. You're a good and kind editor. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:09, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Quek_See_Ling

@Onel5969:, Hi, I have reviewed the article in whole and make comment there, my conclusion is to keep (per comment there), do see anything you will like to discuss. Thanks --Quek157 (talk) 20:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tag unreadability tag?

One of the reasons I rarely contribute to en: these days is that their rules have become totally unreadable. Where once people would have considered a weakness in an article a reason to improve it, now it's a reason to slap a tag on it that doesn't tell the reader what's wrong with the article, nor does it help, or indeed invite, the original writer to improve the article.

I've corrected the article on the Vasa run as it still claimed it was the longest, which it isn't any more. To avoid merely saying "No it isn't!", I added a page on the current longest cross-country ski run (as far as I know): Pendlerrennet. If you want something improved about the article that you can't improve yourself, than ask me for something specific. In my experience people merely slapping on tags will eventually just lead to the information disappearing from Wikipedia. Aliter (talk) 12:02, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you are talking about. Can't get much more specific than saying an article is uncited, and that it may not meet notability guidelines. Add some references from reliable independent sources, and look up WP:GNG and WP:NSPORTS to understand what constitutes notability. Tags are put on an article to let ALL editors know that the article needs improvement, and what about the article needs work. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent article creations

Hello,

Thank you for your input on those recently created articles. I will adhere to stricter standards when making creations from here on out. I thought a standard had been set forth that a collegiate athlete that does have some notability from their college days whether nationally or inter-conference alone is not enough for inclusion (I had created an article on Vanderbilt's former starting QB a long time ago. He had no pro experience even on a practice squad and therefore got deleted). I had gone through some of Tennessee's rosters and did checks on some players to see if they made it to the pros. I figured practice squad was notable enough because some had links on team year pages. If I am wrong here, I understand and will go about normal editing and stricter conditions for article creations. Thank you for all you do on here to make the site better! Red Director (talk) 17:16, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The definition of spending time in the NFL is actually playing in the NFL. Without that they don't pass WP:GRIDIRON. Practice squads and draftees don't count. And none of the 3 appear to pass WP:NCOLLATH, as they didn't win a national award, aren't members of the College Football Hall of Fame, and did not gain significant national media attention as an individual. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:47, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Busy Bakers"

The short is notable for being the last Warner Bros. short to be supervised by Hardaway and Dalton. Yay Dad (talk) 04:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a criteria for notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure that is a criteria for notability. Yay Dad (talk) 03:51, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, feel free to provide a link to where it says that. Cause it's not. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:57, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marking Jicka as a living person

Hi, you propose deleting Jicka page because it is a biography of a living person. He is dead for over 12 years, I have started the page so that people will work on developing it (there is nice French language article on him, but I didn't find much English language sources). — Preceding unsigned comment added by GuggiePrg (talk • contribs) 16:04, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A7 on Antonio Foscarini

Hi Onel5969 -- I've declined this speedy because being an ambassador to two major cities seems a clear notability claim. Being executed for treason and then rehabilitated also appears somewhat unusual. As he died in 1622, we don't need to worry about the BLP policy with regard to the lack of sourcing. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:26, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Espresso Addict - Thanks for the explanation. I don't think I did a BLP prod though, that's why I speedied. Without references, there is nothing to show that the assertions claimed in the article are accurate. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:53, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Xianzi, the Shrimp Eater

Hi, I'm the professor of the college student editor (bzuegel) who wrote the Xianzi, the Shrimp Eater Wikipedia article. You flagged it as needing more citations. Can you please be more specific or flag specific sentences rather than the entire article? As a specialist on the topic, I graded and vetted this article before it was uploaded to the main space, and I am satisfied with the citations in this work. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michwang108 (talk • contribs) 03:05, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chinsō

Hi, I'm the professor of the college student editor (hgiordano) who wrote the Chinsō Wikipedia article. You flagged it as needing more citations. Can you please be more specific or flag specific sentences rather than the entire article? As a specialist on the topic, I graded and vetted this article before it was uploaded to the main space, and I am satisfied with the citations in this work. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michwang108 (talk • contribs) 03:06, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shigajiku

Hi, I'm the professor of the college student editor (ltk8) who wrote the Shigajiku Wikipedia article. You flagged it as needing more citations. Can you please be more specific or flag specific sentences rather than the entire article? As a specialist on the topic, I graded and vetted this article before it was uploaded to the main space, and I am satisfied with the citations in this work. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michwang108 (talk • contribs) 03:08, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michwang108 - first two things: please always sign your comments on talk pages (either article's or user's), using four tildes (like this: ~~~~); also, please provide a link to the article you have a question about. Now to your question, and I'm going to answer all three here. Virtually every assertion in each of the articles needs a citation, else it is considered original research and can be deleted at any time. For example in the Xianzi article, there is an uncited assertion at the end of the "Sources" section. Any time you see something like that, there should be a citation. All three articles are very under-cited. Additionally, when citing a book, magazine or newspaper, please use page numbers. When citing a book like Awakenings : Zen figure painting in medieval Japan, and not giving a page number, the citation is virtually worthless for researchers. Hope this helps. Btw... all 3 were fascinating articles, thanks for contributing (or guiding your students to contribute).Onel5969 ^{TT me} 04:39, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pin Drop Studio

Hi Onel5969, I'm the creator of the Pin Drop Studio article you reviewed today. Thank you for your comments, and for your view that the subject is notable. Your are duly noted and I have made edits accordingly, which I would like to get your perspective on. I've used only the most relevant citations, and re-wrote the lead to be more factual, as you suggested. I look forward to hearing from you as to whether I should re-submit this current version for review. Kind regards.Wantaz (talk) 13:51, 2 May 2018 (UTC)Wantaz[reply]

Nicely done Wantaz - moved to mainspace. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:57, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. That is very encouraging! Thank you, Onel5969. It's my first article and I am looking forward to creating more. Wantaz (talk) 14:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)Wantaz[reply]

16:49:18, 2 May 2018 review of submission by MinskBel

MinskBel (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Alexander Abugov (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, could you please help me to edit the article so it would not violate any rules. Tnanks! MinskBel (talk) 16:49, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:51:42, 2 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by MinskBel

MinskBel (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Alexander Abugov (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, could you please help me editing the article. Thanks a lot!

MinskBel (talk) 16:51, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

17:23:51, 2 May 2018 review of submission by MinskBel

MinskBel (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Alexander Abugov (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

I just would like to add that the author worked in Soviet Union where there were a lot of restrictions. Only government could decide what to publish on English for other countries. Some materials were re-published on English (see https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=7004021962), other materials are presented as attached copies (on Russian) on https://independent.academia.edu/AlexanderAbugov. I understand that it's hard to read on Russian to prove that the name on those publications is the same as Alexander Abugov (since it's A.L.Abugov or Abugov A.L. (but by Russian letters)). Also please check https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3960-5667.

Please also check some citations on the draft where different authors cite some publications of Alexander Abugov.

I would really appreciate your help.

Thanks! MinskBel (talk) 17:23, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Purushapura

Hi, I notice you reverted it to the redirect to Peshawar. I did not see such discussion about the consensus. I would like it to be an independent article as in the case of Patna/Pataliputra ie. the old city is separated historically to the present day entity. Thanks.Sgnpkd (talk) 07:22, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cross Country Detours

All the travellogue cartoons from Tex Avery have pages. This is the only one so why not make a page for it. It is notable for being Avery's travellogue series. Yay Dad (talk) 18:15, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Those are not legitimate notability criteria. See WP:OSE. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:18, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then why policy say Keep cause this article is just as notable as the other travellogue films. Not understand. Yay Dad (talk) 18:24, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because you don't understand. That's not what policy says. It says exactly the opposite. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:07, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know not understand. But what does mean? Yay Dad (talk) 14:26, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

02:48:51, 5 May 2018 review of submission by MinskBel

MinskBel (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Alexander Abugov (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The submission was declined based on reason that there is almost a zero citation count on Scholar and it doesn’t meet criteria for reliable, secondary sources. Please consider the following:

1. The author worked in Soviet Union where there were a lot of restrictions. Only government could decide what to publish on English for other countries. The criteria for citing on Scholar is hardly reliable for scientists who lived in communist countries and it does not reflect the importance of scientific work.

2. Thinking about reliable, secondary sources there is an evidence that such a scientist produced significant amount of scientific publications and inventions. 2.1. Some materials were re-published on English - Scopus (please see independent source – Scopus https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=7004021962). 2.2. There is also independent source on German - Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology(please see https://www.tib.eu/en/search/?id=198&tx_tibsearch_search%5Bquery%5D=Abugov%2C+A.L.&tx_tibsearch_search%5Bsrt%5D=rk&tx_tibsearch_search%5Bcnt%5D=20). 2.3. There is an independent source on Polish - Institute of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (please see http://www.ios.krakow.pl/sawios/expertus.php?KAT=%2Fhome%2Fwww%2Fsawios%2Fpar%2F&FST=data.fst&FDT=data.fdt&ekran=WIN&lnkmsk=2&cond=AND&mask=2&F_00=00&V_00=Abugov+A.L.) 2.4. The information about inventions can be found at European Patent Office (please see https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?compact=false&ST=advanced&IN=Abugov%20Aleksandr%20L&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&PA=%5BSU%5D#!)

3. Since not all publications and inventions were available for different citing agencies and only small amount of publications were available for other than Soviet Union countries there is a full source of publications and inventions on https://independent.academia.edu/AlexanderAbugov This source contains copies of original publications and author’s certificates for inventions on Russian which can be downloaded. Those copies reflect significant contribution to science which with Soviet Union collapse is available now for other researchers. 4. Please also take into consideration that in publications the name of author is written in Russian tradition as A.L.Abugov or Abugov A.L. There is a good amount of citations in publications on Russian which probably are not reflected on Scholar or other than Russian languages citation agencies. 5. All described above mentions prove that subject is notable and worthy.

Please consider everything said above and reconsider your decision about that submission. Any your suggestion about improvements will be taken with gratitude.

Thanks!

MinskBel (talk) 02:48, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2nd May Review of Draft:Shamim Hanafi

The draft has been updated. The two dead links removed and replaced by two new and reliable sources.

inam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inamabidi (talk • contribs) 12:17, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Precious three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:34, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gerda Arendt! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:03, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't define the notability

Four films and a popular TV series make notable. Xx236 (talk) 12:56, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to read notability guidelines. No they don't. And don't post on my page again. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:01, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Uh...what's that about? Talk pages are explicitly to discuss and work with each other. Xx236 has been around longer than I have, and I'd be willing to almost guarantee good faith from their edits. English is also not their native language. What's with the "don't post on my page again"? Sock (~~tock~~ talk) 15:18, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sock - long time no speak. You're right about user talk pages, as long as the discussion is civil. I've simply grown tired of incivility and lack of AGF (which to me is a form of civility), the latter of which the other editor clearly was guilty of. And so when I come across it on talk pages, I ignore it. However, on my talk page, I can ask that they don't interact here. Which is what I did. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:21, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Protected

I hope you don't mind I've protected this page for a few hours, for reasons that are probably evident from the page history. I'll happily undo if this is unwanted. Thanks. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 18:54, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all Ivanvector - I had put in a RPP request for a day or so. I appreciate it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:52, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Green Lantern Corps film please to keep it and at the very least keep the edits and source material

Can we PLEASE keep the page Green Lantern Corps (film) ???

It's definitely going to happen.

The page has good sources and good edits that deserve to please be preserved.

Thank you so much !!!

96.249.215.234 (talk) 11:50, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move

Hello. First of all thank you for filling out references in the said articles (I was never able to know how to use the automatic tools). The article Aldwych bus bomb needs to be moved to Aldwych bus bombing (since it's obviously a 'bombing'). The latter currently redirects to the present name. If you're an admin, are you able to perform this move now please? --Gateshead001 (talk) 12:22, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, Gateshead001, happy to help. Not an admin, but I have put in a request for the move, so it should happen in the next day or so. Keep up the good work. Lots of good article starts. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:26, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the assistance! --Gateshead001 (talk) 12:41, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gateshead001: I spotted this at CAT:SD, it's now

Done. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:36, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi thanks for reviewing so many of my new articles! Mccapra (talk) 23:06, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, Mccapra - Keep up the good work! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:46, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why delete my entries？

I think Chongqing No.68 Middle School is a notable middle school.It is a demonstration junior high school in the Shapingba District and the school is one of the ten most influential middle schools in Chongqing, China.It is as notable as Chongqing Railway High School and Chongqing No.7 high School.Why these schools can have entries,Chongqing No.68 Middle School can not have entrie?--被你抛弃的哀伤 (talk) 13:57, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, the claim that it is one of the ten most notable is uncited. Second, very rarely are elementary or middle schools shown to be notable, as per WP:OUTCOMES. Third, pointing to other articles is called WP:OSE, and not a valid argument. To show a non-high school is notable, you have to have quite a bit of in-depth coverage from non-local sources, which this article does not have. Sorry. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:00, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the correct procedure (per policy) which we apply to non notable primary and middle schools, is to blank and redirect them to the school district article (US), or to the article about the locality (rest of the word). We add the {{R from school}} templateto the redirect page. If as in the case of this article, the creator reverts the redirect, then it should be sent to AfD. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chongqing No.68 Middle School where you are welcome to participate. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:03, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Kudpung - You're absolutely correct, should have redirected. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:07, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why return redirect? I am slightly annoyed

Somebody put a redirect to the new Lake Street Dive album "Free Yourself Up". I removed the redirect tag and placed the album information in is place. Please put something on the talk page of "Free Yourself Up". You leaped without thinking. Rcollman (talk) 15:53, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, "slightly annoyed", first, it's polite to provide a link to the page you're talking about. Second, seriously? Not a SINGLE reference. Of course it was going to be redirected. Please read the notability criteria at WP:GNG, and specifically what to do with an album with no indication of notability at WP:NALBUMS. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:57, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Updated Mark Friedman

Hello, you nominated Mark Friedman for deletion because it had no references. I fixed it. Lemme know if more has to be done.

Mattyice10 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattyice10 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mattyice10 - There are two problems. First, the article is inaccurate. He does not currently play for the Flyers. He is not on their roster, and the single source doesn't show him playing for them. I'll remove that since it isn't verified. Apparently he plays for the Lehigh Valley Phantoms, and since he hasn't played 200 games in the AHL, he doesn't meet notability requirements as per WP:NHOCKEY. Don't know if he passes WP:GNG, so I've in-reviewed to allow a different editor to evaluate it. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:59, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for reviewing all of those pages of mine! I was pleasantly surprised when my 46 new notifications turned out not to be someone trying to hack my account.

—Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 22:41, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries Compassionate727... nice job, keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SHINee From Now On is Notable

You recently deleted SHINee From Now On because it "wasn't notable." It IS notable. THis was their final release as 5, AND it contains unreleased tracks that feaure Jonghyun pothsumously.-K-popguardian (talk) 16:27, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, you alive?-K-popguardian (talk) 00:57, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dude... you coherent? If you are going to be irrational and rude, don't post here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:59, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dixon ES

Re: Dixon Elementary, User:Kausticgirl said there's a documentary about it. I'll investigate further. WhisperToMe (talk) 14:03, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Found some refs: https://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/the-curators-of-dixon-school/Film?oid=6946139 and http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/11/15/new-film-looks-at-arts-influence-on-dixon-elementary-school-students/ - Will restore the article WhisperToMe (talk) 14:11, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Dua Lipa

I'm the creator of List of awards and nominations received by Dua Lipa page. Did it met the requirements to not get removed? Was it accepted?

Rodrigo1198 (talk) 18:30, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The threshold for list articles is very low, but it's not a question of acceptance/rejection, but one of does it pass the notability guidelines. This does. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:54, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		Thanks for your hard work picking up the slack of late! Cheers, — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 02:38, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

College football pages...

Every FBS and FCS teams have their own pages going back at least 5 years now. For you to single out 2018 Saint Francis Red Flash football team and 2018 Sacred Heart Pioneers football team and redirect them and not the other 280 pages is crazy. Please take your reasoning to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football before redirecting again. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 03:29, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did. And please understand application of guidelines, rather than WP:OSE arguments. Will revert to redirects as per WP:BRD until a consensus is reached on the talk page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:46, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hasty proposed delation of Géza Pálffy

Dear Onel5969, thank you for your message and I'd like to congratulate to you for The New Page Patroller's Barnstar but I think you're not right but we are human beings and to err is human. I think you have not pay enough attention to the fact that I am an confirmed editor and I am aware of the facts of notability guideline for academics and the rule of WP:NSCHOLAR and the article in question is highly suitable for creating a wikipedia article. Your nomination for delation was pretty husty, I think, and I understand your intention to defend the interests of Wikipedia but on the one hand the article was still in its start point, I've just started the first steps so it was an unfriendly act to offend this article but on the other hand I may have made a mistake that I've forgotten putting the template "under constrction" though this article is abouut a notable man, scientist who is respected in my country and in Central and Eastern Europe. First he has lotsa references in several other aricles becase his publications are used in lotsa articles:

[1]

You are not right, he owns several secondary sources and not only in Hngarian bt in English, too. I think if a person can be found in a contemporary biograpichal dictionary, that person can also deserve the article in wikipedia. A lexicon article has been written about Géza Pálffy in Hungary:

Géza Pálffy (in Hungarian). In: Béla Varga (ed-in-chief.): Veszprém megyei kortárs életrajzi lexikon (A Contemporary Biographical Dictionary of VIPs in Veszprém County). Veszprém: Veszprém Megyei Önkormányzat Közgyűlése (Self Government of Veszprém County). 2001. Retrieved 2018-05-23.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)

I understand you do not know this historian in Amarica but the scientists who research the history of Habsburg Monarchy in the world, they know his name. He is young, in his forties but he is among the respected and notable historians. I have extened the article and added to the article all the sources about it and there exist lotsa newspaper articles about it but unfortunately they were published in Hngarian and his name can also be found on the webpage of the Government of Hungary because he can have receaved a very important civil award, the Order of Merit of the Republic of Hungary from the minister of Human Capacities, Zoltán Balog on 8 May 2015. If you do not understand Hungarian but you can find his name easily in the webpage below:

"Állami kitüntetéseket és szakmai díjakat adott át Balog Zoltán (Minsiter Zoltán Balog Gave Out Civil Awards and Decorations to Citizens)" (in Hungarian). Emberi Erőforrások Minisztériuma (Ministry of Human Capacities). 2015-08-19. Retrieved 2018-05-23.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: year (link)

I hope I have managed to prove my arguments and standpoint that the article in question should be kept on English wikipedia and now you will give up the idea to delate it and as you have written it to me, I can remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}} and you'll accept this, you agree with me and you won't change my editing and you would no longer like to delate it. Best regards.Borgatya (talk) 01:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flawed AfD

I believe you made a flawed AfD nomination here [2] by representing the Order of Canada as the 2nd highest civilian decoration. That is technically true BUT the only thing higher is Order_of_Merit which you can see is restricted to 24 living recipients across the entire Commonwealth. It is quite possible none of them are even Canadian. Comparing the Order of Canada to the second highest military honor is quite misleading. Every Order of Canada recipient meets WP:ANYBIO #1. Legacypac (talk) 02:57, 24 May 2018 (UTC). I've raised the discussion here Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)#Order_of_Canada Legacypac (talk) 03:10, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have the right to that opinion. To me, if a person has won the Silver Star, that is higher than ANY civilian award. Yet, that is not considered significant by WP standards. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018

Hello Onel5969, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:

A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons

There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy

Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English

A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

News

Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Songs of Kurogane Communication

I merged the two articles I created into one. Plus, I also fixed the weird sentences. I need your review. And lastly, I'm putting two more citations eventually. --Komitsuki (talk) 08:05, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Daneta Wollmann

In an effort to try to learn from my mistakes I see you reviewed Daneta Wollmann. So magistrate judges also qualify for WP:JUDGE criteria 1? I had read that to just mean congressionally confirmed Judges. Or was she notable for some other aspect? Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:35, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You could be right, Barkeep49, although that's not the way I read wp:judge. As per #1 of that, which reads in part, "...judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office...", and I'm not sure, and there is no direct guidance as to whether or not magistrate judges should or should not be included in that designation. If the district she served in were statewide, than it would be easy to include, but since it only covers the western portion of the state, I can see why your position has merit. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:07, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Witchcraft XVI: Hollywood Coven

If you want the page to be removed, ask for it, don't blank. I have added notability template according to your critics.Xx236 (talk) 06:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Debra Dean

Don't be discouraged by some of the spiteful comments in response to your deletion nomination. There are a lot of so-called contributors around who expect others to do all their work for them. Deb (talk) 09:46, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deb - thanks for the encouragement. Learned a while ago that for many editors WP:AGF is mere lip service, including some who participated in that AfD. While I understand that WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP, sometimes it is the only way to get an article improved, or to resolve the issue of whether or not it should be an article or should stay a redirect. In this instance I checked to see if her novels had articles, and saw only the stub article without a single independent source. As I was not researching the notability of her books, my searches only turned up the several reviews to Madonnas, plus a single review of one of her other novels. In addition, there wasn't a single in-depth article about the author herself. In fact, despite the recent good work by Coolbeapple, there still isn't a single in-depth reference about her from an independent source. Since the editor who turned the redirect into an article was too lazy to put any effort into the article and source it properly, and I couldn't find the sources, AfD appeared to be the route to go. Actually, I had decided to close the discussion and remove my nom, until Eppstein's comment. Which made me quite done with the matter. Took both the article and the discussion off my watchlist. Incivility is one of my target points. No need for it. And while as I said before, AFDNOTCLEANUP, I actually enjoy when an AfD I began results in turning a garbage article (or in this case 2, if you include Madonnas), into decent ones. Again, thanks. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:57, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Too true. I feel the same about it. Taking something to AfD (or speedy deleting it) can get you a lot of flak - God knows I've had plenty of it - but sometimes it's the only way to highlight this issue and get people to actually do something about it. Deb (talk) 07:46, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stub Query

Hi, I'm still relatively new here, but just had a quick query as to why Brisbane Street, Perth was categorized as a New South Wales geography stub when it's in WA. Thanks. MadamePhoenica (talk) 00:44, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Just wanted to let you know it eventually occurred to me why it was listed as a NSW stub *face palm* lol MadamePhoenica (talk) 01:03, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah - screwed that one up. It's now corrected. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:55, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah the Average Australian wouldnt know much about the geography of New York for that matter, so the same is expected in reverse - at least you are able to correct... thanks for that. I remain nostalgic for the editors (from who knows where) who think Tasmania is a country... JarrahTree 13:05, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks JarrahTree - While I don't do a lot of editing on Australia articles, I do a fair bit. I simply mis-read the article and picked up on the fact it was named after the governor of NSW, rather than the more important fact that it was in Perth. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:15, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hahah - I have done worse (I dont admit to my mistakes that much) - but thank you for your help with the Australian project area - much appreciate your help JarrahTree 13:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Serbia reverts

Can you explain why you reverted three of my updates to the selected articles; like Portal:Serbia/Selected article/17? I see no benefit to the portal.--Auric talk 12:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain to me why you're asking me about stuff I didn't do? It was not I who reverted you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:57, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Woops, Sorry!--Auric talk 15:35, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rewiew

Hi Onel5969, please rewiew this pages:

Thank you and have a nice day Patriccck 15:20, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chellapilla Venkata Rao

This man was important in the history of the Proteaceae. Most of his work has not lasted, but people did have to argue against him to reach current consensuses. His work has not been republished, nor has it yet found its way into online repositories. I hope you will give me the time to find further references to him (probably most of which will not be capable of adding much to the story). But he was prolific and influential in his time. MargaretRDonald (talk) 20:44, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, simply does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:SCHOLAR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:09, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Which is why at the talk page I have said that considering the unchallenged articles about botanists with similarly low publication rates etc that dont fit the absurd metric havent been touched - making this an undue exception. Most practising botanists have not been in institutions to qualify the academic parameter - they have been government civil servants - and the strictures simply do not apply JarrahTree 13:24, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Which is an invalid WP:OSE argument, which is why I ignored it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:27, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

fair enough but it does not convince me that there arent large numbers of potential stubs about botanists, grologists, veterinary surgeons and other civil servant professionals that deserve to stand free of metrics that are confined to workplace environments that simply that do not corellate relative to publication obsessed academics JarrahTree 13:31, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP has guidelines. If you wish them changed, make a proposal. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:32, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha - in all WP:AGF - try it. Nothing personal, it is a long and complicated issue, here is not the place to explain. JarrahTree 13:42, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is tied into a complex argument about the origins of the pedia in the states where things like scholar make sense - specially if you are tied in with medicos, psychs, and academics - but in the global south and post colonial environments like India and Australia the base of the metric assumptions simply dont fit - but short of being in a sit down situation, lots of coffees/beers or wines at something like a wikimania - hey this is not the place. JarrahTree 13:55, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Take Me to the Kaptin

Could you please explain to me as to why the page Take Me to the Kaptin was deleted and redirected to Prism (Prism album). I believe the page was not finished and was not given a fair chance to be fixed up and add additional information. I could not see any vandalism present. The page is notable and should be visible to the public. An explanation is due. LilJohnnyWimple (talk) 13:06, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The page was not deleted, simply redirected. Please see WP:NALBUM for pertinent notability criteria, none of which was shown in the article. If the article is a draft in progress, it should be in the draftspace, not the mainspace, until it is ready. The vandalism is due to the personal attack. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:08, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Layne

Hi there! Looking at the edit history for journalist Ken Layne, I see that you were involved in its move from AfC to mainspace in June 2014. Last week on the article's talk page, I proposed a rewritten version that brings it up-to-date, improves the prose quality, and uses better sources more carefully. I would make the change myself, except I happen to be representing Mr. Layne as a paid consultant. Following the WP:COI guideline, I think it wiser to avoid editing directly and instead seek agreement from a volunteer to implement the changes. If you're too busy or not interested, I would certainly understand, but if you might be willing to help with this subject again, I would be most grateful. Let me know when you have the chance. Best, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 13:33, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Following up just to say, this has now been addressed. Best, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 15:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clover (band)

I am checking to see why four albums I entered (Homestead Redemption, The Best Of Clover: An American Band In London, Live At The Paradiso, and Live At Winterland) were removed and redirected to the Clover (band) page. The band members Alex Call, John McFee, Sean Hopper, and Huey Lewis who appear on these albums are well known musicians and I would consider them notable (867-5309, Doobie Brothers, Huey Lewis and The News). Clover is releasing their new album Homestead Redemption pretty soon as well.Eskew (talk) 14:11, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eskew - as I said in my edit summary, none of them show any indication of notability, and as per WP:NALBUM should be redirected to the band. If they do meet notability criteria, please add that, with appropriate citations to the articles. Please be aware that notability is not inherited, and simply because the band, or band members are notable, does not make their albums notability guaranteed. Same with an upcoming album. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:15, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the info.Eskew (talk) 15:03, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Worcester County politicians

Can I get your opinion about the way Template:Worcester County politicians is being used? It has been added to the settlement articles in Worcester County, Massachusetts, and in most instances it appears to overpower the article. Most of the details in the template, such as the name of the county sheriff, are unnecessary per WP:USCITIES#Government. The template also disrupts the layout of articles, such as at Bolton, Massachusetts, and adds a layer of complexity for anyone wishing to update the information. I think this is a place where plain text would be preferred, but wanted a second opinion. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Dooley

Spot-on - you have to actually play to be considered notable under WP:NFOOTBALL. Being a squad member is not sufficient. Giant Snowman 13:11, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I thought. Thanks GiantSnowman. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:12, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unreviewed

Just got your message - wondering why that page was unreviewed. It's the proper page for UEFA, and from my experience all domain name redirects are a valid reason for their creation. SEMMENDINGER (talk) 01:53, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Semmendinger - because I screwed up. Was in the process of leaving a message on your talk page when I got notification of this message. When I used the curator tools, it didn't seem to be reviewed, so I clicked, just as I realized it said, "Unreview". My apologies. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:55, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so that was an automated message? (Good to know because I've definitely done that before, oops!) No problems here! :) SEMMENDINGER (talk) 01:57, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

personal statement

Hi sorry I don't understand what you mean, everything (for example, the plot summary and so on) in this page are directly translated from the cited webpage, do you mean I need to put a quotation mark on all lines or what to do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bblueberry (talk • contribs) 11:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bblueberry - articles should have footnotes. WP:CIT and WP:CITE are good guidelines to read. Especially quotes. If you quote something you must have a citation. And it needs to be formatted properly so that other researchers can attest to its validity. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:17, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your quick reply, shall I put quotation marks before the reference links? Or is there any sample page you could advise me to take a look so I can understand what you mean by footnote? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bblueberry (talk • contribs) 11:22, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bblueberry - WP:QUOTE, and MOS:QUOTEMARKS are two good items to read about quotes and formatting. Off the top of my head, since it passed GA status, you can always take a look at Phoenix, Arizona, and the style of quotations there. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:45, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for those pages. I just added some footnotes in the page, please check if they are correct. thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bblueberry (talk • contribs) 12:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please review Caillou Pettis

Can you please look over the draft available for the article on Caillou Pettis and see if it is good to submit for actual publication? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimplyBatman22 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In my opinion, no. First delete EVERYTHING that uses Facebook, Twitter, YouTube as a source. None of them are reliable sources. Then remove stuff that comes directly from him. Other than the interaction with the singer, nothing stands out in the sourcing as in-depth coverage about him. Since the article was just deleted through an AfD discussion, there should be some recent events which push this person into the notable column. I'm not seeing anything like that in the last few months. Sorry. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:09, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hi, thanks for your work. Please note that en.WP doesn't normally link common terms, occupations, years, dates, etc. Tony (talk) 13:16, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tony1 - Thanks. Know that. Can you give an example of where I've done that recently? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:25, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry, I read the diffs wrongly. Best. Tony (talk) 02:09, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, Tony1 - was just a bit flummoxed. Take care and welcome back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:10, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Baylus C. Brooks, Onel5969.

Unfortunately Joe Roe has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Previously deleted, substantial copyvios, unclear notability

To reply, leave a comment on Joe Roe's talk page.

– Joe (talk) 11:07, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Sky Sword II

Hey Onel5969, reading through User:Mfb/Taiwanese articles will help you better understand the IP on that page. Feel free to ask questions or discuss on User talk:Mfb/Taiwanese articles. Adamgerber80 (talk) 22:07, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, Adamgerber80. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:21, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FT8 revert

Hello Onel5969, please, let me disagree with your revert on the [FT8] page. FT8 as protocol must have a dedicated page with more details as such. The redirect of a protocol to a software application is not correct. The FT8 is a communication protocol commonly associated to the WSJT-X, the most famous software program that implements it but they are distinct entities. They have a relationship similar to the PSK31 or Olivia_MFSK protocols and the fldigi application software that, correctly, have dedicated articles. If this clarify, I will restore my edit creating the contest to specific protocol information. Of course, I remain available for any further information you may need. Very kind regards ----FabC (talk) 13:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Chapin What Made America Famous review

Hey there, I saw that you reviewed my page. Thank you for taking the time to do it. I haven't fully learned about the review system. So, my question is how exactly do I see the review that you left? Thanks. Citybuild122 (talk) 14:30, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Citybuild122- I actually had the privilege of working with Mr. Chapin for one day when he was giving one of his charity concerts in Riverdale NY back in either late 79 or early 80 (it's a shame I can't remember the exact date). He was a very cool guy, and got to speak with him pretty in-depth during the day and at dinner. That a page is "reviewed" simply means that an editor who has enough experience has taken a look at your article. Sometimes the reviewer will leave a message on your talk page, if there's something specific they fell needs work, or sometimes simply to tell you "nice job". Sometimes the reviewer will simply "tag" the article with any issues they see, like "needs more references", "needs copyedit", "POV issues", etc. In this instance, I didn't really see anything wrong with the article (with the very minor issue of the first reference being malformed - which I just now fixed), so didn't tag it or leave a message. It's more than a stub, a true "start" article. The only possible issue with it might be one of notability, so if you can find more references from independent reliable sources, that would be a good thing. Hope this helps and keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:45, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the reply. That is amazing that you were fortunate enough to work with him. I was born 2 decades after his death, so I didn't have the privilege of seeing him, however I am a very strong admirer of his work. I have also put some edits into the main Harry Chapin page, and have created a couple articles about his songs. I truly find it amazing what he was able to accomplish in his very short musical career. Citybuild122 (talk) 14:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft re-review

Hey there! Been a while since we last chatted, anyway just to let you know, there's currently another review request on the Draft page for Better Call Saul (season 4). Is it okay if you review it. Thanks again as always. The Optimistic One (talk) 18:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thanks!

Hi, thanks for all your work reviewing new articles. Unfortunately there is no "thank" option for page curation log entries, so I thought I'd leave you an actual message :) Dr. Vogel (talk) 23:00, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks DrVogel - just trying to help out where I can... Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NXLog article review

Hi, thanks for reviewing my article on NXLog. I am disappointed to see that you found it includes promotional notes. Please move the article draft back to me and allow to continue to fix the article, and let me know which bits need further refinement so that it complies. Thanks. Robinersek (talk) 04:02, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robinersek - not an admin, so can't do that. You should ask the admin who deleted the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of Apollo Sugar Clinics

Dear Onel5969 you shouldn't tag the article as speedy deletion, you may put any other tag like promotional content but you shouldn't de-motivate new users by deleting the article. I am kindly requesting you to help this article improve or remove promotional content. Can you please tell the exact words, line or section that is promotional so that i could fix it.TheGrandSon (talk) 12:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TheGrandSon. Other than the lead, most of the rest of the article is simply a promotional brochure. It simply advertises the locations and products of the company. Even the history section is written in a promotional manner. The second line of the history section is okay, and the advisory council is fine. If you would like, I can move it into draftspace so that you can work on it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Onel5969, Thank you for your response. Please suggest: If i remove the promotional content, Can you remove this deletion tag?TheGrandSon (talk) 12:31, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. At a brief glance, it probably meets notability criteria. But I didn't check for that, to be honest. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:33, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just removed the promotional content. Please consider if it is OK as per Wikipedia guidelines.TheGrandSon (talk) 12:43, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Onel5969, Thank you for restoring the article and help me to fix the issue. Can you also suggest relevant category for the article.TheGrandSon (talk) 12:47, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the categoryTheGrandSon (talk) 12:56, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merchandise Giveaway Nomination - Successful

Hey Onel5969

You have been successfully nominated to receive a free t-shirt from the Wikimedia Foundation through our Merchandise Giveaway program (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Merchandise_giveaways). Congratulations and thank you for your hard work!

Please email us at merchandisegiveawaywikimedia.org and we will send you full details on how to accept your free shirt.

Thanks! Seddon (WMF) (talk) 00:49, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Seddon (WMF) - but are you sure you have the right editor. I went to the link above and can't see where I was ever nominated, let alone awarded. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:50, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Mila Turajlić

Thanks for going through all of these pages. From what I understand, mostly linkrot needs to be addressed so I'll take care of it soon. Abonzz (talk) 14:45, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, Abonzz - keep up the good work. Some good pages to look at are WP:CITE and WP:CIT. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:48, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

onel5969 I guess you meant the following page 1. So I added the citations. Abonzz (talk) 17:20, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

Hi. Thanks for reviewing all my articles! Enjoy your virtual pie

~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 13:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Abelmoschus Esculentus - keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:47, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

River Raška

River Raška looks like a plausible redirect to Raška (river). May I know why you unreviewed the page? Pratyush (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PratyushSinha101 - misclick on my part... I didn't see that you had already reviewed it. My apologies. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:26, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Cheers. :) Pratyush (talk) 14:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing the mentioned ambiguity

Firstly, I appreciate you for denoting the ambiguity in the article of Al-Atabat Al-Aliyat

Secondly, I fixed it --removed its ambiguity by adding/eliminating related statements.

Thirdly, Atabat-Aliyat is an Islamic phrase/expression which means the whole of 6 shrines which are in 4 cities of Iran (altogether), so I hope the edited version is more clear. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 12:26, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ali Ahwazi - Nice job. It's something I've done myself in the past, you understand the material so well, that you think everyone has your level of understanding. Your changes now make understanding the meaning much clearer to someone, like me, without your level of knowledge of the subject. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:31, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

your civility

I do not know whether it was intentional, but your item 50 above - not once trolling at that AFD raises my estimation of you. The sadder Afds are where eds seem to reflect a severe sense of antipathy towards contrary arguments and have a need to venture in. You didnt, and even beared with my comments at your talk with restraint. Thanks for that, the Australian biota project is the better for what I interpret as your civility - may it serve you well. JarrahTree 12:54, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks JarrahTree - I appreciate that. I don't have an agenda, other than attempting to make the project better in some small way. I made my point with my nomination, and let the conversation flow. That doesn't mean that if an editor had written something I disagreed with I wouldn't have chimed in, but the AfD simply progressed so there was no need for me to make any additional comments. On AfD's which go contrary to my nom, probably 75% of them I don't disagree with the outcome, and usually the article in question has been improved to the point where I wouldn't have nominated it in the first place. Hopefully, we're all working together towards improving this resource. Take care and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:26, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taman Permai, Seremban

You deleted my page and now i can't find it. You could have at least moved it back to draft so i had a chance to edit accordingly. It took me a long time to learn how to draft on in the first place.

The reason i drafted the page in the first place is because i received many request from schools kids in the area about the areas history for their project. I can still work on it but i can you please reinstate to draft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UPCSB (talk • contribs) 08:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also advice on how to fix it would be good.

Hi UPCSB - I don't delete articles. I tagged your article for deletion because it was simply a promotional page, which is against Wikipedia guidelines. If you ask the admin who deleted it, unless there are other issues with it I don't know about, they should be willing to reinstate it as a draft so that you could work on it. Since it is deleted, I can't look at it, and therefore other than the promotional aspect, I can't give you any specific advice on how to fix it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:31, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gottstein Futurity - Added tags

Gottstein Futurity

You "Added tags to the page using Page Curation (more footnotes, refimprove)"

I've checked the article again but can't see what I missed. Would you please give me some advice on this. Thanks. Stretchrunner (talk) 13:33, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stretchrunner - In the history, the first paragraph is uncited. The chronology is uncited. The race distances are uncited. The records section is wholly uncited, as is the lengthy winner's table. The second sentence of the lead is uncited. While no references are required in the lead, that's only if the information is included, and cited, within the body of the article, which this isn't. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:13, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Appreciate your input. But, I need some help. I had referenced the 2014 Media Guide (now 2018) at the bottom of the winners table because when I tried to put it in the "Winners" header, it wouldn't work. The Media Guide gives full details for all needed referencing. Could you tell me how to fix this reference placing.Stretchrunner (talk) 15:21, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! Thanks anyway. 15:24, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your contributions reviewing automobile articles! TKOIII (talk) 14:18, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sepik F.C.

Howdy! Thanks for reviewing both University Inter F.C. and Sepik F.C.. I'm attempting to improve the coverage of PNG football clubs on Wikipedia, and as such there's several pages that I'll be creating in the future. I appreciate your tagging of the Sepik page for notability, but given the side have played in PNG's highest level of competitive football, I'd argue that all clubs who have done so are notable enough to be included here on WP. Take the page Besta Madang Fighters for example - they too only competed once in the Papua New Guinea National Soccer League, but have had a page up (which I've just improved) since 2008. Let me know if you think my efforts are fruitless/pointless! MrMarkBGregory (talk) 16:06, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MrMarkBGregory - I think you're doing very nice work, keep it up. I tagged the article because I wanted someone with a better specialty in football to have a look at it. You very well may be correct, but I was unsure. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:12, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, no worries then. I'll plough on! MrMarkBGregory (talk) 16:33, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notability tag on Dazhuang

The article Dazhuang, Hualian County, Taiwan was tagged a Notability tag and asked to cite "reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond its mere trivial mention", which I don't understand why? The sources provided include the official page from the Hualian County Government, a book written by three Japanese linguists, and a book published by Department of Cultural Affairs of Hualian County. Are these not enough? -Benson Fang (talk) 22:43, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not in my opinion. Two of those are primary sources. These show that the place exists, but not that it meets notability criteria. Not being a speaker of Chinese, I tagged it to allow someone with expertise in the language to ascertain those sources. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:47, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Both Linguistics Materials of the Formosan Sinicized Populations I: Siraya and Basai and 大庄平埔西拉雅族文物圖說與民俗植物圖誌 are secondary sources, if you've ever read them; the former one was the compilation and review by Tsuchida and his colleagues in 1991 based on a secondary source by Yoshinori in 1917 (who in turn compiled the source based many primary sources written between 1850s-1910s), and the later contains the author's reviews to many primary sources on the village written between 19-20th century. In my opinion, the tag should be added by someone who has at least a merest knowledge on the page, especially when it comes to a potential deletion of the page. -Benson Fang (talk) 23:17, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sienna Senior Living

Hi Onel5969, I see you recently tagged the article Sienna Senior Living with the advert tag. Could you point to a specific sentence or paragraph that could use improvement? -Mparrault (talk) 23:29, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No. 23 Elementary Flying Training School - Redirect Page

Good morning, you reverted several edits that I had made on the No. 23 Elementary Flying Training School redirect page. First edit I had made was completely documented and made for good reason, as in the School was never in Davidson, Saskatchewan. The second edit though maybe a little confusing was also made for good reason. No. 23 Elementary Flying Training School was originally established at RCAF Station Davidson, in January of 1945 they moved the school to RCAF Station Yorkton. I am curious how would you would handle this situation?

Neither of the Stations had pages until the last few days and I am trying to sort out the links in order to best reflect the changes and allow people to accurately find the information.

Mech1949 (talk) 16:51, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redlink redirects

Please tag redirects whose target does not exist as WP:G8. There is no need to take them to WP:RFD. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:53, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tavix - Will do. Missed that definition on the CSD menu. These were actually the first like this I had ever come across. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:57, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nan Ino Cooper

Many thanks for the review, and this kind of encouragement is very good to see. Though I have to say the bulk of the work was done by JWalace and was their first contribution to Wikipedia as part of an event working with schools to train students to edit WP. Battleofalma (talk) 09:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm PRehse. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Zhu Ming, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

PRehse (talk) 11:40, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

notability tag

You added the notability tag to the Mered Medhanie article, with no explanation or further discussion. I invite you to detail your specific concerns on the talk page, so we can improve the article to meet your standards. In the meanwhile, I will remove the tag so the page doesn't get deleted before you have had the opportunity to start the discussion. I am writing this to emphasize that I am treating your edit as a good-faith one and not as drive-by tagging, and that I am not dismissing your concerns. Please feel free to re-add the tag once you have explained your reasons for adding it. I can even offer to revert my deletion myself, once we can make constructive improvements. Regards CapnZapp (talk) 11:46, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First, there is no requirement that I "explain" why I added the notability tag. If you remove it without improvement, I will re-add it. Second, I am concerned about the "we" you mention above. Who is this "we"? WP accounts are for individuals, not groups, and creating one for a group is a violation of WP policy. I tagged it because I am uncertain if this individual passes notability criteria, and want someone with more expertise in that area to review the article. That would be someone without a connection, like yourself, to the article. Right now, it appears to be a case of WP:BIO1E, as the only claim to fame is the potential mis-identity. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:52, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for identifying your concern. I shall start a talk page section discussing the issue. CapnZapp (talk) 17:30, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Feel free to (re)tag it - hopefully now we can discuss it without the threat of imminent deletion. CapnZapp (talk) 17:39, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article review request

Hi I created this article Draft:Inspector General Report on FBI and DOJ's Actions in the 2016 Election. Could you please have time to review it because there's almost a thousand articles in the waiting list?? Jerry the Bellybutton Elf (talk) 03:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing new articles I created

Hi ‪Onel5969, just to let you know how much I appreciate your prompt reviews of ‪Alexander Uzylan, ‪Carl Perutz‬ and Emil Obrovsky. Best regards, Jamesmcardle^(talk) 02:39, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NROADS

Where is wp:nroads anyways? hueman1 (talk) 03:05, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Where is it? hueman1 (talk) 03:12, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Onel5969, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: . Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: , , , .
Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing

Hi, just wanted to say thank you for reviewing Zero Magazine (music magazine) as a newly created page. Thanks! --Culix (talk) 10:19, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Review request

Hi a couple of months ago you reviewed Csaba Szekely, and you were so nice that you gave me some guidelines about what I should do different, and now I had the time to correct it. If you can please take a look at it.

Thank you Levivien (talk) 20:06, 16 June 2018 (UTC)(talk)[reply]

New Page Reviewer's Osmium Star

		The New Page Reviewer's Osmium Award
		Amazing work over the last few weeks, I noticed that you passed the threshold of 15,000 reviews in the last year, so I present you with the Osmium Star. This is only the second time this has been awarded. Congratulations! You are a one man reviewing machine. Cheers, — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 00:28, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries Insertcleverphrasehere - as of your message on this page a few months ago, decided I could be of the most help focusing on this for a while. Hope to get it down to below 1000, and then simply keep an eye on it and maintain. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for your dedication to the project, it is people like you that help to keep the wiki from falling apart through the forces of entropy. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 07:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Juma bin Maktoum bin Hasher Al Maktoum

Although the article on Juma bin Maktoum bin Hasher Al Maktoum is a stub, it still contains information that would not fit as well in the article on his brother Saeed bin Maktoum bin Hasher Al Maktoum. Векочел (talk) 05:14, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is he is not independently notable, so if there is info that wouldn't mesh with the target page, it should be left out. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:09, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article approval review

Hi. I noticed you approved two redirects to my article Claresholm highway massacre. Would you be able to approve the article itself so it can start showing up in google search? Thanks. Inexpiable (talk) 16:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Ziggeo

Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Ziggeo, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G11: Not unambiguously promotional. Seems reasonably neutral. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:33, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your ignorance of cricket

See here, when I said leave it alone: Australian cricket team in South Africa in 1993–94?

Your ignorance was not needed. Leave things you know nothing of alone. Marplesmustgo (talk) 18:05, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Marplesmustgo: An editor does not need detailed subject knowledge to edit an article for style and policy issues. Please see Wikipedia:Civility for some suggestions about communicating with other editors. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bio request: Darwin Smith

Can you improve Bio on Darwin Smith, a Kimberly-Clark CEO who transformed the company within his span of career from ~30% to ~400 percent profit company. Regards.

Hi. Sorry, but while I think the individual is notable, I have absolutely zero interest in expanding that article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1942 in Singapore - Article yyyy in country

Hi~

I understand the major event for the year 1942 in Singapore is the Japanese occupation in Singapore. However, as part of the list of years in Singapore, I changed it to the format similar of 1965 in Singapore.

As I understand, Article yyyy in country is meant to provide a summarised view of events for that particular year in that country, redirecting it to the main event article defeats the purpose. For example, Adnan Saidi perished in 14 February 1942 during the Battle of Singapore, a war memorial is built to honor him, a feature film Leftenan Adnan (Malay for Lieutenant) featuring him as the main character.

With the above information, is that sufficient to revert it back to yyyy in country format?

Thanks -Xaiver0510 (talk) 01:44, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Xaiver0510 - I don't think there's any hard and fast rule, but in my opinion, as soon as there are two items, it becomes a valid list. A single item warrants a redirect to that particular item. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:20, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will keep that in mind, so if I am to add on other items, I guess we can keep to to the yyyy in country format? Will add on other significant events before making the changes. -Xaiver0510 (talk) 03:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tory Lanez Chixtape IV

Hi, just wondering what is the problem with my edit for the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dweezychang (talk • contribs) 03:40, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, please read notability guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, PCB Fiducial Mark, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:20, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Image Fiducial Mark, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:20, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Panel Fiducial Mark, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:20, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arthistorian1977 - any particular reason? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:23, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow ... that's a glitch. Those 4 redirection you see as "unreviewed" by me, popped up in review tool as waiting for review and I was sure I am making them reviewed. :( No harm intended. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries Arthistorian1977... sometimes it's difficult to see whether or not the tool is saying its been reviewed or not. Done it myself from time to time. Just wanted to make sure there wasn't something I was missing and I should have requested deletion. Take care. And nice work on NPP.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Kazan Imperial University, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:25, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts for reviewing new articles in Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU^(Talk) 13:58, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Lee Vilenski. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Wrestling at the 2018 Mediterranean Games, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:36, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Felipe Vigamy, Onel5969.

Unfortunately Domdeparis has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

sorry this is a double redirect and also a rather dodgy misspelling for Felipe Vigarny

To reply, leave a comment on Domdeparis's talk page.

Dom from Paris (talk) 16:00, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Domdeparis - no worries... thanks for picking it up. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:18, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:DynamiteDennyDVDcover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Makololo Chiefs (Malawi)

Hello Onel5969,

Thank you reviewing this article and leaving a pleasant comment: it was much appreciated!Sscoulsdon (talk) 07:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmit article for AfD

Sorry but the last AfD was a really unfair one as only one person voted to delete the article. Really the AfD vote was even. And yes the AfD was closed as delete but it should't have been. The Optimistic One (talk) 19:14, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfD's are not votes. An AfD can have 10 editors vote !keep, and if their arguments are spurious, as the single !keep vote at this AfD was, then they will be discounted. If you felt it was unfair you should follow the proper procedure as per WP:DELREV, and not engage in an edit war. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I gave the reason on another AfD nomination as said on that one. Sorry about that, i'm very thankful that you were kind enough to resubmit the AfD and for that i am very pleased. Again, thanks. The Optimistic One (talk) 19:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Guido Brunetti

Hello
I notice you deleted the article I wrote for this character, with the edit summary "Restore redirect - no notability outside novels established". In fact the notability was asserted in the first paragraph; Brunetti is the subject of more than two dozen novels, and a similar number of (admittedly German) TV films, so there is the same notability for him as for any of these others, and perhaps more so than many of them.
Also, I put in the novel refs so that people would know the observations were from the author's head, rather than from my own, but there's no shortage of references, as you might have seen. If the problem was only with the references, wouldn't it have been more civil to leave one of the “add references” tag, if you didn't want to look for them yourself?
Anyway, I've re-instated the article, with some other refs that might be more to your taste; if you still dislike it I suggest you open an AfD discussion saying why, rather than going for this back-door deletion process.
I've also added an explanation of why I've put the article there, for your (and everyone else's) information. Regards, Swanny18 (talk) 21:54, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. First of all, the article wasn't deleted, it was turned into a redirect to the author. Second, all of what you say above is irrelevant. The fact that other articles which are similar exist is called WP:OSE, and is not a good article. References are fine, but to show a fictional character is notable, you have to show that he is notable outside the fictional world in which he exists. Fictional bios should have in-depth, well-sourced character development sections, or it should show the evolution of the character and have lots of critical discussion on the character, for example. One of the best examples is the The Doctor (Doctor Who). It can be taken to AfD, where it will be deleted, but why waste other editors' time? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Naic-Indang Road

@Onel5969: Hello, can we talk about this article and its deletion proposal? Thanks. hueman1 (talk) 09:00, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naic–Indang Road. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:27, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Uhh... No one is replying? hueman1 (talk) 09:03, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's the way it goes sometimes. Discussions can last up to 3 weeks. Most comments happen at the beginning of that period, and near the end. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:05, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Thanks a lot for the review on the three pages, especially Abirameswarar temple. Ssriram mt (talk) 12:45, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Yoni Palmier, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:13, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kudpung - Might I ask why? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:15, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Very poorly translated or machine translation of an unattributed article in fr.Wiki. And even though I'm perfectly bilingual, I'm not going to clean it up ;) Should not be in mainspace. Move to draft. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation Kudpung. While awkward, I didn't think it was that bad. Missed the lack of attribution. I've tagged it with a rough translation tag, but if you feel the need to draftify, please do so by all means. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:23, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Yoni Palmier, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Tommy Recco, Onel5969.

Unfortunately Kudpung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Unattributed poor or machine translation from fr.Wiki

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:03, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Denis Waxin, Onel5969.

Unfortunately Kudpung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Unattributed poor or machine translation from fr.Wiki

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:08, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Jacques Plumain, Onel5969.

Unfortunately Kudpung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Unattributed poor or machine translation from fr.Wiki

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kudpung - Not going to get into an edit war with you, but I'm simply not seeing major issues with the translations in any of these articles. Run-on sentences occasionally, but not to the extent you seem to be seeing them. To me, an article like Champs-Bruley cemetery is one that is truly a rough translation, almost to the point of unintelligibility. However, regardless, I thought the view was to tag them with what needed improvement, unless we feel like working on them ourselves. Not sure why you are unreviewing them. Clearly, they meet notability criteria. Clearly you feel they need more work on their grammar. Yet I feel they clearly should remain in mainspace. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:17, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then please at least complete all the tasks associated with New Page Patrolling and notify the author. Pages like this will almost never attract the attention of other users, and they just make work for me and everyone else. Serial mass production of poor translations is neither in the spirit of article creation just for increasing the number of a users creations, nor boosting the the number of a patroller's reviews. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good point. I didn't realize that when I tagged an article using the curate tool, that no message was sent to the article's creator. I thought that only occurred when I simply hit "reviewed", and didn't choose to leave a particular message. In the future, I'll make sure I leave a message in the text box. However, in this instance, I disagree with your assessment that they are poor translations. While they may be awkward in spots, but they seem to be pretty coherent to me. Regardless, take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:32, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Curation feed never sends a message to the creator unless you write one (except deletion tags and 'not English'). Many patrollers believe that a simple automated message should be posted on a creator's talk page as soon as an article is marked as 'patroled', while another auto message could be sent if the patrol has involved a maintenance tagging. These are Curation features that are urgently needed. Currently however, most patrollers can't be bothered to manually do either, which leads to accepted, but perma-tagged articles - another reason why we stress that New Page Patrolling should be a process of depth and accuracy rather than speed. . Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for taking time to review 3 of my submissions. Serenesage (talk) 15:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for reviewing three of my submissions. Serenesage (talk) 15:19, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect reviews

Just thought I'd pop up and thank you for reviewing my redirect pages. That's all :P GoAnimateFan199Pro (talk) 15:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PROD of SPSS

I'm not well enough to contribute much at the moment but you may wish to review my comment at Talk:Sree Pushpakabrahmana Seva Sangham. - Sitush (talk) 16:38, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I blanked an article about unregistered design rights that I believe should be removed

I realised I did a wrongful edit when I blanked https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unregistered_design_right&redirect=no. Apologies for that, I'm not that familiar with the correct procedure. Thanks for reverting. Unregistered designs do not only occur in the UK, the article should be removed instead of redirected to design rights (United Kingdom). That way the references to this article do not mislead the reader. --Martsniez (talk) 13:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Martsniez - you can request to have the redirect deleted. That's the proper procedure. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:16, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, did I make the request correctly just now? --Martsniez (talk) 13:27, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Nice job. And thanks for your civility! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:30, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For info

Hi. Thanks for reviewing some articles I've just started. However, I think there's an issue with auto-patrol rights. I've started this thread at WP:VPT. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:24, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree Lugnuts, will chime in there. Was shocked to see you pop up on NPP. However, I checked about 20 of your new creations, and they are all auto-patrolled. Not sure what the issue was with that one article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:25, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spur

Congratulations! Just 56 minutes after the first edition has been upoloaded, you already was able to put to the site the sources remain unclear template, when the final version was still under edition. Great job!--Szegedi László (talk) 08:18, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol broken

Please be aware that the autopatrol userright is broken, so new articles by editors such as myself are showing up in recent changes when they shouldn't. Abductive (reasoning) 14:34, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abductive - Thanks... I realized that yesterday when I "reviewed" a page by Lugnuts (see above). So what I'm doing now is checking user contributions, and clicking on a creation pre-6/28. If the editor should not be showing up on the NPP, I'm simply doing a courtesy "review", so it comes off the list. Thanks for the heads up. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:45, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation

		Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		You completed over 4600 reviews during the recent Backlog Drive! I feel confident in saying that we could not have done it without you! — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 01:35, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure you could have Insertcleverphrasehere. Especially since some folks don't think I really do that much quality work. Regardless, my goal was to help get it below 1000, so I'm going to continue watching it until they get this autopatrol snafu figure figured out, then go to a strictly maintenance review (around 50/day), to keep a handle on it. You've done an excellent job at getting more editors involved, so if we all average 25 or so, that should keep it down around this level. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:12, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop!

I draw your attention to:

This page should not be speedily deleted because it's copyright has been duly acknowledged under the {{NSW-SHR-CC}} licence and, it is WP:NOTABLE due to its listing on the New South Wales State Heritage Register (NSW SHR). I draw readers attention to the project to generate articles for all items listed on the NSW SHR, of which this article is just one of several hundred in progress. On the basis of the above, the speedy deletion tag should be removed. Rangasyd (talk) 12:19, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely my fault, Rangasyd - I missed the attribution on the bottom of the page. Which I had seen on earlier articles, but forgot was there, so when the copyvio results came back, I simply reacted to that. I was writing to an admin when I realized that if the copyvio report was indeed correct, there were a bunch of articles which needed to be looked at when you shot me this message. Thanks. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:32, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Glad you can stop messaging me... lol :-) Rangasyd (talk) 12:37, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blakewill

Hi, I wish to add a separate page for me, the writer Marc Blakewill, (also part of Blakewill & Harris). It contains new verfiable info. Can you explain why it has been undone? Thanks. Marc Blakewill (talk) 15:32, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marc Blakewill - There are 2 issues. First, there were no independent reliable sources in the article. Second, while the duo might be notable, each of you might not be, that's why we need those sources. Third, you have a conflict of interest in writing an article about yourself. As per WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY, they are highly discourged. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:34, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Agyemang

Hello, you added more footnotes tag to this article page Elizabeth Agyemang. I have added more footnotes so is it okay to take off the tag now please? --Celestinesucess (talk) 22:12, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Newcastle Interchange light rail station

Why was Newcastle Interchange light rail station reviewed and accepted when it has already been posted in its talk page that it is virtually a duplicate of Newcastle Interchange - they are both the same location - we dont need two pages for the same place.Fleet Lists (talk) 23:09, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Ipigott. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Water polo at the 2018 Mediterranean Games – Women's tournament, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Ipigott (talk) 08:54, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing frenzy

Hello. For the past few days I have been getting many "reviewing" notifications about articles I have created. What is this about please? It seems bizarre all of a sudden.Zigzig20s (talk) 15:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zigzig20s - Something broke on the NPP on 6/29, so every new article/redirect goes into the queue. Even those of admins, sysops, and autopatrolled users. A few of us have been slogging through to "review" those which shouldn't have been on the list, like yours. Hopefully, it will be fixed soon. We were told it would be fixed today, but as of this moment, still broken. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:26, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks.Zigzig20s (talk) 15:27, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tieling no 3 junior high school

hi there, I just want to know the reason of not regarding the junior high school as a secondary school. In China, the secondary education is consist of two parts: junior secondary education and senior secondary education. Although both of them lasts for 3 years, the contents are completely different. For instance, I graduated in 2015 from the school which the article about it is proposed to be deleted in seven days, then I passed the Zhongkao exam and get a score sufficient to enter the Tieling High School, a senior high school. The article about the senior high is also created by myself. Now I just can't figure out why the school is "not-notable,non-secondary". The no 3 junior school is one of the only two elite junior high schools in Tieling! Sorry for my impoliteness and the inconvience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomskyhaha (talk • contribs) 15:29, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the Chai River Reservoir article now redirects to the Tieling County article

Sorry for inconvience again, but I'm just feel confused when I found that the article about the reservoir now redirects to an unrelated article. The original article about the reservoir disappered. ps after read some talks above:so I need to add some references and citations then it won't be redirected, right?

Hi. Tomskyhaha - absolutely. Just add some references. You can find out how to format footnotes at WP:CIT. Also, please remember to "sign" your comments with four tildes ( like this: ~~~~). Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Just a newbie here😊. So I'm considering to move the information about the junior school to a new paragraph in Tieling. Is it appropriate to do so? Thanks.Tomskyhaha (talk) 16:02, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Hank Nelken, Onel5969.

Unfortunately Domdeparis has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Sorry but the sources are not enough to show he meets WP:NAUTHOR one is an WP:INTERVIEW the others are passing mentions affiliated or not indepth.

To reply, leave a comment on Domdeparis's talk page.

Dom from Paris (talk) 13:02, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lucibufagin

Please see comments to you on the talk page of that once-was-an-article. If you agree that a mistake may have been made, please be a gentleman there and say so; if you believe you can further defend the point, that would be good to have as well. Either way, your input is requested. Thank you. 2602:306:CD92:4960:3519:A9F:3960:3C00 (talk) 17:28, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

I'd like to thank you for reviewing several new articles I have written. Manzarene (talk) 22:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dragovic (disambiguation)

Rename article Dragovic (disambiguation) in only Dragovic--SrpskiAnonimac (talk) 13:22, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zooropa Babyface

Hi, please note that I placed sources and information relevant to the Babyface article. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Squaredroot (talk • contribs) 17:54, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian People's Army

You recently reviewed this page and made nice comments on the contributors talk page. I have redirected the article to Romanian Land Forces as all the content was an unattributed cut and paste from there. Lyndaship (talk) 09:20, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching that, Lyndaship - how did you notice it was a cut and paste move? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:05, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a history of an editor using socks to create or add copied content to articles like this. I'm always dubious when a new editor produces such a complex article soon after joining Wikipedia. I did a few Google searches for phrases in the article. There is another give away but I don't want to reveal it here in case a copying editor sees and changes their pattern. Lyndaship (talk) 12:23, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation, and the heads up. I'll be more diligent when I come across such articles in the future. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:31, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Liebe ohne Angst article title move

Hello Onel5969, can you please explain why you have changed the title of the article created as Liebe ohne Angst (1989 film). It has been moved to "Love Without Fear (film)", although I had already created a redirect to "Love Without Fear (1989 film)", so it could be found searching via either language. That is the standard practice with foreign language film titles.

The policy WP:TRANSLITERATE has been put in the editing notes, by way of explanation, but that policy is about using English versions of foreign names, such as place names or ordinary terms, where there is established usage. That is not the same thing as film titles. There must be several thousand German films listed on English wikipedia and the standard practice is to listed them with the original German title, see this List of East German films for examples.

The film in question is only available in German and it doesn't even have English subtitles.

Can you please change it back.Felixkrater (talk) 17:56, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Felixkrater - you very well could be right. However, looking at MOS:TITLE, in the section dedicated to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles#Translations, it points you back to WP:COMMONNAME, which I should have noted in my summary, rather than transliterate. There, the example is given of Seven Samurai (not: Shichinin no Samurai). This seems to indicate that the English version should be used. If there are several thousand articles titled incorrectly, that's a perfect example of WP:OSE. By the way, nice job on the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:12, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Onel5969 Yes, Seven Samurai is an established name. That film is well known and has been widely shown in English speaking countries, so it has an established English name. The German film The Lives of Others is another example of well known foreign film being generally known by an English title, so that article title is in English, but most East German films are not well known in English speaking countries. I also think, with this film in particular, it is misleading to have the article title in English, as it implies that it might be available dubbed or with subtitles, when it isn't. If all the East German films have to be moved to English titles, I'm not volunteering to do it ;-). If "Liebe ohne Angst", must have an English title, is it possible that you could fix it so that it is "Love Without Fear (1989 film)" and the redirect being "Liebe ohne Angst (1989 film)" so they properly mirror each other, and that "Love Without Fear (film)" is deleted. Sorry to be fussy as it is only a stub, but I spent quite a long time researching it.Felixkrater (talk) 21:05, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is that you presuppose that commonname only refers to "established names". That's not what it says. It's pretty clear. Unless the foreign film is widely known by it's foreign name, the English name should be used. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:29, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Remembering article: Naic–Indang Road

@Onel5969: I feel bad for my article, I didn't even do anything to save it. I wish I could modify some guidelines when it comes to notability of roads in the Philippines. --hueman1 (talk) 07:24, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Elmidae. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, List of recently extinct birds, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:11, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(No idea how THAT happened, btw. Don't remember any unreviewing. Presumably an artifact of the back-and-forth there right now :p --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC) )[reply]

When reviewing, if I'm going to undo/revert, sometimes I click "reviewed" before making the change. That way it saves me time if the article redirects, to having to go back to the redirect page and click "reviewed" after redirecting. I had just done that, when you undid the change, which I guess prompted the message. No worries. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:31, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of current members of the EU Parliament

Hi, thanks for the review. I've changed the links as you suggested on List of current Members of the European Parliament. Could you check if this is what you expected? Thanks. --Martsniez (talk) 12:26, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Martsniez - Yes, exactly! Thanks. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:28, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Hey - your edit summary here is over the top. Please make sure you are familiar with WP:No Personal Attacks. This behavior can lead to a block. SQL ^{Query me!} 16:36, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SQL - Sorry, wasn't meant to be insulting. Merely descriptive. He's been asked not to post on my talk page, and continues to do so, when he isn't blocked. He has repeatedly used insulting and derogatory terms to myself and other editors, and continues to do so. He's repeatedly entered into edit wars, and continues to do so. What descriptive word would you suggest I use to describe an individual who continues disruptive, derogatory, insulting behavior over and over again, despite multiple requests and warnings? Let me know, and I'll request my comment be revdel'd. But I understand your point. Reacted to someone who's insults have gotten under my skin. Should've shown more restraint. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:49, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dish

Signature dishes are important aspects of a well-known fine dining restaurant. Oysters and pearls are ubiquitous and defining at the French Laundry, as the Waldorf salad is at the Waldorf-Astoria. It's not advertising someone to go there by simply listing the restaurant's most prominent and lasting dish that it's best known for. See this search, showing that signature dishes are very commonly mentioned. Are you in the culinary industry? If not, I could see how you could find this information unnecessary. Yet in the food world, it's pretty important. $ɱ$ (talk) · vbm · coi) 16:57, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But that's my point exactly, this isn't a food publication. It's an encyclopedia. Food guides do place importance on items which are advertisements for the establishment. When I'm hiring a food service provider, of course I want to know what they're good at. When I lease a restaurant for an event, of course I want to know what their specialty is. But those are advertising concerns. And, imho, there is a difference between a dish which has become world-famous, such as the Waldorf salad, and the signature dish of a relatively new restaurant. The former deserves a pertinent mention in the article, the latter is merely fluff in an encyclopedia. If you don't mind, I'll ping someone who is pretty active in the food project, Northamerica1000, to get another opinion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:04, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't a food publication, but it is supposed to detail the most important aspects of a restaurant, for an article on a restaurant (or restaurant/hotel). And a restaurant's signature dish is among the most important aspects of a restaurant, in the public eye. We can agree to disagree, and try to find other views. But know that I'm as much a Wikipedian as a lifelong worker in the food industry, so I cannot overstate the significance of this.

ɱ

(talk) · vbm · coi) 17:52, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did a tally, and six out of the eight sources listed in the article mention/describe out the dish: virtually every source about the place. The other two are not really relevant to an overall view of the restaurant/hotel, so it's understandable the dish wouldn't be mentioned. Therefore it's pretty clear it's important enough for us to mention it.

ɱ

(talk) · vbm · coi) 17:59, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Received ping). Pinging Ɱ. I have replied regarding this matter at Talk:The NoMad. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:57, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Togo Air Force

You requested deletion of Togo Air Force to make way for a move, but your rationale implies that you really want to move to Togolese Air Force. If that's the case, then it is the latter that needs deleting and the former can simply be retargeted. SpinningSpark 14:23, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spinningspark - No. Was totally unaware of the second redirect. Was pretty sure I referenced Togolese Air Wing in my speedy request. That's the developed article on the subject. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:28, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Togolese Air Wing is the article you want to move, but the target you named for the move in your request as the correct name was Togolese Air Force. SpinningSpark 14:35, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, Spinningspark - You're right. My mistake. If you could delete Togolese Air Force, I'll move the air wing article to that title, and fix the redirect of Togo Air Force. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:38, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. SpinningSpark 14:40, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Spinningspark - the move, etc. are now complete. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cabinet Erdoğan IV references

I've added three comprehensive references to the article.--Joseph (talk) 20:24, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nicely done, Joseph. Keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:47, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The New Centre for Research & Practice

Great minds think alike ... see here Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:44, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't even look at the talk page Cwmhiraeth, since it was a red link. Will remember to look there in the future. Nice work on NPP btw... Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit on Nokia 3.1

Hi, I see that you have reverted my edits on Nokia 3.1 on the basis of lack of references, and ultimately, verification. Although I understand that you are merely doing a good-faith edit, but I am restoring the contents and adding sources. I hope you don't mind, and feel free to clear your doubts. Thanks for the good job! --Navinsingh133 (talk) 13:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Navinsingh133 - No issues whatsoever. My only problem with the article is that it was unreferenced. The article could use more references, and definitely needs more footnotes for all the statistics. Thanks for reaching out. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:39, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Understood! I will add a long list of references when I will have more time, they are easily available. For now, I have added three references. Thanks!--Navinsingh133 (talk) 15:12, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Navinsingh133 - Nice job. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SK Group review

Oddly, I got three notifications that SK Group have been reviewed. Two are credited to you. But I never edited this article even once, AFAIR/AFAICT. I assume this is a software bug but thought I should check if you have any idea... Wnt (talk) 23:58, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wnt. Has to do with SK Innovation, a redirect which you created back in 2013. A new editor keeps trying to turn it into an uncited article, and keeps getting reverted. And then the reconstituted redirect gets reviewed, hence your notifications. Sorry for the hassle, but really no way to prevent it until the new editor ceases their disruptive editing.

AAAMC

the redirect to Indiana University was a dead link, there is nothing on the school's wiki that refers to the cultural archives of the AAAMC. As to notability, rock and roll was founded on rhythm and blues music, as played by the black DJ's of the era. Without their input where would Elvis, Chuck berry and all the music of the period be? More importantly, seems that any source for images gets scrubbed from wikis and there is no alternative, is there something that i'm missing? CaptJayRuffins (talk) 02:01, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. A knowledge and understanding of what counts as notability on WP. Please see WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:52, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Residential house of Nikolai Panin, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arthistorian1977 - any particular reason? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:29, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links deleted or allowed / WP:ELNO

Hi Onel5969, I had pinged you on a separate talk page. The policy as it exists states: WP:ELNO

Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject, one should generally avoid providing external links to:....

Which in turn directs to WP:ELOFFICIAL, which clearly states:

An official link is a link to a website or other Internet service that meets both of the following criteria:
The linked content is controlled by the subject (organization or individual person) of the Wikipedia article.

The linked content primarily covers the area for which the subject of the article is notable.
Official links (if any) are provided to give the reader the opportunity to see what the subject says about itself. These links are normally exempt from the links normally to be avoided, but they are not exempt from the restrictions on linking.

Which is followed by: WP:ELMIN

Normally, only one official link is included. If the subject of the article has more than one official website, then more than one link may be appropriate, under a very few limited circumstances.... More than one official link should be provided only when the additional links provide the reader with significant unique content and are not prominently linked from other official websites. For example, if the main page of the official website for an author contains a link to the author's blog and Twitter feed, then it is not appropriate to provide links to all three. Instead, provide only the main page of the official website in this situation.

Social media should only be deleted if a link to one is included in the subject's official website, if one such official website exists. DA1 (talk) 15:27, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, we also delete social networking if there is no link on the official website. That has continuous consensus. ‘Only one’ is the only reason to leave 1 social networking site if no official website exists (and option 2 of ELOFFICIAL, quoted above, could be a reason to remove those as well). —Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 18:25, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're allowing yourself to misinterpret what I've written above. I am alluding to the fact that all socials can only be removed if they already exist on the official website. Barring that, we allow one (1) social link per subject as pointed out above. Your 'consensus' is referring to anything beyond the (1) social link. I am not talking about removing 2nd or 3rd links which is established consensus. Some users misinterpret WP:ELNO to assume "social media" in general is barred (0 links) which isn't the case if they read the first line (which redirects to WP:ELOFFICIAL and WP:ELMIN). – DA1 (talk) 18:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies if I misunderstood. —Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 20:02, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Patrick James McGinnis

Hi. I'm trying to submit a draft for review in the above space, with an article of the same name having been deleted previously for violation of a block or ban. I've taken the content, cleaned up the refs and changed some of the wording and submitted it for review twice but the user Smartse has deleted it both times for proxying (I'm trying to have the draft reviewed for payment from the user who published the article the first time). I've reached out to Smartse to ask him what I'm supposed to do next in order to get the draft a fair review since he keeps deleting my drafts but I've had no answer in nearly a week. Is there any input you can provide on this? Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 21:uh40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

You can't reuse content created by a blocked user. If you want to create the article, you need to start your own version completely over again. SmartSE (talk) 09:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Smartse: And what if my own version ends up being similar to and using many of the same refs as the previous content? I don't understand how you'll be able to discern the difference when the subject of the article is the same and as such the info on the subject will all be almost the same. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 00:03, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And why did you need to delete the draft in my user sandbox when the content is not in the draft space or main space? Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 00:54, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you start it over again, it's very unlikely that it will be the same. For starters, the deleted version contains unverifiable and promotional content, so if you write a version of it properly, then this won't be an issue. G5 applies in all namespaces. SmartSE (talk) 09:39, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Davykamanzi: Reading what you said more closely: I'm trying to have the draft reviewed for payment from the user who published the article the first time That's really not ok and if you had pointed this out initially as you should have done at Draft talk:Patrick James McGinnis then I would have told you that. You're acting as a meatpuppet for a prolific abuser of Wikipedia: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mamadoutadioukone. SmartSE (talk) 15:21, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Smartse: I'm pretty sure I left a disclosure on Draft talk:Patrick James McGinnis (a parallel one is still visible in my talk page), but that aside, the big question for me is how you would be able to determine whether a new draft I submit was completely rewritten from scratch if the information ends up being similar to that present in the drafts you've deleted. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego

@Davykamanzi: The disclosure was{{Connected contributor (paid)|User1=Davykamanzi|U1-employer=an intermediary|U1-client=Motion Ave Inc|U1-otherlinks={{Diff|Draft:Patrick James McGinnis|cur|846912312|(diff)}}}} Given you wrote "an intermediary" rather than Mamadoutadioukone it's seems likely you knew what you were doing wrong but did it regardless. If you start an article from scratch it will be obvious whether it is your own work... if a new one appears out of the ether... probably not. There's nothing more to say. (Sorry for co-opting your TP Onel5969). SmartSE (talk) 19:23, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is it ok if I ask?

How do you find all the newly created pages? I've managed to review like two articles during my whole Wikipedia career.★Trekker (talk) 13:59, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi *Treker - First, you have to have NPP rights. Go to the project page and request them. Once you have them, there's a good link at the top of my talk page in the section Other Useful Links. It's called "New Pages Feed". Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:04, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know, thanks!★Trekker (talk) 14:07, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

Thank you for reviewing my redirects!

‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:39, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Feel free to delete that, I meant to make it a user page Echo9001 (talk) 17:44, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Denson

On May 1, you added the {Notability} tag to this article. No problem with your actions at all. However, I have recently expanded the article and included several referenced sources. Do you think that the tag can now be removed ? I have some doubts about his notability, so would welcome a second opinion. Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 21:02, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice additions, Derek R Bullamore, but I'm still on the fence. This is a case, imho, of true borderline notability. In such cases, I tend to lean toward keeping. Put it another way, I wouldn't argue if someone removed the notability tag, but don't feel comfortable in removing it myself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:18, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Yeah, I feel a bit the same. I will ask for another couple of opinions from elsewhere. Thanks all the same. Regards, Derek R Bullamore (talk) 13:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries Derek R Bullamore - btw, excellent work on the raw links stuff. One of the most overlooked, and important functions for the long range status of WP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:55, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen R. Donaldson

Hello dear sir. Regarding the revert of Stephen R. Donaldson, I am very disappointed you did it. It is common sense to split such lengthy bibliography staggering the article with appropriate Category:Fantasy bibliographies. Tolkien, Jordan, Feist, Eddings, Bujold, C.J. Cherryh, many more are listed there. So I don't understand this "lack of attribution" you just pointed before reverting it. Really. It is common sense, but obviously you think otherwise. I disagree, but I hope to come to resolution and maybe see it redirected with little mention of his major works and hope that it has new article as I did on many of these authors and serves its purpose. Really. I don't wanna argue with you, but why you reverted it? What do you mean by "lack of attribution"? Attribution is synonym to "ascription". Also "function" in my language. Don't you think that seperate "list of works" can serve purpose? I don't wanna argue with you, Sir. Thank you.

Regards:The Mad Hatter (talk)

I have no problem with the list, but when you cut and paste, you need to provide attribution, so that the history of how that information was included in WP satisfies copyright obligations. I had just asked a question about a similar issue to Primefac, so perhaps they can chime in and point both of us to where we can find out how to properly attribute a cut and paste split. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:39, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello O and MH. Diannaa deals with these quite often. I know that an edit needs to be made that shows in the edit history ~~that uses this kind of format~~ {{Copied|from = |to = |to_diff =|date = 23 June 2017}}. There is also an edit that can be made to the talk page adding a box like the one here Talk:Filmmaking technique of Akira Kurosawa. I haven't used either of these for awhile so I don't know if the formatting has changed so hopefully, P or D can correct any misinfo I might have given. Best regards to all. MarnetteD|Talk 14:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and I think we can do it with not such pressure, because I have done it before. I can put a note on the talk page of propsed List of works by Stephen R. Donaldson, if that's what you mean by "attribution", friends.

Regards:The Mad Hatter (talk)

(edit conflict)Oops the template I used in the above post is the one to use on the talk page. This Attribution: most of the content in this article was moved here from [[ ]] on 23 June 2017. Please see the history of that page for full attribution is the one to use as an edit summary - My apologies for the mixup. MarnetteD|Talk 15:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit count

Wiki mark-up link

Other useful links

Links for new editors

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

Some baklava for you!

Dab fixes

Tag unreadability tag?

Recent article creations

"Busy Bakers"

Marking Jicka as a living person

A7 on Antonio Foscarini

Xianzi, the Shrimp Eater

Chinsō

Shigajiku

Pin Drop Studio

16:49:18, 2 May 2018 review of submission by MinskBel

Request on 16:51:42, 2 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by MinskBel

17:23:51, 2 May 2018 review of submission by MinskBel

Purushapura

Cross Country Detours

02:48:51, 5 May 2018 review of submission by MinskBel

2nd May Review of Draft:Shamim Hanafi

Precious three years!

Please don't define the notability

Protected

Green Lantern Corps film please to keep it and at the very least keep the edits and source material

Move

Thanks

Why delete my entries？

Why return redirect? I am slightly annoyed

Updated Mark Friedman

A kitten for you!

SHINee From Now On is Notable

Dixon ES

List of awards and nominations received by Dua Lipa

A Barnstar for you!

College football pages...

Hasty proposed delation of Géza Pálffy

Flawed AfD

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018

Debra Dean

Stub Query

Portal:Serbia reverts

Rewiew

Proposed deletion of Chellapilla Venkata Rao

Take Me to the Kaptin

Ken Layne

Clover (band)

Stephen Dooley

Unreviewed

personal statement

Please review Caillou Pettis

Overlinking

I have unreviewed a page you curated

FT8 revert

Harry Chapin What Made America Famous review

Draft re-review

thanks!

NXLog article review

Speedy Deletion of Apollo Sugar Clinics

Merchandise Giveaway Nomination - Successful

Ways to improve Mila Turajlić

A pie for you!

Fixing the mentioned ambiguity

your civility

Taman Permai, Seremban

Gottstein Futurity - Added tags

A barnstar for you!

Sepik F.C.

Notability tag on Dazhuang

Sienna Senior Living

No. 23 Elementary Flying Training School - Redirect Page

Redlink redirects

Nan Ino Cooper

I have unreviewed a page you curated

notability tag

Article review request

Thank you for reviewing new articles I created

WP:NROADS