User talk:MagicatthemovieS

Whho — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.113.204 (talk) 00:26, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gospel of Jesus' Wife

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gospel of Jesus' Wife you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Display name 99 -- Display name 99 (talk) 21:41, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gospel of Jesus' Wife

The article Gospel of Jesus' Wife you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gospel of Jesus' Wife for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Display name 99 -- Display name 99 (talk) 01:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Rape on Campus

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Rape on Campus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 22:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Rape on Campus

The article A Rape on Campus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A Rape on Campus for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 05:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A FAC on Campus

Hi Magic, I saw this edit [1] after the ping failed to work. Sorry, I think you need someone with more FAC experience. Ribbet32 (talk) 22:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale for edit?

Your edits [[2]] removed the following information without any explanation:

On November 9, 2015, Phi Kappa Psi filed a $25 million lawsuit against Rolling Stone in state court "to seek redress for the wanton destruction caused to Phi Kappa Psi by Rolling Stone's intentional, reckless, and unethical behavior."^[1]^[2] In September 2016, the magazine sought to have the lawsuit dismissed; however, a circuit court judge ruled that the suit could proceed.^[3] On June 13, 2017, the lawsuit was settled for $1.65 million.^[4]

Can you explain the edits?

Thanks,

JS (talk) 23:17, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Shapiro, T. Rees (November 9, 2015). "U-Va. Fraternity Files $25 Million Lawsuit Against Rolling Stone". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 3, 2016.
^ Complaint, Virginia Alpha Chapter of Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity v. Rolling Stone LLC, No. CL15-479 (Charlottesville, Va. Circuit Court filed November 9, 2015), available at The Washington Post.
^ Higgins, Anna (September 6, 2016). "Lawsuits Against Rolling Stone Move Forward Despite Objection". The Cavalier Daily. Archived from the original on September 14, 2016. Retrieved September 13, 2016. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
^ Fraternity chapter at U-Va. to settle suit against Rolling Stone for $1.65 million

Night of the Living Dead

If you feel the portions that you are removing require sourcing, mark them for citation. Don't just keep deleting the info. Udar55 (talk) 17:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 11B-X-1371

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 11B-X-1371 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 04:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thecmonument in Baltimore

It took a bit of poking to find this out, but the monument in Baltimore is near-unique in that it does not contain a statue. So what was destroyed? The obelisk still stands. I still think it's useful, in this case, to specify that it was the inscription that was destroyed. deisenbe (talk) 19:55, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Dragon (Beowulf)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Dragon (Beowulf) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Magic, it looks to me as if you're rather busy, indeed in something like hot water for your GA nominations. Nothing much has happened on this article since the 20th, and while I'm not in a hurry, GANs mustn't just sit about for weeks on end. I am inclined to end the review now, unless you can assure me that there is some special reason like you have ordered some reviews from the library and they're arriving tomorrow. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite busy and it's probably for the best that the review is ended. Perhaps when I'm less busy we can pick this up again? - MagicatthemovieS

Of course. I suggest you follow through with the suggested changes until you're happy with them, and then get it peer reviewed or just nominate it again. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:54, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 11B-X-1371

The article 11B-X-1371 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:11B-X-1371 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 17:03, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA review nominations

Hi, MagicatthemovieS. I hope that you keep in mind what NinjaRobotPirate, MarnetteD and I recently stated in the case of one of your nominations. I mean, looking here, it's clear that you nominated several articles. I removed the one in question. What would you do if you had two or more reviews going on at the same time? Anyway, I ask that you be more considerate of article contributors before nominating articles for GA. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Magic, I do hope you take this message to heart. Wikipedia needs more good and featured articles, and my best guess about your nominations is that you look for articles close to the mark, do a some work on them, and nominate them. Intentions may be very good, but aside from points raised above and at the cited talk page, GAC has a lot of backlog and you're not doing any reviewing for QPQ. I don't think Gone Girl (film) is ready in its current state either, as Flyer22 Reborn seems to have alluded to. Ribbet32 (talk) 14:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, Ribbet, Flyer22 and everyone else if I caused you any trouble. I really was just trying to help. - MagicatthemovieS

I know you're trying to help, there's no question about that, and that you have helped on different articles. My main question was, have you considered performing the occasional review here and there? Ribbet32 (talk) 03:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I should. - MagicatthemovieS

MagicatthemovieS, see what was stated on my talk page by me and BlueMoonset. You really should not be making these nominations unless you are a significant contributor to the article. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing what Ribbet32 stated above about you possibly reviewing, I don't think you are ready to be a reviewer. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 14:31, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Preston Brooks

Why did you remove the Proslavery activists category? deisenbe (talk) 16:10, 25 September 2017 (UTC) - It's a redundant category as Brooks is part of the category "American proslavery activists."[reply]

Your GA nomination of Disappearance of Maura Murray

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Disappearance of Maura Murray you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Drown Soda -- Drown Soda (talk) 20:41, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Dragon (Beowulf)

The article The Dragon (Beowulf) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Dragon (Beowulf) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Beowulf

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Beowulf you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 07:40, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Don't Cry for Me Argentina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Latin music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

American History X

Please don't revert again, instead, per WP:BRD, make your opinions known at Talk:American History X#Editorial dispute regarding categories so an editorial consensus can be reached. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:01, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --John (talk) 06:11, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Book of Genesis

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Book of Genesis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seraphim System -- Seraphim System (talk) 15:00, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

madonna residence

hi,

thanks for editing the page on madonna (entertainer)

she lives in london, where her 17 year olds son is resident also, I believe

on the page it says she's resident in Portugal -she may own property there, and she was born there

I know because she is 50metres away from me now and I'm in london (she's shorter than you expect!)

but you can accept info only from secondary sources, correct? Andyraytaylor (talk) 20:44, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Your personal experience cannot be used as a source. Sorry :(

Your GA nomination of Beowulf

The article Beowulf you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Beowulf for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 17:21, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Disappearance of Maura Murray

The article Disappearance of Maura Murray you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Disappearance of Maura Murray for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Drown Soda -- Drown Soda (talk) 07:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work to promote this article to GA status. It's a quite a turnaround from when there was a concerted effort to delete the article in 2009, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maura Murray (2nd nomination). I salvaged it at the time and I'm pleased to see much of my material has remained in the article. Thank you for re-including content about the online reception of the case; I'd added this before, but it was stripped out because some Wikipedians have a paradoxical dislike of such things. Fences&Windows 18:48, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Samson

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Samson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 22:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mary Surratt

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mary Surratt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DrStrauss -- DrStrauss (talk) 18:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mary Surratt

The article Mary Surratt you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mary Surratt for things which need to be addressed. DrStrauss talk 18:41, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gerald Ford assassination attempt in Sacramento

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gerald Ford assassination attempt in Sacramento you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Reviewer 65 -- Reviewer 65 (talk) 12:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gerald Ford assassination attempt in Sacramento

The article Gerald Ford assassination attempt in Sacramento you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gerald Ford assassination attempt in Sacramento for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Reviewer 65 -- Reviewer 65 (talk) 12:21, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Samson

The article Samson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Samson for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 19:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Cabin in the Woods

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Cabin in the Woods you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 02:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mitt Romney's 2016 anti-Trump speech

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mitt Romney's 2016 anti-Trump speech you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XJJRosebrook -- XJJRosebrook (talk) 22:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Christianity Barnstar
		This is for all your recent hard work at the articles Samson and Delilah, particularly the latter, which I see you have nominated for GA review. I, unfortunately, will be unable to review it for you, since I have been too closely involved in the process of bringing it to its current state, but I wish you the best of luck in advancing the quality of the article. --Katolophyromai (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pocahontas (1995 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pocahontas (1995 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Changedforbetter -- Changedforbetter (talk) 02:20, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pocahontas (1995 film)

The article Pocahontas (1995 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Pocahontas (1995 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Changedforbetter -- Changedforbetter (talk) 21:21, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Book of Genesis

The article Book of Genesis you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Book of Genesis for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seraphim System -- Seraphim System (talk) 04:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pocahontas

Magic, I'm not sure how much clear this can be. Stop reopening the original GAC. Renominate for a second, completely new review if you must. Also, I'm not sure why you're so insistent on doing this now. You've neglected your earlier driveby nomination The Cabin in the Woods for a month, why not work on that? Or at least tell @Casliber: he might as well close it. Ribbet32 (talk) 14:33, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MagicatthemovieS. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hotel California

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hotel California you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 05:20, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Post to Be

If Post To Be is about sexuality, please put the Post to Be page in the Songs about sexuality category. 73.204.241.132 (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Death of Elisa Lam

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Death of Elisa Lam you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Georgejdorner -- Georgejdorner (talk) 06:21, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Apple of Sodom (song), please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "save page" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 11:16, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mitt Romney's 2016 anti-Trump speech

The article Mitt Romney's 2016 anti-Trump speech you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mitt Romney's 2016 anti-Trump speech for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XJJRosebrook -- XJJRosebrook (talk) 17:42, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Cabin in the Woods

The article The Cabin in the Woods you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Cabin in the Woods for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 20:41, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Apple of Sodom (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Apple of Sodom (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Apple of Sodom (song)

The article Apple of Sodom (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Apple of Sodom (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 02:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello, I'm Hakken. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Weinstein effect‎, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Hakken (talk) 16:09, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA review nominations, part 2

Regarding this nomination at the Apple of Sodom (song) article, perhaps you took what Ribbet32 and I stated in the #Your GA review nominations section above to heart? I ask because you actually worked on that article before nominating it. Not sure if I would call you a major contributor to it or not. Anyway, as long as you significantly work on an article before nominating it, there shouldn't be any issue with you making these nominations...if the other significant contributors don't object or are unlikely to object. It can be a good idea to ask on the article talk page first whether an article is ready for GA. Give people at least two days to reply. If no one answers after that, then you should feel free to press ahead with the nomination. To repeat: You should be a significant contributor to the article you are nominating and you should have the time to work on the article per the GA reviewer's concerns. As a number of failed GA nominations posted above on your talk page show, you either often do not have the time or you do not put much effort in. Don't be concerned with trying to rack up a whole bunch of GA articles, if that is a part of your drive. If you've had little to do with the improvement of an article, but nominate it for GA, it's like you are riding off the hard work of others. Personally, I think it's more satisfying when one is a part of that hard work. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 14:42, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did take Ribbet32's advice to heart. I actually was a major contributer to the "Apple of Sodom" article (look at the history of the page, I'd venture to say I did at least 75% of the edits). As of late, I have been massively changing sub-par articles and then nominating them for GA status, which I did for the Delilah article. I agree with your views on hard work. Thanks for the guidance on how to become a better Wikipedian, and for the follow-up.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 14:42, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for listening to the concerns of fellow editors and changing your approach. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 15:31, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hotel California

The article Hotel California you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hotel California for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 20:21, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of I Don't Like the Drugs (But the Drugs Like Me)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article I Don't Like the Drugs (But the Drugs Like Me) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 22:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of I Don't Like the Drugs (But the Drugs Like Me)

The article I Don't Like the Drugs (But the Drugs Like Me) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:I Don't Like the Drugs (But the Drugs Like Me) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 02:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

When you made this edit you didn't explain why. Seems to me it was useful informaion which led into the following information. I have restored it. Moriori (talk) 21:10, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Moriori: It was from a source that said none of those thing.

What? There were four sources, not the best, but adequate. That information introduced the sentence that followed which needed explaining of how/why this lady in British Columbia was suddenly at San Diego Zoo. I think it is highly pertinent information, but am happy to let GA1 reviewer @Georgejdorner: decide. Moriori (talk) 21:57, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a request for further explanation at Moriori's Talk page.Georgejdorner (talk) 22:17, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Death of Elisa Lam

The article Death of Elisa Lam you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Death of Elisa Lam for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Georgejdorner -- Georgejdorner (talk) 18:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A New Year's honor ...

		The Original Barnstar
		For your work bringing Death of Elisa Lam to GA status when I was mostly otherwise occupied. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Marilyn Manson (band)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marilyn Manson (band) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 17:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images at Satan

Thank you for all the terrific and helpful images you have added to the article Satan. I just thought I would note that you might not want to add any more; we probably do not have space and I think we have enough already. If you find more useful images, we may want to consider replacing ones that are already in the article instead because we do not want to overwhelm the reader with too many pictures. I think that, right now, the numbers of images we have is probably just perfect. --Katolophyromai (talk) 03:54, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Katolophyromai: I felt the same way when I added the image of the shofar. Great minds think alike! However, if you want to remove any images I added, feel free to do so.

Category:Statues of Presidents of the United States

Thanks for finding a few more entries to populate this category. I'll try to keep this one in mind as I continue creating new articles about statues in the National Statuary Hall Collection. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Since all statues are sculptures, but not all sculptures are statues, I went ahead and created the parent Category:Sculptures of Presidents of the United States. I also created the subcategory Category:Busts of Presidents of the United States. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Marilyn Manson (band)

The article Marilyn Manson (band) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Marilyn Manson (band) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 22:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Get Your Gunn

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Get Your Gunn you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Get Your Gunn

The article Get Your Gunn you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Get Your Gunn for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lunchbox (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lunchbox (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 22:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lunchbox (song)

The article Lunchbox (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lunchbox (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jonah and Satan currently under GA review

Hello! Since you helped me so much while I was writing them, I thought I would let you know that the articles Jonah and Satan are now both under GA review. --Katolophyromai (talk) 20:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Booty (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Booty (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 04:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Booty (song)

The article Booty (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Booty (song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 06:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Long Hard Road Out of Hell

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Long Hard Road Out of Hell you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 23:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Long Hard Road Out of Hell

The article Long Hard Road Out of Hell you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Long Hard Road Out of Hell for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Look at Your Game, Girl

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Look at Your Game, Girl you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of [[User:{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}|{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}]] -- [[User:{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}|{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}]] ([[User talk:{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}|talk]]) 15:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Look at Your Game, Girl

The article Look at Your Game, Girl you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Look at Your Game, Girl for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of [[User:{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}|{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}]] -- [[User:{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}|{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}]] ([[User talk:{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}|talk]]) 14:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pocahontas

Hello, MagicatthemovieS. I see you have nominated the film for GA. If its alright, would you like me to review it? — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 07:52, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ssven2: I'd be thankful if you did! -- MagicatthemovieS

Left some comments at the GAR.

— Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:05, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Left some more comments at the GAR in case you did not receive my ping.

— Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 11:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Left some more comments at the GAR regarding the source review.

— Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Booty (song)

The article Booty (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Booty (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 23:01, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gerald Ford assassination attempt in Sacramento

The article Gerald Ford assassination attempt in Sacramento you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gerald Ford assassination attempt in Sacramento for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 05:01, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pocahontas (1995 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Schwartz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pocahontas (1995 film)

The article Pocahontas (1995 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pocahontas (1995 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 16:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( in the enhanced toolbar, or if you use the old "classic" toolbar) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 16:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Delilah

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Delilah you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 17:01, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ―Mandruss ☎ 21:47, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Birth of a Nation

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Birth of a Nation you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 00:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Delilah

The article Delilah you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Delilah for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 15:21, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Escape from Tomorrow

"Song"?

You're working too hard . Daniel Case (talk) 00:27, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Birth of a Nation

The article The Birth of a Nation you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Birth of a Nation for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 00:41, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Annihilation film and "The Colour out of Space"

Hi MagicatthemovieS, I'm a Wikipedia novice so apologies if I am doing this wrong. First off, thanks for your edits to the Annihilation (film) page. It looks great! One of the edits concerns me a bit though: the addition of the link to H.P. Lovecraft's "The Colour out of Space." It's not entirely clear what the connection is since it's only a link and I'm worried that readers might misconstrue it to mean that the film or book was influenced by Lovecraft's story. To quote VanderMeer^[1]: "I know that personally it is frustrating to find readers making a connection between my work and Lovecraft’s when he not only wasn’t an influence, but was a writer who bored me silly when I first encountered him." I know that the film and "Colour" share some similarities though. Maybe there's a way to clarify that? Thanks.

d5dq (talk) 16:27, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@David T Davis: I changed the article so the body of it mentions "Colour" :)--MagicatthemovieS

Perfect! Thank you.--David — Preceding unsigned comment added by David T Davis (talk • contribs) 00:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ VanderMeer, Jeff. http://weirdfictionreview.com/2012/09/moving-past-lovecraft/. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

Your GA nomination of Lest We Forget: The Best Of

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lest We Forget: The Best Of you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 08:20, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lest We Forget: The Best Of

The article Lest We Forget: The Best Of you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lest We Forget: The Best Of for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 11:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delilah response

You did add the media appearances for Delilah. Might I suggest you add in any info from those pages that might be different from the bible even when the latest Samson movie comes out. --Rtkat3 (talk) 16:31, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Rtkat3: The article already passed for GA. With all due respect, if you would like the article further changed, I would suggest you do it yourself.--MagicatthemovieS

Horst-Wessel-Lied

I've opened an RfC on the question of whether this article should be included in Category:Obscenity controversies in music. You'll find it here. In the meantime, the article stays in the status quo ante, i,e, not in the category, until there is a consensus. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What the heck are you doing?

I've reverted several changes to categorization on school articles just now. Schools are not monuments or memorials. They are also not songs. Please self revert the rest of your changes to categorization on school articles and seek a consensus for your changes at a central location like WT:WPSCH. Thanks John from Idegon (talk) 00:24, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you should seriously consider archiving your talk page. The majority of Wikipedia users access the site on mobile devices and your talk page is getting to the size where it will crash mobile browsers. John from Idegon (talk) 00:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@John from Idegon: According to the article List of Confederate monuments and memorials, schools named after Confederates count as monuments and memorials.--MagicatthemovieS

That has absolutely nothing to do with this. John from Idegon (talk) 00:46, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@John from Idegon: Wikipedians have already determined that a school named after Robert E. Lee counts as a Confederate memorial. By the way, I deleted old, unimportant aspects of my talk page so that it would be easier to load.--MagicatthemovieS

No, a few (more likely "a") Wikipedians determined that schools should be listed on a single list article. That is in no way a consensus to add them to a category. I see I'm not the only editor that has taken issue with your categorization work. In order to be added into a category, an article has to have information in it on the topic of the category. An article on a school has no information on the Confederate States of America (and if it did, it should be removed as off topic) and an article on a lake has no information in it on Stonewall Jackson. John from Idegon (talk) 01:05, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Monument and memorial controversies

The article is about Controversies - those precede actions. It’s not just about actions that have happened. It’s about proposed actions as well as past controversial actions. (I created the article, for what that's worth.) I am restoring the section you removed. deisenbe (talk) 11:20, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Jaws (film), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. I see based on your Talk page that other editors have taken issue with your categorizations, so I'm asking you to please be more careful. Jaws is not classified as a monster movie anywhere in the article, nor is it listed at List of monster movies. DonIago (talk) 16:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confederate Soldier Memorial (Columbus, Ohio)

You added a category to Confederate Soldier Memorial (Columbus, Ohio) that said that it was demolished in 2017. As far as I know, only the statue was vandalized - the rest of the memorial was still there as of November 20, 2017. Do you have later information? Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 22:14, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Bubba73: I don't. Woops.--MagicatthemovieS

then I think that the category you added today is not correct. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 22:17, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting. ----Another Believer _(Talk) 22:20, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 22:40, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Da Vinci Code (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You boldly added a category. It was reverted. Now it's time for discussion. SummerPhD^v2.0 01:06, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nayirah testimony

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nayirah testimony you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 18:20, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your category additions

Seriously what the actual fuck? Can you use logic sometimes and read the article? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 04:30, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tawana Brawley rape allegations

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tawana Brawley rape allegations you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 11:00, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mary Surratt

The article Mary Surratt you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mary Surratt for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nayirah testimony

The article Nayirah testimony you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nayirah testimony for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:40, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tawana Brawley rape allegations

The article Tawana Brawley rape allegations you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tawana Brawley rape allegations for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:02, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nayirah testimony

The article Nayirah testimony you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Nayirah testimony for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:21, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Night of the Living Dead

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Night of the Living Dead you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 23:20, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited My Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pulp fiction (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Night of the Living Dead

The article Night of the Living Dead you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Night of the Living Dead for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 16:20, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tennessee

I’ve rolled back what you did on Removal of Confederate monuments. Everyone involved would agree that they’re being removed. They may be moved somewhere else, but it will be somewhere much less conspicuous and public. Now they’re sitting in warehouses. Remember the parks themselves were renamed. deisenbe (talk) 10:52, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Night of the Living Dead

The article Night of the Living Dead you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Night of the Living Dead for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 21:42, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for the help with the I Need You (Paris Hilton song) article! Aoba47 (talk) 21:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rock Is Dead (Marilyn Manson song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rock Is Dead (Marilyn Manson song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 04:20, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stonewall Jackson monument

you added - what is the evidence? Isn’t it in Monticello, county seat and only significant town? deisenbe (talk) 16:08, 12 June 2018 (UTC)•[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rock Is Dead (Marilyn Manson song)

The article Rock Is Dead (Marilyn Manson song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rock Is Dead (Marilyn Manson song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 01:01, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Born Villain (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Born Villain (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 00:41, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Born Villain (film)

The article Born Villain (film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Born Villain (film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 21:41, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Birth of a Nation poster

Please go here to discuss the poster for The Birth of a Nation. 24.18.128.102 (talk) 19:27, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Signing your posts

Please use four tildes (~~~~) to sign your posts. As designated in Wikipedia:Signatures, your signature must include at least one link to your user page, user talk page (here), or contributions page, and the date and time at which the comment was made. Nardog (talk) 22:50, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you're too lazy to add tildes every time you comment, what you can do alternatively is add {{YesAutosign}} to your user page and let SineBot take care of your signatures. Nardog (talk) 22:56, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is why I came to this page as well, to add a "please sign your talk page comments" template message. Adding four tildes (~~~~) is pretty easy and becomes second nature if you post enough. Or, like Nardog said, you can add the auto-sign template to your page and then your posts will be signed for you. Either way, please see to it that your post are signed, as it is one of the guidelines here. Thank you - ^theWOLFchild 02:01, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised you're still making incomplete signatures like "MagicatthemovieS (talk)MagicatthemovieS" despite having been warned by a total of four people in the past year. Is there some special reason you can't type tildes? Because that has to be much more inconvenient than "~~~~". Nardog (talk) 04:19, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Santa Muerte

Your edit of Santa Muerte messed it up and I have reverted it. Want to try again? Editor2020 (talk) 02:01, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Noah (2014 film), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. If it's "plain" that there was an obscenity controversy, then it should be easy enough to find a way to add the word, or a version of it, to the article, with reliable sources. I couldn't immediately find one. DonIago (talk) 15:42, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brokeback Mountain. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please be more careful and review article content before adding categories, as you appear to be disregarding WP:CATVER in multiple cases. Just because a film isn't shown in a certain country doesn't automatically mean it constitutes an "obscenity controversy". I would recommend not adding the category to any film that doesn't have some version of the term "obscene" within the article itself, as you are arguably engaging in original research. If you disagree you are welcome to ask the question at the article's Talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:17, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Cruising (film), you may be blocked from editing. You are continuing to apply Category:Obscenity controversies in film inappropriately. The protests related to this film don't appear to have had anything to do with obscenity. Please stop. DonIago (talk) 19:41, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Obscenity controversies in film

What were the 'Obscenity controversies in film' in Peeping Tom (film)? I might recall some obsceneties but no controvosy about them -- SteveCrook (talk) 10:50, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SteveCrook: The film was banned in Finland for years.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 13:37, 10 August 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

But *why* was it banned? And does being banned in Finland make a controvosy? -- SteveCrook (talk) 07:16, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Great God Pan

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Great God Pan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 03:01, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Great God Pan

The article The Great God Pan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Great God Pan for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 19:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Great God Pan

The article The Great God Pan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Great God Pan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 23:42, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vergil (Devil May Cry)

Hi. I recently noticed your edit to Lady's article and thus wondered if you are interested in the Devil May Cry series. Thanks to the 3142 artbook, I managed to find a lot of information for Vergil (Devil May Cry). I aim to make GA like Lady but my prose is not very since I'm a native English speaker. Feel free to edit if you are interested. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 15:49, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: I only read/edited that page because it was the pet project of a Wiki friend of mine; I have no real interest in - or experience with - this series or video games in general. Thanks for asking though!MagicatthemovieS (talk) 15:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

Your GA nomination of Colors of the Wind

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Colors of the Wind you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 19:20, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Colors of the Wind

The article Colors of the Wind you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Colors of the Wind for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:41, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Methuselah

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Methuselah you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 18:40, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Great God Pan

On 4 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Great God Pan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Arthur Machen's novella The Great God Pan has influenced such writers as H. P. Lovecraft, Peter Straub, and Stephen King? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Great God Pan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Great God Pan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Methuselah

The article Methuselah you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Methuselah for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 00:22, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of cult films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Levin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Hills Have Eyes

Hello MagicatthemovieS, Sorry about the delay in reply. Looking at the article for The Hills Have Eyes, the article seems to be coming together fine. There are just things that need to be worked on. The Post-production section seems to be a little short, if there is more information from reliable sources it should be added to that sub-section (the film has been banned in some countries), if there isn't any then that's fine. The article is also missing information on the film's various home media releases (VHS, DVD, Blue-ray) that needs to be added to the article in a Home media sub section under "Release". Franchise and Popular culture section can be expanded a bit more, with the Franchise section noting the success of this film spawning the franchise. Popular culture section can be expanded somewhat as well, with the Raimi, Craven thing given a bit more detail (Here's a good starting point: https://bloody-disgusting.com/news/3417253/long-history-wes-craven-sam-raimis-communication-film/). I'm not entirely certain, but I think the Wrong Turn series was inspired by The Hills Have Eyes, any unofficial sequels, and slight mentioning that the film spawned various rip offs need to be added as well. It's looking good so far, I will try to help with the continued expansion when I can (I am working on a bunch of different projects at the moment so my contributions might not be as big as I would like).--Paleface Jack (talk) 17:26, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Paleface Jack: Thanks for your guidance! Would you like to review the article once i nominate it for GA?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 19:22, 25 September 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

I can't promise anything. But I'll let you know if I do.--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:35, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Paleface Jack: Sure thing. Do you know where I can find info on the film's home video releases? I'm especiall worried that I won't be able to find info on its VHS release. Also, do you know any other Wikipedians who would be interested in reviewing the article?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 19:39, 25 September 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

I look on Allmovie, Amazon for DVD/VHS releases but sometimes amazon doesn't cover all the VHS releases and repeating sources is kind of a stickler for me. As for other Wiki users, I don't know.--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:48, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Paleface Jack: Allmovie has info on the film's DVD and Blu-ray releases, but I can't find info on the film's VHS release anywhere. What do I do? Is there a way to cite a VHS cover or something?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 16:47, 3 October 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

I'll look into it (rolls up sleeves)...--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Paleface Jack: Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide simply says that the film was released on VHS. Is that info enough? I want to nominate this article for GA today. Would you be willing to review it?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 17:01, 3 October 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

Unfortunately, no. I did however find a couple of sources though and VHS Collector.com is a good start, however I can't seem get on it. I will add some sources if you can try for VHS Collector site.--Paleface Jack (talk) 17:25, 3 October 2018 (UTC) Let me know if you can access the site first before adding it to the page.--Paleface Jack (talk) 17:26, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Paleface Jack: I can't access that website. When you say "Unfortunately, no" are you saying I lack enough info on the film's VHS release or that you won't review the article? Just asking for clarification.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 17:32, 3 October 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

I'll see what I can do about expanding the Home media section. In the mean time keep looking for more possible sources for the VHS release and give them to me. Other users might be able to help as well but I can't think of any at the moment. Keep up the good work!--Paleface Jack (talk) 17:35, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Finished the first edit. Tis a bummer though that VHS Collector website isn't responding though. I kind of like that site as it gives dates and distributors for various VHS releases of films.--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:02, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Paleface Jack: Thanks for your help. However, I should inform you that the higher-ups at Wikipedia have decided that Amazon is not a valid source (shrugs). Thanks again for improving the article.MagicatthemovieS (talk)MagicatthemovieS

I had a feeling that it was bound to happen. Oh, well. It just makes finding other sources a lot harder.--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:16, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hi. It is kind of annoying to be reading discussions in edit summaries as opposed to talk pages. Edit summaries probably should be used to write... edit summaries. Thanks for your attention. Thinker78 (talk) 05:03, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Thinker78: Intentionally or not, this message came across as rude. I didn't do anything warranting such condescension.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 05:36, 27 September 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

I apologize if it looked rude, not my intention. I am just forthcoming. Thinker78 (talk) 05:57, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:STUBSPACING

Hi. When you are revising categories at articles, please try to keep an eye out that WP:STUBSPACING is still being followed. For example, this edit at The Exorcism of Molly Hartley took the situation from conforming with WP:STUBSPACING to not conforming with it. Just so you know... Thanks. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:42, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Hills Have Eyes

Hi MagicatthemovieS! I'll see what I can do. I'm a bit swamped as of this month, but I do like the idea of trying to get more GA quality material for Halloween. I've submitted my Matango article awhile ago and these things sometimes take a while to fill up. Can't promise anything, but I'll see if I can find time. Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:16, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I have officially started a review, but I would try to compile a contemporary and retrospective reception of the film in the reception section. Currently, there is only a slightly mixed group of reviews. Would it be possible to dig up some original reviews? Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:28, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrzejbanas: The only original reviews I have are from Roger Ebert, Leonard Martin, and Variety. Do you think that is enough for its own sub-section?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 14:34, 5 October 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

Well the Ebert one seems to be part of another review, which is a sliver weak (as its a review of Swamp Thing first and foremost.) I can't do it today, but I'd be willing to go and seek out other reviews perhaps later next week. My local university has a library that lets me search a lot of original reviews. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:47, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrzejbanas: Thanks! If you decide to review the article, when would you do it?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 14:51, 5 October 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

It all depends honestly. If I find a lot of information to contribute, I don't think I'll be able to do a review as I would have added too much to the article. I'll try to get back to you by the end of next week. If you don't hear from me, feel free to send me a message. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:41, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrzejbanas: I now have four contemporary reviews of the film and several retrospective ones. Seeing as there's no Wiki rule for how many reviews need to be cited in a film article, I think that you reviewing the article would be a much greater help that you adding more citations to reviews, considering that if you add too much to the article you cannot review it. Thanks so much for your help!MagicatthemovieS (talk) 17:41, 5 October 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

Merger discussion for Night of the Living Dead

An article that you have been involved in editing—Night of the Living Dead—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Enter Movie (talk) 05:08, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Hills Have Eyes (1977 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Hills Have Eyes (1977 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NinjaRobotPirate -- NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:40, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Hills Have Eyes (1977 film)

The article The Hills Have Eyes (1977 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Hills Have Eyes (1977 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NinjaRobotPirate -- NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:02, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - I see you were able to get someone knowledgeable about GA review to check your article on this film. While it is true that I do enjoy movies (of all kinds, not just horror), I am not AT ALL experienced with the GA process. In fact, I'm currently working on an article to take my very first stab at getting it to GA status. I am, however, very good at finding typos, RS citations and factoids, so if you ever need that kind of help, I'd be glad to assist in the future. Good luck on your next GA attempts. Cheers, LovelyLillith (talk) 21:58, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Hills Have Eyes (1977 film)

The article The Hills Have Eyes (1977 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Hills Have Eyes (1977 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 23:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

Apparently, there's a bug in the system. Because Born Villain failed its first GA review, you're gonna get a message saying that the latest nomination also failed. You should ignore that, because it's passed this time around. The bot will add the GA icon any minute now. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk) 01:23, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Eckhart Tolle. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Softlavender (talk) 07:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bad Girl (Avril Lavigne song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bad Girl (Avril Lavigne song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Drown Soda -- Drown Soda (talk) 06:41, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bad Girl (Avril Lavigne song)

The article Bad Girl (Avril Lavigne song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bad Girl (Avril Lavigne song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Drown Soda -- Drown Soda (talk) 19:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:TheGracefulSlick

Your continued "comments" at a sockmaster's Talk page are disruptive. If you do it again, you risk being blocked. And you should archive this talk page. It's absurdly long.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:24, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt anyone would find enough cause to block for this, especially since the entire incident could've been easily avoided had the blocked template also been added to the top of the talk page back when it was added to the main user page. There is no notification whatsoever on TheGracefulSlick's talk about them being blocked, and certainly no need for the edit warring or WP:TPO violations on your part. Or maybe a more informative edit summary than "no" first time around would be helpful in not having the situation escalate in the first place. A little bit of understanding and restraint next time around, don't you think @Bbb23:? Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:57, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Elton John

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Elton John you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 18:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Elton John

The article Elton John you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Elton John for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 11:01, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Lot No. 249"

@Drown Soda: did you see my message on your talk page about "Lot No. 249"? I nominated it for review.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 15:49, 19 November 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MagicatthemovieS. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lights Down Low

Can you add the Lights Down Low (MAX song) page to the Category:songs about sexuality category if you know the song is about sex? 73.1.54.180 (talk) 13:20, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article must state that the song is about sex for it to be included in that category.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 18:16, 2 December 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

Last Christmas

Hi MagicatthemovieS

Please don't add articles to non-existent categories, as you did[3] to Last Christmas.

And a WP:EDITSUMMARY helps too -- your edit summary usage is v low

Thanks. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of nicknames used by Donald Trump, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rocket Man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of 1RR at Stephen Miller

This[4] is a violation of the 1RR restriction on the page. If you want to make your change (which does not reflect the content of the RS as well as the long-standing text), get approval for it on the talk page. Also, do not cast aspersions on your fellow editors, as you did when you claimed the page had been written up by the "the open borders crowd." Snooganssnoogans (talk) 17:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to post-1932 American politics and articles relating to recently deceased or living people

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 17:57, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Talkin' John Birch Paranoid Blues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scribner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Talkin' John Birch Paranoid Blues

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Talkin' John Birch Paranoid Blues you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Drown Soda -- Drown Soda (talk) 20:21, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Talkin' John Birch Paranoid Blues

The article Talkin' John Birch Paranoid Blues you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Talkin' John Birch Paranoid Blues for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Drown Soda -- Drown Soda (talk) 21:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"The Hanging Tree"

Hello, I noticed your edits on "The Hanging Tree" article. I appreciate the extra help with word flow and other additions you have made. It does beg the question: Why have you taken an interest in the article? I only ask because this article was practically bare-bones before I started fixing it. It is a popular song with an interesting background to it. Was this page on your watchlist by any chance? De88 (talk) 05:18, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@De88: I like to see which song/film/religion/literature articles have been nominated for GA status to see how I can improve them :) I appreciate this message - I rarely get thank-yous on this site. I recently nominated a fact to be included in the the "Did you know..." section of the home page; would you be willing to review it for me: it shouldn't take very long.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 05:32, 21 December 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

Yeah, no problem. Although reviewing "Did you know..." facts is foreign to me, I will definitely review it! I really do appreciate the additions you have made to the article. Rarely do other users contribute to the articles I work on so it is nice when others provide help. The page used to look like crap - words not piped correctly, red links, laundry sources in the lead, etc. It looks way better now. De88 (talk) 07:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@De88: To review my nomination, check the "Did you know..." page, and look at the facts dated December 19. My fact is the one with Abraham Lincoln pictured next to it. Thanks fr your help!MagicatthemovieS (talk) 09:31, 21 December 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

I thought my edit went through. No worries. I will re-do it. Thanks for letting me know! De88 (talk) 09:46, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@De88: Is the fact acceptable now? If you go to edit it, you can see the changes I made to it.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 10:08, 21 December 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

The only thing needed now is to check one source cited in the article with a high violation rate. It means the article was most likely plagiarized. Try to reword some quotes to get the percentage rate to go down. De88 (talk) 17:58, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Talkin' John Birch Society Blues at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:24, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Talkin' John Birch Paranoid Blues at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:30, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal Greetings!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello MagicatthemovieS, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
★Trekker (talk) 09:37, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Homeostasis07 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Merry Xmas Magic. Congratulations on all your GAs this year. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk) 19:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Xmas

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:55, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice: Arab–Israeli conflict

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 21:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Linda Sarsour

Thank you for your recent edits to the page. Just be careful about that 1RR—it's not worth getting banned. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 23:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikieditor19920: What's the 1RR?MagicatthemovieS (talk)MagicatthemovieS

The page's edit history showed you made a series of non-consecutive reverts and the page is under 1RR restriction. It seems another editor did, too, so I'm not trying to get on your case, and I do think your changes were an improvement--just giving a heads up. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 01:28, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to say the same. There are some exceptions to WP:3RR but it's best to err on the side of not reverting when unsure. Removing large portions of text is always reverting, and changing a small amount of text is usually a problem if it's a revert of a recent edit, so it's a good idea to check recent edits to avoid breaking the rule if you've already performed one revert (or three if 3RR is in place). wumbolo ^^^ 16:42, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging users

Greetings. Please note that other users won't receive your WP:PING, such as here, unless you also include your signature in the same edit. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 07:24, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Breach of 1RR

Your recent editing history at Linda Sarsour shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially, as the page in question is currently under restrictions from the Arbitration Committee, if you violate the one-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the one-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You have twice today added back material on Sarsour's supposed religious views that was removed by other users. Please self-revert to avoid being blocked from editing. Thank you. –Sangdeboeuf (talk) 18:09, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Zionism

Anti-Zionism is a nebulous thing, but you ought to read WP:CAT#Articles as well as WP:LABEL. Unless reliable sources (not partisan sources) clearly and consistently describe somebody or something as anti-Zionist, the category doesn't apply. Disagreeing with the current government of Israel or its policies is hardly anti-Zionism, nor is support for BDS. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:50, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Talkin' John Birch Paranoid Blues

On 22 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Talkin' John Birch Paranoid Blues, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bob Dylan refused to perform on The Ed Sullivan Show after the CBS network tried to censor the lyrics to "Talkin' John Birch Paranoid Blues"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Talkin' John Birch Paranoid Blues. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Talkin' John Birch Paranoid Blues), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 00:01, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Hanging Tree (The Hunger Games song)

On 24 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Hanging Tree (The Hunger Games song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jennifer Lawrence was so anxious about performing "The Hanging Tree" in The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1 that she wanted to lip sync to a professional singer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Hanging Tree (The Hunger Games song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Hanging Tree (The Hunger Games song)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 00:02, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard B. Spencer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Death of a Nation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Linda Sarsour

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Linda Sarsour you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 02:41, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Linda Sarsour

The article Linda Sarsour you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Linda Sarsour for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:41, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1RR

Your second reversion of my edits to Linda Sarsour are a violation of the 1-revert rule emplaced for that article. I would request that you self-revert to avoid any necessity to resort to noticeboard enforcement actions. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 21:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NorthBySouthBaranof: I will be out on the town for the rest of the day without access to a computer - could you revert my edit?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 22:50, 6 February 2019 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

Fixing citations

Would you tell me what tools you use to fix citations to prepare articles for GA noms? Wikieditor19920 (talk) 03:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just fix them manually, believe it or not. It's very tedious.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 03:32, 8 February 2019 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

If you have the chance, would you try fixing citation #2 on Goucher College? I can't for the life of me get it to work right. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 03:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikieditor19920: Done! Glad I could help! Say, I'm planning on getting the article for artist Mark Ryden to GA status; would you be interested in helping me in any capacity?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 04:05, 8 February 2019 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

Sure—I'd be happy to take a crack at it. If there's anything in particular you'd like me to focus on in the article, let me know. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 04:26, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikieditor19920: Unreliable or improper citations are an issue when his early life is discussed. The section discussing albums and books he has done art for is also a woeful mess.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 04:31, 8 February 2019 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

@Wikieditor19920: Thanks for being willing to help me!MagicatthemovieS (talk) 04:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

Potential GA nomination

I'm planning on nominating Goucher College to be reviewed for GA status. Would you be willing to take a preliminary look at it and tell me what you think could be improved on, if anything? Wikieditor19920 (talk) 20:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikieditor19920: I changed what I though needed to be changed. The article looks great to me!MagicatthemovieS (talk) 01:04, 9 February 2019 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

DYK nomination of Linda Sarsour

Hello! Your submission of Linda Sarsour at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --- Coffeeandcrumbs 22:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1RR

You need to self-revert your removal of my WaPo quote; you've once again violated 1RR on Linda Sarsour. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 17:56, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The reverts in question are here and here. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 17:57, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NorthBySouthBaranof: Thanks for your comment; I accidentally broke a rule, and I try very hard to always comply by Wiki policy, so thanks again for helping me out. I reverted my former revert so that my latter revert may stand.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 18:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

That's not the way it works. Either revert the WaPo quote or I'll open a noticeboard thread. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 18:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NorthBySouthBaranof: would you kindly direct me to a Wiki guide explains how 1RR works?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 18:07, 10 February 2019 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

February 2019

Your recent editing history at Born This Way (song) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are on a 1RR, might I remind you? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 22:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jurnee Smollett-Bell

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Jurnee Smollett-Bell, please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Wiki rules" vs "no consensus"

Hi, I just saw Special:Diff/884893816 on my watchlist. Could you take a moment to show me the rule that forbids using TMZ as a source? Thanks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I realize now I was wrong. Feel free to restore the info. MagicatthemovieS (talk) 20:10, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: I was wrong. Feel free to restore the info. MagicatthemovieS (talk) 20:11, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MagicatthemovieS, no worries; I personally agree that tabloid newspapers are generally bad sources and should not be used. I'll ping Trillfendi here, but you're not the only person to object to the change: User_talk:Trillfendi#This_made_me_laugh_out_loud.

I guess the information better stays out, but feel free to discuss this further on the article's talk page. Pinging PaulCHebert as well. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-existent categories

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to You Make Me Feel..., please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. You may find it helpful to use the gadget HotCat, which tests whether a category exists before a change saved.Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You did it again[5], to Bossa Nova Baby.

Again, I have rveerted. But please don't do this. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sex and Candy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sex and Candy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 07:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Crime and Punishment/GA2

Hi. In case you missed the pings, is Talk:Crime and Punishment/GA2 ready to be closed? AIRcorn (talk) 22:53, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Aircorn: Sure thing 👍MagicatthemovieS (talk) 22:57, 9 March 2019 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

Still needs to be closed. Let me know if you need a hand to do it. AIRcorn (talk) 00:18, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Aircorn: I don't know how to close it.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 00:25, 3 April 2019 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

Mark the GA page with the outcome (Kept or Delisted). If it is kept you just need to remove the GAR template from the talk page and update the article history template. If you are delisting it you do the same, but also need to change the class assessment on the talk page and remove it from the WP:GA list and remove the {{good article}} template fro the article page. I have asked multiple times for a bot to do this, but so far there have been no takers, so we are stuck with it being a manual process. AIRcorn (talk) 04:06, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Do the Clam. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. What on earth was that about? You replaced a valid category with a non-existent nonsense category. I have warned you about this sort of thing before. Please see WP:REDNOT, and please do not remove valid categories. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:48, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And here's another one: this[6] edit to Corey Feldman. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:55, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sex and Candy

The article Sex and Candy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sex and Candy for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-existent categories

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Infinity Within, please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. You may find it helpful to use the gadget HotCat, which tests whether a category exists before saving a change. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:34, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sex and Candy

The article Sex and Candy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sex and Candy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 20:21, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And I have now nominated it for DYK as well. Daniel Case (talk) 06:04, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Linda Sarsour

Hello! Your submission of Linda Sarsour at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 11:29, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Elisa Lam GAR

Death of Elisa Lam, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 14:31, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Linda Sarsour

On 31 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Linda Sarsour, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that activist Linda Sarsour (pictured) was a leader of the 2017 Women's March and the 2019 Women's March? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Linda Sarsour. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Linda Sarsour), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

women in fiction and reality

Thank you for quality articles such as Linda Sarsour, Gospel of Jesus' Wife, Marilyn Manson (band), Delilah, Disappearance of Maura Murray, for adding categories such as Women in the Bible, links, refs, and rephrasing, for service from 2013, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:39, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Sex and Candy

Hello! Your submission of Sex and Candy at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:00, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sex and Candy

On 11 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sex and Candy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sex and Candy. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sex and Candy), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 04:31, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Dope Show

I've done what I can with "The Dope Show" (fixed infobox and track listing & formats sections; added all known personnel and charts and certifications). There's actually a lot of decent info on the article as it is, except the people who added that info neglected to add a source (but I'm sure they must have read all this somewhere—all that stuff about "The Brutalist architecture did not permit a reasonable angle or height from which to film [the music video]; instead, the band was placed on top of the trailer of an 18-wheeler transport truck.") So uncannily specific. If you ever feel like completing the quadruple of Mechanical Animals singles... ;) Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:03, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Horse (Katy Perry song)

Hi. I found Mic.com says "Katy Perry's pop-rap crossover "Dark Horse," " Because "pop-rap" is a fusion of hip hop and pop. Can you replace with this as "hip hop" and "pop" are now redundant. 2402:1980:241:26A7:A2DF:4077:4694:ECF6 (talk) 14:16, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Death of Marilyn Monroe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Breakfast at Tiffany's (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Cantwell

Heya, just a heads up—BLP applies outside of the article namespace, and it's best to avoid edit summaries describing article subjects as things like "this racist POS". GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:47, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category Removing

Can you please explain why you are removing certain categories from hundreds of pages? Regards, Guywan (talk) 20:16, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Guywan: I'm removing redundant categories.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 20:17, 9 May 2019 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

Could you please provide a link to the Wikipedia policy concerning "redundant cateories"? Regards, Guywan (talk) 20:20, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Guywan: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categorization#Category_tree_organization

The page says "to the general rule [is] that pages are not placed in both a category and its subcategory."MagicatthemovieS (talk) 20:31, 9 May 2019 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

"These are called non-diffusing subcategories. They provide an exception to the general rule that pages are not placed in both a category and its subcategory: there is no need to take pages out of the parent category purely because of their membership of a non-diffusing subcategory." I'm taking this to ANI to get the input of administrators. Guywan (talk) 20:41, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How long do you think it will take for a response from an administrator?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 20:43, 9 May 2019 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

(oops edit conflict - someone already replied) the guideline advising against doing what you are doing follows right in the very next part of that sentence, “there is no need to take pages out of the parent category purely because of their membership of a non-diffusing subcategory”. Also the edit summaries you are leaving are going to cause alarm bells to anyone like me who has a bunch of articles on the far right on their watch list. Your use of words like ‘evil’ and ‘racist POS’ would suggest that you have some reason for making the edits aside from, or in addition to category organization. When you edit in quick succession like that, they all come up on my watch list together and it looks at a glance like POV editing - especially given the subject within which all of those articles fall. Edaham (talk) 20:45, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Shapiro, T. Rees (November 9, 2015). "U-Va. Fraternity Files $25 Million Lawsuit Against Rolling Stone". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 3, 2016.

[2] Complaint, Virginia Alpha Chapter of Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity v. Rolling Stone LLC, No. CL15-479 (Charlottesville, Va. Circuit Court filed November 9, 2015), available at The Washington Post.

[3] Higgins, Anna (September 6, 2016). "Lawsuits Against Rolling Stone Move Forward Despite Objection". The Cavalier Daily. Archived from the original on September 14, 2016. Retrieved September 13, 2016. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

[4] Fraternity chapter at U-Va. to settle suit against Rolling Stone for $1.65 million

[5] VanderMeer, Jeff. http://weirdfictionreview.com/2012/09/moving-past-lovecraft/. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[1]