User talk:Gerda Arendt: Difference between revisions
→Thank you for the Sapphire: new section |
→top: <center> tags are deprecated and not guaranteed to work well - also correct number of closing </div> tags now |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[File:Cherry blossom Frauenstein.JPG|182px]] |
[[File:Cherry blossom Frauenstein.JPG|182px]] |
||
</div> |
</div> |
||
<center> |
<div style="text-align:center;"> |
||
to the memory of [[User:Gerda Arendt/Images#16 April 2014|the dead]],<br />[[User:Wehwalt#What I stand for|the scuttled]], [[Wikipedia:QAI/missed users|the banned]]<br /> and those who have<br /> |
to the memory of [[User:Gerda Arendt/Images#16 April 2014|the dead]],<br />[[User:Wehwalt#What I stand for|the scuttled]], [[Wikipedia:QAI/missed users|the banned]]<br /> and those who have<br /> |
||
{{nowrap|[[User talk:Lecen|just]] [[User talk:PumpkinSky#Precious again|given]] [[User talk:Khazar2#Reconsider?|up]]}}<br /> |
{{nowrap|[[User talk:Lecen|just]] [[User talk:PumpkinSky#Precious again|given]] [[User talk:Khazar2#Reconsider?|up]]}}<br /> |
||
{{nowrap|[[User:Anythingyouwant|just]] [[User:GFHandel|given]] [[User:Marrante|up]]}}<br /> |
{{nowrap|[[User:Anythingyouwant|just]] [[User:GFHandel|given]] [[User:Marrante|up]]}}<br /> |
||
{{nowrap|[[User:Darkness Shines|just]] [[User:Potočnik|given up]]}}<br/> |
{{nowrap|[[User:Darkness Shines|just]] [[User:Potočnik|given up]]}}<br/> |
||
</center> |
|||
</div></div> |
</div></div> |
||
Revision as of 16:35, 14 May 2014
Welcome!
Hello, Gerda Arendt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Graham Waterhouse, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted. ... Again, welcome! Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:39, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Go Gerda Girl
You do great work and I love it! Don't let Tony get to you. Ihre Arbeit ist grossartig. Weiter schreiben, eien lange Zeit. PS, I really liked the article about the church the communists blew up. BarkingMoon (talk) 11:50, 19 June 2011 (UTC) Sehr geehrte Gerda, I have a watch on your page since a few weeks ago. I approved and moved 167 to holding for June 24.BarkingMoon (talk) 12:11, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:13, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
- Keine Problem. Koennen Sie ueberpruefen DYK Noel F. Parrish? Danke. BarkingMoon (talk) 12:14, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
- Later, yes, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:24, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
- See my talk page. Thanks so much! BarkingMoon (talk) 11:13, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- On 30 December 2011 the article became a GA, thanks to Ched, PumpkinSky and MathewTownsend, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:40, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- See my talk page. Thanks so much! BarkingMoon (talk) 11:13, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- Later, yes, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:24, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
- Keine Problem. Koennen Sie ueberpruefen DYK Noel F. Parrish? Danke. BarkingMoon (talk) 12:14, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Flowers and sapphires
blushing
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Flowers!
For a true gem of a person ...
almost forgot one thing
Cherry Impact event barnstar
Standing Strong
uh, a tree for you
A barnstar for you!
The Mandarax Barnstar of Excellence
First ever Wiki Angel Award
... I'd make a Wikilove thingy ...... with a pretty picture, but I'm lazy so instead you'll have to settle for text" Barnstar Hi Gerda, I saw your note on my talk page. Thanks for the kind words, and for being so refreshingly pleasant and un-bitter all the time. An inspiration to us all. I'm sure I'll see you around eventually, but probably won't be for a while yet. Enjoying my time away. Cheers. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
|
nice edit notice ;)
A Halloween present from Wikipediocracy on my eighth anniversary. Best wishes. Mads Lange (talk) 09:28, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- nice comment, peace maker - I pass free treats today, Reformation, even the Bach cantata got a pumpkin + I like sharing, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:32, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- peace GA ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
I'm not by there very often, but today I saw the recent kerfluffle at AN/I and thought you could use some sweets. Lest you think this is all selfless, though, I brought a second fork. Care to split it? -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC) |
Thank you, sweet of you, - I would share with Andy first if his doctors allow. Day by day I hope the thread autoarchives (havn't looked today), - I am sure his doctors allow no stress ;) . Did you see the list of 18 discussions "drowning" a project? - Everybody who takes an unbiased look is welcome to share the baklava! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:58, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Infobox request
Work your magic, if you have a few minutes: A Song for Simeon.--ColonelHenry (talk) 23:55, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- Done. Did you know that Simeon is among my images? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:41, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Infoboxes clarification request archived
Hi Gerda, the infoboxes clarification request in which you were named as a party has been closed and archived. The Committee clarified that acting on behalf of a restricted user to breach a restriction is WP:PROXYING and so is not permitted. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:39, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
WP:PROXYING, which is a policy says "Wikipedians in turn are not permitted to post or edit material at the direction of a banned editor (sometimes called proxy editing or proxying) unless they are able to show that the changes are either verifiable or productive and they have independent reasons for making such edits"
(my emphasis). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Jahrhundertring
On 6 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jahrhundertring, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a French team created the Jahrhundertring (scene pictured) of Wagner's Ring Cycle at the centenary Bayreuth Festival in 1976, causing "a near-riot"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jahrhundertring. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 17:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Really glad to see this cultural milestone make it into the encyclopedia and onto the front page too. Well done! Whiteghost.ink (talk) 03:19, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you, see my memories :) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:51, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
nothing secret here
Hello Gerda, nice to meet you. Are you really the Notorious Infoboxen WikiCriminal that has been terrorizing the music articles? :-) As you can see from my first posting on AGK's talkpage, up above the duromac thing, I am *also* a notorious wikiCriminal. Or at least, notoriously silly (AGK blocked me -- then later unblocked me -- when they mistook one of my not-all-that-funny jokes over on the Bishzilla talkpage).
But then I'm a friend of 28bytes, also no real name but heart and reason.
|
---|
But my actual question for you is this -- I did not really understand your reply to me.
Well, okay, I understood the watchlist part, and the thank-you part. You are surely welcome. <bows> But what button and what secret thing are you referring to? I do login as an IP, of course (you can call me 74 if you like), but User_talk:Clover1991 has registered a pseudonym; they are the one submitting the article, not me. Maybe the link to the 'secret' thing in my message was was confusing -- it is just a pokemon character, one of many not-very-notable-toys which has a long article in mainspace, badly in need of cleanup, and short on reliable sources. The pokeman-article is not related to the Duromac thing, directly, I was just using it as a metaphorical example of how wimpy our deletionist-standards are when something is 'popular' to some degree in the english-speaking-world. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 14:05, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
|
- We get literally 1000 new editors every month! Problem is, we lose 1050 editors, every month; that *must* stop. Thanks for listening, and thanks for improving wikipedia. p.s. Upgrades,[5] unofficial tutorial,[6] and the 'official' helpdocs,[7] too. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 13:21, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for sharing elucidation! The infobox story goes back to 2005, did you know? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:39, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Infobox
Thank you for your cogent arguments on infoboxes for all biographies, so the "look and feel" of Wikipedia extends to all people. The arguments against them for certain classes of people is just silly. I love the way you have collected their specious arguments. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you, it's nice to feel understood ;) - did you vote? - here's another collection of arguments, the candidates speaking for themselves, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
tale of the ironing lady
|
---|
Gerda, apropos of Mark Williams-Thomas, why don't you simply add the parameter
|
Thanks again!
Thanks much, Gerda, for the reprise of your award. It's refreshing and encouraging to encounter some kindness amidst the bellicosity, irrationality, and bigotry that I frequently encounter. TimidGuy (talk) 12:02, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Hope is precious and great joy is found in living
Thank you for the sapphire—cornflower blue is a color of some significance to me. In the maelstrom that Wikipedia can sometimes be, remember these words from Ode to Joy:
Wem der große Wurf gelungen, Eines Freundes Freund zu sein, Wer ein holdes Weib errungen, Mische seinen Jubel ein! Ja, wer auch nur eine Seele Sein nennt auf dem Erdenrund! Und wer's nie gekonnt, der stehle Weinend sich aus diesem Bund!
Walk lightly and remain yourself, above the fray. →StaniStani 09:20, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you, it helps to open my shop again. - I sang the words last year, here, helping. The blue colour is also of significance to me. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- shop open --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Yay :-) — 74.192.84.101 (talk) 03:16, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Writer's Barnstar | |
Your efforts in creating and translating articles, here and elsewhere, is greatly appreciated. Thank you Gerda. Drmies (talk) 20:47, 21 January 2014 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Your efforts in creating and translating articles, here and elsewhere, are greatly appreciated. Hafspajen (talk) 20:52, 21 January 2014 (UTC) |
- Thank you, both, you excellent writing team, - guess what, I even started attacked a Magnificat today, or should I say four? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:37, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Magnificat, Magnificat, Magnificat, anima mea Dominum, Magnificat Magnificat Magnificat anima mea! Hafspajen (talk) 00:53, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- magnificent, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:56, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Editor's Barnstar | |
To you, Gerda Arendt, for your unswerving dedication to improving this wonderful free encyclopedia, and for encouraging clear thinking among your fellow editors. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 07:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC) |
- "encouraging clear thinking", - I am actually crying now, thank you. - It will go in the selection "blushing", above. I remember winning an argument by "facts and myth", that was two years ago. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Well, you definitely make me think, and your comments restrain my tendencies to rush to judgment. And restraint is something worthy to be cultivated, don't you think? Cullen328 Let's discuss it 08:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- I keep trying to encourage clear thinking (without having been able to word it that well), - Eric is someone who didn't need that ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Well, you definitely make me think, and your comments restrain my tendencies to rush to judgment. And restraint is something worthy to be cultivated, don't you think? Cullen328 Let's discuss it 08:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you Gerda for your continued kindness and support. You are a super-duper Wikipedian and I'm proud to be working beside you!
— Keithbob • Talk • 22:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- My pleasure! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:34, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
The 100 DYK Nomination Medal
The One Hundred DYK Nomination Medal | ||
Gerda, to mark this new milestone. "Light as a flight of tumbling birds was the dipping and soaring of her syllables." Moonraker (talk) 00:06, 1 March 2014 (UTC) |
- Congratulations, Gerda! Chris Troutman (talk) 01:36, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- thank you, in light flight, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Well done!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:04, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Congratulations. Oh, my gosh. You were really working. I think I am at my 5th... Hafspajen (talk) 12:25, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- I think you read that wrong, it's for nominations for others, something I am really proud of ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:31, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- No, I meant what i said Hafspajen (talk) 12:49, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- You meant you are at your 5th nomination for someone else? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:51, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Congratulations. Oh, my gosh. You were really working. I think I am at my 5th... Hafspajen (talk) 12:25, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Cannot find your musician
Dear Gerda. Good morning! Thank you for
Waking up to a horn call: thank you, blowers! "Weiche, Wotan, weiche", as Anna Russell explains, means: "'Be careful, Wotan, be careful.' She then bears him eight daughters." - Please look at the discussion on Dick's talk and tell me what you think of it (and the image). (In real life, I have a friend called Dick who plays horn.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:00, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Done. - Next glove, same history (absent friend started, I continued and completely forgot): Victor Bruns, infobox and warning on the talk, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:55, 7 March 2014 (UTC) |
FA congratulations
Just a quick note to congratulate you on the promotion of Erschallet, ihr Lieder, erklinget, ihr Saiten! BWV 172 to FA status recently. I know you know all about WP:TFAR and the "pending" list, so this is just a reminder to use them as and when suits you. Many thanks. BencherliteTalk 10:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Can I add my congrats to the above? A thoroughly deserved and welcome addition to our FAs! - SchroCat (talk) 09:57, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
An award for you!
Granted! A long term goal could be to get all of the articles up to GA at least. I'm planning a similar thing with Academy Award winning films. Haha although there's rather a LOT of cantatas to do... Maybe 5-10 GAs and 3 FAs would be a better short term goal.. Happy to review any of them, although I might have to ask you to review a few of mine!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:17, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
And my long term related goal could be to blue link all the red links in the cantata articles :-]♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:11, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Congrats on getting this article through FA and a well-deserved FOUR award...just to let you know, you can put a little top icon for FA, GA, and Four on your user page by posting somewhere on your user page:
Just don't forget to change the "icon_nr=" parameter as needed. Good Job, Gerda. I very much enjoy your continued work on the Bach Werke and other musical gems.--ColonelHenry (talk) 22:04, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
re Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment LibertiesThank you for your kind words about Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties. I'm not really participating much these days at DYK stuff, so I'll respectfully defer to the community about that. Yes, I nominated Thaddeus Stevens to TFAR, I think it's most educational for our readers in light of recent films 12 Years a Slave (film) and of course Lincoln (2012 film). Thanks again for your kind encouragement of my quality improvement projects, — Cirt (talk) 22:37, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
|
Structure of compositions
Canto + Passions
|
---|
Hello, Gerda! I've read both The Creation structure and St Matthew Passion structure and was about to do the same with Canto Ostinato. Do you think I should create a new article or should I embed a wikitable in Canto Ostinato? I'm already doing some tests at my sandbox. Wildbill hitchcock (talk) 22:05, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
|
- The one thing I learned on Wikipedia was patience ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 00:24, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your efforts!
The Original Barnstar | ||
Your name came up on a Wikipediocracy thread about solid content writers who don't get the credit they deserve and I just wanted to drop by and do a little of that. Thanks for your work on behalf of The Project! Carrite (talk) 15:28, 31 March 2014 (UTC) |
- Interesting, - I thought I got all the credit that I deserve, from infoboxes criminal and battlefield warrior to angel and excellence (just open "blushing" above). But thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
difference between hard and tough
|
---|
Hi Gerda, there's a question over at WP:RD/L on which you may be able to advise, although I realise it's not really your kind of music! Martinevans123 (talk) 19:43, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
|
Is this To romantic?
angel
|
---|
Hafspajen (talk) 17:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
April 2014Hello, I'm BracketBot. I love you. I have automatically detected that your edit to O Welt, sieh hier dein Leben may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you love me, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message, even if you will break my hart. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:28, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
User:BracketBot informs you: I'll' be back for your Jägermeister soon. BracketBot (talk) 20:28, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
|
- Without a hard heart, you can't survive here. Do you know why the men leave and the women, left behind, have to do the work, in the name of a better women/men ratio? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:08, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- HM, like women... User:BracketBot informs.BracketBot (talk) 20:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- HM? Her majesty? Humble minister? Honest musician? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:19, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- User:BracketBot informs you: I like you best. I'll' be back for your Jägermeister soon. .BracketBot (talk) 20:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- thank you for that important message (trying to stay serious) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Lovely image. I tried also. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:22, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- thank you for that important message (trying to stay serious) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- HM, like women... User:BracketBot informs.BracketBot (talk) 20:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
DYK for St John Passion structure
On 18 April 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article St John Passion structure, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in the structure of Bach's St John Passion (first page pictured), the centre of symmetry is "Durch dein Gefängnis ...", expressing: "By your prison ... came our freedom"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/St John Passion structure. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 17:31, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Excellent work, future FA, mark my words!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:00, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Reviewing ColonelHenry's articles
I see you are participating. Please, please ensure that you verify that the reference sources actually say what is attributed to them; this is one of the key problems already identified, that the content of the article does not match the reference sources. Risker (talk) 14:07, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- I am done for now, I checked the articles I know well, translated one of them today and have other things to do. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:10, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Geology Hall and New Brunswick Theological Seminary I passed for GA. I looked into most of the sources and thought they were fine. It comes as a great shock that CH would do anything disruptive. I'd be very surprised if after all of his articles were checked that they were all hoaxes. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 05:53, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Remember not, Lord, our offences is a great article, on a red link by me ;) - also a great title, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- ps: the first time "disruptive" was applied to me, I felt honoured. (I don't remember what it was, perhaps scheduling TFA, - I did that once.) - Did you know there's Disruptive Technologies? I think it was also Liz pointing out that disruption is good for creating something new. Generally; I am rather with the "disruptive" than those who protect a status quo as if it was something sacred, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:15, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- my memory worked: it was not the TFA scheduling (which was uneventful, thanks to Bencherlite's help, in the memorable time of anarchy after Raul had left), but an early Opera discussion, when I had added (in the process of developing {{infobox opera}}) an infobox to an actual opera to try it out, see? (I love the last example of the template, with the "self portrait" of a famous editor) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
TFA
Thank you. I'm working on Yellowhammer at the moment, but the rail is next in line (plenty of time before next April!) Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:52, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Touching. Matches the DYK author so well, who some think didn't even exist. I wrote He was despised when he left, sadly one of my most useful articles, - see just above, to the memory ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:58, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
BWV 172
Thank you for the lovely note and I am sorry for my slow response: I'm a bit snowed under. I will try to have a look at Baroque instruments but I am not sure I am equal to the job!
You realize I'm going to have to go off and listen to 172 now, don't you? Thank you! :)
In other news, (a) have you seen The Grand Budapest Hotel? It claims to have been inspired by Zweig. We enjoyed it! and (b) just to boast, my brass band was playing outside St Paul's Cathedral yesterday for the women priests 20Y thing - it was fantastic!
Cheers DBaK (talk) 18:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you, love all of it, sorry, didn't see Budapest Hotel, but remember staying in one, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:46, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- ps: attended evensong in St. Paul's, thought of it writing Utrecht Te Deum and Jubilate, - BWV 172: three trumpets & timpani, no strings, unusual! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:49, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Unusual but fabulous! :) DBaK (talk) 18:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Erm - NO strings?? I am worried that I have missed the point here. I'm just listening and it's v nice but I hear fiddles. (Suzuki vol. 7) Please enlighten me DBaK (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Only movement 3. There's a table with scoring in the article, is that comprehensible? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:13, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- AHA! I was too impatient listening. Yes, the table is fine thanks and so is no. 3! :) Lovely. DBaK (talk) 19:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- We performed it in 2000, along with BWV 66, bassist was a brother of Andreas Scholl ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:25, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Lucky you! What a gorgeous piece, eh? With a mixture of shame and delight I admit I didn't know it - which is terrible, but great! I've listened to it a LOT since last night. Did you hear AS on R3 the other night? He was great and they played some stuff in which he sang low - which was a surprise, and worked pretty well. I'd still rather he stayed Up There but this was interesting to hear too. DBaK (talk) 09:18, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- We performed it in 2000, along with BWV 66, bassist was a brother of Andreas Scholl ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:25, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- AHA! I was too impatient listening. Yes, the table is fine thanks and so is no. 3! :) Lovely. DBaK (talk) 19:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Only movement 3. There's a table with scoring in the article, is that comprehensible? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:13, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Erm - NO strings?? I am worried that I have missed the point here. I'm just listening and it's v nice but I hear fiddles. (Suzuki vol. 7) Please enlighten me DBaK (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Unusual but fabulous! :) DBaK (talk) 18:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Message
I will clean up Edda Görings article in a few minutes with intention of getting GA status, I would appreciate your review at that time. Kind regards. Jonas Vinther (talk) 15:48, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you! As English is not my first language, I avoid GA reviews - where I would be the only reviewer - but participate in FA reviews ;) - I like infoboxes, as you will know ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:59, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- Sind sie Deutsch? Jonas Vinther (talk) 19:23, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- Ja. - I have categories on my user page ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:05, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- Wunderbar. Ich bin Däne, aber ich spricht Deutsch. :) Jonas Vinther (talk) 21:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- Eu sou Brasileiro, e por isso eu entendo qualquer um dos lados :) ! Krenakarore TK 22:22, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- Wunderbar. Ich bin Däne, aber ich spricht Deutsch. :) Jonas Vinther (talk) 21:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- Ja. - I have categories on my user page ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:05, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Sapphire!
Gerda: I just have to say, I wish every editor on Wiki were like you! I've run into a rough patch lately with people being very cranky and forgetting all about AGF. It's at times like that I pull out the sapphire you gave me, take a deep breath and remember "the project... the project...." not the personalities! Thank you again for the award and the WikiLove. Cheers!! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- I do the same. Look at today's, found this, inspiring: "I've not lost perspective, though, Wiki is not flawed beyond hope, it's just a long way from being perfect. That's nothing to be ashamed of, it's an opportunity for good people to take responsibility and improve things." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:09, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks again and wishing you a happy Mother's Day (U.S.) ! Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:06, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you, same to you, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:09, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks again and wishing you a happy Mother's Day (U.S.) ! Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:06, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Why on earth
Why on earth do we not have a [12] here? Hafspajen (talk) 23:08, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
-
wwwwwww
-
Why has this man that paper on his head?
- You mean fr ? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:14, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes. Hafspajen (talk) 23:15, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
So we can use it in the article in the gallery, of course. Hafspajen (talk) 09:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- (ec, you said the same:) You can find it in the history ;) - Seriously: I have one archive per year, to see discussions in context. Many images on one topic don't help context, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:01, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
You do. Well, are we going to care for this painter who painted fine pictures or not? Georges Clairin deserves more than this. I like this Tribal Dancer.jpg picture. Hafspajen (talk) 18:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- You start, I still have several other projects but will look, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:04, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- No, not yet. I have the tree project to translate, and the cheese. Sheep's milk chese .. But some day... Was just asking if you feel for it. Hafspajen (talk) 19:10, 6 May 2014 (UTC). Hafspajen (talk) 19:10, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- No idea why the man has the paper on his head. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:59, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Karl Ludwig Gerok
On 9 May 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Karl Ludwig Gerok, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that organist Karl Ludwig Gerok, who studied and taught at the Musikhochschule Stuttgart, composed chorale preludes on "Aus tiefer Not" and "Gelobt sei Gott"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Karl Ludwig Gerok. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:47, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Invisible Rail
Thanks, I've just found a major article on breeding too Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:22, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Lovely, - we had fun discussing birds, and language, back then ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:49, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Bachvereniging
I confess to be unhappy about the move from the original name to the English translation. How is that a common name? For decades, the Dutch name was the only one, now it's the name that distinguishes the group from many other Bach societies, most sources have it, also the German Wikipedia, for a reason, - can't we be international and historical here also? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- The Netherlands Bach Society is the name the ensemble itself uses internationally (see http://allofbach.com/en/). All current English sources also use the English name, as far as I can establish. Your edit to the article makes clear that the ensemble was founded as De Nederlandse Bachvereniging. That the German Wikipedia uses the Dutch name is understandable, as the ensemble itself does not use a German name. Buxtehude (talk) 17:13, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Accepted. (Would you change your name?) - However, that website has the title of BWV 61 wrong ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:27, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
!
Thank God for rose lovers. Lovely rose gallery... Hafspajen (talk) 18:08, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Hildesheim Cathedral
On 11 May 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hildesheim Cathedral, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that after the Hildesheim Cathedral, a World Heritage Site, was destroyed in World War II, the westwork (pictured) was restored without the additions made in 1840? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hildesheim Cathedral. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 10:08, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Nice, well done! That will be hall of fame for it. (Look at this, Chinese catedral with ballons, fun. File:Cathedral of the Sacred Heart of Jesus 07.JPG.) Hafspajen (talk) 17:41, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Re: Church cantata
Hi Gerda, I'm not too sure about that ... parentheses are generally used for disambiguation, and there's nothing to disambiguate in this case. Graham87 09:09, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- The question came up in the FAC for BWV 172. People wished an article about church cantata, instead of linking to Bach cantata. That is not written (yet), but the more specific one - to which I would even prefer to link - is there. Bach was not the only one to write church cantatas. If we call it Bach church cantata we will have the same discussion as on Bach cantata, and with more justification, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:17, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the thanks!
Just realised I posted my message to User:Khazar2 using my old account (Lionfishy). When I get a bit of time I'll try to contribute a bit more! - Lionfish0 (talk) 09:30, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the thanks, Ch. 2
Thank you, Gerda Arendt, for your very kind words on my talk page.
Yesterday I was reading with interest about the cathedral in Hildesheim, and was amazed at the story of its legendary 1,000-year-old rose bush. [13] Perhaps that would make a DYK nomination? Sca (talk) 13:29, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Both articles were made for the purpose (see here) and appeared successfully the last two days ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:33, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oh! Where was I on May 10? Nice work.
- My sister in Colorado was worried about her roses due to a late-spring snowstorm, so yesterday I sent her a link to Thousand-year Rose and said, "I think there's hope for your roses." A pic she took of one of them a couple years ago can be seen here. [14] Sca (talk) 14:31, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Tell Furius, who translated, - I only looked for refs ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:35, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Done Sca (talk) 15:12, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Your rose, Hafspajen and Sagaciousphil would love it. You will find some from our area there, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:18, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- That one, I say is a Peace rose, and if the snowstorm comes just put a common paperbag ower them, Sca and they will be just fine. Tea-roses are a bit delicate, but it worth growing them since they are so gorgious. Hafspajen (talk) 17:46, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Gerda sells her contribution short! Glad that you enjoyed the article and glad to have been part of bringing it to you! I hope the wilted roses regrew. Furius (talk) 20:36, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- I came across the next cathedral without references but will return to my music, "Ich steh hier und singe" ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:42, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Done Sca (talk) 15:12, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Tell Furius, who translated, - I only looked for refs ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:35, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Too kind
Thank you so much Gerda - you are too kind. I am blushing. :) DBaK (talk) 20:03, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Kafka tense
Hello. I'm afraid I don't know the work in question - what exactly is going on with the tense here? Is the book about events following an engagement that occurs before the start of the story? I'd have thought that would still fall under WP:TENSE (or that it should, at the least, be rewritten to avoid mixing present and past tense). --McGeddon (talk) 22:12, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- "It deals with the troubled relationship of a son and his dominant father, facing a new situation after the son became engaged." I may be wrong but understand that even if the story is told in the present tense, the fact that changed before should be in the past tense. That's not mixing but stressing the sequence of events, no? There's an article on the story. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:20, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- I would go for either "after the son gets engaged" or if I really wanted to stress posteriority "after the son has gotten engaged". Furius (talk) 23:16, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you, I tried without tense, improvements always welcome, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- I would go for either "after the son gets engaged" or if I really wanted to stress posteriority "after the son has gotten engaged". Furius (talk) 23:16, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for thanks
There really should be a "reply to thanks" button, to spare me the effort of typing as I'm winding down for my holiday now (from my oh-so-difficult daily life). My musical idiocy again came into play with the organ, I'd no idea what a manual was - thankfully there's an online encyclopaedia called Wikipedia that told me it's the keyboard. Amazing. Belle (talk) 16:44, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- What we get from translation ;) - Manual (German), from manus = hand, - we think of the playing hands more than the keys, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:11, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Help
This is almost ready. User:Hafspajen/Remember... Bur remember, when clear, you post it... OK, I need help. Because this reviewing makes me desperate. Template:Did you know nominations/Biertan fortified church, Câlnic Citadel, Dârjiu fortified church, Prejmer fortified church, Saschiz fortified church, Valea Viilor fortified church, Viscri fortified church it is abourt thr German Saxons in Transylvania. But I am pretty nervous to give a green tick. Mainly because of the scandals with the DYKs lately, and I am not too knowledgeable about about DYK or the the content. Could you please step in as a co-reviewer, or single, I need help. Looks interesting, but makes me nervous, the hook, too-please... Do you realise that they are seven articles to check? And people were making a lot of fuss about my refs, noew I am using thee monkey, .<ref>{{cite web|url=|title=|publisher=|accessdate=}}</ref> but this I don't know anything about. <ref>[http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/596 Villages with Fortified Churches in Transylvania] at the UNESCO site</ref>
Isn't this the bare URL people cry about? And Sagaciousphil is not here nowadays.. looks like it. Sca? Any interest in this? Feels like it would need more the one person, maybe two, three, four.. Hafspajen (talk) 15:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- I told you what to do, no? (and that I have little time for this, - you can request another reviewer by using the red icon, you would still have done your review). Remember: not even two articles in one hook, let alone seven! and not such a boring hook! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:22, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the Sapphire
Hello, Gerda,
Thank you for the sapphire. If someone had awarded it, or something similar, to me along the way, I might have been encouraged to remain.
Georgejdorner (talk) 16:32, 14 May 2014 (UTC)