|Part of a series on the|
Musée du Quai Branly Robe Pakistan
The Pakistan Movement or Tehrik-e-Pakistan (Urdu: تحریک پاکستان – Taḥrīk-i Pākistān) was a religious political movement in the 1940s that aimed for and succeeded in the creation of Pakistan from the Muslim-majority areas of British Indian Empire.
The movement progressed within India alongside the Indian independence movement, but the Pakistan Movement sought to establish a new nation-state that protected the religious identity and political interests of Muslims in South Asia. The first organised political movements were in Aligarh where another literary movement was led by Sir Syed Ahmad Khan that built the genesis of the Pakistan movement. An educational convention held in 1906 with joint efforts of Syed Ahmad Khan and Vikar-ul-Haq, the Muslim reformers took the movement to the political stage in the form of establishing the mainstream and then newly formed All-India Muslim League (AIML), with prominent moderate leaders seeking to protect the basic rights of Muslims in the British Raj. During the initial stages of the movement, it adopted the vision of philosopher Iqbal after addressing at the convention of the AIML's annual session. Muhammad Ali Jinnah's constitutional struggle further helped gaining public support for the movement in the four provinces. Urdu poets such as Iqbal and Faiz used literature, poetry and speech as a powerful tool for political awareness. Feminists such as Sheila Pant and Fatima Jinnah championed the emancipation of Pakistan's women and their participation in national politics.
The Pakistan Movement was led by a large and diversified group of people whose struggle ultimately resulted in the British Empire announcing the Indian Independence Act 1947, which created the independent dominions of India and Pakistan. The Pakistan Movement was the result of a series of social, political, and intellectual transformations in Pakistani society, government, and ways of thinking. Efforts and struggles of the Founding Fathers resulted in the creation of the democratic and independent government. In the following years, another nationally–minded subset went on to established a strong government, followed by the military intervention in 1958. Grievousness and unbalanced economic distribution caused an upheaval which led East Pakistan to declare independence as the People's Republic of Bangladesh in 1971. After a strong concessions and consents reached in 1973, the new Constitution established a relatively strong government, institutions, national courts, a legislature that represented both states in the Senate and population in the National Assembly. Pakistan's phase shift to republicanism, and the gradually increasing democracy, caused an upheaval of traditional social hierarchy and gave birth to the ethic that has formed a core of political values in Pakistan.
- 1 History of the movement
- 2 Political campaigns and support
- 3 Conclusion
- 4 Timeline
- 5 Notable quotations
- 6 Leaders and founding fathers
- 7 See also
- 8 References
- 9 External links
History of the movement
The East India Company was formed in 1600 and had gained a foothold in India in 1612 after Mughal emperor Jahangir granted it the rights to establish a factory, or trading post, in the port of Surat on the western coast. As the Mughal Empire quickly declined in power, the British Empire expanded quick to gain control of the subcontinent in the 1700s. The economic, social, public, and political influence of East India Company and the strong military projection further limited the rule of the last Mughal emperor, Bahadur Shah II. The defeat of Tipu Sultan, the ruler of Mysore, proved to be an event which led to the fall of Mysore Kingdom under the direct or indirect rule of the East India Company.
All over the subcontinent, the British government took over the state machinery, bureaucracy, universities, schools, and institutions as well establishing its own. During this time, Lord Macaulay's radical and influential educational reforms led to the numerous changes to the introduction and teaching of Western languages (e.g. English and Latin), history, and philosophy. Religious studies and the Arabic, Turkish, and Persian languages were completely barred from the state universities. In a short span of time, the English language had become not only the medium of instruction but also the official language in 1835 in place of Persian, disadvantaging those who had built their careers around the latter language.
Traditional Hindu and Islamic studies were no longer supported by the British Crown, and nearly all of the madrasahs lost their waqf (lit. financial endowment). Discontent by these reforms, Muslim and Hindu rebels initiated the first rebellion in 1857 which was inverted by the British forces, followed by final abdication of last Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah II, also the same year. Noting the sensitivity of this issue, Queen Victoria removed the East India Company and consolidated the power by gaining the control of subcontinent into British Empire. Directives issues by Queen Victoria led to the quick removal of Mughal symbols which spawned a negative attitude amongst some Muslims towards everything modern and western, and a disinclination to make use of the opportunities available under the new regime. This tendency, had it continued for long, would have proven disastrous for the Muslim community.
In justifying these actions, Macaulay argued that Sanskrit and Arabic were wholly inadequate for students studying history, science, and technology. He stated, "We have to educate people who cannot at present be educated by means of their mother-tongue. We must teach them some foreign language." The solution was to teach English.
General Sir David Baird discovering the body of Tipu Sultan, 1799.
Eventually, many Muslims barred their children to be educated at English universities which had proved to be disastrous for the Muslim communities. Very few Muslim families had their children sent at the English universities. On the other hand, the effects of Bengali renaissance made the Hindus population to be more educated and gained lucrative positions at the Indian Civil Service; many ascended to the influential posts in the British government.
During this time, Muslim reformer and educationist Sir Syed Ahmad Khan began to argue for the importance of the British education. Sir Syed was a jurist and a scholar who was knighted by the British Crown for his services to British Empire. Witnessing this atmosphere of despair and despondency, Sir Syed launched his attempts to revive the spirit of progress within the Muslim community of British India. At notable Muslim gatherings, he argued that the Muslims, in their attempt to regenerate themselves, had failed to realise that mankind had entered a very important phase of its existence—an era of science and learning. Despite harsh criticism from the Islamic orthodoxy, he helped convince many Muslim communities to realise that the very fact was the source of progress and prosperity for the British. Therefore, modern education became the pivot of his movement for regeneration of the Indian Muslims. He tried to transform the Muslim outlook from a medieval one to a modern one.
In attendance, Sir Syed advised the Muslim communities to not participate in politics unless and until they got modern education. He was of the view that Muslims could not succeed in the field of western politics without knowing the system. In the 1900s, Sir Syed was invited to attend the first convention of Indian National Congress, and many persuaded him to join the party but he reportedly refused to accept the offer. Instead, he urged the Muslims to keep themselves away from the Indian National Congress and predicted that this convention would prove to be a Hindu party in the times to come. In response to this, Sir Syed called in and established the first All India Muhammadan Educational Conference where he provided Muslims with a platform on which he could discuss their political problems. He also became an instrument of leading the Aligarh Movement to provide Western education to Muslim communities. This led the establishment of the Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) which became pivotal place of providing modern teachings on science and technology, modern politics, law and justice, literature, history, and contemporary arts. Sir Syed's writings and scholarly works played a role in popularising the ideals for which the Aligarh stood whilst also helped to create cordial relations between the British Crown and the Indian Muslims. One of his biggest achievement was the removal of misunderstandings about Islam and Christianity. It was from this platform that Syed Ahmad Khan strongly advised the Muslims against joining the Hindu-dominated Congress and also promoted the idea that Hindus and Muslims are two distinct nations. His writings, arguments, theory, and efforts later conjoined and his idea was now popular as the "two-nation theory". At the time of his death, Sir Syed was known as the father of "two-nation theory" and earned the title "Prophet of Education".
The Aligarh movement and the two-nation theory provided the basis of the Pakistan Movement. With the help of Sir Syed and Nawab Vakar-ul-Mulk, the All-India Muslim League (AIML) was founded in 1906, followed by the vision of Sir Mohammad Iqbal of a homeland for the Muslims floated in 1930, on to the Pakistan Resolution of 1940, and the League gaining strength to finally attaining a separate homeland for the Muslims of India. Since his death and the establishment of Pakistan, his name continues to be extremely respected in Pakistan, even as of today; Sir Syed University of Engineering and Technology is named after him.
Rise of organised movement and Muslims minority
In 1876, Queen Victoria took the additional title of Empress of India. Passed by the Queen, the 1833 act appointed Lord William Bentinck as Governor-General of British India. The success of All India Muhammadan Educational Conference as a part of the Aligarh Movement, the All-India Muslim League, was established with the support provided by Syed Ahmad Khan in 1906. It was founded in Dhaka in a response to reintegration of Bengal after a mass Hindu protest took place in the subcontinent. Earlier in 1905, viceroy Lord Curzon partitioned the Bengal which was favoured by the Muslims, since it gave them a Muslim majority in the eastern half.
In 1909, Lord Minto promulgated the Council Act and met with a Muslim delegation led by Aga Khan III to meet with Viceroy Lord Minto, a deal to which Minto agreed because it appeared to assist the British divide and rule strategy. The delegation consisted of 35 members, who each represented their respective region proportionately, mentioned hereunder.
- Sir Aga Khan III. (Head of the delegation); (Bombay).
- Nawab Mohsin-ul-Mulk. (Aligarh).
- Nawab Waqar-ul-Mulk. (Muradabad).
- Maulvi Hafiz Hakim Ajmal Khan. (Delhi).
- Maulvi Syed Karamat Husain. (Allahabad).
- Maulvi Sharifuddin (Patna).
- Nawab Syed Sardar Ali Khan (Bombay).
- Syed Abdul Rauf. (Allahabad).
- Maulvi Habiburrehman Khan. (Aligarh).
- Sahibzada Aftab Ahmed Khan. (Aligarh).
- Abdul Salam Khan. (Rampur).
- Raees Muhammed Ahtasham Ali. (Lucknow)
- Khan Bahadur Muhammad Muzammilullah Khan. (Aligarh).
- Haji Muhammed Ismail Khan. (Aligarh).
- Shehzada Bakhtiar Shah. (Calcutta).
- Malik Umar Hayat Khan Tiwana. (Shahpur).
- Khan Bahadur Muhammed Shah Deen. (Lahore).
- Khan Bahadur Syed Nawab Ali Chaudhary. (Mymansingh).
- Nawab Bahadur Mirza Shuja'at Ali Baig. (Murshidabad).
- Nawab Nasir Hussain Khan Bahadur. (Patna).
- Khan Bahadur Syed Ameer Hassan Khan. (Calcutta).
- Syed Muhammed Imam. (Patna).
- Nawab Sarfaraz Hussain Khan Bahadur. (Patna).
- Maulvi Rafeeuddin Ahmed. (Bombay).
- Khan Bahadur Ahmed Muhaeeuddin. (Madras).
- Ibraheem Bhai Adamjee Pirbhai. (Bombay).
- Maulvi Abdul Raheem. (Calcutta).
- Syed Allahdad Shah. (Khairpur).
- Maulana H. M. Malik. (Nagpur).
- Khan Bahadur Col. Abdul Majeed Khan. (Patiala).
- Khan Bahadur Khawaja Yousuf Shah. (Amritsar).
- Khan Bahadur Mian Muhammad Shafi. (Lahore).
- Khan Bahadur Shaikh Ghulam Sadiq. (Amritsar).
- Syed Nabiullah. (Allahabad).
- Khalifa Syed Muhammed Khan Bahadur. (Patna).
The Muslim League's original goal was to define and protect the interests of educated upper and gentry class of the Indian Muslims. Its educational activities were based on AMU, Calcutta University, and Punjab University; though its headquarter was in Lucknow. British thinker, John Locke's (1632–1704) ideas on liberty greatly influenced the political thinking behind the party's movement. It was the dissemination of western thought by John Locke, Milton and Thomas Paine at the AMU that initiated the emergence of Muslim nationalism. Sir Aga Khan III was appointed its first and founding president; Ali Johar wrote party's first constitution. Despite its activism and educated mass, the party remained less influential in various areas as compared to political movements such as Khaksars, Khudai Khidmatgar, Ahrar, and Hirat until the 1930s.
By the 1930s, Muhammad Iqbal had joined the party whose writings, speeches, philosophical ideas, and his British education training played a crucial role in the expansion of the Muslim League. Furthermore, Muslim League's pro-British stance, Jinnah, Ali Khan, and many other leaders constitutional struggle for Muslim rights made it an extremely popular party in the Muslim dominated areas of the Subcontinent. Furthermore, the success of Muslim League in 1934 elections in the Muslim dominated areas played a crucial role in the split between the Muslim League and Congress became apparent when Congress refused to join coalition administrations with the Muslim League in areas with mixed religion. The political scene was set that was to lead to post-1945 violence in India.
World War II
On 3 September 1939, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain announced the commencement of war with Germany. The World War II became an integral for Pakistan Movement with the Muslim League playing a decisive role in the World War II in the 1940s and as the driving force behind the division of India along religious lines and the creation of Pakistan as a Muslim state in 1947. In 1939, the Congress leaders resigned from all British India government to which they had elected. The Muslim League celebrated the end of Congress led British Indian government, with Jinnah famously quoting: "a day of deliverance and thanksgiving." In a secret memorandum writing to British Prime Minister, the Muslim League obliged to support the United Kingdom's war efforts— provided that the British had recognise it as the only organisation that spoke for Indian Muslims.
The events leading the World War II, the Congress effective protest against the United Kingdom unilaterally involving India in the war without consulting with the congress; the Muslim League went on to support the British war efforts, which was allowed to actively propagandise against the Congress with the cry of "Islam in Danger".
The Indian Congress and Muslim League responded differently over the World War II issue. The Indian Congress refused to oblige with the Britain unless the whole Indian subcontinent was granted the independence. The Muslim League, on the other hand, supported Britain, with the means of political co-operation and human contribution. The Muslim League leaders' British education training and philosophical ideas played a role that brought the British government and the Muslim to be close to each other. Jinnah himself supported the British in World War II when the Congress failed to form any form of collaboration. The British government suddenly made a pledge to the Muslims in 1940 that it would not transfer power to an Independent India unless its constitution was first approved by the Indian Muslims, a promise it did not subsequently keep.
The end of the war
In 1942, Gandhi called for the Quit India Movement against the United Kingdom. On the other hand, the Muslim League advised Prime Minister Winston Churchill that Great Britain should "divide and then Quit". Negotiations between Gandhi and Viceroy Wavell failed, as did talks between Jinnah and Gandhi in 1944. When World War II ended, the Muslim League's push for the Pakistan Movement and Gandhi's efforts for Indian independence intensified the pressure on Prime Minister Winston Churchill. Given the rise of American and Russian order in the world politics and the general unrest in India, Wavell called for general elections to be held in 1945. The Muslim League won nearly all the seats in Muslim areas while Congress did the same in predominantly Hindu areas. Polarisation was now obvious and violence erupted throughout the Subcontinent.
For Jinnah, Islam laid a cultural base for an ideology of ethnic nationalism whose objective was to gather the Muslim community to defend the Muslim minorities in the subcontinent. Jinnah's representation of Indian Muslims was quite apparent in 1928, when in the All-Party Muslim Conference, he was ready to swap the advantages of separate electorates for a quota of 33% of seats at the Capital. He maintained his views at the Round Table Conferences, while the Muslims of Punjab and Bengal were vying for a much more decentralised political setup. Many of their requests were met in the 1935 Government of India Act. Jinnah and the founding fathers played a peripheral role at the time and in 1937 could manage to gather only 5% of the Muslim vote. Jinnah refused to back down and went ahead with his plan. He presented the two-nation theory in the now famous Lahore Resolution in March 1940, seeking a separate Muslim nation-state.[not specific enough to verify]
The idea of a separate state had first been introduced by Sir Iqbal in his speech in December 1930 as the President of the Muslim League. The nation state that he visualised, "within the British Empire, or without the British Empire", included only four provinces of Northwest India: Punjab, Sindh, Afghania, and Balochistan. Three years later, the name Pakistan was proposed in a pamphlet published in 1933 by Choudhry Rahmat Ali, a graduate of the University of Cambridge. Again, Bengal was left out of the proposal.
It begins with a glorious precolonial empire when the Muslims of South Asia were politically united and culturally, civilizationally, and strategically dominant. In that era, ethnolinguistic differences were subsumed under a common vision of an Islamic-inspired social and political order. However, the divisions among Muslims that did exist were exploited by the British Empire, who practiced divide and rule politics, displacing the Mughals and circumscribing other Islamic rulers. Moreover, the Hindus were the allies of the British Empire, who used them to strike a balance with the Muslims; many Hindus, a fundamentally insecure people, hated Muslims and would have oppressed them in a one-man, one-vote democratic India. The Pakistan Movement united these disparate pieces of the national puzzle, and Pakistan was the expression of the national will of India's liberated Muslims.
The 1946 elections resulted in the Muslim League winning most of the seats reserved for Muslims, performing exceptionally well in minority states like UP and Bihar relative to Muslim majority provinces like Punjab and NWFP. Thus, the 1946 election was effectively a plebiscite where the Indian Muslims were to vote on the creation of Pakistan; a plebiscite which the Muslim League won. This victory was assisted by the support given to the Muslim League by the rural peasantry of Bengal as well as the support of the landowners of Sindh and Punjab. The Congress, which initially denied the Muslim League's claim of being the sole representative of Indian Muslims, was now forced to recognise that the Muslim League represented Indian Muslims. The British had no alternative except to take Jinnah's views into account as he had emerged as the sole spokesperson of India's Muslims. However, the British did not desire India to be partitioned and in one last effort to avoid it they arranged the Cabinet Mission plan. In 1946, the Cabinet Mission Plan recommended a decentralised but united India, this was accepted by the Muslim League but rejected by the Congress, thus, leading the way for the Partition of India.
Political campaigns and support
The Western Punjab had become a major centre of activity of the Muslim League's pushed for Pakistan Movement. On 29 December 1930, Sir Muhammad Iqbal delivered his monumental presidential address to the All India Muslim League annual session held in Lahore. He said:
I would like to see Punjab, North-West Frontier Province [now Khyber Pakhtunkhwa], Sindh and Balochistan amalgamated into a single state. Self government within the British Empire or without the British Empire, the formation of a consolidated North-West Indian Muslim state appears to me to be the final destiny of the Muslims, at least of North-West India.
On 28 January 1933, Chaudhry Rehmat Ali, founder of Pakistan National Movement voiced his ideas in the pamphlet entitled "Now or Never: Are We to Live or Perish Forever?" In a subsequent book Rehmat Ali discussed the etymology in further detail. "Pakistan' is both a Persian and an Urdu word. It is composed of letters taken from the names of all our South Asia homelands; that is, Punjab, Afghania, Kashmir, Sindh and Balochistan. It means the land of the Pure".
In 1940 Muslim League conference in Lahore in 1940, Jinnah said: "Hindus and the Muslims belong to two different religions, philosophies, social customs and literature.... It is quite clear that Hindus and Muslims derive their inspiration from different sources of history. They have different epics, different heroes and different episodes.... To yoke together two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority, must lead to growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be so built up for the government of such a state." At Lahore the Muslim League formally recommitted itself to creating an independent Muslim state, including Sindh, Punjab, Baluchistan, the North West Frontier Province and Bengal, that would be "wholly autonomous and sovereign". The resolution guaranteed protection for non-Muslim religions. The Lahore Resolution, moved by the sitting Chief Minister of Bengal A. K. Fazlul Huq, was adopted on 23 March 1940, and its principles formed the foundation for Pakistan's first constitution. Talks between Jinnah and Gandhi in 1944 in Bombay failed to achieve agreement. This was the last attempt to reach a single-state solution.
In the 1940s, Jinnah emerged as a leader of the Indian Muslims and was popularly known as Quaid-e-Azam (‘Great Leader’). The general elections held in 1945 for the Constituent Assembly of British Indian Empire, the Muslim League secured and won 425 out of 496 seats reserved for Muslims (and about 89.2% of Muslim votes) on a policy of creating an independent state of Pakistan, and with an implied threat of secession if this was not granted. The Congress which was led by Gandhi and Nehru remained adamantly opposed to dividing India. The partition seems to have been inevitable after all, one of the examples being Lord Mountbatten's statement on Jinnah: "There was no argument that could move him from his consuming determination to realize the impossible dream of Pakistan."
The Western Punjab was home to a small minority population of Punjabi Sikhs and Hindus up to 1947 apart from the Muslim majority. In 1947, the Punjab Assembly cast its vote in favour of Pakistan with supermajority rule, which made many minority Hindus and Sikhs migrated to India while Muslim refugees from India settled in the Western Punjab and across Pakistan.
The local leaders and Sindhi nationalists never submitted to British crown, and the Hurs led by Sindhi nationalist, Pir Pagara-I has fought against the British forces in 1857. After Western Punjab, Sindh had been an influential and ideological place of Muslim League, since the Jinnah family were hailed from Karachi. When the support for Pakistan Movement reached to Sindh, it became an important centre of activities during the Khilafat Movement. These activities led Sindh to be separated from the Bombay Presidency when the Muslim League passed a resolution in 1925 urging separation of Sindh. Furthermore, Sindh was also a birth place of Muhammad Ali Jinnah who had spent his teenage years in Karachi.
A convention held by Muslim League in 1938, the Muslim League devised a scheme of constitution under which Muslims may attain full independence. It was the province of Sindh which first adopted the resolution for an independent Muslim state. The Muslim League had secured an exclusive mandate of Sindh during the general elections held in 1945. The Muslim majority in Sindh was in support of the policy and the programme of the Muslim League as the Muslim League had good equation with the Sindhi nationalists.
Sindhi nationalist leader, G. M. Syed, who reaffirmed his role as one of the leading figure in the movement. His role as founding father and key role in the Muslim League, G. M. Syed proposed the 1940 Pakistan Resolution in the Sindh Assembly, which ultimately resulted in the creation of Pakistan. On 26 June 1947, the special session held in Sindh Assembly decided to join the new Pakistan Constituent Assembly. Thus, Sindh became the first province to opt for Pakistan.
Unlike Punjab, Balochistan, and Sindh, the Muslim League had little support in Khyber–Pakhtunkhwa where Congress and the Pashtun nationalist Abdul Ghaffar Khan had considerable support for the cause of the Independent India. Abdul Ghaffar Khan (also known as Bacha Khan) initiated a Khudai Khidmatgar movement and dubbed himself as "Frontier Gandhi" due to his efforts in following in the foot steps of Gandhi.
Alongside, another movement, known as Red Shirts (now known as Awami National Party) and the people of the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa interpreted their program in their own way. For Pashtun intelligentsia, the Red Shirts political program was based on the promotion of Pashtun culture and elimination of non-Pashtun influence in their province. For Islamic hardliners and Ulemas, their program was mainly Anti-British and their religious stand became a cause of attraction for the poor peasants which meant to check economic oppression of the British-appointed political agents. Furthermore, the strong emphasis on Pashtun identity created by Bacha Khan made it extremely difficult for Muslim League's support for the Pakistan Movement. The 'Red Shirts' and the Congress were able to contain the Muslim League to non-Pashtun regions, such as Hazara Division and Attock District.
The 'Red Shirts' membership rose to about 200,000 activists, which shows its fame and popularity. The Khudai Khidmatgar, 'Red Shirts', and Bacha Khan himself joined hands with the Congress against the Pakistan Movement. During the 1945 general elections, the Muslim League could only managed to win 17 seats against Congress who secured 30 seats. The Muslim League was highly benefited with its activists who played crucial role in gathering support for the Pakistan Movement, specifically Jalal-u-din Baba, an ethinc Hazara. His strong activism with the Muslim League captured a strong mandate of Hazara District and Attock District. Many activists, such as Roedad Khan, Ghulam Ishaq, Sartaj Aziz, and Abdul Qayyum Khan, helped up lifted the cause and image of the Muslim League in the province. Finally, a referendum was held in 1946 to decide the fate of the NWFP as to whether the people of the NWFP ( now Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa) want to vote for Pakistan or India. In this referendum, majority of vote was cast in favour of Pakistan , despite Bacha Khan wanting to accede with India.
It is well documented when the Congress accepted the referendum without consulting the Khudai Khidmatgar, Bacha Khan told the Congress "you have thrown us to the wolves." The spirit of the Khudai Khidmatgar movement took its last breath when it was proclaimed as a political party after the creation of Pakistan. The aims and objectives were changed and gradually people lost their interest in the movement and embraced the idea of pakistan.
The province of Balochistan had mainly consisted of Nawabs and local princely states, under the British Indian Empire. Three of these states willingly joined with Pakistan when the referendum was held in 1947 at the Balochistan Assembly. However, the Khan of Kalat chose independence as this was one of the options given to all of the 535 princely states (out of which 534 accede with Pakistan) by British Prime Minister Clement Attlee.
However, "Nehru persuaded Mountbatten to force the leaders of the princely states to decide whether to join India or Pakistan", and hence independence "was not an option". Nehru later went on to annexe other princely states like Hyderabad with military force. The Muslim League's Pakistan Movement programme was generally supported by the people of Baluchistan. One of its leader and founding father of Pakistan, Jafar Khan Jamali (whose nephew later became the Prime Minister of Pakistan in 2002) was an important and key figure of the Muslim League. Jafar Khan Jamali's heavily lobbying for Balochistan to accede with Pakistan highly benefited the Muslim League. Another influential Baloch figure was Akbar Bugti was stalwart supporter of Jinnah who well received Jinnah who came to visit Balochistan. among the Pashtunes Abdul Ghafoor Khan Durrani Qazi Muhammad Essa and Shahzada Rehmatullah Khan Saddozai they were staunch supporter and loaylist of Jinnah who played crucial role in supporting the idea of Pakistan in Baluchistan. Another young activist, Mir Hazar, helped initiate student rallies and public support for Pakistan Movement in Balochistan. In 2013, Mir Hazar Khoso, who noted and described Jinnah as his inspiration, also became Prime Minister of Pakistan in 2013. In 1947, the Balochistan Assembly passed the resolution and cast its vote in favour of Pakistan, with a majority approving the accession with Pakistan.
Although, Jinnah, Iqbal and other Founding Fathers of Pakistan were initially struggling for the independence of Four Provinces to create a nation-state, Pakistan. The concept and phenomenon of Pakistan Movement was highly popular in the East Bengal, which was also the birthplace of the Muslim League, in the 1940s. The Muslim League's notable statesman and activists were hailed from the East Bengal, including Husyen Suhrawardy, Nazimuddin, and Nurul Amin, who later became Prime ministers of Pakistan in the successive periods of Pakistan. Following the partition of Bengal, the violence erupted in the region, which mainly maintained to Kolkata and Noakhali. It is documented by the historians of Pakistan that Huseyn Suhrawardy wanted Bengal to be an independent state that would neither join Pakistan or India but to be remained unpartitioned. Despite the heavy criticism from the Muslim League, Jinnah realised the validity of Suhrawardy's argument gave his tacit support to the Bengal's plan for independence. However, the plan failed after a successful involvement of Congress in Western Bengali; therefore the Muslim-majority Eastern Bengal was left no choice but to become a part of Pakistan.
During the Pakistan Movement in the 1940s, Rohingya Muslims in western Burma had an ambition to annexe and merge their region into East-Pakistan. Before the independence of Burma in January 1948, Muslim leaders from Arakan addressed themselves to Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan, and asked his assistance in annexing of the Mayu region to Pakistan which was about to be formed. Two months later, North Arakan Muslim League was founded in Akyab (modern: Sittwe, capital of Arakan State), it, too demanding annexation to Pakistan. However, it is noted that the proposal was never materialised after it was reportedly turned down by Jinnah.
In 1947, an armed revolution took place in Jammu and Kashmir over the issue of accession to India or Pakistan. Kashmir's Hindu maharaja, Hari Singh, fearing a loss of control requested Indian intervention in Kashmir. The conflict resulted in a stalemate as the "Line of Control" became the de facto border between India and Pakistan in Jammu and Kashmir.
Role of Ulama
The majority of Barelvis supported the creation of Pakistan. The Barelvi ulama issued fatwas in support of the Muslim League and gave their support to the formation of the state of Pakistan. Sunni ulema and pirs were mobilised to establish that the Muslim masses wanted the formation of Pakistan. In contrast, most Deobandi ulama (led by Maulana Husain Ahmad Madani) opposed the creation of Pakistan and the two-nation theory. Maulana Husain Ahmad Madani and the Deobandis advocated 'composite nationalism': according to which Muslims and Hindus were one nation. Madani differentiated between 'qaum' -which meant a multi-religious nation- and 'millat'-which was exclusively the social unity of Muslims. However, a few highly influential Deobandi clerics did support the creation of Pakistan. The Grand Mufti of Deoband, Mufti Muhammad Shafi, issued a fatwa in favour of the Muslim League. Maulana Ahraf Ali Thanvi also supported the Muslim League's demand for the creation of Pakistan and he dismissed the criticism that most Muslim League members were not practising Muslims. Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi was of the view that the Muslim League should be supported and also be advised at the same time to become religiously observant.
|Part of the Politics series on|
Sir Syed Ahmad Khan (1817–1898) philosophical ideas plays a direct role in the Pakistan Movement. His Two-Nation Theory became more and more obvious during the Congress rule in the Subcontinent. In 1946, the Muslim majorities agreed to the idea of Pakistan, as a response to Congress's one sided policies, which were also the result of leaders like Jinnah leaving the party in favour of Muslim League, winning in seven of the 11 provinces. Prior to 1938, Bengal with 33 million Muslims had only ten representatives, less than the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh, which were home to only seven million Muslims. Thus the creation of Pakistan became inevitable and the British had no choice but to create two separate nations – Pakistan and India – in 1947.
But the main motivating and integrating factor was that the Muslims' intellectual class wanted representation; the masses needed a platform on which to unite. It was the dissemination of western thought by John Locke, Milton and Thomas Paine, at the Aligarh Muslim University that initiated the emergence of Pakistan Movement. According to Pakistan Studies curriculum, Muhammad bin Qasim is often referred to as 'the first Pakistani'. Muhammad Ali Jinnah also acclaimed the Pakistan movement to have started when the first Muslim put a foot in the Gateway of Islam.
After the independence in 1947, the violence and upheavals continued to be faced by Pakistan, as Liaquat Ali Khan becoming the Prime Minister of Pakistan in 1947. The issue involving the equal status of Urdu and Bengali languages created divergence in the country's political ideology. Need for good governance led to the military take over in 1958 which was followed by rapid industrialisation in the 1960s. Economic grievances and unbalanced financial payments led to a bloody and an armed struggle of East Pakistan in the 1970s, in which eventually resulted with East Pakistan becoming Bangladesh in 1971.
Realizing the problems and causes of the East Pakistan's separation led another nationalist subset to work on the more reform constitution that guaranteed equals rights in the country. Much of Islamic texture and basic rights defined by Holy Quran were inserted in the Constitution of Pakistan in 1973; the year when the Constitution of Pakistan was promulgated. In the successive periods of tragedy of East-Pakistan, the country continued to rebuild and reconstruct itself in terms constitutionally and its path to transformed into republicanism. After 1971 catastrophic episode, Pakistan's phase shift to parliamentary republicanism and the gradually increasing in democracy caused an upheaval of traditional social hierarchy and gave birth to the ethic that has formed a core of political values in Pakistan. The XIII amendment (1997) and XVIII amendment (2010) transformed the country into becoming a parliamentary republic as well as also becoming a nuclear power in the subcontinent.
Non-Muslims contribution and efforts
Jinnah's vision was supported by few of the Hindus, Sikhs, Parsis, Jews and Christians that lived in Muslim-dominated regions of undivided India. The most notable and influential Hindu figure in the Pakistan Movement was Jogendra Nath Mandal from Bengal. Jagannath Azad was from the Urdu-speaking belt. Mandal represented the Hindu contingent calling for an independent Pakistan, and was one of the founding-fathers of Pakistan. After the independence, Mandal was given ministries of Law, Justice, and Work-Force by Jinnah in Liaquat Ali Khan's government. He returned to India and submitted his resignation to Liaquat Ali Khan, the then-Prime Minister of Pakistan.
Some local Christians also stood behind Jinnah's vision, playing a pivotal role in the movement. The notable Christians included Sir Victor Turner and Alvin Robert Cornelius. Turner was responsible for the economic, financial planning of the country after the independence. Turner was among one of the founding fathers of Pakistan, and guided Jinnah and Ali Khan on economic affairs, taxation and to handle the administrative units. Alvin Robert Cornelius was elevated as Chief Justice of Lahore High Court bench by Jinnah and served as Law Secretary in Liaquat Ali Khan's government. The Hindu, Christian, and Parsi communities also played their due role for the development of Pakistan soon after its creation.
As an example or inspiration
The cause of Pakistan Movement became an inspiration in different countries of the world. Protection of one's beliefs, equal rights, and liberty were incorporated in the state's constitution. Arguments presented by Ali Mazrui pointed out that the South Sudan's movement led to the partition of the Sudan into Sudan proper, which is primarily Muslim, and South Sudan, which is primarily Christian and animistic.
Memory and legacy
The Pakistan Movement has a central place in Pakistan's memory. The founding story of Pakistan Movement is not only covered in the school and universities textbooks but also in innumerable monuments. Almost all key events are covered in Pakistan's textbooks, literature, and novels as well. Thus, Fourteenth of August is one of major and most celebrated national day in Pakistan. To many authors and historians, Jinnah's legacy is Pakistan.
The Minar-e-Pakistan is a monument which has attracted ten thousand visitors. The Minar-e-Pakistan still continues to project the memory to the people to remember the birth of Pakistan. Jinnah's estates in Karachi and Ziarat has attracted thousands visitors.
Historian of Pakistan, Vali Nasr, argues that the Islamic universalism had become a main source of Pakistan Movement that shaped patriotism, meaning, and nation's birth. To many Pakistanis, Jinnah's role is viewed as a modern Moses-like leader; whilst many other founding fathers of the nation-state also occupies extremely respected place in the hearts of the people of Pakistan.
I would like to see the Punjab, North-West Frontier Province, Sind and Baluchistan amalgamated into a single State. Self-government within the British Empire, or without the British Empire, the formation of a consolidated North-West Indian Muslim State appears to me to be the final destiny of the Muslims, at least of North-West India.
At this solemn hour in the history of India, when British and Indian statesmen are laying the foundations of a Federal Constitution for that land, we address this appeal to you, in the name of our common heritage, on behalf of our thirty million Muslim brethren who live in Pakistan – by which we mean the five Northern units of India, Viz: Punjab, North-West Frontier Province (Afghan Province), Kashmir, Sind and Baluchistan – for your sympathy and support in our grim and fateful struggle against political crucifixion and complete annihilation.
It is extremely difficult to appreciate why our Hindu friends fail to understand the real nature of Islam and Hinduism. They are not religious in the strict sense of the word, but are, in fact, different and distinct social orders, and it is a dream that the Hindus and Muslims can ever evolve a common nationality, and this misconception of one Indian nation has troubles and will lead India to destruction if we fail to revise our notions in time. The Hindus and Muslims belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs, literatures. They neither intermarry nor interdine together and, indeed, they belong to two different civilizations which are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions. Their aspect on life and of life are different. It is quite clear that Hindus and Muslims derive their inspiration from different sources of history. They have different ethics, different heroes, and different episodes. Very often the hero of one is a foe of the other and, likewise, their victories and defeats overlap. To yoke together two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority, must lead to growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be so built for the government of such a state."
Leaders and founding fathers
- Muhammad Ali Jinnah
- Allama Muhammad Iqbal
- Liaquat Ali Khan
- Sardar Abdur Rab Nishtar
- Aga Khan III
- Muhammad Zafarullah Khan
- A. K. Fazlul Huq
- Mohammad Abdul Ghafoor Hazarvi
- Ghulam Bhik Nairang
- Khwaja Nazimuddin
- Jalal-ud-din Jalal Baba
- Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy
- Chaudhry Naseer Ahmad Malhi
- Maulana Zafar Ali Khan
- Ra'ana Liaquat Ali Khan
- Fatima Jinnah
- Abdullah Haroon
- Malak Shamas khan from Sawal Dher Mardan
- A Short History of Pakistan, a book edited by I H Qureshi
- History of Pakistan
- National Monument, Islamabad
- Raja, Masood Ashraf. Constructing Pakistan: Foundational Texts and the Rise of Muslim National Identity, 1857–1947, Oxford 2010, ISBN 978-0-19-547811-2
- Nawab Mohammad Ismail Khan
- Pakistani nationalism
- Pakistan Zindabad
- Encyclopedia of Canada's peoples – Paul R. Magocsi, Multicultural History Society of Ontario. Retrieved 31 January 2012.
- Burki, Shahid Javed (1999). Pakistan : fifty years of nationhood (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. ISBN 0-8133-3621-X.
- "Establishment of All India Muslim League". AIML in India. 1 June 2003. Retrieved 7 February 2014.
- et al. administrators. "Allahabad Address". Allahabad Address. Retrieved 7 February 2014.
- Two-Nation Theory. "Two-Nation Theory". Two-Nation Theory. Retrieved 7 February 2014.
- "Fourteenth Points of Jinnah". Fourteenth Points of Jinnah. 2 June 2003. Retrieved 7 February 2014.
- Ali, Faiz Ahmed Faiz ; translated with a new introduction by Agha Shahid (1995). The rebel's silhouette : selected poems (Rev. ed.). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. ISBN 0-87023-975-9.
- Husein Khimjee (2013). Pakistan: A Legacy of the Indian Khilafat Movement. iUniverse. ISBN 1-4917-0208-7.
- Kurzman, edited by Charles (2002). Modernist Islam, 1840–1940 a sourcebook ([Online-Ausg.]. ed.). Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-515468-1.
- Akbar, Ahmad (2012). Jinnah, Pakistan, and Islamic Identity. Routledge. ISBN 1-134-75022-6.
- Dani, edited by Ahmad Hasan (1998). Founding fathers of Pakistan. Lahore: Sang-e-Meel Publications. ISBN 969-350830-0.
- JasjitSingh, ed. by (1990). India and Pakistan : crisis of relationship. New Delhi: Lancer Publ. ISBN 81-7062-118-6.
- Lieven, Anatol (2011). Pakistan: A Hard Country (1st ed.). New York: PublicAffairs. ISBN 1-61039-023-7.
- Hasnat, Syed Farooq (2011). Pakistan. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Praeger. ISBN 0-313-34697-6.
- Aziz, Mazhar. Military Control in Pakistan: The parallel State. Pakistan: Routledge, Aziz. ISBN 1-134-07410-7.
- "Separation of East Pakistan". Story of Pakistan documents. Retrieved 7 February 2014.
- "Constitution of Pakistan". Constitution of Pakistan. Retrieved 7 February 2014.
- Chitkara, M.G. (1996). Nuclear Pakistan. New Delhi: A.P.H. Pub. Corp. ISBN 81-7024-767-5.
- Cohen, Stephen P. (2004). The idea of Pakistan (1. paperback ed.). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. ISBN 0-8157-1502-1.
- Jalal, Ayesha (1994). The Sole Spokesman: Jinnah, the Muslim League and the Demand for Pakistan. Cambridge UK: Cambridge South Asian Studies.
- Administration (1 June 2003). "Aligarh Movement". Aligarh Movement, Story of Pakistan. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
- For text see "Minute by the Hon'ble T. B. Macaulay, dated the 2nd February 1835"
- Stephen Evans, "Macaulay's minute revisited: Colonial language policy in nineteenth-century India," Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development (2002) 23#4 pp. 260–281 doi:10.1080/01434630208666469
- see "Minute by the Hon'ble T. B. Macaulay, dated the 2nd February 1835"
- "Sir Syed Ahmad Khan". Pakistan Herald. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
- Staff. "Sir Syed Ahmad Khan". Biography, Nazaria-Pakistan. Biography, Nazaria-Pakistan. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
- Muhammad Sheraz Kamran. "NPT – History of Pakistan Movement". Nazariapak.info. Retrieved 31 January 2012.
- Moore, Robin J. "Imperial India, 1858–1914", in Porter, ed. Oxford History of the British Empire: The Nineteenth Century, (2001a), pp. 422–446
- John R. McLane, "The Decision to Partition Bengal in 1905," Indian Economic and Social History Review, July 1965, 2#3, pp 221–237
- Pakistan was inevitable p. 51-52, Author Syed Hassan Riaz, published by University Karachi. ISBN 969-404-003-5
- History of Pakistan Movement (1857–1947), p. 237-238, Author Prof. M. Azam Chaudhary, published by Abdullah Brothers, Urdu Bazar, Lahore
- History of Pakistan and its background, p. 338. Author Syed Asghar Ali Shah Jafri, published by Evernew Book Palace, Circular road, Urdu Bazar, Lahore.
- History of Pakistan, p. 58-59. Author Prof. Muhammed Khalilullah (Ex-Principal Federal Govt. Urdu College, Karachi; Former Dean Law Faculty, University of Karachi), published by Urdu Academy Sindh, Karachi.
- History of Pakistan. p. 232 to 234. by Muhammed Ali Chiragh, published by Sang-e-Meel Publications, Lahore. ISBN 969-35-0413-5.
- Staff writers; et. al. "Establishment of All India Muslim League". Nazaria-e-Pakistan, AIML. Nazaria-e-Pakistan, AIML. Retrieved 18 March 2014.
- R.Upadhyay. "ALLAMA IQBAL- The founder of Muslim politics in the Indian Subcontinent". R.Upadhyay, South Asia analysis. R.Upadhyay, South Asia analysis. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
- et. al. (unknown writer). "Muhammed Jinnah". HistoryLearningSite.co.uk. HistoryLearningSite.co.uk. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
- Bolitho, Hector (1954). Jinnah: Creator of Pakistan. London: John Murray.
- "Muslim League and the impact of World War II". Muslim League and the impact of World War II. Retrieved 14 February 2014.
- Jalal, Ayesha (1994) The Sole Spokesman: Jinnah, the Muslim League and the Demand for Pakistan. Cambridge University Press.
- Mukerjee, Madhusree (2011). "Empire at War". Churchill's secret war : the British empire and the ravaging of india during world war II. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 0-465-02481-5.
- Pan-Islam in British Indian politics, pgs 57,245 by M.Naeem Qureshi
- Mohiuddin, Yasmeen Niaz (2007). "Muslim League and World War II". Pakistan : a global studies handbook. Santa Barbara, Calif. [u.a.]: ABC-Clio. ISBN 1-85109-801-1.
- Pakistan: nationalism without a nation? – Christophe Jaffrelot. Retrieved 31 January 2012.
- Shafique Ali Khan (1987), Iqbal's Concept of Separate North-west Muslim State: A Critique of His Allahabad Address of 1930, Markaz-e-Shaoor-o-Adab, Karachi, OCLC 18970794
- Sir Muhammad Iqbal's 1930 Presidential Address, http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00islamlinks/txt_iqbal_1930.html, from Columbia University site
- Choudhary Rahmat Ali, (1933), Now or Never; Are We to Live or Perish Forever?, pamphlet, published 28 January
- The Idea of Pakistan. Stephen Philip Cohen. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2004.
- Mohiuddin, Yasmin Niaz (2007). Pakistan: A Global Studies Handbook. ABC-CLIO. p. 70. ISBN 9781851098019.
- Mohiuddin, Yasmin Niaz (2007). Pakistan: A Global Studies Handbook. ABC-CLIO. p. 71. ISBN 9781851098019.
- Mohiuddin, Yasmin Niaz (2007). Pakistan: A Global Studies Handbook. ABC-CLIO. p. 71. ISBN 9781851098019.
- A.R. Tariq (ed.), Speeches and Statements of Iqbal (Lahore: 1973),
- Full text of the pamphlet "Now or Never", published by Choudhary Rahmat Ali, http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00islamlinks/txt_rahmatali_1933.html
- Choudhary Rahmat Ali, 1947, Pakistan: the fatherland of the Pak nation, Cambridge, OCLC: 12241695
- Cited in Ainslie T. Embree
- Peter Lyon, Conflict between India and Pakistan: an encyclopedia (2008) p 108
- Akbar S. Ahmed (1997). Jinnah, Pakistan and Islamic Identity: The Search for Saladin. Psychology Press. p. 142.
- Salamat, Zarina (1997). The Punjab in 1920's : a case study of Muslims. Karachi: Royal Book Company. ISBN 969-407-230-1.
- Dube, I. &. S. (2009). From ancient to modern: Religion, power, and community in India hardcover. Oxford University Press.
- "Role of Sindh in the Making of Pakistan". Pakistan Studies. 3 June 2010. Retrieved 8 February 2014.
- Ijazuddin, Chughtai Mirza (4 January 2010). "Sindh's role in Pakistan movement". Dawn area studies archives, 2010. Retrieved 8 February 2014.
- "Abdul Ghaffar Khan". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 24 September 2008.
- "Abdul Ghaffar Khan". I Love India. Retrieved 24 September 2008.
- "Khudai Khidmatgar Movement". Jan 1 2007. Khudai Khidmatgar Movement. Retrieved 8 February 2014.
- Partition and Military Succession Documents from the U.S. National Archives
- Hasnat, Syed Farooq (2011). Pakistan. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Praeger. 2011. ISBN 978-0-313-34697-2.
- Williams, Kristen P. (2001). Despite nationalist conflicts : theory and practice of maintaining world peace. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 2001. ISBN 0-275-96934-7.
- Samina Vakar (21 April 2010). Interview of Mir Zafarullah Khan Jamali (Television production). Islamabad, Pakistan: Pakistan Television Corporation.
- staff (25 October 2013). "Bugti meets with Jinnah". Friday Times. Retrieved 8 February 2014.
- Khoso, His excellency, Mir Hazar Khan. "Prime Minister Justice (Retd.) Mir Hazar Khoso's Address to the Nation". Pakistan Broadcasting Corporation (PBC). Radio Pakistan. Retrieved 3 May 2013.
- Islamabad (3 May 2013). "PM Khosa assures holding of free, fair, peaceful elections". Jang News (in Urdu). Retrieved 3 May 2013.
- Chakrabarty – The partition of Bengal and Assam, page 135
- Jalal – The sole spokesman. Page – 3
- Tripathi – স্বাধীনতার মুখ, page – 8
- Chakrabarty – The partition of Bengal and Assam, page 137
- Jalal – The sole spokesman, page 266
- Bandopadhyay – জিন্না/পাকিস্তান – নতুন ভাবনা, page – 266
- Chakrabarty – The partition of Bengal and Assam, page 143
- Yegar, Moshe (1972). Muslims of Burma. Wiesbaden: Verlag Otto Harrassowitz. p. 96.
- Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. "Kashmir (region, Indian subcontinent) – Britannica Online Encyclopedia". Britannica.com. Retrieved 5 June 2010.
- "The J&K conflict: A Chronological Introduction". India Together. Retrieved 5 June 2010.
- Prem Shankar Jha. "Grasping the Nettle". South Asian Journal.
- Long, Roger D.; Singh, Gurharpal; Samad, Yunas; Talbot, Ian (2015). State and Nation-Building in Pakistan: Beyond Islam and Security. Routledge. p. 167. ISBN 9781317448204.
In the 1940s a solid majority of the Barelvis were supporters of the Pakistan Movement and played a supporting role in its final phase (1940-7), mostly under the banner of the All-India Sunni Conference which had been founded in 1925.
- Cesari, Jocelyne (2014). The Awakening of Muslim Democracy: Religion, Modernity, and the State. Cambridge University Press. p. 135. ISBN 9781107513297.
For example, the Barelvi ulama supported the formation of the state of Pakistan and thought that any alliance with Hindus (such as that between the Indian National Congress and the Jamiat ulama-I-Hind [JUH]) was counterproductive.
- John, Wilson (2009). Pakistan: The Struggle Within. Pearson Education India. p. 87. ISBN 9788131725047.
During the 1946 election, Barelvi Ulama issued fatwas in favour of the Muslim League.
- "'What's wrong with Pakistan?'". Dawn. 13 September 2013. Retrieved 10 January 2017.
However, the fundamentalist dimension in Pakistan movement developed more strongly when the Sunni Ulema and pirs were mobilised to prove that the Muslim masses wanted a Muslim/Islamic state...Even the Grand Mufti of Deoband, Mufti Muhammad Shafi, issued a fatwa in support of the Muslim League’s demand.
- Jaffrelot, Christophe (2004). A History of Pakistan and Its Origins. Anthem Press. p. 224. ISBN 9781843311492.
Believing that Islam was a universal religion, the Deobandi advocated a notion of a composite nationalism according to which Hindus and Muslims constituted one nation.
- Abdelhalim, Julten (2015). Indian Muslims and Citizenship: Spaces for Jihād in Everyday Life. Routledge. p. 26. ISBN 9781317508755.
Madani...stressed the difference between qaum, meaning a nation, hence a territorial concept, and millat, meaning an Ummah and thus a religious concept.
- Sikka, Sonia (2015). Living with Religious Diversity. Routledge. p. 52. ISBN 9781317370994.
Madani makes a crucial distinction between qaum and millat. According to him, qaum connotes a territorial multi-religious entity, while millat refers to the cultural, social and religious unity of Muslims exclusively.
- Syed, Jawad; Pio, Edwina; Kamran, Tahir; Zaidi, Abbas (2016). Faith-Based Violence and Deobandi Militancy in Pakistan. Springer. p. 379. ISBN 9781349949663.
Ironically, Islamic state politics in Pakistan was mostly in favour of Deobandi, and more recently Ahl-e Hadith/Salafi, institutions. Only a few Deobandi clerics decided to support the Pakistan Movement, but they were highly influential.
- Khan, Shafique Ali (1988). The Lahore resolution: arguments for and against : history and criticism. Royal Book Co. p. 48. Retrieved 10 January 2017.
Besides, Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi, along with his pupils and disciples, lent his entire support to the demand of Pakistan.
- Dhulipala, Venkat (2015). Creating a New Medina: State Power, Islam, and the Quest for Pakistan in Late Colonial North India. Cambridge University Press. p. 104. ISBN 9781316258385.
The senior alim conceded that the ML leaders still had some work to do before they could be seen as conscientious and observant Muslims,,,He instead emphasised the virtues of patient and quiet counseling...At the same time though, Thanawi dismissed criticisms of ML leaders as being non-observant Muslims as a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
- "South Asia | India state bans book on Jinnah". BBC News. 20 August 2009. Retrieved 31 January 2012.
- Jaswant Singh. Jinnah: India-Partition-Independence.
- Sarojini Naidu. Muhammad Jinnah: An Ambassador of Unity.
- "Lahore Resolution ;". Storyofpakistan.com. Retrieved 31 January 2012.
- Muhammad Munawwar. Dimensions of Pakistan movement.
- Yusuf Ali Chowdhury; Muhammad Asad; Nawab Ziauddin Ahmed; Amir Abdullah Khan Rokhri. Pakistan Movement Activists.
- Sikandar Hayat. Aspects of the Pakistan movement.
- "History books contain major distortions". Daily Times.
- "Pakistan Movement". cybercity-online.net.
- (Editor), Sohail Mahmood (2006). Good governance reforms agenda in Pakistan : current challenges. New York: Nova Science Publishers. ISBN 1-60021-418-5.
- Heyworth-Dunne, James (1952). Pakistan: the birth of a new Muslim state. University of Michigan: Renaissance Bookshop. p. 173. ASIN B000N7G1MG.
- Tai Yong Tan, Gyanes Kugaisya (2000). The Aftermath of partition in South Asia:Pakistan. London, UK.: Routledge Publishing Co. pp. ix–327. ISBN 0-203-45766-8.
- Sophia Ajaz. "Hindus' contribution towards making of Pakistan". Sophia Ajaz.
- Staff Report. "Christians played vital role in Pakistan Movement". Daily Pakistan. Pakistan Daily. Retrieved 7 February 2012.
- Aminullah Chaudry (1999). The founding fathers. Karachi, Sindh Province: Oxford University Press, Karachi. ISBN 978-0-19-906171-6.
- Mazrui, Ali (9 February 2011). "Is this Pakistanism in Sudan?". guardian.co.uk. Retrieved 31 August 2011.
- Ahmed, Akbar S. (2000). Jinnah, Pakistan and Islamic identity : the search for Saladin (Reprinted. ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-14965-7.
- Saha, ed. by Santosh C. (2004). Religious fundamentalism in the contemporary world : critical social and political issues. Lanham, MD: Lexington. ISBN 0-7391-0760-7.
- Staff (14 August 2013). "Independence day: Hope, joy and mausoleum climbing". Tribune Express 2013. Retrieved 8 February 2014.
- Mohiuddin, Yasmeen Niaz (2007). Pakistan : a global studies handbook. Santa Barbara, Calif. [u.a.]: ABC-Clio. ISBN 978-1-85109-801-9.
- Siddiqui, S.A. (2012). Social Studies. Lahore, Punjab: Gohar Publications,. ISBN 969-526-022-5.
- Muhammad Adil Mulk (23 December 2012). "Being Jinnah". Express Tribune, Mulk. Retrieved 9 February 2014.
- Nasr, Vali (2001). Islamic Leviathan : Islam and the Making of State Power. Oxford U.K.: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-803296-X.
- Ahmad, Akbar (4 July 2010). "Thomas Jefferson and Mohammed Ali Jinnah: Dreams from two founding fathers". Washington Post. Retrieved 9 February 2014.
- Enver, E.H. (1990). The modern Moses: A brief biograhpy [sic] of M.A. Jinnah. Jinnah Memorial Institute (1990). pp. 164 pages.
- Allama Mashraqi
- Sir Muhammad Iqbal’s 1930 Presidential Address, from Columbia University site
- "Presidential address by Muhammad Ali Jinnah to the Muslim League Lahore, 1940". Columbia University. Retrieved 24 October 2016.
- "Pakistan Movement Workers Trust (Tehrik-i-Pakistan) تحریک پاکستان". Pakistan Movement Workers Trust's official website.
- "The Pakistan Movement". Story of Pakistan website.
- "Iqbal and the Pakistan Movement". Iqbal Academy Pakistan.
- "The Pakistan Movement (Picture Gallery)". Pakistan.gov.