Jump to content

User talk:FPP

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Muhib mansour)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Muhib mansour, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Elias Almosuli, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Crown Prince  Talk 10:20, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elias Almosuli

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elias Almosuli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  Crown Prince  Talk 10:20, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

people

[edit]

why isnt here any kurdish and turkuman and chaldean people on iraqi people?

Speedy deletion nomination of Coco de Mal

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Coco de Mal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. • Gene93k (talk) 03:19, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FPP. You have new messages at Gene93k's talk page.
Message added 16:29, 15 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Iker Casillas

[edit]

Hi, I removed the category because I could not see source that says Iker Casillas is catholic. This can for example be mention in personal-life sectiuon with a source: "Casillas is a spanish catholic" with a source. Then category can be added. We can not add anything (including categories) if it is not sourced. QED237 (talk) 16:01, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ok what about this source http://celebriot.com/iker-casillas-weight-height-ethnicity-hair-color-eye-color --Muhib mansour (talk) 16:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry but that is not a reliable source as it can be edited by anyone. At bottom of page it says "It's edited by our users and CelebRiot claims no ownership of it. If you see information that you would like edit, create an account here to do so." so it is not reliable. If it was to be used editors could edit that page saying he is 300cm tall or 500 years old and then add that content to wikipedia. A more reliable source is needed. QED237 (talk) 16:30, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Thomas Dekker (actor), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal talk 20:04, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

[edit]

You cannot go around claiming that actors and actresses are gay or bisexual just because they have played a gay or bisexual character in a film. Doing so is a serious violation of the policy on living people and can result in you being blocked. Likewise, referring to people as "faggots", as you have done above, is not acceptable. Tiller54 (talk) 22:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adèle Exarchopoulos. Tiller54 (talk) 22:55, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The section is Edit-waring and BLP-violations from user Muhib mansour. Thank you.--Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 01:41, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Drmies (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

jew

[edit]

is arjen robben jewish? --Muhib mansour (talk) 15:17, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mandeans

[edit]

Category:Mandeans, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Editor2020, Talk 01:34, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hasan Hosni

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hasan Hosni requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WWGB (talk) 05:04, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Toy Story 4

[edit]

Production on the film has not yet begun, so we can't have an article on the film per WP:NFF. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let me tell you something: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice has a Wikipedia article because filming on it is complete! WP:NFF clearly states, "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date ... In the case of animated films, reliable sources must confirm that the film is clearly out of the pre-production process, meaning that the final animation frames are actively being drawn and/or rendered, and final recordings of voice-overs and music have commenced." Kailash29792 (talk) 08:08, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Religious categories in biographic articles

[edit]

Hi. Please do not add religious categories to biographical articles (as you did at Pierce Brosnan) unless "the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief or orientation in question, and the subject's beliefs or sexual orientation are relevant to their public life or notability, according to reliable published sources." - per WP:BLPCAT. Thanks, BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Help, please

[edit]

Greetings Mr Muhib mansour,


Nice to meet you.

Could you kindly help me translate this article into the Romanized Iraqi Arabic language? Please.


Your help would be very Gratefully Appreciated, Thankyou very much. --Philip J (talk) 22:41, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, to Romanized Iraqi Arabic spoken in daily life instead of standard classical Arabic. --Philip J (talk) 23:14, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, I was referring to the Iraqi Arabic language written in latin alphabet. (for example: يابه شلونك؟ شدتسوي مادتسوي اليوم؟ in Iraqi Arabic is written as "yaba shlonak? shdassowee ma dassowee ilyom?) --Philip J (talk) 23:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Could you help translate these words into Iraqi Arabic?:

  • «السيد المسيح، الكلمة التي أصبحت جسدا، مات على الصليب من أجل خلاص المذنبين، وبُعث في اليومِ الثالث ورُفع إلى السماء." "إنه المنقذ الوحيد للبشرية، خالق السماوات والأرض، والإله الحق الوحيد.»
  • «الإنجيل، المكون من العهد القديمِ والعهد الجديدِ، أوحى بهما الرب، هو الحقيقة الدينية الوحيدة، ومعيار الحياة المسيحية.»
  • «الخلاص يأتي بنعمة من الرب، من خلال الإيمانِ، وعلى المؤمنين أَن يعتمدوا على روحِ القدس للوصول إلى القدسية، وإجلال الرب، وحب البشرية.»
  • «ستكون البعثة الثانية للرب في اليوم الأخير عند نزوله من السماء ليحكم على العالم: سيتلقى الصالحون الحياة الأبدية، بينما يدان الأشرار إلى الأبد.»

Thanks. --Philip J (talk) 23:48, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because I wish to learn the Iraqi Arabic language and to understand how it is written in the latin alphabet. --Philip J (talk) 00:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes please, Romanized Modern Standard Arabic would be fine. --Philip J (talk) 00:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much Muhib for your help! It is gratefully appreciated. May God bless you. If you want any texts to be translated into Chinese, then I can help you. --Philip J (talk) 01:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Can you also translate those words into the Iraqi Arabic dialect? (using both the Arabic alphabet and the latin alphabet). --Philip J (talk) 01:33, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Instead, can you help translate these texts into Modern Standard Arabic?
  • «قبول الروح القدس، والذي يظهر فيما تنطقه الألسن، هو الضمان بأنا سنرث مملكة الجنة.»
  • «ماء التعميد هو السر المقدس للتخليص من الذنوب كافة. يجب أن يتم التعميد في مياه طبيعية كالنهر أو البحر أو الينبوع.

المعمِّد، الذي تلقى تعميده من الماء والروح القدس، يقوم بالتعميد باسم الرب عيسى المسيح. والمعمَّد يجب أن يغطس كافة في الماء حانيا رأسه وناظرا للأسفل.»

  • «يتيح الطقس الديني الخاص بغسل القدمين للفرد مشاركة السيد المسيح، كما يمثل أيضا تذكرة دائمة لضرورة أن يبدي المرء دائما الحب والقدسية والتواضع والمغفرة والخدمة.

ينبغي على كل فرد تم تعميده أن تغسل قدماه باسم السيد المسيح، ويمكن ممارسة غسل القدمِين المتبادلِ متى كان هذا ممكنا.»

  • «إن العشاء الرباني هو طقس ديني لإحياء ذكرى وفاة السيد المسيح. وهو يمكننا من المشاركة في لحم ودم رسولنا، وأن نكون على اتصال به حتى تكتب لنا حياة أبدية ويتم رفعنا يوم القيامة. هذا الطقس الديني يجِب أداءه مرارا، قدر الإمكان، ولا يستخدم في ذلك إلا الخبز الخالي من الخميرة وعصير العنب فقط.»


Thanks. --Philip J (talk) 05:13, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fashion designers for females

[edit]

Category:Fashion designers for females, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mabalu (talk) 11:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fashion designers for kids

[edit]

Category:Fashion designers for kids, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mabalu (talk) 11:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fashion designers for males

[edit]

Category:Fashion designers for males, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mabalu (talk) 11:46, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sporty fashion designers

[edit]

Category:Sporty fashion designers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mabalu (talk) 11:54, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian folk fashion designers

[edit]

Category:Indian folk fashion designers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mabalu (talk) 11:56, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Affifa Iskandar

[edit]

Hello Muhib mansour. I think you need more practice editing before you create pages like this. Your grammar and punctuation need improvement.

  1. We usually don't use <big></big> in the normal text: "affifa Iskandar Estefan" not "affifa Iskandar Estefan"
  2. A persons name is always capitalised, "Affifa ..." not "affifa ..."
  3. We do not link dates: "She born in 10 December 1921" not "she born in 10 December 1921"
  4. References come after, not before punctuation: ".<ref>" not "<ref>."
    • And there should be no space between the punctuation and reference: ".<ref>" not ". <ref>"
  5. Sentences start with a capital letter: "She born in Mosul" not "she born in Mosul"
  6. Don't leave a space before punctuation marks, it should be after: "mother, she live in" not "mother , she live in"
  7. As the person is dead we don't say "is", we usually say "was": "Estefan was an ..." not "Estefan is an ..."

I have fixed the first paragraph for you, see here. I would suggest that you create a wp:draft first next time you start a new page. Regards, 220 of Borg 13:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Butterfly

[edit]

I've made the change you suggested, but please keep your comments on talk pages civil. Thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:33, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hany Ramzy ((disambiguation)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Hany Ramzy ((disambiguation), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Xx236 (talk) 09:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aris F.C.

[edit]

Hello. This is a RM (Requested move 29 November 2015) from Aris F.C. to Aris Thessaloniki F.C., not Aris Thessaloniki because is a separate entity. Aris Thessaloniki F.C. is redirect to Aris F.C. and I propose the move, not merge. We can't merge a redirect page.

If you want to propose a merge of article Aris F.C. with article Aris Thessaloniki, you must create a new section in the discussion page of the article (Talk:Aris F.C.) and explain the reasons for proposing the merger of the two articles. Then you will be able to place the {{merge}}. --IM-yb (talk) 00:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think a personal page has nothing to offer me. --IM-yb (talk) 12:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semiramis

[edit]

I don't know what can you do for that. Maybe in the future, users will participate in discussion. You can see my purpose for merge in the past (Talk:A.S. P.A.O.K. Thessaloniki) with only one user message, two months after. --IM-yb (talk) 23:31, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Translation request

[edit]

Hello Mr Fedil,

I hope you are safe and well.

Could you kindly help me add in the vowels for these Arabic latin text (I have highlighted those text in blue)? Please.


Your help would be very much appreciated, Thank you. --Philip J (talk) 04:23, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just the latinization. --Philip J (talk) 22:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chaldean Christians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Second Gulf War. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help request

[edit]

Dear Sir,

Could you kindly help me latinize this text? please.

هكذا أحبّ اللهُ العالَمَ حتى وهَبَ اَبنَهُ الأوحَدَ، فَلا يَهلِكَ كُلّ مَنْ يُؤمِنُ بِه، بل تكونُ لَهُ الحياةُ الأبدِيّةُ.

The text is relatively short so it should not take too long. --Philip J (talk) 05:22, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can put the latinized text here, Thank you. --Philip J (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mass deletions

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chaldean Christians, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, FPP. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

STOP disrupting articles with your "Chaldean nationalist" fringe theory

[edit]

Please STOP disrupting articles with your "Chaldean nationalist" fringe theory. You just once again vandalized the Chaldean Christians article by removing well sourced mainstream content, replacing it with unsourced "Chaldean nationalist" fringe theory stuff. Just stop it. The Wikipedia is not the place for fringe political activism. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 22:15, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Once again: Stop it. Use the talk page of the article if you have issues. Do not continue edit-warring for your unsourced fringe theory version of the article, you risk a block of your account. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 22:40, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 2A1ZA (talk) 23:25, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Someguy1221 (talk) 00:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, FPP. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Klint Kesto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chaldean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ahmad Al-Basheer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Web (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Suhair Ramzi

[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. FPP, thanks for creating Suhair Ramzi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Imdb is a source specifically banned at WP:RELIABLESOURCES unfortunately. Thanks for taking the time to create this.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 05:44, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Iraq flag bearer at the 2018 Asian Games

[edit]

Hi FPP.. can you help me to find source that talks about Iraq flag bearer at the 2018 Asian Games Parade of Nations? Thank you Stvbastian (talk) 12:24, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mahlagha Jaberi

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mahlagha Jaberi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 01:13, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Tara De Vries) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Tara De Vries, FPP!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your new article on Tara De Vries. I strongly recommend finding more sources on her life and activities in order to expand the article.

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:50, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, FPP. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tukoso Dawronoyo Mothonoyo d’Bethnahrin in Aramaic/Syriac script

[edit]

Hello FPP, I noticed that you are a native speaker of Aramaic. On the page of the Bethnahrin National Council, there is the name of the Patriotic Revolutionary Organization of Bethnahrin in Classical Syriac(Tukoso Dawronoyo Mothonoyo d’Bethnahrin), but only Romanized, not in the Syriac script. Would you be able to render the name in the Syriac script?
Thank you, -Thespündragon 17:39, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1991

[edit]

Most of your changes to 1991 were generally good, but were badly formatted and badly described in English. Specifics:

  1. Australian soccer players are "footballers", even though Australian rules football is more common. They do not use the term "soccer".
  2. You used "dancer" for one person without it being in the lead of the article.
  3. If a native of "foo" now lives in "bar", he is fooian-barian, not barian-fooian
  4. The format for births in year articles is:
  5. We attempt, within dates, to sort alphabetically by surname, although sometimes it's difficult to tell which name is the surname. Generally, if you use the Wikipedia editor (not Visual Editor), for people, you can look at the DEFAULTSORT tag in the last section of the article, just before the categories.

That being said, all the people you added should have been added, under our current guidelines, so I don't mind fixing up your edits. I would rather I didn't have to fix them up, though. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:32, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1994

[edit]

I fixed most of your dash errors in 1994 here. Please take note. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 11:23, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You still need to work on your dashes. See the section above for the correct format. The spaced dash is an WP:NDASH (– or –), not a simple hyphen. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Mehr Eliezer, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I rather think that you were trying to improve the article in good faith, however a disruptive IP had added unsourced information about her being of part Jewish descent... which is not actually attested to in any sources. "Improving" on articles and further cats should be done prudently, so please check sourcing in order to confirm that the information is actually correct before jumping the gun. Remember that we really need to be vigilant and prudent when it comes to WP:BLPVIO. Thanks! Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:18, 21 August 2019 (UTC) [EDIT] Apologies for behaving indiscreetly. I should have followed WP:DTTR and just left a brief message about what I understood to be good faith edits on your behalf. I've left a longer explanation/apology on my own talk. I can be a silly old plonker, but I didn't realise how insulting this looks until you pulled me up on it. Hope you'll forgive me. Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fadi Haddad

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fadi Haddad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... discospinster talk 18:58, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fadi Haddad

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fadi Haddad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Nahal(T) 09:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saraya Abdeen.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saraya Abdeen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Iraqi Chaldeans

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Iraqi Chaldeans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:23, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2019 Iraqi protests

[edit]

On 3 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 Iraqi protests, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:16, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nabataeans of Iraq, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anbar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative names

[edit]

Hallo, I've just been looking at Talasius which you created. The use of bold in the lead is supposed to be for alternative titles from which redirects have been made (see MOS:BOLD). You added the bold but didn't make the redirects. I've done so, but another time please make the redirects yourself. Sometimes you'll find that doing so turns a whole lot of red links blue. It's important to check a "What links here" after you make the redirects, in case any of them are from other uses of the word and need some other action like a disambiguation. Thanks. PamD 11:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at 1991, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 22:12, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Naomi Colford

[edit]
Notice

The article Naomi Colford has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One-time beauty pageant winner without other activity of note, fails WP:BLP1E policy.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:29, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ana Marcelo moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Ana Marcelo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lettlerhello • contribs 00:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ana Marcelo has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ana Marcelo. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ana Marcelo (January 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ezlev was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
warmly, ezlev. talk 03:37, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, FPP! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! warmly, ezlev. talk 03:37, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 1992. Elizium23 (talk) 22:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Heba Magdy moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Heba Magdy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jawad Ali

[edit]
Notice

The article Jawad Ali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The only source is a parenthetical mention of the subject's book that does not support the claim in the article. The rest is entirely unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Laplorfill (talk) 22:37, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ana Marcelo

[edit]

Information icon Hello, FPP. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ana Marcelo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heba Magdy (July 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yeeno was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs for references to more secondary sources to show notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Yeeno (talk) 🍁 21:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ana Marcelo

[edit]

Hello, FPP. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ana Marcelo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 03:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Citing sources

[edit]

Please don't use raw URLs in your references, as you did here. Deb (talk) 15:52, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Heba Magdy

[edit]

Hello, FPP. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Heba Magdy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:07, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced additions to list pages

[edit]

Please do not add unsourced content to list pages. They are not exempt from the requirements of WP:V and WP:BLP. You were already given a final warning for this. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:26, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tim Borowski, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 23:09, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are half German
so maybe you know Borowski is polish name FPP (talk) 23:11, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You cannot deduce descent just from a person's name. And even if you could: without sourcing that would be original research. You've been editing for at least nine years here, you should know that Wikipedia content needs to be verifiable – read Wikipedia:Verifiability if you haven't yet. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 23:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2000, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julián Álvarez.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nabataeans of Iraq

[edit]

Hi FPP! On Talk:Nabataeans of Iraq#Original article restored after rewrite: which one is better?, you asked me why I didn't contact you when I rewrote the article in June 2022. To leave room for other editors in that thread, I wanted to answer you here.

I remember wanting to contact you about it back in June, but then I noticed that you hadn't been editing for months (cf. [1]). I assumed that, as the creator of the article and thus someone interested in the topic, when you returned to editing you would see the rewrite and be happy with it, seeing that it is very much an improvement.

But now I see that you don't believe it to be an improvement, and I understand that you're not happy about me just rewriting the thing from scratch. That's not pleasant, I get that. But that's also why I invited the other editors to comment: they are in a position to more neutrally assess whether the rewrite is an improvement or not.

Now what two of these editors have been trying to tell you is that on Wikipedia, we are not supposed to directly base our writing on primary sources like al-Mas'udi or Sa'id al-Andalusi. This is carefully explained in our policy on original research, more specifically in the section Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources. Note such clauses as:

  • "Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation."
  • "Do not analyze, evaluate, interpret, or synthesize material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so."
  • "Wikipedia articles usually rely on material from reliable secondary sources. Articles may make an analytic, evaluative, interpretive, or synthetic claim only if it has been published by a reliable secondary source."

Wikipedia is a modern encyclopedia, strictly based on modern scholarship. We do not give any weight to what al-Mas'udi or Ibn Khaldun said, only to what modern scholars have said about them. The same goes for the hadith of Umar you wonder about: we only write about a hadith like that in our article when a modern reliable secondary source has written about it. The source you provided is not such a source.

You have been editing here for almost ten years, so it is absolutely crucial that you as soon as possible both understand and accept core policy like this. The same goes for adding wholly unsourced material, such as the 'Influence on writing' section you added here. If you want to continue editing on this website, you must respect Wikipedia:Verifiability and cite reliable sources when adding new material. Please take some time to read through our policy pages (Wikipedia:Core content policies may be a good place to start), and make sure you follow them in the future.

Thanks for taking this into consideration, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 20:09, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am have been active all time since I begun editing here
I dont understand what is your problem with old historians? If the old historians like Al-Masudi and Said al-Andalusi didnt talk about Nabataeans nobody would know about them even your modern historians
Same thing if Luke, Matthew, Mark the Evangelist and John the Apostle if they didnt wrote their gospels, nobody would know who is Jesus? FPP (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This link shows that you did not edit here between 2 March 2022 and 5 September 2022.
I have no problem with old historians. As a historian myself, I read historical sources (primary sources) all the time, including both Arabic writings such as The Nabataean Agriculture and Greek writings such as the Gospels (I also read Latin and would like to read Syriac one day). But that's not relevant here on Wikipedia: in contrast to historians, Wikipedia editors are not supposed to be doing original research. That's because we're all anonymous here, and the presumption is that most of us are not trained as historians, and lack the necessary expertise to correctly interpret primary sources. Not everyone is knowledgeable enough to accurately understand the Bible (or the Qur'an for that matter) in its historical context. Instead, Wikipedia editors must strictly rely on the experts who have already investigated the primary sources: modern scholars.
Over and above that, Wikipedia editors should seek out scholarship of the highest quality. We should not just use any respectable scholar (e.g., Ali al-Wardi), but those scholars who are known specialists in the specific topic we are writing about: the actual subject experts. These can be recognized for example by the fact that they are the author of the relevant entry in a highly respected encyclopedia such as Encyclopaedia of Islam, and so I used Graf & Fahd's "Nabaṭ" entry. Another way to recognize this is the fact that they have written a whole book about the subject published by a highly reputable academic publisher such as Brill. And so I have used Hämeen-Anttila's 2006 book on The Nabatean Agriculture (which I highly recommend you to read if you have any interest in this subject!).
These scholars speak about authors such al-Mas'udi at length. They may even mention the Umar hadith somewhere. But we use them for our articles, because they are among all the people who live on this planet the ones who know most about this subject. Do you understand this? ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 22:04, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 09:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You dont have right to block me without any warning
you admins have alot of privileges and someone have to stop you
you have no right to remove my edits FPP (talk) 00:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FPP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Decline reason:

You were previously blocked for exactly the same thing, and for most reasonable people that would constitute a warning. And any editor has the right to remove your edits if they disagree with them. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 02:06, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

FPP (talk) 00:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


The admin didnt give any examples to which edit I didnt add citation

check years articles

I am most editor who add citations to article

and again the admin have no right to block me for 6 months without any warning

your admins privileges are reason why Wikipedia in decline --FPP (talk) 02:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ima reblock you for the personal attack -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
where is the personal attacks? FPP (talk) 03:49, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #68335

[edit]

was declined back on Jan 19, 2023. I failed to post here at that time. UTRS appeal #69451 is open at the moment. User is on the road to an indefinite block. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:41, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I cant open this appeal anymore FPP (talk) 04:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfairly

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FPP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello I ve been blocked unfairly by Admin Deb without any warning

Admin blocked me over addition of unsourced content but he didnt clarify why I have to add citation to years articles This is only notice about add links to births section, you can read it "Please do not add yourself, non-notable people, fictional characters, people who weren't born in the relevant year, or people without Wikipedia articles to this list. No red links, please." It didnt talk at all about citations and most of links in years article is without links. So admin Deb blocked me unfairly.

When I add citation, its only to satisfy him but it seem he didnt satisfy.

His problem with me personally because he dont want to add links that he dont like by me.

Here is the proof. Admin Deb removed all my edits in [2][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1998&diff=prev&oldid=1138377247

Decline reason:

If you're not comfortable editing with people whose real names you don't know, Wikipedia isn't the place for you. Many people have good reasons for not using their real names. Accusing administrators of sock puppetry is a serious accusation for which you need evidence. As for why you need to add citations, please see WP:BLP. While you don't need to be familiar with every policy, you need to know the ones that are pointed out to you. If people tell you that you need citations, you should consider the possibility that they are right and look into it. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:34, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


You pretend to assume good faith in your page, where is the good faith when admin deb block me for six months with no warning at all. I am not beginner user, I have a lot of articles and contributions here, and I know where can I add citation. In years articles again it didnt talk at all about citations at all. Its only admin Deb want to apply his rules.

Admins here have alot of privileges, how I can approve you dont belong to same account or group? You have no right to tell me that Wikipedia is not my place. I have the right to express my views on the policies of the encyclopedia

And I am still waiting for admin with real name to judge this case --FPP (talk) 12:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfairly 2

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FPP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am still dont get convinced why Admin Deb have right to abuse his power and blocking me unfairly for 6 months. None of those admins get out from their power perspective with each other 1 Admin Deb dont give me any warning as those admins claim, and he block me directly not for one day but six months. Ask yourself is that fair seriously? 2 The edits that I am made didnt require any sources as those admins claim. Here what years article require said I didnt broke any of this requirements. This is only what I read. If there is any other requirements, admin Deb has to inform me and to assume good faith with not blocking me directly for six months. You can check links in births sections in this articles. I can assume that over 90% is without sources. So why only the links that I added it have to be with sources. And when I added alot of those sources is only to satisfy admin Deb but he didnt satisfied. 3 Is it real the reason that admin Deb block is Persistent addition of unsourced content. So why he remove all my edits including at 1998 [article] all links there that I added it are with citations!! None of those admins had a courage to answer this question. Admin Deb did same with 2001, 2002 and 2003 article. He is clearly abused his powers with me. 4 I am not a beginner user here to block me for "Persistent addition of unsourced content" I have a lot of article here all with sources. And I know where I have to add sources. 5 I demand my right to judge this case by admin with his real name, because I am suspicious with those admins. They didnt look like names for encyclopedia admins but look like names of Reddit users. And I have right to criticize those names and this policy. The admins dont have right to told me that Wikipeida isnt my place as last one said If I dont get real answers for this points, I will not waive my right FPP (talk) 06:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Okay ... now you got one of us who uses their real name ...

That's your good news. The bad news is that I'm not any more impressed.

First and foremost, I must raise the perhaps tender subject of whether or not your English-language skills are really up to the task here. Yes, you can generally make yourself understood, but there are also clear grammatical errors in each sentence, such that encyclopedic prose written that way would require serious immediate copy editing. You might very seriously want to take this enforced break to edit the Wikipedia in your native language such that you might better develop the skills and knowledge you have lacked here. If you're not already doing that, that is.

I looked at one of the edits you were complaining about, and the problem isn't, perhaps, so much that you aren't adding sources (although in some cases it seems like you aren't) as that you are using low-quality sources ... I'm not sure we consider soccerways.com and hitc.com reliable sources. You have had all this time to learn the difference, especially with the sort of content you have been adding. It's something you might come to understand better in your native language. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:36, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Category:FIFA World Cup ceremonies performers has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:FIFA World Cup ceremonies performers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American Chaldeans has been nominated for merging to Category:Chaldean Americans

[edit]

Category:American Chaldeans has been nominated for merging to Category:Chaldean Americans. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 16:52, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Chaldean settlements has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Chaldean settlements has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:47, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hany Ramzy (disambiguation)

[edit]
Notice

The article Hany Ramzy (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jacqueline Lovell for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacqueline Lovell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Lovell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SL93 (talk) 19:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FPP&oldid=1233766980"