Wikipedia:Closure requests

The Requests for closure noticeboard is for posting requests to have an uninvolved editor assess, summarize, and formally close a discussion on Wikipedia. Formal closure by an uninvolved editor or administrator should be requested where consensus remains unclear, where the issue is a contentious one, or where there are wiki-wide implications.

Many discussions do not need formal closure and do not need to be listed here.

Many discussions result in a reasonably clear consensus, so if the consensus is clear, any editor—even one involved in the discussion—may close the discussion. The default length of a formal request for comment is 30 days (opened on or before 12 June 2024); if consensus becomes clear before that and discussion has slowed, then it may be closed early. However, editors usually wait at least a week after an RfC opens, unless the outcome is very obvious, so that there is enough time for a full discussion.

If consensus is unclear, then post a neutral request here for assistance.

Please ensure that your request for a close is brief and neutrally worded. Please include a link to the discussion. Do not use this board to continue the discussion in question. Be prepared to wait for someone to review the discussion. If you disagree with a particular closure, do not dispute it here. You can start discussion at the original page or request a Closure review at Administrators' noticeboard with a link to the discussion page and the policy-based reason you believe the closure should be overturned. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Closure review archive for previous closure reviews.

Any uninvolved editor may close most discussions, so long as they are prepared to discuss and justify their closing rationale.

Because requests for closure made here are often those that are the most contentious, closing these discussions can be a significant responsibility. Closers should be familiar with all policies and guidelines that could apply to the given discussion. All closers should be prepared to fully discuss the closure rationale with any editors who have questions about the closure or the underlying policies, and to provide advice about where to discuss any remaining concerns that those editors may have.

A request for comment discussed how to appeal closures and whether an administrator can summarily overturn a non-administrator's closure. The consensus was that closures should not be reverted solely because the closer was not an administrator. However, special considerations apply for articles for deletion and move discussions—see Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions and Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions for details.

Once a discussion listed on this page has been closed, please add {{Close}} or {{Done}} and a note to the request here, after which the request will be archived.

Requests for closure

See also: Wikipedia:Requested moves § Backlog, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old, Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion, Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Awaiting closure, Wikipedia:Templates for discussion § Old discussions, and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion § Old business

Administrative discussions

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive954#User:Creuzbourg and User:K.e.coffman Talk:Hans-Ulrich Rudel

Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive954#User:Creuzbourg and User:K.e.coffman Talk:Hans-Ulrich Rudel (Initiated 2635 days ago on 25 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

•  closed ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 14:24, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive289#Mass creation of improperly referenced BLPs by User:SwisterTwister

Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Mass creation of improperly referenced BLPs by User:SwisterTwister (Initiated 2615 days ago on 15 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

not done. Already archived without closure. --George Ho (talk) 16:40, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Wait, it can be edited: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive289#Mass creation of improperly referenced BLPs by User:SwisterTwister. --George Ho (talk) 16:48, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

•  closed. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 15:21, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive956#Military college dispute getting out of hand

Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive956#Military college dispute getting out of hand (Initiated 2587 days ago on 12 June 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

RfCs

Talk:Intercommunal conflict in Mandatory Palestine#RfC: Proposed split

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Intercommunal conflict in Mandatory Palestine#RfC: Proposed split (Initiated 2641 days ago on 19 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

 Done Closed as clear consensus in favor of proposed changes. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:19, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Battle of Aleppo (2012–2016)#RfC about Al-Masdar

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Battle of Aleppo (2012–2016)#RfC about Al-Masdar (Initiated 2642 days ago on 18 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

 Done --GRuban (talk) 01:57, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Plummer v. State#Request for Comment - Internet meme section - 1st revision

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Plummer v. State#Request for Comment - Internet meme section - 1st revision (Initiated 2640 days ago on 20 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

 Done Closed with consensus to include the majority of the proposed text. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:04, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race#Request for comment

I would like a closure as the user is being disruptive and preventing the community's decision from being enforced. The consensus is also nearly unanimous. (Initiated 2632 days ago on 28 April 2017) nihlus kryik (talk) 16:49, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

The RfC has hit 30 days today. Calling it "nearly unanimous" is contentious and some arguments go against WP:PRIMARY, so there is enough to sift through that it might be advisable to seek an admin particularly well-versed in that policy.--Tenebrae (talk) 19:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

After two days of heavy comments, this RfC is well over 30 days since initiation. The WP:PRIMARY-related question is: "Can editors make subjective claims based on the primary-source episodes without providing a cite (timestamp and quote) as to what exactly was said?" --Tenebrae (talk) 20:29, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Khan Shaykhun chemical attack#Request for comment on Theodore Postol's views and responsibility for the attack

Please, close this. (Initiated 2632 days ago on 28 April 2017). Erlbaeko (talk) 14:36, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Verifiability#Recent changes to policy about verifiability as a reason for inclusion

Looking for additional closers to collaborate with our volunteer User:Winged Blades of Godric, who's already signed up. Not a close for the fainthearted, I would tend to think.—S Marshall T/C 22:16, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

A re-request of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Needing more than one to close RfC discussion at WT:V. Also, just in case: (Initiated 2651 days ago on 9 April 2017) --George Ho (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC); amended, 16:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

@Primefac::--Willing to collaborate?If yes,feel free to drop a note on my talk!Winged Blades ^Godric 14:01, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, sure. Primefac (talk) 20:53, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

 Done. Primefac (talk) 20:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Ned Kelly#RfC about the photo in the Capture and release of hostages section

Would like an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ned Kelly#RfC about the photo in the Capture and release of hostages section (Initiated 2627 days ago on 3 May 2017)? Thanks, David.moreno72 09:15, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

 Done Closed as in favor of including the picture of the monument. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Archive 139#RfC on the notability of flying aces

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Archive 139#RfC on the notability of flying aces (Initiated 2636 days ago on 24 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Noël Coward#RfC on 1944 controversy

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Noël Coward#RfC on 1944 controversy (Initiated 2636 days ago on 24 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

 Done Closed with consensus against proposed text. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Antonio Margarito#Request for Comment about Antonio Margarito's nationality

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Antonio Margarito#Request for Comment about Antonio Margarito's nationality (Initiated 2632 days ago on 28 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Done --GRuban (talk) 17:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Ned Kelly#RfC about the photo in the Capture and release of hostages section

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ned Kelly#RfC about the photo in the Capture and release of hostages section (Initiated 2627 days ago on 3 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

 Done duplicate request - see above. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Khan Shaykhun chemical attack#Request for comment on Theodore Postol's views and responsibility for the attack

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Khan Shaykhun chemical attack#Request for comment on Theodore Postol's views and responsibility for the attack (Initiated 2632 days ago on 28 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Jesus#Press Criticism - Wikipedia's Multiple Parallel Narratives

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Jesus#Press Criticism - Wikipedia's Multiple Parallel Narratives (Initiated 2630 days ago on 30 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

 Done Closed as no consensus for restructuring. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Alone in the Universe#RfC: Studio Album Chronology

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Alone in the Universe#RfC: Studio Album Chronology (Initiated 2627 days ago on 3 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Otto Warmbier#Request for comments dated 28 April 2017

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Otto Warmbier#Request for comments dated 28 April 2017 (Initiated 2632 days ago on 28 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted:-Winged Blades ^Godric 06:51, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Bill Potts#Request for comment

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bill Potts#Request for comment (Initiated 2634 days ago on 26 April 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

(non-admin closure)  Done Snuge purveyor (talk) 19:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Template talk:Sic#RfC: Does tagging "comprised of" help or harm Wikipedia?

Someone please close this RfC on the use of {{sic}} tags in quotations. This should be an easy close, as it asks a simple and concise question and there are 9 responses, almost all of which answer the question at least indirectly, and there is hardly any debate. A closing by an uninvolved party would be very valuable here because the question is relevant to a longstanding conflict. (Initiated 2606 days ago on 24 May 2017)? Bryan Henderson (giraffedata) (talk) 15:39, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

(non-admin closure)  Done Snuge purveyor (talk) 15:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates#RFC: Overhauling the Disney franchise templates for consistency

Would an uninvolved experienced editor assess the outcome of the consensus regarding this RFC? (Initiated 2621 days ago on 9 May 2017) --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:23, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done--Complete scarcity of any substantial discussion.Winged Blades ^Godric 18:22, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Paris Agreement#Proposed merge with United States withdrawal from the Paris Agreement

(Initiated 2597 days ago on 1 June 2017) Consensus has been reached that United States withdrawal from the Paris Agreement should not be merged into Paris Agreement. I'm requesting that this stale discussion is closed. DARTHBOTTO _talk•cont 21:42, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/RfC: Wikimedia referrer policy

Needs uninvolved closer please. Thanks. (Initiated 2598 days ago on 1 June 2017) --George Ho (talk) 23:25, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Teamwork closure is requested by the RfC proposer Guy Macon at "Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Closers needed for a very sensitive RfC." Therefore, I shall abide to request for teamwork and wait for two or three closers interested. --George Ho (talk) 12:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

While a team of closers were found (in the afore-linked thread), current plans are to relist it.So deferred for 30 days(ideally)!Winged Blades ^Godric 18:13, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Also, the discussion was moved from Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) to Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/RfC: Wikimedia referrer policy, so I changed the link in the header. --George Ho (talk) 20:09, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Citation overkill#Should this essay be changed to encourage more citations?

This needs an uninvolved closer. Meanwhile, Wikipedia:Citation underkill was created and then discussed. (Initiated 2590 days ago on 9 June 2017) --George Ho (talk) 17:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

(non-admin closure)  Done Snuge purveyor (talk) 09:34, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Be bold#Proposal to add a sentence about page moves

Would someone please formally close this. Legobot removed the RfC template as lapsed after a month a few days ago, and it has yet to be closed. (Initiated 2613 days ago on 17 May 2017) TonyBallioni (talk) 22:21, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Presidency of Donald Trump#RfC: Possible POV of §Authoritarian tendencies

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Presidency of Donald Trump#RfC: Possible POV of §Authoritarian tendencies (Initiated 2616 days ago on 14 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Ali Hassan Salameh#RfC on whether the article should include more detailed background about his father

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ali Hassan Salameh#RfC on whether the article should include more detailed background about his father (Initiated 2611 days ago on 19 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Hasan Salama#RfC on what aspects of Hasan Salama's life should be mentioned in the lead

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Hasan Salama#RfC on what aspects of Hasan Salama's life should be mentioned in the lead (Initiated 2611 days ago on 19 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Money.Net#RfC about Money.Net founded and founder data

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Money.Net#RfC about Money.Net founded and founder data (Initiated 2614 days ago on 16 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done:-The RFC was non-controversial and the initiator did a good job of charting a closing statement!Winged Blades ^Godric 18:10, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:American Revolutionary War#RfC about infobox changes

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:American Revolutionary War#RfC about infobox changes (Initiated 2624 days ago on 6 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Goguryeo#Request for comment

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Goguryeo#Request for comment (Initiated 2623 days ago on 7 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done:-The issue is prob. resolved and it's difficult to summarise such an opinion-based RFC.And it's short!Winged Blades ^Godric 17:50, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War)#RFC - Funding from US/European governments in the lead

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War)#RFC - Funding from US/European governments in the lead (Initiated 2614 days ago on 16 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Done:-Winged Blades ^Godric 17:48, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System#RFC

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System#RFC (Initiated 2618 days ago on 12 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Kind of Blue#RfC: Description of the recording artist for this album

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Kind of Blue#RfC: Description of the recording artist for this album (Initiated 2622 days ago on 8 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Done:-Winged Blades ^Godric 17:45, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Dismissal of James Comey/Archive 2#Deletion of name info

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Dismissal of James Comey/Archive 2#Deletion of name info (Initiated 2615 days ago on 15 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement#RfC: Lead

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement#RfC: Lead (Initiated 2612 days ago on 18 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Done Primefac (talk) 20:18, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Robert Mueller#RfC

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Robert Mueller#RfC (Initiated 2611 days ago on 19 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Done:-Winged Blades ^Godric 17:38, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Bahá'í Faith#Request for Comment: Lead Section

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Bahá'í Faith#Request for Comment: Lead Section (Initiated 2613 days ago on 17 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Template talk:Policy#Font size

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Template talk:Policy#Font size (Initiated 2616 days ago on 14 May 2017)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Done Bryan Henderson (giraffedata) (talk) 03:08, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections#RfC: Should the article include events related to Trump's tweets that the Obama administration has wiretapped him?

Could somebody kindly assess consensus at Talk:Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections#RfC: Should the article include events related to Trump's tweets that the Obama administration has wiretapped him? Early close requested because discussion has ceased for a while and the debated issue is kind of moot. (Initiated 2603 days ago on 27 May 2017) — JFG ^talk 05:23, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout#Placement of expand language templates

I am requesting early closure of Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout#Placement of expand language templates (Initiated 2581 days ago on 17 June 2017) which has turned into a slanging match. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:41, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

{{Done}} (non-admin closure) FleetCommand (Speak your mind!) 10:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

I have undone the close. It should be allowed to run the full 30 days, and should be given a proper close by an administrator. Joefromrandb (talk) 00:41, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Er, you didn't. All you did was remove the {{archive top}} and {{archive bottom}} templates that had been added by FleetCommand (talk · contribs). As far as the RFC system is concerned, it's still closed. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:51, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

@Joefromrandb:While I am refraining from reverting your revertion; please don't reverse closes unilaterally.There were ample valid grounds for a snow close.And WP:AN is the appropriate venue for discussing closure-related problems!Winged Blades ^Godric 17:31, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Had an administrator closed it, I would in fact, have opened a discussion. I firmly disagree with "ample grounds for a snow close", and while I've no doubt it was done with the best of intentions, I firmly disagree with a non-administrator responding to a request for administrative action. Joefromrandb (talk) 18:07, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

I'm an admin. Should I have closed it? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:58, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Is that rhetorical? You know damn well you shouldn't have closed it. I didn't realize you were an admin. That renders my revert rather pointless. By the numbers it's 12–3. It was my hope that the closing admin would look past that, and actually adjudicate this based on actual arguments, which, if one ignores the handful of baseless votes, seem to be fairly even. One vote from an administrator, however, renders all other votes meaningless, right or wrong, and is, sadly, "ample grounds for a snow close". Joefromrandb (talk) 19:32, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes, it was rhetorical. But if I hadn't already !voted, I could probably have closed it in order to stop the escalation which was already in WP:NPA territory. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:41, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

@Joefromrandb:--Whatever is posted at this noticeboard(which is a sub-board of WP:AN) is typically meant for administrators.But that does not exclude any editor from taking an action on the issues; esp. if that could be performed without the use of any tool specifically provided to the sysops.Also, see this RFC.Thanks!Winged Blades ^Godric 08:15, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

It was clearly a malicious reversion. This reverting person is one of the only two people who disagrees with the others in that discussion. So, he is simply prolonging the inevitable as a last act of defiance before the consensus eventually changes Wikipedia to the way he does not like. I think a closure by an uninvolved editor must never be reversed by an involved editor, at least, not without a round of communication. FleetCommand (Speak your mind!) 15:02, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

 Done As an editor with no prior involvement in the issue, I reviewed the RfC and the related prior discussions ne novo and find that the clear consensus for placement of these templates is at the top of the article. See close for full rationale. While I am confident experienced involved editors are familiar with WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, I am linking to this for those who may not have recently reviewed it. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:17, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:HIStory/Ghosts#Proposed split (2017)

As suggested at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/HIStory/Ghosts/1, I am requesting a closure done by an uninvolved closer. Pre-RFC: (Initiated 2737 days ago on 13 January 2017); RFC: (Initiated 2590 days ago on 9 June 2017) --George Ho (talk) 05:00, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done - discussion is only 22 days old, and it's a fairly clear outcome. Primefac (talk) 20:48, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussions

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 February 14#Category:Television programming by language

(Initiated 2705 days ago on 14 February 2017) Stale discussion, no contributions after early April. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:48, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 April 30#Kemono

(Initiated 2673 days ago on 18 March 2017). -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:41, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Céline Bethmann

(Initiated 2604 days ago on 26 May 2017) Second re-list was seven days ago. Outcome could be keep, redirect or no consensus, but I'm not sure which. Linguist¹1¹ 15:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Already done by Ad Orientem. Deryck C. 11:35, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2017_May_30#File:WernerHerrmann.jpg

(Initiated 2888 days ago on 15 August 2016) The discussion at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2017_May_30#File:WernerHerrmann.jpg has been relisted SEVEN FIVE times since August 2016. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:49, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

• Comment - I have relisted all of the simple discussions that I can disposition. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_June_23#Template:US_Presidential_Administrations

(Initiated 2586 days ago on 13 June 2017) Closure was reverted on 13 June 2017, so the discussion was subsequently relisted. Frietjes (talk) 15:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Other types of closing requests

Talk:Lagardère Sports and Entertainment#Merger Proposal

(Initiated 2733 days ago on 17 January 2017) Stale discussion, needs someone to put it out of its misery please. GiantSnowman 08:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted for RFC to increase participation. --George Ho (talk) 09:39, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Another request to close this discussion. (Initiated 2631 days ago on 29 April 2017) --George Ho (talk) 07:24, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections/Archive 9#Dan Goodin wrote... UNDUE discussion/survey close request

(Initiated 2621 days ago on 8 May 2017) A long discussion has accompanied a slow-motion revert war over the inclusion of a journalist's cited views, which may be UNDUE. The talk thread is at Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections/Archive 9#Dan Goodin wrote... UNDUE and resumed here Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections/Archive 11#Goodin redux. Could an Admin please review and close these discussions so as to settle whether there is consensus to include the comments of Mr. Goodin in the article? Thank you. SPECIFICO talk 00:32, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Canvassing#Issue with lead wording, and possible improvements

Needs an uninvolved closer. (Initiated 2623 days ago on 7 May 2017) --George Ho (talk) 23:36, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Counter Logic Gaming/1

(Initiated 2594 days ago on 4 June 2017) Requesting that an experienced editor close the good article reassessment and carry out the consensus, which is unanimous. –Cognissonance (talk) 06:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

I agree; the consensus is unanimous. DARTHBOTTO _talk•cont 07:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

 Already done by Jo-Jo Eumerus. Snuge purveyor (talk) 10:58, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems#Advice: Copyright Violation; Publication ‘The Isle of Man (Pevensey Island Guides)’ by Trevor Kneale

(Initiated 2752 days ago on 28 December 2016). Request emphatic and clear closure directing the complainant to drop their quest. I would further appreciate their being strongly warned that they will be blocked, or actually, better, for them to be blocked for a month or two or six now, for pursuing it, given extensive and clear feedback they have received already. They made their preferred edit today (which I reverted). --doncram 20:32, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Alleged Saudi role in September 11 attacks#Merge

The consensus needs to be assessed by an experienced user. (Initiated 2639 days ago on 20 April 2017) --Mhhossein ^talk 19:11, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Template talk:Refimprove#Or better

Requesting closure and potential action for the template page. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Fixed link and header for you. (Initiated 2583 days ago on 16 June 2017) --George Ho (talk) 21:57, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

 Done Reverted change and gave some advice to the template editor concerned. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Bitcoin#Scalability debate

(Initiated 2612 days ago on 17 May 2017) Would appreciate it if an uninvolved editor would review and close the discussion on coverage of the "Scalability debate" in the Bitcoin article. N2e (talk) 03:53, 30 June 2017 (UTC)